i agree. also, checkout this webpage:
http://www.aa419.org/ladvampire.html
it basically uses some javascript to constantly download images of fake bank site that are busy raping grandmothers out of their life saving, they have brought 178 site to thier knees so far, and more fall every day. its really badass.
(i hate the/. filters....)
i agree. also, checkout this webpage:
http://www.aa419.org/ladvampire.html
it basically uses some javascript to constantly download images of fake bank site that are busy raping grandmothers out of their life saving, they have brought 178 site to thier knees so far, and more fall every day. its really badass.
if this technique raises the cost of business, and hence lowers the number of operating spammers, i be the net will be a lowering of total net bandwidth usage, even when consisdering the targetted crap flooding of spammers. spam is HUGE these days.
with about 20 seconds of thought you could get around this problem, by for instance making the clients only hit a site a limited number of times before having to go bac kto the server to get some more authorizations. essentially, have the server give out hit tokens for particular sites, the clients grab those and spend them by hitting sites. so in your case, the spamers redirect to lycos, lycos removes that url from the list so no new tokens are generated, and after all the clients spend the token they already have cached from before, wellah, they stop hitting lycos.
if it took me 20 seconds to figure that out, you'd think lycos would be smart enough to do something similar.
the trend holds across counties that use the same machine type, so if "conservatives are simply 'conservative' when it comes to agreeing to participate in exit polls" you'd expect them to be so in all polls, not just areas where they electronically voted.
"conservatives are simply 'conservative' when it comes to agreeing to participate in exit polls when they voted electronically" doesnt make much sense.
though i understand from dailykos's discussion about this that these districts were largely "dixiecrat's"... registered demo's who vote republican. aparently the way their votes are tabulated this year has a similar distribution as 2000....but i didnt check their numbers, so i havnt made up my mind...
or maybe "-1 Factually Incorrect" to be less flamey about it... but so often do i see posts which are just blatanty wrong about their facts, and they maybe not be "trolls" or "flamebait".
i wish they had just taken Ximian's Industrial and added their own branding/colors to it. this is one of the ugliest themes i've ever seen. its kind of annoying because i think having sun pushing linux on the desktop is great, but there are going to be thousands and thousands of people who will think linux looks as klunky as that. oh well, this is a 1.0, i'm sure it will get better and more consistant with future releases
the garmin GPS i've used claims to get about 16t ft accuracy, and starting at the long/lat numbers while i walked around in my back yard seemed to verify that.
another good example is Pure Data (pure-data.org)... this is the original visual audio programming language, and its open source. its rediculous to clain innovation is somehow conclusively tied to the license that the code is released under, when its clearly mostly dependant on the author. sure, open source projects often clone ideas from closed source, but closed source clones closed source, and closed source clones open source all the time.
of course i read the faq's, jackass. show me where in the GPL the availability ISO's defines weather or not a distribution is free software. Do you understand what free software is, or are you just being thick?
well, the fact that fedora plans to continue support for *7.3* should give you an idea of their idea of longevity. i doubt significant numbers of people are running redhat 8, which is why they arent supporting it.
Don't post if you dont understand, jesus. All versions of redhat are free software, open source, publically available, get it? All you pay for is *support*.
They decided that *right now* there is no money in support for home users in a boxed product, and they are probably right.
---
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/faq/
Q: You mentioned licensing - what does this mean? I thought Linux was free.
A: Except for a few components provided by third parties (for example, Java) all the code in Red Hat products is open source and licensed under the GPL (or a similar license, such as the LGPL). So you always have free access to the source code. In fact you can download it from our FTP servers at any time. However, Red Hat does not provide free access to the binaries of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and these, combined with an annual subscription to Red Hat Network, access to upgrades, and a selected support services, are the components that Red Hat bundles into each Red Hat Enterprise Linux solution. Since every Red Hat Enterprise Linux product includes support for the system on which it is installed, Red Hat supplies the products with a per-system usage/support subscription. This simple model ensures that systems which useRed Hat Enterprise Linux are able to access the maintenance, services and product upgrades to which they are entitled. Of course, as mentioned before, this has no impact on your access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source code.
Don't post if you dont understand, jesus. All versions of redhat are free software, open source, publically available, get it? All you pay for is *support*.
They decided that *right now* there is no money in support for home users in a boxed product, and they are probably right.
---
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/faq/
Q: You mentioned licensing - what does this mean? I thought Linux was free.
A: Except for a few components provided by third parties (for example, Java) all the code in Red Hat products is open source and licensed under the GPL (or a similar license, such as the LGPL). So you always have free access to the source code. In fact you can download it from our FTP servers at any time. However, Red Hat does not provide free access to the binaries of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and these, combined with an annual subscription to Red Hat Network, access to upgrades, and a selected support services, are the components that Red Hat bundles into each Red Hat Enterprise Linux solution. Since every Red Hat Enterprise Linux product includes support for the system on which it is installed, Red Hat supplies the products with a per-system usage/support subscription. This simple model ensures that systems which useRed Hat Enterprise Linux are able to access the maintenance, services and product upgrades to which they are entitled. Of course, as mentioned before, this has no impact on your access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source code.
no, i would imagine that the Fedora Linux Project will be supporting 7.3 and 9 as long as they think its helpful, which of course depends on how many people continue to use them.
Slashdot Mirror
i agree. also, checkout this webpage: http://www.aa419.org/ladvampire.html it basically uses some javascript to constantly download images of fake bank site that are busy raping grandmothers out of their life saving, they have brought 178 site to thier knees so far, and more fall every day. its really badass. (i hate the /. filters....)
i agree. also, checkout this webpage: http://www.aa419.org/ladvampire.html it basically uses some javascript to constantly download images of fake bank site that are busy raping grandmothers out of their life saving, they have brought 178 site to thier knees so far, and more fall every day. its really badass.
if this technique raises the cost of business, and hence lowers the number of operating spammers, i be the net will be a lowering of total net bandwidth usage, even when consisdering the targetted crap flooding of spammers. spam is HUGE these days.
with about 20 seconds of thought you could get around this problem, by for instance making the clients only hit a site a limited number of times before having to go bac kto the server to get some more authorizations. essentially, have the server give out hit tokens for particular sites, the clients grab those and spend them by hitting sites. so in your case, the spamers redirect to lycos, lycos removes that url from the list so no new tokens are generated, and after all the clients spend the token they already have cached from before, wellah, they stop hitting lycos. if it took me 20 seconds to figure that out, you'd think lycos would be smart enough to do something similar.
the trend holds across counties that use the same machine type, so if "conservatives are simply 'conservative' when it comes to agreeing to participate in exit polls" you'd expect them to be so in all polls, not just areas where they electronically voted.
... registered demo's who vote republican. aparently the way their votes are tabulated this year has a similar distribution as 2000. ...but i didnt check their numbers, so i havnt made up my mind...
"conservatives are simply 'conservative' when it comes to agreeing to participate in exit polls when they voted electronically" doesnt make much sense.
though i understand from dailykos's discussion about this that these districts were largely "dixiecrat's"
yeah, good point. i downloaded it once and installed it on 5 machines here.
'cause you are a fucking chump.
or maybe "-1 Factually Incorrect" to be less flamey about it... but so often do i see posts which are just blatanty wrong about their facts, and they maybe not be "trolls" or "flamebait".
gaim and winscp go on my windows installs pretty quick.
there is no one CC license, there are at least 5 or 6: http://creativecommons.org/license/
its a new bugfix/feature in 0.4 (thank god) so i could see why you would have been confused.
chong got busted for selling bongs explicitely for marijuanna use. he didnt pretend that it was for tobacco use only like most other bong sellers do.
i wish they had just taken Ximian's Industrial and added their own branding/colors to it. this is one of the ugliest themes i've ever seen. its kind of annoying because i think having sun pushing linux on the desktop is great, but there are going to be thousands and thousands of people who will think linux looks as klunky as that. oh well, this is a 1.0, i'm sure it will get better and more consistant with future releases
the garmin GPS i've used claims to get about 16t ft accuracy, and starting at the long/lat numbers while i walked around in my back yard seemed to verify that.
another good example is Pure Data (pure-data.org) ... this is the original visual audio programming language, and its open source. its rediculous to clain innovation is somehow conclusively tied to the license that the code is released under, when its clearly mostly dependant on the author. sure, open source projects often clone ideas from closed source, but closed source clones closed source, and closed source clones open source all the time.
anyone ridden one?
of course i read the faq's, jackass. show me where in the GPL the availability ISO's defines weather or not a distribution is free software. Do you understand what free software is, or are you just being thick?
well, the fact that fedora plans to continue support for *7.3* should give you an idea of their idea of longevity. i doubt significant numbers of people are running redhat 8, which is why they arent supporting it.
(sorry bout the formating on the other post...)
Don't post if you dont understand, jesus. All versions of redhat are free software, open source, publically available, get it? All you pay for is *support*.
They decided that *right now* there is no money in support for home users in a boxed product, and they are probably right.
---
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/faq/
Q: You mentioned licensing - what does this mean? I thought Linux was free.
A: Except for a few components provided by third parties (for example, Java) all the code in Red Hat products is open source and licensed under the GPL (or a similar license, such as the LGPL). So you always have free access to the source code. In fact you can download it from our FTP servers at any time. However, Red Hat does not provide free access to the binaries of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and these, combined with an annual subscription to Red Hat Network, access to upgrades, and a selected support services, are the components that Red Hat bundles into each Red Hat Enterprise Linux solution. Since every Red Hat Enterprise Linux product includes support for the system on which it is installed, Red Hat supplies the products with a per-system usage/support subscription. This simple model ensures that systems which useRed Hat Enterprise Linux are able to access the maintenance, services and product upgrades to which they are entitled. Of course, as mentioned before, this has no impact on your access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source code.
Don't post if you dont understand, jesus. All versions of redhat are free software, open source, publically available, get it? All you pay for is *support*. They decided that *right now* there is no money in support for home users in a boxed product, and they are probably right. --- http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/faq/ Q: You mentioned licensing - what does this mean? I thought Linux was free. A: Except for a few components provided by third parties (for example, Java) all the code in Red Hat products is open source and licensed under the GPL (or a similar license, such as the LGPL). So you always have free access to the source code. In fact you can download it from our FTP servers at any time. However, Red Hat does not provide free access to the binaries of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and these, combined with an annual subscription to Red Hat Network, access to upgrades, and a selected support services, are the components that Red Hat bundles into each Red Hat Enterprise Linux solution. Since every Red Hat Enterprise Linux product includes support for the system on which it is installed, Red Hat supplies the products with a per-system usage/support subscription. This simple model ensures that systems which useRed Hat Enterprise Linux are able to access the maintenance, services and product upgrades to which they are entitled. Of course, as mentioned before, this has no impact on your access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux source code.
fedora legacy will support 7.3 and 9 for the forseeable future with up2date connected to a yum repository.
no, i would imagine that the Fedora Linux Project will be supporting 7.3 and 9 as long as they think its helpful, which of course depends on how many people continue to use them.
its a good question, but since its a community effort now i imagine that it will continue to be supported as long as there is still a large demand.
what kind of crack are you smoking to get such an idea?
fedora legacy will provide updates to redhat 7.3 and 9. http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/terminology.h tml