if the EC wants to solve the root cause they should (i) force MS to follow standards (ii) abrogate OEM contracts (iii) may be expose some recent MS cheap tricks such as the office pseudo open formats.
same with me. This news surprised me as my experience is for FF to run as fast or faster in Ubuntu; next comes mac osx, and third windows. but of course there is nothing scientific or even objective in there.
It isn't. First time you start firefox after the update it tells you about the new add on and you can delete it or disable it on the spot. Before that it will not work. I've got the ms update and was surprised myself (as I only run on demand ms updates, and review before installing, and it did not say it was installing this add on bundled in.not update)
the store sells the file. DRM fee files can be edited anywhere you want, converted and truncated. don't need to convert to wav at all. I use vlc and audacity.
they should also sue those that enter the site address manually. Why why not those that copy-pasted the site address? And the dns providers should be be sued as well, as well as google and all the search engines.
Only little detail -- I still have the right to buy what suits me. If I don't like it I don't buy it. This is the issue. -- drm will fade away when there is no demand for it.
It is MS fault and it is regulators fault for letting this type of contractual terms go on and it is OEM fault not to rebel. It is also consumer fault as most should know better by now.
this privacy feature (as exists in safari) maybe misleading. afaik it only stops local logging + cookies. Your IP and ISP+others logging will continue.
You clearly don't know what your are talking about. many linux distros are now much more user friendly than mswin (I use ubuntu), and nearly all online (as google docs) of local install wp (like kword) are easier/faster/more predictable than msword.
a good thing about online docs is the robust and clear version control. you know who edited what and when, and you can revert to previous version. not like the clumsy revision and track changes of ms office + unlogged file changes
(c) limits the licensee right to make copies (you can't except fair use or if the license says otherwise as in GPL). Does not oblige the author to make or sell any copies if he doesn't want to.
I don't want to chase anything. They should chase the needles. Anyway they can sue whoever they want. What I think is wrong is to uphold their claim, as it may serve other less-legitimate/understandable claims
imho the decision is dangerous. proper tools for proper problems. if the issue is stopping cheating, sue or stop the users. not the bot developer and definitely not the concept of sw programs talking to one another.
Slashdot Mirror
Parent is funny? where?
hypocrite bastards
if the EC wants to solve the root cause they should
(i) force MS to follow standards (ii) abrogate OEM contracts
(iii) may be expose some recent MS cheap tricks such as
the office pseudo open formats.
same with me. This news surprised me as my experience is for FF to run as fast or faster in Ubuntu; next comes mac osx, and third windows. but of course there is nothing scientific or even objective in there.
It isn't. First time you start firefox after the update it tells you about the new add on and you can delete it or disable it on the spot. Before that it will not work. I've got the ms update and was surprised myself (as I only run on demand ms updates, and review before installing, and it did not say it was installing this add on bundled in .not update)
troll(s) is who modded this way
ok -- from the table figures --
(whats -- power on)
mean 256
mode 150
max 610
min 91
stdev 107
the store sells the file. DRM fee files can be edited anywhere
you want, converted and truncated. don't need to convert to wav at all.
I use vlc and audacity.
Linux is ready for the desktop. Try Ubuntu and see for yourself.
they should also sue those that enter the site address manually. Why why not those that copy-pasted the site address? And the dns providers should be be sued as well, as well as google and all the search engines.
This is what http://re.search.wikia.com/ is doing
Only little detail -- I still have the right to buy what suits me. If I don't like it I don't buy it. This is the issue. -- drm will fade away when there is no demand for it.
It is MS fault and it is regulators fault for letting this type of contractual terms go on and it is OEM fault not to rebel. It is also consumer fault as most should know better by now.
this privacy feature (as exists in safari) maybe misleading. afaik it only stops local logging + cookies. Your IP and ISP+others logging will continue.
you're right. bad mods happen more and more imo.
(now for offtopic -- digg style mods are much better)
The article does mention Asus --
What Dell is really doing here is building the equivalent of a secondary Asus Eee PC into a full-featured, full-size laptop.
Flash plugin from adobe works fine for me on firefof on ubuntu. Shockwave doesnt.
Also hope he wins and as a funny side effect the uk gov has one ore reason to complain that the eu is taking away the power to "protect" its citizens
The tiger was careless and he should do what he can to escape an out of proportion sentence
You clearly don't know what your are talking about. many linux distros are now much more user friendly than mswin (I use ubuntu), and nearly all online (as google docs) of local install wp (like kword) are easier/faster/more predictable than msword.
a good thing about online docs is the robust and clear version control. you know who edited what and when, and you can revert to previous version. not like the clumsy revision and track changes of ms office + unlogged file changes
most (including google docs) already have a offline+synv feature. still bulky but improving.
(c) limits the licensee right to make copies (you can't except fair use or if the license says otherwise as in GPL). Does not oblige the author to make or sell any copies if he doesn't want to.
I don't want to chase anything.
They should chase the needles.
Anyway they can sue whoever they
want.
What I think is wrong is to uphold
their claim, as it may serve other
less-legitimate/understandable claims
imho the decision is dangerous.
proper tools for proper problems. if the issue is stopping cheating, sue or stop the users. not the bot developer and definitely not the concept of sw programs talking to one another.