Slashdot Mirror


LaserMonks Offer Prayer, Printer Cartridges

Minnesotan writes "According to a Twincities.com article: If you need discounted inkjet- or laser-printer cartridges, Wisconsin's LaserMonks say they'll give you a doozy of a deal while you 'support prayer for the world'. The Cistercian priests - yes, they're actual Catholic monks - oversee a novel e-commerce enterprise out of their rural abbey. Proceeds go to maintain the monastery and finance charitable works around the world."

404 comments

  1. Well somebody has to say it... by tekiegreg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Noticed they were using ASP, from the Evil empire....heathens!!! Oh wait they're monks, and they offer me prayers so does that cancel out and make them ok again?

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Elgon · · Score: 5, Funny
      ASP??? They should be using Perl, shurely??

      Perlmonks

      Elgon

    2. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Micro$oft is the correct path and open source is full of heathens!

      Or maybe your just an idiot! Why don't you inform THEM of the error of their ways ... pointless mentioning it here.

      Let's hope these people get into the laptop parts business aswell ... it seems after 3 months of praying for my part to just pop up by same strange mystery after hours of prayer isn't going to work.

    3. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. ASP is a technology. PERL is a language. PERLScript can run on ASP. Methinks Elgon would fail even a simple interview, let alone a senior position.

      I fail to understand why people think they are competent and think ASP==VBScript. Even PHP runs quite easily under the ASP umbrella.

    4. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There Catholics it doesn't mean that they have to be Open Source Zealots. In my reasoning using windows is a Bad Idea which will loose you to loose a lot of money in the future, but using windows is not evil, just not the best decision.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think it's simply that ASP is evil, while Perl is good. Also its creator, Larry Wall is a Christian. If enough people pray to him after he dies and miracles occur as a result, then he could become St. Larry eventually. I don't think miracles that occur when you use perl would count towards his canonization, however. That's just routine.

    6. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you can use ASP without VB. You can put lace undies on a stinky monkey too, but that doesn't exactly make it any sexier. So I say go away and astorturf some other day.

    7. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems to me that these guys are being pretty "open source' with their dough and their time. In fact for 900 years! Why don't some of you open source newbies help them with some pro bono PERL help. Then you could help them help others.

      Pray On, Monx! God sees every good thing you do!

    8. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      So, should our (ink-selling) monks call themselves The Monastery Gates instead of The Lasermonks?

    9. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by Elgon · · Score: 1
      I'm very well aware of this - the question is though, what proportion of people use anything other than VBS or JS under ASP?

      Damn few, I'm willing to bet.

      Elgon

    10. Re:Well somebody has to say it... by alphamale · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing these guys aren't selling CPUs.

      'Cause, uh, then they'd be chipmonks, see.

  2. H2G2 by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Funny

    LaserMonks? With a name like that, they've got to be electric!

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    1. Re:H2G2 by squidfood · · Score: 1
      With a name like that, they've got to be electric!

      I don't believe so.

    2. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LaserMonks? With a name like that, they've got to be electric!

      But do they do your believing for you?

    3. Re:H2G2 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      And in that moment, the poster was enlightened.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H2G2 (Score:3, Funny)
      LaserMonks? With a name like that, they've got to be electric!


      Not to nitpick, but the Electric Monk was from Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency, not H2G2.

    5. Re:H2G2 by fshalor · · Score: 1

      Agree... I'll definatly have to replenish my 1012 from these guys. It's just too cool a concept to pass up. I think I'm going to do it just for the chance of launching into a atheo/agnostic debate with them.. Cool Beads.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    6. Re:H2G2 by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      This whole story- printers, monks, computers- reminds me of the Nine Billion Names of God by Arthur C. Clarke, which you should read if you haven't. If only to chuckle at the quaint predictions for computer science he made back in 1967.

    7. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe this error can get posted on /., but for chrissake, the Electric Monk makes an appearance in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency, NOT H2G2.

    8. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah so electric this name !! :)

      Photo gratuites

    9. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were probably just a bunch of printer geeks who, upon realizing they were never going to get laid, decided to cut their losses and just become celibate monks!

  3. Hmmm. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Funny
    Does Brother Dominic works there?

    I guess Xerox wasn't too much off the bat...

  4. Oh, so that has been my problem ... by ThisIsAnExampleAccou · · Score: 4, Funny
    All of this time, I have been cursing at my printers, rather than blssing them.

    Michael Bolton: Load Letter? What the f*ck does that mean?!?!?? You wanna step to this? I didn;t think so!

    /end office space quote

    1. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by Oggust · · Score: 1
      All of this time, I have been cursing at my printers, rather than blssing them.

      Well, I'm pretty sure printers are evil, but maybe this tames them somehow. Kind of the same reasoning as with those snake-wielding southern pentecostals. (Or whatever they are. Baptists?)

      Could be worth a try. The chickens didn't work, but they're really for SCSI so maybe that was it...

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    2. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's uhh.. "PC Load Letter"...

    3. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure. You use curses with terminals, not printers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by tyleroar · · Score: 1

      And he got an Insightful mod because why?

      --
      Portland, North Dakota Puppies
    5. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hamsters for printers. That's probably where you've gone wrong.

    6. Re:Oh, so that has been my problem ... by magarity · · Score: 1

      cursing at my printers, rather than blssing them
      If these monks make toner like the local monks here make cheese (excellent!) you'll be singing a different tune soon.

  5. All I need is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if I could only just get a prayer for my dying OS.......

  6. With These Guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Refilling your Lexmark cartridge isn't just a DMCA violation -- it's a sin!

    1. Re:With These Guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Good thing they're catholic--sins don't matter--if you confess--which it looks like they're doing.

      So, everything's on the up-and-up.

    2. Re:With These Guys by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Refilling your Lexmark cartridge isn't just a DMCA violation -- it's a sin!

      Joke apart, those monks could do it : can you imagine Lexmark dragging them to court over this? Sure they'd be guilty, but Lexmark's sales would take a big dip, so they'd never do it. How's that for a DMCA circumvention scheme?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:With These Guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How's that for a DMCA circumvention scheme?

      FLASH -- Confessionals boarded up nationwide. RIAA sez, "Props to the Pope."

    4. Re:With These Guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the monks are refilling a prebate cartridge, Lexmark would explain to them that they are refilling Lexmark property (essentially stealing from Lexmark). If the monks continued filling prebate cartridges, then Lexmark would issue a cease and desist that would be well within Lexmark's rights. DMCA is only being applied to Lexmark's prebate cartridges. Prebate cartridges remain property of Lexmark. The user of the cartridge only has use of the toner in the cartridge.

  7. Holy Printing, Batman! by graniteMonkey · · Score: 1, Funny

    Somebody had to say it.

    --

    This is a manual virus. Copy it to your sig and help me spread!
  8. time honored tradition by drenehtsral · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is an updated verson of a very old (middle ages) tradition of monastaries doing some specialized task (and doing it well) and using thier product to sell or barter for needed supplies, food, etc...
    This practice kept a lot of trades and information alive that might have otherwise died out. It would take a reel jerk to sue them for DMCA violations too =:-)

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
    1. Re:time honored tradition by dogfart · · Score: 5, Funny
      It would take a real jerk to sue them for DMCA violations

      A DMCA suit then appears inevitable.

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    2. Re:time honored tradition by terraformer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I went to catholic HS and I wil tell you, there is no better fund raiser than a catholic organization. As you said, they have a long tradition of "charitable" works and they just update them for the times they are in.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    3. Re:time honored tradition by drenehtsral · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Christ on a pogo stick! Get over it already. I'm personaly an atheist, but I still think it's sort of a neat idea. Spit your venom elsewhere, please.

      --

      ---
      Play Six Pack Man. I
    4. Re:time honored tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      can I also buy an absolution?
      can I get discounts if I buy dozens? :-)

    5. Re:time honored tradition by terraformer · · Score: 1

      It wasn't venom, merely a healthy appreciation for reality and not some idealized view of the clergy... Personally I could care less how they make their money.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    6. Re:time honored tradition by Pirogoeth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kind of like the priest from my hometown that found an interesting thing to do with duck poop...

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    7. Re:time honored tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This is an updated verson of a very old (middle ages) tradition of monastaries doing some specialized task (and doing it well) ....

      And a particularly appropriate task. After all, one of their primary functions was copying books.

    8. Re:time honored tradition by toxic666 · · Score: 1

      Trappist Ale and Salvator Double Bock (even the secularized Paulaner version). Need I say more than Breakfast of Champions?

    9. Re:time honored tradition by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      During college I worked at a pizza parlour, and the manager was a monk. Getting a job outside of the monastery was his way of supporting himself.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:time honored tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is an updated verson of a very old (middle ages) tradition of monastaries doing some specialized task (and doing it well) ....

      And a particularly appropriate task. After all, one of their primary functions was copying books.

      And those scribe monks got very pissed when the printing press made their skills obsolete. Maybe this is their revenge: undercut the overpriced inkjet sinners.

    11. Re:time honored tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is inappropriate for the current religious themed comment section.

      Now go to hell.

    12. Re:time honored tradition by Eccles · · Score: 5, Funny

      A priest selling duck poo? Holy shi....

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    13. Re:time honored tradition by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      This practice kept a lot of trades and information alive that might have otherwise died out. It would take a reel jerk to sue them for DMCA violations too =:-)
      You obviously don't know about the RIAA!!!
    14. Re:time honored tradition by zenthax · · Score: 1

      "And a particularly appropriate task. After all, one of their primary functions was copying books." That probaly means that they are now going to get sued for helping pirates distruibte illegal ebooks.

    15. Re:time honored tradition by NETHED · · Score: 1

      Sir, If I had mod points....man, you just made my night!

      --
      --sig fault--
    16. Re:time honored tradition by Eiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is particularly true of the Cistercian order, to which the lasermonks belong. In the middle ages, they were a sort of poor newcomer compared to the Benedictines or Dominicans, and therefore were given only marginal, hilly lands for their monasteries. Thereby short on income, they developed their monasteries into high-tech medieval factories, doing things like textile production or metalwork with waterpowered machines (water power being one asset they did have in the mountains). Cistercian cloth was among the finest in Europe, and overall the order was one of the leading technological or commercial organizations of the time.

    17. Re:time honored tradition by kzadot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Takes a jerk to sue monks? WTF? We are talking catholic monks here. If anyone needs to be sued, its flat-earth believing, copernicus-killing, book-burning, orphan-molesting, anti-science, creation-believing, anti-birth control, each-other-sodomizing, sodomy-condemning, oral-sex-condemning, bible bashing, hypocritical, catholic monks.

      We have a lot to sue these clowns for not just DMCA violations.

    18. Re:time honored tradition by lxs · · Score: 1

      After all, one of their primary functions was copying books.

      Shouldn't they be running a warez server then?

    19. Re:time honored tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, who says they have to make money doing some sort of low-tech job like making soap bars, etc.

    20. Re:time honored tradition by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Hey, at least they're offering something of value in exchange for your money. Most churches just expect you to plunk down the cash without so much as a thank you.

      Hell, a lot of the far-right Protestant churches tell you that if you don't give them 10% of everything you make that you'll burn in hell. Then, after you give them their tithe, they still pass around the collection plate and expect you to give some MORE for whatever project they're pushing this week (support missionaries in India, new hot tub in the rectory, etc)

      I say more power to these monks. They are being useful members of society, which sets them apart from the other 99% of the religion industry who are nothing more than parasites. And, unlike many TV preachers *cough*Fallwell*cough* they aren't being loud-mouthed hipocrits.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  9. Makes you wonder by Rathian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whether Lexmark will attempt to DMCA them?

    That'll make for a wonderful headeline:
    "Lexmark to sue monks"

    Still, can't help but think of Brother Theo from Babylon 5, great character.

    1. Re:Makes you wonder by D-Cypell · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whether Lexmark will attempt to DMCA them?

      Nah... they havent got a prayer! ;o)

    2. Re:Makes you wonder by radar_uk · · Score: 1

      If only SCO made printers...

    3. Re:Makes you wonder by DeadChobi · · Score: 0

      Nahh, its bad publicity to sue the agents of god. Lexmark surely wants everyone to keep buying printers, so they'll just stay quiet about the competition from the catholics. I think its really cool that monks are selling printer cartridges online, maybe I'll put one in just to see if it will make my f*cking canon actually work correctly. Just one more way for my high school to cut corners on their expenses while still making sure everything comes out of the teacher's pockets

      --
      SRSLY.
  10. maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Nadsat · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they sell to non-catholics? Or do they first circumsize and baptize everyone who buys a modem from them? :D

    1. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or do they first circumsize and baptize everyone who buys a modem from them? :D
      *ahem* it is the greek orthodox church, i believe that circumsized and baptizes.....not the catholics

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    2. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Catholics aren't circumsized. Jews are.

    3. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Catholics, especially orthodox, follow a strict interpretation of the Old and New Testament. In the Old Testament, Jewish converts are circumsized. It is common practice for Catholics to be circumsized as well.

    4. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      I live in a country where we used to burn Jews and neo-Catholics during the so called Renaissance, my parents are Catholic, I am Catholic. So is the vast majority of the population.

      I do not know one single circumcised person.

    5. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which country do you live in? Catholic Holiday. Feast of the Circumcision: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03779a.htm

    6. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Atticu5 · · Score: 1

      I do not know one single circumcised person.

      Maybe I shouldn't be asking this, but how are you so sure?

    7. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Because I am a male and I am not circumcised. Neither is my father. Neither is anyone else. The whole concept of circumcision is foreign to us.

      According to Roman Catholic doctrine, you are not supposed to mutilate your body unless you explicitly need it for health reasons, or to benefit another without prejudice of your health.

      Read this for more info. Circumcision used to be strictly forbidden according to canon. Only in 1952 was it considered permissible but only for health reasons.

    8. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is funnier? A theist ignorance of science, or a scientist (or man interested in science) ignorant of theism?

    9. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by arcanumas · · Score: 1

      I am Greek orthdox. Which comes from Being a Greek AND an Orthdox :)
      We do get Baptized (i somehow thought that was common in catholics.. it's not!?) but we do not get circumsized.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    10. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Cantate Domino:
      "It firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors. Therefore, it commands all who glory in the name of Christian, at whatever time, before or after baptism, to cease entirely from circumcision, since, whether or not one places hope in it, it cannot be observed at all without the loss of eternal salvation. Regarding children, indeed, because of danger of death, which can often take place, when no help can be brought to them by another remedy than through the sacrament of baptism, through which they are snatched from the domination of the Devil and adopted among the sons of God, it advises that holy baptism ought not to be deferred for forty or eighty days, or any time according to the observance of certain people, but it should be conferred as soon as it can be done conveniently, but so ,that, when danger of death is imminent, they be baptized in the form of the Church, early without delay, even by a layman or woman, if a priest should be lacking, just as is contained more fully in the decree of the Armenians."

    11. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have clarified. my point in bringing it up was to show connection. lineage. i was raised an america catholic in ohio and was circumcised. not sure if that has so much to do with being catholic... but by old traditions rooted in former practices of circumcision.

      their is a connection to jewish customs, as old christians were jews.

    12. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Actually, every Christian church baptizes. And almost everyone in the US is circumsized, but not for religious reasons.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Dhalka226 · · Score: 0, Troll

      (i somehow thought that was common in catholics.. it's not!?)

      It is. One of the Seven Sacrements.

      1. Baptism
      2. Confirmation
      3. Reconciliation
      4. Communion
      5. Holy Orders (when your calling in life is to molest a little boy, apparently)
      6. Marriage (Matrimony)
      7. Annointing of the sick

      See how well the catholics taught me?

      Any wonder I've become an athiest? *eyeroll*

    14. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Theosis · · Score: 1

      Some Catholics, especially orthodox, follow a strict interpretation of the Old and New Testament. In the Old Testament, Jewish converts are circumsized. It is common practice for Catholics to be circumsized as well.

      Indeed, they do follow a strict interpretation. However, you allude to an interpretation that is flawed.

      Circumcision was used by the Jews to enter in a covenant with God. When Jesus came around, the new way to enter into the covenant with God was baptism (both Jewish circumcision and Orthodox baptisms are generally done to infants).

      There is nothing against circumcision in the Eastern Orthodox Church, however it is not part of Church tradition, but has become more of a social tradition.

      In short, circumcisions are for the Jews, not Christians.

    15. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by dekemoose · · Score: 1

      Catholics, and many others, are circumsized in America due to a certain hang-up we have on being circumsized. Its more of a cultural thing in the US than a religious one. As a religious matter, I don't know that there is a preference on being circusized among Catholics, but its been so long since I've been a practicing Catholic that I don't recall.

    16. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for making that clear. I am Serbian Orthodox (which for everyone else, that means Serbian AND Orthodox), but we were always taught it was those of the Jewish faith who believed in circumcision. And American doctors, of course.

    17. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      *ahem* it is the greek orthodox church, i believe that circumsized and baptizes.....not the catholics

      *double ahem*, the greek orthodox church does not practice circumcision, and many (most?) greek orthodox males are uncircumcized. This is based only on circumstantial evidence.

      Pun aside, it is the Jews who practice circumcision as a religious rite.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    18. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh. Cicumcision, Baptisim. Its all the same fanegale

    19. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      "When Jesus came around, the new way to enter into the covenant with God was baptism (both Jewish circumcision and Orthodox baptisms are generally done to infants)."

      This isn't true. Baptism is a public confirmation that you are a Christian. Jesus was baptised by John when he began his public ministry.

      Paul refers to "spiritual circumcision" as the new "covenant"; in the OT/Hebrew bible, circumcision was the sign of the covenant (see Moses), but in the NT, Jesus' death is the final sacrifice for believers.

      "In short, circumcisions are for the Jews, not Christians."

      Paul distinctly says that circumcision is a non-issue in Christianity; it doesn't matter whether you're snipped or not.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    20. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1
      it is the greek orthodox church, i believe that circumsized and baptizes.....not the catholics

      This isn't informative--it's mostly wrong. Catholics, as do most (all?) Christian denominations, do baptize. As for circumcision, it has its roots in Judaism and the bible, but is mentioned as being unnecessary in several places in the New Testament. I do believe the Catholic church discourages the practice. See here.

    21. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muslims too, for the most part, though it's not as big a requirement as in Judaism. It's more like extra credit...

    22. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Theosis · · Score: 1

      This isn't true. Baptism is a public confirmation that you are a Christian. Jesus was baptised by John when he began his public ministry.


      There was nothing wrong with my initial statement. In fact you make baptism sound more like a public show than the true act of a covenant with God that it is.


      Paul refers to "spiritual circumcision" as the new "covenant"; in the OT/Hebrew bible, circumcision was the sign of the covenant (see Moses), but in the NT, Jesus' death is the final sacrifice for believers.


      I don't know what church you belong to, but it is an accepted idea that baptism is the sign of a covenant between God replacing Jewish circumscision. I'm not sure what point that above statement tried to make. They are both true statements but disjointed in context with the topic of this off-topic dicussion.

      "In short, circumcisions are for the Jews, not Christians."


      Paul distinctly says that circumcision is a non-issue in Christianity; it doesn't matter whether you're snipped or not.


      Again, my statement was not incorrect. I specifically said the Orthodox church doesn't care if you are circumcised, but some make note not to take the act of circumcision in a religious tone, because it no longer applies in Christianity.

      I have no idea why you basically reiterated my entire comment.

    23. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by kilcloone · · Score: 1

      Very few people are "uncircumcized", which is a difficult bit of plastic surgery The word is "intact".

    24. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Very few people are "uncircumcized", which is a difficult bit of plastic surgery The word is "intact".

      Yes, my mistake with the terminology.

      I believe your assertion that "very few" people are circumcized may apply only to the US. Many people outside the US are "intact". There is no medical reason why the procedure is performed - anyone who bathes on a regular or even semi-regular basis has nothing to worry about in the genital hygene dept.

      Perhaps this is a new /. poll?

      - Yes, I've been cut.
      - No, I'm all there.
      - I'm female you jackass.
      - I have no genitals you insensitive clod!.
      -

      Ok maybe not.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    25. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know, but when I tried to check out the site I got this:
      Access to this server is forbidden from your client
      How did they know I'm protestant?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by operagost · · Score: 1

      The Catholic church has created many unbelievers. Don't let the evil one win - don't listen to what "the establishment" says. It's not the true church - the church is the body of believers. The truth is in the Bible.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if that was sarcastic or not. *laugh* I'll assume you were sincere.

      Nah, truthfully, Catholicism played only a minor part in my coming not to believe. I stopped believing a long time ago (long before the sex abuse scandals, which ARE absolutely despicable) and examining parts of the Bible have only made my anti-religious temper worse.

      Things just don't connect for me in (Christian) religion and the more I talk to people about it, the more I think I'm right. Nobody can even come up with the same story, for one; if I'm going to be wrong, I might as well be wrong this way! The entire concept of many religions, at its core, rubs me the wrong way.

      If you believe, that's good. I hope you get something out of it that makes it valuable to me. Me, I don't, I never did.

    28. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think you're thinking of "decircumcized" as being the difficult plastic surgery. "Uncircumcized" means not circumcized, not repaired.

    29. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      "I don't know what church you belong to, but it is an accepted idea that baptism is the sign of a covenant between God replacing Jewish circumscision."

      DISCLAIMER: IMHO applies to entire comment :) This must be a difference between the Orthodox church and Protestantism. When a Protestant becomes a Christian, they enter into a covenant with God in much the same way that circumcision marked the covenant between a Jew and YHWH. Baptism is good, but it's not a sacrament as it is in the Orthodox church; baptism is an outward symbol of faith. While we're on the subject, communion/Eucharist is an inward symbol of faith, and so I would argue that, while it is good to partake of the Eucharist, it is not an essential element of Christianity. Romans 10.9-10: "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." I really believe that Christianity is as simple as that - a simple verbal confession and the profound belief in Christ as Saviour. Again, IMHO.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    30. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I had some para breaks in there but they were lost when I edited.

    31. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by blockhouse · · Score: 1

      Intact, uncut, circumcised, uncircumcised, whatever. My favorite way to characterize it is: do you have an anteater, or a helmet?

    32. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Theosis · · Score: 1


      DISCLAIMER: IMHO applies to entire comment :) This must be a difference between the Orthodox church and Protestantism. When a Protestant becomes a Christian, they enter into a covenant with God in much the same way that circumcision marked the covenant between a Jew and YHWH. Baptism is good, but it's not a sacrament as it is in the Orthodox church; baptism is an outward symbol of faith. While we're on the subject, communion/Eucharist is an inward symbol of faith, and so I would argue that, while it is good to partake of the Eucharist, it is not an essential element of Christianity. Romans 10.9-10: "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." I really believe that Christianity is as simple as that - a simple verbal confession and the profound belief in Christ as Saviour. Again, IMHO.


      I would agree that we may be treading on the fundamental differences between Orthodox (and Catholicism) vs. Protestantism and this is not the forum for discussion (or arguing) of the differences.

      I can say IMHO as well, that while it is true that a verbal confessional and inward belief is integral, it is only part of the story. The rest of it relies on constantly repenting sins, and the doing of good works. Thought and action.

      Also, a vital aspect of Orthodox theology is the concept of Theosis. It is a strong concept with subtleties that can be easily misconstrued. The link states it clearly I think.

    33. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Grant_Watson · · Score: 1

      Catholics, as do most (all?) Christian denominations, do baptize.

      Quakers don't. I think they're the only one that comes to mind that doesn't.

    34. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      HIs ways are mysterious...

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    35. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Y'know what? You have faith in God. I have faith in God. That's good enough for me :) It was nice to meet you; I hope to run into you again someday ;)

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    36. Re:maybe this isn't such a good idea... by Theosis · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. :-)

      Nice meeting you too.

  11. sinners by arcanumas · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if slashdoting the website of monks is actually a sin...

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    1. Re:sinners by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I wonder if slashdoting the website of monks is actually a sin..."

      Only if you get modded up for joking about it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:sinners by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Funny
      Only if you get modded up for joking about it.

      I guess i should better go confess to them for being a karma whore.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:sinners by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...

      1. Make clever pun
      2. Respond to other's self-referential posts
      3. ???
      4. Get modded up!

      --Joey

    4. Re:sinners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 first posts and 1 "BSD is dying," and you will be absolved of your sins.

    5. Re:sinners by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      I got this message from the website (running Mozilla Firebird 0.7)

      Access to this server is forbidden from your client

    6. Re:sinners by MooCows · · Score: 1

      So?
      As far as I know, 'Funny' gives 0 karma bonus. (while overrated still recuces your karma)
      In other words: posting +6 funny -1 overrated gives you a penalty to your karma while stilling being modded to 5.

      Weird 'flaw' in the mod system. (losing karma for posting funny stuff)

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    7. Re:sinners by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Yup, so did I, running mozilla 1.6

      Heck of a way to run a business when you're so married to the lord that it really looks as if its to windows ASP.

      I can steer them some business, but not if I cannot see the product on a browser of MY choice.

      --
      Cheers, Gene

    8. Re:sinners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE yields the same result. I suppose this is their (rude) response to being slashdotted. They couldn't maybe just say "Server under heavy load--temporarily unavailable?"

    9. Re:sinners by Bill+Privatus · · Score: 1

      I'm in a hotel - private, though high-speed, network, on Lodgenet - and I can't get in with Mozilla 1.5, Netscape 4.8, OR MSIE 6.x....

      This looks like perhaps they are just being creative in being slashdotted :-)

      I would have been more entertained by a message mentioning demonic influences or some such!

      Oh, something like

      Access to this server is forbidden from all locations where Leaders of the Anglican Church, or any Episcopal church members who elected openly gay priest Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire, have stayed overnight, traveled through, flew over, or viewed using the unaided eye.
      --
      Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good! - Me.
    10. Re:sinners by nv5 · · Score: 1


      Mozilla Firebird 0.7 worked fine for me - so did Mozilla 1.5

    11. Re:sinners by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      I wonder if slashdoting the website of monks is actually a sin...

      No we're /. for us it's a SIN, to not slashdot the sites in our stories :-D.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
  12. You insensitive clod! by phaetonic · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm an athiest!

    1. Re:You insensitive clod! by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1

      I'm an athiest!

      You INFEDIL!

      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    2. Re:You insensitive clod! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm an athiest!

      and a dyslexic too.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean he doens't believe in dogs?

    4. Re:You insensitive clod! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Thats OK they will still sell you ink at a good price.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...your point being?

      they don't run around calling you an insensitive clod for not being catholic...

    6. Re:You insensitive clod! by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      It's atheist you insensitive clod!

      Unless you hate "thiests" for some odd reason?

    7. Re:You insensitive clod! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm a clincally depressed fecalpheliac on prozac.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Dr Evils new plan... by Eluding+Reality · · Score: 3, Funny

    After Sharks with frickin laser beams didn't work out.... Dr Evil hatches his next plot - LASERMONKS
    mwhhhahhahahaha mwhhhaaaa

    1. Re:Dr Evils new plan... by NETHED · · Score: 1

      I dont know where a good shot of it is, but Moonracker (sp), that great (read horrible), James Bond Movie had Monks w/ Lasers.

      --
      --sig fault--
  14. Borrowed scripts by ctrl-alt-elite · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looking over the page's source, it looks like they borrowed a lot of their JavaScript. Talk about copying scripture...

    /rimshot

    1. Re:Borrowed scripts by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My thought was that the site is seriously dialup-hostile, and that they need a new webmaster!

      OTOH, now I know where I'm going to look next time I need a toner cart!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. It gets weirder by Pflipp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I heard some of these monasteries actually make money off brewing beer!

    (Next, they'll be back at handwriting Bibles again for the lack of printing ink...)

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
    1. Re:It gets weirder by a-aiyar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not that weird. Trappist monasteries have been brewing beer for centuries. They've been making cheese as well. Perhaps the best known Trappist beer and cheese are from the Scourmont abbey in southern Belgium -- can you say Chimay :-)

    2. Re:It gets weirder by gwernol · · Score: 5, Informative

      I heard some of these monasteries actually make money off brewing beer!

      There is a great and long tradition of Trappist monastaries brewing beer. The Belgian trappist ales are some of the finest in existence. If you like your beer dark, rich and potent then there is nothing finer. The best known are the Chimay ales which are truly excellent, especially the chocolatey Trippel.

      Goodness I think its time to leave work and find God at the bottom of a bottle...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    3. Re:It gets weirder by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Informative

      I heard some of these monasteries actually make money off brewing beer!

      So? They're catholics, not mormons. Jesus turned water to wine, they turn grain to beer.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:It gets weirder by steeef · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The best alcohol made by monks comes in the form of Chartreuse:

      Only three monks know the identity of the 130 plants, how to blend them and how to distill them into this world famous liqueur. They are also the only ones who know which plants they have to macerate to produce the natural green and yellow colours. And they alone supervise the slow ageing in oak casks.

      (text from http://www.chartreuse.fr/pa_green&yellow_uk.htm)

      Wonderful liquer. Tastes like drinking a Christmas tree, but one made of 55% alcohol.

    5. Re:It gets weirder by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Not just beer, either. The liquers Frangelico and Benedictine were originally made by monks.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    6. Re:It gets weirder by devphil · · Score: 1


      Exactly. I can't recall offhand what the literal Greek translation is, but the New Testament injunctions are against getting/being drunk (i.e., loss of control), not drinking.

      Many Christians observe that, since one of the first things to go when drinking is your ability to tell whether your self-control is impaired, the easiest way to avoid losing control is not to drink to begin with. Some just recommend it informally, some leave it up to the individual, others (like the Mormons) make it dogma.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    7. Re:It gets weirder by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Friend saw a Belgian monastery like this. Monks on one side of the highway, brewery on the other. There was a walk-overpass with an conspicuos silvery-shiny insulated hefty pipe tagged along. They proudly explained to him that the pipe on the overpass was their "beer main" to supply the monastery on the other side of the road. There was beer on tap in the hallways in the living qarters. (My friend did not get to see their chappel, but I have my guess...)

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    8. Re:It gets weirder by andynz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, if a Christmas tree tastes like cheap aftershave.

    9. Re:It gets weirder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any nunneries where the sisters make money selling their bodies?

    10. Re:It gets weirder by sofakingl · · Score: 1

      Only 3 people know? Talk about closed source! I wonder what their back up plan is in case the 3 of them die or come down with amnesia.

    11. Re:It gets weirder by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      According to the History Channel. Beer was actually invented by Catholic Monks. During lent which is a period of fasting, the monks made beer as a high calorie drink to give them energy to complete their tasks. When they realized that they were getting drunk off it, they sent some to the Vadegin (spelling?) in Rome to see it was worthy. When the officials in Rome tried the beer (who are used to drinking wine) found the taste revolting and commended the monks for their sacrifice.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:It gets weirder by grylnsmn · · Score: 1

      Some just recommend it informally, some leave it up to the individual, others (like the Mormons) make it dogma.

      Actually, the Mormon prohibition on drinking has nothing to do with the New Testament, but instead comes from modern revelation from a living prophet.

      The Word of Wisdom was given to Joseph Smith in 1833 and can be found here. It's not just "don't drink, don't smoke", but a list of things to eat that are healthy for you as well.

    13. Re:It gets weirder by vicparedes · · Score: 1

      They also distill gin and also purportedly invented Jagermeister. There's a monastery in the States where they manufacture and sell fruitcakes.

    14. Re:It gets weirder by panxerox · · Score: 1

      Well they did till they got put out of business by chinese imports.

      --
      "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    15. Re:It gets weirder by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      There is a great and long tradition of Trappist monastaries brewing beer. The Belgian trappist ales are some of the finest in existence. If you like your beer dark, rich and potent then there is nothing finer. The best known are the Chimay ales which are truly excellent, especially the chocolatey Trippel.

      Agreed. The Trappist monastaries produce some truely tasty ales. They are unfortunately quite expensive (at least from what I've seen). $7.10 for a single 12 oz bottle.

      While $42 for a six pack is quite high, it is at least going to a good cause. That's more than I can say about my $99 upgrade from Win 3.1 to Win95. ;-)

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    16. Re:It gets weirder by steeef · · Score: 1

      Unknown, but supposedly they're not allowed to ride in the same car at once. I'm guessing they have more rules as well.

    17. Re:It gets weirder by Xenographic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for your stomach's sake and your frequent infirmities."

      1 Timothy 5:23, New King James version.

      Only the Mormons are against all drinking, really, though a few other denominations (e.g. Methodists) did participate in Prohibition, ages ago. The Bible only really condemns being drunk (not just drinking) as parent says.

    18. Re:It gets weirder by SEE · · Score: 1

      Hmm. So the Hisotry Channel was that off-its-ass wrong? Because been dates back to the Ancient Egyptians, as in several millenia BC.

    19. Re:It gets weirder by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      Close. Beer had been around for a long time. When the Catholic church began spreading into the area that is now Germany, there was some question as to whether German priests would have to give up beer. A sample was sent to the Vatican, and the Pope made some comment to the effect that if the German priests wanted to do this additional penance, it was fine with him. Imagine what kind of condition the beer was in by the time it got to Rome. Non-pasteurized, probably transported by ox cart, over the Alps in the summer when the passes were clear. Skunky doesn't even begin to describe it!

    20. Re:It gets weirder by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      can you say Chimay

      Evidently not. How do you pronounce it?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    21. Re:It gets weirder by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Several Baptist groups condemn alcohol entirely as well. It just depends where you're at I suppose.

      --
      What?
    22. Re:It gets weirder by blockhouse · · Score: 1

      Trappist monasteries have been brewing beer for centuries.

      Not only that, but they've been distilling spirits for centuries too. In fact, during the Middle Ages, monasteries were one of the few places where scientific knowledge was preserved, and monks would experimentally distill with all kinds of herbs and spices. Some popular beverages today take their names from monasticism. Chartreuse, for example, was first distilled in a monastery in Chartres, France. Cappuchino was invented by the Capuchin Franciscans. Benedictine was, of course, invented by Benedictines.

      And Trappist beer is some of the best stuff I've ever had. I highly recommend Westmalle Tripel. Made by Trappist monks in Belgium, who apparently believe that if God wanted us to filter beer, He wouldn't have given us livers.

    23. Re:It gets weirder by blockhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, I dunno about all that, but I find all the justification I need to drink in the Good Book.

      The First Epistle of Blessed Paul the Apostle to Timothy, chapter 5, verse 23 (Douay-Rheims Version) says: "Do not still drink water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thy frequent infirmities."

      There you have it, folks. A divine license to drink. W00t!

    24. Re:It gets weirder by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly."

      no hot drinks? What the heck is that about? Coffeine and tobacco prohibition I can understand, but hot drinks? wha' happen?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    25. Re:It gets weirder by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      Well, Earth is ~6 million years old, but that doesn't stop the Catholics from claiming their leader created it ~6 thousand years ago...why not beer too?

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    26. Re:It gets weirder by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      the easiest way to avoid losing control is not to drink to begin with.

      I believe part of the reason they started suggesting this was that alcoholism was becoming an epidemic in England and America.

    27. Re:It gets weirder by mjan · · Score: 1

      Evidently not. How do you pronounce it?

      Like 'shemale' without pronouncing the "l" in the end.

    28. Re:It gets weirder by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      Any comments on how they need to open-source the recipe for the sake of competition you go right on the enemies list.

    29. Re:It gets weirder by the_womble · · Score: 1

      I like Chartreuse, but it is not as good as either Trappise beers, or Benedictine, or the greatest drink invented by monks (although no longer AFAIK made by them), champagne.

    30. Re:It gets weirder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what would happen if Bin Laden crashed an airliner into the Chartreuse monastery?

    31. Re:It gets weirder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooo! It's fun to be wrong no matter WHICH belief system you believe.

      The generally accepted "scientific" age of the earth is ~5 billion.

      So the atheists and the theists don't like you now.

    32. Re:It gets weirder by grylnsmn · · Score: 1

      no hot drinks? What the heck is that about? Coffeine and tobacco prohibition I can understand, but hot drinks? wha' happen?

      We've been told by modern prophets that hot drinks refers to coffee and tea. Other drinks (like hot chocolate, spiced cider, or herb teas) are perfectly allowable.

    33. Re:It gets weirder by smchris · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Chartreuse looks so pretty, hits you hard.

      Sorry, even these guys are too expensive for the likes of me. See:

      http://www.tonerrefillkits.com

    34. Re:It gets weirder by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It is specifically stout beer that monks created.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    35. Re:It gets weirder by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      (e.g. Methodists) did participate in Prohibition...

      Homer Simpson angry voice: Stupid Methodists!

      --
      Sig it.
    36. Re:It gets weirder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are also a bit incorrect. Catholics do not necessarily believe one way or the other. There is no definitive statement by the Catholic church that one must accept evolution or must reject it, just that one must accept the ultimate creation of man by God. One is not officially told to believe detailed aspects of this which cannot be known. There is, however, a longstanding tradition of belief in the non-evoluted creation of our first parents about 6000 years ago. This has historically been supported by the genealogies of the Old Testament, and is just one allowable position.

    37. Re:It gets weirder by DarkManaX · · Score: 1

      It also comes from the Calvinist doctrines that plague modern American Christianity (at least American; probably elsewhere as well)

    38. Re:It gets weirder by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      No, the Southern Baptists hate Calvinism. They're always talking about how horrible it is. You should listen to some of those Baptist radio preachers scream and yell about it. :-)

      Besides all that, Calvinists are on the fringe of Christianity, though they're probably the closest to adhering to the actual words of the Bible of any theological group. The mainstream Christians in America (and throughout much of the world) are mostly a bunch of nuts. They say all sorts of things that don't agree with the Bible at all.

  16. Lasermonked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site is already unavailable too :-\

  17. Re:My wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uhm, OT?

    Anyway, I'll be happy to have a pleasant, civil discussion with you!

    Come over for tea sometime -- we can watch "The Life of Brian" :D

  18. Aha! by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

    So they're the ones that have been spamming me!

    --
    - Sherman
  19. Blasphemy by contagen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm pretty sure slashdotting a bunch of monks is asking for plague, famine, or at least a couple of lightning bolts.

    1. Re:Blasphemy by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could be worse. They might be Shaolin monks, in which case Taco's going to get seven kinds of stuff kicked out of him for putting their bandwidth bill into the stratosphere.

  20. And a libertarian, eh? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Ah, religion and politics. The atheist/libertarian geek is quite common. Some /. polls may have brought this up. I'd be very surprised to see more than a quarter theist in any way.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:And a libertarian, eh? by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Is there any such thing as a moderate Libertarian? (Someone who is a middle of the road conservative on fiscal issues, and middle of the road liberal on social issues) I like Libertarian beliefs in small doses, but usually it seems they go to far. Most people consider them extremists so much to the point that I would not put an affiliation with Campus Libertarians on my resume.

      --Joey

    2. Re:And a libertarian, eh? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The atheist/libertarian geek is quite common."

      true...until about 30.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:And a libertarian, eh? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Is there any such thing as a moderate Libertarian? (Someone who is a middle of the road conservative on fiscal issues, and middle of the road liberal on social issues) I like Libertarian beliefs in small doses, but usually it seems they go to far. Most people consider them extremists so much to the point that I would not put an affiliation with Campus Libertarians on my resume.

      Congratulations, you are a Democrat. :-)

    4. Re:And a libertarian, eh? by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you are a Democrat. :-)

      I don't think so. I am very progun, I am prochoice up to a point, I believe in fiscal constraint, but have no problem and will look forward to President Bush's space initiative. I believe taxcuts lead to growth, that the US was right to attack Iraq and that Marajuana should be legalized...

      I am registered Republican, but if there was a moderate libertarian (read: matched all of the above) I would switch affiliation...

      --Joey

  21. Experiment in Progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can prayer help a web server? Apparently not!
    Also I sure hope a slashdotting is not a sin. We are using up God's bandwidth after all.
    Ok I'll stop....

    1. Re:Experiment in Progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I guess kernel.org really does have more bandwidth than God.

  22. But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faith. The act of believing something with no proof.

    Until then. it's a fairy tale.

    1. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Aeolusz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Boy, could we ever have some fun with this one! Can you prove that Caesar existed? Can you prove that Napoleon tried to conquer much of Europe? Did these things happen: Absolutely! Why? Because there is a great deal of evidence. But how do you prove these things? Impossible! You must weigh the evidence. Saying that Christianity is a fairy tale because of a lack of proof is pretty lame -- not really worthy of slashdot if you ask me.

    2. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are non-faith based 'religions'. Buddhism, anyone?

    3. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice argument. You managed to strengthen the parent's point by your own rebuttal.

      Did these things happen: Absolutely! Why? Because there is a great deal of evidence.

      You said the keyword: evidence. There is exactly zero evidence that Christianity is valid. Hell, there isn't even a single shred of evidence that Christ was ever born.

    4. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

      Buddhism is faith based. You have faith that by following the teachings of those enlightened ones, you too can become enlightened.

      --
      Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    5. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Aeolusz · · Score: 1

      Wasn't meant to be a rebuttal to the parent but to the line about fairy tales. Perhaps I put too much faith in my clicking abilities. Zero evidence is a pretty silly kind of thing to say when even the strictest Atheist historians agree that Christ was born, lived and crucified.

    6. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you prove these things? Impossible! You must weigh the evidence.

      But Caesar and Napolean are realistic historical figures. I believe they were generals and rulers who left their mark on history because their actions are believable and there's a great deal of evidence for those actions. The buildings, weapons, paintings, ships and writings that have been left behind and records that have been passed down by historians.

      Jesus Christ may very well have existed, I certainly have no doubts that the stories of his existance have had a great impact on the world.

      However, if he existed (and wasn't just the subject of a great many popular plays that people started taking literally) - he was probably just a street magician or cultist. I certainly don't believe he could fly (walk on water), survive death (resurrection), duplicate matter (fish), predict the future, control plagues and the weather, nor do I think he was the literal "son of god" (unless, of course, we all are, being children of the universe).

      The simplest explaination is that he cheated, reports of his miracles have been greatly exaggerated - and that the bible is 90% fiction from hyperactive minds. At least some of the bible's moral message isn't all bad (the "be nice to everyone" bit), despite the horrors of a vengeful supernatural entity that has done nothing but provoke mindless violence and horrific wars (eg: "god spoke to me and told me to kill X because the bible says he doesn't like Y").

      And David Blane survived for 40 days in a box with nothing but liquids. I don't know how he did it, but that doesn't make him a supernatural being.

    7. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by citog · · Score: 1

      The use of 'faith' in the grandparent post implies faith in a deity or the divine, rather than faith in a method as you have implied.

    8. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      Over the last 50-60 years a lot of stuff has been dug up in the Mid East that proves most of the ideas and history of the Bible. For more, I refer you to Werner Keller's The Bible As History, available from Amazon , for more info.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    9. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Qeantk · · Score: 1

      They do? News to me. You might check your sources.

    10. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A lack of proof isn't the reason people call Christianity a fairy tale. It's called a fairy tale because the stories of the lives of Caesar and Napoleon seem at least probable, whereas the story of the life of Jesus seems as if the people who told it had breathed the smoke from a burning bush or two too many.

      Also, believing in Caesar and Napoleon--even the most passionate and rock-solid belief--doesn't require me to cut off a little piece of my dick. Caesar's dead, see? He's not watching from on high anywhere, ready to smite me for eternity if I should have unhealthy thoughts about the girl next door. Napoleon didn't rise again, either. Not only is that more likely to be true than any resurrection, it means that Napoleon isn't gonna give a damn whether or not I hit the bar after work tonight.

      If it was published under any other name, the Bible would be considered a book of ridiculous fairy tales. For example, if the world was flooded, how did freshwater fish survive? How did Noah keep a ship that large from falling apart or sinking without iron braces and bilge pumps working constantly? Where would one find the corner on a spherical planet anyway? Is it possible at all to walk on water? I could go on and on; open the Bible to any page and you will find a blatant slap in the face to reason and sense. The catch-all answer to all biblical inconsistencies is, of course, "It was a miracle!" Well, so was Cinderella's pumpkin turning into a carriage. So was Rip Van Winkle's age-long nap. How about Jack's magic beans? If saying that these are fairy tales isn't lame, then neither is saying the same thing about Christianity.

    11. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      Religion is product of fear.Fear of unknown.Be it natural forces or the tribe in next forest.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    12. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > when even the strictest Atheist historians agree that Christ was born, lived and crucified.

      You mean, all the strictest faith based historians, I think; not the real ones, although some real ones do give it benefit of the doubt that it likely happened (well, the crucifixion part is more likely an added embellishment by the story tellers).

    13. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Theosis · · Score: 1

      You said the keyword: evidence. There is exactly zero evidence that Christianity is valid. Hell, there isn't even a single shred of evidence that Christ was ever born.

      All in all, if I had to believe in something, whether it proved true or not, it would be Christianity. Religions sometimes have good messages in them that are worth living to.

      However, I should note while the supernatural aspects of Christianity certainly cannot be proved, there are indeed non-Christian references to Jesus of a more secular nature.

      That does not necessarily constitute a complete forensic analysis, but it does add to the possibility that Jesus was at least a real figure that did suffer as mentioned in the Bible.

      Keep in mind that anyone who would be willing to record anything about Christianity would most likely be a Christian, immediately excluding them from the realm of what you consider a reliable source. Why would anyone who is a non-Christian bother historically noting someone who they probably considered a crackpot?

      This may be one reason:

      The Annals by Tactius offers a passage commonly used to claim Jesus existed in a true historical setting. Here is the excerpt:


      Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus,and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.


      This I believe makes a reference to Nero's claim that Christians were responsible for burning Rome. However while doing that makes a mention of Jesus. if anything, it's an interesting passage.

      There are more references by Roman and Jewish sources that are interesting to consider.

      So no, your above assertion is not necessarily true.

    14. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to reread what they're finding at Megiddo; it looks like the David & Solomon kingdoms were, um, comforting, um, shall we say, *exaggerations*...

    15. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, Caesar was supposed to be divine. so were the Egyptian Pharoahs. For that matter, I think the existence of Joseph Smith is pretty indisputable, but it's a longer row to hoe to prove that he was a prophet.

      You see, the Bible isn't 100% true or 100% false. It's not the case that Jesus either never existed, or existed exactly as described in the Bible, miracles, Messiah, and all.

      The story that there was some Jewish preacher who attracted a following and was executed by the Romans is at least as probable as that of Napoleon. (What, you're telling me that the French are gonna make some short Corsican guy their absolute ruler only a couple of decades after violently throwing off their aristocracy, and that he's gonna whip up on the the Prussians, Austrians, Russians, British Empire, and Spain ALL AT THE SAME TIME with his crack French surrender monkeys? Don't make me laugh.)
      No divinity is necessary in either case.

    16. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not quite true any more. The Jesus Seminar (a group formed to sell crappy pulp "scholarship" books, it would seem) seems to think that Paul made it all up, and that there was no "historical Jesus."

      They are, of course, quite comical and serious scholars rarely waste time on them. I was at a talk by noted scholar Dr. William Lane Craig and when I asked about them, he essentially said that they weren't worth his time...

      Now, someone will probably note that Dr. Craig is a Christian, but even most atheists don't give this arguement the time of day. They generally assert that, while someone named Jesus existed, the stories about Jesus have been mythologized and the supernatural elements are either mistakes or simply never happened for some other reason. Only the "skeptevangelists" (who seem to exist primarily online) generally give this arguement the time of day.

    17. Re:But ALL religion is faith based. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      religonis a product of love.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. Re:Some facts... by Slowtreme · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Bottom line: Christians aren't necessarily a colt believing a fairy tale.
    Maybe it's more like a mare, or a pretty little pony?
    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  24. Re:My wish by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    Simple, don't mention religon.

  25. Maybe we could find... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 4, Funny

    A witchdoctor toner refiller who could put a curse on SCO with each cartridge purchase.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Maybe we could find... by Salubri · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Weeeell... that sounds good at first. Remember though that most people that follow that, the traditional and the new age alike, try to avoid that due to the law of threes: a basic summary being whatever you do is returned threefold to you. In other words, said witchdoctor would have three times the curse he put on SCO thrown right back at him, and he knows that. Take into account the fact that a witchdoctor who refills printer cartriges probably reads slashdot and groklaw, and knows SCO doesn't really have much to show in the way of evidence (or SCO wouldn't need to ask IBM for everything they've contributed so they can then look for breaches of IP) and said witchdoctor would be stupid to do this. They'd just bring a load of negative energy straight down on them to accomplish something that the army of IBM lawyers seems to be doing well enough on their own.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
  26. aaah so thats where you're hiding... by bbowers · · Score: 0

    that was getting a bit old after scrolling forever... I was hoping there were some actual comments at the bottom half of this!

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  27. no affiliation by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have no affiliation with Trappestine Quality Candy except that Mom orders it every year around the holidays and it's really good. Just sayin'.

    Ok, so I have an affinity. Check my nick. :sigh: Yum!

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:no affiliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Catholic friend gave me some for Christmas the year before last, if memory serves. They were quite good :)

  28. Douglas Adams is back! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wisconsin's LaserMonks say they'll give you a doozy of a deal

    Are these LaserMonks related to the Electric Monk by any chance?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Douglas Adams is back! by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Yes. They are capable of believing many mutually contradictory things, including ones that are entirely impossible. :-)

      <grins, ducks & dodges the thunderbolts>

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
  29. Slashdotting... by Unnngh! · · Score: 1

    ...We're all going to hell

    1. Re:Slashdotting... by danidude · · Score: 1
      ...We're all going to hell

      Speak for yourself, I didn't clik on the link to their website. It is useless... Long ago I discovered why nobody in /. RTFA.... the site of the Article is slashdotted anyway :)

      --
      - no sig.
  30. Are these print cartridges pre-molested? by I+am+Liquidity · · Score: 0, Troll

    OOPS I'm goin to hell. Hold me a spot pls.

    1. Re:Are these print cartridges pre-molested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jacko is not a monk!

  31. /.ed by trolman · · Score: 1
    They have been /.ed so use the google cache

    This supports charities albeit without the tax deduction.

  32. Which singularity? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Uploading?

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Which singularity? by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1
      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
  33. I for one... by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome our new monk overlords, well actually they kinda are if they talk to god and all.

    In my prayers tonight: "God, give me strength to put up with my job to take care of my Fiance..."
    God: "I can do that for you, but buy some new toner for your HP Laserjet 1100 for only $50 at http://www.lasermonks.com and you'll get a raise and your Fiance will love you forever..."

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God always gets the most click-thrus.

    2. Re:I for one... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Argh! Spam from the almighty. I'd like to see bogofilter block that!

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    3. Re:I for one... by qtp · · Score: 1

      well actually they kinda are if they talk to god and all

      Being Trappists, they're sure as he^H^H^H^H^Hnot talking much to anyone else!

      Oh yeah, they also make realy good jam!

      --
      Read, L
    4. Re:I for one... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      No need to get on your knees yourself -- just use Lasermonk's "Request A Prayer" link! :)

      (Yep, there is one!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  34. I can see it now... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the year 5057 A.D., a consortum of middle aged monks form a weapons production business, selling their wares exclusively to Christian battle outposts and missionaries in distant galaxies, fighting a holy war against the masses of Romulan infidels...

    and so these intergalatic boomstick hawkers called themselves...PhaserMonks.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
      In the year 5057 A.D., a consortum of middle aged monks form a weapons production business, selling their wares exclusively to Christian battle outposts and missionaries in distant galaxies

      Sound vaguely familiar to me.

  35. Tax Write Off? by clandaith · · Score: 1

    So, what if they change their pricing plans...

    "For a donation to the church of $19.95 we will refill your printer cartriges for free."

    Then, you can write off the donation!

    1. Re:Tax Write Off? by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      If LaserMonks is 501(c)(3), then I think it's a write-off. IANAL or Tax expert though!

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    2. Re:Tax Write Off? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Not quite, part of the deal about writing off charitable contributions is that you don't recieve any goods or services in exchange for the donation, otherwise the church would be the world's most powerful outsourcing firm and grocery.

      Every reciept I've ever recieved for a donation says something to the effect of 'no goods or services were exchanged for this donation, keep this form for taxes'

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  36. Thanks for the warning by frovingslosh · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's good to know these things. Without being warned I might have actually done business with them and become part of the problem of them forcing their religious views on the "ignorant pegans" around the world. And, yes, I do know what I'm talking about - I was brought up in that cult as a child.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Thanks for the warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now you're part of slashdot. coincidence? i think nyet!

    2. Re:Thanks for the warning by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Is a pegan, anything like a vegan?

    3. Re:Thanks for the warning by iainf · · Score: 1

      Shame you can't spell "pagan", then.

    4. Re:Thanks for the warning by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, they never eat anything that ever had to pee

      --Joey

    5. Re:Thanks for the warning by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1
      Hypocrite.

      One of the basic tenets of Christianity is the spreading of the gospel. Your intolerance to their religious beliefs is akin to you forcing your religion, or lack thereof, on them.

      It a vicious circle my friend.

    6. Re:Thanks for the warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know what you're talking about, why in the h-e-double-toothpicks can't you spell pagan? (Pardon my French.)

    7. Re:Thanks for the warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is a pegan, anything like a vegan?

      Yes. And his GF has a vegana.

    8. Re:Thanks for the warning by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      If you know what you're talking about, why in the h-e-double-toothpicks can't you spell pagan? (Pardon my French.)

      Catholic school education

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  37. err .. by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

    I for one would like to welcome our toner cartridge weilding lasermonk overlords ?

  38. My favorite is Chimay beer by swb · · Score: 1

    And their cheese is pretty good, too.

  39. A reasonable question by Maigus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are there going to be any comments to this story which aren't modded "funny"? I mean really, what can you say?

    1. Re:A reasonable question by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      I mean really, what can you say?

      Are there going to be any comments to this story which aren't modded "funny"?

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  40. Used it by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

    Yeah they're cheap as hell but the refurbished (is that the word to use?) cartridge for my HP 970 cxi flat out didn't work. In fact, I think my printer's been really confused since.

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  41. great organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    You mean they can give me a reason not to buy from them two times ??

    1. inferior refilled inkjet cartriges AND
    2. supporting a church

    I for one do not EVER willingly do business with any organization or entity that has a religious component.

    No boy scouts, no Christian Childrens Fund, no Salvation Army, nothing fishy. .. and this isn't just about christianity ,. it's any religion, just happens that the majority religion in my area is christian.

  42. New twist on an old idea. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Monks used inks to copy and illuminate manuscripts throughout the middle ages.

    Now they are selling us the ink to copy and illuminate whatever manuscripts we want.

    Since I'm pretty sure those ancient monks never had permission to copy any of the works they did, does that make them the original data pirates?

    1 0WnZ0r y3 0ld 4$5

    1. Re:New twist on an old idea. by Jaywalk · · Score: 1

      Since the Middle Ages didn't start until about a thousand years after the text was already written, I think it would have been public domain even with the bone-headed extension act.

      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    2. Re:New twist on an old idea. by citog · · Score: 1

      ... guess you could call the Crusades the transport method of an early P2P network then

    3. Re:New twist on an old idea. by gerardlt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, copyright did not begin to form as an idea until the 17th - 18th Centuries.

      The huge cost of reproducing a book meant that it was not a problem until the movable type printing press became popular at the end of the fifteenth century - which ultimately put the monks out of that kind of business.

      Interestingly, the way that reproduction happened in the middle ages (and before) was was very similar the way that people copy music now. Essentially, a monastery would swap works with it's "friends" (other monasteries, generally).

      Sources:

      • http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/end middle/bluedot/print.html
      • http://arl.cni.org/info/frn/copy/timeline.html
      • The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco (Fiction).
      --
      /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
    4. Re:New twist on an old idea. by Quixotic137 · · Score: 1

      Since I'm pretty sure those ancient monks never had permission to copy any of the works they did, does that make them the original data pirates?

      I think they could argue that God gave them permission to copy the bible...

    5. Re:New twist on an old idea. by base3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but did the publisher who required transfer of the copyright to get it printed give permission :)?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    6. Re:New twist on an old idea. by MooCows · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they could argue that God gave them permission to copy the bible...

      I hope so, or there's gonna be one hell of a lawsuit

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    7. Re:New twist on an old idea. by Newspimp · · Score: 1

      Just how long does it take for a monk to manually write out a copyright notice these days... :)

    8. Re:New twist on an old idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the copyright lasts until 75 years after the death of God.

    9. Re:New twist on an old idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you presumably don't want to swap books (or music) with your enemies, and it's pretty hard to do so with people you don't know. Wouldn't you pretty much have to swap with friends?

      Modern music swapping, OTOH, is much more likely to be a matter of widespread swapping with those you don't know, thanks to P2P apps. For that matter, some people are going out of their way to try to create P2P networks that guarantee you're in the "someone you don't know" category.

    10. Re:New twist on an old idea. by tc9 · · Score: 1

      The hallmark of the Celtic monk, source of many of those manuscripts was a bound, locked book hanging from the belt. Hiking across europe, reading each night, always the Bible, oftne two or three other books, like as not quite secular.

  43. Complaints by vpscolo · · Score: 1

    what if it goes wrong? Do you think God would give a refund?

    Rus

  44. BonsaiMonk has been doing this for a while now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check it out here now if only there were a technoGeek monastery somewhere...

    1. Re:BonsaiMonk has been doing this for a while now by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      if only there were a technoGeek monastery somewhere...

      What, the Scary Devil Monastery isn't good enough for you?

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  45. Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That not even God can stand a slashdotting.

    1. Re:Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please distingush between His Servants and The Real McCoy

      kthxbye

    2. Re:Just goes to show... by citog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Read the article: Rev. Bernard McCoy runs the operation. Is he 'real' enough? :)

  46. A slashdot atheist! by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Wow! No wonder I keep coming back here.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  47. Re:Some facts... by RabidStoat · · Score: 1
    1. The bible is not a fairy tale. It is put together as a collection of independant first hand accounts, not mythology.

    Which version are we talking about here ? If it's a collection of first hand accounts why so many different edits ? Shurely they aren't putting a little spin on the stories to match them up to the social ails of the day ? No, didn't think so.

  48. Re:My wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever chatted with a Protestant? Christianity isn't a religion, its a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP!

    Its all in your head though, of course.

  49. Glory to God Towing by alw53 · · Score: 2, Funny


    We used to have a Glory to God
    Towing company in Fort Collins.

    1. Re:Glory to God Towing by jamesots · · Score: 1
      We used to have a Glory to God
      Towing company in Fort Collins.


      In Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya, there's a "Glory to God Butchery".

      --
      Ho hum for the life of a bear
  50. getting slow so... by hellish+products · · Score: 1, Interesting

    this may or may not get modded to hell based on you're personal religous and spiritual orientation. Monk e-business BY JULIO OJEDA-ZAPATA Pioneer Press More photos JIM GEHRZ PHOTO The Rev. Bernard McCoy heads up LaserMonks -- when he isn't praying, of course. SPARTA, Wis. -- Phone calls to LaserMonks' rural headquarters are sometimes tinged with caution or outright suspicion. Those are awfully good prices for generic inkjet or laser-printer cartridges, a caller might remark after checking the offerings at www.lasermonks.com. What's the catch? And, c'mon, you aren't really monks, are you? A recent caller lost seven years of savings to an online scam artist after trying to book a cruise for herself and her daughters. She vowed never to buy anything else on the Internet. But with three printers churning out student papers in her Pennsylvania home, she couldn't ignore discounts of up to 90 percent over name-brand cartridges. Look, she told LaserMonks, she had trust issues. She needed the firm to set her mind at ease. LaserMonks' response helps explain why the two-year-old e-commerce venture based at the Cistercian Abbey of Our Lady of Spring Bank -- yes, with actual Catholic monks -- appears to be on a stratospheric business trajectory. At a time when online printer-cartridge vendors can trigger mistrust because of some questionable offers clogging inboxes, LaserMonks has seen its gross revenue soar from about $2,000 in 2002 to about $500,000 in 2003. Projected 2004 sales are three to four times higher still. To pull off this e-tailing feat, LaserMonks has had to win over disbelievers with high-quality products and top-flight customer service along with rock-bottom prices, not to mention small but meaningful gestures its clients don't expect. The skeptical Pennsylvania mother, for instance, got four cartridges on speculation. Try 'em out, LaserMonks said. If you like them, consider sending us a few bucks. No hurry, take a few months to think it over. The company soon got paid in full for the shipment, along with a second order for four cartridges. ORA ET LABORA The 75-year-old abbey, which has been at its current location about 130 miles southeast of St. Paul for 19 years, isn't the sort of place that screams "e-commerce hotbed." Perched on a wooded hill, just up an unpaved road and through a decorative gateway, the low-slung composite-stone structure seems bereft of life -- until Gregorian chanting tips off a visitor that white-and-black-robed inhabitants are somewhere about. Inside a small chapel, a few Cistercian priests melodiously remind themselves of the Latin dictum ora et labora -- prayer and work, always in that order. Only then does the 36-year-old Rev. Bernard McCoy trod through a carpeted hallway to his modest office -- the LaserMonks nerve center. From there, he oversees a nationwide network of people and facilities in his practical role as the abbey's "steward of temporal affairs." McCoy's key role: generating cash to support the abbey along with its complex array of charitable causes around the world. That also means overseeing a modest portfolio of real-estate holdings. One recent day, he haggled good-naturedly with the local tax assessor over one property's perceived value. Before LaserMonks came about, McCoy obsessed over other ideas for turning his perennially cash-strapped monastery into a money machine. Until last year, he sold spiritual books and other religious items on the Web. For a while, he oversaw a program to move and renovate homes due for demolition. He has considered cultivating shiitake mushrooms, building a golf resort and breeding Christmas trees. This is a common issue for monasteries, convents and other such communities, which typically must support themselves. Trappistine nuns in Dubuque, Iowa, make candy. Nearby Trappist monks build caskets. Oregon Trappists warehouse wine. Massachusetts Trappists make jams and jellies. Belgian Trappists brew beer. Filipino monks and nuns make fruit concoctions dubbed Food for the Soul. Greek Orthodox monks in Resaca, Ga., sell han

    --
    This sig blantantly stolen by a pack of robo-monkeys.
    1. Re:getting slow so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't even bother to put in line spacing, or paragraph formatting... Man, you are slacking on your duties as a Karma Whore....

    2. Re:getting slow so... by hellish+products · · Score: 3, Informative

      lazy...

      Monk e-business
      BY JULIO OJEDA-ZAPATA
      Pioneer Press
      More photos JIM GEHRZ PHOTO
      The Rev. Bernard McCoy heads up LaserMonks -- when he isn't praying, of course.

      SPARTA, Wis. -- Phone calls to LaserMonks' rural headquarters are sometimes tinged with caution or outright suspicion.

      Those are awfully good prices for generic inkjet or laser-printer cartridges, a caller might remark after checking the offerings at www.lasermonks.com.

      What's the catch?

      And, c'mon, you aren't really monks, are you?

      A recent caller lost seven years of savings to an online scam artist after trying to book a cruise for herself and her daughters. She vowed never to buy anything else on the Internet.

      But with three printers churning out student papers in her Pennsylvania home, she couldn't ignore discounts of up to 90 percent over name-brand cartridges. Look, she told LaserMonks, she had trust issues. She needed the firm to set her mind at ease.

      LaserMonks' response helps explain why the two-year-old e-commerce venture based at the Cistercian Abbey of Our Lady of Spring Bank -- yes, with actual Catholic monks -- appears to be on a stratospheric business trajectory.

      At a time when online printer-cartridge vendors can trigger mistrust because of some questionable offers clogging inboxes, LaserMonks has seen its gross revenue soar from about $2,000 in 2002 to about $500,000 in 2003. Projected 2004 sales are three to four times higher still.

      To pull off this e-tailing feat, LaserMonks has had to win over disbelievers with high-quality products and top-flight customer service along with rock-bottom prices, not to mention small but meaningful gestures its clients don't expect.

      The skeptical Pennsylvania mother, for instance, got four cartridges on speculation. Try 'em out, LaserMonks said. If you like them, consider sending us a few bucks. No hurry, take a few months to think it over.

      The company soon got paid in full for the shipment, along with a second order for four cartridges.

      ORA ET LABORA

      The 75-year-old abbey, which has been at its current location about 130 miles southeast of St. Paul for 19 years, isn't the sort of place that screams "e-commerce hotbed."

      Perched on a wooded hill, just up an unpaved road and through a decorative gateway, the low-slung composite-stone structure seems bereft of life -- until Gregorian chanting tips off a visitor that white-and-black-robed inhabitants are somewhere about.

      Inside a small chapel, a few Cistercian priests melodiously remind themselves of the Latin dictum ora et labora -- prayer and work, always in that order.

      Only then does the 36-year-old Rev. Bernard McCoy trod through a carpeted hallway to his modest office -- the LaserMonks nerve center. From there, he oversees a nationwide network of people and facilities in his practical role as the abbey's "steward of temporal affairs."

      McCoy's key role: generating cash to support the abbey along with its complex array of charitable causes around the world. That also means overseeing a modest portfolio of real-estate holdings. One recent day, he haggled good-naturedly with the local tax assessor over one property's perceived value.

      Before LaserMonks came about, McCoy obsessed over other ideas for turning his perennially cash-strapped monastery into a money machine. Until last year, he sold spiritual books and other religious items on the Web. For a while, he oversaw a program to move and renovate homes due for demolition. He has considered cultivating shiitake mushrooms, building a golf resort and breeding Christmas trees.

      This is a common issue for monasteries, convents and other such communities, which typically must support themselves.

      Trappistine nuns in Dubuque, Iowa, make candy. Nearby Trappist monks build caskets. Oregon Trappists warehouse wine. Massachusetts Trappists make jams and jellies. Belgian Trappists brew beer. Filipino monks and nuns make fruit concoctions d

      --
      This sig blantantly stolen by a pack of robo-monkeys.
  51. Vocations to the Priesthood by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Having fewer signups into priesthood, the Catholic Church officially announced that they will be issuing standard lasers to people who complete the training program. The Pope noted that "this is a momentous occasion. Since the film Star Wars came out, the Church had contemplated issuing Light Sabers but did not want the public to know that we had such technology. Until now, we only dress like jedi knights."

    On a more serious note, it's a difficult job raising money in a monastery. Unless you happen to attract genetically altered rich folks that answer to the name "47" (Hitman 2), you'll need to find creative ways to earn a living. I've heard quite a few that have products for sale ranging from seasonal fruitcake, chocolates, and now toner cartridges.

    Wake me when the amish start selling toner cartridges.

  52. Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    And where would geeks be without caffeine? Try Monastery Blend Coffee from the Christ the All-merciful Saviour Russian Orthodox Monstery on Vashon Island near Seattle. Excellent stuff.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by zulux · · Score: 1



      Monistary Belnd cofee is roasted by Coffe Appassionato . REALLY GOOD STUFF. Some of the finest cofee you can buy.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Is there by any chance a central list of all the stuff you can buy from monasteries? Would be kinda interesting, especially since per what folks have posted here, there seem to be plenty of unique products.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea for a website.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yep. Now to find the ambitious webmaster to make it. They can use your tagline as the main title. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      If I were personally that ambitious, I'd have about 3 different websites running even as we speak.

      Actually, I don't know how many monasteries sell items that really are aimed (deliberately or not) at the geek lifestyle. Mostly they sell religious items, which shouldn't be too surprising but which also limits interested customers to their co-religionists. It might end up as a rather small listing if it aims at geek- or general-interest products.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:Other Monastic Geek Suppliers by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have a dozen or so websites, but none of that particular ambition :)

      Tho you'd think it would be a good project for the monks themselves. (But first, a total redo of the lasermonks site -- good gods, what a horrible mishmash of ugly code! looks like it started life in Word and got dumped thru a couple other editors, plus some copy and paste js...)

      If religious items sold that well, monasteries wouldn't be strapped for cash. Stuff appealing to folks who shop online (which often tends to be geeky stuff) clearly has a better market. Hmm.. ya know, if this keeps up, the monastic system just might get dragged kicking and screaming into the 13th century. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  53. Sweatshop monks? by serutan · · Score: 1

    The article mentions in passing that the monks achieve their great 90% discount prices through "canny negotiations" with manufacturers, but distinctly does not say which manufacturers. Could they be the original mfrs? Are HP and Lexmark welcoming these guys as competitors and cutting them a huge break? Or (more likely) are we talking about the same overseas child-employing sweatshops that supply all the other incredibly cheap goods we're used to? I'd kind of like to know.

    1. Re:Sweatshop monks? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      A scenario:

      Canny Monk Negotiator: Give us supplies at a huge discount, and we'll say prayers for you.

      Toner Dealer: [silence]

      Canny Monk Negotiator: OK, if you don't help us out, you'll be going straight to Hell.

      Toner Dealer: I sell toner for a living. Hell holds nothing fearful for me.

      Canny Monk Negotiator: Give us a good deal, and you can write off the balance from your taxes.

      Toner Dealer: You're a very canny negotiator. Where do we ship it?


      Simple. And of course the toner dealer gets the toner from his sweatshop. What's your point?

      Virg

  54. Re:Some facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bible was compiled as a teaching tool. We do hold its contents to be divinely inspired, though. That means the faith and traditions of the early Christians came LONG BEFORE the Bible was compiled. (Yes, Catholics had compilers!)

    The Bible was then compiled to aid in the teaching and propagation of the faith. The writings were done and directed at people for the social ails of THEIR day. (surprisingly enough, a lot of it still applies to the social ails of this day)

    There were writings that did exist but went against the faith and traditions -- they didn't include those.

    Later on, people decided they wanted to interpret the teaching tool differently. That's like someone editing/printing a HOWTO and someone else picking it up and arguing with the editors about what the HOWTO is for.

    So we have the Bible...and other people's versions of it with their own interpretations, rules, and spin. Now if you want to celebrate your Christian faith the way the Apostles did -- you've really just got one choice.

  55. Ink, the other white meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, what we really need is a couple more abbeys making good beer. Those Belgian monks aren't cranking it out fast enough. 8-)

  56. I Need 300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need 300 of those InkJet cartridges for my orphanage in Nigeria. Pleaze pleaze help me get ink catridges. The Orphans ore so very hungry.

    Larry Catina Davis

  57. What can I say? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would you like friars with that?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  58. Re:Some facts... by citog · · Score: 1

    I think he's aiming at subliminal 'stud' link ... :)

  59. Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but nobody really had to say it. Except for you.

  60. Re:Some facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. "a collection of independant first hand accounts". No it isn't, and anyone who says it is hasn't studied the bible.
    3. At least nominally.
    4. This means what, precisely? Being a christian means you have a high IQ? Puhleese. Go tell it to Gallileo. Algebra was invented by muslims, Euclid, Pythagoras et al would have believed in the greek pantheon and so on. If "most" of the scientifik discoveries of the 19-20C were made by "christians' because the prevailing norm was that everyone identified as a christian.
    5. oh but the bible does..? yeah right.

  61. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats hilarious!

  62. Re:Some facts... by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

    You know I read this over and over and still can't work out if you are serious or not. Personally I think, if you are serious, you've got a pretty strange grasp on reality.

  63. Bah you know by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    Scribe, laser printers, same thing really.

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  64. DMCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't this already been determined to fail DMCA? (specifically Lexmark)

  65. But... by GozerBrothers · · Score: 2, Funny

    do they only sell Brother ink cartridges?

  66. Huh? by devphil · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since I'm pretty sure those ancient monks never had permission to copy any of the works they did,

    Citations, please?

    I'm pretty sure they did. Because many of the copied manuscripts have little line-counts in the margins, called stichoi, noting how many lines the scribe copied that day, so that the person hiring the monks to do the work knew how much to pay him. Perfectly legitimate job.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Huh? by sceptre1067 · · Score: 1

      True... though my wife's memory of the time period (she's the expert) is that some Monastaries did copy with out permission from the owner of the original manuscript. In such cases, if discovered, the monastary had to turn over all copies to the owner...

      -pc

    2. Re:Huh? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Her memory of the time period? You really go for the older ladies, eh?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Huh? by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      Or maybe she just reads about it a lot :/

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
    4. Re:Huh? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      memory, n.

      1. The mental faculty of retaining and recalling past experience.
      2. The act or an instance of remembering; recollection: spent the afternoon lost in memory.
      3. All that a person can remember: It hasn't happened in my memory.
      4. Something remembered: pleasant childhood memories.
      5. The fact of being remembered; remembrance: dedicated to their parents' memory.
      6. The period of time covered by the remembrance or recollection of a person or group of persons: within the memory of humankind.
      7. Biology. Persistent modification of behavior resulting from an animal's experience.

      Reading about something cannot give you memory, only an understanding.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sense 3 applies here. "All that she can remember from reading about the period".

    6. Re:Huh? by sceptre1067 · · Score: 1

      I guess, she keeps mumbling about how there can only be one...

      I'm just tired of having to hide these headless bodies. :-P

  67. Honesty is dead long live honesty!!!! by Swai · · Score: 0

    Everybody in the geek world know the 'fashion' of recycling ink cartridges is only a scam to make others rich through the ink refilling industry operating beneath. Shame on those who hide behind a false good cause to make money. Plain and square: decency and honesty have no room these days.

  68. Lazermonks? by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    And God sayeth unto the people:

    "You know, I have one simple request - and that is, to have monks with frikkin' laser beams attached to their heads!"

    Amen.

  69. for no reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason for circumcision.

    1. Re:for no reason. by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      Hygiene. Us lazy Americans think it's too much work to pull back a foreskin.

    2. Re:for no reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average slashdotter wacks it five times a day. Think of all the extra calories you could burn pushing back that foreskin! You could drink twice as much Mountain Dew!

  70. They also outsource windows hardware config... by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Funny

    The REAL plug 'n pray ;-)

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  71. Re: Monks and candy, yeah by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1

    The gentle folk at Gethesmani do an excellent bourbon fudge. Mmmm...

  72. That's proof of something else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's proof these people BELIEVED in the fairy tale, not proof that the fairy tale is real.

    1. Re:That's proof of something else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But come on, that is the whole point.

      We believe in the bible because a bunch of bishops, many in Egypt (like Origen, the great god of the bible, although he later got, um, expurged, oops), got together and bartered and came up with a compromise "bible", and we believe in those bishops, so we believe in their bible.

      Its all very scientific, really :)

  73. they have a plane?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The monk in the article has has a plane for business trips.

    Somehow, this seems to undermine my faith in this enterprise.

    They also haven't actually done anything charitable with the $500,000 revenue so far. There's great tax advantages in being a charity; and everyone goes out of their way to help you.

    I hope I'm just being too cynical?

  74. technicalities by fermion · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    and playing with their dogs Luxor, an Egyptian Pharaoh hound, and Ludwig, a Doberman pinscher.
    periodically heads aloft in a 1954 Piper Tri-Pacer recently donated to the abbey and maintained by private donations
    he will use it for travel to business meetings as LaserMonks continues to grow.
    McCoy, like his brethren, is allowed no possessions other than a few mementos with deep meaning.

    I think this is why some religious organizations have such a bad name. Although they preach humility, piety and charity, as you dig deeper you find pure bred dogs, private aircraft, and a desire not to mix with unwashed masses by flying commercial. Sure they don't own anything, but that is almost like a rich man transferring assets to a proxy to avoid taxes and insure entrance to heaven. These things have to be more than technical requirements.

    Combine this with their heavy sales pitch that a purchase will help those less fortunate, and one gets close to the likes of girl scout extortion, the selling of papal indulgences, and claiming to be the protector of the environment while sucking electricity like there is no next generation.

    There are a lot of fine religious leaders out there. I have worked with many of them, and the come from all faiths. Most of them would not consider excessive luxuries for themselves before the needs of others. Most of them would take responsibility for they blessings they use, and not hide behind technicalities.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:technicalities by technos · · Score: 1

      Eh.. You can pick purebred dogs out of a linup at most any pound. And I'm sure 99% of the pounds out there are going to waive the "neuter/spay and shots" fee when the guys wandering through the door are a bunch of monks.

      Airplane? Woop. Was prolly a $4,000 ont time tax writeoff, and three guys in an antique Cessna probably works out cheaper than commercial, especially when all you're paying for is gas.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  75. Not the first time.... by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    it was a medieval practice for a monastery to be self supportive.

    Dom perignon anyone?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  76. Faith and Its Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, read this:

    Somehow, the Christians have managed to brainwash themselves into thinking that faith somehow justifies their belief in a deity. Faith is central to the Christian religion, and all "true" Christians are required to have a significant amount of it. After asking a person what their reason for believing in an invisible sky pixie is, the answer is often "faith". I'm not entirely sure how faith became the most common answer to such questions, but one thing is for certain: the Christians who think in this manner have no idea what faith really is, and more importantly, what it implies when one must resort to it.

    Faith is defined as belief without evidence that supports the belief. Having faith in the existence of God quite simply means that there is no evidence supporting his existence. That is, after all, exactly what faith is. I find it amusing when a Christian claims that he or she has found irrefutable proof of God, for such a thing would make faith of this sort impossible. Belief isn't faith if the belief has been proven. Seeing as faith is so important to Christianity, proof of the existence of God would actually be rather detrimental to their principles.

    Consider the statement "I believe because I have faith." I personally have encountered this statement many times when arguing with Christians. Let's examine this reasoning more closely. If faith is defined as belief without evidence, then the statement can be rewritten as, "I believe because I believe without evidence," which essentially means, "I believe because I believe." This is purely circular reasoning. The same kind of logic is used by five-year-olds when asked a "why" question. Ask a child of that age why he did a certain thing, and he may very well answer "Because," and nothing more. Ask him, "because why?", and he will again reply with, "Because." The same circular logic is used by Christians when answering why questions with faith. Faith, therefore, is not an answer of any kind to questions concerning the reasons for religious belief.

    Suppose for a minute that faith did somehow justify a belief in God. If it can be used as reasoning for the belief in one god, then why not another? If having faith in the Christian god somehow makes the belief in him valid, then wouldn't it also validate a belief in Zeus, Odin, or Thor? If Christians are supported in their beliefs, then so are members of every other religion with a belief in a deity.

    The only reason that faith is a major part of Christianity is that there simply is no evidence for the existence of God. Christians must resort to faith because there is, and never will be, proof of God. If there were, then they would be using it in their arguments, not just depending on blind, baseless, and irrational dogmatic beliefs.

    Taken from this page

  77. Re:Some facts... by btakita · · Score: 1

    This means what, precisely? Being a christian means you have a high IQ? Puhleese. Go tell it to Gallileo.

    You're bantering the same horse as the parent. (Not)? Being a Christian does not preclude someone from being smart.

    Anyways, Galileo was a Christian. However, a faction in the inquisition didn't like his discoveries because it threatened their world view and|or power.

  78. Re:Some facts... by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 1

    1. ...that was writen about 30 years after the fact.

    2. true but irrelevant.

    3.At least half of Americans are overweight, your point?

    4.Has to do with number 3, theres so man of them; and I'll bet you could find a similar statistic about famous criminals

    5. evolution goes pretty deep into explanation and what do you expect, I dont think that science should have all the answers by 2004 AD(ignore that) we havent even cured the common cold.

    Bottom line: Never argue with a man about religion, sports, politics, music, or OS preference.

  79. Yes - Discussing with religious people is tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read a bit about it here, it's quite good!

  80. Not talking about "proof" of Christianity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Christianity exists. How? Easy, some of my relatives adhere to this belief system. I've seen it in person. So yes, Christianity, the collection of people who beieve in a greater being named God who sent forth a man named Jesus, it exists.

    But the thing in which Christians (and Muslims and Jews) believe in? Belief in God with no proof that this entity even exists. That's the fairy tale.

  81. Monks who illuminate web pages by Fjornir · · Score: 1

    Hey, I guess I'm the only one who remembered these guys when this story rolled around, but there's an order of monks who will illuminate web pages!

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  82. One stop shopping by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
    Since I'm always praying the print head will last as long as the cartridge this is the perfect combination of services.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  83. Somebody modded him flamebait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must have been one of the monks themselves :-)

  84. Re:w17 7h332 f002 by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    That's odd, most of the large software companies have led me to believe those are the same thing...

    --
    True story.
  85. Re: Monks and candy, yeah by jfandre · · Score: 0
  86. Ya, but do you black-out? by msimm · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you don't at least see little people its not really worth it. I'll just have another Guinness.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Ya, but do you black-out? by steeef · · Score: 1

      I drink it for the taste (and the smell). Guinness is great, but I like finishing up a night at the bar with a shot of Chartreuse.

    2. Re:Ya, but do you black-out? by msimm · · Score: 1

      I was just being daft. I mainly stick to simple drinks like beer or single malts. It sounds like an interesting drink, but the next fancy drink on my list is still Absinthe. Bless them little people!

      :)

      --
      Quack, quack.
  87. Do they think I am a godless heathen or What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to go to the monk's website, and this is what I got:
    Access to this server is forbidden from your client
    I'm using mozilla on knoppix. What's the deal?

    scifiber_phil,

  88. Cough! by msimm · · Score: 1

    If you like to get all your calories from sugar. Its like eating a Snickers bar in a glass. Give me an IPA or a single malt.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  89. Re:Some facts... by Jaywalk · · Score: 1
    Which version are we talking about here? If it's a collection of first hand accounts why so many different edits?
    Do you mean in edits in transmission or translation? As far as transmission goes, that's what textual criticism is for. Theoretically, critical texts should be able to cull out later edits from the original text. If you check the underlying text of modern bible translations, there are only trivial differences. Even the non-critical texts (like the Textus Receptus) don't provide a lot of ground-shaking variations from the later versions.

    Translation variations are more likely to be for historical or scholastic reasons than anything else, but history plays a part as well. For example, the King James version was partly created to produce an English translation to displace the Geneva Bible, mainly because James didn't like the footnotes in the latter. But it wouldn't have gotten anywhere if it didn't pass intellectual muster. Later translations such as the Revised Standard Version and the New International Version were made mostly to clean up the older version of English and to apply textual criticism principles to the contents.

    Bottom line is that they're all pretty similar and the differences that exist are pretty unimportant. Think about it; tinkering with a translation is more likely to get you laughed at by anyone who knows the language, and the languages are too well known to just muck around with. Any modern Greek can pick up a copy of the New Testament and read the original language. If he knows English too, there's not a lot of wiggle room for a biased translator to move around.

    Not that people don't try. Lots of cults produce their own "interpretations", but they're just not accepted. The major translations don't have a lot of variations either in the translation or the underlying text. The big difference isn't the interpretation of the text, but applying it to real life. If you want to see an editor's bias, keep an eye on the footnotes.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
  90. Re:Some facts... by infernalC · · Score: 1

    The Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Catholic Churches and the Eastern Orthodox Churches (collectively the Apostolic Churches, because they have valid, unbroken apostolic succession [which is also debatably claimed by Anglican bishops]) derive all translations of their bibles directly or indirectly from the Hebrew scriptures (the Law and the Prophets) and the Septuagint. The Septuagint adds several Greek texts to the Law and the Prophets to round out the Christian Old Testament (including the Wisdom of Jesus Son of Sirach, certain pieces of the Book of Daniel, etc.), and the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles and the Revelation to John, which compose the New Testament. The Protestant and Pentecostal Churches have at times left out certain Greek writings in the Old Testament which the Apostolic Churches call deuterocanonical and they call apocryphal, some because it reduces printing costs and others because they question the inspiration of them. The western churches nearly all leave out the Books of Maccabees beyond the second because they were omitted by St. Jerome in his translation into Latin, called the Vulgate, which was used almost exclusively in the Roman Church until the Second Vatican Council.

    The neccessity of all the edits arises out of the diversity and dynamic nature of the common languages. Should we all not speak different languages, the Septuagint and the Vulgate would likely be sufficient. Should English not have changed since the 15th century, Anglicans would probably all still use King James' Authorized translation. But this is not the case. Even most of Jesus' own words were probably never written in any language but Greek, although his primary and possibly only language was Aramaic, spoken today only in the Assyrian Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

    I hope you have some appreciation for what I wrote here, and I hope I did not offend anyone. This is not intended to be flamebait.

    In nomine Patris, et Filii, + et Spiritus Sancti. Amen.

  91. View from HP? by LS · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I work at HP, and when I go to their website, all I get is:

    "Access to this server is forbidden from your client"

    Not very friendly monks, now are they?

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:View from HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get that same error, and I'm in Wisconsin and have nothing to do with HP.

      It may be a 'from slashdot' thing, or a Microsoft ASP page thing.

      Either way, not willing to change clients to obtain access. I am willing to call them collect and discuess thier lack of understanding of the idea of web access. And I'm willing to use the 'free' cellphone minutes on weekends to call and leave a toll callback number so they incure an expense because they 'forbade' Mozilla.

    2. Re:View from HP? by omarius · · Score: 1

      Tried it (from a Virginia community college) in IE and Mozilla, and got the same error.

      Snot jus yew.

    3. Re:View from HP? by monkhelper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you willing to be open minded and take into consideration that our web host cut us off due to unusually high traffic? We had to do more than pray to get back up and running.

    4. Re:View from HP? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I work at HP, and when I go to their website, all I get is:
      "Access to this server is forbidden from your client"
      Not very friendly monks, now are they?

      I'm in California. The site works fine when I go there with IE, but in Mozilla, I get "No web site is configured at this address."

      They are sniffing user agent strings. Your client being in Asia has nothing to do with it.

    5. Re:View from HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you willing to be open minded--You're new to Slashdot, aren't you? :-)

  92. Re:Some facts... by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

    Indeed. From what little bit I studied the Bible, it is commonly accepted that all of the gospels were written long enough after the death of Christ that not one of them could have been a first hand account by anyone alive at the time. They have references to historical events known to have occurred as much as centuries later, for crying out loud. I am not saying the Bible isn't true. I am not saying the Gospels don't tell a true story. I am just saying you certainly can't prove any part of the Bible to be true by broadly calling it a collection of first hand accounts.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  93. hmmmm.... by hbean · · Score: 1

    ...apparently even god can't protect a server from a good slashdotting :)

    --
    "Give someone a program, frustrate them for a day... Teach someone to program, frustrate them for a lifetime."
  94. Re:My wish by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 1

    Then why the hell are you browseing slashdot?

  95. "Access to this server is forbidden..." by SylvesterTheCat · · Score: 1

    ...from your client"

    I wonder if this means that I should to go home and rethink my life...

    1. Re:"Access to this server is forbidden..." by Bellhead · · Score: 1

      Me, too: both IE and Netscape give the same error message. Anyone else blocked?

    2. Re:"Access to this server is forbidden..." by monkhelper · · Score: 1

      Our webhost shut us down due to traffic. Absolutely ridiculous. Recommendations for a good webhost would be divinely welcome.

    3. Re:"Access to this server is forbidden..." by 17028 · · Score: 1

      Miracle Hosting Network. Profits go to charities, mainly child related.

      http://www.miraclehosting.com/

      Tell them that Thomas (the programmer) sent you!

  96. Lasermonks by forgetful · · Score: 1

    Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach (Might apply) I'm just an old nerd from before it had anything to do with computers. When I try to connect via:http://www.lasermonks.com/ I get this message: Access to this server is forbidden from your client What's with that?

    --
    "...while history is usually explicable it is often irrational" --Roger Spiller
    1. Re:Lasermonks by monkhelper · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am a monkhelper and because of the wonderful newspaper article about Lasermonks and the traffic from your site, our webhost shut us down because traffic was flooding the server. We greatly apologize for this and would love for one of you techno-wiz-people to recommend a good host that will grow with us and allow us as much bandwidth as we need. And yes, they really are monks and are extraordinary human beings. I like to say that the vision behind Lasermonks is "technology meets theology" with a bit of spice.

    2. Re:Lasermonks by tvh2k · · Score: 1

      Well just how much traffic are we talking about? Keep in mind that the slashdot effect will wear off soon, particularly when this story drops off the front page.

    3. Re:Lasermonks by archivis · · Score: 1

      Yeah the slashdotting wears off...but what about the scars?

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
  97. Re:Some facts... by cfuse · · Score: 1
    Before we start the anti-christian trolling, here's a few facts:

    1. The bible is not a fairy tale. It is put together as a collection of independant first hand accounts, not mythology.

    Like all first hand accounts, it should be taken with a large grain of salt. Added to the fact that the source documents have been translated through several languages and heavily edited.

    4. Many (most) important scientific discoveries throughout history have been made by Christians (Wright brothers...)

    So what? what's this got to do with anything? It could be argued that these christians managed to make their discoveries despite their religion (think about the middle ages/renaissance when you could quite literally be burnt at the stake for challenging church beliefs, the earth is not flat and the world is not at the centre of the universe).

    Many critical discoveries were made before christianity was of any note. Hippocrates, Pythagoras, Archimedes and Plato spring to mind.

    5. Science has not explained many fundamental characteristics of the universe... and evolution doesn't fully explain how complex life developed. Science doesn't (yet) provide all the answers.

    I'll take science over ignorance any day. How *exactly* has the theory of evolution not explained complex life developing?

    If religion works for you, great. For me, religion represents an excuse not to take responsibility for ones own decisions and living a false reality where people are something other than smart primates.

  98. Re:My wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine. Then stop continually mentioning atheism.

    Believe it or not, you do not have some unique right to not be offended. You also do not have some unique right to force other people to talk (or not talk) about things you do or do not want.

  99. /.ed by tvh2k · · Score: 1

    Boy...that was fast. I guess ppl think they're being all religous buying their toner from monks.

  100. scam artists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it's a good deal, but they are lying. It's mandated that they do "prayer before labor" yet if you read through it they pray but never labor.

    In fact, all the work is done through subcontractors.

    I smell a rat, this guy is not supposed to "own" anything, but he has some pretty kickass deals going down, and a big new monastery on the horizon.

  101. Hey.. We know what they are buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kiddie porn, sex toys and altar boys.

  102. While we're all praying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't we pray that certain litigious bastards go away or get severely beaten by the courts sometime soon?

  103. Brand Management? by attonitus · · Score: 1
    This is an updated verson of a very old (middle ages) tradition of monastaries doing some specialized task (and doing it well) and using thier product to sell or barter for needed supplies, food, etc...
    McCoy and his main monk helper, Brother Matthew Ludick, dabbled in a bit of in-house manufacturing before realizing they couldn't keep up with demand nor guarantee top-flight work.

    McCoy then negotiated with a number of contract manufacturers to outsource orders

    Interestingly, what they're specialising in is the monk brand. They don't do any of the manufacture, and they outsource the fulfillment and the customer management too.

    Now, all they need to do is learn from the other very old Christian tradition of excellent franchise management...

  104. Amazing by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1
    I can't believe I'm reading a Slashdot poster who actually appears to understand that baptism replaces circumcision as the initiatory rite into the covenant.

    Shocking. Thank you.

    --

    DFL

    Never send a human to do a machine's job.

    1. Re:Amazing by Theosis · · Score: 1


      I can't believe I'm reading a Slashdot poster who actually appears to understand that baptism replaces circumcision as the initiatory rite into the covenant.

      Shocking. Thank you.


      You're welcome. :-) and thank you.

  105. Re:Some facts... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    1. You can trace the Bibl to its roots. Edited changes are known.

    5. Theolistic evolution. Some small religous groups, such as the Catholic chruch, believe that it is possible the evolution was gods way of creating life.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  106. Re:Some facts... by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1
    From what little bit I studied the Bible, it is commonly accepted that all of the gospels were written long enough after the death of Christ that not one of them could have been a first hand account by anyone alive at the time.

    This turns out not to be the case. In the first place, you would have to say (on the basis of zero evidence) that John was a liar, since he explicitly claims to have been an eyewitness. In the second place, this late dating of the gospels is only "commonly accepted" by people who refuse to believe even the possibility that the content of the gospels is true: hardly an impartial audience.

    More importantly, there is evidence to demonstrate that these naysayers don't know what they are talking about: namely, references to a parody of Matthew that was written by Gamaliel no later than 70AD.

    Well, he couldn't have written a parody of a non-existent document. And he wouldn't have written a parody of a document that no one took seriously. And it would have been pointless to write a parody of a book so new that no one had heard of it. So it's entirely reasonable to suggest that Matthew wrote his gospel no later than 60AD. So in fact there is no reason whatever to pretend that it wasn't written by an eyewitness.

    Now, with respect to Bible books as being universally firsthand accounts - that, of course, is a given: Moses, after all, lived millennia after the events recorded in the early chapters of Genesis; and as you rightly say, this fact doesn't mean that Genesis isn't true.

    --

    DFL

    Never send a human to do a machine's job.

  107. Hypocrite. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    No, the Catholics tried to teach me Hypocrisy. They even told me how good it was when the Pope sent all those missionaries over to the new world to kill the central American Indians and loot their treasures... er, I mean save them from their heathen beliefs. But somehow the cult indoctrination didn't take, I now understand that any and all religions are the worst forms of evil.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  108. Great Way Into Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot a Monk's web server!!!

  109. It's a deal, God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    So if I promise only to have sex with altar boys, can trade all the mp3's I want over kazaa?

  110. Re:Some facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5. Theolistic evolution. Some small religous groups, such as the Catholic chruch, believe that it is possible the evolution was gods way of creating life.

    Hmm, yes. I suppose you if can't silence a threatening idea, just claim it's what you were saying all along.

  111. Re:Some facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I believe in creation as stated in Genesis. However, it was written in poetic form to the people of the day, so the actual details are open to interpretation. Obviously, upon creation (and whatever Big Bang started matter expanding), solar days did not exist... but at that time the day was the basic unit of understood time. In order for our relatively stable universe to have developed, there obviously had to be a number of extremely complex forces. Our universe appears more art than pattern. The "watch in a forest" analogy comes to mind. In addition, I don't contest the fact that all living things came from the same living matter. However, I believe that each creature was created, NOT by natural selection, but by Creation. This isn't to say that natural selection doesn't exist... it does. However, natural selection from a random force would have resulted in patterns. There are no fossiles for transatory species - the times of "evolution" appear to be extremely small with no record. Did they even happen? Taking all the evidence in for myself, I don't see how there could not have been a creator. However, I welcome others views and find it interesting to read about them.

  112. Re:Some facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For me, religion represents an excuse not to take responsibility for ones own decisions and living a false reality where people are something other than smart primates.

    Interesting. For me, atheism is the easy out. It takes a lot of personal responsibility to study Scripture, set aside time for daily prayer, and generally try to descern God's will for my life. The responsibilty is in the free will given to me by God. Religion isn't about deciding what I want to do, then declaring "That's God's will." (although there are some "Christians" who take that tack). Religion is a relationship. And relationships are chock-full of personal responsibility.

    Last time I checked, humans are something more than smart primates. Well, I suppose that doesn't count the ones who are determined to prove that's all they are. :)

    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997

  113. That's not funny by blockhouse · · Score: 1

    5. Holy Orders (when your calling in life is to molest a little boy, apparently)

    Speaking as one who is applying to seminary to study for the Catholic priesthood, and on behalf of the 99.9% of Catholic priests who are all good, holy men, I must take exception to your hateful, prejudiced remark. I would tell you to crawl back under whatever rock you spawned from and die in your own filth, but that wouldn't be Christian of me.

    Instead I'll forgive you and pray for your salvation . . . I somehow think that may be more beneficial to you in the long run.

    1. Re:That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't very funny to the thousands of young children who were abused throughout the last century by Cathloic priests around the world.

    2. Re:That's not funny by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I would tell you to crawl back under whatever rock you spawned from and die in your own filth, but that wouldn't be Christian of me.

      Of course it wouldn't. And by adding that little addendum, of course, you're completely innocent. You didn't say any such thing, merely thought it out loud! You're a truly excellent Christian!

      Perhaps you should worry about praying for your own salvation and improvement. You won't be much of a priest if you're going to be an ass at the first opportunity. Even if "provoked."

      As for the "99.9% of Catholic priests who are all good, holy men," I will begin to believe that when your leaders aren't being dropped like stones for covering up molestations of children. And no, I DON'T mean moving the asshole to Rome instead. Until every one of them who ever touched a child is hung and the Catholic church admits its wrongdoing, admits their policy of covering it up--oops, that document WAS discovered!--admits that their "holier than thou" attitude, which you have just proven, is nothing but a sham, the Church has absolutely no moral or spiritual authority to ask for anybody's salvation but their own and they damn sure don't have the authority to offer any forgiveness but their own.

      Until your entire religion drops its prejudices against women, against gays, against anybody who doesn't agree (going to hell if I'm not Catholic, eh?), you have no moral or spiritual authority to speak of my "prejudice" or anybody elsesr, and surely not to pretend it is in "God's name" or the interests of salvation that you do so.

      Put your own house in order and then you can bitch and lecture about mine.

      If you think this is hateful, just wait until I stop sticking to the facts and really throw my opinion of religion and Catholicism in particular in.

      You may proceed to moderate this as a troll.

    3. Re:That's not funny by loserbert · · Score: 1

      You should read the book The Davinci Code. I'll say no more.

  114. They make their own way to do their own thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Most of you have complained taht TV ebvangelists have begged for money. here are a bunch of Godly men who are working so they can help someone else! I say its great. They are making their own way and trying to offer everyone a good deal on stuff people actually need.

    Help these guys out and I bet they even bless the toner. you will notice they dont hit you up for an offering to pray for you. They pray for you because they love God and they care.

  115. Eh. Prices are mediocre. by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

    I just looked up the cartridge for my printer, at least, (A Samsung ML-1710 - the cheapest laser printer money can buy) and found them for $40 more than I can get them with a simple Froogle search. Similarly scaled differences on a few other random cartridges I searched for.

    Nice domain name, though.

  116. Oh-oh, a geek paradox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A geek needs his printer cartridge refilled. He weighs:

    Pro: Monks do good works
    Con: Monks propagate the virus-meme of religion

    Argh, what to do???

  117. Now shaloinlasermonks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about beeing on the short end of the karmic stick...

  118. Re:Some facts... by technoCon · · Score: 1

    rumor i heard was that the Philosophy department was mad that this uppity Mathematician was talking about celestial bodies and trying to usurp their top slot on the academic ladder and they sicced the church at Galileo to knock him down a peg.

    also heard Galileo's models were less accurate than Ptolemaic models used by the Vatican observatory (he assumed circular, not elliptical orbits). so he had this theory that didn't fit the evidence as well as the Ptolemaics' and the papists rejected it for that reason (among others).

    happily, Galileo taught the church a valuable lesson in biblical hermeneutics: that of phenomenological language. the narrative describes phenomena and not underlying mechanisms. thus, when the weatherman says sun-rise, we know he's speaking phenomologically and not asserting geocentricity.

    mod me down for being off topic. mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa maxima.

  119. Monks != Priests by Elanor · · Score: 1

    Monks aren't priests.

    That is all.

    1. Re:Monks != Priests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some monks are priests. They even have a special title. it depents on weather they are Orthodox or Roman Catholic.

      That is all.

  120. Re:Post Comment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    I just found this comment - I have trolled many, many times but never bothered with a cut n paste or a page widener. Why do you think the inclusion of my login name in the cut n paste means I posted it? I am WELL KNOWN for ALWAYS trolling as myself, and I take it as an insult that I'd be assumed liliy-livered enough to post ANYTHING as an AC.

    I have nothing to hide, save my email address.

    I can't prove that I didn't do the page widener, but my posting history speaks for itself, I will post whatever garbage and insults come into my head, I have no fear of moderation.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  121. Electronic Scriptorium by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

    This recalls an interesting 1996 article from Wired Magazine, called "The Electronic Scriptorium". It discussed the efforts of Religious as transcriptionists, and web page designers.

  122. You are wrong about Catholics by Adam+Rightmann · · Score: 1

    It's Protestants who claim evolution is a lie, and the Earth is 6,000 years old. Catholics believe that evolution and the Big Bang are the most likely explanations for why we are here, they accept that Genesis is a metaphor.

    --
    A. Rightmann
    1. Re:You are wrong about Catholics by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      Damn. Thanks for deflating any humor present in my post!

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  123. LaserMonks? by hakkikt · · Score: 1

    When I first read Lasermonks, I imagined monks shooting laser beams from their index fingers to kill sinners.
    Sort of an Inquisition from a post-apocalyptic 25th century.

    I've seen too much japanese movies... Hehe...

  124. Ecumenicism by afeeney · · Score: 1

    Ah, but do they support Diablo printers?

  125. Re:Post Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. Nice try, dumbass.

  126. This is VERY OLD news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They spammed me last year about their products.

  127. Re:Post Comment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    It was YOU wasn't it?

    Why do you post as an AC? Don't you realise that your Slashdot username and it's associated karma is NOT a respected or valued commodity?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  128. Internet prayer. by I+am+Jack's+username · · Score: 1
    Rememer to say the Internet prayer (also in Latin) before logging on.

    If you can handle satire, see my suffer the Usenetter prayer.

  129. Buddhism is not necessarily faith-based. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    There are many varieties of Bhuddhism. Some of them are religions (Tibetan Bhuddism comes to mind).

    Bhuddhist philosophy (which is not a religion) does not require you believe anything without proof - in fact it encourages you to take a personal journey in order to prove to yourself, on your own terms, that the Eightfold Path does in fact lead to enlightenment.

    You might be familiar with the Rinzai teaching, "If you meet the Bhuddha in the road, kill him!" or the more commonly used "the finger pointing at the moon is not the moon". Both of these are exhortations to the listener to directly experience Bhuddhism (in this case Zen flavor) rather than placing faith in teachers or teachings.

  130. Edjimicate yerself, boy! by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Although your comment can be applied to most forms of christianity, there are plenty of religions that don't require any specific belief system.

    Read "The White Goddess" by Robert Graves. Read the Unitarian Universalist Principles. Read "Introduction to Bhuddism". Read the Tao Te Ching and the Lieh Tzu. If you make it through all that and you aren't either convinced or sound asleep, read George Fraser's "Golden Bough" (which is a sure-fire soporific).

    Saint Augustine's argument from faith is not the only Christian "proof" either. It's just the most popular these days. Some people prefer the famous ontological proof from Rene Descartes' "Meditations on First Philosophy" (which is a hell of a lot more readable than Fraser, Graves, or Augustine).

    *** read the sources *** instead of asking some slashbot you don't even know to tell you what Descartes wrote!

  131. Divine drinking license, but for other reasons by devphil · · Score: 1


    Before water was pasteurized, people all over the world have known for a long time that a small amount of alcohol would kill most of the bacteria in the water.

    Of course they didn't know about bacteria. They just knew that water+wine would keep you less sick than just water.

    Even so, certainly no Prohibition in the New Testament. Cheers!

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  132. Specialties by lildogie · · Score: 1

    "We specialize in ink for Brother printers."

  133. Beliefs by Jimee+D'Geek · · Score: 1

    Everybody needs something to believe in,
    So I believe I'll have another beer...

  134. Beer-making monks by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    There's a very well-known beer in Germany, Kloster Andechs beer, that's made by Benedictine monks at a monastery in Bavaria.

    The monks use their brewery and beer-making skills to support themselves and their monastery. It's become such huge business for them, that they now employ many non-monks from the surrounding area.

    Here's their website:
    http://www.andechs.de/englisch/index_mai n.asp

  135. Slashdotters and paranoia by archivis · · Score: 1

    Don't mind the slashdotters, pretty sure most of them are crazy.

    Mind you, so am I, so who knows...

    --
    In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    1. Re:Slashdotters and paranoia by archivis · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention that I use Mozilla Firebird and I got through to your site just fine.

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
  136. Conflict of interest? by macraig · · Score: 1

    If I happen to be a naturalist/atheist/freethinker/Bright (take your pick) or maybe even just a Mormon or Scientologist, would it be a conflict of belief - would I be a hypocrite - for buying product from these guys, knowing that after a fashion some of the money might be used to indoctrinate others with a message of conviction contrary to my own?