As a consequence, you'll have to enter into it how much milk you drank each time and you'll get email and to house advertisements for Chocolate syrup. Your insurance company will give you a discount if you've ordered your veggies 3 times a month. Plus your fridge could get a virus and dispense ice in the middle of the night.
None of these are bad things. But my point also aren't as big as the internet. Again there or some great use cases, sump pump/garage door are great ideas. But imagine your grandma maintaining wiring to all of her windows plus configuring the alerts. It is more time and money than if a window gets left open for an hour on accident, then for a contractor to come out and run cables through the walls configure some network appliance to send reports back to some company who will sell the information . I don't have the personal bandwidth to care about every time someone opens the window to talk to someone outside. Even further the energy that you are going to spend on a network connected closet light is way more than you are going to spend on a 6 watt bulb being on for the night. And I for one don't want to be woken up in the middle of the night if a guest in my house needs a towel and leaves the light on. The 10 cents isn't worth worrying over, it can wait until I walk by and see the light through the crack.
I know at my work monitoring the systems has yielded some cost savings. Somethings make more sense at an industrial scale and a lot of the tools were there before the IoT fad. I also know that the consumer products will improve and there will be some good ones. Maybe a furnace that lets you know before it fails. Or in college I would have liked to know, if all the washers were in use before hauling my laundry there. But this is no where near as big of a game changer as the internet.
Maybe I am too much of skeptic, but color me surprised if IoT products take off. What people really want is convenience and IoT devices currently provide less. When you walk into a room to turn on the lights you don't want to get your phone out of your pocket. What use would an IoT fridge or oven provide? I sure don't want to have to program my fridge every time I put in something or take something out, and if I am using my oven I am standing nearby. Do you really need text alerts when your popcorn is done?
Don't get me wrong there are definite use cases, even if some have small audiences. But I think the suggestion that this is as big of a game changer as the internet is silly. Way back in the 90's when the internet was getting started even then people recognized the usefulness. Being able to have messages sent instantly and be able to give information on topics. No one is nearly as excited to have their remote tell them their lawn mower needs it's oil changed and that they burnt their poptart. Let alone be left in the dark for the night because their light bulb got a virus.
This is supposed to be an alternative to just using plain HTTP. If you are already paying for a cert from a CA you trust, then this doesn't target you. Even if a couple parties have the key, it's still protects you from all of the others that don't. The whole point is that it's better than nothing. I have a personal website that doesn't do too much and I'd put https on it if I didnt have to pay for a key.
One of my family members is paralyzed from the waist down. They have limited mobility in one leg and none in the other. They can walk with a full leg brace and specialized crutches. It doesn't take all the connections to be severed to be paralyzed....
A little piece of web history, and then you have to end it with a statement about computing 500 years from now. Obviously current web standards still will still apply...
In production environments, where outages cost real money, support contracts are definitely not a sign of ignorance. Good admins acknowledge they don't know everything and sometimes need help.
In the grand scheme of world news, it's new worthy because Syria has not authorized air strikes. So it could be a start of an international incident because China and Russia don't like other nations interfering on any countries sovereign soil.
Right or wrong, Slashdot has had big world news and political articles for as long as I can remember.
Of course, if everyone was running my favorite OS, we wouldn't have any security vulnerabilities. It of course has to do with the OS and not that the users have enough rights to run unknown code from an email.
But the sucralose and aspartame were secondary in the testing, most of the testing was straight glucose vs. sucrose + saccharin vs plain sucrose. From what I read so far.
One is a neutron Star. So a object multiple times more dense than the Sun but only a 5-15 miles wide. The other a red giant (when our Sun becomes a red giant it'll be as big as Earth's orbit). So the first barrier you would cross working for the middle is a iron polymer a million times stronger than steel as you crossed out of the tiny tiny neutron star into the absolutely enormous red giant. An analogy would be a BB gun pellet inside of a balloon.
It decreases the incentive for some people. There are plenty of counterexamples of unpatented innovative software. I know I know, don't feed the trolls.
The point that I was trying to make wasn't a point against headsets. It was that they perform their intended purpose well, but you don't see most end users with them. Headset just cutout one piece, holding the device in your hand while doing audio tasks.
Likewise some of the watches are very similar, some units have impressive battery lives and allow you to do GPS/accelerometer or visual tasks that require viewing only.
In the end, your point rings true. What "killer app" is would be more convenient on a tiny screen strapped to you with little input capabilities rather than the multifunctional device you have to will also have to carry in your pocket that has already been done (notifications/fitness)? That's the answer the OP's looking for and I think the collective answer is "I can't think of one".
Most of the things on a watch that someone would want can also be handled on a phone. Add to this that most of those things are things that require cell/data signal, so you are required to carry your phone. The inconvenience of sticking your hand into your pocket to look at a larger screen generally doesn't top the inconvenience of having to have a device strapped to your body that you have to take off to charge all the time and have to pay several hundred dollars for.
This is the same thing people have seen with bluetooth ear pieces. They are really nice for a small percentage of the time, but not enough to capitalize for the majority of the market.
The another problem with watches is size. You have to competing design constraints. People want small and light and durable on their wrist. Versus large screen size for reading what was sent.
Lastly many people don't want to be that connected. They want to be able to ignore the notifications every 5 seconds that someone posted a new tweet or your grandma sent you a hilarious forward. You eventually want to see them, when you can have the time to stick your hand into your pocket. But it can generally wait 2 seconds for that to happen.
There are two points of view on this. One that technology can solve all these basic problems. Take unit analysis in science. You can do a google search to convert miles per hour into centimeters per second But yet you still want students to be able to know the concept and be able to evaluate their knowledge of the concept without a piece of technology doing the effort for them. You aren't complaining that Physical Education classes still teach Track and Field now that we have cars that can drive people.
It's simple. They are allowed on tests. Teachers stock them because they can be used on the tests their students need to take. And then every parent wants to get whatever the teacher is using so that their child can get the most help from the teacher.
They've had a good amount of censorship for a while. Especially after they starting providing information on member posting very illegal content. It didn't kill the site then.
Slashdot Mirror
As a consequence, you'll have to enter into it how much milk you drank each time and you'll get email and to house advertisements for Chocolate syrup. Your insurance company will give you a discount if you've ordered your veggies 3 times a month. Plus your fridge could get a virus and dispense ice in the middle of the night.
None of these are bad things. But my point also aren't as big as the internet. Again there or some great use cases, sump pump/garage door are great ideas. But imagine your grandma maintaining wiring to all of her windows plus configuring the alerts. It is more time and money than if a window gets left open for an hour on accident, then for a contractor to come out and run cables through the walls configure some network appliance to send reports back to some company who will sell the information . I don't have the personal bandwidth to care about every time someone opens the window to talk to someone outside. Even further the energy that you are going to spend on a network connected closet light is way more than you are going to spend on a 6 watt bulb being on for the night. And I for one don't want to be woken up in the middle of the night if a guest in my house needs a towel and leaves the light on. The 10 cents isn't worth worrying over, it can wait until I walk by and see the light through the crack.
I know at my work monitoring the systems has yielded some cost savings. Somethings make more sense at an industrial scale and a lot of the tools were there before the IoT fad. I also know that the consumer products will improve and there will be some good ones. Maybe a furnace that lets you know before it fails. Or in college I would have liked to know, if all the washers were in use before hauling my laundry there. But this is no where near as big of a game changer as the internet.
Maybe I am too much of skeptic, but color me surprised if IoT products take off. What people really want is convenience and IoT devices currently provide less. When you walk into a room to turn on the lights you don't want to get your phone out of your pocket. What use would an IoT fridge or oven provide? I sure don't want to have to program my fridge every time I put in something or take something out, and if I am using my oven I am standing nearby. Do you really need text alerts when your popcorn is done?
Don't get me wrong there are definite use cases, even if some have small audiences. But I think the suggestion that this is as big of a game changer as the internet is silly. Way back in the 90's when the internet was getting started even then people recognized the usefulness. Being able to have messages sent instantly and be able to give information on topics. No one is nearly as excited to have their remote tell them their lawn mower needs it's oil changed and that they burnt their poptart. Let alone be left in the dark for the night because their light bulb got a virus.
This is supposed to be an alternative to just using plain HTTP. If you are already paying for a cert from a CA you trust, then this doesn't target you. Even if a couple parties have the key, it's still protects you from all of the others that don't. The whole point is that it's better than nothing. I have a personal website that doesn't do too much and I'd put https on it if I didnt have to pay for a key.
One of my family members is paralyzed from the waist down. They have limited mobility in one leg and none in the other. They can walk with a full leg brace and specialized crutches. It doesn't take all the connections to be severed to be paralyzed....
Because that is putting time and effort into developing features to support competitors. At least they support competition with decent security.
Just a lame copy of Namor the Sub-Mariner
Nigeria isn't where is Ebola currently is. It's not even relevant even if it was still happening...
A little piece of web history, and then you have to end it with a statement about computing 500 years from now. Obviously current web standards still will still apply...
Nice piece of CSS history though.
After putting a standard halogen light behind my monitor, I eliminated the headaches was having. [/anecdote]
I fail to see how having the light colored does anything additional besides be distracting.
Good for them. One less party getting a cut of a probably already small paycheck. It also gives Google more control over employee quality.
In production environments, where outages cost real money, support contracts are definitely not a sign of ignorance. Good admins acknowledge they don't know everything and sometimes need help.
In the grand scheme of world news, it's new worthy because Syria has not authorized air strikes. So it could be a start of an international incident because China and Russia don't like other nations interfering on any countries sovereign soil.
Right or wrong, Slashdot has had big world news and political articles for as long as I can remember.
Of course, if everyone was running my favorite OS, we wouldn't have any security vulnerabilities. It of course has to do with the OS and not that the users have enough rights to run unknown code from an email.
But the sucralose and aspartame were secondary in the testing, most of the testing was straight glucose vs. sucrose + saccharin vs plain sucrose. From what I read so far.
Massive was indeed what I meant.
One is a neutron Star. So a object multiple times more dense than the Sun but only a 5-15 miles wide. The other a red giant (when our Sun becomes a red giant it'll be as big as Earth's orbit). So the first barrier you would cross working for the middle is a iron polymer a million times stronger than steel as you crossed out of the tiny tiny neutron star into the absolutely enormous red giant. An analogy would be a BB gun pellet inside of a balloon.
It decreases the incentive for some people. There are plenty of counterexamples of unpatented innovative software. I know I know, don't feed the trolls.
The point that I was trying to make wasn't a point against headsets. It was that they perform their intended purpose well, but you don't see most end users with them. Headset just cutout one piece, holding the device in your hand while doing audio tasks.
Likewise some of the watches are very similar, some units have impressive battery lives and allow you to do GPS/accelerometer or visual tasks that require viewing only.
In the end, your point rings true. What "killer app" is would be more convenient on a tiny screen strapped to you with little input capabilities rather than the multifunctional device you have to will also have to carry in your pocket that has already been done (notifications/fitness)? That's the answer the OP's looking for and I think the collective answer is "I can't think of one".
Most of the things on a watch that someone would want can also be handled on a phone. Add to this that most of those things are things that require cell/data signal, so you are required to carry your phone. The inconvenience of sticking your hand into your pocket to look at a larger screen generally doesn't top the inconvenience of having to have a device strapped to your body that you have to take off to charge all the time and have to pay several hundred dollars for.
This is the same thing people have seen with bluetooth ear pieces. They are really nice for a small percentage of the time, but not enough to capitalize for the majority of the market.
The another problem with watches is size. You have to competing design constraints. People want small and light and durable on their wrist. Versus large screen size for reading what was sent.
Lastly many people don't want to be that connected. They want to be able to ignore the notifications every 5 seconds that someone posted a new tweet or your grandma sent you a hilarious forward. You eventually want to see them, when you can have the time to stick your hand into your pocket. But it can generally wait 2 seconds for that to happen.
There are two points of view on this. One that technology can solve all these basic problems. Take unit analysis in science. You can do a google search to convert miles per hour into centimeters per second But yet you still want students to be able to know the concept and be able to evaluate their knowledge of the concept without a piece of technology doing the effort for them. You aren't complaining that Physical Education classes still teach Track and Field now that we have cars that can drive people.
No, of course not. The point is how quickly the images fall off the board. More than likely quicker than an DMCA request.
Good luck with the ACT or SAT being a take home... Those are the tests that really matter for selling calculators.
It's simple. They are allowed on tests. Teachers stock them because they can be used on the tests their students need to take. And then every parent wants to get whatever the teacher is using so that their child can get the most help from the teacher.
They've had a good amount of censorship for a while. Especially after they starting providing information on member posting very illegal content. It didn't kill the site then.