The only thing porn does demonstrate is the rapid and disturbing deterioration of dumb sluts, due to drugs and declining credit worth of fading youth leading to desperation and extremes of behaviour, slut as a term in this sense being used regardless of the sex of the individual, now being one of five possibilities ie born both, one or the other or changing from one to the other.
It was already illegal. Technically speaking as freedom of speech is a constitutional requirement and no law shall be enacted that infringes it, contract law is then covered. You can not write a contract, that infringes freedom of speech as that would invalidate contract law itself. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", so technically you can not write contract law, that would enable private individuals via contracts to infringe freedom of speech of others. So the common lie, private industry can censor speech whilst government can not is a lie.
The US government already had it war on news, Ronny Raygun killed it along with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., bullshit won and it is still winning in the US at least on main stream media. Its like they can not accept that their bullshit always rots away when exposed to the truth, they just keep it going, anyhow with taxpayer dollars, targeting the majority with more propaganda. The workers are shit, the rich are gods, shut up and obey, why don't they just brand that on all poor children's foreheads the first day they enter school. Your funny bit of propaganda, oh yeah, main stream media all owned by right wing corporations is pro left, what a load.
Realistically they should be involved these are core issues of the digital age, a citizens digital rights, the right to privacy, the right to digital security, the right to equal access to the shared global societal digital network and the right to be 'Anonymous';D.
It is the same old crap, in one breath they talk about downloading a file, ohh ahh scary stuff and in the next they actually talk about reality, file sharing, nothing to do with downloading files and everything to do with uploading. I am not responsible for anything any media company does when distributing content, I watch and ad and watch content and thats it, what they do beyond that is their responsibility.
So not 'Downloading' but uploading and the ass hats are just trying to throw in scary language. A billion web sites containing trillions of bit of copyrighted information, every page and every image on that page and every paragraph of text on that page, all of it subject to copyright laws and what, they claim you the down load are meant to what, verify the legality of all of it, what a load. When they talk file sharing, they are talking about uploading but then again a product like this https://www.cnet.com/au/produc... would technically infringe copyright because it broadcast content upon request.
There is one huge problem with that, buried way down in the EULA you still agree to it and so it might not come with telemetry and spying and ads but how exactly are you going to keep that shit out, any patch at any time and M$ can stick it right back in there. Hell, the code is right in there from day one and can be activated with any built in buried config change, which can be done with any patch at any time and your security is done. Now consider how many billions can be garnered with insider trading on switching on telemetry and switching it off again to have a quick look at your financials prior to public release.
Sure you can keep them out at time of install but they can break right back in there with any patch or even any access by the operating they own and control to any of their websites. Do M$ provide tailored upgrades to specific users, yes and those upgrades then do very naughty things (including hacking firmware). There is absolutely nothing you can do to keep them out, except to never connect M$ controlled computers to the internet. Windows 10 has factually proven they can never be trusted.
The deluded ass hat monarchs of Saudi Arabia have been committing extraordinarily destructive socio-religious hacks of the terrorist variety across the entire planet and their civil suit and criminal prosecution comeuppance is coming so, hmm, how exactly to put this, fuck em.
It is not so much about anonymity in purchases, it is all about control. With a card they do most emphatically control you, you no longer buy stuff, you ask permission to have stuff and that can be denied for what ever reason they choose, in a capitalist society via that card, they can turn you into a non-citizen instantly.
Once you card is blocked you are done, no public transport, all services linked to the card shut down ie no phone calls, no taxi, no food, no drink, you can try walking home.
Via that card, they will be able to control you, your politics, your life and via their cards, your family. It is extremely dangerous stuff, cash in a capitalist society is freedom, no cash and you become a slave, always asking permission from your masters.
That's all right Nestle have also figured out many ways to cut the chocolate out of chocolate, hmm tasty, any one ready for that ever so tasty chocolate flavoured soy bar, notice Nestle never ever detail have much chocolate is actually in their chocolate.
"Sinkholing is an action whereby traffic between infected computers and a criminal infrastructure is redirected to servers controlled by law enforcement authorities and/or an IT security company. "https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/%E2%80%98avalanche%E2%80%99-network-dismantled-in-international-cyber-operation. Hey, fuckers, you are meant to fix the end users computers not fucking keep a back door for yourselves, seriously, what the fuck?
Does windows 10 phone home all the time on the phone like the desktop basically sticking the end user with the cost. Does the windows 10 phone actually make more calls than a typical end user reporting on that end user. Does it make two calls at once, one to the person the actually end user wants to talk to and another to send a copy of that call to the phones actual bosses, M$. Does the always on microphone run the battery down or if you have a desktop and the backend server matches the open mike on the phone to the open mike on the desktop and temporarily stop eaves dropping on the phone.
Easiest way to tackle 'a' drone in a combat situation is with another semi-automated drone. Rather than carrying weighty explosive, simply a somewhat armoured drone with steel blades, basically a flying lawnmower (said drone could also target people, flying buzz saw, quite nasty). Set if off in the general direction and let it use sonar for the final attack run, some times it will survive and sometimes it will not but the targeted drone will go down (lighter fabrication due to payload and required range). Many boomerang drones at once, far more problematic (boomerang because they come back for reuse if they do not strike a desired target and detonate).
Tackling 'a' boomerang drone in any more modern battle field will be totally unrealistic, as sending out say, 10 times as many as required to complete target destruction, to ensure some get through would be the norm, what the heck, you can bring back say 60% to 80% of them and automatically disarm them and send them out again, once they have been rearmed.
Being a combatant on a drone dominated battlefield means nothing but being a short life target, praying they run out of drones before you do, with the defending side having a great advantage in that regard ie defence structures housing tens of thousands of drones (relatively safe whilst they are locked up inside and indescribably dangerous when released all at once, why not, if you win, you can automatically recover all drones that failed to achieve their targets and were not destroyed).
They whole idea is to stop playing war by ensuring psychopaths no longer gain positions of governance or influence, rather than coming up with more and more stupid ways of killing each other.
Keep in mind the election is decided upon a state by state basis. So he won the most states. It is not a national vote but a state by state vote and you would be denying the residents of each state their democratic right to vote for whom their state chooses. It is a tyranny of the majority thing, even doing away with the electoral college and going with preferential voting it would still be an electoral region by electoral region vote and who won the most regions wins the vote regardless of final numbers.
Keep in mind this prevents corrupt politicians from favouring more populous regions and riding rough shod over less populous regions. So winning regions still trumps (tee hee) over the total number of votes.
Not it is not, when associated with marketing it is but when associated with reality it is not. Look no further than the sneaker market, there was a company the spent more money on advertising than they do on making their shoes, spent big with sporting knob heads, you know they type, "it's not lying, it's acting". Now the way you get tell fakes from the genuine product is because they were made better and lasted longer than the genuine product and they people publicly demonstrated that quality difference or lack there of in the genuine product, company name was ree-something not that popular any more, I think the name ended in bok and they got bought out.
From an end user point of view, they should only target misrepresented products if those products are of worse quality than the falsely advertised products. The law should protect the quality of the product and not the quality of the bullshit advertising associated with the all to many genuinely 'bad' products with genuinely false advertising claims;).
So it would seem the NSA's excuse of choice is to be a toddler, we didn't do it, Russia did (it has been pretty noticeable for a while). So much so, they have to intersperse it with, we didn't do it, China did. When ever they are asked to prove their claim in court the always claim national security (they can not prove how Russia and China did it with out proving how they did it to Russia and China and that Russia and China are just retaliating). How about a treaty to stop doing, nope, nuh uh, they don't want that, pervy little bastards still want to feed their ego and sense of power and control over everyone else by getting and hoarding everyone's secrets. Little rat bags never grew out of their childish behaviour, we all knew and disliked them for it when they were young and oh look, they are still hard at it, tugging away at their own bits, getting all hot and bothered spying on everyone else (I bet if they had showers in NSA buildings the floors would be sticky, eww).
I see you understand very little of society and the principles of caring and sharing. You give nothing away for free, you are simply repaying those who have repayed others, when a task is freely shared. Your write reviews for 'free' to pay for reviews you read for 'free' and that likely saved you quite a sum of money in buying some shitty product that got the bad review it deserved. See, that's how it works, you are simply sharing, get it, sharing in the task of eliminating bad products from the market, a very worth while investment, see that, right there. You are not reviewing for free but simply investing time and capital into the reviewing marketing and the return is not buying a crap product you end up having to replace with another crap product, which you replace with another crap product, and maybe just maybe finally then getting a reasonable product (that my buffoonish friend is the return on your investment, avoiding that).
The whole point is to turn Linux coders into proctologists pushing Windows probe 10 and get them to help M$ do the good work of prying into everyone privacy. Privacy a human right, no surely not, it is a product to be bought, sold and traded, to enable mass end user manipulation and to establish tight corporate controls over the unruly majority.
Time for a push back and the legislation of the right to privacy for all citizens.
Dude wake up to yourself, you are no more being exploited than the non-writer working right next to you and they lack the creating writing ability to ever escape that way, seriously what the hell is that matter with you.
Low end shitty jobs should pay a living wage, they should be able to pay for a home, clothing, food, health care and some reasonable leisure activity. There should be no stigma that whiny writers attack to being a low end down trodden shit eating common as fuck worker, wait what, perhaps attitudes need to seriously change. They work, they should earn a reasonable living and they should be treated with dignity and respect.
I'd like the profession of kicking questionable writers up the arse, but they wont even let me make it a hobby;D. Dude your, hobby, your choice, can't make a living from your hobby, well, try another hobby. My concern is that you should not feel like shit doing a job and earning a living, that you should feel a reasonable measure of dignity and respect in that job, if that is not happening, then there is something seriously wrong with society and I put the blame squarely at the feet of ignorant, arrogant, self involved duplicitous writers.
To be fair there definitely was one good point, getting rid of the privatised Federal Reserve where those who fund government get government to borrow make believe money from them, literally completely imaginary make believe money and the government has to pay it back with actual real tax payer debt money. Now that should be fraud, not legalised theft by the 1% from the 99%, really is stupendously disgusting stuff and those ass hats have been killing people to keep it the corruption going.
Getting rid of the EPA, meh, most likely nor more that between 10 and 20 million Americans would die as a result in the next say 10 to 20 years, beyond that, likely the entire US society would collapse in a mire of extremely toxic pollution that would take centuries to clean up. As for paying income tax, there is a sound reasonable way to significantly reduce income taxes, make the government the only legal bank and the gap between interest on deposits and interest on loans would pay a huge percentage of income tax (something of course the corrupt banksters would 'violently' oppose, keep in mind they have demonstrated ties to organised crime, drug dealers, arms dealers et al).
The interesting thing about all this fake news and propaganda, is there are actually two distinct types of propaganda. The first everyone knows about and that is the stuff propagandists target at majority, the regular marketing lies told for what ever purpose. The second kind of propaganda is entirely different, now that propaganda is actually targeted at the propagandists.
Propagandists are bound to react to what the perceive as their target audience reactions and especially careful to protect their lies whilst hiding the truth. This makes them very reactive, they are forced to listen in case they are being exposed, or they are not selling their lies. There are really powerful emotions at play, greed, fear of being exposed for the crimes, fear of no longer being able to hide who they really, with very serious consequences, not only losing the proceeds of their crime but extended custodial sentences. This makes them very vulnerable to propaganda targeted at them, they must react or fail and suffer severe penalties.
The reactive nature allows them to be manipulated into over reacting or reacting in the wrong manner and traps them into doing things like pushing into more and more extreme propaganda which becomes harder and harder to sell or propaganda that undermines their own propaganda or even propaganda that foolishly exposes more secrets than it should.
Fix fake news, I would say break up the big main stream media organisation but if hardly seems worth the effort any more, they have already been tricked into destroying themselves by over reacting and whoops they can't take it back now, just going to dig themselves deeper and deeper. Simply legislate 'News' as a licensed profession and those practising are bound by the truth, fail to prove the truth they claim in court, then they do the prison time. Now if you want to tell stories and do no claim to be a licensed news practitioner, then not a problem, do want you want as long as it is within the regular laws. Once you claim to be a licensed news professional than you expose yourself to criminal penalties for lying (this is something that main stream media organisations will oppose maybe 80% of the market, about 20% will support it because they report the truth and the News licence and there honour and integrity would see them with a worth while professions).
All that is happening is main stream media is attempting to shut down all competing independent media sites by cutting off advertising, so you can get doubleclick will not be far behind. Problem is independent media is a lot cheaper to produce and can quite simply out last main stream media. Although main stream media will get the majority of corporate controlled advertising dollars, they have a shrinking audience and their advertisers will not be pleased to spend money on fuck all and will be forced use independent advertising agencies that work the the independent media organisation. So main stream media with billions in costs, paying wildly ego bloated individuals ludicrous amounts of money, will all of it sudden find collapsing revenues and being unable to pay to keep those bloated organisations going and collapse into bankruptcy, leaving nothing left but independent media organisations. Keep in mind those independents can shrink back to part time without much different and quite a few already have substantive media war chests.
All the bullshit about RT and Sputnik, is just that bullshit to smear over the attack on independent media, that RT and Sputnik reach out to independent media as viable sources, is the only reason they are attacked. Although RT wants to pretend they are under threat, they know it is all pretty much just camouflage for censorship targeted at, ALL, independent media sources.
People find independent media, only because they are actively looking for it, except of course when the idiots at main stream media want to attack independent media sources and give them tons of free advertising and their own disaffected viewers. Those viewers who sought out independent media will not go back to main stream, they will simply seek out other independent media channels.
The failure is nothing more complex than shitty coding lanaguges pushed out by corporations to favour their profits and not concerted industry and government coalition to design the best possible coding langauage, taking into proper account existing english and maths langauge. Why will it not happen for decades more, sheer insensate corporate greed, greed that knows no bounds and demands more for ever. My god what a pile of shit the english language and maths would be if designed by modern corporations, hundreds of copyrighted and patented variants, tossed out regularly to charge for upgrades.
Noam Chomsky always seems to blames the US government for the bad things the US government has done of which there are many, many, many, well, don't want to write that too many times, things they have done wrong. The common saying for the US government, they always get it right, after they have found every possible way of doing it wrong. The failure is driven by US corporations using influence to drive solutions whose only purpose is to favour their profits, even when competing corporations force competing actions to be take, that undo each others efforts. Don't want the US government looking like a bunch of fuck ups with endless PR=B$ flowing around to try to cover it up, then get rid of the god damn corrupt useless corporate influence on it's actions don't just bullshit about it and hope the problems will automagically solve themselves in spite of US government actions.
Slashdot Mirror
The only thing porn does demonstrate is the rapid and disturbing deterioration of dumb sluts, due to drugs and declining credit worth of fading youth leading to desperation and extremes of behaviour, slut as a term in this sense being used regardless of the sex of the individual, now being one of five possibilities ie born both, one or the other or changing from one to the other.
It was already illegal. Technically speaking as freedom of speech is a constitutional requirement and no law shall be enacted that infringes it, contract law is then covered. You can not write a contract, that infringes freedom of speech as that would invalidate contract law itself. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", so technically you can not write contract law, that would enable private individuals via contracts to infringe freedom of speech of others. So the common lie, private industry can censor speech whilst government can not is a lie.
The US government already had it war on news, Ronny Raygun killed it along with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., bullshit won and it is still winning in the US at least on main stream media. Its like they can not accept that their bullshit always rots away when exposed to the truth, they just keep it going, anyhow with taxpayer dollars, targeting the majority with more propaganda. The workers are shit, the rich are gods, shut up and obey, why don't they just brand that on all poor children's foreheads the first day they enter school. Your funny bit of propaganda, oh yeah, main stream media all owned by right wing corporations is pro left, what a load.
Realistically they should be involved these are core issues of the digital age, a citizens digital rights, the right to privacy, the right to digital security, the right to equal access to the shared global societal digital network and the right to be 'Anonymous' ;D.
It is the same old crap, in one breath they talk about downloading a file, ohh ahh scary stuff and in the next they actually talk about reality, file sharing, nothing to do with downloading files and everything to do with uploading. I am not responsible for anything any media company does when distributing content, I watch and ad and watch content and thats it, what they do beyond that is their responsibility.
So not 'Downloading' but uploading and the ass hats are just trying to throw in scary language. A billion web sites containing trillions of bit of copyrighted information, every page and every image on that page and every paragraph of text on that page, all of it subject to copyright laws and what, they claim you the down load are meant to what, verify the legality of all of it, what a load. When they talk file sharing, they are talking about uploading but then again a product like this https://www.cnet.com/au/produc... would technically infringe copyright because it broadcast content upon request.
There is one huge problem with that, buried way down in the EULA you still agree to it and so it might not come with telemetry and spying and ads but how exactly are you going to keep that shit out, any patch at any time and M$ can stick it right back in there. Hell, the code is right in there from day one and can be activated with any built in buried config change, which can be done with any patch at any time and your security is done. Now consider how many billions can be garnered with insider trading on switching on telemetry and switching it off again to have a quick look at your financials prior to public release.
Sure you can keep them out at time of install but they can break right back in there with any patch or even any access by the operating they own and control to any of their websites. Do M$ provide tailored upgrades to specific users, yes and those upgrades then do very naughty things (including hacking firmware). There is absolutely nothing you can do to keep them out, except to never connect M$ controlled computers to the internet. Windows 10 has factually proven they can never be trusted.
The deluded ass hat monarchs of Saudi Arabia have been committing extraordinarily destructive socio-religious hacks of the terrorist variety across the entire planet and their civil suit and criminal prosecution comeuppance is coming so, hmm, how exactly to put this, fuck em.
It is not so much about anonymity in purchases, it is all about control. With a card they do most emphatically control you, you no longer buy stuff, you ask permission to have stuff and that can be denied for what ever reason they choose, in a capitalist society via that card, they can turn you into a non-citizen instantly.
Once you card is blocked you are done, no public transport, all services linked to the card shut down ie no phone calls, no taxi, no food, no drink, you can try walking home.
Via that card, they will be able to control you, your politics, your life and via their cards, your family. It is extremely dangerous stuff, cash in a capitalist society is freedom, no cash and you become a slave, always asking permission from your masters.
That's all right Nestle have also figured out many ways to cut the chocolate out of chocolate, hmm tasty, any one ready for that ever so tasty chocolate flavoured soy bar, notice Nestle never ever detail have much chocolate is actually in their chocolate.
"Sinkholing is an action whereby traffic between infected computers and a criminal infrastructure is redirected to servers controlled by law enforcement authorities and/or an IT security company. "https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/%E2%80%98avalanche%E2%80%99-network-dismantled-in-international-cyber-operation. Hey, fuckers, you are meant to fix the end users computers not fucking keep a back door for yourselves, seriously, what the fuck?
Does windows 10 phone home all the time on the phone like the desktop basically sticking the end user with the cost. Does the windows 10 phone actually make more calls than a typical end user reporting on that end user. Does it make two calls at once, one to the person the actually end user wants to talk to and another to send a copy of that call to the phones actual bosses, M$. Does the always on microphone run the battery down or if you have a desktop and the backend server matches the open mike on the phone to the open mike on the desktop and temporarily stop eaves dropping on the phone.
Now would this https://www.reddit.com/r/Reddi... be considered abuse.
Easiest way to tackle 'a' drone in a combat situation is with another semi-automated drone. Rather than carrying weighty explosive, simply a somewhat armoured drone with steel blades, basically a flying lawnmower (said drone could also target people, flying buzz saw, quite nasty). Set if off in the general direction and let it use sonar for the final attack run, some times it will survive and sometimes it will not but the targeted drone will go down (lighter fabrication due to payload and required range). Many boomerang drones at once, far more problematic (boomerang because they come back for reuse if they do not strike a desired target and detonate).
Tackling 'a' boomerang drone in any more modern battle field will be totally unrealistic, as sending out say, 10 times as many as required to complete target destruction, to ensure some get through would be the norm, what the heck, you can bring back say 60% to 80% of them and automatically disarm them and send them out again, once they have been rearmed.
Being a combatant on a drone dominated battlefield means nothing but being a short life target, praying they run out of drones before you do, with the defending side having a great advantage in that regard ie defence structures housing tens of thousands of drones (relatively safe whilst they are locked up inside and indescribably dangerous when released all at once, why not, if you win, you can automatically recover all drones that failed to achieve their targets and were not destroyed).
They whole idea is to stop playing war by ensuring psychopaths no longer gain positions of governance or influence, rather than coming up with more and more stupid ways of killing each other.
Keep in mind the election is decided upon a state by state basis. So he won the most states. It is not a national vote but a state by state vote and you would be denying the residents of each state their democratic right to vote for whom their state chooses. It is a tyranny of the majority thing, even doing away with the electoral college and going with preferential voting it would still be an electoral region by electoral region vote and who won the most regions wins the vote regardless of final numbers.
Keep in mind this prevents corrupt politicians from favouring more populous regions and riding rough shod over less populous regions. So winning regions still trumps (tee hee) over the total number of votes.
Not it is not, when associated with marketing it is but when associated with reality it is not. Look no further than the sneaker market, there was a company the spent more money on advertising than they do on making their shoes, spent big with sporting knob heads, you know they type, "it's not lying, it's acting". Now the way you get tell fakes from the genuine product is because they were made better and lasted longer than the genuine product and they people publicly demonstrated that quality difference or lack there of in the genuine product, company name was ree-something not that popular any more, I think the name ended in bok and they got bought out.
From an end user point of view, they should only target misrepresented products if those products are of worse quality than the falsely advertised products. The law should protect the quality of the product and not the quality of the bullshit advertising associated with the all to many genuinely 'bad' products with genuinely false advertising claims ;).
So it would seem the NSA's excuse of choice is to be a toddler, we didn't do it, Russia did (it has been pretty noticeable for a while). So much so, they have to intersperse it with, we didn't do it, China did. When ever they are asked to prove their claim in court the always claim national security (they can not prove how Russia and China did it with out proving how they did it to Russia and China and that Russia and China are just retaliating). How about a treaty to stop doing, nope, nuh uh, they don't want that, pervy little bastards still want to feed their ego and sense of power and control over everyone else by getting and hoarding everyone's secrets. Little rat bags never grew out of their childish behaviour, we all knew and disliked them for it when they were young and oh look, they are still hard at it, tugging away at their own bits, getting all hot and bothered spying on everyone else (I bet if they had showers in NSA buildings the floors would be sticky, eww).
I see you understand very little of society and the principles of caring and sharing. You give nothing away for free, you are simply repaying those who have repayed others, when a task is freely shared. Your write reviews for 'free' to pay for reviews you read for 'free' and that likely saved you quite a sum of money in buying some shitty product that got the bad review it deserved. See, that's how it works, you are simply sharing, get it, sharing in the task of eliminating bad products from the market, a very worth while investment, see that, right there. You are not reviewing for free but simply investing time and capital into the reviewing marketing and the return is not buying a crap product you end up having to replace with another crap product, which you replace with another crap product, and maybe just maybe finally then getting a reasonable product (that my buffoonish friend is the return on your investment, avoiding that).
The whole point is to turn Linux coders into proctologists pushing Windows probe 10 and get them to help M$ do the good work of prying into everyone privacy. Privacy a human right, no surely not, it is a product to be bought, sold and traded, to enable mass end user manipulation and to establish tight corporate controls over the unruly majority.
Time for a push back and the legislation of the right to privacy for all citizens.
Dude wake up to yourself, you are no more being exploited than the non-writer working right next to you and they lack the creating writing ability to ever escape that way, seriously what the hell is that matter with you.
Low end shitty jobs should pay a living wage, they should be able to pay for a home, clothing, food, health care and some reasonable leisure activity. There should be no stigma that whiny writers attack to being a low end down trodden shit eating common as fuck worker, wait what, perhaps attitudes need to seriously change. They work, they should earn a reasonable living and they should be treated with dignity and respect.
I'd like the profession of kicking questionable writers up the arse, but they wont even let me make it a hobby ;D. Dude your, hobby, your choice, can't make a living from your hobby, well, try another hobby. My concern is that you should not feel like shit doing a job and earning a living, that you should feel a reasonable measure of dignity and respect in that job, if that is not happening, then there is something seriously wrong with society and I put the blame squarely at the feet of ignorant, arrogant, self involved duplicitous writers.
To be fair there definitely was one good point, getting rid of the privatised Federal Reserve where those who fund government get government to borrow make believe money from them, literally completely imaginary make believe money and the government has to pay it back with actual real tax payer debt money. Now that should be fraud, not legalised theft by the 1% from the 99%, really is stupendously disgusting stuff and those ass hats have been killing people to keep it the corruption going.
Getting rid of the EPA, meh, most likely nor more that between 10 and 20 million Americans would die as a result in the next say 10 to 20 years, beyond that, likely the entire US society would collapse in a mire of extremely toxic pollution that would take centuries to clean up. As for paying income tax, there is a sound reasonable way to significantly reduce income taxes, make the government the only legal bank and the gap between interest on deposits and interest on loans would pay a huge percentage of income tax (something of course the corrupt banksters would 'violently' oppose, keep in mind they have demonstrated ties to organised crime, drug dealers, arms dealers et al).
The interesting thing about all this fake news and propaganda, is there are actually two distinct types of propaganda. The first everyone knows about and that is the stuff propagandists target at majority, the regular marketing lies told for what ever purpose. The second kind of propaganda is entirely different, now that propaganda is actually targeted at the propagandists.
Propagandists are bound to react to what the perceive as their target audience reactions and especially careful to protect their lies whilst hiding the truth. This makes them very reactive, they are forced to listen in case they are being exposed, or they are not selling their lies. There are really powerful emotions at play, greed, fear of being exposed for the crimes, fear of no longer being able to hide who they really, with very serious consequences, not only losing the proceeds of their crime but extended custodial sentences. This makes them very vulnerable to propaganda targeted at them, they must react or fail and suffer severe penalties.
The reactive nature allows them to be manipulated into over reacting or reacting in the wrong manner and traps them into doing things like pushing into more and more extreme propaganda which becomes harder and harder to sell or propaganda that undermines their own propaganda or even propaganda that foolishly exposes more secrets than it should.
Fix fake news, I would say break up the big main stream media organisation but if hardly seems worth the effort any more, they have already been tricked into destroying themselves by over reacting and whoops they can't take it back now, just going to dig themselves deeper and deeper. Simply legislate 'News' as a licensed profession and those practising are bound by the truth, fail to prove the truth they claim in court, then they do the prison time. Now if you want to tell stories and do no claim to be a licensed news practitioner, then not a problem, do want you want as long as it is within the regular laws. Once you claim to be a licensed news professional than you expose yourself to criminal penalties for lying (this is something that main stream media organisations will oppose maybe 80% of the market, about 20% will support it because they report the truth and the News licence and there honour and integrity would see them with a worth while professions).
All that is happening is main stream media is attempting to shut down all competing independent media sites by cutting off advertising, so you can get doubleclick will not be far behind. Problem is independent media is a lot cheaper to produce and can quite simply out last main stream media. Although main stream media will get the majority of corporate controlled advertising dollars, they have a shrinking audience and their advertisers will not be pleased to spend money on fuck all and will be forced use independent advertising agencies that work the the independent media organisation. So main stream media with billions in costs, paying wildly ego bloated individuals ludicrous amounts of money, will all of it sudden find collapsing revenues and being unable to pay to keep those bloated organisations going and collapse into bankruptcy, leaving nothing left but independent media organisations. Keep in mind those independents can shrink back to part time without much different and quite a few already have substantive media war chests.
All the bullshit about RT and Sputnik, is just that bullshit to smear over the attack on independent media, that RT and Sputnik reach out to independent media as viable sources, is the only reason they are attacked. Although RT wants to pretend they are under threat, they know it is all pretty much just camouflage for censorship targeted at, ALL, independent media sources.
People find independent media, only because they are actively looking for it, except of course when the idiots at main stream media want to attack independent media sources and give them tons of free advertising and their own disaffected viewers. Those viewers who sought out independent media will not go back to main stream, they will simply seek out other independent media channels.
The failure is nothing more complex than shitty coding lanaguges pushed out by corporations to favour their profits and not concerted industry and government coalition to design the best possible coding langauage, taking into proper account existing english and maths langauge. Why will it not happen for decades more, sheer insensate corporate greed, greed that knows no bounds and demands more for ever. My god what a pile of shit the english language and maths would be if designed by modern corporations, hundreds of copyrighted and patented variants, tossed out regularly to charge for upgrades.
Noam Chomsky always seems to blames the US government for the bad things the US government has done of which there are many, many, many, well, don't want to write that too many times, things they have done wrong. The common saying for the US government, they always get it right, after they have found every possible way of doing it wrong. The failure is driven by US corporations using influence to drive solutions whose only purpose is to favour their profits, even when competing corporations force competing actions to be take, that undo each others efforts. Don't want the US government looking like a bunch of fuck ups with endless PR=B$ flowing around to try to cover it up, then get rid of the god damn corrupt useless corporate influence on it's actions don't just bullshit about it and hope the problems will automagically solve themselves in spite of US government actions.