Listening to Ted Cruz, I think that he missed his calling. He sounds like he should be preaching in a tent revival. Or perhaps leading a mega-church on TV.
And frequently, it was Opsec failures by German operators that allowed the British to crack encrypted German communications. For example, there was a German operator in the field who would start every communication by hitting the same key three (or four) times.
Other issues were encrypted weather reports. The British effectively had the plain text of part of those weather reports because they could also see what the weather was.
For tax filings Google and Facebook sell to the whole of the EU from Ireland, not the UK.
FTFY
Google has employs plenty of people in the UK with job titles that include "sales". That the "sales" take place in Ireland is merely the way it is reported for tax purposes.
The one time I got close to being on a jury (I was one of the last jurors to be rejected during voir dire), about half the jury members had a masters degree. Mostly liberal arts.
For emails, body text is the "data", whereas email headers are "metadata". From, To, Subject, that sort of thing
They might define it that way, but it's not true. The envelope addresses are metadata, but the headers, "To", "From", "Subject" and other fields are explicitly data. The server doesn't use these in order to route the email to the appropriate mailbox (apart from spam analysis, but if you use that argument, there is nothing that is not metadata, since spam analysis typically looks at all the data in an email.)
"Google has records that could help in a cyber-investigation," he said. Giorgio warned me, "We have a saying in this business: 'Privacy and security are a zero-sum game.'".
That could mean what you're saying, and that he thinks that he needs a database of 100% of everyone's communication or there's no security.
I don't think that you understand the term "zero-sum game" and the rest of your post is an off-topic rant, based on either your misunderstanding or a poor reading of this thread, or both.
How is it that he wasn't on a 5150 hold? If the police know that you threatened suicide, they are going to be knocking on your door, wanting to haul you away to be supervised in a suitable location (hospital).
When are the ****ing/. developers going to fix the problem that logs me out between opening a window to write a post and submitting it?
Okay explain to me why Facebook should pay for your porn streaming. Go ahead, and listening.
I didn't say that Facebook should pay for this. What I did say that Facebook's justification for providing a walled garden is bogus. The long game from Facebook is not beneficial for people.
As a case study, Google the story of Madison Priest
A very good example that people with money are often not smart. The decision makers must have had access to technical advisers. Either they ignored them, or they never asked them, substituting their own judgement for that of people with more knowledge. It's a little like the Dunning-Kruger effect. People who have money and/or power think that they got it because they are smart, whereas it is more likely that they got it because of connections or simple ruthlessness.
Their "investments" in Priest were no different from buying a lot of lottery tickets.
Exactly the same constraint applies to Facebook or a mobile carrier paying for internet access - it has costs, and it doesn't make sense for FB to pay for everyone to stream porn videos from Xvideos.com.
This is in part a strawman and in part false. Yes, Facebook has costs, but its decisions will be informed by its desire for profit, not a remit for public service. Just like any action of a public servant, decisions on book purchases can be challenged by civilians. There is no such accountability in Facebook's decisions.
FInally, probably one of the best collections of pornography can be found in the British Library, so the idea that Wikipedia not paying to stream pornography is equivalent to libraries not stocking it is false.
Slashdot Mirror
Listening to Ted Cruz, I think that he missed his calling. He sounds like he should be preaching in a tent revival. Or perhaps leading a mega-church on TV.
One more: since the announcement does not specify otherwise, one can presume that 22GB per customer means 22GB per contract.
Got 4 phones on a contract? Share that 22GB between all of you, which makes it 5.5GB/phone, which isn't a lot.
Google/Oracle is about copyright. This is about contracts.
Or it could park like a BMW driver.
FTFY.
And frequently, it was Opsec failures by German operators that allowed the British to crack encrypted German communications. For example, there was a German operator in the field who would start every communication by hitting the same key three (or four) times.
Other issues were encrypted weather reports. The British effectively had the plain text of part of those weather reports because they could also see what the weather was.
But ...... Hollywood told me it was Americans who captured the Enigma machine. Surely the filmmakers would never lie about something so important as this?
FTFY
Google has employs plenty of people in the UK with job titles that include "sales". That the "sales" take place in Ireland is merely the way it is reported for tax purposes.
The idea was that the Lords would keep the Commons in check, unfortunately, the Lords voted themselves into irrelevance a few years ago.
It's not just the "free downloads". T-Mobile is throttling Youtube, which is not included in the "Binge-on" plan.
The one time I got close to being on a jury (I was one of the last jurors to be rejected during voir dire), about half the jury members had a masters degree. Mostly liberal arts.
They might define it that way, but it's not true. The envelope addresses are metadata, but the headers, "To", "From", "Subject" and other fields are explicitly data. The server doesn't use these in order to route the email to the appropriate mailbox (apart from spam analysis, but if you use that argument, there is nothing that is not metadata, since spam analysis typically looks at all the data in an email.)
I don't think that you understand the term "zero-sum game" and the rest of your post is an off-topic rant, based on either your misunderstanding or a poor reading of this thread, or both.
Except that you are the one with the strawman. He quotes Ed Giorgio, who was working with Mike McConnell, then director of National Intelligence:
That is a rhetorical question, since the NSA doesn't think that it is constrained by US laws or the US constitution.
The thing is, when one end of the conversation is a US citizen, they are not supposed to continue spying on that conversation.
They won't. They will drag you away to be assessed by a mental health professional. Look it up.
How is it that he wasn't on a 5150 hold? If the police know that you threatened suicide, they are going to be knocking on your door, wanting to haul you away to be supervised in a suitable location (hospital).
/. developers going to fix the problem that logs me out between opening a window to write a post and submitting it?
When are the ****ing
And app developers have not only stopped developing for WP, they are pulling existing apps out of Microsoft's app store.
I didn't say that Facebook should pay for this. What I did say that Facebook's justification for providing a walled garden is bogus. The long game from Facebook is not beneficial for people.
A very good example that people with money are often not smart. The decision makers must have had access to technical advisers. Either they ignored them, or they never asked them, substituting their own judgement for that of people with more knowledge. It's a little like the Dunning-Kruger effect. People who have money and/or power think that they got it because they are smart, whereas it is more likely that they got it because of connections or simple ruthlessness.
Their "investments" in Priest were no different from buying a lot of lottery tickets.
s/Wikipedia/Facebook/ Duh!
This is in part a strawman and in part false. Yes, Facebook has costs, but its decisions will be informed by its desire for profit, not a remit for public service. Just like any action of a public servant, decisions on book purchases can be challenged by civilians. There is no such accountability in Facebook's decisions.
FInally, probably one of the best collections of pornography can be found in the British Library, so the idea that Wikipedia not paying to stream pornography is equivalent to libraries not stocking it is false.
I bet those executives who decided to take on the risk of using this well for methane storage still got their bonuses, though.