Everytime there is a story like this, the title always throws me. They make it sound like it is for copy protection (like proposing a new restriction) but then it ends up being against. I guess sometimes it's just a little ambiguous.
I know that, I meant exclusively. They only use them for the G3. That means only the iBook. IBM did do some G4 development but Moto currently makes all their G4s.
If Mr. Dvorak had bothered to do the slightest bit of research before writing another baseless artice, he would know that Apple is switching to IBM processors, not Intel.
"... if there were a Safari v62, and it did happen to leak to the public, and someone did happen to run it, and that person did happen to discover a bug with text-decoration, well then I would hypothetically be most grateful, and would in fact fix such a bug with the utmost expedience. In fact, it might even be fixed already, assuming of course there were such a build, and it did in fact have this problem."
All of you who are saying you'll never buy a Mac because of this are going a little too far IMO. Every company makes controversial decisions. How many times has Microsoft done something that has made your blood boil? (I think more/.ers use Windows than are willing to admit.) Just because a company makes one decision you don't agree with is not a good reason to permanently boycott them. If you were Steve, you could hire whoever the hell you wanted. Point is, you are not and everyone "thinks differently" and has their own opinion of the right man for the job. This is not a political rant (I did not vote for Gore), but maybe he will bring something to Apple that they can use. He's not Phil Schiller, he's not going to be in your face and most people will probably forget all about this after a few months.
I think that it was probably something like that. They didn't have any other big name. If you remember the commercials, she was virtually the only name mentioned.
Slashdot Mirror
lol, i guess it did.
Apparantly the Slashdot grammer checker broke on the last sentence of this article.
Everytime there is a story like this, the title always throws me. They make it sound like it is for copy protection (like proposing a new restriction) but then it ends up being against. I guess sometimes it's just a little ambiguous.
I know that, I meant exclusively. They only use them for the G3. That means only the iBook. IBM did do some G4 development but Moto currently makes all their G4s.
For one thing, they have already started making the motherboards.
If Mr. Dvorak had bothered to do the slightest bit of research before writing another baseless artice, he would know that Apple is switching to IBM processors, not Intel.
Yeah, that's what I meant, should have been more specific.
Did you see his latest entry?
"... if there were a Safari v62, and it did happen to leak to the public, and someone did happen to run it, and that person did happen to discover a bug with text-decoration, well then I would hypothetically be most grateful, and would in fact fix such a bug with the utmost expedience. In fact, it might even be fixed already, assuming of course there were such a build, and it did in fact have this problem."
i laugh every time he says that
Really, I've had less bugs with it than any other of the unreleased verions.
Wow did anyone else see that. Some really great exposure there for the movement.
They didn't "pick up" Tracker. They just reaired the first season of it. (It only had one before it was cancelled.)
for (terrorists=all; terorrists > 0; terrorists--)
kill next terrorist;
ABC broadcasts only 720p. (the only network station that does so)
if (we take out Saddam) future = peace; else future = more terrorist attacks;
The more resources they have, the faster we can win the war.
I say let them have it. Better the Pentagon use it for something constructive than biased talking heads for their fluffed up stories.
What an ass!
I agree. Just because I don't agree with Gore politically doesn't mean he couldn't be of some use to Apple.
All of you who are saying you'll never buy a Mac because of this are going a little too far IMO. Every company makes controversial decisions. How many times has Microsoft done something that has made your blood boil? (I think more /.ers use Windows than are willing to admit.) Just because a company makes one decision you don't agree with is not a good reason to permanently boycott them. If you were Steve, you could hire whoever the hell you wanted. Point is, you are not and everyone "thinks differently" and has their own opinion of the right man for the job. This is not a political rant (I did not vote for Gore), but maybe he will bring something to Apple that they can use. He's not Phil Schiller, he's not going to be in your face and most people will probably forget all about this after a few months.
That's on Google news right now.
When was the last time anyone visited another search engine? I can't remember when I did.
He's definitely not always shirtless in the movie.
Someone apparantly thought this was a nonstandard Apple practice. In fact they have always provided detailed specs like these on all their systems.
I think that it was probably something like that. They didn't have any other big name. If you remember the commercials, she was virtually the only name mentioned.
Yes, from a VHS tape. It isn't CD quality obviously but it still sounds pretty good.