It's weird. As terrible as my English is, it's still better than what the article showed. But, if I'm not good at English, at least I have an excuse: It's merely my second language, and not even a second official language in my country.
Well they get money only when you click, right? So does that mean it's unethical to never click? Is it unethical to switch the channel or go make a sandwich when there's a commercial break on TV?
If they can make it so that I can live for thousands of years and still be youthful as I am today, that would basically make one of my dreams come true. I really really hope this will be possible before I die, but I am not too sure.
I remember the old IBM 386 at my high school. Robust things, a giant box and small screen and a big clunky keyboard... not to mention the mouse, a big unergonomic and heavy object with clunky buttons as well. Ah, those were the days.
It's also the only system that makes sense. Every time I see someone use another system that goes like 02/03/04, I always have to ask myself, what was the order in that system again? March 2nd, 2004? February 3rd, 2004? March 4th, 2002?
Spending $311 million to satisfy the curiousity of humankind is a tiny price compared to the hundreds of billions we spend on the military every year, globally.
Without Poland's backing, those countries that supported the proposal in May now fall short of a qualified majority in the Council of Ministers.
Lacking a qualified majority, the draft will be referred back to the Council, which will have to come up with a new draft to put before the European Parliament next month.
God only seems to get credit for the bad things he didn't do. For example, if there's an earthquake that kills thousands and leaves most of the city in ruins, and if they find an alive 5 year-old child in the rubble, then it's the work of god that he survived. If a tornado kills hundreds, but a family somewhere is found not dead, it's proof that there is an all-loving god. Yes, thank you god, for not killing me. Oh, the other thousands who died? Eh, they simply didn't believe in fairytales as much as I did. Thank you god, for saving my life. The rescue workers and paramedics and the doctors, nurses and skilled surgeons? Well, god worked through them... yes, that's how it was.
He has many good points, and my first question as I read his review was "how long before someone cleans up that Hamilton article?":)
I believe that the Wikipedia approach works like evolution, that is what works stays and the other stuff goes or is edited. The end result will be a growing, more perfect Encyclopedia.
Yes they're all the same without difference. Everything is light. That is why they are using visible EMR instead of X-rays in hospitals. It's all the same and should be called the same!
Ion propulsion is done by Japan as well, on their latest asteroid sample return mission. Soviet experimented with ion thrusters back in the 60's. Also don't forget the current Rosetta mission - the first probe to land on a comet. And as for Venus we have Venus Express, Mercury we're collaborating with Japan on the Bepi-Colombo. Also, within the frameworks for the Aurora programme, ESA is working on a Mars rover and a Mars sample return mission.
If companies realise they want to have their computers a little more safe from the almost weekly virus attacks, then they will switch to Firefox. Same with the average person - as soon as they hear about it and dare to try it.
Slashdot Mirror
And it works, since people apparently click everything they see.
It's weird. As terrible as my English is, it's still better than what the article showed. But, if I'm not good at English, at least I have an excuse: It's merely my second language, and not even a second official language in my country.
Well they get money only when you click, right? So does that mean it's unethical to never click? Is it unethical to switch the channel or go make a sandwich when there's a commercial break on TV?
If they can make it so that I can live for thousands of years and still be youthful as I am today, that would basically make one of my dreams come true. I really really hope this will be possible before I die, but I am not too sure.
I remember the old IBM 386 at my high school. Robust things, a giant box and small screen and a big clunky keyboard... not to mention the mouse, a big unergonomic and heavy object with clunky buttons as well. Ah, those were the days.
Maybe if you used both?
You should use non-metric units. It's more fun to see road signs inform you about speed limits using furlongs/fortnight.
What you say !!
It's also the only system that makes sense. Every time I see someone use another system that goes like 02/03/04, I always have to ask myself, what was the order in that system again? March 2nd, 2004? February 3rd, 2004? March 4th, 2002?
Indeed sounds like something you do in high school as one of the assignments.
Paris Hilton and me at the Hilton in Paris in France?
Spending $311 million to satisfy the curiousity of humankind is a tiny price compared to the hundreds of billions we spend on the military every year, globally.
http://www.euobserver.com/?aid=17806
God only seems to get credit for the bad things he didn't do. For example, if there's an earthquake that kills thousands and leaves most of the city in ruins, and if they find an alive 5 year-old child in the rubble, then it's the work of god that he survived. If a tornado kills hundreds, but a family somewhere is found not dead, it's proof that there is an all-loving god. Yes, thank you god, for not killing me. Oh, the other thousands who died? Eh, they simply didn't believe in fairytales as much as I did. Thank you god, for saving my life. The rescue workers and paramedics and the doctors, nurses and skilled surgeons? Well, god worked through them... yes, that's how it was.
Does that mean they had the option of broadband but consciously chose not to have it? Or that they just couldn't have it even though they want it?
...I'll be late for work anyway.
Thanks for this info. Very very interesting, especially for me, I'm very interested in the Soviet space programme - maybe because it was so secret.
And such an elevator is realistic? Even if it could be built it seems like a waste as it would be rather useless.
Yes it does.
I've seen articles at Wikipedia that uses lots of information from the Encyclopaedia Britannica from 1910, since the copyright is apparently expired.
I believe that the Wikipedia approach works like evolution, that is what works stays and the other stuff goes or is edited. The end result will be a growing, more perfect Encyclopedia.
Yes they're all the same without difference. Everything is light. That is why they are using visible EMR instead of X-rays in hospitals. It's all the same and should be called the same!
Ion propulsion is done by Japan as well, on their latest asteroid sample return mission. Soviet experimented with ion thrusters back in the 60's. Also don't forget the current Rosetta mission - the first probe to land on a comet. And as for Venus we have Venus Express, Mercury we're collaborating with Japan on the Bepi-Colombo. Also, within the frameworks for the Aurora programme, ESA is working on a Mars rover and a Mars sample return mission.
Lego, no question. I've played with it for as long as I can remember. I liked it all, city, space, mideaval and of course technic.
If companies realise they want to have their computers a little more safe from the almost weekly virus attacks, then they will switch to Firefox. Same with the average person - as soon as they hear about it and dare to try it.