"Seems it's best to sue the city whenever the city does things for the city. Such actions by the city are undemocratic. And when I mean undemocratic, I mean a barrier to free trade. And when I mean a barrier to free trade, I mean... not sure what that means, but it's what all the kids are talking about these days. Hey--did you get your Bush 2005 Christmas Calendar?"
I followed the link, but it was only a story about the quest for the Holy Grail. Except the Holy Grail was a dixie cup, and the crusaders took twice as long to search for it, but still came up with nothing, except t-shirts with corporate logos.
Why bother spying when you can just scan the biometric database for government-defined "irregularities"?
Genetics is the new gospel these days anyway. Just store the DNA and scan the DNA for sequences of genetic "patterns" or "defects" that makes people more prone to terrorism... the terrorism gene... then preemptively arrest them!
Problem with Thunderbird is that I never liked the way it handled multiple-acounts. And could not import multiple identities from Outlook very well.
Hopefully this is resolved. Looking forward to Thunderbird dropping presents all over the place from the sky.
No, Bush's policy has always been to ease taxes on the rich while shifting them to lower icomes. The question is... how can Bush tax the poor users of the internet while letting the rich shop for free?
This is hype. Gates is advertising that he has a personal interest in defeating Spam.
It is a contradiction to say that Microsoft will end all Spam in 2 years... while in the same sentence arguing that legislating to fine spammers is the best approach.
If Gates really did have a way to end spam in 2 years, there would be no reason for wanting to fine spammers, since they would be as ineffectual.
Capisce?
Detectives will love this discovery: The Yahoo group dedicated to documenting "The Beast," now displays the message: "*** LATEST NEWS **** Welcome to followers of ilovebees.com!"
Freedom to Ayn Rand means blowing up mountains in the name of progress to make room for industry. Is that how you or the mountains want freedom defined?
Bzzz blah blah. Calm down, man. Take a deep breath. You are still ignoring my basic question, which I clearly made in bold. If the law is automating control via technology, then the law is wrong.
There is a difference between private people using their cameras, and law enforcement using their cameras. Law enforcement needs just-cause, private does not. The intentionality is different.
Please do not call imply others are "retarded, don't understand the words you're using, or you're just being flamebait" until you step back and fully digest the topic at hand.
Ticket cameras are sinister. Using technology for the sake of automating control will be one of this century's biggest human rights struggles.
Public space you say? You deserve private rights in public space. Police officers are not legally allowed to rape you; cameras for monitoring as a "preventative" measure is a kind of rape. If you don't stop this now, you'll become accustomed to these new ways, and then you'll next reques "we should all be innoculated with XXXXXX to prevent YYYYYY" or "we should specially register all XXXArabsXXX for reason YYYTerrorismYYY". Oh the latter part already has happened.
How many times do we have to repeat ourselves? The problem is with the EQUATION, not the VARIABLES.
"What 9/11 produced for them is a windfall opportunity to rebake all of their old bogus arguments as to why we shouldn't have any of these (outage reports)," Moir said. "They've morphed all of their comments into post-9/11-ese."
She's a terrorist!
Post-9/11-ese will become as ridiculous as claiming someone is a witch! communist! or jew!
Over time post-9/11-ese will be recognized as ludacrious. If it hasn't already.
As you said "if it's on the net it must be true. If it's post-9/11-ese then it must be propaganda.
You are correct in that there is much Linux propganda as well.
My statement did not mention Linux though--it mentioned open source. Open source is exciting. It is sexy. It is Zapatista-flavored. Now--like the early days of programming--we see creativity returning for the sheer love of it... and not for capital motivations. Cap It All is what I say.
In regards to sucessful open source stories, Linux is becoming hugely popular on the server side (not yet desktop). Also, open source projects like mysql, php, and apache already have dominant positions.
that the most maintstream is political propaganda? It subvertedly cites how such media as Fox News is technically considered comic book material, somehow striking a chord for those looking for good old school girl pr0n.
Exactly. Open source does not kills jobs. Listen carefully and fully. Open source bridges the way to progressive frontiers, which encourage creation in smaller venues that could not have existed otherwise due to lack of fiscal resources.
You tag reflects your statement: "if your law requires a police state to enforce it, then your law is wrong."
The problem of protecting intelluctual property of scientists goes back to the problem of property. Who can own what and how much. I say CAP it ALL. Avoid this problem. Encourage innovation and respect and research. These are the fundamentals of CAPitALLism.org.
Slashdot Mirror
"Seems it's best to sue the city whenever the city does things for the city. Such actions by the city are undemocratic. And when I mean undemocratic, I mean a barrier to free trade. And when I mean a barrier to free trade, I mean... not sure what that means, but it's what all the kids are talking about these days. Hey--did you get your Bush 2005 Christmas Calendar?"
I followed the link, but it was only a story about the quest for the Holy Grail. Except the Holy Grail was a dixie cup, and the crusaders took twice as long to search for it, but still came up with nothing, except t-shirts with corporate logos.
With Gorilla Gone? Will There Be Hope For Freefallers?
I downloaded 8 million of them myself. So the numbers perhaps are slightly misleading.
Why bother spying when you can just scan the biometric database for government-defined "irregularities"?
Genetics is the new gospel these days anyway. Just store the DNA and scan the DNA for sequences of genetic "patterns" or "defects" that makes people more prone to terrorism... the terrorism gene... then preemptively arrest them!
YEAH!
Problem with Thunderbird is that I never liked the way it handled multiple-acounts. And could not import multiple identities from Outlook very well. Hopefully this is resolved. Looking forward to Thunderbird dropping presents all over the place from the sky.
What fact? OK, do the math. Show your stuff. Don't hold out. And don't assume anyone is left here. Or right. What's with all these assumptions?
Looking for truths here. Not left or right blah blah blahs.
Although, seriously, are you really trying to convince me that Bush is adopting a sort of anti-reagonics strategy?
No, Bush's policy has always been to ease taxes on the rich while shifting them to lower icomes. The question is... how can Bush tax the poor users of the internet while letting the rich shop for free?
This is hype. Gates is advertising that he has a personal interest in defeating Spam. It is a contradiction to say that Microsoft will end all Spam in 2 years... while in the same sentence arguing that legislating to fine spammers is the best approach. If Gates really did have a way to end spam in 2 years, there would be no reason for wanting to fine spammers, since they would be as ineffectual. Capisce?
First step - require for safety
Second step - require for law
Third step - we trip and fall
Fourth step - forget how to crawl
Fifth step - alcohol
Detectives will love this discovery: The Yahoo group dedicated to documenting "The Beast," now displays the message: "*** LATEST NEWS **** Welcome to followers of ilovebees.com!"
;)
http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/cloudmakers/
I believe CAP mentions the impact of honeybees as well, though not so directly: www.CAPitALLism.org
Freedom to Ayn Rand means blowing up mountains in the name of progress to make room for industry. Is that how you or the mountains want freedom defined?
Bzzz blah blah. Calm down, man. Take a deep breath. You are still ignoring my basic question, which I clearly made in bold. If the law is automating control via technology, then the law is wrong.
There is a difference between private people using their cameras, and law enforcement using their cameras. Law enforcement needs just-cause, private does not. The intentionality is different.
Please do not call imply others are "retarded, don't understand the words you're using, or you're just being flamebait" until you step back and fully digest the topic at hand.
In peace--
Ticket cameras are sinister. Using technology for the sake of automating control will be one of this century's biggest human rights struggles.
Public space you say? You deserve private rights in public space. Police officers are not legally allowed to rape you; cameras for monitoring as a "preventative" measure is a kind of rape. If you don't stop this now, you'll become accustomed to these new ways, and then you'll next reques "we should all be innoculated with XXXXXX to prevent YYYYYY" or "we should specially register all XXXArabsXXX for reason YYYTerrorismYYY". Oh the latter part already has happened.
How many times do we have to repeat ourselves? The problem is with the EQUATION, not the VARIABLES.
sigh... CAPitALL
Hmm... I see your point. Sadly, I don't think they will be reading The CAPitALLism Manifesto anytime soon. God figure.
:)
But just in case, CAPitALLism sent their "contact us" page a letter of introduction
"What 9/11 produced for them is a windfall opportunity to rebake all of their old bogus arguments as to why we shouldn't have any of these (outage reports)," Moir said. "They've morphed all of their comments into post-9/11-ese."
She's a terrorist!
Post-9/11-ese will become as ridiculous as claiming someone is a witch! communist! or jew!
Over time post-9/11-ese will be recognized as ludacrious. If it hasn't already.
As you said "if it's on the net it must be true. If it's post-9/11-ese then it must be propaganda.
Sigh.
You are correct in that there is much Linux propganda as well.
My statement did not mention Linux though--it mentioned open source. Open source is exciting. It is sexy. It is Zapatista-flavored. Now--like the early days of programming--we see creativity returning for the sheer love of it... and not for capital motivations. Cap It All is what I say.
In regards to sucessful open source stories, Linux is becoming hugely popular on the server side (not yet desktop). Also, open source projects like mysql, php, and apache already have dominant positions.
Another MS prediction based on propaganda. Like the Gus Van Sant film, makes me wonder if they see the elephant.
Unplug the mainframe, and 500 little peer to peer servers emerge.
What this article neglects to indicate is, ironically, Fear, Unvertainty, and Doubt. Open source. MS only sees FUD when it is convenient!
tell me I am wrong. Afraid or uncertain that I right?! Ha!
I venture to say that free software undermines totalitarian states.
br> Let the governments make use of free software.
Let free software implant their heads with new ideas of collaboration outside of a central heirarchy.
The open source butterfly has flapped its wings. Let the reprecussions unfold... watching governments despertly stuggle yet fail to keep control.
that the most maintstream is political propaganda? It subvertedly cites how such media as Fox News is technically considered comic book material, somehow striking a chord for those looking for good old school girl pr0n.
sigh--cap it all.
Exactly. Open source does not kills jobs. Listen carefully and fully. Open source bridges the way to progressive frontiers, which encourage creation in smaller venues that could not have existed otherwise due to lack of fiscal resources.
Monopolies kill jobs. Monopolies stifle life's potentiality.
Time to declare ourselves free.
You tag reflects your statement: "if your law requires a police state to enforce it, then your law is wrong."
The problem of protecting intelluctual property of scientists goes back to the problem of property. Who can own what and how much. I say CAP it ALL. Avoid this problem. Encourage innovation and respect and research. These are the fundamentals of CAPitALLism.org.
Saying "the problem of nuclear power is merely one of 'waste' and what to do with it" is like saying the problem with George Bush is only one of war.
You don't need petrochemical fertilizer, pesticides, etc to grow vegetables
Local farmer's markets grow food locally.
Some peopel eat food other than what's on the gas station shelves. Some people like their bodies.