So you are saying that the government of China will be quite content for their employees to use Windows anal probe 10 at home instead of WindowsSE 10 because they don't care if employees accidentally leak information at home, yep, uh huh. So if various governments say Windows anal probe 10 is not safe enough for them to use, why exactly do those governments think it is safe enough for their citizens to use, why is that allowed to happen. This is blowing up fast and will do a lot of damage to M$ and corrupt paid off governments.
You defend illegal access to you phone account, exactly the same way you defend illegal access to your car. Say it was stolen, or the access was illegal, they define the location of the illegal vehicle use (which cell phone tower) and you prove you were elsewhere at the time. The telecoms are just to greedy to pay for proper account validation, so you simply force it upon them and when you control of that phone ends you notify them and they shut down access until someone new enables it. Still can be hacked but a whole lot more difficult and a trail of evidence is created when they do attempt to hack it and of course many will get busted when they attempt the hack. So it is all about blocking the clear path and creating one full of very high hurdles and pits full of water, and each one is a point of interception and evidence gathering. None of this is necessary if every one is honest or say they stay testing for psychopathy at a young age and treating the problem early prior to a trail of victims being created, until then all those hurdles and pits have to be created to more readily enable proper investigative opportunities.
You have forgotten the whole rent or buy issue. Will netflix be taken down by others selling permanent licences to online libraries, just like Steam for games or Apple iTunes. Is netflix a fad that will fade against distributors like itunes, whose popularity will grow and shrink and grow again and again, but people keep coming back. Of course no one can trust M$ who will sell it to you and then cancel it and say what licensed copy, we shut down that failing business arm. It really depends how low the prices go, as to whether the rental or the sales market dominates, cheaper the price sales dominate, the higher rental dominates. Limited consumer time is also a problem as more and more interactive content starts to dominate and that stuff sucks in huge volumes of consumer eye ball time, limiting non interactive content time.
On the flip side, life imprisonment and the death penalty. So tame a wild individual or lock them up or kill them. So breaking into someone's house, assaulting people, kidnapping them at gun point and locking them up in a cage until demands are met, are also bad but not so bad when it was the police acting with a search warrant based upon substantive evidence, yet to be proven, of criminal activity. So post prosecution and substation of evidence, a new kind of home detention and pacification. Not to say the rights of citizens should not be substantially tightened to prevent the worst kind of abuses and mass enslavement.
Well, that's the rub isn't it, you can only be a virgin once, so once they have tracked you, they will track you forever. So why worry, you have just joined the gang, one of countless millions being tracked, monitored, secret warrants ready to execute at the first excuse. When silly shit like this becomes normal, it ceases to be a threat, in fact not being tracked tends to make you look suspicious now;D.
They committed a range of criminal offences least of which is trespass. They should be criminally charged being an incompetence idiot is no excuse to break the law. So break and enter and demolish, I'll bet anything you like they also stole a bunch of stuff. Might seem a little unfair but idiots who do stupid things should be taught the consequences of not stopping, checking and confirming. Computer made me do it, is not an excuse. Beside demanding criminal charges be filed makes the whole civil suit thing so much easier.
The bill is straight up 100% stupid. Obviously the phone on it's own is nothing, it is it's connection to the network that counts. So the bill should target the connection ie no connection are allowed to mobile phone network, without the user personally fronting the network representative, showing ID and a photographic record taken, so basically an operators licence, where all pass but must be identified. Then you hold the licences operators of that phone accountable for the actions sourced from that phone, you of course lose accountability on proof of hack or report of theft of the phone.
The incumbent Telecom lobbyists would have blocked this because of cost. They do not give a crap who suffers what as a result of criminal activities being conducted via that all too easy access, that just want more money with fewer responsibilities. The bill needs to target connections to the network and that people are identified and recorded when establishing that connection and held liable for criminal actions initiated from that device to the network.
Hacked from the start. So the original content all that empty pseudo celebrity nonsense and that typical marketing driven conformity and the lack of thought that brings those ideas to the forefront, produces, oh look, it produces exactly what we have got. No hack that kind of shallow thinking produces results that are shallow and driven by empty marketing memes, that in turn drive and feed more shallow thinking. So no left wing thinking because that requires careful thought and understanding and a measure of enlighten self interest, far harder to program.
More likely, women due to aeons of habit, stay with child in protected group are generally more socially inclined. This will mean they will favour more socially inclined employers who will favour other kinds of rewards beyond straight payment. So better holidays, more arranged time off, higher quality break periods (food and social time), more talking and social interaction, more social support services and social activities. All that costs but it will attract specific kinds of employees and tend to drive off the greed obsessed ones who tend to be counter productive.
So creating a much healthier and happier and more costly work environment, can get you better employees who will accept reduced pay based upon those other benefits and those employees will be far more loyal and more supportive, as well as being emotionally bound to the company.
Explaining this to shallow bean counters so they stick it in their spreadsheets, is near impossible. It requires experience and broad knowledge to understand and implement in a work place. Generally see it in the quite companies who continue on without much fanfare, as pockets of excellence, that no one hears about.
I would have to say getting banned from marketing events for being too investigative rather than just promoting the marketing line is a good thing rather than a bad thing. As for exposing some jock strap douche making money basically bragging about the size of their ego and their junk for who they really are, tiny on the inside and the outside, well, that is fair too, makes for a healthier society, less focused on junk because that junk is all bullshit, designed to do nothing but sell junk. A whole lot more mocking of pseudo celebrity bullshit will make for a better society, with more people waking up to the idea, that those ass hats at the top ain't all that special, ain't better than everyone else, don't have more of a right to a public voice, they are just greedy pushy lying egoistic freaks and in reality should have less of a public voice than the majority, rather than more. The rules are a changing, whether you like it or not and fakers will be exposed no matter how rich or powerful.
Well the M&M does want to replace those sold of assets with something, a huge mega bonus for herself as a result of pumped up profits for those quarters that incorporate those sales. You sell something, you make money, even though what you sold will no longer make you money, but this quarters profits are huge and so are your bonuses. Yeah pretty much a scam, organised by champions of the Peter Principle, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., perhaps we can now call it M&M principle https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., why do those idiots so much remind me of the typical corporate executive when it comes to proper business plans, rather than managing scams to enrich themselves and hide their incompetence.
You could do it with a solar powered hot air balloon. Use light weight solar panels to absorb heat and also use the electricity generated to heat the air within the balloon. Obviously starting with helium provides a huge boost, so hot helium will rise further and faster than cool helium. This will also help with icing up. You can also use the energy to power high efficiency light weight motors for better directional control. The balloon material would have to be thicker than normal to provide greater insulation. Only problem daytime only operation.
Let's be honest if terrorists started blowing up the luxury hidey holes of the rich and greedy along with those rich and greedy in attendance, things would change real fast. Where as blowing up the rest of us, just locks the status quo more firmly in place. Genuine terrorist would not target the 99%, genuine terrorists would zero in on the 1% as the decision makers. The more this bullshit drags on, the more blatantly, glaring suspicious it becomes. So somehow beyond all logic those really smart terrorists who plan these attacks are really, really stupid because they make smart plans to attack stupid targets, targets that gain them nothing but do ensure more money, a lot more money is spent fighting those terrorists. Yeah, the really did used to target those making the decisions and the rest of us were just collateral damage. Now they don't ever, ever touch the decision makers.
The easy solution to fix many problems. All government spending must be localised, no tax payer dollars, not one cent to be spent on imported products or services, directly or indirectly. This maintains and protects a production base to build on. This is a fair and reasonable demand by tax payers, you take the money from tax payers, than it is only fair that the money you take is spent on tax payers. To many international corporations are cheating all over the place.
So likely there is more information in the background and it was an inside joke. Often the presenter with more information will show humour based on there internal information that outside do not have and the joke is received as being a little off. However if you look about the joke based upon the idea that those people with really old PCs, have really old PCs simply because they do not consider them 'worth' upgrading ie their last PC, then your opposition looking to sell into that market will find them pretty poor customers ie positively bankrupt PC budgets when it comes to spending money on PCs, they will of course have money to spend on other stuff. They are crying crocodile tears for M$ who has to give away what the average user is no longer willing to buy. The interesting side is by M$ giving away product in the manner it has, it is creating Apple customers, who will budget money to purchase from Apple what M$ can not give away for free.
Why bother? Just stop them from creating a cashless society, problem solved. Demand anonymous cash remains, demand a right to carrying freedom in your pocket in a capitalist society. Demand the right to be able to purchase the essentials of life without having to ask permission first. If they want to get rid of cash fine, then end capitalism first. I would have no problem with a cashless society where need is served before greed and where those who demand greed before need are simply locked up as mentally disturbed individuals in need of treatment;).
It does if you really understand what he is actually implying and who he is really targeting with that statement. It is a snide and very subtle shot at M$ targeting a market that is not upgrading old PCs basically they are running them into the ground and many not looking to replace them at all (so exactly who is M$ trying to sell to). So nothing to do with PC users as such but PC users using old computers that they are not interested in replacing. So the bulk of PCs users are people looking to replace PCs with other things, a tablet, a phone, a big screen all in one. So Apple are not big on PCs in fact tiny but you know it rather sad that the majority of PC owners will not be PC buyers, rather sad for M$. So yeah, a subtle insider shot at M$ and nothing really to do with PC users, the vast majority of whom over time will cease to be PC users. Just us overly sensitive power and business users, cheeky Apple;).
The problem is errant and false data. No amount or search or filtering can clear up a poisoned data base. Bad data creates false association and relationships, which means bad results are generated by all searches. You can not clean up bad data without it also taking out good data, you can not get good data without also getting flooded out by bad data. If fact the best defence against those deep total data acquisition system is to simply generate false data and allow those systems to flood themselves with it. Computers can for more readily generate false data than they can acquire, store and collate it and rejecting bad data means, that data must be actually analysed, each and every instance of it.
So say the US government wants to track all potential Chinese espionage agents, simplest defence the government of China simply makes all Chinese citizens look like potential espionage agents (purposefully leaky data bases ie honey pots with false data, everywhere, it's just a cheap box but it can contain data that will cost millions of dollars to analyse) and the US government is back to square 1.
The sheer volume of bullshit data that computers can generate is basically infinite, just look at main stream media News, what a joke. Of course people are learning to reject it all based upon the source, basically just ignore it, especially when espionage agents produce it against their own citizens (US main stream media, what a mess). In the espionage world this is much more complex because of course false data is used to hide real data and hence you get bogged down in too much data. Sort of like the bullshit espionage agents try to spread in main stream media, of course unlike the spy vs spy sources, we can just turn around and ignore that entire corrupted source and go elsewhere (So main stream news is corrupted shite and main stream NGOs are corrupted shite, so just ignore them and let them go belly up full of US/UK espionage agents, investors will not be impressed).
It is odd that they would publicly announce it. They are rich and greedy and annoucing the sale of crappy shares that a likely to lose a whole bunch of value makes little sense ie you are driving down the price whilst you are trying to sell. I smell a little stock manipulation, they have already lost a bundle on the reduce price of fossil fuel stock. So attack the PR=B$ story that all is rosy in fossil fuel stocks, to really drive down the price selling lots early to help that trend. When it hits bottom, buy them back and when it recovers sell them again, helps if you pay of pension funds to buy to your sells and sell to your buys. Then at the top of the bounce sell out and hope to recover the money initially lost in the drop in share price that accompanied the drop in fossil fuel price. Also regardless of what the demopublican corporate whore said, coal is fucked, sell like there is no tomorrow.
Disagreeing on delivery not on content. I felt that politeness and pointing out the changes (the impact of the changes is then questionable) did not properly carry across the real impact of the changes and the emotions generated, in a somewhat satirical and humorous fashion. Sometimes politely pointing out things and clinically dissecting the changes, does not really get the point across about the real impact of those changes and a more challenging approach is required, a reminder of the emotions being generated.
What cash is, is something that can not be refused because it is your cash ie, how may I serve you today, oh you want to buy that loaf of bread, some milk and some baloney, sure and thank you for your money, oh wait the system says that money is shit because it's your money and I must refuse it, if it was someone else's that is OK but the banks have collectively decided that you can not eat today, please contact you nearest treasury officer for assistance.
A pocket full of cash and you eat, a pocket full of credit cards and you ask permission to eat. That is exactly how anonymous cash is, you do not need to ask permission to fucking spend it, it can not be rejected just because it is yours (most glaring example of exactly that, racism) and when it comes to stealing it, it takes real effort, rather than curruptly shifting around bits to enrich the minority at the majorities expence in some of the biggest scandals in history.
Also, don't ever forget, that the banks what to charge you too look after your money and pay not interest to use it for what ever they want to. Don't like that idea, tough fucking luck, we wont let you have that money we will only allow you to transfer it to one of our cartel members and charge a fee for that, so that then they can charge fees for gambling your money. The whole cashless society in capitalism thing is one huge scam, to basically enslave the majority.
In the internet age, not only should there be a label but they should be a direct link to a website with full details of product, every single ingredient, the production process (if it's boiled in sulphuric acid I want to know and I want to avoid it) and packaging details (if the packing gives on oestrogen emulators I want to know and avoid it). There is no excuse for providing full details of all food products.
This is not furniture, this is changing work tools, so that their use is no longer natural to the person that trained with them. So for an extended period they make frustrating errors, again and again and again, hugely impacting the work effort for months. I am older and I swapped from GUI to GUI and I know full well how disruptive that is and it last for months and you lose a shit bucket ton of productivity and the hate those who made the changes a little more, each and every time the work flow is disrupted.
I think the snail mail analogy is by far more appropriate. So for snail mail a simple envelope, nothing more secures it because there are real penalties for interfering with it https://www.law.cornell.edu/us.... So for electronic mail, simply enact the same laws and provide a simply concretion envelope. The mail identities it source and it's intended recipient and if you get it by mistake simply forward it on to authorities for redirection or inform the sender and delete it. Open it when you are not the intended recipient and you break the law and you have to identify yourself when you open it and acknowledge that with the sender. These laws would impact all email providers and force them to respect the privacy of senders and receivers by law (five year penalty for all players involved in breaking those laws). You bet email will become real secure real quick if a prison sentence is involved when you invade people's privacy.
Slashdot Mirror
So you are saying that the government of China will be quite content for their employees to use Windows anal probe 10 at home instead of WindowsSE 10 because they don't care if employees accidentally leak information at home, yep, uh huh. So if various governments say Windows anal probe 10 is not safe enough for them to use, why exactly do those governments think it is safe enough for their citizens to use, why is that allowed to happen. This is blowing up fast and will do a lot of damage to M$ and corrupt paid off governments.
You defend illegal access to you phone account, exactly the same way you defend illegal access to your car. Say it was stolen, or the access was illegal, they define the location of the illegal vehicle use (which cell phone tower) and you prove you were elsewhere at the time. The telecoms are just to greedy to pay for proper account validation, so you simply force it upon them and when you control of that phone ends you notify them and they shut down access until someone new enables it. Still can be hacked but a whole lot more difficult and a trail of evidence is created when they do attempt to hack it and of course many will get busted when they attempt the hack. So it is all about blocking the clear path and creating one full of very high hurdles and pits full of water, and each one is a point of interception and evidence gathering. None of this is necessary if every one is honest or say they stay testing for psychopathy at a young age and treating the problem early prior to a trail of victims being created, until then all those hurdles and pits have to be created to more readily enable proper investigative opportunities.
Mobile phone account, not an ISP account, incumbent telecoms are not exactly slack and easy going when it comes to spoofing access.
You have forgotten the whole rent or buy issue. Will netflix be taken down by others selling permanent licences to online libraries, just like Steam for games or Apple iTunes. Is netflix a fad that will fade against distributors like itunes, whose popularity will grow and shrink and grow again and again, but people keep coming back. Of course no one can trust M$ who will sell it to you and then cancel it and say what licensed copy, we shut down that failing business arm. It really depends how low the prices go, as to whether the rental or the sales market dominates, cheaper the price sales dominate, the higher rental dominates. Limited consumer time is also a problem as more and more interactive content starts to dominate and that stuff sucks in huge volumes of consumer eye ball time, limiting non interactive content time.
On the flip side, life imprisonment and the death penalty. So tame a wild individual or lock them up or kill them. So breaking into someone's house, assaulting people, kidnapping them at gun point and locking them up in a cage until demands are met, are also bad but not so bad when it was the police acting with a search warrant based upon substantive evidence, yet to be proven, of criminal activity. So post prosecution and substation of evidence, a new kind of home detention and pacification. Not to say the rights of citizens should not be substantially tightened to prevent the worst kind of abuses and mass enslavement.
Well, that's the rub isn't it, you can only be a virgin once, so once they have tracked you, they will track you forever. So why worry, you have just joined the gang, one of countless millions being tracked, monitored, secret warrants ready to execute at the first excuse. When silly shit like this becomes normal, it ceases to be a threat, in fact not being tracked tends to make you look suspicious now ;D.
They committed a range of criminal offences least of which is trespass. They should be criminally charged being an incompetence idiot is no excuse to break the law. So break and enter and demolish, I'll bet anything you like they also stole a bunch of stuff. Might seem a little unfair but idiots who do stupid things should be taught the consequences of not stopping, checking and confirming. Computer made me do it, is not an excuse. Beside demanding criminal charges be filed makes the whole civil suit thing so much easier.
The bill is straight up 100% stupid. Obviously the phone on it's own is nothing, it is it's connection to the network that counts. So the bill should target the connection ie no connection are allowed to mobile phone network, without the user personally fronting the network representative, showing ID and a photographic record taken, so basically an operators licence, where all pass but must be identified. Then you hold the licences operators of that phone accountable for the actions sourced from that phone, you of course lose accountability on proof of hack or report of theft of the phone.
The incumbent Telecom lobbyists would have blocked this because of cost. They do not give a crap who suffers what as a result of criminal activities being conducted via that all too easy access, that just want more money with fewer responsibilities. The bill needs to target connections to the network and that people are identified and recorded when establishing that connection and held liable for criminal actions initiated from that device to the network.
Hacked from the start. So the original content all that empty pseudo celebrity nonsense and that typical marketing driven conformity and the lack of thought that brings those ideas to the forefront, produces, oh look, it produces exactly what we have got. No hack that kind of shallow thinking produces results that are shallow and driven by empty marketing memes, that in turn drive and feed more shallow thinking. So no left wing thinking because that requires careful thought and understanding and a measure of enlighten self interest, far harder to program.
More likely, women due to aeons of habit, stay with child in protected group are generally more socially inclined. This will mean they will favour more socially inclined employers who will favour other kinds of rewards beyond straight payment. So better holidays, more arranged time off, higher quality break periods (food and social time), more talking and social interaction, more social support services and social activities. All that costs but it will attract specific kinds of employees and tend to drive off the greed obsessed ones who tend to be counter productive.
So creating a much healthier and happier and more costly work environment, can get you better employees who will accept reduced pay based upon those other benefits and those employees will be far more loyal and more supportive, as well as being emotionally bound to the company.
Explaining this to shallow bean counters so they stick it in their spreadsheets, is near impossible. It requires experience and broad knowledge to understand and implement in a work place. Generally see it in the quite companies who continue on without much fanfare, as pockets of excellence, that no one hears about.
I would have to say getting banned from marketing events for being too investigative rather than just promoting the marketing line is a good thing rather than a bad thing. As for exposing some jock strap douche making money basically bragging about the size of their ego and their junk for who they really are, tiny on the inside and the outside, well, that is fair too, makes for a healthier society, less focused on junk because that junk is all bullshit, designed to do nothing but sell junk. A whole lot more mocking of pseudo celebrity bullshit will make for a better society, with more people waking up to the idea, that those ass hats at the top ain't all that special, ain't better than everyone else, don't have more of a right to a public voice, they are just greedy pushy lying egoistic freaks and in reality should have less of a public voice than the majority, rather than more. The rules are a changing, whether you like it or not and fakers will be exposed no matter how rich or powerful.
Well the M&M does want to replace those sold of assets with something, a huge mega bonus for herself as a result of pumped up profits for those quarters that incorporate those sales. You sell something, you make money, even though what you sold will no longer make you money, but this quarters profits are huge and so are your bonuses. Yeah pretty much a scam, organised by champions of the Peter Principle, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., perhaps we can now call it M&M principle https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., why do those idiots so much remind me of the typical corporate executive when it comes to proper business plans, rather than managing scams to enrich themselves and hide their incompetence.
You could do it with a solar powered hot air balloon. Use light weight solar panels to absorb heat and also use the electricity generated to heat the air within the balloon. Obviously starting with helium provides a huge boost, so hot helium will rise further and faster than cool helium. This will also help with icing up. You can also use the energy to power high efficiency light weight motors for better directional control. The balloon material would have to be thicker than normal to provide greater insulation. Only problem daytime only operation.
Let's be honest if terrorists started blowing up the luxury hidey holes of the rich and greedy along with those rich and greedy in attendance, things would change real fast. Where as blowing up the rest of us, just locks the status quo more firmly in place. Genuine terrorist would not target the 99%, genuine terrorists would zero in on the 1% as the decision makers. The more this bullshit drags on, the more blatantly, glaring suspicious it becomes. So somehow beyond all logic those really smart terrorists who plan these attacks are really, really stupid because they make smart plans to attack stupid targets, targets that gain them nothing but do ensure more money, a lot more money is spent fighting those terrorists. Yeah, the really did used to target those making the decisions and the rest of us were just collateral damage. Now they don't ever, ever touch the decision makers.
The easy solution to fix many problems. All government spending must be localised, no tax payer dollars, not one cent to be spent on imported products or services, directly or indirectly. This maintains and protects a production base to build on. This is a fair and reasonable demand by tax payers, you take the money from tax payers, than it is only fair that the money you take is spent on tax payers. To many international corporations are cheating all over the place.
So likely there is more information in the background and it was an inside joke. Often the presenter with more information will show humour based on there internal information that outside do not have and the joke is received as being a little off. However if you look about the joke based upon the idea that those people with really old PCs, have really old PCs simply because they do not consider them 'worth' upgrading ie their last PC, then your opposition looking to sell into that market will find them pretty poor customers ie positively bankrupt PC budgets when it comes to spending money on PCs, they will of course have money to spend on other stuff. They are crying crocodile tears for M$ who has to give away what the average user is no longer willing to buy. The interesting side is by M$ giving away product in the manner it has, it is creating Apple customers, who will budget money to purchase from Apple what M$ can not give away for free.
Why bother? Just stop them from creating a cashless society, problem solved. Demand anonymous cash remains, demand a right to carrying freedom in your pocket in a capitalist society. Demand the right to be able to purchase the essentials of life without having to ask permission first. If they want to get rid of cash fine, then end capitalism first. I would have no problem with a cashless society where need is served before greed and where those who demand greed before need are simply locked up as mentally disturbed individuals in need of treatment ;).
It does if you really understand what he is actually implying and who he is really targeting with that statement. It is a snide and very subtle shot at M$ targeting a market that is not upgrading old PCs basically they are running them into the ground and many not looking to replace them at all (so exactly who is M$ trying to sell to). So nothing to do with PC users as such but PC users using old computers that they are not interested in replacing. So the bulk of PCs users are people looking to replace PCs with other things, a tablet, a phone, a big screen all in one. So Apple are not big on PCs in fact tiny but you know it rather sad that the majority of PC owners will not be PC buyers, rather sad for M$. So yeah, a subtle insider shot at M$ and nothing really to do with PC users, the vast majority of whom over time will cease to be PC users. Just us overly sensitive power and business users, cheeky Apple ;).
The problem is errant and false data. No amount or search or filtering can clear up a poisoned data base. Bad data creates false association and relationships, which means bad results are generated by all searches. You can not clean up bad data without it also taking out good data, you can not get good data without also getting flooded out by bad data. If fact the best defence against those deep total data acquisition system is to simply generate false data and allow those systems to flood themselves with it. Computers can for more readily generate false data than they can acquire, store and collate it and rejecting bad data means, that data must be actually analysed, each and every instance of it.
So say the US government wants to track all potential Chinese espionage agents, simplest defence the government of China simply makes all Chinese citizens look like potential espionage agents (purposefully leaky data bases ie honey pots with false data, everywhere, it's just a cheap box but it can contain data that will cost millions of dollars to analyse) and the US government is back to square 1.
The sheer volume of bullshit data that computers can generate is basically infinite, just look at main stream media News, what a joke. Of course people are learning to reject it all based upon the source, basically just ignore it, especially when espionage agents produce it against their own citizens (US main stream media, what a mess). In the espionage world this is much more complex because of course false data is used to hide real data and hence you get bogged down in too much data. Sort of like the bullshit espionage agents try to spread in main stream media, of course unlike the spy vs spy sources, we can just turn around and ignore that entire corrupted source and go elsewhere (So main stream news is corrupted shite and main stream NGOs are corrupted shite, so just ignore them and let them go belly up full of US/UK espionage agents, investors will not be impressed).
It is odd that they would publicly announce it. They are rich and greedy and annoucing the sale of crappy shares that a likely to lose a whole bunch of value makes little sense ie you are driving down the price whilst you are trying to sell. I smell a little stock manipulation, they have already lost a bundle on the reduce price of fossil fuel stock. So attack the PR=B$ story that all is rosy in fossil fuel stocks, to really drive down the price selling lots early to help that trend. When it hits bottom, buy them back and when it recovers sell them again, helps if you pay of pension funds to buy to your sells and sell to your buys. Then at the top of the bounce sell out and hope to recover the money initially lost in the drop in share price that accompanied the drop in fossil fuel price. Also regardless of what the demopublican corporate whore said, coal is fucked, sell like there is no tomorrow.
Disagreeing on delivery not on content. I felt that politeness and pointing out the changes (the impact of the changes is then questionable) did not properly carry across the real impact of the changes and the emotions generated, in a somewhat satirical and humorous fashion. Sometimes politely pointing out things and clinically dissecting the changes, does not really get the point across about the real impact of those changes and a more challenging approach is required, a reminder of the emotions being generated.
What cash is, is something that can not be refused because it is your cash ie, how may I serve you today, oh you want to buy that loaf of bread, some milk and some baloney, sure and thank you for your money, oh wait the system says that money is shit because it's your money and I must refuse it, if it was someone else's that is OK but the banks have collectively decided that you can not eat today, please contact you nearest treasury officer for assistance.
A pocket full of cash and you eat, a pocket full of credit cards and you ask permission to eat. That is exactly how anonymous cash is, you do not need to ask permission to fucking spend it, it can not be rejected just because it is yours (most glaring example of exactly that, racism) and when it comes to stealing it, it takes real effort, rather than curruptly shifting around bits to enrich the minority at the majorities expence in some of the biggest scandals in history.
Also, don't ever forget, that the banks what to charge you too look after your money and pay not interest to use it for what ever they want to. Don't like that idea, tough fucking luck, we wont let you have that money we will only allow you to transfer it to one of our cartel members and charge a fee for that, so that then they can charge fees for gambling your money. The whole cashless society in capitalism thing is one huge scam, to basically enslave the majority.
In the internet age, not only should there be a label but they should be a direct link to a website with full details of product, every single ingredient, the production process (if it's boiled in sulphuric acid I want to know and I want to avoid it) and packaging details (if the packing gives on oestrogen emulators I want to know and avoid it). There is no excuse for providing full details of all food products.
This is not furniture, this is changing work tools, so that their use is no longer natural to the person that trained with them. So for an extended period they make frustrating errors, again and again and again, hugely impacting the work effort for months. I am older and I swapped from GUI to GUI and I know full well how disruptive that is and it last for months and you lose a shit bucket ton of productivity and the hate those who made the changes a little more, each and every time the work flow is disrupted.
I think the snail mail analogy is by far more appropriate. So for snail mail a simple envelope, nothing more secures it because there are real penalties for interfering with it https://www.law.cornell.edu/us.... So for electronic mail, simply enact the same laws and provide a simply concretion envelope. The mail identities it source and it's intended recipient and if you get it by mistake simply forward it on to authorities for redirection or inform the sender and delete it. Open it when you are not the intended recipient and you break the law and you have to identify yourself when you open it and acknowledge that with the sender. These laws would impact all email providers and force them to respect the privacy of senders and receivers by law (five year penalty for all players involved in breaking those laws). You bet email will become real secure real quick if a prison sentence is involved when you invade people's privacy.