Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Would You Do If You Were Suddenly Wealthy?

An anonymous reader writes: There are a few articles floating around today about comments from Markus Persson, aka "Notch," the creator of Minecraft. He sold his game studio to Microsoft last year for $2.5 billion, but he seems to be having a hard time adjusting to his newfound fame and wealth. He wrote, "The problem with getting everything is you run out of reasons to keep trying, and human interaction becomes impossible due to imbalance. ... Found a great girl, but she's afraid of me and my life style and went with a normal person instead. I would Musk and try to save the world, but that just exposes me to the same type of a$#@%&*s that made me sell minecraft again." While he later suggests he was just having a bad day, he does seem to be dealing with some isolation issues. Granted, it can be hard to feel sorry for a billionaire, but I've wondered at times how I'd handle sudden wealth like that, and I long ago decided it would make the human relationships I'm accustomed to rather difficult. So, how would you deal with Notch's problem? It seems like one the tech industry should at least be aware of, given the focus on startup culture.

842 comments

  1. For starters... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about volunteering time and money and spend some time helping people in need instead of whining, blaming, and name calling?

    1. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go talk to Jimmy Carter and see if you can continue some of the great work he did.

    2. Re:For starters... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      How about volunteering time and money and spend some time helping people in need instead of whining, blaming, and name calling?

      It's not mutually exclusive. When you are rich you can vent wide and help.

    3. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I was going to say "put aside enough money to live relatively comfortably for the rest of your life, then give most of it away". That way you probably won't have to work if you don't want to, and you aren't isolated.

      Or just do random acts of kindness - pay off a whole neighborhood's mortgages, or something. Help some disadvantaged kids get better teachers, provide clean water or infrastructure in developing countries, donate money to interesting research projects. Help unemployed people learn new trades. There's plenty to do, and it might help with his social isolation as well.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    4. Re:For starters... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck that! I'd track down APK and have him committed!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:For starters... by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      Sounds good to me. That guy has some major mental illnesses.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:For starters... by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      For starters, I could buy the name brand mac and cheese any time I wanted, not just on special occasions.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    7. Re:For starters... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      to a host file...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hard time taking anyone seriously that says anything like "NOT cocaine and NOT strippers"

    9. Re: For starters... by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you get all sorts of fancy ketchups too? Perhaps some Dijon ketchup.

    10. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you youngsters. None of you remember Eric S. Raymond's infamous "Surprised by wealth" post when VA Linux IPOed.

      Jesus fucking Christ, that was 1999. 15 years ago.

    11. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      but of course....

    12. Re:For starters... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If he can't keep a woman around while being a billionaire I'd say that mental illness is called "ego".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just do random acts of kindness - pay off a whole neighborhood's mortgages, or something.

      This is America
      Unless you do this anonymously, you will probably be sued and/or approached by half the people in the neighborhood for money until the end of your life

    14. Re:For starters... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Even with $2.5B, this guy can't afford to pay off everyone's mortgage in the US. So if he pays off some neighborhood's mortgages, he'll have everyone else screaming for the same thing.

      Doing it anonymously is the only way. Unless you're a fame-seeker like Trump, having that much money can be a real PITA because it'll bring so much attention to you, and you won't be able to have a normal life or normal relationships; everyone will be after you for your money. That's gotta make it impossible to get a decent girlfriend too: you're going to be a magnet for the gold-diggers, and won't be able to discern the quality women from them. Again, just look at Trump: you think Melania hooked up with him because of any true love?

    15. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just assumed his cell had internet access.

    16. Re:For starters... by dimeglio · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would increase my standard of living gradually until I no longer felt I was rich. Then I would complain about unreliable help, minimum wage hikes, high taxes and government entitlements.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    17. Re:For starters... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he can't keep a woman around while being a billionaire I'd say that mental illness is called "ego".

      I knew someone who was a "mere millionaire" who had the same problem.

      It's not ego. Women don't come labeled with tags that say "sincere" and "gold digger" so you can tell who loves you because you're a wonderful person and who merely loves your wallet.

      That's the real ego problem. Most of us would like not to have the "love" leave when the money does. Or, for that matter, when a higher "bidder" comes along.

    18. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It used to be that there wasn't pre-wrapped bacon.

      That issue has been addressed, at least. (On that page, you have to scroll down a bit to find it. It's called "fully cooked", meaning that you just unwrap it and eat it.)

      And you don't even need a million dollars to buy it.

    19. Re:For starters... by tmosley · · Score: 0, Troll

      He's right though. 75% of armed conflicts in the world are started by the US. We really are terrible.

    20. Re:For starters... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For starters you would never see my fat ass again. I would never post another thing to /.. My ass would be laying on some beach somewhere with some bronze honey fanning me with one of those palm leaves and other serving me cold drinks out of a coconut cup.

      Some people say, "if I ever get rich I won't quit work." Screw that, may ass would be out of here. It would be the last thing you ever saw of me as I ran out the door.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    21. Re:For starters... by ndrw · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know you're trolling a bit here, but if you want specific evidence of something Carter has done right, check out the Guinea Worm Eradication program. The Carter Center is a major part of this initiative, that is reducing (with the goal of eliminating) a painful and debilitating parasitic condition. Cases of Guinea Worm have dropped from over 3 million yearly in the early 80's to less than 100 so far this year (W.H.O. stats). The Guinea Worm life cycle requires human infection, so once this thing is gone, it's totally gone.

    22. Re:For starters... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, nothing Carter has done is of any worth except for Habitat for Humanity.

      Carter was involved in negotiating several peace agreements in Africa and Asia. He has also helped improve the legitimacy of numerous elections. Peace and democracy are worthwhile.

    23. Re:For starters... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Doing it anonymously is the only way. Unless you're a fame-seeker like Trump, having that much money can be a real PITA because it'll bring so much attention to you, and you won't be able to have a normal life or normal relationships; everyone will be after you for your money.

      Or go with the Gates methodology - don't worry about anonymous, consider your 'new job' to be running a charity foundation. Examine charities in-depth to find the good ones that can efficiently help the world with the money they're given, then give enough money to really make a difference.

      By getting out there and making a difference, he'd have that contact.

      Still, he's a programmer, not a CEO. His skillset is different, so it's going to take some time to adjust.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    24. Re:For starters... by bezenek · · Score: 1

      Who is APK?

      --
      Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
    25. Re: For starters... by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 2

      Also, be sure to have ample supplies of Grey Poupon whenever you drive around in your limo, because you never know when some smart ass is going to ask you for some. Then you'd be all... "BOOM! Grey Poupon in da hizzy!"

    26. Re:For starters... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Buy slashdot and replace the chimpanzees that are the 'editors'.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    27. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just do random acts of kindness - pay off a whole neighborhood's mortgages, or something.

      Except that is not how the world works. Rather than being seen as a kind guy, you just create a lot of envy in all the other neighbourhoods (especially those directly bordering the one you helped).

      Help some disadvantaged kids get better teachers, provide clean water or infrastructure in developing countries, donate money to interesting research projects. Help unemployed people learn new trades. There's plenty to do, and it might help with his social isolation as well.

      I would support these suggestions. But I am skeptical whether it will help with the problem of isolation. You'll always be seen as the Guy with the Money, and that will always set you apart from everyone else in whatever project you start.

    28. Re:For starters... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      GDAC can't even do math.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    29. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you always wanted a monkey?

    30. Re:For starters... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Not having to work I think is part of the cause of isolation though. How was your day? becomes an even more boring question. Also, resentment from other people (that don't like their job/to work) that they have to but you don't.

      I think if you want to not be isolated you need to pull a Buffet and become buddies with another billionaire and hangout giving away money and finding projects, continue to work just as hard, or give away enough of it that you DO have to work again.

    31. Re: For starters... by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

      Naw, the term "fancy" there is likely just a scam. I might be tempted into splurging and finding out if Top Ramen is any better than regular Ramen though.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    32. Re:For starters... by clovis · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you said, and more.
      Six diseases are being fought by the Carter Center
      http://www.cartercenter.org/he...

    33. Re:For starters... by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      But...haven't you always wanted a monkey?

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    34. Re:For starters... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      How about volunteering time and money and spend some time helping people in need instead of whining, blaming, and name calling?

      How about first giving some percentage of those billions to all the employees you screwed over when you sold Minecraft out from under them?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    35. Re:For starters... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Some people say, "if I ever get rich I won't quit work." Screw that, may ass would be out of here. It would be the last thing you ever saw of me as I ran out the door.

      I say that, but then again I've got my own company and I love my job. I like the idea of going somewhere sunny and drinking nice drinks out of a coconut shell, but I'd get bored eventually.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    36. Re:For starters... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Some people say, "if I ever get rich I won't quit work." Screw that, may ass would be out of here. It would be the last thing you ever saw of me as I ran out the door.

      Wait a minute - you don't wear pants to work?!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    37. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're getting fancy. I would have to have like a million dollars in order to buy that!

    38. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'd set up something to give away most/all of it after I'm dead, and then just strive to not go on crazy spending sprees.

    39. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he can't keep a woman around while being a billionaire I'd say that mental illness is called "ego".

      I knew someone who was a "mere millionaire" who had the same problem.

      It's not ego. Women don't come labeled with tags that say "sincere" and "gold digger" so you can tell who loves you because you're a wonderful person and who merely loves your wallet.

      That's the real ego problem. Most of us would like not to have the "love" leave when the money does. Or, for that matter, when a higher "bidder" comes along.

      Speaking as a mere multi-millionaire, I assure you that most women do carry tags that say "sincere" and "gold-digger" that are plain to see, especially if they don't already know what you are.
      It's the guys that are hard to figure out.

    40. Re:For starters... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      As someone who finds many of Carter's political ventures horrifying at best, I do have to applaud him for Habitat for Humanity, the Guinea Worm eradication program, and similar efforts.

    41. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not ego. Women don't come labeled with tags that say "sincere" and "gold digger" so you can tell who loves you because you're a wonderful person and who merely loves your wallet.

      Oh I don't know - some of those "Russian" brides are seriously hot! And if not, there are plenty of hot asian woman whom probably wouldn't know the difference between millionaire and billionaire..

    42. Re: For starters... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I might be tempted into splurging and finding out if Top Ramen is any better than regular Ramen though.

      You could pay to have that looked into.

      Which Ramen?

      Top. Ramen.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    43. Re:For starters... by dj245 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If he can't keep a woman around while being a billionaire I'd say that mental illness is called "ego".

      I knew someone who was a "mere millionaire" who had the same problem.

      It's not ego. Women don't come labeled with tags that say "sincere" and "gold digger" so you can tell who loves you because you're a wonderful person and who merely loves your wallet.

      That's the real ego problem. Most of us would like not to have the "love" leave when the money does. Or, for that matter, when a higher "bidder" comes along.

      Not only that, but being friends with people of a different social status is not easy. I wasn't always very successful, but now I am at the point where I live a very comfortable life. The more successful I get, the more it seems that there are people who "want something" from me. It starts small, with people wanting to use my apartment complex's pool or other facilities. It has a way of snowballing into the expectation that my family will do all the driving and hosting of get-togethers. These problems only occur with friends who are of a lower economic status than us. If they reciprocated, we wouldn't care. I understand those friends aren't flush with cash, but a platter of home cooked baked chicken isn't that expensive, and some of them can't even be bothered with that. A cooler of cheap beer is within just about everyone's monetary reach; especially if I will offer you the same at a later date. But that isn't what I get out of many friendships with lower class people.

      We don't have this problem with people on the same income level. They always reciprocate. I don't think about who is "up" and who is "down" monetarily, because they make an effort, and that is enough. Poor people don't seem to think about what I want in return for helping them. I don't count dollars, because I have plenty of my own. The effort in keeping a friendship is all I want to see returned. Sadly, that's very hard to find.

      Rich people must struggle tremendously with the problem of someone always trying to get something from them for nothing. You see all the worst and selfish behaviors of humanity. If I were as wealthy as Notch, I would have to dress like a bum, travel the world inconspicuously, and hope nobody notices me. I don't think I would be able to handle all the "help a brother out" BS that he probably has to deal with. It must be exhausting.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    44. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, after the obvious setting up the kids, wife and self for the future (investments, college funds, etc.)..

      Research the local issues
      Understand the problems and issues
      Devise plans to address the problems and issues
      Review plans with key stakeholders and community leaders
      Implement plans
      Witness lives and community get better with hard work

    45. Re:For starters... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Not on the day you're quitting. If you're quitting the right way, that is.

    46. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I suddenly became wealthy, I jump around different jobs; jobs in IT, retail, etc. The minute some manager or customer started treating me or my coworkers like shit, I'd turn around and dish it right back. Without the pressure of where I'd get my next paycheck, I could do my small part to turn upside down the worlds of shitty bosses and clients. For example, I once told my team at a previous job that if I won the lottery while working there, that I'd give each of them a million dollars to all quit at the same time and leave our asshole bosses scrambling.

    47. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I agree, not working drives a lot of people crazy. That doesn't mean he can't work though; he could donate time to various things instead. Hell, doing research on what you want to give money away to could take up a substantial amount of time, depending on how diligent you want to be.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    48. Re:For starters... by Apocryphos · · Score: 1

      Friendship isn't based on monetary reciprocation. You sound completely out of touch with the rest of the world.

    49. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Sure, you create envy and resentment. That doesn't change the fact that you did a good thing. Yes, people will be upset at you for not doing something for them, but that's because humans are kind of assholes that way. It would still help people. Do it anonymously if you really want to.

      You'll still be set apart, but I think if you are really sincere about it, people will know. If nothing else, hiring people who can help you find projects to do will combat isolation - just think of "giving money away responsibly" as a job. Find other people to do that with.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    50. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      They'd have no basis to sue you. I doubt you'd even need to get a lawyer - any competent judge would tell them to fuck off when they tried to file the suit. Yeah, some people would squander the gift and then ask for more money, but you don't have to give it to them. They already got a bigger break than most people do. Furthermore, there's no problem with giving it anonymously - that's still a good thing.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    51. Re:For starters... by Apocryphos · · Score: 2

      Let me clarify - money isn't be-all measurement of effort. If it was, you are probably not putting any "effort" into the friendship either because the sums of money you spend on them relative to your income are so tiny that the corresponding figure on their part would buy nothing. Sometimes a person really struggles just to have time free from their own problems and pursuits to attend your event, for example.

    52. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of the post; monetary compensation was pretty specifically exempted. Effort was not, which makes sense.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    53. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Peace and democracy are worthwhile.

      Neither are valued by the military-industrial complex. Guess whose opinion counts for more?

    54. Re:For starters... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Then you don't know enough about what he's done. The Carter Foundations has raised lots of money for very useful goals - reducing river blindness disease which may end up being eradicated, the Guinea worm disease is down to less than one hundred cases, and so forth. They spend money to train health workers in Ethiopia. On the diplomatic front, Carter has probably done far more mediation for conflicts than any other single person.

      I think you're just disgruntled because he's from a different political party than you prefer. Perhaps you have another example of a past president or even vice president that's actually spending most of the time making the world a better place?

    55. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread is starting to sound a lot like a KitH sketch...

    56. Re:For starters... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      One reason why rich people tend to marry the same.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    57. Re:For starters... by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      yeah. i have a hard time imagining myself bored with notch's wealth as well. I think the difference between us (well myself) and notch is we have aspirations and interests in the world beyond work. I work to enable the life i want to live, but i have a hard time really enveloping myself in my work. There's all this stuff i want to do, and most of it involves going out in the world and hanging out with people and doing things. I work enough to afford living in the bay area and not being a bum, but i know if i had that wealth, it would take me a LONG time before i found myself feeling unfulfilled.

      I get the impression that Notch liked sitting in his basement and making minecraft. That's not a condemnation. It worked out well for him financially. Right now, i think he feels pressure from society to go out and party and travel, and he honestly never wanted it.

      Myself, i'm looking at cutting out of work early today to go surfing. I will reap no financial rewards from it, but i'll feel fulfilled by it.

    58. Re: For starters... by Zalbik · · Score: 2

      But don't get a real green dress...that's cruel.

    59. Re: For starters... by eyegone · · Score: 1

      Isn't all ketchup fancy?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    60. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do most of that right now. It gets boring too. Good luck.

    61. Re:For starters... by nblender · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting. So I have a friend who has done very well. We've been acquaintances since Gr7 and good friends since University. Our sons are good friends. Now he is quite well off and no longer needs to work. I still have to work for a living and hope for eventual retirement...

      So the problem I have is whenever we go anywhere either as a family or even just the two of us, he always insists on paying which makes me feel uncomfortable... So I always refuse and insist we split it. We seem to have reached some sort of silent consensus that we'll just split it from now on... See, I want to hang out with him and his family because we enjoy their company, not because they're well off... I think he thinks he's helping by offering to pay all the time...

      Anyway, it's not a real problem... But an annoying thing that's developed since he became 'very comfortable'...

    62. Re:For starters... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Frankly, nothing Carter has done is of any worth...

      Indeed, his paintings of scrappy dogs and creepy feet in the bathtub are absolutely horrid.

      Oh wait, wrong ex-prez
         

    63. Re:For starters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I guess if I were to get overnight wealthy, it would have to be the lottery, Powerball or something.

      What would I do?

      Well, I'd leave work so fast the door wouldn't come within a mile of my ass hitting it on the way out. While I *might* stay long enough to be a nice guy, maybe give the passwords to someone, I'm outta there.

      People that say they'd keep working, not me. I don't understand that, I have PLENTY of things I like to do that can keep my occupied for the rest of my life.

      I"d likely but a nicer house here in New Orleans...one in maybe Denver, CO to go when too hot here, and maybe one in Key West or somewhere near a beach when I felt in that mood.

      Married? Hell no....why get married when you can now be free to chase pussy 24/7...or if nothing else, do the sugardaddy.com thing...cute, good looking girls, and you get to upgrade models at will without having to risk losing half your shit you own.

      But more seriously, the world is your oyster if you are that rich. Travel, see things..hell, you can see and do a lot without ever leaving the US.

      I have plenty of friends around the US, so, I don't really need more. I'd take care of them and their families (the ones that are married)...and well, just have fun.

      I have never understood the lottery winners who'd just keep working. I've got a ton of stuff I'd rather be doing at any point in the day.

      Heck, on some long times in between contracts, one time was 7mos...I'd wake up about 8-9am, go walk the dog...maybe jump on my motorcycle and hit the gym daily for 1-2 hours. Home for lunch, then maybe back on the motorcycle (summer/early fall) and go check out a new art museum or something here in NOLA...and maybe catch a fest or meet friends of mine getting off work at a bar for a few about 4pm....come home...lather, rinse, repeat.

      Personally I never got tired of that easy life..and hey, if I was rich and got bored, I could always travel somewhere and vacation from that!!!

      Yep, I'm sorry, I dunno how someone could be rich and miserable.

      If it is so bad, gimme the money and let me take a swing at that type of life. I assure you, I'll have no problems.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    64. Re:For starters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      How about entertaining yourself, travel, have fun..party with (old established) friends....

      I don't understand, do that many people out there NOT have at least a thousand and one things they'd rather be doing on a work day? No hobbies, outside interests?

      I mean, hell...the ONLY reason I work, is to earn enough $$$$ to support my lifestyle. If I didn't have to earn the money, I'd certainly not be working...and I"d have a blast till I died.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    65. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither do billionaires have dollar signs tattooed on their foreheads. Unless you're a celebrity, random people will never know who you are, at least initially.

      The world is a huge place. Even if you only ever travel first class and stay at 5-star hotels, there's tens of millions of "real" people out there to meet and befriend. And of course nothing is stopping you from back-packing the Alps, volunteering in Guatemala, etc.

      So, yes, it is ego, at least in the sense of needless self-conscious anxiety. Ego and laziness. Use some of that money for psychotherapy, for heaven's sake, if self-reflection[1] isn't your strong suit.

      [1] As opposed to self-loathing or self-pity, which too many people mistake for self-reflection. Pro tip: coming to grips with your feelings and admitting your deeply-held beliefs is one thing. But if you're not aware, at least some of the time, of the cognitive dissonance you constantly experience--about your beliefs, about your sense of identity--then you're not actually capable of self-reflection. You have to be aware of the cognitice dissonance before you can backtrack and find where your faulty assumptions lie. _That_ is self-reflection. You need to a build a little Socrates in your head who is constantly challenging you. You can ignore little Socrates, and should for your own mental health, but if he's not there then you're just a meat-bag coasting through life. It's too exhausting for most people.

    66. Re: For starters... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      You could pay to have that looked into.

      Or you could just ask the Nissin company, who will tell you that it is much better. But to really know you have to spring for a package and try it for yourself.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    67. Re:For starters... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You can't hit the gym daily for 1-2 hours with a job? Tons of people do.. ok, it's the bottom end of your scale, but I do an hour a day (walking on a treadmill, watching TV on an iPad).

    68. Re:For starters... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Sorry... my list includes.

      Don't tell anyone I have money especially my kids, settle my debts , don't spend it all in one place, continue working {a few more years so no one is the wiser}, do some home improvements, retire, go fishing.

    69. Re:For starters... by gawdonblue · · Score: 2

      Who is APK?

      I'm not sure, but I hear he's quite a package.

    70. Re:For starters... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Peace and democracy aren't worthwhile to the US. They interfere with our ability to manipulate the world.

    71. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fancy is overrated. I saved up enough money to buy some Fancy Feast once, and let me tell you, it was neither fancy nor a feast.

    72. Re:For starters... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that. He said any kind of reciprocation would count-- even a plate of chicken.

      Friendship is a two way street.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    73. Re:For starters... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Simple. I'd continue to do what I love, and do projects that interested me.

      Sure, I might live in a (slightly) better house, and drive a better car when I do, but I'd still be programming. It would just be what I wanted to program.. regardless of if or when it ever made money. Some of it may be to betterment of mankind. Some of it may be just because I want to. Maybe take a class or two at a good college to brush up on some of the newer theories.

      Enable a few more people who show a love for what I do, to do more. Fund a few start ups with people who are truly passionate about their work... even if it never turns a profit.

      I'd take a few more vacations with the same friends I always have had, and make a few new friends, regardless of status or wealth. Maybe even make a few people's dreams come true.

      And I'd still be programming.

    74. Re:For starters... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      He did. They got a big payout when the company was sold.

      More critical to me was his statement that some day he would opensource minecraft when it started to die off. Part of what made minecraft succeed was the open sourcey feel to it. If he had said upfront it would be closed source owned by microsoft many of the people who helped it succeed wouldn't have invested their time into it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    75. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this interesting too, as it's something I wrestle with a bit. I am not "wealthy" by any stretch, and will have to work for another 35+ years till I can reasonably retire. But I am "comfortable", and can afford a nice dinner out with friends every so often. One of my friends from school, who is a great guy, is also a perpetual student. He is legitimately studying, but it also means that he's consistently under-employed. I don't have qualms about paying for dinner if I eat out with him, as we don't go to $200 a person restaurants and it's ,maybe once every few months. But I think he feels uncomfortable with that, so we generally split the bill. But that makes *me* feel a little uncomfortable, as I know that I can pay for that meal with an hour or two of work, and he is almost certainly dipping into savings that must be damn near threadbare at this point.

      Money does weird things to relationships...

    76. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. So I have a friend who has done very well. We've been acquaintances since Gr7 and good friends since University. Our sons are good friends. Now he is quite well off and no longer needs to work. I still have to work for a living and hope for eventual retirement...

      So the problem I have is whenever we go anywhere either as a family or even just the two of us, he always insists on paying which makes me feel uncomfortable... So I always refuse and insist we split it. We seem to have reached some sort of silent consensus that we'll just split it from now on... See, I want to hang out with him and his family because we enjoy their company, not because they're well off... I think he thinks he's helping by offering to pay all the time...

      Anyway, it's not a real problem... But an annoying thing that's developed since he became 'very comfortable'...

      If I like soda and you like 60yo scotch, I want separate checks.
      If you like soda and I like 60yo scotch, you should want separate checks.
      If you like soda and I like 600yo brandy, you should want separate checks, or you will be broke.

    77. Re:For starters... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Didn't Carter get a Nobel prize for the North Korean's agreeing to not make nuclear weapons. Except that they did anyway. Carter is a fool and should have to return the Nobel prize since it was based on false accomplishments. Good on him if some other things his foundations did turned out well.

    78. Re:For starters... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Pity he couldn't do more to fight for installing democracy in the USA.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    79. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barring a lotto, your smarmy, self-serving attitude is exactly why you'll never be rich.

    80. Re:For starters... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Some of us get satisfaction from building things, learning how things work, and making them better.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    81. Re: For starters... by pellik · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest always keeping a jar of Grey Poupon in your limo as well.

    82. Re:For starters... by pellik · · Score: 1

      How vein you must be to think that people will be watching your ass when you leave.

    83. Re:For starters... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Didn't Carter get a Nobel prize for the North Korean's agreeing to not make nuclear weapons?

      No. The Nobel Committee didn't even mention North Korea in their award statement.

    84. Re:For starters... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      No ya don't. Mocking their screw-ups account for about 20% of my mod-points.

    85. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write a Slashdot post suggesting that hostfiles don't cure cancer. You'll find out soon enough.

    86. Re:For starters... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you could just give out smaller amounts so you have more things to research. Give out $100M a year in $1M chunks, that would do it.

    87. Re:For starters... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Women don't come labeled with tags that say "sincere" and "gold digger" so you can tell who loves you because you're a wonderful person and who merely loves your wallet.

      does it matter? get a vasectomy and have some fun.

      but in all seriousness i would open a homeless shelter

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    88. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'all are funny. You see I can't afford basic stuff - at all. I just last week was talking to my god brother about a phone I got from work and the look in his eyes was "there he goes talking about that fancy pants JOB he has again".

    89. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Philanthropy would also have been my first choice. Now that my mom is retired, she is running a small non-profit with her sister. I can tell this has been an amazing experience for them and they are truly enjoying it.

    90. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Runs check on the numbers for habitat. Something like 45% of your donation doesn't make it to the actual person in nEd. Instead it funds the "administration" of habitat.... Very low by charity standards.

    91. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help some disadvantaged kids get better teachers, provide clean water or infrastructure in developing countries, donate money to interesting research projects.

      Why does no one ever think of helping disadvantaged teachers get better kids?

    92. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, nothing Carter has done is of any worth

      You obviously have President Carter confused with someone like yourself. Do something, then your opinion may have worth. Try comparing yourself, your life's work, to President Carter and his, and if you are not in awe, you did it wrong, or you suffer from delusions of grandeur.

      I'd bet my LIFE that anything that President Carter failed dismally at had more worth than anything you've done that you thought you did well, or was worthwhile.

      President Carter is a great man, an exceptional human being. You, I would guess, have some excuses for yourself. That's ok, not all men an be great.

    93. Re:For starters... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I touched on this in a post on a different site just a day or so ago. I sold my business for a decent sum of money, certainly nothing akin to this guy's earnings but I am financially set to the point where I can be pretty stupid (if I want) and not actually have to worry about it. The problem is that, once people know you've accumulated some wealth, their whole attitude changes. You can no longer trust their motives.

      I have a feeling that this is going to be a novella. You have been warned. I am not the greatest at articulating but, I suppose, I'm pretty decent at verbosity.

      For example, I am no longer married and have not been for a quite a while. I will never be able to wed again. It is difficult to even have an intimate relationship. I have, indeed, been "burned" already due to my unfamiliarity with the situation. I'd rather not get into details but, suffice it to say, I'm an idiot. I can no longer really trust anyone because I don't know their motives.

      I'm far from greedy and pay every single tax that I am obligated to pay. I help my nearest village, usually aiming towards helping the impoverished and increasing education in tech, and I donate a great deal because I feel that is my end of the social contract - not because I am obligated to by any law. All of my income is from capital gains and feel that my tax burden is lower than it should be - which is one of the reasons I enjoy donating. I feel that donating is akin to a form of taxation (willful) with representation.

      Then, at the same time, I'm viewed as some sort of unethical monster by others. They assume I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth - not that I didn't spend eight years in the military to pay for my education. They hate my children because they have trust funds that enable them to not work - though they still do. They don't realize that those trust funds are actually funds in the market that may well be keeping their employer afloat or allowing their employer to expand.

      Though I not have a board seat at my credit union they think I am somehow stacking the deck - even though I am no longer "playing the game." Yet, in the past two weeks we've allowed a nearly insolvent company to stay in business for another year and allowed a single proprietorship agricultural business to expand as well as opted to be lenient with several businesses who were having financial difficulties.

      I've given away more money than many will make in their lifetimes. I had relatives and friends "crawling out of the woodwork." Everyone has wanted something. No matter what I do, it will not be enough. Yes, I have been lucky and don't ever have a risk of being financially needy ever again and no, I am not anywhere near 'wealthy' comparatively speaking. I did not do anything immoral or unethical to get here. I worked my ass off and got lucky and was in a position to capitalize on luck by taking chances. I attribute it not to my skill or work but to my good fortune - I was lucky and did not work harder than many other people who were not lucky, I actually worked less hard than they did.

      And, if it matters, my two children are both productive members of society. Well... In the Boy Child's regards let's at least settle for saying that he is not harmful. He's, ostensibly, still in school but that's changed. He lives frugally, which is good. They do have trusts and have full control. They could be stupid and try to manage it themselves or spend it all at once as opposed to living off the interest and dividends. They could get away with not being productive but they're hardly lucrative lives. I did not want to enable them to be vile nor did I want to give them cause to be socially harmful.

      Both of them have a "trivial" income of about $3000 USD per month and can do absolutely nothing - should they desire. My daughter is now in the medical field doing her rounds in an emergency room. My son, claiming to study biology, went to Peru at the start of this year and, from all accounts, is not actually studying the fauna so very well... He's th

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    94. Re:For starters... by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      I mean, hell...the ONLY reason I work, is to earn enough $$$$ to support my lifestyle. If I didn't have to earn the money, I'd certainly not be working...and I"d have a blast till I died.

      Generally speaking, once you have enough money so you don't have to work, many of the pressures of work go away (you're not worried about getting fired, etc.). If you're actually independently wealthy, you typically start your own business doing some type of work that you really find fulfilling. You generally won't work for someone else unless you really want to work for them (i.e. getting your "dream job", or working with someone you idolize).

      The reason you will still work with ridiculously wealthy is because if you don't work you'll soon get bored, or start to feel like a worthless leech only taking from society, but not giving anything back. It's the same reason why so many retirees go out and get jobs they don't really need.

    95. Re: For starters... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Feeding our tapeworm... I am not sure if you were going for the KitH reference but, if you were, I remember that episode. I loved that show.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    96. Re: For starters... by jhoger · · Score: 1

      So you're a conservative. No one fucking cares.

    97. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Oh, definitely. $1M will do a lot, and there are definitely tons of labs that could use it. Or even start an endowment at a few universities so they can have more PIs.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    98. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno how someone could be rich and miserable.

      When you come into sudden wealth, it changes all the relationships in your life.

      Posting as AC, as something like this did occur to me (on a vastly smaller scale!). I worked for a hot tech company, and all the friends and neighbors were always following it and wanting to talk to me about how well the company was doing, how stock options were doing, etc. It was interesting and little sad to see how people started treating us differently as the company stock was going up and up and kept going up. Did a remodel on our house, which made our good fortune more visible and "real" to those in our 'hood, and it seemed afterward that a lot of our neighborhood friends became a lot more distant and secretive.

      So I can definitely see how the unequal balance will require a recalibration, and perhaps move one out of their old social group and into another.

    99. Re:For starters... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The problem is that rich people don't have friends the same way poor people do. When you are poor you rely on each other and the bond is a lot stronger. When you are rich it's merely a person of convenience to chat to at parties, then say nasty things about them after they leave.

    100. Re:For starters... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I happen to live by a beach somewhere warm. As much as it sounds great when your from somewhere cold, it does get boring just sitting around all day.
      Holidays feel good because of all the shit that happened before the holiday. It's relative. If you whole life is a holiday you simply get bored and depressed, just like Markus Persson

    101. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he has real interest in "doing a Musk", while wanting to avoid the nonsense, he could invest in Musk (or equivalent thereof, like Carter). What we really need is the sort of "Long Range Foundation" described by Heinlein a whole bunch of years ago in his novel "Time For The Stars". If done right, it could legitimately suck up all kinds of loose billions, and eventually reward humanity hugely.

    102. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i was him, i'd start by getting in shape. Then, mostlikely trying to fund something simillar to spacex. Of course, you will encounter assholes, but so what? That's inevitable, and crying over it is counterproductive.

    103. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    104. Re:For starters... by SacredByte · · Score: 2
      Attaining and maintaining wealth requires work.

      Those who put in the work to earn their wealth tend to have the drive that pushes them to get out and do things. Not just cruising around the world and hanging out with friends, but actually working towards tangible goals.

      On the other hand, those who receive a windfall of unearned wealth (inherited, lottery, etc.) often spend the money and end up worse off than they were to start with. They see more zeros in their bank account, and they constantly have the urge to splurge.

      In both cases, working is a defense mechanism: It helps keep one group sane, and the other from spending through all their money.

    105. Re:For starters... by Goragoth · · Score: 1

      If I suddenly came into that kind of money I would use it to realize all of my creative dreams. I would start a computer game company, hire people to create one or more TV shows that I have ideas for, and more. I have millions of ideas for things that I would like to create that would just need some capital to get going. Sure some might turn out to be awful but it wouldn't matter with that much money to back me up. Once those are up and running I would set up my own set of charity organizations targeting what I think are the worlds biggest problems. I would also invest in nuclear R&D and push for more nuclear development and a move to electric cars to finally tackle the CO2 problem.

      That would be for a start. I'm sure I could come with a million other things to spend the money on too. What I wouldn't do is buy a mansion and a bunch of sports cars, that's just stupid. A nice house and a good electric car sure, but nothing ostentatious. I've never understood the whole "conspicuous consumption" thing.

    106. Re:For starters... by zootnami · · Score: 2

      But Notch's problem isn't things to do, it's people to do them with. Your cash-spending ideas may be enjoyable to you, but you're doing them alone. That's fine if that suits your personality type, but many people want to do things with friends. When you're suddenly rich, all your current friends are stuck at work so they aren't available to go on adventures.

      And if you do meet people who can accompany you, you'll always question their true motivations; are they hanging around you because they truly like you, or your cash? If you're generous and throw elaborate parties for your friends, pay for their jaunts with you, and put their kids through college, then you may not realize it but they'll come to fear you. Don't annoy him or he'll take it away. Everyone with less money than you will become a yes-man.

      That's what Notch has come to realize. He can only trust the motivations of other rich people because they're the only ones who don't want anything from him. Hanging out with the rich and famous becomes a necessity instead of a perk. Sure, it's a nice problem to have... but it still sucks, and it doesn't just affect the mega-rich. Even us 99%'s will see it between our friends in different socio-economic classes.

    107. Re:For starters... by zootnami · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Replied to the wrong comment. Sorry.

    108. Re:For starters... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I'd continue working but not for a corporate overlord. There are a lot of projects I would like to do but need a lot of money to get off the ground.

    109. Re: For starters... by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      My dad, a war hawk Republican who despises most Democrats will even tell you Carter is the best Ex-president in his life time, if not ever.

      I have to agree. I detest quite a few things Carter the president did (it would be nice if we could recycle out nuclear fuel) but as a former president he's done some great stuff.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    110. Re: For starters... by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Democracy by definition is oppression of the minority and that's often the opposite of peace.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    111. Re:For starters... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      does it matter? get a vasectomy and have some fun.

      Oh really now. I don't want to spend my time alone the other 3 hours of the day.

    112. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed how many people think they'd love this life... the classic "money makes you happy" thing, full of sex with random people, live for your own pleasure. This is precisely what Notch has found to be empty and meaningless.

      Seriously, take a look at how many ultra-rich and famous people eventually realize that living for personal pleasure is shallow and meaningless. IMHO you're never going to find the happiness you're looking for, if you think money (and/or the things money buys) will give it.

      Disclaimer: yes I know that being poor can suck even more than being rich. That's not my point.

    113. Re:For starters... by houghi · · Score: 1

      I agree, except for the "taking care of" part. I would not give qnybody qny money. Luckily I do not have family or friends in need of money and as I live in Europe, that would not happen, unless they are stupid and do stupid things.

      If they spend more than they get in, then me giving monies will just enhance that and make the hole deeper and harder to get out of. If they signed for na house they can't afford, then that is not my problem.

      And living in Europe, it is highly unpossible that it would be due to medical reasons. My mom gets cancer treatment for free. My sister received it fro free.

      And for the rest: travel. Driving around the world by car. No need to take a plane to get you from London to Capetown in 1 day if you can drive it in 1 year or more.

      Do something like Gunter Holtorf and that you can make as cheap or expensive as your budget allows. Interested in more? Look up 'overlanding'.

      Now if you want to burn money fast, you can always buy a boat.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    114. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, democracy by definition is rule by the people. It doesn't say minority or majority.

      Of course, if it's rule by a minority of the people, you have an oligarchy.

    115. Re:For starters... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      When you come into sudden wealth, it changes all the relationships in your life.

      Then don't let people know that you're rich. There are plenty of towns you could move to that probably wouldn't recognize Bill Gates and definitely not recognize the creator of Minecraft. I know I wouldn't recognize him.

      I'm not super rich but I probably make 2-3 times what my friends make but I keep it to myself. I drive a normal car, live in a normal house, and without looking at my bank account you would have no idea that I make more than most of my neighbors.

      That being said, if I had billions of dollars I would definitely open up an R & D lab and employ a half dozen engineers to help me with my hobbies. :-)

    116. Re:For starters... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      But Notch's problem isn't things to do, it's people to do them with. Your cash-spending ideas may be enjoyable to you, but you're doing them alone. That's fine if that suits your personality type, but many people want to do things with friends. When you're suddenly rich, all your current friends are stuck at work so they aren't available to go on adventures.

      You can dole it out piecemeal and corrupt all your friends into yesmen but there's a simpler solution when you're an instant billionaire. You hopefully had friends before your windfall, so just give all these friends $10 million a piece no strings attached and no additional money ever. Now they are rich too, the ones that want to be your friends will stick around and the rest, it's a small price to pay to get rid of them. $10 million is enough that your old friends should be able for the most part keep up with most of your adventures now.

    117. Re:For starters... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      If he has real interest in "doing a Musk", while wanting to avoid the nonsense, he could invest in Musk (or equivalent thereof, like Carter). What we really need is the sort of "Long Range Foundation" described by Heinlein a whole bunch of years ago in his novel "Time For The Stars". If done right, it could legitimately suck up all kinds of loose billions, and eventually reward humanity hugely.

      This is exactly what Warren Buffet did. He found an organization that was aligned with his goals and gave his money to them so that they could deal with the day to day instead of him.

    118. Re: For starters... by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      In an oligarchy you want to be part of the 1%.

      In a democracy you want to be part of the 51%

      Whoa be unto the 49%

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    119. Re:For starters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You can't hit the gym daily for 1-2 hours with a job? Tons of people do.. ok, it's the bottom end of your scale, but I do an hour a day (walking on a treadmill, watching TV on an iPad).

      I try, but often, things get in the way....that and the job is not always close to where the gym is.

      And it is rushed, if having to do the gym early in the morning before work, and a PITA if you have to go in the afternoons (4-5pm) when the gym is full, and traffic is a PITA getting there.

      So, yes, much easier to do it as your pace, at your times if you don't have to force it into an already crowded schedule with a work day.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    120. Re:For starters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The reason you will still work with ridiculously wealthy is because if you don't work you'll soon get bored, or start to feel like a worthless leech only taking from society, but not giving anything back.

      AGain...nope, I have plenty of hobbies and interests, and would not get bored.

      And as for society...what do I have to "give back"? I don't feel I owe "society" anything really, I'm in the game for ME. You come into this world alone, you have a short period of time here...you gotta enjoy it.

      Sure I love my family and my friends, but when it comes down to it, where rubber meets the road, it is all about me, the individual and what makes my short time on earth here special and fun.

      I don't owe anyone anything. I don't mind giving, but I don't feel obligated to give anything back to anyone.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    121. Re:For starters... by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Educate thy self troll:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08...

      He's one of best President we ever had, who has never gotten enough credit because of the charlatan that followed him.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    122. Re:For starters... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Then don't let people know that you're rich. There are plenty of towns you could move to that probably wouldn't recognize Bill Gates and definitely not recognize the creator of Minecraft. I know I wouldn't recognize him.

      If you are Bill Gates, or even Notch, the cat's going to get out of the bag sooner or later.

      Now maybe if you managed to lay low long enough, people would be okay at pretending to ignore the "new" circumstances once your identity were eventually revealed, but it's never going to be the same.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    123. Re:For starters... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      It can be difficult to do such things due to legal constraints. Put broadly, you can't set up something that other people can't change after you die. See: Rule against perpetuities.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    124. Re:For starters... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      A little rambly, but interesting. Most of what you say makes sense, though I've really got to think there's still some way to make a long-term relationship fit in there.

    125. Re:For starters... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a bit tough to touch on all the subjects I wanted to mention and there was no way I could really be deep with any of them because of the length and readability reasons. I am not a writer. I probably could have written it in PERL and had it shorter and more readable.

      Anyhow, to comment on your reply, I am not sure how to have a meaningful long-term relationship really. Well, no... I'm sure of how to do it but the trouble is getting to the long-term part. I am not sure how to achieve that. I currently have two lady friends that I am intimate with who know the situation and accept it and don't actually seek a committed relationship.

      I am definitely not sure how to say this...

      They are not prostitutes or anything but I choose to financially support them in part as a gift. I do not do so because they sleep with me. I do so because they are enabled more with the help. It would be tough to gift anonymously in this sort of situation and I think I'd decline to pay if they directly asked for money. I do frequently give them gifts (sometimes cash) because it helps them and it is something I can afford to do - again, it's not as a payment for services rendered or anything.

      This is awkward to explain. Hmm... I guess I'd potentially give them cash if they asked but it's too complex to give list the variables. An example might be that one mentioned that she was having issues with her vehicle and asked if I was willing to loan her the money to get it repaired (Was it hinting, asking, or merely conversation? I can never be certain.) and that was an issue that I was able to resolve for her quickly and easily.

      I'd say we have loving relationships. The two know each other and have been in the same room at the same time and are completely aware of the situation. I don't think that either of them prefer it but they seem inclined to be okay with it and have stated that they are happy. One of them lived here in the house with me for a while and they've both gone off on extended vacations with me in the past. No, not at the same time... Strangely, that's not as much fun as one might think and neither of these two seem to be "into" that sort of thing.

      I don't pay their way through life or anything. They both have jobs and whatnot. I have the house that was here on the land when I bought it so I could easily afford to put them both up here but I imagine that would just lead to conflict. They may be friendly to one another now but I'd expect some conflicts if it were long-term. I'd "settle" for one but I have a poor history at being faithful and do not want to harm anyone - some of the issues are my own personal failings and others are monetary. I guess that's accurate.

      Can I make a long-term relationship work? Well, these days it's possible to sue for "palimony" (strangely enough - spell check recognizes that as a word). I could almost certainly get a legally binding contract written up to protect my assets I suppose. Hell, I'd be fine even if I lost a bunch in a lawsuit. I just don't want the hassle, the risk, or having that much baggage when the inevitable breakup occurs.

      With my ex-wife, even though the divorce was a long time before I sold my business, I still felt obligated to give her a chunk of money after the business sold and I was actually able to access the money. She'd helped me create the business, in some ways, by enabling me and encouraging me to take the risks and try the route I did take. If I'd not been sexing secretaries or other random women we'd likely be together still.

      Then, we have the really awkward situation of proposing that contract or a prenuptial agreement. While they're more acceptable today they are basically saying that I don't believe the relationship will last and that I think they're a money grubbing whore. I'm not really sure how to put that in a light manner that will be honest. It's not like I can say that I'm interested in protecting them...

      So, it's possible but I can't think of a way to make it probable. I could expand my horizons

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    126. Re:For starters... by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Anyway, it's not a real problem... But an annoying thing that's developed since he became 'very comfortable'...

      There's your solution right there. It takes effort and luck to be financially very comfortable. But returning the favor by annoying someone back? That's totally free, and triples your investment in entertainment value after the first couple times. You just have to be creative about it :-)

    127. Re:For starters... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I guess if I were to get overnight wealthy, it would have to be the lottery, Powerball or something.

      What would I do?

      Well, I'd leave work so fast the door wouldn't come within a mile of my ass hitting it on the way out. While I *might* stay long enough to be a nice guy, maybe give the passwords to someone, I'm outta there.

      People that say they'd keep working, not me. I don't understand that, I have PLENTY of things I like to do that can keep my occupied for the rest of my life.

      I"d likely but a nicer house here in New Orleans...one in maybe Denver, CO to go when too hot here, and maybe one in Key West or somewhere near a beach when I felt in that mood.

      Married? Hell no....why get married when you can now be free to chase pussy 24/7...or if nothing else, do the sugardaddy.com thing...cute, good looking girls, and you get to upgrade models at will without having to risk losing half your shit you own.

      But more seriously, the world is your oyster if you are that rich. Travel, see things..hell, you can see and do a lot without ever leaving the US.

      I have plenty of friends around the US, so, I don't really need more. I'd take care of them and their families (the ones that are married)...and well, just have fun.

      I have never understood the lottery winners who'd just keep working. I've got a ton of stuff I'd rather be doing at any point in the day.

      Heck, on some long times in between contracts, one time was 7mos...I'd wake up about 8-9am, go walk the dog...maybe jump on my motorcycle and hit the gym daily for 1-2 hours. Home for lunch, then maybe back on the motorcycle (summer/early fall) and go check out a new art museum or something here in NOLA...and maybe catch a fest or meet friends of mine getting off work at a bar for a few about 4pm....come home...lather, rinse, repeat.

      Personally I never got tired of that easy life..and hey, if I was rich and got bored, I could always travel somewhere and vacation from that!!!

      Yep, I'm sorry, I dunno how someone could be rich and miserable.

      If it is so bad, gimme the money and let me take a swing at that type of life. I assure you, I'll have no problems.

      You must be under age 32.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    128. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two sides to this--in my own family some people will insist on going out to dinner at fancy restaurants we can't pay for--then paying and complaining that we don't pay for them. But we can't! We didn't want to eat there. We want to stay home and eat tofu. We want to eat take out falafel. But they are like WHAT? NO! And it's also hard because we can't keep up or reciprocate but they refuse to slum it with us. So we actually don't see our own family members. We go to a motel and have a great time hiking in the woods nearby. They go to Turks & Caicos. Try seeing it from the other side--there's some shame involved in getting richer people to slum it. And I wouldn't say it is class--we have ivy league degrees and one more degree than these family members. So it's not like we're these money grubbing people. We LIKE our life. We went into the non profit sector and they went into business so we are broke and they are rolling in cash. We don't really care that our car is a beater and our house is ramshackle and we don't need anything from them. The only 'money' thing we like is travel. So it's also on the richer people--their values can also be an obstacle for connection if you are not the rich person. They will no longer enjoy takeout falafel by the seaside or the grubby hotel in the Guatemalan jungle.

    129. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Woe

    130. Re:For starters... by fuzzy2k · · Score: 1

      Get involved in answering a classic question, like "Will money buy happiness?" Your anecdotal evidence suggests not, and I have been content to accept it on face value for most of my life, but I would feel better if we could prove it. To that end, I will offer myself up as a test subject. tart giving me money, and as soon as I am happy I will let you know.

      --
      --- Say something clever. Pretend it was me. Thanks.
    131. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but it sounds you are a little jealous.

    132. Re:For starters... by doccus · · Score: 1

      I'd do the "Magic Christian" thing ;-) Amazing how many relieved homeless people there could be. Of course I notice because I live in the area with the hiighest level of homeless in Canada. OK so maybe some would go and spend it on booze or a rock.. Others wouldn't. Holding back assistance because you don't know what they'd spend tt on is elitist and self righteous. The only reason God allows some people to become rich is to help the less fortunate. This isn't *my* opinion, incidentally. This is what people that have died for anywhere from 15 minutes to several hours were told. By what they recognized as "God". And furthermore, in their "life reviews" the biggest question was always "what did you do for others around you?" Check it out for yourself at Youtube's ndeaccounts...

    133. Re:For starters... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was going to say "put aside enough money to live relatively comfortably for the rest of your life, then give most of it away".

      Isn't it funny how none of the whiny, social-activist Hollywood actors actually manage to walk that walk.

    134. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine 'reciprocating' doesn't always have to involve money. If the thing you've always done is go out to dinner at restraunts reciprocating can be suggesting a date and making a booking. To the friend with too much cash they don't care who pays the bill, but because you made the effort to set up dinner it counts as you putting in the time to continue being friends.

      The poster you replied to appears to prefer hanging out at peoples places, yeah that is going to incur some costs for the host. But the effort of inviting people over is still more important.

      Even people without much money tend to be time poor. So watching where they spend their time shows where their heart is. This equally applies to rich peoples time, and for them watching where their cash goes tells you very little.

    135. Re:For starters... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      But then they'd have to skip the private jets and cocaine! That's clearly unreasonable.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    136. Re:For starters... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a bit tough to touch on all the subjects I wanted to mention and there was no way I could really be deep with any of them because of the length and readability reasons. I am not a writer.

      Sounds like it's time to hire someone to ghost write your memoir. Or not. :)

      ... lady stuff ...

      Sounds like you've found your way into a role that could best be called "sugar daddy" or close to it. Not pejoratives here, just condensing a few paragraphs into a term that's borderline cliche, but I guess it exists for a reason. If I understand it right, there's a personal connection, but there's also a financial imbalance strong enough it does intrude on the relationship in some ways, even if it's on the whole mutually beneficial. You're in a position to be able to provide some now and then and can enjoy it, and they're in a place where they really appreciate it, but it's also not the core of your relationship, just one of the fringe criteria.

      I could almost certainly get a legally binding contract written up to protect my assets I suppose. Hell, I'd be fine even if I lost a bunch in a lawsuit. I just don't want the hassle, the risk, or having that much baggage when the inevitable breakup occurs. ... Then, we have the really awkward situation of proposing that contract or a prenuptial agreement. While they're more acceptable today they are basically saying that I don't believe the relationship will last and that I think they're a money grubbing whore. I'm not really sure how to put that in a light manner that will be honest. It's not like I can say that I'm interested in protecting them...

      I'm going to disagree a little here. I have to ask, when you get car insurance, do you say, "It's because I'm planning to crash the car?" Do you have insurance on your house because it's preparation for burning it to the ground? Does health insurance mean you're trying to catch cancer? I know that a prenup, being about a relationship instead of physical stuff feels a little different and I can see that, but I think that's overly negative. You could also just look at it as a contingency plan. Contingency plans are great for *everything*. I have a contingency plan for supper, for what happens if my Friday night falls through, and what happens if my wife dies and leaves me with two little kids, or one, or none. I don't want any of these things to happen, but I've thought about all of them, to at least some extent.

      It seems clear that money is already intruding upon your relationships. If it wasn't at all, I'd say that's great and drop it. But since it is, a prenup is just one of many ways to manage how and to what extent it intrudes. Acknowledging that fact doesn't necessarily turn into an insult to your partner, at least in my mind. For one semi-random data point, the financial guy Dave Ramsey, who leans pretty conservative Christian and holds the belief "when you get married, two become one in all ways" still recommends prenups when more than a million dollars is involved.

      On the flip side, if past history indicates you're not entirely comfortable in strictly monogamous relationships, that's completely outside the financial discussion. I think that can be addressed, too, if you want it to be, but through mostly different means.

      I am certainly open to advice or insight if you have any.

      Well, I'm just some random schlub on the internet, so I'm not sure what my advice is worth. I haven't been in your situation, and the closest thing to a credential I have is "I like to think about stuff"and sometimes listen to other people's situations. Mostly I guess it depends how much you're bothered by things. If you're in a good place and were just commenting, maybe there's nothing to be done. But if it weighs on you, there's probably room for change, if you want to go for it. How's that for some ultimately weak commentary?

    137. Re:For starters... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In no particular order... I don't think one needs to experience something to opine accurately on it. I can generally assume that getting shot sucks. So, thank you for your thoughts - I appreciate them. It's always good to get someone else's perspective.

      I've pondered writing something of value but I can't get much further than the title. I do have an idea of consolidating a bunch of my online posts to tell a story. I'm not entirely sure what the value would be. It does seem like an interesting project though I'd probably just give it away as an ebook.

      No, but I tell the insurance company that I just might get hammered and wrap my BMW around a tree. (Yes, I know the porcupine joke. But I did just recently allow myself to splurge on my first "bespoke" vehicle and it was a 640Li. I hope you understand.) I am not sure how they would take it and I'm not sure how I would express it - should I actually opt to go through with something like that.

      What a strange conversation to be having on the internet... Ah well... There are surely pictures of my penis online somewhere, this is hardly more revealing.

      I really don't know where to even begin to bring up a subject like that. I think the 'sugar daddy' is apt when not using it as a pejorative. It's an amicable situation. I'd almost be willing to just move one of them in and give them a set allowance but that really skirts on prostitution in my eyes and, to be honest, I do desire something more meaningful than that. I mean, yeah, I may be a bit shallow by some folks standards but I prefer to think of myself as a realist and not entirely a prick.

      I think it may be time to hit the road again for a while. I've a decent RV that I take out for months at a time when I get wanderlust. I've been known to just do it in a car as well. Sometimes I think I can meet just the right girl and whisk her away to a new life but picking up teenage runaway girls is probably against the law. Wireless is ubiquitous now and I'm always just using RDP/VNC to go through a home computer anyhow. I can live in an RV pretty comfortably actually but I hate driving it in a city so I usually tow a car on a dolly behind it - for every dinosaur you don't burn, I will burn two.

      *shrugs* I can see where the guy would get depressed. He'll get over it. Drugs and alcohol don't help - not even if you're extracting Fentanyl (80 times more potent than heroin) and ingesting it via IV. I do keep my occasional weed usage but that's really not a method of coping, that's just to enjoy some introspection or whatnot. Boredom is important to avoid. It's easy to be bored. I'm a car lover to the point where I have a mechanic that comes in and works on my cars every Saturday - I've taken to helping him out and doing a bit more of the work myself as I keep him busy.

      Maybe he should find something and start coding again. I'd write something useful if, say, I could think of something that we actually needed that I was interested in. Ah well... It is nice to be able to invest in others and to see where that goes but I'm not one to be a controlling interest so there's little to do but watch. I do see a therapist just to have someone tell me if I'm being an idiot. So far so good. They tell me that I'm a full research paper's worth of material. Yay?

      Anyhow, yeah... I'm not averse to advice or criticism. I'll take any more insights you've got and are willing to throw out there. ;-) I can't guarantee I'll listen or anything but I will read and apply logic and my own personal concerns. I just can't seem to think of a way to find "Miss Right" without being dishonest. I'm kind of liking the rambling around the country at random though I should broaden my horizons a bit but I really don't think I want to drive around the entire planet.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    138. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just take him out to drinks alone sometime and tell him how you feel?

      Have a conversation!

      Maybe you'll both learn something.

    139. Re: For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Woe!" --Keanu Reeves

    140. Re:For starters... by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it isn't about money, it's just about showing that you care. For example, I have this friend that has a complicated financial situation. When we go out with her, she tries to spend as little as possible, or even openly transfer the cost to people that she considers that have a better situation. But she spends more with her roommate. I don't really care about the money, but if you say that you can't go out because you need money, or expect me to foot most of the bill, and at the same time spend more with other people, I feel that my friendship is worth less.

    141. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love is overrated.

      Speaking as one married for over 30 years, I assure you that love is not overrated.

    142. Re:For starters... by BranMan · · Score: 1

      A bit of a late reply, but I just came across this. I have enjoyed reading your ramblings. I'm a bit below you on the pay scale - comfortable but still definitely working for a living - saving and planning for retirement at some point, so I'll have time on my hands then for sure.

      Romantic relationships seem really important to you, so that's what I will talk about here.

      Once I gave relationship advise to a woman I met during a layover in an airport who was heading off to a political party convention of all things. The only thing I could come up with kind of stuck with me - "Find the one you can't live without. Then.... don't [live without them]". I've been pretty lucky in that department - coming up on my 25th wedding anniversary next year.

      A friend of mine met the man of her dreams - they are still together to this day I am sure, though I have not seen them in many years - at a gaming convention of all things. Met and talked and hit it off and stayed up all night talking. And that was that.

      What I'm trying to get at with my rambling is that when it happens it just happens. And if you know them enough to trust them you can trust them with anything - you just know.

      My advise to you is to get out there on the road like you don't have much in the bank, and just meet people. This I know you think is dishonest, but bear with me. Take the time to get to know her - find the ONE man - and during the course of a year play all the "what if" games. What if we won the lottery - what would we do? Then make it happen - concoct your own lottery, or contest, or drawing, or whatever, and "win" a couple of million dollars.

      Then do with her all the things you'd do in that case - that will be more fun than you can imagine. And after a year of that - if it hasn't all come unglued - come clean about everything. And she will not care one bit - if anything she'll think it's the most romantic thing she has ever heard of.

      That's how I'd do it.

    143. Re:For starters... by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you're a sociopath/psychopath. Got it.

    144. Re:For starters... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That is absolutely fascinating. I think I will give that some thought and actually implement some of that idea. I'm reasonably good at discussing things with being honest but not saying everything and that's a reasonable compromise, thank you. I'd not thought of that. "Me? No... I don't work now. I'm out looking to see what life has to offer. I used to be in the traffic modeling field but I am currently just looking to see where life's road leads me. How about you? What are your goals?" Something like that really has potential with the bonus that I'd get to be happy because I'm not being dishonest.

      I've not found anyone new to truly love and be intimate with, at a real degree, in a long time. I do miss it. I've made new friends whom I truly love and would die for. Well, to be honest, I'd find a corrupt cop and have someone threatened or hire them a lawyer but I suppose I'd die for them if it ever truly came to it but, really, I kind of doubt that situation is going to arise.

      As a decent, I think, human we feel obligated to help those around us - especially those who are in need and we are close with. I have neighbors who were reasonably poor. They're your typical older Maine couple on a farm that is not much more than subsistence farming, to be told. They are, well, more content today.

      For example, she's my cleaning lady - she makes very good money and works a few hours a day. She does my shopping, she cleans my clothing, and makes me a few meals a week. She checks on me daily which has been her habit since I used to be an abuser of IV opiates. It took me a while to convince her to start picking up other things she might need while on the same trip.

      Her husband does a few things but I have him, "Cutting out some of that damned excess wood and thinning it out for the wildlife." (Known as Timber Stand Improvement and is an excellent thing to do.) Why, of course, I don't need that wood and he's encouraged to "just sell it, give it away, keep it." Of course their truck wasn't suited so I bought a "new truck" that he helped me pick out and, again, there's no reason to leave the thing clogging up my driveway - I have enough cars as it is. Seeing as he's using it to do work for me then he might as well have a gas card.

      They still farm. I buy a half cow and a couple of pigs from them at a time usually. They've stopped billing me for the milk. I've learned to safely operate a chainsaw, cut down the meat to serviceable cuts, preserve my food, garden, and many more things - I'd say I'm making out better than they are.

      Which, by the circular reasoning that is my head, brings me back to my point. Thanks again. I'd somehow overlooked that what we call soft skills or interpersonal skills needn't be deceptive nor done with malice or an attempt to control. I need to be able to justify all of my actions. I'm a Buddhist (not a GOOD Buddhist and surely not a monk) so doing the right thing is important to me. Of course, "because I want to" is a fine justification though, "because I can" is not.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    145. Re:For starters... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Do I need one? I didn't say this was an ex-President contest.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    146. Re: For starters... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'm not a conservative, and you're a troll.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    147. Re:For starters... by operagost · · Score: 1

      That you'd call Reagan a charlatan indicates just how ignorant you are. It's setting the bar pretty low, but Carter is still better out of office than he was in it. One of the best Presidents ever? Not in any academic's opinion.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    148. Re:For starters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually know a guy who is trying that. With some of them, he's found he's in a situation much like Notch, in the sense that the women view him as a wealthy simply because he's an American, which puts a strain on the relationship. While it is true he is likely more rich than they are in absolute terms, it's not like he lives a significantly different lifestyle than they do, other than perhaps the fact he owns a car.

    149. Re:For starters... by BranMan · · Score: 1

      No problem - ideas are free to share and if anything I've suggested helps, I'm glad. My goals? Don't have many actually - I've got a pretty good life, I enjoy what I do (so by some accounts I've never worked a day in my life), and who I'm with. Can't ask for more.

      Another idea came to me - look online or on your cable for a show called "Millionaire Matchmaker". There are actually people out there specializing in, yes, matchmaking for the wealthy. Can't say how well it works out really, but hey, it's another thing you may not have considered.

      Nice to hear you're helping out some of those around you - I'd probably sneak in similar acts of kindness as you've managed. I try to help out as I can too - there are plenty of people 'below' me on the financial scale that I can and have given a little boost.

      I of course could tell you're not a native speaker - I've never heard the term 'sexing' before - but it's all good. Surprised you are apparently living in Maine - I'm living next door in New Hampshire myself.

      Good luck with finding The One! And for all our sakes keep off the opiates. Nasty stuff - glad you kicked it.

  2. Girl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marry a little girl!

    1. Re:Girl. by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      you pervert

    2. Re:Girl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      marry a little boy?

    3. Re:Girl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Girl. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I've heard stories of Silicon Valley engineers saving up their money, retiring to Mexico or Central America in their late 50's, building a mansion, and marrying a sweet little girl from the nearby village. The family consents to this because they will get the old man's money when he dies.

  3. Better myself by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Step 1: Stop reading Slashdot

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Better myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Step 2: Hire poor people to read Slashdot for me.

    2. Re:Better myself by internerdj · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be the CEO of the company I work for. Nice to meet you. Is this actual permission or do I need to keep "compiling"?

    3. Re:Better myself by westlake · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Stop reading Slashdot

      That isn't going to be a problem much longer unless DICE finds a buyer.

    4. Re:Better myself by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your title started out nice enough. But "stop reading slashdot" is not what I would do, it is what I wouldn't do.

      Assuming I were no longer constrained by money, the "suddenly wealthy" mentioned in the headline, bettering myself and others would probably be the next set of goals as I checked off items from my bucket list.

      The daily money earned off $2.5 billion is going to be about $50K-$100K, which would be pretty fun. Every day you can spend what most american families earn as annual income. Personally I wouldn't be throwing out multi-million-dollar grants to organizations, but I would enjoy traveling while trying to spend $50K per day.

      Spending the big money quickly on things would only be fun for a short term. Owning things would help a bit with the comforts of home, being suddenly wealthy means no longer being constrained by financial resources. There would be a few places I'd want to visit -- maybe tour castles and visit a bunch of countries -- but having virtually unlimited funds spread over time could be enjoyed with others who are less fortunate.

      So I think if I was suddenly a multi-billionaire, of course an accountant would be one person I'd hire, and I'd put together a small account for daily spending, say $50K, added daily to an account for everyday spending. Then I would look to spend that much and no more, especially not dropping off millions for an endowment to some organization. At least until I reached old age and was ready to donate large bundles to other groups doing good in the world.

      I would look to my own hobbies and activities that bring joy to myself and others. For me, that would mean turning my artistic hobbies of watercolor and photography into bigger parts of my life, not so much as moving on to my next career as it is developing my self. (Of course, I'd similarly pick up some of my wife's hobbies, but we share many of them.) We could enjoy life as a global tourist being generous with funds, buy new clothes and leave old ones to the local donation centers. I'd spend time doing other hobbies that are purely for fun, like kite flying, and with all that money that means visiting assorted beaches and kite festivals around the globe, enjoying the benefits of money while trying to appear as a normal but generous tourist. As I developed myself, I'd look to develop others as well. Why pay a professional to tutor just me when I can help develop the talents of others as well? Pay for classes in the subject and invite a few lucky winners with a similar skill level, and participate as just another person in the class. (I might make it known that I was the one paying for the class, depending on how much one-on-one time I wanted, or maybe just remain an anonymous member.)

      Maybe go spend a few months on the endless beaches of Chile, along with my wife. Hire some people to help learn the language from our current skills into full fluency. Hire some art teachers to teach both myself and a lucky group of a dozen other similarly-skilled natives (where I pay their regular wages so they can attend the class) as we paint on site for a few days at each location, perhaps providing art supplies they could take home at the end of the week paid for by my accumulation fund. For my kite flying hobby, when I wasn't out practicing art, I'd probably have a bunch of various sport kites delivered to that week's hotel (which of course would be directly on the beach), and bring a crate each of solidly-built deltas, some thick-sparred revolutions that will survive the inevitable beginner crashes, and a some single-string kites for the unskilled. The lucky strangers who happened to be at the beach that day could pick one up, enjoy it for the day, and take it home. Maybe enjoy time doing whatever skill building my wife also enjoys, or maybe letting her enjoy her classes without me, both so we can enjoy our own individual interests and also so we have things to talk about. Then maybe move on to mountains and beaches of Peru and Colombia, again spending around $50K/day on grou

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    5. Re:Better myself by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Spending the big money quickly on things would only be fun for a short term.

      Wait, you're not Jackie Gleason, are you?

    6. Re:Better myself by guestapoo · · Score: 1

      Step 2: Hire someone read it for you

    7. Re:Better myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hire young attractive women gifted with striking diction to read Slashdot TO me.

    8. Re:Better myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do this while you're poor too!

    9. Re:Better myself by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Impossible. It's like the hotel california. You can check out any time you like, you can never stop reading it.

  4. Buy an island by grub · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd buy an island and make a nation out of it. I would live there with the family and my army of 1000 topless female slave-warriors. The island would have a private airstrip and a private jet, piloted by a topless female slave-warrior, that would whisk us around the globe. People would become jealous of my topless female slave-warriors because Grub Island would be the only place on the planet with them.

    I would have a lottery with $1,000,000 ticket prices. The prize would be one week on my island with 10 topless female slave-warriors to be at the winner's beck and call. After the winner departed Grub Island, the other topless female slave-warriors would destroy the lottery winner's 10 because they would then be soiled and not worthy of me.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Buy an island by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      I'd buy an island and make a nation out of it. I would live there with the family and my army of 1000 topless female slave-warriors. The island would have a private airstrip and a private jet, piloted by a topless female slave-warrior, that would whisk us around the globe. People would become jealous of my topless female slave-warriors because Grub Island would be the only place on the planet with them. I would have a lottery with $1,000,000 ticket prices. The prize would be one week on my island with 10 topless female slave-warriors to be at the winner's beck and call. After the winner departed Grub Island, the other topless female slave-warriors would destroy the lottery winner's 10 because they would then be soiled and not worthy of me.

      Dude, your island, so lame. I would instead buy an island adjacent to Grub Island and open up Dave's All Nude Badass Island!!! (neon signage mandatory of course). 1000 topless female slave-warriors??? Nope. Too much work. We will limit this to 100, and have some kind of competition from all the disgruntled (read: horny) warriors from Grub Island, and.. oh hell, lunch break is over. Back to my appointed task of wage slavery..

    2. Re:Buy an island by wiggles · · Score: 0

      *Beckon Call, not "beck and call".

    3. Re:Buy an island by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Nononono....buy an island, and let thepiratebay colo there. Watching the Chris Dodd Hollywood response would be classic comedy.

    4. Re:Buy an island by wiggles · · Score: 4, Funny

      nevermind. I'm wrong.

      Hey slashdot. Can we edit/delete our posts please? FFS, this site is almost 20 years old and you still don't have this capability?

    5. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't.

    6. Re:Buy an island by chipschap · · Score: 2

      You'd get tired of it and have to upgrade to grub2.

    7. Re:Buy an island by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hey slashdot. Can we edit/delete our posts please? FFS, this site is almost 20 years old and you still don't have this capability?

      That is because it is the way Slashdot was designed. It is intentional, as if you could go back and edit your posts, you can change their tone afterwards.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, your idiocy will forever remain as a testament to what a fucking doofus you are. Such is the penalty when boys play the man's game of grammar nazi.

    9. Re:Buy an island by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And said island would disappear under a cloud of "freedom and democracy" within 6 months, courtesy the US. And suddenly all the topless slave women would have disappeared, re-appearing later as Washington interns.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Buy an island by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      On Slashdot, one must think before one speaks.

      ...

      Pffffftttt ah hahahaha naw, I can't keep that up. Nobody fucking does that. No, it's so we can laugh at your mistakes and preserve them forever to taunt you with.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    11. Re:Buy an island by PatientZero · · Score: 4, Funny

      *Beckon Call, not "beck and call".

      nevermind. I'm wrong.

      Oh thank god. I couldn't handle another linguistic bombshell like "for all intensive purposes" actually being "intents and purposes"! That rocked my world when I was eleven, and I don't think I ever recovered.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    12. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol your a fagget

    13. Re:Buy an island by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2

      It's "for all in tents and porpoises", dum-dum.

      --
      +0 Meh
    14. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You're AMERICAN, aren't you. "Beckon call" indeed - you fucking idiot.

    15. Re:Buy an island by tmosley · · Score: 1

      That makes me giggle.

    16. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While buying an island is not out of the question, making it into an independent nation appears to be harder than you think:

      http://www.worldislandinfo.com...

    17. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BWAAAHAHAHAHHA you faggot go read a book

    18. Re:Buy an island by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      This counts a Flamebait?

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    19. Re:Buy an island by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      I'd spend as much as I could on booze, drugs and women. The rest, I'd just waste.

    20. Re:Buy an island by grub · · Score: 1

      This counts a Flamebait?

      It is to those losers who couldn't afford my $1,000,000 lottery for a week with 10 of my topless female slave-warriors.

      Dream big, people!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    21. Re:Buy an island by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Hey slashdot. Can we edit/delete our posts please? FFS, this site is almost 20 years old and you still don't have this capability?

      I frequent at about 6 sites mainly for discussions and none of them allows to edit posts. Where did you get the idea?? And what about using the Preview button to actually preview your post before hitting Submit? Would that be a sign of inappropriately excessive responsibility or what?

    22. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. A rather forward jape from one of our usually docile Eurotrash friends. You're probably hitting puberty and having a hormonal imbalance. Don't worry. TPTB in your country will soon locate you and clip your balls to keep you gentle.

    23. Re: Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, I think this whole issue is a damp squid.

    24. Re:Buy an island by wiggles · · Score: 1

      I've been around here for a while (check my UID). I remember back in the 90's when they explained this - and it never made sense to me then, nor does it make sense to me now.

      Reddit proved that editing/deleting posts doesn't have those kinds of issues.

      Even if you accept that argument, getting around it by instituting some sort of versioning for posts - ("This post was edited. Click here to see previous versions.") can eliminate that.

    25. Re:Buy an island by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      I've been around here for a while (check my UID). I remember back in the 90's when they explained this - and it never made sense to me then, nor does it make sense to me now.

      Reddit proved that editing/deleting posts doesn't have those kinds of issues.

      Even if you accept that argument, getting around it by instituting some sort of versioning for posts - ("This post was edited. Click here to see previous versions.") can eliminate that.

      The easier change would be for you to get over the aversion to having something you wrote somewhere being permanently wrong. The horror.

      Honestly I'm impressed you came back and admitted to having made a mistake. I'd far rather have the high opinion of you I currently do than have none because your original post was edited to remove the inaccuracy.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    26. Re: Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't have a peasant uprising, after all. Remember subjects, arbeit macht frei!

    27. Re:Buy an island by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You should have included something about Scientology in your post. That could have gotten it deleted fairly quickly.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    28. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've watched Cobra Verde, haven't you?

    29. Re:Buy an island by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      That is because it is the way Slashdot was designed. It is intentional, as if you could go back and edit your posts, you can change their tone afterwards.

      I agree, although it would be good to be able to rate your own posts "-1 retracted". (Or perhaps better, edit your posts, but only so as to add <del> </del> around bits.)

    30. Re:Buy an island by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It's "for all in tents and porpoises", dum-dum.

      "Dum-dum". I like that. The word has fallen out of favor in recent times. We need to bring it back.

      Kids these days swear too much. They should be saying "dum-dum". Sarcastically.

    31. Re:Buy an island by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      See that little button labelled "Preview"...?

      It's there for a reason.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    32. Re:Buy an island by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      The easier change would be for you to get over the aversion to having something you wrote somewhere being permanently wrong. The horror.

      Honestly I'm impressed you came back and admitted to having made a mistake. I'd far rather have the high opinion of you I currently do than have none because your original post was edited to remove the inaccuracy.

      I agree with you to an extent, and I think that if posts can be edited, then conversations can become confusing (I have found this). But I do think it could be good to have a way for posters to mark content that they acknowledge to be inaccurate. Of course I know to read comments sceptically, but if people could mark their own mistakes, it would reduce the noise, and save me some web searches.

    33. Re:Buy an island by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I have heard that Reddit does have issues like that. People will draw out a flame, then change their post to be more moderate to make the other side look bad.

      I don't read Reddit though, so I cannot speak from experience.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    34. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowledge is power. France is Bacon.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/dxosj/what_word_or_phrase_did_you_totally_misunderstand/c13pbyc

    35. Re:Buy an island by Lorens · · Score: 1

      I'd buy an island and make a nation out of it.

      Back to the drawing board my friend:

      http://worldbuilding.stackexch...
      http://www.worldislandinfo.com...

      Seeing what you want from life, I'd recommend simply moving to a country with a permissive view on prostitution. It would probably be much less expensive than rolling your own (recommend firing those unworthy instead of "destroying" them, though).

      </troll accepted>

    36. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been watching too many harem anime. 1000 topless female warriors would have a revolution and kick your butt. You would be lucky to keep your life never mind your fortune.

    37. Re:Buy an island by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Many sites solve this problem by letting you edit your post within 5-10 minutes of posting it. They analyzed the complaints and arrived at a perfectly reasonable solution to evolve and adapt without ruining.

      Sometimes "intentional design decision" is another way of saying "tradition and habit."

    38. Re:Buy an island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit has all kinds of issues. Granted, it's a lot more than being able to edit posts, but that certainly isn't helping things.

      Though I certainly wouldn't mind something like a 30 second undo timer after hitting the submit button.

  5. Become a full time SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And end the scourge of patriarchy in tech!

    1. Re: Become a full time SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahaha. Haahahshahahshahhas. Hahahshshshhshshshahshhahshaagsvsvsvsvsvvsvssvsva. I can't breath. Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    2. Re:Become a full time SJW by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think we should fork Patreon and make Patriarch that the "SJWs" (I hate that word) can use to acquire funding - it would just be an amusing site and likely attract all sorts of interesting emails. Unfortunately, I suspect that it would be filled with MRWs (I hate that word too) who do little but antagonize their enemy.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  6. Trading one set of problems for another by erp_consultant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Becoming wealthy (whatever "wealthy" is considered these days) comes with its own challenges.

    People with no money have very specific challenges: find food and water and shelter for your family. Everything else is secondary.

    People that have a job and shelter but not enough money have different challenges: Buying a car, paying for school, You have enough for basic necessities but not enough for aspiration items.

    People with lots of money have unique challenges: Who do you trust? Taxes become problematic. Gold diggers. How do you raise kids without spoiling them?

    It seems to me that the sweet spot is around 100K per year. You're not rich but you have enough. In many cities that is enough to buy a nice home and a new car every 4-5 years. It's a nice place to be.

    1. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      Yeah I always hear people say "wouldn't it be great to win the lottery?".. Uh, I dont think it would be. Don't get me wrong I would love if all of a sudden 1 mil fell on my lap. Be enough to pay off my house, fill up my retirement account, open up some investment accounts, with plenty of play money left over. But it wouldn't be enough for me to quit my job.

      I second your opinion that 100k/year would be a pretty sweet spot. Plenty to pay all your bills, go on a nice vacation once or twice a year, have some nice things, but you still need a budget.

    2. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by leonbev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In coastal Connecticut, $100K a year isn't enough to buy a decent house if you're trying to raise a family at the same time.

      I'd bet that the New Yorkers and Californians in the forum would agree with this statement.

      $200K might be enough to get a nice home around here, but $100K a year here is like making $40K a year in a rural area. The taxes and real estate prices are a killer.

    3. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Actually, a million cash would be about enough to fund a $60k a year income assuming you can get a good rate of return (6%...crazy these days). And you'd have to play the stock market. Banks aren't paying squat, even for a million bucks.

      A million isn't as much as you think when it comes to retirement savings.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I second your opinion that 100k/year would be a pretty sweet spot. Plenty to pay all your bills, go on a nice vacation once or twice a year, have some nice things, but you still need a budget.

      You must live in a cost of living hellhole. Your comment sounds like my lifestyle, and I'm sole breadwinner making $35K.

    5. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ever win the lottery, I'll help you shoulder the burden of the proceeds.

    6. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth. I just bought a house in a college town in Oklahoma for $50,000. Income of ~$35,000. Not atypical for this area.

    7. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd still have gold digger issues at 100K.

    8. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      NYC: $100k isn't even close to enough. The sentiment, moderation in all things, is nice; but if you want to have real free time, you need extra.

    9. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by roninmagus · · Score: 1

      For those who agree: Come to Nashville, then. We've had our problems with gentrification too, but 100k will buy you a very nice upper-middle lifestyle and a city lifestyle comparable to other cities.

    10. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Yes - certainly NYC and San Francisco/San Jose/San Diego are notable exceptions. You can toss in Boston, Miami, Los Angeles and Chicago too.

      But if you live in Atlanta or Charlotte or Phoenix or Omaha or Kansas City you're probably doing pretty well on 100K.

    11. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6% is pathetic. If the person is relatively young and has a good mixed portfolio, they should be getting at least 10%. I know a few people with investment portfolios over $50M that are getting 15%.

    12. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by PatientZero · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the sweet spot is around 100K per year.

      Sadly, that's still below the poverty level in the San Francisco Bay Area. :(

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    13. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But if you live in Atlanta or Charlotte or Phoenix or Omaha or Kansas City you're probably doing pretty well on 100K.

      Yeah, but then you're living in a shithole, at least in the case of Phoenix. Plus you have to deal with temperatures over 100F every day and night for 9 months out of the year.

    14. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

      Nah - the real gold diggers are those tramps that stalk pro athletes and show up at all the parties hoping to get impregnated.

      The more shit you have the more flies you attract :-)

    15. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by bsharp8256 · · Score: 1

      SHHHHH don't let the secret out! Traffic is bad enough as it is!

    16. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      According to the Census bureau the average household income in Nashville is $46,686. That is $6360 less than the national average. In other words, you can live like a King on the cheap in Nashville, just don't expect to get paid like one.

    17. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      But if you live in Atlanta or Charlotte or Phoenix or Omaha or Kansas City you're probably doing pretty well on 100K.

      Yeah, but then you're living in a shithole, at least in the case of Phoenix. Plus you have to deal with temperatures over 100F every day and night for 9 months out of the year.

      I live in Atlanta, make right around 50k a year (give or take, this year will be more due to a very nice profit sharing check). Just got married this year, and on just my salary alone was able to buy a 2k sq ft house (we could have gotten more, but we want to save). And this doesn't even take into account my wife's salary which is around 30k a year. Granted, I am out in the suburbs which makes for a rough commute, but that is much more preferable to paying way too much to live with hipsters in Midtown/Little Five Points or killing myself to keep up with the Joneses with a 700sq ft condo in Buckhead/Brookhaven. Of course, I also have a 1 year old Focus commuter car that will be paid off next year (with 125/month payments no less) and only mildly crushing student loans (about 38k for grad school). You just have to decide for yourself what level quality of life you want to have and live within the means necessary to reach that level.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    18. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I second your opinion that 100k/year would be a pretty sweet spot

      Sweet spot is generally always 20% more than what you currently make.

    19. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by realcheese · · Score: 1

      People with lots of money have unique challenges: Who do you trust? Taxes become problematic. Gold diggers. How do you raise kids without spoiling them?

      I remember someone from school that came into a bunch of money. The problem was that she wanted to travel all over the world at a moments notice and all of her "old" friends were busy going to school, working and doing stuff to make ends meet. She basically had to find new friends that were rich and also had nothing to do so they could pal around the world together.

    20. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The first thing you do is hire manservants.

      If I had $250,000/year income, I could do my own dishes, tend my own yard, and so forth. I probably would tend the bees; but I'd get out of gardening. I'd have a gardener. Someone else would clean my house.

      There is no faster way to create jobs with some $200k/year of disposable income than by paying some teenage wench to clean your house, and some old fuck to tend your trees. There just isn't.

      If you have millions of dollars, that's great! You can start businesses; but can you create jobs? Well, kind of. If you find a way to produce something currently in production, but with *less* labor, you can produce that product more cheaply. That means you can undersell your competition, outcompeting them, and *eliminate* jobs. More unemployed.

      With more unemployed, but cheaper common goods, people generally have more money after buying all the shit they need (except the unemployed, who are struggling to get by). That means you can now spend your millions to expand some niche market--say, smart phones, which still cost $600 and bump your bill by $30/month, but now everyone has more than $600 on hand, whereas before they had the ability to spend an extra $50 on shit they wanted--and make a shitton of profit. That, of course, requires workers--this is why it costs money--so you wind up creating jobs, although only about the amount you displaced in the first place.

      This is why we always have unemployment, and why population tends to expand: you create wealth by making things cheaper to produce; you make things cheaper to produce by reducing the total invested labor-hours in production. All those layers of profits added on every good (coal to make steel, steel to make bolts, bolts to make cars) are just aggregate price; bulk purchase can negotiate that down, and direct competition can force it down, but only to the aggregate human labor costs of everything put together. When you reduce the labor cost, you wind up increasing the total buying power--same number of humans produce more things, thus the same percentage of the total income (of everyone and every business) purchases more--which means you can re-employ the same amount of displaced labor (not necessarily the same people) elsewhere, and everyone can buy more shit.

      It also means the cost of high amounts of production drops. Producing 10 things costs $100 per unit because of inefficient methods (you wouldn't open a million-dollar production facility to make ten chairs; you'd do it in a slow, inefficient manner that costs less than a million dollars in labor); producing producing 10 million costs $10 per unit, because you can use better methods; and then producing 10 billion starts relying on things like fertilizer and artificial irrigation to grow trees for wood, which is more expensive than simple tree farming, and so it costs $50 per unit. You can actually support a bigger population as you raise wealth in this way, because suddenly everyone can afford that $50 per unit good, since they're spending $50 less elsewhere on other goods; of course, then the population grows and keeps its 4%-8% unemployment, because low unemployment is restrictive on total population wealth and weird shit happens.

      So yeah. I'd have tutors, manservants, and landscapers. I might have a purser, but uh... look, my finances are better than yours. Financial management is a side hobby that's reached such a point of acuity for me that I scare bankers and accountants. Their balls shrivel up and die when we talk. I'm hoping our interest rates will go up to 14% median on mortgages so I can start an information campaign to eliminate the 30-year mortgage, since high interest rates make 10-year mortgages accessible for most people who can afford a 30-year mortgage (you wind up only having to tip in $100-$200 more per payment, instead of $2,000+ more; and you pay overall less for the same house). I was going to kill my mortgage in three years, but decided to stretch it to four or five so I cou

    21. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Half a million would be enough for me to immediately retire just fine. Probably not the happiest position, but it would be manageable.

    22. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, the cost of living sucks in Monaco, eh? Go live in Montana instead, then, genius....

    23. Re: Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most people making 100K in "Phoenix" would probably live in a little house in Scottsdale if their job permitted. Scottsdale and other "rich" areas around Phoenix are actually fantastic. For the really nice areas in AZ, a 100K annual income is not sufficient. You can buy a house for 50K in Phoenix, but trust me, you would not want to do it.

    24. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Also depends on size of family, definition of "nice vacation", and what "some nice things" constitutes. Do you throw everyone in the car and drive 60 miles away to a cabin in the woods for a week, or do you put everyone on a cruise to the Bahamas? You could probably do the cabin trip for less than 1k no matter family size, but flying somewhere adds up quick as you add people. "nice things" could mean that you insist on a brand new BMW every 4-5 years, or that you're fine letting some other guy pay the depreciation and instead going for the low mileage old used cars of whichever make and model has the best reviews and highest reliability.

      Doing roughly equivalent things but changing how frugal you are about said things can easily account for 10-20k in a year. There are a lot of small things where the time investment no longer is worth the cost or the aggravation (clipping coupons and buying those weird off-brand poptarts that taste kind of funny, for example). There are also a lot of big things that are easier to justify spending money on when you have money (For example, keeping your gaming PC more current than you used to while making less). Also keep in mind that taxes eat quite a bit more at 100k than they do at 35k.

    25. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      "The problem was that she wanted to travel all over the world at a moments notice and all of her "old" friends were busy going to school, working and doing stuff to make ends meet. She basically had to find new friends that were rich and also had nothing to do so they could pal around the world together."

      Exactly. Otherwise you become MC Hammer with a collection of hangers-on that all disappear when the money is gone. OK maybe not all but most of them to be sure. If you decide to become a jet setter and want to bring the old gang along then be prepared to pick up the tab for everyone. Either that or make friends with other jet setters that can pay their own tab.

      The more I think about this the more convinced I am that I don't want to be rich. I just want to be comfortable.

    26. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      400k a year is what I think you would need in New York, Paris, London, Palo Alto. I'm at 200k a year, it's nice, but with a two teens, wife, mother-in-law to take care of, it's not wealthy. It's good, but not wealthy.

    27. Re: Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100k a year?

      I wa there and you right as long as you have that income.

      My job was offshored In my 40s. My savings then was depleted.
      See, the way the job market is, if you are unemployed, you are damaged goods.

      Now, if I made 100K because of capital - stocks, bonds, real estate or some perpetuity ; then THAT would be great!

    28. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In coastal Connecticut, $100K a year isn't enough to buy a decent house if you're trying to raise a family at the same time.

      I'd bet that the New Yorkers and Californians in the forum would agree with this statement.

      $200K might be enough to get a nice home around here, but $100K a year here is like making $40K a year in a rural area. The taxes and real estate prices are a killer.

      If you wanted to buy a decent house and raise a family and all of that and didn't need to be near some specific job and wanted "normalcy", you wouldn't choose coastal Connecticut or New York or even California unless family or some other personal reason took you there.

    29. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      My unique challenges would be just to retire and keep roughly the same standard of living. I'm a bad investor and all that stuff bores me to tears.
      So it would be a lot like what I do now, except with not going to work, with someone who cleans up my place, someone to do the taxes for me, a nicer neighborhood, etc. I'm sure my friends will still stick around if I was wealthy. Maybe I'll go stir crazy with nothing to do, but that would happen whether or not I was wealthy.

      I make a lot more than 100K a year, but in Silicon Valley that doesn't mean you're at the sweet spot. I've got a dumpy townhouse in a marginal neighborhood. If I ever retire I will have to move away.

    30. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40k in a rural area is fantastic. Unless you literally own the farm that is easily 15k more than average.

    31. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      Californian native here. Can confirm.

      Any city in California that has jobs that support wages of $100k+ have houses that cost $700k and up. Everything else in those areas cost more too, including rent, food, gas and sales taxes. Even at $100k/yr you're still looking at a $140k down payment to save for while paying higher rates for everything else. Start saving early in life or you're screwed.

    32. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Massachusetts, and this is spot on. I make north of $100k, but considerably less than $200k. On the one hand, I feel like I make a ton of money at my job (engineer). On the other hand, it really is not enough to buy that decent house (without spending like 30% of my salary on PITI payments), at least not without moving another 20 minutes further from work (and most amenities).

      It's a bit frustrating at times, as I will occasionally see reference to homes in the south or midwest and note that I could afford a double-mcmansion in some of those places, with plenty of cash left over for other stuff.

      And obviously I could move, but my friends and family are here. So I choose to stay, and just get frustrated that the nice house I'd like is just ever-so-out-of-reach.

    33. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's not that bad...

      Living in the bay area pushes it up to about $150k. Rent is $4k /month and mortgage... Don't get me started ;)... Without housing, sub $100k would probably be interesting, unless you have kids approaching college...

    34. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by mvdw · · Score: 1

      I've often thought about this; you know, dreaming of winning the lottery and all. I often think, if I won the lottery, I could spend all my life finishing all those projects I have to do. But then, most of those projects are in place because I don't have a lot of money, so the impetus to do them is gone. Also, part (a lot?) of the fun in the projects is because it's a challenge to complete on a limited budget. If I had a lot of money, not only would the project be useless, but the fun part would be removed because suddenly there is no budget constraint. I wonder if my life would be empty if I had a lot of money? At least I could travel more, which would be great. But all those electronics and programming projects I have and enjoy doing - well, would i enjoy them as much if I weren't constrained by money?

    35. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by mvdw · · Score: 1

      I have no mod points (and I've already posted in this thread anyway); but I find your post interesting and informative. Does the premise of your last paragraph depend on US tax law?

      I didn't post merely to blow smoke up your ass though - I am genuinely interested in your sig line; can you explain it?

    36. Re: Trading one set of problems for another by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Lots of people in Chandler, Gilbert, and Tempe probably make about that much and live in more normal-sized houses. North Phoenix isn't bad either, nor is Ahwatukee. No, you really don't want to live in a $50k house in South Phoenix (north of South Mountain) or on the west side.

    37. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing you do is hire manservants.

      No no no.......you hire WOMAN servants.........preferably young ones that have Double D Breasts and wear French Maid Outfits..... ;)

    38. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I average 13% or so with my "play" account and I really don't have any history with it and I have no financial degrees or anything. I simply look for trends in various news aggregation sites and read the comments as well as talk to people. It does require that I pay attention but it works pretty well. The 13% also factors in bonds. I typically only play with bonds and stocks and, with the latter, I've found a great way to tell what is going to do well is by keeping up on the comments more than keeping up with various press releases or the likes.

      If I could cut the first few years of my learning curve off then my number would be much higher than 13%. I've not crunched the numbers but I suspect it would be closer to 18% but that is very heavily weighted by investments in Tesla. My "play" portfolio has significantly less than 50M in it. However. I don't personally manage my own investment, savings, and protection portfolio though that has a lower growth percentage than what I manage to do but that is by design. I'd rather that be handled by someone who actually knows what they're doing.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    39. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I make that in NYC. I have an awesome decently spaced (700 sqft) 1br apartment in a very cool neighborhood for around 2200/month.

      I plan on getting a mortgage soon, and my monthly costs toward housing will only reduce. I make enough money to take cabs everywhere, buy random luxurious shit like expensive drones, custom made leather jackets, a wardrobe of tailored clothes, a 75" TV with a surround setup and PS4....and I have plenty to spare. Hell I just went for a 1 week vacation in SF, LA and Vegas.

      I feel like I make enough to enjoy a luxury lifestyle and to be able to have enough leftover to put towards savings and the stock market.

      According to some calculator I just used, I'm in the top 14%. With my comp and bonuses I will likely go to top 12%.

      Anyone who doesn't think 100k in NYC is not only doing well but is damn well luxury has a lack of perspective and is completely, 100% out of fucking touch.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    40. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by houghi · · Score: 1

      If I would have a LOT of money and I am talking e.g. Euromillions with a win of 15.000.000EUR Taxes would not be an issue.

      So what if I have to pay taxes on the generated income of that 15.000.000. It becomes only a problem if you want to keep or increase the amount fo money you have.

      You fill out the form and that's it. See? No problem. I would not even move to a tax haven. At least not because of paying less taxes. Income from 15.000.000 would be say 5% per year. (Low risk stuff. No need to go high risk). Of that 5% say I have to pay 50% (High number) so I get 2.5% net. That is 375000 per year and that is if you do not want to get your amount to get less.

      If I would take an extra bit out of it to get to 500.000, I am living an extremely good life till the day I die and when I die all will be almost gone. Good.

      See, no problems with the taxes, unless I want somehow to pay less. Only then do I need to go looking for loopholes, hire an accountant, follow my income and outgoing stuff to the T and in general do what other would be called 'working'.

      No thanks. I would rent and lease as much as possible. No need to own a house that you need to buy and sell when you are bored with the location. Rent in an appart-hotel and move when you feel like it.

      Want to live in NYC for a month or two? Move to Sydney for a few months? South Africa? Do a 6 months trip? All easy without owning a lot and you have a spendible amount of 500.000 per year. That is 40.000 per month or almost 10.000 per week. And all that without the issue of bothering about taxes.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    41. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes, the last thing about solar panels is pretty context-sensitive.

      I wrote up a fully risk-analyzed, funded, well-computed Citizen's Dividend. It's essentially just replacing all our welfare (not medicare/medicaid) with an expansion of social security in which everyone starts getting paid at age 18.

      The whole thing is worked off the actual market cost of everything. For example: I paid $725/mo for a 700sqft apartment, and a lot of people are paying less per square foot (I've seen rents as low as 64 cents per square foot in nicer areas, which is ludicrous). I took the $1/sqft number, computed from a market where the typical margin was 33 cents profit on the dollar, and added a 33 cent risk margin ($1.33/sqft). Worked out how to put together a good 224sqft apartment (I can do better: 100sqft capsule apartments) for $300. That means we can definitely supply this, we can supply it for a profit, and we can make an assload of money doing it.

      Carry the same out for food, clothing, utilities, and so forth, and you come up with surprisingly little. After piling it all together, I added an 8% risk margin (I want a 15% margin; that will come with time) on top of the total in 2013 computations. It came out actually under $600 for the market economy to make a large profit supporting a single individual--note that's $600 per individual for merchants and landlords to make themselves rich as all fuck, not $600 for a person to go out, today, and find some non-subsidized housing and food. Because the people who pounce on setting up the infrastructure fastest will find themselves richer than Warren Buffet in about 3 years, I expect the magical hand of the Free Market will become the immensely greedy hand of give-me-that-shit-now in this particular case (in the same way I expect a cat to eat a bowl of tuna if I leave it near a thousand cats).

      17% happens to be the viability number for 2013. In 1950, it'd have to be a 120%-135% income tax; obviously, that's more income than actually existed at the time, so not viable. At the time, welfare cost 1.5% (including social security OASDI). As of 2013, the total cost of welfare made up 17.2% of the total IRS reported AGI, while the total cost of a viable Citizen's Dividend came to 17%. State welfare services to support immigrants and children (neither of whom receive a dividend; it's only for natural-born, resident, adult, American citizens) would shrink to a tiny fraction of their current size, providing the risk control for obvious fallout of either eliminating such welfare or just handing out money every time people had babies (the latter strategy is not only an insanely bad idea, but an unaffordable one).

      The CD gets cheaper over time, because of how wealth works (work in progress). For complex reasons, I contemplate fixing the number at 17%. The first obvious reason is to get that risk margin up to 15% (in case we have another 2007 Great Recession--the upcoming automation crisis will be worse); and the second is to ensure that, while any income represents a substantial improvement in quality-of-life, the quality-of-life of the poorest continues to improve right along with the wealth of society. I also just don't want bureaucrats and politicians tinkering.

      It's fairly involved and requires a lot of transitional planning and a lot of built-in risk controls. Once it's set, it doesn't require any bureaucratic tinkering; all it takes is some administration to collect money and send out ACH, which is kind of "we keep the pumps running" and not "we decide who gets what." The fact that it's cheaper than modern welfare also helps.

    42. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Yes for day to day living taxes would most likely not be an issue if you had as much money as you mentioned. But what if you have children or others that you want to pass the money along to after you die? If you're not careful they could lose half of it in inheritance taxes. It would be wise to put that money into a trust and for that you need professional help, unless you happen to be an accountant or attorney.

      Personally, I might think about setting up my principle residence in a place like The Bahamas where they have no taxes. You could still rent places in Paris or NYC or Milan or wherever you like but just keep a home base in a low tax or no tax location. One thing about multiple residences though - you need someone to look after it when you are not there. And if it's a house then you need someone to do the landscaping and take care of the pool, etc. You'll probably need a vehicle in each place as well. I'd probably opt for a nice lock it and leave it condo with security staff. Come and go as you please.

      A pretty awesome lifestyle to be sure but not without its own set of problems.

    43. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by houghi · · Score: 1

      If there were children, I would have a life insurance for if they are young. If they are older, they would have to fend for themselves and I hope that they have the same attitude as Ãmy sister and myself have towards our parents:
      We both hope there is nothing left when they die. If anything, there could be a lot of debt, so we can denounce the inheritance. That way we were sure that they lived their lives to the fullest.

      And the muliple residences: I would rent short term. Think appart-hotel. That way you have hotel service without the worries of staffing and if you leave, it is not your problem anymore.

      I would live e.g. 3 months in one city in a apprt-hotel and then leave for the next one if I want to or stay longer.

      Sure, more expensive than buying a house, but if I have enough, why not?

      Having a car in each place? Rent them. If you want a new one, rent a new one. If you look beyond Herz and Avis, prices can be very reasonable. Sure, don't rent a Rolls ...

      The issue that you have is that you want to own things for whatever reason. I do not want to own anything. OK, the clothes that I wear, but that is about it. Some clothes that fit into a suitcase a wallet with some credit cards and I would be set.

      No ownership, no long term rent, no binding with anything.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    44. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Montezumaa · · Score: 1

      Come live in the Atlanta area(or anywhere around the Southeastern United States), which is where I live(technically, it's the "Metro Atlanta Area", but I really live in the shithole that is Haralson County, but my wife and I built a brand new house, on over 10 acres of land, all for cash), and enjoy our summertime temperatures of slightly over 100 degrees Fahrenheit, with a humidity level that is, at least, 90 percent and above. I would gladly take 100 degrees Fahrenheit in the Phoenix area, or in that general region of the United States over where I live. Though, I would like some cooler temperatures the rest of the year, so...

    45. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this one isn't +20 Insightful. It's about as fundamental as it gets when understanding people's relationship to money.

    46. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Lorens · · Score: 1

      I average 13% or so with my "play" account [...] has significantly less than 50M in it

      Money breeds money :) The problem is getting up on the wave, after that the wave just grows unless you spectacularly lose your footing.

    47. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Lorens · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I make [100k] in NYC. I have an awesome decently spaced (700 sqft) 1br apartment [...] Anyone who doesn't think 100k in NYC is not only doing well but is damn well luxury has a lack of perspective and is completely, 100% out of fucking touch.

      Hmmm. 100k. Add in wife and two or even three kids (2br, 3br, 4br apt?) Suddenly maybe 100k seems a bit low... it's all about your expectations! Personally, I've run the numbers and decided that 100k would be enough to make me move the family to NYC, but maybe I'm optimistic.

    48. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by KGIII · · Score: 1

      This appears to be absolutely true. I think it's likely due to being able to take greater risks and not worry about it and so you get bigger returned. Well, if I had to guess that's what I'd guess.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    49. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      100F in Phoenix is *at night* (in the summer). In the daytime, you're looking at 110-120.

      Why the hell would you build a new house in a place you think is a shithole? Why not move someplace you like better, and where you like the climate better, especially if you're going to make that kind of long-term investment? I'm not real wild about the place I'm living currently either, but there's a good reason I have no intention of buying a house here: I hope to get the hell out of here in a year or three. I made the house-buying mistake before, and I'm not ever doing it again (esp. with values not appreciating like they used to) until I'm living someplace that I actually like a lot, and plan to stay for a good long while.

    50. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      You're a family of one. You didn't mention much about school, or the future, or a companion, or kid(s), or even a pet. You're doing just fine by yourself, and maybe don't have any school loans to pay off either, and I tip my hat to you. BTW you also don't mention a car, which is one of the expenses mentioned in the post you replied to (but of course I agree in NYC you don't need a car . . . unless you want to drive out of the city now and then . . ) Point is I don't think I'm 100% out of touch if you add on some very realistic expenses, and especially if you want to be able to quit your job and do other things that cost any money, like travel. We WERE talking about "being suddenly wealthy", right? not just getting by comfortably? (BTW I grew up in Manhattan, live a few miles from the GW Bridge, and my son lives in a Manhattan co-op now. I know what NYC costs.)

    51. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      We had a babysitter when our son was small who told us, after having stopped by a real estate open house down the street, that based on the price they were asking, we could sell our house and buy the fanciest house in the little town in North Dakota where she grew up, and have enough left to not work for ten years. And we pointed out, Yes, but then we'd be in the little town in North Dakota that YOU LEFT TO COME HERE. :-)

    52. Re:Trading one set of problems for another by tlambert · · Score: 1

      If there were children, I would have a life insurance for if they are young. If they are older, they would have to fend for themselves and I hope that they have the same attitude as Ãmy sister and myself have towards our parents

      One of the best things you can do for a new baby is be prepared to immediately get a permanent or whole life policy for them, which they can later borrow against, and pay themselves back with interest. If you fully fund it, which takes 11-12 years, if you pay in as much as you legally can, they can borrow from it to pay for college, borrow from it for their wedding, borrow from it to buy their first home, and so on.

      There are only about 6 companies in the U.S. which offer policies where you can set your own interest rate on cash value funds borrowed (which then becomes a tax deduction, but adds to the cash value on top of the term value.

      The best part is you don't have to depend on your kid being a star athlete, magic minority (e.g. "Irish boys named Humphries"), or be a stellar academician (although I expect most of us here would expect that last of our kids...) and get a scholarship, or not go to college except on daddy or mommy's checkbook.

      It's more worthwhile than a trust fund, in most cases, because they *have* to pay themselves back.

  7. Do something money can't solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Buy land and start a small hobby farm (very small). Animals and crops require constant attention, you can't ignore them for even a day. Keeps you busy, keeps you grounded, even if you do still get most of your food from a grocery store. He's got enough to bring internet access out from nearby town or city, so he can stay up to date and work for fun instead of a living, until he figures out what he'd rather do instead.

    Stop "solving" all your problems with money and pick up a few that require attention and care instead of cash. You can buy the animals, buildings, and tools, but YOU still have to use them or you fail and things die.

    1. Re:Do something money can't solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a real-life tamagotchi, if you will.

    2. Re:Do something money can't solve by trabby · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he is just playing real life Minecraft...

    3. Re:Do something money can't solve by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      That would actually be kind of fun. Buy a decent sized bit of farmland, get some high speed internet out to it, hire help as needed in the interim and work on making the place automated and high tech yet as self-sufficient and sustainable as possible.

    4. Re:Do something money can't solve by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Pffft, there's software for that.

    5. Re:Do something money can't solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy land and start a small hobby farm (very small). Animals and crops require constant attention, you can't ignore them for even a day. Keeps you busy, keeps you grounded, even if you do still get most of your food from a grocery store. He's got enough to bring internet access out from nearby town or city, so he can stay up to date and work for fun instead of a living, until he figures out what he'd rather do instead.

      Stop "solving" all your problems with money and pick up a few that require attention and care instead of cash. You can buy the animals, buildings, and tools, but YOU still have to use them or you fail and things die.

      ...or you could just play Farmville with a big budget!

    6. Re:Do something money can't solve by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't do the whole raising animals thing but I do grow, hunt, and fish much of my own food. Even then, I still buy a half a cow, pigs, and fowl from local farmers. I've learned a number of cuts and can butcher my own food. I've learned to preserve foods by drying, canning, pickling, and smoking. I don't think you need to be "productive" to be content but it does help to have obligations and things to keep you busy.

      Also, striving for happiness is a fools errand. Instead, I seek to be content. Of course, being content makes me happy which is a bit circular. However, hopefully you get the idea..

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    7. Re:Do something money can't solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy land and start a small hobby farm (very small). Animals and crops require constant attention, you can't ignore them for even a day. Keeps you busy, keeps you grounded

      My friend worked with an old guy who was single; he retired and immediately complained that he was bored. My friend told him to buy a small ranch with a few head of cattle to take care of.
      It worked, old dude was happy and occupied.

    8. Re:Do something money can't solve by volmtech · · Score: 1

      When I was 40 I lost my farm. If I had won the $80 million powerball then I would have had the biggest and best potato farm in the world. Farming with plenty of money is the most fun thing you can do standing up. Today at 63 you couldn't pay me enough to farm. First I would find a doctor to fix what ever is wrong with my side so I could at least bend down and pull a few weeds in my garden without feeling like Ronda Rousey just punched me in the ribs. I would give my daughter enough money so she could quit work and have me a grandchild. I would build a nice house with a big art studio for my wife on my land and bribe AT&T enough to run cable the mile and a half to it.

      Twenty years ago I read somewhere that most men in their 50s are happy. They have either become successful in their jobs or used to being a failure. At that time I wanted to punch the person who wrote that in the nose. After 20 years of basically being a failure I actually have gotten used to it. Of course having 13 acres of land and a paid for livable mobile home and a $2000 a month SS check might not be considered failure to some people.

      I have four wonderful successful children and a lovely loving wife so I do consider myself rich. Do the best you can but be content with what you get.

  8. Buy slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn it into Meatspin

  9. First things first. by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first thing I need to do is hire an accountant so I know how much I actually have. If I do anything else first, I have a feeling a significant portion of the fortune would be gone before I have any kind of understanding of what my tax burden is, and I'd fuck myself right back to poverty.

    Next thing I do (after buying a house, of course) is start studying accountancy, because if I've learned anything from reading the news the past several years, it's that NOBODY can be trusted with that many zeroes.

    After that, I've got friends who need help, and who deserve it much more than I do. I want to see them happy. Then I can start worrying about businesses and philanthropy and shit like that.

    1. Re: First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hire five accountants that don't know each other. Have them each processes the books. If one or two don't add up like the others, potentially some fucking is going on not in your favor.

    2. Re:First things first. by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I'd hire at least two accountants and two lawyers, each to check the others work, and hopefully reduce the risk of being ripped off by either one.

      I'd allocate some portion of the windfall to a trust that would be as untouchable as possible. The purpose of the trust would be to provide continued income in perpetuity for my immediate family, and eventually education of descendants.

      Then I'd work to find charities that appeal to me for whatever reason and find a way to actively help them through volunteering, and eventually improve their funding. Or maybe start a charity to serve an unmet need in the local community.

      I think one of the things that appeals the most to me for business/charity would be starting a school. In particular the online schools you hear about all seem to be outright scams aimed at gathering government backed student loans. I'd kind of like to see an online school accredited for 9th grade all the way through college. Going for a lower starting grade might work but I'd be hesitant to go all the way down to elementary levels, as kids at that level still need a lot of personal interaction with teachers to keep them focused.

    3. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made a cool million and you know what I changed? NOTHING! I told nobody and I didn't even buy a new car because I no not need a new fucking car. I like the one we have. I can chill, travel and do what ever I want but I keep it cool, I do not show off and just I enjoy it.
      OK yes, I bought some nice crap (nothing absurd) for my wife but she has no idea what we got and this is how it's going to be :)
      This is the easiest way to really enjoy it. No pain, no gold diggers, no new "friends", none of this shit.

    4. Re:First things first. by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Next thing I do (after buying a house, of course) is start studying accountancy, because if I've learned anything from reading the news the past several years, it's that NOBODY can be trusted with that many zeroes.

      After that, I've got friends who need help, and who deserve it much more than I do. I want to see them happy. Then I can start worrying about businesses and philanthropy and shit like that.

      You're overthinking this. Read The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein. Invest your money sensibly. Make sure that all your eggs aren't in one basket - invest with a number of different firms and with a broad portfolio. Pay attention to annual performance and ask questions.

      Then look after your friends, although you'll discover that everyone looks at you in a different way.

      Even when you're wearing your old comfy jeans, they'll look at your feet and see the $800 shoes that you bought because they're the most freakishly comfortable things you've ever put on your feet. Your Aston Martin key fob will start unwanted conversations with TSA screeners every time you pass through security (they all seem to think that a Ferrari 458 would be a much more sensible choice than a 4-door sedan).

      Meeting people gets a bit awkward. They'll ask where you live and you'll tell them, "Just out of town, near the river," hoping that they won't ask the next question, which is, "Oh! How many acres? Three? Four?" You'll lower your voice as you start apologetically - "A hundred and sixty. But we have horses..." It's not the sort of attention an introvert enjoys.

    5. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd fuck myself right back to poverty.

      I think you overrate your stamina. A billion dollars will buy a lot of hookers.

      Well, I suppose you could do it by getting married without a prenup.

    6. Re:First things first. by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd hire at least two accountants and two lawyers, each to check the others work, and hopefully reduce the risk of being ripped off by either one.

      Also, occasionally force them to brutally fight to the death. With themed weapons, like one gets a 3-ring binder, and the other gets one of those staple remover things. Replace the loser with fresh blood. Keeps them lean and on their toes.

      I'd be a good rich dude, I think.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re: First things first. by bistromath007 · · Score: 0

      I feel incredibly sorry for you. I'm so glad I'm being crushed by poverty and debt that i accrued trying futilely to raise myself out of it, instead of having to deal with people talking to me.

    8. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hire at least two accountants and two lawyers, each to check the others work, and hopefully reduce the risk of being ripped off by either one.

      Sounds like hiring two foxes for guarding the hen house.

    9. Re:First things first. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      They'll ask where you live and you'll tell them, "Just out of town, near the river," hoping that they won't ask the next question, which is, "Oh! How many acres? Three? Four?" You'll lower your voice as you start apologetically - "A hundred and sixty. But we have horses..." It's not the sort of attention an introvert enjoys.

      It's easy. Have you seen the movie "Ex Machina"? Just do what that guy did: build a really nice house on some island which is only accessible by helicopter, and live there by yourself. Don't build any artificially-intelligent robot babes though, that'll only lead to disaster.

    10. Re:First things first. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      So, how do you just end up with a million that nobody knows about? Including even your wife?

    11. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      160? Pfft...that's only a 1/4 of a section...go for 640 at least.

    12. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're overthinking this. Read The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein. Invest your money sensibly. Make sure that all your eggs aren't in one basket - invest with a number of different firms and with a broad portfolio. Pay attention to annual performance and ask questions.

      In other words: give to the rich so that they will screw the poor for you and make you richer in return.

    13. Re:First things first. by Jiro · · Score: 1

      I saw a reddit thread that specifically suggested going to a lawyer and accountant that normally deal with big corporations with lots of money. If your lawyer routinely deals with similarly large sums of money, the lawyer and accountant won't be tempted to do any funny things to you, and they probably have more experience dealing with it anyway.

    14. Re:First things first. by charlesj68 · · Score: 2

      If you don't put these fights on Pay Per View I am going to hate you forever ...

    15. Re: First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when your wife does find out, and she will. She will end up hating you, divorce you, and take every penny that you had. Good luck with that.

    16. Re:First things first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't put these fights on Pay Per View I am going to hate you forever ...

      If he does put them on pay-per-view he's going to be richer than Notch by at least an order of magnitue. How much money have North American viewers (and advertisers) spent on reality TV where nobody actually dies?

      The guy who finds a legal way to make "The Running Man" happen will retire a multibillionaire, but at some point he will realize that he's not in it for the money, he's in it for the lulz.

    17. Re:First things first. by ilahiler · · Score: 1
  10. Batman by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

    I would be Batman.

    1. Re:Batman by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, this would be a perfect idea. There used to be a guy in Maryland known as the "Route 29 Batman" who would dress up in a (really nice) Batman costume, and would go to hospitals to visit sick children and entertain them.

      And sadly, he was killed in a car accident just a few weeks ago, so there's certainly an opening for it:
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

    2. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could be your Robin.... But I do not wear knee pads.....

    3. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brampton, Ontario, Canada (just outside Toronto), there is a similar fellow:
      https://www.facebook.com/BramptonBatman

      Bravo produced a documentary on him.
      http://www.bravofact.com/2015/06/08/good-knight-aka-batman/
      (My daughter is featured in the documentary)

    4. Re:Batman by LaurenCates · · Score: 2

      Damn it, I get misty every time I think about that guy dying.

      When he died, he showed up so much on my Facebook feed, not from news reports, but because of how many things I follow that he ended up doing events with (like the 501st Legion).

      Solid guy. Went too soon.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    5. Re:Batman by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...or at least maybe throw some money into Wayne Research to come up with some of the toys Batman gets to use. It's easier to work from home that way, and less problematic if you're a feeble IT geek who's bad with heights ;-)

    6. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Maryland drivers. It's like Russia over here.

  11. give $100 million each to best friends & famil by Ionized · · Score: 3, Insightful

    then we could all still hang on roughly equal levels.

    i'd ONLY have $1.5 billion left to myself, oh noes :-(

  12. 2 for me, 2 for others by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    For others, I would create two charities: 1) Art foundation that provides housing to artists in a major city (probably Detroit, for various reasons), in exchange for art. Ideally, 10 years from now the foundation will be self-supporting by selling some of the art from the artists that happen to become famous. 2) Education foundation that provides free BOARDING school to children of high risk adults - i.e. homeless, drug addicted, criminal convictions. Because normal public school can't help the kids if their parents are the problem.

    For me I would do the following: 1) Take a whole bunch of classes - how to do EVERYTHING. Dance, defend a client from a lawsuit, simple surgery, how to play a piano, how to build a car, how to carve a wooden boat. You name it, I want to learn it. 2) Creating a publishing house that makes the decisions on which new book to publish via a combination of crowd sourcing and AI, rather than the current system.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:2 for me, 2 for others by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      For others, I would create two charities: 1) Art foundation that provides housing to artists in a major city (probably Detroit, for various reasons), in exchange for art. Ideally, 10 years from now the foundation will be self-supporting by selling some of the art from the artists that happen to become famous. 2) Education foundation that provides free BOARDING school to children of high risk adults - i.e. homeless, drug addicted, criminal convictions. Because normal public school can't help the kids if their parents are the problem.

      For me I would do the following: 1) Take a whole bunch of classes - how to do EVERYTHING. Dance, defend a client from a lawsuit, simple surgery, how to play a piano, how to build a car, how to carve a wooden boat. You name it, I want to learn it. 2) Creating a publishing house that makes the decisions on which new book to publish via a combination of crowd sourcing and AI, rather than the current system.

      Detroit? They would shoot you and take your money.

    2. Re:2 for me, 2 for others by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Yes Detroit is having issues, that's why you go there - the land is cheap. But I never said I would live there, I said I would buy PROPERTY there and rent it out in exchange for Art as opposed to a cash rent.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:2 for me, 2 for others by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Education foundation that provides free BOARDING school to children of high risk adults - i.e. homeless, drug addicted, criminal convictions. Because normal public school can't help the kids if their parents are the problem.

      I think you are on to something here. Maslow's hierarchy says that a person has basic needs that must be fulfilled. Without meeting those needs, a person cannot live to his or her full potential. A boarding school would certainly meet those basic needs. However, I would take it a step further and have a staff member who's responsible for loving the children as their own. I know, it sounds strange! But that is a need that has to be met. Just a person to sit down at dinner and ask them about their day is important!

      Based on this summary, it sounds like some of Notch's needs are not met. He basically has no social group to belong to. If he want's to help the world, maybe he should join the Peace Corp. There he will meet a group of individuals with a common goal, and grow his social circle. With that need fulfilled, he can move on psychologically, and do something epic.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:2 for me, 2 for others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, setting up a foundation isn't as easy as you think it might be (if you want it to remain tax exempt**). If you think many of the people that want to "help" you set up your foundation have pure intentions, you will probably be sadly mistaken.

      Money is simply a tool for getting things done. If it is your money, and you have the intension of doing good with it, it behooves you to allocate the time to make sure that happens and not leave it to random chance. At best the money is squandered on travel, high-thread count sheets, or beauty salons, at worse you will be making an unscheduled trip to south Africa to fire a dorm-matron for sexual assault.

      Time is worth way more than money. To simply think you can sprinkle money on something and fix something you have only cursory knowledge of, you may just make the problem worse. You also need to make sure you aren't experiencing the dunning-kruger effect in your ability to "help" with something you have very little practical experience with... You wouldn't be the first person to make a "white-man's burden" mistake with their money.

      My suggestion is to invest a significant time to learn about some problem first, and then figure out what it takes to fix (generally the fix involves money, but often this can be done w/o a charitable foundation). Too many people do it in the wrong order.

      **Foundations aren't allowed to just hoard money, and grow by investment returns, they need to distribute the money every year. IRS requires minimum annual distributions from charitable foundations (basically all the interest or other income they earn every year, or 5% on assets they hold, but generate no income in a year) for charitable purposes or they lose their tax exempt status. Because of this minimum distribution requirement, most foundations need to set up standing grant committees to help give away foundation income to other charities and benefactors need to pace how the money is put into the foundation (like how warren buffett is pacing his donations into the bill and Melinda gates foundation) to avoid flittering away money randomly at the end of a year. Generally, this requires much time and effort, not some fire-and-forget one-time donation to establish the foundation, and finding people that you both trust and are actually qualified to do this is something generally not found in the close circle of most people that stumble upon money. Sometimes it just better to give the money directly to existing charities yourself if you don't have the infrastructure to do the work. Of course if you are a control freak, or if you have so much money that you need to pay full time staff to distribute your money for you (or if you are an egomaniac and want a foundation named after you), a foundation is probably your best bet, but be prepared to put in the work or you might find it being done in a way that you don't appreciate by people you hire and thought you could trust.

  13. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by RLiegh · · Score: 2

    This is the best answer right here, and it would cure his loneliness, too. Not only do the people who have stuck by you during the hard times deserve the reward, but they're the ones who have proven who you can trust.

  14. Stay quiet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd keep my mouth shut about it.

    1. Re:Stay quiet. by TWX · · Score: 1

      That actually is a good approach when it comes to meeting people.

      Look at the population of a given society and its wealth/income. It's a curve, with more people toward the lower-end of the spectrum. If one wants to function in circles among more people, one's behavior needs to relate and be relatable to those people. On the other hand, there are people that one probably doesn't want to associate with down in that end because they're physical risks or mooches. At the other end there are fewer people, but those people understand the nature of the money and how it applies. The dangerous people there are those that promise to do good for you with your money, but essentially use legal means to steal it.

      This is essentially the same kind of problem that the United Kingdom's Prince William had, and there was a lot of time spent courting Ms. Middleton before their marriage. She came from a family that had some wealth, so there was an understanding of money, and my guess is that there was a whole lot of vetting on his side of her side before his side would bless the marriage. They also met in college, which is a very good place for people from disparate backgrounds that otherwise may have something in common to get to know each other, where wealth or the lack of it may not matter as much.

      Back to the subject of this discussion, he can either not disclose his money (the approach of the character Tom Bookman had in How To Marry A Millionaire) and court without getting into the details until the relationship seems to be working, assuming that his tastes are still affordably reasonable to the average person so his extreme wealth is not obvious, or he can look for 'society' circles to try to operate in, hoping that despite the smaller candidate pool that he finds people to interact with that he likes, and women that aren't out-for or uncomfortable-with his money. The former is difficult to do because if anyone learns of the wealth the game in that particular scene is up, but being wealthy, it's not hard to stop and start again elsewhere. The latter is hard because there could be a lot of boorish people or a lot of gold-diggers even among the already wealthy.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  15. This has been asked and answered. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repost.

    Turns out it's not such a burden after all.

  16. money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just give me the money! I'll find a use for it.

  17. I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably in South America. Venezuela, I think. Maybe Argentina. I'd set up a swathe of factories to make consumer goods from local materials, staff them with locals, and then sell them in local markets at maybe a 3% or 4% target margin. If I couldn't find the materials I need I'd set up factories to produce them too. I imagine a few billion dollars would last quite a long time, even if I lost money on every item sold.

    1. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by narcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'd lose it all paying bribes before you managed to build your first factory. Every local official wants whatever they can bleed out of you. The third-world is littered with half-finished hotels and other abandoned construction projects.

    2. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      Then do it cheaper, show up with a private contractor militia, local official wants a kickback? give it to him in 5.56 rounds from your bodyguard named bubba.
      Declare you are setting up a private police force to clean up the corruption, horribly gruesome wipe out several of the top dirty cops and the rest will fall in line.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      They'll come back and level your compound with mortars, artillery shells, unguided rockets and so on.

    4. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then buy some of the half finished projects, and finish them. If someone got the project half finished then it is feasible that someone else could take it to the finish line.

    5. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You'd need an entire army to do that. A small militia of private security contractors isn't going to be able to handle the police and army even in a country the size of El Salvador.

    6. Re:I'd go to an impoverished third-world nation by guestapoo · · Score: 1

      Ah, in first world, it's called 'lobby', right.

  18. Don't tell anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key is not to tell anyone you're rich.

    "What do you do?" "I got a severance package from my last job. I'm kind of inbetween jobs right now"

  19. "What do all men with power want?"... by cloud.pt · · Score: 0

    ...obviously, more power. If I suddenly had a surplus on disposable income, I would immediately invest in Tesla stock. There is no such thing in this world I am more certain of its growth than TSLA. I had this hunch about 2 years ago, I just didn't have the money. My investment would have doubled and I wouldn't sell the stock unless I was in life or death necessity of it right now. Other than taht, I'd do the usual stuff: buy an island, a jet, and people to do my current job so I could brag I kept my previous life intact to journalists but I "gained incentive" to do what I really want to do. Then I'd probably lose it all in some years out of my total inability to manage the moneee.

    1. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I put $10k into Tesla when it was at about $20. Of course I panicked and sold when it got to about $40. =p Oh well. Even if I'd kept it all, the only real difference in my life would be that I'd be driving an Aston Martin. (No, of course not a Tesla.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I bought 2000 shares when they were at about $24. I still have them. I've been pondering moving away from Tesla but I kind of want to wait until the middle of next year to see where it goes. I'm pretty sure that the value will not drop to the point where I would be selling at a loss and I expect to see a decent growth between now and the middle of next year.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Keep them longer. I forecast that TSLA will explode by 2018-2020 with the release of their 50k USD car, when they decide to apply all their know-how in a seriously mass-marketed vehicle. Not to mention their manufacturing process only has a tendency to improve with the gigafactory, with dedicated battery production, and the fact they will expand to the home appliances field with the solar/renewable power storage they announced last year. Somebody with TSLA stock should hang on to it like it's a winning lottery ticket.

    4. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my current plan is to hold them until mid-2016 and see how well the company is doing then. I am not one who tends to move money around a whole lot and I buy long-term simply because I invest in a company and not just to make a profit. They've grown a great deal since I purchased them and I'd probably be tempted to sell if I needed the money. However, if I needed the money I'd have not bought stock with it.

      Somehow my stock purchasing learning has been strangely successful. I really don't have an expertise or anything. I just read a lot of comments at sites full of smart people. Yes, I was drunk when I decided on this plan. I've since stopped drinking but the plan has gone pretty good. It does help that I was also buying like a drunken sailor when the market was crashed in the late 2000s.

      Lots of people said they wanted a Tesla. So, yeah... Tesla stock it is. It's been a lot of fun learning. I like companies with novel ideas that look like they may be trendy. I've tried to explain it in the past but I'm not that articulate. Sometimes I stoop to mashing up news feeds (even a word cloud helps) and see what bubbles to the top. I've not had much luck figuring out anything from comments so I read those. It's not like I was doing anything more productive and I was going to read them anyhow.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Really nice to hear from your experience mate, you seem like the type of guy I'd want to invest in my company (if I had one) :P

    6. Re:"What do all men with power want?"... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Find something you're passionate about and tackle it in your spare time. Then, as it grows, expand your hours until you are in a position to take the risks and go at it alone or with a partner. A lot of the investors are not just the jackasses in VC firms looking to cash out or get control of the assets. "Silent" business partners are not entirely uncommon though they're not the easiest to find.

      I think the key is to remember that every hour you're working at your real job is an hour that you're spending enriching someone else. I think single-proprietor and small businesses are the way of the future and I expect there to be an expansion of them in number. This seems to be something we're reverting to like the days of yore when we had a farmer, grocer, blacksmith, miller, etc... It's much like we're reverting to dumb terminals with our compute devices.

      Not too long ago I found someone online who had an interesting plan. They are doing urban farming with closed water systems and growing both fish and "organic" food for market. I've mentioned that they should also consider keeping records of what they've done and how they've done it so that they can, eventually, consider franchising it. I have not told them specifically (I don't want to be anything other than a motivator in this case at this time) but if they manage to do get this off the ground - even a little, if they have a decent business plan, and if they have an expansion plan that covers something akin to the franchising option then, by all means, I'd buy a stake in their company and provide the business with low interest capital for expansion purposes. Absolutely...

      I think, and this is just my opinion and it is shared by a few folks that I have spoken with on the subject, much of what is looked for (at the personal level - ignore the VC firms if you can) is passionate people with good business sense and an actionable and articulate plan. There's a risk but one can show where that risk is mitigated and how well one has researched the risks and how to approach them as cautiously as possible. Of course, one can not always be cautious.

      So, again, if there's something you're passionate about and you're willing to work hard then you may find there are people interested. What is looked for is, often, people who've already got the business started. For example, don't come to me with an idea. Approach me with an idea that you've already thought about AND have started on - show me how you plan on making your idea a reality and why that can be profitable. Businesses started in spare time have huge growth potential and a lot of smaller businesses are a safer bet than investing in one giant business that demands a greater investment. On top of that, well, you have a greater chance at impacting good people by investing in small companies.

      An example might be a friend of mine who had a single franchise coffee shop (their initials are D.D. but I don't want to promote them or anything) and he had several good locations to act on as well as one existing location (and a Subway). He came to me for help and offered me the chance to invest. He articulated his plan well, had done his research, and had a history of success but not at the level he needed to in order to expand like he wanted to.

      Was my investing risky? Absolutely. However, that's a known and I happily threw a goodly sum at him. Instead of the five year plan my money was repaid in a little over two years. Today I still make 20% of his continued profits. I'd have been a fool to not have invested in him. He's currently looking into selling the Subway (he has a standing offer that is exceptional for a Subway in Farmington, Maine) and wanting to expand into a few other areas as well as increasing his coffee shop empire.

      A key point was that we kept it strictly professional. I have no controlling interest and he can buy me out at any time for a pre-arranged figure (20% of the total value of the properties plus the existing properties - if he sells the Subway, for example, I get 20% of

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  20. Bond villain by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd have to go Musk and start building my Bond villain infrastructure.

    Fleet of cars who's 'owners' don't know are autonomous-check.

    Fleet of rocket ships-check.

    Doomsday device-check

    The question is: Where is Musk's secret lair?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Bond villain by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Floating off the coast of Florida right now, waiting for another attempt to land on it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Bond villain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is: Where is Musk's secret lair?

      Well, I'd tell you, but then it wouldn't be secret now would it?

    3. Re:Bond villain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is: Where is Musk's secret lair?

      Fremont. The last place anybody would expect.

  21. Just how wealthy are we talking about here? by evorster · · Score: 1

    Let's say the GDP of a reasonable country....
     
      more than enough to to never worry about eating dog food when I retire.
     
      I'll pay for schooling of people that cannot afford it. That has the best bang for the buck, I guess.

  22. Give Most of it Away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd skim a little off of the top to make sure that I never needed to work another day in my life ever again and then give the rest away. Start with my favorite charities and then, if any was left, spread it amongst some of the more obscure operations.

    Then I could do what I wanted rather than what's needed to put food on the table.

  23. Become a Tech Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meet lots of interesting motivated people, do cool projects (without having to do the heavy lifting), hopefully improve the human condition.

    Bliss.

  24. Easy one by lorinc · · Score: 1

    1 Make sure I'll never run out of money by doing basic investments.
    2 Found my own research lab using the ROI of 1 and have fun doing research without the burden of finding funds for it.
    3 No need for 3.

    Notch, if you want to try, send a PM ;)

    1. Re:Easy one by MaizeMan · · Score: 1

      I've also had the thought "If I were rich, I could fund all my own research and never have to write a grant proposal again!" Not: "If I were rich, I could quit this job and never had to write a grant proposal ever again."

  25. Fame is the real problem ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Money is money. It can't treat a person well and it can't treat a person poorly. People on the other hand is another issue, especially people who you don't know yet who know you (or think they know you).

    Money can be buried in investments, or dispersed if you want to go to the trouble too. Bury a person though, that will get you in trouble with the law. Disperse people, and they will think you're antisocial.

    I can't honestly say what I would do if I had that much money. I would like to think that I'd bury it in investments, skimming just enough off the top to behave like a typical person. Yet I would do my best to avoid the fame bit. Relationships are awkward enough when you know them and they know you. Having the imbalance where people know you, but not the other way around, is something to be avoided.

    1. Re:Fame is the real problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a lot of money, certainly not in the range of a billion, but I generally have enough to be comfortable (ie I don't worry about surprises like car repairs or suddenly becoming unemployed). While I tend to have a larger net worth than the people I date and some of my friends, it's never become an issue and I think it's because I don't mention it.

      My clothes, my home, my car are all pretty much the same as when I had very little in the way of funds, my life style didn't change much with the influx of cash. This makes is fairly easy to maintain friendships and relationships. I don't flaunt my money so it doesn't make things awkward. Money usually didn't come up until I'd dated someone long enough to consider living with them... sometimes not even then, come to think of it.

      My point is, if someone is feeling isolated or like they have too much money to interact with others, then maybe the problem isn't their wealth, but how they use it. If you suddenly start driving fancy cars, buy a giant house and so forth it's going to be an issue. In that case it probably isn't the money that is the problem, it's the person spending it.

      As the above post states, one could bury the money in investments, put some aside for retirement, do some good in the community and live a pretty low-level (yet comfortable) life style. Or they could go all out for Wayne Manor. Guess which one causes waves in one's life?

  26. Obligatory "Office Space" Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a million dollars?

    Lawrence: I'll tell you what I'd do, man: two chicks at the same time, man.

    Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd do two chicks at the same time?

    Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I were a millionaire I could hook that up, too; 'cause chicks dig dudes with money.

    Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.

    Lawrence: Well, the type of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do.

    Peter Gibbons: Good point.

    Lawrence: Well, what about you now? What would you do?

    Peter Gibbons: Besides two chicks at the same time?

    Lawrence: Well, yeah.

    Peter Gibbons: Nothing.

    Lawrence: Nothing, huh?

    Peter Gibbons: I would relax... I would sit on my ass all day... I would do nothing.

    Lawrence: Well, you don't need a million dollars to do nothing, man. Take a look at my cousin: he's broke, don't do shit.

    1. Re:Obligatory "Office Space" Reference by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. Amen...

    2. Re:Obligatory "Office Space" Reference by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Fuckin 'eh mang

    3. Re:Obligatory "Office Space" Reference by ameline · · Score: 1

      Lawrence was the smartest character in that film.

      --
      Ian Ameline
  27. Put the money to good use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of ways I could spend money on myself (bigger house, nice car, etc), but at some point, you just don't need gold-plated toilets or whatever, so you should start looking for ways to make use of the money to do something good. Pick one or more causes that mean something to you, and start putting your time and money toward helping them.

    Personally, I donate a decent chunk of my time right now to the MIT science fiction society; we run the world's largest open-to-the-public library of science fiction and fantasy novels. Sadly, a lot of new books are written every year, but our space isn't growing, so if I found myself winning the startup lottery and holding a hundred million dollars, I'd buy the library a nice large building to hold all the books.

    You might find that you'd rather work on curing malaria (like Bill Gates). Or that you want to run a gamer-centric convention, and a gamer-centric charity, (like the penny-arcade folks who started PAX and Child's Play). There are plenty of diseases in the world; all sorts of ways you could improve education; charities to help poor people experience the outdoors; charities to help people get to sci-fi conventions who otherwise couldn't afford to go. Find a way to make the world a better place that resonates with you and makes you happy, and go for it, don't just swim in your money like Scrooge McDuck. Heck, start a business, you'll have a bunch of people happy that you gave them jobs, and you can pursue a dream of writing that uber-awesome game you've always wanted to write...

  28. That's easy by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Piss people off by spending it, or not spending it, the way I want. Since I'll be dead and have no heirs there's no reason to spend it on others, especially when no one bothered to spend their money on me during my lifetime.

    Screw people. We're supposed to be the smart ones. If you want to spend a fortune, make your own. Don't expect someone else to spend their money the way you want.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you sound so bitter that no one bothered to spend their money on you.

  29. It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It really is difficult to feel for Notch when, by his own admission in that series of tweets, he shows that having the material possessions and lavish experiences that is typical of filthy rich people has been his primary focus. It's myopic, depressing to the point of repulsion, and all-too-typical of the rich.

    As for the human interaction element, that's of his own doing and merely an extension of the HAVING ALL THE RICH DUDE THINGS mentality. I wouldn't really care to hang around someone regularly who has some obnoxious, resource-guzzling mansion, replete with luxuries that, frankly, no person really needs. It all feeds into a mental sickness, and the only way he can snap out of it is by his own sheer will--to question himself and why he feels so empty. The answers, while not that difficult, tend to elude those who have relinquished critical thinking regarding their own lifestyle in favor of, "Well, I sure am having a shitty week... time for a weekend bender in Ibiza!"

    I hope he's able to successfully reflect on his current life situation and realize that to have "normal" human interaction, you can't flaunt wealth and economically divide yourself from your peers in the numerous ways the rich tend to.

    1. Re:It's all a matter of perspective by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. He bought a bunch of shit and found out that it doesn't bring happiness.

      Personally, I'd own less 'stuff' than I do now, and live out of a suitcase. With 1.5 billion dollars, I'd travel the world and probably never stop. Buy an unassuming-looking car in Europe or the UK and drive all over, meeting new and interesting people and exploring new places. Hike the West Highland Trail in Scotland; ski the Alps in Switzerland; explore the catacombs of France, rent a speedboat and putter around on Lake Como in Italy, etc.

      That, to me, is being rich - it means being free to go anywhere and do anything. I don't need a lavish life of luxury; I just want to be free of the shackles that keep me from seeing the world.

    2. Re: It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy... this guy gets it.

    3. Re:It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have to be about rich person stereotypes about having too much luxury to mess up interactions. I've been in a situation where I got a new job that paid comfortably at the same time as a friend lost his job, followed by a period of working low paying jobs that made it difficult to take care of his family, including some medical needs. I wasn't close to rich, but simply having some amount of disposable income compared to him created a difficulty that only got worse with time. I tried to help out in some cases that were important, like covering some bills for medical and a few other essentials. But at some point, even if telling someone they don't need to pay you back and avoiding any other reference to helping them, some people become stressed out at feeling like they are in debt anyway. Sometimes it is a self-fulfilling prophecy too, that worry asking for help will ruin a friendship ends up actually damaging a friendship.

    4. Re: It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy fucks.

    5. Re:It's all a matter of perspective by chipschap · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Down to a certain point, I've also learned that "less is more" when it comes to material possessions. The posessions can start to own you instead of the reverse.

    6. Re: It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another mental issue of those with more money than they know what to do with, even if it is a couple grand here and there... thinking they can save the world with their money, one person at a time. It. Just. Doesn't. Work. I've lived it, seen it with my own eyes. People have to want to save themselves, and bailing them out of their own financial issues doesn't necessarily amount to any kind of actual help for the person. Most of the time, it just replaces the financial issue with another set of problems.

      Sorry to hear about your experience, but stereotypes exist for a reason; there's some grain of truth to them. And you've proven it with your anecdote.

    7. Re:It's all a matter of perspective by mvdw · · Score: 1

      That, to me, is being rich - it means being free to go anywhere and do anything. I don't need a lavish life of luxury; I just want to be free of the shackles that keep me from seeing the world.

      Yep, agreed. I'd buy a 4x4 camper and do the pacific rim. Australia through South East Asia, China, Mongolia, Russia, Alaska, Canada, USA, Mexico, all the way down to Chile. Adventure!

    8. Re: It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC. The only reason I bailed them out is they have kids, and the kids shouldn't have to suffer because of mistakes or misfortunes of their parents. And we're not even talking a couple grand here, as more like a couple hundred can sometimes make the difference between getting electricity turned off or being able to get prescription medication. They still had plenty of their own things to bail out on their own and continued to work their asses off, so it is not like they because lazy or dependent. But debt of any non-trivial size can ruin friendship, even when it isn't actually something that was supposed to be repaid.

    9. Re:It's all a matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. When I read in the article:
      "Just three months after the Microsoft acquisition, Persson paid $70 million for an opulent Beverly Hills mansion, complete with a 2,500 bottle wine room, a candy room, and 15 bathrooms. Persson also began hosting wild parties where guests like Skrillex, Selena Gomez, and Tony Hawk would sometimes make appearances." ... I immediately thought, "Well, duh, THERE'S your problem!" Of COURSE people are not going to relate to him as a real normal person when he does that kind of over-the-top ostentatious wasteful nonsense.

      If I suddenly received a billion dollars or whatever, the idea of buying a $70 million mansion and hosting celebrity parties would not be on my "to do" list...

  30. Be a mentor/angel investor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, when you strike it rich, people will glom onto you. Everybody wants something, and they gravitate toward people they think can grant their wishes.

    I'd say that's fine, but I'd make it clear that I'm going to make you work to achieve your dream. Starting a business, or a humanitarian organization, or a school - let's make it happen. But what I won't do is just give you a stack of Benjamins and let you loose.

  31. Enjoy Your Life by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I would just enjoy your life. So he says he found somebody who was afraid of his lifestyle. Find somebody else who isn't. Don't waste your time moping about other people. Find something to do with your life that makes you happy without requiring other people. Somebody like Notch, although rich, isn't a huge face in the media, and can probably stay under the radar in most circumstances. Very few people are actually going to recognize him unless he wants to be recognized.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  32. Not what you think it means by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Most people think they'll be "smart investors", but 70% declare bankruptcy. Higher divorce rates, homicides, law suits, etc.

    1. Re:Not what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people with little money aren't "smart investors" with those few funds, so why would they think they would be smarter when they suddenly get a ton of money?

  33. two chicks at the same time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /obligatory

    I guess if I was Notch I would millions of tiny violins people could play while I whine about my girl problems.

  34. Realistically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found a great girl, but she's afraid of me and my life style and went with a normal person instead.

    Did he never meet a great girl who wasn't that interested in him before? I guess it's possible that they were otherwise perfect for each other and she just couldn't see past his wealth but probably she would have preferred the other guy anyway.

  35. I think there is a movie about this by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Stamp out kitten juggling!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  36. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any best friends really.

    1) Setup a trust fund for my children.
    2) Give some money to my parents, and my ex brother in law (he's cool).
    3) Make sure my ex wife gets nothing at all.
    4) Buy a boat.

  37. Put it away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy some stuff I've always wanted, new computer / monitors.
    Clear all debt for my friends.
    Put it all away.
    Look up the average income for my city.
    Set my bank to disk out monthly "pay cheques".
    Donate remaining interest to charity / family in need.

  38. This seems relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IalDTq8jS6I

  39. Why should the "industry" be aware? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Unless you mean "those seeking to enter", then this is yet another call on an "industry" to solve the problems of individuals. Notch can't deal -- Notch's problem, mot "the industry's".

    1. Re:Why should the "industry" be aware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, since 99.99 of those of us in the industry are never, ever, ever going to get close to having this problem. This seems more like a backwards way to fantasize about having so much money.

  40. Spend my time looking for places to give it away by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2

    #1 setup an annuity for FSF

    #2 look for software projects begging for $ to get going.

    #3 look on Kickstarter for projects begging for $ to get going.

    #4 become a prophet!

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  41. Sell All I Have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And give the money to the poor.

    1. Re:Sell All I Have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah... A WISE rich young ruler...

  42. coming into wealth by categorics · · Score: 1

    after adopting a special needs child from another country... children around the world sorely need so much help..The day I received the money would be the first day of my new job

  43. Vegas, Baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, probably a trip around the world to see everything that is on my bucket list, then after that get involved with something involving education
    and a few trips to Vegas, or Monte Carlo ..

    But I'd definitely not whine like a little punk.
     

  44. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #3: Not a chance in hell. The courts are setup to fuck men.

  45. Two girls at one time is taken so... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Shut down my business, buy a winter home, hire a maid. Tell people I'd inherited about 1% of the wealth I had and set up an anonymous non-profit to parse out most the money for education and arts projects I like.

    Then go do everything I'm already already doing, except I'd never bother to look for sales. 'Cause, really, I kind of like my life.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Two girls at one time is taken so... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Then go do everything I'm already already doing, except I'd never bother to look for sales. 'Cause, really, I kind of like my life.

      You probably also understand that money doesn't matter besides providing the basic necessities. Sometimes just watching the birds playing outside can be more enriching than another zero tacked on the end of your bank balance.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  46. What I would do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm working on becoming financially self-reliant and as such I've already given this a little bit of thought.

    For of all, I figured I would need around 250.000 EUR to become self reliant if I'm willing to emigrate to a "poorer" country like e.g. Thailand. To be self-reliant in The Netherlands (my home country) I would probably need a bit more. At the moment I've saved around 40.000 EUR in my first 1,5 years of saving, so I should be on track to make this happen. I might actually have quite a bit more money if I sell my house in 10 years. At that point I should be in my early 40s.

    Self-reliance to me means that I'll be able to live of the money I earn from my ETFs and bonds. 250.000 EUR is my goal, since that should earn me on average around (250.000 * 0.05 after taxes and inflation) 12.500 a year or around 1000 EUR a month. The average living standard in a country like Thailand is around 500 EUR a month or so I've read. While definitely not rich with this kind of money, it might be a decent start.

    With that kind of money I would rent a small house (I'm single, I don't intend to have kids - might want a girlfriend at some point). I would make sure I'd have a good software dev room. I would work on some of the many ideas I'm having. Games and other kinds of apps. Hopefully some apps would earn me extra income, which I would put back into ETFs on bonds. Over the years I'd become more and more wealthy, but would set some aside for old age when the body breaks down.

    If I'm single / widower when I die, I might give the money to some foundation, like WWF, though ideally I'd develop some sort of foundation myself that keeps earning money through ETFs and only spends part of the profits each year on some foundation while it automatically keeps growing larger and larger.

  47. I'd do the things I love and meet people that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've met people worth over $100 million. It's not a big deal. The problem is, some people don't ever interact with the ultra wealthy or famous. Some, I mean most.

    Markus needs to find a hobby. mountain biking, running, whatever. It sounds like he is enjoying his wealth by buying material things. Buy a 2 year old jeep and mountain bike. None one will know who you are and judge you for who you are. It sounds like he is making his wealth apparent.

    That guy I know worth $100+ million drives a $50K car. And it's not a BMW. Last I knew it was a high end Chrysler. But his guest house on his primary property cost him $2 million.

    Pont is, if you met him .... you would quickly realize that this guy is smart. Smarter than almost anyone I have ever met. And that is all that is apparent. And that is the point.

  48. People can be leeches by Morpeth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in college, there was a guy who was really wealthy (no idea how much, not billions, but millions I'm sure) --- his parents died young, I think it was an accident of sorts, and he inherited a fortune, or got a settlement.

    Anyway... people used him for free beer, parties, food, anything they could get from him. I knew him tangentially because he was a pen and paper gamer, and ran some D&D sessions so we had some common friends.

    The poor guy seemed miserable, knowing most people were only hanging out with him for his money, etc. Seriously, he was just a sad sack, seemed depressed and lonely in that existential kind of way. I know people say 'aw.... poor little rich boy', but I really felt bad for the guy. He seemed like a decent enough person, but the money didn't seem to make his life really that much better. Sure he didn't have student loans like I did, didn't have to work like I did -- but I had some good friends, who certainly didn't hang out with me for money (or lack thereof)

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:People can be leeches by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is Notch. Looks like he already struggled with making personal connections with people, and this didn't help. My brother ain't Notch rich but is much the same way: kind of challenging even for another nerd, appreciates getting to be friends/brothers like a human, but does awkward things like punitive tipping that's either 'zilch' or '$50 bill' like some feudal lord.

      Must be kind of like being a giant robot wanting to befriend humans. It's either 'nerd SMASH!' or 'here, let me effortlessly do for you what you're stressing horribly about because to me it's literally no big deal'. That's very distancing and you gotta work hard to not be distorted by a reality like that.

      Maybe nobody is willing to work hard to be a normal person to Notch. I volunteer! :D

      'cos I'm Slashdot User #580. ha HA! I bet Notch isn't a three-digit slashdotter. And clearly that is the only important thing in life, right? So we can be friends, and I'll try not to condescend too much to Notch :)

    2. Re:People can be leeches by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      When I was in college, there was a guy who was really wealthy (no idea how much, not billions, but millions I'm sure) --- his parents died young, I think it was an accident of sorts, and he inherited a fortune, or got a settlement.

      Anyway... people used him for free beer, parties, food, anything they could get from him. I knew him tangentially because he was a pen and paper gamer, and ran some D&D sessions so we had some common friends.

      The poor guy seemed miserable, knowing most people were only hanging out with him for his money, etc. Seriously, he was just a sad sack, seemed depressed and lonely in that existential kind of way. I know people say 'aw.... poor little rich boy', but I really felt bad for the guy. He seemed like a decent enough person, but the money didn't seem to make his life really that much better. Sure he didn't have student loans like I did, didn't have to work like I did -- but I had some good friends, who certainly didn't hang out with me for money (or lack thereof)

      I grew up with someone in high school like that. He was 15 and already experienced this because he was inheriting a lot of money from his parents. His father owned a factory which produced an expensive chemical compound. His father bought him a very expensive car at 16 which he had no choice but to drive. In hindsight I recognize why he tried to keep his $$$ unknown and would get mad when we called him moneybags.

    3. Re:People can be leeches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why the rich have their own parties, their own social circles, and their own activities. Like paying money to hunt the homeless.

    4. Re: People can be leeches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hugh Hefner had/has that problem - that models might ingratiate themselves to him only to get ahead in the industry.

      He decided he didn't care.

    5. Re:People can be leeches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think that might also have something to do with him being depressed or having issues, possibly stemming from childhood? I know I'd have turned out a lot different if I had lost my parents when I was young, most likely not in a good way.

    6. Re:People can be leeches by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      Definitely, I'm sure that had a lot to do with it too -- but I can only imagine having 'friends' who you couldn't really count on or trust only made it worse. Even if life throws some nasty shit at you, having good people to talk to, hang with, and 'be there', can help a lot. I don't think this guy did because of his wealth.

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  49. become a scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had that much money, I would get a PhD in radio astronomy or particle physics. Then I would try to get in on the coolest project I could find, but work for free.

  50. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you interested in that can make the world a better place? For sure you can give a bunch of money to NGOs that do important things in education, the environment, poverty, health. Or maybe your philosophies run more toward the free market, and you can spend time finding and funding/helping startups that are going to make the world a better place. Or maybe your skill set is such that you can join boards of ongoing ventures and help them focus. It's easy: you have money, but you may -- or may not -- have other skills to contribute as well. You have philosophies of how to make the world a better place. Combine those in any way that makes sense, and do it. Make the world a better place.

    As for lifestyle, no need to be ostentatious if that's not your thing. Drive the car you want, life in the place you want to live, etc., and you will attract a like-minded person. Which, by the way, is the same rule the rest of us should apply! Lots of us have been passed over by people who have different lifestyle desires than us. That's a good thing. You'd do the same, one would hope.

    1. Re:Easy by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      1) Buy a nice house. 2) Buy a nice car to stick in the garage. 3) Pay off all bills and ex wife. 4) Continue downloading porn when not eating out from my penthouse. 5) Hide as much as legally possible from the mooching meme sensibility used by politicians to gain power. 6) Donate to them, playing their game of paying them to get back out of the way, which is why they got in the way to begin with, using aformentioned meme as hoi polloi fraudulent cover story.

      Eventually) Die, and they take a huge chunk of it anyway, having taxed it all once already.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  51. I'd do boring things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd probably first pay off all debts I had and all the debts of my family and friends. I'd still keep my same shitty job so I had something to do, and if it got too bad I figure I'd have enough money to fake my death and start somewhere else.

  52. Fund a political campaign by sfcat · · Score: 2

    Right now every US presidential candidate needs a billionaire backer to run. That usually means bad things. Maybe Notch and his $$ can balance the scales a bit and back Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren? But then again, I don't know his politics and perhaps this is a terrible suggestion.

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    1. Re:Fund a political campaign by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      That ain't what Bernie is about. Which is sort of the point of that exercise

  53. Take over a small southern town by butchersong · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy every industry in said town. Give loans to desperate people that you know they can't pay back. Buy up all the politicians and the realestate. Become sheriff because that is where the real local power is. Make subtle changes to the town and architecture giving everything a creepy southern gothic kind of feel. Slowly tighten your grip year after year. Ah, it would be heaven.

    1. Re:Take over a small southern town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buy every industry in said town. Give loans to desperate people that you know they can't pay back. Buy up all the politicians and the realestate. Become sheriff because that is where the real local power is. Make subtle changes to the town and architecture giving everything a creepy southern gothic kind of feel. Slowly tighten your grip year after year. Ah, it would be heaven.

      But then, you'll have to worry about those damn Duke boys spoiling all your schemes.

    2. Re:Take over a small southern town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While funny, actually this is not a terrible idea. I read about some dude who set up a huge amounts of daycare centers after he got a large chunk of money and then gave it away to anyone who needed it instead of charging 500 bucks a month. Wha? He wanted to let people work and have their kids be taken care of and they learn something at the same time. Apparently crime is WAY down and the mean income is way up. With people on their way to college that would have never even thought of that before. In 1-2 generations you can transform huge areas from poverty to working hard to get more.

    3. Re:Take over a small southern town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitt? Is that you?

    4. Re:Take over a small southern town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been done...

      http://www.wired.com/2014/04/rawfile_0404_ave-maria/

    5. Re:Take over a small southern town by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mess with the bouncer of the roadhouse bar, though.

  54. Serious Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have it all worked out lol.

    1. Sort out my debts (Kind of no brainer loL) and debts/mortgages of my closest friends & co-workers.
    2. Get a nicer house, but certainly no $70m mansion. Many 'normal'' people in my area have houses between $1m & 2m CAD, so I would probably settle for something in the 2-5M range there. It would have to be somewhere that I can play 'cars'.
    3. Cars. I'm a car guy, don't think I need to expand on that one much. Get my old dream cars, a few supercars. Note that my choice of cars are for DRIVING, not showing off, which leads me on to...
    4. Tracks... It would be nice to find a place that is near a nice karting track. Failing that, buy a place where I can BUILD one. Either play on it myself until I get bored, or hand it over to someone to manage for me and make a business of (Doesn't need to be profitable). Get the grassroots racing scene going by injecting some of my weath into it.
    5. Workshops - I would not NEED to work on cars, but I may still WANT to and hell, i'd have the time, right? Still want to build a Se7en replica. Although with that money, I could tool up to build something far more fancy.
    6. Play - Soooo many things I want to play, but have no money or time for... Watersports, skidoos, skiing, just have fun doing the activites I want to do without having to worry about the bottom line. Child is still in school, so I would have to find someone else to play with (partner does not like all this activity stuff)
    7. Invest (I guess this was a no brainer, should have been in nr 1)
    8. Donate. If I had 2.5bn, and I live to 100, that would leave me with over 40m a year - Even with all that crazy spending, it would still easily be over 30. Even if I invest loads, for what I know not, I could still easily donate a million a month or something. Work out how I can make my money do something every month - don't just throw it at charities, but maybe find ways to directly inject it where it's needed. This could be incorporated with some volunteer time. Maybe do a month long trip once a year to places that really need the help - something.

    I just don't thing that I would have that much trouble keeping going with that much money. Look after my friends, look after my self & family, look after the world. Plenty to go around and PLENTY of stuff to do.

    Alas, I'll be stuck here, not being able to do track days in my leased car (I can't afford a warranty miss) and pondering if I will be able to go skiing once this winter :/

    1. Re:Serious Answer by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'd like to play cars, I'd get a 1986 ford escort and have it fully restored to mint condition. Then i'd sell it to some high schooler for $200 bucks and do the same thing with a 1982 chevette hatchback, a 1987 dodge omni, etc. Just restoring old hatchbacks and minivans, then dumping them out to the market dirt cheap when I'm done playing.

    2. Re:Serious Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that too! You get the funs and then so does someone else who can't afford them!

      Sell my old McLaren F1 for the price of a can of coke, just to be nice :)

    3. Re:Serious Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahhaha, that's awesome.

  55. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He got rich, moved to California and started going to clubs, strip clubs. All things devoid of any personality or soul, he moved to a soulless land and wonders why he is lonely.

    I would have stayed where i was, but travel and live big with my friends.

  56. problem - solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem - workers from startups are so rich they can't have social success

    Solution - we don't get social success anyway. Enjoy not having crushing student loan debt, or mortgages. If you want to save the world then go privately and massively sponsor engineers-without-borders or doctors-without-borders.

  57. surprized by irony by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    invest it all in VA Linux Systems.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  58. Easy by Gestahl · · Score: 1

    1) Buy nice house. 2) Buy nice car. 3) Set up a trust for my nephew. 4) Setup an investment account that will payout a few hundred thousand every year for me personally on an average year. 5) Setup a non-profit with the rest, and setup computer labs in high schools and colleges. 6) Teach.

  59. im glad you asked, slashdot. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    I know we all have our desires and hopes of winning the lottery, but for us slashdotters im sure there are a few indelible things we would absolutely need to do. Ive compiled a list i think best represents the community.

    1. replace inefficient and wasteful toilet paper with stack of cash. replace glade plug-in with more appropriate bathroom salvadorian priest to burn myrrh when needed.
    2. finally repair faulty kitchen sink with tap that, instead of dispensing Jolt cola as intended, unfortunately just dispenses cold water.
    3. finally upgrade from Gentoo on X64 to the intended platform, Gentoo on D-Wave quantum annealer.
    4. Notify the zoning board that you will finally come 'up to code' and install the helipad that was intended for the roof alongside the infinity pool that used to be the neighbours back yard.
    5. repair the broken outdoor grill with the fully staffed Brazillian churrascaria you'd been meaning to install.
    6. kick the disgusting habit of waking up every morning, getting in a car, and driving to work.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  60. A couple ideas by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    - Buy Slashdot: so that they don't need the extra money that have them publish ad-oriented stories, sometimes
    - Pay competent consultants and developers to "help" Gnome, xOffice, and a mega bunch of other OSS projects to get managed efficiently/properly
    - run for president, as a lot of wealthy people do, I guess

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:A couple ideas by FranTaylor · · Score: 0

      - Buy Slashdot

      this is why the geeks will always be poor, they are SO dumb

    2. Re:A couple ideas by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, buy Slashdot, and pay them to finally approve my book review, (which is way better than the one currently on the front page, and a better book, too! IMCANAAHO*)


      *In My Completely Arrogant Not At All Humble Opinion

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:A couple ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please Notch, buy Slashdot...

  61. It's a hard problem ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Suddenly everybody wants a piece of you and you have to distrust their motivations. Because the amount of people looking to sink in their teeth isn't going to be small.

    Conversely, how do you expect to have a normal relationship with a non-wealthy person? Suddenly they're trying to keep up with a zillionaire and haven't got the means ... which means they're living on the charity of rich people and whatever their mood does. That tends to be present no matter how much you want it to not be. Get into a fight in some faraway location you can't afford to be in on your own, and you're a nobody.

    Get rich over time, and you can build up some friends in the same situation. Get rick quickly and you can't. In which case you better hope your family and your existing friends can cope with it.

    I've seen TV shows with some lottery winners ... and they constantly get letters from random people looking to get handouts, or people trying to scam them. Because people are greedy bastards. Oh, and the other rich people want nothing to do with you because you're new money.

    I've always said I have no interest in being rich and famous ... I want to be rich and anonymous, precisely because I don't want to deal with this bullshit.

    The real question is ... as tragic as this is, how much sympathy do recent billionaires expect from the rest of us? The whole "I'm a billionaire, now what?" is one of those questions which you can't expect a serious or helpful answer from anybody who hasn't done it.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:It's a hard problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the level of sympathy is related to how they earned that money. Is Notch some piece of shit "too big to fail" con artist wall street bastard that fucked people out of their retirement by selling shit investments then betting against them?

      No he isn't. He made what is apparently a really fun game people love to play. So for me, I'd go easy on him.

    2. Re:It's a hard problem ... by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      As a start-up billionaire, I'm sure you can find fellow start-up billionaires (or millionaires) to hang around with and maybe invest in some other ventures.
      He already managed to build up a very successful company which is a massive online game on different platforms. He probably had to pick his team very carefully from the foundation up; so he should be a good judge to which companies to invest in.

  62. The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Realize that your life is yours to live. You choose your lifestyle, not the other way around.

    I've been my own boss for a while and I've grown a successful company. I'm a millionaire many dozens of times over. I drive an old Volvo wagon I bought used for $2500. I live in a 1500 square foot house. I buy clothes at Kohls. Only a very small handful of people know what I'm worth, and they are sworn to secrecy.

    I chose to life the lifestyle of a regular Joe. Here's a step-by-step guide to coming into a lot of money quickly:

    1) SHUT THE FUCK UP. Keep it secret to the best of your ability. If you can't, come up with a plan for that. But, do the best you can.

    2) Decide NOW what kind of lifestyle you want to live. Think 5 years down the road about the company you will want to keep. Birds of a feather flock together. White people hang out with white people. Rich people hang out with rich people. It sucks, but you have to decide now.

    3) Put the principal away, and pay yourself what it takes to live the lifestyle you decided to live in Step 2.

    4) Finally, and most important, change NOTHING right away (except, paying off debt is perfectly okay). Stay at your job. Don't run away. Don't take a vacation. Don't throw a party for all of your close friends unless you want to find out how many of them actually aren't your close friends. Just maintain the status quo and make decisions SLOWLY.

    That is the best advice I can give, from one rich guy to another.

    1. Re:The solution is easy by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      Biggest pitfalls of the newly rich are not knowing what to do with it, so much so that they get into things they shouldn't and end up bankrupt, overdosed, etc. Simply put, everything said above is extremely good advice.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:The solution is easy by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      I'm a millionaire many dozens of times over. I drive an old Volvo wagon I bought used for $2500.

      You know, keeping a low profile is great, but why not buy a more up-to-date & hopefully more reliable car?

      "OH damn, thats guys driving a 2 year old Honda Accord, he must be have millions of dollars in the bank" ?

    3. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a millionaire many dozens of times over. I drive an old Volvo wagon I bought used for $2500.
        You know, keeping a low profile is great, but why not buy a more up-to-date & hopefully more reliable car?

      Than an old Volvo wagon? Good luck. Finding a car with more mileage to the gallon these days is easy. But with more mileage to the car? And if anything breaks, you can get it fixed anywhere without having to visit an ink cartridge dealer specialized on the computers in your car that snoop on you whenever they can.

    4. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 2 year old accord costs $20,000 or so, doesn't it? $17,500 buys a lot of maintenance, and my Volvo is in excellent shape, and still gets nearly 30MPG on the highway. It also has creature comforts the Accord cannot touch, even though it is 10 years older.

    5. Re:The solution is easy by bsharp8256 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't get much more reliable than an old Volvo wagon...that said I'd be buying a newer (though not necessarily new) car too.

    6. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 and 4 are no-go for me.

      1 - I have a sister who can't shut up. She'd blab, and this kind of thing is next to impossible to hide from immediate family.

      4 - The job getting harder and harder to do. Remaining in it because it's allowing me to put extra money aside every month, and I think it has a short remaining shelf life.

      But 2 and 3 - yeah. I can do 2 and 3.

    7. Re:The solution is easy by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Up through a few tens of millions, I'd say this approach is possible, even if still likely difficult for many people. If we're talking on the order of 2.5 billion, it may be a different kind of problem. It's less, "How do I arrange my daily life?" and more "Should I go to mars, start an institute, or take over an island nation?" kind of money. Maybe some people could essentially ignore the burden of that tremendous potential, but I think most (particularly someone of a programmery bent of mind) would see that as a problem to be solved and feel the need to do something with it. Particularly when, like Notch, you're already in the public eye at least a little, and also know you don't want to put yourself out there more, it can be challenging.

    8. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very wise.

    9. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're talking on the order of 2.5 billion, it may be a different kind of problem. It's less, "How do I arrange my daily life?" and more "Should I go to mars, start an institute, or take over an island nation?" kind of money.

      This.

      At $1M, rent a 1-bedroom apartment and chill out on my projects for rest of life.

      At $10M, buy a bigger house and chill out on my projects for rest of life and maybe have a workshop in a basement.

      At $100M, behave like $10M guy but buy a ticket on a Soyuz or get in line for whenever SpaceX or Bigelow make orbital tourism a thing.

      At $1B, call Elon by his first name, and MARS, BITCHES, knowing he would take the call.

      Notch, if you're reading this. Mars. Be the first man on Mars.

    10. Re:The solution is easy by yabos · · Score: 1

      Because motherfucker Jones https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    11. Re:The solution is easy by chaotixx · · Score: 2

      I respect your approach to wealth, but think you should really reconsider your decision to shop at Kohl's.

    12. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh horse shit. How fucking stupid would you feel if you ended up with a terminal diagnosis and only a couple of months to live but hey you didn't want anyone else to know so you just kept going to work.

      You bet your ass I'd take a vacation and quit my job. I'd also put most of the money aside and ensure I drew it down slowly so I wouldn't have to work again. If I genuinely had enough spare I'd hire a housekeeper. Then I'd focus on my family and my hobbies.

    13. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post from someone with first hand experience. Everyone else on this thread sound like some average joe trying to imagine what they would do if they were rich.

    14. Re:The solution is easy by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I dunno, if I had a bunch of money I might buy a car like that because it would be cool and also fun to tinker around with and I would have the time to do so.

  63. Answer is easy by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    (1) Buy/build a super-yacht big enough to live on as your home.
    (2) Travel the world, taking your home with you.

    Requires 'only' a few hundred million to really make it work.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Answer is easy by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      You think way too small. You can buy decommissioned aircraft carriers for cheap.

      Time to go all snowcrash and build a floating nation.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Answer is easy by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      The silly thing is, depending on how "super" a yacht you need, you're off by a few orders of magnitude. My parents have been living aboard and cruising the world for the last 14 years. A 48' (14m) sailing catamaran isn't exactly a mega-yacht, but it's actually more boat than two people need - it was bought for a family of four plus visitors - but it's also possible to buy it and fit it out for about the cost of a house. In fact, they still own the house, and I think its value is higher than the boat despite being a fairly dated suburban location. Lots of people go cruising on less than a quarter million. You certainly can sink a few million into the boat if you want to - it'll get you a larger and more luxurious one, maybe with a few more perks and automation and definitely with more space - and you can then add a permanent staff if you'd like to (owning a boat on your own is a lot of work, and there's something to be said for hiring a cook, a mechanic, etc.) and now you're talking real money... but it's still only going to come out to probably 7 digits initially and then about 6 digits per year.

      Not saying you couldn't spend more than that if you really want to, of course, but you hit seriously diminishing returns.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:Answer is easy by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I know people who have done this, but it really only takes a few hundred thousand if you plan right. A 40ft yacht (any bigger needs a crew) and $20k spending money per annum will get you around the world and back for a few years.

  64. I would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    terminate systemd development, and elect Donald Trump President.

    1. Re:I would by rl117 · · Score: 1

      You know, the first idea isn't such a bad one! More seriously, he has the capital to drive any software development programme of his choice. He could be the next Mark Shuttleworth if he desired it.

      If I had the capital, I'd likely set up a small company to do software development that interested me, and which would also be either useful to others (purely philanthropic) or would have some commercial demand too. The kind of stuff I want to do now but either can't devote time to, doing small bits and pieces here and there, or that requires more people than just me. So long as he has some goal to focus on, he can do whatever he wants. And as other posts mentioned, what he's lacking looks like a purpose in life--any purpose is better than wasting the opportunity the wealth brought him. Hell, he could buy many smaller corporations, start/join charities, anything he desired.

    2. Re:I would by Lorens · · Score: 1

      If I had the capital, I'd likely set up a small company to do software development that interested me, and which would also be either useful to others (purely philanthropic) or would have some commercial demand too.

      I seriously feel that one could revolutionize computing by applying capability theory to it (think KeyKOS / EROS / Coyotos / CapROS). I know that if I sometime needed or just wanted a computer in my eye or ear or something, something I had to trust, then that would be it.

  65. Who says we're not? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    A lot of very wealthy people live amongst you and don't appear wealthy, because they save and invest and live modestly.

    Your problem is you think affluenza, or sudden riches, means you need to spend like a fish.

    Smart people just put all their new wealth into their retirement accounts over a few decades, pay off their car loans, and reduce their mortgages (keeping some allows you to deduct a lot of cool things), while not appearing to be wealthy.

    First, if you inherit a fortune, or make a killing on IPOs, do the above. Then figure you'll blow 10 percent of it on silly things. Cut yourself some slack. It might sound fun to buy 10 new coats because you can (and it is kind of fun), but after that initial period you'll realize you don't really need more stuff, or it owns you.

    Other things you can do (some of which I've done) are: figure out what your most fun hobby or hobbies are, and pay for Lifetime memberships or access to them. I got SIFF Platinum Lifetime membership, NOW Lifetime, and I was good. Because those tend to be sometimes charitable things (like when I got platinum donor status to some of the local art museums and music events), you may be able to deduct a lot of that.

    And then go back to living. Everyone else will be worried about the future, but if you're diversified in sound low-cost mutual funds, you realize you never can spend that much anyway.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Who says we're not? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      oh, and useful advice: don't give a lot to one group, they keep asking you for money, and that gets old fast. Find out what threshold their donation level is, and donate $1 less than that. I gave KUOW and the local zoo something like $10,000 each, but they kept asking for money and it was supposed to be a one time gift. They hire donation people to keep asking you for money, and it can take 3-5 years before you disappear off those lists. Throwing money at stuff like monorail campaigns is another idea.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Who says we're not? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      oh, and useful advice: don't give a lot to one group, they keep asking you for money, and that gets old fast.

      The wealthy find the cries from the poor to be unpleasant, so they erect walls to silence the noise

    3. Re:Who says we're not? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      You only need walls if you display wealth ostentatiously. That is what the nouveau riche find. Their fancy digs and cars and yachts attract attention.

      Tiaras are for the foolish. The best watches cost $25 or less, or wear none at all.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Who says we're not? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Good point, but there may be no way around that. One thing people definitely need to be careful of, is who you donate to. Being rich doesn't translate to no work, or it shouldn't; in fact, I'd be studying my ass off learning finance so I would have a clue what's going on. I'd probably get a bit paranoid too. How would I know if my accountant and lawyer were skimming off the top? I wouldn't know if I was ignorant of the whole system.
      I'd research and investigate every charity I looked to donate to, and anyone who sought me out with their hand out (besides the normal automated stuff everyone gets) would automatically get on my "no" list. I'd probably start my own foundation, really.
      On a more personal level, if I hit it big, my dream is to build a sweet recording studio and finally start laying down original tracks. That would be the dream. I'm working on it now, but it's slow going. I'd be happy with that. IT pays the bills, but the stress is also taking years off my life.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  66. A friend of the family had this exact problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He already had a grown successful child but no grandchildren, was retired from big blue after getting his Rolex, married into a ridiculous amount of money with his second wife, and lived comfortably in Boca Raton. The boredom along with not feeling as useful anymore led to depression and eventually a suicide attempt. Part of his therapy was to go work at a local subway sandwich shop. This is a guy who use to babysit me and cook tiger shark for dinner, so I always got a kick out of imagining him slinging subs for john Q public.

    You don't necessarily need to be productive, but feeling useful on the inside seems to be a major outlier when it comes to the mental health of "retired" successful people.

  67. On misery by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A successful celebrity was once asked if money buys happiness.

    Her reply was, "I'd rather be rich and miserable than poor and miserable."

    1. Re:On misery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The version I heard went, "Money can't buy happiness, but it's better to cry in a Porsche than a Volkswagen."

    2. Re:On misery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good quote. I hope you get modded up to 5. I do imagine money can make things easier, although other problems may be introduced at the same time.

      If I suddenly had $2.5 billion...

      I'm going to assume $1.25 billion after taxes to be safe.

      I'd probably put aside $205 million to live off of comfortably. That's about $1 million per year for 60 years I think, adjusted for 3.5% inflation. While I may not be able to spend $1 million in a given year, it'd be nice having that option. Anything left over can go to charity anyway. I'd quite possibly find 10 homeless people/families and just "sponsor" them with $14k (tax-free gift) per year. Set up through my bank account.

      I'd probably donate at least $100 to $250 million to the university I graduated from. In the form of an endowment with certain requirements. Very little to none would go towards tuition reduction as I feel that's the government's responsibility. Although to be fair, it could indirectly reduce tuition if they cut spending elsewhere because of it. I won't go into the details concerning the hypothetical I thought of before, but some of them include maybe another Japanese teacher and some to the math/science departments. I figure 1% interest would be spend, so, $1 million to $2.5 million per year.
      [Running total: $305 to $455 million]

      I might take 10% ($125 million) and save that specifically for charitable donations for over the years... outside of the money donated to the college and outside of the money I'd donate out of my $1 million/year personal spending. These would be tax deductible charities, even if I don't benefit in year 2 onward.
      [Running total: $430 to $580 million]

      Assuming I can donate it to the city or some charitable organization, build a dorm-style apartment building for what would be homeless people up until then. Ideally with a 30% rent cap if a tenant ends up getting a good job but doesn't want to move out... for stability purposes. By dorm style, I'm talking about small bedrooms, kitchenette, small bathroom, etc. Something that won't be pleasant, but better than living in tents. I'd add solar panels, perhaps solar water heating, and other energy efficient things to keep things cheap. Wired for cable TV and Internet but no idea how it should be paid for or done. Let's say $25 to 100 million for this project.
      [Running total $455 to $680 million]

      Build my own dream house... an underground one... sort of. Won't go into details. I'd hope the cost would be under $2 million.
      [Running total; $457 to $682 million]

      Go back to college. Don't know if it'd be for a degree or not, but why not? Learning can be fun. Being around family is nice too. Oh year, I'd give them some money. Immediate family, I figure $20 million each. That way they get at least 60 years of $100k/year with inflation. I might also put aside $20 million to give to friends, family, and strangers. Once that $20 million is gone, I may feel better just flat-out refusing giving money away.
      [Running total; $557 to $782 million]

    3. Re:On misery by jdk1 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have neither riches nor poverty, and be happy.

  68. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why get married? Wasn't the whole "buy the cow so the milk is free" idea WHY you got married?

  69. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only do the people who have stuck by you during the hard times deserve the reward,

    You know, my gut reaction was to agree with your comment. But, thinking about it more I don't think "deserve the reward" is quite right. To be honest, I don't think any person can be said to "deserve" $100 Million. Not only does it create the sort of imbalance that Notch is talking about with others, as you have the equivalent buying power of hundreds of people over their whole life, but it's pretty clear that there are others who work harder, smarter, etc who still never see any "reward" of that scale and the very nature of such a reward only works precisely because it's so rare. To that end, at some level it's a curse. You get all the greedy and anger and fear of others, which you have to spend a lot of your effort placating, just to have anything like a normal relationship with them.

    but they're the ones who have proven who you can trust.

    Now this is the part I agree with. The real question is what it means "proven who you can trust". It doesn't mean a lack of greed or selfish imposition. It means more, "I know enough about them that I can trust myself to know their worst impulses". Giving them $100 Million might be enough to placate them for a while, but consider the The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard. One can burn through $100 Million without trying, and it doesn't take much spending for jealousy to take hold, no matter the scale. It's one reason why, in a way, the discussion is most about buying off your friend's greedy to try to keep their monkey off their back.

  70. Create a State of Nature by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    I'd create a State of Nature to preserve the pre-civil culture of northern Europeans -- not just to "save the world" but because that's the enrivonment I want:

    1) Buy up large tracts of undeveloped land in nations, in exchange for low land value taxation, that agreed to let people, on those lands, live by the 7 points of agreements between individuals outlined in the aforelinked blog post on "The State of Nature".
    2) Permit any indigenous peoples to remain so long as they agreed to those points, excluding everyone else but invitees of the people in those nature preserves. This includes financing a nature preserve patrols (drones, etc.) to prevent encroachment.
    3) Set up a cloning foundation to clone people who have been taken out of the gene pool by the current dysgenic culture -- particularly highly intelligent and attractive females that got conned into giving up childbearing for a "career".
    4) Set up a foundation for emergency relocation of population when a host nation violates their agreement to permit autonomy.
    5) Invite people I like personally to the nature preserve in which I want to live.
    6) Invite other lonely billionaires to live in other nature preserves so they could enjoy the natural healthy relationships with beautiful intelligent women.
    7) Do what I can to help Bezos, Musk, et al to reduce civilization's ecological footprint on the biosphere -- preferably by space migration. This involves all manner of technology.

  71. Buy an Island by tgetzoya · · Score: 1

    I'd buy an island off the coast of Italy. I'd find someone willing to spend all my money (which shouldn't be too hard) and I'd use a couple million to create a venture capitalist corporation. I'd hire people to run the day-to-day operations and live on my island away from the world.

    If there's any money left, I'd buy a professional sports team.

  72. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by frooddude · · Score: 1

    Erm, she's already an ex, there's very little she can do about his change in worth.

  73. The same way other rich and famous people do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Follow the lead of Howard Hughes.

    1. Re:The same way other rich and famous people do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow the lead of Howard Hughes.

      Are you suggesting investments in ridiculous but awesome aerospace projects, or are you suggesting a million square feet of storage space for stale urine bottles? Because I could invest in balsa wood farms or storage REITs, and I gotta tell ya, I'm kinda having a hard time making a decision here.

    2. Re:The same way other rich and famous people do... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      send the urine to space, duh

  74. pass it on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are many developers who wouldn't mind being mentored so that we too can become successful (rather than toiling in dead-end jobs or just-not-making-it). and as expected, yes even some funding to help us turn our ideas into reality.

  75. Two Billion Is Not Very Much In Politics by Ugmug · · Score: 1

    Two billion dollars will buy you 2 minutes with a senator, 10 minutes with his call girl, and a 30 minute limo ride out of town complete with a police escort....all at the same time!

    1. Re:Two Billion Is Not Very Much In Politics by tj2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, when you look at the corruption scandals where politicians are being indicted for various idiocies, it's amazing how *little* it takes to bribe them. Some of these dimwits are taking a huge fall for bribes amounting to no more than $100-200k over several years.

  76. Buy /. by jimbolauski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would buy /. and make sure questions like these would be relegated to reddit & digg.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  77. Stop hanging with the Little People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you come into that much money, you are no longer Little People. Stop trying to think that you are. Little people will generally despise you for your money. Hang with other famous/rich/powerful people. Seriously. They might despise you for your money, but are generally better at hiding the knife when they slide it between your ribs.

  78. Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a problem here, I'm very anti-social, have developed a general dislike of people and have few attachments other than financial to my current city.

    So I would just pack and move someplace else, probably have a cool house built, and keep doing what I'm doing without having to do it for anybody else.

    If he wants to hide/conceal some of his money, just rent a decent apartment in town where he can hang out, and drive a cheap car like a vette. He also needs to lock up his social media accounts and make it not so obvious who he is and how much money he really has.

  79. Common mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a common mistake that people who come into sudden wealth often make is drastically changing their lifestyle in accordance with their new wealth.

  80. Donate it all except for enough to live on by blackanvil · · Score: 1

    Should it happen, I'd donate all but what I need to live off the interest with a life of luxury (say ~$10million, probably less) -- in exchange for the usual board positions if that's what I'm interested in at the time. It's what several billionaires have promised to do upon their deaths -- instead of passing the massive wealth and all its negatives to their heirs, donate it except for a few million for them to live off of if needed. If you don't want the hassle, get it over to someone who needs it; if you want to maintain control, insist on a board position as part of the deal.

  81. For starters... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    ..give 90% of it away; keep what I need for a healthy, sustainable life-style; my favorite charities will be getting the rest in some form.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  82. Seriously? by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

    There's absolutely no reason he can't have two lifestyles. One living as a regular joe in a suburban house driving a regular car. This lifestyle can be used for dating and others where it's more important to maintain a low profile. Maybe new potential endeavors or getting to know new people.

    And the other in his mansion. with the yacht.

    Sometimes it's easier pretending to be two or more different people than being one and being torn in a hundred different directions because you ultimately know people will want to use you for what you have, and finding substance in our relationships becomes the most important thing in life.

  83. for the average slashdot reader by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    the average slashdot reader will behave no differently than any other lottery winner:

    poor intuitive math skills mean you don't understand that 1+2+3+4=10. You will over-extend, over-commit and spend yourself into bankruptcy, just like most lottery winners.

  84. Oh, I've thought about it by EStrat · · Score: 1

    Get rid of all debt. Make sure my kids will be financially secure if I drop dead (though that's largely taken care of with life insurance). Among other things, that addresses making sure my kids will not have to worry about paying for college. Reno my condo. Buy a house in Princeton. Give money to close friends (you know, those I've had for decades) and family.

    Retire, or seriously cut back the hours working for someone else. Write.

    Volunteer time/money/expertise for anti-poverty; healthcare; and guys-not-getting-screwed-when-divorcing-a-crazy-person causes.

    1. Re:Oh, I've thought about it by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ...and guys-not-getting-screwed-when-divorcing-a-crazy-person causes.

      Where the hell were you when I needed you in 2001?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  85. Prepare Yourself by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Being wealthy is only a burden if you let it be one. If you don't want a bunch of attention, don't buy a bunch of flashy things that will attract attention. If you want to save the world, hire an economist from a university to study ways to maximize the impact my money has in benefiting society.
    Take time, travel, learn, become well rounded and interesting. Heck, move to Bhutan and steal from yourself. Build yourself to be willing and able to accept the responsibility that comes with this great power.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  86. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Quirkz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until one dies of an overdose, one disappears into some kind of cult, half of the rest spend it all and blame you when you won't give them more because now they're entitled. It sounds like a good plan, but it can go bad pretty easily, too.

  87. Absolutely by sycodon · · Score: 2

    Go completely dark.

    Hire attorneys to handle ALL your affairs. Carry only credit cards. Stay out of the news.

    But you can also have fun anonymously...

    Make an arrangements with a car deal to give away cars to people you think deserve it as you encounter them.
    Pay the check for an entire restaurant full of people when you leave.
    Watch for local foreclosures and intercede on the behalf of those you think are getting a raw deal.
    Fund a promising local business for two years.

    Of course it goes without saying that you pay off the mortgages of all your relatives and set up college savings accounts for all of your children, nieces, nephews and cousins.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Absolutely by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Rich people don't think that way. the richer you get the more greedy, unless the money is attached to their name for "immortality" reasons.

      I have done work for billionaires, the assholes cant pay their bills within 180 days.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Absolutely by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I would start a payday loan co-op. Give out payday loans like a regular place. After taking out overhead costs, I would refund the fees to the borrowers at the end of the year.
      I'd also figure out other ways to screw over the predatory financial community.

    3. Re:Absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Anglican Church is doing this in parts of England, FWIW.

    4. Re:Absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done work for billionaires, the assholes cant pay their bills within 180 days.

      Of course not..That's 180 days of interest that they're not getting on that money.

    5. Re:Absolutely by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but someone who wins the lotto or sells a Minecraft probably doesn't think like the typical billionaire.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    6. Re:Absolutely by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      But you can also have fun anonymously...

      Make an arrangements with a car deal to give away cars to people you think deserve it as you encounter them.
      Pay the check for an entire restaurant full of people when you leave.
      Watch for local foreclosures and intercede on the behalf of those you think are getting a raw deal.
      Fund a promising local business for two years.

      Set up a charity on the quiet to fly bums to Hawaii (or any other island they'll be unlikely to be able to migrate away from on their own) in twos and threes and see how long until someone notices (if you can keep it up unnoticed for a year it'll be a serious problem by that point).

      Anonymously mail small suitcases full of cash to random local politicians to see what happens. (optional: anonymously tip off the media amount said suitcase)

      Buy a few hundred drones and then every few weeks send one on a few mile flight to land on the same persons doorstep at 2am (taking a different route and launched from a different place each time). See how long you can keep it up before they either flip out and/or start a side business selling gently used drones.

    7. Re:Absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it goes without saying that you pay off the mortgages of all your relatives

      Does it? I'd rather set up a trust for each of them and have it pay them an allowance each month. You know, give them security, not investment pressure. The amount would be too low to quit working and live comfortably, but enough to cover regular expenses, so that they're off the treadmill and can afford to make financially sound decisions. Buy a new car when the old one costs more in repairs than it's worth, not keep repairing the clunker because you can't afford a new car. That sort of thing.

      Just because I'm rich doesn't mean everybody I know automatically becomes rich as well. For example, if I wanted to have dinner out with a couple of friends, I would not pay for the restaurant. We'd choose a restaurant that everybody can afford and they'd pay their share of the bill. You might think, if you're rich, why would you go to a "cheap" restaurant and not take your friends to the best restaurant and pay for it? Because I'm not taking them out, we're hanging out together. You can only "treat" your friends a couple of times before you start feeling exploited and at least some of your friends feel "bought" and like they're not being able to keep up.

    8. Re:Absolutely by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In a comment below you mention how you'd to not just kill but to gruesomely kill people. So I scrolled back up. In this comment you sound about as intellectually honest as the average racist. I am thinking jealousy and entitlement are your issues but I'm sure you've all sorts of confirmation for your beliefs much as those who'd judge black people by reading the court logs in their newspaper.

      In other words, it's nice that you have an opinion and all but I'm not sure you should be seen as someone with a respectable opinion or even someone who's qualified to opine in the first place.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  88. What I wouldn't do: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Immediately purchase an incredibly expensive mansion that basically none of my existing friends would ever be able to drive to much less feel comfortable in, assuming they didn't just hate me on the principle of flaunting my wealth like that in the first place. Making a move like that and complaining about feeling alienated is just moronic.

  89. First by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    I would have a broadband connection installed at home.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  90. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #3: Not a chance in hell. The courts are setup to fuck men.

    I had a woman judge and I still got full custody or our disabled daughter. Yes, I'm a man.

    I agree that getting married is a sucker's bet, but as an anecdote, men don't always get fucked.

  91. I think thats a problem I could handle by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    The biggest issue is if you have kids or not when you come into that sorta wealth. If I had children I would feel some obligation I think to retain said wealth for them and future generations.

    Since I don't have kids though I think it would be fairly easy. First a billion dollars is a heck of a lot of money. If I am still a "billionaire" after paying the taxes on the windfall than I essentially have more money then I really know what to do with.

    First) I'd probably make a gift to some family members of paying off their mortgages. That will probably run me a million or so. Hopefully that would be a sufficient gesture that they would not resent my sudden wealth and be glad that my good fortune has made what is probably the biggest monthly payment in their lives a thing of the past.

    I don't think I'd move or anything but I could probably drop a 100K or remodeling my own place.

    I'd certain acquire some new costs like hiring out the law work etc.

    I'd probably blow another few hundered K building a bigger garage and picking up four or five fun cars, nothing nuts like a super car or anything stuff I could actually drive, a Tesla, Alfa 4C, Corvette, and couple interesting classics.

    I'd travel and go cool places. Invite my current friends to go with with me on my tab. Again though nice hotels, good resturants etc, but no renting out the entire floor or anything nuts.

    The rest I probably just live life as I do now with, for the most part. I guess I would on my own projects like OSS stuff rather than work a day job.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  92. Get some fucking hobbies. by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I would have no such problems with 2.5 billion. it would allow me to dip my toes into many, many things without the worry of financial ruin. I could throw 10-20 million at various projects and get involved with the actual process, and possibly help change the world for the better. I could do things on a whimsy. Shit, I would start another band and tour 9 months out of the year, but wouldn't have to weigh "gas, food, or a motel room because the floor in that house is soaked in cat piss and roaches". (I still wouldn't do a goddamned tour bus though..) But then again, I have very simple "needs", but lots of interests.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Get some fucking hobbies. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I have very simple "needs", but lots of interests.

      I'm having a kind of gap year from work, to focus on stuff like arts and music, but also academic studies. While I don't have tons of money to throw around, I think I can understand some of the issues here to some extent. It's great to have hobbies or voluntary work where you meet people from different backgrounds. That way you don't have to explain things like where you work or how much you make. It generally helps to have meaningful things in your life that are not dependent on your wealth. I guess if you have a shitload of money, you can think of it as a backup that lets you extend your gap year indefinitely.

      Basically, I'm just repeating the parent post. Do what you like doing, be it work or studies or whatever. I guess a more general issue is that when people suddenly find themselves with a higher status (e.g. due to graduation, promotion, etc.) they feel a pressure to do grand things. That would explain why sudden wealth might feel like a burden -- you feel like you have to invest it in something world-changing, and if you fail to do that, you'll be more miserable than before all the wealth. But like any peer pressure, you can ignore it an focus on what you really like. Maybe some of those things will grow into something grand and world-changing, with or without all the money.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Get some fucking hobbies. by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      It would also help if you didn't go around telling everyone how much money you're worth. T-shirt and jeans, move to a new city, just be one of the crowd. (change your name if you have to)... If no one knows you're a billionaire, but maybe at best some kid with a trust fund, you can still be a regular person...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  93. Move and take on a new identity. by pla · · Score: 1

    This problem has a pretty straightforward answer - Just move, and take on a new identity as someone moderately wealthy (ie, no need to work, but not "solid-gold Veyron" level crazy-rich).

  94. His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by goathumper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hindsight is 20/20, but I've always thought that were I to come upon a windfall of some large(ish) caliber, I'd likely not tell a soul, and not change my lifestyle significantly and suddenly. Sure it's tempting to run out and buy a Ferrari, but if one thinks about it, those are childish wishes and whims - a lack of self-control, if you will. The first things I'd do is settle all my debts (house, car, etc.), which aren't as visible to others. I'd also start winding down my employment (i.e. 1-month or even 2-month notice).

    By simply slowing the transition down significantly, perhaps even "embellishing" the nature of the windfall (i.e. "I just closed a deal that's going to do very well for me over the next 2 years") such that the changes are logical and incremental vs. sudden and drastic, one can avoid such "acclimation pains" in one's social circle.

    In the end, if you change your life drastically there's a very good chance you'll run into the same isolation issues - windfall or no. So it's about the (perceived) speed of the climb, not the steepness.

    Besides, if you make the change slow it's easier for people to see that you're not changing - just your lifestyle and economic conditions. Less scary that way I think.

    PS/ what's he bitching and whining about women for? he can afford any (set of) pornstar(s) he wants now!! :D

    1. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be possible for him to not tell a soul. Everybody knew he made minecraft, everybody knows MS bought it...even if they could keep the exact dollar amount secret (which they probably couldn't because of shareholder reporting requirements) everybody would know it would still be a lot of cash.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      For me it is already simple. I have a wife and a circle of friends.
      1. I would give all friends children Florida pre paid college funds.
      2. Set up scholarships.
      3. Maybe start a college.
      The issue is to weed out those that are in search of a trough.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by eth1 · · Score: 1

      PS/ what's he bitching and whining about women for? he can afford any (set of) pornstar(s) he wants now!! :D

      If you flaunt your wealth, I think you get what you deserve in woman department.

      As a single guy, if I was in a similar situation, and was actually serious about finding a good girl, I'd put the money away and just pretend I'm living on $100k/yr or whatever until I find the right girl.

      Whether the marriage will survive the shock of her finding out she's now a billionaire, well, that's another question. :)

    4. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by JoeWalsh · · Score: 1

      The idea of making changes incrementally is a good one. It reminds me of the advice I heard from someone who was able to retire in his early 50s. He quickly learned that, when people he meets ask him what he does for a living, he shouldn't say "I'm retired." People get jealous, react negatively, etc. So he started telling people he's taking a sabbatical, and that's worked much better for him.

    5. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I would also add to yours:

      Find some hobbies you enjoy, and start doing them more.
          For me, this would be camping, boating, computers, stuff like that.
      Go on a nice vacation, or if you want to get away from everyone you know, go on a permanent vacation.

      As far as the women goes, I have been single for 10 years now, you don't need a woman in your life, and as goathumper points out, you are richer than Hugh Hefner, who cares about finding a meaningful relationship, just don't get married and live happy till you die.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I'd do your point 1 too, if I had the money to make that feasible. It'd really take some pressure off of them.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    7. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      A lot of my friends already think I'm incredibly wealthy because I live overseas and travel a lot.

      What they don't realise is that this lifestyle is possible because I don't spend my money on flashy stuff just to look impressive or because I've been brainwashed by marketing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Most of my friends have kids or grown kids. Oh and they are married as well.
      I am kind of surprised that Markus is not in the same position as I am. He is 36 but he is single. I think that is a big issue. Being super rich and single could make it really difficult to find a true mate.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:His first mistake was changing his lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS/ what's he bitching and whining about women for? he can afford any (set of) pornstar(s) he wants now!! :D

      If he's looking for the "partner for life" kind of girl, she's unlikely to come in a porn star wrapper.

  95. Such an easy thing to answer. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    What would you do if you are suddenly wealthy?

    Just start worrying what would you do if you suddenly lose it all. Simple.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  96. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by CauseBy · · Score: 1

    You must have enlightened friends and family. Some of my friends are bright, but my family members would blow through $100M in a couple years then be back to zero.

  97. Run my mouth by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    First I would keep my pie hole shut about coming into a massive pile of money. Then since I wouldn't have to worry about where my next meal is coming from I would start running my mouth at work and let people know what I really thing of some of their ideas. There are a couple of people who I think just like to hear their own voice and when you are in a meeting with them they give the impression that you are there to bask in their glory and genius even if they say some of the stupidest shit ever to be utter.

    Apart from that get a new car (I'm thinking an M4), get a new truck like vehicle (can't take an M4 out hunting in remote areas), put up a cabin on my recreational property. Although I would like a nice custom made leather trench coat made from that nice thick cow hide that they make motorcycle safety jackets out of. Apart from that I would probably quietly give to various charities, ensure that my children will be well off, and that any of my relatives won't have to worry about school if they apply themselves.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  98. End game? by Jakune · · Score: 1

    So, to me what to do would be simple. Sure, he just won the part of life dealing with having funds to live a life... but is that all there is to life? If you are one to have a religion... I am sure there is plenty to learn there I assume he still "thirsts for knowledge"? I know money wouldn't automatically teach me everything about the cosmos. Isolation? why is he isolating himself? I kinda question the girl that left him because she wanted a more normal person. It sounded like she was concerned about his life style, not his potential life style. That to me doesn't sound like a choice of money, but a conscious choice of living a specific lifestyle. Now, one challenge I could see, he started a company, grew it well, and sold it for a bucket of money. If that was his main motivation in life (work life balance much?) he will need to re-direct his motivation. That is if he looks at it as winning that part of life. Then again I do know entrepreneurs (dealing with much smaller amounts of money) that enjoy building up the company (restaurant/etc), just to sell and start up another. I could imagine many different things I would do, free time to try my hand and research/higher degrees. Also, all my hobbies... I could spend plenty of time there. and since many of those are hobbies that can include people (its not like im just sitting there painting warhammer 40k figures all day long) I would still socialize with others. Frankly I wouldn't move far from where I am now, and would retain my same friends (I am sure they would get to receive some of my fortunate luck too). Honestly, I think I would still want to pursue some work, whether its "real" work or volunteer type work, I wouldn't want to turn to mush.

  99. Easy. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Step 1 - pay off all debts.
    Step 2 - Invest most of it so that it makes me a yearly income that is comfortable.
    Step 3 - Troll detroit with all kinds of OCP and "New Detroit" advertising, pay a couple of guys to break into GM headquarters and hang an OCP banner over the GM sign at the top.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Easy. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  100. Support Open Source Projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I'd contribute to OSS projects. Since I can't code my way out of a paper bag, I'd work with various projects to see what they need and then help them hire the people they need and support this hire.

  101. Burgers by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    All kinds of triple-deck etc. cheese burgers I've never tried or even imagined, giant sandwiches, 2^12 combinations of pizza toppings, 4000 bottles of red wine (not even really fancy ones, just roughly $10 and up)

    I would eat and drink myself to death, but trying to keep it as long and varied as possible.

    1. Re:Burgers by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the football (soccer) star who said when asked what he did with his fortune: "I spent a lot on fast cars, booze and women, The rest i just wasted."

  102. Good answer, good answer! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I find you ideas fascinating, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  103. Low maintanence by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, it seems he's already tried what I probably would have gone for at his age: Buying a ginormous house and trying to act like a hedonistic big shot.

    As a ... more experienced person nearing 50, I think my priorities would be different. Big houses suck. They require continual maintenance, and who's going to be wasting their time shepherding all that? Having to deal with stupid BS little issues all day is precisely what he sold to MS to avoid. The more big expensive crap you acquire, the more effort has to be expended to maintain it all. No wonder he's made himself miserable. I can always trade time for money, and that certainly goes moreso for someone with his new financial resources. Its TIME that is precious.

    Today, I'd find a fun interesting place to live, and *rent* myself a place there. Preferably somewhere walkable, so I wouldn't have to maintain a car (gawd, what a time and money sink those things are). I'd probably approach a local charity (like the food bank) and offer to do some free computer work for them. Knowing myself (and as a developer he's probably similar), it wouldn't take long to find some really interesting problem in there that could have wide application.

    As for meeting people, how is he going to meet cool new people while locked behind gates in that mansion? Blah.

    1. Re:Low maintanence by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      This is great advide to anyone, regardless of sudden wealth. Just because you graduated and got a real job doesn't mean you have to quit a frugal student lifestyle. With the money saved, you can afford a gap year to focus on fun things every now and then.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Low maintanence by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      Your post reminds me of when someone I know, who was an early staffer on the Obama 2008 campaign, got some tech support with their email. From Chris Hughes.

  104. Take Care Of Business! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got virtually no relationships now, so there wouldn't be anything to whine like a little bitch about.

    I'd:
    Eliminate my debt.

    Eliminate my family's debt. At least for mortgage and car.

    Invest for my future and my heirs.

    By all the toys. Island, boat, plane, car(s), other vacation homes.

    What? There's still money left over? That's gas money for the boat and the plane.

    Maybe philanthropy, but only if there is a shit ton left over and I make sure they don't ever come to me. I'll call you, you don't call me.

  105. Depends how wealthy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be a lot more ambitions with $2.5 billion than just a couple of million.

    Either way, highest priorities would be taking care of the urgent (but not that expensive) stuff: pay off the mortgage, do some house upgrades (or perhaps buy a new place), make sure the kids' college expenses are covered (within reason, they need to learn the value of work, too) and the like.

    Beyond that, donate to a number of worthy organizations (not all of them 501(c)3). EFF, for example, perhaps ACLU and NRA also (let's defend all the liberties), and a few lesser known outfits promoting worthwhile (to me, anyway) goals - Space Access Society, 100 Year Starship, etc. Some medical research charities, a few others.

    Endow scholarships, quite possibly with some interesting conditions (but not as oddball as the duct tape prom outfit scholarship) and/or fields of study.

    If the wealth is in the billions rather than "mere" millions, then I'd look at doing a Musk and investing in some higher-risk, high-payoff endeavors: space transportation, new energy technologies (fusion, small fission, etc), and so on. Tomorrowland type stuff.

  106. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minecraft 2?

    1. Re:What about... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a great idea. Then Microsoft can sue him right back into blissful financial oblivion.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  107. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These days, the milk is free anyway if you know how to get it. No reason to buy a cow when you can grab one off the street for free.

    Let's hear it for feminism!

  108. you're both right by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are correct that a million will net about $60k. That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income. Actually $600K per ten years is reliable - year to years gains will fluctuate and that's okay - your spending doesn't have to fluctuate to match each year.

    What will ALSO net $60K spending money is earning 100K, saving 12% for retirement, spending 15% on your mortgage, etc. Once you retire, you're no longer saving up for retirement. If you pay off your house before you retire, you're no longer paying mortgage. You're probably not saving for your kids' college anymore. Therefore a $1 million retirement fund will provide approximately the same lifestyle as a $100K / year job.

    This assumes you're under 55 currently, so you don't count on any social security at all. *

    * You know based on how people are 55 today that 20 years there will be more 75 year-olds than there is money to pay benefits.

    1. Re:you're both right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This also ignores inflation - in 20 years, that $60k will feel like ~$40k if we assume 2% historical rates.

    2. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments

      Dogma, most often repeated to dazzle small fish into thinking the stock market is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen. It's roughly equivalent to a poker table, and it's a zero-sum game. There's a great illusion where you put in a million dollars and a $5 stock with 200,000 shares issued becomes a $50 stock and woo there's ten million dollars!! ...except the other guy at the table only has the million dollars that was put into the market in the first place; you're not getting more than a million dollars by selling all your stock (the price will collapse or you won't sell it all) unless he brings another nine million dollars from outside *into* the stock market, netting $10 million in and $10 million out.

      The trick is the idiot does come back with $10 million, because he sees the price going up and up, and wants in on that; you sell it back to him because you see the climb slowing and showing distress, and then it collapses and he cries and sells it back to you for $1 million, and you sell it to the next moron with $10 million in his pocket when it climbs back, and now you have $19 million in your pocket and two poor single-millionaires across the table from you.

      The biggest argument against diversification isn't the most obvious. The most obvious is that investing 100% into SPY (the S&P500 tracker) is an instant diversified portfolio; as corollary, any selection of multiple securities--stocks, bonds, options (though they expire), commodities (they get delivered, so you have to keep trading contracts in practice; exchange funds that handle this for you are a close substitute)--behaves like a single security, fluctuating up and down as the market does and as their representative sectors in total do.

      A diversified portfolio doesn't magically make money; it simply lowers risk. You must make good buying and selling decisions to make money. In the extreme, a single-stock strategy has the potential to gain *much* more than a diversified portfolio; it can also *lose* much more. In a diversification strategy, you try to select a bunch of securities--stocks or funds which represent a strategy (sector investment, profile investment)--based on what you think would make a good single-security investment, scaling their proportion to their relative risks versus return and your risk tolerance.

      That all sounds complex, but it's easily illustrated. Let's say you think BGWNR is likely to climb sharply, making you a 7% profit in the next 6 weeks, but that it's of course more risky than SFBT which you believe is near-guaranteed to make you a 2% profit in the next 6 weeks. You have a pile of money with which to purchase these investments to fill a gap in your portfolio. If your strategy is an aggressive, higher-risk affair, you might put 75% of your money into BGWNR, and 25% into SFBT; if the market betrays you, BGWNR losses should be partially or wholly mitigated by SFBT losses, and the loss in total should be less even if both lose (because BGWNR would lose more of its value than SFBT). If your strategy is a conservative, lower-risk affair, you might put 10% into BGWNR, and 90% into SFBT, because a loss in both would be almost as small as a loss in SFBT, and a win in both would be significantly (but not greatly) larger than a 100% investment in SFBT, and a loss in BGWNR is way more likely than a loss in SFBT and so would probably leave you with *most* of the gain from SFBT if SFBT went up and BGWNR went down.

      Does diversification magically mean profit? No. It means less profit, and less loss; it means you don't wake up one day finding out you got wiped out at the race track, and so can keep playing. If you're not a good trader in the first place, you might consistently lose money until you bleed to death slowly. For that matter, the market as a whole has a strong influence on individual securities: MSFT or AAPL can experience a 1.2% drop for the day for ab

    3. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Dogma, most often repeated to dazzle small fish into thinking the stock market is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen

      No one said that. And "Small fish" might also think that a vegetable market is a place where vegetables are grown. They would be as wrong as "small fish" who think that "stock market is a place where money is generated".

      The company backing the stock is what might generate the money - stock is just a part representation of it. In the process of conversion/division of companies into stocks, and the sale/exchange process of course has some stealing as well as inefficiencies.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    4. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I said "most often repeated to dazzle small fish".

      The company backing the stock is what might generate the money - stock is just a part representation of it

      The money traders get by buying and selling stocks is not generated by the company behind the stock. Traders bring all the money to the table.

    5. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Yes. Vegetables bought and sold in vegetable market are not typically grown in the vegetable market.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    6. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's not a great analogy. The vegetable market is where you go to buy consumables, produced by farmers. The problem is our vegetable market in question is a place where some farmer dumps off vegetables he grew, then goes back to being a mason; meanwhile the consumers who buy vegetables sit in the farmer's market for about 30 years selling those same vegetables back and forth between each other, with some consumers coming and going, and with the occasional opening or tightening of their wallets.

    7. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Yet buying vegetables can be a good idea.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    8. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      To eat them, yes. To trade them back and forth? Only as a show to get money out of other idiots who think they can make money the same way.

      In essence, it's a giant pyramid scheme: as long as more people keep coming and bringing more money on the table, you can buy from the big winners above you and sell to the new fish below you, making income mostly by inflation or fool-hardy eagerness. The usual line that you can "invest your money and let it grow" (that just getting into the market and holding onto so-called "investments" means you *necessarily* *will* get more money later)--importantly, the narrative that everyone can do this and make money, properly *NOT* mentioning that *someone* else must lose money in the exchange, implied largely by telling people that investing in securities and funds is what they *should* do or else they're not being financially responsible--relies on the market being a pyramid scheme of this sort.

      In reality, the market doesn't function exactly that way. It's sold as a glossed-over pyramid scheme, but it functions as a poker table. Poker isn't really gambling, in the strictest sense of the word: we legally and generally consider gambling to encompass games of chance, and exclude games of skill (this creates interesting situations where wagering on which baseball team wins is gambling, but wagering on whether your team can beat an opponent is not: your ability to collect on that wager relies on your skill, and you can affect it by training yourself and your own team). Skilled poker players regularly fleece every last dime out of new fish who come to the table thinking poker is a game of cards, rather than a game of psychological manipulation; the stock market also is a game of psychological manipulation, and immunization of the self thereof.

      As a poker analogy, it's quite apt: someone must lose money for someone else to gain money; and you mostly affect this by reading the sentiment of the other players and avoiding distortions of thinking which cause unrealistic sentiments. That is to say: when you see a bubble market, you read how excited the others in the market are by identifying the movements of securities prices and the news and other reporting, and buy into it; when you see these indicators showing a slowdown and a loss of confidence, you sell out to the portion of the market which is still fully-confident and driving the (now more slowly climbing) price upward. You come out with a tidy profit, and those overconfident fools are left holding a bag of pink slips that suddenly become worthless.

      Pure technical analysts would say this is why the stock market is curves and not spikes: it grows, its growth slows, and then it rounds off and accelerates downward; it doesn't grow linearly upward, then instantly reverse and start going downward in a straight line. More broad analysts try to read the sentiment from news, and identify if the small fluctuations and the slowdowns are a matter of growing disillusion or just slow trading days and cold feet in general. Nobody in-the-know really says it's like a roulette wheel waiting to hit even or odd and instantly reverse direction without warning, although black swans (like 9/11 or Fukushima Daiichi) happen.

      All in all, the whole of this doesn't suggest diversification is a way to maximize profits; rather, it's a way to minimize losses in unpredicted, poorly-read markets where your skill isn't up to par or the situation is just uncontrollable. Nobody can predict a nuclear meltdown--anyone who does predict a nuclear meltdown *prevents* *it* *from* *happening*. Any business which predicts its own demise does something to stop or soften the blow. In general, businesses and governments have much better data than you--they have everything you can see plus loads of secret data, as well as better facilities to analyze it--and so most negative (and positive) situations you can see coming are already being handled (mitigate the negative, exploit the positive). Hedging your bets is necessary only

    9. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      You are fighting windmills.

      Or, in short: it's not a way to make sure you have a steady upward gain

      Nobody said it is a way to make sure you have a steady upward gain. But that in itself is no reason to not participate in stock market - or if it is, you don't show how in your longish replies to my short posts.

      All in all, the whole of this doesn't suggest diversification is a way to maximize profits

      Nobody said "diversification is a way to maximize profits" either.

      Similarly, earlier you said

      Dogma, most often repeated to dazzle small fish into thinking the stock market is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen

      Nobody said it is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen.

      But like vegetables are not grown in vegetable market but yet it might make sense to buy them in vegetable market, just because money isn't generated in the stock market doesn't mean it is not a good idea to buy stocks in the stock market.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    10. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Nobody said it is a way to make sure you have a steady upward gain. But that in itself is no reason to not participate in stock market - or if it is, you don't show how in your longish replies to my short posts.

      Let's try this:

      That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income.

      A "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" is nothing. It's not a reliable income, it's not a reliable strategy, it's not even really a *strategy* in the stock market (diversification is a risk strategy, not an investment strategy; an investment strategy has to have some planning for how to select in such a way as to produce gain).

      In other words: that sentence is just a bunch of gibberish and jargon, the kind oft-repeated to people who have *no* investment strategy, frequently *by* people who have no investment strategy, and otherwise by people who stand to profit by getting you into the market (e.g. funds managers who can skim a fee off the top). Buy and hold is crap and professional investors--the big capital investors stealing money hand-over-fist, and particularly the people employed to invest and make gains in investment banking houses--are buying and selling based on sentiment (buy low, sell high). The buy-and-hold strategy--the strategy of "keeping long-term investments"--imposes a timing restriction ("don't sell before X time") or a timing strategy ("buy things you won't have to sell for X time") blindly and bluntly, as a cudgel, with no actual investment strategy related to growth and gains-taking (i.e. actually increasing the value of your portfolio).

      Nobody said it is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen.

      The suggestion that you *should* be investing if you're not a skilled, well-versed, highly-competent investor implies that money is generated in the market.

      There are exactly two kinds of people in the market: Con-artists and marks. If you're just leisurely walking through the stock market buying what looks good, you're a mark; if you're studying the market to determine when idiots are holding out their money to be happily taken away, you're a con-artist. Marks are marks because they believe money comes out of the market magically: they'll "invest" and they'll get a return.

      You don't have to outright say a thing to *say* a thing. Smoking improves your mood, gives you more confidence, and puts you among peers of great smokers like John Wayne. A great mass of marketing is built around this--it's all true, of course--and historically has lead people to believe smoking would make them healthy, happy, relaxed, and virile because the marketing statements create an association between smoking and all of those things *without* ever stating as much. They greatly *imply* such things. That's the same as when you tell the fish they can easily make income by putting their money in a diversified, long-term investment portfolio; without a huge pile of additional information, it sure sounds like money just pours out of the stock market as long as you're "diversified"...

      This sort of marketing by heavily implying untrue situations, by deliberately misleading the audience, is well-known. It's so well-known that most modern advertisement is based heavily in legal research to stick to common knowledge (which is often faulty--Vitamin C doesn't cure or prevent colds, but look at the orange juice ads...) or shaky research (there *is* research, with poor controls and bad experimental design... and we cite the one study that supports us out of 100 that don't) and avoid criminal false advertisement by deliberately misleading consumers.

      But like vegetables are not grown in vegetable market but yet it might make sense to buy them in vegetable market, just because money isn't generated in the stock market doesn't mean

    11. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income.

      A "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" is nothing. It's not a reliable income, it's not a reliable strategy

      But nobody said it is a strategy. Nobody even said the investments must all be in equity all the time. Windmills that you perceive to be giant warriors. Why must every statement on /. be a strategy? It can be a part of a strategy, or not a strategy at all.

      The suggestion that you *should* be investing if you're not a skilled, well-versed, highly-competent investor implies that money is generated in the market.

      In spite of recently becoming a well-versed student of horticulture, how can you still assume this? Desirable stuff need not be generated at the place where it is acquired. There is a lot of stealing in the vegetable market - gourds the dealer knows to possess worms within are sold at "high" prices. Yet vegetables remain PART of most good nutrition strategies.

      You don't have to outright say a thing to *say* a thing. Smoking ...

      You don't have to outright *send* giant warriors to fight you. Just erecting windmills is enough for you to mistake them for giant warriors and start fighting them.

      and historically has lead people to believe smoking would make them healthy, happy, relaxed, ...... it sure sounds like money just pours out of the stock market as long as you're "diversified

      There was a time in 18th century when it was the considered opinion of many influential members of society that tobacco is good for health. Later research proved them wrong.

      At what time point do you think stocks became completely bad idea as a part of "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    12. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's called "unspoken implications", which may or may not be true, but which are nonetheless implied by a statement. Stock market advice--such as all that you cover here--is littered with it.

      Suggesting so flippantly that laymen should be in a "diversified portfolio" without qualifying the statement with a disclaimer of skill and strategic considerations is suggesting they take up a strategy, with the implication that "diversified, long-term holdings" are a strategy for making money. The greatest armor in this sort of lie is the ability to come back and show that you are *technically* correct, even though you've made fertile ground for people to make exactly one and only one conclusion from your statements.

      I've taken the route of shaping information myself to control my parents. That's how I dealt with them growing up: I said things which all suggested, iron-clad, whatever I needed them to believe, unless they were in possession of specific other information. They made up their own conclusions, consistently incorrect. This is the same way legal con artists work, and the basic foundation for diplomatic circumlocution.

      At what time point do you think stocks became completely bad idea as a part of "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?

      The entirety of your original post heavily and directly suggested to the lay-person--to the person who would find something new in your advice, instead of seeing tripe that any experienced investor has heard again and again--that just buying up a bunch of diverse stocks and sitting on them for years creates an income.

      To a lay-person, "long-term investment" means "buy and hold" and "don't cash out until you're ready to spend it; just let it grow."

      To a skilled investor, the term "long-term investment" has little meaning. The only investments bought on term are term investments--bonds, CDs, etc.--intended to mature and pay a fixed rate of return; stocks are bought and sold on market sentiment, buying when it's opportune and selling when it's opportune. Your "long-term investment" may suddenly be a bad investment in 3 days's time when company news comes out that sends the stock rocketing up 60%, and you immediately know it's going to sharply come back down in the next day if not the next few hours, so you sell out of that immediately. Markets turn around: what's good this month might not be good in 3 months or 2 years, hence why I got out of basic materials after making a tidy profit--I was buying and selling every several days (I used to swing trade to handle the 3 days settlement time), but eventually got out of that market entirely.

      I'm so aggressively against bad investment advice because I know how the market works. I stopped trading long ago, and won't just stick my money in "long-term investments" and hold a "diversified portfolio" and hope for the best. When I was trading, I was looking at the market for 18 hours every fucking day, waking up at 4am to inspect foreign markets, and carrying out technical analysis using online tools and some additional techniques not currently in practice (which, really, took up time not well spent; paper analysis to use special techniques didn't give me an advantage). I'd hold a stock for about a five-day, or else when I sold I'd have to wait 3 days for the funds to settle before I could buy again; no margin or day trading. My return was approximately 1% per day, with a peak at 29% gain in one month.

      Never again. That shit drives me bat shit crazy; it's not worth the money.

      Now my money sits in 1-2% guaranteed income accounts. The rest of you are all playing a form of lottery with more money in the pot and less lost to failure. You might come out ahead much of the time--most people do, eventually, and the market mostly biases inflation toward the better players--but a lot of people just lose their ass taking all this generic advice and packing their 401(k) money i

    13. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Suggesting so flippantly ... qualifying .... considerations is suggesting

      There was a "fortune cookie" in /. a few days ago which said "It is now safe to switch off your computer". Everyone taking this "advice" must have been heavily affected. In what manner do you plan to take up their cause?

      It has been "suggested" dozens of times in /. that /dev/null is the perfect backup location. People taking this "advice" are in trillions of times a higher need of your "protection" than the readers of raymorris (2726007).

      The entirety of your original post ... that just buying up a bunch of diverse stocks and sitting on them for years creates an income

      Which my "original post" exactly? My first post on this thread was only about the "where" of generation of the wealth rather than its probability / advisability. I used the example of vegetable market for the purpose.

      But you have incorrectly strongly "suggested" that my "original post" had mentioned/implied anything about "income" without any qualification. What do you plan to do with yourself now?

      At what time point do you think stocks became completely bad idea as a part of "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?

      550 words irrelevant to the question

      550 words follow your quote of my question, but none of them tell exactly WHEN stock market became completely a bad idea for a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    14. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You're just being a dense politician. It's like you're shouting "STEM CELL RESEARCH HAS PRODUCED SO MANY MEDICAL ADVANCES!" in an attempt to attack someone who hasn't funded embryonic stem cell research, when 100% of the medical advances produced from stem cell research are adult stem cells: you can come back and say you never said that, because you didn't; but you did imply a lot, because you did. You can defend your rhetoric effectively, even though you know every statement you made would mislead and imply things that are simply not true.

      I've explained this repeatedly in great detail, and you only respond to "suggesting a diversified portfolio of long-term investments will make income is suggesting that just 'investing' magically gets you income, when that's a non-strategy equivalent to a game of chance" with "well I said a diversified portfolio of long-term investments is a good plan; I didn't say you didn't have to actually apply your own thinking or anything".

      You are correct that a million will net about $60k. That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income. Actually $600K per ten years is reliable - year to years gains will fluctuate and that's okay - your spending doesn't have to fluctuate to match each year.

      A million dollars dumped into a diversified portfolio of long-term investments will either be half a million dollars or 1.1 million dollars or 1.5 million dollars or 200,000 dollars in several years. A million dollars INVESTED CONSCIENTOUSLY AND MANAGED CAREFULLY-- which may not quantify with a level of diversification you consider "diversified", because a person may hold 80%+ in low-interest, guaranteed income sources (like CDs) because they don't have any great knowledge on most of the market sectors and so can't do much other than blindly invest in "diversification" that's entirely likely to just throw money away; and which may not qualify as long-term because the only real definition of "long-term investment" is the tax definition that tells you you pay income brackets on less than 1 year holdings and capital gains on more than 1 year holdings, and so the term "long-term investment" has no meaning as a description of investing strategy--may, likely, make gains in respect to the relative skill level of the investor against all other investors in the market in aggregate based on investment influence (which comes down to how much capital they can move and how much news they can make).

      The statement, "That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income," is just fluff. It has no meaning, and implies bad advice.

    15. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Nice article you've written there, but it doesn't even address any of my questions. Do you read a post before replying?

      I'll restate my questions out of context, you can go back to search the context if you want:

      0 . "In what manner do you plan to take up their cause?"

      1. "Which my "original post" exactly?"

      2. "exactly WHEN stock market became completely a bad idea for a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?"

      And just FYI, I am asking these questions literally, not implying anything else by asking these questions.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    16. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      0 . "In what manner do you plan to take up their cause?"

      Meaningless question.

      1. "Which my "original post" exactly?"

      I quoted the original context that started this entire thread in the last message, and you're still asking which.

      2. "exactly WHEN stock market became completely a bad idea for a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?"

      The statement, "That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income," is just fluff. It has no meaning, and implies bad advice. IMPLIES. It's a statement made without sufficient context to suggest, at all, that stock market investment requires a strategy; the completely meaningless term "long-term investments" as well implies buy-and-hold strategy, suggesting that investments just magically grow over time, and so you should just buy into a fund and leave your money there to grow--which is bad advice.

      You don't invest on term. You don't look at a stock and say, "This is a good stock. I'm going to buy this and hold onto it for years and years. It's going to be a long-term investment." That's not a thing you do unless you're stupid. Similarly, "I'm holding a bunch of different stocks" is a much different statement than "I'm only holding stocks which I believe are going to make gains": diversification of a portfolio is a risk strategy--it protects you in case you're WRONG about any particular investment--and not an investment strategy.

      The statement,

      You are correct that a million will net about $60k. That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income. Actually $600K per ten years is reliable - year to years gains will fluctuate and that's okay - your spending doesn't have to fluctuate to match each year.

      Says to close your eyes, shove your money in a bunch of holes that look good, and leave it there "because the market grows and a diversified portfolio always makes money". That's not a strategy; it's the same thing as taking your money to the casino and betting on random horses, roulette positions, slots, and crap shoots. You want to stay away from investments you're not sufficiently certain of and put your money in investments you've built enough knowledge about to reasonably predict gains, and pull your money out when you're no longer certain of gains; if that means holding 2 or 3 different securities, or even exactly one, instead of 5 or 10 or 30 at once, it's still the best strategy. It absolutely *will* mean buying and selling on the *market's* schedule, not yours; you don't get to make "long-term investments" if you're actually trying to not lose your money.

    17. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      None of the questions 0, 1 or 2 have even begun to be answered. You quote the question and then continue repeating the non - answer for the n-th time. Why don't you try answering the questions for a change?

      E.g. the answer to "WHEN" doesn't have to be an explanation of raymorris' statement. It is supposed to be a time , as you might have studied in 3rd standard, primary school if you went to one.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    18. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      .g. the answer to "WHEN" doesn't have to be an explanation of raymorris' statement. It is supposed to be a time , as you might have studied in 3rd standard, primary school if you went to one.

      When did the Oval Office move here from Alpha Centauri 3?

      The point I have made, repeatedly, which you've been artfully dodging with all the grace of a drunken pig, is that it's never, NEVER, been an investment strategy. I've said that diversification is a RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, and that "long-term investments" are a bullshit term with no real strategic meaning beyond "Duhhrrrr duhhrrrr I don't know how r stoks working, so I'll just buy shit and hold onto it uhn uhn!" Giving *anyone* the advice to just make up a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" without an investment strategy--without a way to analyze when to buy in and exit the market, thus making diversification a secondary consideration (a risk consideration, not an investment consideration) and "long-term investments" the stupidest thing you can say (because you get in when it's the right time, and get out when it's the right time)--has been bad advice and patently ludicrous since investing in markets (grain, stocks, etc.) became physically possible.

      Diversification is the result of managing risk, not investments. It's managing the risk *of* investments, but it's not a strategy to say, "Well, if I want to make money, I need to have diverse investments"; it's a strategy to say, "Well, if I want to not take the brunt of bad positions, but also not take full advantage of the good ones, I should pick multiple positions I think are good, in the hopes that I'm right about enough of them that I'll make an overall gain more consistently, even though it'll be smaller."

      That leaves the question: "How should I invest my money?" Stocks, bonds, options, commodities? Technical analysis, fundamentals, markets? Day trading, swing trading, or trend trading? Big movers, dividend stocks, low-volatility? That's how you construct a strategy. How are you going to buy in, what type of movement are you targeting, and what are your parameters? Are you doing trend trading on technical analysis, restricting your selections to securities with good fundamentals and high dividend yields in market sectors with good performance? Are you doing purely-technical day trading? Swing trading by technical analysis, but only on securities with good fundamentals or with historically broad, stable swings?

      You'll notice the strategic consideration determines what securities you purchase and how long you hold them, while the risk consideration determines how many securities you hold. Your multiple holdings may not even be diverse: I was making better than 1% per day for a couple weeks in *only* basic materials, between MHR and GPL, among others, using swing trading with technical analysis. The basic materials market was outperforming the S&P, which is a common market baseline: you divide a sector index (like Basic Materials or Financials) by the S&P500 index to show relative percentage movement. If the sector is growing faster than the S&P, it's a good sector to invest in; if it's growing slower, it's not. If Basic Materials is making a higher percentage gain than the S&P, while Financials is making a lower percentage gain than the S&P, it means money is leaving Financials and going to Basic Materials: people are selling Goldman Sachs and buying Magnum Hunter Resources. That means less buying interest in Financials and more in BM, which means buying BM and holding it while the money flows in will get you some gain--then you sell back out.

      Buying Financials as a hedge to "diversify" my portfolio would be a bad buy in that situation, as I'm highly likely to lose money in Financials and highly likely to make money in Basic Materials. Being heavily invested in Basic Materials, on the other hand, will tend to lose me money when the Basic Materials market turns down, an

    19. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      is that it's never, NEVER, been an investment strategy

      Great. Now can you show me a post in this thread by anybody other than yourself which mentioned anything about it EVER being a strategy?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    20. Re:you're both right by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It was stated that a portfolio of diversified, long-term investments was a reliable income. That suggests STRATEGY: DIVERSIFY PORTFOLIO WITH LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS.

      Whether you want to interpret it as a different way or not is a matter of politics: you say something your audience will interpret in one way:

      You are correct that a million will net about $60k. That's in a diversified portfolio of long-term investments, a fairly reliable income. Actually $600K per ten years is reliable - year to years gains will fluctuate and that's okay - your spending doesn't have to fluctuate to match each year.

      Audience: "I should buy a set of diversified investments and keep them so they make money. I've been told that's a good strategy."

      Speaker: "What? That was a bad idea? Oh, I uh, I didn't *say* it was a *air quotes* strategy *air quotes* per-se... you know, I don't recall using the word...."

      Many political words are similarly abused. The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable." The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Pétain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.

      Again:

      That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different.

      Speaker suggested a strategy. Speaker and others might argue he did no such thing, because it wasn't stated outright; and anyone with at least the better part of half a brain will recognize the wiles of human communication and the political manipulation in statements made to suggest things while giving a person the simultaneous ability to claim credit for the suggestion if it works out or to disclaim responsibility when it doesn't.

      It's a common strategic use of language: you say something in such a way as to be able to show it was your idea, but also to show that what you're suggesting isn't what you *meant* because it can be interpreted in a different way. If it works out, you go with the first; if not, you quickly jump to the second.

      I am disinclined to let people get away with crap like "you should pray, it will do a lot of good" followed up later with "I didn't say there was any sort of deity listening."

    21. Re:you're both right by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Awesome. So you didn't answer the question :

      2. "exactly WHEN stock market became completely a bad idea for a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?"

      But you answered a made up question :

      "exactly when stock market became completely a bad idea as the STRATEGY for "diversified portfolio of long-term investments".

      Which is great. But can you now try answering the original question, now that you have talked to imaginary straw men enough for a life time? I repeat the original question:

      2. "exactly WHEN stock market became completely a bad idea for a "diversified portfolio of long-term investments" ?"

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  109. Money's happiness lasts only a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Studies have shown that most people would be very happy if their income doubled. But then they get used to the new level and need another double fix. There is never enough money.

    I think that the sweet spot is $500k, especially in an urban area. I would never pay a million dollars for my house, but that is what it will sell for.

    A large increase in money means moving to a new house in a new social strata. If you are 1000 times richer than your neighbors and friends, life is impossible.

    Reading everything is helpful. You learn from Jane Austin that ones "wealth" was not how much money was in the bank, but how much one could spend in a year.

    1. Re:Money's happiness lasts only a few years by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      then they get used to the new level and need another double fix.

      I've been happy with my income at every income level I've every had from south of $50k to north of $100k. I figure at $2mil I could retire and live off the investment return indefinitely. In Hawaii. Where I bought 3 acres at the bottom of the real estate market a few years ago.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:Money's happiness lasts only a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "bottom of the real estate", do you mean you bought 3 acres at the bottom of a volcanic caldera?

  110. No biggie by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    As a hobbyist game developer myself, I know what I would do.

    Buy a nice home somewhere, and use most of my free time to make and play games.

    But keep a low profile, so I can still take walks, order a coffee and visit wherever I like.

  111. yup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya cant have it both ways..
    yes money cant buy happiness, the feeling of safety (deep saftey), it ruins trust, relationships, etc. which is why its best suited for those whom are older.
    I wonder what the stats are regarding wealthy individuals, specificially: (physical, chemical, Health), Longieviety, Mental Health, family illness, etc..

    Like a hoarder or "pink" from the Movie by Mr. Floyd, what do you do when the "Walls come down", " and your exposed to society"

    The right decision, the wrong decision, which way to go.

    It's like growing up

    when your young, you cant wait to grow up, the freedoms, no more mandatory school, you can do what ever you want. But, what to do?

    Remember anything you do, has to be carefuly evaluated Like ROOT on a Linux machine..
    Because your at the top or close to it, your decisions may be ever so far reaching because you are able to mitigate most of the safeguards in place..
    That being said, its easy to have your decisions affect others in such a way that it may deter from the attepmted experience..
    All you know is, you dont want to go back to the way it was when you were trying to reach it..
    but now that you have it,, deperession sets in, schitophrenia drops by and introduces you to the notion that every one is taking from you, and not even attempting to give back, which further isolates your thoughts, your emotional capacity, and thus really screws you up :(

    a quick solution to the situation,
    Open up a marijuana club. Because you need not worry about the finanitial issues associated with Poor decisions made in that "area/industry".
    Further more, because you dont have to compete with the other malodies that other establishments in that area fall victum to, you have the oppurtunity to really make a big "social" splash and thus encouraging the distribution of your Good name in various circles which in turn leads to the oppourtnity of healthy social interaction with young and old while also helping those in our society get along as normal as possible..
    It could only lead to good things..
    Imagine, doing what not even to most well known indivualds could not accomplish such as:
    Helping with a cure for MS
    Helping with a cure for MDA
    Helping with a cure for Parkinsons
    The list goes on and on..
    I understand being lonely. Life at the top is naught so grand..
    Life at the bottom sucks too
    Life in the middle, taken advantage of above and below

    Why is it in our society, we find pleasure in screwing each other.. Why do we feel the need to make things difficult for every one around us..
    Like Rodney King said, "cant we all just get along?"

    Imagine a world where people in any class supporting eachother for the greater good of our society

    Imagine "all the people"

  112. Help random people by kbg · · Score: 1

    If I was a billionaire I would travel around in disguise and, because it is impossible to help everyone, I would help a number of random persons I would see. Like a homeless man in the street, a single mother on welfare, e.t.c. I would create a company with staff which only purpose would be to help those people to find a home, a job and education.

    1. Re:Help random people by plopez · · Score: 1

      Howard is that you?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Help random people by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I make it point to help someone who seems to need it every day.

      It is not difficult, and it does not require billions in the bank.

      A few coins or a few moments of your time can often accomplish a quite lot for someone who's in a real jam.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  113. What I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Pay off the mortgages of family and maybe friends.
    2) The Devil makes work for idle hands. Find a charity doing something you believe in and become a volunteer for them.
    3) Have a balanced life. Doing stuff and keeping in touch with friends is essential.

    1. Re:What I'd do by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      "1) Pay off the mortgages of family and maybe friends."

      Why don't you feed all the neighborhood cats while you're at it, since you like having extra mouths to feed...

  114. Money by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Whoever said money can't buy happiness simply didn't know where to go shopping."
    -- Bo Derek

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  115. Get a hobby and grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go find something that is fun and challenging.
    Something where the money is nice, but your effort/skill is really what makes it go.
    Participate with like-minded folks.
    Classic examples are sports, travel, flying.

    Sounds like some life counciling would not hurt.
    It's not clear that money can help in that area.
    Maybe a wise butler?

    The problem to solve is how use this cash to shorten the time to grow into a confident, comfortable with himself adult.
    You have youth and money on your side.
    At least it should be a fun and interesting problem to have.

  116. I have a gran idea coming from the truly poor! by luciferxe · · Score: 0

    Honestly I have no use for that much money. My goal would be to invest about 50% of it. Take what ever money would be gained and hand it out to the people. Not from some agency or NPO. I would go to the streets daily and hand out everything I could. I would pay others to do the same. I would go to stores and pay attention if anyone is using state funding(food stamps etc.) and offer to pay their bill. Then give them double what ever it came to in cash. I would go to local farmers markets and buy them out. Then sit on the corner giving it all out for free. I would go to soup kitchens and take them all out to a restaurant. I would spend my money on the people. Not looking for friends or to be praised. I see too much suffering here in Woonsocket R.I.. No questions. No matter whom. Of course then again I may have nothing left to live for anymore depending on how today goes.

  117. Sudden immense wealth by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    I would avoid fame at all costs. In addition, I would do my best to hide how wealthy I was.

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    1. Re:Sudden immense wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. But also mingle with the folks I really want to hang with and not let then now how wealthy I was.

  118. ok fine, create $100 million trust funds for each by Ionized · · Score: 1

    for the irresponsible ones anyway

  119. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Depends... suppose the Minecraft guy got divorced before he sold Minecraft. The wife can still say he started developing the game during their marriage and she's therefore entitled to some of the proceeds. Weirder judgements have heppened.

  120. I'd find something that needs to exist but doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I'd look for a way to change that. I have some ideas about transportation and electronics that I would want to pursue. I would see what manufacturing capabilities I can make available to people in need of prototypes ("maker space", but more as a service than a shop). I would construct and build a solar powered trike. Not because I think it's important; the concept just appeals to me. Go for the quote from Tomorrowland: "I guess I got tired of waiting for someone else to do it for me." Look for the thing that you want but can't buy, and make it.

  121. The ultimate recording studio by ebh · · Score: 1

    I'd purchase a large number of rare and vintage musical instruments and related gear, see that it's all taken care of properly, and build a recording studio where people could record using those instruments.

    1. Re:The ultimate recording studio by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      This++. But don't limit yourself to rare and vintage, necessarily. Give me a call when you need musicians...

  122. So Much by transfire · · Score: 1

    I wish I could come into that kind of money b/c there is so much I would like to do if I had the resources. For instance, I so much want to "Musk" the housing industry.

  123. nope, you are stuck with your own stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and the rest of us will be able to laugh at you forever.

  124. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanted to post exactly this. He may manage his wealth, but many of his friends would be destroyed, and at best might experience exactly what he is feeling.

  125. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She could petition the court for a child support jack if his kids are under 18.

  126. Don't Musk. Invest in Musk by lazarus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I would Musk and try to save the world, but that just exposes me to the same type of a$#@%&*s that made me sell minecraft again."

    You don't have to try to be Musk. If you don't feel the need to get into that or be that sort of creative, at least you can recognize the people who do/are. Call him. You don't need to buy public shares when you have that kind of money. You invest in other people who are trying to change the world.

    Keep some for yourself and enjoy your life while knowing that your money is helping to change the world. Don't like what Musk is doing? He's just an example. Fine something you believe in and invest.

    I would blow it on something I found ridiculously cool. Like hardened, high-speed em-drive interstellar probes or something. But to each his own.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  127. F that by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I had animals as a kid. That's waaaaay too tied down.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:F that by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on the animals. Cats are extremely low-maintenance. You could leave them alone for a week with an automatic litterbox and food dispenser. Or hire someone from Craigslist to check on them every few days. Some of them actually travel really well too, so you could always bring them with you. The main problem is finding hotels that'll take them, but you can always just sneak them in if they're not very vocal.

      What I really don't understand is why so many people have dogs, and not just any dogs, but big dogs. There's no way you can get away when you have one of those things. They have to be walked at least once a day, they have to be let outside several times a day to relieve themselves (since they can't use litterboxes), if you live in a subdivision that means you need to accompany them outside so you can pick up the poo or else get fined (or you let them into your back yard and pretty soon the place looks like a Mad Max scene but with piles of dog poo all over), you can't easily take them on a plane (cats go in carriers under the seat), when you do take them they need a giant cage, and then frequently the pilot forgets to turn on the cargo bay heat so the dog freezes to death during the flight. The food cost is huge because they eat so much of it, so count on $50-100/month just for that, and on top of that now your house stinks and is filthy unless you invest a ton of time into constantly cleaning both the dog and the house (since they apparently can't keep themselves clean). You can board your dog when you travel, but that costs $30-50 per day, which adds up fast. Hiring a pet sitter from Craigslist is also doable, but most likely isn't going to work well because they can't visit often enough to let the dog out before it shits on the carpet or in his cage. You can't even spend an unplanned night at someone's house with a dog, because there's no way to arrange a pet-sitter that fast unless you have some very accommodating neighbors (and it's not good to assume they'll be around to take care of your dog at such short notice).
      .

    2. Re:F that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had animals as a kid. That's waaaaay too tied down.

      My kids behave like animals. Same result.

    3. Re:F that by c · · Score: 2

      What I really don't understand is why so many people have dogs, and not just any dogs, but big dogs. There's no way you can get away when you have one of those things.

      As a person with (some) big dogs, I feel I have it easier than people with children...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    4. Re:F that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat hair is 100 times worse than dog hair....yeah the lab I have sheds more but the crappy roomba does a decent job of keeping up and it isn't that super fine shit that gets all over everything.

      The lab spends enough time running through weeds and grass that she is never really dirty..unless she find something really interesting and then you just have to hose her off...which she loves so it isn't a chore like trying to wash a cat.

      I have a automatic food dispense and a "dog door" in the garage, so I can easily skip out for a night if I need to (the main "yard" is just over an acre and fenced in). Yep sometimes it sucks to take the dog for a run, it might be cold or rainy, but I have a companion who will gladly help get my ass out the door. Plus I'd like to see a cat jump a pheasant or grouse, or retrieve a duck from the water.

      And WTF are you feeding a dog at $100/month, mine is probably $20/month in food and another $10 in treats and crap
      google agrees with me....
      http://infographiclist.com/2015/01/11/cost-of-owning-a-pet-dog-vs-cat-infographic-pet-cost-infographic/

      Now I will admit, I wouldn't leave my dog alone for week...so the cat would be better there...come to think of it I'd gladly leave the wifes cat alone in a burlap back in the river for months just to get the fucker to stop walking on the cars.

      lol captcha: minority
      I wonder which one of us it was targeting ;-)

    5. Re:F that by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Cat hair is 100 times worse than dog hair....yeah the lab I have sheds more but the crappy roomba does a decent job of keeping up and it isn't that super fine shit that gets all over everything.

      Cat hair? What cat hair? Come to think of it, I had a cat when I was a teenager that shed a lot, but my current cats don't. Some are a lot worse than others; a Persian would be a PITA for that reason, but my current American shorthairs don't shed much at all, I don't even notice it. You can brush them occasionally with a wire brush that pulls out the loose hair if it's a problem.

      it isn't a chore like trying to wash a cat.

      Luckily, I haven't had to do that very much. And some cats are much worse than others with this. Some of them just sit there and look really annoyed and unhappy, others go wild and tear you to shreds. I think part of it is doing it once in a while so they're used to it (and wearing heavy gloves, and trimming the claws beforehand). With my current two cats, one is a bit of a problem, while the other is pretty cool.

      Plus I'd like to see a cat jump a pheasant or grouse, or retrieve a duck from the water.

      Why would I care about that? I think I'd care about that about as much as watching a tractor pull. Besides, cats are predators, and most predators avoid any kind of prey which is too close their own body mass. Cats are relatively small, so they go after animals the size of a rat, at the very largest, and usually things like mice and small lizards. A duck is about as large as a cat. A Yorkie or Chihuahua probably isn't going to be much help with ducks either.

      the main "yard" is just over an acre and fenced in)

      That makes a big, big difference I think (plus your dog-door in the garage). Most big-dog owners I see have little or no yard. That seems like a terrible environment for a large dog.

      And WTF are you feeding a dog at $100/month

      Ok, maybe $100 was an exaggeration, but a friend of a friend who has Cane Corsos told me it was $50/month per dog for his. Granted, these are very large dogs, but that's what I'm talking about here--big dogs, not all dogs averaged together (including Chihuahuas).

      get the fucker to stop walking on the cars.

      Not a problem with indoor cats.

      lol captcha: minority
      I wonder which one of us it was targeting ;-)

      I'm not sure, but I think it was me. It might be geographically-based though, but I really wonder; when I lived next to NYC and visited a lot, I sure saw a lot of people with dogs at the dog park. I can't imagine how that can be a decent environment for a dog to live in unless it's Chihuahua-sized. Now, all the women I see on OKCupid (including ones in DC, not too far from where I live) seem to have big dogs. Whatever happened to that stereotype about women liking cats more? That's directly contrary to my observations.

    6. Re:F that by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      There are these places called kennels that take care of dogs for you. Some of them are even nice. But yeah it takes some planning.

    7. Re:F that by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think I mentioned that (I called it "boarding"). The problem is they're expensive, and as you say, they require some planning. You can't just spend the night with someone unplanned and have a kennel keep your dog from crapping on the carpet before the morning.

    8. Re:F that by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Well a lot of people don't just randomly go out for the night. I do agree that owning a dog significantly restricts your flexibility. They are great pets though.

    9. Re:F that by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Other points have been discussed replies from others, I just want to chime in about "big" dogs. Most small dog species are mentally retarded - so if you're getting a dog for intelligent company, you don't get much choice than big dogs.

      Some big dogs can be dumb, and some small dogs can be smart but big ones on an average are smarter by some margin.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    10. Re:F that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really don't understand is why so many people have dogs, and not just any dogs, but big dogs. There's no way you can get away when you have one of those things.

      That's why you need to get a physicist. The physicist can be trained to deal with dog issues and can usually handle being left alone for a few days at a time with relatively few issues. Plus they're cheap to maintain and are sometimes self-sustaining, but not so much so that they'll be in danger of leaving. It's well worth the terrible puns and obscure Japanese and/or British TV/movies you'll inevitably be subjected to.

  128. I could just stop begging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an obsessive-compulsive programmer working on Free Software, I'm solicitating money from other Free Software enthusiasts in order not to have to have a paid job. Problem is, those who are most passionate about software (here the music typesetter LilyPond are those who have already invested considerable time and love and money in it themselves. So the list of the most significant sponsors reads like a Who's Who of the ancient and partly present gods of this software. That's embarassing. Instead making the bulk from micropayments would require actually reaching the users but there is no good strategy for that. Nagware, ads, self-advertisement on mailing lists (which only reach a very small subset of people)?

    And then I'm not the most amicable person, and creating frequent reports and basically customer pampering is something that I totally suck at, at least eventually. Being independently wealthy would just mean that I could keep doing what I can without worrying all the time that I cannot make ends meet even in the short term. Of course, that would still not do my taxes for me...

    In other words: there are fscking enough worthwhile causes to put your money to if you just open your eyes. If he did every worthwhile project even in some small town, he'd likely get rid of a lot of his trouble. Instead he'll likely throw it to the stock manager leeches in order to have even more things to worry about, and they'll try sucking the most out of needy people in return.

  129. Eccentric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm eccentric and poor now. I'm sure I could handle being eccentric and wealthy just as well. People are already hard. Having more money won't make them any harder.

  130. Fix systemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With $2billion it might be possible to fix systemd

    1. Re:Fix systemd by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      For the cost of a .22 round, you can take it out behind the shed and put it out of our misery.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  131. Having considered this in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with the other posts about hiring an accountant first, and paying off my debts next. Once the black board is clear I would engage in a couple of things that would suddenly become possible. First up is a long term effort to bring potable water to areas where none is available. There are a myriad number of methods to accomplish this so there is no new technology to invent. It simply needs to be implemented, typically along with a reasonable solution for waste. Coupling any of these with (again any number of) renewable energy solutions would bring a community currently at the bottom of the civilization scale into a much better place.
    Given that I would be onsite for many of these efforts, it solves the problems typically associated with newfound wealth in terms of pariah who look for people with money to take it from them. Being in a remote, 3rd world location makes getting to me difficult. I would be serving humanity, and avoiding those whose self interest exceeds their politeness.
    The other project is directly in the realm of renewable energy but with a twist. The project would be to use uninhabitable lands such as the Sahara desert as very large scale solar energy farms. This would tilt the balance of power in terms of the energy economy to an area in desperate need of an influx of salable resources and provide a large scale demand for workers in areas plagued by unemployment and economic depravity. In fact the math holds that if enough energy could be captured rather than strike the ground, climate change could be thwarted, or at least lessened. The shear investment in infrastructure for the build would positively impact the areas surrounding where the farms where built. Being deliberately placed in uninhabitable areas removes concerns about impacting the surrounding community. The long term gains for the world-wide energy economy would be staggering. The only thing missing is a group of people with the vision, and the capital to make it happen.
    So ultimately I would quit my current job which serves only my personal interests, and go off to do something that benefited everyone, world wide.

  132. so many voices an yet so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet another profound remark, lost in the quagmire that is Zero Mod points.
    I mean really guys, does some one have to sign up for some BS account just to get noticed?
    Relaly guys take a moment to stop read your own articles, and responses, and really think about this one..
    think long, deep and hard about whats the right thing to do here??

    1. Re:so many voices an yet so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame, but you were right. :(

    2. Re:so many voices an yet so much silence.. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ProTip: Posting a response to your own meaningless ramblings proclaiming them "profound" does not make them so.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  133. #1 Pay off all my bills by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    # 1 Pay off all my bills for sure, second get a truck that can pull my new boat OR depending on how much i won buy a houseboat and eat fish and enjoy the rest of my life lol nice dream hu? ya i play the lottery but the odds are super low,BUT ya cant win if ya don't play :} so i at least have some odds

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  134. Get yourself to Private Banking immediately by riskkeyesq · · Score: 1

    Most of the major banks offer a Private Banking service. Ask about it at your bank (Wells Fargo was a huge help to us). A surprisingly large part of the service consists of specialized staff to help you deal with these issues. You are not the first person, nor the last, to have immense wealth suddenly thrust upon them. The myriad of psychological issues that accompany those windfalls are best dealt with by people who have the experience of dealing with individuals struggling with the unforseen downsides and conflicts. It's far better to be rich than to be poor, but the transition in either direction is not an easy one. Good luck.

  135. What I would do... by xaeridus · · Score: 1
    It's an easy plan I've layed out in the case I get wealthy, depending on level of wealth:
    • 1) Pay off all my debt
    • 2) Moderately Upgrade items I use (No Supercars, lavish houses or jets, that just encourages isolation)
    • 3) Put enough money in retirement accounts to live a comfortable lifestyle into retirement (so I can also blow most of the rest of the money)
    • 4) Fill college funds for my kids
    • 5) set aside money for my family, only help with most pressing items
    • - This also lets me know who in my life is a gold digger, and who will continue to treat me the same. I don't want to be a bank, but "everyone gets one"

    • 6) Setup a scholarship for kids to go to school (most average student, best manners in a video game, whatever)
    • 7) Setup funds for charities like homeless shelters, work programs and other items to get people on their feet
    • 8) Continue working in fields I love (life needs challenges)
    • 9) give away random gifts to strangers
    • - my favorite atm is giving $5 starbucks gift cards to parents when their kids are being obnoxious in public, sometimes you just need a break!
      - paying electric bills for all customers who are behind
      - buying groceries for the people who are clearly just trying to get by
      - paying for all the kids in the school to go to sea world, local zoo, etc

    in the case of billions, I like the Musk idea - improve the world, help build what you've always wanted. Things get hard and frustrating, but I think remembering to be a normal human and not flaunt your money or lifestyle goes a long way. I also think those hard parts of life is what gives us the most return - accomplishing something hard is far more satisfying than doing something easy.

    1. Re:What I would do... by plopez · · Score: 1

      Here's what I would do if I had a bazillion dollars:
      1) Endow scholarships. I've received some so why not.
      2) Endow a chair in the academic department(s) of my of my choice.
      3) Endow Bletchly Park.
      4) Create my own research institute.
      5) Endow open source projects.
      6) Find a few good start ups and invest in them. Research them *carefully* first. Probably not any in the middle of the Silly Valley circus, there are too many phoney start ups these days.
      7) Iceland!
      8) Fight the dominant paradigm.
      9) Buy a small country.
      10) Buy some politicians to save the planet.
      11) Create K-12 academic materials free of bias.
      11) Build the city of tomorrow under the sea.

      I would meet a huge number of people in the process, many of whom would share my interests. I surely would not be bored.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:What I would do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's what I would do if I had a bazillion dollars:

      7) Iceland!

      8) Fight the dominant paradigm.

      9) Buy a small country.

      These could all be done at once.

      11) Build the city of tomorrow under the sea.

      Miami, FL is already built, just be patient.

  136. Lonely putz stays lonely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like he expected money to solve his social interaction issues. Now that he found it didn't, he feels "cheated".

    wah...

  137. billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    No, he doesn't. When you are a billionaire, you are not free to do whatever you want to. You cannot travel freely, you need an armed security detail EVERYWHERE you go. You need to live in a secured house/building/whatever. You are very limited in who you can meet and hang out with as most people will freak out and start acting differently when they find out who you are. Your prospects for love and dating are very limited unless you just want a gold digging trophy wife.

    Also, there is a real question about your life motivation, when you are a coder with a lot of money. Presumably, he enjoys coding, but why would he do it now that he can hire 100 better coders to do anything he can think of? It makes it hard to want to get out of bed in the morning when you simply don't have any reason to.

    Notch, if you are listening, figure out what give you joy in life, and then use the money you have to create and influence things in a good direction. Also, go talk to Bill and Warren about joining their charity or found your own to do some real good for people who have nothing. There are a lot of them in the world.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 2

      'Notch' is an exceedingly average-looking person, not a celebrity, and isn't even popularly known by his real name. If he dropped a few pounds (and he could stand to) and shaved his beard he'd be near-unrecognizable. Hair plugs wouldn't be out of order either. His own mother wouldn't recognize him, much less the average person on the street.

      And, it's not required that you state your real name and wealth status to everyone you meet.

      All that is required is that he remain low-key and doesn't flaunt his wealth and identity. If he walked into a restaurant in Grenoble I guarantee you nobody would even blink.

    2. Re: billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I understand your angle, you didn't exactly refute any of the points made in the GP; instead, you've rationalized talking points out of the very conceit of the well-to-do upon which the GP was based.

      The only reason you'd need to do anything you've stated (aside from the end regarding charitable pursuits, which is fine and dandy) would be because you've fallen victim to your own ego and can't keep your mouth shut about your wild success. In today's hyper-connected society, if you're on to a big idea, you have to go full-bore to protect your identity--that means a pseudonym, a financial advisor who spreads around your assets and whose mouth is sealed by NDA, and just generally keeping your trap shut. That even means with your friends. I don't talk about my business successes with those close to me. I "consult" and that's the end of it. When questions of money come up, that's a nice red flag that, if I can't redirect the inquiry to something more meaningful, kind of tells me that someone is nosy and not worth my time. That's not a social skill limited to the rich... it's merely a difference of degrees.

    3. Re:billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      No, he doesn't. When you are a billionaire, you are not free to do whatever you want to. You cannot travel freely, you need an armed security detail EVERYWHERE you go. You need to live in a secured house/building/whatever. You are very limited in who you can meet and hang out with as most people will freak out and start acting differently when they find out who you are. Your prospects for love and dating are very limited unless you just want a gold digging trophy wife. Also, there is a real question about your life motivation, when you are a coder with a lot of money. Presumably, he enjoys coding, but why would he do it now that he can hire 100 better coders to do anything he can think of? It makes it hard to want to get out of bed in the morning when you simply don't have any reason to. Notch, if you are listening, figure out what give you joy in life, and then use the money you have to create and influence things in a good direction. Also, go talk to Bill and Warren about joining their charity or found your own to do some real good for people who have nothing. There are a lot of them in the world.

      I would hire Tiger Woods to teach me how to play Golf. Both on and off the course!

    4. Re:billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      When you are a billionaire, you are not free to do whatever you want to. You cannot travel freely, you need an armed security detail EVERYWHERE you go.

      No, you don't. That's ridiculous. Yes, if you're a billionaire in some shithole in Central America that would be correct, but you certainly don't need to worry about that kind of thing in western Europe. There's lots of billionaires these days; they don't all have armed guards. Most people wouldn't know most billionaires if they saw them on the street. A few famous ones like Donald Trump and Bill Gates, sure, but most regular people wouldn't know Elon Musk if they saw him at the mall (and even he's famous in tech circles).

    5. Re:billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I read an article a few years ago that William Buffet still drove himself around in a Lincoln Town Car. Don't know if he's upgraded his wheels yet.

    6. Re:billionaire is a hard set of shoes to fill by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      He should get a better car; those cars are crap. There's lots of much nicer, and more reliable, cars for the same money.

  138. Buy three more wishes by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Wait...what was the question again?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  139. Revenge... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    I would buy a controlling interest in the stock of my former workplace, and then indulge in some payback for my former bosses, coworkers and users....

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  140. You don't have to do much at all... by sirwired · · Score: 1

    There's no law saying that somebody suddenly wealthy has to quit their job, buy a nice car, a mansion, a private jet, etc. Certainly you need to do all the Estate and Tax things anybody with a lot of money needs to do. (The tax part doesn't have to be hard, if you don't mind paying a lot of taxes, the tax forms work just as well even if you enter very large numbers onto them, and the IRS will happily cash your very large check.)

    If you manage to come by your money in a relatively anonymous fashion, you don't even have to tell anybody you are secretly rich.

  141. Problems by frizz · · Score: 1

    My college professor used to say, "The problems associated with success are preferable to the problems associated with failure, but they are problems nonetheless."

  142. Schools by dj.delorie · · Score: 1

    Our town doesn't have a high school, and the elementary/middle school is very overcrowded. I'd start there, and spend extra to get the best teachers.

  143. Burdened by wealth? by plopez · · Score: 1

    Give it to me. I hate seeing people suffer.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  144. Edinburgh Fringe Festival, all 3 weeks, every year by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Renting an apartment within a few blocks of the Royal Mile, of course. Plus a second or third apartment to invite friends and family for their vacation times; I'm assuming there's enough wealth to share generously here. Then on to other events and activities around the calendar and the world, with exceptions for special events (weddings, birthdays, whatever) as they come up. In more practical terms, all of the young generation in that friends-and-family category will get all the education they can get admitted to. Experiences can have a longer-lasting impact than things.

  145. Dole it out to yourself gradually by they_call_me_quag · · Score: 1
    The problem here is the sudden change from having almost nothing to having $2.5B. If you talked to someone who was well adjusted with $2.0B, another $500M would be no big deal. But going from $0 to $2.5B is too big of a jump.

    So run it like a business or an investment, with a budget and goals. No investor would hand a brand new CEO $2.5B... they would ration the funds over time. You could do the same with yourself.

    For example, put most of the money into a well managed trust and "give" yourself $250K per year as an allowance. You could bump that amount up each year on a predetermined schedule, but you'll probably hit a point where you don't need more. Set a goal that once you've gotten married you'll have access to a one time "payment" of an additional $500,000, perhaps to buy a new house. (You might be financing part of your house... ironic, but it's all part of not being isolated. And your credit score is kick ass.) You first child is born... bump your annual pay by another $50K for each child while your money manager begins automatically setting aside money for college funds.

    In other words, live the comfortable life of a trust fund baby, except that you play the role of both parent and child. You will need a reputable firm to handle the details... reach out to other billionaires for recommendations on who to consider for this critical role.

    You will probably die with over $2B in the bank, but so what so long as you are happy and you've led a good life? And if you throw yourself into the world (travel, volunteering, parenting, etc.) you will likely discover a cause that you feel is worth of your largess. Don't look for it... you'll know it when you see it.

  146. What I have always done by hodet · · Score: 1

    Turn off the alarm clock.

  147. Publicly or anonymously wealthy? by eth1 · · Score: 1

    I think whether or not the world knows who you are makes a big difference. If everyone knows you've got that kind of money, you're kind of stuck surrounding yourself with "flappers" in order to maintain some amount of peace and quiet.

    In my case, my first priority would be to stay anonymous.

    After that... Well, relatively small amounts of money can make a *huge* difference for some people. A $200 million lottery payout at even a crappy rate of return still gives you a five-figure PER DAY budget without touching the principal. I would make it my mission to give away at least 90% of that, daily and personally. Impossible, perhaps, but probably way more fulfilling than anything else I could do with it.

    Ultimately, Heinlein was right when Jubal (in A Stranger in a Strange Land) pointed out that people want to SPEND money, not HAVE money.

  148. Help as many people as possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Musk is trying to save the world, he is doing a shitty job of it. Provide the world with unlimited free wireless power in the same way that Nikola Tesla dreamed. The technology has been already invented a long long time ago. It just needs to be implemented. Then with what is left, start converting internal combustion engines to run off of water using electrolysis so that the hydrogen and oxygen can be used in the combustion chamber.

  149. Less bitching, more philanthropy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting Anon due to mod points.

    Why not do some philanthropic things? Wouldn't it feel fulfilling to change the world in some way? Help needy people... buy mosquito nets for Africa, donate to ALS research, work on space travel, back things that seem important and need a boost, setup a thinktank, etc... DO SOMETHING! Less bitching and more doing!

  150. Retire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retire, then spend the rest of my life writing free software.

  151. Do some good by kwiecmmm · · Score: 1

    Start an internet provider company that provides a gigabit network, and actual customer service. And don't rape your customers with the charges!

  152. Fix my problems, invest the rest by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    First things's first, I'd hire an accountant, a lawyer, and an executive assistant, have them all keep each other in check and keep me financially and legally secure, and let me direct the use of that money more easily than having to spend it all myself. But that settled, I would fix the problems that personally affect me the most, first:

    My mom is presently homeless and in terrible physical health, and her mom (my only living grandparent) likewise; grandma at least can stay with another of her kids for now, but I live in a tiny trailer and can't really help mom. But simultaneously, the first childhood home I can remember, near where I live now, is for sale. I'd buy that house in cash immediately and let mom and grandma live there, with in-home nursing care and a personal assistant to help them with anything they need, and instructions to help enroll them both in creative and social programs (painting classes, book clubs, etc) to help bring them both back into good enough mental shape that I can have positive relations with them again.

    I'd buy my dad's underwater land off him, and basically redevelop the entire thing into a proper house, rather than the decaying frankenstein partially rebuild mobile home and unpermitted slapdash structures it's made of now. It would include a lot of garden space, so that dad could grow his own food, which he loves to do already, and which would save him a lot of money. I'd probably also buy him a lot of musical instruments, and let him retire to the music he's always wanted to do his entire life.

    And lastly I'd buy the property at the top of the hill from where dad lives now, the ruins of the huge old house I grew up in as a kid, before the mountain fell on it. I'd have the whole place rebuilt the way I remember it, and retire there myself. I'd finally be able to live with my girlfriend, and we'd get married and live happily ever after in there.

    Of course, new cars and computers and phones and such for all of the above, and physical and mental health care and therapy for everyone involved until everyone's in as good a shape as possible, but that's all trivial on the scale we're talking about.

    I'd then invest enough money in some stable long-term investment like index funds, such that the returns are enough to fund the upkeep of all of the above and a comfortable lifestyle for everyone involved indefinitely. I would then spend my time completing the life's work that I've had to put off until retirement.

    I'd probably finish the mod for an ancient video game that I never quite completed, and then make another mod for another ancient game that I never even got to start, just for a warm-up. I would likely hire a bunch of my old friends who wanted careers as video game developers to help me with this, and maybe fund a startup for them to bring their own projects to fruition together and realize their own life dreams.

    Then I would finish writing my philosophy book (probably hiring a philosophy student or graduate from the local university to be my sounding-board and fact-checker, since I'm so out of practice in that world now). Then I would probably spend the rest of my life fleshing out the speculative fiction series I've been very slowly developing in one form or another my entire life. I'd probably also study a lot on my own, or take classes or hire teachers when I can't teach myself something from books.

    I might want to make the personal-funding investment large enough that I could afford to travel while I do all of this, and then I'd buy a boat and sail from port to port along all the coasts (and up all the rivers) of the world, maybe traveling by horseback up the rivers where boats can't fit. Bringing an entourage with me the whole time to make sure we can communicate with the locals, get us through customs, stay out of trouble with the law, don't miss any important sights, etc. See the world, while doing my life's work, since all I need to write is a laptop and I can do that from any hotel room anywhere.

    Any money left over would g

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  153. Find Something to Care About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, that's all you need to do.

    If it's a cause you care about, find a way to go after it. If you are alone or the field is sparsely populated, you'll probably lead the cause. Otherwise you may find it better to join an existing organization.

    If it's business you care about, found a company or buy one. Either in whole or in part, it doesn't much matter. But go corporate.

    If it's adventure you care about, start investigating the adventurous life. Become that.

    I suspect the biggest issue hanging over all these choices would be: Must you lead, or can you follow? Do you require control or are you satisfied leaving control in the hands of others? And of course this isn't a 100% either/or choice. You may want control over certain aspects of your work or time but are happy leaving other aspects in the hands of others. The dividing line on that will be important.

    Another issue, lesser I suspect, is how social you are. Do you want to do things alone or with others? For most people the answer will be "with others of course!" Then you need to discover what relationship you want with those other people (which gets back to the control issue).

  154. First, I would hire someone by uncqual · · Score: 1

    First, I'd hire someone whose entire job was to say "NO" (s/he would be fired for saying anything but "NO"). Then, when someone approached me asking for money, I'd say "I have a person who manages my money and makes my financial decision for me. Here's their number."

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  155. Oooh, here ya go... by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

    I would (wait for it...) take a really nice nap.

  156. I'll tell you what I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two chicks at the same time

  157. Number one.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Keep it a secret.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  158. Comment subject by liskoturri · · Score: 1

    Could probably use about $100k myself. That would be plenty to pay off mortgage of this small home here in the backwoods. Hell, maybe splurge a bit and get 2008 model Volvo V70, my dream car. Yes, 2008. The last model that actually looked good. I'd shut up about the money. I'd say absolutely nothing to anyone. I'd stay right here where I live, 360 sq ft is enough for two dudes and a mini dinosaur. The rest... I'd invest in startups and companies that are important to me, some stuff that helps humankind as a whole. Maybe buy enough politicians to have the majority vote and put my own candidate as the president.

  159. Money can in fact buy happiness by seebs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who thinks money can't buy happiness has never bought a week's groceries for a poor person.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Money can in fact buy happiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, it was the food that caused happiness ...

    2. Re:Money can in fact buy happiness by seebs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the money bought it.

      You can also do the same thing with, say, rent. One time a person I know online was distressed about owing their roommates back rent on their share of rent, and very worried about how they'd ever make it up. I happened to ask how much it was, and it turned out to be right around the boundary of "large enough that I should mention it to spouse before spending that much", but not enough to actually worry about.

      I dunno. I see a lot of people who are a lot wealthier than I am and miserable because they don't understand what it is that makes them happy, so they spend a lot of money on things which exist only to be expensive, and not on things they actually want or care about.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    3. Re:Money can in fact buy happiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like you. And I second this notion. You can wrap yourself in luxury, but there's nothing better than blessing someone with your generosity.

  160. Spend it by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    As someone who has little life and a large penchant for daydreaming, I've come up with a rough list of things, in order of priority:

    1) Hire an accountant. I would do this before I even collected my new-found wealth
    2) Pay off all of my debt
    3) Gift large sums to my family, working with my accountant to see as little as possible be eaten by taxes (amount to gift depends on what I receive, but for $2.5B probably a million each sibling (4) and 10-20 million to my folks)
    4) Set aside a good amount for long-term living, so that even if I undertake anything and bottom out I still won't need to work at all
    5) Find a nice area, probably somewhere 30-60 miles outside a major city, and settle down there (at least, use it as my "home base")
    6) Donate vast swaths to select charities. EFF is up there, as is the UCLA. I also have more specific charities that I have personal relationships with, such as a poverty assistance center outside of Detroit, a feline sanctuary outside of Denver, and a cancer research fund that partners through my fraternity.

    Once all of that is done I'll probably undertake a large number of economic experiments. Maybe something like MINCOME, but attempt to make it self-sufficient. I've always had a idea of taking the run-down areas of Detroit and turning it into a city of sorts for veterans, offering both housing and employment. These might be separate, or they might be the same. Such a city would also try to implement various "newer" technologies and be used for studying them, such as heavy solar installation and a revamped electrical grid.

    Another notion I've long had is a website where people (likely just Americans) can apply for a $1000 grant for anything. Ideally I would partner with various companies to supply whatever was being purchased to help spread money further via sponsorship (and maybe a reality TV series), like if they applied for a grant to use towards a washer/dryer I would just buy the washer/dryer for them.

    tl;dr: Pay off my debt, set aside money, they give most of the rest away

  161. 100K a year by tlambert · · Score: 1

    100K a year after taxes.

    It's bound to go up, but to being "wealthy" means $2-4M in investments to get to that after taxes. Depending on how.

    Everything after that is either "invest in the investments" or "pay off the house loan against the line of credit".

    Any way you look at it, if you do not want to work, or you do not want to work on something other than "facebook++" for some asshole who thinks he has a magic "get rich quick" scheme, you are at a minimum looking at $4M.

  162. Open Source by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Get involved with helping under-funded important opensource project, like NTP, OpenSSH, and getting hardware into the hands of reputable open source programmers for better support.

  163. Easy. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    1. Put the money in some nice, safe savings and investments, dispersed among a few banks. Or even currencies. It's not the highest return, but it is lowest risk.
    2. Quit job.
    3. Buy small house. Not a mansion. Just somewhere with spare bedroom I could turn into a workshop.
    4. Tell no-one of my obscene wealth.
    5. Enjoy a life of doing just about anything I wish with all that free time.
    6. Commission huge amounts of furry art, buy myself lots of cool tech-toys to play with, hire professional programmers to work the bugs out of a few open-source projects that are pretty good but could use some refinement. All the little things you wish you could do, but can't afford.

    Now, if I have a truly crazy amount of wealth:
    7. Commission the construction of the world's largest needle, and rent a camel for a day.

  164. Cart before horse by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    See, his real problem, in my opinion, is that he put the cart before the horse, and made a crapton of money before properly establishing a family life. I'm married, so I don't have to worry about meeting Miss Right. What's more, we have six kids and are barely able to make ends meet -- so now would be absolutely the perfect time to become suddenly wealthy!

    Now, if only I could come up with the next Minecraft...

  165. hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would live better that's for sure even if i'm all alone. Everybody as an adult becomes alone in a point of their lives. Boo Hoo. I would travel through out the U.S, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. Plus, I would have the time and money to start a new career or business. The guy is 36 years old, live your life for crying out loud because by the time your 60 your mind and body will start going downhill.

  166. Help by mark-t · · Score: 1

    With enough capital to retire off of, I'd probably use whatever was left to help people, to the extent that money can.

    Maybe build an apartment building that wasn't being run for-profit to keep rent down for low-income families or something like that.... having come from one myself, I know how much of a difference the availability of stuff like that can make.

  167. Affluenza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Notch is suffering from the early symptoms of Affluenza. If he doesn't start to correct this problem he will be hanging out with Kardashians and/or trying to start his own reality show.

  168. Give most of it away by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Well, forst I would hire an accountant and an a tax attorney.

    Then I would give the same % back to God as I do my regular paycheck, but it will be more complicated than just handing a check to my local church.

    Then I would pull out enough for myself to pay off my debts and be able to generate 150-200% of my current income, adjusted for the cost of living in the most expensive metro area in America. This will be in the $1-10M range.

    Everything else goes to charity, with one catch: if you ask, and I hadn't slready decided to give you money, you just disqualified yourself. If I had decided already, you'll get the low end of the range I was thinking of giving you.

    Oh, make that two catches: no publicity as long as I live. A private thank-you letter and a note for the tax man is enough. If you want to name a scholarship, endowed chair, or building after me fine, but please do it over my dead body. :)

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  169. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The condom failure rate for people with that much money is AMAZINGLY high.

  170. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Just an FYI, taxes will take about 50% (more or less, depending on the state) in gift tax. So like, if you ever do have $1.5billion, that's a good thing to know, I guess.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  171. hire two ninjas by clovis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Persson also began hosting wild parties where guests like Skrillex, Selena Gomez, and Tony Hawk would sometimes make appearances.

    I'd hire a ninja keep those people out.
    And another ninja to beat my ass if I had actually invited them.

    1. Re:hire two ninjas by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      Persson also began hosting wild parties where guests like Skrillex, Selena Gomez, and Tony Hawk would sometimes make appearances.

      I'd hire a ninja keep those people out.
      And another ninja to beat my ass if I had actually invited them.

      Those people? Those people are precisely the kind of people who would show up to a Notch party. They were all raised middle class, at best, and I'd be shocked if any of them are more than double digit millionaires.

      ...

      Yeah, I looked it up. Skrillex is worth an estimated $36 million, Selena Gomez is worth $20 million, and, surprise, surprise, Tony Hawk is worth $140 million. Still, none of them came from even big money, let alone old money.

      With the exception of 2 or 3 posts here, Notch probably got better advice from Tony Hawk than he has from anybody else. Which is amusing to think about.

  172. Politics? Technology? Investments? Fun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being rich on that scale requires one getting into politics on some level. Basically there is a difference between money and power and those things are not equivalent. Somebody armed with the power of the mob can come after a guy with money.

    Start your own political party, Minecraft party, why not? Run for POTUS, what the hell, Mitt tried it, Clinton and Trump are trying...

    On the other hand you can also invest into research and various alternative ideas if you feel bored doing what everybody else on that wealth level does - trying to chase the markets.

    Build your own space rocket, seems to be the latest fad for billionaires.

    You can set up an investment fund of-course, let others try and do something with your money while really enjoying your life a little bit.

    Heck, invest into my startup.

  173. Personally by tkrabec · · Score: 1

    I'd move into a house that allowed my wife & kids to have more property for horses & horse related stuff
    I'd put in a food forest, silvo pasture & raise some cows, & more pigs.
    I'd put in a nice shop, wood working, metal working, laser cutter, cnc, 3d printer or 2. that way I could get back into wood working & just play doing stuff

    I'd probably also take a really long trip (30-60 days) with my family to see the US,
    I'd spend more time with my kids camping, fishing, horseback riding, etc.

    Then possibly go walkabout when their older.

    --
    TKrabec Pahh
  174. okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boo hoo hoo.

  175. I would correct the wrongs around me by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I would use my technological/business skills to properly and permanently correct the wrongs around me, except that I would make sure the combine it with things that I love. So for instance where I once lived the local aid organizations were always begging for their local food banks. There are families who need food, this is a terrible thing in a modern country. Thus I would spend my money buying up some prime farmland where half of it would be to grow food, and the other half would be leased out to create a revenue stream to fund the growing half.
    Then in the downtown I would do the same pairing. One property would be purchased to lease out and fund the food bank operations, while another building would be the food bank.
    The key would then to completely opensource the above model.

    The same sort of thing could be done with homeless shelters, research organizations, etc. This way where the government does not charge the wealthy elites enough taxes, I would just charge them rent.

    The key would be that I would aim to charge the wealthy money that then goes to fund the worthy. Other examples would be to have a luxury hotel that funds a rehab center.

    One other odd thing that I would set up is a medical research charity where my money covers all administrative costs. Donor money then 100% goes to actual research. Except that I would not spend the money with established researchers. I would only hire researchers who were working on their PhD or had graduated within the last 5 years. They would then get 10 years of funding that could only go to people meeting the same PhD conditions. At the end of 10 years they would either have delivered or failed. Close would be something for another funding organization to look at.

    Thus donors to the charity would know that exactly zero of their money would be going to a bloated administration or to "established" researchers, many of whom have only established themselves as really good at getting grants. The 10 years would allow these young researchers to break the chains of convention and ignore their established peers and potentially explore areas that would be impossible if their established peers had any say. There would also be little auditing except to watch for violations where the designated researchers were somehow forced to hand the money over to others or egregious fraud.

    1. Re:I would correct the wrongs around me by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Except, that people "correcting" the wrong things in the wrong ways is how a lot of the problems were created in the first place.

      But go ahead, you are probably no worse than others... 8-)

  176. I like slashdot the way it is. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    Nope, and I like it that way.

    Slashdot is forum of the ancient internet and is modelled after usenet. Comments have subjects, just like a usenet thread. And once you post something, it's out there, just like usenet. Sure they could let you edit the post, but then you could make the replies seem stupidid or nonsensical.

    I like it like this.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:I like slashdot the way it is. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      On Usenet, you can delete posts.

      (Yes, I realize many sites ignored those requests, but it is possible and I did it.)

      Actually, I think most of these web fora, and many mailing lists, would be far better as Usenet groups.

  177. What would I do with money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. SHUT UP. no one else needs to know you have a bank roll....
    2. hire a very good financial adviser to invest said lump of money.
    3. Live off the interest of said money and repair computers and Networks when I felt like it.

    Other than those 3 things, I would do nothing differently other than stop working and maybe a bit more travel but nothing stupid

  178. Give some relief to who is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would donate 1 year worth of stipend to each and every person begging for money that I could find in the city.

  179. Taxes + inflation by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Actually, a million cash would be about enough to fund a $60k a year income assuming you can get a good rate of return (6%...crazy these days).

    Forgetting about taxes and inflation? To turn $1M into $60K/year of income you'd need a rate of return closer to 10-13% or so every year without fail. If you get less then your rate of return has to be higher the next year because you'll have dipped into your principal or you'll have to live on less for that year. Some years you will be almost certain to have a negative return.

    1. Re:Taxes + inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're forgetting that other forms of income are also taxed.

  180. Even Rich People Have Problems by sudon't · · Score: 1

    Sure, even rich people have problems, but, I'll take those problems over the problems poor, (and working), people have.

    To anyone newly super-wealthy out there, having problems making new friends, let me offer a solution. Fill up my bank account with a few million, and as two former poor persons, we should have a lot in common. I'm intelligent, but not a nerd. I have lots of ideas on how to enjoy life, and would be happy to help out. No, I'm serious. PM me.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

    1. Re:Even Rich People Have Problems by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Dear Respected One,

      GREETINGS,

      Permit me to inform you of my desire of going into business relationship with you. I got your contact from the International web site directory. I prayed over it and selected your name among other names due to it's esteeming nature and the recommendations given to me as a reputable and trust worthy person I can do business with and by the recommendations I must not hesitate to confide in you for this simple and sincere business.

      I am Wumi Abdul; the only Daughter of late Mr and Mrs George Abdul. My father was a very wealthy cocoa merchant in Abidjan,the economic capital of Ivory Coast before he was poisoned to death by his business associates on one of their outing to discus on a business deal. When my mother died on the 21st October 1984, my father took me and my younger brother HASSAN special because we are motherless. Before the death of my father on 30th June 2002 in a private hospital here in Abidjan. He secretly called me on his bedside and told me that he has a sum of $12.500.000 (Twelve Million, five hundred thousand dollars) left in a suspense account in a local Bank here in Abidjan, that he used my name as his first Daughter for the next of kin in deposit of the fund.

      He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth and some huge amount of money his business associates supposed to balance his from the deal they had that he was poisoned by his business associates, that I should seek for a God fearing foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money and use it for investment purpose, (such as real estate management). Sir, we are honourably seeking your assistance in the following ways.

      1) To provide a Bank account where this money would be transferred to.

      2) To serve as the guardian of this since I am a girl of 26 years.

      Moreover Sir, we are willing to offer you 15% of the sum as compensation for effort input after the successful transfer of this fund to your designate account overseas. please feel free to contact ,me via this email address
      wumi1000abdul@yahoo.com

      Anticipating to hear from you soon.
      Thanks and God Bless.
      Best regards.
      Miss Wumi Abdul

      PLEASE FOR PRIVATE AND SECURITY REASONS,REPLY ME VIA EMAIL:
      wumi1000abdul@yahoo.com

      --

      Enigma

  181. Tell nobody, and go slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read some of the stories about "Notch", you get a sense that his problems started before MSFT bought him out. For example, he was previously divorced. Also, the constant hat and trench coat might indicate somebody trying to build a wall around himself, so he's probably an extreme introvert. His best course of action is probably to start a new venture to keep himself from brooding, which he's stated he doesn't want to do so he doesn't have to deal with the "assholes" he's dealt with in the past. But I guess he doesn't realize he can just hire a person to tell anybody who enquires "Sorry, dude's a billionaire, he doesn't need your money, not for sale at any price", and anybody else he doesn't want to deal with.

  182. Look for Your Peers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is how to find a girl. The answer is: start with the societies and old money. Then widen the search to those royalties and industrial figures aboard. Accumulate those fortunes together.

  183. Buy Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and turn it into a porn site.

  184. House Prices by sjbe · · Score: 1

    In coastal Connecticut, $100K a year isn't enough to buy a decent house if you're trying to raise a family at the same time.

    Quite so. You can find a place to live but it's going to be a dump relatively speaking.

    $200K might be enough to get a nice home around here, but $100K a year here is like making $40K a year in a rural area.

    It's worse than that. Houses along the Gold Coast area cost something like 3-5X what they do out in the midwest where I live. A house that would cost me $100K in Michigan would cost me something like $400K+ anywhere along the so called Gold Coast. I know because I almost moved there at one point and went house shopping. The house I have now would have cost me well over a million anywhere remotely close to Greenwich CT.

  185. Keep doing what you like, provided there was such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be easy for me. I like what I do, my job and my hobbies. My job (engineering) is a lot about helping people, so it is something that I would definitely continue doing because the best rewards are immaterial. Now I could ignore the financial aspect and focus on what seems the most interesting or worthwhile.

    I think it is probably easier for someone older who is somewhat less of a consumer. I have many toys and there are not a lot of toys that make me go "Ha!". I do not salivate before the newest and greatest things. I just went back into biking and I bought a $2,500 used bike that is just great. 140 HP, in great condition and very comfortable. I can't really imagine why I would want a more expensive one. I typically drive my cars until they return to dust, so my 2005 will last a while longer. I probably won't wait as long before replacing the tires :)

    I would definitely complete my house remodeling that has been stalled for the last year or so. I would probably do much less myself and get professional help. My wife would continue gardening, knitting and sewing because this is what she likes to do as well.

    With more time on our hands, we would travel some. There are many great places to visit, but we both are home buddies, so I cannot see myself as a permanent traveler.

    The problem with some people who become suddenly rich is that they do not have something they like to do other than make money and/or spend money. Once they have so much of it that exactly how much they have does not matter, what is left for them to do?

  186. Charitable foundation by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    If I were uber rich that would be my goal. More than all the houses, the planes and exotic cars, the sports franchises, having a foundation with the means to do lasting good on a globally significant scale and leaving a legacy rather than just an estate would be so fulfilling. Well it would for me anyway.

    Not a big Microsoft fan, but I absolutely admire Gates for his foundation's work. Given it was MS that bought Minecraft I'm sure Bill could give him some pointers.

  187. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    These days, the milk is free anyway if you know how to get it. No reason to buy a cow when you can grab one off the street for free.

    And how exactly do you get it for free anyway? Some men are just much more gifted with talking to women than others; AFAICT, getting "it" easily as you say seems to involve spending a lot of time at bars, and being outgoing and confident. When you don't drink and are introverted, this isn't so easy to do. It's still not hard to get free sex even if you're an introvert who doesn't like alcohol or socializing that much: you can just use Tinder, but it requires lowering your standards a lot. and "liking" all the women who are 20 years older and/or 200 pounds heavier than you. I'd rather play Minecraft.

    Now don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say that it's impossible to meet a nice and attractive woman as an not-terribly-social introvert and create a permanent relationship with her, but you're talking about quick sex or a "hookup" as they call it these days, something altogether different than a typical courtship.

  188. Re:Spend my time looking for places to give it awa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't #4 be "Prophet!!!"? And then shouldn't #3 be "???"

  189. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    experience exactly what he is feeling

    Misery loves company.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  190. Re:Edinburgh Fringe Festival, all 3 weeks, every y by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    ps - I'm not including taking care of an older generation, as many others have mentioned, because my older generation is gone; I *am* the older generation.

  191. Buy the best politicians you can afford by sinij · · Score: 1

    I would buy the best politicians my money can afford, converting some of my money into power. Then I'd use this power and money to push humanity to the stars. I don't care who does it - Musk, NASA, or someone else. We are going there and beyond and/or die trying. I'd also be on one of the first flights out.

    Why? Because nobody remembers the person who bankrolled Christopher Columbus.

  192. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    That's the problem, it's a toss-up.

    Also, your results are likely to be very different based on several factors, such as the geographic area you're in (and the political leanings there), and state law.

    What state/region are you in? And how bad was your wife? The typical complaint is that the only way men get full custody is when the wife is basically a crack whore, judged mentally incompetent, etc.; cases where it's so completely obvious the woman is unfit for custody that they have to give it to the man or else put the child in foster care.

  193. yep, good idea by swschrad · · Score: 1

    for me... (1) get rid of the trashmobiles we've got. (2) set up a managed trust for a relative that is indigent and has physical issues. (3) upgrade the security system slightly at home. (4) develop a charity to pass a bill or so around where it's needed in places not covered by safety nets. (5) and NOW we have time to dump a week or two at a time into Habitat for Humanity, get some green space up in neighborhoods that badly need humanizing, stuff like that.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  194. Re:ok fine, create $100 million trust funds for ea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is my exact plan for any potentially large lottery jackpot win. It's also why I only play Powerball and Mega Millions. I don't want to win $10k on some stupid scratch-off ticket that costs $10. Odds are that I would lose the $10 without much real enjoyment. "Whee! I won $5k after taxes!" If I was in such dire financial straits for $5k to be life-changing, then I shouldn't be spending $10 on a scratch-off ticket.

    The minimum payouts (assuming I don't get screwed with having to share the pot) for both of the big games are enough for me to comfortably retire immediately. That fantasy alone is worth a few bucks a week. For less than two packs of cigarettes, I can have a major psychological boost (fantasy of possible win) with the added benefit of avoiding lung cancer. On the other side, that's just a single skipped Starbucks mocha, and I get the added benefit at the waistline.

  195. Key to being rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key to being rich is not appearing like you are rich. If you have a mansion, bentley, and all the things money can buy then once people catch on they leech on you because of your money. If you continue to live a modest life style as if nothing has changed then people will continue to like you for you. This doesn't work if someone is a celebrity.

  196. I'll solve his problem by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    I offer to solve all of Mr Persson's problems caused by excessive money. I can solve them all by tomorrow, for the low low price of 2.5 billion dollars.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:I'll solve his problem by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I can help too, just in case he doesn't want to burden you with the same issues by giving you all of his money in one lump sum! :)

      Seriously though? Here's some suggestions:

      1. You're not the first one to be rich. There are banks and special funds that deal only with the very rich and can help you contact them. Especially families like the Bilderbergs, Rothschilds, or the like, have long histories in dealing sensibly with HUGE amounts of money.
      2. Start a harem and get kids. Why settle for just one incredible girl if you can have 5 okay ones? They add up! :) Okay, maybe not. But still, dating several girlfriends that just want your money is incredibly expensive and your money problem will be reduced in no time at all. You also will have no idea where all your spare time went.
      3. Buy an island. I don't know why, but it seems to be the thing to do for billionaires. White cats and evil laugh are optional.
      4. Look for a nice technical problem that you could try to solve using your computer skills, but would be too much work if you had to do it all by yourself. Then hire a bunch of cool kids and have them work at it, with you as problem owner. This is assuming you like programming.
      5. Contact the Gates Foundation, Carter Foundation, or Buffet foundation and ask them if they need more money. Heh.
      6. Institute scholarships for students. You can afford to give quite a few students an education without having them burdened with crippling loans.
      7. Pay the mortgage on your house.
      8. Buy the nicest house you can get, and hire a butler. A butler is a manager. Get an older one, who has experience with other rich people and can teach you how to deal with money.
      9. I have a company and an idea for some cool software, so feel free to fund it :)
      10. Fund the 10 most interesting scientific longshots.
      11. Look at art and patronize a few young and interesting artists.
      12. Buy a nature reserve and make sure it doesn't get emptied out by poachers - you can afford to pay the guards better than the poachers.

      It's not that hard to come up with a longer list, actually. Feel free to contact me for more ideas :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  197. Live normal by jimmybuffet · · Score: 1

    The way to be treated like a normal human being is to live like one. I would buy a modest but nice house on a bunch of land in the country, buy some cars and toys, nice stuff but not exotic or ultra extravogent. In addition to that be generous with my time and cautiously generous with my money. When people see that you are wise (not a pushover) and normal they treat you as such.

  198. make yourself happy by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Send all your money to me and you will be happy again.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  199. It's tough... by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    making decisions with what to do with a large windfall. I inherited $1.2 million last spring and I am actually more miserable now than I was last year. Suddenly you have to hire lawyers and accountants. No matter how much you try to keep a lid on, relatives and co-workers do find out...then they start dropping not so subtle hints that they could use some it...

    1. Re:It's tough... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      If it's been a year, that's a believable enough time to just say you spent it all and it's gone. Think that might work?

      Besides, a million doesn't even go that far these days. Pay off a mortgage and some debts, upgrade a few things, set aside some money for kids/schooling if appropriate, invest some of it for retirement (assuming it hasn't put you into retirement mode yet) and that's basically it. Or if you have retired and it's part of your nest-egg, then it's basically tied up. Either way, it ought to be nearly all spoken for, without piles of money left to roll around in. If I were your co-worker, that's certainly what I'd assume.

  200. I'm not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'd sure like a chance to find out!

  201. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily for me I'm the friend who would be overdosing and joining cults if I suddenly became rich.

  202. Buy Adobe Flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and decommission it by end of year.

  203. I must be happy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    The only things I could think of to do if I was suddenly wealthy is a)get a $2500 gaming PC so I can max out the new games, and b) get a Suzuki G-48W Gregoire Maret signature chromatic harmonica (http://www.suzukimusic.com/harmonicas/g48w/).

    The rest I'd turn over to my wife and daughter to do with as they please. Other than that, I'm already pretty satisfied.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:I must be happy by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      You can make a $2500 gaming PC yourself for around $500 if you shop on Cyber Monday and build it yourself.

      If a $2500 gaming PC is what you want, try doing that.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:I must be happy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You can make a $2500 gaming PC yourself for around $500 if you shop on Cyber Monday and build it yourself.

      You misunderstand. I am planning on building it myself. I figure for $2500, I'll be able to build a $5000 gaming rig.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  204. Superfund Non-Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put it into a non-profit green recycling company to clean up the toxic messes of the world that we are all now eating? http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/welcome-to-beautiful-parkersburg/
    Chernobyl
    Mongolia
    Fukishima
    Sunken Russian Nuclear equipped submarines rotting in the Artic sea.
    Etc.

  205. if you are that ignorant of his work... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    then you should be reminded about how horrible you are.

    1. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fact that he pulled US troops out of Iran to let the Shah fall (turning a close ally into a hated enemy), and put in a presidential order with a permanent moratorium on the construction of any new power reactors in the US... he did more than anyone else to ensure the US is chained to oil and coal for decades to come than any other president.

    2. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The Shah was an evil bastard. The US really should have had no business making allies with evil dictatorships just because we were scared of socialist takeovers.

    3. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by beamdriver · · Score: 1

      Yes, but still significantly less evil than the crew that replaced him.

    4. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Yes, but still significantly less evil than the crew that replaced him.

      The problem with the Iranian revolution wasn't the iranian revolution, but the people who hijacked it. The revolutionaries where great people who wanted democracy and a liberal and free Iran , but unfortunately a lot of Iran where illiterate and conservative and this allowed the far right religious conservatives to sweep in and sieze control from the people. And the first thing they did was not only round up and execute the shahs men, but also the very people who overthrew the shah.

      Irans revolution is a modern tragedy, and something we are seeing repeated in Syria as ISIS snatches victory away from the people for their own sinister ends.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    5. Re: if you are that ignorant of his work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger issue is that U.S. should have avoided overthrowing Iran's last democratically elected secular leader...

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh

      The cia overthrows their leader and installs a religious extremist dictator just help the Brits steal their oil. Stupid is as stupid does.

    6. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Yes, but still significantly less evil than the crew that replaced him.

      That seems to have been true in the long run, for the most part.

      However, the important thing is that he was evil enough to set up the conditions for what followed. The brutal oppression under his regime primed the population for a radical shift, and that's what allowed the Islamists to build up support for their movement.

      Of course, the Islamists pulled a huge bait-and-switch, and dealt with all parties in bad faith, but it's extremely unlikely they would ever have been anything but a political footnote if the US and UK hadn't engineered the ouster of the previous democratic government to make room for the Shah.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    7. Re: if you are that ignorant of his work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it says much about the United States. It would have happened sooner or later. Islamic extremism is not an isolated problem. It was and is a widespread problem in the Middle East. We have seen it happen over and over again, and it has rarely been the fault of the United States. The United States just gets the blame because they are the scapegoat.

    8. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think I would take the opinion of someone with a PHD in nuclear physics over an anonymous coward. not to mention that the Shaw was only a close ally because we removed the democratically elected president of the country in order to put this puppet there. I know that ethically challenged idiots like you seem to think that citizens should be honored for the privilege of suffering under our puppets, but, in reality, they tend to get pissed as us.

    9. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by doccus · · Score: 1

      The Shah was an evil bastard. The US really should have had no business making allies with evil dictatorships just because we were scared of socialist takeovers.

      Uh, that was the entire foreign policy of the US from 1950 onwards. Your suggestion of US staying out would have caused the unemployment of thousands of sleazy CIA agents whose only job was to force out legitimate democratically elected leaders in these middle eastern and banana republic countries, and install diktators like the Shah, install corript leaders like tha Saudi regime and their Bin Laden cohorts, and Cuba, The Contra crap That Senile POS y'all had for a president .. that imported all that cocaine for harlem. so he could get guns. actually said "Im proud to be a contra in spirit".
      WHat can out of work CIA agents like that possibly do for a job otherwise? Perhaps the mob can take them in? ;-)

    10. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I used to flip burgers. In my experience a fired CIA agent could handle that.

    11. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by operagost · · Score: 1

      then you should be reminded about how horrible you are.

      I'm not ignorant. That's my opinion, and your worthless trolling is your horrible opinion.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:if you are that ignorant of his work... by doccus · · Score: 1

      I used to flip burgers. In my experience a fired CIA agent could handle that.

      Aah.. perhaps a late response.. but you've overlooked the obvious.. As soon as they start flipping the burgers they'll get the workers to all unite and force the current manager/owner out, to be replaced with one who'll do whatever the cia agent and his buddies tell him to, until the restaurant goes belly up. Then the CIA guy and his buddies will buy it at "fire sale" prices, and install hidden cameras everywhere to spy on all the customers. And.. time to move on to restaraunt #2..
      Not sure I'd want him flipping burgers in MY grill ;-) ... And you?

  206. Charity by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Donate it all to a charity.

    A charitable foundation that you create yourself and whose only purpose is to support poor YOU.

    So you get the benefit of being known for donating all your billions to a charity, people think you're poor and yet, you can offer yourself anything you want.

    Plus, depending on how and where you do it, it can save you tons of taxes.

  207. Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would I do if I was rich as Notch? Easy; get a job at Valve and move your desk to the HL-3 area and get to cracking!

  208. Make someone's day, every day. Or be a dick. by Pascoea · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With 2.5 Billion Dollars? I'm too lazy to do the real math, but im guessing you could pick one random person and give them $100,000 every day for the rest of your life and still have enough money to live comfortably.

    OR you could hire enough people to completely buy out the next iDevice release on opening day, and light the whole batch on fire, just to watch the hipsters cry about it. 453 retail Apple stores, 100 people per store, 20 devices per person, $700 average retail would cost you just over $634M. You wouldn't completely buy them out, but it'd be enough to make a pretty little dent. (This seems to be an XKCD "What if" submission waiting to happen... "What would it take to buy every iPhone available on release day? And what could I do with them once I bought them")

  209. It depends on the definition of wealthy by swb · · Score: 1

    ..and how good you are investment and taxes.

    I think unless you have an after-tax one-time amount in excess of $10 million dollars or more, you're unlikely to live better than a basic upper-middle class lifestyle.

    I did a spreadsheet based on investing all of it into tax-free munis (because they're safe, and I can eliminate tax questions) and only have to make rough guestimates on investment yields and inflation.

    It isn't hard to outspend your capital and dividends over time, especially if you dump a bunch of money on property.

    I put in $200 million in principal, less $25 million invested in real estate and I run out of money in about 30 years, but it does require spending about $5 million a year in cash, which wouldn't be hard to do if a person liked to travel -- a private jet to Europe from NYC could be close to $100k to charter. You could throw out a million per year easily flying private aviation.

    Want to own a yacht? Very easy to blow $3 million on a pretty basic motor yacht (Hinckley T55, you can drive it yourself, no crew or certification required) and not hard to see spending $50-70k per year on fuel and maybe another $100k on services for it.

    And $25 million doesn't buy you fantasy real estate, either. NYC condos go way past that all the time, and if you factor $25 million buying you more than one property you're getting into pretty ordinary luxury if you divide that by 2-3 unique properties and they would all need maintenance and caretaking.

  210. Pussies - all of you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would become a super Villan, surround myself with hot chicks in bikinis and you bet your ass I would have sharks with lasers, I would know the value of a dollar and Austin Powers would be dead!

  211. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Admiral_Grinder · · Score: 1

    Notch was married for, but for a year. He got married after Minecraft took off though, or just after he formed the Mojang company.

  212. "money doesn't solve everything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but most people would gladly trade the problems that it *does* solve for the new problems that it does not. Arguably a much smaller set, and much more tractable.

    No room to bitch. If you're wealthy, and bitching, then give your wealth to someone that would appreciate it.

  213. Create new memories. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not often that buying new stuff will invoke the same depth of feeling as travelling somewhere new. Long after the experience, you're left with memories and lessons learned, which add quality to your life. The mistake people often make is going for luxurious travel experiences. They are fun to do occasionally...but you really don't learn anything from them. Everything is done for you. Instead, do some research, make sure you have backup resources to fall back on if things go South, and seek out adventures that take you out of your comfort zone. You will learn that the world is a wondrous place, with a lot of wonderful people...and you will learn a lot about yourself along the way.

  214. hmm i would..do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    invest in long term stocks... and live off of dividends...3.5% to 4.51% return would be okay.
    i would buy land in south africa.... for a solar panel plant .. making and generating power.
    pay media to start ad's for texas to separate from usa.
    i would build a texas plant for open hardware .. to breakup the nsa's hardware cartels
    i would build pipelines to move water around in north america.. move flooded area's waters to drought areas like cali and texas..
    buy up lots of land in mid-west and canadian prairies and wait for north/south poles to melt and collect on real estate...
    once the real estate is sold off.. then start my own blackwaters but much bigger.. 1000's time bigger and use force to re-obtain the land i just sold.
    then start ww3

  215. Simple: Retire and Be Free to do whatever I please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it

  216. Give me your money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved! :)

  217. Buy Anonymity by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

    I would buy anonymity. Hire a team that would go through and erase all evidence of me. In panopticon we now inhabit, complete anonymity would be the most valuable thing in the world. People, corporations, governments, they'd have no idea I exist, where I live or what I do. I don't know if it's possible, but with a few billion I'd give it a shot.

  218. Cover my family, then everyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put aside enough for me and my family for the foreseeable future, then donate the rest.

  219. Have projects by cdani · · Score: 1

    Start some project and work hard for it. You will know why you wake up and you will also find interesting people working in the field.

  220. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is easy. The only honorable thing to do when one becomes rich is to stop wanting material things and concentrate on helping those who are suffering. Invest the money wisely and give away all of the annual net income you don't need to live. Leave the rest to a foundation that helps people.

  221. Really, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world is this stuff that matters [let alone news for nerds]?

  222. Right wing propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always these articles about how we are supposed to feel bad for the struggles of the powerful and rich.
    This isn't the first article about being rich, powerful is hard and you totally should feel pity toward them.

    I'm not buying it.
    This article in a long series of articles is typical of propaganda.
    Notice how he complains about problems non-rich people have as well.
    Not having a girlfriend, big whoop!
    New challenges arise constantly for most people.

    Not to say there aren't problems for Notch, there are but Notch is in a luxury position.
    (You see people are not evolved to win the struggle to survival and then feel a bit lost.
    Understandably since our psychology has never evolved to deal with such a series of life events.
    The question for Notch is: "What to fill the time in my life with now."
    One thing rich people should do is to assert their self more instead of their money.
    Stand up to people who want to make it all about the money.

    What Notch could do to fix his problems:
    For starters, learn and get a degree in psychology or, and neurology.
    This to achieve two things:
    -> Study about the assholes that forced you to sell Minecraft.
    Study them until you know how to identifie/detect, expose and ignore such assholes!
    -> Study loneliness.
    Study how to remedy loneliness, study how rich people defeat loneliness as a psychology/neurology student.
    Make information on both issues publicly accessible.

    With new-found knowledge should come some new-found confidence in doing things better.
    It looks like Notch would like to have a project of some kind, some kind of coding project.
    But the burn of selling his 'baby' is still fresh.

    Either way Notch might want to find a hobby and coding can be a very good hobby if accompanied by other healthy lifestyle choices.

    Thus Notch should become a hobby coder, can be with or without company like structure.
    But in addition to that: what Notch's life certainly needs is creating a charity that gives away coder time, hardware, other resources and money to some free software projects.
    The charity is both a hobby and a way to meet new people for Notch.
    Due to loose connections with beneficiaries Notch should be able to make new friends and acquaintances easier than in other fields.
    Not to mention many people are as the head of a software project familiar with some life aspects which are the same in Notch's life. Making contact easier.

  223. Birth Control by myid · · Score: 1

    I would donate money to an organization that freely distributed birth control devices. Overpopulation strains the supply of natural resources like water, strains the food supply (farms being bought to put in housing), increases pollution, etc. And parents that don't have huge numbers of children can better care for their children. Lessen overpopulation -> help with many other problems.

    1. Re:Birth Control by mvdw · · Score: 1

      I would donate money to an organization that freely distributed birth control devices. Overpopulation strains the supply of natural resources like water, strains the food supply (farms being bought to put in housing), increases pollution, etc. And parents that don't have huge numbers of children can better care for their children. Lessen overpopulation -> help with many other problems.

      That's putting the cart before the horse. If you listen to Hans Rosling he will tell you that when there are abundant resources, low child mortality follows, and then the birth rate naturally goes down. This has happened many, many times. So what I am basically saying is you will get the same effect by supplying clean water and health care to the third world, along with of course the life expectancy benefits that go along with those.

  224. science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would contact some scientists and offer to fund their research. Mostly medical research but probably a little space and ocean also. Not only would these benefit me and everyone I could make more money or fame with it.

  225. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Kjella · · Score: 1

    This is the best answer right here, and it would cure his loneliness, too. Not only do the people who have stuck by you during the hard times deserve the reward, but they're the ones who have proven who you can trust.

    I think even the best of friendships might end up weird if sucking up to you might mean another drop of many millions of dollars. And many people will feel quite obliged by something like that, even if it's a gift. And some feel unnaturally compelled to match spending habits even though they clearly can't afford it, though I suppose not with a billionaire. Sure, some people are welfare queens and will take what they can get but many also don't want your charity. It's always easier to peer with your peers, which is why rich people tend to lump together.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  226. another rich asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a DOUCHEBAG!!! Any respect I had for that guy just went out the window! This is what happens when someone that already has money, gets more of it, they whine. How about give the fucking money to someone like ME who has lived in poverty pretty much my whole life!? I'd buy my way out of this shitty country (USA) and into Europe. Then I'd invest some of the money in a permanent residence (probably in Germany), and live my life!!! I'd invent, I'd go to college (its free there). I'd build kit ultra lights (something I've wanted to do, but am too poor to ever do), I'd try my hands in programming, maybe dabble in hardware, or FPGA's, etc. Hell, I'd spend every weekend in the Hofbrauhaus! ....

    WHAT A DOUCHEBAG!!!!

    So mad right now!

    1. Re:another rich asshole by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      How about give the fucking money to someone like ME who has lived in poverty pretty much my whole life!? I'd buy my way out of this shitty country (USA) and into Europe.

      As someone that could be considered a nomad and has moved countries, you don't need much money to move. You can even move regularly if you wanted. You have to be willing to travel and move light though. It's also going to be out of your comfort zone, because you would need to go ahead with a plan that has limited visibility in the details behind it.

      Then I'd invest some of the money in a permanent residence (probably in Germany)

      Get a job in Germany, get a credit card, pay off your monthly expenses on the credit card, pay off the credit card every month (build up your credit rating for four years), save up for a deposit (for four years), get a mortgage for your house. These are things you can do.

      'd go to college (its free there)

      Wrong, it's public universities and enrolment, administrative fees are not free. That said, it would likely cost for food, rent etc. about 10,000 Euro a year. You cannot make use of the welfare system while studying. Above undergraduate qualifications, you have to meet even more conditions to avoid necessity to pay a variety of fees.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  227. I've never understood the "burden" of wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my case, I got semi-wealthy very slowly over the years. I retired earlier this year at age 55 with a net worth of about USD $2.5 million. I started with very little -- all the money came from saving aggressively and investing in the stock market.

    The money is really just numbers on a spreadsheet. My wife and I continue to live our same life, spending about USD $40,000 per year for living expenses. The money is nice to have as a safety net, but it changed our lives very little except for allowing us to retire early. I'm perfectly content with the idea of never spending a majority of that money. I don't think that having significantly more money (say, $1 billion instead of $2.5 million) would really change much for us -- I guess maybe we'd do more charitable giving out of a sense of obligation?

    For years I've read about people who have been ruined by money, or who find the money to be a "burden". I have never been able to fathom that concept. You just stick the money in an account -- how hard can that be? If people are bothering you about the money, then hire a lawyer to deal with them. If you have no idea how to invest money, then hire a professional to help. You're under no obligation to change anything else about your life. (The exception is if you also become famous, then you might find new limitations on what you can do -- but again, professional assistance is always available to help.)

  228. actually that's net of inflation by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Actually the 6% number is net of inflation. Over the long term, stocks tend to return about 9% including dividends. Some calculate 10%. On average, bonds yield about 6%-7%. So the gross yield on a balanced, diversified portfolio will be about 8 or so. Subtract inflation and you get 6%.

    Also, as one might expect, an overall price increase (inflation) tends to correlate with bond and stock prices rising too. So inflation serves to dampen volatility a bit. That is to say, when inflation is high, returns tend to also be high, so net returns are more consistent than gross.

  229. What I'd do by Strahan · · Score: 1

    I find it funny that a guy who got rich selling software that lets people explore their creative side chose to purchase a home rather than build one. I'd buy a $250k home to live in for the year or two it'd take for my dream home to be built then I'd give the $250k home to a friend. I always wanted to sit down with a pad and pencil and just draw out whatever I felt would be awesome for a home then give it to an architect to make realistic plans from. That'd be so awesome. I would, of course, build a top end IT infrastructure in my home and a ballroom sized LAN party center. I'd also be a philanthropist. I make $90k a year now, and I'm 40 so I figure if I calculate to 100 years old (unlikely I'll last that long) giving myself a $10k raise every 5 years I'd need $8,910,000. So I set ten million aside in a safe investment fund, maybe convert some of it to commodities to be safe then the rest I could just go nuts with. Help a bunch of people. Rather than just buy people homes and cars and that kinda thing I'd like to be the "debt angel"; pick needy/struggling families and pay off whatever debts they have so they can start clean. Doesn't really do any good to buy someone a Bugatti Veyron if they can't afford insurance or maintenance. Oh yea, speaking of cars.. I'd buy a bunch of cheap supercars (i.e. not Veyron level, more like Gallardo level) then rent them out at reasonable costs so fellow car guys who can't afford to own something like that can at least have fun with them on the weekend :) Yea, they'll likely get trashed but with 2.5 billion in the bank that wouldn't really be a problem lol. Regarding friendships and such, that may be a problem if the billions fall to a teenager but at forty I already have a handle on who my friends are so that wouldn't bother me.

  230. Maybe all you nerds shouldn't have bought it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn how to identify when your money is all getting funneled to one guy and opt out. Minecraft could just as well have been open source. It's worth nothing.

  231. I would travel and learn by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    I'd travel for a while but I'd also go back to school and learn a bunch of stuff I never thought I'd have time to learn. I'd become a pilot. I'd learn to scuba dive. I'd browse through class catalogs and just start taking classes that sound interesting or travel and take classes from professors I find interesting.

  232. Would not flaunt money by 2ms · · Score: 1

    If I were him I would maybe would just not do ostentatious displays of wealth such as ridiculous mansions, bugattis etc. Put the money away, drive around in a GTI, etc. Not saying I think there is anything wrong with being wealthy or that people should generally hide it. Saying that if one doesn't like the kind of attention that it's attracting, then don't have it out front and center. Have yourself be the first thing people encounter rather than your wealth.

  233. Be evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go into politics. Buy my way into power. Climb up and up. Then make life a living hell for all the peons. And I mean HELL. Legally, of course. Oppose me, you get arrested or sued into the gutter. Close down parks, close down playgrounds, raise prices everywhere so that entire communities would get uprooted and forced into slums. Buy firms, factories, close them down. Destroy jobs. Flush workers into the streets. Raze entire blocks into the ground, dig a deep deep pit, build a massive tower rising from the pit, a horrible and oppressive building to cast a shadow over your once-fair city. So you will learn not to worship money and power and maybe grow a spine and try to rebel. Of course I will put your puny rebellion down, but you can try and try and try again. It will teach you not to give up. And each time I will crush you down more and more, taking revenge over your loved ones. That will teach you determination. Or you can roll over and be my bitches forever - or until I tire of it, which would be very quickly. And when I tire of you, into the shit pit you go!

  234. Notch's house by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I guess part of why people find these discussions so interesting is the fact that there are so many different angles one can take, and still sound logical and "correct".

    (I mean, from a purely practical standpoint - it's probably among the bigger wastes of time we could engage in discussing. What are the chances I'll ever personally have such a financial windfall? I barely ever even play the lottery. Pretty sure I'm not alone in that realization.)

    Regarding Notch spending all that money on a huge, fancy home though? It's funny, because I've met several older and very wealthy people in the past who advised me that a big house is *exactly* where I'd want to put a big chunk of my money, if I was in that situation. Your argument against doing so makes lots of sense to me. But at the same time? A home is normally the single biggest item a person spends their income on, and with good reason. Whenever you're not at work (and even then if you work from home), you're probably living in your house if you're not out running errands or doing something for entertainment. Your garage or carport on your home serves as some protection and a parking space for your vehicle(s) too. And the land around your house might be used for such things as growing a garden or other hobby activities. In other words, you get a lot out of the purchase. Most other things you buy depreciate rapidly. Even if you spend money keeping them looking like they're brand new "out of the box"? Their resale value plummets as the years go by. With a house, not so much. You *might* wind up with a poor resale value, but that depends largely on factors you have some control over when making the initial purchase (such as the location and what's trending around it). Choose location wisely, and chances are quite good your house will fetch at least enough on the open market to keep up with inflation, no matter how long you live in it first.

    IMO, Notch is a somewhat unique individual anyway, in that he's very introverted and quite possibly suffers from at least a mild form of Asperger's. I think your typical coder/developer who found him/herself in his situation with a property like Minecraft would have simply been driven to keep building the product and adding onto it, as its popularity soared. Most of us know, deep down inside, that we probably only get a few chances (at most!) to do something in life that really has an impact and matters to a large number of people. Many people with kids would say their offspring counted as one of those opportunities. But otherwise? Most of us just hope to work for a company on some sort of project that has importance, so we can say we were "part of it". It's rare to embark on a project by oneself that achieves that level of notoriety. I have a feeling Notch's misery is mostly self-inflicted, and doesn't *really* have a lot to do with the fact he attained wealth.

    1. Re:Notch's house by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      A home is normally the single biggest item a person spends their income on, and with good reason

      For a typical middle-class person, sure? For someone on the lower end of the upper class even, probably (the tax break is tough to beat). But for the true upper class, you should be spreading your investments around. At that level, you have plenty of other useful things you can do for investments and tax dodges. Unless you want to spend all day following the market, probably the best thing to do would be to put most of it in big indexed funds, and live off the interest (aka: a "Trust Fund"). But I'm not in that weight-class, so someone there could probably advise you better.

    2. Re:Notch's house by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't get it either. A big house is just going to be a money sink, so I wouldn't buy one unless I really had the need for a big house. If I had a bunch of money and was interested in spending it on where I was going to live, I'd probably buy a large chunk of land and drop a modest house in the middle of it. That would also have the advantage of not having nearby neighbors too.

  235. Do an extended pub crawl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go from one small English town to another every two weeks, stay AirBnB and visit the local pubs. Write a novel. Become an subject matter expert in some arcane and remunerative field. Open a distillery (if it's a business failure, you don't care).

    In short, become an interesting person, and never mention to anybody how much money you have.

  236. Call Mark Cuban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He might have some ideas about enjoying it. Also, if you made your money through business and not the lottery, maybe he can get you on Shark Tank?

  237. $100k/year by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

    Set up an account that transfers to you $100K, adjusted for inflation, every year, for 40 years, and which you cannot change afterwards. That's $4M. You may live longer than that but you'll need to save. Form a research/charity/whatever organization of your liking -- say, to finance teleportation research -- where you are on the board with 25% of the vote and transfer the rest of the money to this organization. Announce that to everyone, so your life is back to normal, you'll still find incentive to work, and you may contribute to something exciting.

  238. Notch doesn't want to spend money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a lazy bastard. How hard it is to spend $2 billion?
      Ooooh, look at me shake in confusion!

    Truly proof of his mentality, along with backstabbing Mojang, Minecraft fans, Minecraft content creators (yogscast debacle, etc.)
    This is a Notch problem, purely a Notch problem.

    Might as well go on another fucking vacation. We all know you LOVE a good vacation.

  239. Thick Hide, Enjoy, and Donate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, grow a thick hide. You're gonna get asked to give money to everyone for their sick goldfish. And if you dare to say no, you are gonna get called at least a couple of bad names. People are going to have a hard time feeling sorry for you, so you are going to get the worst of some things.

    Second, take some time for your self. Get yourself a nice home, if you're rich enough, maybe 2 or 3. Spend some time on yourself. If you like skiing, go do that. If you like carpentry, go build yourself a nice workshop and go make Amish-style cabinets, or something If you like bowling go bowling, Whatever.

    Third, if you are so rich that you are having a hard time thinking of ways to spend it, find some way to give it away. Or to use it to help people or causes that you want to promote.

    Set limits though, chances are you are going to want to pass on some wealth, down the road, so put some aside, there are lots of financial managers that could give advice on how to setup trust funds or whatever fits.

    That should cover all the basics. Everything else is the details.

    Maybe find a way to hang out with some people with similar problems. Celebrities and other rich folk, you might not like everyone, and they might not all like you, but if you can find someone who has, or had, a similar set of problems, maybe you can comiserate. plus maybe they don't need you for your money. True, this does risk isolating you from "the average joe"

    And if nothing else works, go anon. lots of people troll forums pretending to be someone else, go play WoW and just don't mention that you are rich, maybe pretend to be a student (to explain your massive amounts of free-time) or sometihng. Met some people that way, if need be,

    Anyways, good luck. I hope I have a chance to figure it out myself someday too =)

  240. Blame Los Angeles by FlacoFuerte · · Score: 0

    L.A. in of itself can be a very isolating, soul-stealing place, let alone when you move into a manor such as his (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZhM56v9UVQ). Status obsessed vapid and shallow social climbers, hangers-on abound. Move to Brooklyn. Eat good food, be around people that don't care who you are, find a nice lady thats a better person than you. Buy a banana hat in TF2,live happily ever after. Just a proposal.

  241. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh dude, you have NO idea! I know someone who just got fucked for over $30K in "back payments". He was up to date on his child care costs but she decided she wanted more. She also wants her son out of the house now so he's supposed to pay for college and living expenses for him at a dorm only a few miles from his ex's home - kid's grades are so poor in high school he's sure to tank in college. He's also refused to speak to his father for years. Prior to this the guy was forced to pay for her "education". As soon as he paid for classes she dropped them. This woman has NEVER had a job and has instead lived off of this guy while riding the new hubby into the ground. She's also made sure to file for divorce in NY where he becomes responsible for the kid until he's like 21. If you think a change in worth won't allow you to get screwed by an ex where there are kids you had better wake up before considering kids! I know another guy who is also getting screwed over pretty good by a woman in much the same way only he doesn't have much money. She's going to leach his military pension, the handwriting is on the wall but he's not yet figured it out

  242. Just nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would just do nothing. Completely nothing. I would wake up in the morning and and ask myself: "What do I need to do today to pay the bills?" And than I would smile and turn on my side and sleep some more.
     
    I would force myself to do nothing. And once you are used to do nothing you will love being bored. Your mind will be clear, simply because you do nothing. Your brains don't have to think about appointments, deadlines, ... and will have time to maybe find a clever idea.

    Most progress in our history was made when people got bored. When people didn't have to struggle to find food, or to work for the overlord, or to work to pay the bills. Many great things were invented because the inventor had nothing else to do. I would try to give my self the gift of being bored in the hope to be the one with a great idea so I could spend my time on this idea, maybe a dream. It could be a great idea and I could hire a team to help me achieve that idea. It could be a bad idea and I would go back to doing nothing to get bored again.

    Boredom and laziness were the greatest motivators for inventions. I would give myself both and enjoy the lack of obligation while I'm at it.

  243. The Millionaire Next Door by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    You might enjoy reading "The Millionaire Next Door", by Thomas Stanley. He writes about his study of wealthy people and what they are like. He emphasizes that many of them avoid flaunting their wealth and more or less blend in with their neighbors. Best of luck to you.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  244. Buy a boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a big ass boat. Throw great parties. One weekend announce that I need help washing and waxing the boat and someone to bring beer. The people who show up with beer to work on the boat are friends. The rest are minions.

    1. Re:Buy a boat by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      A boat is a hole in the water in which to put your money.
      Boat = break out another thousand.

  245. one of two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either end up killing myself accidentally - eg too many fast bikes , women silly things etc, Or spend a chunk and find that when I can have everything it it no longer means anything to have it and then just stick the rest away to make more money for moneys sake like a lot of rich people do. Then live a very ordinary life style but free of the worry about how am I going to pay the electricity bill this month.

    Keep my Job and go to work cause I want to and when my shithead of a boss gives me grief I would just be able to smile with feeling stressed/

  246. Play Minecraft all day!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Play Minecraft all day!!!

  247. Re:For starters... Listen to Steve Jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen to Steve Jobs who said, "do what you love."
    Sound advice, imo.

  248. Family, hobbies, and charities, oh my by Cyrano+de+Maniac · · Score: 1

    I'd pay off my mortgage, remodel the house a little bit to make it more usable, and look around for a reasonable lightly used car to replace my wife's aging vehicle. Then I'd help my siblings (and my wife's) out by paying off mortgages, school debt, and the like. I'd set up some sort of financial structure to make sure that my wife and, should they come along, my children would live without financial stress for the rest of their lives after I pass away. And a goodly chunk right off the top would go to my church and another religious organization that was very important in my life.

    After that, I'd take up a bit of travel. I'd take lots of guitar lessons and buy more music equipment than someone of my skills can reasonably justify. I'd set up an endowed foundation to perpetually help fund the type of charities and other organizations that I think need supporting. And maybe get back to taking dance lessons regularly. I'd go to more concerts, and pay for better seats and the occasional meet-and-greet. And I'd spend time developing an open-source project idea that I've had for several years. And I'd probably pay someone else to mow the lawn, tend to the flower garden, and clear the driveway of snow.

    --
    Cyrano de Maniac
  249. Change the world by n2hightech · · Score: 1

    I would start a Manhattan like project aimed at developing a programmable self replicating machine. Imagine an atomic level 3D printer. A flat panel one side is a digester the other side is an extruder assembler. Folded out from the edges would be solar panels. It would be able to replicate using sunlight and consuming trash, basic raw materials and have the ability to transmute elements when needed. As the number of machines continues to grow they would switch from building duplicate machines to homes, cars, roads, dams, water purification plants, power plants, farms schools or whatever mankind needs here on earth. Once everyone's needs are satisfied it would switch to building rockets to send itself into space where it would build human habitats on the moon. Then on to Mars to terraform the planet. Next out to the asteroid belt where it would consume asteroids to build seed ships for the trip to other solar systems. Even if the project failed it would likely result in some amazing technology.

  250. The Friends You Lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2007 I had become close friends with a girl. It was never going to be a relationship, and even though I wanted it, eventually I gave up and accepted our friendship. At the time, I was an engineer getting laid off and she worked as a barista in a local coffee joint making minimum wage. We got along great, best of friends. I got a new job, did well for myself, and she was happy for me. An incredible opportunity came around for me and I moved to Silicon Valley to do some "change the world" type stuff. She moved out here too, and we reconnected. Nothing had really changed for her, but now I was making well into six figures, owned a vacation home in the country that I kept a car and truck at, and had two daily driver sports cars at my residence in one of the most exclusive towns in South Bay. My personality hadn't changed though. She would always talk about the opportunities she had missed in life, and late one night I decided to do something about it. We were talking about the glass igloos in Finland where you can watch the aurora borealis at night, and how she dreamed of going there. I pulled out a laptop, started checking airfares and car rentals and said "ok, for your birthday, let's go." At first she was on board, but before I clicked the "purchase" button on the tickets, she stopped me and said "no, we can't, I'll feel like I owe you something." This bothered me. I couldn't give a gift to make a friend's dream come true, because the disparity of wealth made it feel like she could never give back to me. Later, she began training for the Portland Marathon. "Training" is a loose word because she wasn't keeping track of how far she would go on a practice run, where she went, or how hard the run was. I got her an entry level Garmin Forerunner to help her see progress and make sure she was able to reach her goals. She looked at me and thanked me and was happy, but like before I saw that happiness fade from her face and she said to me "I can't have this. I could never afford this." She cried, hugged me, thanked me, and accepted it the gift. The last major incident she was visiting her family back in the midwestern town she was from, which was only 45 miles from my other home. We decided to see a show that was on tour there, and we would ride together to the airport the next day to come home. When the black town car pulled up to take us to the airport, she stared at me in disbelief and asked "I can ride in that?" I assured her it was ok. When we got to the airport, we parted ways since our flights were at different terminals, hugged, and wished each other a safe trip.

    That was the last time I ever saw her.

    We talked a little online after that until one night she just sent me a text that said "This friendship isn't working for me anymore." According to her, I was too kind, too thoughtful, and too giving, so I must have been manipulating her. And that was it, she was gone. Someone I cared for deeply, whose friendship and companionship I valued tremendously left me because she couldn't accept the lifestyle I had now. It fed a conspiracy theory in her head.

    I understand this guy. I have every *thing* I could want. But in the end, I come home every day to a cat. I have a dysfunctional relationship with a woman who can't decide whether we're equals or whether its my job to support her, and my closest friends are 1800 miles away. The loneliness gets to me. Often. I spend time volunteering to be around people. I enjoy helping others. ButI want to go home, back to the wide open spaces and fresh air, to people I understand and who understand me. I tell myself that this is temporary, the cost of chasing dreams and doing things to help make the world better.

  251. She's just not that into you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found a great girl, but she's afraid of me and my life style and went with a normal person instead.

    Sorry to be harsh, but this sounds exactly like, "sorry, I don't date coworkers," or the one a friend got in college, "you're just so perfect, I'm afraid I would fall head over heels for you".

    She's just not that into you. Money or no money, the other guy was more attractive.

  252. Work on other goals by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    I had a decent layoff package about 10 years ago, and it was great. I spent almost a year living out of my truck going from rock climbing spot to rock climbing spot. I was happier and healthier than during any other similar stretch of time in my life. Right now I don't want more money, I want more time. I would love to be able to go do the Appalachian Trail, the Pacific Crest Trail, and spend a lot more more nights hanging in a portaledge on side of El Cap. I'd love to spend more time with my wife and kid too. Heck, just being able to hang out by a fire ring in Joshua Tree National Park without a vacation countdown clock in the back of my head would be a huge life improvement.

    I honestly enjoy my work, but I have shown myself that I can be even happier not working just fine for a pretty long stretch. If I could have 3 months off a year I could stop bumping into burnout so often. My real fear is that by time I can retire, or at least slow down the hamster wheel I am stuck on, I will not be able to physically do the things I really enjoy anymore. Maybe I should start buying lottery tickets?

    1. Re:Work on other goals by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I honestly enjoy my work, but I have shown myself that I can be even happier not working just fine for a pretty long stretch. If I could have 3 months off a year I could stop bumping into burnout so often. My real fear is that by time I can retire, or at least slow down the hamster wheel I am stuck on, I will not be able to physically do the things I really enjoy anymore.

      As I prepare to take my weekly flight out for work, this is a fear that I think about every week.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  253. What I did by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

    I retired and founded a charity "Kawaza School Fund" that supports a school in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. We are a small charity but everything we can do to help these children is greatly appreciated. It's amazing what just a little help can do for people with so little.

  254. How about sharing a little with your employees? by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    Notch's Mojang was supposedly different from your typical greedy corporation and it was more family. In the end he sold out and left all his employees hanging. Out of that $2500 million dollars, would it be so hard to allocate $50 million into a trust fund such that every one of his 50 employees could have an interest-only income of $50,000 per year indefinitely? Yet he couldn't even sacrifice 2% of his payout?

  255. Play God by ememisya · · Score: 1

    Well of course I'd have to be original and find myself in the privileged position to send out a satellite to space to be able to monitor all human activity on the planet so I can watch everyone else do nothing instead. Since I can't be quite sincere with my feelings given the paranoia of people's eyes on my wealth, I would just use all the pent up anger and unexpressed love to see if I can influence others outside the scope of reasonable sensory input. Such as putting an extra dot on your T.V., or playing the sound of a bird that lives near your home every time you open the door to leave your house, speeding up your computer fans and what-not, all in a reasonably dismissible manner to satisfy those ignored feelings. This would make me be in a position to scare my new billionaire friends (since they would think I know everything) and given the God Mode view I have in other people's lives, it would give others the feeling of my superior position in society. Yea, that sounds like a good plan. All so one day future generations would look back and say, "Wow, that guy, he really made it good in life, he could watch me try!" That's what we're all aiming for here folks. The stage of life! And less fortunate are the non-volunteer cast! What could be better? Minding my own business? Falling in love? Raising children like every other mammal on the planet? Naaaah, that's for ugly and poor people. Screw those guys.

  256. Isolation by endus · · Score: 1

    I have isolation issues already, believe me. If I was mega wealthy I would just go ahead and have those issues in Hawaii during the time I would usually spend at work.

    I have no doubt that being mega-wealthy introduces its own set of problems, but that's a set of problems I'm definitely willing to try on for a while. At the very least I would have more free time to travel.

  257. Finish school, then start a WSDE by Touvan · · Score: 1

    With the collapse of capitalism in full swing (except in isolated parts of the US and Germany) I'd probably go back and finish school - economic, politics, and economics. Then I'd start a worker self directed enterprise (WSDE). I might even do that anyway.

  258. People will "LOL" at this. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    For starters, I could buy the name brand mac and cheese any time I wanted, not just on special occasions.

    People will "LOL" at this.

    It is a very real issue for those of us who grew up poor.

    On special special occasions, you could include 1lb of ground beef.

    Like once a week. Most rich people used to be incredibly poor people who will Never NEVER again be in that position.

    1. Re:People will "LOL" at this. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you have ground beef money you have no business speculating on "What Would You Do If You Were Suddenly Wealthy?". You already are wealthy.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    2. Re:People will "LOL" at this. by nolife · · Score: 1

      Adding a can of tuna is easier and cheaper. Much better in my opinion.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  259. LOL by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Uh... LOL. Sorry.

  260. Get a divorce. by Weirsbaski · · Score: 1

    I know, but here me out before you judge. A windfall would free up my wife to know she wouldn't be working a low-wage job until she's 60+ just to keep the health insurance, and it would free me to not have to give up my dreams due to having to pay alimony.

    Money can't buy happiness by itself, but this would free both of us up to do the kind of things that can bring happiness, even if we're not doing those things together.

    --

    I am not a sig.
  261. Donate to slashdotters by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

    I would definitely start donating huge sums to random slashdot posters ;)

  262. FFRF is my wish by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I'd give a huge chunk of it to the FFRF.

  263. If I had Minecraft money? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    Bank away around 10% for me. Then Musk the rest. I would figure out what problem I wanted to solve and see who's leading the charge. Make sure there's money to make it happen.

    I'd go with printable organs and invest in research there.

  264. Simple by PPH · · Score: 1

    Invest in the Chinese stock market. Wealth is no longer an issue.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  265. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a woman judge and I still got full custody or our disabled daughter. Yes, I'm a man.

    Just curious, how do you think things would have gone if your daughter wasn't disabled...
    Maybe your ex-wife's lawyer didn't put in their A-game and phoned it in.

    I'm not saying you didn't get what you wanted from the judge in this case, but perhaps you don't know what it's like to go up against the full fury of a woman once scorned and a judicial system that enables that...

  266. Minecraft? Secret? Huh? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    The dude was head of a company that made one of the top-selling software packages of all time. He sold the company to Microsoft.

    When someone googles your name and they get "minecraft creator sells to MS for $2BN", there is no way to not tell people.

    Furthermore, when you're worth that kind of money, you *have* to change your lifestyle for personal safety.

    1. Re:Minecraft? Secret? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could easily travel almost anywhere and not have people recognize him. A lot of people look similar to him, even with all the news stories for the most part people wouldn't recognize him, and the few that do wouldn't raise a big enough stink to make it an issue. He could travel under a psuedonym or a version of his name and not have a problem. He could have a driver/body guard that just acts like a friend so it doesn't give it away that he's anybody special.

  267. Rich, not famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's rich, not famous. Save the bragging about being in the "three commas" club for the 2nd date.

  268. Broadway's 2 cent or 0.02 new shekels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What Would You Do If You Were Suddenly Wealthy?

    1. Convert to judaism
    2. Stand on the roof
    3. Play the fiddle
    4. Turn the story into music theatre
    5. Profit and more profit!

  269. Yes, I'm mad. As in angry mad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Oh woe is me! I have so much money!

    I dream all the time about what I'd do with a fraction of that money. I'd make sure my family is well taken care of as well as my closest friends. I'd finally be able to afford to live in my own home and never have to rent again (except for taxes). I'd go hiking everywhere. I'd take my friends and family on lavish vacations and wouldn't accept "no thanks, we'll pay". I'd buy my own car and never would have to lease again. I'd rediscover my artistic side that died when I started working 9-10 hour shifts 6 days a week for a paltry pay. Maybe I'd attempt to learn coding so I could make my own Android games. I could have time to read all the books, hike all the trails, watch all the sunsets, bask on all the beaches, drink all the liquors, I could take all the pictures, I could... You know what? I'm going to stop because I'm getting pretty angry and depressed at the same time.

    -Wage Slave Working Stiff

  270. Just do whatever you think you need to make you ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if that equals giving away all your money and pretending it never existed (lie as necessary).

    Personally I'd keep doing the stuff I like (research, writing papers, programming) but quit trying to be funded for it, as it's the grant proposal stuff that I truly detest. And I certainly would never work in a boring job again just for money. And I'd fly first class, choose accomodation for comfort rather than budget, and tell the uni where to shove it's restrictions on personal travel post conferences.

    But that's just me. Each to his/her own I guess.

  271. Not really "suddenly" by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Here is a very abbreviated timeline of events, from a couple different wikipedia pages:

    2009-05: Mojang founded and Minecraft first publicly released.
    2010-06: Alpha version of Minecraft released
    2011-01: One million copies of Minecraft sold
    2011-09: First Minecraft convention
    2011-10&11: Official release of Minecraft on PC, Android, and iOS, four million copies sold.
    2012-05: Minecraft released on XBox 360, sold over 400,000 units within 24 hours.
    2012-05: Over $1 million in merchandise sales.
    2012-06: Minecraft Lego sets released.
    2013-12: Playstation 3 version released.
    2014-09: Playstation 4 and XBOne versions release.
    2014-09: Sale of Mojang to Microsoft for $2.5 billion announced.
    2014-10: 60 million copies of Minecraft sold.

    So i'd hardly call this "suddenly" becoming wealthy, it's not like he won the lotto or anything. It involved a lot of hard work (albeit with an even larger amount of luck) over half decade. He probably became a millionaire sometime in 2011, though the writing was probably on the wall in 2010, and there was a lot of news about him becoming a multi-millionaire in 2012. (And according to the reports i've seen Notch is actually worth about $1.5 billion now, not $2.5 billion. Presumably due to a combination of taxes and not being the sole owner of Mojang.)

    I'm sure it may have seemed like it all went by in a blur to him, but if he wanted to work on maintaining normal relationships with the people around him that's something he should have been doing the entire time and it's going to be hard to start now.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  272. What I would do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay off the houses then sock the rest of it away. I wouldn't change my lifestyle what-so-ever. I'd continue to go to work and do my job. The one difference would be that I would feel completely free to tell the boss that what he's asking for is stupid (if it is). What's he going to do? Fire me? Don't need the money. Ultimate freedom.

  273. Re:give $100 million each to best friends & fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The milk isn't free though. If she gets preggos off of you, or anyone while she was in a relationship with you, you will get stuck with 18 years of child support. In fact, just being around the baby might be grounds to force you to pay.

    Avoid women at all costs until this is changed.

  274. Still searching for an idea for a corporation to c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am still looking for a corporation to create, to do what is currently not being done to help the innovators at the bottom. I want to be able to help people, like myself, realize creative projects by giving help not in the form of money, necessarily, but by supplying resources to them to realize their goals themselves. Many people barely have the time or resources to access the resources that are available. I could provide a service such as writing and submitting grant proposals to other grant agencies. Another service could be finding Information on materials and processes. Another is creating snippets of code or fabricating components for hardware developers. I could also provide computational and digital modeling services. What do you need?

  275. Expose the fraudulent legal system by RickNolegalname · · Score: 0

    Yes, that is what we do. Its illegal to use a legal name. The fraudulent legal system is over. Evil will and must destroy itself. Babylon is fallen! Read why at http://losethename.com/

  276. As an introvert by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    I would buy / lease an island. Move to it. Say my final goodbyes to humanity. Buy a rather large telescope.
    Maybe open an endangered animal preserve on the island with me.
    ( Dino's optional )

    Food / supplies can be air dropped periodically. Get a pilots license for when you have to venture back to civilization.

    Retire. Enjoy life as it's meant to be instead of being a wage slave who spends their life doing nothing but sitting in a cubicle, working to pay off some debt.
    Travel, see how the rest of the world really is vs what the media tries to portray. Keep a low profile, be humble.

    Maybe start another Nobel prize sort of thing for stuff you consider important. Try to make a difference in the lives of those who aren't as fortunate. Disease research, fresh water projects, clean energy research, etc. There is an awful lot wrong with the world that funding can help with. I wish the folks who keep buying yachts, mega-mansions, and their seventh gold plated Ferrari would understand that concept. :|

    I mean, seriously, how much money do you need to live an amazing life for the rest of your days ?

    Figure that out, then become a name that folks will remember for making positive things in the world a reality instead of the usual ultra-rich and greedy we usually get.

  277. Be a dragon. Like smaug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no doubt, I wouldn't do anything good with it.
    I was poor growing up hungry and cold and poorly cared for, and I didn't care for it. now I'm okay and earn a reasonable amount now but I'm stuck in this survivalist mindset from my childhood and teens, where I get precious about things like food and money.

    Seeing others waste food is a red-button for me. And I find certain things my friends spend money on insane. (Brand labled goods ect)
    Thing is I'm not poor anymore I have tens of thousands of dollars saved up. doing nothing... a part of me really wants to travel learn another language and see the world but
    I'm also trapped by my fear because I have these ghosts from my past asking me if I'm "hungry or cold," and if I'm not then I'm okay for now but I should save resources because famine and poverty is always around the corner. I'd be this way even if I had millions of Dollars.

  278. What I'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Get my house off the grid
    2. Invest some of the money in mutual funds
    3. Travel every year

  279. Two things... by turb · · Score: 1

    First I'd setup a game store, lots of tables, make it a great community place to discover and play.

    Second, I'd be writing open source software, kinda like I do now but picking my own projects. Hacking ART or the soon to be released source for swift on Linux.

  280. Why not by guestapoo · · Score: 1

    * Donating money to opensource projects
    * If I have enough money, buy some interesting commercial projects and make them opensource
    * Donating money to books (scientific, education one) sharing community
    * Buy rare books, expensive books, valuable books and upload for every one

    Hmm, think again:
    * Hire some talents to write softwares for me
    * Buy companies that could make me more wealthy
    * Buy major publishers and rise the price of books (when they are all owned by me)

    Hmm, I want more:
    * Hire some talent to build terminators for me
    * Buy oil, weapons firms that could make me more powerful
    * I don't read book anymore.

  281. Tell ya what I'd to..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    two chicks at the same time.

  282. Seller's regret? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for Notch.

    He was pretty much conned into selling his beautiful creation to one of the most evil technology corporations in history. Although he was very well paid for it, it must be heartbreaking for him to think what will almost certainly happen to his project in the years to come.

    Has all the money he could ever need. Still not happy. I wonder why.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  283. data science, data science, data science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the rise of ubiquitous cloud computing, Google, wikipedia, a sufficient number of mathematically trained individuals, FOSS software, R+CRAN, ipython+python data science packages, etc. the golden age of data science is beginning. I would put the money to work funding research in data science techniques in a FOSS environment.

    If you have a society with a sufficiently strong data science technology and the computing capabilities to put it into action then suddenly all sorts of problems can be asked and answered. I would put the money in a FOSS environment so the leeches who want to construct an artificial bottleneck and charge rent are shut out.

    I don't mind people making money or even getting rich. I mind people getting rich by screwing over everybody else.

    Johnny Loves Linux.

  284. Skydiving More by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Mostly just more skydiving and less working for douschebags. Having to work 40 hours a week to support my hobby, I've got several more years flying a wingsuit and jumping from a plane before I feel comfortable getting into BASE. And most of the good BASE jumping is Europe. Barring accidents, I think I could easily spend a couple of decades at this hobby, even if that was all I was doing.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  285. My bucket (of money) list by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

    1. I'd pay the folks at the Genode project whatever it took to produce a live CD bootable image, and keep them doing it with every new release. (genode.org if you care)
    2. I'd see if the silly idea I had in college for an FPGA replacement on steroids would actually work by designing the chip and having it fabbed... then fixing the bugs until it worked right. (bitgrid.blogspot.com if you care)
    3. I'd redo the house, install enough solar to power everything, and build a laboratory with a machine shop.
    4. I'd build my own locomotive to run out at the Heston Steam Museum (either diesel electric, or just electric)
    4. I'd dig to the bottom of the cold fusion thing, and see if it really works.

  286. Maybe he should create a new alias by pellik · · Score: 1

    So he's a geek programmer. He probably spends some time on IRC. Maybe just start over with a new alias, on a new channel. He can make new nerd friends and nobody has to know he's rich. Once you've got a connection with people you might be able to get past the money issue by just grounding them with whatever conversation made you friends in the first place. Just laugh it off, so to speak.

  287. Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I get rich, I will buy my $130,000 dream car, buy a penthouse in one of those happening cities in Asia, buy a house with an apple orchard with a "workshop" where I build new projects with Arduino, raspberry pi etc, start a foundation to help poor children who shown high level of intelligence.....

    This is all just a fantasy because I know myself best. If I really get rich, I will just stay on my bed all day to play games, waste my time on slashdot, and maybe grow too fat to even have sex....

  288. it's not an epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > It seems like one the tech industry should at least be aware of, given the focus on startup culture

    You must be joking. With anywhere from 90-95% of startups failing within 3 years, the problem of accidental billionaires is not exactly at epidemic proportions. If you want to be aware of a problem, perhaps consider more meaningful issues like retrenchment, re-skilling, and jobseeking.

  289. Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd start by travelling around the world. I'm lucky enough to have an awesome family now so it would be harder with the kids n school but still.

    However as a single person I'd backpack - no need for flash hotels etc, etc; fly into a place, meet some people who are already backpacking, travel with them a while, go your own way. There is a heck of a lot of the world to see.

    You'll meet nice, new people who are also travelling for the experience and fun; as you get to remote corners of the world you will meet people who have already rejected the western rat race but are happy and satisfied living their lives. Also if you travel the third world you can just tell folks you are a computer programmer or whatnot. Any foreigner/westerner is seen as really wealthy and so you don't have to let on. Sure people will still scam you for money but you'll be travelling with a bunch of people in the same boat.

    As for the money; well you won't need a lot of it so put it in a managed trust.

    You may well see people living in conditions that you can improve by anonymous gifts and projects; do things locally in the communities and places you visit and then return later - you'll feel a tremendous sense of purpose and start growing attached to places and people.

  290. The talent farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i suddenly got a big load of cash, I'd use it to buy a chunk of land & a whole bunch of old trailers. I would invite homeless or near-homeless musicians to come live for free in my trailer park, which would have a special clubhouse full of studios & performance areas. Once free of the constraints of monthly rent, they would be free to perfect and hone their art... also since they would be surrounded by other musicians with the same amount of free time, awesome new bands would hopefully result.

    Sure there would be a lot of problems and drama.. but think of the music!

  291. Don't change anything at first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't change anything if you get a giant load of money except maybe your phone number. But certainly don't buy a house in an exclusive neighborhood and hang with celebs at late night parties. I think Notch should move back to Sweden and stay out of the spotlight. Enjoy some really basic hobbies....hook back up with his ex. Invest modestly in a few promising companies. Try to disconnect from those seeking you for money and stick with your friends. Tell them you've invested it all and need to work for a living. And get a job that you like or start a small company and limit how much of your own money you put into it so you keep it real. You don't have to solve world hunger. Just give yourself 3 to 5 years to figure out how you want to spend your money- don't go living it up right away or you'll end up regretting it.

  292. Completely selfish set of goals by locoluis · · Score: 1

    0. Avoid fame at all costs. It ruined Notch's, Nguyen Hà Dông's, and many others' life.
    1. Buy a large-enough plot of land and anonymously transfer its ownership to my mother.
    2. Tell them that I got a job abroad in [insert developed country name that's *not* the U.S.] so they finally leave me alone.
    3. Fix my teeth.
    4. Learn that country's language.
    5. Actually find a job there.
    6. Buy a decent house there.
    7. Become a citizen there.
    8. Find a lonely single woman. Date her. Marry her.
    9. Donate anonymously, mainly to educational non-profit projects in my country. Never disclose my identity.
    10. Spend the rest of my days as a writer, cartoonist and hobbyist.

  293. Fame != wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we first point out that Notch's problem isn't his wealth. It's his fame (and notoriety and success which is linked to his wealth but not the same thing). Very very few people have problems with actual wealth. Wealth in and of itself doesn't generate notoriety. Notch's issue is that he's the Minecraft guy. Minecraft a game so popular my Dad probably has heard of it. I understand why a girl might be hesitant to step into that arena especially with all the death threats and gamergate going on. All that risk is out there. Does that have anything to do with Notch? not really but anything could happen and he's a big target. And none of this risk has to do with wealth. Plenty of gamedevs aren't rich and have become big targets in the gaming industry. Heck while she's probably not poor Feminist Frequency is a huge target as you can tell from how man

    As for actual wealth? Wealth is easier to manage. There are countless books on people who do this well mostly in the entrepreneurial self help section with titles like "The Millionaire Next Door" and such. Hire some good money people. Get one of those woodsheds that white YouTubers always seem to have an just make stuff like grossly oversized wooden versions of Settlers of Catan. Depending on my wealth I'd help some people out. Give to charities of my choosing. I know my mother was always a big fan of scholarships so we might do one of those. Travel. Read. Play games. I'd have time to actually make plans rather than just figuring out what task I can afford to do next.

    My technology would work for me. Instead of against me. I don't think many /.ers realize how much money can make or break your teach plans. My computer screen cracked and I haven't fixed it for a month simply because I don't have the funds. If I had the money I'd be able to get a computer that wouldn't stutter when I open 5 tabs. My sister wouldn't have a computer that overheats and dies in 35 minutes. I'd actually be able to do things like make backups. Actually practice programming rather than just constantly redoing beginner tutorials. I might go legit on streaming services or downloads. I'd check out this Netflix thing everyone talks about. I'd date. Because I could afford to be flexible in asking out girls. If they want to go out we can go out, if they want to stay in we can stay in. The time to work out would be amazing. I do alright skipping breakfast and lunch but I used to run distance and as much as i hate being in my head I miss the ability to just go and not stop. I don't have time for that now.

    I wouldn't need to be Elon Musk. There's plenty of smaller injustices to fix that I can work on. I know some kids I could keep out of trouble. I know a mother who wouldn't say no to help getting control of her life back from her ex. I got a cousin whose life sucks and my heart breaks just a little bit because I can't afford to help him.

    I'm not saying Notch has it easy anymore than Bow Wow has it easy (he also went through the same sort of emotional breakdown at one point). Life isn't easy being rich and famous. It's easier sure but there are aspects that have to suck. In a way he's lucky as he notes in his tweet (https://twitter.com/notch/status/637665813483417600)

    And just venting and not feeling like I had to hide made it feel a bit easier to cope with already.

    That's gotta help. If I vented my frustrations with life. No one would care. I'm a nobody. He at least has a platform to be heard. I'm glad he has one.

    - WK

  294. Fourth thing to do by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Good advice (for someone who barely sees 100K).

    Now for the fourth (unless I'm terribly bad at counting) thing to do, after fixing whatever legitimate financial problems your close friends may have. Don't go for poor-neighborhood philanthropy. A few billions might not even be enough for Bill Gates philanthropy. I think your best bet is really to Musk (v) it, pick a few technological projects that can benefit from a few hundred million of "concentrated" funding.

    To take the Elon Musk example, do you think his wealth would have made a bigger difference if he spread out the billion or so he made from Paypal onto dozens of Kickstarter-sized projects as opposed to his initial "focus" on two or three flagship projects, namely cheaper access to space, electric cars and perhaps solar power (I think this came later)?

  295. Re:Make someone's day, every day. Or be a dick. by mvdw · · Score: 1

    Good, can you submit it please? Randall has been too long in putting up his next instalment after "Jupiter Descending".

  296. Outsource myself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow no one has mentioned this. Find a job that you'd like to do really well, but you're struggling at. Maybe you're not charismatic, maybe you're not as attractive as you'd like to be, or maybe some corrupt person is taking up room in your way. Hire a team of talented people to work silently behind the scenes for you. A personal assistant, a private eye, a fantasy football ringer, a facebook ringer, a pinterest ringer, a think-tank, someone who's better at your job than you, etc. Pay them obscenely to make you a superstar. Why? Just because you can.

  297. No sex and drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So nobody will spoil it all in sex drugs and gambling?

    Riiiiight

  298. seems simple by Doctor+Device · · Score: 1

    Invest most of it in low-risk funds, live modestly, spend on the occasional shiny new thing, and take care of my family and friends. use my time to learn new things, travel, pick up a hobby. I guess being antisocial and unambitious makes it easy.

    --
    -It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
  299. I'd ruin someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would. I would make it the goal of my wealth to utterly destroy the CEO at my current workplace.

    I'd run him out of his job, and see to it that he was recognised as a thieving conniving fat stinky greasy little wretch that he actually is. He's misappropriated millions in public funding by refusing to pay staff for work that's done, he's ruined lives by having people work hundreds of hours a year for free, then has the cheek to bitch that it wasn't good enough.

    I'd bankrupt him, and I'd see him held accountable for his public and private frauds, for his tax frauds, and many other things.

    I'd also make sure he knew who had done it, and why it had been done. I've seen him ruin too many lives to tolerate that pathetic worm.

    1. Re:I'd ruin someone by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

      Why wait until you're rich?

      Get started right now. Sounds like the law would be on your side. Maybe decide that you're okay with losing your job and finding a new one, so the fear of want is gone.

      He sounds like an evil ass. Smush him. It's easier than you think, because you'll have pretty much everybody on your side, even people you may not know about yet.

  300. eh... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    I might start up my own non-profit. Or I might start my own for-profit business. Normally that would be financially risky but...hey...billionaire. Then again if I'd already started my own business and had it be wildly successful, which is why I'm a billionaire in the first place, I admit I wouldn't be as motivated to try it again. Might just stash 50 million somewhere and give the rest away. 1% interest (after inflation) would be $500k/year.

  301. Re:http://www.agritura.co.uk/dunlop-acifort-classi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a very durable shaft already. Just ask my wife.

  302. Fix it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay off the mortgage then take te rest and find all those things in society government refuses to and build solutions to fix them. (+ Secretly become Batman.)

  303. Notch 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a terrible breakup a few years ago. Accepted an awesome job offer in a city I knew nobody. Made good money, but had nobody to share it with. Totally different scale, but felt similar. I worked on myself, treated my body well, and learned to say "no" at work and "yes" in my spare time. You don't need a billion dollars for that, but with his resources, I would get personal trainers, mentors, chefs, etc., study stuff I always wanted to study, but never had the time to do so, travel, and sure, buy fancy things that make my home nicer or in general my life better somehow. I would be generous, but no creepy Santa Claus (hint: don't invite people to parties and vacations everybody knows you only throw because you are bored). I would keep my eyes open, and would find new exciting challenges, maybe working on a new company (once I'm not burned-out anymore) or charity. I would never talk about money, in particular not with friends (unless they need my help) or with people (friends or not) who come to me with investment ideas. Money is what everybody associates with me now. I cannot change that, but I won't remind them by showing off with blingy shit or by talking about stuff nobody else can afford.

  304. Nuclear Fusion by DMJC · · Score: 1

    I'd take the crapshoot and try to fund all the low cost fusion projects that are out there. There's about three promising ones now. Polywell positive net fusion going to cost $100 million to build a working reactor? Done. Hell I'd allocate $250 million to that project alone. Why not take the crapshoot with 1/10th of the 2.5 billion. It's not like you're going to run out of the other 2.25 billion any time soon. If Polywell doesn't work out, put another 200-300 million into other fusion projects. If those all fail, abandon fusion research and work on something like robotics/automation or space travel. Pretty sure you could re-purpose designs/technology from the Apollo missions at a much lower cost than the government will to get your own moon mission going. Most of the space innovators etc don't have the balls to try those projects now because they care about keeping their billions in the bank.

  305. Measured Approach by Elessin · · Score: 1

    Given a very large sum (say $100,000,000), you could easily live well and still retain most normal relations with people around you. Invest $10mil quietly in a personal heavily diversified portfolio through 2 different agencies (of solo if you have the chops). That should be more than enough to support you for the rest of your days without even touching principal. You could then quietly pay off all of your Big Debt (house note, car note, student loans, credit card debt, etc). After your big debt is gone, living expenses are exceptionally cheap. You could easily afford a modest 2 bed /1 bath house/condo in a nice/mostly nice neighborhood. You could drive around in a mostly new but not 'new' reliable car. In other words, your appearance and lifestyle can be very comfortable but never betray your actual finances. Going 'grey man' as is often thrown out there. The rest of your cash could be used to do lovely and interesting things. For example, you could have a company that donates larges sums to life saving ventures like cancer research, etc through a shell company (think Delaware corp to preserve YOUR anonymity). Imagine what 20 or 30 million in a large high dividend portfolio could do donating yearly to these causes. At this point, you wouldn't even be using half of the above mentioned $100 mill but you could be making a huge difference and still maintain your anonymity. You could quietly fund local art galleries, online radio stations, NPR, local and regional charities. You could fell ALL of the poor in your area....forever. End homelessness locally. Be the deciding monetary tipping point for localized/regionalized green energy. And you could do all this anonymously Throwing money at organizations wont' make the world better automatically, but I'd like to think that a few 100 million towards the eradication of cancer might be worth the time, money, and effort. And that's just one worthy way to 'spend it all' and still maintain a relatively sane life.

  306. If he really hates it that much.. by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

    He could give it all / a couple of million to me.. I'm sure i'd adjust just fine.

  307. Nuke everybody's debts. by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

    I know so many people with cool ideas who can't do anything with their lives other than treadmill because they are anchored to debts.

    I've got a long list of names of all the people I've met over the course of my life whose debts I'd wipe out with anonymous gifts should I ever come into the money. I'd spend on that project until everybody is in the clear, or until half the money is gone; whichever comes first. I've never thought in terms of billions before, so you could probably lift a whole lot of people out of slavery and still have plenty left over for the next stage...

    Start up a foundation, (or a series of them. Why not?). -Maybe the kind with twenty million sitting pat, collecting interest, and you only spend the interest, (except interest bearing projects are sort of the problem which put everybody into debt in the first place. Going all Batman on the banking elite isn't really an option, so I'm not 100% clear on how to proceed with regard to that philosophy. However...)

    Foundations. Fixed budget groups with one or two captains heading up each with mandates like, "Seek out cool stage productions and finance them!" "Promote Maker Spaces and the ability to learn, build and fix tech for people of all ages!" "Awesome private schools where earnest disadvantaged kids can afford to be!" "Set up systems your community can use to establish and maintain their own food security!" "Off the grid, one home at a time..!"

    Stuff like that.

    It'd be fun to imagine new ways to make the world more awesome and less miserable for lots of people; to give people the chance to spread their wings and really use their gifts rather than burn all their energy just treading water.

    Fame is not something that bothers me. That's why you hire secretaries.

  308. Visit every country in the world once by tigersha · · Score: 1

    I love maps. I want to actually see all of it

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  309. PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do a PhD. People are always dropping out of graduate courses because they don't have enough money. You have to like doing research, of course...

  310. Be an AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Live life on Slashdot as an Anonymous Coward.

    Thinking about Natalie Portman.

    Eating Grits before they're poured down pants.

    Hugging Cowboy Neal.

    Building a Beowulf Cluster out of everything.

    Decrying the imminent death of BSD.

    And complaining about everything I can complain about.

    Sounds like a full life to me!

  311. Overreaction. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    So, how would you deal with Notch's problem?

    Put money into funds/trusts.

    And then get a job.

    Wealth in itself is not the problem. It is the overreaction to the "success" which is the problem. Most "rich" folks are douchbags not because wealth makes them that, but because they believe that they are better than the rest.

    Distance yourself from the money. Give yourself few years to get back on then feet. And only then (very) slowly start thinking what to do with the money.

    Money is ultimately the choice. It is only social perception - the status - that if you rich, you have to have an expensive car and huge house. In reality, you can still drive a cheap replaceable car and live in a small comfy house.

    P.S. It is easier when you have family and tight friends. It is changes nothing when you burn money on them. Do not lend/give away money to the close people: giving money would only distances you. Instead, for example, go to together to the expensive vacations destination, renovate house, etc.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  312. It will get better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has lost something; his old life. Depression naturally follows, but he'll probably eventually adjust. He should probably just make sure he doesn't go and spend it all away though, then he'll lose something again; his new life, and depression would follow again from that.

    I know nothing about the man, but he probably just needs a friend to tell him to hang in there; thing will get better. He's just got an awful lot of money, It could be worse...

  313. I will gladly take the money off your hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will happily swap my job with you and offer you a "normal" life instead, just give me those 2 billion I gladly take them off your hands and solve your firstest-of-the-first-world problem!

  314. Maintenance and money by phorm · · Score: 1

    "They require continual maintenance, and who's going to be wasting their time shepherding all that?"

    The people you pay to do so?

    1. Re:Maintenance and money by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The people you pay to do so?

      OK, now who's going to be monitoring those people, evaluating their performance, firing ones that aren't up to snuff, recruiting and hiring new ones, etc? You can't hire your way out of a "too many responsibilities" problem, any more than you can code yourself out of a "too many layers of indirection" problem by adding another layer of indirection.

  315. Random acts of kindness by phorm · · Score: 1

    I looked at what one could do when winning the various lotteries. Over $50m, and even if you're only making 1% interest on the principal, you're still raking in $500k+/year (pre-tax). Given a diversified and fairly low-moderate risk portfolio, I'd imagine that 1% isn't a particularly high number to aim for, so let's say 2%, or roughly a million a year (in INTEREST, never touching the principal)

    That still gives me a fair bit of cash to both enjoy myself personally and do fun stuff for others. Maybe I'd like to hit the fancy hotels or restaurants I haven't tried before, but I'm probably still going to enjoy a milkshake or fries and gravy at a late-night Denny's. There's still going to be stressed out waitresses or young people who are working and trying hard to get ahead. With that kind of income, it's not going to even make me flinch to drop a tip here and there that could be potentially life-changing for something at that stage of life and income. Drop some dough and pay for somebody's tuition, whatever.

    Or wander around and find some people who lost a job and/or are about to lose their house, car, whatever. Drop some cash and pay off their debts. Clear things out. Stuff like that could be a lot of fun.

  316. Outward, not inward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of trying to better my own situation (once I'd bought everything I could possibly need that is), I'd use my money to benefit everyone else's.

  317. Search Netflix for awesome shows cut short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then fund them again. Imagine if he had been able to take Firefly or Arrested Development right away and kept them going!

    he could probably make a ton of money that way and meet some actresses to boot.

  318. R O T F L M A O: Commit yourself... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject - quit being a butthurt lunatic, ok? Seriously...

    APK

    P.S.=> I can't believe you're still SO butthurt - you only do it to yourself like you did here vs. myself -> http://ask.slashdot.org/commen... and I shot you to pieces for it, easily, as I'd been thru it before with other trolls such as yourself here, using NETCRAFT DATA TO DO THEM IN JUST AS I DID YOURSELF (shouldn't have tried me - you failed)... apk

  319. Coren22 = still 'butthurt'? Yes. Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & where ya shot yourself down vs. me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    You're clearly unable to validly technically disprove my points on hosts (which do the job for more speed, security, reliability, & anonymity FROM A SINGLE FILE YOU ALREADY NATIVELY HAVE better than ANY single other "so-called 'competitor'" there is in browser addons, doing all that AND FOR MASSIVELY LESS RESOURCES CONSUMED too...).

    * :)

    (It's very funny to me, since You fools always 'start up' with me trolling me, yet only to fall flat on your faces - LMAO, every SINGLE time you do it - & your self-defeats?? You do to yourself, every single time too... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> If ANYONE has a "major mental illness", it's clearly yourself being unable to face the fact you can never, EVER, get the better of me... apk

    1. Re:Coren22 = still 'butthurt'? Yes. Why?? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I have disproven you before, at this point continuing the argument would be further proof of mental illness. I have no need to prove anything to you, I don't need to prove myself right to validate myself, as I know I am right and you are not.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  320. Yet another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about giving money for the protection of Nature ?! People are too many already ! And I don't mean rhinos or cheetahs which you see daily on Animal Planet etc. I mean habitats - the very foundation for life on earth. Nobody makes much fuss about rare plants and their habitats which are destroyed daily - in Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, and all over the world - by what is called "antropic activity". The Amazon and all other rainforests belong here too, of course.

  321. What Would You Do If I Was to be Suddenly Wealthy? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    The first thing, would be to try to remain anonymous. I would clear my debts, I would then lock the wealth up for a month or two to allow me to decide what are my new priorities.
    a) My children's debts would be secretly paid off.
    b) A trust fund setup for my grandchildren
    c) A selling of the existing home and a move to a smaller bungalow. (lateral move)
    d) I would spend some of the wealth on some current technology, some comfortable clothing and a new car.
    e) I would return to University, to enjoy the pleasure of learning
    f) I would look at what part of it I could give to a registered charity

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  322. As for me ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    It's a fascinating question, but let's just start with the assumption that I get a few billion and the tax man takes half. I have 1.5 billion to work with.

    I'd probably start out with setting up a few small charitable trusts with 10 million each, for things that I care about in my community -- food banks, educational assistance for economically disadvantaged students, and housing & heating assistance for the elderly and disabled. They would pay out 5% of invested holdings every year. This would get me on a nice dinner party schedule, with some benefits to attend and give me some causes to work on and with other like-minded people. It doesn't have to be flashy, but it does have to be meaningful to me. This is how I'd meet people and pick up a social life.

    I'd build a new house up in the mountains, with room for all my toys. I'd get an apartment in NYC and another house out in southern California. I'd probably move around between all three, through the year. I'd probably do a fair amount of traveling abroad as I felt the need.

    I suppose, if my GF didn't care for this life, at some point I'd meet someone that would want to go along for the ride.

    Honestly, I'd park most of the money in cash and securities and play it by ear.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  323. Minecraft Inventor Has Run Out of Stuff to Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one finds this ironic that the center of the question is Minecraft's creator? He needs hobbies and interests at this point. Maybe he should take up some game that is incredibly time consuming.

    From wikipedia,
    "Minecraft is an open world game that has no specific goals for the player to accomplish, allowing players a large amount of freedom in choosing how to play the game."

    Life has imitated art yet again.

  324. Produce and anime version of Ulysses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd produce an anime version of Jame's Joyces' Ulysses with Studios Ghibli.

  325. Law and justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd break the most stupid -should-not-be-illigal- contestable(/conflicting) laws, and get them thrown out by the highest court.

  326. Give all the money away quickly by isc7 · · Score: 1

    I have worked for many people who worked for a living and then one day there was a million dollars in the bank that they truly could withdraw and take with them. At this point, they become greedy, and greedier. Previously if the computer(s) are broke "Fix them, send me the bill.". Now as rich, "Are you sure there isn't a cheaper way?" "We can get buy without that computer." etc. So my answer is find a cause(s) that can spend your money well and decently and give it away. Keep some for a rainy day or move to a place you always wanted to live, but don't become rich, you may not like your life afterward or yourself. Contact me if you want a good cause... I have one.

  327. Energy plus housing by feraudy · · Score: 1

    I'd be investing in energy-plus housing:ie housing that produces more energy than it consumes. There is lots to be discovered about this and I would contribute to other people's well being for a very long time.

  328. What Would You Do If You Were Suddenly Wealthy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put up a "Fuck Obama" sign visible from space.

  329. Debt by tmshort · · Score: 1

    i am in one of those strange places where I make a decent living, but ended up with a lot of debt (mostly due to divorce) and have to deal with a mortgage and my children going off to school.

    1. Pay off debt - credit cards, mortgages, other loans.
    2. Put aside money for college for the children.
    3. Donate money to some very specific, local, causes. My wife has a community theater group she wants to support, and I'd want to support the local Boy Scout troops, and some other groups.
    4. Travel: spent more time working when I was younger than traveling. I'd like to see more of the world. And not just in one-week chunks.
    5. Figure out what I really like and then do it. I've been a software engineer for a long time, but it doesn't really satisfy me as much as it used to.

  330. Old joke by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    To quote an old joke:
    Well, I guess I'd just keep farming until it was all gone. 8-)

  331. I would invest in perfecting MagLev by Josh-Levin · · Score: 1
    If I had a billion dollars, I would invest in perfecting Danby-Powell superconducting MagLev. See http://www.levicar.com/. For three-quarters of that amount, a test facility could be built in Nevada (see http://www.readinessresource.n...). This would eventually lead to a nationwide MagLev net that could bring MagLev depots to within ten miles of any point in any built-up (urban or suburban) area.

    In ten years, this can replace existing passenger and freight rail, and displace a lot of air travel. In forty years, this could be a multi-trillion dollar industry satisfying most of the county's transportation needs cleanly and efficiently.

  332. No! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Buy /.
    Step 2: Fix it!
    Step 3: Watch the old school /. return.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  333. Invest in longevity by Lorens · · Score: 1

    Once you've set up all your kids and family and (other) loved ones and ensured yourself a permanent comfortable income, invest where you want to make a difference : computing, politics, health. Your health... if I had so much money that I have to ask for ways to spend it, my second question would be how to make reasonably ensure I get a lot of time to spend it in. Money can't buy time, but maybe *lots* of money could? Peter F Hamilton, here I come!

  334. YOU have? Where?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall you couldn't validly disprove ALL of my points on hosts. That's all I challenge trolls like you to do. You never can, or will. Fact...

    * The links I posted show that much & so are my consistent successes vs. trolls like yourself, everytime I post them.

    APK

    P.S.=> You project this in your trollish activities here "talking behind my back", like a gossipy old HAG would... lol!

    ... apk

    1. Re:YOU have? Where?? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What does it matter is I disprove all your points? That is not possible, but it also doesn't mean all your points are correct. Some of your points are correct, but no matter how many times you post them, you will not change people's minds, mostly because you irritate people, you are worse than the ads people are trying to block with the repeated inflammatory posting.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  335. Family and perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would bury myself in my family for a bit, and "spread the wealth" to avoid too great an imbalance. This is how I would combat isolation, alongside avoiding the limelight, finding people who have no idea who I am, and trying new things in areas I'm not known for.

    I would also try desperately not to assume that there is an imbalance simply because the person knows who I am, how much I have, etc. For some people it truly doesn't matter in the way you don't want it to.

    Finally, I would also try to recognize and account for my wealth being a new perfect excuse for anyone to employ to avoid telling me the real reason they've opted for someone else.

  336. Maslow's hierarchy of needs by mundlapati · · Score: 1
  337. Setup a lottery system by mundlapati · · Score: 1

    I'd setup a perpetual lottery system and send money "directly" to the winner's bank account.
    There are millions of people living in abject poverty.
    http://www.instat.gov.al/en/th...

  338. I'd make you wealthy by NewYork · · Score: 1

    I'd strive to make everybody wealthy;

    For now I'll give $300 million for creating an Independent Nation for the Untouchable in India;
    https://www.change.org/p/indep...

  339. Amateur. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No idea what to do with $2.5B? Amateur.

  340. Re:Don't Musk. Invest in Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who know what Musk will be in few years? Right now he's just a guy with fat mouth touting he'll put million people on Mars when he doesn't even have million people driving his electric car (which is orders of magnitude easier)

  341. Re:Make someone's day, every day. Or be a dick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanted to make a real dent in idevices, better way to use money would be to import tons of outstanding cheap android phones (like Redmi Note 2, Lenovo K3 Note, Meizu m2 Note) and give it away for free to any one who is interested in upgrading from an old iphone to android.in US. At $150 per pop, that works out to over 4.2 million awesome android phones given away for free. Much better use for your $634 million dollars.

  342. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Pay off my debts.
    2. Put my kids through college.
    3. Build a house.
    4. Setup foundations to support the arts in several places.
    5. Create a scholarship.
    6. Provide funds to a charity that I trust. Anonymously.
    7. Invest in SpaceX, and Bigelow Aerospace.
    8. Build and fund my own science lab.
    9. Become Iron Man.

  343. Reminds me of Office Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean besides two chicks at the same time?

  344. That's right it's impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What does it matter is I disprove all your points? That is not possible" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 02, 2015 @10:08AM (#50443411)

    See subject: Correct - my points in favor of hosts are unassailable truth/fact (for once, you're right).

    ---

    "you irritate people, you are worse than the ads people are trying to block with the repeated inflammatory posting" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 02, 2015 @10:08AM (#50443411)

    Truth & fact = "inflammatory"? No, they're just fact & truth!

    I "irritate you"? Hey, listen:

    You're the one gossiping behind MY back now, boy, as well as trolling me in the past!

    (... & yes - I have a whole SLEW of those bookmarked regarding you specifically in fact, & along with many others LIKE you)

    Yes - you're irritated since you CAN'T PROVE ME WRONG... & you admittedly KNOW it, see your own post now.

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "Some of your points are correct" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 02, 2015 @10:08AM (#50443411)

    Ok then - Which ones are NOT correct, Coren22?

    (Let's hear it so I can SYSTEMATICALLY dismantle your ass, YET again (you gossipy old HAG talking behind my back as usual & again today too -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... like a bitch does))... apk

  345. I would . . by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    I would make sure that my family, friends and loved ones were financially taken care of, then donate the rest to missions and relief work, and then I would go very, very far away, someplace no one knows me.

  346. I hand Coren22 his ASS once again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All consolidated vs. his bullshit trolling here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (It's always that way... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> It's just (& you KNOW I've just GOTTA say it, as per my own 'inimitable style') "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" vs. "ne'er-do-well" big talkers yet never doers like Coren22, who likes TALKING BEHIND MY BACK on /. ... apk

  347. campaign for a middle-class-society by h00manist · · Score: 1

    if i were in notch's position, i think i would campaign for a society with a bigger middle class. perhaps some tax law that automatically adjusts the highest and lowest tax brackets every year, according to the distance between wealthiest and poorest.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  348. Pay my debt by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Pay my debt, put money aside for my entire family to go to college when they want, get a replacement for my 2002 Kia, but otherwise not change much.

  349. Here's some ideas: by bensch128 · · Score: 1

    1) Buy a lot of rainforst and set aside a trust to protect it in perpetuity.
    2) Pay off the college debt of some struggling entry level workers
    3) Fund schools
    4) fund food banks
    5) Support the politician of your choice - maybe he/she really will make a difference
    6) Give all of your money to charity and go find a real job - you will be happier and you'll definitely get laid by a chick who digs you

  350. Go back to school. by Agripa · · Score: 1

    1. Become a full time student.
    2. Find a wife.
    3. Start a family.

  351. Re:TOUCHING, FUNNY. INTERESTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Stop reading Slashdot

    by the way I'm not a coward.. even tho the name says it. its just I m lazy to make an account x"D
    WELL NOW U KNOW WHAT KIND OF PERSON I AM.
    u want girls?
    i'll give u girls. PROSTITUTES.WHORES. they want money .. not love.
    u want a girl who u want to llove and live with the rest of ur life ?
    u find them. love happens naturally. u never buy love. cuz u CANT. true love and shit may sound lame ass horny but there's nothing like discovering that ur life partner was a person so nearby. u were just soo stupid to understand love that u sold ur job.
    u misunderstood love.
    that's y u did a stupid mistake. becuz u believed love was money.
    its never too late. go start doing gr8 things like charities and donations. u'll get noticed. many girls will come to u. maybe that one u lost will be found. but pls..
    PLS DONT TAKE HER BACK. SHE AINT URS. KICK HER OUTTA UR PARTY AND SAY @FFFT!!!14511
    THERE!
    and njoy.

    NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW........ what wud I do with that money?
    first ...... I would do ma happy dance...
    then go to Hollywood and try ma luck .
    p.s I 'm a teenager tryin' hard to get famous with ossom job so I don't have to study nymore x"D