Slashdot Mirror


Digital Clock Without Electricity or Moving Parts

NerdMachine writes "Throw away those slide rules and embrace the digital age. The Digital Sundial is a 10 year old invention on display in Sundial Park (Genk, Belgium), Deutsches Museum (Munich Germany), Kölnisches Stadtmuseum (Cologne, Germany), and Martha's Vineyard, USA. You need to pivot it to adjust daylight savings time. If you can't visit one of these, Digital Sundials International can sell you one for US$12,000+, or you can buy a pocket version for under US$100 for that special nerd in your life."

269 comments

  1. Sunlight? Heard about it by SIGALRM · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the true tradition of all sundials, the device is purely passive - it operates without electricity, and has no moving parts. Instead, the sunlight is cast through two cleverly designed masks
    I live in Seattle. Just a wild guess... but I don't think these clocks are going to sell well here.
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torch light sales might go up though if this thing catches on.

    2. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by boarder8925 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or New York City. Wasn't there something recently about how the buildings are so tall they're blocking out the sun?

    3. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by boarder8925 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Torch light sales might go up though if this thing catches on.
      Well, those torches better be able to move like the sun, otherwise the clock won't work.
    4. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?

      I don't get it? I'm one of the almost 50% of Brits who hasn't heard of Auschwitz... according to that dastardly BBC

    5. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by dna42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

    6. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have my thoughts about it being a flunk too.. This is the thing geeks would love to have, unfortunately, I very much doubt it would work in basements, and normal people would just buy a digital watch, cos they think they're still pretty neat.

    7. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've heard that in some places those small rectangles of light above your head can take up to half your view.

    8. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      I worry more about when there's that floating exclamation point over my head. Not only does it make me look funny and block out my ability to look up, but invariably when it happens, someone comes up and starts trying to talk with me. It gets boring after a while.

      I suppose you could use the exclamation point to light a sundial like this, but most graphics cards aren't good enough for something like that.

      --
      The *special* hell.
    9. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by iocat · · Score: 2
      It's not a watch. It's a clock.

      Yes, I am the most pedantic member of the slashdot community ever.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    10. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they'll kick the shit out of the Arizona market. Stupid wall plug punks, all tired with they're sore backs from leaning down to reach the socket all the time wishing there was a solution to they're $10 digital clock expenditures and labor.

    11. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, you don't realize the potential of a digital sundial wristwatch!!!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    12. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in Seattle. Just a wild guess... but I don't think these clocks are going to sell well here.

      Just get the guy who figured out how to sell fridges to Eskimos.

    13. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 0

      We're not decended from apes, we're God's creation!

      Ever opened a Bible? You insensitive clod!

      --
      "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
    14. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles... "

      I don't know about you, but the planet that I am on orbits at 93 million miles or so from its star.

    15. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you read Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, you insensitive clod?

    16. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, eskimos use fridges to keep food warm.

    17. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by pyrote · · Score: 1

      it may not be, but how about this?

      My friend has one of these, only he hates poking himself with the little pointy bit.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    18. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by AngusSF · · Score: 1
      Yes, but they'll kick the shit out of the Arizona market.
      I doubt it. I live in Tucson, and we don't have a south-facing window on our house where we could mount this ;-)
      --
      "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
    19. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by CharlesF · · Score: 1

      (Score: +5, Subtle Douglas Adams reference)

      --
      Do not read this sig!
    20. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but the plant on which I live has an orbit that is 147.5 million km (~91.6 million miles) away from the sun at perihelion and 152.5 million km (94.7 million miles) away from the sun at aphelion, with an eccentricity of 0.017.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    21. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      We're not decended from apes, we're God's creation!

      Ever opened a Bible? You insensitive clod!

      Uuuk, uuk!
    22. Re:Sunlight? Heard about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I live on a planet, not a plant.

  2. What i need for Christmas!! by CmdrObvious · · Score: 2, Funny

    That will go perfectly with my new Digital Sun! I cant wait!

    1. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      Sundials don't work, the one I've had in my basement hasn't changed time since I installed it.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by neverutterwhen · · Score: 4, Funny

      A quick hack for this would be to remove the rest of your house.

      --
      My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
    3. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Mine works in the basement, but I'm getting really tired walking in an arc from one end of the room to the other with a halogen trouble light. ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    4. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by garignak · · Score: 1
      Mine works in the basement, but I'm getting really tired walking in an arc from one end of the room to the other with a halogen trouble light. ;P

      Yeah, that does sound like a lot of trouble.

      /me ducks

      --
      "Sometimes a man's gotta do what a woman wouldn't consider." - Red Green
    5. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sundials don't work, the one I've had in my basement hasn't changed time since I installed it.

      Your basement? Don't you mean your parent's basement?

    6. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sundials don't work, the one I've had in my basement hasn't changed time since I installed it.

      You forgot to put the batteries in, stupid!

    7. Re:What i need for Christmas!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick hack for this would be to remove the rest of your house.

      If you are in IT this should be happening shortly.

  3. Defeating the purpose of the sundial by ralphart · · Score: 5, Funny

    $12,000 USD?? That doesn't seem like a very bright idea.

    1. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by mikeputnam · · Score: 0

      Imagine if they had applied the logic and reasoning to something actually useful.

      --
      It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. -Aristotle
    2. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      http://perso.wanadoo.fr/blateyron/sundials/gb/inde x.html

      Download their excellent windows program and make one for free instead

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    3. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by jetkust · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've been looking for a cost-effective solution of telling time myself. Just the other day, a salesman was trying to sell me one of those plastic watches you sometimes can find in cereal boxes. Ultimately, the $1 price tag was just a bit too pricey so I had to decline. Thats why this story interested me. FINALLY a clock I can afford!! But when I read the story, I realized. That damn thing is $12,000! I couldn't believe it? I can get a REAL watch for that price.

    4. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by thre5her · · Score: 1

      Free, or $200?

    5. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But just think about all the electricity you'll save with a sundial! It'll practically pay for itself!*







      *In about fifty million years

    6. Re:Defeating the purpose of the sundial by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      The free version should be enough to make almost any sundial you are capable of making - the paid for version is for ultra sophisticated types beyond the capability of mere mortals like you to construct :-)

      Seriously its a brilliant piece of software, give it a try

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  4. Re:No Electricity? by silicon-pyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA. From the product info:

    Sunlight is cast through two cleverly designed masks in the shape of numbers that show the current time of day

    Its a cool idea.

  5. I cringe by TheRoachMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cringe at the sight of that Belgian website about the sundial park in Genk. Awful awful awful. I'm ashamed for my country.

    1. Re:I cringe by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Twoo words Beer and Choclate. Waffles indeed.

    2. Re:I cringe by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Mannequin Pis! (which I always thought was "Man that can piss" -- same difference)

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:I cringe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saison Dupont Vieille Provision more than makes up for it.

    4. Re:I cringe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is Manneke(n) Pis, not Mannequin Pis.
      And manneke pis is indeed translated literally as "Little Man Pis" or "Little Man that Pisses".
      Manneke is used to refer to a little man (or child). Weather you use manneke or manneken depends on what dialect you use. Mannetje is the 'correct' Duch (Flemmish in Belgium. Same same but different) form for "little man".

    5. Re:I cringe by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Hey, it said _UN_official.

    6. Re:I cringe by myster0n · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be ashamed anymore : it's dead now. Besides, the website is from the Netherlands. And if you felt bad about this, how about me? I am from Genk (didn't even know we had a sundial park though).

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    7. Re:I cringe by owlstead · · Score: 1

      And mussels/oysters and fish. The mussels are bred in the Netherlands and prepared in Belgium. Talking about good cooperation with our Belgium friends. Then we have the Belgium fries. I'm sure we left some gastronomic experience out, but that's out the top of my head.

      Belgo's in Dublin, Ireland has "bejaardentehuis" written all over its walls. In very large letters.

    8. Re:I cringe by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Twoo words Beer and Choclate. Waffles indeed.


      Typos aside, all is forgiven. =)

      Mmmmmm ... sweet Belgian beer.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:I cringe by TheRoachMan · · Score: 1

      Actually it's "Manneke Pis", not mannequin :) Manneke is literally 'little man' or 'small man'. The postfix 'ke' is dialect for 'tje' (so undialected it is 'Mannetje pis'), which is a diminutive, and it doesn't exist in English. Basically you put 'small' or 'little' in front of the translated word to get the same effect, but it doesn't feel the same. 'Manneke pis' means 'little man piss', so you weren't off by much when you think it is 'man that can piss'.

      Nice to see that people on /. appreciate our food and culture :)

    10. Re:I cringe by loconet · · Score: 1

      add women! my girlfriend is belgian. Also delicious ;)

      --
      [alk]
    11. Re:I cringe by localoca · · Score: 1

      I never noticed this in Dublin (i'm the delicious belgian girlfriend), where exactly have you seen those?
      Fairly interesting actually...

    12. Re:I cringe by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Who wouldn't appreciate the wonderful beer selection there? It was incredible...mmmm Leffe... There's a restaurant in Maryland named Mannequin Pis , so I thought that's how it was spelled, then. Besides, Spanish is my second language, not French or Flemish :)

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    13. Re:I cringe by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Not to mention we have worlds largest iron atom.

    14. Re:I cringe by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      I'm from Genk too, but I didn't know that either until I was walking through the park with my wife and spotted that collection of sundials over there. However, I seem to have completely missed that digital sundial (may not have been there yet at that time).
      We have one thing to be proud of however: The digital dial in Genk was the first one on public display world-wide

      Perhaps Genk should include something more about the sundial park one their own website, instead of just linking to that dutch site :-)

    15. Re:I cringe by TheRoachMan · · Score: 1

      In fact it's an iron crystal, enlarged 165 (some sources say 150, some say 160, some say 165) billion times. The 9 orbs each represent an iron atom. So it's actually the world's largest ircon crystal, not atom.

    16. Re:I cringe by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Sycamore Street, Temple Bar, Dublin 2. I presume it's still there and still has the letters on the wall. It's (or was) pretty good Belgian food, especially if you notice that no-one of the staff is actually from Belgium.

  6. Flintstones meet Jetsons by gmknobl · · Score: 1

    And just to mix your metaphores...
    "Holy Modern Stone-Age Family, Batman!"

  7. No by Slur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My understanding at this moment before reading the article is that it uses shadows and light to make a digital readout.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
    1. Re:No by grub · · Score: 1


      Sheesh, man. You have a low enough ID that you should know better than to read the articles.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  8. Pocket version by cwapface · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonderful, maybe someday they'll invent a digital clock that somehow fits around your wrist

    1. Re:Pocket version by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      The obvious line: Is it 12 O'clock or are you just glad to see me?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. Re:No Electricity? by and+by · · Score: 1

    Nope, it looks like it uses something like polarized glass. The site says that it uses two "masks," so that'd be my guess.

  10. Praise by floorpunch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thats the greatest thing since easy open soup cans. I am that special nerd in my life. And dad-gummit im going to purchase this masterful device. Good write CMDRTaco. Hadley.

  11. Whoa by underpar · · Score: 4, Funny

    $12,000 USD?? That doesn't seem like a very bright idea.

    And if you're not bright enough it won't work when you're inside.... That's deep.

  12. Not until... by bourne_id · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. they have built-in calculators, can be worn on the wrist, and can run a scaled-down version of Linux.

    JMD

    --
    When all else fails, feel free to panic.
    1. Re:Not until... by Lando+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Does it have to be Linux? I bet NetBSD will run on it today.

    2. Re:Not until... by freakmn · · Score: 3, Funny

      So Solaris running it now isn't good enough for you?

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    3. Re:Not until... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...can be worn on the wrist...

      You might want to be more specific about your requirements. Remember the atomic wristwatch?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  13. Re:No Electricity? by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    Hmm I can answer myself after RTFA ... ugh. "n a singular blend of artistry and utility, the digital sundial combines the ancient science of sundials and advances of modern technology with elegant simplicity. Like a digital clock, the digital sundial displays the current time using digits. In the true tradition of all sundials, the device is purely passive - it operates without electricity, and has no moving parts. Instead, the sunlight is cast through two cleverly designed masks in the shape of numbers that show the current time of day. The sundial is available in two versions, for use in either hemisphere. Placed on the inside of a south-facing window (north-facing in the southern hemisphere), the sundial can be read through the horizontal mirror. The display updates every 10 minutes, and gives a remarkably accurate record of the time during the daylight hours." But if it updates every 10 minutes I wonder how useful that is.

  14. Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 5, Funny

    as in the earth. If the earth didn't rotate, it wouldn't work. Sorry, but there must be a moving part.

    1. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by njfuzzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sundials would also work with a moving sun. ;)

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny


      Is that you, Aristotle?

    3. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      earth and sun are not parts of the sundial, so it's without moving parts.

      --
      IAAL
    4. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Just... wow.

    5. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The sun is not part of the sundial.

      Uh-huh.

      -Peter

    6. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Funny

      in the same manner that a sense of humour is not part of you, right?

    7. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, not at all.

      But I will give you a clue:

      "Give me a place to stand and a lever long enough and I will move the world."

      ;)

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    8. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by NardofDoom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone stop this frame-of-reference madness!!

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    9. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And lets not forget photons!

      I think 299 792 458 m/s certainly qualifies as moving.

    10. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be my owl then ;-)

      Seriously, with only a place to stand all you can hope for is a good pulley system. For a lever you also need a fixed point, thus 2 places (hint: you must get a torque). And he had to use pulleys even for a ship ;-)

    11. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the same way as iraq is not part of th US .... um

    12. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      yes, in exactly the same manner.

      --
      IAAL
    13. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Thanks for confirming that! It is rare to find such honesty on /.

    14. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      You are Archimedes, and I claim my five pounds!

    15. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, why heck, from my vantage point here in heaven, I can see the sun spinning on it's own axis, while the ENTIRE solar system (including your 'sun' dial, earth, moon, etc.) is moving around the center of the galaxy! :-)...which brings me to my latest invention...a MOON dial! (unfortunately, it has a few bugs...seems to work only during full and partial moons, etc.) ;-)

    16. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Wow. That was pretty random.

      -Peter

    17. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      I've used a modified version of that as a pick-up line...

      "Hey baby, wanna see a demonstration of Archimedes' Principle?"

    18. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I commend you on remaining abstinent.

    19. Re:Doesn't a sundial require a moving part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lima milkshake.

  15. The sound of silence by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1, Funny

    It would be great if all other watches/clocks would be banned and criminalized, so that no one could read the time when it's dark. That would make my life a lot easier and I could spend the time I gained through that to think of a way to turn the world dark at some point in my lifetime.

    1. Re:The sound of silence by NardofDoom · · Score: 3, Funny
      So when they call me into work at 2AM to fix something I can show up at 7 and say my watch wasn't working.

      Excellent.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    2. Re:The sound of silence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, or you could live way up in Canada when it gets light around 8:30 in the dead of winter and enjoy the extra hour and a half of sleep!

  16. Re:No Electricity? by san · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, it doesn't. It consists of two plates with lines, which either transmit or block light depending on the specific location of the sun (the viewer needs to be at a specific position).

    The visible lines then align in such a way that you can read off the time in digits. Hence 'digital'.

  17. Sunlight? Pocket? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you can't visit one of these, Digital Sundials International can sell you one for US$12,000+, or you can buy a pocket version for under US$100 for that special nerd in your life."

    Evidently the sun does shine there for some people...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  18. Douglas Adams quote by gmknobl · · Score: 3, Funny

    We "still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea."

  19. Re:No Electricity? ::holds back insult:: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even look at the website for it?

    "In a singular blend of artistry and utility, the digital sundial combines the ancient science of sundials and advances of modern technology with elegant simplicity. Like a digital clock, the digital sundial displays the current time using digits. In the true tradition of all sundials, the device is purely passive - it operates without electricity, and has no moving parts. Instead, the sunlight is cast through two cleverly designed masks in the shape of numbers that show the current time of day. The sundial is available in two versions, for use in either hemisphere. Placed on the inside of a south-facing window (north-facing in the southern hemisphere), the sundial can be read through the horizontal mirror. The display updates every 10 minutes, and gives a remarkably accurate record of the time during the daylight hours." -Digital Sundials International

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Not a good gift... by Kjuib · · Score: 0

    "for that special nerd in your life"
    I thought nerds don't leave their Parents basements. How are they supose to use a sun dial? Maybe if it ran off monitor radiation, that would be something for the geek in me.

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:Not a good gift... by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of us nerds think evolution is important; I have learned from a female biology nerd that we can reproduce under the right conditions. I highly recommend it not only for the good of the human race, but it's fun too.

    2. Re:Not a good gift... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      Seriously dude, you won't be able to have kids with that doll. I've told you before, it isn't possible.

    3. Re:Not a good gift... by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, after 5 hours of UT I swear I turned around and might've seen a girl walk past the CS lab!

  22. "the special nerd in my life" by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    or you can buy a pocket version for under US$100 for that special nerd in your life.

    just happens to be me.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  23. Only 10 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This has to be the fastest slashdot has got an article to the frontpage. Congratulations

  24. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So it's perfect for Saskatchewan (Canada) which doesn't have that silly tradition of "spring forward fall back".
    (same thing with Arizona, USA?)

    Honestly, (after spending the first 30 years of my life in Saskatchewan), I cannot understand WHY daylight savings time exists

  25. Okay, so to recap by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's some kind of fancy light bouncing device that can tell you what time it is every 5 minutes. It's not incredibly useful at night. You can't play doom on it.

    Next!

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
    1. Re:Okay, so to recap by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Staring at it on a moonless night is close enough to playing Doom...

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:Okay, so to recap by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      > It's not incredibly useful at night.
      Bah - just use a flashlight.

  26. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by hankwang · · Score: 1
    So basically this sundial is useless when it comes time to change the time back or forward an hour.

    RTFA. You just turn the clock such that the sun hits it at a different angle.

  27. The sun is a MOVING part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except at night maybe. Editors asleep at the switch again. Or fully awake ad men.

    1. Re:The sun is a MOVING part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the sun revolves around the earth? When did that start happening again?

    2. Re:The sun is a MOVING part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun revolves around the the galatic center and pertubates relative the the galactic plane.

    3. Re:The sun is a MOVING part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except at night maybe.

      Not only does this guy believe the sun revolves around the earth, but he also seems to think it stops moving at night time.

  28. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Mundocani · · Score: 1

    Is there an equivalent of RTFA for somebody who didn't even read the headline? RTFH perhaps? You just rotate the thing "one hour" in the correct direction to adjust for DST or Summer Time or whatever your country might call it.

  29. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd shoot you, but the waste of lead wouldn't be worth it.

  30. Re:No Electricity? by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

    No. Solar energy in the form of light. No electricity involved. It really is just a very complex sundial-- whose output is numerical.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  31. Disclaimer: Guarenteed not to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in Rochester.

  32. Read on of the pics on the home site.... by weaponx71 · · Score: 1

    It says that this thing doesnt use any electricity or lenses... but by filtering through precise slots... so basically... its like one of those Kracker Jack toys that "move" when you turn it side to side... cept now.. the Sun "moves" and the image is reflected.. It only LOOKS digital... Kind of cool... but whats the point, and why $12,000???

    1. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      > ... but whats the point, and why $12,000???

      There's at least 1000 nuts out there who have the cash and will buy one or two.

    2. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

      I think they charge this much because the only people/groups who might want this toy have enough money not to care about the cost. They would be: governments, bill gates, ... sultan of burma ... ect

    3. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      "It only LOOKS digital"
      It *is* digital. Digital means it displays DIGITS as in 1, 2, 3, 4.

      "Digital" does not equal "electronic".

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    4. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by weaponx71 · · Score: 1

      I understand now, and read that it uses DIGITS, and thus they called it Digital...

      But who else in here, when you hear Digital time peice thinks of a big ass clock that uses Digits instead of Roman numerals or no electricity????

      its missleading to me, thats all...

    5. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's not Arabic vs. Roman numerals that makes a digital clock. Analog clocks (and sundials) have hands (or gnomons). This one doesn't. It just has numbers. You know, like 1 2 3 4 5.

      Those might be easier for you to handle than spelling. I'd look into them if I were you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by AndyL · · Score: 1

      You could have a digital clock that uses roman numerals.

      The point is that the digits change to show the time. (As opposed to a analog clock where the hands move and numbers are just for reference.)

    7. Re:Read on of the pics on the home site.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it IS digital. The time displayed is digits.
      That's what a digital clock is. The digital does not mean digital electronics.

  33. Spoiled Kids These Days... by Godling · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...will never learn to read a proper sundial.

    1. Re:Spoiled Kids These Days... by daeley · · Score: 3, Funny

      So are you saying gnomon is an island?

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Spoiled Kids These Days... by madagascar · · Score: 1
      So are you saying gnomon is an island?

      tenuous>

      ...almost...

      /tenuous>

    3. Re:Spoiled Kids These Days... by Speare · · Score: 1

      Rephrased, "In Korea, Sundials Are for Old People"?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  34. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The idea of DST is broke, not the clock.

  35. Re:No Electricity? by eclectro · · Score: 1

    RTFA...

    I would, but for the webserver time has truly stopped.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  36. Great by Jozer99 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Couldn't you power a hundred digital watches off a solar panel that big?

    1. Re:Great by BashDot · · Score: 1

      What solar panel are you talking about? I realize the article may be slashdotted, but the link to DSI isn't. Go take an acutal LOOK at the device, THEN bless us with your commentary.

    2. Re:Great by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I do believe he means if it were a solar panel, not a sun dial, it would generate enough wattage to power lots of digital watches.

      Jeremy

    3. Re:Great by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I think GP meant:
      If you replaced the gadgetry with a solar panel of equivelant surface area . . .
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Great by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If it were a pony, he could put on his pink cowboy hat and ride it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Great by BashDot · · Score: 1

      If that is what he meant, then I apologize for jumping at it.

  37. Metaphore? by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    ... or cliche?
    ... or meme??

    We've just ushered in a new X-tream-nerdy(tm) age of mixed-memes!

  38. Then they're a Free iPod Killer! by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    Don't forget they need to also play .ogg files.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  39. Re:No Electricity? by dustman · · Score: 1

    (the viewer needs to be at a specific position)

    The viewer doesn't need to be at a specific position. The light which gets through the slits shines onto the "display" of the device.

    If I shine a flashlight past my hand onto the wall, it doesn't really matter where you are (as long as you can see the wall), you'll be able to tell that I'm making a bunny shadow puppet.

  40. Wow by slapout · · Score: 2, Funny

    I could buy 17 Linux licences from SCO for that!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  41. Re:No Electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mirrordot.org/

  42. Re:Hate to say it, but... by underpar · · Score: 1

    umm.. dude.. it has digits.

  43. Ahh, sunlight... by revolvement · · Score: 5, Funny

    A slashdotter's arch-nemesis.

    *runs from the flames*

  44. The Equation of Time by apikoros · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although the clock is set to read in 5 or 10 minute intervals, depending on the time of year it could still be up to 16 minutes fast or slow compared to your watch or clock because of the Equation of time. Our sense of time is so conditioned by our dependence on the mechanical/digital that solar time is now percieved to be "wrong".

    1. Re:The Equation of Time by shawb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And then there's the fact that the sun does not necesarilly shine for one half of a day (day being one complete revolution of the earth around its axis, not sunrise -> sunset... erk.)

      Where I live (Milwaukee, WI) sunset can be as early as 4:20 PM on the winter solstice and as late as 8:35 PM on Summer solstice (Central Standard Times, I believe.) I'd think that right before sunset the clock would read 6:00PM, so that's over an hour and a half off.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:The Equation of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      16 minutes plus or minus 4 minutes per degree of difference between your longitude (east/west) and the longitude associated with the center of your time zone.

      Your 16 minute case is for a dial on the longitude at the center of a time zone.

    3. Re:The Equation of Time by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      That would be true if the sun rose and set in the same angle over the horizon all year, but the sun does not do that. During the summer, it sets and rises north of where it sets and rises in the winter. At the equinox, it sets and rises due west and due east.

    4. Re:The Equation of Time by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      At the equinox, it sets and rises due east and due west (Not vis versa), only at the equator.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:The Equation of Time by stienman · · Score: 1

      I'd think that right before sunset the clock would read 6:00PM, so that's over an hour and a half off.

      You would think wrong. The reason for the earlier sunset and later sunrise is that the sun is being blocked by the southern horizon (assuming you're in the northern hemisphere) more and more as the earth 'tilts away' from the sun. The angle of incidence, while not linear, is not going to cause such a clock to be off by as much as you indicate.

      -Adam

    6. Re:The Equation of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at http://www.digitalsundial.com/Instructions.pdf (the instructions from the people who make these things) They can be adjusted to set the time accurately for your slice of the time zone, as well as being adjusted for daylight savings time.

    7. Re:The Equation of Time by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? I _might_ be wrong, but I am pretty sure I remember seeing a special about some North American Indians that did not live on the equator, which had a wall that pointed due east/west, and they mentioned that the sun would rise and set right along the line of the wall during the equinox (which they showed on camera).

      In fact, take a look at March 20's Astronomy Picture of the Day, taken in Arizona.

      sets and rises due east and due west (Not vis versa)

      The sun sets in the west.

  45. Better information by fredistheking · · Score: 4, Informative
  46. Nice idea but... by cephus440 · · Score: 1

    ... I never leave my basement during daylight hours. I would have to set up something to allow light to stream into the house... I would probably have to cut a 4 foot wide gap through my house and the two neighbors houses so that the shadows don't distort my clock. Oh, the humanity... image if someone where to ask, "what time did it start raining?" I would never be able to answer that question. This is a really geeky product - not so nerdy. It is really kewl and I want one, but how much would I use it? Last idea, what if you made a LARGE compass - enough so that this clock can float on the arm. Then you can use it in your car - only at red lights.

  47. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by emmons · · Score: 1

    Because the work day is 8-5, regardless of what the sun is doing.

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  48. Re:Hate to say it, but... by nekonoko · · Score: 1

    It displays digits, hence digital.

  49. Re:Hate to say it, but... by Kymermosst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not a digital clock in any sense of the word.

    What high school did you graduate from? Obviously they weren't doing their job.

    From dictionary.reference.com:

    digital

    1. Of, relating to, or resembling a digit, especially a finger.
    2. Operated or done with the fingers: a digital switch.
    3. Having digits.
    4. Expressed in numerical form, especially for use by a computer.
    5. Computer Science. Of or relating to a device that can read, write, or store information that is represented in numerical form. See Usage Note at virtual.
    6. Using or giving a reading in digits: a digital clock.


    Please see #6, and then go think about why you don't know the definitions of common words. It also seems that you can't be bothered to look them up.

    Are you sure you are 'intelligent' by any sense of that word?

    (Sorry, I couldn't resist...)

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  50. Re:No Electricity? by cavac · · Score: 1

    But if it updates every 10 minutes I wonder how useful that is.

    As i'm usually 'bout 5 minutes too late at work, a clock that only updates in 10-minute-steps would probably save me quite some trouble...

    --
    Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  51. Re:No Electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd RTFA but the server looks like it's running on one of these clocks! *SNORT* *CHORTLE* Ho ho ho, I'm a clever one!

  52. Re:Hate to say it, but... by ottergoose · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not a digital clock in any sense of the word.

    It shows the time with discrete digits, so it is digital.

    From Wikipedia: [Digital] comes from the same source as the word digit: the Latin word for finger (counting on the fingers) as these are used for discrete counting.

  53. Re:Hate to say it, but... by dwlovell · · Score: 1

    It is digital in the sense that most digital watches are digital.

    They display the time using digits instead of the analog rotary minute/hour hands.

    Not sure if even normal battery powered digital watches have little computers in them storing time in 1's and 0's.

    -David

  54. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A sundial tells you solar time which is not civil time. And at best, depending on your longitude within your time zone, solar time will agree with civil time 4 times a year.

  55. No moving parts? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

    You need to pivot it to adjust daylight savings time.

    You are required to move it so it gives correct time for 6 months out of the year. I think that qualifies as a moving part.

    1. Re:No moving parts? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "You are required to move it so it gives correct time for 6 months out of the year."

      No, it always gives correct time for the time zone it's specified. You don't change the time, you change time zones; where I sit, when Daylight Saving Time starts I go from Eastern Standard Time to Eastern Daylight Time. Eastern Standard Time doesn't change, it keeps on ticking along at UTC-0500.

    2. Re:No moving parts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that... doesn't make sense...

    3. Re:No moving parts? by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1
      that... doesn't make sense...

      Says you. Think about it this way: "TIME" (as in vibrations of an electron in the outer shell of a cesium atom) may be real, but "THE time" (as in "lunch time" "departure time", and "quitting time") is a polite fiction that we observe collectively in order to make synchronizing our activities easier. That's one reason why we have time-zones in the first place: so that a train trip that takes an hour doesn't land you at a destination where the clocks say that the trip took only 57 minutes (or an hour AND three minutes, depending on which way that you traveled.) After all, the "real" time is determined by when exactly the sun is at the apex of its arc in the sky, which we call "high noon." (I'd say "when the sun is directly overhead", except that that isn't true for more than twice a year for any place on earth, and it isn't true at ALL for any place on earth north of the tropic of Cancer or south of the tropic of Capricorn.)

      By the same token, daylight-savings-time is OBVIOUSLY wrong, as "high noon" doesn't occur until 13:00 if you are observing it. So, in that light (ha ha), the sundial is right: it's the people that are observing daylight "savings" who are wrong.

      When viewed objectivly, that is.

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    4. Re:No moving parts? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      How about this: changing your clocks for Daylight Saving Time is just like changing your watch after you cross a time zone boundary. The only difference is that you changed time zones without moving. The clock you don't change is still right for the time zone you used to be in (Standard Time), but you're now in a different time zone than it (Daylight Time) for the next few months.

      Standard Time doesn't change. Daylight Time doesn't change. The only thing that changes is you when you decide to stop living in one and start living in another.

    5. Re:No moving parts? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "After all, the "real" time is determined by when exactly the sun is at the apex of its arc in the sky, which we call "high noon.""

      Then you're screwed, since the length of time between two consecutive solar noons varies throughout the year, with the sun drifting by as much as 15 minutes from mean noon (i. e. where the sun would be if all solar cycles were the same length). Mean noon and apparent noon coincide only four times a year. Blame Kepler.

      This is why everybody has switched to mechanical clocks to begin with; they're actually far more consistent timekeepers than the sun and don't require a degree in astronomy to figure out. "Real time" is determine by 9,192,631,770 oscillations of a cesium-133 atom.

      "the sundial is right:"

      Your basic sundial is only right four times a year. If you know what day of the year it is you can figure out the correction factor between local apparent time and local mean time, and many of the more detailed "analog" sundials have analemmas instead of a straight noon line so that you don't have to do any math, but I really don't see how you could work that into a digital sundial like this (especially since you'd need an analemma for each and every point marked on the sundial to get local mean time at any point other than noon).

  56. Are They Running the Website on The Sundial??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sundial is down!

    Anyone have a mirror?

  57. $12000 USD? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    That's absurdly expensive.

    1. Re:$12000 USD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom was absurdly expensive, given that she didn't even let me stick it in her butt.

  58. Re:No Electricity? by harrkev · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you follow the manufacturers link and then get the instructions, it explains how it works. But here it is in a nusthell (as I understand it).

    1) Make holograms of the digits of the time in question (lots of holograms).
    2) Take the holograms and cut them into strips.
    3) Take some of the strips and glue them back to make one hologram
    4) Put a mask with slits in it over the hologram. At a certain time the light will only illuminate the hologram strips that coorespond to the current time.

    Pretty neat, if you ask me (too bad you didn't).

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  59. Paraphrased from Seinfeld: by bm17 · · Score: 1

    Elaine: Hey, what time is it?
    Kramer: I don't know. I don't wear a watch.
    Elaine: How can you not wear a watch?
    Kramer: I've never needed one before.
    Elaine: How to use know what time it is?
    Kramer: By the position of the sun.
    Elaine: How do you know what time it is at night?
    Kramer: I don't, but that's only a couple of hours anyway.

  60. Re:No Electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... I think it probably still runs off of electricity produced by solar energy, right?


    Dude.. I get it, you didn't read the article.. you didn't even click the link and look at the pictures.

    but to top it all off, your commenting without even reading the damn summary! "no electricity"
  61. Re:Hate to say it, but... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

    However because it is just solid structure, there is no reason why you coulnd't build a macro version out of say VAXen and then you'd have your digital sundial!

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  62. Re:It's patented! by tigre · · Score: 1

    Patents are fine for genuine innovations, which this is. Especially since it's not software-based. It is an ingenious assembly, so for that we thank the inventor with the ability to profit from it (for only a few more years) without competition.

  63. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do i set the alarm, and Play the radio?? And what kind of battery life does this so-called "Sun" have?

  64. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by pknoll · · Score: 1
    Install one in Arizona, and it'll be right year-round.

  65. Lacking Features... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A traditional sundial with a gnomon can tell you not only solar time but day of the year, altitude and azimuth of the sun in addition of a note telling your latitude and longitude. This new fancy digital one only tells you only solar time and I didn't even see a correction factor chart to get civil time.

    "... others may tell you of storms or showers but I'll only tell you of sunny hours..."

    "... life is but a shadow; we are but dust. This dial tells you die all you must..."

    --some dialest

  66. There is no Earth by paranode · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Do not try to think of the Earth rotating. That's impossible. Instead only try to realize the truth.

    There is no Earth.

    Then you'll see that it is not the Earth itself that rotates, it is only yourself.

    1. Re:There is no Earth by daeley · · Score: 1

      Neo-medes: Okey dokey.. move the Earth. Right, no problem, move the Earth, move the Earth, no problem, right...

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  67. Big Sundial Lobby by Caelicola · · Score: 1

    I always knew that there was some huge corporate conspiracy behind the fact that in German class we learned that a Taschensonneuhr was a "pocket sundial." How foolishly at the time we made fun of it... =P

  68. Americans by dazedagain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it can't be installed in an SUV most Americans won't buy it anyway.

    1. Re:Americans by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Damn... I can't find it anywhere.. nope... not even under this rock in a cave in the land of ignorance... where the hell is the insight in that comment?

    2. Re:Americans by dazedagain · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your observation. If you've ever been stuck in Los Angeles traffic and seen the number of SUV's with video screens, satnav, etc. onboard it might make more sense. I promise in future to post only those comments that equal or surpass the highly polished whatever that exemplifies /.

    3. Re:Americans by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      That still would not have been insightful, and the tone would have made it flamebait or troll anyway. Unfortunately, anti-Americanism has become what exemplifies slashdot...

    4. Re:Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as am American (I'm hiding because the lot of you cant be trusted), America and it's leaders as well as religious and conservitive crowd have brought this all on us.

  69. OT: wmp10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. Public counterexample by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    I live in Seattle. Just a wild guess... but I don't think these clocks are going to sell well here.

    The University of Washington might disagree!

    1. Re:Public counterexample by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

      That damn sundial taunts me every time I walk past it. I walk past it on my way back from work every day, and on the few days the sun hasn't set, it's invariably overcast. Maybe some day I'll be able to tell the time without having to look at my wristwatch.

      <farnsworth>A man can dream, can't he? A man can dream...</farnsworth>

      --
      My other sig is also a .Porsche
  71. Re:No Electricity? by san · · Score: 1

    You're right. I missed that there is a semi-transparent projection screen on the plate closest to the viewer.

  72. China: Not So Funny Use of Digital Sundial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This new technology for a battery-free wristwatch has practical applications on the battlefield. For example, the leader of a platoon need not be concerned with ensuring that there is a power source to run radio communications for synchronizing an attack. The leader could simply use the sun (i.e. sundial) to determine the precise time when to attack a fortification concurrently with a leader of another platoon. The time would have been agreed upon two weeks prior to the attack at a top-secret meeting of NATO.

    Hopefully, the inventors of this technology have not revealed its intricacies to the Chinese; otherwise, their military forces will benefit.

  73. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

    My workday is 7am-3pm. I work 6am-2pm in the spring, we just all set our clocks to hide that fact. Why? So the farmers don't feel bad about getting up at 4AM all by themselves. Since now it's 5AM, supposedly. But I still get up an hour after the farmers, so the jokes on them.

    --
    Changa hates change.
  74. Globe as sundial by SiliconEntity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read an article in an old Scientific American about an especially simple sundial: mount a globe of the Earth outside, orienting it to be exactly parallel to the real Earth. That means pointing the north pole of the globe at the North Star, and rotating it so that your current meridian of longitude runs across the top. This will put your current location exactly at the top of the globe.

    The cool thing is that sunlight will now fall on the globe in exactly the way it falls on the Earth (during the day, that is). You can see the day-night terminator and it will be the same as the terminator on the actual Earth. You can see which polar regions are getting 24 hour sunlight or night. You can tell whether it is day or night anywhere on Earth, and even estimate what time it is there.

    It sounded pretty cool although I never bothered to try to set one up. You'd need some kind of waterproof globe that wouldn't fade in the sunlight. Probably there are some like this on public display somewhere.

    1. Re:Globe as sundial by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      You can do the same thing in software, and see the results as the desktop background.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Globe as sundial by polarbrowser · · Score: 1

      And that somewhere I believe is Monticello.
      I figured out what that marble device is on Thomas Jeffersons deck at monticello. On the deck wing facing the University of Virginia there is a marble sphere with an arrow through it on a pedastool. It looks like a certainly oriented globe. I asked the tour guide and she said it was "some gadget goo-gaww that jeferson had" - she really had no clue. I have a picture and I'll have to look at it.

  75. Handy Tool by ReeprFlame · · Score: 1

    That's sooo frikin cool! Think about it, it is easily readable, does minutes [no need to the NIST atomic time clock - although time will be off by a bit due to the orbit of earth] and can double as a compass! Sweet...

  76. Older than that by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    The concept is more than ten years old; I read about a proposal for a digital sundial (in the same sense as this one) in a magazine called the Mathematical Intelligencer back in the 80s. However I think that design was more complex and involved some kind of custom fractal-like structure so that the sunlight was always shadowed just right to produce digits. The patented version looks simpler and perhaps less elegant but much more practical.

    1. Re:Older than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Scientific American had a column in the second half of the eighties as well where they detailed the construction of this device. I believe it was in 87 in a column that always appeared on the last page of the magazine before the backcover

    2. Re:Older than that by Toby+O'Neil · · Score: 1

      It was in Ian Stewart's column "Mathematical Recreations" in Scientific American, pages 104-106, (1991). Stewart's article was based on a paper by the mathematician Kenneth Falconer. As far as I am aware the article by Ian Stewart is the first time a discussion about digital sundials appears in print.

      The paper by Falconer is Sets with prescribed projections and Nikodym sets and was orginally published in the Proceeding of the London Mathematical Society 53 (1986), pages 48-64. The paper is concerned with a much more abstruse mathematical problem but, in everyday language, essentially describes a method to construct an object so that its shadows are any prescribed shape you wish at different times of the day. Of course, being a pure mathematics paper, the method given is completely impractical...

  77. Moving Part: the earth by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    Moving Part: the earth

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
    1. Re:Moving Part: the earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that logic, everything has a moving part. So no one can say anything that is made has no moving parts. It now becomes a question of moving relative to what?

  78. you could make one inexpensively by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You could make one inexpensively using a laser printer, overhead-projector foils, several sheets of glass (one frosted), and just about anything for the housing.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:you could make one inexpensively by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I can't quite figure out how to use your list of objects to make one of these. The best I can figure out is that it involves taking all the objects except the laser printer and dumping them in the trash. Then you just look at the display on the laser printer and read the time. Am I missing something?

      Using a laser printer seems like cheating, though. :-)

    2. Re:you could make one inexpensively by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't quite figure out how to use your list of objects to make one of these. The best I can figure out is that it involves taking all the objects except the laser printer and dumping them in the trash. Then you just look at the display on the laser printer and read the time. Am I missing something?

      Assuming you wern't just trying to be funny.

      The core of each digit of the "digital sundial" is a sandwich composed of:
      - A grating with vertical black/clear bars.
      - A layer of glass. (Thickness varies depending on how fast the digit should cycle - the thicker the faster.)
      - A second grating with a more complex set of bars that I'll describe later.
      - A frosted glass "screen" to diffuse the light for viewing from all angles.

      The thickness of the bars on the first grating is such that, if the digit goes through N changes, the clear band is significantly less than 1/Nth the width of the clear band plus the dark band. (To get the appearance of the various digits to match, all of the upper gratings have the same light/dark band width ratio, determined by the digit with the most states.)

      Stacking the first grating on the glass produces a band of light stripes on the bottom of the glass that slides sideways as the sun moves. The spacing of the bands and the thickness of the glass are such that the bands move by one band-spacing in one cycle-time for the digit. The glass both holds the spacing between the gratings constant and reduces the angle through which the light moves, so the clock produces a readable image for nearly 12 hours, rather than being really dim near sunrise and sunset.

      For every light/dark band pair in the upper grating there are N bands in the lower grating. Each band is a stripe through the image of one of the digits, cycling through the N digits. As the sun moves, the bands move across this pattern, sequentially being "stenciled" by a different digit.

      The light coming out of the lower grating strikes the frosted glass "screen" and is diffused sideways, so the clock can be read from many angles.

      You use the laser printer to make the gratings, by computing their appearance and printing them on overhead-projector foils.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:you could make one inexpensively by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The glass both holds the spacing between the gratings constant and reduces the angle through which the light moves, so the clock produces a readable image for nearly 12 hours, rather than being really dim near sunrise and sunset.

      The bending of the light also nearly linearizes the rate of motion of the shadow, resulting in a negligible error in the displayed time over the period where it is visible.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:you could make one inexpensively by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      whoops, yeah, I was just trying to be funny... guess I was too subtle. Good explanation.

      This would make an excellent little project -- a three-page pdf; one page with the instructions and two pages with the grating patterns would be nice to have.This is something genuinely inventive, so I think its patent is well-deserved and should be respected. Maybe in 2012 we'll see non-patent-encumbered free versions.

      I'm thinking this would be in the vein of this cool dragon illusion that I've got on my desk.

  79. Sarcasm of the day (from me at least ;) by Jahf · · Score: 1
    The Digital Sundial is a 10 year old invention

    Well, at least it is good to know /. is finally clearing out the submissions pool.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  80. Another digital clock by ZZ-Type · · Score: 1


    This one uses a little (of your) electricity, but technically it has no moving parts!

    Digital Analog Clock

    --

    Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
    Those who forget the past are doomed ... oh
  81. Battery by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... what kind of battery life does this so-called "Sun" have?

    The clock mechanism is powered by a flywheel.

    The display is powered by thermonuclear fusion.

    Horrors! Have to ban sundials! That "sun" thing is so dangerous when they're working that just a few minutes exposure can give you a radiation burn.

    (Bad, bad woodchip mill. Good old outback bill.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  82. Re:No Electricity? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Let's see if I can put this in terms us geeks might understand... :)
    It's a bit like an LCD panel, there's a backlight and there's a filter that enables or disables each pixel. But instead of flipping the pixels using a small current, the pixels light up based on the position of the light source.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  83. dated? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That thang is wicked. Can someone license the mechanism and make a calendar? If not Julian, then maybe Mayan?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:dated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone license the mechanism and make a calendar?

      Probably not, since the position of the sun on December 3rd at 09:29am won't be that much different to the position of the sun on December 2nd at 09:29am...

    2. Re:dated? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      But it *is* different. The position at 9:29AM is't much different than at 9:30AM, but this clock detects/shows it. The Sun's total range across the seasons is 47 degrees, and during the course of the (24h) day is 360 degrees, so the calendar function requires only 7.6x the precision. Currently it gets moved to accomodate the "daylight savings", which is a measure of the seasonal change in the daily position's frame of reference WRT the solar path in the sky. I want v2.0: a clock that could possibly actually tick out the centuries, the millennia!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  84. But with a webcam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you'd need is a webcam and some code and you could probably make a Firefox extension to display the globe in near real time. Oooh, and if you put the webcam on a motion-control rig so you could move to any latitude and longitude (and maybe even add a mechanical zoom), you could put it on a website and get slashdotted!

    To be honest, I'm going to have to find a nice weatherproof globe to mount on a pedestal outside. On the one hand, it'll look nice, and on the other hand, I can see (during my day) whether it's light wherever mi ami ends up being stationed. (Ooooh, with a motion-control system, I could have a lamp fill in for the sun during dark hours... that would be geekish enough, I suppose, and it'd only require proper gear ratios, since the earth's rotation is close enough to constant. Controlling it all with a digital watch would be bonus.)

  85. Already been patented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never leave my basement during daylight hours. I would have to set up something to allow light to stream into the house...

    Apparently such devices has been developed, and are called windows. You may infringe one of M$ patents, if you try to build your own...

    1. Re:Already been patented by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      basement: The area of a home below ground level.

  86. I have the small one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought the small 100$ version as a christmas gift. It's a very neat little thing, it's about three inches in diameter, and the results are impressive, but require bright, direct sunlight.

    I'd recommend it for a gift for anyone who likes trinkets based on science, this is a novel implementation of a simple principle.

    If I were to change anythign about it, i'd make it bigger. I don't know why the disc isn't 5...6 inches in diameter. It would be much more impressive.

    1. Re:I have the small one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be 6" in diameter, except that it was designed in Europe, where everything is smaller.

  87. But but but... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    I can already tell if it's light or dark outside by looking.

    What time is it???????

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  88. Re:No Electricity? by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter, it only gives you the true local time anyways, which is guaranteed to be totally different from the standard time for the time zone you're living in.

    It could easily be off by half an hour or more anyways

  89. The Great Globe by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    In Durlston Country Park, Dorset, England there is a big stone globe. Sadly, I don't remember it being oriented in the way you are describing, but if someone was to make a similar sculpture oriented in the right direction it would probably last quite a while.

  90. Rooftop + webcam by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what's to stop you from placing it on top of the highrise and place a webcam in front of it. bjd

    1. Re:Rooftop + webcam by boarder8925 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That defeats the purpose of not having to use electricity.

    2. Re:Rooftop + webcam by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 1

      a periscope would work...

    3. Re:Rooftop + webcam by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, the clock doesn't
      work without the proposed webcam, or when
      the webcam is off...

      bjd

  91. To late done. Just say IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.freeos.com/articles/3800

    Yes it is a prototype 1. Just add some software and you have the calculator no problems.

    Here is the second Prototype.
    http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/ngm/in dex_e.htm

    Question is will market it take it. And when will it be on sale.

  92. Wait a.....minute? by bmgoau · · Score: 1

    So, according to my sundial, time stops when the sun goes down? I dont want time to stop, id rather have a sundial that works at night and for that natter how is it supposed to wake you up for work?

    1. Re:Wait a.....minute? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      It's trivial to build a sundial alarm, if you wake up when the sun is up.

      Get a bunch of very thin, straight tubes. Like tent poles, but maybe shorter. Shorter will give you more of a ramp up and ramp down period.

      Make a big bundle of these, about a square foot cross section. Build a hole on the wall in your bedroom (Or use a window), wait until the correct time to wake up (Otherwise you have to do a lot of math), stick the bundle in the wall so the sunlight comes straight in.

      Now cover up the rest of the hole or window. Get a mirror, stick it directly in the line of the tubes, and aim the reflected sunlight at your pillow on your bed. You may want a slightly convex mirror in case your head isn't exactly in the right place.

      Place plastic wrap or something over the tubes to keep the air in. Sleep facing the mirror.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  93. Re:No Electricity? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


    It's more than a cool idea. It is like one of those magic tricks, where there are no wires or supports or anything, but it works, and the audience is left dumb by it. It's the kind of thing that makes science exciting.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  94. just imagine... by calculadoru · · Score: 1

    ...a beowolf cluster of these things... (sorry, it had to be said)

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  95. Re:No Electricity? by eclectro · · Score: 1

    the last time I went there, mirrordot had croaked also.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  96. I am an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an American ... you insensitive clod!

  97. Uhh... it has some pretty significant moving parts by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I dunno about you, but I would call the Earth a damn big moving part that is required for the operation of this thing...

  98. Oh, come on. by thegnu · · Score: 0

    I included a smiley. How can you get mad when someone includes a smiley? Watch:

    This is bullshit! :-)

    See?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  99. Internet Time by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would be cool to make one of these that shows Internet Time. You remember, that dot-com time invention from Swatch to have time-zone crossing con-calls at @526 and everybody would then know when that was. For those who missed that, Swatch wanted to cut 24 hours into thousand pieces, so one unit of Internet Time (called a beat) is app. 1.5 minute, which is accurate enough for things like the start of a meeting.

    The headache will be of course that sundials are by nature giving time in "local time" and need a correction to display "standard time". This problem would be agrevated when the dial has to display Internet Time, which can only be overcome to build custom sundials for every longitude on earth. This sounds bad, but sundials are anyway normally custom made, so maybe this isn't too bad. Probably the biggest obstacle is that now already, 5 years after the invention, nobody remembers what internet time was. Oh well.....

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    1. Re:Internet Time by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Insightful


      5 years after the invention, nobody remembers what internet time was. Oh well.....


      The problem is, that it was a stupid "invention".

      You see, we already have a universally accepted standard time, Universal Time Co-ordinated (UTC).

      Not only is it universally accepted it's also trivial to convert between time zones, just add or remove hours (and occasionally minutes) as necessary.

      Swatch "Internet Time" offered nothing over UTC, it was, without a doubt, pointless.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    2. Re:Internet Time by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      As a person, travelling weekly between two timezones, I really think it was good idea. Be fair, even my PDA doesn't have a good solution for booking meetings in multiple timezones and then remembering me at the right time, in whatever timezone I am.

      For me the failure of Internet Time was caused by Swatch's pompous choice of making Bern "the center of the world". Oh gosh!!! If I would have implemented Internet Time I would have used the date-line, 180 degrees East or West as point zero. Nobody lives in the Bering Street, nobody can get an ego, nobody can get upset. Perfect for a neutral baseline for a new timezone.

      Oh well.....

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  100. It's not that fucking hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're = they are

    The word you're looking for is their.

  101. Not all U.S. states observe DST by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only "moving" required is moving the whole unit to (most of) Indiana or Arizona, which do not observe daylight saving time.

  102. Digital Clock Without ... Moving Parts by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    So whats new? Digital clocks have never had any moving parts. (Ok, maybe if you count the quartz crystal, or MAYBE the buttons, but really now...)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  103. Re: Only if you MUST mount them all exactly flat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sundials only have to be "custom made for every location" if you insist on mounting them flat. If you don't have a problem with tilting them weird angles, then just like you orient the thing to the north pole, you can also orient it to the Greenwich meridian.

    Of course, orienting to Greenwich UTC would mean that when the sun comes around behind your tilted sundial you can loose up to half your already-reduced interval of daytime usefulness. But a UTC clock isn't what you were talking about anyway. [Or is it? You didn't provide any A for us to RTF, so I can't tell.] If you just orient your sundial [digital or analog] to your local time-zone's appropriate meridian, the loss of daytime is insignificant.

  104. Well I have... by eobanb · · Score: 1

    ...a Digital Sun SGI IBM. Ha.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  105. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24-7-365 in Arizona?

    Nope, sorry-- even in Arizona it can't quite work 12-7-365. Nights can happen even where the weather is clear!

    Anyone for a moon-dial extension of the concept, to improve on that? It might be possible to tell time almost 75% of the year then, if you have good night vision. It would be an interesting mathematical challenge, if not completely useless...

  106. Braille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone make a sundial that works in braille? Blind people need to tell the time too. Hell, they only have a 50/50 chance of telling if it is day or night.

  107. A deserving patent by Cardbox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This design was turned up as "prior art" when I was drawing up my own patent for moire-based time indication. It was sufficiently offtopic not to be relevant, but it was rather a nice idea so it's good to see it being implemented. It also sets a useful pricepoint for my own design...
    Yes, it would be cool to display the date but there are a couple of problems.
    1. When you're considering time, the sun moves round and round (forever westwards), so one position corresponds to one time, but when you're looking at dates, it oscillates (between north and south), so any date indication will be ambiguous between November and January, October and February, September and March...
    2. Near the solstices the noon sun moves very very slowly, so the degree of amplification of motion required would be enormous and you'd run into diffraction problems.
  108. Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can sell you one for US$12,000+, or you can buy a pocket version for under US$100 for that special nerd in your life."

    That's expensive hardware... just like the hardware of this other company with a name based on a bright celestial body near our planet.

  109. Re:Fall Back, Spring Foward by rebelx2 · · Score: 1

    Actually daylight savings was created to conserve oil/coal for electricity. During WWI and WWII the US was big into conservation of resources and factories turing out war machines implitmented daylight savines so that the factories didn't have to use as much electricity for lighting. We care much about energy conservation anymore. We all counteract any savings now by working longer hours and driving SUV's, and having lights turned on on everything 24/7, so the whole point to daylight savings is well... pointless. I imagine we keep it around for the same reason we keep blue laws around.

  110. Re:No Electricity? by dschuetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Make holograms of the digits of the time in question (lots of holograms).
    2) Take the holograms and cut them into strips.
    3) Take some of the strips and glue them back to make one hologram


    I don't think it uses holograms. It's more like a series of carefully-arranged slits, with light coming in from any given angle only making it through the gauntlet in a single path, while light form a different angle hits a different path. Theoretically *like* a hologram, but simulated by the masks over a depth somewhat greater than a single sheet of film.

    On the other hand, I'd wondered *years* ago whether a digital sundial could be easily made from a simple hologram. No need to cut into strips -- any hologram already gives different images depending on the angle you look at it from. Generally, you see this as you walk around a hologram (like the novelty ones where someone blows you a kiss). Only instead of you walking, if you move the light source, the same animation plays out. Just build a multi-image hologram of all sorts of clock images, and as the light source moves, you'll see the clock animate forwards. It could even be an analog clock -- any picture would work.

    If you account for varying altitudes of the sun, you might even be able to get the month displayed (though it'd probably have to show two dates at once, letting the user decide whether it's, say, December 1 or January 9 (each being about 20 days away from the solstice).

  111. Barrier Screen Imaging by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    Seems like a novel application of a much older technology - barrier screen imaging. This is also similar to Lenticular imaging too - used for 3-D and "flip" image creation.

    It's not a new technology, just a cool application of existing stuff.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  112. Compass? by Jameth · · Score: 1

    But, you need to orient it directly south. Now, if that pocket version had a built-in compass, I'd get one to take camping with me. No joke.

  113. apologies in advance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Korea, sundials are only for old people...

    I'm sorry, really really sorry.

    but in soviet Russia, sundial adjusts you...

  114. Re:No Electricity? by harrkev · · Score: 1

    According to the instruction sheet, it uses holograms. Maybe I misread it. Follow the links in the article to find out.

    Also, as far as only needing one, I am not sure that they can do this with a white-light hologram where the source of the light provides the angle information. The only thing that I have ever seen changes the image based on the position of the viewer.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  115. Re:No Electricity? by VeriTea · · Score: 1
    It is even more cool if you read the original article by Ian Stewart in Scientific American. The article (if I recall) was about these monks that wanted an easier way to know when the proper prayer times should be. They got to talking about how useful it would be to have a digital sundial, and then did some of the background calculations needed to see if it was possible. I remember when I read that article back in high school (someone gave me a huge collection of old Scientific American magazines and I read through all the back issues - I certainly wasn't in high school in 1987)I thought it sounded like an really cool idea. Now that they exist I would love to have one!

    --
    --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
  116. Like A House? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    for instance.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  117. UV or X-ray based sundial? by Blue+Mushroom · · Score: 1

    Are there any frequencies of light that aren't scattered by clouds? How difficult would it be to use materials that fluoresce for those frequencies as the basis for a sundial that works on overcast days? But maybe no material fluoresces brightly enough to be visible through the cloud-diffused sunlight. In that case, with the digital sundial, you could enclose the time-displaying side of the sundial in a shade box with a viewing aperture.

    Anybody know why you couldn't redesign the digital sundial to work for UV or X rays? I bet you could even get more accurate time readings that way.

    --

    "Humanity lives and dies by its capabilities of communication, or lack thereof."

  118. interesting by Changa_MC · · Score: 0
    I live in farm country, and around here everyone has always blamed it on the farmers (ranchers, technically). Which never made sense, since they get up before dawn no matter what "time" it is anyway.

    Factory work here is carried out in 3 shifts, so that lights are always on and the machines are always running. So not much point in daylight savings on those grounds anymore either. But stopping it would not make friends, where ignoring it doesn't make enemies.

    Governmental inertia.

    -SIG needed.

    --
    Changa hates change.