The problem is branding everything someone says as invalid because you think the person is an asshole.
Which is not what GP nor I were saying, so thanks for the strawman.
And, one more time: John McAfee? The guy who's basically been on a conspiracy-ranting, drug-fueled, run from the authorities for the last decade? That's really who you want to use as a backstop for a pedantic point? Fuck me, I'm getting tired of this aspie shit.
and each needs evaluation independently.
I'd give you shit for being new here, but you're not and you should know better. One more time: McAfee? Fuck me.
Works pretty good on my old, busted up iphone 5. Works pretty good on my 4 year old ipad. Finding it kinda weird it works well on iOS and not on Android.
Have advancements in computers caused a ~90% reduction in the number of bugs, debilitating hacks and successful attacks?
Since when? You're talking about a field that has seen explosive growth in just the last 20 years. If you've got a graph that says that hacks, etc. have ouptaced adoption of IT technology by several factors, great. Otherwise, this is a pointless argument.
riddled with shit security
That's better. But I doubt hackers are going to be responsible for more than a handful of deaths for a variety of reasons, especially since we treat cars a lot differently than we do PCs, both on a cultural and technological level.
Won't be so damn easy to watch a vehicle mega-corp get away with vehicular manslaughter because drivers clicked "I Agree".
I have several trial lawyers on speed dial who'd be happy to laugh at you. We've been putting up with industrial accidents for over a century, and industry almost always wins. I don't know why you think this case will be any different.
and is single highhandedly responsible for ruining the countries and by extension for all the migrants.
It's not exactly a fringe argument to say that Britain's colonial and post-colonial policies exacerbated local problems as well as inventing entirely new ones, especially when it came to its holdings in Africa and the Middle East.
I view immigration as a case of if your country sucks fix it.
What if other actors (e.g Britain or the USA) have had (and continue to have) non-negligible involvement in your country's development? Is it still entirely their fault?
There's your problem: As a regular human, all you can see is a business opportunity. Big corporations don't think like that, think in terms of control. The thing is, even if they think or know that that particular approach isn't the most lucrative one, they do know that nobody ever went broke keeping a tight leash on their IP.
The terms of the replacement are that you have to return the chip in all of the original retail packaging, including all paper inserts, manuals, and logo stickers, with your original receipt.
Look, we all know of people who hop on the bandwagon of science and are as stubborn as anyone.
That's like judging the artistic merit of a band by focusing on their groupies. When the faithful criticize scientists, they're not using those arguments anyway.
There are also plenty of religious folk who use their brains
Unfortunately, they're in the minority and not anywhere near as loud-mouthed as their fundie brethren.
Slashdot Mirror
What part of this is enjoyable?
The problem is branding everything someone says as invalid because you think the person is an asshole.
Which is not what GP nor I were saying, so thanks for the strawman.
And, one more time: John McAfee? The guy who's basically been on a conspiracy-ranting, drug-fueled, run from the authorities for the last decade? That's really who you want to use as a backstop for a pedantic point? Fuck me, I'm getting tired of this aspie shit.
and each needs evaluation independently.
I'd give you shit for being new here, but you're not and you should know better. One more time: McAfee? Fuck me.
LOL, picking John McAfee as the hill you want to die on is hilarious. Next you'll be telling us Martin Shkreli is actually a pretty cool dude.
How the fuck is it faster and less crash prone than safari on iOS then? Christ, Apple, get your shit together.
Works pretty good on my old, busted up iphone 5. Works pretty good on my 4 year old ipad. Finding it kinda weird it works well on iOS and not on Android.
You're not going to eliminate racism by hiding it.
Sure you are. No baby is born racist, they get taught that shit by someone or something.
Your idea is sound in principle ("information wants to be free"), but in practice it doesn't really work out that way.
I'm just not seeing the social dilemma.
Others do, though. Are there opinions worth any less than yours?
Your digestive system does, though.
Have advancements in computers caused a ~90% reduction in the number of bugs, debilitating hacks and successful attacks?
Since when? You're talking about a field that has seen explosive growth in just the last 20 years. If you've got a graph that says that hacks, etc. have ouptaced adoption of IT technology by several factors, great. Otherwise, this is a pointless argument.
riddled with shit security
That's better. But I doubt hackers are going to be responsible for more than a handful of deaths for a variety of reasons, especially since we treat cars a lot differently than we do PCs, both on a cultural and technological level.
Won't be so damn easy to watch a vehicle mega-corp get away with vehicular manslaughter because drivers clicked "I Agree".
I have several trial lawyers on speed dial who'd be happy to laugh at you. We've been putting up with industrial accidents for over a century, and industry almost always wins. I don't know why you think this case will be any different.
That will make dying hurt less right?
No, but the ~90% reduction in auto-related fatalities will.
the UK invaded the majority of the globe
Close enough
and is single highhandedly responsible for ruining the countries and by extension for all the migrants.
It's not exactly a fringe argument to say that Britain's colonial and post-colonial policies exacerbated local problems as well as inventing entirely new ones, especially when it came to its holdings in Africa and the Middle East.
I view immigration as a case of if your country sucks fix it.
What if other actors (e.g Britain or the USA) have had (and continue to have) non-negligible involvement in your country's development? Is it still entirely their fault?
Wait, the country that has one of the most aggressive pro-filtering stances outside of the Middle East is now a beacon of reason? ROFLMAO!
Do we really know this?
Yes.
How long have we been measuring winds in storms that are still this far out?
About 70 years.
Would we have known if a storm was this strong at its current location 50 years ago?
Yes.
however these speeds are only found in the eyewall so it's not as bad as it sounds.
Sure, if the winds were responsible for the majority of damage and lives lost. But they're not, so it is just as bad as it sounds.
So, Cuba, a large mountainous island in the Caribbean, then.
There's your problem: As a regular human, all you can see is a business opportunity. Big corporations don't think like that, think in terms of control. The thing is, even if they think or know that that particular approach isn't the most lucrative one, they do know that nobody ever went broke keeping a tight leash on their IP.
I didn't know George Costanza had a slashdot account.
The terms of the replacement are that you have to return the chip in all of the original retail packaging, including all paper inserts, manuals, and logo stickers, with your original receipt.
Jebus! What's next, Vogon poetry?
WHOOOooooOOOoooooOOOOooooSHHHHHH!
Sarcastic answer: The U3 suddenly became a reliable statistic last January 20.
Nah, it's been rock solid for me going on almost 9 years now.
Not-sarcastic answer: Citation needed.
Here you go
Reading comprehension apparently is.
Whooooooosh!
Don't blame me, I'm using the GOP's own unemployment methodology.
94 million Americans still out of work. If that's not enough motivation, I don't know what is.
Actually, considering how big of a resource hog slack is, I'd love some competition.
Look, we all know of people who hop on the bandwagon of science and are as stubborn as anyone.
That's like judging the artistic merit of a band by focusing on their groupies. When the faithful criticize scientists, they're not using those arguments anyway.
There are also plenty of religious folk who use their brains
Unfortunately, they're in the minority and not anywhere near as loud-mouthed as their fundie brethren.