Why is it disturbing or embarrassing? Why kink shame? It's really unsettling and crass. Some like same sex anal intercourse, some need to convert their genitals, some need watersports, people need many things to feel fulfillment and we should not shame them because if it.
Sorry I'm not familiar with Mr. Furry's work but the times I've seen his Pepe it has appeared fairly different from the one most commonly in use online.
Wishful thinking. Get over it, Trump won, for better or worse. And keep in mind this gigantic investigation you're fawning over is only being discussed here and now over someone buying internet adverts. Internet advertising. If you can't see how nonsensical this is than I weep for the future of the republic.
It has nothing to do with "shady" site placement and everything to do with the fact digital advertising simply by and large doesn't work. Seems like YouTube and Spotify, sites with a captive user, are the only ones that can even get their ads noticed (albeit marginally) with most other ads being completely ignored. Though sometimes they really try and force you to look at an ad (covers the page, countdown to proceed) which then causes people to find active ways to remove them from their online experience.
Slashdot Mirror
"bow-up"?
Is that like an "epic clap back"?
2 cents has been credited to your account
Why is it disturbing or embarrassing? Why kink shame? It's really unsettling and crass. Some like same sex anal intercourse, some need to convert their genitals, some need watersports, people need many things to feel fulfillment and we should not shame them because if it.
I'm glad people are out there preserving bits of the past like that. I think it's more important than most realize.
They're all over the thrift shops for some reason.
Not using gold plated optical lines, pffft. Why even bother?
Check out Techmoan on YT sounds up you're alley.
Alphabet is an abhorrent corporation and they are far worse than Microsoft, IBM and SCO combined.
Politics is already eroding slashdot's credibility, stop making it worse, that's what the editors are for.
Twitter said about 75 percent of the blocked accounts this year were spotted before a single tweet was sent
It really makes ya wonder how they knew these accounts were tied to "terrorism" and what criteria are they even being used to deplatform people.
Do we have any word yet on any browsers or forks that plan to omit these extensions?
Sorry I'm not familiar with Mr. Furry's work but the times I've seen his Pepe it has appeared fairly different from the one most commonly in use online.
Your assertion has very little basis in reality, outside of CNN sound bites at least.
Wishful thinking. Get over it, Trump won, for better or worse. And keep in mind this gigantic investigation you're fawning over is only being discussed here and now over someone buying internet adverts. Internet advertising. If you can't see how nonsensical this is than I weep for the future of the republic.
Things like milk are usually a loss leader at c-stores here.
citation needed
Google shouldn't be trying to fix anything. They should not be shaping our culture through propaganda.
Do terms of service agreements stand up in court?
That is more than enough info to identify what files the user is playing. Slightly creepy imho.
Oh my, that's just painful.
Loving this casual sexism, double standards are great!
Either provide a link to source or go take your meds.
Once in a lifetime for people in the path. Lord I ain't traveling for that shit.
It has nothing to do with "shady" site placement and everything to do with the fact digital advertising simply by and large doesn't work. Seems like YouTube and Spotify, sites with a captive user, are the only ones that can even get their ads noticed (albeit marginally) with most other ads being completely ignored. Though sometimes they really try and force you to look at an ad (covers the page, countdown to proceed) which then causes people to find active ways to remove them from their online experience.
Sometimes the first stone is cast by a policeman - sometimes it's even the only stone.
Got any of that uhhhh source with that ramble?