Trump says a lot of shit he can't do, doesn't have any experience doing, and can't back up with any even remotely concrete details. Trump says he will make you richer! Trump says he will fix all the roads! Trump says he will ban shitty music from the radio! It's pure unfettered populism.
When you read musician-skewed news aggregation websites, do you need them to explain what Cubase is? No, because it's content targeted towards technical people who, if they don't know what something that is fairly common knowledge is, probably know how to go about finding out.
Why anybody paints the NRA as anything different than what it is, an industry lobby group who's sole vested interest is the growth and increase of gun sales for the companies that fund it, is beyond me.
>I think it already IS pretty much a protected class as you put it.
It isn't.
>If you merely suggest that people, need to lose weight, for their health and yes, even for a better appearance, you catch hell for "fat shaming" or whatever the SJW term for it is today.
If it's your own family or friend, go for it. If it's a stranger, you're being rude.
>Don't get me wrong, no one should be taunted or teased, but these days, you can't even give advice that used to be noted as common sense anymore without offending someone or hurting little Suzy's self esteem.
Unsolicited advice of almost any kind has always been a socially inept move.
> We are actually going out of our way to tell fat kids that they "look ok" and should be proud of looking obese, out of shape and generally unhealthy.
Who is we? Food companies? Fat parents to fat children? Health agencies and gyms? Everyone except for you? Using the word "we" is just you couching your whining in non-specifics.
> Common sense has gone out the window, with everyone dancing on eggshells to try not to offend anyone. WFT did we get so afraid to offend anyone?
That could be a line straight out of a post from 1950, because people have been thinking the society is collapsing in a puddle of weakness around them since the dawn of time.
>It's good that Trump is threatening to use libel laws against them.
Because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy? That's practically his campaign in a nutshell. "I'll sue!" The fact that he never does isn't really important, because people who like him for his propensity to blow hard about legal action have the collective attention span of a gnat.
And we should feel sympathy for early adopters of technology... why?
I'm curious - who asked you to feel sympathy for early adopters of technology? Somebody down at the library? John, from account management? A little bird?
So corporatism is a huge problem, but every dollar they have they've earned? Am I getting this right? The government sucks for giving breaks to corporate America, but companies are pure because they earned all their money through blood, sweat and tears?
Trump says a lot of shit he can't do, doesn't have any experience doing, and can't back up with any even remotely concrete details. Trump says he will make you richer! Trump says he will fix all the roads! Trump says he will ban shitty music from the radio! It's pure unfettered populism.
*stiffles a guffaw*
Full of whiners, you say.... bwuahahaha. Did you type all that with a straight face?
I guess that makes you doubly stupid for being unable to draw from what is supposedly a free source of easy money?
So ... the front page is the wayside?
You have to buy development kits, genius.
When you read musician-skewed news aggregation websites, do you need them to explain what Cubase is? No, because it's content targeted towards technical people who, if they don't know what something that is fairly common knowledge is, probably know how to go about finding out.
You're not lazy. You're obstinate.
Speaking of doing free work for somebody else, do you also need somebody to explain what Google is?
> into a political one
Why anybody paints the NRA as anything different than what it is, an industry lobby group who's sole vested interest is the growth and increase of gun sales for the companies that fund it, is beyond me.
The GP was asking if "his" solution seemed too obvious. Indeed, it is so obvious, it's noted in the summary itself.
Yes, you're missing reading the summary.
>I think it already IS pretty much a protected class as you put it.
It isn't.
>If you merely suggest that people, need to lose weight, for their health and yes, even for a better appearance, you catch hell for "fat shaming" or whatever the SJW term for it is today.
If it's your own family or friend, go for it. If it's a stranger, you're being rude.
>Don't get me wrong, no one should be taunted or teased, but these days, you can't even give advice that used to be noted as common sense anymore without offending someone or hurting little Suzy's self esteem.
Unsolicited advice of almost any kind has always been a socially inept move.
> We are actually going out of our way to tell fat kids that they "look ok" and should be proud of looking obese, out of shape and generally unhealthy.
Who is we? Food companies? Fat parents to fat children? Health agencies and gyms? Everyone except for you? Using the word "we" is just you couching your whining in non-specifics.
> Common sense has gone out the window, with everyone dancing on eggshells to try not to offend anyone.
WFT did we get so afraid to offend anyone?
That could be a line straight out of a post from 1950, because people have been thinking the society is collapsing in a puddle of weakness around them since the dawn of time.
100% of other drivers can't wait for BMW drivers to just be passengers.
If people had common sense, they wouldn't keep assuming things are common sense.
>It's good that Trump is threatening to use libel laws against them.
Because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy? That's practically his campaign in a nutshell. "I'll sue!" The fact that he never does isn't really important, because people who like him for his propensity to blow hard about legal action have the collective attention span of a gnat.
They were right. You don't have the communication skills.
And we should feel sympathy for early adopters of technology ... why?
I'm curious - who asked you to feel sympathy for early adopters of technology? Somebody down at the library? John, from account management? A little bird?
This is going to be a hilarious shitshow of comments from people who rule at loving the blues.
So corporatism is a huge problem, but every dollar they have they've earned? Am I getting this right? The government sucks for giving breaks to corporate America, but companies are pure because they earned all their money through blood, sweat and tears?
It must get exhausting to be so obtuse.
What part of sticking your hand down somebody else's pants is complicated to you?
Impressive, you did exactly what the label below the button said you would.
The persecution complex is strong with you.
"Only democrats spend tons of money" says area man with no grip on reality.
How is health insurance different from auto insurance?
That's your thesis?