Slashdot Mirror


Companies Start Implanting Microchips Into Workers' Bodies (latimes.com)

A Swedish start-up called Epicenter is offering to implant its employees and start-up members with microchips that function as swipe cards, allowing them to open doors, operate equipment or buy food and drinks with a wave of the hand. While these microchips have been available for decades, the technology has never been implanted in humans on such a broad scale. "Epicenter and a handful of other companies are the first to make chip implants broadly available," reports Associated Press. From the report: [A]s with most new technologies, it raises security and privacy issues. Although the chips are biologically safe, the data they generate can show how often employees come to work or what they buy. Unlike company swipe cards or smartphones, which can generate the same data, people cannot easily separate themselves from the chips. Epicenter, which is home to more than 100 companies and roughly 2,000 workers, began implanting workers in January 2015. Now, about 150 workers have the chips. A company based in Belgium also offers its employees such implants, and there are isolated cases around the world in which tech enthusiasts have tried them out in recent years. The small implants use near-field communication technology, or NFC, the same as in contactless credit cards or mobile payments. When activated by a reader a few inches away, a small amount of data flows between the two devices via electromagnetic waves. The implants are "passive," meaning they contain information that other devices can read, but cannot read information themselves. Ben Libberton, a microbiologist at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute, says hackers could conceivably gain huge swaths of information from embedded microchips. The ethical dilemmas will become bigger the more sophisticated the microchips become. Epicenter workers stage monthly events where attendees can receive the implant.

178 comments

  1. Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they scan the real-time position of the chip? Because very morning they'll measure about 30 minutes of rapid wrist motion on the right arm and slow finger movements on the left...

    1. Re:Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the the data correlation algorithms match those mornings to your least productive days, you will be asked to undergo chemical castration. For the good of the Team.

    2. Re: Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I scratch the candida out, I seem to have some sort of yeast overgrowth, it itches like a mofo. But combined with the self-molesting, it's pleasurable.

    3. Re:Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, maybe it can help me fap more efficiently, ensuring a perfect orgasm every time!

    4. Re:Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean every instead of very? Grammar is not a game.

    5. Re: Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you keepinkling score then?

    6. Re:Meta data? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Learning guitar, eh? Good for you. Builds character.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Meta data? by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Or, they'll match the days you skip the wank and go to work horny with your least productive days and then require everyone to have an orgasm before coming in to work.

  2. This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A bracelet with the chip in it would be a much better alternative, with no need to implant anything, cause tissue scarring, risk infection, etc.

    Seriously, it could be a silicone band. Or a ring. Or a little sticker you could apply to any piece of jewelry you want.

    1. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by InvalidsYnc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the point is more of that it cannot be separated from the person. You have to steal a body part to impersonate them, vs just snagging the band/ring/etc.

      Not that I condone it, just speaking to one of the reasons why something that cannot be easily separated from someone would have an advantage.

    2. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me point out that people used to get their cars stolen. Then anti-theft chipped keys came along and we got car jackings and home invasions.

      So, if you work in a secure facility that someone really wants into... this ensures the bad guys always know where the keys are and how to get them, and you're not going to like it when they do.

      It's just a bad idea. This company's doing it as a PR gimmick.

    3. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, if you work in a secure facility that someone really wants into... this ensures the bad guys always know where the keys are and how to get them, and you're not going to like it when they do.

      Note to self: do not implant secure access microchip in dick.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    4. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Or it could be a badge that shows your picture, name, and any other information your employer thinks is prudent to show. If an unfamiliar face shows up in a secure area, other employees don't need a special reader and database access to check the stranger's badge.

    5. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      Don't forget about the implant ripping out of your body if you get an MRI.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    6. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by zawarski · · Score: 1

      Which, coincidentally, are the top two millennial motivations!

    7. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Badges can be faked, so I've always been a fan of the badge being a link to call up a digital version that can be used with live facial recognition (be it human or computer-based).

      There's a big difference between a little 'cut and paste' on a physical ID (though that can be a pretty impressive criminal art) and inserting a complete record into a (hopefully fairly secure) database.

    8. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by snookiex · · Score: 1

      Unless your partner has one in her vagina...

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    9. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by ctilsie242 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This just oozes stupid. To boot, we already had a company (VeriChip) already try this over a decade ago, to at best a ho-hum audience. Here is why this sucks:

      1: The chip can't really be updated. If there is a security break, the insecure chip is there forever.
      2: Someone can be looking for the company employees to target them.
      3: With how employees are hired/fired, having an armful of chips will suck over time.
      4: I read about bad reactions to these in animals.
      5: This is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Nobody glues a mechanical key to their body for a reason.

      If a company wants to ensure individuals can get in without an ID card, go with biometrics and a PIN, the biometrics being a "username", the PIN being the password. If a company wants higher security than a badge, have a badge + PIN, badge + biometrics, or all three. That will work for 99.99% of all security needs.

    10. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

      These thing get implanted like a millimeter below the surface. Someone skilled could remove it without you even noticing immediately.
      Also, an easier method would just be to scan for the chip and making a software copy.
      the great thing about a card is that it can be shielded when not in use.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    11. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad Guys? Is that you, Liam Neeson?

    12. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is more of that it cannot be separated from the person. You have to steal a body part to impersonate them, vs just snagging the band/ring/etc.

      That doesn't follow. Instead of stealing the key, you can either (a) cut out the chip, or (b) force the person to come with you at gunpoint/knifepoint.

    13. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Yeah but - without that tracking chip McKoy imbedded under their skin, Kirk and Spock might still be trapped in that jail cell. So there are distinct advantages to the tech which you're obviously and willfully ignoring.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      Worse, it gets rid of my excuse for being late of "I realized in the car that I forgot my badge and had to go back for it".

    15. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges.

    16. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be non-magnetic (plastic and copper) but the alternating magnetic fields of anMRI could generate enough current to fry the circuits.

    17. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Note to self: do not implant secure access microchip in dick.

      Not adequate.

    18. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect of psychopaths and the idiots that follow them?

      Captcha: cohere

    19. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Badgers? We don't need no stinky badgers.

    20. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      There are lots of things you can't put through an MRI (and some people are allergic to the imagining fluid) so it's not as though people are put through MRIs without being made sure it's safe to do so.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    21. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Sure, you want a secure database as your primary authorization back-end -- but badges deter electronic cloning attacks, casual tailgating, and generally raise the cost of an undetected intrusion.

    22. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by peragrin · · Score: 1

      The scanning trick only works if the system doesn't use a token to do authenticating. If you embed a serial number and then transmit a time stamp and let the token hash the two then you have to record the whole transaction and need the chip itself to forge. However once you have the chip then all bets are off anyways.

      Usually you want to get in and out unnoticed.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    23. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by vittal · · Score: 1

      Simple solution to #4: Stop reading.

      This solution was brought to you by channelling my inner Pat Robertson.

    24. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by es330td · · Score: 1

      With how employees are hired/fired, having an armful of chips will suck over time.

      I think it more likely that this will become the equivalent of badges in games. People will brag about having a chip from Google, Snapchat or [insert trendy tech company here.] Next there will be dating sites where prospects will be filtered by previous employment.

    25. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      Or a chip embedded into an ID card which could be hung around someone's neck or attached to their belt.

      Wait a minute...

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    26. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 4, Informative
      This bullshit is so old. Here's Robyn Curnow's article on having a microchip removed after getting it implanted to obtain "VIP" access at a bar around 13 years ago:

      http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/10/05/spark.bajabeach

      Once back home in London, I begin to feel uncomfortable and unsure about my VIP status.

      The Baja Web site assures that getting rid of the microchip is a simple and harmless procedure, something like removing a splinter.

      But the two doctors I consult in London's Harley Street disagree. Getting the microchip became serious business.

      Hard to find

      General practitioner Dr. Stuart Sanders referred me to consultant plastic surgeon Lena Andersson as soon as he realized he could not feel the microchip.

      It was buried so deep inside my upper arm that Andersson sent me off for an X-ray, and even that did not help the doctors.

      Although the microchip was visible on the X-ray, it was impossible to pinpoint the exact location in my arm as it was nowhere near the point of insertion.

      Finding it involved surgery at the clinic and a severe dose of post-Baja regret. One night out in Barcelona has permanently seared into my upper left arm.

      While splayed out on an operating table -- once again anaesthetized -- Andersson removed the chip using a high-tech sensor X-ray and two monitors to guide her to it.

      The missing microchip was finally located -- more than a centimeter away from where it was inserted.

      Andersson later explained that it was so difficult to remove because it was so small and soft.

      "It is very soft. I understand why we had a problem finding it. You couldn't feel it and I couldn't feel it. The smaller they are, the more difficult they are to get out."

      So, now I have a small microchip the size of a large piece of Basmati rice in a specimen jar as a souvenir -- I also have eight-millimeter scar on my upper left arm.

    27. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      So, if you work in a secure facility that someone really wants into... this ensures the bad guys always know where the keys are and how to get them

      This is already the case. Actual "secure" facilities require some sort of swipe card/badge/etc plus a PIN number. And the bad guys are why you are actually given two PIN numbers, one that opens the door and one that opens the door and summons security.

    28. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      If you've ever tried to go through a secure door with your hands full, you'd understand why a token you don't need to handle is nice.

      Especially if the reader is a little above waist level, where your arms would naturally be if carrying something.

    29. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some parts of the world, thugs chop off a finger if the gold ring won't come off easily.

      Now this thing is implanted in the hand, between thumb and index finger. Easy enough to cut open to get at the chip. I'd much rather have a ring or key that I can take off at gunpoint - if I ever get an access device for the vault door.

      We have already seen the movies where they take an eye out to trick the retina scanners. . .

    30. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I will remember for sure the second one, given I never used it.

    31. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, the stupids are the old geezers that can't adapt to the present times and keep screwing up big time. No millennial fucked up the environment, for once. Or fucked over the next generation because of their greed.

    32. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Actual secure facilities have guards at the entrances, even if it's just a poor receptionist with a panic button on the wrong side of the bulletproof glass.

      And yes, I've seen that, though it was really only to keep activists/protestors out, not anyone who might come in with significant 'hardware'. I've never had the opportunity or inclination to check out military-grade security.

    33. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, considering how much they love this wave-of-the-hand concept, why not wear a bracelet with chip in it?
      Too easy to steal? OK then, perhaps a keycard. Gasp! that's done already!

      Yes you are right, an external solution is better than the internal/semi-permananct one.

    34. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I think the point is more of that it cannot be separated from the person.

      You could do that with superglue rather than surgery.

    35. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullet proof glass does nothing to protect a person from a high-end laser aimed at their eyes or from puking from a dazzler (whatever those things are called).

    36. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Then anti-theft chipped keys came along and we got car jackings and home invasions.

      Except that car jackings and home invasions have gone down.

    37. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So cloudy bulletproof glass?

    38. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by rnturn · · Score: 1

      But, if this catches on and most companies wind up adopting this, MRIs become less and less useful as a diagnostic tool for the medical community. All because of a supposed convenience for the patient's employer. Questionable trade-off (IMHO).

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    39. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual "secure" facilities require some sort of swipe card/badge/etc plus a PIN number.

      And not just any PIN number but a personal PIN number. For identification.

    40. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by zawarski · · Score: 1

      Hit a sore spot, snowflake?

    41. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - which is why I'd want to have such a chip in a finger ring. Plastic ring for guests, steel ring for workers, silver ring for middle management, solid gold for bosses.

    42. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      You're gonna need that MRI to find the cancer once it spreads from the flesh around the chip.

      We've already seen the tumors from chipping animals.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/08/AR2007090800997_pf.html

    43. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      The easy solution to make sure people remember the second one is to make it be the first one plus a small number, say 1-10. You could even just make it be the first one plus the last digit of the first one (or first, second, etc.) to make it even easier.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    44. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      My thought, also. When I was thinking why they'd want an implant instead of a bracelet, I had to start wondering how much alcohol their employees consume on a typical evening.

    45. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The second one is usually a variation of the first one. Like +5 to one of the digits, or reverse the order.

  3. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Epicenter workers stage monthly events where attendees can receive the implant."

    welcome to our cult.

    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the word "epicenter" pretty much never has a positive connotation. If you find you're at the likely epicenter of anything, you sure want to get the hell out of there!

    2. Re:lol by arth1 · · Score: 1

      "Epicenter workers stage monthly events where attendees can receive the implant."

      Especially on April 1.
      Just saying.

  4. Not a big deal by kelarius · · Score: 1

    As long as the implants are completely voluntary and offer to remove them when no longer wanted, I don't see a problem here.

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    1. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you need to reassess the term 'voluntary', as there are many ways that corporate management can 'entice' you to 'volunteer' against your will. It's a slippery slope here, and as a previous poster mentioned not only invades privacy beyond what is required to achieve the desired function (unlock a door, purchase lunch), but also imposes health risks that many may not wish to undertake merely for the sake of employment.

    2. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Voluntary is when my choice between yes or no carries with it negative and positive outcomes on BOTH sides. If the employees choose not to have the implants there is a negative outcome (your employer may consider that you are not a "team player") along with the positive outcome (no chip).

      I think you might be confusing Voluntary with Trial. Trial is when something happens and the people who do not volunteer for the testing are not affected in any way.

      It's a common mistake.

    3. Re:Not a big deal by RazorSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a dangerous way of thinking. The problem is that making microchip implants ordinary opens the door for these type of things to be abused. First it's just voluntary for those who want to work for a particular company, then it's just ordinary for those who work for particular industries, then it's just your driver's license. At first all it does is open doors, and then later iterations will monitor your location and health and who you interact with.

      Sure, it's a slippery slope argument but slippery slope arguments aren't necessarily fallacious. This has already happened with cell phones. They started as a niche device and now it's difficult to function in society without one. And they collect all your information and make privacy obsolete. It doesn't take a ridiculous amount of foresight to see the dangers of certain technologies. George Orwell predicted the danger of televisions with cameras/microphones connected to the internet in 1949 yet we still allow these things in our home without demanding legislative protections to our privacy.

      I see a problem here.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    4. Re:Not a big deal by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 1

      >This has already happened with cell phones. They started as a niche device and now it's difficult to function in society without one.

      I like your point and your analogy, but actually, it's not that hard to function in society without a cell phone. I've been doing it for years. The only downside is a slight delay in getting the information you need or communicating with someone. I find the trade-off totally worth it.

    5. Re:Not a big deal by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Not having all information readily available at any given time is not a required function for daily living.
      I feel sorry for anyone who sees their cell phone in such a way.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  5. What's the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody already carries their phones with them everywhere they go.

  6. They can implant it on my watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please implant it on my watch or anything else wearable that I usually carry around but easily can leave behind. Thank you.

    1. Re:They can implant it on my watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can implant it on my issued badge, but nothing I own.
      If this is ever a condition of employment I would fire my employer.

    2. Re: They can implant it on my watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi AC,

      If you don't want to be a level 1 cyborg maybe slashdot isn't the right place for you. PETA and SAFE are actively recruiting snowflakes and Google is training their AI to be offended so don't worry about us either.

  7. Michel Jackson Faraday gloves by judoguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Problem solved!

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    1. Re:Michel Jackson Faraday gloves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused about what problem you've solved?

      How to prevent yourself from getting into your own workplace?

  8. 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark of the beast?

    1. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so it begins.

    2. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark of the beast?

      It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

    3. Re:666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a form of the name of Nero. The Apocalypse (or Revelation) of Jesus Christ (or Saint John the Divine) was written in opposition to Nero. But it was done so in a way which would be in-obvious to the authorities.

  9. military soldiers had this done by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    almost 20 years ago. blood type/serial number/etc. voluntarily, mostly. inevitable.

    1. Re:military soldiers had this done by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Citation? Cause I call bs, There was no program implanting chips in military personnel 20 years ago. Or 10 years ago.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    2. Re:military soldiers had this done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not chips. But 75 years ago, certain soldiers had their blood type and serial number tattooed on the arm. Prisoners only got a serial number. Not voluntarily, and striking demonstration of what happens when people become just numbers in the bureaucracy.

    3. Re:military soldiers had this done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the US Army about 40 years ago and we had nothing like this.

  10. It begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gradual process of transforming humans into robots.

    I, for one welcome our new robot overlords...

  11. The pain of termination by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    "Sorry, but you're being let go. These two gentlemen will escort you from the building, with a stop at the nurse to yank your chip."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  12. Will Not Comply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt this will ever become "mandatory", but should that be the case, I will not comply. I'm not one for conspiracy theories or end times nonsense, but this smacks of nothing but a means to control people. I'm subject to no man. Since my life is not my employer's property, what would be the end goal? People have lives outside of work. Sadly, in the US and in other places, employers don't seem to grok that people have lives that begin the second the leave for the afternoon. The French understand this. I doubt this crap would ever fly in France, Spain, Portugal, or Italy--all places that deeply value family time and balance.

    Some people will say this is the precursor to the "mark of the beast". Perhaps. Either way, I wasn't born with technology in my body and I will not shuffle off this mortal coil with any, either. Will not comply.

  13. Clone RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, I understand it is nearly impossible to clone an RFID chip (Impossible in that it is nearly trivial if you ignore people saying it can't be done)
    Since they are implanted and can't be covered, anyone with an NFC reader can read it, and clone it in a matter of seconds just by walking by you.

    Not sure where all this removing body parts comes from. Why bother with that when you can secretly clone in less time than it takes to cut out the chip from someone's arm.

    1. Re:Clone RFID by fisted · · Score: 3, Informative

      RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards.
      No, gaining access to the smart card contact pads won't help you in any way, neither will MITMing it.

      IOW you're full of shit.

    2. Re:Clone RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking TOTP. How does it work?

    3. Re:Clone RFID by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards. No, gaining access to the smart card contact pads won't help you in any way, neither will MITMing it.

      IOW you're full of shit.

      RFIDs are far simpler than Smart Cards, and a lot easier to clone. The RFID protocol just extracts a single integral value - what length of data, what is in the data, etc is completely up to whomever programmed the chip and determined by the chip used too. But in the end, it's not very secure, and often they're passively powered - meaning you just apply power and the RFID chip starts transmitting the number where actively might be able to do some other stuff too, but even then that's really just for when you don't have time to passively power the chip before reading it.

      Once read, the chip value doesn't change, and can therefore be easily cloned. IOW - you could (in theory) use a rifle with a directional antennae to read an RFID chip from a fair distance away - this was proven years ago at a quite distance from the chip - https://www.theregister.co.uk/..., in part due to security concerns with RFID data being implanted into passports. Once you read the data, cloning is generally easily to do - just program a similar chip to emit the same value.

      RFIDs are rather stupid in terms of data security and complexity. Typically the value is aligned with a value in a database somewhere - the RFID value being just an lookup in a column in the database; so minimal data is transferred and allowing the system to otherwise track it using other means.

      So yes, copying RFID is trivial and by itself provides no means of verifiable authentication as a result; combined with other data (f.e a PIN number), however, it can work pretty well.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    4. Re:Clone RFID by fisted · · Score: 1

      The RFID protocol

      I think you're talking about one particular application/protocol, while i'm talking about a class of devices.

      There's nothing stopping you from using RFID in more elaborate ways. Once you have something that knows sort of a private key, but without the ability to reveal the actual key, you're on smartcard-level security. And that was my whole point when saying

      RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards.

    5. Re:Clone RFID by swillden · · Score: 1

      RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards. No, gaining access to the smart card contact pads won't help you in any way, neither will MITMing it.

      IOW you're full of shit.

      RFIDs are far simpler than Smart Cards, and a lot easier to clone.

      Yes, and no.

      There are multiple standards here. There is one set of standards which define devices that work like you say, and that set of standards is properly called RFID. However, there's also the contactless smart card protocols, which are often called NFC. Chips which implement those standards can come in virtually any form factor -- including implantable chips. That wasn't always the case, but antenna technology has advanced. The summary says these chips do NFC, which means that they technically are not RFID chips, though you'll never convince the press not to call them that.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Clone RFID by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      The RFID protocol

      I think you're talking about one particular application/protocol, while i'm talking about a class of devices.

      There's nothing stopping you from using RFID in more elaborate ways. Once you have something that knows sort of a private key, but without the ability to reveal the actual key, you're on smartcard-level security. And that was my whole point when saying

      RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards.

      If you're using the RFID as a seed into something else (e.g a seed to generate a decryption key)...then yes, you're correct - you can use it in more elaborate ways; however, Smart Cards are not RFID; they're more akin to NFC - a separate standard that allows a lot more to take place for communications. RFID is a dead simple tech and extremely limited too; move beyond that and you're no longer doing RFID.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  14. How about no by DrXym · · Score: 1

    It's a stupid idea. People work for a couple of years in a company and move on, yet they're suppose to have a foreign object inserted into them that remains for the rest of their life? Sane companies issue swipe cards, key fobs or similar to their employees.

    1. Re:How about no by arth1 · · Score: 1

      yet they're suppose to have a foreign object inserted into them that remains for the rest of their life

      It's just under the skin. It can easily be removed. Even by the person itself, unless they implanted it between the shoulder blades, or the person is American.

    2. Re:How about no by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      People work a couple of years at any given company because of layoffs, bad managers, poor pay, etc. If this company is offering an implant, then it's also an incentive to behave properly so they *DON'T* have a high turnover.

    3. Re:How about no by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      The way you use the word "easily" is unsettling.

    4. Re:How about no by DrXym · · Score: 1

      It can be easily removed by not having it inserted in the first place.

    5. Re:How about no by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      People work for a couple of years in a company and move on

      This is in Sweden. Job hopping is far less common there than in the US.

    6. Re:How about no by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The way you use the word "easily" is unsettling.

      Nah. Same procedure as if you get a splinter or bb/shot pellet under your skin, I would think: A short slice with a sterile knife, flick it out, and close up with a drop of superglue and/or a butterfly closure.

    7. Re:How about no by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      It may be medically easy, but getting/leaving a job should not involve any medical procedures. And with the growing ineffectiveness of antibiotics...well I'll just carry an ID card instead.

    8. Re:How about no by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It may be medically easy, but getting/leaving a job should not involve any medical procedures.

      Agreed. Including sampling of a person's bodily fluids, taking fingerprints, retina scans or anything else that isn't public knowledge.

  15. A new use for anti-shark suits by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/... Perhaps double duty as a wearable Faraday cage.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:A new use for anti-shark suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or chainmail armor. The metal in the chainmail also kills germs so you keep smelling minty fresh as well.

    2. Re:A new use for anti-shark suits by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Jeezus! Overkill much? Wrapping a strip of tin foil around your arm would probably do the job just fine.

  16. Very big deal by sjbe · · Score: 1

    As long as the implants are completely voluntary and offer to remove them when no longer wanted, I don't see a problem here.

    Then you aren't thinking hard enough about the problem. There are all sorts of serious problems.

    There is voluntary and then there is "voluntary" where your choice is to do it or lose your job. Once the infrastructure gets set up in such a way that it is
    inconvenient/impossible to function effectively without them then they no longer are voluntary in any meaningful sense of the word.

    If it is voluntary then there is little advantage in such a system, especially if few people opt-in. The cost alone will make it prohibitive and virtually all the advantages reside with the employer not the employee.

    The privacy issues involved in this sort of thing are legion. Too numerous to even enumerate here.

    There is the creepy factor. Do you really want to be micro-chipped like the family pet?

    There also are problems of infection, maintenance, removal, etc. If the system gets compromised then the users potentially get to have surgery. Fun!

    1. Re:Very big deal by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Interested Bible readers might have other objections to the implant in their foreheads or right hands, especially if it turns out you can't buy or sell without one. (I've just described the Mark of the Beast from Revelations.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. Late April fool by chirone · · Score: 2

    I hope it's a late April fool

  18. we are the borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. And we have a great corporate culture and no PHB's!

  19. Finally! The restroom problem is solved by DutchSter · · Score: 4, Funny

    At long last, we can figure out which jerk is using all the toilet paper and clogging the plumbing. As a bonus we can improve employee health!

    Dear employee: We have noticed that you are using an average of 9.8 squares of toilet paper per wipe, and wiping an average of 19 times, 3.2 seconds per wipe, four times per day, and yet only spend an average of 6.4 seconds at the sink. And by the way, using your right hand for that is just nasty. Please report to the Employee Wellness center for voluntary tips on how to wash your hands and increase your fiber intake.

  20. Easy by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    If you are afraid, just wear a metal butcher's glove on that hand.
    If you decorate it with a bit of leather and diamonds, people might think they saw Michael Jackson at the gas station.

  21. Over my cold dead body by bettodavis · · Score: 1

    Nothing personal, but the only way any company/government busybodies are putting a meat tag on me is over my lifeless corpse.

    And they are opening themselves to litigation if employees feel coerced into getting such an invasive and demeaning tracking method.

    1. Re:Over my cold dead body by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Nothing personal, but the only way any company/government busybodies are putting a meat tag on me is over my lifeless corpse.

      I personally plan to donate my own corpse to the local University Medical School when I die. They always need dead bodies for the anatomy courses. In order to liven up a dull lab session for the students, I want to implant a bunch of micro SD chips in myself, before I die. I want to fill up the chips with some Japanese Hentai. I hope the students find it to be a hoot and a half. Kinda sorta like finding "Easter Eggs" in programs.

      "Hey, Professor! Look what I found in the spleen . . . is there supposed to be a chip in there?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Over my cold dead body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a humble AC, I wish to hell I had mod points, you've just brightened up a fairly gloomy afternoon...
      +1 Internets

  22. Black Mirror by RazorSharp · · Score: 3

    Sometimes I think that corporations watch Black Mirror for ideas.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    1. Re:Black Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke but it really does seem like people use the list of things you can't do as a go to for ideas.

      "Hey how do we fight terrorists?"
      "Anyway except read our emails."
      "What if we read your emails?"

      "What can we do in a traditional D&D campaign?"
      "Absolutely anything except firearms and sci-fi"
      "Hey I have an idea. What if we did firearms and sci-fi?"

    2. Re:Black Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've got it backwards. I'm pretty sure Black Mirror watches corporations for ideas, and just extrapolates a little bit.

  23. Skilled? Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's hope the ones stealing the implant from you are skilled!

  24. I love mine! by gachunt · · Score: 1

    I had a RFID chip implanted in my hand 3 years ago, just for self-interest. ( I have no desire to enslave the human population in end-times )

    It was inserted by a friend who's a registered nurse, with some Lanacane. (highly recommend the Lanacane!)

    I chose my non-dominant hand in case something went horribly wrong, but there haven't been any complications.

    It is very convenient and I use it daily. My house door locks, garage door opener, car door locks and safe are all accessible by a swipe of my hand, as well as a rfid reader by my bed that turns off all my house lights and lowers the house temperature for overnight.

    I can understand the concerns people have about implanting chips - chipped bracelets/rings could all do the same thing and I haven't been able to convince my girlfriend to get one implanted yet -- but I just love the convenience of always having it with me.

    Sadly, my workplace won't let me use my chip with their swipe access system. Which would have been super handy today, since I forgot my ID card, and had to walk around to the front entrance in the pouring rain.

    1. Re:I love mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your username is missing a 'stupid' at the beginning and has an extraneous 'g', 'a' and 'h'.

      These chips are objectively a terrible idea overall, and while they may have a few minor conveniences you should consider the bigger picture regarding normalizing this activity.

    2. Re:I love mine! by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      I haven't been able to convince my girlfriend to get one implanted yet -- but I just love the convenience of always having it with me.

      I think you want to wait for a more permanent relationship status than just "girlfriend" before considering something like this. Roughly half of marriages end in divorce; how many girlfriends / boyfriends do people go through before finding "the one"? If your girlfriend gets the implant, you can easily clone it and retain a copy even after you break up, leading to possible security issues for her in the future.

    3. Re:I love mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been able to convince my girlfriend to get one implanted yet

      Strange, she let's me implant one

  25. Can I get a big "HELL, NO!" from y'all? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Glad I don't work for that company. I'd rather be unemployed than have anyone put something like that in any part of my body. I know it's not mandatory, but still..

  26. Some forethought is in order by nine-times · · Score: 1
    I don't have an objection to these kinds of implant per se, but I think it warrants thinking a bit before implementing it. Some potential issues that should be addressed (in no particular order):

    * It would be good for governments to work out a legal framework for acceptable use of these kinds of chips. For example, can a company force its employees to have a chip like this implanted? How much pressure, and what kind of pressure, can a company put on its employees (or possibly customers) to accept a chip? What kind of information is legally allowed to be gathered using this chip?
    * It would be good to have this chip be standardized. If we're going to head down this road, you know a lot of people are going to want to use it for a lot of purposes. Given the way things work these days, I wouldn't be surprised if every company wanted you to use *their* chip that only works for *their* services. Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Facebook will each come up with their own completely incompatible chip technologies. You'll end up with a chip for your work, a different chip for your apartment building, and yet another just to log into your email account. Yes, I think we are that stupid. If people are going to be implanting chips for this purpose, it should just be one chip that can be used to authenticate your identity, and that authentication should be able to be used anywhere.
    * Therefore, you'd want to have a standards body to decide how it should all work, and everyone needs to get on board.
    * That standards body should have unbiased, non-political security experts to advise them. Those security experts should not only evaluate the technical design for the chip, but also how easily the chip could be cloned, removed, used for surveillance, or otherwise compromised/abused. They should also look at how significantly the implantation improves security over a carried token, and whether the technology can be future-proofed to prevent people from needing to swap it out excessively due to emerging security vulnerabilities.

    I don't know what else. That's just off the top of my head. I'd assume that real experts with time to think about it could have quite a bit to think about.

    1. Re:Some forethought is in order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget the 'security' and 'progress' angles, even if you'd never change employers, appartment, wifes and whatnot, rest assured you'd collect different generations of implanted chips whenever the old ones are no longer deemed sufficient.

  27. I'd claim religious exemption by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    Okay, I'm not really religious, but for this I'd convert! Enemy of the enemy.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:I'd claim religious exemption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that you DON'T want to receive the Mark Of The Boss in your hand or in your forehead? Not even if this gets you a permanent posthumous "vacation" to a place where it is always warm quite warm?

  28. Creepy, human cattle by evolutionary · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Basically it's like branding cattle. Of course this could be done through rings, bracelets, or even simple rfid's in wallets, but the point is you CAN'T remove it when you want. I suspect this is a test/beginning in getting people to be branded just like livestock. The trouble is, like livestock, we'll have zero privacy (see the movie "Minority Report": the possibilities there (knowing what to market to you while passing through a mall) are similar to what is already happening now to quieter degree). People need to recognize the purpose of a design, and when they see it it works against them, say "no". People aren't vocalizing their concerns enough on this one. We all want to be a part of the A future. The question is, which future do we really want long term.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  29. Been available for dogs & cats for years by klubar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This technology has been available for dogs & cats for years. Most dogs and outdoor cats are "microchipped" so the local ACO (animal control officer) or shelter can identify the owner. I've even seen it used with fish and other marine animals at the aquarium.

    Not a new technology, and well proven.

    Whether it's a good idea is another question.

    1. Re:Been available for dogs & cats for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dog lives 16 years, if you're lucky.

      You get employed at age 25. When you're 60, the chip you got rusts and release gunk inside your body.

    2. Re:Been available for dogs & cats for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the answer is "no, it's not a good idea."

    3. Re:Been available for dogs & cats for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First chipping then neutering, huh?

    4. Re:Been available for dogs & cats for years by Raenex · · Score: 1

      First chipping then neutering, huh?

      The feminist dream of the ideal male.

  30. Dangerous... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See just the employee card on its own, as long as it's JUST ID, isn't really an issue.

    The problem is that eventually, these things all get unified. Companies will first push for that same chip to become your medicalert bracelet equivalent, and that'll sound good because it helps keep people safe. And then your bus card. Eventually your debit card, then your health insurance and SIN... Except every reader will increasingly be reading every single piece of this.

    Identity and "wallet" theft aside, the value of this to advertisers, blackmailers and of course every single corrupt LEO (pardon the redundancy) or spook out there will be measured on a cosmic scale. And if you thought parallel construction and planted evidence are bad now, wait until it becomes literally impossible to ever have an alibi...

  31. Bad guys will chop your hand when stealing your ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really bad idea....

  32. too many chips by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    So when the gig economy fires up and we all start working for 100 companies over our careers, we have to get 33-34 chips in our arms if 1/3 of them decide they are 'secure' enough to use this? Who pays to have these removed surgically when the number of chips in the arm gets ridiculous for anyone?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:too many chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There more than enough money to pay for this. Infinite in fact.

    2. Re:too many chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well since you're no longer an employee when you want it removed, it's entirely on you. But you may be forced to keep it for an indeterminate length of time as part of the NDAs, and other companies may begin to exchange codes (if there even IS any security on any of these, and I would strongly doubt it) in order to use your chips as your references when looking for another job... ...or if the original company still needs a scapegoat of some sort. You'd be surprised the places you've been and the things you've accessed should you happen to blow the whistle on breaches by those above.

    3. Re:too many chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo!

    4. Re:too many chips by rnturn · · Score: 1

      When the gig economy fires up? It seems to be here. Now. I never bothered to disable the emails I was receiving from a variety of job aggregation sites when I was last in a job search because I figured that, as imperfect a barometer as job ads are, it was good to read through them occasionally to keep on top of how things are going out there. What I've been seeing is that more and more of the job listings are for straight contracts. CTH is showing up less and less than a few years ago and companies looking for FTEs seem to be few and far between. So implanted chips for everybody, eh? If you ever have an autopsy done upon your death, the coroner will be able to tell what companies you worked for.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  33. Fuck this NWO shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather starve to death than to be chipped like a dog and followed around in real time, only to be assassinated by a psycho...

  34. Umm, just NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think so.
    Would have to be one serious amount of incentive for me to even consider this.

    Besides personal privacy issues, there are these little thoughts as well...

      - How hard would it be for someone to plant a chip reader on the bottom side of a hand rial in a public place to just steel your info/money - easier than a card skimmer I suppose.
      - What happens when I change jobs - does it get removed, deactivated (are you sure its deactivated), avg job tenure is only a couple years these days.

    and then there is this thought
      - Ever seen those movies where the bad guy just cuts the good guys hand/thumb off to gain access to a secure area? Think Id rather them just take my badge/fob.

    Carry on. Nothing to see here.

  35. YOUR body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your body belongs to you, and if you are willing to let some corporation or government dictate and require you to put something in it, then you are a true slave. Hold your ground.

    besides, If I wanted to I could scan the chip in you and forge my own duplicate and put it in my pocket. This is not as secure as they would have you believe.

  36. Death of dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mark of the beast blahh blahh gov't rules us all yada yada blah.big brother...

    Now that's out of the way, I refuse to do this because I refuse to be chipped like
    I am a dog, or some package to be "processed". I don't know about anyone
    else, but I prefer to keep my dignity not
    to mention my humanity intact.

      I'll stick with card and wallet thank you very much.

  37. Just wait until you leave the company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It will make the layoff or firing that more pleasant when they want it back.

  38. Why not make it recall implantable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way the company can add the literal to the present figurative that we already get.

  39. Just give me a lifetime contract by DalM · · Score: 1

    I'll take the implant, you got it. Just show me a lifetime contract.

    1. Re:Just give me a lifetime contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with a lifetime contract, is that you won't like the termination clause.

  40. Meanwhile, back at the ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, back at the ranch, they implant all the sheep. "BAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH", they say.

    Unsurprisingly, the thoughtless lizard-brained so-called-human trendies can be herded just the same.
    A little fearmongering here, some temptation there, and they're happy to do whatever you want of them.
    You are livestock and your life is worthless. Now get your chip. Yes you're a good "cyborg".

    Speaking of Sweden, how's the migrant rape... er I mean cultural enrichment ...situation going?
    Anyone from Malmo want to sound off? "Thank you may I have another HIV+ jihadist dick in my pussy!" Ah yes, great... Those poor souls...
    Wake the fuck up Europe. Stop being a bunch of faggots and cuckolds. Just because you side with them doesn't mean they will spare you.

  41. Switching jobs? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    So what happens when you switch jobs? You have your current employer's chip removed and your new employer's chip installed? The firmware gets updated? How exactly does that work? If the firmware can be updated what's to stop a hacker from doing something to a device inside of one's body? Nothing could possibly go wrong. I doubt this idea will ever see the light of day.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  42. Revelation 13:16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    16 And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, 17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark—the name of the beast or the number of its name.

  43. Re:Bad guys will chop your hand when stealing your by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really bad idea....

    So implant it in your dick - nobody will miss that

  44. Jesus is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how the Tribulations start. Right?

  45. Never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck that Swedish startup! This should be outlawed right quick.

  46. NDA by Kurdy · · Score: 1

    It should include a little dose of cyanide to enforce a non-disclosure agreement clause in case of termination.

    --
    The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts. - Marcus Aurelius
  47. Expert opinion by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Has anybody asked Logan about this?

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  48. Let the magic smoke out... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    From the article: "...the chips are biologically safe..."

    I guess it all depends on your definition of 'biologically safe.' I bet it wouldn't be very safe if the chip were to get an overloaded electromagnetic pulse at its operating frequency. Gives DOS attack a new meaning.

    On a positive note, it might get hot enough to cauterize the area around it thus preventing infection.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  49. AAaaaaaaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    666! The number of the BEAST! They warned us about this, they did, in the BIBLE!

    All kidding aside, this does seem a little... 1984-ish, and I personally would tell them to go fuck themselves; no one shoves a fucking leash up my ass. I hope they will do the same. Biometric should be good enough. If it's not, well, tough tittie-toenails!

  50. Id Badge by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Because ID Badges with the same RFID's are sooooo inconvenient, lets resort to permanent tagging.
    The corporate overlords are smiling.

    1. Re:Id Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in a secure facility and one of the problems we had was folks forgetting their badge. OTOH, my mother used to say, "You'd forget your head if it weren't attached." So I suppose there's that.

  51. Uh, oh.... by Whooty+McWhooface · · Score: 1

    Boss: Could you hand me those pliers, please?

    You: Sure. Here you go.

    Boss: Thanks. There has been some cutbacks in our department, so I'm going to have to let you go. Now hold still please (if you want to get your severance check).

  52. Re:Finally! The restroom problem is solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And please stop, umm... 'shaking' the chip in your arm three times a day. It'll break. And we don't the chip!

  53. Mark Of The Beast by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    This would never fly in America. Evangelicals would think it was the mark of the beast, and begin quoting Revelation chapter 13 again and again, especially verses 16 and 17.

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:Mark Of The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it will. Think of the children! If you refuse the chip you're a terrorist!

    2. Re:Mark Of The Beast by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      I'm more than happy to allow the righteous anger of Evangelicals to work for our privacy.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:Mark Of The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought Revelations was surprisingly insightful for the crazy ramblings of a doomsday cult whose leader had been crucified. Maintain control over society by inserting yourself into every economic transaction, public or private.

  54. One more question you'll want to ask... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... when applying for a job. "Do you inject foreign objects into your employees?"

    I've been hanging out on the Internet long enough to remember the Usenet thread "The Great Usenet Piss Test"--on misc.jobs.misc, IIRC--which listed companies that had drug testing policies ranging from the "yeah this makes some sense" to the absolutely ridiculous. Now we can, I guess, expect to see a host of web sites popping up listing companies that want to implant transponders in their workers. (Retirement can't come soon enough.)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  55. Other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black Mirror is taking its ideas from people sitting in on corporate board meetings. Given that the companies basically run themselves (outside of offshoring, layoffs, buyouts, sellouts, and bankruptcies), corporate executive types have nothing better to do than discuss fictional ideas to improve their business, or disenfranchise their employees. And what could be better in doing that than near-future ideas like the concepts often posed on shows like Black Mirror?

  56. Most people prefer submission.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And most also appear to enjoy enacting biblical end times terrors, rather than fending them off.

    I sometimes wonder if the Old Testament was written as both a how-to manual to authoritarianism and a lesson in reverse psychology, the way people seem to enjoy taking up their own chains.

  57. Wait, This Could Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could the dick microchip reader be ah, um, an "insertion" type device? Can we request a manual scan from a gender of our choosing? What if multiple scans are required? You know, the chips and readers aren't terribly reliable and the presenting persons are sometimes "too quick and enthusiastic".

    And I want Dyson to come out with an improved dick reader with more power, greater airflow and heating. "We take the obvious problems with dick readers and solve them", yeah, that's the ticket!

  58. Congo Natty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but to think of the song by Congo Natty.

    Congo Natty - Micro Chip (Say No)

  59. Companies start implanting Microchip into workers by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Companies start implanting Microchip into workers' bodies

    Oh yeah? Fuck you, companies. I'm an Atmel man.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  60. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farnsworth: "I'm installing an empathy chip."

      Fry: "And that'll allow Bender to feel other people's emotions?"

      Farnsworth: "Yes. If by 'allow' you mean 'force.'"

  61. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Employees tell employers who require implanted chips to go fuck themselves.

    1. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Employees tell employers who require implanted chips to go fuck themselves.

      Just like they told employers to go fuck themselves when they demanded urine specimens in exchange for the privilege of earning a living?

  62. It will go something like this by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Boss: You are required to have a chip implanted in your body. Me: Go fuck yourself. Boss: You're fired. Me: I'll remember you said that when I own the company after the lawsuit.

  63. Not to get religious but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original KJV version of the Bible says the mark is "in," not on like in the Left Behind books. 666 is just the Roman numerals at the time added up in order. And "decades" huh? You're telling me we had commercial chip implants since 1997? No, but in 1998 we had Windows 98. Come on dude. -_-

    1. Re:Not to get religious but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hermeneutics. I'm not sure the phrase "in the hand" might not mean "on the hand" in idiomatic English of KJV's time.

      If someone says they gave you a "kick in the butt," they really mean "on the butt" (at least I hope they do, given they're not Red Foreman).

  64. This Perfect Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read about this in This Perfect Day, by Ira Levin.

    Marx, Christ, Wu, Wei,
    We thank you for this perfect day.
    Wu, Wei, Marx, Christ,
    All but Wei were sacrificed.

  65. Demoliton Man by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Alright, so he can't buy food or a place to stay for the night and it would be a waste of time to mug somebody, unless he rips someones hand off, so lets hope he doesn't figure that one out.

  66. Want building entry? Remove limb that has RFID. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My memory is a bit fuzzy here and I cannot provide attribution but.. several years back, a governmental agency south of the US border thought it was a good idea to implant the RFID chips used for identification and authorization for building entry into humans. Long story short, a few people lost their limbs because some found an opportunity to exploit. For identification, any biometrics or RFID without continuous assurance that said mechanism has been un-tampered is worthless.