Few missed gem are ever found, a shorter copyright term might lead to a greater exposure for them and so give the author some recognition. That said I think even 30 years might be a good compromise--it can still let the generation play with it's culture.
Re:Houston, we have a busted/confirmed myth
on
Ask The Mythbusters
·
· Score: 1
Obviously common sense and Occam's Razor are just goverment coverups.
Re:Houston, we have a busted/confirmed myth
on
Ask The Mythbusters
·
· Score: 1
It might be more fun to try to build a set where all the "anomalies" happen, it might be cheaper to go to the moon though.
Re:Houston, we have a busted/confirmed myth
on
Ask The Mythbusters
·
· Score: 1
How in the world is "crosses being obscured" convincing? How stupid does one need to be to think that someone would set up physical crosses in the set to simulate crosshairs etched into the camera?
Slashdot Mirror
Except that the aim of those consoles is "taking over the living room," and losing money instead of profiting is the strategy.
Except that Ubuntu is derived from Debian unstable every 6 months.
Few missed gem are ever found, a shorter copyright term might lead to a greater exposure for them and so give the author some recognition. That said I think even 30 years might be a good compromise--it can still let the generation play with it's culture.
And just because we don't know how it works does not mean that it's free will.
Actually you also have to look at webservers, databases and in case of GNU/Linux at distros.
That's not money in the briefcases...
Just ignore any answers from people who identified a human as non-inteligent.
How about we compare the base of spyware install?
Only if does not explode.
You can sleep tight then, it's not part of the GPL.
You are just too lazy to see all the colors, pull yourself together!
Well then, good news! It's a suppository.
http://openclipart.org/
Obviously common sense and Occam's Razor are just goverment coverups.
It might be more fun to try to build a set where all the "anomalies" happen, it might be cheaper to go to the moon though.
How in the world is "crosses being obscured" convincing? How stupid does one need to be to think that someone would set up physical crosses in the set to simulate crosshairs etched into the camera?
Not to ruin the joke but that is exactly what primes are.
Imagine hundred fake plates in front of hundred cameras.
As far as I remember it required a special light source.
Go Dell!
In hell! Burn waste of film, burn!