Slashdot Mirror


The World's First Banner Ad

An anonymous reader submitted a link to what they claim is the the internet's first banner ad. It comes from 1994 HotWired, paid for by AT&T. It's ugly, but no animation, no popups. It makes me a little nostalgic.

157 comments

  1. Can't see it by adrianbaugh · · Score: 3, Funny

    I went to have a look, out of curiosity, but privoxy killed it by size... Ho hum :-)

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:Can't see it by LehiNephi · · Score: 2

      I also couldn't see it at first--I apparently have an Adblock rule that kills it. Good to know that new technology works on old problems, too.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    2. Re:Can't see it by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      I don't use privoxy or AdBlock, and couldn't see it.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:Can't see it by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, my eyes almost got burned out of my skull looking at this thing...

    4. Re:Can't see it by LDoggg_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same here. Apparently privoxy doesn't like "banner.jpg"

      mirror

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  2. Gotcha! by toofast · · Score: 5, Funny

    I AdBlocked it just before I was tempted to click on it. Bastards won't get me that easily.

    1. Re:Gotcha! by Potor · · Score: 1

      proxomitron wiped it too. i thought the banner at the top of the site was the banner in question. god, is it awful!

    2. Re:Gotcha! by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Adblock.. right.. that's why I can't see it :D

      --
      01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    3. Re:Gotcha! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Adblock.. right.. that's why I can't see it :D"

      You were warned that if you did that too much you'd go blind!

  3. um by theCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it goes to a joke site. Can we get some verification of the authenticity of this? Anyone from the old HotWired days want to comment?

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:um by tpgp · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's genuine.

      Was a bit in the news last year on the 10th anniversary.

      The comments on this adblog post have a little more info.

      And its bloody depressing that this image is linking to crap you don't want to look at 10+ years on....

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the real, first banner ad. I did some consulting work for the marketing company that created it. I need to post anonymously for various reasons on this.

    3. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on it as well. Bob is that you?

    4. Re:um by macadamia_harold · · Score: 1

      Is Hotwired still around?

    5. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's me. How did the genital herpes thing turn out?

  4. In CBG's voice... by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could this domain name BEEEE more annoying?

    1. Re:In CBG's voice... by yotto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as a poor text-only user, a domain name that almost takes up the entire 80-column display is an insta-skip.

    2. Re:In CBG's voice... by netfool · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm thinking of registering theevenlongerlistofthelongeststuffatthelongestdoma innameatlonglast.com, just out of spite.

      --
      Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    3. Re:In CBG's voice... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:In CBG's voice... by prockcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can't. The limit is 63 characters, and they're at 63 characters exactly.

    5. Re:In CBG's voice... by leabre · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many buffer overflows a domain like that can expose in IE?

    6. Re:In CBG's voice... by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      we're gonna need HOSTNAMEv6 !

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    7. Re:In CBG's voice... by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      Or if you feel like spelling, try to go to the Welsh Village that has the longest British village name (not the longest in the world though). LLanfair.....gogogoch or something or other.

      Or just click here

  5. Click Through Rate? by mikesmind · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder what percentage of people who click from Slashdot will buy today?

    --
    www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
  6. Domain name by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0, Funny

    http://thelongestlistofthelongeststuffatthelongest domainnameatlonglast.com/first66.html

    The World's Longest Domain Name?

  7. Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If animation bothers you so much, why do you allow it on your own site?

    Anyone else remember when Hemos and CmdrTaco violently swore Slashdot would never have Flash ads?

    1. Re:Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone else remember when Hemos and Taco swore that Slashdot would never have a subscription level?

      Money makes everyone compromise their values.

    2. Re:Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes and Yes.

      Taco sold out along time ago. We all knew it was goign to happen, even in the early days, but we figured there would be an alternitive for when he did.

      The problem is there is not one.

      digg? No fuckign way. digg is nothing but a glorified link site with comments form the peanut gallery.

      kuro5hin? No fuckign way. Rusty and his ultra biased fanbois cna all go fuck themselves.

      Where I ask you? Where else but slashdot can I read old news adn post false or misinformed comments and have people praise me as an OSS mesiah.

    3. Re:Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Money makes everyone compromise their values."

      That is only valid when people value money more than other things.

    4. Re:Hey Taco by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      .. which happens at the point you realize that [enough] money CAN buy pretty much anything in the world.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    5. Re:Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where I ask you? Where else but slashdot can I read old news adn post false or misinformed comments and have people praise me as an OSS mesiah."

      Hate to break it to ya, Sparky, but we don't think you're that sharp, either...

      Sorry - couldn't resist.

    6. Re:Hey Taco by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I believe the 'Slashdot Cruiser' was the moment when Taco jumped the shark.

      Weird. That was about when I discovered Slashdot.

      It's all my fault!!!

    7. Re:Hey Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps there's a fair reason. They want to keep slashdot running, but can only do that if they sell advertising and subscriptions. While they don't like them, they'd like a slow unreliable server even less.

      Or maybe they're a bunch of sellouts.

    8. Re:Hey Taco by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Yeah! The 'Slashdot Cruiser' was so frickin' cool.

    9. Re:Hey Taco by jonwil · · Score: 1

      When it came down to a choice of allowing flash ads vs not having enough advertisers to pay the bills, the choice was clear.

      Unfortunatly, advertisers want flash ads (which isnt surprising, a flash ads is easier to create and potentially a smaller file than the same ad as an animated gif due to the vector nature of flash files) and slashdot has to comply to get the advertisers.

  8. Buffer overflow! by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm! That domain name overflowed a buffer in Firefox, and now I have teams of Hungarian hackers fighting Russian hackers for control of my Linux box. Don't click it!!

    1. Re:Buffer overflow! by ndansmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you type "pwn3d" in Cyrillic? I've always wondered.

    2. Re:Buffer overflow! by Stradenko · · Score: 1

      Since /. seems to strip non-ascii junk, see my transcription.

    3. Re:Buffer overflow! by AzureWrathHal · · Score: 1

      Best website ever.

    4. Re:Buffer overflow! by caluml · · Score: 1

      What really freaks me out is people that try to type in Cyrillic, but without using Cyrillic characters. Let me try with the Russian word for Russia: POCCNR. How did I do?

    5. Re:Buffer overflow! by XPACT · · Score: 1

      O4EH XoPo|_|_|o (very good)

    6. Re:Buffer overflow! by Stradenko · · Score: 2, Funny

      I looked at that and saw "Rossner" ... your last two letters are too backwards to make any sense (to me) ;)

    7. Re:Buffer overflow! by Joe+Random · · Score: 2, Funny
      How do you type "pwn3d" in Cyrillic? I've always wondered.
      In Soviet Russia, Cyrillic pwn3z you!
    8. Re:Buffer overflow! by OneOver137 · · Score: 1

      0+7334H0! (excellent) "aht-leech-na"

    9. Re:Buffer overflow! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      What character encoding are you using? You're not ...using the Windows character encoding are you? This is /.!!!

      --LWM
      PS - any russian haxor is gonna be able to type "p0wnd" juuuust fine.

    10. Re:Buffer overflow! by Stradenko · · Score: 1


      $ file pwned.txt
      pwned.txt: UTF-8 Unicode English text

      Which makes sense, since my locale is en_US.UTF-8. I didn't think about using any specific encoding. (I assume it was readable)

      PS: As for your PS ... the original question wasn't how does a russian hacker type p0wnd, it was how would it be written in cyrillic. (an alphabet used by more than just russians)

    11. Re:Buffer overflow! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Ok, now that I can read it ( :-p ), I must say, the 2nd one you've got there isn't exactly pronouncable. FWIW. Considering we're transcribing a badly typed bit of l33t-spe4k to cyrillic, I guess that's rather minor... :)

      --LWM

    12. Re:Buffer overflow! by Stradenko · · Score: 1

      My cyrillic comprehension is rusty, but I thought it was pronouncable...like "pooned" (like the animation from pwned.nl).

    13. Re:Buffer overflow! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      It's got a silent "y" not a "u".

      --LWM

    14. Re:Buffer overflow! by Stradenko · · Score: 1

      Touché.... Revised. Is the revision more correct? ... Not that anyone cares anymore :)

    15. Re:Buffer overflow! by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Yes, but...yes, no one cares anymore ;-)

      --LWM

  9. Previously covered by "ClickZ" in 2004 by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Previously covered by "ClickZ" in 2004 by oliana · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's TEN YEARS OLD. Of course it's been covered before.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
    2. Re:Previously covered by "ClickZ" in 2004 by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Yeah. We'll get the dupe in another ten years... this time around with a Google TextAd image. :P

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  10. And just think.... by beyond_the_blue · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they've gotten MORE obnoxious since that.

    --
    "Sometimes you have fun, and sometimes the fun has you"
  11. 10 years later... by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google honed the concept of relevance in advertizing with unobtrusive text ads.

    Secret sauce: relevance

    Result: Profits and a market cap of $130B

    Compare this with the fate of the company that paid for that first banner ad...

    1. Re:10 years later... by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I remember those "you will" ads AT&T ran. They were really cool if I recall. I have tried to find them on the web, or at least a list of what att said we would be doing and check the score...

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:10 years later... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      I definitely remember "Pay a toll without slowing down" was one of them. I think of it every time I go through the 45 MPH EZ Pass express lanes.

    3. Re:10 years later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "you will"

      Every time I heard that at the time, my thoughts were immediately drawn to some BSDM pr0n I was treated to at some point. The top was in the midst of beating her pet rather savagely and asked, "Are you at all sorry?" The pet answered, "Yes, I am!" and the mistress immediately said, "You WILL be!"

      Somehow that sort of attitude didn't seem to be all that different from the typical AT&T mentality, quite frankly.

      Everything links back to pr0n. It's almost like Bacon numbers.

    4. Re:10 years later... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Secret sauce... unobtrusive so I don't hate them, relevant so I actually might think about looking at them.

      As opposed to the standard, irrelevant so there's no way I'd ever look at them on my own but obtrusive so maybe I'll accidentally do it.

    5. Re:10 years later... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, where I live, we don't have 45mph EZ Pass lanes.

      That didn't stop me from trying, after one of my friends told me that they'll still work at a healthy speed.

      Did it a few times... until I started getting pissed off letters in the mail telling me to slow the F down.

      Moral of the story: Just because they work at 35mph, doesn't mean you can ignore the 10mph posted limit.

      Kind like flashing banners: Just because you can make them, doesn't mean you should.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:10 years later... by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      Here in Denver we have ExpressToll arches over our tollways, and don't even have to slow down at all (posted speed limit is 70MPH).

    7. Re:10 years later... by jackbird · · Score: 1

      On some highway-to-highway interchanges (like the NJ to PA turnpike interchange), they have Express EZPass lanes with posted 45 MPH speed limits. Given how many poeple walk around toll plazas, I'd never want to blow through the slow lanes.

    8. Re:10 years later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everything links back to pr0n. It's almost like Bacon numbers."

      Wow...Not only did pr0n (not Al Gore) "make" the Internet, it was the inspirarion for TV advertising, too! Too bad it got so watered down...

      By the way, gotta love Kevin Bacon ranking 1049th in Bacon Numbers!

    9. Re:10 years later... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      'Somewhat relevant' so they'll distract you from your search and waste your time.

    10. Re:10 years later... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      Doen't look that bad.

      Worth slightly more than 10 years ago.

    11. Re:10 years later... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      The "you will" was followed by "and the company that will bring it to you: AT&T".

      The fun thing is that while most of their predictions was true, and they actually had all this great technology working in the labs and even as products, they were copmpletely unable to market it. The AT&T commercials were about brand, not products. So all the incredible cool stuff the brilliant people at Bell Labs cooked up, never reached the consumers. A huge waste.

  12. First spam email in 1978? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:First spam email in 1978? by fishdan · · Score: 1

      great link. Amazing to see RMS at it even way back then.

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    2. Re:First spam email in 1978? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the good part is where he asks to be spammed if anyone ever starts a dating service. I guess he got his wish...

    3. Re:First spam email in 1978? by Intron · · Score: 1

      Interesting claim. See RFC 706 entitled, "On the junk mail problem", by Jon Postel, dated Nov 1975. There were less than 100 systems on the net when this RFC was written. This may also be the first mention of "denial of service" attacks.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    4. Re:First spam email in 1978? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Old post. No digg.

  13. LOL, I can't believe I licked on thelink! by photovoltaics · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe I clicked on the link... to a banner ad!

    1. Re:LOL, I can't believe I licked on thelink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well i wonder if this could be the next thing to take over from banner ads.

      http://tads.biz/

      Keep em all in one place would be good, and for 16 years!

    2. Re:LOL, I can't believe I licked on thelink! by jtnw · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you licked the link either! jtnw

  14. No kidding! by DigitalJeremy · · Score: 1

    that's just silly, and kinda hard to take seriously

  15. Museum of Internet Atrocities? by Caspian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps, some day, stuff like this will be presented in a Museum of Internet Atrocities, collecting the history of spam, banner ads, pop-unders, Flash ads, DDoS attacks, tubgirl and goatse?

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    1. Re:Museum of Internet Atrocities? by alejandrodelloco · · Score: 1

      That would be a fun page to see tucked away in a corner of archive.org.

  16. I find this... by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...more interesting. The World's First Patent

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:I find this... by creepynut · · Score: 1

      I find that domain name more interesting...

  17. Re: Nope nope nope- it's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but that's utterly bogus. I remember banner ads back in '94 and they did not look like that....

  18. IMP by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Funny

    dont forget to use tinyurl for people to get there

  19. Funny by Back+Slider+1969 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The world's first banner ad links to the world's worse joke. Interesting.

  20. Screw this by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I can't punch a monkey, shoot a duck or try to slash the ninja, I'm not clicking!

    How far we've come in 12 years!

    1. Re:Screw this by timster121 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unforunatly, you can't find good mortgage rates, either :(

  21. Nostalgic indeed by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah, those were the days. It doesn't flash, or Flash, or move, or make noise, or anything. It just... sits there.

    /me wipes away a tear.

    1. Re:Nostalgic indeed by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 1

      And yet somehow the choice of colors still made me want to rip my now-pulsating eyes out of my skull with a ragged spoon. Why, oh why would you want psychedelic swirl for your font color?

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    2. Re:Nostalgic indeed by russellh · · Score: 1

      Yes... although half the web at that point was ing...

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  22. First audio ad by Patrick_Seaman · · Score: 1

    I believe that the following is the first audio ad. In the early days of AudioNet (Broadcast.com), we began to have problems with other sites deep linking and hijacking our content, passing it off as their own. So, I decided to create an ad that would identify the source "Thank you for listening to AudioNet!" -- which would preceed all our content. I recorded the clip on my perlcorder in my car, in back of AudioNet's home on Elm Street, in the Deep Ellum part of Downtown Dallas. First audio ad

    1. Re:First audio ad by smithcl8 · · Score: 0

      Didn't radio stations play ads long before the Internet was invented?

    2. Re:First audio ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is the first Internet banner ad, but I clearly recall seeing banner ads on Prodigy years before the web was even in place. Do those count since Prodigy was prior to the Internet web?

    3. Re:First audio ad by Patrick_Seaman · · Score: 1

      Not only on Prodigy, but what about all the BBS's? I recall there were some higher-end BBS's that had ads -- I just don't remember if any were 'clickable.'

      -pfs

    4. Re:First audio ad by Patrick_Seaman · · Score: 1

      Radio stations, TV stations, sure. The subject was Internet or 'online' in a more general sense.

      There were lots of websites that were hijacking our streams and building their model around them. This audio interstitial ad didn't stop the hijacking, but since it identified the source as coming from AudioNet -- which was the biggest name in audio content, people started coming to us directly. Later, we started doing more traditional "radio style" audio bumper ads as the market for the advertising increased....

      -pfs

  23. Which word are you supposed to click on? by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you supposed to click on HERE? or are you supposed to click on YOU WILL?

    I mean if you click one word or the other they will take you to different internets.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  24. Banner Ads are dead by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

    At least, non-dynamically created banner ads. In The Future, all ads will be dynamically targeted, based on one metric or another. Banner ads will have to adapt or die.

  25. I wonder . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    if some poor schmuck has saved the very first piece of spam email sent,. . . EVER!

    1. Re:I wonder . . . by giant_toaster · · Score: 1, Informative

      First ever spam email sent. It was in 1978!

      DIGITAL WILL BE GIVING A PRODUCT PRESENTATION OF THE NEWEST MEMBERS OF THE
      DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY; THE DECSYSTEM-2020, 2020T, 2060, AND 2060T. THE
      DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY OF COMPUTERS HAS EVOLVED FROM THE TENEX OPERATING SYSTEM
      AND THE DECSYSTEM-10 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE. BOTH THE DECSYSTEM-2060T
      AND 2020T OFFER FULL ARPANET SUPPORT UNDER THE TOPS-20 OPERATING SYSTEM.
      THE DECSYSTEM-2060 IS AN UPWARD EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT DECSYSTEM 2040
      AND 2050 FAMILY. THE DECSYSTEM-2020 IS A NEW LOW END MEMBER OF THE
      DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY AND FULLY SOFTWARE COMPATIBLE WITH ALL OF THE OTHER
      DECSYSTEM-20 MODELS.


      WE INVITE YOU TO COME SEE THE 2020 AND HEAR ABOUT THE DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY
      AT THE TWO PRODUCT PRESENTATIONS WE WILL BE GIVING IN CALIFORNIA THIS
      MONTH. THE LOCATIONS WILL BE:

      TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1978 - 2 PM
      HYATT HOUSE (NEAR THE L.A. AIRPORT)
      LOS ANGELES, CA


      THURSDAY, MAY 11, 1978 - 2 PM
      DUNFEY'S ROYAL COACH
      SAN MATEO, CA
      (4 MILES SOUTH OF S.F. AIRPORT AT BAYSHORE, RT 101 AND RT 92)


      A 2020 WILL BE THERE FOR YOU TO VIEW. ALSO TERMINALS ON-LINE TO OTHER
      DECSYSTEM-20 SYSTEMS THROUGH THE ARPANET. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND,
      PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE NEAREST DEC OFFICE
      FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXCITING DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY.



      Source http://www.templetons.com/brad/spamreact.html

    2. Re:I wonder . . . by nsayer · · Score: 1
  26. In the real world by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    If you reused another persons advert from 10 years ago, what would the implication be? This just got me thinking about old adverts being recycled by other companies.

  27. AT&T's "You Will" campaign by zsazsa · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was a part of AT&T's "futuristic" "You Will" campaign. Anyone else remember the commercials 12 years ago? A lot of the things they promised, like attending meetings in your bare feet, checking out at the super market a shopping cart at a time, are now possible -- just not with AT&T's technology. Sorry, guys.

    ad-rag.com has the old TV commercials -- but you have to pay €2 for the privilege. :(

    1. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      I remember them. I was in 6th grade and thought they were the coolest ads ever. The motif was copied by Smith Barney several years later, IIRC.

    2. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      You just made me feel very old. Those ads are all over VHS tapes I still watch from time to time. 12 years? God, I am old.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    3. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      How do 12 year old commercials make one feel old? 12 years isn't much. I don't feel old (ok, sometimes I do, but...), and I recall commercials from 30 years ago. Ones with Mr. Whipple's "Don't squeeze the Charmin", Cal Worthington & his dog spot, or the O-S-C-A-R M-A-Y-E-R commercials teaching me how to spell my first word B-O-L-O-N-G-A. Depending on the amount of TV a kid watched, 12 years could put you at 15/16.

      Let me guess, you weren't born yet when StarWars was first in theaters?

    4. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

      or the O-S-C-A-R M-A-Y-E-R commercials teaching me how to spell my first word B-O-L-O-N-G-A.

      In an early variation of targeted advertising, possibly by region, my Oscar Mayer ads taught me B-O-L-O-G-N-A.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    5. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by narcc · · Score: 1

      Which beats the wikipedia version, which taught us B-O-L-O-G-N-A-A...

    6. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      I doubt I taped much tv when I was 3, though consumer VCR's didn't exist when I was 3 either,
      The point I was making was that I tend to think of those tapes as recent, and they're already 12 years old.
      I mean, there are worse things. I have a tape with part of an episode of Miami Vice, and another with half of the premier of Werewolf on Fox.
      And, since you asked, I saw Star Wars multiple times during its original theater run.
      Satisfied I am old enough?

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    7. Re:AT&T's "You Will" campaign by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I never could spell well, and even a jingle can't seem to fix that.

  28. Doubtful sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the same people who say the ENIAC was the first computer, and that George Washinton was not the first US president.

  29. Too bad it wasn't patented... by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    It's a real shame that somebody didn't take out a business patent on this - this is an area where stifling of innovation might have been a good thing!

  30. Dammit, firefox! by lilmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    My installation of Firefox isn't blocking it :-(

    Stupid firefox, I'm gonna get a *real* web browser, like Lynx - Lynx wouldn't show me the banner ad!!

    --LWM

    PS My god, it's ugly! We've come a long way! Not sure if that's good or bad...

  31. First Slashdot Banner Ad by AlabamaMike · · Score: 1

    Does Rob still have the first /. banner ad? That would be some cool nostalgia ...

    --
    Pimpin' all the Karma Hoes!
  32. Slow news day? by mmell · · Score: 1
    Then again, why do I have this strange urge to switch to AT&T?

    fnord

  33. AdBlock by BiDi · · Score: 1

    AdBlock is effective even against such banners. I couldn't see the banner until I disabled my filtering.

  34. Re: Nope nope nope- it's a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your know the drill; Link or STFU, Trev.

  35. In Soviet Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia advert sells you!

  36. First Slashdot Banner Attacking Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets find out exactly when Taco became a sellout to his own cause.

  37. Parent isn't a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the truth.

    Mods can't dispute it, so they choose to censor it instead.

  38. 468x60 by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So they defined 468x60?

    1. Re:468x60 by Puggs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Took me a while to figure out you meant dimensions - I thought you were talking about some bastardisation of Intel and Motorola processors... ;-)

    2. Re:468x60 by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      heh. Well I was in a hurry.
      hmm a 486x60000 CPU or at 486x60010 drop in replacement for that 7% performance gain.

  39. So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This banner ad can be found here?

    Oh how I wanted to do that.

  40. Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. In the late 1980s, Prodigy was using ads that were banner ads in every sense of the word. For all you young whippersnappers, this was before the days of the Internet and HTML. Prodigy used a protocol called, um, NAPHTHA? NABPLANALP? NAMBLA? NAFTA? Anyway, it used a highly compressed format to deliver graphics that looked like Tangrams over the blazing-fast 1200 bps modems that had recently become available.

    It was a joint venture of IBM and Sears, and was marketed as being a highly family-friendly service. All content was rigidly controlled. Every posting was inspected and approved by a moderator, and off-topic posts were brutally deleted. Anything criticizing Prodigy, or the moderators (soon referred to as "Cato," as in Cato the Censor), was considered off-topic, of course. You could sometimes get off-color content past them, but only if you were a cunning linguist.

    It was heavily commercial. The whole premise was getting people to buy stuff. Their attitude was sometimes characterized as "shut up and shop."

    Anyway.

    At the bottom of almost every Prodigy screen, there was a rectangular area. It was about an inch high and extended the width of the screen. It was brightly colored (garishly colored, many machines of the time being limited to 16 colors or so) to contrast with the rest of the screen, and decorated with eye-catching blocky NAPLPS (I knew I could remember it) graphics. All of them offered to take you somewhere where you could buy something if you clicked a button.

    They were exactly like banner ads.

    They were banner ads.

    1. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...all you young whippersnappers"

      You coders have it made with your binary Ones and Zero's why when I first started coding we didn't have yer easy 0's and 1's...why we had to use sticks and stones for our coding.

      - Credited to Darkman6

      Also

      "The internet - the world as viewed through the eyes of the New York Post"

    2. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok grandpa... sure.. time for your medicine. :)

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    3. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by tgd · · Score: 1

      Crap. I was reading that thinking how silly all that point and click stuff seemed to me at the time. CompuServe, GEnie and services like that were far more useful for national networks, and local systems were better still. So that, and my birthday looming in a couple days, makes me really feel like a grandpa.

      On a similar note, I'm racking my brain and can't remember what the name of the software in the late 80's that became trendy for doing graphics over a BBS was. It was sort of like the graphics language DEC used on the Gigi systems, but had the concept of clickable regions and stuff so you could make a graphical BBS like Prodigy or the early AOL.

      Anyone remember what it was called?

    4. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASCII

    5. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah I remember Prodigy. My dad and I would sit on there for hours playing MadMaze. In fact, you can still play MadMaze. Those horrid graphics...

      We were on there once during a lightning storm and our modem caught some extra juice and it melted the buzzer. Thank god it didn't waste the PC. That 286 was like $2400. I must have been about 7 years old at that time.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    6. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of RIPScrip from Telegrafix. They devised a protocol called RIP that transmitted vector graphics as plain ASCII. Sort of a 90's precursor to SVG. They even developed browser plugins to use their vecor format on the web, and had some interesting demos before even Flash was out. Way ahead of its time, but it never caught on because the company kept everything proprietary, and wanted you to use only their software, or license the protocol from them. I think they finally folded about 4 or 5 years ago.

      Some of the old BBS software, like MajorBBS and Wildcat! incorporated support for RIP by default in their later versions, and if you run DOSBox with modem emulation enabled, you can install RIPTerm 1.54 and connect to some BBSes by telnet to see RIP in action.

    7. Re:Phooey. Prodigy used 'em circa 1987. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ANSI? I remember software to write ANSI pages

  41. Doesn't look so old to me... by measure · · Score: 1

    It was pretty savy of them back in 1994 to think of this:
    "Thousands of technical jobs online now.. added daily.. (Click to find your perfect job)! "

    Hmm, did Yahoo hot jobs exists back then? Oh, right I need to RTFA!

  42. Not the first banner ad by koltrane · · Score: 4, Informative
    This may be the first WEB banner ad, but Prodigy was running advertising banners along the bottom of their EGA screens back in 1991 (and probably earlier). If you think this looks primitive, check out the ZEOS banner on this ZD Prodigy page (Date Unknown)

    http://www.styla.com/images/port_prodigy_full.gif

  43. tads.biz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i wonder if this could be the next thing to take over from banner ads.

    http://tads.biz/ [tads.biz] [tads.biz]

    Keep em all in one place would be good, and for 16 years!

    1. Re:tads.biz by liveinthemix · · Score: 1

      I like this idea.

      Well better than the milliondollar homepage idea anyway.

    2. Re:tads.biz by trollable · · Score: 1

      You're right. This ad has probably the lowest CPC.

    3. Re:tads.biz by liveinthemix · · Score: 1
  44. I think... by blorg · · Score: 1
    How do you type "pwn3d" in Cyrillic? I've always wondered.

    ...you just did

  45. One big ad by MikeTheMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    An article about a site with a banner ad on it?

    If this isn't a Slashvertisement, I don't know what is ;-)

  46. Pot meet Kettle by Wizworm · · Score: 1

    Funny how TFA wines about Banner adds but is hosted on a page with a HUGE banner

    --
    I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
  47. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    who has Slashdot's RSS feed at the top of their Gmail inbox, and thus saw this as:

    Slashdot - The World's First Banner Ad - 3 hours ago

  48. I don't think this is the 1st banner ad by TheRealDamion · · Score: 1

    It may be the 1st that can be found now, but I find it hard to believe that >1 yr of the www a jpeg was the 1st banner ad, jpegs were quite new, many browsers didn't support them (Xmosaic early versions certainly didn't). I suspect advertising oriented annoying banner ads were in gif format before this one. I was around online back then but everyone just used irc, archie, fsp, ftp and usenet back then the www was fairly unpopular.

  49. 468x60 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Back in the early days, the standard image size for a banner ad was 400x40 pixels. It wasn't for a few years that everyone standardized on 468x60. How about that?

  50. The more things change.... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    "It's ugly"

    Oh yea, banner ads are much more sexy and pleasant today.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  51. Patent prone by scarlac · · Score: 1

    So will we be seeing patents filed for banner ads and lawsuits anytime soon? AT&T proberly regret now that they didn't put a patent on it (or maybe they did?)

  52. "Have you ever right clicked your mouse..... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    ....right here?" You will, and you'll block images from Our Server. Then you can idly speculate about what spam would be in the blank spaces on web pages (if it amuses you to do so.)

    (psst. does anybody know who's sponsoring Slashdot these days?)

  53. Just...wow by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Christ! And people complain about the length of the URL for MY site! <_<

    Imagine typing that bastard in while browsing with the PSP!

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  54. Clever, But not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advertisers on Prodigy used banner ads back all the way back in '93, certainly before this ad ever existed. And theirs were animated too (gasp!)...

  55. Nice ad by MrT · · Score: 1

    I like the way it's designed to "trick" people into CLICKING RIGHT HERE -> even though the whole block is the link. Yes, I know, we've seen that before many, many times, it just never occured to me that the Internet's first ever banner ad (supposedly) would use gimmick.

    And the punchline "YOU WILL!" is a nice touch. How did they know?