You know what's also interesting? Coherent sentences. The X-Serve Cluster Node is a dual process system with a price that's $1000 under its non-cluster targetted counterpart. It also has some other missing features deemed not neccessary for clustering purposes.
-- If you disagree then it must be overrated, redundant or trolling.
Well I dont know if that picture is the product you are talking about, but I can't help but notice an 'ATI Graphics' branded card on the top right hand side. Last time I checked, that ususally got stamped on graphics cards!:)
-- "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
Yeah, but still, the damn thing is $2800. With that kind of cash I could buy an absolutely kick-ass dual or quad Xeon machine that would destroy anything Apple can make.
One ATI card (32MB of DDR SDRAM and VGA connector) installed in lower PCI slot; optional AGP 4X card (64MB of DDR SDRAM; DVI, VGA, and S-video connectors; dual display support) installed in PCI-AGP slot
Well I dont know if that picture is the product you are talking about, but I can't help but notice an 'ATI Graphics' branded card on the top right hand side. Last time I checked, that ususally got stamped on graphics cards!:)
Look at that page again. It's the general Xserve page. The picture is just a normal Xserve. The table below the picture lists the specs on the various models. That table indicates that there is indeed a cluster node model and that it does not have a graphics card (or it uses a new card called "None";)
Malda:
Timothy, I've got some bad news. VA Software is bleeding red ink like a river
of blood. We've got to rightsize someone, I think it has to be you.
Timothy:
But Rob, I need this job! You know they won't hire me back at Burger King
since that peeing incident! And my parents are having the basement fumigated
right now! You know Pudge doesn't need a job. Isn't there something I can
do?
Malda:
Hmmm. Well, if you give me a blowjob, or let me fuck you up the ass, I won't fire you.
Whips out his penis
Timothy: starts sucking Hey, your dick tastes like shit!
Malda: What do you expect? Michael didn't want to be fired either!
Ahh, the end of an age. The only computer my mother ever used that almost completely replaced my usefulness.
-- Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
Re:Mom likes em
by
Oculus+Habent
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Apple didn't go away, just the shape. And, if you're tied to a curvy all-in-one system with a CRT, you can still go with the iMac's big brother.
On a more serious note, Apple got lots of praise and lots of flak for producing a translucent computer. They knew it was "trendy" and they knew when to move on. Now everyone making a translucent device that wasn't designed to be translucent should move on, too.
There are all the usual jokes about the vacuum cleaners and the iLamp, but have you heard anyone say, "While the user interface is straightforward and the availability of the BSD architecture is a great plus, I'd never buy one because I think it looks like a lamp." - No. They don't know anything about them, but their friends said Macs suck 15 years ago, so they fall back on the only insults they know.
Sorry for the rant.
-- That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
I wouldn't buy a computer that looks like a lamp. I want my computer to look like a computer, damn it.
Computers are supposed to look like lamps. I don't know what the heck you people are thinking, buying computers that look like a cross between a television and a typewriter. Bizarre.
Re:Mom likes em
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Then Apple screwed up, because it sure doesn't look like any lamp I've ever seen! Unless.. you think lamps have flat bulbs that shine light in your face or something.
Personally, I think it looks like a shaving mirror.
But seriously, here's a flat screen, here's a DVD drive and power supply. How many different configurations ARE there? Thank goodness apple didn't just bolt the drive to the back of the screen and call it a day.
Re:Mom likes em
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Sadly enough, I know a couple of people that said that they wouldn't buy a computer that looks like a lamp becuase they aren't esthetically pleasing.
Of course, they laughed at the original iMac as well, they couldn't take it seriously because it has no default floppy.
I'm sure they'll find another reason to not by the next generation Macs as well, and it will be just as "informed" as there last decision.
I seem to recall a Gateway machine that was built exactly like that... flat screen with the cpu and drive bolted to the back of it, kb & mouse dangling off as usual...
Re:Mom likes em
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
This is 'insightful'??? What, pray tell, does a computer look like? I know some former NASA and AT&T employees who might not agree with you.
I don't buy a computer case for it's looks. I buy it because it'll be big enough to hold my mobo and peripherals, and have enough fans to cool my CPU's.
Who cares what it looks like? Really. It's under my desk which is also where I keep my feet, and the dog is known to roam....
-- Huh?
Re:Mom likes em
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
> I want my computer to look like a computer, damn it.
http://www.histoire-informatique.org/musee/2_3_16. html
It's a shame that used 400 MHz iMacs are still selling for $600. You can pick up a used 1.4GHz Celeron for $200. I would probably have to go with slightly higher specs than a bottom of the line 400MHz imac, but anything better nears $800, which is just under the price of a new emac. So there you have it, the reason I will probably never own a mac. People refuse to part with their used ones. I guess if I ever do buy a new mac, I know if I decide to upgrade I can get a premium for my used one. It would be sort of like trading in a used Chevy caviler for a new BMW and only having to pay a $2000 difference.
If your mom ever decides to part with her mac, tell her I mess her and I'm sorry I never returned her phone calls.
-- Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
You can, however, pick up a beige G3 for $150. Not candy colored (or 400Mhz), but you can upgrade most parts on it with old PC parts and run OSX on it.
Resale value of Macs tends to reflect their longer useful life. Perhaps it's simply because there are fewer gamers using them, or maybe because the parts are high quality throughout (you do get something for the price). I've seen professional artists still happily using 7-8 year old machines, 5-6 year old G3s pushing OSX or chugging away with OS9 in business situations...even a couple of 11 year old Quadras being used as RIPs. Not to say that old Wintel boxes aren't in use too, but I've just seen more old Macs in use. OSX is changing this of course, as XP is probably getting many Win95/98 users to pick up a new machine.
No. They don't know anything about them, but their friends said Macs suck 15 years ago
15 years ago, Macs did suck. The one thing that made me start to consider actually crossing over to the dark side was OSX, but I'm not quite done with school, so I haven't had the cash to shell out for a Mac. Maybe once I graduate this summer I'll try one.
--
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
15 Years ago Macs had a [consistent GUI|SCSI|PostScript|3.5" floppies|etc.] while Windows 3.1 wasn't event out yet. the best you could have on a PC was DOSSHELL. But I guess you're too young to remember it.
15 years ago was 1988. In february that year, Apple released A/UX 1.0, which combined a SVR Unix with Macintosh system software 6 (it wasn't called MacOS then.) Probably you would run in on some variant of Macintosh II (first released in 1987!), which had six NuBus slots into which you could plug extension cards, such as 8bit and 24bit! graphics cards and network cards. The OS supported multiple displays.
So while the PC-world was still struggling with DOS and pre-3.11 Windows, we Mac-people could enjoy Unix, vivid colors, multiple monitors, and of course the pleasant experience of using the Macintosh interface.
Now tell me which computer type *really* sucked in 1988?
why? computers (Apples, neXT etc excepted) are FUCKING ugly and hugely intrusive in most domestic environments. I wouldn't be surprised if a large part of the big switch to laptops was their hugely reduced physical intrusion in the home.
I remember putting three video cards into a IIci in the computer lab one day after school just for the hell of it, and getting into a load of trouble for taking the computers apart.
-- That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
I do remember 1988 quite well, and the stupid GUI is exactly what I always hated. Mac never had a real command line until OSX, and that always bothered me. I used to tinker with DOS commands all the time trying to do interesting things. The MAC clickety-clickety philosophy felt very limited and still doesn't work for me, and it's one of the reasons I now use Linux over Windows whenever possible (I am a realist. Some stuff just isn't supported on Linux, and trying to run important enigineering applications in Wine doesn't cut it).
--
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
Perhaps now that people realize Apple has stopped selling fruit colored computers we can see the end of all the pink and purple translucent plastic office products...
It'll never happen. Those cycles move more slowly than the computer style cycles. Apple had effectively moved away from colorful plastic just when they were getting to full capacity.
And try telling people that Apple doesn't sell computers by the flavor anymore.:-)
One can only wish, but the most annoying was those cheap calculators you see everwhere that are in fruity colors... and then the matching everything... it got really bad when the mac first came out, but its not that bad now. (although i like my purple lava lamp...)
-- "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
You are so right!
Personally I prefer bland, opaque designs. Bright colors can make one feel cheerful and happy, which is so annoying. I would much rather be reminded of the non-descript conformity we all strive for.
-- Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
I Hate \.
Hooray... maybe Apple finally grew up. Hooray to the end of the fruityness.
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
I agree
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Pheh, you don't have to work with optical equipment that comes in "Eye Mac" colors. If a peice of equipment uses abrasive wheels it doesn't need to be translucent blue.
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
I agree.
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yeah wow... so apple killed its old CRT iMac..
boo hoo.
apple hasn't made anything 'fruity' in a while.
The closest you can get is the white LCD iMac (much better)
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Hey now! The multi-colored George Foreman grill matches the iMac used for curing kitchen boredom. Nothing like browsing for pr0n *AND* grilling up some lean burgers! Too bad the Foreman grill only takes a few minutes to cook something...
Re:RIP iMac
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The fruitiness will always be with Apple. The customers, at least.
Oh yes, everybody loves switching now. It's all about "I switched." Not only does apple lead the way as far as aesthetically pleasing design, it leads the way for sales ploys too.
Has anyone else noticed how many times they say "Switch from AOL... better features... no problems... etc." in the MSN ads?
Also, you don't see anyone making a bajillion spoofs of M$ ads... (I don't seem to remember m$ having any real ad campaigns, actually... Nothing like the most recent switch as well as some of the other great ads apple has given us.)
Your post is a capital crime.
I think our country should stop chasing turban-wearing ghosts and bring you to justice!
Seriously, that was an awful joke.
-- Sigmentation fault - core dumped
It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
ciroknight
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I'll miss the old iMacs, they really sent a shockwave throught the PC community (prompting many users to get one even if they didnt know what the hell they were getting into in the mac world), and a lot of new ideas and concepts.
I especially liked the manuals... the shortest manuals ever, something like 20 words right? But anyways, I've gotta hand it to Apple for those things lasting as long as they did, and bringing a new style and appeal to the computer market. Live long and prosper iMac..
-- "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
Slack0ff
·
· Score: 1
Im still mourning the canclation of the Mac SE's... My Mac SE FDHD is still running word 3 perfectly, only uses 1 power outlet, and is the sexiest computer ever to grace the planet.
-- Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life
-Office Space
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
Twirlip+of+the+Mists
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
All Macs use only one power outlet, unless you attach some third-party gear. On my machine right now, the mouse is plugged into the keyboard via USB, which is plugged into the monitor via USB, which is plugged into the computer via ADC, which is plugged into the wall. That's it. No other plugs.
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
rworne
·
· Score: 2
I beg to differ, we have an iBook, iMac (Lamp-style) a Quicksilver, some NeXT equipment and a bevvy of Wintel PCs & notebooks.
The Quicksilver is by far the sexiest piece of hardware to grace the planet (The MDD is too flashy), especially when paired with an Apple display.
Tastes change over time though, the NeXT cube used to be the sexiest back in the mid-1990's
Funny thing is, althought I owned many Wintel and a few Macs, I never thought of Wintel systems as "sexy" but utilitarian. The only Wintel brand to break that mold would be Sony's Vaio series esp. their notebooks.
So: NeXT cube = old and busted
Quicksilver = new hotness
-- I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
dasmegabyte
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Actually, the setup guide for the iMac was even more ingenious. I have it hung on my wall, to remind me of the subtlty everybody should strive for in computer documentation.
It's an orange book, that folds out, with 5 pictures, each representing the the plugging in of a different cable. There are no words whatsoever.
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
charon_on_acheron
·
· Score: 2, Funny
[voice=Homer] And I guess you are using some sort of network connection that doesn't use a wire. It's like the cable router somehow senses the computer's need to transmit data, and the router just picks the data out of the air. And then when the router has data for the computer it just thinks about the data really hard, and the computer reads its thoughts. Sure, Lisa. You have a magical cable router, that can send and receive data wirelessly. do-di-do-di-do...
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
pherris
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Tastes change over time though, the NeXT cube used to be the sexiest back in the mid-1990's
NeXT invented "sexy" computers. I still remember the first time I saw that black magnesium cube and thought this is the coolest thing I've ever seen in computers. Then I saw NeXTStep, an OS to match it's case. I miss both.
Have you ever heard someone talk about an x86 box this way? To many NeXT users even the beloved iMac will not be missed as much.
-- "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
He said that his computer is only using 1 power plug, not one wire. I can't decide whether you have terrible reading comprehension or a terrible sense of humor. Since you are paraphrasing the Simpsons, I guess it's probably the latter.
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Either:
A: He doesn't get it (yes, wireless network connections are possible)
B: He gets it and is making fun of people in group A.
I vote for B.
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
ktakki
·
· Score: 1
Have you ever heard someone talk about an x86 box this way?
Yes, but massive amounts of case-modding were involved.
Pardon the hackneyed analogy, but if NeXT was a Shelby Cobra, and Macs are like a gull-wing Mercedes, x86 boxes are '57 Chevys that get chopped, channeled, lowered, louvered, with chrome-plated exhausts, baby moon hubcaps, and 17 coats of hand-rubbed candy apple red paint and lacquer.
I can recall maybe two case-modded Macs mentioned on Slashdot (and a magnesium NeXT chassis that someone put into a furnace to see how well it would burn), but the number of articles on case-modded x86 PCs boggle the mind, like the Hello Kitty laptop, or the PC embedded in the mound of foam, or the PC-in-a-toolbox, or the one in the toaster...
Of course, my favorite case mod was the Vax (or was it an SGI?) that was converted into a mini refrigerator.
k.
--
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
Re:It will be missed by few, loved by many
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
As long as they keep selling the eMac, how significant is this announcement? I mean, provided that you can spend the extra coin, the eMac seems like a better choice what with the larger CRT and all.
Still, it will be hard to make a fishtank out of the flat-panel iMACs...
-- ***
Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
Re:No biggie
by
goon+america
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
Have you not heard of nostalgia?!
The original iMac may have saved Apple. That is why it garners so much deserving affection. Steve Jobs supposedly started the project 10 days after he returned to the company's staff.
I agree that the iMac played a significant role in the revival of Apple's fortunes. It was announced in May '98 along with the PowerBook G3, driving Apple to a $101 million profit in the 3rd quarter of the year.
The infamous Jobs 'reality distortion field' may have contributed to your belief that he started the project. When Jobs returned to Apple, the iMac project was already under way. The 'all in one' design had been established, although it was only a conceptual polystyrene moulding.
(Read all about it in 'The Second Coming of Steve Jobs' by Alan Deutschman - an excellent account of the recovery of the company)
The iMac didn't save Apple. It was the $150 million infusion of Microsoft cash in 1997 that saved Apple. Get your facts straight!
You mean the SETTLEMENT between Microsoft and Apple, due to Microsoft STEALING Quicktime technology? It was part of a cross licensing deal. Microsoft had to pay up.
-- Linux is only free if your time has no value.
Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
Saved Apple? That's absurd! Everyone knows Apple is teetering on the edge of ruin, and will be folding any day now... Haven't you been reading the news for the past 10 years?
Still, it will be hard to make a fishtank out of the flat-panel iMACs...
On the other hand, it will be easy to make a fishtank out of eMacs because it already contains the kitchen sink.
Whoops, wrong EMACS.
-- A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived in the earth.-Mark Twain
Re:No biggie
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Same thing with Commodore. People keep saying they are about to go out of business.
Re:No biggie
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"You mean the SETTLEMENT between Microsoft and Apple, due to Microsoft STEALING Quicktime technology? It was part of a cross licensing deal. Microsoft had to pay up."
Hmm I imagine they didn't have to develop Office for the Mac OR pay promptly. They most likely could have dragged their feet. Finally I have not seen a single person has ever point to an authoritative source that said the cash was a settlement. I have seen multiple sources including time and Apple press releases that suggested the money was insulation from insullation from possible legal recourse. So saying they owed VS proving some body like a court said they owed are two very different things. Do you have any court remedy that you can cite showing they were compelled to pay this money?
I am interested to see it if you do.
Re:No biggie
by
cameldrv
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
It's hardly that simple. Microsoft agreed to purchase $150m worth of Apple stock. Furthermore, apple had over a billion in cash at the time, so that didn't really save the company. The key thing for Apple was the commitment to continue to develop Office for the Mac. Without that, the Mac would cease to be a really viable platform.
Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann
education takes a backseat as usual
by
inputsprocket
·
· Score: 0, Troll
...but still avalailable to educational establishments.
What's with that? They think that schools are so used to old equipment, they can continue to flog their discontiued lines to them???!
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
Ponty
·
· Score: 2, Informative
It's cheaper. Eductational institutions are often compelled by budget restraints to buy lower cost items than other people/institutions. I'm sure Apple would rather they buy an older machine than no Mac at all.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
inputsprocket
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Damn, then why am I trying to flog this darn Performa on eBay for 100 Euros!
Yes, fair enough and Apple have always had their entry level Macs for many a school to whip up, and I suppose the eMac will take centre stage on that front, but there's a big difference between entry level and discontinued.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
TKinias
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
scripsit inputsprocket:
...but still avalailable to educational establishments.
What's with that? They think that schools are so used to old equipment, they can continue to flog their discontiued lines to them???!
Maybe an institution would have an interest in a standard platform? If I've already got (say) forty-five eMacs and I get the funds to add five more to my lab, is it inconceivable that I'd want to get five more like the ones I have, so I don't need to support an additional hardware configuration?
Not everything's a conspiracy...
-- In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
inputsprocket
·
· Score: 1
If I've already got (say) forty-five eMacs and I get the funds to add five more to my lab, is it inconceivable that I'd want to get five more like the ones I have...
I'd say that if you had the budget, you'd want to buy 5 more eMacs, and not 5 discontinued iMacs.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
physicsnerd
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
It's not a matter of old equipment, it's a matter of the right tool for the job. The old imac is a perfect computer for some of the applications that schools have. For instance, in a school library what are the computers used for? 1) Searching for books, and 2) doing research online. You don't need a G4 or a P4 to use Google, or to search for a book in the stacks. Apple isn't pawning off old crap on schools, they're giving sys admins more choices.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It was an analogy.
The idea is that if you run a large shop, or have a small staff, you'd want more of what your staff already deals with, to save stress on training and unexpected problems.
His point would have been just as valid if he'd said "Compaq Presario" or "Dell Dimension" instead of "eMac".
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
TKinias
·
· Score: 1
scripsit inputsprocket, quoting me:
If I've already got (say) forty-five eMacs and I get the funds to add five more to my lab, is it inconceivable that I'd want to get five more like the ones I have...
I'd say that if you had the budget, you'd want to buy 5 more eMacs, and not 5 discontinued iMacs.
<shame>OK, so I can't type.</shame>
I meant if you already had a bunch of iMacs, you might want to maintain that standardization.
-- In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
inputsprocket
·
· Score: 1
Yup, but then they should preload those 600MHz G3's with OS 9 and not OS X imho
My humble Performa, running OS 8.6 is still a VERY adequate web, email, and word processing (among other things) station. Hmmm, now where are those machines on the Apple for Education site?
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
inputsprocket
·
· Score: 1
Sorry.
But when it comes to typos, there's a big difference between an iMac and an eMac. IMO, the eMac still represents everything the iMac stands for, and should be its replacement even for educational establishements, which was the point I was trying to make originally. Now, I've been labelled twice as trolling:(
Re:education takes a backseat as usual
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Unlikely. The Fox family was using a Macintosh II-esque machine until they got their iFruit. That was, what, 1999? 2000? At least six years after that case style had been retired anyway. I'd express sympathy that Jason has to use such old equipment, but I figure since he's such a little shit he deserves it.;-p
-- Sanity is relative. For some of us it's just a distant cousin.
The computer that put Apple back on the charts
by
juushin
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
It was the computer that brought Apple back from the duldrums. Six years ago it was a revolutionary move to bundle the components like the classic Mac.
It indeed is a sad day...
Re:The computer that put Apple back on the charts
by
kfg
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
And 20 years ago it was revolutionary to "componantize" the home computer.
"There is nothing that hasn't been thought of. The trick is to think of it again." - Goethe
KFG
Re:The computer that put Apple back on the charts
by
Anonvmous+Coward
·
· Score: 1
" Six years ago it was a revolutionary move to bundle the components like the classic Mac. "
You mean like a laptop? Not trying to shoot you down here, but 6 years ago is when we saw the beginning in a sharp increase in laptop sales.
Re:The computer that put Apple back on the charts
by
juushin
·
· Score: 1
Good point, but you have to consider that 6 yrs ago laptops were hovering close in size to that of a desktop and weren't nearly as fast. Apple's design was clearly a unique move.
I never though they were too aesthetically pleasing. Though, I will say that they were pretty good (not underpowered or lacking in feature) when I used them in a Journalism class I took once.
And Ellen said...
by
KillerHamster
·
· Score: 5, Funny
...and it was like, beep beep beep... and it was, like, gone...
5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
yozzle
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
5 years is much longer time than your average x86 PC company would sell a computer for. I'm no Mac fanatic, in fact, I don't even own one, but I guess this goes to show that Apple does make solid products that last for a while.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
What you say?????
They form factor may be the same but they kept putting faster (altough slower than PC) chips and other new stuff in them. It's not like they were selling the exact same iMac for 5 years. I mean, duh.
I know this is slashdot and lately it's been a big spermy lovefest for the Macs but lets at least make an effort to be sane.
Retard.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Or is terrified of progress. You make the call.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
BlueGecko
·
· Score: 1
It would be worth remembering that the most recent iMacs had nothing in common with the original except the name and overall form factor. The mouse and keyboard have changed; DVD and CD-RW replaced the CD drive, and was made slot-loading; FireWire appeared; the speakers got overhauled; the dot pitch on the monitor steadily decreased; VGA-out got added. The iMac that Apple just discontinued only remained an iMac because it had a single form factor and was semitransparent blue plastic. For such nostalgia, the eMac ought to do fine. Otherwise, be nostalgic with a bondi-blue iMac; they're surprisingly cheap nowadays and make great email kiosks.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
malfunct
·
· Score: 1
Speaking of that, how long did the AT form factor last? How long will ATX last? hmmm
--
"You can now flame me, I am full of love,"
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
make an effort to be sane
How about an effort to be civil?
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Or is terrified of progress. You make the call.
Huh? Apple may not be perfect, but it is at least progressive.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
tmark
·
· Score: 1
That may be more because the state of the art in PCs seems to advance so much more quickly. Thinking back to the PCs of 5-years ago, there seems to be *much* bigger advances in the PC world then the incremental increases in speeds that iMac users have had to content themselves with. PC company's CAN'T sell essentially the same computer for 5 years because the market will leave them behind. Apple, on the other hand, makes and controls its own market so this can never happen - even if maybe it should.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonvmous+Coward
·
· Score: 4, Funny
"...but I guess this goes to show that Apple does make solid products that last for a while."
A friend of mine has worn the same pair of shoes for over three years now. He's got unusually proportioned feet so he can't just go to the store and pick any old pair of shoes he wants. He has to go to a specialty place.
Take a minute to let that anecdote set in.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
fobbman
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Five years is nothing. How long has beige owned the PC market?
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I just sold 3 iMacs. One 233 (original iMac) and two 333Mhz Models. Each one sold for $300.00 + shipping. That's only slightly less than what PCs go for now brand new! That's staying power : )
And when I re-installed the machines before packing them up I realized that they actually still kick butt. I popped a Belkin Wireless USB network adapter on.. and they came right up (after installing drivers of course) Fast on my cable modem.. and that's with only 6MB video ram on a ATI Rage IIc graphics part : ) even did some quick and easy photoshop stuff on them. Not bad : ) I was actually tempted not to sell one of them : )
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
tim1724
·
· Score: 4, Informative
As others have pointed out, Apple didn't sell the same machine for 5 years. Here's a useful chart showing the different versions of the G3/CRT iMac. (I think there may have been some slight variations for the educational market, in terms of memory and drives)
Things which remained the same across revisions:
Shape and size (height and weight changed slightly, I think this was due to CRT changes)
15" CRT (actually, I think different CRTs were used, but all were 15")
USB
CPU type (various revisions of the G3 processor family)
Lack of floppy drive
10/100 Mbps Ethernet
56 kbps modem
Things which changed between releases:
Price (no, it didn't start out as a sub-$1000 machine!)
color (Bondi blue, fruit flavors [strawberry, orange, lime, blueberry, grape], indigo, ruby, graphite, blue dalmation, flower power, snow)
speed (started at 233Mhz, finished at 700Mhz)
memory (32MB... 256MB)
hard disk (4GB... 60GB)
mouse (they eventually dropped that evil hockey puck but it took them too long to do that...)
keyboard (changed when the mouse changed, I think)
video card (Various flavors of ATI Rage cards, from Rage IIc to RAGE Ultra 128)
IR port.. quietly dropped in Revision C (when the fruit flavors were added)
internal expansion.. the never-supported "Mezannine" slot was dropped in Revision c)
Firewire.. introduced to some machines in 1999, but wasn't included with all machines until 2001
Airport (802.11b).. slowly added to product line, same as Firewire
Fan.. Rev. A and Rev. B had fans, the fanless iMac began with Rev. C
optical drive.. CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, CD-RW of varoius speeds (I don't think the Combo drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) or SuperDrive (DVD-RW/CD-RW) were ever available)
A number of very different machines, but all basically looked the same (ignoring color) and were sold under the same name.
-- --
Tim Buchheim
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
dasmegabyte
·
· Score: 3, Funny
I wear a 10 1/2 EEEE. Please, tell me what shoestore he goes to...I buy new New Balance sneakers every six months, and new Dunham boots every eight.
Incidentally, I buy a new mac laptop once a year, but that's just because my rich mac friend never remembers to save enough cash to pay his property taxes...
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
He buys quality shoes?
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Tycho
·
· Score: 1
iMacs came in one more color: sage.
-- Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
geekoid
·
· Score: 4, Funny
so your saying your 'friend' has an odd shaped penis?;)
-- The Kruger Dunning explains most post on/. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Just because you can find suckers that will pay too much for old computers, doesn't mean they are worth what you sold them for. I wouldn't pay $300 for an old mac, or a new PC.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Tsuzuki
·
· Score: 1
I think Apple turned production over to LG at some point, which is partly why the video logic boards tend to fail in later iMacs.
I don't own an iMac, but as others have pointed out its impact on industrial design at large has been very significant. I own one of the first G4s and a 2001 iBook, and they're both humming along quite happily. ^_^
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
OhCrap
·
· Score: 1
I have size 11 EEE feet, so I always order my shoes by mail- there is no way the mall would have anything that would fit me. I have a pair of boots that I bought from Mason Shoes- a mail order company- that I have worn for the last 6 years. I wear them every day and the sole of the boot is guaranteed for life. I believe that I will wear out before the boots do. Mason Shoes has a great return policy if you order a shoe and it doesn't fit- just send it back-no questions or problems.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonvmous+Coward
·
· Score: 1
"He buys quality shoes?"
Nar, if I were implying that I would have mentioned that he had trouble finding the right color of shoe.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
zeet
·
· Score: 1
oddballshoe.com - I wear a size 16 and have dealt with these folks before. They have the biggest selection of odd sized shoes I've seen, might be able to help you.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Wow, In Australia, no big shoe sizes either;>13. So where do the cops get theirs?Or to Apple users just have bigger feet.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually, I had a revision C and it had a fan. The fan was gone with the next version (the one without the RF shield)
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
dasmegabyte
·
· Score: 1
Well, you know what they say about guys with big feet......they have trouble typing on the skinny-ass mac keyboards.
(seriously, the other thing they say about guys with big feet is totally true, ladies, and goes double for under-pronators with wide duck feet)
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The fan was nixed with the Slot-Loading revision(Rev. E), not with Rev. C.
My mom has a Rev. D strawberry one, and it still has a fan.
*sob*
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
and on the 9th day, God gracefully ate the gumdrop.
In other news...
by
Chriscypher
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
... you can buy the same form factor from Apple, albeit called an eMac.
-- "You have liberated me from thought."
Re:In other news...
by
questionlp
·
· Score: 2, Informative
The main differences between the eMac and CRT iMac is that the eMac is a G4 (faster but requires more power and runs warmer) rather than a G3, and the eMac has a 17" CRT versus a 15" CRT.
Even still, the entry-level eMac goes for about $150-200 more than an entry-level CRT iMac... that definitely makes a difference for schools and companies on a budget.
eMacs have a fan in them while iMacs did not. This makes a big difference to some people. Not to mention that they came in colors and styles while the eMac is only white. It is generalizations like yours that make people think PCs are better than Macs when they have not even tried both to see what fits their needs.
-- Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
It was cool...
by
Bendebecker
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
It was cool, the only problem is that Apple never sells old systems and Mac addicts seem to be far less likely to sell their computers on ebay. Since I don't want to pay $800 for a computer I only want to play around with, that usually means the only macs I get are covered in grease...
Anyone know a good place to buy old (like 3-5 yr. old) Apple computers like imacs or ibooks?
-- There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes, most of us won't be able to afford
it.
-- Lemmy
Re:It was cool...
by
BMonger
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Re:It was cool...
by
TheRaven64
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Anyone know a good place to buy old (like 3-5 yr. old) Apple computers like imacs or ibooks?
You could look on eBay, but you'll notice that the price of a second hand Mac really isn't that much lower than a new Mac and people still actually buy them at this price. Something to note when considering switching, they seem to devalue much less than PCs. I've still not entirely figured out why...
refurbmaddness.com has them pretty regularly. Their best price right now appears to be $599 so I don't know if I would consider this a particularly good deal but then I think you can find one on ebay fairly easy. Original iMacs (slower obviously) can be had for much less than that and are fairly plentiful.
-- Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
You could try to get a refurbished one from an online store. I just got one (from a friend) and it's one of those iMac DV Special Edition graphite colored ones which is 400mhz G3 with a DVD-rom drive, 128mb ram, an ATI Rage 128, and an Airport slot. Best of all you dont have to take the whole thing apart just to get to the RAM since it has a door in the back with easy access to two ram slots (regular PC SDRAM DIMM's) which you can upgrade to 1024mb. I have OSX 10.2 Jaguar running on it and it runs smoothly. I've seen these lately on Ebay for around $350.
Mac addicts seem to be far less likely to sell their computers on ebay
Are you kidding? Every old Mac I've sold except one has been sold on eBay. There are always tons of used Macs for sale there. I've also bought two Macs on eBay-- I got an older Graphite G4/350 tower for my company, to be our OS X Server testbed. And I'm typing this post on my G4/733 Quicksilver. If you're persistent you can find and acquire a good machine for a decent price.
The only trouble if you're a buyer is Macs usually retain a high resale value, and there are usually a lot of people interested in the better machines-- especially now, when older machines that can run OS X well are a hot item-- so they get bid up into the stratosphere.
If you're selling, though, it's great-- I loved getting $800 for a 1.5 year old iBook 500MHz a couple months ago.
~Philly
Re:It was cool...
by
jcdick1
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Check with University of Michigan's property disposition. They are an all-Mac school.
And they have some pretty good deals, too. I got an HP LaserJet 4M+ with Postscript module, MIO, and almost new toner cartridge for $100.
Re:It was cool...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
With Intel and AMD delivering faster and more powerful processors
at a rate which makes your head swim, the consequences are plain as
day. Apple is hurting, its spindly financial footing sinking ever deeper
into that fiscal bog of no return. Frankly, many prominent industry
analysts have crunched the numbers, concluding that Apple's outlook is
bleak indeed.
In Apple's latest numbers released in January for its
fiscal first quarter of 2003, revenue fell from a year earlier and all
of the company's major computer lines saw diminished numbers. PowerMac
sales were down 20%, while iBook sales fell 8%.
At the same
time Apple's sales were falling, PC sales rose, though just slightly,
according to figures from IDC released last month.
The last
time Apple was in this state, it brought back co-founder Steve Jobs to
fix its issues. He fostered the development of the iMac and secured
a US$150-million investment from Microsoft. But there aren't any new
iMacs in Apple's future and Microsoft, bolstered by its victory over the
U.S. Department of Justice, is clearly not going to help the beleaguered
computer maker this time.
So what have you got left? Apple is
a company that controls around 3% of the computer market, has recently
undergone a restructuring and is slowly fading into nothingness. Software
makers don't even have Mac users on their radar and it's not like Apple
can bring Mr. Jobs back to right the ship this time -- he's already
there.
Check with University of Michigan's property disposition. They are an all-Mac school
This information is way out of date and wasn't correct even in 1996. U of M has a fair number of MacOS machines, but some labs (the Business School, for one) have no Macs at all and don't want any. Property Dispo has some good stuff, but it's a toss-up as to whether you can get reasonable equipment, since the students all have lots of spare time and they jump on the good deals at 7am.
-- Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
Dunno about students' acquisitions, but everywhere I go, every secretary, administrator and staff member has an iMac. I am sitting in front of one right now, in a what I assume is strawberry.
And I didn't say one wouldn't have to get there quick. Its property disposition. Its a glorified garage sale. But they have them.
Well, for one thing, Apple makes a point of having their new OS releases run on older hardware. You can run the latest OSX release on an original iMac, which is 5 years old. Try running XP on a PC that you bought 5 years ago simply by inserting the CD and clicking "install"... That means that an older machine is more useful because it can run up-to-date software (kind of like why old PC's are still useful if you run Linux of BSD on 'em:)
I've never bought from them myself but they seem well talked of on Mac sites.
I bought the 1999 issue iMac DV SE I'm typing this on from them. They rock, and their prices are fantastic.
(Not affiliated, satisfied customer, etc...)
--saint
Re:It was cool...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Wow, what a horrible, horrible website. So unfriendly to text browsers! People who don't make their websites accessible to all are arrogant and ignorant pigs who have no business creating websites at all. Just some stupid prick who doesn't know what the fuck he's doing but gets by anyway and gets paid money he doesn't even fucking deserve. FUCK OFF AND DIE, SCUM! Fucking pisses me off.
I am happy to be part of the 3% that get it. This powerbook is the best damn computer that I have ever owned. OSX is the best operating system that I have used.
If they go under then I will start to consider a PC.
Besides, Logic Audio does is not made for PCs anymore. The latency on all my midi stuff is like 2ms, better than PCs.
I'm surprised that slashdot posted about the CNET article about the end of the original iMac instead of new clustering Xserve. I mean think about it. Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of...oh nevermind.
Either the editors read your comment (and I've been struck by lightning), or you're just a good prognosticator. They did post an article about the new clustering Xserve sometime after your post.
As far as computing is concerned, the iMac was just a blip on the screen of desktop computing. But realize the impact the iMac had on industrial design for absolutely everything.
You couldn't swing a deat cat and not hit a differently colored George Foreman grill, a phone, a printer, a kitchen gizmo, some transparently housed electronic gizmo, another technologically-all-in-one-packaged device, or any combination of the two.
Lest we forget the bold step Apple gave us in dropping the floppy, and changing the way peripheral removeable storage designers view the desktop.
O Mac must be next
by
L.+VeGas
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Re:O Mac must be next
by
DLWormwood
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Appropriate joke for the Mac platform, since PowerPC processors have an eieio instruction...
-- Those who complain about affect & effect on/. should be disemvoweled
Re:O Mac must be next
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
If things go well I'll show her my O-mac. You know what I mean. O. O. O.
Thanks for the convenient link to "APPLE.COM"
by
Hao+Wu
·
· Score: 0
Slashdot finds links I never would have been able to guess on my own. I would like to ask the editors-- can I run "MS Word" on this Dell my son just bought for my birthday?
Runing a R.I.P Apple story (on the front page) on Troll Tuesday. This should be fun.
--
Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.
Educational availability
by
BWJones
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Hey, they are still available through educational channels. I just ordered another one given the success I have had with an iMac running Webvision. This site is a new iMac G3 running OS X and is getting on average 30 thousand hits/day and the machine is absolutely quiet with no fans so one can actually have their server up and running right next to your desk.
Re:Educational availability
by
bob670
·
· Score: 1
I bought my iMac 600 CRT 5 weeks ago, I always had a secret lust for an iMac and I'm glad I did it before they were gone. Listening to Dylan and the Dead and typing this on it right now.
I'm bob670, I get high with Ellen Feiss, and I escaped the 'borg.
*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
shayborg
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I don't think it's too much hyperbole to claim that the iMac was one of the most revolutionary computers -- ever. The all-in-one factor was important, certainly, though not unique by itself. Neither was USB, the lack of a floppy drive, or a round and colored case. But the combination of these (and others) in one radically different computer probably changed the history of personal computers. When was the last time you saw a large manufacturer sell a beige case? When was the last time you saw a computer that didn't come with USB? Even now, manufacturers are still slowly phasing out the floppy drive, something that Apple basically did with that one bombshell back in 1998. Love it or hate it, the iMac changed the face of computing forever, and will be remembered as such a pioneer in the annals of the history of personal computing.
My friend still has one of those. I never thought much of them when I would use it, since this was during the time I was an adamant Mac-hater. Plus, I didn't really think the different fruity colors were too aesthetically pleasing, but I guess that was my opinion - my friend thought her Mac was the best.
It was the thing that brought Apple back to the masses. However, now they have OS X to bring Apples to the geeks like me.
Um, they weren't the *same computer* they sold 5 years ago I'm afraid. I count
20 revisions made to that machine in 5 years. That gives each system a shelf life of about three months!
Re:*blink*
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I don't know where you got 20 from there, unless you counted the all but one of the flat panel iMacs and the eMac as well, for some reason. (Hint: there are more flat-panel iMacs than just the one labeled "flat panel".)
And even then, most of those "revisions" you are talking about were multiple processor options in the same revision.
Re:*blink*
by
Oculus+Habent
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Let's see... The Dell started with the 4100 in 2000. The 4200 wasn't available in the US, but they had the 4300. They introduced the 4300S, the 4400, 4500, 4500C, 4500S, 4550, and now the 4590T. This is since 2000.
There were 13 revisions to the CRT iMac, and some of them are barely revisions (The 2000 iMac DV SE was a faster processor and a bigger hard drive, no architecture/component changes beyond that). Several are component upgrades, with the base system being the same. Dell's revisions are different architectures.
Hey, 10 computers over 28 months gives Dell's systems an even shorter shelf-life than the iMac by your calculations.
-- That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
The 4300 - current models aren't very different at all. They have the same chassis and components for the most part with only the motherboard being changed because of newer bus speeds and the like. In fact one board change did nothing but switch from having two metal heat sink clamps to one built in clamp and the lastest motherboard revision did nothing but incorporate integrated ethernet on each board. The next big change will be the floppyless systems, now that is innovation!:P
Hey, I used my Rev B iMac from 1998 all the way up until this january when I got my TiBook. People said they weren't upgradable, hah! My iMac has 512 MB RAM (originally only said it could have 256 MB), a 40 gig HD (came with a 4 gig), a Gamewizard Voodoo2 3D card, and a 500 Mhz G3 processor upgrade (originally 233) with Firewire. So I'd say for a computer that "wasn't" upgradable, it stood the test of time!
-- -Alex
Re:*blink*
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I find it ironic(iRonic?) that you're mentioning "floppyless" in a comment about an article about the discontinuation of the computer that started the whole floppyless revolution. And a full 5 years after its release, no less.
Still available in other parts of the world
by
prewashedironman
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Uk apple store still has it, as does the French, Spanish, German, Austrian and Irish (and i'm guessing the rest of the world apart from The USA, but I'm too lazy to check any more countries.) They start from 999 or £649.
Education likes CRTs.
by
Trillan
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
The new iMac is better in nearly every way, but one nice thing about the old CRT-based iMac is that it is difficult to damage.
CRTs are not bullet-proof, but they are much more "bored kid with a pen"-proof than LCDs.
one nice thing about the old CRT-based iMac is that it is difficult to damage.
This is so true... I have an iMac which survived torments such as taking long train rides in a bag, falling from a table, a failed attempt at overclocking, endless LAN parties with malicious PC users, power surges, running without the case and taking dust for months, overheating, sub-zero temperatures, having a loose screw somewhere on the motherboard, being used as a seat and dragged in the snow... I probably forget many.
It's been encoding DVDs for the last 67 hours, still going fine.
Re:Education likes CRTs.
by
hobbesmaster
·
· Score: 1
This kind of post makes me want a new type of moderation: +1 Scary
Okies, I cannot speak for all LCD monitors, But Ive had a lot of them pass through my hands, both second hand and new. Yes the majority of them are fragile and it doesn't take much to lose a pixel or 10.
I must also point out one significant model that has stood out from the rest, not for clarity or resolution or pitch, (although all of them are A1). It stands out because it is tough as nails. Its an LG Studio Works 570LS. I own it, and have used it as my lan monitor for many trips around the country side to lan events. The monitor even survived one nasty roll around in the back of the car with a computer chasis. It rolled around and got what appeared to be a massive scratch in the middle of the panel. It wasn't tho, it was actually paint that had been scraped off of the chasis and onto the lcd panel. It washed off with some cleaner. The monitor was strong enough to take a scratch from a case that is SIGNIFICANTLY stronger than any child with pen. To scrape paint off a metal chasis (and a corner of the chasis no less) goes in my books as TOP STUFF.
Why doesn't anybody make desktop LCD displays with low-glare glass over the plastic LCD? I bought an Apple 17" LCD display and I'm tired of slapping my friends' hands when the reach to point at something on the screen...
So long dear friend! We will miss you! I had a rev. B. iMac Bondi Blue and it was one of my 1st investement on a Apple Computer. Lasted me 4 years and gave good service.
Long live the new iMac!
-- Apple is like a strange drug that you just cant quite get enough of they shouldnt call it Mac. They should call it crack
They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
The originals had some nasty display problems
by
t0qer
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Being a PC tech, I never really get to play with macs too much. I have had 3 with shot monitors come across my desk though.
My buddy bought some Imac with firewire for $150 bucks. AV version I think it was called. Anyways he brought it over, I patched his OS9 to its latest patches. He had it for about 2 weeks until the monitor gave out.
So of course, he brings it back to me. Having never ripped one of these things open I was excited at the prospect of tinkering around with some new hardware. Before I grabbed a screwdriver I called apple.
tech: No matter what the problem is, hold the special programmers button on the side, it erases the nvram which will make your monitor work because it has a bad analog board.
After several attempts at this and failing he gave me something else to try.
tech: press the apple key + q r a t during bootup, again this will fix your problem.
Well, again that lead nowhere.
So with the help of my fine freind google, I found a PDF service manual and some more docs. I converted the imac into a pile of electronic parts, pressed some magic button inside and still, black screen:(
Eventually I read that the analog boards on these things go out quite frequently, the replacement cost of the board went way above the $150 my friend had originally paid for it. I talked him into getting an external monitor (works now) and things were happy again.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
filterswept
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
A/V iMacs had notoriously crappy displays. I remember seeing one that "shifted" the screen up and to the left, so that the bottom right corner was in the middle of the display. Shaking the machine would cause the screen to move around, before it would settle back into some other decidedly non-standard placement. It was funny, but mostly because it wasn't mine.
Also, those things were a b-i-t-c-h to take apart. You couldn't get at anything without taking off 5 different covers, losing ten screws, custting two fingers, and breaking off three attach-point tabs.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
jjh37997
·
· Score: 1
"My buddy bought some Imac with firewire for $150 bucks. AV version I think it was called. Anyways he brought it over, I patched his OS9 to its latest patches. He had it for about 2 weeks until the monitor gave out."
Put two and two together, buddy. The reason your friend was able to buy a firewire AV iMac for just $150 was because the previous owner must have realized that the video was goign flaky.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
unitron
·
· Score: 1
So how often has google or anybody else helped you to find any x86 platform service manuals or other documentation designed for someone who knows which end of a soldering iron not to hold? If more often than never, where and for which piece of hardware?
--
I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
t0qer
·
· Score: 1
Creative Nvidia Intel Ati
Just about any of the big name chipset vendors have decent documentation. Also there's a lot of howto's on things like installing hard drives, what not.
It's really not that difficult when you get down to it. Buy brand name components, read manual, install drivers, if problem still exists goto troubleshooting section of manual or web site.
I know apple fans like doggin the x86 platform. Good hardware = no problems, doesn't matter it's an apple manufactured board or one from intel, if the QA has high standards then you will not recieve an inferior product.
This Google search turns up quite a few results of the problem if you need to see in more detail what problem I was referring too.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
unitron
·
· Score: 1
My only Apple experience is somebody gave me a IIe but no software and I'm using the monitor as a television (pretty good picture). Know where I can get an Abit BX6 schematic? Or a schematic for any x86 mobo from the past few years?
--
I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.
Re:The originals had some nasty display problems
by
t0qer
·
· Score: 1
You can't get a schematic for an imac!
In other news...
by
heldlikesound
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Alarm clock designers, cheap plastic toy manufactors, and eMachines annouced plans to "reinvent" their catalogs, creating whole new lines of items, based on the idea of a solid base, with a flexable-like and a flat screen interface.
A representative from eMachines was quoted as saying, "Good designers copy, great designers steal directly from Jonathon Ives."
Honestly, other than the "snow" colored version, I thought the iMac was pretty ugly... The new 17" however, very nice...
--
Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
See ya! Wouldn't wanna be ya!
by
nycroft
·
· Score: 1
Some say that it's too bad that Apple is letting the iMac go. But Apple needs to keep progressing ever forward. Who needs a translucent easter egg with a 15 inch screen when Mini Me has a fly laptop with a 17 inch screen and a Super Drive? If nostalgia sold computers, Apple would still be rolling out the 128k.
That's not to say that the iMac was bad or anything. It was Apple's savior. We'd all like to see Apple continue to make great computers. To do that, it's gotta kick that old freeloading 5-year old out of the house.
-- Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is enemy action.
Yea, yea, the iMac saved Apple, and I appreciate that, but I am pretty much sick of bondi blue.
Re:Good Riddance
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Apple hasn't sold a bondi blue product since the original model iMac. Since then, it's never been an option.
You must get sick of colors pretty easily.
Re:Good Riddance
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Well, no he has a point. My PC case has a nasty bondi blue transparent trim...as does my epson printer. I see it all over the place, the guy has a point. And no, I never liked it when I bought it- it was that or nothing.
But the system was quickly becoming outdated. The G3 processor combined with the Rage 128 graphics (barely updated since its introduction) simply does not run OS X very well. On an early iMac, it's downright painful. The only remaining G3, the iBook, only runs X acceptably because of its better graphics chipset.
iMac still goes on....and on.....and on
by
dethl
·
· Score: 1
My brother has my old Bondi iMac 233mhz running the 10.2.4, and its still running great. Not to mention that he put in some extra memory, but then again, all computers could use extra memory.
I wonder if they are slimming down their product line in anticipation of the PPC 970 line that is *cough, September* soon to come.
I don't think this should be called as an RIP of the iMac, since the name still lives on, albiet its a totally different form factor.
-- "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
Re:iMac still goes on....and on.....and on
by
FyRE666
·
· Score: 1
My brother has my old Bondi iMac 233mhz running the 10.2.4, and its still running great.
This just goes to show how expectations differ. I bought an iMac a few years ago to test web pages out on the browsers on that platform. It's a G3 400MHZ with 512MB RAM. I couldn't believe how bad OS9 was - I mean, crashes every few hours at best. So once OSX came out I snapped it up.
Now that was a painful experience! OSX (the first version) was worse than running Gnome+Nautilus on a 486 with 16MB of RAM! Dragging/resizing windows was horrifyingly slow. As I say, it was only there to test pages, so it wasn't really that much of an issue. So I upgraded to 10.1. Still dog slow. There was no way I could use that every day as a primary machine.
Anyway I wiped it last week and installed Yellow Dog Linux (the install is cake, BTW - couldn't be easier). I actually enjoy using the machine now - if I want to just do some browsing, or read email I often use it instead of one of my Athlon PC's. It's really nice to be able to browse with no fans whiring away in the room. I can honestly say I'm converted. I only usually use Linux on headless boxes (I do have one PC linux workstation, but don't use it much) but I like using the little iMac now. I'd urge anyone else who finds OSX too slow to give YDL a go!
I'm not pleased with the trend of removing the floppy from computers. I consider myself lucky being able to find a new laptop model with a floppy couple of months ago.
From what I've seen, quite a bit of Mac users (faculty at my university) still use floppy with their computers through the usb-floppy. And when the classic iMac came out, LS-120 was still prevelant (remember those? superfloppy drive that took BOTH 120MB superdisks and 1.44 floppies). Perhaps Apple was intending to eliminate the floppy, but I think it's still in use.
--
$cat/dev/random > Sig
Re:Sad story for all...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Is the C-Family really being phased out? I don't think so.
Did the imac beat the C64's sales record for a single model? If so thats a pretty high mark to have attained.
--
"You can now flame me, I am full of love,"
I thought the already did?
by
mesach
·
· Score: 2, Informative
I thought they dropped the gumdrop style when the LCD style came out, then changed the CRT model to the eMac...
Are they stopping sales of the eMac? show me someone who bought an CRT iMac recently please.
-- moo.
Re:I thought the already did?
by
DavidinAla
·
· Score: 1
The old G3 iMac (in the original form factor) was still available at the Apple store online as of this past weekend. I was helping a friend shop for his first Mac, and we specifically discussed that model as we considered options for him. I can't say whether people were still buying them, but they were shown as available.
David
Re:I thought the already did?
by
MaxQuordlepleen
·
· Score: 1
I bought one last weekend. It was at a big-box electronics store. Obviously they knew the retail channel was drying up and the demo unit was selling for a couple hundred below list. Always wanted to try OS X so I snapped it up.
I have a Thinkpad for my actual work, but this little iMac is the cat's ass as my home desktop...
Re:IT? No, ID!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Informative
Well, the blip wasn't as small as you might think. Without iMac, Apple might have been very insignificant by now and OS X wouldn't have been the most succesfull (and arguably the most innovative) consumer-oriented flavour of UNIX ever.
Jules Stoop
A tear for the computer that saved Apple
by
ihatewinXP
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
1997, I was a die hard PC user just begging for a reason to 'switch' (back then you called it getting rid of Win95). On the software side the Mac OS was already showing its age badly and Rhapsody was a pariah. Enter the iMac. When it was going to be a time consuming clusterfuck to finally get everyone onto the OSX-UNIX-NeXT-Carbon-Blue Box(anyone remember that?)-Cocoa new Mac OS they innovated int he only space left..Well enter 2003 and OSX is just growing up and users are still clinging to classic boxes. But the imac - a hardware revolution that brought Apple just enough limelight and revenue to keep it afloat- 5 years later and a recent slashdot poll pegged apple as going out of business: Never... It was an eye opening computer to own and i love my daily use of its decendent, the flat panel.
At the least they will live on for YEARS as macquariums.
-- ----
The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Too bad that external USB floppy drives are the number 1 peripheral.
Re:Mom likes em-The "Box(ing)" in of PC design.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I actually don't mind. I think that computer design has stagnated on the PC platform. Everything seems to be a variant on the box design. Go back through all the mod articles on Slashdot and you'll notice a common element (Box embedded in concrete, box with a picture window, etc). Now can anyone give a technical reason why this should be so?
As far as computing is concerned, the iMac was just a blip on the screen of desktop computing. But realize the impact the iMac had on industrial design for absolutely everything.
Dipping into my unreliable memory the significance of the iMac (in desktop computing) was removal of legacy items: the floppy drive and the old serial port. It seemed to kick-start the USB peripheral industry (which was pretty much the only way to add devices to it - see removal of floppy drive;-). It came with ethernet as standard which was rare in consumer models.
Well, there are a few suggestions. Your point about design is well made - I remember when even kettles tried to look like the iMac. Bizarre.
-- Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
me a number based on the order in which I joined
You mean this one!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I can see right through this...
by
raehl
·
· Score: 3, Funny
This is just the first step in paving the way for a corporate partnership between Apple Computer and Hershey Co. The Hershey Kiss shapped iMac is just around the corner, available in brown, white, or brown and white striped. Consumers may upgrade to "with almonds" for $100 extra.
Re:I can see right through this...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
(score: 4 Funny) ? who's modding this as funny?
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
Neither was USB, the lack of a floppy drive, or a round and colored case. But the combination of these (and others) in one radically different computer probably changed the history of personal computers.
What a bunch of bullshit!
Maybe dead in Steve's heart...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Informative
My iMac's not dead yet, I expect to get at least 5 or 6 years of routing and firewalling service out of it.
Seriously, the old iMacs (the DV version, in particular) make damn fine personal servers, with their reduced power consumption and perfect silence.
Re:Maybe dead in Steve's heart...
by
SimJockey
·
· Score: 1
OK, I'll bite, how do you use a single ethernet port iMac for a firewall?
I have an old iMac that will be relegated to the second string soon, which I'd love to find a use for. Every homebuilt firewall I've looked into has 2 ethernet cards as a pre-requisite. What am I missing?
-- Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
Re:Maybe dead in Steve's heart...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You can have multiple IPs on one interface. And you can also have a PPPoE or PPTP interface and an en interface on the same ethernet card.
Re:Maybe dead in Steve's heart...
by
CJ+Hooknose
·
· Score: 1
OK, I'll bite, how do you use a single ethernet port iMac for a firewall?
You buy a USB<->Ethernet adapter. These things are pretty evil and slow (~8 Mbit max, plenty for a cable/DSL connection), but they exist and they apparently work. Kernel modules for MacOS < X might be tough to find, but the standards-compliant ones are supported by Real OSes (check the docs in/usr/src/linux/Documentation/Configure.help for reported working cards, adjust file location for your OS) and you're not going to try to run a firewall/gateway on MacOS 9, are you? Didn't think so. HTH,
-- Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
Re:Maybe dead in Steve's heart...
by
MalleusEBHC
·
· Score: 1
I have a Cube (I love it to death, but I would pay a ton for an extra PCI slot) where I have the same problem - only one ethernet card. Luckily, the IP over Firewire preview from Apple works like a charm. My Cube is now able to sit on the network and filter everything coming into my LAN, all the while completely silent.
The only "downside" is that it requires the box you are connecting it to be using OS X as well, but for those of us with homogeneous OS X networks, it is fantastic.
Please, show me
by
daveschroeder
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Please point me to where I can get a dual or quad Xeon system for $2800 from a commercial vendor that will provide support for it.
Thanks.
Re:Please, show me
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Informative
Also, please prove to me that this imaginary system can "destroy" anything Apple can make at running, say, AltiVec-optimized code, like BLAST (which is of course the whole reason you'd get a cluster of Xserves in the first place).
Dollar-for-dollar, G4s will whip the absolute shit out of any Intel or AMD product **IF** the code is heavily vectorized and takes serious advantage of AltiVec. That's just the way it is. Are PCs better/faster/cheaper for a lot of other things? Yep. Is Apple hardware also sometimes the right/best/cheapest hardware for the job? Yep.
The right tool for the right job, my friend.
Re:Please, show me
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Dell PowerEdge 2650 is in roughly that price range, FYI.
That's dual 2.4[6|8] ghz xeons, scsi-based disk array, and potentially gobs and gobs of ram (nb: dell rapes you harshly on ram costs, you're better off buying good ram from a third party; the situation on the disk side is similar but not quite as highwayrobberish.) The 2650 is a nice machine, we've got several of them here @ work...
Please point me to where I can get a dual or quad Xeon system for $2800 from a commercial vendor that will provide support for it. Thanks.
With pricing available to just about any Compaq corporate customer, a dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz Proliant DL360 (rack-mount 1U server) comes in under $2800, which includes 3 year standard support. List price is ~$3500.
Re:Please, show me
by
Jaysyn
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
how about for $2803?
Here
http://www.xicomputer.com/
These guys make some of the best x86 CAD systems around. The the machine I got the above quote for is a dual Xeon 2.0, half a gig of RAM, SCSI Raid 5 (40Gb), & 1Ghz ethernet.
Apple's $2800 XServ has one 1.33GHz PPC, the Dual system starts at $3800 and I'd be willing to bet a single 3.06GHz HT Xeon could outperform it. Still not a bad deal though.
-- Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
Actually, the cluster system has the dual for the same price.
Now it's a paperweight
by
boy_afraid
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I'm an übergeek, but my wife wanted an iMac because it was cute. When we went shopping for one I asked her what specs was she looking for, g3?, 500 Mhz?, ram?, dvd drive? She just looked around pointed and said, "I want the blue one." I swear, I'm not kidding! We took it home, I set it up in 2 minutes, plugged it into our home network, she used it for a while, but then went back to using my computer. The reason she gave was that her computer was too slow when playing computer games. It seems the Java VM sucked @ss and was very very slow. She used my highspeed, water-cooled, dual monitor, 500 MB RAM system to play Pogo games on IE. Now I have it boxed up sitting in a corner in our new house. I swear I'm going to get my money out of it as soon as I can get her a desk and an 802.11b router and a wireless card for her iMac.
Anyone want an iMac??
Re:Now it's a paperweight
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
sure! I'll take it if you want to get rid of it. I'll even chip in shipping and handling! hehe
me: imneuromancer@yahoo.com
Re:Now it's a paperweight
by
Jucius+Maximus
·
· Score: 1
"When we went shopping for one I asked her what specs was she looking for, g3?, 500 Mhz?, ram?, dvd drive? She just looked around pointed and said, "I want the blue one." I swear, I'm not kidding!"
Apple understands the thought patterns of the non-technical. They know that most people think that a computer is an appliance. This is *exactly* what they were expecting.
At the time of the iMac, apple made it so that if you wanted a mac, you basically had three decisions to make;
1. Desktop or Laptop?
2. Professional or general-use?
3. Colour?
This is much simpler than the 52^347 choices you have when making a PC. Heck, I want to have all those choices, choose my preferred thermal grease for CPU cooling, rounded cables, custom fans, etc. But Apple knows that 99% of the computer-buying market doesn't know what the heck all those choices are. Therefore they simplified it to choices that everyone understands. And it worked!
Re:Now it's a paperweight
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Too bad for them that only 2 out of 100 people are that fscking stupid. I always thought you could bank on peoples stupidity (There is an over abundance right here!) but Apple has proven me wrong.
Re:Now it's a paperweight
by
The+Analog+Kid
·
· Score: 1
My dad is the sameway, when he comes over he plays Pogo, but in my apartment we act like big boys and use Mozilla, or Phoenix. I swear to god I should have bought a G4 Tower before I left the house.
Re:Now it's a paperweight
by
tuxedobob
·
· Score: 1
What has it so "revolutionized" in the computing market? Sure... Apple/Macintosh is the only company (other than IBM with its horrible line of 286-based all-in-one PS/2 units)to provide these hard-to-update all-in-one systems! I wouldn't want to be the sucker whose CRT decides to blow - leaving either the charred remnants of a computer, OR a repair bill that a millionaire wouldn't pay. Have fun "upgrading" your iMac - which is unadvisable unless you have a money tree growing in your backyard.
Fruity colors? That was just great. Now you could get migraines by simply starring at yur computer. Fortunately (both for Apple and its customers) tis is long long gone.)
The doing away of the floppy. You know, the floppy was going to die anyways since it is simply too small. I don't use the one I have right now - but I know that if I ever need it - its there. I don't want any company to impose its standard on me. 12 years ago IBM pulled the same stunt on ITS customers by shipping PS/2s with 3.5 inch floppies. Fine - the 3.5 is DEFINITELY a better media. But their customers, who had a myriad of 5.25 inch floppies, couldn't do anything but put them up their arse - or cough up the money for the 5.25 drive. Where are the PS/2s now huh?
I use these bubble-shaped turds every day, unfortunately for me. And every day I cuss at them for the horrible design of the 1-button mouse (great innovation Apple. Are you suffering from the not-invented-here syndrome?) And every day I cuss at that horrible excuse of a multitasking system they call OS 9. I could delve into a zillion things that tick me of about the bubble-mac.
A Brave Machine
by
Michael_Burton
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I had one of the original Bondi Blue iMacs. While other people were praising its beauty, I thought it was kinda ugly. As a fashion statement, the blue translucent plastic seemed somehow akin to bell-bottom trousers and leisure suits. The periodic release of new machines with different color schemes seemed to support that view.
But it was a fine computer. The original iMac was a brave departure from the beige boxes we'd all become so accustomed to. The compact all-in-one design simplified things for people who don't want to invest a lot of time in figuring out how everything goes together. (You or I may feel unfulfilled with any computer we haven't built with our bare hands from raw sand, but there are plenty of folks who just want to use the thing.)
The iMac moved things forward in part by turning its back on a lot of legacy stuff. The iMac upset a lot of long-time Mac fanatics who were upset that they couldn't plug their old ADB and serial peripherals into the USB ports. Some people were aghast at the absence of the floppy drive. Now that Dell has embraced the idea of computers without floppy drives, I guess the iMac's work here is done.
Snif... Drat... I promised myself I wouldn't cry...
-- When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
Re:A Brave Machine
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The iMac upset a lot of long-time Mac fanatics who were upset that they couldn't plug their old ADB and serial peripherals into the USB ports
I'm *still* upset. That's because I have a perfectly functioning pre-G3 with quite a few legacy peripherals. Now, I can no longer upgrade the computer or use the peripherals on anything else without forking out extra for a scsi adapter.
The old iMac says just one thing to the new one...
by
indros13
·
· Score: 3, Funny
:-P *cd-rom tray ejects*
(Yes, I know the old one didn't have tray loader, but I'm trying to be funny)
-- Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
It's the mouse...
by
Chief+Typist
·
· Score: 4, Funny
See what happens when you try to sell a computer with only one mouse button!
no doubt. i use a 5 button intellimouse explorer on my pc and use every button. i have an iBook and it is so annoying when i don't have an external mouse handy. the one button mouse is dreadful indeed.
Re:IT? No, ID!
by
ncc74656
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Did the imac beat the C64's sales record for a single model? If so thats a pretty high mark to have attained.
Are you speaking of years in production or sales volume? If it's the former of which you speak, the record holder remains the Apple IIe (1982-1993).
-- 20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
jayhawk88
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yes, thank God the iMac showed the computing industry that they should focus on style and asthetics over features and functionality. I'm so fucking glad that Dell, IBM, and HP now feel the need to change the form factors of their machines every 3 months, and in the process give me some of the most horrible, badly designed machines ever made. iMac can kiss my ass. Anyway, my favorite iMac story:
I'm working at CompUSSR as a technician. It's a slow day, and I happen to be up at the front counter of the tech department, filling out some paperwork or something. A lady walks in the front door carting an iMac in hand, and from 10 feet away I can see the anger in her eyes. She steps up to the counter, and with one emphatic push, heaves the iMac up onto the counter, where it lands with a deafening *THUD*, loud enough the whole store takes notice. She takes a few moments to catch her breath from the effort, then looks me straight in the eye, and says...
"Jeff Goldblum is a fucking liar!"
It was a good 5 minutes before I could compose myself enough to speak.
Re:Annoying fruit, iMac, dead at 5
by
AK-47
·
· Score: 1
Yeah, and fuk sega for dropping the 32x less than six months after they released it. And fuk Sony for deep sixing the ps one after all these years.
Pricing from dell
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Informative
The cheapest dual processor Xeon rackmount server from dell is a PowerEdge 2650. With all other options stripped and no OS, it's $5425 retail. For a single Xeon, subtract $500.
Please don't give me some BS about how you can build some amateur-hour machine for $2800, because I really don't fucking care. The Xserve is a supported machine from a commercial vendor, with a supported commercial UNIX, with telephone support, optional onsite support, and the ability to beat the living daylights out of Intel stuff at certain tasks. So please, the original poster needs to get a grip on reality.
Did you even read the page you linked to? It clearly says SINGLE 2.4 XEON and NO OS. You do not get dual 2.8 XEONS for $2667. To get dual 2.8 XEONS add $699 and you still need the OS. Red Hat AS 2.1 is $799. So now we're at $4165. But Dell is offering $300 off if buy before midnight tomorrow 3/19. So you can get it for a limited time for $3865. Still $1000 more than the XServe.
Do we have any reason to believe that a pair of 1.33GHz PowerPC G4 processors are as fast as a *single* 3GHz Xeon?
Well, do we?
Factors in favor of the Mac:
1) Fewer cycles per instruction
Factors in favor of the Xeon:
1) More total Hz
2) Speed scales sub-linearly with # processors (don't expect 2 processors to be 2x as fast)
3) Xeon has hyperthreading, which is supposedly like having part of a second processor.
I'm not saying the Xeon IS faster than dual PowerPCs, but I wouldn't take it for granted either way. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of benchmarks.
I don't think so. I just did the same thing. 2 1.4 PIIIs, 256 MB Ram and default HDD config (no raid), no additional hardware and added RH 2.1 AS for the OS and it came to $3294. That price is good until 3/19 then it goes up to $3594. Either you didn't actually add the second proc or you didn't add the OS.
reconfigure the box. i guess you can't link to a system which has all of the configurations one has specified, which i do routinely, every day, but with premier.dell.com =(
and btw, in that dell... hardware raid and scsi. i'll give you the ide/scsi perf battle, but hardware raid? where's that in the xserve?
-- vodka, straight up, thank you!
Ellen got a powerbook.
by
SHEENmaster
·
· Score: 1
Here is a java game that I wrote with her in it, but it reportedly has display problems in M$IE/MSVM and j2re1.4.1 for OS X. I'll rewrite it as a JApplet when I get a chance.
More concerning is the trend to eliminate the parallel port, the serial port, the PS/2 ports... etc.
These days all those functions are on one super-IO chip the computer must have anyway, so at least throw us a bone and give us headers we can connect our "legacy" devices to.
Actually I am a big fan of apple in general (I am a graphic designer) but I like the Power Macs - you know those big grey boxes that you can actually upgrade extensively and actually rival window pc enthusiasts.
When the imacs came out I thought they were terribly useless - the monitor screen was too small (I like 19" minimum - altho I use a cinema screen 22" now) Also I didn't like the fact that I didn;t come across any imacs that had dual cpu's which was what I needed for my work. All in all i'm glad these cheep pieces of crap have gone away, let apple stick to making real computer i'd say...but then again they have the wonderful lamp light taking its place...
I guess they are just trying to be "hip" and get all the noobs using crap computers instead of focusing on making fast, powerful, and solid machines....
I don't think it's too much hyperbole to claim that the iMac was one of the most revolutionary computers -- ever.
I'm gonna nit-pick now. I know that's out of character for me, but y'all just bear with me.
I don't think "revolutionary" is really the right word to use here. I think a better word would be "influential."
The Apple II was revolutionary; it created the personal computer market from scratch. The Macintosh was revolutionary; it changed the way people interact with computers. The iMac was more evolutionary than revolutionary, but the combination of its design (rounded, transluscent, tinted, happy-looking) and its design philosophy (easy and fun to use) touch everything.
So I think I would say that the iMac was the second-most influential computer ever. The most influential? The IBM PC, of course.
I agree, but it's not Apple's fault that the rest of the industry can't integrate style and functionality in one package.
Apple didn't care if YOU hated them!
by
phillymjs
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
And that's because YOU weren't their target market for them.
The iMac was designed to be used by grandmas and the like, to send e-mail and browse the web. People like grandma don't need expansion or upgrade capability. Grandma won't be swapping out her video card and processor over the weekend to squeeze a few more FPS out of Quake III. As long as the machine starts up and runs when she wants to use it, it will always be plenty fast for grandma.
Don't call them cheap crap just because they didn't meet your needs. They were very good machines, they did just what they were designed to do, and for whom they were designed to do it, period. If they didn't, the model wouldn't have survived on the price list for almost five years, so show some freakin' respect-- if not for the iMac, there might not have BEEN those Power Macs you like so much.
~Philly
Re:Apple didn't care if YOU hated them!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Maybe he wasn't but maybe he should have been. As their market continues to decrease, they should really care about everyone that is NOT an apple user.
Steve has managed to keep the company alive, barely. But that's a far cry from what he SHOULD be doing with apple.
You CAN go wrong by ignoring 98% of computer buying public.
Re:Apple didn't care if YOU hated them!
by
phillymjs
·
· Score: 1
Maybe he wasn't but maybe he should have been. As their market continues to decrease, they should really care about everyone that is NOT an apple user.
Uh huh. And maybe you should've read his friggin' post, because it's fairly obvious he IS a Mac user-- he just prefers the Power Macs, for the reasons he listed.
Steve has managed to keep the company alive, barely.
Yeah, they're SO just scraping by, with about 17 of the last 20 quarters or so being profitable, and at least half of those in a down economy. You want to talk computer companies barely alive, let's talk Gateway-- not Apple.
~Philly
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You mean like SGI has done since the late 80s?:-)
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You seem to be confusing "personal computer" with "the entire desktop machine market". There were several *very* innovative manufacturers that did creative things in the workstation scene that took years to filter down to the "PC" market ("PC" in the original sense, not just x86 machines). Examples: SGI (want to see where consumer graphics will be in five years? look at an SGI machine from five years ago.), Wildcat (on the x86 side).
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
craw
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
What was revolutionary about the iMac was the near total dependence on the plug-and-play USB interface. We didn't fully appreciate it at the time, but computers became a lot easier to deal with when one did not have to mess around with a multitude of different interfaces and cables (scsi, parallel, serial, ps2, adb,etc).
Let's see what I have now. USB mouse, keyboard, zip drive, floppy drive, scanner, Palm Pilot cradle, SD/MMC card reader, laser printer, ink-jet printer, web-cam, and link to my digital camera. All hot swappable, all plug and play, and no rebooting.
What is kind of weird is that I can remember when/. posted the story on the introduction of the iMac. Whoa, flames galore!
correct me if i am wrong
by
minus_273
·
· Score: 0
but didnt apple also stop selling the new flatscreen imac? so are imacs now extinct?
-- The war with islam is a war on the beast
The war on terror is a war for peace
Re:correct me if i am wrong
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Well... if they did, it's a cold day in hell!
I think they stopped selling the original iMac because they needed extra space on their hardware page for the two new PowerBooks and the new Xserve.
Re:correct me if i am wrong
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Re:correct me if i am wrong
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
You're wrong, and in the time that it took you to post your question to Slash, you could have typed www.apple.com in your broswer, and choose visit apple store see for your self, but that would have required that you really cared about the question, now wouldn't it?
Lest we forget the bold step Apple gave us in dropping the floppy,
Should the floppy really die? As a software tester, test analyst, and now a test team lead, I have seen many an "over the baffle" solution thrown our way. Sneakernet will always be valuable alternative in a high-pressure, low turn around time environment. Especially for small.ocx,.dll, &.ini files.
When CD's are a penny a piece and reusable, I can see his, but not yet.
I remember when I use to work at Best Buy back in 1998. We started selling the green IMac. They didn't sell too well, so, a sales rep from Apple came to the store to try to sell more Imacs. He didn't sell one IMac. Eventually we stopped selling them all together because Best buy refused to sell all the different colors. They only want to sell the green one.
--
----
"Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"
She's all washed up
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
my parents got one when they first came out. been unhappy customers ever since. imho they were awful peices of junk to begin with.
*ducks*
even besides my extreme bias aggainst apple, i do have to say the newer non-clam powerbooks are pretty damn nice. There isnt an x86 varient on the market that matches its value. think ill get one when this vaio weares out.
--
Competition in America: If you can't beat 'em, Sue 'em!
Re:2650 starts at $4K totally stripped, with 1 pro
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Informative
The Dell starts at $2,300, for a single cpu, add the second cpu, and you're at the price of the Mac. Add in an OS (Say RedHat Advanced Server, for the support from Red Hat, to be equal with Apple, and your looking around $3,600.
This is by going to Dell, small businesses, find the 2650, customize and add a CPU, and OS of choice.
This reminds me of the movie Zoolander. While idiotic, Ben Still is hilarious. Using the term Eugoogly. Kinda funny. Also, the scene where they are trying to get the "files from the computer", and the are shaking the IMac all around trying to figure out how to open it. Great stuff.
-- "I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it's going to begin"
Re:Mom likes em-The "Box(ing)" in of PC design.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Now can anyone give a technical reason why this should be so?
Because all the bits you buy are shaped in such a
way that the box is the easiest form factor to make.
Apple had the advantage of being able to build their
own bits for their boxes, the typical hobbyist does
not.
Re:2650 starts at $4K totally stripped, with 1 pro
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
When I go to configure a 2650, and strip out everything it lets me strip out, it's $4K. So please, tell me where this 3K 2650 is.
Re:The old iMac says just one thing to the new one
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually, the first ones did. They were stupid little laptop drives though, the kind that pop out an inch or so and you have to manually pull it out, snap the CD on the spindle, and push it back in.
gumdrop-shaped?!?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I say its a fancy fish bowl.
Still expensive
by
00_NOP
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Having read this I thought "right, go to ebay and buy one to run 'nix on). But they are still 75% more than an "equivalent" PC:-
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
So I think I would say that the iMac was the second-most influential computer ever. The most influential? The IBM PC, of course.
The IBM PC? Though it was influential I would say it hardly holds a candle to the iMac. The PC's influence was purely on computers, while the iMac changed the way people designed phones, pencil holders, desks, etc. Seriously, when's the last time you saw a phone at Walmart with a case design like a PC? Hell, even PCs were influenced by the iMac.
So...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Does it have a one button mouse as well?
Re:So...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
no, but it WAS the best computer ever.
THANK GOD!!!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
1 Apple down, many more models to go, Apple dont stop here, drop them all, old and new!
-- A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board:
"You know what? You're right."
Re:Mom likes em-The "Box(ing)" in of PC design.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"Because all the bits you buy are shaped in such a way that the box is the easiest form factor to make. Apple had the advantage of being able to build their own bits for their boxes, the typical hobbyist does not."
Well the problem with this argument is that if you take a modern Mac apart. You'll notice that the majority of the parts are the same standard parts (smae form factor, same maker even) that go into PCs. Some of the parts that are Mac specific, aren't ground-breaking in the form-factor department either. BTW I was talking more about the indutry in general. Not just hobbyiest, although the hobbyiest has the same limitations that a manufacturer would (what shape is a CD-ROM drive again?).
Have no fear! Daisy-chain iMac is here!
by
Decimal
·
· Score: 5, Funny
On my machine right now, the mouse is plugged into the keyboard via USB, which is plugged into the monitor via USB, which is plugged into the computer via ADC, which is plugged into the wall. That's it. No other plugs.
I guess if you need to escape out of the window real quick for some reason, you won't have to go looking for rope.:)
Still have two of the originals (almost), and the only time they gave me trouble was after a lightning hit to my home. Every ethernet device in the house went out, including two iMac motherboards. Insurance paid, but a year later I discovered after a lot of pain that the processor card had been partly fried but only showed symptoms when upgrading from 32 to 256MB RAM for OS X. Got a new processor card on eBay for $50, and it lives on and on, serving my daughters for all their school, chat, and music download needs... I expect they will drag the iMacs off to college in the next year or two. Better than worrying about an iBook being stolen!
Jobs' Mac gave us windows, icons, mice, and pointers. His NeXT computer gave us the WWW, his iMac gave us a network appliance, and his OS X gave us Unix for teenagers. Quite a set of lifetime achievements...
I'm a teenager and I use Linux...I don't think that any *nix system should be viewed as something that should not be touched by teens. Linux is a great system, and some reading (helpfiles or how-to's) anyone can learn how to use it effectively. Even if you don't want to do any reading, today's distros make it easy to get a basic system up and running without pain. I especially like the apt-get program I installed on my system. With one command I can install just about any program that I want. Windows and Mac OS X both don't offer this feature.
-- SIGFAULT
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware? (small correx)
by
zuhl
·
· Score: 1
IIRC, the mezzanine slot was ONLY on the Rev.A iMac. It was never on the Rev. B. It was there in the first place for testing purposes and they left it on in order to meet the initial run. But they sold enough that some clever folks figured out a way to make use of it. Also, the Rev. A was based on a modified PowerBook motherboard and used SO-DIMMs. Later Revs used "normal" 168-pin DIMMs like their PowerMac brethren.
Also, eventually with the intro of the slot-loading DV iMacs (Rev. C?), they began using AGP for the graphics subsystem. I have one of those (blueberry) and it is truly a great computer. Runs OS X pretty well, too, though it spends more time in OS 9 right now. Great for e-mail and Diablo II.:-) Best $1200 I ever spent.
difference bewtween a mac and pc
by
b17bmbr
·
· Score: 1
i have an old 1998 233 mhz imac (with 4gb hdd and 6mb VRAM) that i upgraded to 160MB RAM. it runs jaguar great. can do all my LAMP (okay no L) development and even run office X (i know). try running XP on anything 5 years old. you can't. i haven't tried to run linux on it. pc hardware just deosn't have the lasting power, it seems. i wonder if apple tests their stuff on older hardware too. they might charge for jaguar, but many mac users can upgrade on their existing hardware. every new version of windows has required new hardware.
-- My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
Re:difference bewtween a mac and pc
by
dfj225
·
· Score: 1
Yea thats nothing special....I am typing this right now on a PC from the same year (PII 400 with 128 mb of ram) running RedHat 8.0 with KDE blazin w/ transparent menus and all. Hardware is hardware dude,it all ages at the same rate. Plus, I have a friend who has 233 PC that is running XP with only 128 mb of ram. You see, if in 1998 the PC and the Mac were of equal power (lets just assume that for the sake of argument) then today, they are of the same power. Nothing has changed, software design is the same for both platforms (in a general sense, its not like Mac programs are dramatically less taxing on a system or something like that), so therefore a PC from 1998 and a Mac from 1998 both equally outdated.
-- SIGFAULT
Re:difference bewtween a mac and pc
by
b17bmbr
·
· Score: 1
yes they're both "outdated". and yes, hardware ages at the same rate. the point is that mac hardware/software has a longer useful lifespan, and is more upgradable as far as os's are concerned. i would like to know how xp runs on that old pc. i'm sure it "runs", but what is lacking?
software design is the same for both platforms (in a general sense, its not like Mac programs are dramatically less taxing on a system or something like that)
i would argue that one. especially on os x, software design is not essentially the same. consider two similar apps using MFC, VB, and Cocoa. The MFC and VB apps will be 2-3 times as alrge and require much more memory.
-- My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
Re:difference bewtween a mac and pc
by
krouic
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
I bought a Dell PII 266 MHz about 6 years ago (64 Mb RAM, 6Gb HD). I have since upgraded the RAM to 128 Mb, the HD to 20Gb and the original 2D Gfx card to a 3D capable one. It runs Windows XP/ Office XP flawlessly, although not like a racing horse. It runs most of the recent games, with Gfx options set to a minimum.
I predict its end of life as a gaming machine in about 2 years, as the motherboard does not have an AGP slot, the PCI 3dfx card is not supported anymore and all new Gfx cards require AGP.
Of course, it was the most powerful configuration that could be bought then, but it shows that quality made PC can last as long as Macs.
The real issue is that so many of the products the original poster is refering to are crap. There was a definite mentality that if someone took a random product and replaced its case with a cheap, pastel, translucent plastic case, it would instantly become cool.
I agree with the original poster... the sooner that fad dies, the better. There's more to stylish design than translucent plastic, and blindly applying an idea to everything you can get your hands on because someone else did it successfully is just another form of conformity
Not that I dont think it looks absolutely horrific, but for the record I've found most of that translucent plastic they use on everythign from iMacs to whatever the hell else they wanna make "cool" to be very durable.
Once in high school, an iMac fell off a desk in the lab and bounced off the floor. Crashed the dsik real good, but the rest of the machne was unharmed. *shrug*
I'm talking about all the "jump-on-the-translucent-bandwagon" stuff being crap, not Apple machines. I generally like Apple's designs quite a bit, and find them very high-quality. What I hate is the concept of taking a case, using the exact same blocky design that's always been used, but making it out of cheap translucent plastic, and thinking it's now magically cooler.
Heck, even when it's not cheap plastic it's usually horribly ugly. The early USB ZIP drive that's the same old design but in translucent blue is a perfect example.
Re:Cheap crap != conformity?
by
Pharmboy
·
· Score: 1
Heck, even when it's not cheap plastic it's usually horribly ugly. The early USB ZIP drive that's the same old design but in translucent blue is a perfect example.
I agree. Some things look better when you CAN'T see everything inside. WHY would need or want to see the inside of a zip drive anyway, unless you are trying to figure out that whole 'click of death' thing.
Now that I thing about it, this would apply to porn as well. I don't need to see the inner workings in order to appreciate the functionality.:D
-- Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
Re:Cheap crap != conformity?
by
dnahelix
·
· Score: 1
uh... plastic is plastic. It doesn't matter what color it is or how translucent it is. Anything you see with bright translucent plastic, as a new design, was most likely dull, opaque plastic previously.
You may not like the design sense but calling it 'cheap crap' is silly. If you want a stapler made out of fine hardwoods and gilt, then go buy one!
I also don't think anyone is designing their product 'blindly' or doing something to make their product 'cool' It's done because marketing research shows that the current consumer wants a brightly colored appliance over a dull colored appliance.
-- Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
I Hate \.
George Foreman is a company/man, not sure which, who produces cooking grills in North America.
-- God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
Re:*sniff* (a eulogy)
by
toddhisattva
·
· Score: 1
Heh, I think Twirly left the smiley off his last sentence;-)
Best all-in-one EVER...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
...and my rev. A is still going strong, albiet modded to the gills. It continues to serve my site 24/7 and does a fantastic job. Thanks for a great machine, Apple!
Shape and size (height and weight changed slightly, I think this was due to CRT changes)
The case design retained the same basic look, but was actually changed fairly significantly in 1999 when they introduced the DV models. The original iMacs had an FCC-mandated metal RF shield surrounding most of the components and visible through the translucent case, obscuring the view of most of the actual functioning stuff; the surface of the plastic case was molded with a slight texture that somewhat artfully obscured the view of the shield/interior, allowing a "hint" of a glimpse of it. In late 1999, when Apple introduced the DV models, they introduced a new case design (codenamed "Kihei") that incorporated the RF shielding in the plastic, eliminating the need for the metal shield (and hence making the interior more interesting to look at). They slightly resculpted the entire case to be slightly shorter (taking up a tiny bit less space) and eliminated the texturing, making it easier to see through to the actual components inside; this also facilitated the convection cooling you mention. The new case also got rid of the door that covered the ports on the side of the old case, exposing the ports in a recess on the side, and also replaced the tray-loading optical drive with a car-style slot-loading one.
best buy was the reason they didn't sell
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I worked at the Mcallen Texas store for a day as an Apple rep when they first came out. I had countless people asking about it, deciding to purchase it and when it came time to get one out of storage the sales people did not want to get them. Which had nothing to do with commision as I have heard some people bable on about since the employees get nothing out of any sale other that a pat on the back for a job well done. Instead they insisted that the customers get a Packard Bell (or HP, I can't remember which) several times throughout the day. Needless to say, they didn't take home the iMac. I think that Best Buy carrying the iPod is a step in the right direction. I recently stepped in Compusa in Mcallen and was in heaven. A fairly decent selection of Apples. The sales people were very open about both platforms. If somebody wanted Apple thats what they got without any hassles and same goes with PCs. When somebody was asked the difference between the two, they were given a good explination and were given a choice as to where to go.
And in other news...
by
dfj225
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Ford no longer sells the 1998 model Taurus and has instead replaced it with the model year 2003 line. Anaylists were left baffled at this move. One remarked, "Who thougth Ford would make such a drastic move as this? Updating their models and not selling the older ones...I'm baffeled!" Similar trends have been noticed in just about every other freakin company on earth! So why is this front page/. news?
-- SIGFAULT
Re:And in other news...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually you are fucking moron. That is the worst example possible.
The Taurus platform has not been updated in YEARS. The Taurus has not had any substansial powertrain changes since 1996, and the chassis is still the original 1986 design.
Because this is/., not a marketing and company strategy report for apple!, 'News for Nerds' could constitute classic iMacs being cut, just as the G4 cube being cut was news! Also, even though apples is not selling these publicly, as the article says they are still producing iMacs and selling them to educational establishments
I think you missed the point of my post, it was sarcasm that was meant to prove the point that this is not really news for anyone, Wall Street Journal or/. When I read/. I expect to see something that is really cool, thought provoking, or related to deep technology. The fact that Apple has stopped selling an old brand that it carries is something that is logical. With, I'm sure, hundreds of story submissions daily and only 8 picked for front page, I don't think this was worthy of being picked. I'm sure there was some article that was more interesting that got passed over. I don't mind seeing interesting news about Apple posted on/., but anymore it seems like anything with the words Apple, Mac, or OS X gets instantly posted on the front page.
-- SIGFAULT
Re:And in other news...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It is funny, but you should reallize that the iMac was upgraded many times, so the analogy (like most) isn't very good.
Also, your point is wrong. It is news. I can't believe they can still find suckers to buy computers with build in 15" monitors. Yuck.
wrong...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
heavier but smaller. trust me on this one i carry a lot of both.
Re:wrong...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Wow, a 17" eMac is smaller than a 15" iMac? Apple is even more amazing than I thought!
Is eMachines now free to sell their iMac lookalike?
-- If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
Excellent!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It seems in short time I'll be able to afford an Apple, finally. This discontinued one, that is.
I trust it cab run Linux (Yellow Dog, probably -- any other version?).
Also, they should make excellent X-terminals since they lack de CPU box.
Now if only those MAc fanatics would make a lot of money so they can buy the new expensive Apples and sell this old iMac to me...
both?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
i own macintosh computers that i have bought. i also own linux, solaris, and sgi boxen. they have their strengths- but the mac is by far the 'easiest' to do movie editing, music, photog. etc.
[quote]With WindowsXP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote]s/WindowsXP/Windows200/ s/Windows200 0/Windows NT/ s/Windows NT/Windows 98/ s/Windows 98/ Windows 95/ s/Windows 95/Windows 3.1/ s/Windows 3.1/Windows 3.0/ s/Windows 3.0/Windows 2.0/ s/Windows 2.0/Windows 1.0/
It's good to have a dream.
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware? (small correx)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
incorrect. the "rev b" imac has the mezzanine slot...i know, i own one.
I got your stapler right here...
by
MsGeek
·
· Score: 4, Funny
One of the fundamental laws of the universe is that sooner or later, everything becomes Office Space. Everything that doesn't become Office Space becomes This Is Spinal Tap.
-- Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
The one time I tried snowboarding, I had to wear a size 14 boot. It still wasn't wide enough. I was pretty good at the snowboarding part, considering I was wearing clown shows, but we had to give up after only being on the slopes for an hour because my feet were bleeding.
Or even the other way around! We've got an old Windows machine in a room on one end of the house, and we didn't feel like buying a wireless adapter for it (or stringing 100ft of ethernet cable over there). So the few times it needs to get on the internet, we just bring the iBook over, plug in a cable between the two, and have the iBook set to share its Airport connection to the rest of the house network. Cool thing about newer Mac ethernet ports is that they auto sense the TX/RX lines, eliminating the need for a crossover cable in this case.
The original VW bug is still made in Mexico and another third-world country I can't remember of.
Guess nobodys cares as much for round colorful coputers as they do about cars....
-- In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
Re:IT? No, ID!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Nah, I don't believe the George Foreman brand character actually exists. I think he's really just a figment of some advertising executive's vivid imagination, much like the Keebler elves, the Quaker Quaker, Betty Crocker, and Martha Stewart.
--
"The difference between that which is real and imagined lies solely within
one's perception. The true power of a strong imagination lies within one's
ability to impose their reality upon others." - T. Dozier
Well in that case, I'll sell you a piece of history:-D I have a Rev B iMac sittin right next to me, haha. Remember, the price is at a premium now cuz it's a collectors item
A hideous looking but magnificently functional design for its intended use. The best thing about them? Quiet. Who needs a quiet fan when you _ d o n ' t _ n e e d _ a _ f a n !
I had to support a variety of those iMac thingies over the years, and I was sad when they dropped the IR port. I nearly wet the floor when I was looking at that port and had the user's Palm III in my hand, then on a whim instead of setting up his cradle I just pointed it and pressed hotsync... and it did.
OK, I know it's normal for laptops, but usually fussy. This just... worked.
A few years later I was problemsolving a printing crisis with a bad ethernet cable and no crimp goodies. Again, point the oldy-but-goody bondi iMac and shoot at the HP printer with 20 seconds of configuration... and it prints. Damn!
And yes, after I realized they were just a laptop with a CRT glued on, I used the handle to lug them between buildings.
Even better, the heat vents were wisely on a slope, so the cats could never settle down on them.
Maybe Apple likes us!
Or maybe we're just technologically backward;)
-johnl
You must be thinking of the new iMac.
by
Trillan
·
· Score: 1
I don't know what size the new iMac is. However, the eMac is both bigger and heavier than the iMac (although it's a bit less deep due to a shorter tube).
iMac: 15.8" H x 15.2" W x 17.6" D (40lbs)
eMac: 15.8" H x 15.8" W x 17.1" D (50lbs)
I have an orange iMac, which we keep in a public room on the first floor (my wife checks email througout the day.) I actually really like the colored iMacs and the translucent sides. It goes well with the rest of our stuff. I suppose a completly non-descript computer would blend in, but how boring is that? If I pay over $500 for something, it might as well look interesting.
-- It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
Farewell, faithful friend
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
*sniff* We'll miss you, original iMac.
Re:Apple dying
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
[quote]With WindowsXP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote]
Looks like SOMEbody's been spending too much time chatting with UBB!;)
Computers should look like lamps. At least, flatpanel computers should.
Somebody in the ancient past here on/. made a great point about the CRT iMac once; they said the design was like a shark. It was simply evolved to the most logical, streamlined form given the necessity of the parts contained therein.
The flatpanel iMac really is a stupendous design. I'm the first to pick on the niggles, too: for instance, if the keyboard's legs are extended and located close to the iMac base, the disc tray bumps into it) but those are few and far between. Even the round base, which is the most likely target for the form-over-funtion argument, supplants this by offering the ability to rotate the iMac, thus giving you both a 'side'-mounted drive tray and access to ports...an Apple sales guy hit me with this when they came out. I mentioned that there should be easy-to-reach ports on the side at least, and he picked up the iMac - by the arm, which was also surprising at the time - and rotated it 90 degrees. That was slightly mindblowing.
Anyways. I think the only thing keeping the new iMac shape from becoming as ubiquitous for desktops as the Sony Trinitron black-matte design became for televisions is the fact that Apple won't likely let anyone get even close to that design without suing them for a trade dress violation.
Yes, thank God the iMac showed the computing industry that they should focus on style and asthetics over features and functionality. I'm so fucking glad that Dell, IBM, and HP now feel the need to change the form factors of their machines every 3 months, and in the process give me some of the most horrible, badly designed machines ever made. iMac can kiss my ass.
That doesn't make any sense. You blame Apple for the shortcomings of those other companies?
Hey, guess what. There's this supa-cheap knockoff of transluscent housing around the spectacularly lame case of my work PC. It's actually sharp enough to almost cut you when you reach for the CD drive. So fuck you, Apple, for providing an impetus of design that these lacklustre PC manufacturers just could not handle, even while they tried to capitalize on the new craze of coloured computers while not getting it at all.
-- If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
There are more than you think...
by
Paradox
·
· Score: 1
Actually there is a fair amount of modding going around in the Apple world. It just seldom gets mentioned. The clamshell iBook was particularly popular for very beautiful custom paint jobs, and the quicksilver G4's have had people play with them quite a bit as well.
I guess I do kinda miss the days of spraypainting my PC to give it a neat color then hand-painting the faceplates of the CDROM and whatnot. Maybe just for masochistic reasons though....
Everyone assumes that. While the iMac surely did a lot to restore Apple's mindshare, in fact the company had already gone back into profitability with the G3 PowerMacs.
[quote]With Windows 2K there is no need for Classic Mac any more.[/quote] s/Windows 2K/Windows ME/ s/Windows ME/Windows 98/ s/Windows 98/ Windows 95/ s/Windows 95/Windows 3.11 (and WFW)/ s/Windows 3.11 (and WF Workgroup)/Windows 3.1/ s/Windows 3.0/Windows 286 & Windows 386/ s/Windows 286 & Windows 386/Windows 2.03/ s/Windows 2.03/Windows 2.0/ s/Windows 2.0/Windows 1.0/
# Some on-line sources quote that Windows 2.03 # is actually Windows/386. It's strange, as I # recall I'd installed Windows 2.03 on my AT- # compatible machine featured 80L286-12, and it # tooks at least 1 year for the Windows/286 and # Windows/386 to be in the market.
[quote]With Windows XP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote] s/Windows XP/Windows 2K Pro/ s/Windows 2K Pro/Windows NT4/ s/Windows NT4/Windows NT3.x/ s/Windows NT3.x/Windows NTx.x/
The UK apple store isn't selling the iMac classics, however if you goto it (http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/ukstore/) , before the picture loads, the text and hover text says 'iMac clasic', but its a picture of new displays, uncanny!
-- Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
Re:IT? No, ID!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'm old enough to remember when translucent phones and alarm clocks weren't sexy, they were cheap Taiwanese imports sold at discount stores. (This was also about the time when New Wave music hit the scene.)
How things change.
Re:IT? No, ID!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I pay about the same price now for a CD-RW as I did for a 5 1/4" SSSD floppy in the mid-'80s.
So, yeah, I think it is time for the floppy to go.
Whoops! I certainly didn't mean to suggest that "*nix is not for teenagers". In fact I'd been trying to teach some *nix to my kids for ages. OS X did it for me. Lindows or other Linux may do it for others.
FWIW, you can install fink on a Mac with OSX and apt-get to your heart's content.
-- ThosEM
eOne
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
They may now call it eOneMore...
Re:5 year lifespan for hardware? (small correx)
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The mezzanine slot was on Rev. A and Rev. B both. All revisions up to Slot-Loading(Rev. E) used SODIMMs, and were approximately equivalent to the low-end PowerBook at the time.
The Rev. A and Rev. B were at the same time as the "Wallstreet" PowerBook, which had a G3/233 on the low end at the time. Rev. C was a minor upgrade and matched the mid level PowerBook, also "Wallstreet", and had a G3/266. Rev. D matched the "Lombard"/Bronze Keyboard/1999 PowerBook, and had a G3/333.
Apple also released today an Xserve Cluster Node that has no graphics card and starts at $1000 than the high-end Xserve.
"The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
Ahh, the end of an age. The only computer my mother ever used that almost completely replaced my usefulness.
Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
Perhaps now that people realize Apple has stopped selling fruit colored computers we can see the end of all the pink and purple translucent plastic office products...
I'll miss the old iMacs, they really sent a shockwave throught the PC community (prompting many users to get one even if they didnt know what the hell they were getting into in the mac world), and a lot of new ideas and concepts.
I especially liked the manuals... the shortest manuals ever, something like 20 words right? But anyways, I've gotta hand it to Apple for those things lasting as long as they did, and bringing a new style and appeal to the computer market. Live long and prosper iMac..
"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
As long as they keep selling the eMac, how significant is this announcement? I mean, provided that you can spend the extra coin, the eMac seems like a better choice what with the larger CRT and all.
Still, it will be hard to make a fishtank out of the flat-panel iMACs...
*** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
...but still avalailable to educational establishments.
What's with that? They think that schools are so used to old equipment, they can continue to flog their discontiued lines to them???!
I wonder if this means the newspaper comic Fox Trot will retire its iFruit computer.
This is the real signature
(Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
It indeed is a sad day...
I never though they were too aesthetically pleasing. Though, I will say that they were pretty good (not underpowered or lacking in feature) when I used them in a Journalism class I took once.
...and it was like, beep beep beep... and it was, like, gone...
5 years is much longer time than your average x86 PC company would sell a computer for. I'm no Mac fanatic, in fact, I don't even own one, but I guess this goes to show that Apple does make solid products that last for a while.
and on the 9th day, God gracefully ate the gumdrop.
... you can buy the same form factor from Apple, albeit called an eMac.
"You have liberated me from thought."
It was cool, the only problem is that Apple never sells old systems and Mac addicts seem to be far less likely to sell their computers on ebay. Since I don't want to pay $800 for a computer I only want to play around with, that usually means the only macs I get are covered in grease...
Anyone know a good place to buy old (like 3-5 yr. old) Apple computers like imacs or ibooks?
There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
most of us won't be able to afford it.
-- Lemmy
I'm surprised that slashdot posted about the CNET article about the end of the original iMac instead of new clustering Xserve. I mean think about it. Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of...oh nevermind.
check out the best blog ever:
http://oehlberg.com
As far as computing is concerned, the iMac was just a blip on the screen of desktop computing. But realize the impact the iMac had on industrial design for absolutely everything.
You couldn't swing a deat cat and not hit a differently colored George Foreman grill, a phone, a printer, a kitchen gizmo, some transparently housed electronic gizmo, another technologically-all-in-one-packaged device, or any combination of the two.
Lest we forget the bold step Apple gave us in dropping the floppy, and changing the way peripheral removeable storage designers view the desktop.
Old Macdonald had a farm.
e Mac
i Mac
e mac
i Mac
O Mac
'Course my fave is BigMac.
Best Windows Freeware
Slashdot finds links I never would have been able to guess on my own. I would like to ask the editors-- can I run "MS Word" on this Dell my son just bought for my birthday?
I suggest you read Slashdot
Runing a R.I.P Apple story (on the front page) on Troll Tuesday. This should be fun.
Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.
Hey, they are still available through educational channels. I just ordered another one given the success I have had with an iMac running Webvision. This site is a new iMac G3 running OS X and is getting on average 30 thousand hits/day and the machine is absolutely quiet with no fans so one can actually have their server up and running right next to your desk.
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
I don't think it's too much hyperbole to claim that the iMac was one of the most revolutionary computers -- ever. The all-in-one factor was important, certainly, though not unique by itself. Neither was USB, the lack of a floppy drive, or a round and colored case. But the combination of these (and others) in one radically different computer probably changed the history of personal computers. When was the last time you saw a large manufacturer sell a beige case? When was the last time you saw a computer that didn't come with USB? Even now, manufacturers are still slowly phasing out the floppy drive, something that Apple basically did with that one bombshell back in 1998. Love it or hate it, the iMac changed the face of computing forever, and will be remembered as such a pioneer in the annals of the history of personal computing.
::bows and gets off his soapbox::
-- shayborg
It was the thing that brought Apple back to the masses. However, now they have OS X to bring Apples to the geeks like me.
Um, they weren't the *same computer* they sold 5 years ago I'm afraid. I count 20 revisions made to that machine in 5 years. That gives each system a shelf life of about three months!
Uk apple store still has it, as does the French, Spanish, German, Austrian and Irish (and i'm guessing the rest of the world apart from The USA, but I'm too lazy to check any more countries.) They start from 999 or £649.
The new iMac is better in nearly every way, but one nice thing about the old CRT-based iMac is that it is difficult to damage.
CRTs are not bullet-proof, but they are much more "bored kid with a pen"-proof than LCDs.
So long dear friend! We will miss you! I had a rev. B. iMac Bondi Blue and it was one of my 1st investement on a Apple Computer. Lasted me 4 years and gave good service.
Long live the new iMac!
Apple is like a strange drug that you just cant quite get enough of they shouldnt call it Mac. They should call it crack
The eMacs are quite a bit bigger.
gumdrops.
They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
Being a PC tech, I never really get to play with macs too much. I have had 3 with shot monitors come across my desk though.
:(
My buddy bought some Imac with firewire for $150 bucks. AV version I think it was called. Anyways he brought it over, I patched his OS9 to its latest patches. He had it for about 2 weeks until the monitor gave out.
So of course, he brings it back to me. Having never ripped one of these things open I was excited at the prospect of tinkering around with some new hardware. Before I grabbed a screwdriver I called apple.
tech: No matter what the problem is, hold the special programmers button on the side, it erases the nvram which will make your monitor work because it has a bad analog board.
After several attempts at this and failing he gave me something else to try.
tech: press the apple key + q r a t during bootup, again this will fix your problem.
Well, again that lead nowhere.
So with the help of my fine freind google, I found a PDF service manual and some more docs. I converted the imac into a pile of electronic parts, pressed some magic button inside and still, black screen
Eventually I read that the analog boards on these things go out quite frequently, the replacement cost of the board went way above the $150 my friend had originally paid for it. I talked him into getting an external monitor (works now) and things were happy again.
Alarm clock designers, cheap plastic toy manufactors, and eMachines annouced plans to "reinvent" their catalogs, creating whole new lines of items, based on the idea of a solid base, with a flexable-like and a flat screen interface.
A representative from eMachines was quoted as saying, "Good designers copy, great designers steal directly from Jonathon Ives."
Honestly, other than the "snow" colored version, I thought the iMac was pretty ugly... The new 17" however, very nice...
Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
Some say that it's too bad that Apple is letting the iMac go. But Apple needs to keep progressing ever forward. Who needs a translucent easter egg with a 15 inch screen when Mini Me has a fly laptop with a 17 inch screen and a Super Drive? If nostalgia sold computers, Apple would still be rolling out the 128k.
That's not to say that the iMac was bad or anything. It was Apple's savior. We'd all like to see Apple continue to make great computers. To do that, it's gotta kick that old freeloading 5-year old out of the house.
Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is enemy action.
Yea, yea, the iMac saved Apple, and I appreciate that, but I am pretty much sick of bondi blue.
But the system was quickly becoming outdated. The G3 processor combined with the Rage 128 graphics (barely updated since its introduction) simply does not run OS X very well. On an early iMac, it's downright painful. The only remaining G3, the iBook, only runs X acceptably because of its better graphics chipset.
My brother has my old Bondi iMac 233mhz running the 10.2.4, and its still running great. Not to mention that he put in some extra memory, but then again, all computers could use extra memory.
I wonder if they are slimming down their product line in anticipation of the PPC 970 line that is *cough, September* soon to come.
I don't think this should be called as an RIP of the iMac, since the name still lives on, albiet its a totally different form factor.
"Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
I'm not pleased with the trend of removing the floppy from computers. I consider myself lucky being able to find a new laptop model with a floppy couple of months ago.
From what I've seen, quite a bit of Mac users (faculty at my university) still use floppy with their computers through the usb-floppy. And when the classic iMac came out, LS-120 was still prevelant (remember those? superfloppy drive that took BOTH 120MB superdisks and 1.44 floppies). Perhaps Apple was intending to eliminate the floppy, but I think it's still in use.
$cat
Is the C-Family really being phased out? I don't think so.
Did the imac beat the C64's sales record for a single model? If so thats a pretty high mark to have attained.
"You can now flame me, I am full of love,"
I thought they dropped the gumdrop style when the LCD style came out, then changed the CRT model to the eMac...
Are they stopping sales of the eMac? show me someone who bought an CRT iMac recently please.
moo.
Well, the blip wasn't as small as you might think. Without iMac, Apple might have been very insignificant by now and OS X wouldn't have been the most succesfull (and arguably the most innovative) consumer-oriented flavour of UNIX ever.
Jules Stoop
1997, I was a die hard PC user just begging for a reason to 'switch' (back then you called it getting rid of Win95). On the software side the Mac OS was already showing its age badly and Rhapsody was a pariah. Enter the iMac. When it was going to be a time consuming clusterfuck to finally get everyone onto the OSX-UNIX-NeXT-Carbon-Blue Box(anyone remember that?)-Cocoa new Mac OS they innovated int he only space left..Well enter 2003 and OSX is just growing up and users are still clinging to classic boxes. But the imac - a hardware revolution that brought Apple just enough limelight and revenue to keep it afloat- 5 years later and a recent slashdot poll pegged apple as going out of business: Never...
It was an eye opening computer to own and i love my daily use of its decendent, the flat panel.
At the least they will live on for YEARS as macquariums.
---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
Too bad that external USB floppy drives are the number 1 peripheral.
I actually don't mind. I think that computer design has stagnated on the PC platform. Everything seems to be a variant on the box design. Go back through all the mod articles on Slashdot and you'll notice a common element (Box embedded in concrete, box with a picture window, etc). Now can anyone give a technical reason why this should be so?
Dipping into my unreliable memory the significance of the iMac (in desktop computing) was removal of legacy items: the floppy drive and the old serial port. It seemed to kick-start the USB peripheral industry (which was pretty much the only way to add devices to it - see removal of floppy drive ;-). It came with ethernet as standard which was rare in consumer models.
Well, there are a few suggestions. Your point about design is well made - I remember when even kettles tried to look like the iMac. Bizarre.
Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
me a number based on the order in which I joined
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/uc lickcomics/20030316/cx_ft_uc/ft20030316&e=3&nc id=
Cracks me up
Oh, wait.
Never mind.
This is just the first step in paving the way for a corporate partnership between Apple Computer and Hershey Co. The Hershey Kiss shapped iMac is just around the corner, available in brown, white, or brown and white striped. Consumers may upgrade to "with almonds" for $100 extra.
paintball
Neither was USB, the lack of a floppy drive, or a round and colored case. But the combination of these (and others) in one radically different computer probably changed the history of personal computers.
What a bunch of bullshit!
My iMac's not dead yet, I expect to get at least 5 or 6 years of routing and firewalling service out of it.
Seriously, the old iMacs (the DV version, in particular) make damn fine personal servers, with their reduced power consumption and perfect silence.
Please point me to where I can get a dual or quad Xeon system for $2800 from a commercial vendor that will provide support for it. Thanks.
I'm an übergeek, but my wife wanted an iMac because it was cute. When we went shopping for one I asked her what specs was she looking for, g3?, 500 Mhz?, ram?, dvd drive? She just looked around pointed and said, "I want the blue one." I swear, I'm not kidding! We took it home, I set it up in 2 minutes, plugged it into our home network, she used it for a while, but then went back to using my computer. The reason she gave was that her computer was too slow when playing computer games. It seems the Java VM sucked @ss and was very very slow. She used my highspeed, water-cooled, dual monitor, 500 MB RAM system to play Pogo games on IE. Now I have it boxed up sitting in a corner in our new house. I swear I'm going to get my money out of it as soon as I can get her a desk and an 802.11b router and a wireless card for her iMac.
Anyone want an iMac??
Oh the horror! The Horror!
What will the world ever do without yet another overpriced overblown computer?
Linux works just fine on my Athlon, thank you.
I had one of the original Bondi Blue iMacs. While other people were praising its beauty, I thought it was kinda ugly. As a fashion statement, the blue translucent plastic seemed somehow akin to bell-bottom trousers and leisure suits. The periodic release of new machines with different color schemes seemed to support that view.
But it was a fine computer. The original iMac was a brave departure from the beige boxes we'd all become so accustomed to. The compact all-in-one design simplified things for people who don't want to invest a lot of time in figuring out how everything goes together. (You or I may feel unfulfilled with any computer we haven't built with our bare hands from raw sand, but there are plenty of folks who just want to use the thing.)
The iMac moved things forward in part by turning its back on a lot of legacy stuff. The iMac upset a lot of long-time Mac fanatics who were upset that they couldn't plug their old ADB and serial peripherals into the USB ports. Some people were aghast at the absence of the floppy drive. Now that Dell has embraced the idea of computers without floppy drives, I guess the iMac's work here is done.
Snif... Drat... I promised myself I wouldn't cry...
When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
(Yes, I know the old one didn't have tray loader, but I'm trying to be funny)
Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
See what happens when you try to sell a computer with only one mouse button!
Are you speaking of years in production or sales volume? If it's the former of which you speak, the record holder remains the Apple IIe (1982-1993).
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
Yes, thank God the iMac showed the computing industry that they should focus on style and asthetics over features and functionality. I'm so fucking glad that Dell, IBM, and HP now feel the need to change the form factors of their machines every 3 months, and in the process give me some of the most horrible, badly designed machines ever made. iMac can kiss my ass. Anyway, my favorite iMac story:
I'm working at CompUSSR as a technician. It's a slow day, and I happen to be up at the front counter of the tech department, filling out some paperwork or something. A lady walks in the front door carting an iMac in hand, and from 10 feet away I can see the anger in her eyes. She steps up to the counter, and with one emphatic push, heaves the iMac up onto the counter, where it lands with a deafening *THUD*, loud enough the whole store takes notice. She takes a few moments to catch her breath from the effort, then looks me straight in the eye, and says...
"Jeff Goldblum is a fucking liar!"
It was a good 5 minutes before I could compose myself enough to speak.
Yeah, and fuk sega for dropping the 32x less than six months after they released it. And fuk Sony for deep sixing the ps one after all these years.
I always figured printers held that slot.
That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
The cheapest dual processor Xeon rackmount server from dell is a PowerEdge 2650. With all other options stripped and no OS, it's $5425 retail. For a single Xeon, subtract $500. Please don't give me some BS about how you can build some amateur-hour machine for $2800, because I really don't fucking care. The Xserve is a supported machine from a commercial vendor, with a supported commercial UNIX, with telephone support, optional onsite support, and the ability to beat the living daylights out of Intel stuff at certain tasks. So please, the original poster needs to get a grip on reality.
I think that I'm the last Ellen Feiss fan standing.
Here is a java game that I wrote with her in it, but it reportedly has display problems in M$IE/MSVM and j2re1.4.1 for OS X. I'll rewrite it as a JApplet when I get a chance.
And don't forget my classic Switch Article.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
These are retail prices; if you want to talk special acaedmic or volume discounts, the Xserve's price comes down too.
What the fuck is the point of your post?
More concerning is the trend to eliminate the parallel port, the serial port, the PS/2 ports... etc.
These days all those functions are on one super-IO chip the computer must have anyway, so at least throw us a bone and give us headers we can connect our "legacy" devices to.
Actually I am a big fan of apple in general (I am a graphic designer) but I like the Power Macs - you know those big grey boxes that you can actually upgrade extensively and actually rival window pc enthusiasts.
When the imacs came out I thought they were terribly useless - the monitor screen was too small (I like 19" minimum - altho I use a cinema screen 22" now) Also I didn't like the fact that I didn;t come across any imacs that had dual cpu's which was what I needed for my work. All in all i'm glad these cheep pieces of crap have gone away, let apple stick to making real computer i'd say...but then again they have the wonderful lamp light taking its place...
I guess they are just trying to be "hip" and get all the noobs using crap computers instead of focusing on making fast, powerful, and solid machines....
Ave Molech Setting
I don't think it's too much hyperbole to claim that the iMac was one of the most revolutionary computers -- ever.
I'm gonna nit-pick now. I know that's out of character for me, but y'all just bear with me.
I don't think "revolutionary" is really the right word to use here. I think a better word would be "influential."
The Apple II was revolutionary; it created the personal computer market from scratch. The Macintosh was revolutionary; it changed the way people interact with computers. The iMac was more evolutionary than revolutionary, but the combination of its design (rounded, transluscent, tinted, happy-looking) and its design philosophy (easy and fun to use) touch everything.
So I think I would say that the iMac was the second-most influential computer ever. The most influential? The IBM PC, of course.
I write in my journal
I thought the saddest iMac moment was that scene in Zoolander... Oh Well...
RIP? You make it sound as if my IMac is Dead and Burried!
And the Amiga's still alive and... um...
*hugs Amiga 1200 to chest and cries*
Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
Bill,
Should we try to sign her up to do an ad for us?
-Monkeyboy
I agree, but it's not Apple's fault that the rest of the industry can't integrate style and functionality in one package.
And that's because YOU weren't their target market for them.
The iMac was designed to be used by grandmas and the like, to send e-mail and browse the web. People like grandma don't need expansion or upgrade capability. Grandma won't be swapping out her video card and processor over the weekend to squeeze a few more FPS out of Quake III. As long as the machine starts up and runs when she wants to use it, it will always be plenty fast for grandma.
Don't call them cheap crap just because they didn't meet your needs. They were very good machines, they did just what they were designed to do, and for whom they were designed to do it, period. If they didn't, the model wouldn't have survived on the price list for almost five years, so show some freakin' respect-- if not for the iMac, there might not have BEEN those Power Macs you like so much.
~Philly
You mean like SGI has done since the late 80s? :-)
You seem to be confusing "personal computer" with "the entire desktop machine market". There were several *very* innovative manufacturers that did creative things in the workstation scene that took years to filter down to the "PC" market ("PC" in the original sense, not just x86 machines). Examples: SGI (want to see where consumer graphics will be in five years? look at an SGI machine from five years ago.), Wildcat (on the x86 side).
What was revolutionary about the iMac was the near total dependence on the plug-and-play USB interface. We didn't fully appreciate it at the time, but computers became a lot easier to deal with when one did not have to mess around with a multitude of different interfaces and cables (scsi, parallel, serial, ps2, adb,etc).
/. posted the story on the introduction of the iMac. Whoa, flames galore!
Let's see what I have now. USB mouse, keyboard, zip drive, floppy drive, scanner, Palm Pilot cradle, SD/MMC card reader, laser printer, ink-jet printer, web-cam, and link to my digital camera. All hot swappable, all plug and play, and no rebooting.
What is kind of weird is that I can remember when
but didnt apple also stop selling the new flatscreen imac? so are imacs now extinct?
The war with islam is a war on the beast
The war on terror is a war for peace
Should the floppy really die?
As a software tester, test analyst, and now a test team lead, I have seen many an "over the baffle" solution thrown our way.
Sneakernet will always be valuable alternative in a high-pressure, low turn around time environment. Especially for small
When CD's are a penny a piece and reusable, I can see his, but not yet.
I remember when I use to work at Best Buy back in 1998. We started selling the green IMac. They didn't sell too well, so, a sales rep from Apple came to the store to try to sell more Imacs. He didn't sell one IMac. Eventually we stopped selling them all together because Best buy refused to sell all the different colors. They only want to sell the green one.
---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"
It didn't take long.
duh
Eh? Sorry, I don't get it?!
Code, Hardware, stuff like that.
bzzt, wrong. try again. <$3k
HAHAHAHAHA omfg roflmao!!!
It's soooo true!
iMacs are actually complicated! Totally.
The original (Rev A) Bondi iMac had a tray (I had one); the slot loading iMacs came about later.
:)
Granted, it was a laptop-style tray (you know, the low-profile ones) and it didn't so much eject as release, but it had a tray
my parents got one when they first came out. been unhappy customers ever since. imho they were awful peices of junk to begin with. *ducks* even besides my extreme bias aggainst apple, i do have to say the newer non-clam powerbooks are pretty damn nice. There isnt an x86 varient on the market that matches its value. think ill get one when this vaio weares out.
Competition in America: If you can't beat 'em, Sue 'em!
The Dell starts at $2,300, for a single cpu, add the second cpu, and you're at the price of the Mac. Add in an OS (Say RedHat Advanced Server, for the support from Red Hat, to be equal with Apple, and your looking around $3,600.
This is by going to Dell, small businesses, find the 2650, customize and add a CPU, and OS of choice.
As you may know, the iMac design was inspired by the dyson dustbuster. Does this mean the end of the union of dustbuster and computer? :-(
This reminds me of the movie Zoolander. While idiotic, Ben Still is hilarious. Using the term Eugoogly. Kinda funny. Also, the scene where they are trying to get the "files from the computer", and the are shaking the IMac all around trying to figure out how to open it. Great stuff.
"I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it's going to begin"
When I go to configure a 2650, and strip out everything it lets me strip out, it's $4K. So please, tell me where this 3K 2650 is.
Actually, the first ones did. They were stupid little laptop drives though, the kind that pop out an inch or so and you have to manually pull it out, snap the CD on the spindle, and push it back in.
I say its a fancy fish bowl.
Having read this I thought "right, go to ebay and buy one to run 'nix on). But they are still 75% more than an "equivalent" PC :-
The IBM PC? Though it was influential I would say it hardly holds a candle to the iMac. The PC's influence was purely on computers, while the iMac changed the way people designed phones, pencil holders, desks, etc. Seriously, when's the last time you saw a phone at Walmart with a case design like a PC? Hell, even PCs were influenced by the iMac.
Does it have a one button mouse as well?
1 Apple down, many more models to go, Apple dont stop here, drop them all, old and new!
DC's already got you beat with that.....
A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
"Because all the bits you buy are shaped in such a way that the box is the easiest form factor to make. Apple had the advantage of being able to build their own bits for their boxes, the typical hobbyist does not."
Well the problem with this argument is that if you take a modern Mac apart. You'll notice that the majority of the parts are the same standard parts (smae form factor, same maker even) that go into PCs. Some of the parts that are Mac specific, aren't ground-breaking in the form-factor department either. BTW I was talking more about the indutry in general. Not just hobbyiest, although the hobbyiest has the same limitations that a manufacturer would (what shape is a CD-ROM drive again?).
On my machine right now, the mouse is plugged into the keyboard via USB, which is plugged into the monitor via USB, which is plugged into the computer via ADC, which is plugged into the wall. That's it. No other plugs.
:)
I guess if you need to escape out of the window real quick for some reason, you won't have to go looking for rope.
Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
Still have two of the originals (almost), and the only time they gave me trouble was after a lightning hit to my home. Every ethernet device in the house went out, including two iMac motherboards. Insurance paid, but a year later I discovered after a lot of pain that the processor card had been partly fried but only showed symptoms when upgrading from 32 to 256MB RAM for OS X. Got a new processor card on eBay for $50, and it lives on and on, serving my daughters for all their school, chat, and music download needs... I expect they will drag the iMacs off to college in the next year or two. Better than worrying about an iBook being stolen!
Jobs' Mac gave us windows, icons, mice, and pointers. His NeXT computer gave us the WWW, his iMac gave us a network appliance, and his OS X gave us Unix for teenagers. Quite a set of lifetime achievements...
ThosEM
IIRC, the mezzanine slot was ONLY on the Rev.A iMac. It was never on the Rev. B. It was there in the first place for testing purposes and they left it on in order to meet the initial run. But they sold enough that some clever folks figured out a way to make use of it. Also, the Rev. A was based on a modified PowerBook motherboard and used SO-DIMMs. Later Revs used "normal" 168-pin DIMMs like their PowerMac brethren.
Also, eventually with the intro of the slot-loading DV iMacs (Rev. C?), they began using AGP for the graphics subsystem. I have one of those (blueberry) and it is truly a great computer. Runs OS X pretty well, too, though it spends more time in OS 9 right now. Great for e-mail and Diablo II.
i have an old 1998 233 mhz imac (with 4gb hdd and 6mb VRAM) that i upgraded to 160MB RAM. it runs jaguar great. can do all my LAMP (okay no L) development and even run office X (i know). try running XP on anything 5 years old. you can't. i haven't tried to run linux on it. pc hardware just deosn't have the lasting power, it seems. i wonder if apple tests their stuff on older hardware too. they might charge for jaguar, but many mac users can upgrade on their existing hardware. every new version of windows has required new hardware.
My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
Would someone care to explain who George Foreman is?
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
cluster node are newsworthy items, especially for the front page.
I agree with the original poster... the sooner that fad dies, the better. There's more to stylish design than translucent plastic, and blindly applying an idea to everything you can get your hands on because someone else did it successfully is just another form of conformity
I don't know you, but I'm still waiting for my Red Swingline. None of this new curved 747 crap, the true Classic Red Swingline qua Office Space.
**AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
After your reply, she says "WHAT? I have to take it out of the fucking box??"
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore.woa/72007/wo/T37v6M2r3u0A3FPJx3v1QqTLWOu /0.3.0.3.27.21.0.0.1.0.3.1.1.0?104,54
:-)
They can design nice computers, they can design nice GUIs, but they obviously can't design sane URLs
...or maybe Insightful?
CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
George Foreman is a company/man, not sure which, who produces cooking grills in North America.
God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
Heh, I think Twirly left the smiley off his last sentence ;-)
...and my rev. A is still going strong, albiet modded to the gills. It continues to serve my site 24/7 and does a fantastic job. Thanks for a great machine, Apple!
jaz-
Which, IIRC, has a CRT monitor and is superior to the original iMac in nearly every way.
Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
The case design retained the same basic look, but was actually changed fairly significantly in 1999 when they introduced the DV models. The original iMacs had an FCC-mandated metal RF shield surrounding most of the components and visible through the translucent case, obscuring the view of most of the actual functioning stuff; the surface of the plastic case was molded with a slight texture that somewhat artfully obscured the view of the shield/interior, allowing a "hint" of a glimpse of it. In late 1999, when Apple introduced the DV models, they introduced a new case design (codenamed "Kihei") that incorporated the RF shielding in the plastic, eliminating the need for the metal shield (and hence making the interior more interesting to look at). They slightly resculpted the entire case to be slightly shorter (taking up a tiny bit less space) and eliminated the texturing, making it easier to see through to the actual components inside; this also facilitated the convection cooling you mention. The new case also got rid of the door that covered the ports on the side of the old case, exposing the ports in a recess on the side, and also replaced the tray-loading optical drive with a car-style slot-loading one.
I worked at the Mcallen Texas store for a day as an Apple rep when they first came out. I had countless people asking about it, deciding to purchase it and when it came time to get one out of storage the sales people did not want to get them. Which had nothing to do with commision as I have heard some people bable on about since the employees get nothing out of any sale other that a pat on the back for a job well done. Instead they insisted that the customers get a Packard Bell (or HP, I can't remember which) several times throughout the day. Needless to say, they didn't take home the iMac. I think that Best Buy carrying the iPod is a step in the right direction.
I recently stepped in Compusa in Mcallen and was in heaven. A fairly decent selection of Apples. The sales people were very open about both platforms. If somebody wanted Apple thats what they got without any hassles and same goes with PCs. When somebody was asked the difference between the two, they were given a good explination and were given a choice as to where to go.
Ford no longer sells the 1998 model Taurus and has instead replaced it with the model year 2003 line. Anaylists were left baffled at this move. One remarked, "Who thougth Ford would make such a drastic move as this? Updating their models and not selling the older ones...I'm baffeled!" Similar trends have been noticed in just about every other freakin company on earth! So why is this front page /. news?
SIGFAULT
heavier but smaller. trust me on this one i carry a lot of both.
Is eMachines now free to sell their iMac lookalike?
If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
It seems in short time I'll be able to afford an Apple, finally. This discontinued one, that is.
I trust it cab run Linux (Yellow Dog, probably -- any other version?).
Also, they should make excellent X-terminals since they lack de CPU box.
Now if only those MAc fanatics would make a lot of money so they can buy the new expensive Apples and sell this old iMac to me...
i own macintosh computers that i have bought. i also own linux, solaris, and sgi boxen. they have their strengths- but the mac is by far the 'easiest' to do movie editing, music, photog. etc.
so who needs to grow a penis? hmmm, MRS. geek?
[quote]With WindowsXP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote]s/WindowsXP/Windows200/0 0/Windows NT/
s/Windows20
s/Windows NT/Windows 98/
s/Windows 98/ Windows 95/
s/Windows 95/Windows 3.1/
s/Windows 3.1/Windows 3.0/
s/Windows 3.0/Windows 2.0/
s/Windows 2.0/Windows 1.0/
It's good to have a dream.
incorrect. the "rev b" imac has the mezzanine slot...i know, i own one.
One of the fundamental laws of the universe is that sooner or later, everything becomes Office Space. Everything that doesn't become Office Space becomes This Is Spinal Tap.
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
And as I said here, I'm only 16.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
Try finding a 11AA.
Skiis.
-fred
Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
George Foreman is a man. He is a former Heavyweight boxing champ. His most famous bout was the 1974 Rumble in the Jungle with Ali in Zaire.
...is with an airport card. Make it into an airport hub, and use the ethernet cable to hook to your DSL.
Works a treat, and cheaper than an Airport hub, if you've got the computer already.
-fred
Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
Sales volume is what I was interested in. I might be wrong in my initial assumption though :) Would be interesting to know.
"You can now flame me, I am full of love,"
believe it. my mac guru buddy turned it into a fishbowl :)
The original VW bug is still made in Mexico and another third-world country I can't remember of. Guess nobodys cares as much for round colorful coputers as they do about cars....
In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
--
"The difference between that which is real and imagined lies solely within one's perception. The true power of a strong imagination lies within one's ability to impose their reality upon others." - T. Dozier
No way, the original Macintosh or the Lisa was the most influential PC of all time. 100% of the market wouldn't be where it is today without it.
I have a website. It's about Macs.
TROLL DAMNIT
LaxMac: because Apple knows why your chair is brown...
:(
Because Apple's kiss is a sweet; disguised underneath is a marketing gimick from RiteAid's pharmacy
This post should be modded up - it's golden :)
Well in that case, I'll sell you a piece of history :-D I have a Rev B iMac sittin right next to me, haha. Remember, the price is at a premium now cuz it's a collectors item
-Alex
A hideous looking but magnificently functional design for its intended use. The best thing about them? Quiet. Who needs a quiet fan when you _ d o n ' t _ n e e d _ a _ f a n !
I had to support a variety of those iMac thingies over the years, and I was sad when they dropped the IR port. I nearly wet the floor when I was looking at that port and had the user's Palm III in my hand, then on a whim instead of setting up his cradle I just pointed it and pressed hotsync... and it did.
OK, I know it's normal for laptops, but usually fussy. This just... worked.
A few years later I was problemsolving a printing crisis with a bad ethernet cable and no crimp goodies. Again, point the oldy-but-goody bondi iMac and shoot at the HP printer with 20 seconds of configuration... and it prints. Damn!
And yes, after I realized they were just a laptop with a CRT glued on, I used the handle to lug them between buildings.
Even better, the heat vents were wisely on a slope, so the cats could never settle down on them.
Damn those pesky terrorists
I thought apple Stop Selling these Imacs two years ago. I must have miss something on the way to fry's eletronics.
Can sombody clarify processor/chipset development roles between the three companies?
Here in Ireland we can still buy original iMacs...
;)
-johnl
Look at the bottom of this page : The Apple Store (Republic of Ireland)
Maybe Apple likes us! Or maybe we're just technologically backward
I don't know what size the new iMac is. However, the eMac is both bigger and heavier than the iMac (although it's a bit less deep due to a shorter tube). iMac: 15.8" H x 15.2" W x 17.6" D (40lbs) eMac: 15.8" H x 15.8" W x 17.1" D (50lbs)
I'm really curious what the front of the screen is. It must be fairly thick.
Does this mean it's also the end of the iBrator as well?
:) They don't all like the new iMac, it reminds them that anal probe thingie...
I know of many women who'll be disapointed
-- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
About 6 months after the launch of the iMac my kettle blew up - and I replaced it with a translucent blue kettle.
Im convinced this is the only useful 'iMacalike' product out there - as you can actually SEE your water boiling.
Apple - been happily going out of business since 1985
You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
iMac....iCrap
It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
*sniff* We'll miss you, original iMac.
[quote]With WindowsXP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote]
;)
Looks like SOMEbody's been spending too much time chatting with UBB!
Somebody in the ancient past here on /. made a great point about the CRT iMac once; they said the design was like a shark. It was simply evolved to the most logical, streamlined form given the necessity of the parts contained therein.
The flatpanel iMac really is a stupendous design. I'm the first to pick on the niggles, too: for instance, if the keyboard's legs are extended and located close to the iMac base, the disc tray bumps into it) but those are few and far between. Even the round base, which is the most likely target for the form-over-funtion argument, supplants this by offering the ability to rotate the iMac, thus giving you both a 'side'-mounted drive tray and access to ports...an Apple sales guy hit me with this when they came out. I mentioned that there should be easy-to-reach ports on the side at least, and he picked up the iMac - by the arm, which was also surprising at the time - and rotated it 90 degrees. That was slightly mindblowing.
Anyways. I think the only thing keeping the new iMac shape from becoming as ubiquitous for desktops as the Sony Trinitron black-matte design became for televisions is the fact that Apple won't likely let anyone get even close to that design without suing them for a trade dress violation.
If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
that was damn funny.
That doesn't make any sense. You blame Apple for the shortcomings of those other companies?
Hey, guess what. There's this supa-cheap knockoff of transluscent housing around the spectacularly lame case of my work PC. It's actually sharp enough to almost cut you when you reach for the CD drive. So fuck you, Apple, for providing an impetus of design that these lacklustre PC manufacturers just could not handle, even while they tried to capitalize on the new craze of coloured computers while not getting it at all.
If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
Actually there is a fair amount of modding going around in the Apple world. It just seldom gets mentioned. The clamshell iBook was particularly popular for very beautiful custom paint jobs, and the quicksilver G4's have had people play with them quite a bit as well.
I guess I do kinda miss the days of spraypainting my PC to give it a neat color then hand-painting the faceplates of the CDROM and whatnot. Maybe just for masochistic reasons though....
Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
The original iMac may have saved Apple.
Everyone assumes that. While the iMac surely did a lot to restore Apple's mindshare, in fact the company had already gone back into profitability with the G3 PowerMacs.
[quote]With Windows 2K there is no need for Classic Mac any more.[/quote]
s/Windows 2K/Windows ME/
s/Windows ME/Windows 98/
s/Windows 98/ Windows 95/
s/Windows 95/Windows 3.11 (and WFW)/
s/Windows 3.11 (and WF Workgroup)/Windows 3.1/
s/Windows 3.0/Windows 286 & Windows 386/
s/Windows 286 & Windows 386/Windows 2.03/
s/Windows 2.03/Windows 2.0/
s/Windows 2.0/Windows 1.0/
# Some on-line sources quote that Windows 2.03
# is actually Windows/386. It's strange, as I
# recall I'd installed Windows 2.03 on my AT-
# compatible machine featured 80L286-12, and it
# tooks at least 1 year for the Windows/286 and
# Windows/386 to be in the market.
[quote]With Windows XP there is no need for Mac any more.[/quote]
s/Windows XP/Windows 2K Pro/
s/Windows 2K Pro/Windows NT4/
s/Windows NT4/Windows NT3.x/
s/Windows NT3.x/Windows NTx.x/
The UK apple store isn't selling the iMac classics, however if you goto it (http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/ukstore/) , before the picture loads, the text and hover text says 'iMac clasic', but its a picture of new displays, uncanny!
Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
I'm old enough to remember when translucent phones and alarm clocks weren't sexy, they were cheap Taiwanese imports sold at discount stores. (This was also about the time when New Wave music hit the scene.)
How things change.
I pay about the same price now for a CD-RW as I did for a 5 1/4" SSSD floppy in the mid-'80s.
So, yeah, I think it is time for the floppy to go.
Whoops! I certainly didn't mean to suggest that "*nix is not for teenagers". In fact I'd been trying to teach some *nix to my kids for ages. OS X did it for me. Lindows or other Linux may do it for others.
FWIW, you can install fink on a Mac with OSX and apt-get to your heart's content.
ThosEM
They may now call it eOneMore...
The mezzanine slot was on Rev. A and Rev. B both. All revisions up to Slot-Loading(Rev. E) used SODIMMs, and were approximately equivalent to the low-end PowerBook at the time.
The Rev. A and Rev. B were at the same time as the "Wallstreet" PowerBook, which had a G3/233 on the low end at the time. Rev. C was a minor upgrade and matched the mid level PowerBook, also "Wallstreet", and had a G3/266. Rev. D matched the "Lombard"/Bronze Keyboard/1999 PowerBook, and had a G3/333.