Slashdot Mirror


User: Paleomacus

Paleomacus's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
241
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 241

  1. Re:Three Blind Mice on Three Blind Phreaks · · Score: 1

    IIRC. A group of blind phreaks with perfect pitch told him about it.

  2. Re:Three Blind Mice on Three Blind Phreaks · · Score: 1

    Draper wasn't the one who figured it out.

  3. Re:buy used, sell in student paper on Ripoff 101: Gouging Students for Textbooks · · Score: 1

    Come visit any of the fine SUNY(State University of New York) Schools. You'll see what he's talking about. I just keep all my books...fuck everybody I say.

  4. Re:Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA on Microsoft Agrees Settlement Over MikeRoweSoft.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    We all know what a software festival at Redmond means. He'll spend 6 days and 7 nights in a re-education and brainwashing resort.

  5. Re:English/Metric on Another English/Metric "Spacecraft" Problem · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but I measure mine in meters.(Transplanted from a blue whale)

  6. Re:yay! on Man Page Project Can Now Use Official POSIX Docs · · Score: 2, Funny

    man bind,man kill,man bash, man touch, and man finger are my favorites

  7. Re:For The Think Tank on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: 1

    But I'm not Don't question my authority or put me in the dock Cozimnot!

    Won't happen again.

  8. Re:-1 Pedantic on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: 1

    Speaking of irony. When I logged on Slashdot this morning my fortune was;

    FOOLED you! Absorb EGO SHATTERING impulse rays, polyester poltroon!!

  9. Re:For The Think Tank on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: 1

    Slight error there, I was NOT speaking I was typing.. there is a difference.

    Purely symantics. The way I see it writing(even on slashdot) benefits from having 30 seconds of proofing applied before submission. No spelling or grammer checker would have caught the error you made(none that I've encountered that is).

    I agree with your statement that I am ignorant. However you seem irrational. I never claimed that your spelling and grammar should be perfect(who is to determine perfection?) just that you might want to strive to improve yourself.

    I believe knee-jerk defensiveness is a stronger sign of ignorance. I am far from perfect and can accept the errors I make. I also don't use my handicaps as excuse for anything.

    But in your brain it seems, anyone that posts on /. with a mistype, bad punctuation or shitty grammar somehow should know better, wake up and relise this is the real world, no one is perfect.

    This sentence is nonsense. I do realize this is the real world and the imperfection inherent. Somehow, I cannot find the place in my brain that you have retrieved these fascinating tid-bits.

    I didn't correct you to pass any judgement.
    I won't be responding to this thread further.

  10. Re:For The Think Tank on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: 1
    And your life is so great that you have the time to reply?

    I was just trying to half-way politely correct someone. One in twenty of my posts is a correction of spelling or grammar. There are just some things that I find really irritating.

    1. Similar irritants:
    2. irregardless - it's just not a word and has no valid linguistic meaning
    3. 'play it by year' - correctly: 'play it by ear', the first makes no sense

    There are quite a few more but I think you get the idea. I don't correct people in public unless I'm very good friends with that person(even then rarely). I just figure here is a good place to occasionally correct people so that they might not sound uneducated in the real world. The way you speak _does_ make people think differently about you.
  11. Re:For The Think Tank on Sun's new UltraSPARC workstation: the Blade 1500 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You could have just read the aticle and then posted something worth my time instead of this dribble.

    You could have just learned the English language and then posted something worth anyone's time instead of this drivel

  12. Re:Funny you mention automakers... on Paranoia · · Score: 1

    That's horrible. I had completely forgot about the Element. What the hell are automakers thinking? None of these vehicles look futuristic, modern, nor good.

  13. Re:Funny you mention automakers... on Paranoia · · Score: 0

    IMHO, the Aztec is the fugliest vehicle on the entire planet.

  14. Re:Indeed! on One-Way Ticket to Mars? · · Score: 1

    What made the space travel possible to the degree we have now?

    Deciding that it was a goal and that we're going to devote time, money and resources to the project.As well as feeling the need to accomplish the feat.

    That's what it's taken to accomplish 'magic trick's' throughout history. Why not try?

    I hear space chicks are easy!

  15. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. on Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Rumors · · Score: 1

    Some of the authors left much to be desired. I wish they wouldn't have been so set on releasing the entire series so rapidly. I forget the names of the authors that I didn't care for but one couldn't describe a space battle(Greg Bear I believe), and another one or two thought that they were really funny(they weren't funny, just irritating).

  16. Re:Not exactly the Matrix on Matrix-Style Brain Interface Closer To Reality · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself!

  17. Re:Two Words on Clean Nuclear Launches? · · Score: 1

    Which is the concept I couldn't articulate sufficiently with my pea brain so I used an example.

  18. Re:Two Words on Clean Nuclear Launches? · · Score: 1

    IANANP( I am not a nuclear physicist ) but it seems to me that a mass to energy conversion is what a nuclear reaction is.

    e.g. the uranium core in a nuclear bomb being subjected to an explosive force of some sort(dynamite?) to initiate a chain reaction which causes the conversion of the reactive mass to energy.

  19. Re:Not famous yet on JRR Tolkien: Return Of The Domain Name · · Score: 1

    So what's this first name? You can't dangle something like that post out there and not give us our pay off!

  20. Re:All together now! on Yahoo and Unilateral Anti-Spam Technology? · · Score: 1

    Let's not even try. Let's just shoot them. Cheaper and a lot less work than trying to change the world in a non-violent manner.

  21. Re:choice on Microsoft Unhappy With HP's iTunes Decision · · Score: 1

    Apt and hilarious! Bravo!

  22. Re:for no reason. on LaserMonks Offer Prayer, Printer Cartridges · · Score: 1

    Hygiene. Us lazy Americans think it's too much work to pull back a foreskin.

  23. Re:Marketing on Should a '9200' Brand Mean a 9200 GPU? · · Score: 1

    Agreed. But I've never seen specs(except possibly the AthlonXP marketing is similar) that say a [Chipset] that approximates [AnotherChipset]. They always just say 'features [Chipset]'.

  24. Re:Marketing on Should a '9200' Brand Mean a 9200 GPU? · · Score: 1

    Ok here's a simpler example(tad absurd tho). You buy a 5 pound sledge. Then one day you need a stick to wack somebody with(without excessive injury nor death) and a 5 pound weight to replace the weight of a golden idol(a la Raiders of the Lost Ark). Well you better hope that 5 pound hammer head is actually 5 pounds and that the hammer haft is swingable.

    How about this one, you buy a roast beef sandwich and end up with two slices of bread and sliced soy substitute, you're not going to be happy because this is NOT what you bought/were led to believe you bought.

  25. Re:Marketing on Should a '9200' Brand Mean a 9200 GPU? · · Score: 0

    What if someone wants to take this '9200' chip out of their laptop for some other purpose that only a '9200' could perform? Then there _is_ a difference in performance and features(eg, agp 8x).