But, most importantly it would expand the pool of patents available for open source and remove additional ideas, concepts, and inventions further out of the reaches of the patent-only law firms. The evildoers only need one essential patent on, say, using electronic memory.... with a computer*.
Or, using non-electronic memory without a computer. Wait, that will not fly. OK, how about: using non-electronic memory... with a computer*?? Ding ding ding! It doesn't matter if you are an antisocial greedhead with no friends and no brain, because you too invent old and once-original technology and bend the world over a barrel for already using it! And it doesn't matter how many patents others may have, because anti-social greedheads only want to make money, and they don't necessarily use their computers to do it. Yes, put away your making-money-...-with-a-computer patent, for it is useless against these vermin.
*If these are taken, you may need to resort to patenting real life actions + computer. Think: buying stuff... with a computer. Buying not-stuff... with a computer. Be creative.
"So this is a case where maximizing profit also happens to be "do no evil" (depending on your definition of evil)"
What are you saying? In this very slashdot article's advert section, we find:
Custom Essay Service Original Essays, Book Reports, Papers and other Academic Writing. customessay.com
Essays High Quality - Instant Download Find one on your topic today! DueNow.com/Essays/ Is slashdot evil by certain definitions of evil? If correcting grammar makes one a grammar nazi, does correcting evil make one an evil nazi?
On the off chance that you're being cynical because you don't know better, I'd like to provide you with some info:
AoE provides a strong technical precedent for VoE. It addresses the latency and transceiver cost issues. Bandwidth remains a problem for high res applications, but you would do well to remember that ethernet bandwidth has increased ten thousand fold - FOUR orders of magnitude - since its inception.
The resolution of the human eye is constant; ethernet will eventually provide enough bandwidth - unless you are fucking blind. Can't help you there...
Dust and grime on connector ends and inside ports tends to foul high bandwidth fiber connections such as you describe. In my experience, this is fiber's most significant drawback: dust mites shouldn't bring down your gigabit ethernet link, but they will...
Or at least they did mine before I upgraded to copper and ebayed all of my optical ethernet gear. This brings me to my point - why in the fuck can't we pipe this stuff over ethernet? The medium is irrelevant. Chop your stream into frames, ship it out... done & done.
*sigh* but that would cost slightly more and be worth it. Better to reinvent the wheel in a more consumer-friendly squarish shape...
In that case, expect to see the future demotivator poster and lolcat memes protected. Memes have value, specifically cultural value. Yes! You may have our technology, our software and our right to think,
Have you ever thought that if you wanted something to be improved, then maybe you should just speak up and offer a solution?... just look at how Linux has progressed in its development. And from this, the article writer deduces that.............. users are responsible for closed-source shittyness.
I don't know about software, but I think glue usage is responsible for this article's shittyness.
Bill G, composed of a complex set of heuristics, considers many viewpoints and conceivable game states in pursuit of value for Bill G. Additionally, Bill G doesn't include your viewpoint in these calculations because fuck you.
Considering his enormous fortune, Bill G may be regarded as efficient and successful entity insofar as it improves Bill G's hand.
Original Replica, composed of a set of heuristics, considers some viewpoints and game states in pursuit of value for Original Replica. Additionally, Original Replica doesn't include Bill G's viewpoint in these calculations because fuck Bill G.
Considering with an enormouse beer in his hand, hxnwix regards the situation coolly: "don't hate the player, hate the game."
They do need to recoup the cost of the development of failed drugs and dead-end research.
That being said, we might also want to remember that RIAA members need copyright durations of artist's death + 1000000 years in order to compensate for all those failed artists.
And let us not forget that not every hole exxon drills yields oil, which makes $3.50/gallon a reasonable price for 85 octane gas.
Furthermore, we should bear in mind that baby seals are vastly overpopulated...
Do you have evidence indicating that IBM is laying off a higher percentage of $90,000+ employees with engineer in their title as compared to those in the [ $50,000 -> $90,000 ] bracket ?
If you are right, then IBM is pretty much screwed. There would be only two possibilities:
(1) If IBM's pay is at all related to merit, this would be a suicidal move.
(2) If it's not, then they've been fucking themselves over for a long time now.
Really, these two points are reducible to one singularity. Singularities are theoretical, but Richard Feynman once said that a good test of a scientific theory is to ensure that it not only proves everything you'd expect, but that it makes something else come out right, too.
Firstly, let's see check what we already know about singularities. They are rarely seen, so all we have is a scientific definition: a point of infinite denseness. Clearly, what we are looking at falls under a valid if impertinent reading of the proper definition of a singularity.
Next, let's check if they tell us anything about our dear IBM. Well, in our universe, singularities are normally surrounded by an event horizon - an identifiable sort of border beyond which nothing can escape. In this case, something is escaping from the point of infinite denseness, and as you'd expect from information that's undergone such compression and total rearrangement, what's coming out is bullshit. In other words, this singularity lies at the center of a very familiar phenomenon: the brown hole. And this is obviously also true: IBM is the asshole of the universe that you describe.
But - my god! This supports an intriguing proposition. How do you get information into a brown hole? It just isn't possible - not in any polite sort of way, at least. There can be only one possibility: a wormhole must comprise the interface between the two coelestial phenomena !!!
Now what I want to know is: are you sure? Because really, this is all very far fetched, but it would be perfectly correct if you are right. You would SURELY earn the nobel motherfucking prize in the field of asshat upon empty dome.
it's important for tech workers especially to understand that they are likely replacable [sic] at a fraction of their cost -- and the more experience under their belt, the more this holds true. Would you care to elaborate on this? Wherever intuition born from experience provides value - in engineering, for example - you would expect experienced employees to be payed more. Indeed, this is the case. Wherever the simplicity of the job obviates the need for experience, you would expect raises to be minimal - at Walmart, for example. And yeah, Walmart employees get dicked at raise time.
Seriously. I knew a chick who worked at Walmart before she became a stripper - when she asked for her X-Mas raise, her boss told her to go clean up the women's changing room, since some guy, apparently inspired by the abutting lingerie section, had gone in there and made rather a mess. That's when she realized the one reason she wasn't a stripper already was a lie.
Not that engineers aren't whores... We're all whores for somebody. Except for politicians - they're not whores for nobody. Engineers generally should not be strippers, however. 'Nuff said.
And SSH I did - I tunneled vnc over SSH back through my linux router to my desktop and learned, learned, learned about networking. It was OK since that was before anyone important knew anything at all... now they know enough to want control.
These days, you should probably just get a decent linux or wince phone and completely bypass the official chowder-head restricto-net. Cat and mouse games are fun until you realize that getting caught means getting stabbed in the face by junkies over at the "alternative education" center. Ah, law and order, how you protect us...
You don't understand. I don't have much time for this post, but I'll try to put down as much as I can. The shrewdness of this country's electorate has degenerated to the point that the majority are influenced primarily by irrelevant issues. These people dwell in a manufactured reality where gay marriage represents a threat to their families and where terrorism represents a greater danger than highway accidents. In this country, where racist advertisements win elections, the electorate has neither the patience nor the sophistication to vote in their own interest.
In a generation, who will even be capable of understanding them? Who will explain that China may justly demand payment for the bonds that financed the Iraq war? Who will explain that China also financed non-negotiable prescription drug costs? Who will rise against the inevitably racist, jingoistic populists who will seek to blame minorities and foreign countries for the effects our own electoral malfeasance?
Declining healthcare, deteriorating federal institutions, failing eduction, the second Iraq war, Katrina - these will have been but the beginning of the storm unless we can achieve the most improbable sort of governmental change. Can you think of any action made by the administration in the last six years to uphold the tradition of good, pragmatic, secular governance? The framers understood that the sort of thing we're seeing cheapens these values and that they are neigh impossible to restore. You heard it over and over in school - once we lose our institutions and freedoms, we will not easily reclaim them.
Like justice, truth, honor and trust, these things are as water. They are passing through our fingers and we have little hope of gathering them from the mud that will be our children's graves.
Nobody can grab you out of the voting line for a long ride in a windowless van if you vote from a mobile phone.
Nevertheless, it's clearly impossible for one voting server running open source software and closely monitored by representatives of every major party to handle the load.
Man, I hate it how supercomputers are sooooo slow.
Slashdot Mirror
For patently I spy a silver lining
no more blu-ray - patently shining
That makes sense because Mr. Enzi, the bill's sponser, who is listed at the very top of the bill as its sponser, is a Republican.
Yes. That's right. Republicans want big government in your computer and want big government's hand in your wallet.
Or, using non-electronic memory without a computer. Wait, that will not fly. OK, how about: using non-electronic memory
*If these are taken, you may need to resort to patenting real life actions + computer. Think: buying stuff... with a computer. Buying not-stuff... with a computer. Be creative.
What are you saying? In this very slashdot article's advert section, we find: Custom Essay Service
Original Essays, Book Reports, Papers and other Academic Writing.
customessay.com
Essays
High Quality - Instant Download Find one on your topic today!
DueNow.com/Essays/ Is slashdot evil by certain definitions of evil? If correcting grammar makes one a grammar nazi, does correcting evil make one an evil nazi?
On the off chance that you're being cynical because you don't know better, I'd like to provide you with some info:
AoE provides a strong technical precedent for VoE. It addresses the latency and transceiver cost issues. Bandwidth remains a problem for high res applications, but you would do well to remember that ethernet bandwidth has increased ten thousand fold - FOUR orders of magnitude - since its inception.
The resolution of the human eye is constant; ethernet will eventually provide enough bandwidth - unless you are fucking blind. Can't help you there...
Right - and because there's no such thing as 10gbit ethernet.
Dust and grime on connector ends and inside ports tends to foul high bandwidth fiber connections such as you describe. In my experience, this is fiber's most significant drawback: dust mites shouldn't bring down your gigabit ethernet link, but they will...
Or at least they did mine before I upgraded to copper and ebayed all of my optical ethernet gear. This brings me to my point - why in the fuck can't we pipe this stuff over ethernet? The medium is irrelevant. Chop your stream into frames, ship it out... done & done.
*sigh* but that would cost slightly more and be worth it. Better to reinvent the wheel in a more consumer-friendly squarish shape...
As someone lucky enough to work with *wince* daily, let me assure you that Apple has nothing to worry about.
BUT YOU WILL NEVER TAKE
. . .
OUR LOLCAT!
Comcast: Microsoft would pay us to use their software, which we don't, since it sucks ass. So why should we have to compensate you?
TiVO: Because our stuff is better? Isn't it normal to pay for value?
Comcast: Not when you value fucking people over! So I guess you'll just have to go fuck yourselves, you selfish bastards.
TiVO: Wow... OK. Just... wow.
Step 1: Troll slashdot.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Profit!!!
Apparatchiks everywhere seem unenthused about the Soviet giant. Could it be that he has lost his mojo?
In other news, how does Bill Gates maintain his good looks?
23192319 disconnected by peer
23192319 gets a worm in his ear
23192319, disconnected for a year!
23192319, there's no such thing as luck in hell.
-Celine
I don't know about software, but I think glue usage is responsible for this article's shittyness.
"Adults who live in houses, as opposed to transient youngsters who move from apartment to apartment"
Also, anyone over the age of 30 with an IQ under 30.
Bill G, composed of a complex set of heuristics, considers many viewpoints and conceivable game states in pursuit of value for Bill G. Additionally, Bill G doesn't include your viewpoint in these calculations because fuck you.
Considering his enormous fortune, Bill G may be regarded as efficient and successful entity insofar as it improves Bill G's hand.
Original Replica, composed of a set of heuristics, considers some viewpoints and game states in pursuit of value for Original Replica. Additionally, Original Replica doesn't include Bill G's viewpoint in these calculations because fuck Bill G.
Considering with an enormouse beer in his hand, hxnwix regards the situation coolly: "don't hate the player, hate the game."
They do need to recoup the cost of the development of failed drugs and dead-end research.
...
That being said, we might also want to remember that RIAA members need copyright durations of artist's death + 1000000 years in order to compensate for all those failed artists.
And let us not forget that not every hole exxon drills yields oil, which makes $3.50/gallon a reasonable price for 85 octane gas.
Furthermore, we should bear in mind that baby seals are vastly overpopulated
OS X also uses GL for all WM window buffering and display. Yet, it doesn't rape your battery.
Is apple just that good or is the rest of the world just that pathetic?
Hmmm... we could easily need an open source collective.
That owns all of our copyrights upon pain of nobody-hears-your-music.
FUCK!
That bit about Feynman is paraphrased from this most excellent & mostly non-facetious speech by the great man himself.
Do you have evidence indicating that IBM is laying off a higher percentage of $90,000+ employees with engineer in their title as compared to those in the [ $50,000 -> $90,000 ] bracket ?
If you are right, then IBM is pretty much screwed. There would be only two possibilities:
(1) If IBM's pay is at all related to merit, this would be a suicidal move.
(2) If it's not, then they've been fucking themselves over for a long time now.
Really, these two points are reducible to one singularity. Singularities are theoretical, but Richard Feynman once said that a good test of a scientific theory is to ensure that it not only proves everything you'd expect, but that it makes something else come out right, too.
Firstly, let's see check what we already know about singularities. They are rarely seen, so all we have is a scientific definition: a point of infinite denseness. Clearly, what we are looking at falls under a valid if impertinent reading of the proper definition of a singularity.
Next, let's check if they tell us anything about our dear IBM. Well, in our universe, singularities are normally surrounded by an event horizon - an identifiable sort of border beyond which nothing can escape. In this case, something is escaping from the point of infinite denseness, and as you'd expect from information that's undergone such compression and total rearrangement, what's coming out is bullshit. In other words, this singularity lies at the center of a very familiar phenomenon: the brown hole. And this is obviously also true: IBM is the asshole of the universe that you describe.
But - my god! This supports an intriguing proposition. How do you get information into a brown hole? It just isn't possible - not in any polite sort of way, at least. There can be only one possibility: a wormhole must comprise the interface between the two coelestial phenomena !!!
Now what I want to know is: are you sure? Because really, this is all very far fetched, but it would be perfectly correct if you are right. You would SURELY earn the nobel motherfucking prize in the field of asshat upon empty dome.
Seriously. I knew a chick who worked at Walmart before she became a stripper - when she asked for her X-Mas raise, her boss told her to go clean up the women's changing room, since some guy, apparently inspired by the abutting lingerie section, had gone in there and made rather a mess. That's when she realized the one reason she wasn't a stripper already was a lie.
Not that engineers aren't whores... We're all whores for somebody. Except for politicians - they're not whores for nobody. Engineers generally should not be strippers, however. 'Nuff said.
And SSH I did - I tunneled vnc over SSH back through my linux router to my desktop and learned, learned, learned about networking. It was OK since that was before anyone important knew anything at all... now they know enough to want control.
These days, you should probably just get a decent linux or wince phone and completely bypass the official chowder-head restricto-net. Cat and mouse games are fun until you realize that getting caught means getting stabbed in the face by junkies over at the "alternative education" center. Ah, law and order, how you protect us...
You don't understand. I don't have much time for this post, but I'll try to put down as much as I can. The shrewdness of this country's electorate has degenerated to the point that the majority are influenced primarily by irrelevant issues. These people dwell in a manufactured reality where gay marriage represents a threat to their families and where terrorism represents a greater danger than highway accidents. In this country, where racist advertisements win elections, the electorate has neither the patience nor the sophistication to vote in their own interest.
Few apprehend the deleterious impact of their thoughtless voting. The irrepreprable systematic sabotage of our most essential federal institutions, dignity and even our fundamental human rights are, quite simply, too complex, too overwhelming and too horrible to contemplate.
In a generation, who will even be capable of understanding them? Who will explain that China may justly demand payment for the bonds that financed the Iraq war? Who will explain that China also financed non-negotiable prescription drug costs? Who will rise against the inevitably racist, jingoistic populists who will seek to blame minorities and foreign countries for the effects our own electoral malfeasance?
Declining healthcare, deteriorating federal institutions, failing eduction, the second Iraq war, Katrina - these will have been but the beginning of the storm unless we can achieve the most improbable sort of governmental change. Can you think of any action made by the administration in the last six years to uphold the tradition of good, pragmatic, secular governance? The framers understood that the sort of thing we're seeing cheapens these values and that they are neigh impossible to restore. You heard it over and over in school - once we lose our institutions and freedoms, we will not easily reclaim them.
Like justice, truth, honor and trust, these things are as water. They are passing through our fingers and we have little hope of gathering them from the mud that will be our children's graves.
Nobody can grab you out of the voting line for a long ride in a windowless van if you vote from a mobile phone.
Nevertheless, it's clearly impossible for one voting server running open source software and closely monitored by representatives of every major party to handle the load.
Man, I hate it how supercomputers are sooooo slow.