Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Agrees Settlement Over MikeRoweSoft.com

GillBates0 writes "CNN's reporting that Microsoft Corp has settled with Mike Rowe, persuading the teenager to give up his domain name in exchange for costs of changing the existing domain to a new Web site, Microsoft certification training, an Xbox, an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond and some other gifts. Includes a choice quote from Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler: 'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'. Mike had received a 25-page letter from Microsoft informing him he was committing copyright infringement, and threatening legal action, as reported earlier on Slashdot."

689 comments

  1. Arrgggh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Kid sold out!

    1. Re:Arrgggh! by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but since he had fallen in the trap of offering to sell the domain for a good amount of money, he was pretty much done for. This is probably the best option he could go for, but I have to agree that it would have been interesting to see the developments of this story if Mike had chosen otherwise.

      --
      DrkBr
    2. Re:Arrgggh! by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That doesn't mean it was in bad faith, like MS claimed. The kid had an actual business running. He simply decided to make a counteroffer when they came up to him. Had they not, he would've run the site all the same. He wasn't cybersquatting

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    3. Re:Arrgggh! by md65536 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah.

      "Ha! He took the bait! He said his site was worth $10000 to him! Now his ass is ours! Let's eat his soul!"

      "Oh wait! The public is actually sympathizing with this monster? Let's give him an xbox! Make sure to get some nice press photos of us and our new best friend."

    4. Re:Arrgggh! by firstadopter.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he would of gotten his $10K if he held out. But he probably got a few thousand worth of Microsoft goodies + a visit to Redmond isn't 1/2 bad.

    5. Re:Arrgggh! by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least they are going to give him and MCSE so he'll know how to re-image/re-boot his XBox when it BSODs on him.

    6. Re:Arrgggh! by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      The visit to Redmond is probably so Bill can kick his butt in person.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    7. Re:Arrgggh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line item of an xbox is silly sounding, but it likely will play him just like you suggest.

      At least they didnt stick him with an Ultimate TV just in time for the big game or a WebTV for his grandparents on the other coast.

    8. Re:Arrgggh! by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Funny

      The XBOX was a good idea.

      Until he decides to throw a mod chip in it and open up Mike's house of XBOX hacking.

      It all goes downhill from there...

    9. Re:Arrgggh! by kommakazi · · Score: 1

      lol, that's the exact thing that came to my mind when I read the story. Funny the first post said it :)

    10. Re:Arrgggh! by gangien · · Score: 1

      please, i doubt bill could even get his leg that high.

    11. Re:Arrgggh! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the guy isn't in a wheelchair yet. Not out of necessity, but if I had that much money I would be working on a hovering jet wheelchair to get around my office/house/city. It would probably have lasers on it too.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    12. Re:Arrgggh! by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 3, Funny
      The visit to Redmond is probably so Bill can kick his butt in person.

      No, it's just another way of saying "Go to hell".

    13. Re:Arrgggh! by Llamakiller-4 · · Score: 1

      A Deal with the Devil

      I've often wondered what the going rate is for your soul. (Adjusted for inflation) Well, here it is:
      "in exchange for costs of changing the existing domain to a new Web site, Microsoft certification training, an Xbox, an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond and some other gifts."
      Wouldn't it be ironic if Mike becomes the future "Luke Skywalker" that takes down the evil Empire?

      --
      "It's what you learn after you know it all that counts", Earl Weaver - Legendary Coach of the Baltimore Orioles
    14. Re:Arrgggh! by Bill_Royle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A million kids have web design website up and running. Calling most of them "actual businesses" is like calling a door-to-door vacuum salesman an "account executive."

      As an aside, it seems to me that if you are going to charge to set someone up with a website, and you have a button at the bottom claiming XHTML 1.0 compliance, you'd better be compliant. At least, an "actual business" would be.

      ###

      This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
      Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser.

      Line 247, column 59: there is no attribute "leftmargin" (explain...). ..." text="#000000" id="all" leftmargin="10" topmargin="10" marginwidth="10" mar

      Line 247, column 74: there is no attribute "topmargin" (explain...). ..." id="all" leftmargin="10" topmargin="10" marginwidth="10" marginheight="10"

      ###

      This goes on and on, no need to paste it all. Point is, claiming that this is an actual business is a joke.

    15. Re:Arrgggh! by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      Kid sold out!

      Faced with the choice of "selling out," or facing a multi-year legal challenge that could end up costing who knows how much money (tens of thousands? hundreds of thousands? millions?) can you really blame him?

      Sure, i would have cheered him on if he'd decided to go for the golden ring, but i'm not going to criticize him for taking the easy way out and covering his ass.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    16. Re:Arrgggh! by abradsn · · Score: 1

      He could have someone do it for him.

    17. Re:Arrgggh! by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      I see you're still supporting that hopeless idealist who would call himself President. Tell me, are you doing it out of spite? Would you really want the First Lady to look like a rat*? And lastly, did you or did you not vote for Nader in 2000?

      yours

      * Don't get me wrong, I love ratty women. But it's just not First Ladylike. Neither is "YAAGH!" presidential.

    18. Re:Arrgggh! by shantanu.singh · · Score: 1

      yep nothing more than that. in fact microsoft should be giving everybody training on how keep peace of mind when such thing happen. BUT personally I prefer money back.

      --
      ----- Mobility for us! http://www.mobility4us.com
    19. Re:Arrgggh! by Fulg · · Score: 1

      No, it's just another way of saying "Go to hell".

      Damn, and I had to go and spend all my mod points already... Definitely +5 Funny :)

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    20. Re:Arrgggh! by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Kick his butt in person? Are you serious? Have you SEEN Bill? He couldn't kick his way out of a wet paper bag. He has his 'thugs' do it for him (reference Simpson's episode).

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    21. Re:Arrgggh! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I sorta figured the guards would just hold the kid down for a few minutes while Bill worked up the energy.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    22. Re:Arrgggh! by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

      Not only does it fail XHTML 1.0 Transitional verification, it failed every OTHER one as well: XHTML 1.1, XHTML Basic 1.0, XHTML 1.0 Strict, XHTML 1.0 Transitional, XHTML 1.0 Frameset, HTML 4.01 Strict, HTML 4.01 Transitional, HTML 4.01 Frameset, HTML 3.2 and HTML 2.0 . Pity.

      --
      This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
    23. Re:Arrgggh! by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Well spotted. They also include:
      """
      Line 636, column 20: non SGML character number 146 (explain...).

      <td>Sorry there hasn?t been a lot of news posted by me lately, I have been very
      """

      Let's play spot the windows user...

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    24. Re:Arrgggh! by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      I see you're still supporting that hopeless idealist who would call himself President. Tell me, are you doing it out of spite? Would you really want the First Lady to look like a rat*? And lastly, did you or did you not vote for Nader in 2000?

      * Don't get me wrong, I love ratty women. But it's just not First Ladylike. Neither is "YAAGH!" presidential.

      And i'm supposed to care about the opinion of someone who thinks the height of discourse is to go around insulting other people's political choises without even the pretense of rational thought? You think we should choose a presidential candidate based on what their _spouse_ looks like? And people thought democracy was in trouble when what the _candidate_ looked like started to influence the results!

      No, i didn't vote for Nader in 2000. I voted for Gore. What that has to do with the issue at hand i'm really failing to see.

      It's another sad commentary about the state of our democracy when people are more concerned about one spontaneous act of genuine exuberance than they are about the actual issues. People seem to be making more out of "the scream" than they did about the sex scandals surrounding Clinton when he was running. They're certainly making a bigger deal out of it than the fact that the administration has finally admited we probably won't find WMDs in Iraq.

      When you feel you have both the desire and the ability to talk about the significant issues in this campaign, come back and try again. Until then, your opinion is irrelevant and your contribution worthless.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    25. Re:Arrgggh! by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      "your opinion is irrelevant and your contribution worthless"

      OhHH! Now you've done it. I've hated Dean and his muppet candidacy since long before his unholy squeal after his trouncing in Iowa, but I do happen to agree with you that it was blown entirely out of proportion (he was trying to energize a bunch of disappointed kids... sure, that's understandable.)

      But I also think he was sort of asking for the negative attention--I mean, he'd spent the day criticizing the media for building up expectations for him. Now the media, when criticized, just love to find a way to strike back, and of course they pounced on him as soon as he did something a little silly. That the Doctor failed to understand this simple law of politics is an indication (like we needed any more) that if elected President, he wouldn't survive a day in Washington.

      In fact, we wouldn't have to worry about his becoming President to begin with, since if he won the nomination the Democrats would be doomed come November--not only as far as the presidency goes, but as the most visible figure in the party he'd also manage to cripple the campaigns of dozens of Democratic senators and congresspersons running for (re)election, just by virtue of the fact that he is unelectable. He's likable, I'll grant you that, but in order to learn to like him you really have to spend some time watching him on TV and reading interviews with him, and even then I think most people would have to give him the benefit of the doubt to understand his rather oddball brand of enthusiasm.

      And yes, electability is a significant issue in this campaign, and all campaigns for that matter. There could be a candidate out there who matches my views on every single issue, and I still wouldn't vote for him or her unless there were a realistic chance he or she could beat Bush.

      Finally, to me, your leaden response to what (I'll admit) was essentially a tongue-in-cheek troll only serves as further proof that Dean supporters take the Doctor's candidacy waaay too seriously. People in that campaign just can't take a joke. Plus, they need to shower more often.

      yours

      PS. You want my real opinion? Raw and uncensored? People who support Dean are naive, idealistic college students who have never participated in the mainstream political process before, and by and large are propelling the Doctor forward because it's the cool thing to do. There was this Deaniac they interviewed on CNN a couple weeks ago who said something like, "I'm out here in Iowa because all my friends are here. It seemed like it would be fun and I'd get to meet a lot of cool people." Please. Give me a fucking break.

  2. Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny

    How exactly does one agree a settlement? Isn't that a bit like setting up someone the bomb?

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      What you say?

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Limburgher · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have no chance make your time!

      --

      You are not the customer.

    3. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by scmason · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but your sig rocks!

      --
      "I am a patient boy. I wait I wait I wait. My time is water down the drain..." Fugazi
    4. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for great justice

    5. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by jxs2151 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Off topic, but your sig rocks!

      Not only does it rock on ./ but it rocks in New Hampshire. It rocks in South Carolina and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and it rocks in California and Texas and New York. And it rocks in South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then it rocks in Washington, D.C. but not enough to take back the White House.

      Yeaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!

    7. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

      Gee, how do I bring my blog to the attention of MS lawyers? I need an Xbox.... http://mikeysoft.zblogger.com

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    8. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by eclectro · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      I think that at this point, this is a sign that Dean has failed it.

      Too bad, I would have enjoyed seeing him body slam Dubya WWE style.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    9. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Did I see a toronto in there? Heheheheehe...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    10. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd vote for a lunatic? Hey, Deanie Babies, it's all over. I may vote Democratic this fall, but it certainly won't be for a mentally unstable guy like Dean.

      My favorite slogan for the election this year is, "Lick Bush in 2004". (any year is good for licking bush)

    11. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't rock too well in Iowa. Won't rock in the South. Methinks it may have rocked so much that now it's off its rocker.

    12. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no chance to survive make your time!

      Without that extra word, the phrase is almost incomprehensible.

    13. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't.

    14. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by scmason · · Score: 1

      If Dean makes the primaries, your option would be to vote for a person who sent thousands of Americans to die in a desert based on intelligence he KNEW was flawed, all for the sake of a grudge match. Is that the kind of stability you are looking for?

      --
      "I am a patient boy. I wait I wait I wait. My time is water down the drain..." Fugazi
  3. aka... by jaden · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it"... I smell an innovation patent coming.

    1. Re:aka... by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft has always been adept with the distribution of carrots...how else do you think they've been able to steer their firm through the treacherous waters of antitrust lawsuits.

      Here, Mr. Judge, is a big diamond studded gold carrot. Here, Mr. Senator, can I help you with your campaign funds...

    2. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "how else do you think they've been able to steer their firm through the treacherous waters of antitrust lawsuits."

      Yeah, remember how they got the Justice Department to drop their lawsuit before it got to court. Oh, wait ...

    3. Re:aka... by firstadopter.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously they are the best at settlements. Remember how they offered all that software to the States... Microsoft s/w! We give it away for free so we I can lock you in the future!

    4. Re:aka... by neilcSD · · Score: 0

      that smell is actually the stick that was in Microsoft's ass...

    5. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread has more to do with the MS Acquisitions Department (Visio, DOJ), than the MS Public Relations Department.

    6. Re:aka... by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny.

      I pictured a monster sized bully beating up a kid in an ally way. Then, a small boy seeing what's going on runs off to tell a large hurd of nerds who comes running in masses. The monster is cought red handed hurting the poor kid with about 50k anger nerds and geeks watching. Quickly the monster reaches into it's deep pockets. Opps, he left the wallet at home, but he finds some chomp change and a few other goodies. He then stand before the nerds and says "This was all a big misunstanding. I was, umm, about to give him, umm, this pocket full of change, my game console, training at my enslav, I mean, training camps, in trade for his website."

      "See," moving the boy head, "he has agreed to take my offer, so can we please forget about all of this?"

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
    7. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      that's gay


      I pictured you being gang-banged by a group of angry bikers. Suddenly, a trucker convoy pulls up, and a dozen big truckers with tire irons proceed to kick ass. Then, as you're about to thank them for rescuing you from such depravity, they pull out their cocks and fuck your ass some more.

    8. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Seriously they are the best at settlements. Remember how they offered all that software to the States... Microsoft s/w! We give it away for free so we I can lock you in the future!"

      That sounds like a Linux tactic.

    9. Re:aka... by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it"

      I'm not sure I would want that stick, even if the stick had a carrot tied to it.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    10. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Linux may be given away freely, but you sure have a better chance of it remaining free in the future. With MS, the first hits free, then your MS's b*tch.

    11. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The couldn't buy the DOJ, so they bought a president instead. Bush's first course of action once he took office was to direct the DOJ to immediately cease its case against MS.

    12. Re:aka... by medscaper · · Score: 1
      I smell an innovation patent coming.

      You know, most of these innovation patents recently DO smell like ass.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    13. Re:aka... by devross · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...about 50k anger nerds and geeks...

      Gotta watch those anger nerds man. They're seriously dangerous. You can tell they're coming too because of the high-pitched nasal "war whine" they make when they're about to attack.

      --


      If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
    14. Re:aka... by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Then, a small boy seeing what's going on runs off to tell a large hurd of nerds who comes running in masses.

      That's GNU/Hurd of nerds...

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    15. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have a rich vein of gay sex fantasies to draw inspiration from. Just how much KY do you get through in a week anyway?

    16. Re:aka... by kerrbear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it

      Hey, do you think I could get an XBox too if Microsoft finds out about the web site I dedicated to my pet bird: MyCrowSoft.com?

    17. Re:aka... by LadyLucky · · Score: 1, Funny
      The monster is cought red handed hurting the poor kid with about 50k anger nerds and geeks watching

      I hear one of the nerds had a +5 calculator of Jock destruction.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    18. Re:aka... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you mean it takes them 20 years to arrive?

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    19. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I see. That's why the DOJ hasn't gone back to court to complain about MS. Oh Darn ..

    20. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, MS didn't buy a president, he was elected fair and square by the Supreme Court as intended by the founding fathers.

    21. Re:aka... by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      Then, a small boy seeing what's going on runs off to tell a large hurd of nerds...
      shouldn't that be GNU/hurd ?

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    22. Re:aka... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Along the same lines as I was thinking...

      I wouldn't want a carrot tied to that stick.

    23. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean "seriously danger"?

    24. Re:aka... by mesach · · Score: 1

      Even with a carrot on the end of it, I guarantee that most people will still end up getting the shit end of the stick.

      --
      moo.
    25. Re:aka... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      think I could get an XBox too if Microsoft finds out about the web site I dedicated to my pet bird: MyCrowSoft.com?

      or my anti-viagra site: MyCrowIsSoft.com

    26. Re:aka... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy is flawed.

      I don't care how big this monster is, there's no way it would be able to fit an xbox in it's pocket.

    27. Re:aka... by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 1

      Very nice, you made my day.

    28. Re:aka... by ModifiedDog · · Score: 1

      And the one dedicated to my child who takes HGH MikeGrowsOft.com

  4. XBOX?!?! by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cheap bastards could'nt give him a decent console like a PS2 or GC... now the poor canadian guy is stuck on Halo all day!!!!

    1. Re:XBOX?!?! by mrm677 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      XBox is probably the best console according to game developers. Gamespot.com also always claims that the most fluid and best graphics/gameplay comes from XBox followed closely by Gamecube, and then finally the PS2. This is for comparing games written for all three platforms.

      It could very well have to due with the cross-platform rendering toolkits that game developers use. They may not be tuned correctly for PS2.

    2. Re:XBOX?!?! by kinnell · · Score: 1

      It's his own fault. He should have held out for a monster truck

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    3. Re:XBOX?!?! by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares what the developers think? The Xbox is definitely not the favorite console of the people playing games. And to mangle a quick quote from Maddox, saying the Xbox has the best graphics and therefore is the best console is like saying that since I painted this picture with the best paints, I must be the best artist.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    4. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gamespot.com also always claims

      Dude, I don't know where to start to point out what's wrong with your post and your brain...

      When you enter "biased" and "I feel lucky" at google chances are high that it will take you straight to gamespot.com and their latest XBox homage.

      You certainly never spend time in front of all these consoles but you try desperately to us that the XBox (you know it's just a inferior PC that hardly runs Linux) is superior and rules the world (except Japan, Europe, and pretty much the rest outside the US).

      Get gamespot.com out of your head and _try_ to form your own opinion.

    5. Re:XBOX?!?! by tackaberry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohh, I want a free XBox too.

      www.MikeRhoSoft.com is still free.

      MikeRowSoft.com, MikeRoeSoft.com, and MyCrowSoft.com are all taken.

    6. Re:XBOX?!?! by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really comes down to games. However most developers are increasingly writing their games using cross-platform toolkits so that they can penetrate all three markets. And according to the people I know, Xbox performs the best. Gamespot.com corraborates this.

      So unless the few games that are console-exclusive are really what matters to you, or some tangible things like form factors, then the only difference is graphics/gameplay quality and smoothness. And XBox wins here for most cross-platform games.

      Using your paint analogy, if an artist draws the exact same picture multiple times using different paints, then the superior picture will be the one that uses the superior paints.

    7. Re:XBOX?!?! by Larry*boy.3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      gamecube sucks, you fucker

    8. Re:XBOX?!?! by mrm677 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey asshole, I have friends and family who write console games for a living.

      Read my other reply in this thread.

    9. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, its all about Counter Strike on Xbox Live. It rules.

      Beats the hell out of all the Damn STEAM updates and crap.

      So the graphics on CS on Xbox arnt as good as halo, but come on, HOW GOOD CAN CS LOOK!? Its all about the game play and the 'nades! and they do them both very well.

      Next....Halo2!!!!! COME GET SOME!

    10. Re:XBOX?!?! by zeno_2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Xbox has lots of problems, and its not just thier console. EA wont do any multiplayer games on the XBox using Xbox Live because Microsoft charges access to those games and Microsoft keeps all the money. Some developers might say that its the best console, but I bet those developers did mostly pc games and im sure the switch over isn't hard. Microsoft has raped bungie (im not the only one who thought the pre-microsoft halo movies looked pretty kickass compared to how the game turned out). In fact id say the only reason why the Xbox is popular is because the company behind it can pretty much throw as much money as they want behind it, they dont innovate, they buy companies who do. Oh and the fact that Microsoft moved my job over to india doesn't help me like them any more..

      Down with the XBOX! Gamespot sucks too!

    11. Re:XBOX?!?! by BTWR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yeah, and accoding to Gamespot (and IGN), Mario Kart 64 and Mario Kart Double Dash both SUCKED.

      (shows what they know...)

    12. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have all 3 of the current "big 3" systems.

      I started with a GC, and its still may favorite...the first party stuff can't be touched, and for multiplayer (Smash Bros, Monkey Ball 2, Mario Kart) and other exclusives (the first Rogue Squadron game on it, at least) make it the last one I'd give up.

      Then I got a PS2...ugh. I got it for WDL:Thundertanks, hoping it would be another "Battle Tanx", but it sucked. For a while its saving grace was GTA3 and GTA:VC, but now it's only the thought that the sequel to those will be on this system first that have me keep it around. There are some other good games, but overall the gem/shovelware ratio is way too small to justify the expense of the system. I really think that "first mover advantage" combined with the leverage of playing PSone games (which in turn had a huge first mover advantage) as well as being untouchable for specific genres I don't care about (sports, RPGs) are what make this system the leader.

      I got an Xbox lastly, and its made a tremendous impression on me. It follows in the Microsoft tradition of not really innovating much, but copying some of the very best parts of other systems. It's a buttugly huge console but it has the best controllers (the S-version, the original were just clones + minor enhancements and great enlargements of what the DC had) and some of the games are sweet...Halo and Crimson Skies in particular. It is very likely THE biggest horsepower console out now, and it shows.

      So while my heart is still with Nintendo, I've really been impressed with what Xbox has done. And will probably never really forgive PS2 for the dumbness of only putting 2 controller ports on without a multitap...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    13. Re:XBOX?!?! by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Comparing cross-platform games is only good for comparing the game itself, not comparing the consoles. SSX3, for instance, looks excellent on an XBox, but the PS2 controls suit it a lot better, but that doesn't tell me which is the better console.

      The games define a console, not the technical specs (which would you rather have, a NES or a CDi?), and some of the best games I've played are only available on certain consoles. Each console has its awesome games (Disgaea, KOTOR, Zelda: TWW). There is really no "best" console, just the best console for you depending on what you want to play.

    14. Re:XBOX?!?! by schapman · · Score: 1

      you can not forgive the PS2 for only having 2 controller ports.. and I'll not forgive the XBox for requiring u to buy a remote to watch DVDs :P All the systems do stuff like this.. you just gotta balance who's is worse

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    15. Re:XBOX?!?! by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot... where only a joke like this will get a million geeks up in arms and starting a pissing contest of who's system is better (rolls eyes)

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    16. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey asshole, I have friends and family who write console games for a living.

      Can you spell "irrelevant"?

    17. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      few games???? mario,zelda,metroid,mario kart,mario golf, mario tennis, pikmin,super monkey ball 1/2/3, viewtiful joe, and the list goes on.

    18. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with the XBox you get the option of buying the upgrade (although I think it's lame that the IR unit isn't built-in).

      You can buy as many controllers for your PS2 as you like, but you can't use more than two at a time.

    19. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pissing contest here... Just a little loser that takes biased gamespot.com opinions for the word of god..

    20. Re:XBOX?!?! by hesiod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > if an artist draws the exact same picture multiple times using different paints, then the superior picture will be the one that uses the superior paints.

      No, not at all. The superior picture will be the one that looks the best with the given paint. Each kind of paint (console) has advantages & disadvantages -- there is no perfect paint, because they have different attributes which make them all good. Except Sega brand paint, which skipped the middle man and started selling paintings directly and gave up on the paint.

    21. Re:XBOX?!?! by soft_guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I have a PS2, but I've never even played any multiplayer games on it. However, I seem to recall a thing you could get called a multi-tap that was specifically for pluggin in >2 controllers. Am I wrong on this? If so, what does the multi-tap do?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    22. Re:XBOX?!?! by Jeff+Reed · · Score: 1

      You know, you can buy an adapter to allow you to use more controller ports for games that support it on the PS2. Just like how you can buy a remote to watch DVDs on an X-Box.

    23. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's truely amazing the money you can make from american illiteracy...

      perhaps I should buy mykrosof.com ?

    24. Re:XBOX?!?! by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      EA is entitled to it's own opinion, but Xbox live is one of the best online gaming services I have used since Kali.

      Myself I think most of the attempts on the other consoles seem hap-hazard, and not as well implemented, by having a dedicated system, it allows Microsoft to worry about buddy features, and chat, while the game developers can worry about the game balance.

      Still don't know why I am responding to you, since it seems like a troll post, yet it's getting MODed Interesting, oh wait it's anti-MS which means that it's instantly MODed up.

    25. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, you can buy an adapter to allow you to use more controller ports for games that support it on the PS2. Just like how you can buy a remote to watch DVDs on an X-Box.

      Yes, but I have pet theories that by requiring users to buy an extra piece of middleware, roughly the cost of a controller but with no other tangible benefit, far fewer game companies put 4 player modes into their games then would if it was 4 ports in the basic hardware.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    26. Re:XBOX?!?! by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They said foster his interest in technology...

      Xbox is definitely the piece of equipment to have. Linux, MythTV, emulators, media players... screw games.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    27. Re:XBOX?!?! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Other people have mentioned the Multitap for the PS-2... There's one other advantage to it - you can actually use two multitaps, one on port A and one on port B, and have 8 player simultaneous games. I know of two series that can use this - EA's NHL series, and 989 sports Gameday and NCAA football series. And I have no doubt that the other EA and 989 series can do it too, since they tend to use the same engine.

      Can you do 8 player on a single XBox? Haven't tried (or heard of it) yet, so I'm curious.

      -T

    28. Re:XBOX?!?! by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Cheap bastards could'nt give him a decent console like a PS2 or GC... now the poor canadian guy is stuck on Halo all day!!!!"
      But Microsoft have to find *some* way to get rid of all the X-boxes taking up valuable space in warehouses around the world... :-P
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    29. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 1

      It's true about the theoretical advantage of two multitaps...but I think it's used far less often than 4 player mode is left out...

      (after all, splitting a screen into 8 bits is getting a little silly, 4 seems to be a good amount, for complex interaction among players and all.)

      Stuff likes Halo lets you link up LAN-wise, that's about it...after a while it gets expensive to render all those viewpoints...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    30. Re:XBOX?!?! by bluprint · · Score: 1

      By that logic, Windows is undoubtedly the best OS on the market (for home/personal use).

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    31. Re:XBOX?!?! by Orion442 · · Score: 0

      Thats good and all, but I think its the Borg nanobots that comes with the X-Box that sucks.

    32. Re:XBOX?!?! by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      EA is entitled to it's own opinion, but Xbox live is one of the best online gaming services I have used since Kali.

      Id probably agree with the quality that comes with Xbox live, mainly the voice chat, but I feel this could be done without having a centralized system. They could of course go with a system like they have now, but also make it possible to do multiplayer without using Xbox Live, but they dont.

      Still don't know why I am responding to you, since it seems like a troll post, yet it's getting MODed Interesting, oh wait it's anti-MS which means that it's instantly MODed up.

      Im sorry if I come off as a troll, but thats how I see it. The problem I have with Xbox is that if I want to play multiplayer, I have to pay 50 bucks to Microsoft every year. In the end im paying for something that I shouldn't have to pay for, because the system is capable of doing multiplayer without having it connect to xbox live. This wouldn't be an issue if Microsoft let game companies make their own matchmaking service in their game, that doens't use xbox live. Ah well, im sorry I wasted your time by making you respond back to me, i'll try not to do that in the future..

    33. Re:XBOX?!?! by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      Who cares what the developers think? The Xbox is definitely not the favorite console of the people playing games.

      Yeah, who cares about the developers. That's a smart attitude.

      The bottom line is that if you want to play any game besides "Control The Jaggie Object Through Dark and Foggy Terrain", you're going to have to have something besides a PS2. I like how Vice City was beautified to take advantage of the better Xbox hardware. It's sad to see it on the PS2. I won't even play it. For whatever reason, Sony has the market-share. That's undeniable. Their practices would get Microsoft blasted by these same people who see Sony locking in developers, bullying competition, etc, etc though.. and think "Golly, Sony is way better than Microsoft. And the 'Memory Stick' is a rockin' good idea." Oh well, live and learn I guess..

    34. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great. Now go XBOX yourself with your stupid XBOX.

    35. Re:XBOX?!?! by pantycrickets · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, not at all. The superior picture will be the one that looks the best with the given paint. Each kind of paint (console) has advantages & disadvantages -- there is no perfect paint, because they have different attributes which make them all good.

      Sony must use some very jaggy paint.

    36. Re:XBOX?!?! by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      By that logic, Windows is undoubtedly the best OS on the market (for home/personal use).

      I'm sure that any real poll conducted would agree with that. Money talks.. bullshit usually ends up half finished on sourceforge. :)

    37. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pissing contest here... Just a little loser that takes the biased word of god for the opinions on gamespot.com.

    38. Re:XBOX?!?! by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      In fact id say the only reason why the Xbox is popular is because the company behind it can pretty much throw as much money as they want behind it, they dont innovate, they buy companies who do.

      Wait, for a second I thought you were talking about Sony. Because I know they didn't "innovate" much with the PS1 gamepad (stolen from SNES), the analog stick? (stolen from N64), CD based games? Turbo-DUO.

      How about their in house developement or flagship characters? Crash Bandicoot?

      Locking in developers? How about Rockstar games? Sad that such a great game (Vice City) had to be shelved so long from the PC and Xbox while Sony tried to milk it for all it was worth. Of course if it were released on all systems at once, people would see how terrible it looked on the PS2 in comparison and buy something else.

    39. Re:XBOX?!?! by CFTM · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Save MAYBE Zelda, Metroid and Mario Kart, I wouldn't waste my time on the Gamecube. I hate the bloody controller. They *ALMOST* got me to buy one of those things when they were offering the original NES Zelda's that could play on the gamecube for $99 but I decided a PS/2 and a XBOX were enough, particularly because I never really play either of them anymore.

    40. Re:XBOX?!?! by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Actually the XBOX has an ethernet card so you can do up to 16 players through various methods. It's the only system with an online system setup and ready to go with various games. 8 on 8 Hockey could be pretty amusing but it seems pretty pointless for football but that's just me.

    41. Re:XBOX?!?! by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh Kali 005569 baby! I wonder if that thing is still around, I remember spending hours upon hours of my youth kicking peoples asses at warcraft 2 ... it's too bad that there was never a ranking system when I could play 8 hours a day :) Oh wait, I'm over it.

    42. Re:XBOX?!?! by RegalBegal · · Score: 1

      It's not 2001 anymore. XBoxes are outselling PS2s they are even being gotten in exchange for PS2s....backwards compatibility is the largest reason PS2s sold well at first. Ask any local gamestore manager/clerk/or associate. I'm serious.

      --
      "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
    43. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However most developers are increasingly writing their games using cross-platform toolkits so that they can penetrate all three markets. And according to the people I know, Xbox performs the best.
      Funness is not proportional to benchmarks.

      Performance on a couple of toolkits is not the same as performance on a well-implemented engine. (And a lot of the toolkits are complete shite. As in: many games written for the PSone have better graphics.)

      ...if an artist draws the exact same picture multiple times using different paints, then the superior picture will be the one that uses the superior paints.
      Unless the artist has the mental capacity of a four-year-old and was only "trained" to use fingerpaint. NTSC video isn't too far from fingerpaint.
    44. Re:XBOX?!?! by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      gem/shovelware ratio is way too small to justify the expense of the system.

      I don't care what this ratio is. I only buy the gems, and I ignore the "shovelware", so it's existence doesn't harm me. What's important is how many gems there are. How much shovelware there is is only relevant if you buy games by choosing at random from those on the shelf in the store.

      I think that although ps2 does have far more crap games than gc, the two have roughly the same number of gems.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    45. Re:XBOX?!?! by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Good to see someone that remembers good old Kali. My number was in the 10k range, still have it on a text file some where on my computer.

      Remember playing Descent on it.

    46. Re:XBOX?!?! by llzackll · · Score: 1

      That is true. Developers like the XBOX because it's based on common PC (x86) architecture, and uses DirectX. There are plenty of tools already out there. And porting something from Windows to XBOX is a trivial task. Gamecube on the other hand is designed for gaming from the ground up, and not as many tools available for it.. It can do some kick ass graphical things in hardware that even the best video cards for the PC can't even do.

    47. Re:XBOX?!?! by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      Wait, for a second I thought you were talking about Sony. Because I know they didn't "innovate" much with the PS1 gamepad (stolen from SNES), the analog stick? (stolen from N64), CD based games? Turbo-DUO.

      By the way, the Ps1 was out before the N64, (ps1 came out december 1994, N64 came out june 1996). But hey, Microsoft copied the Xbox controller from a Volkswagen Beetle =). Im just mad that Microsoft f*cked up Halo, and im never buying an xbox.

    48. Re:XBOX?!?! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Isn't Gamespot part of that damn IGN network that forces you to login to watch video clips (advertising) of upcoming games? Don't they also force you to stare at an ad for a few seconds before you can read the article?

      I really hate models like this.

    49. Re:XBOX?!?! by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      Plus you can run linux on the xbox, attach it to a video monitor, slap on every usb device known to man (provided you can find a driver) and generally use it as a fully functional computer. Lets see the ps2 do that!

      Besides, if it runs GTA:VC I am a fan already.

    50. Re:XBOX?!?! by Geckoman · · Score: 1
      Wait, for a second I thought you were talking about Sony. Because I know they didn't "innovate" much with the PS1 gamepad (stolen from SNES), the analog stick? (stolen from N64), CD based games? Turbo-DUO.

      By the way, the Ps1 was out before the N64, (ps1 came out december 1994, N64 came out june 1996).

      That's correct, but the PS1 analog controllers didn't come out until much later. I'm sure some creative Googling could find exact dates.
    51. Re:XBOX?!?! by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      In the end it probably doesn't matter because some more creative googling will find another controller out there that uses an analog stick that came out before the Ps1 and the N64.

    52. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it must be said that this is of little use right now if you buy an Xbox with a Focus video encoder chipset (read: every Xbox sold today), as you'll be limited to 640x480 for the time being.

      PS2 can also do most of the things you mentioned with regards to Linux, although the kit must be obtained from Sony itself. (which includes a VGA connector, 40Gb harddisk, Network Card, Linux CD/DVD-ROM, etc)

    53. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I don't care what this ratio is. I only buy the gems, and I ignore the "shovelware", so it's existence doesn't harm me. What's important is how many gems there are. How much shovelware there is is only relevant if you buy games by choosing at random from those on the shelf in the store.

      I think that although ps2 does have far more crap games than gc, the two have roughly the same number of gems.


      Fair enough! I brought out the "ratio" argument as a pre-emptive counter to "but the PS2 has SO MANY GAMES" thinking. I agree the # of gems are probably roughly equal, but for a variety of reasons (nostalgia cashins ala Metroid and Super Smash Bros, multiplayer emphasis) I prefer Nintendo.

      The only PS2 gems that really caught me were GTA:VC and then GTA3. Now that they're on Xbox (and my relatives bought 'em for me for Christmas even though I didn't ask for him, since they're not THAT much better than PS2, shinier cars and better controls) I just don't see the need for the PS2. I might tool around with some of the Ratchet and Jax and Clank and Daxter platformers, or odd stuff like Ico, and curse the arrangement that means GTA:next will come out on PS2 with that system's limitations in mind, but that's it. (YMMV, depending on the genres you like)

      You're right though, the shovelware ratio isn't a general argument, since few gamers buy all the games or just randomly select from the entire library...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    54. Re:XBOX?!?! by Yakko · · Score: 1
      And the rest of us probably couldn't care less; we want GAMES for our PS2 and we're getting them.

      If I want to play games on a PC, I'll build a gaming rig. Actually, I already have one. It plays all those old-school DOS games very well. :o)

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    55. Re:XBOX?!?! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      No, that's crap.

      The XBox has far more graphical power than the other two consoles. The XBox can display in every HDTV resolution, and defaults to 480p. The other consoles default to 480i. The XBox has a hard disk large enough to store every save game you'll ever need, half your CD collection, give each game tons of space for caching content, and store all the patches you'll get off Live. Then there's XBox Live, which is a tremendous feature in itself.

      I mean, hell, you guys all hate XBox because it's made by Microsoft, and I understand that. But to argue that the other consoles have even CLOSE to the power of the XBox is plain delusion. There's absolutely *nothing* that a PS2 or Gamecube can do that an XBox cannot do, period.

    56. Re:XBOX?!?! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      on 8 Hockey could be pretty amusing but it seems pretty pointless for football but that's just me.

      Um...

      Hockey is 5 vs 5, or 6 vs 6 if you include the goalies. 8 vs. 8 would be pretty damn useless.

      OTOH, football is 11 vs. 11, so 8 on 8 would be fine, or even 8 vs the computer (which is what I can do with two multitaps and 989 Sports).

      -T

    57. Re:XBOX?!?! by mr_jrt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the original "digital" PS pad didn't have analogue sticks...

      --
      Boo.
    58. Re:XBOX?!?! by Enucite · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely *nothing* that a PS2 or Gamecube can do that an XBox cannot do, period.

      My gamecube fits nicely into the small space in my entertainment center next to my Xbox. It also fits in a small backpack. Two things an Xbox couldn't do, period. ;)

      Also, the Gamecube can boot Mario Sunshine, DoubleDash, Mario Party, Smash Bros, Pikmin, Zelda, Metroid and Viewtiful Joe. When I put those in the Xbox I just get a funny error message. :-/

    59. Re:XBOX?!?! by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      Im just mad that Microsoft f*cked up Halo, and im never buying an xbox.

      I happen to be an Xbox zealot now maybe.. but yeah, I remember waiting and waiting for Halo to come out on the PC only to find out it was being hijacked by Microsoft. A very sad day for America indeed.

    60. Re:XBOX?!?! by neko9 · · Score: 1

      exactly. for example just only for "gran turismo" series i would buy ps1 or ps2 or in the future ps3. that is the best racing series ever.

    61. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't played PGR2, have you?

    62. Re:XBOX?!?! by OxyFrog · · Score: 1

      Except they're not. December 2003? Sony outsold Microsoft 2 to 1. November 2003? Same thing. Rest of the year? Yup. Hell, even Gamecube is outselling Xbox lately.
      And that's just in the US. In Japan, PS2 outsells Xbox at least 30 to one.

    63. Re:XBOX?!?! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Nah, the PS2 is just an old POS.

    64. Re:XBOX?!?! by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      *grins* There is a kit for making the PS2 run Linux... It is sold somewhere on Sony's site...

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    65. Re:XBOX?!?! by incom · · Score: 1

      I hope xbox will get some japanese RPG's one of these days. I one of the ones who've been following the genre since Final Fantasy 1, and dragon warrior etc for the nes. I think that's the main problem with the xbox popularity in Japan, you just can't succeed there without some nice RPG's.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    66. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I like how Vice City was beautified to take advantage of the better Xbox hardware. It's sad to see it on the PS2.
      I have both versions, I don't think the Xbox is THAT much better....shiny cars, seperate fingers, better control layout. That's about it.

      I've heard that the PS2's memory limitations were why you get so many things disappearing when your back is turned, so I was bummed they didn't try to improve that and kept it more of a straight port.

      I'm convinced GTA:next would be so much better if it wasn't slated to first run on PS2.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    67. Re:XBOX?!?! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Methinks the moderators need to know what the fuck I am talking about before moderating (you fucking clueless dolt). This was certainly on the topic at this point.

    68. Re:XBOX?!?! by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      according to this you can run at 1024x768 at 80hz. That, coupled with a gf2+ and a p3, makes the xbox a nifty, pretty spunky computer for under 200 bucks.

    69. Re:XBOX?!?! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The XBox can display in every HDTV resolution

      And unless you are one of the There's absolutely *nothing* that a PS2 or Gamecube can do that an XBox cannot do, period.

      And there's nothing an XBox can do, that a PC cannot, period. It can do less, actually. To argue that an XBox has even CLOSE to the power (not to mention upgradeability) of a good PC is ludicrous. Therefore, the XBox is worthless. What you say? They have different uses? Duh, that's the point.

      Each system has its strong points. The XBox does really well (best) with realistic-looking 3D, texturing, etc. No wonder, it's a PC. The game cube has its sorta-niche market with cartoon-style animation, a la cell shading.

      I don't hate the XBox because it is made by Microsoft, I dislike it because IT IS NOT EVEN SLIGHTLY ORIGINAL! Except for the packaging & extra restrictions, it is a PC that you could build for yourself (admittedly, it would be more expensive).

      And, as another poster said, the Gamecube is portable. This has come in handy for my friends, since we can't all afford consoles but don't want to sit at the same person's house every friggin' day.

      FYI, I have used all three systems & my friends (together) have all of them. I like the GC games, the XBox graphics, although I'm not into the kinds of games the XBox has, but I can appreciate the graphic quality (as for playability, eh... that's another matter entirely). The PS2 has so many more games that it's hard to deny it is the most desireable, in general, although I would get a GC first (the only console systems I own are the Sega Genesis & an Atari 2600 in the garage).

    70. Re:XBOX?!?! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > And unless you are one of the T

      Grrr, I fucking hate HTML.

      "And unless you are one of the <1% of the population that has an HDTV, it's an absolutely useless feature that just raises the price."

    71. Re:XBOX?!?! by lardbottom · · Score: 1

      Actually, can you imagine if he would have insisted on a PS/2? And maybe a Dell with linux on it? They would have thrown his butt in the slammer for life. But man, what a hoot!

      --
      Give me a fish, I shall eat well for a day. Teach me to fish, and I will eat well until some idiot patents it.
  5. compensation? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Funny

    MSCE training? Jesus, I didn't know they were going to be that hard on him

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:compensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arbeit macht frei... Welcome to BillWorld.

    2. Re:compensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One domain name for one soul. Sounds like a fair trade to me.

    3. Re:compensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being a Minesweeper Expert and Solitaire Consultant isn't that bad.

    4. Re:compensation? by simcop2387 · · Score: 0

      Being a Minesweeper Expert and Solitaire Consultant isn't that bad.

      thats Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:compensation? by aled · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for the movie! "portal to hell" a site in internet that sucks your soul in. It's like Ring, isn't? but you now, one you saw one terror movie, they are all the same. BTW, that would make more than one soul per domain.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    6. Re:compensation? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      MESC? MSCE?!?

      Are they printing new certs? Just remember, MCSEs Must Consult Someone Experienced.

  6. He's got a great chance to make something of this. by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope he takes the free publicity & does something good with it. If he can handle this gracefully and turn it into something positive, he can end up being seen doing so by the right people, and turn it into a good opportunity for himself.

    Or, he can stay in his room and play with the new Xbox, that's OK too I suppose.

  7. One more thing... by patricksevenlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget the, "I got sued by Microsoft and all I got was this stupid shirt" t-shirt :)

    1. Re:One more thing... by geekee · · Score: 1

      " Don't forget the, "I got sued by Microsoft and all I got was this stupid shirt" t-shirt :)"

      How about "I got sued by Microsoft, and I still have this t-shirt on my back.":-)

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:One more thing... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      Well I am really surprised at the amount of crap he got (sans the t-shirt of course). I mean really, an x-box? They were going to give him $10, weren't they?

      Hmm.

      1. Register domain that gets large corporation pissed.
      2. ?
      3. Have large corporation send you gifts.
      4. Profit

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    3. Re:One more thing... by Gobiner · · Score: 1

      What he really needs is a sticker on the console that says "I got sued by Microsoft and all I got was this stupid XBox."

    4. Re:One more thing... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Or "Microsoft sued, I lost my other shirt". :)

    5. Re:One more thing... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I am surprised they didn't pay more.
      They must've threatened him really bad or why would he give up the domain so cheaply otherwise?

      I mean we're talking about microsoft. They could've easily cashed out a million (or half a million) for that boy and turned the whole event into a cheap marketing stunt to trigger tons of positive press.

      I think both (mike and ms) have lost in this deal.
      Sorry about that but only for one of them...

    6. Re:One more thing... by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 1

      Monkey Island huh ? :)

    7. Re:One more thing... by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Paying too much would invite other people to try and cash in on similar stuff. Paying just right amount, and especially paying in something other than cash is both decent PR, and discourages false claims.

      And it's not too bad a deal for the kid either, as far as I can see. Being bogged down in a courtroom against MS at that age (or at any age) is something I wouldn't do if it was just about a domain name, especially when there's a chance of losing the case (and losing your financial future at the same time)...

  8. Microsoft BUYS EM out by firstadopter.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like Microsoft realized they were getting bad press, so bought him out with.. you guessed it, Microsoft freebie products. Now bad press turns into Microsoft product marketing. Those guys are brilliant in Redmond. Grrr...

    1. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by StringBlade · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...and Microsoft has never bought out the competition before, right?

      -- This post has been brought to you by the letters 'S' and 'arcasm'

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    2. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Exactly what should they have done to satisfy both parties?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Like I said, if he's interested in technology he'll get Linux.

    4. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by MrEd · · Score: 4, Funny
      (simpsons)


      "All right boys, buy 'em out!"


      (Bill's thugs start smashing Homer's office)


      "What, you don't think I got this wealthy by writing checks, do you? Muahahahahahaha!"

      --

      Wah!

    5. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the "1970's" between the words "in" and "technology".

    6. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by jrumney · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Exactly what should they have done to satisfy both parties?

      Leave him the fuck alone.

      They knew full well that Microsoft(TM) do not have a legal leg to stand on in trying to get Mike Rowe to stop using his own name. If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this? That would just be inviting domain squatters to taunt them.

    7. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Heh, man. It's not as bad as all that. Microsoft spent a lot for the lawyer time involved, and this Mike Rowe guy probably didn't spend all that much. He's getting computer training out of it, not to mention publicity - if he applies himself that's going to help him big time (even if you argue that MCSEs are just rubber stamped, smart people with MCSEs will still do very well).

      It's a good deal for all involved.

    8. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that all that shit combined costs Microsoft less to produce than the $10 they originally were going to pay him... Sucker..

    9. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot would Microsoft's handling of this case be mutated into evil form.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but if I were Mike Rowe, I'd MUCH rather have a bunch of nice stuff than a $10 domain name.

    11. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by GeckoX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're right.
      The damage done though is that nobody will learn this because Mike Rowe bent over and took it up the ass in exchange for an XBox and an MCSE...And to think we were supporting the little prick.

      --
      No Comment.
    12. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by blogboy · · Score: 1

      And it's all tax-deductable.

    13. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by dyte · · Score: 1

      Your math needs some help. They take a loss selling the Xbox at $179.

      But I do agree that they got off really, really cheap (as far as we know)

    14. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by debian4life · · Score: 1

      I am not the biggest MS fan, but I am less a fan of people doing stupid crap to get over and other legal shenanigans that take advantage of our less than perfect legal system. Now instead of coming down on a 17yr old they have gone the other way and caved in. Thereby setting the precedent for other punks to start buying domain names that vaguely resemble Microsoft.com so they can get their free stuff. They would have saved themselves money and time buy just letting the kid keep his domain name and moving on with life. But with all "suits", they just couldn't let it go.

    15. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They knew full well that Microsoft(TM) do not have a legal leg to stand on in trying to get Mike Rowe to stop using his own name. If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this? That would just be inviting domain squatters to taunt them.

      First of all, although it's bad publicity, they have a leg to stand on, especially once you realize that this is not only about Mike Rowe using his own name (which it isn't at all...that's been done before with the Uzi Nissan/Nissan.com case). Now I don't know a damn thing about Canadian law (and very little about trademark law anyway) -- but Microsoft has enough cash and lawyers to bankrupt this kid (and his family) -- which means that after they bankrupted Mike Rowe (and his family) they'd win a summary judgement when Mike Rowe failed to show up for court.

      Secondly, Microsoft HAS to protect their trademark. This is not a simple case of a kid just using his name...I keep hearing this and I just think it's naive. Check out the Register article from the original slashdot post last week. In it, they paraphrase him as saying he wanted a cool site with a name that sounded like the software giant (my paraphrase). If this is true, Microsoft has a case -- it's NOT just someone's name, and if Mike Rowe actually said this, it proves intent. Now, as far as how trademark law applies to homophones (and this is the crux of the case) -- I don't know. AFAIK, it hasn't even been tested. However, if MSFT's trademark was dilted in any way, or it is even perceivable that their trademark is being tested, MSFT is responsible (to their shareholders) to fight tooth and nail to preserve that trademark. Otherwise, Microsoft's trademark doesn't mean squat under law. If I ran a business that had a trademark to protect, I'd consider doing the same thing.

      Instead of looking bad and spending a shitload of money, they ended up looking like nice guys and spending next-to-nothing. Sounds to me like they did the right thing. A win/win situation. This is about the easiest settlement I've ever heard of. Do you think that every time someone settles, it's because they didn't have a leg to stand on? Do you have any idea how much it takes to go to court, especially when you know you will not benefit?

      I guess what frustrates me about this (I ranted alot in earlier coverage of this topic) is that this shows where Slashdotters seem to have the hardest time being objective. If they see Microsoft, they immeadately think "those bastards". If a company tries to protect IP or trademark in any way, slashdotters will jump and yell "bastards". If a big company with deep pockets sues a little guy, slashdotters will jump and yell "bastards". If there's ever a dispute over a domain name and a large orginization is involved, Slashdotters are quick to yell "bastards". Sure, alot of these guys are bastards (I'm not Microsoft fan), but it's pretty imporatant to at least try and learn the facts before taking sides.

      BTW -- if it's not immeadately clear from the post, IANAL.

      --

      -Turkey

    16. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think MS can produce an XBox for less than $10? And I thought Apple had huge profit margins!

    17. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      But his name isn't mikerowesoft, it's mikerowe. I think that MS would stand a very good chance in court given that his site name is pronounced exactly the same as microsoft.

      MS didn't cave -- they flipped around the bad press with a couple hundred bucks of goodies *and* got the name back.

    18. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      They would have saved themselves money and time buy just letting the kid keep his domain name and moving on with life. But with all "suits", they just couldn't let it go.

      No, they couldn't just let it go. If they did not, they really do risk losing rights to their trademark. This would be a really Bad Thing for Microsoft because 1,000 other Microsofts will pop up. Does trademark apply to homophones? I don't know, but if I were Microsoft, I'd probably try to test it too.

      --

      -Turkey

    19. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this?

      They caved? I thought they were getting the domain name. I guess I got confused when I read the post and article.

    20. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Considering that the primary issue is that Microsoft's trademark might be diluted it stands to reason that no one in their right mind would confuse Canadian Teenager with Software Bully. Even in the realm of computer software one is clearly distinct from the other. I doubt a reasonable person would become confused and think that he needed to give a Canadian teen $300 for the latest version of Windows or that he should call him up because he's having trouble with Office.

      I have to agree with that intent though. Just leeching off the name is rather sleazy. If intent was unproven, however, I really think that Mike probably had a pretty significant advantage here.

    21. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it wasn't Mike Rowe. It was Mike Rowe Soft. There is a big difference legally. For example for a business name you are legally allowed to use your name, but you cannot attach anything on to it. So MS does have a leg to stand on, and was right in protecting its name. It could have done it in a more personal way, but that doesn't matter. Mike probably knew it sounded this way, and used it nonetheless.

    22. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS had plenty of legal leg to stand on - see Nissan Computer Corp versus Nissan Motors of America. Heck the guy had been using the Nissan company name BEFORE Nissan Motor Corp even changed its name.

      Think about it - if all you speak is broken english how would you spell Microsoft. MikeRoweSoft is tangible. Also, trademark law looks at the popularity of the trademark, the intent, and the person's industry.

      Microsoft definately has a trademark with the highest protections because of its extreme popularity. Mike Rowe intended his website to be for his fledgling computer stuff - definately the same industry. Also the intent - MikeRowe picked that domain name SPECIFICALLY because it sounded kind-of like Microsoft. The kid even MENTIONED this in his newspaper interviews.

      Also this wasn't a standard trademark issue - it was a domain name issue. WIPO is definately a lot more lenient to the trademark owner than to anyone else.

      Stop playing armchair lawyering here, esp considering what you don't know what the hell you're talking about. If this actually went to court the kid would lose.

      MS couldn't have left him alone because by not vigorously defending your trademarks, you can lose your right to them. Letting just one or two violations slip by can kill you in future trademark protection suits.

      If you name your kid DyeItCoke don't think he can go buy that website, Coca-Cola would do the same thing because you HAVE to, the law requires it if you want to keep your trademark.

      What do you think happened to Kleenex, eh?

    23. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Microsoft was trying to avoid testing it. Homophones are not a slam dunk. While it may be an interesting question, Lawyers prefer to walk into court with all their ducks known and in a row.

      This was a decent ending, no blood, no foul. Since the matter hasn't gone to court, no precedent has been set for anyone to cry over.

    24. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mike had no advantage. Intent was proven - see his canadian news articles where he said he picked the name because it sounded almost like Microsoft. Bam, intent.

      Are you sure a reasonable person would not get his website confused with the real Microsoft. Remember this is a global corporation - if you spoke Korean would you be able to make the distinction? How about if you were Balinese? Or Ugandan? If the website was professionally designed who says how misleading it can be - the law doesn't say 'reasonable IT person living in the US/UK/Canada.'

    25. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Considering that the primary issue is that Microsoft's trademark might be diluted it stands to reason that no one in their right mind would confuse Canadian Teenager with Software Bully. Even in the realm of computer software one is clearly distinct from the other

      You're absolutely right. It serves to reason that nobody but the world's biggest asshole would confuse the two. However, in court Microsoft would likely see a different side of things. When Gigantic Corporation USA tries the same shit and MSFT tries taking them to court, they would be able cite the MikeRoweSoft.com case. I think that MSFT lawyers would have a hard time telling the court "well, in that other case, you'd have to be an asshole to confuse the two".

      All that being said, I forgot to mention that MSFT didn't go after Mike Rowe for trademark infringement...it puts a major hole into my argument. However, I think it's a pretty fair assumption that they may have just taken the path of least resistance on this one.

      --

      -Turkey

    26. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by bonch · · Score: 1

      They did have a legal leg to stand on.

      You honestly think you'd be able to get away with calling your business/website "Mike Rowe Soft?" Microsoft legally must protect their trademark, or they lose it--and they owe it to their shareholders to do such.

      If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this?

      Of course. He was only 17, and it's not like Microsoft wants to sue him out of existence. This really isn't that big of a story. Some kid created a spinoff company name, the real company told him to quit, and they settled. I don't get the Slashdot-induced uproar around this.

      Slashdotters want this to be some sort of loss for Microsoft, though, so suddenly it's because of "bad publicity." What bad publicity? The publicity from Slashdot? Yeah, right.

    27. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by someonehasmyname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I don't want to sound like I'm defending Microsoft here, I hate Windows and despise MS's business tactics.

      IANAL, but I have been reading copyright/trademark law extensively lately. I'm helping a friend legally secure his band name, as well as exclusive use of the name on t-shirts, posters, stickers, etc. All of that is in the realm of Trademarks, more specifically, a subset called a "Service Mark."

      "Microsoft" is a trademark. Trademarks aren't like Copyrights. If a trademark owner knows someone else is violating their trademark and doesn't do anything about it, their trademark can be REVOKED. Where with Copyright, you can ignore someone violating your copyright if you want, and it's still a valid copyright.

      I don't agree with Microsoft's tactic of waiting for a counter-offer so that they could bring out the big guns, but they had to make an effort to notify Mike Rowe that they believed he was in violation.

      Aside from the legal aspects, you and I both know he only used "soft" in the name because it'd sound exactly like "Microsoft."

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    28. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by princewally · · Score: 1

      "BUZZ"

      Wrong answer. For a business, you are allowed to use your own name and attach anything you want to it, as long as you include your whole name.

      I'm guessing his name is Michael, so he isn't included in that naming convention.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    29. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- You honestly think you'd be able to get away with calling your business/website "Mike Rowe Soft?" --

      Sure why not? as long as you didn't sell software. There are many companies out there with the same name and in different markets.

    30. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by llzackll · · Score: 1
      When Gigantic Corporation USA tries the same shit and MSFT tries taking them to court, they would be able cite the MikeRoweSoft.com case. I think that MSFT lawyers would have a hard time telling the court "well, in that other case, you'd have to be an asshole to confuse the two".

      They wouldn't be able to site the MikeRoweSoft.com case as precedent, because it was settled out of court and there was no verdict.
    31. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Even if you sell software, if your name is Mike Rowe, and you haven't obviously changed it to that by deed poll just to piss off Microsoft, then there is legal precedent (at least in Commonwealth countries, I don't know about the US) that you are allowed to use your own name for your business, followed by a common abbreviation for what your business is. As MS hasn't gone after companies like ArcSoft, it can hardly lay claim to the abbreviated form of "software".

    32. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Stop playing armchair lawyering here, esp considering what you don't know what the hell you're talking about. If this actually went to court the kid would lose.

      Sorry? Who's doing the armchair lawyering?

    33. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by llzackll · · Score: 1
      MS had plenty of legal leg to stand on - see Nissan Computer Corp versus Nissan Motors of America. Heck the guy had been using the Nissan company name BEFORE Nissan Motor Corp even changed its name.

      Think about it - if all you speak is broken english how would you spell Microsoft. MikeRoweSoft is tangible.


      I don't think homophones apply to trademark. In the Nissan case, there is a difference. Nissan was spelled Nissan.. No where in "MikeRowSoft" is the word "Microsoft" contained.

      Just because it *could* be mistaken by someone who doesn't know proper english does not matter one bit. The site was not representing itself as microsoft in any way. Any sane person would know this.. As far as the law is concerned, they would be considered handicapped. I don't think handicap laws apply here.

    34. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      They wouldn't be able to site the MikeRoweSoft.com case as precedent, because it was settled out of court and there was no verdict.

      Right -- I should have been more clear...my bad. Had Microsoft just let it go, (I believe that) it would have been citable.

      --

      -Turkey

    35. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Slashdotters seem to have the hardest time being objective

      Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:28:45 -0800 (PST)
      From: Bill Gates
      To: "Eric A. Stephens"
      Subject: Re: Using "Microsoft" in a domain name

      [ sorry for the off-topic thing to "Microsoft-law", it's just the best medium I can think off off-hand ]

      Ok,
      I've been getting tons of email about the trademark thing due to the action of stopping the auctioning off of Microsoft-related names, so instead of just answering individually (which was how I started out), I'll just send out a more generic email. And hope that slashdot etc pick it up so that enough people will be reassured or at least understand the issues.

      And hey, you may not end up agreeing with me, but with the Longhorn announcement tomorrow I won't have much time to argue about it until next week ;)

      Basically, the rules are fairly simple, and there really are just a few simple basic issues involved:

      - I (and obviously a lot of other people) do not want to have "Microsoft" as a name associated with unacceptable (or borderline) behaviour, and it's important that "Microsoft" doesn't get a name of being associated with scams, cybersquatting, etc etc. I'd personally hate that, for rather obvious reasons. I _like_ being proud of Microsoft, and what has been achieved. I'd rather not have to apologize for it..

      - Trademark law requires that the trademark owner police the use of the trademark(unlike, for example, copyright law, where the copyright owner is the copyright owner, always is, and always will be unless he willingly relinquishes ownership, and even THEN he ends up having rights).

      This is nasty, because it means, for example, that a trademark owner has to be shown as caring about even small infringements, because otherwise the really bad guys can use as their defense that "hey, we may have misused it, but look at those other cases that they didn't go after, they obviously don't care.."

      - Even with things that aren't scams or something like that, VALID uses of "Microsoft" may be bad if they mean that other valid uses of "Microsoft" are blocked.

      Those are the kind of ground rules, I think everybody can pretty much agree with them..

      What the above leads to is

      - I'm required to ask people to acknowledge the trademark. When you use the term "Microsoft" in official marketing literature etc, you should acknowledge it as a trademark owned by me. Not because I love seeing my name in print, but simply because of the "policing" issue (#2) above.

      (And no, that does NOT mean that you have to add that to normal, everyday use of the term. Common sense rules the day, think of the situations where you see the silly "xxxx is a trademark of yyyy", and realize that yyyy may not really care except the legal issues force them to ;)

      - _Intent_ matters. It matters a lot.

      If your intent is to use the word "Microsoft" as part of a real Microsoftproject, that doesn't mean that you automatically absolutely have to get permission from me. That's the LAST thing I want. I want "Microsoft" to be as free as possible as a term, and the real reason for having a trademark in the first place was to _protect_ it rather than use it as some kind of legalistic enforcement thing.

      But, for example, if your intent is to register "mylinux.com" (made up example, I don't know if it is registered or not) only in the hopes of selling the domain name for mucho dinero later, then that kind of intent is not something I (or anybody else, I think) would find really acceptable, because now the use of "linux" in this case has really been a question of blocking somebody ELSE from using the term and using it to get money.

      This is where the cybersquatting laws come in, for example, allowing the use of a trademark as a way to make sure that such squatting activity does NOT happen.

      - Being "specific" is _good_. Being specific

    36. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      The damage done though is that nobody will learn this because Mike Rowe bent over and took it up the ass in exchange for an XBox and an MCSE...And to think we were supporting the little prick.

      Yeah, what was that little bastard thinking looking out for himself and accepting an XBox, free MCSE certification (if/when he passes) and other such gifts for his domain name. They even said they'd cover the costs in getting him a new domain name.

      He doesn't owe his supporters on slashdot a damned thing, and he sure didn't do them any harm by accepting hundreds of dollars of free stuff to hand over his domain.

      I think if I were 17 and I got offered an XBox in return for my domain name i'd be f'ing stoked, but an XBox, MS Certification, Money to cover the costs of changing my domain name, and whatever else they gave him? Shit i'd have folded too.

      -matt

    37. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...They wouldn't be able to site the MikeRoweSoft.com case..."

      Would that be citing the site or siting the site? ;-)

      cite=quote (verb)
      site=location (noun)
      www.dictionary.com

    38. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...if MSFT's trademark was dilted in any way, or it is even perceivable that their trademark is being tested, MSFT is responsible (to their shareholders) to fight tooth and nail to preserve that trademark."

      Just my opinion here, but Microsoft's trademark was dealt a black eye by the lawsuit , not by this kid with the unfortunate name (how would you like to go through life having to introduce yourself as "micro"? Lets hope, for his parents' sake, this legal adventure has been sufficient to discourage him from filing suit against them) but we expect big business to behave like an automatic juggernaut (as opposed to a juggernaut with a heart), so it's probably not surprising that that's exactly the way it does behave...

    39. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by traid · · Score: 1

      What i think is funny is that mikerowesoft.org and mikerowesoft.net are both taken by a cyber squatter now. Wonder if they are the next on the list to get sued, or get xboxs.

      --
      None of us are as dumb as all of us.
    40. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You bastard!"

    41. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      ... given that his site name is pronounced exactly the same as microsoft.

      It's actually pronounced "throat-wobbler mangrove".

    42. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by cabraverde · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if I were Mike Rowe, I'd MUCH rather have a bunch of nice stuff than a $10 domain name.

      Me too. But instead he got MCSE training and a crappy XBox.

    43. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by geekoid · · Score: 1

      1: I would suspect they could get a law firm to give him service probono.

      2: No judge in the US(i suspect Canada to) would take away there tradmark because somebody has Mike Rowe Soft domain name. I mean it has to become deluted.

      3: the right thing would have been to leave him alone.

      4: MS has earned being thought of as 'those bastards' If you enter any relasionship with MS and aren't thinking 'What are these bastards up to?" you will be screwed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by HiThere · · Score: 1

      O?

      I must be typical /. then, because to me it looked like:
      step 1: Threaten
      step 2: If step 1 gives bad press, bribe

      Both methods of business operation have more to do with gangsters than with anything an honest business would do.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    45. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by llzackll · · Score: 1

      I own the patent on site.. so you cannot use the word cite, as somebody might confuse the two... See you in court

    46. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Bad Press? Heck, they do that to themselves.

      From this;

      Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler Friday. "It is in his best long-term interest to develop his own commercial reputation in his own name."

      Mr. Desler, that *was* his own name, you sanctimonious asshole.

      Sigh.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    47. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      His last name does not contain the word 'soft'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    48. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      But neither does his domain name contain the word "Microsoft".

      However, it *does* contain his name, whose spelling in no way resembles "microsoft". I don't believe that Trademark law was intended to include phonetics.

      His use of the site aside, NanoGator, I personally consider MS's threats against him bogus and totally uncalled for. But actions in this arena are not exactly news, where Microsoft(TM, etc) are concerned, are they?

      Cheers

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    49. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "However, it *does* contain his name, whose spelling in no way resembles "microsoft". I don't believe that Trademark law was intended to include phonetics."

      a.) It does resemble Microsoft when you put 'soft' on the end of his name.

      b.) Yes, it covers phoentics. Consider what would happen if they ran a radio ad.

      " His use of the site aside, NanoGator, I personally consider MS's threats against him bogus and totally uncalled for."

      I agree. Though, I wouldn't be all that surprised if MS's battle with Lindows has some influence here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    50. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      a.) only phonetically.

      b.) Relevant portion? I don't recall having seen anything like that...and I'd be surprised that more companies aren't suing because of it. I'm curious about that.

      WRT to radio ad: Legally, I can see your point. From a common sense standpoint, it's nonsense and absurd. But then so many things are in our great country nowadays....I can just see a 17 year old software dev being mistaken for The Great Microsoft. Uh, yeah. Stupider^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H sillier things have happened. Like he'd be advertising on national/international radio, anyway. Or anything but local.

      I'm starting to think that Microsoft may have the same lawyer/developer ratio that SCO does. They certainly are a *busy* bunch of bastards. :)

      WRT to Lindows: Microsoft lost that battle, Thank t'Great Guh :) ( unless something has happened that I didn't see? Please, tell me it's not true! I'd like to keep my supper down :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    51. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by incom · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with sticking up for the underdog? People do it all the time, it's a common behavior. What really is there to actually hate about it? I find it a far stranger behavior when people blindly cheer on the big guy, no matter the situation. Those people give me the creeps.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    52. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I can just see a 17 year old software dev being mistaken for The Great Microsoft. Uh, yeah."

      Well, ya gotta admit, it did hit him mentioned on Slashdot twice. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    53. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Hee. His website survived, too. :) MikeRowe(soft): I'll be back :-)

      Now it's Dupe time....like Bullet Time, but temporally inverted.

      Burnin' the Late Hour Oil, also? Heh. I wish I remember how Data put it in TNG....it's late and I'm brain fried, pizza time, bed....sigh.

      Slashdot can be worse than IRC. Really.

      Good Guh, it's going on midnight. Argh. *Thud*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    54. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with sticking up for the underdog? People do it all the time, it's a common behavior. What really is there to actually hate about it? I find it a far stranger behavior when people blindly cheer on the big guy, no matter the situation.

      There's absolutely nothing wrong with sticking up for the underdog. I don't remember saying that there was anything to hate about it (although objectivity is important) -- if I did, I probably spoke a little too strongly. However, without trying to attack anyone, I think that this type of non-objectivity does a couple of things: 1. It speaks about one's character. 2. It's an indicator of maturity. 3. It's difficult to bring credibility to a discussion (like this one) when all someone has are opinions with no basis of fact to back it up. It's important to know (and understand) what you're standing up for. Is it OK to stick up for an underdog if they're a mass murderer fighting for freedom (or life) against a big court system? I know that the example is pretty extreme, however it's necessary to demonstrate my point. Just because someone is standing up against odds, doesn't mean that they're right.

      All I was trying to say was that it's necessary to examine the facts before determining that the big player is an asshole. I believe that your argument may solidify mine as "blind cheering", either way, is just counterproductive.

      --

      -Turkey

  9. Donations by invisik · · Score: 1

    Should have asked them to donate to the Mozilla group or buy you a lifetime license to SUSE Enterprise server!

    Hard to say what to do, they can exert some pressure.

    Congrats on getting more then their original offer!

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  10. Technology? by sirReal.83. · · Score: 4, Funny

    'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'

    Then what the hell is he going to do with a Microsoft cert?

    1. Re:Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...wish I had mod points....

    2. Re:Technology? by Spond!Max · · Score: 2, Funny

      Paper his birdcage with it? Use it to start a fire? Make a placemat? Line a drawer? Earn less than he would if he worked at Burger King?

      --
      oo *
    3. Re:Technology? by CheapScott · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Microsoft cert?

      It'll give him minty fresh breath after breathing the rarified Microsoft air. Maybe he can follow it up with a Microsoft altoid just to be sure....

    4. Re:Technology? by jstrain · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty funny. If I had mod points, you'd get 'em...

    5. Re:Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what the hell is he going to do with a Microsoft cert?

      More than you with nothing I'd bet!

    6. Re:Technology? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Heh, MS and Philip Morris merger. Talk about conventrating targets of corporate hate into one place.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  11. XBOX by supe · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder if it's got a mod chip?

  12. Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by tbase · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I'm sorry, that was just plain wrong.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      (Quickly registering the name MikeRowesSoftsSucks.com)

    2. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

      He might be tech savvy, so maybe we'll see MikeRoweMachines.com, or, being a Canadian, maybe next it'll be MikeRoweFish.com (groan).

    3. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by saforrest · · Score: 1

      He might be tech savvy, so maybe we'll see MikeRoweMachines.com, or, being a Canadian, maybe next it'll be MikeRoweFish.com

      Hmm? Is there some Canadian/fish thing I don't know about? Is this some obscure ice-fishing reference?

    4. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... maybe next it'll be MikeRoweFish.com

      Nah; that'd just get him sued by microfiche manufacturers.

      Ya think they'd try to buy him off by offering a free microfiche reader?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'm sorry, that was just plain wrong.

      You think thats wrong?! My friend Mack had his domain revoked by MS lawyers because of trademark laws. The domain was called MackRoweSoft.com

      pfft

    6. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think MikeRoweStiffed would be better?

    7. Re:Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by spanklin · · Score: 1

      I keep waiting for the MikeHuntSoft.com jokes...

  13. I should point out by krog · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...that there are perhaps 20x fewer people who care about the outcome of this story, than those who care about the recent troubles with goatse.cx. So why not post a story on goatse.cx and keep your users happy?

    No -- not a troll, not offtopic, not flamebaiting. There's just no other forum to ask a question like this, so I do it here.

    1. Re:I should point out by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      I've posted about this before. I totally agree. I'd love to see a story about what is/has been going on with goatse.cx. I think it's totally suitable for a yro story. Much more important than this kid.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:I should point out by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      This is a good point, considering how much of an impact goatse.cx has on /. postings, you'd think this would be more important to the readers. Of course if they're not reporting on it {insert conspiracy theory here}.

      Of course I started a chain of emails to try to get them to start using a Gentoo topic icon (since they have em for all of the other distros, including Caladra) to no avail. I sometimes wonder who's running the show around here.

      CB

    3. Re:I should point out by SpooterMM · · Score: 1

      You can find more info on why they took it down here as well as a petition to get the site back here.

    4. Re:I should point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Why don't they just remove the dolphin content leaving the rest of goatse up?

  14. No name change? by BHennessy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would have thought the Microsoft would have wanted some change to the name of the company too? Surely the same problems will arise if he's still calling his business/site Mike Rowe Soft or whatever?

    1. Re:No name change? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a matter of fact, they took him to the courthouse to legally change his name to Joe Rowe to avoid any possible future trademark infringements.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:No name change? by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, because then that would be a Trademark case.
      MS wasn't charging him with that because they knew that they don't have a case there, they'd lose hands down. They played the prove-he's-a-domain-squatter card on him.

      Big difference.

      However, now that Mike Rowe has caved to MS, should he try to continue a company under the same name, MS will have HUGE ammunition in a trademark case because Mike Rowe has essentially admitted to attempting to profit off of a name similar to Microsoft...

      Man, that little turd's done all kinds of damage by caving to them.

      --
      No Comment.
    3. Re:No name change? by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      The issue wasn't with his company's name which is "Mike Rowe Designs". It was with his domain name. He doesn't have to change his company's name.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    4. Re:No name change? by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 1

      "Man, that little turd's done all kinds of damage by caving to them." Um, no. A settlement was agreed to. This has no bearing on case law.

    5. Re:No name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      However, now that Mike Rowe has caved to MS, should he try to continue a company under the same name, MS will have HUGE ammunition in a trademark case because Mike Rowe has essentially admitted to attempting to profit off of a name similar to Microsoft...


      I think the point of most settlements is so people can get monetary rewards without any guilt or blame on anyone.

  15. New precendent? by Morgon · · Score: 1

    Well hell, if companies are going to do this I think I'll register the following names (not checked for existence)

    sohnee.com
    nintendough.com
    mycrowsoft.com .. I'll just start an entertainment center based on freebies from companies' domain "settlements"

    They should have left this guy alone. They've just paved the way for more abuse.

    --
    [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    1. Re:New precendent? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You'd be less successful than Mike. Remember, his actual name is Mike Rowe, so mikerowesoft.com is somthing he might have gotten away with since it doesn't even contain the word Microsoft. Also, he wasn't in the business of registering domain names and then squatting. They crack down on squatters, but in this case Mike only had one domain and didn't solicit its sale (except under stress in a reply to a Microsoft offer).

      One odd thing: I keep reading about copyright violations in these stories, but shouldn't Microsoft's claims be trademark-related? Copyright doesn't apply to a business name as far as I know.

      Regarding the settlement: it mentions the MCSE, the XBox and so forth, but I'm guessing there's money in there somewhere, too. This was a very bad PR situation for Microsoft. Since Mike had the PR on his side, yet is giving up the domain, I'm guessing he got more than just some courses, plane tickets and a game console in return.

    2. Re:New precendent? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      "Regarding the settlement: it mentions the MCSE, the XBox and so forth, but I'm guessing there's money in there somewhere, too. This was a very bad PR situation for Microsoft. Since Mike had the PR on his side, yet is giving up the domain, I'm guessing he got more than just some courses, plane tickets and a game console in return."

      OTOH this could turn into a PR win for both, especially if Mike really uses that MCSE stuff.

      --
      C|N>K
    3. Re:New precendent? by VickyNaylor · · Score: 1

      My Crows oft' explore a brow, sir.

      --

      ---
      imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie...
    4. Re:New precendent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [but shouldn't Microsoft's claims be trademark-related? Copyright doesn't apply to a business name as far as I know.]

      Microsofts' claims are whatever they decide they are, and apply to whatever they say they do. At least as far as anyone who doesn't have millions laying around to fund armies of lawyers for years of litigation is concerned.

    5. Re:New precendent? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      Good point. Though what I mean is, even with millions lying around (or billions, in Microsoft's case) can they get anywhere by claiming copyright infringement when the claim involves a phoenetic variation on their name? Their name is a registered trademark. Isn't copyright infringement as silly a claim against Mike Rowe as patent infringement would be?

  16. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > hope he takes the free publicity & does something good with it.

    I hope he fails miserably and dies alone. He gained popularity because of the name he was born with, just like a Kennedy. Meanwhile, the rest of us fight for a chance at living the dream...

  17. That's one way to get an XBOX... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Now, that worked out well for him (I suppose)

    Though, he should have know that the Red's were out of bullets. Then he could have traded away his pacifist medic! I hope he got bill gates to admit he likes ribbons in his hair and that he wants to kiss all the guys on the blue side.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:That's one way to get an XBOX... by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      No red vs blue spoilers without appropriate warning please.

    2. Re:That's one way to get an XBOX... by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      Grif: I don't know, I think we could hold out for more.
      Simmons: We don't have any bullets dumbass.

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
  18. Free XBox by nhaflinger · · Score: 1
    WooHoo!

    Is that all it takes to get a free XBox? Register a bunch of Microsoft rip off domains? I guess I have something to do this afternoon after all.

    - Nicholas
    www.hackerintel.com

  19. Help him? by lxt · · Score: 4, Funny

    I doubt his nice MCSE will help him get a job :)

  20. Xbox??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should've asked for a PS2 :P

  21. Dupe! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think. Wasn't this in a slashback?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  22. Say what you will about MS... by Nijika · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good way out for both parties, really. While I don't dig Microsoft going after anyone for a domain name, it's a known tactic to squat on "near miss" domains. Usually the speculators aren't bright eyed 17 year old kids, and that tactic would be suitable for the usual bottom feeders. In this case though, where they clearly want to quash that domain, but not cripple some poor teenager, I like this.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:Say what you will about MS... by malfunct · · Score: 5, Interesting

      mikerowesoft is not a near miss. Its a very far miss at best, plus its his own damn name. I think MS was sort of out of line on this one, though he provoked them by posting (at least some at the time I saw the site) anti-MS content on the site. Shows that corporations (whether legally or though monetary means) are far more powerful than any individual which may not be a good thing.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Say what you will about MS... by MP3Chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hardly call MikeRoweSoft.com a near miss. He obviously took advantage of his own name so that it SOUNDED like Microsoft... but to think that his intention was to dupe people into "accidentally" getting to his site is a bit absurd.

      Aside from that, I don't see how his domain name could be copyright infringement anyway. Unless MS somehow owns copyrights on any word or phrase that sounds like Microsoft...

    3. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where they clearly want to quash that domain, but not cripple some poor teenager, I like this.

      Riiiight! Microsoft did this out of the goodness of their collective heart.

      No, they started legal proceedings, threatened the kid and accused him of being a cybersquatter. Then, after the story was leaked to the press and generated negative comments from everyone, they backed off and got reasonable, something they could have done in the first place.

      And you like this? Why?

    4. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      It isn't copyright infringement. It IS trademark infringement. And if Microsoft didn't try to protect it's trademark (no matter how stupid all parties think such actions are), they risk losing their trademark.

      When that happens, anybody can use it. You'd start seeing "Microsoft Linux" distros, even though MS had nothing to do with them.

    5. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Darth · · Score: 1

      it isnt trademark infringement either. that would require him to be selling software and for the marks to be very similar in a way that would cause confusion in the market. I dont think anyone would confuse these two names as the same company.

      they might have had a case for trademark dilution, though.

      if his site constituted a parody or criticism of microsoft, it'd probably be protected from both claims.

      and you probably wouldn't ever see someone branding linux (or any other software) with the microsoft name since that would be trademark counterfeiting and that violates federal law, and possibly the relevant state's laws as well.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    6. Re:Say what you will about MS... by brucmack · · Score: 1

      Who's going to try to go to Microsoft.com and end up typing MikeRoweSoft.com? There wouldn't be any accidental traffic to his site, and his site wouldn't come up on any searches for MS either.

    7. Re:Say what you will about MS... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      He IS selling Software services off his website (when i looked last week). He was advertising his web design business.

    8. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And you like this? Why?"

      I like it because the end result is good for everyone. Both parties were smart and not too greedy so both win. I wish everything in life could be as reasonable.

      As to the fact that Microsoft was greedy/pushy/dumb/unreasonable at first; well, I don't expect much from first efforts from humans, Experience shows me that people usually get it wrong at first.

      Furthermore first offers are always out of line; that's why YOU NEVER ACCEPT A FIRST OFFER.

    9. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Darth · · Score: 1

      he's selling services that microsoft doesn't offer. for trademark infringement, he'd have to be using a similar (or the same) mark to sell goods or services that are in the same market as microsoft.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    10. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      He claimed he was trying to start a software business. He also stated publicly that he registered it because it sounded like "microsoft." While on paper you wouldn't confuse the two, microsoft and mikerowesoft are phonetically identical. While you may not agree with it, the arguement can be made that the phonetic similarity between microsoft and mikerowesoft would be enough to constitute trademark infringement.

      MS may not have won such a trademark case -- that's not the point. Hell, they probably wouldn't care. The point is that an arguement CAN be made for trademark infringement. Unless you vigilantly defend your trademark, someone else can come along, point at the one time you ignored it, and can claim that the term has become generic.

      You won't see anyone branding linux "Microsoft Linux" today, because MS still holds the trademark. Once the term "Microsoft" becomes generic, there is no more trademark, and such a title is fair game. Which is the whole point.

    11. Re:Say what you will about MS... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure thats false... The Mcdonald's Golden Arches are a trademark. I'm violating thier trademark if I sell UPSs for computers and market them with the McDonald's Logo.

      I'm also pretty sure it would still be trademark infirngment if I made the arches purple instead of gold, so don't try to tell me that because he spelled it differently he can get away with it.

      He is selling a product using using someone else's tradmark. He has admitted that he specificly choose the name because he thought it would be cool to use something that sounds like thier name.

      He did wrong, he got caught, he got free stuff and his 15 minutes of fame. Everyone is happy except the people who want to "stick it to Microsoft" in any way they can.

    12. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Darth · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure thats false... The Mcdonald's Golden Arches are a trademark. I'm violating thier trademark if I sell UPSs for computers and market them with the McDonald's Logo.

      trademarks are specific to the product or service being sold.

      from the requirements for applying for a trademark (U.S. Trademark Law section 2.32):
      "A list of the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses or intends to use the mark."

      Unless McDonalds sells UPSs, you would not be infringing their trademark. You might be diluting their trademark, and they could possibly come after you for that, but that is distinctly different from trademark infringement.

      I'm also pretty sure it would still be trademark infirngment if I made the arches purple instead of gold, so don't try to tell me that because he spelled it differently he can get away with it.

      Actually, color trademarks require the holder to specify in detail the colors used in the trademark.
      Section 2.52 of the U.S. Trademark Law :
      "Color marks. If the mark includes color, the drawing must show the mark in color, and the applicant must name the color(s), describe where the color(s) appear on the mark, and submit a claim that the color(s) is a feature of the mark. "

      Once again, it would not be trademark infringement. It would be trademark dilution.

      He is selling a product using using someone else's tradmark. He has admitted that he specificly choose the name because he thought it would be cool to use something that sounds like thier name.

      section 2.52 of the U.S. trademark law requires a detailed description of the sound if the mark is a sound. Microsoft's trademark doesnt appear to include a detailed description of the sound of pronouncing it in english. (i couldnt verify this to make absolutely sure because the uspto's trademark search engine is down, but microsoft's trademark use guidelines for the registered mark have no information about any pronunciation guidelines)

      Everyone is happy except the people who want to "stick it to Microsoft" in any way they can.

      i'm not trying to "stick it to Microsoft" and i'm not saying that the way the issue was resolved was bad. I'm saying that it is not a clear case of trademark infringement. I also said they might be able to get him on trademark dilution.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    13. Re:Say what you will about MS... by Nijika · · Score: 1

      So at no point did this come to the attention of MS top brass. And at no point did that top brass think "geez, this kid's only 17 and we're trying to buckwheat him like he's a spammer from Florida or something, maybe we should ease up." Riiiight. Talk about vilifying people just because you don't like their (unfortunately) popular software.

      --
      Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  23. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Cyclopedian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's only 17.

    Let him have his XBox fun, and some college life to go with it. If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.

    But I agree: it's a chance to build some positive ties that he can use to network his way into a job after college.

    -Cyc

  24. Not impressed. by Photar · · Score: 1

    He should have held out for way more. On the other hand, this kid didn't strike me as all that withit in the first place.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    1. Re:Not impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am impressed. People don't usually get anything from Microsoft (not counting bloody hemorrhoids and permanent technological impairment).

    2. Re:Not impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have held out for way more. On the other hand, this kid didn't strike me as all that withit in the first place.

      Lemme guess...you're from the USA, right ? If so, I imagine your next move will be to sue the teenager for not putting up enough of a fight ?

    3. Re:Not impressed. by dyte · · Score: 1

      He should have held out for way more

      How do you know he didn't? Is the information that has been made public always the whole story?

    4. Re:Not impressed. by Photar · · Score: 1

      I know he didn't hold out for more because he settled for less.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  25. They'll be coming for me next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have never forgiven my parents for naming me Windows Crashes Too Much Jones.

    1. Re:They'll be coming for me next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Windows Crashes Too Much, it's me you're long lost brother, Basketball

    2. Re:They'll be coming for me next by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      Son, this world is rough
      And if a man's gonna make it, he's gotta be tough
      And I knew I wouldn't be there to help ya along.
      So I give ya that name and I said goodbye
      I knew you'd have to get tough or die
      And it's the name that helped to make you strong.

      Now you just fought one hell of a fight
      And I know you hate me, and you got the right
      To kill me now, and I wouldn't blame you if you do.
      But ya ought to thank me, before I die,
      For the gravel in ya guts and the spit in ya eye
      Cause I'm the son-of-a-bitch that named you Windows Crashes Too Much Jones.

      (sorry Shel & Johnny)

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    3. Re:They'll be coming for me next by Xyde · · Score: 2, Funny
      Apologies to the Monty Python Crew, but this reminded me of...

      Bounder: Ah good morning. I'm Bounder of Adventure

      Tourist: My name is Smoke-too-much

      Bounder: Well you'd better cut down a little then

      Tourist: What?

      Bounder: You'd better cut down a little then

      Tourist: Oh I see! Cut down a little then.....

      Bounder: Yes...I expect you get people making jokes about your name all the time?

      Tourist: No, no actually it never struck me before. Smoke...to...much....(laughs)

      Bounder: Anyway you're interested in one of our adventure holidays?

    4. Re:They'll be coming for me next by NagaNine · · Score: 0

      looks to be a linux web server: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.mike rowesoft.com

    5. Re:They'll be coming for me next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In that case, Microsoft should have just waited for the thing to die in a few weeks and saved the four cents they spent manufacturing that XBox.

      Ah, hindsight.

    6. Re:They'll be coming for me next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windowscrashestoomuch.com would probably be ok. Also microsoftsucks.com . With regard the trademark the issue is whether or not it would cause confusion to customers, it doesn't prohibit legitimate criticism or parody. mikerowesoft.com used to do computer related business is in grey territory, probably dark grey.

  26. new Web site by MagicM · · Score: 1

    Mike also is working feverishly to put together a new Web site, his father said.

    He has seen the light! Onward to get a GameCube (www.ninetendo.com) and a PlayStation (www.soknee.com)?

  27. With any luck... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 5, Funny

    He'll mod the X-box and run linux on it.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    1. Re:With any luck... by caluml · · Score: 1
      He'll mod the X-box and run linux on it.

      And register another funky Microsoft sounding domain, and run the website from the modded Xbox...

    2. Re:With any luck... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Someone so needs to send him a free copy of Hacking the Xbox.

    3. Re:With any luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he ruin a perfectly good xbox to run a non-commercial, non-supported, non-user friendly niche OS?

  28. XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't he ask for a GC with Metroid Prime and Zelda? Or a PS2???

    This is like giving away the domain for free *AND* being forced to dispose that outdated lite-PC hardware for them.

  29. Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    Call me devil's advocate, or whatever, but being as this kid obviously made a website of such a name as to bait and/or parody Microsoft, and then microsoft turns around and basicalyl rewards him for said baiting....is this really the message people ought to be getting?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      The kids name is Mike Rowe, he didn't make it up. He was trying to start his own little software company. Now, I'm sure he knew what he was doing when he registered the name, but frankly, I'm not seeing the problem.

      Now if it was me (granted, I'm not a 17 YO anymore), I'd have held out and told MS to bite my shiny metal ass.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, MS baiting has incredible entertainment value.

    3. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by pebs · · Score: 1

      It is punishment enough that they are baiting him into becoming a Microsoft drone.

      --
      #!/
    4. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      But he didn't register MikeRowe.com , he registered MikeRoweSoft.com . In this day and age it is IMPOSSIBLE not to notice the connection between that and said software giant

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by MCZapf · · Score: 1
      So? That's his good luck, and Microsoft's bad luck, IMHO. I think it's perfectly reasonable to attach "soft" to your name when naming your own software company.

      Personally, I never would have agreed to transfer the domain name to Microsoft. The most I would have agreed to would be to stop using the domain, but I would have kept it registered under my own name. Also, I would have stipulated that Microsoft pay for re-registration for the rest of time.

    6. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then YOU would have been laid waste to in court, as this was just Microsoft trying to solve the problem as cheaply (for them) as possible. Had you advised Microsoft to bite anything, your next stop would have been the poor house.

      So, in summary, while you claim to not be "a 17 YO anymore" in your pidgin English, you HAVE proven to be quite easily outsmarted by someone who isn't yet a legal adult.

      Good day to you.

    7. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by Sumbody · · Score: 1

      I think the kid would have had a better leg to stand on if the Redmond Phoenetics Cleansing and Namespace Purificication Corporation tried to come after MichaelRoweSoftware.com rather than the more casual MikeRoweSoft.com

      The latter, I think, proves Master Rowe was trying to spit into the wind.

    8. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt Mike was well aware of the pun and probably thought it was pretty clever. MS, however, has no legs to stand on as no one would be likely to confuse MikeRoweSoft with Microsoft - it's not like it's a couple of letters off, it's a LOT of letters off, and no one would mistakingly type in MideRoweSoft instead of Microsoft.

      As a matter of fact, it would probably be worse in the long run for Mike as he told people to just see his website at "double-u double-u double-u dot Mike Rowe Soft dot com."

      The question is how does this infringe on MS?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  30. The Value of This Settlement... by GTRacer · · Score: 1
    ...depends on how you view the offerings. Mike's asked-for $10k versus:

    Microsoft certification training, an Xbox, an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond...

    Where you are on the Windows-Linux continuum will dictate how you see this. Also, the trolling possibilities are just endless - "MCSE pwnx0rs!!!11", etc...

    Gotta love that quote from Mr. Desler, though! Means to an end, indeed!

    GTRacer
    - Wouldn't mind an Xbox and a broadband pipe to play it on

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  31. Mike Rowe cowed down by CitznFish · · Score: 1

    such a shame... what the hell did M$ see in his URL that scared them? No one would ever type that in tto get to microsoft.com, not even illiterate monkeys.

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    1. Re:Mike Rowe cowed down by flewp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speeking for all teh illiterate monkeys out thair, yew sir our rong.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    2. Re:Mike Rowe cowed down by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a "gamer" BBS? Those illiterate peons could misspell using the space-bar alone.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  32. Really infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm just wondering if this is really legal infringement only because it happens to sound like microsoft? I can't beleive the court even wasted its time with this case.

    Can't this just open the door for others to sue based on remote similarities to copyrighted material or trademarks?

    1. Re:Really infringement? by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

      In Canada, yes, as per Corporations Canada web site [emphasis mine]:

      "A proposed name that looks, sounds or suggests similar ideas as an existing business name or trade mark is not eligible for incorporation under the CBCA if it is likely to cause confusion with the other business name or trade mark. The Act gives the Director, CBCA the responsibility to decide whether your proposed name is likely to cause confusion."

      In other words, a corporation's name may not be valid if the authorities believe the phonetic resemblance causes confusion. In this case, it's debatable whether a .com domain name should be treated the same way as a corporation name, and whether the phonetic resemblance is a problem. But yes, it would be worth the court's time to look at it.

  33. You know... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    I'm going to register mizzlesizzle.com, and see if Microsoft, with help from Snoop Dogg, sues me for copyright infringement.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  34. MyCrowSoft.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love my crow because he's so cuddly and soft. I have registered this domain to show him off to the world.

  35. What if FOX did this? by phaetonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I remember an episode on the simpsons where they would make fun of brands like:

    Sorny
    Panaphonic
    Magnetbox

    Yet nothing happened to fox.

    1. Re:What if FOX did this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmmm, perhaps satiric speech is protected speech?

    2. Re:What if FOX did this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're allowed to parody names.

  36. You can tell he's only 17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sold out for a fucking xbox

  37. other gifts by sageFool · · Score: 0, Redundant

    > ...and some other gifts.

    Hopefully some of those were suitcases full of cash.

  38. Free Education by bmiller949 · · Score: 1

    I think Mike should have pumped Microsoft for a lot more. Like a free Harvard education. Lifetime supply of Mountain Dew. Jenna Jameson dream date. To hell with that MCSE non-sense. Give him something he could use.

    --
    <sig>no sig</sig>
  39. Re:compensation? (LMAO) by Grrr · · Score: 2, Funny

    'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'.
    ...


    Naaaaaah, too easy.



    <grrr>
  40. It's a nice ending by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1

    The kid is clever. I'm glad that MS relented, despite the fact MS knew they would win in court. Mike Rowe - Although we will forget all about you in like 3 months, good luck!

    --
    what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
  41. Foster his interest in WHAT? by jrumney · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology

    Shouldn't that be foster his interest in Microsoft?

    I mean come on, an X-box? An MCSE course? And I bet the migration to another webserver has to be to IIS and all.

    1. Re:Foster his interest in WHAT? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that Funny moderation has gone, because I was dead serious. I'm especially concerned about the moving the existing domain to a new Web site wording. Its not entirely clear what that means, but my interpretation given the rest of the "gifts" is that they want to get him off the Red Hat Enterprise server where his site is currently hosted and onto a Mikerowesoft platform.

    2. Re:Foster his interest in WHAT? by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 1

      no, they should buy him a brand new&shiny PS2 with loads of games2play, get him a CCNA cert, teach him Java , mysql and Apache Kung-fu... Gimme a break man...

      --
      Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
    3. Re:Foster his interest in WHAT? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the fact that in order for that Xbox to be useful, he has to purchase games for it, which makes MS money. And well, if he decides to use the Live service......thats more money, and well, you get the picture. So instead, MS is hoping this will make them some money.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  42. "buy him out boys" by serano · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Simpsons quote:

    Bill Gates: I didn't get rich writing checks. <Says to thugs:> Now buy him out boys.

    <Thugs break pencils, tip over desk.>

  43. MSDN subscription by Major_Small · · Score: 1
    didn't he also get an MSDN subscription? That sounds like a pretty good deal for both parties...

    IMO, microsoft was offering too little and mike rowe was asking too much at first, but at least things got settled out of court and peacefully... mike rowe gets a ton of good stuff, and microsoft gains control over a potential parody domain name...

    1. Re:MSDN subscription by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      Actually, they gave him a Slashdot subscription so he could post pro-MS trolls and help spread anti-Linux FUD.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    2. Re:MSDN subscription by chammel · · Score: 1

      I think that he could have have gotten a MSDN Universal subscription for life out of this deal at least.

      --
      Neutrons are slippery little rascals, they can fool you. They can bounce and show up around corners you don't expect.
  44. In all honesty, by raz2 · · Score: 1

    I could do with that. :)

    I mean, a free (right?) MSCE certification course, an Xbox.

    Not that I fully agree with Microsoft even making this much of a problem out of this whole case, but I think this settlement is quite good for both parties. 8)

    --


    -raz
    "I shoot troubles with a jackhammer"
  45. Media, aint it great. by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    Just shows how hard bad PR can hit ya. Like everyone said amazing that it is all free MS stuff. I like the free training, while they are there how about pitching in to pay for the test you guys. Would it not be cool to see this kid turn in to a white hat linux hacker after all the free stuff. oh well I'm glad he won his lottery, and I hope he doesn't get blacklisted from any future jobs that deal with MS.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  46. Re:You'd have to pay me... by jedi_gras · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure you'd see it on ebay soon...

  47. sell out by lmahan · · Score: 1

    The kid didn't sell out, he was already a Microsoft droid, his whole defensive strategy was MS based. He's got a future at MS!

  48. mod parent up by mekkab · · Score: 1

    I guess its news that a kid got some free-isht out of Microsoft... (including his legal fees), so that makes Microsoft better than the RIAA, but... this boils down to "individual transfers URL to company for some money." Is this really that newsworthy?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  49. wait... by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

    If you want to foster someone's interest in technology, don't you show them Linux?

    1. Re:wait... by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      My interest in technology was fostered when I was shown MSDOS, of course that was when everyone was complaining that they didnt need 32bit computing...

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    2. Re:wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did "foster" come to mean "destroy"?

  50. Extension of Copyright? by Klatoo55 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How far does this extend? Sure, you can sue phonetic copies, but what if someone makes a macrohard.com? Is that infringement as well? Or maybe micrsoft.com, or some other creative misspelling... What are the boundaries for this type of suit?

    --
    ------- "A true friend stabs you in the front." -Eliot
    1. Re:Extension of Copyright? by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      Looks like somebody already beat you to macrohard.com...

    2. Re:Extension of Copyright? by Klatoo55 · · Score: 1

      i'm going to lay on the floor and cry... Why?!!

      --
      ------- "A true friend stabs you in the front." -Eliot
  51. Microsoft finally did it right by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Microsoft seems to have realized there was a good way out of this. Now they've protected their (rather bizarre) trademark claim without creating the appearance that they'll pay cash to domain squatters.

    Master Rowe gets a nice toy or two, and has a career track ahead of him.

    In the end, everyone smiles but the lawyers. Good.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  52. Make your own darn forum. Here's how: by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's just no other forum to ask a question like this

    Then make such a forum for yourself. Write your question in your journal, open it for comments, and then link it in your Slashdot sig.

  53. The one good thing is... by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

    at least Microsoft values good publicity more than the perverse pleasure of beating the crap out of a student. Actually, the whole thing is kinda funny. An Xbox? Why not just give him a bag of heroin and some junkie certification training.

    M

  54. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those goodies for copyright infringement! I wonder what they're going to give me for the Office 2002 copies I've been handing out...

  55. I Hat You Mike Rowe by greymond · · Score: 0, Funny

    Great another kid who gets shit handed to him for doing nothing, yay.

    1. Re:I Hat You Mike Rowe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ears are cold, can you hat me too?

  56. Give it up? Never. by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have given the domain name up. If I put my name into a domain name or any other name, it's my name, and I can choose to use it how I want to. Mike Rowe Soft is a great name for a company, and anyone could have validly created a company with that name.

    It seems the kid was only interested in money, not the principle. In theory if my last name is 'Book' and my wife's last name is 'Rizzoli', and she hyhenates her name, she would be 'Rizzoli Book'. Just like the actual Rizzoli Books company.

    Should someone give up a domain name in those circumstances? No way.

    1. Re:Give it up? Never. by firstadopter.com · · Score: 1

      The domain name isn't all that anyway. The three word domain names are kind of cheesy. Two word ones are the best.

    2. Re:Give it up? Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then you would have been driven into the ground by Microsoft, either by their outright victory, or by dragging it on until you beg to die.

      It's always a surprise how little the alleged "adults" here at Slashdot actually understand the real world.

  57. The W. C. Fields strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, I'm envisioning the old-timey classic comedy situation where the mean old W. C. Fields-esque villain is desperately trying to pry a big all-day sucker from the hands of a cute little baby in a carriage. But then he suddenly realizes that everyone has turned to watch him, so he quickly grins a big sugary smile and makes like he was only patting the kid on the head instead of trying to steal its candy.

  58. He should have... by suman28 · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should have taken the first offer of $10. Atleast, that would have been worth something rather than the crap he got.

  59. Trademark, not Copyright by Ezubaric · · Score: 2, Informative


    If you make someone think that you are someone else by using their logo/name, that's trademark violation. If you copy the site itself, that's copyright violation.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:Trademark, not Copyright by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You and others keep bugging with the idea that it was a trademark violation. Guess what? It was neither. Trademark corresponds to a very limited set of things, almost always a company name associated with a product if a field. That's why there can be two companies named Apple, one who makes pies and the other computers.

      Now, MikeRoweSoft is a company name, but not even a copy of the Microsoft name. Nor is it associated with any products. The fact is, at best MikeRoweSoft could be claimed to be a derivative work of the name Microsoft (same pronunciation, different spelling). Of course, it's ludicrous to believe one can copyright a single word. Why do you and others think it's any less ludicrious to trademark a single word? Or do we never see knock-off G-ello on the store shelves?

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    2. Re:Trademark, not Copyright by kelzer · · Score: 1

      That's why there can be two companies named Apple, one who makes pies and the other computers.

      Wow, some company owns the trademark for "Apple" pies? Man, my local grocery store better stop selling what they call apple pies in their bakery dept, or they'll get sued for trademark infringement.

      (I think maybe you meant Apple records?)

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    3. Re:Trademark, not Copyright by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      No, I wasn't meaning the Apple record label. I was just generically stating that a word could be reused (not that MikeRoweSoft == Microsoft) validly anyways. Btw, I doubt that a company named Apple would be allowed to make pies trademarked "Apple(TM) pies", mostly because there would be the issue of having "Such and Such's(TM) Apple pie" vs "Apple(TM) pie". It'd just be too confusing. Now, "Grandma Thornbury's(TM) Apple pie" vs "Grandpa Thornberry's(TM) Apple Pie" would probably cause some issue, but even there I doubt any sane judge would disallow one. Trademarks are designed to protect *products*, so I don't see how ICANN (I believe they're the one responsible for management of domain names) can claim something like microsoft.com is a trademark. microsoft-word.com, sure. And someone other than Microsoft owning microsoft.com and trying to selling that's related to Microsoft's field of sale, sure. But the name itself? That's crazy.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  60. Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA by xeeno · · Score: 1

    More like "keep him from fostering an interest in law" am I rite?

    1. Re:Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA by Paleomacus · · Score: 5, Funny

      We all know what a software festival at Redmond means. He'll spend 6 days and 7 nights in a re-education and brainwashing resort.

    2. Re:Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      I'm okay with that... where do I sign up?

    3. Re:Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brainwashing is no joke. You can watch someone who's totally in to open source turn in to a linux hater over the course of a couple months at msoft. I'm not a huge fan of linux myself, but they even become blind to their own blatant hypocrisy (maybe there's a better word for this).

  61. Free Xboxes? by dylanm · · Score: 1

    Hmm so does this mean I can get a free xbox for any of these?
    mikerowsohft.com
    miycrohsoft.com
    miicroesouft.com
    miekroezopht.com

  62. canada by Feyr · · Score: 1

    had he not gone for the 10000$ bounty first, he could have kept his domain AFAIK. from what i remember, in canada you can have a company named after yourself (ie your name is Doug McDonald, you could have a company including McDonald in its name)

    unless they can prove you are acting in bad faith (a fast food chain named McDonald and Sons)

    1. Re:canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but his company/domain name wasn't MikeRowe.com, it was MikeRoweSoft.com.

    2. Re:canada by Feyr · · Score: 1

      it's still his name, "soft" is generic enough to not matter

    3. Re:canada by StormcallerESC · · Score: 1

      If your example friend registered McDonaldDouglas.com would he get a free fighter plane?

      --
      - Stormcaller
      http://www.stormcaller.net
  63. Why not from the beginning? by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I don't understand is why Microsoft didn't do this from the beginning. They send a legal threat and find out they're dealing with some kid. Instead of turning around to sue the hell out of the kid if they had just offered this from the beginning there would never have been any story and this would be a complete non-issue.

    1. Re:Why not from the beginning? by firstadopter.com · · Score: 1

      The reason why they didn't do this in the beginning was they thought the kid would just get scared and run to mommy and give up. At least the kid fought back.... a little. Got a respect the first fight back.

    2. Re:Why not from the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the f**k do u know it would be the case???? Sure Microsoft is stupid but that's because it employs idiots with IQ higher than yours.

  64. Copyright infringement? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    Is this Slashdot-legal again (eg "I'm going to trademark the wheel! And copyright Mikerowesoft! And patent the book I just wrote!") or was there copyright infringement occuring as well as trademark infringement?

    Serious question: The original Slashdot story said copyright too, but I followed all the links and couldn't find anything copyright related at any of them. It looks like the area of law involved here is trademarks, not copyright.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Copyright infringement? by imadork · · Score: 1

      Mike Rowe's original post on his website about the letter from Microsoft mentioned the words "copyright infringement". Other sites (including the major news sites, once they got a hold of the story) used those exact same words, since that's what he wrote on his site.

  65. in other collective news by rogabean · · Score: 1, Troll

    i'm suprised the collective didn't demand he legally change his name as part of the "settlement"... LOL

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  66. Sweeting the Deal by lithiumfox · · Score: 1

    I mean, this kid could have it all, and he got a penny compared to all the money that microsoft is worth. He should of atleast asked for something more expensive. Who needs MCSE when you can have your own private spaceship.

  67. Taxes by manganese4 · · Score: 1

    Will these Gifts count as income and would he be requried to pay taxes on them and effectively pay Micorsoft, who will write off the gifts on their taxes, to lose his domain name?

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
  68. That It! by sherpajohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am changing my name to Winifred Dowes (the fact I am male is not relevant!). All my friends will now call me Win, please.

    My new Domain is gonna be WinDowesHome.com

    Will I get any games with my x-box?

    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
    1. Re:That It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were female, you'd have got a few Slashdot invitations atleast.

    2. Re:That It! by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or you could join up with Mike Rowe and create MikeRoweSoftWinDowes.com

      This way you can violate two trademarks with just one domain name!

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:That It! by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or keep a blog and call it WinDowesUpdate.com, but the only problem is that Microsoft gave up that domain after the DDoS, right?

    4. Re:That It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not change your name to Winston? Fag.

    5. Re:That It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wyn is actually a male name, so no need for Gender-bending.

    6. Re:That It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would only give in to a modded x-box

    7. Re:That It! by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but that domain name has already been take.... hey wait a minute... it's free....

      MINE!!

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  69. Whitehouse.com by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

    Why can Microsoft do this when the White House can't sue Whitehouse.com?

    1. Re:Whitehouse.com by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Because the adult entertainment publication Whitehouse existed long before the world wide web did. Whitehouse the magazine was established, had an established trademark, etc, etc. Basic trademark law.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Whitehouse.com by Popageorgio · · Score: 1
      Ah, thanks for the info.

      Of course, I wonder how you knew about the "adult entertainment publication"...

  70. They are dealing with the wrong person by aaandre · · Score: 1

    He did not commit copyright infringement, his parents did!

  71. Copyright infringment??? by thisissilly · · Score: 1

    What copyright infringement? Was he illegally copying Microsoft software? Trademark != copyright.

  72. Good for Mike by djeaux · · Score: 1

    Yes, he had a nifty "parody" domain registered. And yes, he'd probably have been whupped in court over it. A lot of folks so far are griping that he got Micro$oft stuff -- cert course, XBox, etc. -- but what do we expect Micro$oft to be giving away? SCO licenses? Some folks are even speculating that he will be doomed to an IIS hosting service, even though we don't know if MikeRoweSoft.com was a horrific FrontPage mess to begin with... I think somebody at MS finally saw that the heavy-handed approach was not the best route to take with a 17 year old. They turned it into a PR win. And I think Mike Rowe would say it was a win-win.

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  73. "You have the right to retain dumb consumers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So how far would they be allowed to go if his full name was Mike Rowesoft? What limit do we put on the price of preventing so-called consumer confusion?

  74. Almost. More precisely: by tepples · · Score: 1

    Is that all it takes to get a free XBox? Register a bunch of Microsoft rip off domains?

    Almost. You have to register a bunch of potentially Microsoft rip-off domains to which you have a legitimate claim. Being named Mike Rowe and having "soft" (as in "software") be a generic term for computer programs apparently counts for a lot to defeat a trademark claim in court, or Microsoft would not have offered such a generous settlement. This case sets a (non-binding) precedent: If the concatenation of your real name plus a product or service you plan to provide sounds like the name of a Fortune 500 company or one of its products, and you register that concatenation in the .com or .net space, you're likely to earn a big settlement.

  75. Nothing more than a SELLOUT!! by TrollBridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I posted this on his Blog, and I'll say it again here. He did this with no other intention than to extort Microsoft for some free shit.

    Looks like he sold out for a pittance too. Course he's only 17; what could one expect from a greedy little urchin?

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Nothing more than a SELLOUT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one cared when you posted it there, and no one cares when you post it here.

  76. Interesting I just registered ... by rhino_badlands · · Score: 0, Troll

    Interesting I just registered ...

    MikeRoweSoftOffice.com,MikeRoweSoftWord.com,Mike Ro weSoftExcel.com,MikeRoweSoftPowerPoint.com,MikeRow eSoftOutlook.com,MikeRoweSoftDotNet.com,MikeRoweSo ftGames.com,MikeRoweSoftMice.com ...

    I wonder what kind of neat swag i can get out of them for each one of those

    --
    - MOSKIE
    1. Re:Interesting I just registered ... by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
      I wonder what kind of neat swag i can get out of them for each one of those.

      Troll. Even if you did register MikeRoweSoftOffice.com, that would be prima-facie evidence of intent to deceive, since your other domain is registered under a different name.

      And the next three I checked weren't registered by anybody.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    2. Re:Interesting I just registered ... by rhino_badlands · · Score: 1

      ... Guess the hummor wasn't there for you

      --
      - MOSKIE
  77. Copyright Infringement????? by Iplaw-dc · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Microsoft is sooooooooo powerful that it can change the rules of federal statutes to accomodate it's interests WITHOUT going to court. This is not copyright infringement.

    --
    Jax
  78. What if his name were by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gunus Knottu Nix

  79. Business Models by yintercept · · Score: 1

    You'd be surprised at the number of businesses that get set up with the primary goal of trying to goad a larger company into buying them.

    Most of the dot coms, for that matter, were set up to gain market share, then to sell the company.

    Often research initiatives are done by setting up a company. They do the research, then selling the company, patents etc., if the results are good. Building a company who's only product is the company is often the best way to jump start an idea.

  80. $10,000,000 worth of bad publicity by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I hope Microsoft learned this lesson: Abusive behavior often fails. Responsible, friendly negotiating often succeeds.

    Someone at Microsoft, who was intent on doing things the abusive way, bought Microsoft perhaps $10,000,000 worth of bad publicity. Will he reimburse the company from his paycheck?

  81. Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "sell out."

  82. Actually, he runs... by HogGeek · · Score: 1
    Linux.


    Used to be BSD...


    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.mi ke rowesoft.com

  83. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by AgentAce · · Score: 3, Funny

    If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.

    Yeah, look at Michael Jackson

  84. Anyone check out his site? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    Three weeks ago he was a web developer with a few sample sites and a small little posting about his troubles with Microsoft. Now at his site its plastered with advertisements, and he's no longer developing web sites. Its a place for gamers and geeks, but not slashdot style. Weird what success will do to you. Luckily though he seems like a nice guy and is giving his donations for the lawyer to a charity. Its still amazing to see how something like this can change your life. Right now he has something like 5000 people playing games, on his forums, and just browsing his sight. That's impressive.
    Regards,
    Steve

  85. good move by gt25500 · · Score: 1

    Some PR guy at Microsoft probably said, "Choose your battles, why take a 17 year old to court? Give him an Xbox and become the good guys"

    Smart move on Microsoft's part

    --
    _________ Help me get a PSP!
    1. Re:good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dear gt25500,

      On behalf of Microsoft, please let me state how pleased I am to see that you agree with our position in this matter. Microsoft has never been secretive of our unwillingness to make any moves of a business nature before ensuring that every basement-dwelling Slashdot "user" provides his unrestricted approval.

      Additionally, you have, yet again, placed your unemployed self inside the head of our well-trained public relations department members with an amazing precision. Do not let anyone ever tell you that you're merely a Monday morning armchair quarterback who couldn't pick the winner of a one-horse race.

      Thanks again,
      Steve Ballmer

  86. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn right.

    I just got me a Gamecube for reasons (2) and (3) above. The Gamecube is ranked #2 behind Xbox for hardware performance, and I must say Soul Calibur II on 480i progressive is pretty damn sweet.

    The only other bitch I have about the fricken Xbox is those unweidly controllers. Now, I have a big cock (hands) and all, but seriously, those controllers are just brutal. The Gamecube is pretty big too, but not nearly as big as that of the XBox. The PS/2 for controller size however, beats them all.

  87. Selling out? by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Hmm...there've been a lot of comments about Rowe selling out to Microsoft and caving into corporate bribery and pressure, but what would he truly have gained by keeping his website?

    Don't get me wrong, lord knows I'm no fan of Microsoft, but...really the only value of that domain in particular was the humor of the name. He could very easily migrate his files to another site, keep everything he had from the previous site, and maybe host it on his Xbox after he installed Linux and Apache on it :-P

    And while an MCSE isn't my first certification of choice, are not all opportunities for gaining knowledge opportunities to be taken advantage of? At the very least, having an MCSE would help him to "know the enemy."

    Just this geek's $0.02 worth of food for thought.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  88. For crying out loud by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    Give up the domain. Great. So Microsoft still gives the poor kid the shaft. There's no violation here. Personally, I'd tell Microsoft to shove it up its ass.

    MCSE training? Did he really commit such a heinous act to warrant this kind of attrition? Seriously, how about training AND testing?

    Buncha bullshit IMHO. I guess he should start taking rides from strangers who offer him candy, too.

    Sorry. Shove it, Microsoft. This poor kid is no harm to you, and neither is his domain. And this "settlement" might be a great way to turn him against you forever.

    1. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally, I'd tell Microsoft to shove it up

      Sure you would, toughguy.

    2. Re:For crying out loud by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      No really.

      HEY, MICROSOFT... BLOW ME.

      ummmm, that's funny... I'm not expecting company at this hour...

  89. I hate to say it, but... SELLOUT by fzammett · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know he's 17. I know he has his who life in front of him. I know he can't afford the costs of doing battle with Microsoft (few can, individuals and corporations alike). I know I'm not in his shoes and I might see thing differently if I was. I know all of this, and much more that points to this being the right decision for him, indeed, being the ONLY decision he really could have made.

    But I just can't shake the feeling that this amounts to selling out and nothing more.

    I mean, let me ask this question... is there any one out there that thinks this truly is legitimate copyright infringement? The only point in favor of that I can think of is that he said he wanted people to think he was associated in some way with Microsoft (I forget his exact words, but that's the gist of it). But that one point aside, is similar pronunciation copyright infringement?

    Look, IANAL, naturally, and maybe there's precedent that says it in fact is. If so, end of story I suppose, and I'm wrong. But if there's not, if certainly seems like a worth-wild battle to fight in my opinion. I mean, you've got to draw a line against the darkness somewhere, to paraphrase a beloved captain, and although this isn't the world against terrorism or anything, it's still something worse fighting for I think.

    If for no other reason than to not like Microsoft bully everyone they want without any thought of being wrong, that's enough of a reason!

    I know, I know... 17... whole life in front of him... etc.. etc.. etc...

    Still, I can't shake the feeling that the word sellout applies all too well.

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  90. typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what if he has no interest in microsoft's products? not a very good carrot. 10k would have been nicer.

  91. "Ads are broken." by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Off topic, but I noticed that the Slashdot ad servers are slow today. Before the ad appears it says, "Ads are broken." Is that the official OSDN corporate position?

  92. Mike Rowe = sellout by kobotronic · · Score: 2, Troll

    Way to go, dude. You had your five minutes of net.fame, people on the net heard about your phlight, backed you up and sent thousands of dollars your way in order to help you fight the litigious Beast's gorilla attorneys wanting to steal your rightful property. You should have held on! Instead, you just roll over on your back like a sheep and let them bribe you with trinkets. An X-box and a couple of coupons. Ya big loser! You're nothing but a sellout, and Microsoft's henchmen will now ramp up their efforts instead of backing off from such lawsuits and legal threats. No respect. Dipshit.

    1. Re:Mike Rowe = sellout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kobotronic = luser!

    2. Re:Mike Rowe = sellout by IainMH · · Score: 1

      Jesus, Mary and Joseph.

      HE IS 17.

      I'm not sure if many adults would be able to resist the carrot of free stuff given to you by some charming, charismatic PR person coming to talk to you and your parents.

      Don't forget the stick was some of the biggest legal firepower you can get.

      HE IS 17! History is full of people trying to get young people to fight battles the older people care about. Put your money where your mouth is. Piss Microsoft off and matyr yourself to the cause.

      I for one don't think that anyone can blame a child for toeing the line. It's what we tell them to do anyhoo.

  93. Had a similar experience... by philipkd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was in 1996, I was 14, and I registered gamespotlight.com. I then e-mailed gamespot.com and asked them if they had a problem with it, and they said in fact they did (I was surprised for some reason). They offered to pay me to transfer the domain name, and rather than taking the money, I just did it for free: back then internic let you transfer domains because of trademark disputes for free.

    The good deed was graciously recieved. After meeting up with some of the guys at E3, GameSpot then offered me a paid summer internship in San Francisco when I was 16.

    Bam! Those were the good ol' days.

    - Philosopistry

  94. I would've agreed, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. He's not some 'high profile' guy, where, he's really really established a 'web presence', so loosing the domain name isn't that big a deal. Given that then, basically, he 'sold' a $20 domain name, for, gee, _atleast_ 10 times that (the cost of the xbox alone, about). MCSE training (assuming thats what it is .. maybe it's MSCD), while most of you think it's a joke, is also expensive. The books , assuming MS will pay for them, are also expensive (and probably for most of us 'worth' more than the training ;)

    A free trip, too.

    This guy made out like a bandit, in my opinion. :) ... alright, time to go register a MS trademark infringing domain name.

    coming soon to a web near you: www.visualstudios.net ;)

  95. Embraced and extended by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Never before has the Borg icon for M$ stories been so appropriate.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  96. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  97. Clever... by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

    The conspiracy theorist side of my brain says this was the plan the entire time:

    1. Register a domain name that sounds just like the largest software company
    2. Get mentioned on slashot
    3. Profit!!!

    Please. This kid is receiving donations from all over in his paypal account, now he's getting bought out by Microsoft, getting some free training and other shit. Nice plan. Paid off nicely for him, I think.

    --
    "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
    1. Re:Clever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot a step between 2 and 3 should of been ????

  98. is it modded? by QEDog · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The question should be, is it modded? Damn, everyone I know owns one modded it. The emulators are the thing that make the XBox worth something...

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:is it modded? by disconnectedsmile · · Score: 1

      You can get a dreamcast for 20 dollars at a pawn shop and download every dreamcast game. You don't even have to mod. Plus you can get emulators that run SNES, NEOGEO, NES, SEGA GENESIS, etc. Did, I mention you don't need a mod chip?

    2. Re:is it modded? by QEDog · · Score: 1

      Do they run at full speed? What about the sound? I might be interested in that. I've heard that the XBox would run PS1 games too, but I'm not sure if it runs all of them. Also, the XBox runs a lot of Arcade games.

      --
      "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  99. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. So I don't have the specs with me right now, but whatever i, or p, it still looks pretty fuckin' good.

  100. "invitation to a technology festival at Redmond" by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny

    i hope his mom checks him for a freshly-shaved spot behind his ear when he gets back.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  101. In short... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    We bought him, just not for cash.

  102. He gave in for that? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but that's just such a sad payment for a kids namesake and business identity. The kid should have stuck to his guns.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  103. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by grub · · Score: 1


    You can buy xboxes with mod chip preinstalled for ~CA$400. Install XBOX Media Player and you have a good quality divx/xvid/vcd/svcd/dvd player that can read from the local DVD drive, hard disk or network. It can play DVD-R|RW copies of downloaded games too.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  104. Nice recovery by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    Desler said Friday that Microsoft believes it's important to take steps to prevent widespread infringement of its name. But he conceded Microsoft's original approach was "admittedly maybe impersonal."
    'Impersonal' doesn't begin to describe it. 17 years old and 25 pages of legal documents? How about overkill?

    Anyways, now that they're giving him a free X-Box... He's going to spend $50 a game. How much does that suck? I'm not a MS hater, but he had no reason to settle. He could have played this out in the media, but hey, he got free stuff in the end.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  105. Confusingly similar by BreadMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are the rules for trademarking names and infringement. This is written for a non-laywer, so the english is fairly free of jargon.

    The commonly quoted case is that of LEXUS the law archival and search company and Toyota who wanted to use the same name of thier luxury division. LEXUS sued and lost.

    1. Re:Confusingly similar by Feyr · · Score: 1

      those looks like US rules, even the domain name is registered in the US (florida)

    2. Re:Confusingly similar by endeavour31 · · Score: 1

      The legal search service is LEXIS (or Lexis/Nexis). The only question on infringement is whether a reasonable person (defined as anyone unconnected with /.) might confuse the name with the company holding the original trademark.

      So if you start using "appell" Steve Jobs will come after you and successfully too. Under US law MS had a good case here.

    3. Re:Confusingly similar by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You have one strange definition of "reasonable person" there. I know Americans aren't the most literate people on this Earth, but I think most of them can tell the difference between MikeRoweSoft and the Microsoft logo and brand name that gets shoved in their face everywhere they turn.

  106. So when are they going after THIS guy? by samdu · · Score: 2, Informative

    BetterWhoIs Domain Search

    At least this Mike Rowe dude could make an argument that it was his fricking name.

    1. Re:So when are they going after THIS guy? by thopo · · Score: 1

      Registered in .NL (Netherlands), US lawyers can't touch it.

      --
      keep it simple.
  107. Microsoft Response Out of Line by Lordofohio · · Score: 1
    I think things like this are taking us down the wrong path. I know that Microsoft must think "Hey, his name sounds like ours", but that's got nothing to do with what his domain name actually was.

    His website didn't say anything defammatory against MS, he didn't make any claims that he was sponsored by, related to, etc. MS, and he's not trying to sell anything that takes away from MS's precious monopoly. Most importantly, there is no way that anyone looking for microsoft.com would accidentally type in mikerowesoft.com, nor would they ever get his web site from a search for "microsoft".

    They originally offered him $10 for his domain. That is a slap in the face and must have given a few assholes at MS a good chuckle.

    But what we should really worry about is how subjective these cases can be. If I open an animal hospital in southern Florida, can I call it Gator Aid? The sports drink manufacturer should really not give a damn about my hospital, but they most likely would. My last name sounds like Bose, the stereo makers. If I start a company or market a product or service, does that mean I can't use my name since it sounds like theirs? What are the rules on this stuff?

  108. MikeRoweSoft SELLS EM out by GeckoX · · Score: 1

    Gotta say, nice about face you little weasel.
    His accepting this basically proves that MS was actually correct in accusing him of domain-squatting when he turned down their $10.

    And here everyone was patting him on the back for standing up to these pressure tactics, but the second he accepts an XBox, well it's all ok now isn't it.

    Can you smell the hypocrisy?...kinda tastes like chicken.

    --
    No Comment.
    1. Re:MikeRoweSoft SELLS EM out by jred · · Score: 1

      Not really. If he'd held out for 10,000 bucks, that'd be squatting. If I hold a domain, and have developed it, it's worth more than the money I paid for it. It's not unreasonable for me to want to make a profit off it. After all, it has to be worth *something*, or you wouldn't want it.

      These few items compensated him for the work he's done on it, make him happy, and makes MS happy. That's the way transactions are supposed to work.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  109. Bah - no case - its his NAME by HermanZA · · Score: 1

    MS had no case, they had to yield or risk getting taken to the cleaners if he did go to court...

    1. Re:Bah - no case - its his NAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you're so obiously a trained attourney, where can I send my divorce file. I'd like you to have a look.

  110. Why does microsoft care? by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    I mean honestly, can anyone explain why they care? Is it because they are afraid blind people using text to speech are not going to be able to tell the difference? I mean really....

  111. No McBride sandwich from McDonalds by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    McDonald's reports that its new "Honeymooner" happy meal will be cancelled due to legal threats from SCO.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  112. One more destined for our camp? by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I myself being a highly trained at Microsoft products was what made me realixe just how plain stupid they are sometimes. Having knowledge in linux before i started training Windows 2000 server made me understand that linux does many things easier for an admin. Account management is a breeze in linux as opposed to the nightmare of managing domains, AD and security principles (barf!).

    The more he reads about MS stuff the more the kid is going to understand that there are much better and faster ways of doing things.

    Pople who tend to stay at the MS camp is often people who dont quite understand what happens behind the bells and whistles.

    Typing this away at my 25th reboot installing a frigging client machine Running W2k after having installed a fully fledged Linux Terminal Server with 1 (one) reboot.

    Aww, these moments make me appriciate the awkwardness of VI.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:One more destined for our camp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I myself being a highly trained at Microsoft products was what..."

      "Pople who tend to stay at the MS camp is often people..."
      And the new class required for all Microsoft certifications:

      "Grammar And Spelling For Microsoft Certified Professionals"
    2. Re:One more destined for our camp? by CounterZer0 · · Score: 1

      highly trained my ass.
      Managing hundreds of windows, linux, and netware servers, there are some things (specifically account management!) that Windows and Netware rock at, that linux sucks at. Having to add/change user/password combos on hundreds of machines manually sucks. Changing it once, and provisioning access centrally via a directory rocks.
      Take your rhetoric elsewhere.

    3. Re:One more destined for our camp? by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "Account management is a breeze in linux as opposed to the nightmare of managing domains, AD and security principles (barf!)."

      That's like saying, "Walking is easier than driving a car so why on Earth would anyone want to drive a car?" For the complexity and features of Active Directory, it's really quite simple to administrate, even for a paper MCSE.

      "Typing this away at my 25th reboot installing a frigging client machine Running W2k after having installed a fully fledged Linux Terminal Server with 1 (one) reboot."

      A "highly trained" microsoft user that claims to reboot 25 times during Windows 2000 setup. BULLSHIT!

      -Lucas

    4. Re:One more destined for our camp? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Ehr?

      I never said what directory service i use. To be honest im a netware sucker since i like stability and efficency more than fancy colours and pointless wizards. NDS and linux plays really nice together thanks to the pam ncpfs plugin that now even handles Zenworks and mounting of Netware home dirs etc. Its much better than the windows client even.

      If you have many linux computers you dont manage local accounts either. You setup your authentication server of choice, be it SunONE, Netware, Samba, LDAP, NIS or Windows AD and just run authentivation against it.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    5. Re:One more destined for our camp? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Well try installing Windows2000, service packs, a novell client, sophos, and some other apps without those numbers and get back to me.

      I know i can take a wild walk and disregard the windows crying for a reboot but i dont since many alterations to windows doesnt go through until the next reboot. Im not in the mood to fry a long installation just to see if that perticular reboot was essential or not (in linux i know i dont need to reboot, i can install piles of software and not reboot until im done without implicaitons).

      In windows i have learnt that you have to reboot or else it just hits the fan.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    6. Re:One more destined for our camp? by Sprinkels · · Score: 1

      Answer: automate

      1. Slipstream the windows 2000 and the lastest sp together.
      2. Create a unattended setup script for windows 2000 and include the Novell client, which installation can be automated too.
      3. (Optionally create a disk image using Ghost or Zenworks for desktops)
      4. Install all your other applications automaticly or on demand, using packages. Either with group policies or Zenworks for Desktops
      5. Deploy your workstations and servers automaticly.
      6. Use your now saved time to document and to listen to your customers. Very important.

      Constant rebooting is annoying, but, when you automate it doesn't really matter much.

      Also using the tools you have the right way, is more important than choosing the best tools.

    7. Re:One more destined for our camp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are, quite honestly, the least capable administrator I've ever witnessed. On behalf of the millions who can keep Windows 2000 running just fine (and without 25 reboots), please stick with linux. It's not like you can actually make the public image of linux nerds any worse with even your presence.

    8. Re:One more destined for our camp? by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Damn, you beat me to it!

      Don't forget to add that you can deploy future patches remotely with the option of not rebooting the client computers. The reboot will happen eventually when the user goes home for the day/weekend. If you have a small army of users that don't shut down, it doesn't take much to send them a gentle request that they restart at their earliest convenience.

      -Lucas

  113. Re:Say what you will about MS...2 dumb 2 use Inet by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny
    it's a known tactic to squat on "near miss" domains

    Anyone who types MikeRoweSoft when they mean Microsoft is too dumb to be using a computer and the Internet anyway.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  114. Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... until one day, when his kid registers SonOfMikeRoweSystems.com, and we have to go through this all over again.

  115. Invitation??? by jorlando · · Score: 1

    "...an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond"

    So he messed with the sacred IP os MS, dilluted it's brand name, passed as victim due a legal scam that the laweyrs take on him and now, due bad press, he got some gifts and all will be fine?

    There is a lake or river near Redmond? I think that the guy will visit Jimmy Hoffa :-)

  116. How Sad... by deacon · · Score: 1, Troll
    So Mike Rowe sold out his rights for a pile of cheap disposable consumer electronics, some things that shine and glitter in sunlight, and some worthless training.

    Hell, when I lived in Nigeria, I had to pay more than that for 12 prositutes.

    You would not get my domain name out of me without prying it out of my cold dead hands.

    The kids these days, they have no balls.

  117. Sounds Like a Deal to Me! by sean.m.bober · · Score: 1

    So, in exchange for a domain name, poor Mike Rowe gets to be assimilated?

  118. What about MyCrowSoft by serutan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Probably already been posted, but I wonder how these guys are managing to survive.

    1. Re:What about MyCrowSoft by thopo · · Score: 1

      The site is in .cz, US lawyers can't touch it.

      --
      keep it simple.
    2. Re:What about MyCrowSoft by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Mike should of registered michaelrowesoft.com posted his birth certificate on the index page, and let Microsoft stuff it.

      What about this one: Domain Name: MIKEROWSOFT.COM Created on: 27-Aug-02

      Or this one: domain: michrowsoft.com created: 23-Jan-2004 registration-expiration: 23-Jan-2005

      I just wonder how many variations there are out there.

      Microsoft, a division of Stuart Pidowsky Enterprises, but their friends call them Stu Pid.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    3. Re:What about MyCrowSoft by shystershep · · Score: 1

      Oh man!!! Did ya check out the only active link on that page? It's for Gentoo. Now that's a Windows Update!

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:What about MyCrowSoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya d00d, g3ntoo teh r0x0rs. har har har, we 1s l33t cause we nowe g3ntoo.

      a55 l1nix distr1but10ns for 4ll!

      Moron

    5. Re:What about MyCrowSoft by praxis · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing because it's a parody and in the Czech Republic.

  119. The Real Reason Microsoft Sued... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real reason Microsoft sued is because when you say "Microsoft" into their speech-to-text converter you get...

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  120. Biased Against M$ by bhima · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Come on guys! I use Linux at home, hell I even use NetBSD on my QUBE 2, I'm Pro Open Source and Pro Free Software as much as most of the folks here.

    But be honest! if this had been Gentoo, SUSE or any other Linux oriented company, giving this kid crap lying around in the marketing department would have been applauded.

    What the hell did you expect MS to give him?

    Redhat certified engineering courses? A free G5 Powermac with Steve Jobs' Autograph?

    Get real! Finally MS is doing the right thing (TM) and you STILLwhine!

    Now lets talk about XML patents!

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Biased Against M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But be honest! if this had been Gentoo, SUSE or any other Linux oriented company, giving this kid crap lying around in the marketing department would have been applauded.
      Yep, be warned Deb Ian you are next, then Fee Dora.
    2. Re:Biased Against M$ by payndz · · Score: 1

      Will I be able to get a free G5 if I change my name to Andrew Peter Pel and set up the www.appel.com domain, then?

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    3. Re:Biased Against M$ by geekoid · · Score: 1

      there not doing the right thing. There doing what they can to correct a large PR mistake.

      I can't speak for others, but I don't give anymore slack to any Linux company then I give MS.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Biased Against M$ by jrumney · · Score: 1
      What the hell did you expect MS to give him?

      If they're genuinely concerned about spending the money on educating him in technological matters rather than just giving him cash to spend how he wants, then how about a scholarship at a University where he'll get a real, unbiased education? If they'd done that, I'd applaud them, but it seems that Microsoft can't give away anything without the assurance of getting ten times as much back for it long term.

    5. Re:Biased Against M$ by bhima · · Score: 1

      One: There is no such thing as a "Genuinely concerned" corporation; this is against the nature of corporations. Two: This kid's website, as it is, is not worth the unbelievable cost of an education in American schools!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:Biased Against M$ by tasinet · · Score: 1

      it's not? but it's worth being ridiculed over the press for pickin on kids? and starting a lawsuit? and getting away with it with a fucking XBOX and brainwashing sessions????? I pitty him.. he gonna be fucked up when the 'training sessions' are over..

  121. But what about Hotmale.com? by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mike Roe Soft is indeed a soundalike to mic-ro-soft, on this point you can not debate. It took me a second after reading it to make the sound connection, what the hell does Mike Roe have to do with Microsoft, who is this Mike Roe person, what the hell does Micro.. oh yea....

    Hotmale.com is a much closer soundalike, and a hell of alot more likely to be a miss then mikeroesoft.com. Haven't you been in an office and had people yell "I was just checking my mail and I'm getting gay porn popups from hell".

    Why doesn't Microsoft go after sites that offer gay porn rather then products for the microcomputer? After all... some people might be offended by gay porn popups from hell, and might learn to associate Microsoft's mail service with gay nakid men.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

      might learn to associate Microsoft's mail service with gay nakid men

      I made that association and I don't even use hotmail!

      (or hotmale)

    2. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mike Roe Soft is indeed a soundalike to mic-ro-soft, on this point you can not debate

      Actually a typical pronunciation of Rowe is with the "ow" sound (as in, OW, that hurt, or "how"). Similar to Lowry, which can be low-ry or lau-ry. Hint: The name "Howe" is not pronounced "ho".

    3. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Presumably, their lawyers don't think that they've got a very good case. The site, offering gay porn, presumably does in fact supply pictures of hot males, and so "hotmale" is a reasonable domain. Hell, you could even probably try arguing that hotmail isn't really that hot...

    4. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Cause they would have to pay way more than 10 grand, and would loose that case in court for sure.

      Dunno how long hotmail exists, but sex has been on the internet for a long time ( /m thinks back to huge naked ASCII women while waiting for my printout at university). So hotmale.com might even have existed before hotmail.com.

      After the 10th XBox game, Microsoft is at a profit. Nice going guys...

    5. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Mike Roe Soft is indeed a soundalike to mic-ro-soft, on this point you can not debate.

      actually, you can.

      Rowe rhymes with cow.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but if all HotMale.com did was serve up homosexual porn, MS is not going to go near this one with a 10-foot pole [sic], unless they started offering email services as well...

    7. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up, faggot.

  122. How MS settles suits by Anonymous+Cowabunga · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the way MS pays their billion dollar judgements, by 'paying out' with virtual copies of Office and XP at retail prices. Or by 'paying out' with MS software to educational institutions, as a way to settle their monopoly on the education market. Costs nothing, extends and embraces.

  123. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I hope he takes the free publicity & does something good with it. If he can handle this gracefully and turn it into something positive, he can end up being seen doing so by the right people, and turn it into a good opportunity for himself.

    Yeah, it's really a good deal for him and just the kind of motivation the next m1k3r05ft.com needs. It does pay to be a 17 year old kid getting beaten up on by a soon to be KBE.

    Or, he can stay in his room and play with the new Xbox, that's OK too I suppose.

    That's for after all the training, while he's waiting for someone to hire him.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  124. It's like a happy ending by GussT · · Score: 0

    Out of a rocky start, Mike Rowe is off on honeymoon with Microsoft although that must not give consolation to his ex Wendy Owes.

  125. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

    How about moving his website over to MyCrowSoft.com,or MikeRowsOft.com. How about MaiKuroSofutto.co.jp? Wonder if he still has dibs on .org, .net, .ca....?

  126. Twenty Five pages? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Mike had received a 25-page letter from Microsoft informing him he was committing copyright infringement, and threatening legal action, as reported earlier on Slashdot.

    Twenty five pages? They'd get a one page response from me. It would read something like this: Dear Microsoft, Piss Off. Font size 72, of course.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  127. Re:Microsoft finally did it right -- Lawyers by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    everyone smiles but the lawyers.

    The lawyers still all got their paychecks at the end of the day too.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  128. free ms training? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA That will make him think twice next time.

    What kind of insane compensation is that??!

  129. Didn't the Dutch get Manhattan for a few trinkets? by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... seems to me that Microsoft got off cheap-a few trinkets for his name! Now just watch - they'll send him a refurbished Xbox!

  130. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy a DVD player that does all this (yes.. DiVX.. of COURSE!) w/o a mod chip and for less than $100 in every fuckin' electronics discount for NEW and with WARANTY... I don't see the need to get a crappy PC (XBox) for $400 instead.

  131. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    submitted this HOURS ago. get it together, shitheads.

  132. Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shmuck: "Hey look, this guy's got a clever domain"

    Schmuck's manager: "This guy's ripping us off"

    Schmuck's manager's manager: "This could ruin us, rake him over the coals, call legal"

    Legal: "Hmmm... let's ask him to stop and see if he demands money"

    Mike Rowe: "$10? Are you nuts? That's not worth the hassle, not for something like $10k would I do it"

    Legal: "Congratulations, you're a cybersquatter, cease and desist or die."

    Mike Rowe: "Wow, these guys suck, I'm going to the press."

    Press: "Clippy slices 17-year old's jugular"

    Microsoft PR: "Holy shit!, get Bill's lackey, get Legal!"

    Bill's Lackey: "Geeze man, Legal, back off. PR, give the kid what any reasonable 17 year old would want for the hard work he's put into his domain. And throw in some extra stuff... not so much to make it profitable though."

    Marketing: "and get some brands into the press"

    1. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Does anyone here understand that if a company does not actively protect it's trademarks and tradenames then it can actually lose the legal right to them?

      "Once established, a trademark must be "policed" to maintain rights. If you allow your mark to become synonymous with others' goods or services, you run the risk that your trademark rights will be lost because the name may be deemed to have become "generic" and, thereby no longer identifies a source, but a good or service available from several sources."

      --http://www.mit.edu:8001/activities/e-club/8.html

      Think about how the word "Kleenex" is used and imagine Microsoft losing the rights to their own name by not protecting it. I know this sounds hunky dory to most of you but now imagine a society where companies cannot protect their investments so they don't bother taking the risk to start a business. Now imagine those now non-existant companies not having hired you. You get the picture?

      Yes, I think the MS lawyers were assholes but they were merely following established legal principles that dictate that if they cannot prove that they vigorously defended their trademarks they might not own them long.

      In the end, MS defends their marks, the kid gets something and ./'ers are given something to be angry about.

    2. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Pentagram · · Score: 4, Funny

      And throw in some extra stuff... not so much to make it profitable though.

      An Xbox for the price of registering a domain sounds like a profit to me.

      I'm just off to register My Crow Soft .com. It's going to be the next big thing in avian bedding!

    3. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      not when you start mod chipping it. then they're just start sueing you again!

    4. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Xbox for the price of registering a domain sounds like a profit to me.

      Yeah, until you get the Xbox home, with it's shitty library, and shittier controller. Then you realise you should've just asked Microsoft for a swift kick in the jingle bells. At least that would stop hurting by next year.

    5. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      It is now my mission to fight stupidity on Slashdot. But since fighting stupidity here is hopeless and therefore stupid, I will limit myself to debunking this common myth about the need to protect trademarks.

      It's pretty simple, really. If you read the laws, you will find out that the only way to lose the trademark is for it to become a generic term, like walkman, kleenex, elevator, xerox (potentially), etc. It is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE to lose a trademark because others are using similar names to promote their products.

      If I start selling Cocain-Cola and nobody stops me, the world's most valuable trademark will not be invalidated. There might be some customer confusion and Coca-Cola might lose some money because of that, but their trademark is theirs to keep.

      If, on the other hand, I start calling any cola drink "Coca-Cola" and ask all my buddies to do the same, Coca-Cola trademark will be diluted and eventually lost. In the latter case Coca-Cola lawyers should be frantically calling everyone and asking them not to use the term (threatening to sue).

      So, in conclusion:
      1) it is impossible for MS to lose their trademark because mikerowesoft.com is owned by Mike
      2) Mike had the right to own the domain and use it in any way he wanted
      3) MS sucks

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    6. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Silly me, what was I thinking when I trusted to learned opinions of the world's best legal scholars. I should have been consulting with danila, who assures me that it is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE to lose a trademark. Perhaps you could quote same case law, precedents?

      Go back to your server room and philosophise to the ops monkeys there.

    7. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE to lose a trademark because others are using similar names to promote their products

      How could you possibly know any of this? Are you a lawyer? Also, have homophones of trademarks ever been tested in court?

      So, in conclusion:
      1) You're wrong
      2) You're an arrogant idiot
      3) You suck

    8. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you valued opinions of others as something other than an opportunity to insult them, you would notice the point I was making. I admit that the sentence was ambiguous, but I meant that others using similar names can't lead to losing a trademark, not that a trademark can't be lost at all. Hopefully with this confusion cleared up you are better intellectually equipped to understand my original post. Go back to rereading it and try to understand how your quotations of "world's best legal scholars" are completely irrelevant to the Mike Rowe's case.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Look, you are an arrogant prick as evidenced by your comment that "It is now my mission to fight stupidity on Slashdot."

      I called you out on this and hurt your overinflated ego in the process. Don't start acting like a hurt puppy and try to get pity. You can act like a psychobitch or something elsewhere 'cause I don't have the time to play your games.

      Microsoft acted to protect their trademark, any other interpretation such as "MS Sucks and they're just a bunch of meanies" is immature and show a limited understanding of the business world.

    10. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Think about it, though. Kleenex became the verbnoun for facial tissue. What if someone came up with a cleaning company and had called it Clean-Ex (short for Clean-Express)?

      Again, there is supposed to be a bit of a small domain that is enforcable for the trademark holder to maintain, yet it is the reality that at least for large corporations, that they push this domain out as large as they possibly can.

      Was the "causes confusion in the marketplace" ever met for this domain? Hard to say, because it is easy to see that "mikerowesoft" probably has something to do with somebody named "Mike Rowe", not Microsoft.

      So what if he saw some domain "squatting" possibilities? That is like suing a property speculator/developer for buying up properties at the fringes of urban expansion, before its zoned commercial/retail, and making a killing when the expansion does come his way and he resells the newly rezoned property.

    11. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      The comment about fighting stupidity was clearly intended as a joke. The fact that you were unable to understand hints at your lack of humour, not at me being an arrogant prick. And probably at you being insecure, since you obviously need to pick on others and call people names in order to feel better about yourself.

      As for my ego, I just checked an it is completely fine, no pity needed. It just seems that you overestimate your ability to hurt others, among other things. :)

      You may repeat that Microsoft was protecting its trademark a million times right now. The only outcome would be Slashdot blocking your IP for spamming, it won't make your argument (or whatever you are trying to masquerade as an argument) stronger. Although it looks like an exercise in futility, I kindly recomment you to reread my post, the relevant laws (or legal opinions) you were trying to quote, and some articles on Mike Rowe's case. It happens sometimes that intensive thinking about a particular problem may lead to surprising insights. It can happen with you as well, try it.

      P.S. May I politely ask you about your qualifications in law and business? Judging from your previous derogatory comment about server rooms, you appear to be a supervisor or a middle-level manager, am I correct?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    12. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      If you can back up your assertion with any kind of facts I will be glad to continue. Otherwise you are wasting my time.

      Manager? Hardly.

    13. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      I can't be wasting your time, since I am not forcing you to read Slashdot or my comment specifically. You are wasting your time yourself. As for the facts, I've already gave you a plenty, but here are some more:

      The worst thing that could happen if Microsoft doesn't effectively enforce its trademark is losing the "famous" status, which grants them a protection from dilition, which in turn gives them a right to sue everyone for using a similar looking/sounding trademark.

      Microsoft is happy to not have anyone in the world (except for some underwear manufacturer) using similar name and wants this to continue. Stupid trademark law allows them to do that, but obviously, in order to retain the exclusivity they need to sue left and right.

      This has NOTHING WHATSOEVER IN COMMON with losing the trademark itself. They can only lose the trademark if Microsoft becomes a generic term for something, e.g. if people start using this name for crappy software in general ("this version of Mozilla browser is so Microsoft" or "my students can't write anything but Microsoft code"). Or if MS itself stops using it for a few years, of course.

      http://www.visomark.com/process/
      http://en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Trademark

      Happy now? It's your turn to find (or will you choose to make up them?) some facts to back up your assertions.

      And if you are not a manager, then who are you? Temporarily unemployed? Or what?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    14. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      From your own link:

      "A trademark is protected when the law allows the mark owner to stop competitors from infringement by these confusingly similar marks."

      You really should learn to view matters from all sides, your anti-MS stance is clouding your judgement.

      Your attempt to personalize the debate by inquiring about my employment status is rather pathetic. I think you are projecting. BTW, I am happily employed in a great job for a company I like, making more money than I could have dreamed of. My wife is a hottie and I have two kids who are well-adjusted and likely will not turn into a ranting, raving, anti-everything who was overly influenced by his (her?) leftist professors.

      Now go away and come back when you can come up with something better than a lame-ass wiki link that does more to prove my point than your own.

    15. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1
      From your own link:
      "A trademark is protected when the law allows the mark owner to stop competitors from infringement by these confusingly similar marks."

      Duh! Thank you, Captain Obvious. How come you didn't notice that this was the whole point - whether Mike was infringing on Microsoft trademark or not. But if you think that it somehow follows from this sentence that MS was in danger of losing the trademark, you are dangerously delusional. And if you also have memory problems, let me remind you that the topic we are discussing is whether the company can lose a trademark as a result of others using similar names or not.

      Your attempt to personalize the debate by inquiring about my employment status is rather pathetic.


      You might want to check out this ebay auction (and this one as well, while you are at it).

      My question about your employment status just follows your derogatory remark about server room (actually it would only be derogatory if there was anything bad about working in a server room and if I actually worked there - none of these requirements is met). Apparently, that was too subtle for you.

      Now go away and come back when you can come up with something better than a lame-ass wiki link that does more to prove my point than your own.


      Could you point me to the part of the HTML specification dedicated to NON-LAME-ASS links?

      Your point ("if a company does not actively protect it's trademarks and tradenames then it can actually lose the legal right to them") was disproved in every post I made in this thread. I think it is you who should find some proof instead of throwing insults left and right. Or may be you should quit your well-paid job and actually get some basic education. Or ask one of your kids to read my posts and explain to you in very simple terms why you are wrong.
      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    16. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Look dickhead, in my first reply I quoted a legal scholar's learned opinion on the subject. If that isn't enough for you then nothing I do can make you realize that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

      When you can refute that quote with something other than an irrelevant, ambigious link from an online encyclopedia written by anyone (and everyone) then I will respond. If you cannot do such a basic thing, you get ignored.

    17. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      http://www.iplg.com/resources/articles/losing_trad emark_rights.shtml

      http://www.dykaslaw.com/tradefaq.html

      http://www.lawguru.com/faq/20.23.html

      http://www.whitecase.com/article_unique_product_ch ernichaw_12_2003.html

      Please note that these links are from legal resource pages, not some open-source encyclopedia and certainly not the opinion of some random ./'er.

    18. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      I pity you... Here, have another link. You seem to lack logic and reasoning skills and that causes an inability to realise that deficiency - a truly miserable sight. I, on the other hand, have higher than average reasoning skills, which, according to this paper, makes me overestimate the abilities of others and causes me to behave in such a way as if you were an intelligent person, capable of rational thought. Thus I will have another shot at explaining this to you.

      According to Section 15 of Title I of Lanham (Trademark) Act (paragraph 1065 of Title 15 of the United States Code), the trademark used for 5 years is incontestable, except when

      • Microsoft stops using the trademark
      • someone at Microsoft screws up (miriads of irrelevant formalities, wrong registration, etc.)
      • it becomes generic name for a product or service

      First case is unlikely, second case is completely irrelevant to Mike Rowe's case (you have to believe me, because I've actually read that law and because I am smarter than you), third case is completely unrealistic, because Microsoft does not describe any product in the first place, it's the name of the company. The dilution of the trademark has nothing whatsoever with losing it, in this case it only means that since Microsoft doesn't want anyone using names vaguely resembling its own and has a "famous" trademark, it must stop others from doing it. If they allow Mike to keep his domain name, they might have to allow "Nike Cross Soft" shoes, etc. In no case will they lose

      1. the rights to the trademark
      2. the right to prevent competitors from using it (even Mike, if he starts to compete)
      3. the right to prevent anybody from using it if there is a likelihood of confusion

      So to sum it up, the only reason for MS to attack Mike is that they keep the right to attack someone else next time without any compelling reason. Which is pretty pathetic and morally corrupt, if you ask me.

      And just in case you can find the Trademark Act yourself, here is the link: http://www.bitlaw.com/source/15usc/index.html

      Please note that it is from the US Code and not the first page of some half-assed Google search.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    19. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      "it becomes generic name for a product or service" is what the MS lawyers are concerned with. It doesn't matter what you and your finely tuned 'reasoning' skills think.

      I appreciate you doing all the legwork for proving my point, saves me a ton of time. You gonna keep looking up stuff that proves you wrong?

      Your MS antipathy seriously clouds your judgement.

      Your continued attempt to personalize this debate are pathetic. Continue giving it a shot at explaining to poor, little non-reasoning me. I enjoy watching a person who is so ate up with hatred flounder about.

    20. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      "it becomes generic name for a product or service" is what the MS lawyers are concerned with. It doesn't matter what you and your finely tuned 'reasoning' skills think.

      Oh, thanks for the easy one. Now could you please name JUST ONE product or service, which "Microsoft" stands greater-than-zero chances becoming a generic name for?

      Your continued attempt to personalize this debate are pathetic. Continue giving it a shot at explaining to poor, little non-reasoning me. I enjoy watching a person who is so ate up with hatred flounder about.

      It's easy to persuade a person who is open to different opinion, is willing to admit his mistakes, and ready to change his mind when proved wrong. But to finetune the reasoning skills one needs to become adept at explaining things to and persuading intellectually challenged as well.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    21. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      "Oh, thanks for the easy one. Now could you please name JUST ONE product or service, which "Microsoft" stands greater-than-zero chances becoming a generic name for?"

      Apparently, according to MS lawyers the use of MikeRoweSoft.com was. Again, it matters not what you or I think, the legal experts think so. You can aruge till you're blue in the face about what *you* think, the fact is that the people that matter feel it is so and no amount of anti-MS ranting is going to change the fact that a company can lose a trademark if they do not vigorously defend it. Please see my earlier references to this effect. I notice you did not dispute the case history but instead chose you use your prodigious 'reasoning' powers to yet again blather another MS rant.

      ...to become adept at explaining things to and persuading intellectually challenged as well.

      Blah, blah, blah....whatever Mr. Ego

    22. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      What do you think of this?:

      Google Tells Booble to Cease and Desist

      Is this 'Evil' Google suing? if you are true to your beliefs then this requires you to condemn Google. Doubtful that you can do this since it requires you to turn against not the 'Evil Borg' but one of open source's 'best friends'.

      What say you? Hypocrite or not?

    23. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      What do you think of this?: Google Tells Booble to Cease and Desist

      Is this the 'Evil' Google suing? If you are true to your beliefs then this requires you to condemn Google. Doubtful that you can do this since it requires you to turn against not the 'Evil Borg' but one of open source's 'best friends'. What say you? Hypocrite or not?

    24. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      Apparently, according to MS lawyers the use of MikeRoweSoft.com was. Again, it matters not what you or I think, the legal experts think so.

      I thought so - you didn't do what I asked. I ask you again, please name JUST ONE product or service, which "Microsoft" stands greater-than-zero chances becoming a generic name for. Just name a product, such as "fresh apples are a product that Microsoft may become a generic name for" or a service, such as "helping old ladies cross the street is a service that Microsoft may become a generic name for". As simple as that, just name one, don't jump around pretending that some irrelevant quote are an answer.

      What do you think of this?: Google Tells Booble to Cease and Desist. Is this the 'Evil' Google suing?
      First, in this case there is actual "competition", since Booble is a search engine. Second, Booble is a parody and so is somewhat protected. And third, yes, Google is quite "evil", like any monopoly, although not as evil as Microsoft. I use AllTheWeb, since it doesn't filter my search results. And fourth, they are specifically evil for overzealously protecting their trademark, including trying to spot "google" becoming a generic verb (but at least they have some point here, unlike MS, because "google" might actually turn into a generic name for "do an Internet search").

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    25. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      I kinda figured that your values weren't concrete enough to cause you to equally condemn Google. You are merely another tired, hypocritical MS hater.

      Save your responses, I have wasted enough time on you.

    26. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      I would be really disappointed if I didn't knew better. :) The very same thing happens all the time. When cornered, people like you tend to pretend (or do they actually deceive themselves to feel that way) they are no longer interested. Face it, there is simply no other way for you to finish the debate while saving the face (admitting you were wrong is not an option for a stupid person). I've seen it a lot and you won't fool me. :)

      As for the Google, well, you proved you are stupid a long time ago, but I will still explain. There is no reason for me to equally condemn Google in a very different situation. When MS was fighting Lindows I was quite tolerant to MS as well. Unlike you, I do not have allegiance to companies or brandnames, I try to judge their specific actions in specific circumstances.

      P.S. Anyway, that was fun (in a perverted way) and somewhat useful. The only question that I still have is whether you are just pretending to have won the debate or you are retarded enough to honestly believe that. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    27. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      /ignore

    28. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by danila · · Score: 1

      Can't you at least be manly enough to just shut up silently? By the very act of replying you prove that you are not ignoring me, that subconsciously you are worried about being wrong. :-) Whom are you trying to impress? If you honestly thought that I am not worthy of your attention, you wouldn't reply to me and would just mark me a Foe (as you did in the beginning). Of course, the fact that you started pretending to ignore me only when cornered, when realising that you can not longer ignore the simple question that was here from the beginning - "what product or service can "Microsoft" become a generic name for?" You couldn't answer it, because the answer is "no such product" and it proves that Microsoft was not risking the loss of the trademark.

      Why are you so stupid? Why do you defend Microsoft so vigorously? And what place do you work at that you were so ashamed of naming it? These questions are now destined to remain unanswered, because you would be too embarrassed to stop playing the game of ignoring... Or is it the game of ignorance? Probably not, it looks pretty real. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  133. Kinda like the RIAA by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    And how they're putting kids they've settled with on TV and paying them for it (during the superbowl no less). They actually said it'll help the kids settle their legal fees. Glad microsoft is being so generous. I just hope the kid takes advantage of it while he can.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  134. In Other News... by Flwyd · · Score: 1

    I'm shanging my name to Slas H. Dot.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  135. Hmm, he gets Microsoft Training out of it? by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    I wish my name was phonetically similar to Microsoft.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  136. I think this is big....here's why by andy_geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Micro$oft never changes their mind, never yields to public outcry, no matter how outrageously far they might have overstepped any particular line. In fact, as a company they've always sort of delighted in the fact that they didn't have to make decisions based on practicality and expediency: they've always wanted to world (read, competitors) to understand that they will do what they want, when they want and to whom they wish to do it.

    So, I think it's a pretty big thing when the Redmonster backs down, even over something this silly (and arguably, that they had no claim to in the first place). No, this is not like them apologizing to Apple for stealing-and-ruining their OS (or, to be fair, like Apple doing the same to Xerox-PARC) or changing their mind on just how hard it actually would be to de-couple the browser from the OS, but I think it's an indication of a subtle cultural shift. Maybe it was Ballmer's off-day?

    In addition, I commend young Mr. Rowe for taking as much out of them as they'd give, even if their motives were PR-driven rather than a sincere wish to right a wrong. Besides, the more experience he gains with ASP/.NET, the more he'll realize he was smart to be heading in the direction of PHP to begin with. *snicker*

    --
    "Don't matter how New Age you get, old age is gonna kick your ass." - Utah Phillips
  137. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... the RIAA settled their court case against a 12-year-old girl today, giving her an I-Tunes account with $100 dollars to spend, a music scholarship, three CD albums...

    John

  138. Exterminate Exterminate... Assimilate Assimilate by e4e6 · · Score: 1

    Yes, once again Gates shows why his icon is a cross between Davros and a Borg. That which he can't exterminate, he assimilates. Well, the kid had his 15 minutes and opted to make a deal with a demon rather then stick to his guns. Well, now that he is getting his- the least he can do is continue his move toward the darkside, migrating his pages to a microsoft server and swapping his php to asp. I can't blame Gates on this one, he does what he does and we know what he does. As for Mike Rowe, he received plenty of support and now we know what he does with it! A college education I could forgive, MSCE certification I can not!

  139. The Name is Everything by al!ethel · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a local resturaunt being sued by the "Friendly's" chain over name infringment. I wonder what protection people like Mike Rowe have from companies that can copyright the *sounds* of a name? Is there any way for a private citizen to use his or her name without fear of repurcussions?

    --
    If I could get a firm grip on reality, I'd choke it...
  140. "foster"? by pherris · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler [said]: 'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'.

    "You keep using that word -- I do not think it means what you think it means"

    foster
    tr.v. fostered, fostering, fosters
    1. To beat the shit out of a kid with a group of dirtbag lawyers that would step on their own mother for dollar to the point the victim is too scared to touch anything more advance than a potter's wheel.

    In closing: fuck you M$ and the horse you road in on.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  141. Sir Mix-a-Latin by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 1

    "Magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri." LOL! Did you come up with that yourself ? (I just finished reading "Winnie Ille Pu")...

    1. Re:Sir Mix-a-Latin by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      Well, I *stole* it myself. Pass it on. ;-)

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    2. Re:Sir Mix-a-Latin by Dahan · · Score: 1

      The whole thing (also available in Greek)

  142. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by dustmite · · Score: 1

    Let him have his XBox fun, and some college life to go with it. If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.

    What, like Bill Gates, or Michael Dell? I doubt they regret their early moves into business ... let him decide for himself what gives him kicks .. one's only regret should be not pursuing what one wanted in life.

  143. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have just given the kid $10000 to shut up.

    So does he get michaelrowesoft.com now? Maybe I should squat that one. lol.

    What about
    mycrowsoft.com
    meyecrosoft.com

    and all the others???

  144. $10000 by hey · · Score: 1

    I bet he got his $10,000 bucks -- in addition to
    the nicknacks.
    The agreement says he isn't allowed to talk
    so we'll never know.

  145. Typical Microsoft! by rspress · · Score: 1

    I would not have changed it. Since the guy is using his own name I think he could have beaten MS. I am surprised MS did not make the guy change his name as well.

    The guy is entitled to use his own name for his company. Bribery worked for MS..otherwise they would not have a legal leg to stand on.

  146. I LOVE AMERICA - I BUY XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, japanese, video games... They're trying to destroy our country!!!!

    Join the military!!!! BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!!

  147. damn my TV is busted... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny

    time to register www.SewKnee.com

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    1. Re:damn my TV is busted... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      You may jest, but I'll warrant that at least one Slashdotter spells Sony like that, and could be misled by your site.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  148. Re:"road"? by andy_geek · · Score: 1

    In closing: fuck you M$ and the horse you road in on.

    "You keep using that word -- I do not think it means what you think it means."

    In closing, try to do spelling/grammatical checks if you're going to bold enough to drop an F-bomb on /.

    --
    "Don't matter how New Age you get, old age is gonna kick your ass." - Utah Phillips
  149. He's A Sellout by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    He should have told them to take the original offer and shove it.

    I know I would have. If it was my given name, id not give it up willingly to some corporation.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:He's A Sellout by kelzer · · Score: 1

      You mean like Uzi Nissan?

      Read more here.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  150. I wonder how Time Warner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder how Time Warner (www.timewarner.com) is planning on buying out Tim Warner's website (www.timwarner.com).

  151. Microsoft: Young Rich verses Old Rich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of all the stories of how bratty, ill-mannered young rich act, as opposed to old rich.

    There are a lot of old companies that would have done the right thing to begin with. Microsoft, the 50 billion bully, threatens to sue at first wink, of course. Yesteryear, other companies have offered internships, scholarships, jobs, and support for newcomers. Microsoft, on second try, offers an X-Box...

  152. Uh Oh by Durin00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond...

    sounds like an ambush to me...

  153. This isn't just by billsf · · Score: 1

    At least the site still resolves. Mike can host it overseas if he wants, even with me. There is no aparent copyright violation in using this domain. How can anybody copyright a common name? He just added "soft" because is taken and it probably sounded 'cute' at the time.

    Microsoft has been dying for some time and this was even reported here. It's a desperate company that is going to fight anything to its own demise. If there is any doubts M$ is dying, read about the speech Gates delivered to the World Ecconomic Forum: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3426367.stm

  154. All your websites are belong to us by GussT · · Score: 0

    This could be another of Microsoft's classic blunders in PR foresight - it was the time they let their Jared (as in Subway) get away.

  155. Maybe he had no choice? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    They probably got him on a dodgy copy of Windows or something - the settlement was to either make an example of him with a fine or make everything go away and give him some freebies.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  156. Re: It's Not A Big Deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a big deal. He's a 17 year old kid - the actual domain name doesn't mean that much.

    "I know all of this, and much more that points to this being the right decision for him, indeed, being the ONLY decision he really could have made.

    But I just can't shake the feeling that this amounts to selling out and nothing more."

    You're right, it was the ONLY decision he could've made. He would've been a complete ass to not agree. But uh, since you assert that, how can you also feel that he 'sold out'? He had no choice, right?

    C'mon now. MS has to aggresively persue such things. It's unfortuanate, but it's the "Way It Is". I think this, really, is a win-win situation. The kid gets some nice compensation, for a lousy domain name (because of 'who' he is, it isn't worth much either, I'd peg the monetary worth at the cost of the domain name itself) - MS gets their domain name (which, BTW, I think is fair)*, and avoids a PR catastrophy. :)

    I think you're blowing this out of proportion, personally.

    * It's fair, because assume that they did infact take this to court, and _lost_. So, mike rowe does infact own the domain name - he can, therefor, also sell it. What if he sold it to a competitor, who can now advertise their website (www.mikerowesoft.com) on say, the radio, or TV. When it's pronounced, it will, indeed, sound like "microsoft"(tm). That's allowing this bullshit company to ride on the popularity of Microsoft.
    They could, say something like "We at www."microsoft".com sell the best porn ever!" - wouldn't this be perfectly legal, then, since they own www.mikerowesoft.com? Couldn't this potentially damage Microsoft's reputation? Hmm.

  157. MikeRoweSoftSucks.com by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    GO to MyCrowsOft.com the site for frquent crow fanciers.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  158. Re: He sure as shit can use his own name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They knew full well that Microsoft(TM) do not have a legal leg to stand on in trying to get Mike Rowe to stop using his own name."

    Right, because, Microsoft(TM) were actually claiming trademark infringement over www.mikerowe.com

    Oh.. wait.

  159. stupid kid.. by kemster · · Score: 1

    .. he sold out to the evil empire for a shiny new xbox and a pocket full of candy. typical canadian really

    1. Re:stupid kid.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, had he been an American, I'm sure he would settled for the candy.

  160. Sellout by Hungus · · Score: 1

    I would have fought to keep my name. Now I just see him as a sellout. No respect. The love is gone baby.

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  161. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much easier to update the software in a well hacked machine like the xbox as it is depending on firmware updates from a handfull of hackers. Also the xbox can read your movie files through ethernet. I haven't seen any divx players that can do that.

  162. Looks like Mike did the persuading by greygent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CNN article doesn't say that Microsoft wooed him over with this set of cash and prizes. and judging by what the prizes are, I'd wager that Mike set these terms, and Microsoft said "okay".

    A win-win situation for both parties involved.

    1. Re:Looks like Mike did the persuading by cball2k · · Score: 1

      Ya, sounds right.

      Face it, millions of us 'nerds' would be jobless if we didnt have to fix billie's stuff all the time. He has kept me in the money for the last 20 years. Would ya rather MS started to write linux code, think of what would(nt) happen then...(the first linux BSOD)

      Besides, after awhile the clients move over to unix servers, and life gets easier...

      --
      karma, hah...
    2. Re:Looks like Mike did the persuading by greygent · · Score: 1

      Linux already has BSOD's, they're called "kernel panics" and in this case are "Black Screens Of Death". Personally, I like the Mac OS X kernel panic the best out of the 3, as its multi-lingual.

    3. Re:Looks like Mike did the persuading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see the commercial that had this loser guy trying to squeeze the Mob, in Italy?

      "What, sirGeek, can we do to get you to settle your threats against us?

      "I want...10 million Lira!"

      [mock wincing] "OK. It is done."

      after the geek leaves, all the Mob guys bust out laughing...

      Hard, unless you remember that 1 million Lira was worth about $10 or so (or something equally absurd) at the time.

  163. Other way around ? by LePrince · · Score: 1

    What is MESC ? Mescaline ? Aaaah, you meant Minesweeper Consultant and Solitary Expert. If Illiad was dead, he'd be turning around in his tomb.

  164. Pet bird. by tjensor · · Score: 1

    I have a pet Crow. Its not that tough, so I was thinking of getting it a domain name. Say, MyCrowSoft. Just send me the xbox now and I wont even bother.

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
  165. Speaking of which.... by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't Microsoft be changing their name to Macrohugemegasoft around now?

  166. A Model that doesn't suck!!1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Get Japanese gamers to hate teh XBOCKS
    2. Get M$ haters to hate teh XBOCKS
    3. Teh XBOCKS is made from cheap PC hardwarez (?????)
    4. Profit!!!1!!

    Reality doesn't look as good as at gamespot.com

  167. Geeze... by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

    I understand the kid is getting a pretty good deal out of the whole thing, but principle... He was never, EVER committing copyright infringement, or Microsoft could sue anyone who's name is Mike and last name begin's with an S... If it were me, I would've told them to stick it, and to take me to court - there's not a judge in the planet that would've accepted their arguments.

  168. Not the smartest move by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

    And for the cost of an Xbox (which is, incidentally, much higher than the price), Microsoft gets to tell every other court in the land "See, we won on this occasion, therefore we're right that we own the copyright on anything that even SOUNDS like our name, which, incidentally, includes anything with either the word 'Micro' or the word 'Soft' in it..."

    Thanks a lot...

  169. Re: Put your ear to the ground for early warning by MachDelta · · Score: 1, Funny

    And if you listen really carefully, you can even hear the sound of ten thousand athsma puffers being used simultaneously, which should give you about 5-10 minutes to run like hell before the nerd army arrives.

  170. Micro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Rowe has a mikerowe penis.

  171. just an Xbox ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft: we have beeeellions. What do you want kid?

    Rowe: I want a cheap $180 Xbox and some of that microsoft training. You know the kind that will get me downsized by some dude from India. Then I could sit at home all day unemployed with my Xbox to keep me company.

    Microsft: Now that's a good dumb kid.

  172. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hows about the name Mark? Sounds like the standard "Southerner with marbles in mouth" comedy option.

    MarkRoweSoft.com

  173. Woo Hoo! by Tighe_L · · Score: 1

    I am registering ecksbocks.com tonight!

  174. Pay for Mike Rowe to change his name by SimHacker · · Score: 1
    Microsoft should pay for Mike Rowe and his family to change their names. And put them in the Witness Protection Program.

    A few years ago, I published a web site called www.Micropoly.com, about an open source Microsoft Monopoly game I created as a joke.

    Of course I was worried about being sued by Microsoft and Hasbro at the same time! I even talked to some people from EFF and hired a good lawyer specializing in artists rights, to give me advice on how not to get sued.

    Fortunately the name Micropoly skirts around both vigorously enforced trademarks, and the satirical speech is clearly protected by the First Amendment. However, I learned I was still taking a risk, because the draconian trademark disparagement laws are commonly abused by big corporations like Microsoft and Hasbro, to nullify constitutionally protected freedom of speech.

    But they wouldn't take the bait. The only company I ever heard from was the manufacturer of the proprietary Micropoly Industrial Lubricant, the Solid Idea for Lubrication for food and beverage processing. Their customers were getting confused when they found my Microsoft Monopoly site.

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  175. he also gets by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    a visit to bill gates' neverland ranch.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  176. Umm. Still Not resolved! by AwesomeJT · · Score: 2, Insightful
    C'mon! They just swept the issue under the rug. The bought out a poor kid -- probably scared to death over the thought of being sued by the Almighty Bill. But the real issue still has not been resolved! Did he really do anything bad or is just M$ trying to take over the world again?

    How is this no different than Lindows? Very similiar names, and they probably chose the name because of the closeness to a popular product of M$. Sure, you can argue that point, but can M$ patent/copywrite words that sound similar to their name or products?

    Darn. I was hoping the kid would counter sue. Although, I can't blame him. I would probably sell out too -- but since I already have an XBox -- I would hold out for the $1M instead.

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  177. option two by Bodhidharma · · Score: 1

    He could have a literary web site and call it MikeRoweProse.com. Or if he becomes a mechanic, MikeRoweMachines.com. If he takes up Taoism, MikeRoweWay.com. And if his kid sells machinery, his domain could be SonofMikeRoweSystems.com

    --
    A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
  178. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those DVD players can play games too? Uh huh

  179. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KiSS DP-500 does have ethernet... (NOT optional... ;-)

  180. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by krisp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Which DVD players have samba network support?

  181. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care about Halo...

  182. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude.. if that is a reason to spend 300$ more.. then you should go see a doctor..

  183. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    If that's what he wanted, then good. Now he'll get the question "Are you that Mike Rowe?" for years to come. That's got to be worth something!

    Best of all, if he acts fast he might be able to swipe a better domain in a week or so:

    whois -h whois.godaddy.com mikerowe.com
    Registrant:
    Mike Rowe
    P.O. Box 1196
    Pasco, Washington 99301
    United States

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: MIKEROWE.COM
    Created on: 07-Feb-02
    Expires on: 07-Feb-04
    Last Updated on: 07-Feb-03
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  184. Really? by Sprinkels · · Score: 1
    Account management is a breeze in linux as opposed to the nightmare of managing domains, AD and security principles (barf!).

    If I understand you correctly, you are comparing adminstration of a single Linux box, against administration of a multi-domain Active Directory forest.

    Of course this easier.

    However, I doubt setting up a large Kerberos/LDAP based authentication infrastructure is any easier on Linux than on Windows 2000/2003.

    1. Re:Really? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Well i am administring my networks on samba and Netware. I do not compare to admin a single box. In conjunction with NDS setting up a large NDS/LDAP database is very easy on Netware. OpenLDAP isnt rocket science either and really only lacks a full fledged administration interface.

      Active Directory is a bleak xerox of NDS that lacks much of what makes NDS great. The disk size of a multi domain AD is staggering while i can fit my whole NDS tree on a single floppy.

      When i compare my administration i do everyday i find linux to be easier to use albeit i have more prior knowledge in MS windows. The biggest difference i see is the lack of strange errors in linux. Because it is very transparent i can always track the error down, something wich can be tremendously hard on windows with intermittent errors only occuring even mondays on a full moon and when a cup of coffee is standing on my desk.

      But youre right about the single box. Terminal Servers rock, what heavens made us go with personal computers?

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  185. Oh, the Irony! by rasafras · · Score: 1

    Slashdot loves to flame Microsoft for selling products.
    Now they also flame them for giving them away.

    :)

    On the other hand, I don't think Microsoft was completely justified in going after the kid. They have nothing to gain except bad publicity - nobody would really confuse the two. Now, they're a few grand poorer and one more useless domain name richer.

  186. choice quote by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

    Includes a choice quote from Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler: 'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'.

    At first glance I thought it said fester

    --
    I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
  187. MikeRoweWare.com by GrumpyX · · Score: 1

    It's available, maybe he can get a copy of OS9 and a blade server out of it.

  188. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have sent the kid to a copyright/trademark class at the local law school :) That would've been cool.

  189. Mikerowesoft.net is mine!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  190. What really happened by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Schmuck: Some kid named their group "Mike Rowe Soft."

    Schmuck's Manager: He's riding the coattails of our trademark. Legally, we have to get him to stop.

    Legal: Please stop using this or we will be forced to puruse this legally.

    Mike Rowe: $10? This is worth $10k.

    Legal: You're setting a price? We owe it to our shareholders to pursue this.

    Mike Rowe: Oh, crap! I didn't realize trademark law existed! Could we settle?

    Legal: Sure. Here's some cool stuff if you change your domain name like we requested in the beginning.

    Mike Rowe: Cool, thanks!

    Slashdot: M$ IS RAKING A 17-YEAR OLD OVER THE COALS!!!11

    1. Re:What really happened by incom · · Score: 1

      Schmuck: Some kid named their group "Mike Rowe Soft."

      Don't you mean, some kid named his domain mikerowesoft, which is the kid's actual name? And even in your skewed characterization I still find MS' behavior quite vicious and unjustified.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    2. Re:What really happened by bonch · · Score: 1

      His name isn't "Mike Rowe Soft." It's Mike Rowe. He's already admitted his intentions were to ride off the popularity of Microsoft's name. Why is this still difficult for you to grasp?

  191. This is a NON-STORY--here's why by bonch · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once established, a trademark must be "policed" to maintain rights. If you allow your mark to become synonymous with others' goods or services, you run the risk that your trademark rights will be lost because the name may be deemed to have become "generic" and, thereby no longer identifies a source, but a good or service available from several sources.

    From http://www.mit.edu:8001/activities/e-club/8.html

    1. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by EinarH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and so?
      Even though it's good business policy to protect your trademark, that does not give your business some exclusive right to other words that are pronounced in the same way.
      And some word from a Venture dude..it's not exactly a USSC ruling..
      So he could have fought them in court and probably won.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though it's good business policy to protect your trademark, that does not give your business some exclusive right to other words that are pronounced in the same way.

      Yes, it does. Mike Rowe calling it "Mike Rowe Soft" was an obvious and intended play on Microsoft.

    3. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by EinarH · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Maybe not. No one but him know that for sure.
      And even if it was; it's not obvious that it would be illegal. As long as it's spelled differently and has a vague connection to something relevant, in this case his name and the often used word "soft", it's not obvious that it's illegal.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    4. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, he said it was an intentional play on it. Hence, there went a large portion of his defense.

      The kid may be getting some technology training from MS, but the real lesson here is to keep your mouth shut and let a lawyer do the talking.

    5. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by bonch · · Score: 1

      You just don't get.

      He's already stated his intention was to play off Microsoft's name--so you're wrong on that point. But that's irrelevant anyway.

      Even if it was unintentional, it's too similiar to Microsoft and dillutes the trademark. Microsoft must legally pursue the defense of their trademark.

      I know you are trying desperately to make Microsoft a bad guy in this, but it's just not going to happen.

  192. so does that mean by Myopic · · Score: 1

    does this mean that mikerowesoft.com will now redirect to microsoft.com? i guess we'll see.

    and if they happen to let the domain registration slip in a couple years, would i still be liable to registering it at that point? i mean, that would be them not protecting their trademark, right? which puts it up for grabs.

    hmmm.

  193. I smell a rat by dickiedoodles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Call me cynical if you must but this smells of a rat to me. I doubt that anyone who registered a domain so similar to a huge corporations trademark could claim utter surprise when Microsoft got involved in this however right or wrong that involvement was.

    I think there is a strong possibility that Mike Rowe planned this all along, what did he have to lose? If it came down to it he could surrender the domain and he's lost $10, once they have the domain Microsoft have no reason to push for anything else.

    On the other hand he could enrage Microsoft run to the media and make it look like the big bad guy is squashing the little tiny guy and seeing if Microsoft caved and gave him free stuff, he seems to of got lots of traffic to his site(along with a nice little money making banner advert) and according to the article Microsoft are going to pay to redirect his traffic so whatever he renames it to is likely to is likely to be more successful then it would have been had none of this ever happened. Also when you think about it mikerowesoft is a really lame name.

    --
    In Soviet Russia Slashdot cliches use you
  194. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ability to play potentially gigs and gigs of media files from a remote server is a Good Thing.

  195. www.mikeroesoft.org by dfj225 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so the domains mikeroesoft.org, .info, .biz, and .us are open. If I have been reading things correctly and I register these, then I get a free Xbox and certification?

    --
    SIGFAULT
  196. That's a good one. by Rorgg · · Score: 1

    I just finished Virent Ova! Viret Perna! I never took Latin in school, I'm getting better though. I mean, what better way to learn than with the books I learned English on, right?

  197. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

    i don't know about samba support, but livid does network streaming video. play the video on the server, and watch it on clients connecting to the server. kinda like mp3 streaming for video. they have a video lan client and a video lan server. microsoft and linux software is available at no cost. google for livid for more info

  198. BIBLE?!?!?! by cybercomm · · Score: 1

    Did anyone see what "Documents" M$ sent to that oppr kid? The freakin "document" has more pages in it than the bible, and all that for one domain name? I wouldnt be surprised to find a give us your firstborn clause as well....

    for those wo want to see the pic:
    http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/TECH/internet/01/2 6/mike rowesoft.settle.ap/story.rowe.rowe.jpg

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    1. Re:BIBLE?!?!?! by DotNM · · Score: 1

      FYI, your link results in a 404... hopefully this one will work better. http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/TECH/internet/01/26/mike rowesoft.settle.ap/story.rowe.rowe.jpg

      --
      There's no place like localhost
  199. Something for his new site to run on by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

    This kid is going to make Slashdot again: When his new website is served of off his modded XBox

  200. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I'd ask microsoft to buy me a g5, a powerbook, and an iPod if I were in his shoes, it would be what I would want, and ironic at the same time ;)

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  201. Re:THAT DOESN'T MATTER MUCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was playing Prince of Persia: Sands of Time on a DVD-R this weekend on a chipped XBOX. There're a lot of games out for it now. I wouldn't buy one and buy the games though. Chipped xbox and DVD-Rs mean a cheap game and home entertainment system.

  202. The other Mike Rowe? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Just out of interest, I remember reading 'Atari User' magazines when I was a kid. There was at least one program, possibly more, written by a guy called 'Mike Rowe'.

    I remember thinking, "Is this the guy's real name? Really?"... bearing in mind that "micro" was a common abbreviation for "microcomputer" (which most were at the time).

    'Fascinating' fact: This would have been around the same time that the 'famous' Mike Rowe was born.

    Yeah, okay, I'll shut up now. (And, yep, this post *did* go in the Iraqi LUG thread before, by mistake. It's not my day.)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  203. Location of the "Technology Festival" by macbot3000 · · Score: 1

    Here's where Microsoft's "Technology Festival" will be held...

  204. Bad choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would've asked for a Mac.

  205. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

    You could get laughed out of the office and into the courtroom for such foolishness, my friend.

  206. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many 17 year olds know what they want in life? When I was 17 I wanted to party and I did. I partied away 4 years of college, didn't graduate and spent the next 7 years working my way up from the bottom to get to where I would have been 7 years earlier if I had graduated.

    BTW, Bill Gates happened to be at the right place at the right time with the right idea. It takes more than just motivation to get to that level. Those guys are the exceptions not the rule.

  207. In unrelated news: MikeRoweSoft Linux... by i)ave · · Score: 1

    ...a brand new distribution from the original creator of MikeRoweSoft.com to be available for installation on the Xbox soon.

    --
    -- I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous
  208. MikeRoweBrew.com by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1
    ...would be an excellent choice.

    Wish I had so many options for a clever domain name, not to mention all the cool stuff MS is giving him (and yes I would like the certs, and no I am not a Windoze user most of the time, but a Linux user).

  209. THIS IS FUNNY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long will it take the moderators to notice? And btw, where are my mod points?

  210. Re:Damn Socialists by TheRightIsRight · · Score: 1

    then again, they also watch MTV religiously and the rap is turned up pretty loud right now, do I dont know if they really know what they think.......

    --
    What is the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist??? And why do people on slashdot not seem to have a problem
  211. One word: bribery by commonloon · · Score: 0

    ...isn't enough that Microsoft can buy up good and independent technolgies. Now their buying out little kids!

  212. Exactly what violation was committed? by eaolson · · Score: 1
    The CNN article and slashdot summary both say MS accused this kid of "copyright infringement," presumably because "Microsoft" is copyrighted. Is this just a mixup, and they meant "trademark violation," or is the word Microsoft an actually copyrighted work? I thought you couldn't copyright something that sort, with no actual creative intent behind it.

    And by just using it twice, have I just made this post a derivative work?

  213. Uh Oh.... by Barkmullz · · Score: 1

    - What's your opinion on music downloads?

    - I do download music over the Internet, I can't lie about that.


    5 bucks says RIAA is next. Oh, wait...he's from Canada....go figure.

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  214. Send him Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should send him a few distros of Linux...

  215. Cute Too by ThePlumber2 · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice that he is cute too? Smart AND cute? anyone? This is such a gay touchy feely story, I thought that I would throw in the hot swedish mathematitian troll.

    --
    Thanks, Steve
  216. Don't forget the Xbox is a loss leader by jason99si · · Score: 1

    Of course Microsoft is going to give him an Xbox... its a loss leader. It gets the Xbox name in the press, and Mike Rowe will buy games, ultimately paying Microsoft for the domain! Oh the irony.

    Microsoft recently sponsored a United Way campaign here at my Fortune 500 employer. As an incentive for people to donate, they gave away Xboxen. What a nice gesture considering it ultimately makes them money.

  217. Fark Off!! by stryc9 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Come on... you think he didnt have Microsoft's name in mind when he named his site? There is no 'soft' involved in his business. Web design is not 'software'!! Ok.. maybe thats argueable... but COME ON!!! You *really* think that if MS didnt exist he would have picked that name? He did this on purpose to get attention and money, and it looks like he got both.

    I dont think that he should have gotten anything for being a sneaky, coniving fu%*tard. In fact, being such a natural asshat he should have got payed training to be a fricking lawyer not an MCSE.

    Oh well... i guess we'll all get our last laugh when he actually tries to get a job with his MCSE.

    --
    www.madeofwinandawesome.com
  218. ...but which MCSE? by netglen · · Score: 1

    ...but which MCSE will they credit him for? For all we know, they sly devils could have given him free exams for the MCSE for NT! It would serve him right.

  219. Anyone who supports this kid is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Rowe soft. Let's examine...does he write software? No, he designs webpages. Would someone writing software use the word "soft" as a descriptive term in their company title? Not unless they were copying, say, Microsoft. This is a perfect example of copyright dilution, and the only reason MS didn't drop the legal hammer on him is PR. It kind of sickens me that his extortion attempt succeeded.

    I'm sure there are a lot of Mick Donalds in the world, but if they want to open a fast food restaurant they'll need suck it up and realize that their precious name is already taken.

  220. Got a problem? by krray · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Got a problem? (well, as an American in American :)

    Ah, just take a pill. That's right. For the low, low [30 installments] payment of $9.95 we can make you happy. Life never crashes. Always blue skies out the windows.

    That's AhPill.com
    For the iTrip of your life: AhPill.com
    AhPill.com AhPill.com AhPill.com

    Ask for the "X" line of course if you need to keep it up.

  221. Re: Put your ear to the ground for early warning by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    Troll?
    I have minor asthma and it doesn't offend me. It's f*cking hilarious!

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  222. Let's do this grass roots. by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

    How about we all get together and hard code each of our DNS servers to point to Mikes MikeRoweSoft.com IP address. Who says we have to be held hostage by big money companies? The Internet is OURS not theirs!

    While we're at it, how about a votable markup list of addresses like these. Add a web-site administerable list of which DNS entries you want corrected for your server, then point your DNS to the corrected DNS.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  223. Baffling.. do they take a look in the mirror? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Isn't there SOMEONE in the higher ups at Microsoft that's realized, "Hey.. maybe what we're doing is fucking stupid and overkill. Perhaps we should let off."???

    Surely their PR department doesn't feel that this is GOOD media coverage for a company... or do they?! No one's stupid enough to think, "People across america will completely understand and agree with our decision against this future threat to our company!!"

    I would really just LOVE to sit in a meeting where they came up with the plan to sue Mike Row, a 17 year old kid, because he made "MikeRoweSoft.com" and because they HONESTLY felt threatened by what he put on the site...

    I swear half the time the higher ups are on vacation spending their millions while their 11 and 12 year old children are making the decisions, because what they're doing is pretty fuckin ridiculous and childish (as you all know).

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  224. A Disappointing Day... by _Griphin_ · · Score: 1

    Well this whole fiasco proves one point... In a court case, the one party with the most money and most lawyers wins!

  225. Re:Damn Socialists by silverbax · · Score: 1

    Are you saying Bill O'Reilly is the 'real' news? And that Bush is helping capitalism?

    I love this country, and I love capitalism. That's why I find your comment so naive and funny...

  226. High Marks for MS by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1
    {Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler] said Microsoft would cover Mike's costs of changing to a new Web site and redirecting traffic from the old site. Microsoft also had agreed to help the teen get Microsoft certification training and other gifts, including an Xbox game console, he said, and has invited Mike to a technology festival in March at the corporation's headquarters in suburban Redmond.

    "We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology," Desler said.
    MS racking up some good karma. No matter your opinion of Microsoft, what they did in this case can only be interpreted as generous and constructive.
    1. Re:High Marks for MS by ainsoph · · Score: 1

      MS racking up some good karma. No matter your opinion of Microsoft, what they did in this case can only be interpreted as generous and constructive.

      It actually reminds me of the tactics other cults use, like say for instance the Krishnas, who give out books, and haircuts, and have restraunts, and feed people on the street. Far from being "karma" enhancement, it serves to find more lost hippy suckers who feel like shaving their heads, wearing orange robes, and clapping their finger cymbals.

      In the case of MS, I would have to disagree. Much like them giving away software to college kids (in order to prevent kids from finding "free" linux), by indoctrinating this (IMO innocent) teenager into the wonderful world of Microsoft (THE GOOEY SHINY RED BUTTON) with XBox candy, and other free bullshit is just more of the same despicable Redmond behavior.

  227. Soylent Green by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Microsoft also had agreed to help the teen get Microsoft certification training and other gifts

    The victim has been assimilated.

  228. Different site by LowLoki · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if you guys had been visiting the kid's site at all, but I can tell you this... It's vastly different than it was Friday (last time I bothered to look). I'm not sure if he's using some kind of existing forum template, but he's got a forum program set up, and according to the site, he's got ~2300 online users checking it out now. One of his notes thanks all the people who PayPal'ed him money to help fight the $ystem. He's got a vote posted whether he should donate it to charity, or what. Makes me wonder how much he actually received, heh heh.

    --
    This page was generated by a Flock of Attack Rabbits for you.
  229. Dark Side of the Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luke.. umm, I mean Mike, I am your father^H^H^H^H^H^H Microsoft. Why don't you come on over and join me?

  230. I noticed somthing missing by wolf_m16 · · Score: 0

    they didn't give him a copy of Hacking The X-box... this would help his technology interest greatly.

  231. MS or Mac? by phorm · · Score: 1

    This would be more amusing if the poster was an apple user...

    Oooo... such stylish colors... isn't my new iMac fab?

  232. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, if this is off-topic I want to have some of what you're smoking...

  233. Mike Rowe's Site by gsperling · · Score: 1

    Greetings, fellow /.'ers....
    I read Mike's website, and saw that he posted a poll on what he should do with the donations that people made to him to pay for his legal fees.

    Here is a copy of the post that I made on his site.

    Hi, Mike Rowe:

    I think you should take the donations that you received and turn them around as a donation to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) or the Free Software Foundation (FSF).

    That'd slap Microsoft right back in the puss for all they've done.

    This whole copyright infringement stuff needs to go away. Obviously you can prove your name is "Mike Rowe" and if you have your own software, or are a software developer, or like playing games, (or perhaps you cannot attain an erection) you should be able to put "soft" after your name. Screw MICROSOFT!

    I commend you for settling, however. I probably would have told the bastards to go take a long walk off a short pier, after replaying the scene from The Matrix. "How about I give you the finger, and you give me my phone call?"

  234. SewKnee.tv is avaiable by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1

    Actually, a search on Network Solutions' Web site shows that www.SewKnee.com is unavailable, so you're thwarted. :->

    However, you might like these domain names:

    sewknee.net is available. sewknee.org is available. sewknee.biz is available. sewknee.info is available. sewknee.us is available. sewknee.cc is available. sewknee.bz is available. sewknee.tv is available.

    or these:

    sew-knee.com
    sewgenus.com
    sewknees.com
    sewkne e-joint.com
    sewkneejoint.com
    sew-knee.net
    sewge nus.net
    sewknees.net
    sewknee-joint.net
    sewkneej oint.net
    sew-knee.org
    sewgenus.org
    sewknees.org
    sewknee-joint.org
    sewkneejoint.org
    sew-knee.bi z
    sewgenus.biz
    sewknees.biz
    sewknee-joint.biz
    sewkneejoint.biz
    sew-knee.info
    sewgenus.info
    se wknees.info
    sewknee-joint.info
    sewkneejoint.info
    sew-knee.us
    sewgenus.us
    sewknees.us
    sewknee-j oint.us
    sewkneejoint.us
    sew-knee.cc
    sewgenus.cc
    sewknees.cc
    sewknee-joint.cc
    sewkneejoint.cc
    sew-knee.bz
    sewgenus.bz
    sewknees.bz
    sewknee-joi nt.bz
    sewkneejoint.bz
    sew-knee.tv
    sewgenus.tv
    sewknees.tv
    sewknee-joint.tv
    sewkneejoint.tv

    I hope Sony doesn't "sew" (sue) you!

  235. Re: Put your ear to the ground for early warning by old7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See, it is only funny to those with asthma. Everyone else assumes that it is offensive. What a world we live in.

  236. pity of education by octal666 · · Score: 1

    Anyone there could send him some open source manuals , half the lumpen linuxariat demonizing Microsoft again for suing this boy and now he's going to be a Microsoft expert.

    --
    DON'T PANIC
  237. Free Stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The next time the RIAA tries to sue me for downloading MP3s can i get sent free CDs and a drum set?

  238. Um, people? The kid DID break the law. by BobTheWonderMonkey · · Score: 1


    IANAL, but he was clearly in violation with his domain name, especially by admitting that he was doing it to get attention for his contracting skills (which would make him money). Any way you cut it, his domain name did not pass the nomitive test for fair use, and MS was well within their legal rights to go after him. Glad it turned out okay for Mike, but he was wrong.

    --
    S.
  239. Meanwhile, SCO Settles Over Linux Copyright by A+Merry+Finn · · Score: 1
    Today, SCO has settled with IBM, Novell, and Linux copyright holders over the disputed Linux copyright ownership. According to the agreement, SCO will withdraw all legal claims on the condition that it shall acquire the Linux trademark and copyrights to all Linux source code. In return, Linus Torvalds receives a SCO OpenServer(tm) license, free SCO OpenServer(tm) training and costs incurred by changing his first name.

    "The agreement is very reasonable; after all we are only giving to SCO what is rightfully theirs," said Bartholomew (formerly Linus) Torvalds.

    SCO spokesman said, "We believe it's important to take steps to prevent widespread infringement of our copyrights." But he conceded SCO's original approach was "admittedly maybe impersonal."

    In other news, Britain recognizes Darl McBride's fight against injustice worldwide by knighting him.

  240. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, look at Michael Jackson

    One thing I'm sure he doesn't regret is owning the rights to alot of Beatles music.

  241. no by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " and some other gifts. "

    It is not a gift you you give it in return for something, its a settlement. or a Bribe. or Capatilistic transaction. you get the picture.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  242. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by geekoid · · Score: 1

    well I wasn't all business at that age and I have grown up to regret that!

    I say, be all bussiness until your 35, then retire and screw off. Believe me, the toys are far better then a game console.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  243. Re:Um, people? The kid DID break the law. by psykocrime · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but he was clearly in violation with his domain name, especially by admitting that he was doing it to get attention for his contracting skills (which would make him money). Any way you cut it, his domain name did not pass the nomitive test for fair use, and MS was well within their legal rights to go after him. Glad it turned out okay for Mike, but he was wrong.

    IANAL either, but I call bullshit. His fucking NAME is Mike Rowe, for crying out loud. And if this was technically illegal under existing law, then the law is broken and needs to be changed.

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  244. What I don't understand by jesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does Microsoft want to own MikeRoweSoft.com? Why didn't they just ask Mike to change MikeRoweSoft.com to a page saying "MikeRoweSoft.com has been renamed/moved to _MikeRoweForums.com_ to avoid confusion with the _Microsoft Corporation_."?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  245. ex-box by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

    im thinking of selling the "ex-box", its a crushed cardboard box. it used 2 be a box, but now its an ex-box can i get my free stuff now?

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  246. Reminds me of... by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a proM$ website some guy had back in 1995ish. It was url'd Deon95.com (or something like that). It's layout was pure Windoze 95 and all the goodness that came with it (hold my hair while I gag!). The guy eventually took it down (perhaps M$ bullied him?)

  247. Good business by TachyonAT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually in our country that is just a good way to make money. You either copyright an idea or reserve a domain and then you sell the rights for a ton of money to someone who can actually do something with it. It's not bad faith its simply good business. Acquire something that you think will be sellable someday, then hold out till you get an offer you like.

    1. Re:Good business by tool462 · · Score: 0

      Hey, if it works for real estate, why not for tech?

      [sings] I've got ocean-front property in Air-Ih-Zoe-Nuh.[/sings]

  248. or how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... MikeRowsOft', my site dedicated to scullers named Michael?

  249. Copyright infringment??? Trademark infringment!! by EMR · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was claiming Trademark infringement.. Trademarks and Copyright are two significantly different things.. And trademark only applies to the same market.. Mike Rowe was doing web development.. not software development.. so he should have been able to keep the thing.. Back in my home town there wer two McDonalds.. one the restaurant. the other a clothings store.

  250. SO CAN YOU HAVE THE NAME BILL GATES !? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that every Paul Allen, Bill Gates etc has to now change their First and Last names for fear of some dick head at microsoft legal suing them?

    I wonder if you would change your name for a free xbox and some microsoft brain washing courses?

    ++dez;
    http://WebSearch.COM.AU/

  251. great job Mr Bill Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like you're out to save the world from any website that the average person might, by some slight margin of chance, mistake for the actual Microsoft corporate website...

    Way to go Bill amd Mr Steve "Bomberman" Balmer and crew...

    Wouldn't a simple disclaimer be just a little more appropriate such as "Hey moron, this is not the Microsoft website and is in no way related to that big company located over there in Redmond WA" or some perhaps nicer worded statement. Do people really need such a thing? Are they that hopelessly confused??? Are you???

  252. Microsoft to take over MikeRoweSoft.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft to take over MikeRoweSoft.com
    Teen settles with tech giant for, among other things, an Xbox
    Monday, January 26, 2004 Posted: 10:18 AM EST (1518 GMT)

    SEATTLE, Washington (AP) -- A Canadian teenager whose Web site address bothered a certain giant software company will find a new home on the Web, Microsoft Corp. said Friday.

    Mike Rowe, a 17-year-old resident of Victoria, British Columbia, has agreed to pick a new name for his Web site, currently called www.mikerowesoft.com, said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler.

    Mike's father, Kim Rowe, confirmed that his son had struck an agreement with Microsoft. Rowe said his son could not be interviewed Friday because he had to study for final exams.

    Mike also is working feverishly to put together a new Web site, his father said.

    Desler said Microsoft would cover Mike's costs of changing to a new Web site and redirecting traffic from the old site. Microsoft also had agreed to help the teen get Microsoft certification training and other gifts, including an Xbox game console, he said, and has invited Mike to a technology festival in March at the corporation's headquarters in suburban Redmond.

    "We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology," Desler said.

    In a posting on his Web site earlier this month, the teen said he received a 25-page letter from Microsoft informing him he was committing copyright infringement, and threatening legal action.

    Desler said Friday that Microsoft believes it's important to take steps to prevent widespread infringement of its name. But he conceded Microsoft's original approach was "admittedly maybe impersonal."

    Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  253. Re:Microsoft finally did it right -- Lawyers by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Microsoft's lawyers made a bit of change writing the first letter, documenting the site, and sending the ominous demand notice. They probably let MS know the case didn't need to go to court, too, since what Master Rowe was doing isn't considered trademark violation under the law. But there was no case, and no big money. Yay.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  254. Copyright? by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, unless I missed something what the kid did was trademark infringement, not copyright infringement.
    He wasn't putting pirated MS software on his site, and I just missed that part, was he?

    "MicroSoft" is a trademark, not a piece of literature or other artistic work.

  255. the only reason by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the only reason they gave him an xbox at all is because it cost them less to give it away than to sell it, after the tax write off.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  256. Nissan Soft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Nissan -The auto goys are suing Nissan.com -a Jewish computer company named after the owner's last name which is a Hebrew word.

  257. Just Another Day by spirality · · Score: 1

    Just another example of greed trumping even the pretense of virtue much less the actual existance of it.

    Venal little bastard.

  258. Heres an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has anybody thought of how funny it is that Microsoft is suing a guy named mike, considering that in their commercials they talk about how they encourage "Michael and all his potential". Could a satirical counter commercial like moveon.org did of bush be far behind?

  259. He's a selout by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    I can't believe he just buckled down to the giant. The worst that could happen was he would lose his domain. It might have been something fair to accept if they offered this kindly in the first place but not after their rude behavior. Oh the humiliation he will suffer in the years to come when he tells his story to friends about how he sold his dignity for a few classes and an xbox.

  260. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At least they are going to give him and MCSE so he'll know how to re-image/re-boot his XBox when it BSODs on him.

    Xboxes do NOT give BSODs you fucking troll.

  261. Foster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology

    Then why didn't you offer him all this stuff in the first place, you corporate fucks?

  262. Why couldn't Mike have microsoft.com for $10? by Walles · · Score: 1
    The domain names are obviously somewhat similar. MS even thought this was some sort of trademark infringement.

    What I don't understand is, why is it so obvious that it was Mike who should hand over his domain to MS and not the other way around?

    I realize this will probably be modded Funny, but I really want to know. Anybody?

    --
    Installed the Bubblemon yet?
  263. Where is his business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If his business was so important that he *needed* to keep the domain name, why did he suddenly drop his "business" and decide to try and capitalize from the free traffic thrown his way by the media?

  264. HE'S GONNA GET A JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of the high paying tech jobs around here are for microsoft products. not linux. but gogo zealot ranger

  265. Not necessarily... by goldfndr · · Score: 1
    so bought him out with.. you guessed it, Microsoft freebie products. Now bad press turns into Microsoft product marketing. Those guys are brilliant in Redmond. Grrr...

    Have you checked eBay lately?

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  266. mikerowesoft runs on Linux by unixformat · · Score: 0

    according to netcraft mikerowesoft.com runs on Linux, i wonder if MS didnt like the PR of this. Listening to someone saying, "mikerowesoft.com runs on Linux" meybe interpreted as microsoft.com runs Linux.

  267. Baldur's Gate for PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it. Play it. Then tell us about the PS2 :)

  268. Please stop lying by danila · · Score: 1

    Secondly, Microsoft HAS to protect their trademark... However, if MSFT's trademark was dilted in any way, or it is even perceivable that their trademark is being tested, MSFT is responsible (to their shareholders) to fight tooth and nail to preserve that trademark.

    Sorry, you are an idiot, just like a few other hundreds idiots here on Slashdot and elsewhere who prefer to perpetrate misinformation instead of actually reading the relevant laws.

    The trademark can only be diluted if the name Microsoft becomes generic for something, like elevator, walkman or kleenex. If you have at least an ounce of brain matter, you would realise this is impossible, since Microsoft doesn't really mean anything other then the company. Other MS brands, like Windows or DOS could be diluted, though, but MS-Windows and MS-DOS can't.

    Having other companies use similar looking/sounding names for their products cannot dilute your trademark. It is impossible, the law is very clear and nowhere it says anything else. The only way to lose the trademark was described it in the above paragraph.

    The only case when Microsoft (and its shareholders) migh lose anything is when a similar brand is used to promote competing products, like in Lindows case. But even if Mike starts selling his text editor at mikerowesoft.com, the only thing in danger will be Microsoft profits (not really), not Microsoft trademark.

    Hope you feel smarter and more informed after reading this post.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:Please stop lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hope you feel smarter and more informed after reading this post.

      I think that I'm about three levels dumber after reading this post. You're a complete asshole.

    2. Re:Please stop lying by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Sorry, you are an idiot

      Whoops, I stopped reading there. If you want to make a point, it helps to be polite. If you wish to have a dialogue, common courtesy is paramount. However, if you had the balls to get in my face like that in person, I'd probably knock your teeth out.

      --

      -Turkey

  269. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Zordak · · Score: 1
    If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.
    Yeah, if he's not careful, he could end up like those college drop-out losers Bill Gates, Larry Ellison and Michael Dell. [Remove tongue from cheeck]

    Just for the record and humor-impaired, I am aware that those guys are huge exceptions and fully believe in the value of a college education (I have one myself).

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  270. Re:Fuck you by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Whoops, I stopped writing there. There just wasnt anything else to say. I guess it has something to do with you being a complete fucking moron, but I really can't go into it.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  271. Re:Fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^
    Troll.

  272. Re:Um, people? The kid DID break the law. by BobTheWonderMonkey · · Score: 1

    Nope, that ain't the way it works. His name is Mike Rowe, so "mikerowe.com" would be fine. However, he said outright he was spoofing Microsoft's name in order to attract attention to his skill, for monetary gain. That fails the nomitive test, hence he broke the law.

    The fact that it was willful actually makes him more liable, usually by an order of magnitude.

    Sorry gang, I don't like being on MS's side in anything, but the kid was wrong, and MS was well within their rights to call bullshit on him.

    --
    S.
  273. WIPO now going for $1,125 on eBay by timc · · Score: 1
  274. It's up to $205,100.00 now [n/t] by timc · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.