Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: Windows 10 Creators Update Goes Live On April 11, Will You Upgrade?

Microsoft said today it will start rolling out Windows 10 Creators Update, the latest major update to its current desktop operating system, starting April 11. The company says Windows 10 Creators Update brings with it a range of new features. Some of the chief ones are:

1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge.
2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks.
3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D.
4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application.
5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night.
6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity).
7. Native support for surround sound.
8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app.
9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.
10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets.

Over the past two years, we have seen numerous instances where Microsoft has been pushing Windows 10 update to customers who have Windows 7 or 8 running on their machines. There are still hundreds of millions of customers who're yet to upgrade from Windows 7, arguing that they either prefer how Windows 7 looks and functions, or (in some cases, and) why fix something when nothing is broken. That said, would you consider upgrading your system to Windows 10 Creators Update?

239 comments

  1. If on WinX; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you have a choice?
    It'll deserve a BIG Thank You M$! - For deploying an update that needlessly shortens my SSD life while adding a ton of bloat, without really fixing any existing issues...

    1. Re:If on WinX; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No choice, if you're running 10. It's really not worse than 10. No advantage for me, but then I don't watch picture in picture, and don't paint in 3D. If I did, then I'd like it.
      Been running it in the Insider Program...ho-hum was my reaction.

    2. Re: If on WinX; by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      if you dont upgrade its your own fault.

    3. Re:If on WinX; by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If a Windows updates worries you about your SSD life you need a new SSD.

    4. Re: If on WinX; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you have a choice.

      Windows 10 or something else.

      If you have Windows 10 they're shoving this thing down your throat whether you like it or not. The "will you upgrade" question is ridiculous. Either way you go you have no choice on this specific upgrade, either you must take it or you can't get it at all.

      Welcome to the computer age, sponsored by Microsoft - people wanted their computer to make the decisions for them, and this is the result. Unfortunately for them they now "choose" to obey Microsoft above the people who in theory own them.

    5. Re:If on WinX; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Windows LTSB to avoid the feature upgrades (and all those annoying "apps").

    6. Re:If on WinX; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you need a new OS that is correctly coded.

    7. Re:If on WinX; by segin · · Score: 1

      Like Windows 10.

  2. No, I'm already running 11. by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

    X11 that is. "Creator's Upsate"? Really? Well that name doesn't *sound* very creative. I'm just saiyan (like Goku).

    1. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow! Most Windows only go up to 10, but yours goes up to eleven!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the Spinal Tap Edition.

    3. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Wow! Most Windows only go up to 10, but yours goes up to eleven!

      They're even letting you put windows in your windows!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    4. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's Windows all the way down.

    5. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The names should be "Windows 10 SP1", "Windows 10 SP2", etc. otherwise after many service packs who the hell can tell if the "Creators Update" comes before or after the "Websurfers Update"? The marketing department who came up with "XP" and "Vista" has been repressed, and it's trying to sneak in what it can.

    6. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or Windows 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 etc.

    7. Re: No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what they call it. It's a rolling release model, so they could call it "Windows 10 Super Duct Tape Edition", or " Windows 10 0xC00000005", and you'd still get the latest version shoved down your throat by Windows Update.

    8. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      It always has been.

      It's if you want to go *up* that you need something else.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I am already running Linux exclusively, any version of windows 10 would be a huge downgrade, so no.

    10. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 Spinal Tap Edition:
      "It's like, how much more crap could it be? And the answer is: None. None more crap."

    11. Re: No, I'm already running 11. by rtfmoz · · Score: 1

      You guys crack me up. Windows 10 is lightyears ahead of previous editions and you know it. But all you do is bitch and whine when something doesnt meet your personal opinion. Pull your head out of your collective assholes and look at the rolling green fields on which you stand.

    12. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Yes, but X11 stayed at 11 there since I used it the first time, back in '94
      So from now on Windows is always going to have the lead on X11
      MacOS/X seems to have frozen in time too

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    13. Re:No, I'm already running 11. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... I thought Goku was Super Saiyan...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    14. Re: No, I'm already running 11. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X11? Its all going wayland now.

  3. All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Okay, the Home edition still tries to prevent you from shutting off the crumy updates, and even the pro edition limits your ability to control the OS compared to Windows 7. What good is this decorative entertainment nonsense when the OS controls you. Hopefully people will wake up and get of Windows 10 before the next updates starts telling you what you are allowed to install. That is how bad this OS is. (See class action lawsuit over update mechanism)

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Merk42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, the Home edition still tries to prevent you from shutting off the crumy updates...

      Good.
      The average Windows user can't be trusted to ever run updates, so their computer ends up getting compromised.

    2. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by fisted · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The average Windows user will have no idea how to disable updates. What's the point in taking away that possibility from above (should I say "below", given that they know better yet bend over for the clusterfuck windows is?) average windows users?

    3. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem with that is MS Updates sometimes as bad or worse than no update at all. There are at least 3 instances where the update actually compromised or killed the OS. There are also reported incidents where an update was marked as "critical" but had nothing to do with security. Even the experts can't tell if an update is valid, potentially breaks something, or even creates vulnerabilities. (some do). So, even professionals can't tell without a test environment which no user is going to have. But by taking away the choice, MS is free to wreak havoc on "your" OS as well as compromise your data and privacy. That is an overall negative not just for the user, but potentially for the entire Internet community.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    4. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, the Home edition still tries to prevent you from shutting off the crumy updates...

      Good.
      The average Windows user can't be trusted to ever run updates, so their computer ends up _not_ getting compromised.

      Fixed that for you. You were speaking to the point of Microsoft forcing home users to update their machines?

    5. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by dontbemad · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have even the most basic knowledge of Group Policy editing, it takes around 15 seconds to disable updates from auto installing.

      I'm fine with Microsoft forcing its more "basic" users to update. The fact that they didn't do this in the past is THE literal reason why that company still lives with the stigma of being "virus ridden" and "as full of holes as swiss cheese".

      I'll never get some of you guys. When an OS doesn't force the user to update, its a security risk. When an OS does force the user to update, its an affront to freedom and choice. If you don't want to deal with forced updates, either don't use Windows or become enough of a power user to stop the OS from doing it.

    6. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by geek · · Score: 1

      The average Windows user will have no idea how to disable updates. What's the point in taking away that possibility from above (should I say "below", given that they know better yet bend over for the clusterfuck windows is?) average windows users?

      Sure they can and will. And if they don't the malware they install will do it for them.

    7. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by fisted · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll never get some of you guys. When an OS doesn't force the user to update, its a security risk.

      If by 'updates' you mean fixing security issues, then yes.

      When an OS does force the user to update, its an affront to freedom and choice.

      If by 'updates' you mean fixing security issues, then no.

      It is my understanding that the sort of 'updates' we're talking about here, however, is more than 'fixing security issues'. If I were using Windows, I'd be fine with forced security updates, but not with forced addition of random crap and telemetry.

      either don't use Windows

      I'm running pretty much only NetBSD, with the occasional FreeBSD and Linux machines here and there. Doesn't change that i can be curious about the latest drama of the Windows world.

      or become enough of a power user to stop the OS from doing it.

      Seriously, who are you kidding? You can't just "become enough of a power user" to stop a blackbox OS from doing that.
      All you *can* do is a depth-first traversal of the entire GUI, unchecking every checkbox that sounds related. In no way does that mean that you can be sure everything is actually turned off, becuase, you know, software developers don't HAVE to add a checkbox to a GUI to control $feature.

    8. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The average Windows user can't be trusted to ever run updates, so their computer ends up getting compromised.

      And the average Windows update has a chance of making your computer unusable. That also doesn't factor in updates which add no functional value to the customer but does things like reduce privacy for the customer.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    9. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Updating is sometimes an issue with any OS. I encounter breakages during upgrades with Ubuntu several times a year - often of the network or display devices, and my dad has encountered apps not working after Mac upgrades.

      Not updating for an extended time is always an issue.

    10. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The average Windows user will have no idea how to disable updates.

      No the average windows user doesn't understand the process of updates or when to disable them.

      The average windows user will find something that annoys him, will type it into google and will then take shots in the dark to see what fixes his problem, and one of those will be disable windows update. That's it. It won't get enabled again whether it was the cause or not.

      Remember windows updates were a default on Windows XP too, a lot of fucking good that did for the average user who put more effort into disabling the security notification than they did just letting windows install updates.

    11. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I'll never get some of you guys:
      > * When an OS doesn't force the user to update, its a security risk.
      > * When an OS does force the user to update, its an affront to freedom and choice.

      Because there is MORE then just 2 choices:

      * How many updates NEVER gave _any_ details on _exactly_ what they were doing other then some bullshit generic "Security updates" message.
      * How many updates FORCED the user to migrate to Windows 10?
      * How many updates had NOTHING to do with updates except add spyware?
      * How many updates broke WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage)?
      * How many updates broke Internet Explorer?

      Who the fuck designs a program where you can only install the latest version??? If Microsoft wanted to pull its head out of their collective ass they could have:

      * Clearly, communicated, in detail, EXACTLY what each and every update fixes.

      But no, they didn't.

      Microsoft has ZERO respect for its users.

      So fuck'em.

    12. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully patched machines are also routinely pwned, and updates break existing software.

    13. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      either don't use Windows or become enough of a power user to stop the OS from doing it.

      Written like a true elitist. Only an ass would require everyone using a common household OS to become a "power user".

    14. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This group policy option is no longer available on windows 10 profession version and never was an option on home version, now only the enterprise edition allows it.

      I'm on 10 professional with it available because i had disabled the updates before that milestone patch hit and don't plan on upgrading ever again until it's possible to disable this shoving down your throat and up your ass attitude from microspy.

    15. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average windows user will find something that annoys him, will type it into google and will then take shots in the dark to see what fixes his problem, and one of those will be disable windows update. That's it. It won't get enabled again whether it was the cause or not.

      Then the user fully deserves whatever malware or other consequence occurs as a result of their actions.

      I'm sorry, but the whole "handhold the idiot so they can avoid taking responsibility for their actions" thing needs to stop. That is what has gotten us to where we are today. They couldn't be arsed to learn basic concepts and we've been picking up after them ever since. Microsoft's actions, (yes I'm playing devil's advocate here), are the expected result by most people. Why? Because we allowed them to get away with not doing anything on their own.

      Rant follows:

      If anything, I'm more worried about the final outcome of this trend. Eventually, it will just get to the point that all they want to do is look at a screen showing a facebook / twitter / youtube feed. Forget having any real computational power, that will be heavilly regulated by the state, and be forbidden to the average person. You'll run what they allow you to run and nothing else. Oh, and if they want to use it to spy on you 24/7, you best bet they will, because you won't be able to get anywhere near something as dangerous as a terminal to do anything about it. Any online system not running GovOS will have it's operators hunted down, and the system destroyed. Any complainers will be dealt with swiftly by a massive us VS. them propaganda campaign. Painting the dissenters as threats to national security. Meanwhile, the idiots will rejoice as the internet is turned into a dystopian hellhole, because they'll think that hardware enforced code signing and mandatory law enforcement backdoors, will save them from all of the evils that the old guard "refused" to do anything about.

      That's the future of computing. If you think otherwise you either are an idiot, or a wishful dreamer. (I dream I want to have again, that's been getting further and further out of reach lately.)

      END rant.

      These idiots have refused for years to listen to us about learning how to use a computer. They won't even do basic password management. Go look up any common issue that involves a login on google, chances are one of the highest results you'll get is: "Turn off all security." as the thing to do to "fix" it. You wouldn't permanently remove the lock to your front door just because you couldn't get in one day, yet that's exactly what these idiots do. They may as well be two year olds driving on the interstate. Ignorant, and extremely likely to suffer severe pain. So I have no sympathy for them, nor should you. Let them learn the full consequences of their actions. Don't let someone else help them out of it, or let them socialize the risk. That's the only thing that will get them to learn to do better.

      Captcha: raging

    16. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by thunderclees · · Score: 1

      Even if you disable automatic updates M$ will eventually require Crater for activation. Maybe it is time to consider Linux?

    17. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But their systems are compromised by the updates, so this is a lose-lose issue?

    18. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Many of Microsoft's updates have ADDED security holes. Ie, updates to Outlook that would automatically allow executing programs attached to mail - who would ever trust the security credentials of a company that did that? Most Windows updates are not related to security. Get the security updates, sure, thats great, but you do not need all the crap they push out as updates, not even things listed as "important". Remember how their Get Windows 10 updates caused more problems for users than the average malware. Even those running Windows 10 have had mandatory upgrades that have bricked their computers.

      Your ideas make sense when dealing with a respectable and trustworthy manufacturer. They don't make sense when talking about Microsoft.

    19. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      You mean the GWX ("Get Windows 10") nagware wasn't a security fix? But it was marked as critical!

    20. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Waccoon · · Score: 2

      When an OS doesn't force the user to update, its a security risk. When an OS does force the user to update, its an affront to freedom and choice.

      "Force" != "Default choice"

      I'm fine with Microsoft forcing its more "basic" users to update

      The problem here is that even the "basic" users are starting to have way too many problems with the updates, because the updates suck. The solution is to stop fucking up updates, not ramming them down peoples' throats by locking them out of the group policy editor.

      Users aren't stupid. They're not rejecting updates because they want their computer to suck. They're rejecting updates because the very process, results, and frequency of updates is completely out of hand. It's the same thing that drove people to Macs back when every PC vendor showed 20 self-congratulatory splash screens every time you switched on the power.

    21. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      How many updates NEVER gave _any_ details on _exactly_ what they were doing other then some bullshit generic "Security updates" message.

      Almost none.

      What they really tell you is that the update "resolves a problem". Whether that problem is related to security is another story.

    22. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      How many updates broke Internet Explorer?

      How can you break what's already broken?

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    23. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, MS lives with the stigma of being virus ridden and full of holes solely because it is. Each year they have billions in revenue, million (billions?) in profits, but choose not to fix problems in their OS. Simple as that.

      Second, don't blame the users. Why would I install a "security update" that adds features like "increased snooping" and "more advertising"? MS calls it a security update but it really isn't. How about a clear separation of feature updates and security updates? That will never happen because it doesn't suit MS business plans.

    24. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't want to receive ads on my OS. Microsoft has hardly earned anyone's trust.

    25. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Congrats! You're now running Windows 10 Vulnerable Edition!

      You chose to install Windows 10 (or buy a machine with it preinstalled). Pick your poison: Microsoft has access to your stuff or hackers have access to your stuff.

      Personally, I trust Microsoft (ever so slightly) more than some random hacker. And, the reality of it is, despite having rebooted itself for updates TWICE while I was actively using it (and inside my Active Hours, none the less), Windows 10 has been more stable, faster, and more reliable than any version I've used before it; and that includes everything from 3.1 on. That's even if I choose to count those unwanted reboots as crashes, which, incidentally, I do.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    26. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's not bricked if you can pop in install media and reinstall the OS. If you truly believe you have a valid argument, I urge you to be careful with hyperbole, it only serves to make a valid argument seem invalid.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    27. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I really wish you hadn't posted AC, as I'd like to read more of your posts.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    28. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The typical windows user won't know to do this. The typical Windows 10 user does not even have install media or know where to find it. Probably they run around to find the windows 7 cd stuck somewhere in the packaging the computer came in, then call up microsoft to get upgraded to windows 10, start searching to see if they ever stored the license key somewhere other than on the computer they can't get to boot up, and then eventually end up at Best Buy asking for someone to help them.

      I made a backup of windows 8 install media, and saved my key somewhere (thumb drive), but that's not a typical windows user. Their computer may not be technically bricked, but if you have to go get professional help to recover then the distinction that it's not really bricked is not too important. Not much difference between returning a device to where you bought it from to get it fixed versus sending back to the manufacturer.

    29. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      then call up microsoft to get upgraded to windows 10

      Well... that would be interesting, considering that the user would have been, according to you, "[one of] those running Windows 10 [who] had mandatory upgrades that [...] bricked their [computers]."

      and then eventually end up at Best Buy

      And Best Buy would do what? Oh...

      pop in install media and reinstall the OS

      Also, about that hyperbole:

      Not much difference between returning a device to where you bought it from to get it fixed versus sending back to the manufacturer.

      There's plenty, actually. Out of warranty, you get no support for a bricked device and a repair shop tells you all they can do is sell you a new one. A computer that just needs the OS reinstalled, however...

      I'm sure you see where I'm going with this, but I've been wrong in assuming the double-digit-or-higher IQ of a Slashdot poster in the past, so I'll spell it out for you. Even paying Geek Squad to re-install Windows is cheaper than buying a new computer in most cases.

      And that's before Windows boots into recovery mode automatically after 3 failed boot attempts and automatically restores the system to its pre-update state. Which, by the way, is free and requires the user to literally do nothing but sit there and let the machine fix itself.

      And most people have a family geek they can call who will tell them to do just that. I can see how that might not work for your family but, then, most people aren't related to you.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    30. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Congrats! You're now running Windows 10 Vulnerable Edition!

      Funniest quote I've seen in a week. Glad my coffee was on the desk....

      Personally, I trust Microsoft (ever so slightly) more than some random hacker.

      Personally, I don't trust Microsoft. They don't know or care about me other than as a potential revenue source, both via license fees and data gathering. That latter puts them in the same ballpark as random hackers.

      And, the reality of it is, despite having rebooted itself for updates TWICE while I was actively using it (and inside my Active Hours, none the less), Windows 10 has been more stable, faster, and more reliable than any version I've used before it; and that includes everything from 3.1 on.

      Well, that's really elevating the bar!

      Note that a properly configured XP system blows away Win7 and Win10, and is significantly more secure than either of the latter out of the box. Such an XP system is stripped down to less than 10 running processes based on my vaguest memories of the system. No open ports. As long as you don't run MS software on it, you're relatively safe. IE is just an open invitation to System, and Office macros... well we all know how safe those documents are. Then again, I believe you can configure most of Win7 in a similar fashion with similar results, although I've never bothered to go that far with it. Running a linux desktop is easier.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    31. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      > Clearly, communicated, in detail, EXACTLY what each and every update fixes.

      Like this one?
      https://support.microsoft.com/...

    32. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Running a linux desktop is easier.

      Unless you work in an industry where Adobe products are expected. Other than that, I'm right there with ya and that's exactly what I would be doing if I didn't work in such an industry. MacOS would be an option if Apple sold current-gen top-end hardware, or if I could run it on my own hardware; in fact, it would be a preference in my situation.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    33. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Unless you work in an industry where Adobe products are expected. Other than that, I'm right there with ya and that's exactly what I would be doing if I didn't work in such an industry. MacOS would be an option if Apple sold current-gen top-end hardware, or if I could run it on my own hardware; in fact, it would be a preference in my situation.

      Adobe, how thou hast soured. Honestly, I run a relatively top end MBP and am truly surprised by how well it performs. It's desktop quality easily in most cases. I would have a Mac Pro, but the trash can, although super cool looking, just wasn't going to cut it, ever, thanks to lack of upgradeability and cost for a topped out model. I've considered springing for a 2012 Mac Pro with dual CPUs, but the hack I built on a whim on my formerly dedicated Linux platform runs well enough that I just haven't ever seen the need.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    34. Re:All this Glitz but it's still posessed... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The need for top-end hardware and the need for Adobe are, actually, unrelated. Most Adobe stuff does alright on an m5, in my experience. If I didn't need the Adobe stuff, I'd be happily running Ubuntu on this machine, but I'd have still built it just the same.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  4. Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess this is their way of celebrating the ignition of Vista's funeral pyre. Same day extended support ceases. Captcha:virgins

  5. I'm still on 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all communication to Microsoft shut off.

    1. Re:I'm still on 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... no security updates? Good luck then.

  6. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no

  7. Derision by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    I would deride them thoroughly for being so late to the party with a lot of this stuff, but it's good to hear they're doing... something. Something happened.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Derision by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'll save my derision for after I see what they did and didn't add to WSL. If it still can't create socket files I'm going to lose my shit. UNIX domain sockets are a basic human right!

  8. My windows go all the way to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, guys. From my perspective it'd be a downgrade.

    But hey, wish y'all a great experience!

  9. lock screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be nice if lock screens would display on all monitors, a fix that might "never" come.

  10. This is Slashdot by Merk42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    M$ is bad because M$!

    Did you see {thing} they did(not) do? It is bad because they did(not) do it!

    1. Re:This is Slashdot by WaffleMonster · · Score: 0

      M$ is bad because M$!

      Did you see {thing} they did(not) do? It is bad because they did(not) do it!

      Ever get tired of posting the same worthless non-falsifiable statements?

    2. Re:This is Slashdot by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      M$ is bad because M$!

      That reputation did not spring out of the ether. Microsoft solidly earned it with bad products and bad business practices.

    3. Re:This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean non-falsifiable? It's extremely falsifiable, the problem is, if you read through this thread you see plenty of examples of it. Would you care for me to start copying and pasting them into a post for you?

    4. Re:This is Slashdot by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      Seems it hit a little too close to home for someone.

      It hits too close to home when I see people constantly invoking the same fallacies to communicate their perspectives.

    5. Re:This is Slashdot by Tim+Locke · · Score: 1

      Sin of omission.

      --
      *** On the Internet, no one knows you're using a VIC-20
    6. Re:This is Slashdot by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      M$ is bad because M$!

      Yes but what makes them bad?
      Each section is discussed here.

      * Bloat
      * Backward Incompatibility
      * Perpetual Upgrading
      * Vaporware
      * Hostile treatment of customers
      * Predatory Practices
      * Bundling of inferior products
      * Bugs, bugs, and more bugs
      * Insecurity
      * Closed "standards"
      * Mutilation of existing standards
      * Lack of innovation
      * Attempts at taking over appliance markets
      * Attempts at buying the public's trust
      * Outright Deception

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:This is Slashdot by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean non-falsifiable?

      Non-falsifiable means no practical condition exists where a statement can be evaluated as any more or less valid.

      The statement "This is Slashdot M$ is bad because M$!" is an example of a non-falsifiable statement. This device conveys blanket dismissal of any MS$ actions because "Slashdot" regardless of merit and is therefore equivalent to saying nothing at all.

      It's extremely falsifiable, the problem is, if you read through this thread you see plenty of examples of it. Would you care for me to start copying and pasting them into a post for you?

      Whether the condition holds or not is irrelevant. For example you may well find examples of people expressing: "I hate Windows because Microsoft wrote it". This does not render a non-falsifiable statements any more falsifiable.

      OP post was the 10th chronologically and did not respond to or quote anyone in particular. Not a single one of the preceding posts NOT A SINGLE ONE offered a justification of "Microsoft is bad".

      It's obvious to me it was intended to be a device to dismiss negative opinions of Microsoft without having to offer any merit based information in return. Simply because this is Slashdot anyone offering a negative opinion should be dismissed or discounted simply because everyone always says negative things about Microsoft.

    8. Re:This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would deny that there is a large number of people on Slashdot who would concoct some kind of conspiracy theory about nefarious ulterior motives if Microsoft solved world hunger tomorrow? (That is a hypothetical example, for the literal minded among us)

      The Microsoft of today is a very different company from the Microsoft of the 80s and 90s. One could debate the reasons for that until the heat death of the universe, but for our purposes here it doesn't matter why, just that it is. The Microsoft of the 80s and 90s did a lot of really nasty and underhanded things, which very few would seriously dispute. They shamelessly and ruthlessly abused their market position to snuff out competition. These days the worst people can come up with is the underhanded ways Microsoft tried to get people to upgrade to Windows 10, which is objectively a far cry from the abuses of the 80s and 90s. I still don't get why people get so worked up about the "spyware" in Windows 10, but then turn around and gladly turn that same info (and more) over to companies like Google and Facebook, but that's neither here nor there.

      You wouldn't know any of the above based on comments here. The problem comes in the form of "the lady doth protest too much." The need to run down the competition stems from insecurities about your own current choice, whatever it might be. If someone were really as happy with Linux as they often claim here, they wouldn't give two craps what Microsoft is doing with Windows.

  11. Does it really go live April 11? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Does it really go live April 11? Or did they mean April 1?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Does it really go live April 11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clearly the 11 was binary. So it goes live on April 3rd.

  12. This Windows 10 thing sound neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run on Linux? I use Mint and Slackware. I just wonder if I need to update them first.

    1. Re: This Windows 10 thing sound neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halt! running windows on linux is now verboten by the lizensvereinbarungsvertrag. If you want to run linux, do it on windows.

  13. i guess this question is for windows 7 users only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    since windows 10 regular users (more like betatesters) will be mandatory updated to this version, no mattter if it works or not :P

    so as the only group that can actually answer that question (win7 here), no, im not upgrading to windows 10, ever

    thats a question for 7 years down the line when support for windows 8 ends, like bane said, "come on slashdot, now its not the time for windows 10, THAT COMES LATER!!!!"

  14. Is it free by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Is windows still free?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Is it free by stealth_finger · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Is windows still free?

      Free as in fuck you I think

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Is it free by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes if you claim you are disabled.

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      Tell them you have a limp.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Is it free by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Funny

      A limp what?

    4. Re:Is it free by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Yes, the upgrade is still free(gratis). All you have to do is check a box saying it's for accessibility issues.

      Remember people, when the service is free, YOU are the product.

    5. Re:Is it free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MicroSoft

    6. Re:Is it free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A limp SSD, it started with that blinking icon in my Windows 7 tray one morning... now my whole system has a limp, Dr MS. Please prescribe me some more Win Meds so I can get crazier.
      ref: https://youtu.be/TRIv1Vlc3Wk

    7. Re:Is it free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the upgrade is still free(gratis). All you have to do is check a box saying it's for accessibility issues.

      Remember people, when the service is free, YOU are the product.

      Windows 10 is not now free, and it never was. If you're taking advantage of the upgrade offer, then you still paid for Windows in the form of your qualifying upgrade license. If you're not taking advantage of the upgrade offer, then Microsoft will sell you a copy for $120 or so.

    8. Re:Is it free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even have to do lie about accessibility. You can install from Windows 10 install media and type in your Windows 7 key. No questions asked. Microsoft never actually threw the switch to start blocking free upgrades, they just said they did.

    9. Re:Is it free by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I believe everyone needs to watch that video.

    10. Re:Is it free by tigersha · · Score: 1

      You know how Microsoft got its name?
      Bill Gates named it after his dick!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    11. Re:Is it free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still free? STILL?
          That's a new feature genius, and it was 'given' to us as leverage so we would not complain. I see they've gotten to you just as planned.
      Yes their new style is to hand this OS out monetarily 'free'. But no it's not really free at all. I see you've already 'paid'.

  15. Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge.

    I don't use Edge.

    2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks.

    See #1.

    3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D.

    If it's anything like Paint was for graphics then most likely I'd use something more robust instead of Paint to make 3d stuff. Assuming I have 3D stuff to make in the first place.

    4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application.

    That sounds annoying.

    5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night.

    Honestly not sure about this one. My eyes are fine looking at the screen at night.

    6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity).

    Just what I always wanted for my computer, another attack vector for breaking in.

    7. Native support for surround sound.

    That's nice, don't have surround sound but I seriously think that's a nice feature.

    8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app.

    I don't use Maps and in fact if I could uninstall it I did or would if I could.

    9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.

    I found it annoying when Windows unexpectedly loaded up things like a session record when I fired up Minecraft one day because "gaming experience". Do not annoy me further please.

    10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets.

    Like surround sound this is nice but not something I use.

    Over all I have little incentive to update Windows, more incentive to reformat and use another operating system on my only Windows machine left in my collection. The reality however is they will most likely force this update on me one way or another so if it bugs me to much I'll have no more Windows machines "just for certain games" because the operating system those games relies on is far to annoying for me to continue to in that market when better alternatives I'm already running on a gaming laptop I have running Linux are available.

    1. Re:Well lets see... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D.
      If it's anything like Paint was for graphics then most likely I'd use something more robust instead of Paint to make 3d stuff. Assuming I have 3D stuff to make in the first place.

      Before going 3D, if it could at least have the most basic filters for 2D images, like CONTRAST, LUMINOSITY and some easy stuff like auto color adjustment, ans some exotic sepia, rainbow and greyscale color transform, it would already be a good start. The fact is that the features of MSPaint have not changed since what, Windows 3.1?

    2. Re:Well lets see... by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      The fact is that the features of MSPaint have not changed since what, Windows 3.1?

      Incorrect.

      And MS Paint isn't for photo editing. It's for quick and dirty painting, which it's fine for.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:Well lets see... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge. - I'd like to avoid this.
      2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks. - not intersested
      3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D. - wouldn't ever use
      4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application. - might be OK if I used my laptop to watch TV, which I don''t
      5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night. - ho-hum
      6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity). - sounds like something I'd like to avoid, but I'm not sure
      7. Native support for surround sound. - Might be useful if I used my laptop to listen to music, which I don't
      8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app. - Might be useful if I ever used Micrsoft's maps, which I don't
      9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience. - completely uninterested
      10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets. - I would never use this

      So I guess I'm sticking to Windows 7 on my laptop (not that I could change it anyway, since my work dictates what's on my laptop.)

    4. Re:Well lets see... by SpinyManiac · · Score: 2

      8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app.

      I don't use Maps and in fact if I could uninstall it I did or would if I could.

      Open Powershell as administrator and run this:
      Get-AppxPackage *windowsmaps* | Remove-AppxPackage

      Want to remove any others?

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    5. Re:Well lets see... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      I just looked on Google Images for each version of mspaint since Windows 3.1, and apart from the UI being adapted to each OS, the features have almost remained the same. I understand that it is for "painting", but basic photo editing capabilities would have been a fine addition.

      Back in the days of Win3.1, digital photography barely existed. Now that digital photography is (almost) the only remaining thing and that everyone is using it daily, I think it would be normal for MS to provide some way to basically edit digital pictures. And it's not as if they could not package a fine solution for a few bucks and include it in the basic OS. MSPaint would be the right place to do it.

    6. Re:Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, when I launched Paint in Windows 7 I was surprised by all the new features compared to the old one from 95/98/XP.
      You have a GUI for brush shape and width, you can toggle dashed grids to help you draw, and whatever things, you can also save in .png I think (although maybe XP did it).

      Of course you can use it to draw naked dogs, ridiculous things and faces, not do serious work but Paint always was a program for kids or toying around (or you know, basic functionality when Windows had to fit on floppies, Internet was rare or non existent and you otherwise used third party software)
      Perhaps some people use Windows 7 Paint for somewhat serious uses.

      BTW on linux there's mtpaint, now that looks like 1989 software, with inconvenient color selection.

    7. Re:Well lets see... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity).
      Just what I always wanted for my computer, another attack vector for breaking in.

      I'm curious, how is Dynamic Lock an attack vector?

    8. Re:Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 has a Photo App that allows basic photo editing with fixes, filters, light and color effects. One does not need to use Paint for that.
      Paint is, well a paint program. It requires some level of actual talent to be useful for anything. Perhaps that is why I've never used it very much preferring GIMP, which requires knowledge more than talent to use.

    9. Re:Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MSPAINT has changed in many subtle ways, which is why I keep a copy of the old XP version around. The most notable change is that the relationship between the grid display and pixels has become vague.

      One difference that A) won't show up in google image searches and B) affects even the old XP version is that text has become anti-aliased. This is very annoying and the only way to turn it off is to turn off anti-aliasing for the entire system. Naturally, on the work PC I don't have enough privilege to do that.

    10. Re: Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone successfully impersonates your phone, the PC gets unlocked. Maybe your Bluetooth session has a crypto flaw and gets hacked. Or it doesn't and just gets brute forced. Either way, now his phone broadcasts your phones beacon.
      Click.

    11. Re:Well lets see... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Want to remove any others?

      Yes! starting with Candy Crush! Please post a list of the True Names of apps that empowers you to remove them!
      BTW, does this method remove the app permanently...
      or will it just resurrect itself with the next Tuesday update?

      (not a hater... with Classicshell, Win 10 Pro is quite ok. But the unsolicited bloat IS annoying, and with each forced major upgrade I sweat that some software, license, or hardware I depend on is not going to make it... and for what? 3-D in Paint? stuff I can already get with a 3rd-party application? life with Microsoft...)

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    12. Re:Well lets see... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application.

      That sounds annoying.

      It sounds like a killer feature ... that has been part of every media player except for media player itself since about 1997.

    13. Re:Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application.

      Wow. Can you move the window? and resize it? How is that different than what we've had all along?

    14. Re:Well lets see... by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1

      I don't know the True Name of Candy Crush but Powershell does. The wildcards should handle it for you. Try this:
      Get-AppxPackage *candy* | Remove-AppxPackage

      The safer option is to get the name first, then use that to uninstall:
      Get-AppxPackage -Name *candy*

      Or this gives you the full list of internal names, some translation required:
      Get-AppxPackage | Select Name, PackageFullName

      Note that Groove shows up as Zune, there will be others with odd names.

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    15. Re: Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that Microsoft did think of that, and the actual feature only "locks on connection loss", and doesn't "unlock when connection remade".

      The only major security issue I can see would be if someone manages to duplicate your bluetooth connection and force it to connect to their cloned hardware without noticing the disconnection. Taking over an active bluetooth session isn't quite as easy as it used to be.

    16. Re: Well lets see... by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Don't knock the Night Light thing. It's great. I know this because I've had a program for years that does that.

    17. Re:Well lets see... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Thank you, thank you muchly. Will try.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    18. Re:Well lets see... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I think he's incorrectly assuming that somebody can pick up your phone, wander over to your computer, and be magically logged in.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  16. "I don't want this" by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    Where's that meme picture...

    None of these features sound good. None of them.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:"I don't want this" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Windows 10? No.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  17. win 10 heck no by banbeans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not until they totally remove the spyware they infested it with.

    1. Re:win 10 heck no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those nsa.dll's are there for a reason.

  18. Got rid if it months ago. by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

    So no, but I'll enjoy the reporting of the usual doom and mayhem it will generate.

    --
    Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
  19. Nah. by luna69 · · Score: 1

    I'll stay with Windows 7 for a while longer. But I won't be installing Windows 10 willingly, if ever.

    Microsoft: "We let you choose how much spying we do on your activities!"
    Users: "Uh...please don't spy on us at all. Like, none."
    Microsoft: "OK, here's some revised settings that don't let you actually turn data collection off! One is called 'Basic'!"
    Users: "..."

    --
    No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  20. It's probably going to break something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's not like we have a choice. Why are you even asking us?

  21. no. not during the US Income Tax deadline by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    and maybe not after April 18th, either.

  22. Sabotaging old versions by SmaryJerry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I swear Microsoft always seems to not only not support old versions but actively creates issues to force you to upgrade. On windows 7 just on March 15th they pushed a "security update" to 2010 Microsoft office that basically makes any file with macros in it crash unexpectedly many times a day. I had to roll back the updates on every computer in our office and disable windows updates because we rely heavily on macros. It's so frustrating that things can work fine and they break it. Now we have to think about upgrading to the lastest operating system and Microsoft office which both already changed the way VBA works so transitioning and keeping our existing macros running is going to take many months of work.

    1. Re:Sabotaging old versions by ElrondHalfelven · · Score: 2

      Just FYI Microsoft issued a patch to fix their broken patch you describe yesterday https://support.microsoft.com/...

    2. Re:Sabotaging old versions by geek · · Score: 1

      I swear Microsoft always seems to not only not support old versions but actively creates issues to force you to upgrade. On windows 7 just on March 15th they pushed a "security update" to 2010 Microsoft office that basically makes any file with macros in it crash unexpectedly many times a day. I had to roll back the updates on every computer in our office and disable windows updates because we rely heavily on macros. It's so frustrating that things can work fine and they break it. Now we have to think about upgrading to the lastest operating system and Microsoft office which both already changed the way VBA works so transitioning and keeping our existing macros running is going to take many months of work.

      Right I mean most Linux distros are supported for a full 9 months (Fedora) and others for a full 18! How dare Microsoft not support their 7 year old products!

    3. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more of a don't fix it if it's not broken. Some obscure security update that doesn't tell you what it's actually fixing breaks the product coincidentally while they are pushing new products. The same thing happened to me in Vista. It worked fine until about a year after windows 7 came out. Then there was a windows update that literally broke Vista. Even if I fresh installed Vista then used windows update, as soon as it got to that update my computer would stall on boot until another fresh install. It was always like a week after a fresh install because for some reason Vista and even Windows 7 would never get all of the updates immediately. I had to disable the windows update to keep vista and eventually broke down and got windows 7.

    4. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP had a valid point. Old versions of M$ products were intentionally broken by M$ so it can force the users to upgrade. Note the discussion of programmers on this page. There were intentional bugs being introduced to crash old products. Shameful acts IMHO.

    5. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, I can run CentOS/RHEL with a three year old version of PHP! Or Ubuntu LTS!

      And I don't want to run the Windows equivalent - Windows Server!

      Microsoft sux!

    6. Re:Sabotaging old versions by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

      You're amazing. I'll install this on some test subjects and see if it works.

    7. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora = most distros? I don't think so. Fedora is an intentional bleeding edge distro. There are free Ubuntu LTS versions (not *ALL* versions) that provide 5 years of support for both desktop and server. RHEL appears to offer *at least* 10 years of support for paying customers. WITHOUT *any* updates that don't tell you what they change or why they were made. People pay for RHEL, making it a much closer apples to apples comparison with Windows.

      Do you work for Microsoft, or just not know what you're talking about?

    8. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't use VBA. For the same reason you shouldn't still be on ASP classic.

    9. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be true, in some other reality where Linux distros needed as much support in the first place as Windows does.

      And you know, its a goddamn great job if you make a product that remais popular for 7 goddamn years, where usually developers jump from version to version every half of a year or so (like those linux distros do). Its kinda stupid not to support something like that. But no, not for Microsoft.

    10. Re:Sabotaging old versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right I mean most Linux distros are supported for a full 9 months (Fedora) and others for a full 18!

      Either you're ignorant or just plain lying. This is in *no way* representative.

      You *have a choice* with Linux of anything from bleeding edge/short-support, right up to 10 years support for RHEL/CENTOS etc.- i.e. pretty much the same as Windows with the exception of XP.

      Personally I'm happy to upgrade on a 4-year cycle so I use Ubuntu LTS (5 years).

  23. What is it with companies and dumb program names? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D.

    That's as stupid as buying iPhone apps from iTunes or making a voice call from FaceTime.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  24. Will I upgrade? by bluegutang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more relevant question is: will I be upgraded?

    1. Re:Will I upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory:

      In Soviet Russia, Windows updates you.

  25. Will have to upgrade eventually by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    But not today, or April 11. We have Windows 7 at work, and Windows 10 at the college where I teach. Windows 10 has exactly 0 compelling new features for me. Sadly, our department at work will be upgrading sometime before the fall semester. Can't wait to see what specialized software I run is going to break!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Will have to upgrade eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one computer that Windows 10 upgrade broke completely. It blew away the graphics drivers on an 8.1 install, and after trashing them determined that the hardware wouldn't "support DX 11" so it crashed. After screwing around with MS support online for a few days, the best I could do was reinstall 8.1. And of course, the drivers for the 5 year old video card are all legacy drivers no longer available from nVidia. They only offer newer drivers that don't work on the old card. The pc maker doesn't provide drivers for 8.1 on their website for the original install, which was 8.0. So installing the 8.0 drivers causes some underpinning issues with 8.1 and frequent crashes. The only option is Windows generic drivers, which have their own set of issues. Result: the computer is unfit for use even for children.

    2. Re:Will have to upgrade eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, what? You can download every driver release going back TWELVE YEARS from the driver archive on nvidias site.

  26. I Am! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm upgrading to Windows 10 Creators Update from Linux.

    Linux doesn't have a Creators Update. They don't care about the creators.

  27. This is Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all running Windows 7, Systemd-less Linux or even BSD.

  28. Re:What is it with companies and dumb program name by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    I guess it isn't terribly creative, but complaining about Paint's name is like complaining about Notepad... it'd be more confusing if they renamed it.

  29. Log me out if I step away, really? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    Why log me out and not just 'Lock this computer'? This is as stupid as no-choice reboots to install updates.

    1. Re:Log me out if I step away, really? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      From the article

      Windows Hello can use any paired iPhone, Android or Windows Phone to detect when you step away from your PC or tablet, automatically locking it behind you for an extra measure of security and privacy. This remote lock feature works with smartphones, fitness bands or any device thatâ(TM)s paired to your PC or table

      So it does in fact just lock the computer and not log you out. Whoever wrote the summary obviously screwed up.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Log me out if I step away, really? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's more an enterprise feature than a home one.. Information Governance will love this.. Especially if it's not just a phone, but another token that talks to windows that can be worn on a name badge for example..

  30. Does it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * remove all tracking?
    * remove all msft-centric advertising?
    * protect our privacy by NOT scanning and reporting files it sees back to big brother?
    * let us choose which non-security updates are installed?
    * let us delay reboots post-update for 12 hrs?
    * not contain any back doors?
    * honor the old-school hosts file for everything?
    * run on my existing hardware?
    * support my existing printer and scanners?
    * not suck?

    Yes (he says hopefully)?

  31. Yay all the awesome reasons by Pinkbunnyman · · Score: 0

    1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge. Yay now I can preview it before I close it because it auto opens and that's the only reason I use edge.

    2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks. Actually not a horrid feature as long as I'm reading an ebook on my PC which I don't.

    3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D. Much like it painted as well as Photoshop?

    4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application. VLC has it and plays more file formats still...

    5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night. Or use correct lighting in a room

    6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity). Yay, now if I drop my phone, or pass it to someone to make a phone call my PC will lock

    7. Native support for surround sound. *shrug* I have surround sound with my 7.2 speakers already

    8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app. Nobody uses Microsoft's Map app....

    9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience. Ensures how? throttling my background tabs? How will it affect streaming?

    10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets. Yay, now we can hope that Microsoft keeps on top of their VR software...

    1. Re:Yay all the awesome reasons by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      For the picture in picture mode, you can just set VLC for "Always On Top". I don't know why this was never made an option for every Window. There are various hacks to make it available for all windows but it really should be something that's available by default.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Yay all the awesome reasons by Pinkbunnyman · · Score: 1

      Always on top,
      Remove windows decorations.

      Not really a "hack" it's pretty much by default.

    3. Re:Yay all the awesome reasons by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.
      Ensures how? throttling my background tabs? How will it affect streaming?

      ArsTechnica has a brief review of Creator's Edition. Concerning Game Mode:

      Game Mode is intended to boost gaming performance by a few percent. The idea is straightforward enough: when a game is using Game Mode, Windows plays around with thread affinities to dedicate processor cores to games, shuffling background tasks to other cores...

      Game Mode is available for both regular Win32 games, and for UWP games sold through the Windows Store. In the case of the latter, Microsoft intends to offer an API so that games can automatically enable the mode. For the former, the user will have to opt in explicitly.

      How much difference does it make in practice? Frankly, I'm not seeing any real difference in the games I've used—to the extent that I'm not even sure Game Mode is functioning.

      So, kinda meh. A lot surely depends on the game, and what else you got going on in your system, but I wouldn't expect a night-to-day difference.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    4. Re:Yay all the awesome reasons by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

      There's already visual previews in edge.

  32. Maybe by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    If my laptop will even finish its current update. For the last while now I turn it on and it starts spinning saying configuring updates 100% complete seemingly indefinitely, it doesn't get to 100% it starts there. (I left it for nearly an hour once and it was still 100% complete) so I kill the power, it turns on again says configuration failed and I'm good to go. The laptop is pretty fucked though and its battery doesn't work. I only use it for videos or streaming xbox otherwise I might look into sorting it out.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  33. Symlinks by cs96and · · Score: 1

    None of the changes mentioned in the summary are of any interest to me. The most exciting feature of the "Creators Update" is the ability to create symlinks without elevation... Woo-hoo!

    http://www.ghacks.net/2016/12/...

    1. Re:Symlinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symlinks without needing admin privileges? Yay - time to party like it's 1978! (the year Windows has now caught up to)

      Maybe one day they'll let you make arbitrary windows always-on-top instead of only videos.

  34. Re:i guess this question is for windows 7 users on by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    I don't believe this one is a mandatory upgrade - Anniversary Edition wasn't, for example, and this is the same level of upgrade.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  35. I am almost positive I will be upgrading. by tlambert · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am almost positive I will be upgrading.

    Not because I want to, but because Microsoft will "upgrade" my machine behind my back, whether I want to upgrade or not.

    God help us all, if they ever get a zero day on Linux, because then a lot more machines will end up "upgraded" to Windows 10...

  36. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And stop asking stupid questions.

  37. Let's take a look at the points, then: by Guspaz · · Score: 0

    > 1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge.
    > 2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks.

    I use Chrome. I don't have any plans to switch.

    > 3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D.

    I don't use Microsoft Paint (paint.net or photoshop works fine), and I don't create 3D models.

    > 4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application.

    This was first possible in Windows 3.0 (I don't think there were any video players for Windows 2.0?). In modern Windows, right click on your media player and select "Always on top".

    > 5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night.

    There have been apps to do this for as long as I can remember.

    > 6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity).

    I don't tend to lock my computer at home, and the large delay (30 seconds after the bluetooth signal drops) before it locks after you walk around the computer makes it useless for any environment that actually requirse real security.

    > 7. Native support for surround sound.

    Windows has had native support for surround sound (without any custom software) since, what, Vista?

    > 8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app.

    Nobody uses Bing Maps. People use Google Maps, or Transit, or even Apple Maps. But not Bing Maps.

    > 9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.

    It's still not clear if it works with the games that people actually own, or if it only works with Windows Store games that have a tiny market share. Also, the only benchmarks we've seen from beta versions show that game mode actually reduces performance by 2-5%.

    > 10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets.

    I'm sure that all three people who mortgaged their houses to buy the HoloLens will be thrilled. For most people, headset (I presume you meant headset) based mixed reality is far enough away that Windows 10 won't be relevant by the time it's a thing.

    1. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I use Chrome. I don't have any plans to switch.

      So just because you use Chrome, everyone does? I don't, for my use cases Chrome sucks donkey balls, so I use Firefox (and Edge in edge cases).

      I don't use Microsoft Paint (paint.net or photoshop works fine), and I don't create 3D models.

      Good for you. Some people surely do. You are most certainly not a shining paragon of computer usage.

      There have been apps to do this for as long as I can remember.

      So? Is any given software allowed to exist only once in that little universe of yours? Is the purpose of an application used a primary key in the data base in your head?

      I don't tend to lock my computer at home, and the large delay (30 seconds after the bluetooth signal drops) before it locks after you walk around the computer makes it useless for any environment that actually requirse real security.

      You forget all the environments where real security is not a must, but locking the computer when away for lunch/making tea/going for a piss still makes sense and avoids pranks by coworkers.

      Windows has had native support for surround sound (without any custom software) since, what, Vista?

      Depends. Maybe this update brings a real time Dolby Surround encoder or something like that.

      Nobody uses Bing Maps. People use Google Maps, or Transit, or even Apple Maps. But not Bing Maps.

      Speak for yourself, kiddo. I use Bing Maps because it is 10 times faster than Google Maps.

      I'm sure that all three people who mortgaged their houses to buy the HoloLens will be thrilled. For most people, headset (I presume you meant headset) based mixed reality is far enough away that Windows 10 won't be relevant by the time it's a thing.

      Windows XP is still widely used, even though it was released over 15 years ago. Windows 7 is the most used version of Windows and is over 7 years old. Mixed reality can become a thing in a few years, and this way Microsoft avoids the chicken and egg problem.

      Dude, grow up, seriously.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Picture in Picture mode isn't quite exactly what you're thinking, I don't think. I believe it allows *developers* to do this easier, or something? link with a bit more information

    3. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      > So just because you use Chrome, everyone does? I don't, for my use cases Chrome sucks donkey balls, so I use Firefox (and Edge in edge cases).

      No, but with roughly 96% of people using browers other than Edge, I definitely do represent the vast majority of users in this particular case. New features for a browser that barely anybody uses is not a big new exciting feature.

      > Good for you. Some people surely do. You are most certainly not a shining paragon of computer usage.

      I really doubt that the typical Windows user cares about doign 3D modeling in mspaint, even if they *do* use mspaint.

      > So? Is any given software allowed to exist only once in that little universe of yours? Is the purpose of an application used a primary key in the data base in your head?

      If free apps have provided the functionality for ages, then it's not worth touting as a big new important feature.

      > You forget all the environments where real security is not a must, but locking the computer when away for lunch/making tea/going for a piss still makes sense and avoids pranks by coworkers.

      30 seconds after the bluetooth signal dies (so let's say 60 seconds after you physically walk away from your computer) is plenty of time for a coworker to play their pranks.

      > Depends. Maybe this update brings a real time Dolby Surround encoder or something like that.

      Give us built-in support for heapdhone surround and I'll be excited. With the exception of home theater use, surroundsound on PC is pretty much completely dead. Klipsch even discontinued the ProMedia 5.1 in favour of just the 2.1. I suspect that this is because everybody who cared about surroundsound on PCs either moved to headphones (gamers, mostly) or home theatres (where you're feeding a receiver over HDMI or spdif), so bringing surround back for headphone users would be pretty nice. There don't seem to really be any existing apps or drivers that offer a good universally compatible headphone surround experience.

      General Dolby Surround encoding may not be very useful. Any device that supports dolby is going to support PCM surround (excepting over toslink due to bandwidth limitations) which is what Windows currently outputs, and you can already bitstream Dolby Surround for media playback.

      > Speak for yourself, kiddo. I use Bing Maps because it is 10 times faster than Google Maps.

      Bing Maps has sub-par address matching capabilities, and a market share that rounds off to 0%, although that's for share of site embedding since it's a lot harder to measure user usage share. New features that benefit Bing Maps aren't likely to excite users when few of them use Bing Maps.

      > Windows XP is still widely used, even though it was released over 15 years ago. Windows 7 is the most used version of Windows and is over 7 years old. Mixed reality can become a thing in a few years, and this way Microsoft avoids the chicken and egg problem.

      WinXP has a ~2% share in North America (and not much higher if you include the whole world), but I understand what you're getting at. The problem is that mixed reality is very far from being practical, let alone mass market. That isn't going to happen by the time Win10 is as old as 7 is today. I'm skeptical it will even happen by the time Win10 is as old as XP is today. VR? Sure, that's a much easier problem to solve.

    4. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Sure, but implementing always-on-top is trivial from a developer standpoint, and then the user can just stick the window in the corner of the screen, so it's still not a big deal. I can see people using it, even if it's not for me, but people can get the same thing now in most of the apps it'd be useful for.

    5. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I agree it's not a big deal. It doesn't quite just look like a normal window though, it's got some different styling so it's less "intrusive" or whatever the marketing speak for it is. ;)

    6. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I like how half your arguments are "nobody uses it so why improve it?" Did you not perhaps think that improving the product might be a reason for people to start using it?

      Edge having a builtin ereader in particular is rather interesting. You can get addons to do it in Chrome (and presumably FF and others) but I don't think any other browser has such a thing native yet.

      Paint having 3D capabilities? Sure that won't help most people but consider say.. small game developers. Those that don't have the skills or knowledge to go crazy with something like Maya or 3dsmax. For comparison in the 2D space, just try doing a simple line drawing in Photoshop or GIMP. Its bloody near impossible because those apps are so focused on "professional" features.

      If this new 3D modeling mode in Paint can fill in the role of "dead simple but does the job for dead simple tasks" like it does for 2D, then it could be a great boon to folk who just need a basic model but aren't the artsy type.

    7. Re:Let's take a look at the points, then: by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      If you improve a feature that nobody uses, one possible outcome is that more people will use it, justifying the effort. Another possible outcome is that nobody benefits from the effort. I would rather Microsoft put their effort into improving things that would benefit larger numbers of people.

  38. A lot more features - including the Bash Shell by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    The summary is a bit unfair in listing a subset of the new features.

    Plenty of articles popped last month on the subject.

    I'm upgrading, but then again, I'm not a paranoid, delusional basement dweller who thinks they should stick with one OS (for the record, I run everything from Linux to Windows and a few things in between, like Apple's stuff - whatever is appropriate for the hardware).

    Also, as somebody who has run 2nd generation SSDs for 8+ years without powering them down, I'm not to worried about Microsoft "needlessly shortening my SSD life" with an update, LOL. I don't have an urgent need to hyperbolize everything or insist people stop liking what I don't like.

    1. Re:A lot more features - including the Bash Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your tech site discussion board post, Pajeet! $2 has been deposited to your Bing Rewards account.

    2. Re:A lot more features - including the Bash Shell by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      "I'm not a paranoid, delusional basement dweller "

      "I don't have an urgent need to hyperbolize everything"

      Do you ever try listening to yourself?

  39. Without consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume it will upgrade on its own during the night without consent or warning, and without saving the content of any of the open apps, just like all other Windows 10 upgrades.

  40. Yes by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    I actually rather like Windows 10, have had no problems with it.

    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. I run windows 10 so clearly I am an idiot. I have been running it for 2 years, sure there have been issues, I am running an enterprise version and I'd say the biggest issue was the change from 1507 to 1511 I did not realize that the enterprise copy my work provided was using a LTSB and therefore refused to update to 1511 nvidia's 1070 drivers required 1511 so I had to get a different version of the enterprise windows 10 that was not a LTSB, not really microsoft's fault more the IT department here or nvidia for esoteric requirements.

      Do I use other OSs sure, RPi, Debian, Cent, I use these for random servers, or things that I want to do with a good scripting environment do they have their place, sure. I do I use them for GUI daily computering? No way. Windows is certainly more flexable, want to send some email, add recurring appointments, update contacts, do some spreadsheeting, then jump into a game of BF:1, gonna have to be windows. Are there issues, yes, do they affect me no, but sure I actually know how to use a computer so maybe that's it. Does Linux have issues, sure, how about looping dependencies that will randomly come up, oh to install perl 5 you need gcc 4.3 but only have 4.2 install, but trying to update gcc fails since you have openssl 0.99c and not f, but when you install openssl 0.99f now PHP 5.4 doesn't work ok so you update to PHP 5.6 only to find out that mysql_connect() is not depriciated for mysqli() fucking awesome so now all my random internal pages fail to work. Oh you say mysql_connect() is a security issue so you should be using mysqli() anyway, well, if you are going to make that argument you better wait until every piece of software's source is carved in stone. Oh but secutiy!!!! Sure my internal page that reads temperature data from a sensor thne posts that on an internal page is now going to get haxed but the drive by FBI van, you're right this is what they have been waiting for. I should have just recoded all of my random projects. Or wait, I could just spin up another VM and do something else in there, and you know what I'll be spinning that up with vSphere on Windows 10.

    2. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that it's crappy at its basic tasks, "people" hate it because it does more than that - without asking or even giving clear insights - and takes away control from the user. I'm one of those, my OS should service ME, NOT the other way around. Running 8.1 and sticking with it till M$ is probably gonna stick it to me. I hope that will be a long time coming.

  41. developers developers developers developers by flacco · · Score: 1

    CREATORS CREATORS CREATORS CREATORS CREATORS!!!!! duuuuhhhhhh.....

    God I so do not miss proprietary shit-ware.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  42. Game mode by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.

    Fascinating a "game mode" would be needed to keep system processes from interfering with the operation of games.

    Preoccupying CPU caches with Microsoft P2P networks to facilitate forced updates and constant data collection must be taxing on otherwise idle W10 systems regardless number of available cores.

    1. Re:Game mode by Altrag · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if "game mode" didn't interfere with the bloody games. No, I don't want to record my fucking game or post it to Facebook or have a damned popup showing up every time I load a program that lets me tell Windows its a game but has no option for "no, this isn't a game and stop freaking asking already."

      See also nVidia's ShadowPlay (which records whether you want it to or not, just in case you change your mind partway through and want to be able to start 30ish seconds before you hit the record button and so on..) They have a global disable option (that may or may not actually work) but its pretty well-hidden.

      I'm sure the PS and XBox do similar things, but at least in those instances because the whole environment is so controlled they can ensure that the games are designed to only use 80% cpu or whatever restrictions are needed to allow the behind-the-scenes recording without interfering with play. PCs don't have that capability since my hardware and usage style are under my control rather than theirs.

      Not to mention people with double screens who may be running more than one game at once. Consider things like Minecrafters that have a separate camera account or (in my case,) having two copies running so that I can duplicate creative-mode contraptions into survival and such things. Yes people who do that are "rare" but not rare enough that we should be ignored -- especially the Youtuber types.

    2. Re:Game mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This point is too stupid to be even included in the list indeed. Only makes them look worse, they would've been better off calling it "better gaming performance", although it's a hard one to sell. Big fat slip of the communications/marketing dept.

  43. Already upgraded most systems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already upgraded all my servers to Debian, one laptop and one netbook to Linux Mint, and some computers to Linux Mint. I still have Win7 on one laptop I don't really use, a home theatre PC that I will upgrade soon, and my main rig which will get upgraded to Mint when I buy Ryzen. Gaming will take a hit, but other than that I've been extremely happy with the changes to Linux I've made over the last year. I will probably keep one Windows 7 around for Windows only games, and pass on any Windows 10 or Direct 12 exclusive games.

    prove yourself = possible

  44. Upgrade for sure! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Yes, upgrade from MS Windows to Linux! Use that most of the time, run Windows only in a VM and only if you have to. If it's absolutely necessary, have a computer that boots into Windows - but the more dust said computer collects, the better for you and for the entire world.

    Elsewhere on Slashdot is a story about why Flash died. Too bad it wasn't talking about Windows instead. I had no love for Flash either; but if I got to choose which one of them would be pushing up daisies, Flash blocking browser extensions would still be a thing.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  45. Upgrade to? by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Why is Windows 10 considered an upgrade to anything save, oh, Bob or GEM?

    1. Re:Upgrade to? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Nice for computer games. All MS can then see you like computer games. Do any real computing on a real OS.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  46. "Will You Upgrade?" by d41d8cd98f00b204e980 · · Score: 1

    do I have a choice?

  47. Does it still look like poop? by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

    I actually just this week stocked up on some Skylake parts, as to avoid a forced upgrade that comes with Kaby Lake. The key issue for me would be: Does the UI still look like the afterbirth from Win 3.1?
     
    By all accounts, the answer is yes. It is utterly beyond me how such a terrible eye-straining flat UI could be launched in this decade.

    1. Re:Does it still look like poop? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the look. Minimal is good. I use Windows 8.1 with some registry tweaks and I far prefer that look to the overly glossy Windows 7 which has so much gloss it's like it's trying to pick up users on a street corner. I prefer OSX even more, gets rid of the pointless borders altogether. The start menu in Windows 10 sucks though, as well as the phone-line apps store and metro UI, but for desktop look I like it.

      Everything else in Windows 10 sucks though.

      Maybe that's part of the problem - the user is given no choice. Choice is a good thing but Microsoft feels like choice is an enemy and constantly seeks to thwart user choice. We should have a choice of a flat minimalist look or a high gloss aero look, and all sorts of tweaks in between. Why should anyone's desktop be forced to look like their neighbor's? (I'm still surprised at the few windows 10 users at work who never even bother to change from the default background image)

  48. Re:i guess this question is for windows 7 users on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is now.

  49. Wrong question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will your computer upgrade? Or will you pull a Kaspar Hauser on it and cut it off from the outside world? You may still find that it anticipated your move and one day, when you least expect it, it will have rolled on its mouse balls to the next Ethernet socket and spent all your data allotment on Windows10 Creators like an addicted child on crack.

  50. Some things not mentioned... by Fencepost · · Score: 2

    The main thing mentioned that I care about is the new screen dimmer, but I've been using f.lux for years.

    "Dynamic Lock" could be very handy (auto-lock when you walk away) and I've been looking into something to do that, but I'm looking at it for a scenario of PCs in exam rooms so pairing all of them to doctors' phones isn't really a viable option.

    Not mentioned in the summary, but possibly important to readers here:

    Improvements to control over updates, such as being able to prevent driver updates.

    Improvements to privacy settings - Maybe not so relevant if you're using O&O ShutUp, but nice to have. Apparently includes the ability to see (and clear) the info that MS has, along with a reduction of the info sent when you're using "Basic" telemetry settings.

    An upgrade to Windows Subsystem for Linux (will be bumped to Ubuntu 16.04 from the current 14.04) and better integration with Windows apps.

    A navigation bar in the registry, which could actually be really handy.

    If you use OneDrive on both a desktop with tons of storage (and everything local) and a laptop with an SSD smaller than what's in your OneDrive, now there will apparently be better behavior for files not local on the smaller system. Currently, you basically just modify in OneDrive Settings which folders are available on each system.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  51. Long £$%^ing FIle Paths ? Why the £$%@ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they saving it for NTFS's 30th anniversary FFS ?

  52. Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Misagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to "Barnacules Nerdgasm" on Youtube, who previously worked on Windows at Microsoft, people he know who are still inside have told him that "telemetry" (I.e. spying) will get harder to disable in future updates. Whether all of these will be in this next update or in a future one is hard to say.

    He commented to his own video with this:

    I've been talking to a few 'insiders' at Microsoft that are also saying that many of the things like App Store and Telemetry are now being hard coded into key services like explorer.exe and critical system services that if stopped will crash the box immediately. The reason for this is obviously to prevent programs like anti-beacon from disabling these services. It's pretty obvious at this point that Microsoft wants the data at any cost and their cover story is bullshit. I'll update you guys when I know more or when the Windows releases are public that contain these changes and we'll do a video on how to create a network bridge between your system and the internet to prevent telemetry from working even with all the services on the box trying to make contact.ï

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by imidan · · Score: 1

      create a network bridge between your system and the internet to prevent telemetry from working

      This is exactly what I want before I upgrade from Windows 7. I recognize that I'll probably eventually need to upgrade to 10, but I want a hardware solution to stop my OS chatting with its mothership.

    2. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not too hard -- Linux has several firewall options (iptables vs firewalld (*)) and you can run it on a $50 used pc with 2 nics.
      Takes a little bit of setup but you can do some amazing stuff with iptables. And the newer system
      (net-something) is probably even better. Move your wireless router inside the firewall and just
      use it as an access point. Put DHCP on Linux. We've been running this way for years with
      zero hiccups.

      (*) I know this will inflame some readers.

    3. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      App Store and Telemetry are now being hard coded into key services like explorer.exe and critical system services that if stopped will crash the box immediately.

      Aside from running Office, Windows PC are for gaming. It's their bread-and-butter outside of their vendor-lock-in office software suite and pre-install base. Without those exclusives people would jump ship. Even with the premium for low-end hardware many still leave the Garden that Gates Built for the Apple Orchard.

      But if gamers start thinking that all this telemetry stuff is impacting their FPS, people will start releasing binary patches to shut it off. DRM and Copy protection and content encryption already gets broken the day of release. These vendors have had decades of things like dial-home restrictions that get broken.

      Microsoft will have to start using secure boot and binary singing to prevent people from turning off their spyware. And you will see a flood of YouTube videos to workaround that for a few more frames-per-second or bits-per-second or reduced chance to drop in the middle of a tournament.

      We've seen this war. The vendors always lose.

    4. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of Linux and BSD distributions to make it easy.

    5. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it will eventually be baked into the kernel.

    6. Re:Harder to counter Microsoft spying on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setup a block list in your router.

  53. Windows 10 that I will upgrade to by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. will allow to completely disable telemetry (or won't include it at all)
    2. will not have any mention of UWP/Metro (right now it's even built into Explorer)
    3. will allow to control updates and Windows Defender
    4. will return Classic Control Panel along with all removed options like Glass, Classic UI, etc.
    5. Will introduce Service packs back.

    Until then Windows 7 is more than good for me.

    1. Re:Windows 10 that I will upgrade to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until then Windows 7 is more than good for me.

      But don't you WANT a file browser that reminds you to enjoy a tall refreshing can of Pepsi?

    2. Re:Windows 10 that I will upgrade to by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      allow to completely disable telemetry (or won't include it at all)

      Telemetry. How quaint. My ISP is probably now tracking and selling all my Internet usage regardless of what OS I'm using.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    3. Re:Windows 10 that I will upgrade to by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      At least your ISP doesn't force you to install a keylogger, alone with voice recording and personal files scanning. Besides you can always "opt out" by using VPN/Opera VPN/Tor. Most people won't do, which is why a lot of websites nowadays employ SSL.

  54. Of course. by emil · · Score: 1

    Worst case scenario, you would block them at your router (assuming that you control the network).

    The update will likely crash (as occurred with the last major update), and require a manual download and installation.

    But now that you mention it, RemixOS sounds better all the time.

  55. Switched To FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never looking back. Even with its relative issues compared to Linux, FreeBSD is a dream of a personal computer OS compared to Windows 10.

  56. Idea for Microsoft by emil · · Score: 1

    The people who need quality patches that have undergone thorough regression testing will likely pay for it.

    "Windows Update Premium Subscription" should delay patches for all products until they are verified correct, and allow the user to schedule the patch runs.

    $200/year, and many would likely pay it.

  57. Yes, I will upgrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to Debian Jessie.

  58. Home Edition by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    For everyday users, they really need to dump Windows 10 Home Edition, replace it with Windows 10 Pro, then just call it Windows 10.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  59. Re:What is it with companies and dumb program name by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    How about leaving Paint alone (2D editing) and create something else instead of cramming 3D editing into Paint?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  60. Only if my IT dept pushes it by gosand · · Score: 1

    I only use it at work. I use Linux at home, and my family uses Win7.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  61. Okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you *can* do is a depth-first traversal of the entire GUI

    Spoken like a zealot who hasn't had experience with Windows in over a decade.

    Power users don't use the GUI, champ.

    1. Re:Okay. by fisted · · Score: 1

      who hasn't had experience with Windows in over a decade.

      That's surprisingly spot-on, but overall missing the point, because the same goes for the CLI and whatever tools are provided. protip: you don't have to provide a tool to turn off $feature.

  62. Now with more spying and forced updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 will help serve the public even better once our new Connect-to-spying-ISP module is completed now that the new law is almost passed. Just think of what Windows 10 Telemetry AND ISP-Logging can do!

  63. Do we really have a choice? by jsepeta · · Score: 2

    Eventually Microsoft will shovel the Creators' update onto all Windows 10 computers.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  64. Depends if the Spinning Wheel of Death will let me by pincorrect · · Score: 1

    My one Windows 10 PC, a laptop, just received an automatic update and is now in the Spinning Wheel of Death. The one nice thing about the Spinning Wheel of Death is that it prevents it from booting up and receiving more shitty updates from Microsoft. What a P.O.S. My Windows 7 machines employ active measures to prevent them from being infected with Windows 10.

  65. Great... Push an update just before US Tax Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the odd this breaks Turbo Tax or H&R Block...

  66. major update again? by realwhz · · Score: 1

    Oh no ... every time I saw the word "major", I have to pray and hope that the update won't ruin my box (especially the coexisting linux installation).

  67. nope ... never. Not willingly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No list of features is more than the cost of moving from my current version.
    Each time I get forced to do this, the cost of moving to the next version goes up. This has been happening since XP.
    The features don't exist in a vacuum, and the context has high costs.
    The marketing of the feature is not the same as the substance of the feature.
    - https://goo.gl/images/6UzYJj

    EngrStudent

  68. Probably not... by sigmabody · · Score: 1

    Not that I wouldn't necessarily want it, but since I have the Windows Update service permanently disabled because it's so incredibly and ridiculously obnoxious and "poorly designed" (for which that phrase alone in this context gives the idea of software design a bad name), I don't think I'll ever get prompted for it.

    I'm still holding out for the day when MS manages to extract their metaphorical head from their ass for just long enough to comprehend that being as obtrusive as humanly possible with pushing updates is a MONUMENTALLY STUPID business decision, if you want people to actually take updates. Gotta stop drooling on the floor before you can walk, gotta walk before you can run, gotta run before you can pitch an "upgrade" as an actual upgrade, etc.

  69. Re:nope ... never. Not willingly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this version of OS tanks as badly as their last one. Their continued proliferation of giving my computer existential failures should be reflected in existential-scale hits to revenue for their corporation.

  70. Stop calling every update an 'upgrade' by lpq · · Score: 0

    Win10 was a downgrade in so many ways, its hard to see how they can continue to claim it is an "upgrade".

    Maybe when Win10 supports the *option* for the same features of the Win7 Desktop, and stops trying to dumb down Desktops to the level of a smartphone, it would *start* to be an "upgrade", but it really is an "upgrade" to move to Win10, it's NOT an upgrade.

    Win10 has been about supporting a lower level of OS, to *rent* and never own (can you turn off ads: no) and business Win10 is only available on a 1/person/year basis.

    All the functionality that was in XP -- moved to the appstore, where you can repurchase it ... again and again...

    Upgrade? Ha!

  71. What arrogance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about control.

    You are deflecting by blaming the users. Microsoft shouldn't have default services on in the first place!

    What arrogance.

  72. An that's a big NO on my part by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    None of those 'upgrades' is enough to get me to download it.

  73. I am on Pro with deferred updates... by williamyf · · Score: 1

    So, when the update comes my way in a few more months, with fewer rough edges after the microsoft personel apha tested it, the insiders beta-1 tested it and the home users beta-2 tested it, I'll be glad to be a beta-3 tester for the enterprise guys ;-)

    More seriously, yes, i''l get it, but will not go out of my way to get it on April, or may, or june, or july, or...
    Besides, I use a mac, this is in Bootcamp anyhow.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  74. Re: Great... Push an update just before US Tax Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know it turns out you don't have to do your taxes on April 17th. They can be done what's called earlier.

  75. Will you upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly no. Microsoft has destroyed Windows as an operating system, and I'll not upgrade. I used to like windows and windows server, maintaining networks of windows boxes put my wife and two kids through college. I still have two windows 7 machines, neither of which receives updates or connects to the internet. One used for programming radios and other hardware, and the other for that occasional file or program that is inaccessible from 'nix. So long Microsoft, It was ok while it lasted.

  76. No chance by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 will be my last version of Windows on any computer that I own.

    MS tactics is forcing upgrades to win 10 would have been enough to put me off. However, bundling spyware and adware right in with the OS guaranteed that I would never have win 10. Right now, my employer has win 7 on our work computers but they will probably have little choice but to move to 10. My personal use on windows is pretty much just gaming and a few specialised applications which I can live without.

    Linux has long been my main OS at home and I wouldn't even boot into windows monthly now. Most of my games run perfectly on Linux. While I like a couple of the MS Office applications, open source alternatives that run on Linux do just about everything that I could ever want.

    I lot of friends and relatives are moving to Linux or dumping their desktop OS and moving to Android tablets because that have used Win 10 on their laptops and absolutely hated it. People are often horrified to learn that Windows 10 is spying on them. Windows is not going to die but it is losing market share.

  77. Haven't installed it yet by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    So obviously, no, I won't be updating. Don't need that level of over the shoulder regardless of the presented bennies.

  78. Once again, Betteridg applies by sconeu · · Score: 1

    The answer is no.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  79. Genuine question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to update anyways, have you looked into LibreOffice's features in comparison to upgrading to a newer version of Office instead?

    It may turn out to not be ready for your applications, but if it is you could start people on it for cheap/free and find a software support company for it when you're ready to 'take it enterprise'.

    While I had been pretty content to just let people use what they were used to using in the past, since adding the ribbon bar and breaking various cornercases with old save formats, Microsoft has really been on a downward decline in both the quality of Office and making migration between versions cheap/easy enough to warrant it in a corporate setting. LibreOffice at least tries to nominally keep the UI similiar to past revisions, even as they add options like a selectable ribbon mode for people migrating from Microsoft's.

  80. Will I upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck no.

    Windows 8 was a disaster.

    Windows 10 is even worse.

    Windows 7 forever.

  81. why? by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    How the heck does adding an option to Edge or feature to Paint qualify as an operating system update? The surround sound thing probably is tied to the OS, and the headset thing might be, too. Other than that, these are just software updates to things that people just don't need. For God's sake, deliver the OS and the apps separately. Give the apps away in the app store or, if they're really worth a damn, charge a few bucks for them....however ya want. MS knows how to do this....Office, Minecraft, etc. If people jump onto an app and it becomes the "next big thing", then GREAT! MS should spend some effort making it available to Macs and Linux users, too, and profit away. Just stop confusing updates to these applications as critical updates for the operating system. The average user out there probably isn't paying enough attention to know the difference, and making these updates appear important really just confuses the users when truly critical updates to the OS do get delivered.

  82. Free is too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when it involves stealing my privacy and advertising to me.

    Running an XP desktop and 7 laptop. Windows update disabled on both. Don't care about new features. Never saw one that helped me in any way, but it sure helps them advertise to me.

    Their security updates often break something. So I secure my borders instead. If someone does get in anything of value is encrypted.

    1. Re: Free is too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you prefer to expose your systems to many bug,s mainly how many bug fixes did XP have and you have not update a single one. Twonk

    2. Re: Free is too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAT

  83. Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a fully featured OS that does well to secure people who just want to use it to do their dumb user crap that is entirely obtainable for free (still) and actually improves performance on older hardware

    Nothing else exists that matches that, yet how many people have found the time just today to write essays and outline why they're adamantly opposed to it. what could be achieved if this collective idiocy could be harnessed for the greater good?

  84. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  85. Win10 fanboys? by lpq · · Score: 1

    I never knew there were win10 fanboys (re: getting marked down).
    Marking someone Troll because they hurt your feelings in not a correct usage of moderation points. If only you had explained why what I said was 'untrue', or refuted it you might have some impact, but from someone who had to rescue their 80+y/o mom from a "Welcome to Windows 10" who thought MS had forced the move to win10 without even asking her.

    Of course that *is* what happened to many when they tried to get out of that fake screen. If it was really an "Upgrade", why would MS feel a need to deceive people to opt in to the conversion?

    Upgrades are things people want, not something you have to trick them into installing.

  86. Gimmicky updates by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience.

    If this mode doesn't disable telemetry so you can keep your ping down and bandwidth optimal, then it's worthless.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  87. who need this ? by datadefender · · Score: 1

    my PC is a workhorse. Due to MS-Office it has to be Windows. I don't really care for 7, 8 or 10. The OS the foundation for the applications.
    I do not need any of the fancy stuff - just a robust platform. So I stay on 7 until no longer supported.
    And by then I hope that WINE is good enought to run MS Office under Linux - or better M$ has a Linux version - yes I would even pay for it

  88. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I do understand why many may want MS Office on Linux, I think that would be a horrible idea. MS would just bake the same telemetry features in Office for Linux. If more people would adopt the open document formats, instead of using MS's proprietary format, the world would become a better place. Adobe and Microsoft need to stay away from Linux. Open source has come a long way, some products just need more development to bring them up to commercial levels.

    I dumped MS Office and Photoshop six years ago, and Outlook 1.5 years ago. Things have been very pleasant since.

  89. OFCN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course not. I won't be upgrading until their mythical "single user enterprise license for $7/mo" is actually available.

    People keep saying this is a thing, but I have not been able to find any information about it anywhere except for a single, old, news article about "planned rollout" of the option. Someone prove me wrong with a working link to a microsoft site that I can buy said license from, right now, as a single user. Please, I'm waiting.

    Why do articles hyping up Win10 features keep showing up on /. when everyone knows Microsoft is deliberately and intentionally screwing over all of their users?

  90. Public Alpha Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defer everything!

  91. Game mode - reason enough to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience." -- This alone is, at least theoretically, worth the upgrade. It's so annoying to run a game in slow motion when Windows 10 Home does its upgrade/maintenance thing under the hood.

    1. Re:Game mode - reason enough to upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re telemetry: Microsoft rebuilt Windows from scratch and wanted hundreds of millions of machines for testing, which requires a built-in configuration + bug reporting tool, a.k.a. telemetry. Without telemetry there would be no "free" Windows 10. However, when the main phase of development and testing is over I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft reversed course to charge "free" users for upgrades.

  92. My Take On This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Take On This (and I am currently running Windows 10) answers in { } after the updates and them more at the end:

    1. Visual previews of tabs in Microsoft Edge. {who cares, why not fix Edge so you don't have to do 50 clicks to save a file in the proper folders because you sort your downloads, quit forcing me to save where MS wants me to. I save to a server not my local machine. Fix Edge so it does not crash I have 30 tabs open Edge crashes all the time IE works perfectly, and so does FireFox so MS should be able to fix Edge. Let me completely override Bing I don't want to use it but Edge forces me to use it. I just want to open to Google WITHOUT google or Bing search, tips or any help}
      2. Edge now has built-in support for ebooks. {again who cares I already have a eBook reader that supports every format and it is not in my browser and I can sort, search, mark, etc. etc. books. Plus I can share my config on my phone an other computers. Why not work on something that is needed}
      3. Microsoft Paint now lets people create models in 3D. {Huge who cares, if I am going to do 3D I will use software for that not some severely limited paint program, come on who really thought this was an idea, are you so desperate for updates ?? WTH}
      4. Picture-in-Picture mode for videos. Essentially you can now have a small window with video playing on it placed on top of any other application. {again, who cares any decent video player can do this and much much much much more. This is completely unneeded}
      5. Night Light: A baked in feature in Windows that will allow you to change the color and tone of display so that it doesn't pain your eyes to look at the screen at night. {Ok, stealing f.lux, great another software that works well that will be built into Windows and crippled. no thanks}
      6. Dynamic Lock: The feature first requires you to pair your phone or tablet with the computer. Once done, it will automatically log you out everytime you're away from desk (or technically speaking, the device is out of the computer's proximity). {Log me out, hell no, I don't want that, lock the computer yes, but not log out I am working on projects and I leave my computers (yes more than 1 or 2 more like 10) on all the time I only lock them and that is it.}
      7. Native support for surround sound. {Maybe, I don't know, many are not connecting computers to TV's and Home Sound systems anymore, we have built in software for this now-a-days, again maybe ??}
      8. Ability to scribble and make notes on Microsoft's Maps app. {another beyond who cares}
      9. Game mode: It "ensures" your computer is always maximizing its resources for an optimal gaming experience. {I can see this, ok, good idea}
      10. Built-in support for mixed reality handsets. {Ok}

    Why not fix things that are needed:

    1) Fix Edge, crashing issues, save as issues, all the buttons in the wrong places so going between FireFox, IE, is terrible. Remove the Bing requirements, make all settings on one page or place not a few here, some in advanced and the rest are hidden or can only be changed via the registry.
    2) Fix Admin access to the machines. We need to be able to RDP without logging the user out to fix the machine remotely, just like Server lets 2 people on so should Windows Workstations from 7 to 10 and later. Come help us out we have to install 3rd party software to do this. It should just be built in by now. Also fix RDP so you can log in and show a remote user how to do something, again have to use 3rd party software for this. unbelievable}
    3) Windows Updates: Fix this so the user has complete control on how these are downloaded and deployed. (I understand security and I understand the need my MS to force this, but provide a warning or something when you turn things off or only want a machine to reboot every 90 days or something) Even the ability to turn it off completely. I have systems that run 24x7x365 and cannot be re-booted but at very certain times or days. Windows 10 reboots when it wants and I cannot tell it the machine is used 24x7x365 and to never reboot.

    Thanks for reading...hope MS looks at this.