Which population is he talking about? Surely not the American one which actively voted in an unsophisticated monkey such as George Bush. He gives you hicks and backwoodsmen more credit than you deserve,
If you reused another persons advert from 10 years ago, what would the implication be? This just got me thinking about old adverts being recycled by other companies.
I know about it but don't use it because I'm not prepared to hunt down another application in order to use it. I also didn't upgrade my mac to tiger just to use Safari RSS.
You forget the technologies inside OSX which seem to make it a dream for developers to code for. You only have to look at Aperture and see that a program like that isn't coming out on windows for anytime soon.
Apple have off shored some of their tech support as well you know? Buying higher priced computers hasn't stopped them from doing the same with cutting costs.
You mean James Doohan is dead, Scotty left for a retirement home in a shuttlecraft loaned to him by the Enterprise D in the episode "relics", call yourself a geek?
I concur, after only a few days in my pocket (with nothing in it), it had scratches, annoying really when I still had my mini (going on 6 months now) and it was in mint condition and its been dropped a few times and been hit against keys and all sorts. Something is definately different with the nano. However, I asked for a refund and got it (with the grace period) but not before I got told to buy the cases 3 times by 3 different people while on the phone with Apple. Which I have done and now they have come, they protect everything except the fucking screen! I bought a second nano and kept the plastic wrap on it and shoved it in a case before the air scratched its screen. NOW I'M HAPPY!
You need to keep in mind that a lot of people will watch this stuff on computer monitors and they won't buy the extra equipment from Apple in order to plug it into the TV. Its a fair point to bitch about.
I downloaded one of the Pixar shorts and on my 12" iBook, i thought the picture quality was shit and it wasn't even full screen. I'd rather download pirated content simply because the quality is better, i'm not touching anything from itunes (video content) until they at least double the resolution. Oh and allow CD burning, fire the dipshit who allowed that.
You're an optimistic bugger, i'm sure copyrights, trademarks, patents, digital restrictions, vote hungry senators, human error, privacy laws, right wing groups, feminists and mac users won't all get in the way and allow this pipe dream to become a reality and free sharing good natured planet for all.
I found iPhoto really lacking in options and they weren't the cheapest around. I tested their service with photobox.net and they offered next day delivery (as standard if ordering before 4pm), cheaper delivery prices and a larger amount of print sizes, matt or gloss finish and they gave me free prints. iPhoto sucks compared to them. I got photos from iPhoto which were cropped or the colours weren't exactly what I wanted, certain colours were off. Photobox even offers you to print to canvas or other material items. iPhoto is just convienent thats all.
Which population is he talking about? Surely not the American one which actively voted in an unsophisticated monkey such as George Bush. He gives you hicks and backwoodsmen more credit than you deserve,
Shhh! Please don't challenge the mac users here.
If you reused another persons advert from 10 years ago, what would the implication be? This just got me thinking about old adverts being recycled by other companies.
Don Davis has been in 2 episodes this 9th season. He is a guest character, i wouldn't say he left.
gimmick on this one.
I know about it but don't use it because I'm not prepared to hunt down another application in order to use it. I also didn't upgrade my mac to tiger just to use Safari RSS.
I for one also welcome our intersteller overbearing meteor plummeting towards us overlords.
How does the DVD player auto start then when a DVD movie is put in the disc drive?
You forget the technologies inside OSX which seem to make it a dream for developers to code for. You only have to look at Aperture and see that a program like that isn't coming out on windows for anytime soon.
Why don't you go to the Apple store and check out one of the macs. Simple.
Why does it make a difference when a lot of websites are localised anyway? I
Apple have off shored some of their tech support as well you know? Buying higher priced computers hasn't stopped them from doing the same with cutting costs.
You to? The geek in us has taken over.
You mean James Doohan is dead, Scotty left for a retirement home in a shuttlecraft loaned to him by the Enterprise D in the episode "relics", call yourself a geek?
This caught my eye while reading the comments section.
George Takei reveals he's gay Lad (Oct 28 2005 - 20:52)
So will he asking Scotty for more thrust?
is so close, yet so far!
God damn, 6 domains in 1985, thats like a high street with 6 shops. People got work done then, back then?
The nano tubes don't protect the screen funnily enough, I should know, I bought a pack and then pissed myself over the irony of it.
I concur, after only a few days in my pocket (with nothing in it), it had scratches, annoying really when I still had my mini (going on 6 months now) and it was in mint condition and its been dropped a few times and been hit against keys and all sorts. Something is definately different with the nano. However, I asked for a refund and got it (with the grace period) but not before I got told to buy the cases 3 times by 3 different people while on the phone with Apple. Which I have done and now they have come, they protect everything except the fucking screen! I bought a second nano and kept the plastic wrap on it and shoved it in a case before the air scratched its screen. NOW I'M HAPPY!
You need to keep in mind that a lot of people will watch this stuff on computer monitors and they won't buy the extra equipment from Apple in order to plug it into the TV. Its a fair point to bitch about.
I downloaded one of the Pixar shorts and on my 12" iBook, i thought the picture quality was shit and it wasn't even full screen. I'd rather download pirated content simply because the quality is better, i'm not touching anything from itunes (video content) until they at least double the resolution. Oh and allow CD burning, fire the dipshit who allowed that.
You're an optimistic bugger, i'm sure copyrights, trademarks, patents, digital restrictions, vote hungry senators, human error, privacy laws, right wing groups, feminists and mac users won't all get in the way and allow this pipe dream to become a reality and free sharing good natured planet for all.
Tell me more about this UK law, this is very interesting, have you got any links?
I found iPhoto really lacking in options and they weren't the cheapest around. I tested their service with photobox.net and they offered next day delivery (as standard if ordering before 4pm), cheaper delivery prices and a larger amount of print sizes, matt or gloss finish and they gave me free prints. iPhoto sucks compared to them. I got photos from iPhoto which were cropped or the colours weren't exactly what I wanted, certain colours were off. Photobox even offers you to print to canvas or other material items. iPhoto is just convienent thats all.
I can use bleep.com, which I do do with no problems.