Slashdot Mirror


Thousands of ICQ Numbers Deleted

BondGamer writes "Many ICQ users woke up and found their ICQ numbers were no longer working. There is a topic on the ICQ support with more than 1,500 replies. There are pages upon pages of other topics asking what happened. As of yet, there has been no official response from AOL about what has happened."

264 comments

  1. Obli... by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    DMCA takedown notices because they were found in the decimal representation of some movies?

    1. Re:Obli... by dsanfte · · Score: 0

      The odds of those bits coming together by chance in a movie file, in that exact order, are the same as your odds of guessing another of the MPAA's hex keys completely by chance, out of thin air.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    2. Re:Obli... by badspyro · · Score: 2, Funny

      so, fairly good then?

    3. Re:Obli... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assuming your ICQ number is up to 9 digits, it's chances of being contained in a 9 GB movie are almost 1.

    4. Re:Obli... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The odds of those bits coming together by chance in a movie file, in that exact order, are the same as your odds of guessing another of the MPAA's hex keys completely by chance, out of thin air.

      Wrong. The ICQ numbers aren't random, they go from 1 to how many users have been created. That means that when they reached 65535 users created, every 16-bit number had been used. I'm not sure how high the user count is now, probably around 32 bits.

      So if the HD-DVD DRM had used 16 or 32 bit keys, they would already have them. NOT by chance, but by simple brute force.

      The keys are 128 bits, though, so hitting them are going to take a few million years. Still not by chance, but by simple brute force. (Unless you count the chance of the key selected starting with 98 zeroes).

    5. Re:Obli... by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 3, Informative

      The odds of those bits coming together by chance in a movie file, in that exact order, are the same as your odds of guessing another of the MPAA's hex keys completely by chance, out of thin air.

      Not correct. Let's think this through.

      The infamous hex key you refer to is a collection of sixteen hex bytes. That's 128 bits, for a grand total of 2^128 = ~3.4 x 10^38 possible values. Your odds of guessing one of their keys is one out of 3.4 x10^38.

      Now let's look at what GP said:

      they were found in the decimal representation of some movies?

      The decimal representation of those movies consists, by definition, solely of digits 0 through 9. ICQ numbers consist (last I checked) of integers between 1 and 999,999,999. So to be conservative, let's call an ICQ number any string of nine decimal digits.

      If we converted a whole movie's worth of bytes into decimal digits, how many thousand ICQ numbers do you think we'd come up with? Especially if you start with any arbitrary digit and don't divide it into nine-digit chunks? I had typed out the math, but the point is already well enough made, I think.

      --
      The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
    6. Re:Obli... by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sigh... back in high school I would've understood every bit of that little expression. Then I pursued a music degree instead of a CS degree. Now I can only dimly see how logarithms even enter into it.

      Sigh.

      --
      The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
    7. Re:Obli... by POWRSURG · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what you're saying is that those bits were intelligently designed?

    8. Re:Obli... by Vireo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, for the interested readers, here is the explanation of the AC's computation.

      The expression:

      (9 * (10^9) * 8 * (log(2) / log(10)))

      is the number of decimal digits in 9 GB. 9*(10^9)*8 is the number of bits in 9 GB, and log(2)/log(10) is the factor to convert into the number of decimal digits (look up how to perform base changes when using logarithms). This is about Nd = 21.7 billion decimal digits.

      Now, there is about the same number of sequences of 9 digits in the stream of decimal digits as the number of digits itself... in fact, there is only 8 less sequences than there are digits, so Nd-8 sequences, which is about Nd.

      When picking a random sequence of 9 digits, the probability of it being a particular 9-digits ICQ number is 1 in 10^9. Correspondingly, the probability of it *not* being the particular ICQ number is ( 10^9 - 1 ) in 10^9. Thus, repeating the experiment Nd times, the probability of not hitting the ICQ number becomes ((10^9-1)/10^9)^Nd, so about 3.86e-10. Thus, the probability of finding the ICQ number is 1 minus 3.86e-10, very very close to 1.

      I think the AC made an error in evaluating the probability of not hitting the ICQ number as (9/10)^9. This would be the probability of guessing an incorrect digit nine times in a row in an independant fashion, instead of guessing a 9-digits number wrongly a single time. But feel free to correct me if anyone thinks I'm wrong.

      Either way, this shows that it's almost impossible for a given 9-digit ICQ number *not* to show up in the decimal stream representation of a 9 GB movie.

    9. Re:Obli... by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Those odds are going to be perfect for this new "potential for weird things to happen propulsion system" or PFW2THPS. I think the fact that this "engine" will be built is the same exact #!

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    10. Re:Obli... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL is (are?) a(n) insensitive clod!

  2. irc.icq.com by iamacat · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't have to bother with registration or obnoxious UI. And if you use a fairly unique nickname, you can still keep in touch with friends.

    1. Re:irc.icq.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      wow... that's just like... IRC! :O

    2. Re:irc.icq.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that must be it. It has nothing to do with secureim, message logging (not secure) or the fact that icq is supported in loads of free chat clients.

      Nope, couldn't be that.

      Fucking trolls.

  3. They misunderstand by empaler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their ICQ accounts have not been baleeted, they've simply been reassigned to a new number.

    If they can guess the number within 96 hours they can keep their account. Everything is the same eccept the number. A minor problem is that it does not update your friends' ICQ numbers if they're in the same lottery.

    I don't see the problem.

  4. Backups? by Soruk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably a server drive crash, and this is where we discover AOL have been reliably backing up their ICQ server to /dev/null all these years.

    (and it seems mine is gone too, but I haven't used it in 4 years.)

    --
    -- Soruk
    1. Re:Backups? by Viraptor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seems it's not server problem (not for all at least):
      Citing board post

      "[...]This is a nasty ICQ6 bug, but it is fixed with a complete uninstall of all user data and reinstall.[...]"

      Some other users also say that it helped. Maybe it's an organized hoax, but whatever. You may want to backup your data and try.

    2. Re:Backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And reinstall... Linux?

    3. Re:Backups? by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      this is where we discover AOL have been reliably backing up their ICQ server to /dev/null all these years.

      There's this wormhole theory that says all data you send in /dev/null will not be lost, but actually show up on a server in an alternate universe. So no all hope is lost!

      Now all we need is to get to the other universe.

      But beware: they might all be evil.

    4. Re:Backups? by Debug0x2a · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably a server drive crash, and this is where we discover AOL have been reliably backing up their ICQ server to /dev/null all these years. Well...servers went down, lets go get those backups....

      mount -t ext3 /dev/null /mnt/null

      Um... sir... I think we have a small problem...
      --
      First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
    5. Re:Backups? by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't tell me, they all have goatee's?

    6. Re:Backups? by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it sounds like we need a goatse> goatse wormhole. Now all we need is a brave soul to traverse the hole and set up a transverse goatse hole gate at the deep end.

      Any takers? Oww, come on! What's the matter...No sense of adventure?....Ya wanna live forever?

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    7. Re:Backups? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      So, as long as I stick to GAIM, I'm safe?

      Fine by me...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    8. Re:Backups? by cp.tar · · Score: 1, Funny

      But beware: they might all be evil.

      Knowing our universe, they might all be good.

      If that is the case, even the data sent through /dev/null has already destroyed some of their civilization; sending someone would just finish the job.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    9. Re:Backups? by morari · · Score: 1

      ICQ numbers with goatees?

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    10. Re:Backups? by MrNemesis · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's this wormhole theory that says all data you send in /dev/null will not be lost, but actually show up on a server in an alternate universe.

      Ah, so *that's* where all the stuff in /dev/random comes from!

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    11. Re:Backups? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "There's this wormhole theory that says all data you send in /dev/null will not be lost, but actually show up on a server in an alternate universe."

      I always tought it would come out of some other computer's /dev/random...

    12. Re:Backups? by Crispin+Glover · · Score: 1

      What's GAIM?

    13. Re:Backups? by rabidkumquat · · Score: 1

      if ever there was need for +1 Disturbing, this is it...

      --
      under construction
    14. Re:Backups? by CrowbarKing · · Score: 1

      Considering that it's AOL, I think the alternate universe is full of unicorns.

      --
      If girls liked guys that were interested in them for their brains, they'd date zombies.
    15. Re:Backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!

      Multiple worlds interpretation says that in a separate universe they were backed up properly. Which means that in a different world somebody won't get fired. That's a consolation for that person in this world.

    16. Re:Backups? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      What exactly about climbing into one man's stretched-out anus in one universe, possibly getting a belt-loop caught on his wedding band in the process, and climbing out of another man's stretched-out anus in another universe, possibly getting a belt-loop caught on his wedding band and cursing to yourself because it happens every time, is disturbing?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    17. Re:Backups? by Creedo · · Score: 1

      Well, all of them except for Cartman. And probably Darl, too.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    18. Re:Backups? by present_arms · · Score: 1

      na it was "Er Dave, it was /dev/sdb11 you wanted me to delete?"

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    19. Re:Backups? by belrick · · Score: 1

      There's this wormhole theory that says all data you send in /dev/null will not be lost, but actually show up on a server in an alternate universe. So no all hope is lost!

      Not just on another server, but out that server's /dev/urandom. That universe's physical law's are such that their notion of random data is different from ours.

    20. Re:Backups? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found out about it later in the topic... already re-installed on both my machines, the only downside is that I lost the custom smilies I'd made...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  5. Still Around by bsharitt · · Score: 1, Redundant

    People still use ICQ? I wonder if it's really seeing any significant numbers of new users, or if it's just the old people sticking around.

    1. Re:Still Around by franksands · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's exactly what I thought. Oh, the good years of my first experiences with IM. The joy when they merged the chat with the messages. I wonder if my account still works.

    2. Re:Still Around by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      The only reason I still follow ICQ is to see if my 6 Digit UIN will make me rich some day!

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Still Around by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if my account still works. *looks at title of post*
      Not anymore :)
    4. Re:Still Around by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know if anyone still uses it, but I sure as hell remember my UIN even though I haven't touched ICQ since something like 2000. It's great how I can remember the now-usless 8-digit number for so long and not remember my parents birthdays.

    5. Re:Still Around by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      It seems like a generational thing. I'd be curious what services get the most sign-ups.

      I just tried my ICQ account and it seems to work. Its a 6 digit and I almost never use it. Once or twice a year I might get on to talk to my old boss or people I worked with 7 years ago. I guess that means the delete operation was not for rarely used accounts. I wonder if there is another pattern like international users or something.

      I gave up on ICQ after the windows client got so bloated. When I use it now, its an ancient mac client.

    6. Re:Still Around by comp.sci · · Score: 1

      It actually is fairly popular in some parts of Europe, at least a lot of people are _still_ using it.
      Does anyone have any more accurate statistics on this?

    7. Re:Still Around by hclyff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People still use ICQ? I wonder if it's really seeing any significant numbers of new users, or if it's just the old people sticking around. ICQ is still doing pretty good in Europe, I think. At least in my country. It is quite surprising when you consider that the official client is obnoxious piece of shit loaded with ads and crapware. Unofficial clients sometimes stop working, because someone decided it is good idea to do some changes in protocol and not tell anyone.

      It shows that you don't have to be good at something, as long as you have critical mass of users locked in.

    8. Re:Still Around by metlin · · Score: 1

      People still use ICQ? I wonder if it's really seeing any significant numbers of new users, or if it's just the old people sticking around.


      What? Even if people don't, do you think AOL would want to give up all those eyes that you could target ads at?

      Who cares about increasing the number of users when you still have a target population to serve ads to right now (especially given the way AOL's been going lately).
    9. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto brotha, ditto.

    10. Re:Still Around by am+2k · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm from central Europe, and here everybody is using ICQ. It's gone so far that ICQ is synonymous with IM, and people exchange ICQ UINs instead of phone numbers...

    11. Re:Still Around by zwei2stein · · Score: 5, Informative

      Number of people i _personally_ know who use ICQ: pretty much everyone.
      Number of people i _personally_ know who use something else than ICQ: pretty much noone.

      Here in Czechia, ICQ is simply THE im to use.

      IT just makes no sense to register on something else when you know you wont be able to talk to anyone. And it makes no sense to switch if majority does no switch with you.

      ---

      In the end stuff like aim or messenger have exaclty same type of bloat (sometimes even more anoying than icq bloat) and zero killer features.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    12. Re:Still Around by ggeens · · Score: 1

      I still remember my number, and it still seems to exist on the server.

      However, I have no idea what the password for the account might be or the email address I used back then. (Not that it would help: I no longer have access to those emails.)

      --
      WWTTD?
    13. Re:Still Around by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I'm in Europe too but in my country everyone uses msn, not ICQ or anything else.
      I did know one person using Google Talk once but that's all..

    14. Re:Still Around by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      I'm an international user, and thanks to the magic of gaim i am always on icq.
      Nothing wrong with my account, so far.

    15. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ex-Soviet Central Russia ICQ deletes people's numbers.

    16. Re:Still Around by AbsintheSyringe · · Score: 1

      Oh really. Maybe few years ago, and where central europe are you excatly?

    17. Re:Still Around by schmilblick · · Score: 1

      Vote parent funny! 5+ years ago, ICQ was the IM to use here in Sweden, but almost everyone have moved to MSN Messenger instead now. Except for me. Im old :(

    18. Re:Still Around by Danniler · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least among my frineds/colleagues there is no substitution for ICQ. Anyone with MS Messenger or other IM clients seems to be like a white crow. For example in Russia ICQ for sure has 90%+ IM share (if not 99.9%). I worked in central Europe - almost same situation. Everyone uses ICQ. And one more remark - official client sucks. That's true, so noone really bothers using it. There are so many nice substitutions. Like "qip".

    19. Re:Still Around by riflemann · · Score: 1

      Um, where in central europe? ICQ isn't the predominant IM protocol for all central europe. In the Netherlands, MSN is all the rage, with 'msn' having entered the standard dutch vocabulary as meaning 'to im someone'.

    20. Re:Still Around by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm from central Europe, and here everybody is using ICQ. It's gone so far that ICQ is synonymous with IM, and people exchange ICQ UINs instead of phone numbers...

      Same in Eastern Europe, although Skype appears to be catching up as a replacement.

      Just few days ago I was talking to friends about the new ICQ6, and the conversation went along the lines of:

      ME: you gotta check the new ICQ, they dumped the silly flash voice/cam, the terrible horn and oh-oh sounds. It's a lot better.

      THEM: great! so are you switching back to ICQ (note: they are all on ICQ)

      ME: no, but .. I at least won't start it with disgust anymore.

      And just as I gave them this compliment (it is a compliment! i hated the damn thing), now this story runs. They're out of luck, for sure.

    21. Re:Still Around by gDoDig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IT just makes no sense to register on something else when you know you wont be able to talk to anyone. And it makes no sense to switch if majority does no switch with you. That's why we use Trillian or stuff like that with which you can be online on JABBER, ICQ, MSN, AIM, SIP, IRC, YAHOO and localy with RANDEVOUS all at the same time, that way you are available to anyone and everyone all the time without the hassle of running multiple clients.
    22. Re:Still Around by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Apparently everyone and their dog use it in Russia. Right before they turned GAIM into Pidgin I installed GAIM 1.5 and logged on to my neglected yahoo and ICQ accounts. My 6 digit ICQ was still working up until this morning, and every single day I get at least 3 Russian girls (or so they claim) wanting to chat, and at least 2 spam messages in Cyrillic trying to get me to click in some shady URL that I wouldn't touch with Firefox barricaded behind the Proxomitron and a Firewall on an unpluged computer powered-off =P

      At least one of the alleged Russkys I actually started chatting with is cute. They sure know how to make them in the Ukraine ;)

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    23. Re:Still Around by Altrag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It seems that certain IMs just gained popularity in certain parts of the world for whatever reason. I was in the Philippines a few months ago and yahoo is the "IM synonym" there. ICQ used to be the big thing in my circle of friends back in the late 90s (it was pretty much the ONLY thing back then). Then moved to yahoo for a while (does ICQ even have webcam support in 2007?) and its sort of settled on MSN as my non-geek friends started to pile up. Don't really know why that came to be -- whether its just because its packaged with Windows or because they had far superior webcam support for a while there, or perhaps some other factor -- as I was one of the last people I know to switch up to MSN (back in my "lets hate on M$ cause its cool" party-lining days:P).

    24. Re:Still Around by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      I haven't checked in with it since... 99 or so, But my 8 digit username has been so ingrained in me i use mathematical mashes of it as strings for passwords. (I checked in to make sure it wasn't deleted, (I wasn't honestly concerned if it was) and I had to laugh, my password was three lowercase letters "bnm" now I use that parts 8 digit number in 16 character passwords. Times have changed.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    25. Re:Still Around by wumpus188 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Everyone in your country in on msn? You gotta be kidding... I mean, all 7 citizens ?

    26. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Netherlands is no way Central Europe, even if you ignore the new EU members.

    27. Re:Still Around by franksands · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just tested it in ICQ2go and it still works :D

      On the other hand, all the contacts were offline...hehehe

    28. Re:Still Around by Soruk · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least one of the alleged Russkys I actually started chatting with is cute.

      Congratulations. You've been speaking to the goatse guy.

      --
      -- Soruk
    29. Re:Still Around by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the beginning the client was quite nice and simple. Later on it became soo bloated I decided to follow my friends and to start using the MSN Messenger which was sooo nice and simple. Now the latter is also filled with useless features. :(

      Don't these companies understand that there are many people who just want a simple, graphical chat window?

      And yes, I also use IRC in a screen session every day.. but unfortunately just 5-10 other _technical_ friends are there. My experience is that it's nearly impossible to teach quite a number of less technical people how to use IRC.

    30. Re:Still Around by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I used ICQ a lot back in '98, and for a couple of years after. I then switched to Jabber, and kept my ICQ account in use via a transport so I didn't lose my existing contacts. Since then, AOL bought ICQ and integrated the AIM and ICQ systems, so I can now use my ICQ account to talk to AIM users. I know a couple of people on AIM, and keeping my ICQ account stopped me needing to register a new account for AIM. I can't remember the last time I saw anyone online using an ICQ account number rather than an AIM screen name though.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:Still Around by tijmentiming · · Score: 1

      Central Europe? Why don't you name the country?

      Anyway, I'm from the Netherlands, and it's MSN all the way here.

      When two people say goodbye: "See you on MSN!"
      When two people meet at a bar: "Hey what's your MSN?"
      etc...

    32. Re:Still Around by Tom · · Score: 1

      Whatever "central europe" you're from, must be different than mine (Germany). ICQ is still around, I think I know a few people who are using it. But ICQ UINs instead of phone numbers? Can't be girls you're exchanging numbers with...

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    33. Re:Still Around by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      still a lot of icq here in germany.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    34. Re:Still Around by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Um, where in central europe? ICQ isn't the predominant IM protocol for all central europe. In the Netherlands It depends how you define "Central Europe"; I always thought that the Netherlands was a Western European country, but not Central European. (Then again, Western Europe seems to include every country that used to be on the free side of the Iron Curtain).

      According to this definition, the Netherlands isn't part of Central Europe. Meeehhhh.... the definitions aren't precise anyway, nothing worth arguing about I guess. I think the GP probably meant more like the Czech Republic (AKA Czechia) - which is what I would consider Central Europe- where another poster said ICQ was popular.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    35. Re:Still Around by kraada · · Score: 1

      Pshhh 8 digit number? n00b.

      I'm totally rockin the 7 digit UIN.

      My cell phone number? That's a bitch to remember though . . .

    36. Re:Still Around by Herve5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      in case it helps, the equivalent of Trillian for macintosh is Adium -and I fully agree with the previous post :-)

      --
      Herve S.
    37. Re:Still Around by Felius · · Score: 1

      I still use it pretty much daily (although it's been quite a few years since I used an official client). My UID is slightly over 1.2 million, and I have a couple of continuing users on my list with 6 digit IDs. So it's not just "newbies" using it ;) Still, I'd be happy if my friends would all migrate to GTalk or some other jabber service.

      --
      ..and I'll form the head!!
    38. Re:Still Around by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      So that explains the hundreds of eager ICQ friends from Russia I've accumulated over a span of three weeks.

    39. Re:Still Around by am+2k · · Score: 1

      To answer the three replies here, I'm from Austria, which fits right into the definition Wikipedia is using. However, there are many people switching to Skype for voice chat here, which is a shame, since the official client sucks and nobody has hacked their protocol yet to integrate it into some better client.

      btw, in Poland, gadugadu is the most popular one as far as I know.

      I personally use XMPP exclusively, gatewaying the other protocols for people that are still on those networks using legacy protocols.

    40. Re:Still Around by castlec · · Score: 1

      Czechia.... Don't do it man. There is no Czechia, only Czech Republic. Such a nasty name that is. ICQ is very popular here. Skype is catching on well though.

      --
      When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
    41. Re:Still Around by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      There is no bloody lock in what so ever in the IM-buisness. ATM I'm using a client which supports ICQ, MSN, AIM, and jabber or gabber. Ich a bloody miracle that MSN is doing as well as it is and the only reason it does well is that it was bundled with XP. It is just recently that it has become possible to send offline messages via the MSN protocol. I haven't used the stock ICQ-client since 99 or 00 but I haven't needed to either. Gaim, Miranda and Trillian are the three alternative multi-clients I know of.

    42. Re:Still Around by MollyB · · Score: 1

      [...] if it's just the old people sticking around.

      What? Even if people don't, do you think AOL would want to give up all those eyes that you could target ads at? Being one, I can say 'old people' don't buy anything. I make a point to never purchase anything advertised on TV or the 'Net (Of course, AdBlock Plus takes good care of me online). The "gotta-have-it" crowd thins right out after double nickels.

      I don't use ICQ, mostly because I prefer face-to-face contact, or the phone if I need to speak to a faraway friend. I wonder if I should turn in my Nerd credentials...
    43. Re:Still Around by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      7 Digits? Total newbie there.

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    44. Re:Still Around by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      here in Russia, you can buy a 5 digit ICQ number for 600 rubles ($20).

    45. Re:Still Around by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Trillian doesn't magically bridge networks though, so there's still no point in creating an MSN account if all your friends use ICQ

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    46. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You shoulda seen the mouth on this girl. She could easily wrap that thing around a baseball bat. What? That's not a mouth?"

    47. Re:Still Around by Corbets · · Score: 1

      I'm living in Switzerland and haven't met anyone else with an ICQ pin yet. Skype seems to be the way to go here...

    48. Re:Still Around by dotgain · · Score: 1

      ICQ number buy you?

    49. Re:Still Around by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      Damn! so that is what the message about sending me 'horny' pictures was about... =P

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    50. Re:Still Around by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      No Rolling Rock?

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    51. Re:Still Around by etherlad · · Score: 1

      They're getting there. With the latest build of Trillian Astra (still in alpha testing), you can communicate with MSN contacts without having an account on MSN, although you do need a Yahoo account.

      MSN/Yahoo and ICQ/AIM won't talk to each other, unfortunately.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    52. Re:Still Around by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      I met a girl in a bar once (a long time ago), we got along extremely well. It turned out she worked with marketing at some dotcom business. She gave me her phone number before she left, but I realized when I woke up the next morning that there was something strange about her number. Turns out she was too drunk and gave me her UIN instead of her phone number without thinking about it.

      We met a couple of times after that.

    53. Re:Still Around by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in soviet Russia, ICQ numbers bought you!

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    54. Re:Still Around by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I tend to really not care too much about the extra features in IM clients (decent file transfer support would be nice but isn't a deal breaker) but my experiance of trying to get people off the closed networks or at least onto multiple such networks (avoiding relying on any one of them) is that there are a hell of a lot of people who refuse to run more than one client and also refuse to take the feature hit that a multiprotocol client (or worse jabber with gateways) entails.

      I get the distinct impression that those of us (i'm one and from your post i guess you are too) who use multiprotocol clients with buddy lists of people who are scattered both network wise and geographcially are the exception not the rule. Most people just use what the local de-facto standard is. Here in the UK thats MSN.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    55. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is 6, eventually I will get the password right and maybe I can use it again.

    56. Re:Still Around by Angostura · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Netherlands is central? You're on the coast.

    57. Re:Still Around by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      It's still used a lot indeed in Russia and some other Eastern/Central European countries. For me personally, ICQ usage has dropped dramatically over the last 4 years or so in favour of MSN and Skype, but that is because most of my contacts aren't Russian. Interestingly enough, I still have about a dozen ICQ contacts from Russia, and not a single Russian MSN/Skype contact.

    58. Re:Still Around by SandiConoverJones · · Score: 1

      After posting an ICQ number as contact information on genealogy forums years ago, I keep logged into my ICQ with GAIM. Of course, I also have my AIM and Yahoo ID's loaded into GAIM. Oft times these chat ID's last longer than email addresses, and postings to genealogy forums can get replies YEARS after the original posting. Actually, I had allowed my ICQ to lie dormant for a few years before that, until I had been emailing back and forth with someone from a genealogy forum who only used ICQ, so I resurected that ID. There are reasons to hang on to such things. Not all of the people with whom I communicate are early adopters.

    59. Re:Still Around by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I liked that oh-oh.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    60. Re:Still Around by King+Rayray · · Score: 1

      "MSN/Yahoo and ICQ/AIM won't talk to each other, unfortunately." Actually, the inverse is true. MSN and Yahoo! can intercommunicate now, and ICQ/AIM have been able to for ages.

      --
      Always outnumbered, Never outgunned.
    61. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN/Yahoo and ICQ/AIM won't talk to each other, unfortunately.
      This went completely over your head, didn't it?
    62. Re:Still Around by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      People still use ICQ? I wonder if it's really seeing any significant numbers of new users, or if it's just the old people sticking around.

      It's mostly just thousands of spam bots constantly spamming each other. On the plus side, that's more bandwidth not being spent on e-mail spam.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    63. Re:Still Around by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      here in Russia, you can buy a 5 digit ICQ number for 600 rubles ($20). In that case, shall I post my credit card number here for you to process my request?
    64. Re:Still Around by Mortimer82 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more for the most part, I have an eight digit ICQ number I got around '99 I think and then in 2000 I started using MSN, while nowadays you need to turn off a few of the annoying things like showing "MSN Today", it for the most part site quietly in the corner of my screen and will auto-reconnect if it disconnects for whatever reason. That was the show stopper for me for ICQ, if it disconnected it would have this annoying popup window telling it me it disconnected, then I would have to manually reconnect, just such a pain. Then there were other things like they only started storing contact lists server side after a long time. Anyway, don't use ICQ, MSN works for me, although I have to admit it is a bit of a memory hog these days.

    65. Re:Still Around by sootman · · Score: 1

      Mine is seven digits but that's not why it's easy to remember--I'm 2020x0x.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    66. Re:Still Around by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Same here, although mine is a 6 digit number, starting with 112...

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    67. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, all cute Russkys belong to the goatse guy

    68. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am form Eastern Europe. ICQ is my main IM. It is realy the most popular Instant Messenger. What do you use? MSN or Yahoo? MSN is the one of the first things to remove/disable from my Windows machines together with Apple Quick Time I have yahoo messenger and Skype, I use the yahoo messenger for PC to phone calls (cheaper than Skype) I use ocasionaly Skype for PC to PC call better webcam support than ICQ.

    69. Re:Still Around by X-rated+Ouroboros · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The Mirabilis "Uh-oh!" is the sound I associate with IMs.

      --
      Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
    70. Re:Still Around by HalliS · · Score: 1

      Except for Poland, where they all use Gadu-Gadu (Talk-Talk).

      It's the country's main "Multimedialna Platforma Komunikacyjna" ;)

      The only way to interact with poles via the internet is with GaduGadu or Skype, which they use to call each other and interact with us non-polish Europeans.

      To sum up: MSN owns Western Europe and Australia, crappy ICQ owns the rest of Europe. Poles have their own system. Americans have Aim. Skype is used by many.

      I don't think I IM with anybody from Asia or Africa. Well, many in Africa speak french, so I guess MSN?

      --


      My other UID is 1337
    71. Re:Still Around by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      At least one of the alleged Russkys I actually started chatting with is cute. They sure know how to make them in the Ukraine ;)

      Well, Ukrainians aren't Russkies, although there are some similarities. As someone who has spent significant amounts of time in Ukraine and not too long ago had a Ukrainian fiancee, I will warn you that while they seem great at first, the truth is that almost none of the women over there want to leave and there are only 3 cities in Ukraine that are even worth considering living in - Kiev, Lviv, and Odessa. I've known women in some really crappy Ukrainian towns that could best be desribed with the word "hellhole" and they fully expected any foreign man interested in them to move over there. Few of the women respect men either, so be prepared to be treated like a child. However, the odds are great that you'll never actually go over there to meet whoever you are chatting with, so you'll most likely never know the real story about how these women really are. They certainly have gigantic flaws, they're just not the same as the ones you'll see with American, Canadian or UK women. I broke up with my fiancee because although she cared about me, she had no respect for me at all. To her, all men were children to be ordered about. When faced with a choice to either change her behavior towards me or see our relationship end, she chose to do nothing, so I ended the relationship. Too many of the women over there, like my ex-fiancee, view relationships as a zero sum game. That means in a relationship somebody wins and the other person loses. They have no concept of compromise - to them if you compromise, you lose. Either you get everything you want and win or you are a loser. They have no concept at all of an "everybody wins" scenario. One American guy who married a Ukrainian woman was really proud of the fact that his wife would every few weeks ask him for something she didn't even want, like a really expensive outfit, and he had somehow managed to figure out when she was testing him and he would just say "No" to her. She was happy as a clam that he was a "real man" because by some miracle he had figured out how to read her and could almost always tell when she was serious and when she was testing him and when he said "No" during her tests, she loved it. My idea of a healthy relationship doesn't include that kind of insanity, but yours may differ. Should you seriously persue this, just understand that these women aren't anything like the local gals you have dated and its up to you to decide if the differences are good or bad. If you're not incredibly laid back and easy going, these women are a poor choice.

    72. Re:Still Around by etherlad · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm saying.

      Perhaps a rephrase:

      "The MSN/Yahoo entity and the ICQ/AIM entity won't talk to each other, unfortunately."

      MSN and Yahoo can intercommunicate as of the newer builds of Trillian Astra, as can ICQ and AIM. But those two entities won't talk to each other.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    73. Re:Still Around by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      Same here, although mine is a 6 digit number, starting with 112...

      105xxx here. Mine's smaller than yours... uh, wait a minute...
    74. Re:Still Around by Monkey · · Score: 1

      In the early days when everybody used it, ICQ used to be great for looking up chicks local to your area. ICQ has since removed this feature and I don't think any other IM has had this capability since. Oh well, there's always MySpace...

    75. Re:Still Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, people acually use ICQ? Wow, you guys are backwards.

    76. Re:Still Around by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      I'm a six digit number.. 655x9x

      I wonder if anybody will catch that.

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    77. Re:Still Around by metlin · · Score: 1

      I do not think the OP meant old as in geriatric - he seems to mean old as in, older users (i.e. folks that signed up for the service before anyone else did).

    78. Re:Still Around by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Same thing with my original 5 digit slashdot number. 31???. Hellifiknow what my email was back in the hotbot and lynx days.

  6. I am not an ICQ number !! I am a human being !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny



    I am not an ICQ number !! I am a human being !!

    But call me, #6 !!!

    Who is #2 ??? Eric Cartman ?!

    1. Re:I am not an ICQ number !! I am a human being !! by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 1

      Hello Patrick McGoohan, it's nice to meet you. Posting as AC, I see your still hiding from Number 2 (George Markstein)...

      --
      the significance of a signature is insignificant
  7. Official response? by Rahga · · Score: 4, Funny

    Official response? Expect something along the lines of "We are trying to determine if we do indeed host this 'ICQ' service and who would be in charge, but chances are, we either fired them or that quit years ago."

  8. SQL Statement Gone Awry? by ticklish2day · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like they let a sql n00b into the production database...

    "Jimmy, could you get me a report for user #12345678?"
    "Sure boss, I'll use my awesome SQL skillz"

    clacketty clack... osql.exe... clacketty clack clack
    select * from IcqUsers

    wait wait wait

    "Hmmm, that user is very far down the list. I'll get rid of these earlier records so that record will show up faster."
    clacketty clack... delete from IcqUsers where UserID
    wait wait wait

    "JIMMY WTF ARE YOU DOING???? CANCEL THAT QUERY NOW. YOU'RE RUNNING IT AGAINST THE PRODUCTION DB"
    "Yessirsirright now sir!!!!!!!!!"

    and you can complete the story.

    1. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by asninn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what? Just rollback the transaction.

      --
      butter the donkey
    2. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by kestasjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      autocommit

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    3. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Classic one. He panicked and logged out and during the log out the commit took place (oracle sql defaults)

    4. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once that same n00b in a SQL environment.... on monday :(

    5. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of long long ago, when I tried one of the first versions of Miranda. It somehow ignored my input and managed to register a new account. But I wasn't able to log into it, so I requested that they send me the password for this new account:

      Dear ICQ user,

      Your ICQ password is:

      For security purposes, your ICQ# is not specified in this email.

      "Oh well, they forgot to include the password." I said to myself. Then I thought a bit more ;)
      Apparently Miranda set a zero-length/no password but you can't log in with no password. I wonder how many of these dead accounts exist, because their database allows having no password, while everything else requires one being set.
    6. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by asninn · · Score: 1

      Anyone who uses autocommit in a production environment DESERVES stuff like this.

      --
      butter the donkey
    7. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      So what? Just rollback the transaction. Does Access 97 support rollback?
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Askmum · · Score: 1

      Don't joke about that. Someone in my company actually did that with a shared memory. It was about a search algorithm:
      loop
          get first item
          if item != wanted item, delete item
      until item found

      He was surprised that the second time he tested it, there was only one item in the list.
      Needless to say he was sacked soon afterwards.

    9. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually.

    10. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thank god it's Friday.

    11. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      It's on by default in my experience, and the most damaging queries often work outside of transactions

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    12. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by JAlexoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Nobody needs transactions" - MySQL team. But I'll guess I'll be that nobody.

    13. Re:SQL Statement Gone Awry? by Mhtsos · · Score: 2, Funny

      All men are instinctively afraid to commit for a reason.

  9. That takes me back. by Misanthrope · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ICQ was my first instant messaging client, modern clients owe a lot in terms of features to Mirabilis' innovations. Buddy pounces, file sharing, ability to send messages to people while they were signed off. It also had a generally fun feel to it's gui and sound design. I'm still peeved that it was also my introduction to account theft, somebody with a Czech email address is happily the new owner of my six digit number.

    1. Re:That takes me back. by CrackedButter · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't think anybody cares.

    2. Re:That takes me back. by v1 · · Score: 1

      ICQ was my first IM client many years ago. Back then I suppose it was the only IM client that any number of people were using. You emailed, IRC'd, or ICQ'd and that was about it. ICQ had the appeal of immediate contact while (at the time) being more or less universal.

      My ICQ number is seven digits, which I don't know if that's like having a pre-1000 slashdot ID or what, but I've had it a long time. I never use it though. There are too many IM protocols available now.

      ICQ
      Yahoo Messenger
      AOL Instant Messenger
      MSN Messenger
      Skype
      IRC

      I had to deal with most of these recently as I am trying to hook a student in Germany up with their old class in the USA, and we are having seemingly endless coordination problems. From what I have seen, AIM is the most "clever" at getting around strange network problems, particularly when there is a firewall at one or both ends. The iChat AIM client is particularly talented at establishing audio and video chat through firewalls and routers. Skype's audio quality blows iChat away but it's video is lacking. (skype has chat too but does anyone use it?) IRC appears to be the best choice for meeting with a large (or very large!) group of people. I have not used MSN or Yahoo enough to discover anything useful about them. ICQ has the advantage of leaving messages for offline users which is something I wish AIM did.

      So each of them seems to have an advantage. A few people I know use a chat client (GAIM?) that appears to handle most or all of these protocols at once, and I may try it. It would greatly simplify my being able to contact people, regardless of what chat client they happen to prefer. It would be so much easier if there were just one that met all the needs at once.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:That takes me back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess not that many people know about unix talk/ytalk. :)

    4. Re:That takes me back. by jlowe · · Score: 1

      Yes, it serves it's purpose well. GAIM is now known as Pidgin.

      Check it out. It does take a little learning to get used to the interface, but it's a very nice product.

    5. Re:That takes me back. by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      [Checking for invitation on caller's machine]

  10. I met my fiancee on ICQ by syousef · · Score: 1

    Haven't logged on in some time. Wonder if we're both still there...

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by toetagger · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's almost as big of an accomplishment as meeting your fiance on Slashdot!

    2. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by HLN · · Score: 1

      Me and my girlfriend did most of our initial flirting on ICQ as well... and the same can be said about several of our friends. :)

      Most of my contacts are online today and doesn't seem to be affected by this "mass delete misshap"...

    3. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by ZX3+Junglist · · Score: 5, Funny

      and with the two of you about to be happily married, BAM! AOL deletes her!

    4. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by Sailor+Coruscant · · Score: 1

      My boyfriend first asked me out on ICQ, five years ago now.

    5. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by bheer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your friends flirted with your girlfriend on ICQ too? What's her number again? :-)

    6. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      actually i also have met my fiancee on icq but i told her to fuck off two months before marriage.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    7. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I met my wife on ICQ. She was looking for a lover, and so was I...

    8. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and with the two of you about to be happily married, BAM! AOL deletes her!
      It's Princess Di all over again. Different TLA at work, same old story. At least we assume it's a different TLA....

      (pulls tinfoil hat on a little tighter)
    9. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I met my now hell-beast of an ex on ICQ. Damn you Mirabilis, damn you.

    10. Re:I met my fiancee on ICQ by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      He asked everybody on ICQ out five years ago.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
  11. Sorry, had to do it... by bigred85 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Negative modding be damned, I have to get this out of my system.

    "In Soviet Russia, ICQ number deletes YOU!!!"

    1. Re:Sorry, had to do it... by PMBjornerud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the the ICQ serves as a personal identification number, I think you actually got some truth in that joke.

      --
      I lost my sig.
    2. Re:Sorry, had to do it... by bigred85 · · Score: 0

      The really funny part about it is, the only reason I never got into using ICQ was the whole point behind keeping up with a randomly assigned number. Always seemed counter-intuitive to me, as opposed to using a name that you -- the user -- create.

      But then I guess that just goes to show you how easy identity theft, or account hijacking in general, can be.

  12. User Purge by DuEyNZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    delete from Users where clue = 0;

    1. Re:User Purge by bitflusher · · Score: 3, Funny

      i have no idea what you are talking about, but i cant get my icq fired up

    2. Re:User Purge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest:

      delete from users where user[i].clue 1

  13. thousands screams and .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2

    thousands of people screaming in total darkness, but alas they could not be heard; HAL-9000 deleted their account to let them in...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:thousands screams and .. by Hal9000_sn3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't me. I swear.

  14. ICQ was terrible from day one by ztransform · · Score: 1

    I remember trying ICQ a long long time ago before yahoo! and msn messenger became popular. I hated the thing. I don't know what language it was written in but it was pathetically slow and bloated. I recall sticking with IRC until yahoo! and msn came up with better written clients.

    1. Re:ICQ was terrible from day one by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      Slow? I seem to remember that the first versions I used were quite fast. Only in the later versions it got bloated, and in the end "everyone" started using MSN Messenger so I switched to that.

      As a sidenote, my ICQ number still seems to work, even though I haven't used it for years. If this really is a publicity stunt, it kind of worked, since it made me try to login. (Using Pidgin though.)

    2. Re:ICQ was terrible from day one by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      And MSN isn't bloated? Wow! I recommend something like Miranda... Then you'll have unbloated ICQ too!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:ICQ was terrible from day one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you weren't around anywhere near "day one", because a)ICQ was "it"...no MSN, no Yahoo, nada. They were pioneers of sorts. b)ICQ ran just fine...before AOL got a hold of it but that point is moot now since all the "name brand" IM clients are bloated and full of stupid shit.

    4. Re:ICQ was terrible from day one by Danniler · · Score: 1

      There are many excellent clients for ICQ out there. Qip, Miranda etc.

  15. ICQ still exists? by ddoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this just a publicity stunt to remind people that ICQ still exists? :)

    Bad publicity is still publicity. :)

    1. Re:ICQ still exists? by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Funny; I completely forgot about ICQ. But when I saw this article, I recalled my ICQ# instantaneously.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    2. Re:ICQ still exists? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      I guess it is just a regional thing, but in Israel, ICQ is king.
      Pretty much everyone who uses IMs, uses ICQ.

      This is probably due to the fact ICQ originated from Israel, allowing for early adoption and the creation of a critical mass.
      Few use MSN or AIM and usually in addition to ICQ rather than exclusively.

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:ICQ still exists? by metalzelot · · Score: 1

      It's the same here in Germany. I'm using Pidgin with ICQ, AIM, YIM and MSN but almost ALL of my german contacts only have ICQ. Also if you ask someone if they have a IM address its most probably ICQ. I also know many people from the Netherlands and it seems to me that most people there (if not all ;)) use MSN. In the USA I think AIM is the number 1, but in this case I may be wrong. So the kind of IM service people use really has to be somehow regionally.

    4. Re:ICQ still exists? by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      I am an American living in Germany, and surprisingly ICQ is very popular overseas.

      The surprising part wasn't that it was used more than AIM, but that it took me an entire hour to realize it was because AIM is from AMERICA Online.

      Anyways I have no basis for comparison and absolutely no time was spent studying this besides seeing my friends using it, but I'd venture to say it is the most popular IM client in Europe.

    5. Re:ICQ still exists? by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      Ha, I had to go to their site and look it up. Thankfully I use a fairly resilient (unpopular) username and it was fairly easy to track down. I signed on the first time in years... unsurprisingly nobody was online.

    6. Re:ICQ still exists? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I still know it exist, and actually use it, but overall here in Sweden it's very dead and almost everyone have switched to MSN, probably because of hotmail, webcams and young girls showing themself...

      I hate that it have happened, not because I thought ICQ was great, I always used IRC for my IM usages back in the days anyway, but because ICQ had offline messages and WORK without a lot of bla bla could not send and disconnects and shit. Also of course because they where first and it's not made by Microsoft.
      Can't see why people had to change.

      Anyway in the USA I think AIM is very popular and I play wc3 with a few russians and it seems they all use ICQ, so it's far from dead.

      I have mostly msn, then icq and then jabber contacts on my list, thought I often remove lots of msn people since I want to remove the account totally ;D

  16. Publicity stunt... nothing to see here... by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    I have both a six digit and seven digit ICQ number that I've had since the early days of ICQ and I had no issues logging in this evening, after not having logged in for at least a year.

    1. Re:Publicity stunt... nothing to see here... by Ainu · · Score: 1

      I too have a 6 digit UIN with no issues with logging in. Of course if it was a service failure more going down is unlikely. If it's someone's attempt on the service it may get worse.

  17. low icq numbers suck! by myspace-cn · · Score: 1

    it would be nice of my low icq number came back one day, iirc is was back in 1996 on a windows nt 3.51 box, then people started getting hacked, so by 1997 i wasn't using it, i used irc instead, then in 2006, i decided to try it again using linux, and i find that i can not logon anymore, so i try it in the mirables official client and find i can't logon anymore. i have lost my original email account finally in 2007 (spam ridden after 10 years of web presence, so i finally deleted it.) what's in a number? why should i care? because i did have some friends (contacts) that i made way back, and they are now lost forever.

    1. Re:low icq numbers suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's highly possible after 10 years of silence those friends of yours would not even remember you. You should consider yourself lucky, though - in Sims (2) your relationships go sour after much shorter a period of silence. If they claim they DO claim to remember you, though, that simply indicates they've kept backup copies of their chatlogs ;)

  18. What's new? by wackymacs · · Score: 1

    All AOL seem to do is screw-up again and again these days. They must like bad publicity.

  19. It's all about AIM in the end... AIM and spyware. by sycomonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was under the impression that AOL has been trying to kill ICQ for years now. How are these people so (un)blissfully unaware of the situation?

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  20. I know what happened by harry666t · · Score: 1

    My sister was learning to use regexps and she must've done a typo...

  21. Want to check, but don't have ICQ installed? by Raven737 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't use or even installed ICQ for at least 5 years
    but wanted to check if my really old account with a nice 7 digit account number was still active.
    Used: http://go.icq.com/ (no installation needed) to check.. and it is still working, guess i got lucky.
    Now for another 5 years of not using it (but of course wanting to keep it :)

    1. Re:Want to check, but don't have ICQ installed? by daranz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if AOL will experience a slashdotting of their ICQ servers, as all those people who haven't logged on for over 5 years decide to do it now to see if it still works...

      --
      This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
  22. AOL to customers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    WE HATE YOU!

    Just a friendly reminder

    1. Re:AOL to customers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Customer: Can I drop my subscription now?
      AOL: NO!
      Computer: You've got mail.
      Customer: *sob*

  23. A victim of FUD by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    They're probably just yet another victim in the FUD spread by AACS, and is now trying to clean up their act with all their numbers in use. ;-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  24. ICQ said it best... by Spittles · · Score: 5, Funny

    *uh-oh* :-P

  25. My guesses by Dragon+Rojo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My 7 digit uin it's still active, I remember it like my phone number. Ahh those were the days. I left icq after all my contacts went to yahoo or msn.

    My guesses:

    1.- Someone broke in and messed up the db
    2.- A random clean up?
    3.- Publicity? (As stated in comments above)
    4.- Server failure

    1. Re:My guesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 Profit!

      (i'm sorry.)

    2. Re:My guesses by Dragon+Rojo · · Score: 1

      Good one. I didn't notice the pattern, the joke just flew over my head.

    3. Re:My guesses by Apagador-Man · · Score: 1

      5.- All of the above?

      --
      In the end, there can be only one!
  26. Re:It's all about AIM in the end... AIM and spywar by Scarblac · · Score: 1

    Well, I always just enter my ICQ number into Gaim, together with my MSN address, and it all just works (still does). All my old friends on the list are in it by their ICQ. I had no idea AOL owned it, though...

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  27. That's insane by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Almost everyone complaining has a 6 digit or shorter account number. They just f*cked their million oldest, most faithful users.

    Thankfully, my number is 7 digits.

    1. Re:That's insane by WatcherXP · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC the numbers started at 6 digits. UIN's with fewer digits were internal staff use only. 127XXX = me

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    2. Re:That's insane by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn that my first one was something like 19xxx, back in '96.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    3. Re:That's insane by todorb · · Score: 0

      i've got a friend with a 5-digit number, 7xxxx.

    4. Re:That's insane by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      mines 164xxx and its still up and running. i downloaded and installed it the day it went public. the numbers were definately into the 100000s when it went public

    5. Re:That's insane by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Mine was 6... not that I use it much anymore, but I hope I still have it for the status :)

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    6. Re:That's insane by Urox · · Score: 1

      You're not safe. Mine was seven digits and they "deleted" it a year ago. I had my name, my number, my uid, lots of identifying information, but my password was not working and the "send password" feature was not working. Their solution was to "get another number", nevermind all the contacts I'd made with the other number..

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  28. Computers that forget. by n1hilist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess someone at AOL must've read a certain article about computers needing to forget...

  29. Possible Fix?!? by jkwscurvy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It appears to just be a bug, and your numbers are safe. Backup, remove, reinstall as described here: http://boards.icq.com/boards/view_messages.php?tid =4555&topic_id=2216365. YMMV

    1. Re:Possible Fix?!? by Pym · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how that helps people whose numbers don't work and who are using a fresh install of GAIM (me!). But I'm sure they won't speak to one of "those clients". ;)

  30. In Communist China by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    ....Government deletes You and your ICQ numbers!!

  31. AOL happened by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    23192319 disconnected by peer
    23192319 gets a worm in his ear
    23192319, disconnected for a year!

    23192319, there's no such thing as luck in hell.

    -Celine

  32. Re:It's all about AIM in the end... AIM and spywar by rucs_hack · · Score: 2

    Not possible. AOL have been haemorrhaging customers for years, which has limited their advertising revenue somewhat. No company wants to lose customers, even of free services, because it makes their portfolio look good if they want to sell.

    This is more likely just a screw up.

  33. according to their status page by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    No network problems.
    If something goes wrong, we'll let you know here.


    Hmm, looks like this is definatelly a case of the stupids.

  34. Rollover by apoKalypse · · Score: 1

    Maybe they only used 32bit integers for the ICQ numbers, hit 4,294,967,295 and rolled back to 0.

  35. I DIDN'T DO IT by Debug0x2a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oddly enough it was working perfectly until I went to create an account. BTW, my name is ";Drop Table;"

    --
    First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
  36. You can have mine! by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    I've got a number in the 105xxx range for the right bidder, if you don't mind fielding the occasional obscure question about an IRC client. ;)

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    1. Re:You can have mine! by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1

      So, tell us... where is the ebay link then? ;)

    2. Re:You can have mine! by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      1276XX for sale! make me an offer. Bidding starts at $5000 or a case of Rolling Rock.

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
  37. my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by DylanDarko · · Score: 1

    My account is still working, I didn't know there were 6 and 7 didgit numbers. I have an ancient 8 digit UIN from like '96 or '97, 2526xxxx. old skool icq was way ahead of its time, though i now only have one friend who still uses it as well. I still log on it frequently as it is set up on my Miranda client.

    1. Re:my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I hope my 610XXX one is still there. :-( I haven't got over to my home computer to check yet.

      I'm not using their crappy client, but ICQ still comes with decent features if using Miranda and Trillian, and all off-line features are of course graat. If that UIN broke and they won't repair it (any statement from AOL?), that means a lot of forums I'm signed up with has an invalid UIN. :-((

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by Sunar · · Score: 1

      I have a 6 digit UIN. I signed up the first month it was kicked out to the public. It still works fine also. ICQ was THE IM client then. Everything else out *and wasn't much* sucked soooo badly. I still use ICQ but I run Trillian as alot of people use other IM services. ~Sun

    3. Re:my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Mine is around 1.9 million. I don't know if my knack for getting low UIDs is cool or pathetic.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by Xentor · · Score: 1

      I don't remember when I signed up, but ICQ used to be great... Now, if I log in with my six-digit (178xxx), I get nothing but constant spam.

      --
      "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
    5. Re:my ancient 8 digit UIN still works by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      My 237XXX UIN is still working. Though I don't really use it anymore. Still login occasionally through trillian, but virtually all of my contacts are either on AOL or Yahoo IM.

      Still not sure what the big deal is about all these low UINs,... why people want to hang onto them like they're some kind of status symbol is beyond me,...

  38. Well the Ukraine girls really knock me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least one of the alleged Russkys I actually started chatting with is cute. They sure know how to make them in the Ukraine ;) Are there many three-breasted Total-Recall-type Ukrainian girls? All that Chernobyl radiation has got to have had some effect...
  39. Centralized by Eivind · · Score: 4, Informative

    In an ideal world, this would teach people something about the disadvantages of relying on a centralized server controlled by a corporation over which you have no influence for your communication-infrastructure.

    Msn, and Aim have similar problems.

    Meanwhile, Jabber is the way of the future. Open protocol. Multiple interoperable implementations. Gateways to these "legacy"-protocols anyway, so you can still talk to your icq/msn-using friends. Multiple simultaneous logins. Server-side storage of buddy-lists (so log on from a different location/new computer and everything is there)

    Oh, and for added bonus, jabber-ids on the format of email-adresses are a lot easier to remember than ICQ-uins.

    1. Re:Centralized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now all we need is a decent client.

    2. Re:Centralized by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      My problem with gateways is that they are the ideal place for someone to capture user name and password combinations for 'legacy' IM services. I'm probably not the first person to think of this, but how easy would it be to modify the relay software to, on a successful log in to AIM, MSN, ICQ, or Yahoo to dump the user name and password to a file? Blammo! A large database of "confirmed good" accounts. What you can do with this is, of course, only limited by your imagination. I suppose that on a small scale, this wouldn't be that useful - you'd only be able to log in and talk to people on someone else's list, but if it's a business IM account, or if you'd like to get into the IM spamming game, this would be a great way to start.

      This doesn't even begin to touch on the fact that Jabber servers could grab your 'legacy' IMs and do all sorts of nasty things to the messages as they go through the system, such as modify them, store them, or data mine them to offer you targeted advertisement.

      No thanks. I'll stick with my end-to-end OTR encryption for my messages and Gaim and use Gaim to connect to the legacy IM services.

    3. Re:Centralized by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Not very hard -- if someone has broken into the computer running your jabber-account, it follows that they can do anything with your account that you yourself can do.

      I agree that this can make large jabber-servers such as @jabber.org a tempting target. (though I'm sure the central AIM/ICQ/MSN server experience even MORE attacks, and you're pretty screwed if an attacker gets control there too...)

      But here's the thing: because jabber is *NOT* centralized, there's nothing forcing you to using these central servers. Every sensible business that wants to use IM, and every enthusiast individual should run their own anyway. (and this is completely interoperable, if you use foo@jabber.org and I use bar@mydomain.no we still have exactly the same connectivity as if we where using one and the same server.

      This is neither hard nor expensive. A growing number of web-hotels include the possibility of running your own jabber-server already, it is easy finding a $10/month hosting-plan that includes your own jabber-server.

      Jabber-servers cannot play funny tricks on your messages if the servers are controlled by *YOU*. That's my point. With MSN you do not have any choice other than to trust Microsoft. Similar for the other proprietary ones. With Jabber, it's all open, all distributed, you yourself choose whom to trust. (and if you decide you trust nobody, are free to roll your own) End-to-end encryption of messages is useful, and I wish it was standard in Jabber to, (in ALL network-programs really - unencrypted protocols need to die!) (as it is, you can have it, but it requires you to configure it first, which I'm sure 1% of the jabber-users actually do) but this is really true regardless of which protocol you use.

    4. Re:Centralized by caluml · · Score: 1

      I've added you at bar@mydomain.no, but I'm waiting for you to authorise me.

    5. Re:Centralized by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Uhm. Ok. Do I know you ? You'll have to forgive me if this should be obvious, but your username doesn't really riung a bell with me. No matter I authorised you anyway, I'm the trusting type, or something.

  40. Re:Still Around .. and still using ICQ 2001b :) by Marbleless · · Score: 1

    I that was the the last version I tried that didn't have too much eye candy, ads, flashes etc :)

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
  41. Good or bad? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    For many, many years they were content to just keep the dead accounts out there, I suppose to show investment bankers how much theorhetical money they could make...and if this was part of that process, maybe it's good.

    Or someone missed the syntax of an SQL statment, and the server room's on FIRE. :)

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  42. oblig by Andrei+D · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fix here

    --
    We often refuse to accept an idea merely because the tone of voice in which it has been expressed is unsympathetic to us
  43. Obligatory comment by ButcherCH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Net...as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

    --
    Do or do not, there is no try.
    1. Re:Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or something terrible will happen ... wait n see

  44. Re:It's all about AIM in the end... AIM and spywar by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that AOL has been trying to kill ICQ for years now. Wouldn't it make more sense for them to simply merge the services and brands, possibly retaining two distinct interfaces/protocols (to avoid losing users of one or other set of legacy clients) but effectively just having one service?
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  45. just bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got a 6 digits and it works
    and my friend got a 5 digits number. oh yea baby. can we date now?

  46. Guess my deal with Satan is off then by infonography · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried his ICQ number this morning 666 and it's gone. The bothers me as we really had a good deal in play. He was going to make me Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It was all most done. Blair announced his resignation and I was to step in as planned. He even had a way figured out to get around the fact that I am a US Citizen and everything. Seeing how the US was already taken.....

    I wonder if I can sue them for interference with a contract?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  47. be realistic by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    ICQ is still pretty big and afaict it runs on the same servers as AIM which is also rather big. I rather doubt they will even notice /.

    for all the jokes on /. the only sites that tend get /.ed are those that come into the following categories
    1: those with big downloads
    2: those on home connections
    3: those with dynamic content that doesn't have caching mechanisms in place to deal with lots of hits on the same page.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  48. This is NOT new! by sugapablo · · Score: 1

    This is NOT new! My number got f*cked back in December of last year:
    http://www.sugapablo.net/story.php?id=478

    1. Re:This is NOT new! by Skater · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem but it's been a LOT longer since it stopped working, and like you I had the account for many years without a problem. I registered a new number but got so much spim that I don't log in any more.

    2. Re:This is NOT new! by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      I also had this problem a very long time ago. One day my account simply stopped working. I never received a reason from AOL (actually, it may have still been Mirabilis; that's how long ago it was), so I simply stopped using ICQ.

    3. Re:This is NOT new! by gid · · Score: 1

      I also had the same problem with icq, tried logging in one morning and my password didn't work. My email address I used to sign up with had been shut off, but I was able to track down my friend who still owned the domain and had him set up and email alias for me so I could reset my password. I wanted to keep my 6 digit icq number damn it. :)

      I did have a pretty weak password used for it, so it's possible that someone brute forced it.

  49. I feel a great disturbance.... by skbert · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... in the Interweb. It's as if a 1000 skript kiddies cried out and where silenced.

  50. 72 pages by v1 · · Score: 1

    There are currently 72 pages of posts to that complaint thread. I don't feel like wading through it all to find out if anyone has answered anyone. Can anyone summarize?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  51. Stopgap solutions by Linker3000 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    1) AOL CDs, if angled correctly, can be used to reflect sunlight so as to allow communication via Morse Code over short distances (provided you get sunlight in your basement). Longer transmission paths can be achieved by bouncing the light signal off strategically mounted intermediate CDs.

    2) Banging two AOL CDs together will effect a similar system using sound over shorter distances (eg: 'Mom, is lunch ready yet?')

    3) Laying down a trail of two parallel lines of AOL CDs and linking them together tightly with paperclips so that the metallic reflective surfaces are electrically joined will create a circuit pathway allowing differentially-driven signalling (dig out those RS422 transceivers guys).

    4) Write your message on a spare AOL CD using permanent marker and mail the CD to your recipient (slow, but will improve profitability of your local postal service).

    5) AOL CD = FrisbeeNet?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  52. AOL did something similar with AIM... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    A couple years back, about once a month several hundred (if not thousand) accounts would have their password changed to something random and make it impossible for users to log in. This happened for several months in a row. I knew probably a dozen people affected by it. Since AIM is a free service and most AIM users weren't AOL customers (at least in the sense that they weren't PAYING MONEY to AOL), AOL didn't do anything about it. At first I thought it was Pidgin (GAIM at that time) related, but that turned out not to be the case.

    Perhaps ICQ users are simply more vocal about it... but this isn't a new problem.

    --
    sig.
  53. ICQ Spam - ICQ6- being force added = crapware by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hardly ever turn icq on any longer on account of the Russian/Czech/Ukranian spam. Very annoying and last time I turned it on some damn spammer who kept on spamming on me 'added me' - annoyed I checked and yep, my preferences were to not allow anyone to add me but for some reason spambot boy was able to. I don't even know what the purpose of doing that is but I definitely don't like it and don't turn the icq on for just that reason.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  54. They didn't forward the message. by InvisiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously they didn't forward that message that all their friends sent them, so their accounts got flagged as inactive and deleted.

  55. Publicity by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Funny
    From one of the link, someone posted:

    I HATE AOL. I HATE AOL. I HATE AOL. Its the worst company on the planet

    You can't buy publicity like that.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  56. Did they not read the email... by aj50 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did they not read the e-mail that was sent round last week saying that ICQ was running out of numbers and that some would be re-allocated unless they proved they were active users by sending the e-mail on to all their ICQ using friends?

    Too late to complain now, you should have read the e-mail and sent it on like me. It's not hard, sheesh.

    --
    I wish to remain anomalous
  57. Count me as 'affected'... by HerculesMO · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had a 6 digit ICQ number starting with "333".... and it's lost. I took pride in looking at that as my 'nerd' badge of honor since I was on the ICQ train so long before others.

    Needless to say, I haven't used ICQ in a long time since then, and I won't be using it any time again.

    Fuck AOL.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:Count me as 'affected'... by khristian · · Score: 1

      i had one number with 6 digits, but i forgot the password and made a new one, but that was years ago.i really miss icq, just moved to msn because of the female public. and my account still works :D

      --
      http://derkosak.blogspot.com - That's a blog.
  58. Can They Delete Mine Please? by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 1

    I've asked them several times to delete my number intentionally, as I've not used it in years, yet they say that it's not possible. Now they go ahead and lose hundreds of numbers unintentionally?

  59. ICQ? by coryking · · Score: 1

    Damn! Does that thing store the contact lists server-side yet? I remember the first time I used AIM (or MSN) and the server automagically kept my contact list.

    I've got a 6 digit ICQ number that sits around in Trillian with exactly one contact on it who also has an AIM account as well. What is funny is that while we both use Trillian, sometimes the AIM link will drop yet his ICQ will stay online.

  60. so what by jaimz22 · · Score: 0

    mine works, so i could care less.. until it doesn't work, then I still won't care because it's been years since i talked to anyone on it

  61. A decent client? by dallaylaen · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is a decent client.

    You mean, a bloated ad-ridden flashy clunky pile of junk that forces constant upgrades down your throat?

    No thanks. I'd rather stick with Miranda/Sim which both support jabber as well.

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  62. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry. my fault

  63. From the article: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    However, it can now is not this this problem almost one hour exists and it no one of the support necessary holds here something User again to stations with it we also only once can have calmed.

    Well said, man. Well said!

  64. Make sure you put the right age in by cl191 · · Score: 1

    I had my account deleted years ago, when I jokingly put "1" as my age in the profile, apparently they will get rid of your account if you put anything less than 13 in there.

  65. 6 digit UIN still working by ksattic · · Score: 1

    My 6 digit UIN is still working this morning. I use it every day.

  66. Uh-Oh! by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    Uh-Oh! Now I know why it always made that noise when a new message came in. ICQ can see the future!

    --
    -Xoltri
  67. Well.... by wtansill · · Score: 1

    If the grammar of the posters on the ICQ message board is any indication I'd say that their ICQ accounts were deleted because AOL was ashamed to have such illiterate messages on its network...

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
  68. Syntax Highlighting by nbritton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be cool if the English language had colorized syntax highlighting.

  69. Thanks for reminding me to log into my ICQ account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hadn't in a few months so I checked it...

    And all of my friends still don't remember me! hah

    7 digit # still going strong@!

  70. Delete me based on keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause thats how the world works now

  71. Aim affected too? by dave1g · · Score: 1

    I got booted off aim on 2 screen names that night, and the passwords had been changed. I had to do a password reset on aim.com dunno if that was related..

  72. So, so by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    So they really do leave the west behind? That knocks me out.

    Better luck in the future.

  73. Re:It's all about AIM in the end... AIM and spywar by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

    In a way, they already have. AIM and ICQ run on the same protocol now, and users with relatively recent clients can talk to users of the other service that also have new enough clients.

    --
    End of Line.
  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. All I can say is... by EagleEye1975 · · Score: 1

    Trillian FTW. :)