Stop sending troops to kill people all over the world, in their own countries, people that are of no conceivable threat to America, and they will stop wanting to kill us. Mostly we do this in our economic interest. In essence, terrorism is a cost of the way we do business. If Global corporations and countries were to change to doing business ethically, no longer supporting dictators and corruption to get resources cheaper or with more assurance, their profits would go down but so would the need to strong-arm people all over the world with our armies. Because we don't want to stop doing business this way, we need to seek advice on how to create better ways to hold back the animosity and hate we create by our actions. But until we stop creating the animosity and hate, it will always plague us.
And this relates to vehicle software systems how? Are you saying that having lots of software driven options in a car make it safer? I propose that, unless you are referring specifically to self-driving cars (still little more than a fantasy) then lots of more software systems are simply more distractions and will result in more deaths.
You are funny. At the start of my commute there are hundreds, no thousands of speeding cars. There aren't enough police in all of the state to ticket those drivers.
I never understood this phrase. If there is absence of evidence then you don't need evidence of absence. After all, if you have no evidence, then you have nothing and why should I even need to produce evidence of absence?
Slashdot Mirror
Isn't it America that is fighting in the most conflicts all over the world?
Adapt to what drivers behaviors? The car will be the driver!
Stop sending troops to kill people all over the world, in their own countries, people that are of no conceivable threat to America, and they will stop wanting to kill us.
Mostly we do this in our economic interest. In essence, terrorism is a cost of the way we do business. If Global corporations and countries were to change to doing business ethically, no longer supporting dictators and corruption to get resources cheaper or with more assurance, their profits would go down but so would the need to strong-arm people all over the world with our armies.
Because we don't want to stop doing business this way, we need to seek advice on how to create better ways to hold back the animosity and hate we create by our actions. But until we stop creating the animosity and hate, it will always plague us.
Do you live in a cave? The truth selling itself is so last century. Today outright lies have far more credibility.
no.
like Microsoft developers forums?
And this relates to vehicle software systems how? Are you saying that having lots of software driven options in a car make it safer? I propose that, unless you are referring specifically to self-driving cars (still little more than a fantasy) then lots of more software systems are simply more distractions and will result in more deaths.
where the only processor is behind the steering wheel.
I'm just waiting for someone to pipe up that DM doesn't exist while not actually knowing what DM is.
I seem to recall that nobody knows what dark matter is, thus anyone saying anything about dark matter doesn't actually know what DM is.
You are funny. At the start of my commute there are hundreds, no thousands of speeding cars. There aren't enough police in all of the state to ticket those drivers.
What about the one I ate this morning? I don't think it was charged.
Most of the anti-drug crowd have never used crack cocaine or heroin either, what's your point?
Stealing from thieves is practically a duty.
Irrelevant. You can't kill terrorism either but that doesn't stop anybody from declaring war on it.
Now you load more garbage on your web page than can be hauled buy a 20 ton garbage truck?
hit this guy with a clue stick. Asshole.
Obama talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk. He is beholden to the powers that be and takes orders from them.
Reread the list, none of those things involve riding mass transit but rather building it.
I never understood this phrase. If there is absence of evidence then you don't need evidence of absence. After all, if you have no evidence, then you have nothing and why should I even need to produce evidence of absence?
Oops, wrong story, this was for the He3 story!
squeak squeak.
I treat the g as silent: post-res-sequel. The web site used to have a button 'click to hear it pronounced' but that is gone and I never used it.
Nope.
Just about anywhere, including the nightly news?
since we all know there is no such thing as AGW. I understand the Tuamotus are being abandoned as well.