I don't know what that means, both in general, and in implementation. But it sure makes you sound tough on something. I'm not convinced you have any idea what it means either. Most people just seem to stop talking after their suggestion is to tear something down.
It's not complicated. Zero tolerance just means any infraction. You're trying to be clever by conflating tolerance with blood alcohol level or somesuch. One tolerance would be that one conviction is allowed. It's not complicated.
Also, coffee isn't a drug for the purposes of the law in so far as driving is concerned. Honestly, I don't know what you think you're illuminating here. We probably agree Uber is money pit. But none of the other stuff you said makes any sense.
Wait, it's 2017 and you've never heard of Linux or the GPL?
The thing about people who get played is that it looks even worse if they start their reply with the very thing that should've made it obvious that they're getting played.
You pay royalties on patents you're using to build and sell stuff. Is building and selling stuff using technoligy you're licensing patent trolling? The mental gymnastics required....
if I ask google for music, it just plays the music from google music (granted you need to have a subscription).. it doesn't try and sell you anything. And when I ask it questions, it mostly goes to wikipedia. Hasn't tried upselling anything (yet)
I'm pretty sure advertising in the middle of conversations would drive a massive chunk of users away. I really doubt they'd do that. Sounds like they just want to offer in-line prompts like "share location" or "accept invitation" type stuff in the conversations.
Obviously, anything sufficiently intrusive defeats the purpose of using a messaging app.
Companies with more diverse workplaces make money money, because you don't have 50 people with the same background that think mostly the same way. Companies voluntarily adopt diversity initiatives *precisely* because they're sold on the data that shows that becoming more diverse is better for their bottom line.
There are lots of things you can't put through an MRI (and some people are allergic to the imagining fluid) so it's not as though people are put through MRIs without being made sure it's safe to do so.
> made sure it was harder than ever to compete agains the big ISP's like Comcast....
> It's hard to prove some company is not starting up because of regulations concerns.
You do a wonderful job of arguing against yourself.
> What we know for sure is that more regulations mean more work for companies (in terms of hiring lawyers) to make sure they are complying with rules. That is beyond dispute.
If you're an ISP, you just won't sell this information to a buyer (even if they were to sell individual browsing history, which is totally unlikely given it's relative lack of utility to advertisers) to accomplish two things:
1) you're a well behaved ISP 2) not make an enemy of the lawmakers
Any attempt at buying lawmakers browsing histories is only going to reinforce the argument of the ISP industry that they behave sans regulation when they politely decline to do so.
Slashdot Mirror
> the system needs to be entirely gutted
I don't know what that means, both in general, and in implementation. But it sure makes you sound tough on something. I'm not convinced you have any idea what it means either. Most people just seem to stop talking after their suggestion is to tear something down.
Congrats, you win the dumbest comment of the day award.
It's not complicated. Zero tolerance just means any infraction. You're trying to be clever by conflating tolerance with blood alcohol level or somesuch. One tolerance would be that one conviction is allowed. It's not complicated.
Also, coffee isn't a drug for the purposes of the law in so far as driving is concerned. Honestly, I don't know what you think you're illuminating here. We probably agree Uber is money pit. But none of the other stuff you said makes any sense.
Amazing that people can't spot themselves about to be played from a mile away.
Wait, it's 2017 and you've never heard of Linux or the GPL?
The thing about people who get played is that it looks even worse if they start their reply with the very thing that should've made it obvious that they're getting played.
You pay royalties on patents you're using to build and sell stuff. Is building and selling stuff using technoligy you're licensing patent trolling? The mental gymnastics required ....
Dynamic content - often the page doesn't know the size of the content until it's been served.
good lord
FB Messenger is hardly a monopoly.
if I ask google for music, it just plays the music from google music (granted you need to have a subscription) .. it doesn't try and sell you anything. And when I ask it questions, it mostly goes to wikipedia. Hasn't tried upselling anything (yet)
I'm pretty sure advertising in the middle of conversations would drive a massive chunk of users away. I really doubt they'd do that. Sounds like they just want to offer in-line prompts like "share location" or "accept invitation" type stuff in the conversations.
Obviously, anything sufficiently intrusive defeats the purpose of using a messaging app.
I don't know about you, but I know a lot of people who work in HR, and no, it's not about paying people less.
Companies with more diverse workplaces make money money, because you don't have 50 people with the same background that think mostly the same way. Companies voluntarily adopt diversity initiatives *precisely* because they're sold on the data that shows that becoming more diverse is better for their bottom line.
It found that white women with four years or less of experience actually ask for more money than their male counterparts
That's some mighty fine reading abilities you have there.
*rolls eyes*
Just don't use it, then. Pretty sure they're okay with that.
The more logical explanation is that you're missing some key information.
One piece of which might be that you're the idiot.
There are lots of things you can't put through an MRI (and some people are allergic to the imagining fluid) so it's not as though people are put through MRIs without being made sure it's safe to do so.
WINE is the software. This is asking if you can hit the hardware for a task where the hardware is where your real work is happening.
> made sure it was harder than ever to compete agains the big ISP's like Comcast. ...
> It's hard to prove some company is not starting up because of regulations concerns.
You do a wonderful job of arguing against yourself.
> What we know for sure is that more regulations mean more work for companies (in terms of hiring lawyers) to make sure they are complying with rules. That is beyond dispute.
No, it's really not.
"DDR5 promises double the memory bandwidth"
What a stupid thing to whine about when it actually does double the data rate of the previous version.
There's a reason why the Milos of the world keep losing the culture war, and that's not going to change.
If you're an ISP, you just won't sell this information to a buyer (even if they were to sell individual browsing history, which is totally unlikely given it's relative lack of utility to advertisers) to accomplish two things:
1) you're a well behaved ISP
2) not make an enemy of the lawmakers
Any attempt at buying lawmakers browsing histories is only going to reinforce the argument of the ISP industry that they behave sans regulation when they politely decline to do so.
But mainly, the enormous security risk, bad reputation
No.
lack of native support in browsers.
That's exactly what John Gruber pointed out.
The fact is that the features of MSPaint have not changed since what, Windows 3.1?
Incorrect.
And MS Paint isn't for photo editing. It's for quick and dirty painting, which it's fine for.