That's the first time I've ever heard anyone ask for VMs running on a phone.
The idea has been around for a while. You have a phone for work and a personal phone. Want to combine the two into one piece of hardware without giving control of your BYOD device to your employer? A virtual phone running in a VM on your own hardware is the answer.
You might be better off signing up for one of their business plans. I don't think that Comcast requires actual verification that you are running a business.
it was the following year I think '95 or '96 that they started allowing students to use calculators as long as they had no graphing function,
I used a calculator in my "A" level maths exam (high school) in 1975. I Think that it was an TI SR-50. It made some of the questions remarkably easy -- I think that the people who wrote the exam paper did not realize that calculators could "do" logs.
While the BBC pays lip service to restricting VPN access, I don't think they are wanting to implement any bans.
Ignoring VPNs, the BBCs geographic restrictions are easy to get around (or they were). My experiments with this (perhaps a year to 18 months ago) showed that all you need to avoid the BBCs geographic restrictions was a UK-located nameserver.
Putin can get away with what he's doing becaus the Russian people support it.
People support Putin because all that oil revenue and the sovereign wealth fund it created (when oil was over $100/barrel) have people feeling well-off. However, the current low oil prices are not enough to support the levels of spending by the Russian government and the sovereign wealth fund will be gone in a couple or more years. Then, austerity will bite and the people are much less likely to support Putin.
IMHO, the West's policy in the middle east has been aimed at keeping oil prices low in order to counter the threat from Putin.
As proof of this statement, I point to: 1. the lack of any bomb detonations in the queues for the security check. 2. Breaches of airport perimeter security by a teenager and others.
If there were serious terrorist attempts against air passengers, they would have already happened.
We should use a different system of units for things being exported to the USA, just to show them how annoying it is to have to convert to another system when we're dealing with their products. For example, instead of measuring in centimetres and inches, sell them products measured in centimetres and fingerbreadths.
Surely the TPP will allow companies to export products to the USA that are marked using metric units? Allowing that would remove a real barrier to trade and the TPP is a trade deal, right? right?.....?
"Is" means present tense. Now, currently. Bill Clinton was asked "Is there a relationship". He replied "no" and later, when accused of perjury on this point, by making the statement about the definition of "is", he was really pointing out either the deficiency of the question put to him, or the questioner's understanding of "is". The relationship was in the past, not current, so the correct answer to "is there a relationship" was "no".
In that case, Bill Clinton was right. The question was "Is there a relationship...", it should have been "is there now, or was there ever...".
But a better example of the how the Supreme Court has modified the plain text of the constitution is how the interstate commerce clause is interpreted. The court is quite open about this: it claims that the Federal government can regulate anything that affects interstate commerce. But the word "affects" does not appear in the clause. An example of this: My pharmacist buys the drugs that he stocks from an out of state wholesaler. I then buy from him. Which is interstate commerce? According to the Supreme Court, both are. Or the idea that plants grown in my back yard that I might consume are interstate commerce. Again, the Supreme Court allows the Feds to regulate this because it "affects" interstate commerce. But that's not what the clause says.
The interesting thing is that it is generally the "originalists" who are the one who read the word "affects" into the Constitution, showing that these judges are highly influenced by their own biases, perhaps more so than the laws that they are supposed to interpret.
It's not as intuitive, but if you look to the right of the headline, you will see "(arstechnica.com)". That's the link to the story.
This is presumably another/. layout unimprovement.
Regardless, it was my *work* they were stealing. My effort. They could have gone to the forest and cut down their own trees, but instead?
So I guess oil companies should be able to pump oil out of the ground and pay no royalties? Logging companies should be able to go into national parks and cut down the trees?
What you have to remember here is that Her Majesty's Gov't especially Theresa May and David (Knob in a Pig) Cameron can't even spell "internet" let alone being able to draft any coherent legislation to control the Internet.
Unless the real purpose of this is to hide GCHQ's illegal activity? In other words, provide a plausible source for information that could not be legally gathered? To provide a parallel path for "parallel construction" of evidence?
I did not see it in the snippets of his license agreement, but I think that people should put something in such as:
"if licensee claims ownership of the work in any form (including DMCA take-down notices) and fails to remove such claim within 24 hours of being notified at , this license shall terminate immediately and licensee shall lose all rights granted by this agreement."
Sony's lawyer didn't immediately back down because Sony might have taken an exclusive license.
Exactly what do you expect the teachers to do when there are calls to make them more "accountable" and to link their pay to test scores? When schools are judged on their test score results? Your argument is naive and unrealistic.
And how much time "prepping for the test"? Tests should measure learning achievement, not direct it, but the result of so much testing is that a large amount of classroom time is directed towards the test.
Slashdot Mirror
The idea has been around for a while. You have a phone for work and a personal phone. Want to combine the two into one piece of hardware without giving control of your BYOD device to your employer? A virtual phone running in a VM on your own hardware is the answer.
You might be better off signing up for one of their business plans. I don't think that Comcast requires actual verification that you are running a business.
I used a calculator in my "A" level maths exam (high school) in 1975. I Think that it was an TI SR-50. It made some of the questions remarkably easy -- I think that the people who wrote the exam paper did not realize that calculators could "do" logs.
Ignoring VPNs, the BBCs geographic restrictions are easy to get around (or they were). My experiments with this (perhaps a year to 18 months ago) showed that all you need to avoid the BBCs geographic restrictions was a UK-located nameserver.
People support Putin because all that oil revenue and the sovereign wealth fund it created (when oil was over $100/barrel) have people feeling well-off. However, the current low oil prices are not enough to support the levels of spending by the Russian government and the sovereign wealth fund will be gone in a couple or more years. Then, austerity will bite and the people are much less likely to support Putin.
IMHO, the West's policy in the middle east has been aimed at keeping oil prices low in order to counter the threat from Putin.
As proof of this statement, I point to:
1. the lack of any bomb detonations in the queues for the security check.
2. Breaches of airport perimeter security by a teenager and others.
If there were serious terrorist attempts against air passengers, they would have already happened.
Surely the TPP will allow companies to export products to the USA that are marked using metric units? Allowing that would remove a real barrier to trade and the TPP is a trade deal, right? right? .....?
I have a partial install of Gentoo that I need to work on. The first clean Gentoo install that I have done for almost a decade.
How can I get this botnet to finish the job?
"Is" means present tense. Now, currently. Bill Clinton was asked "Is there a relationship". He replied "no" and later, when accused of perjury on this point, by making the statement about the definition of "is", he was really pointing out either the deficiency of the question put to him, or the questioner's understanding of "is". The relationship was in the past, not current, so the correct answer to "is there a relationship" was "no".
In that case, Bill Clinton was right. The question was "Is there a relationship...", it should have been "is there now, or was there ever ...".
But a better example of the how the Supreme Court has modified the plain text of the constitution is how the interstate commerce clause is interpreted. The court is quite open about this: it claims that the Federal government can regulate anything that affects interstate commerce. But the word "affects" does not appear in the clause. An example of this: My pharmacist buys the drugs that he stocks from an out of state wholesaler. I then buy from him. Which is interstate commerce? According to the Supreme Court, both are. Or the idea that plants grown in my back yard that I might consume are interstate commerce. Again, the Supreme Court allows the Feds to regulate this because it "affects" interstate commerce. But that's not what the clause says.
The interesting thing is that it is generally the "originalists" who are the one who read the word "affects" into the Constitution, showing that these judges are highly influenced by their own biases, perhaps more so than the laws that they are supposed to interpret.
CISA isn't about sharing, it's about spying on our communications.
It's not as intuitive, but if you look to the right of the headline, you will see "(arstechnica.com)". That's the link to the story. This is presumably another /. layout unimprovement.
So I guess oil companies should be able to pump oil out of the ground and pay no royalties? Logging companies should be able to go into national parks and cut down the trees?
You are joking, right? When the DOD gets around to ordering them, they will cost several million dollars each.
Unless the real purpose of this is to hide GCHQ's illegal activity? In other words, provide a plausible source for information that could not be legally gathered? To provide a parallel path for "parallel construction" of evidence?
You mean that piece of paper that the US Supreme court has been shredding, unless it involves freedom of speech by wealthy people?
FTFY
Given the tiny fine that Sony was required to pay for the rootkit fiasco, I doubt that they really care about getting caught.
I did not see it in the snippets of his license agreement, but I think that people should put something in such as: "if licensee claims ownership of the work in any form (including DMCA take-down notices) and fails to remove such claim within 24 hours of being notified at , this license shall terminate immediately and licensee shall lose all rights granted by this agreement."
Sony's lawyer didn't immediately back down because Sony might have taken an exclusive license.
Exactly what do you expect the teachers to do when there are calls to make them more "accountable" and to link their pay to test scores? When schools are judged on their test score results? Your argument is naive and unrealistic.
And how much time "prepping for the test"? Tests should measure learning achievement, not direct it, but the result of so much testing is that a large amount of classroom time is directed towards the test.
* Some countries excepted. Have you seen the cost of tuition in the UK recently?
It's quite relevant because it is an indication of whether the high-speed rail is economically viable.
Just how much is the capital cost per seat of the planes that are the real competition for this train?
I don't know about you, but I proposed that his goal was to make money on a short bet. I spotted the trolling.