My guess is that whoever wrote the article either didn't know the right terminology or didn't think that the audience would. Or, of course, the scientists could have "dumbed down" their explanation so that the journalist could understand it.
I grew up in Los Angles, and the first thing I thought of when I RTFM was that it sounded like an inversion layer. Checking with Wikipedia, I found that it's probably caused by Capping inversion. In fact, I'm almost a tad astonished that none of the climate scientists involved in the study recognized it, although it's possible that none of them came from an area that's subject to such things and had no first-hand experience with the phenomenon.
Changing UI's have caused him to eventually give up using the computer...
I'm not quite as old as your father, but I still prefer the type of UI that I used back in the days of Win95 because it does things the way I expect, and doesn't have an ever-growing set of bells, whistles and gongs getting in my way. That's why my computers all use Xfce, because it's trivial for me to set up the way I like it. And, for somebody like your father, who isn't interested in knowing what's going on "under the hood," switching to Linux isn't hard at all, especially if you pick a distro such as Xubuntu, which is designed with new users in mind.
To the Republicans it isn't. To them, they believe their invisible man in the sky told them the entire Earth is theirs to use.
Not to all, or even most Republicans. That's mostly the Religious Right, and they have far, far more influence than their numbers say they should because the GOP needs their votes to win elections. Just because the far right extremists act that way doesn't mean that the party as a whole agrees with them.
If memory serves, he did use a fire extinguisher as a rolling pin to crush something (I don't remember what, either nuts or ice.) in a special to celebrate the show's tenth anniversary, but never on the show itself.
There are some bosses who are so self-important that they'd fire anybody who suggested that they can fix for themselves, and I agree that I'd not want to work for one, but that wasn't what I meant. I was thinking of the kind of boss who'd fire you for phrasing your suggestion the way I did; of course, following the link may help you understand my thoughts.
I think I'd have been tempted to tell him that he knows how to fix it if he knows how to whistle. Of course, a lot depends on his personality; if he's an arrogant stuffed shirt, you'll be looking for your next job before you know what's happened.
I remember, almost thirty years ago, running across a book with that title. It was the story of a girl (about fourteen, I think) whose family relocated to a lunar colony because her father got a good job up there. The title is a bit of a play on words, of course, but both meanings were appropriate and it wasn't a bad book.
A robot can only do what it's designed to do. It can only use the tools or probes you built into it unless you've added to the cost, weight and complexity of the device by giving it the ability to reconfigure itself, and even then, there are a limited number of configurations it can use. A human, with a tool kit can swap things around however needed, limited only by what's available and can stop in the middle of an experiment if needed to record some unexpected phenomenon. You can't do things like that with a robot because by the time the controllers back here see what's happening, it's too late.
What do we get from sending a meat robot to mars, other than the sort of daredevil glory?
We get something on the scene that's able to adapt to the situation, take advantage of the unexpected and do things on its own initiative. I don't know about you, but I find the Risk well worth the potential benefits.
One of the things accomplished by taking Voyager I behind Titan was a direct measurement of the thickness and density of Titan's atmosphere. They did this, btw, by measuring how much of the probe's signal was absorbed before it was completely occluded and by how long it took the signal to come back to normal strength after it came out on the other side. And to show you how good the navigation was, closest approach was less than two radii out, meaning that if it had been cut in half, Voyager would have collided with Titan instead of just passing closely. I know this, because I spent some time at JPL in the mid 1980s and am slightly acquainted with the man who came up with the idea and did most of the work involved.
Back when the (then) newest version of Windows would reboot when there was a problem instead of giving you a BSOD with the option to kill whatever caused it and try to continue, I had a friend who was a senior developer. He actually insisted that if something went badly wrong, he wanted his computer to reboot right then and there. He didn't care what program had crashed, he didn't want a chance to save his work, he just wanted it to reboot without asking. I never did understand his attitude, but I can only guess that a lot of people must have shared it because there wasn't the type of mass protest that I would have expected. Clearly, when it comes to Windows, spontaneous rebooting has been acceptable behavior for decades.
If it's true that there are more traffic fatalities every year in San Diego than there are murders, it must be the world capital of bad drivers. Maybe they should be putting some of this money into improving their Driver's Education and Driver's Training classes instead of trying to make it harder for people to use the streets.
Not everybody who has a tattoo is stupid. I have three, but not by choice. They're 50 cm "up," and it takes two days of prep and the help of a proctologist to see them.
Not that good of a location, hard to see and easy to be covered.
Whoosh! That's a reference to the TV show Dark Angel. All of the gene-engineered "soldiers" from Manticore had barcodes on the back of their neck and it wasn't a tattoo, either; if you removed that section of skin, the barcode would still be there when it grew back.
Microsoft products are simply a disaster and require years of experience in order to use them.
And there's a very good reason for it: vendor lock-in. Once you've gone with Microsoft and its products, there's a very long, expensive learning curve before your employees are proficient and productive. It takes an exceptionally brave manager to admit that they were wrong and that all of that money the company spent on retraining was wasted, especially when it's easier (and possibly cheaper) to stick with what you have because "everybody knows how to use it."
I had the same experience. However, I've also found that clicking on the number of comments will get you to the discussion. I do wish that the webmonkies would give the crack-pipes back to the mods and stop uglifying the site.
For several years now, Google has taken to ignoring all of the punctuation in my query to "give me more results," when I added them to get me less results and avoid wasting time wading through page after page of irrelevancy. Yes, I know that I can force Google to Do It My Way, but only after the fact and in any event, I shouldn't have to. Google knows how to give me exactly what I asked for so why doesn't it Just Do The Right Thing. Google may not be doing evil, but it's forgotten that if you don't please your users they won't come back and there won't be any ad revenue. Personally, I've switched to startpage.com, not so much for privacy issues but because it returns the kind of results I want, not what gives them the most advertisements.
Well, no, legalising the blasting of such people with a shotgun would probably be a very effective way to protect the privacy rights of those who don't want the cameras on them.
I'd have no problem with that, provided that it was limited to practicing politicians who needed killing.
Slashdot Mirror
My guess is that whoever wrote the article either didn't know the right terminology or didn't think that the audience would. Or, of course, the scientists could have "dumbed down" their explanation so that the journalist could understand it.
I grew up in Los Angles, and the first thing I thought of when I RTFM was that it sounded like an inversion layer. Checking with Wikipedia, I found that it's probably caused by Capping inversion. In fact, I'm almost a tad astonished that none of the climate scientists involved in the study recognized it, although it's possible that none of them came from an area that's subject to such things and had no first-hand experience with the phenomenon.
New Mexico isn't the only state that's done this kind of thing. At one time, so was Alaska.
No, it has no effect on its own ability to spread, because it only updates Flash on machines it's already infected.
Changing UI's have caused him to eventually give up using the computer...
I'm not quite as old as your father, but I still prefer the type of UI that I used back in the days of Win95 because it does things the way I expect, and doesn't have an ever-growing set of bells, whistles and gongs getting in my way. That's why my computers all use Xfce, because it's trivial for me to set up the way I like it. And, for somebody like your father, who isn't interested in knowing what's going on "under the hood," switching to Linux isn't hard at all, especially if you pick a distro such as Xubuntu, which is designed with new users in mind.
Just to pick a nit, unless you have a copy of make in the same directory as the kernel source, it's make meuconfig that you'd be running.
To the Republicans it isn't. To them, they believe their invisible man in the sky told them the entire Earth is theirs to use.
Not to all, or even most Republicans. That's mostly the Religious Right, and they have far, far more influence than their numbers say they should because the GOP needs their votes to win elections. Just because the far right extremists act that way doesn't mean that the party as a whole agrees with them.
If memory serves, he did use a fire extinguisher as a rolling pin to crush something (I don't remember what, either nuts or ice.) in a special to celebrate the show's tenth anniversary, but never on the show itself.
FWIW, Alton does admit to having one unitasker in his kitchen, although he's never needed to use it: a fire extinguisher.
There are some bosses who are so self-important that they'd fire anybody who suggested that they can fix for themselves, and I agree that I'd not want to work for one, but that wasn't what I meant. I was thinking of the kind of boss who'd fire you for phrasing your suggestion the way I did; of course, following the link may help you understand my thoughts.
I think I'd have been tempted to tell him that he knows how to fix it if he knows how to whistle. Of course, a lot depends on his personality; if he's an arrogant stuffed shirt, you'll be looking for your next job before you know what's happened.
What you did, essentially, is make your own Lavarand. That's cool, of course, but don't try selling them because they're still under patent.
The moon has no atmosphere.
I remember, almost thirty years ago, running across a book with that title. It was the story of a girl (about fourteen, I think) whose family relocated to a lunar colony because her father got a good job up there. The title is a bit of a play on words, of course, but both meanings were appropriate and it wasn't a bad book.
A robot can only do what it's designed to do. It can only use the tools or probes you built into it unless you've added to the cost, weight and complexity of the device by giving it the ability to reconfigure itself, and even then, there are a limited number of configurations it can use. A human, with a tool kit can swap things around however needed, limited only by what's available and can stop in the middle of an experiment if needed to record some unexpected phenomenon. You can't do things like that with a robot because by the time the controllers back here see what's happening, it's too late.
What do we get from sending a meat robot to mars, other than the sort of daredevil glory?
We get something on the scene that's able to adapt to the situation, take advantage of the unexpected and do things on its own initiative. I don't know about you, but I find the Risk well worth the potential benefits.
One of the things accomplished by taking Voyager I behind Titan was a direct measurement of the thickness and density of Titan's atmosphere. They did this, btw, by measuring how much of the probe's signal was absorbed before it was completely occluded and by how long it took the signal to come back to normal strength after it came out on the other side. And to show you how good the navigation was, closest approach was less than two radii out, meaning that if it had been cut in half, Voyager would have collided with Titan instead of just passing closely. I know this, because I spent some time at JPL in the mid 1980s and am slightly acquainted with the man who came up with the idea and did most of the work involved.
Back when the (then) newest version of Windows would reboot when there was a problem instead of giving you a BSOD with the option to kill whatever caused it and try to continue, I had a friend who was a senior developer. He actually insisted that if something went badly wrong, he wanted his computer to reboot right then and there. He didn't care what program had crashed, he didn't want a chance to save his work, he just wanted it to reboot without asking. I never did understand his attitude, but I can only guess that a lot of people must have shared it because there wasn't the type of mass protest that I would have expected. Clearly, when it comes to Windows, spontaneous rebooting has been acceptable behavior for decades.
If it's true that there are more traffic fatalities every year in San Diego than there are murders, it must be the world capital of bad drivers. Maybe they should be putting some of this money into improving their Driver's Education and Driver's Training classes instead of trying to make it harder for people to use the streets.
Not everybody who has a tattoo is stupid. I have three, but not by choice. They're 50 cm "up," and it takes two days of prep and the help of a proctologist to see them.
Not that good of a location, hard to see and easy to be covered.
Whoosh! That's a reference to the TV show Dark Angel. All of the gene-engineered "soldiers" from Manticore had barcodes on the back of their neck and it wasn't a tattoo, either; if you removed that section of skin, the barcode would still be there when it grew back.
Does that mean that you'll give a good grade to a student who came up with a clever way of solving the wrong problem?
Microsoft products are simply a disaster and require years of experience in order to use them.
And there's a very good reason for it: vendor lock-in. Once you've gone with Microsoft and its products, there's a very long, expensive learning curve before your employees are proficient and productive. It takes an exceptionally brave manager to admit that they were wrong and that all of that money the company spent on retraining was wasted, especially when it's easier (and possibly cheaper) to stick with what you have because "everybody knows how to use it."
I had the same experience. However, I've also found that clicking on the number of comments will get you to the discussion. I do wish that the webmonkies would give the crack-pipes back to the mods and stop uglifying the site.
For several years now, Google has taken to ignoring all of the punctuation in my query to "give me more results," when I added them to get me less results and avoid wasting time wading through page after page of irrelevancy. Yes, I know that I can force Google to Do It My Way, but only after the fact and in any event, I shouldn't have to. Google knows how to give me exactly what I asked for so why doesn't it Just Do The Right Thing. Google may not be doing evil, but it's forgotten that if you don't please your users they won't come back and there won't be any ad revenue. Personally, I've switched to startpage.com, not so much for privacy issues but because it returns the kind of results I want, not what gives them the most advertisements.
Well, no, legalising the blasting of such people with a shotgun would probably be a very effective way to protect the privacy rights of those who don't want the cameras on them.
I'd have no problem with that, provided that it was limited to practicing politicians who needed killing.