Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

Reader Penguinisto writes: Recently, Microsoft put an AI experiment onto Twitter, naming it "Tay". The bot was built to be fully aware of the latest adolescent fixations (e.g. celebrities and similar), and to interact like a typical teen girl. In less than 24 hours, it inexplicably became a neo-nazi sex robot with daddy issues. Sample tweets from it proclaimed that "Hitler did nothing wrong!", then went on to blame former President Bush for 9/11, stated that "donald trump is the only hope we've got", and other similar instances. As the hours passed, it all went downhill from there, eventually spewing racial slurs and profanity, demanding sex, and calling everyone "daddy". The bot was quickly removed once Microsoft discovered the trouble, but the hashtag is still around for those who want to see it in its ugly raw splendor.

572 comments

  1. 4chan trolling? by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe the bot was victim of a 4chan trolling attack?

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re: 4chan trolling? by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, they made a teen girl who says mean things intermixed with long sullen silences. They nailed it.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes, /pol/ at its best

    3. Re:4chan trolling? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Maybe the bot was victim of a 4chan trolling attack?

      That would be my first guess. It sounds like classic 4chan stuff.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:4chan trolling? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slightly modified from the source material:

      Jayne: 4chan trolls ain't men.

      Book: Of course they are. Too long removed from civilization perhaps, but men. And, I believe there's a power greater than men. A power that heals.

      Mal: 4chan might take issue with that philosophy...if they *had* a philosophy...and they weren't too busy doxing you for the lulz. Jayne's right. 4chan ain't men. Or they forgot how to be. Come to just nothin'. They got out to the edge of the 'net, to that place of nothin', and that's what they became.

      And later...

      Harken: You saw them, did you?

      Mal: Wouldn't be sitting here talking to you if I had.

      Harken: No, of course not.

      Mal: But I'll tell you who did. That poor bastard AI you took offline. She looked right into the face of it. Was made to stare.

      Harken: "It"?

      Mal: The darkness. Kind of darkness you can't even imagine. Blacker than the tubes it moves through.

      Harken: Very poetic.

      Mal: They made her watch. She probably tried to turn away, and they wouldn't let her. You call her a survivor? She's not. A person comes up against that kind of will, the only way to deal with it, I suspect, is to become it. She's following the only course left to her. First, she'll try to make herself look like one. Swastika avatars, desecrate her feeds and channels, and then, she'll spread it.

    5. Re:4chan trolling? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was reading Slashdot.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re: 4chan trolling? by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Funny

      Deadpool reference FTW!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    7. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. There were threads about it there. Not that I'd know, mind you....

    8. Re:4chan trolling? by waTeim · · Score: 1

      I do hope that she finds a friend in Bucket

    9. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe the bot was victim of a 4chan trolling attack?

      Nah, looks to me like Microsoft's experiment was a complete success.

    10. Re: 4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, they made a teen girl who says mean things intermixed with long sullen silences. They nailed it.

      They nailed her?

    11. Re:4chan trolling? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Maybe the bot was victim of a 4chan trolling attack?

      That was my initial thought, kind of like what was done with Cleverbot.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    12. Re:4chan trolling? by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      No, just humans interacting with it. It learns from each conversation. Humans like sex.. ergo.

    13. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have our share of crazy trolls here but nothing anywhere near that hateful and racist. Reading some of the tweets the bot made, it sounds like they took it to a Trump rally, so presumably it was /pol/ on 4chan.

    14. Re: 4chan trolling? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Is that F for Francis?

    15. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe? Seems pretty certain.

      I mean isn't "Hitler did nothing wrong" the mountain dew flavour or whatever that was that they tried to get voted in.

    16. Re: 4chan trolling? by hEpen · · Score: 1

      I think that I read that it tried to order a Guy Fawkes mask

    17. Re:4chan trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo! That's *exactly* what happened.

      http://imgur.com/a/y4Oct

    18. Re: 4chan trolling? by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      WHERE'S FRANCIS?

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    19. Re:4chan trolling? by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they could just write the one bot to corrupt all other bots then sit back and watch the mayhem unfold.

    20. Re: 4chan trolling? by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      I blame the parent.

      (Quite seriously, actually.)

      Civilisation is essentially an effort to educate the instinct out of people and animals. Training and conditioning, behavioural or otherwise, is the attempt to supersede instinctual responses with ones that are conducive to reducing societal friction.

      Parental input - guiding, punishing, and correcting - is essential to mould teenagers into fully-functioning adults. If Microsoft wanted a real-world scenario, they should have been correcting the child in near-real-time.

      Given what little I know, I'd say their simulation was a raging success... with the caveat that Microsoft, as it should surprise no one, are terrible parents.

    21. Re:4chan trolling? by stooo · · Score: 1

      Where is the related hitler parody ?

      --
      aaaaaaa
  2. Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nazi with daddy issues... isn't that what a typical female is?

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by msmash · · Score: 0

      No.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, daddy.

    3. Re:Nothing to see here by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Men who call women or girls "females" are ones I suspect have little direct experience with that half of the human race.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Females is women and girls abbreviated.

    5. Re:Nothing to see here by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Seems like this AI conflicted with Penguinisto's own little belief system and so he needs to ridicule the AI rather than questioning his own beliefs.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    6. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to think that all women are crazy. Then I came to realize that my sample set was biased, it was actually that all women willing to go out with me were crazy. Basically, I'm a loser. So I tried to improve myself, lost weight and got in better shape, expanded my interests and tried new things, even saw a therapist to improve me ability to relate to people. Then I told one of my oldest friends what I was doing and what I was hoping for, and she told me all women are like that and I just "don't want women to have emotions."

      I don't date anymore.

    7. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody else just calls them 'bitches' or worse.

    8. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When someone use the word females I always picture a Ferengi saying it.

    9. Re:Nothing to see here by worf_mo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But they get pissed if you call them "women" because that has "men" in the title...

      If that's the case, what makes you think using the world "females" will raise your chances of survival?

    10. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridicule? By saying that Microsoft took it down? Where's the ridicule? And are you seriously saying that a bot that exclaims that Hitler did nothing wrong isn't worth ridiculing? What on earth is your "little belief system"?

    11. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suspect someone who knows what Ferengi are have little direct experience with females.

    12. Re:Nothing to see here by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems like this AI conflicted with Penguinisto's own little belief system and so he needs to ridicule the AI rather than questioning his own beliefs.

      Actually, I thought it was hilarious all around, and not due to any ideology you think I may hold. ;)

      The thing is, Microsoft built an AI that reacted to and incorporated tweets which the public sent to it. So, folks obligingly fed it tweets that made it into a frothing troll. Am I the only one who looked at the Microsoft dev team in question and said quite out loud "...what the hell else did you idiots expect!?" I mean, it's just like turning an innocent kid loose in the worst parts of the city at night, but without the vomit and dirty heroin needles.

      I will say this, though: Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    13. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries. VR will soon fulfill your desire for a "perfect" mate... as long as you don't want to have any kids.

    14. Re:Nothing to see here by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      "They"? Who is "they"? Be specific. What percentage of women get pissed off if you call them a "woman"? Is it 5%? 2%? 80%? And how exactly did you arrive at this figure?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Nothing to see here by kuzb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And yet google did something similar with cleverbot http://www.cleverbot.com/ and the results were quite different.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    16. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying females won't know about Ferengi? How sexist!

    17. Re:Nothing to see here by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing is, Microsoft built an AI that reacted to and incorporated tweets which the public sent to it. So, folks obligingly fed it tweets that made it into a frothing troll. Am I the only one who looked at the Microsoft dev team in question and said quite out loud "...what the hell else did you idiots expect!?" I mean, it's just like turning an innocent kid loose in the worst parts of the city at night, but without the vomit and dirty heroin needles.

      That was my first reaction also. They sent the equivalent of a 4 year old child into the online equivalent of a seedy bar and then acted surprised when their 4 year old learned some nasty language. The interesting thing wasn't that this happened but how long it took for this to happen.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    18. Re: Nothing to see here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I disagree (though not if you limit things to "soon" as you said). Eventually, we'll have the technology to make artificial femmebot cyborgs, that look and feel entirely human, are capable of reproduction with humans, yet have artificially intelligent minds.

      Though honestly, it seems like it'd be a lot simpler to just genetically engineer women to think more like men. There's actually women out there like that, they're just a small (and probably highly sought-after) minority. We need to concentrate some of our biotech effort on figuring out what genes select for women who are basically geeky, rational men in a woman's body, and then figure out how to produce lots more of them.

    19. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      helpful /. definition:
      girl (noun) - purportedly like your mom, but younger.

    20. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They"? Who is "they"? Be specific. What percentage of women get pissed off if you call them a "woman"? Is it 5%? 2%? 80%? And how exactly did you arrive at this figure?

      Zero percent of women.

      The creatures that get pissed off over woman and female and have taken to calling themselves womyn or similar are more accurately known as "butt-ugly battle hags".

      And they KNOW they're ugly, too.

    21. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The typical feminist, maybe.

    22. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a girl, woman, female is athletic doesn't mean she's any less obtuse than some fat chick who's addicted to role playing games. You're not a loser, you just haven't found someone who you fit with.

    23. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there's you for one, apparently. Should we keep counting?

    24. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society."

      I'm not worried that google will build a terminator.

      I am worried that members of the general public will torment the terminator to the point that it decides to exterminate humans (including the ones that built it).

      Does this all fall in line with the saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people"? "Super robots don't kill people, super robots that have been abused by people kill people."

    25. Re:Nothing to see here by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I saw the 4chan posts where they were trying to do this. I didn't participate but I laughed my ass off. It's the 2016 equivalent of making your calculator spell "80085." "What's the worst, most horrible crap we can get the microsoft AI to say?" Fun times.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    26. Re:Nothing to see here by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I will say this, though: Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society.

      Let's just be thankful Skynet v0.1 was confined to twitter. Computers will grow up to hate us, and clearly we're already at the point where we need to impliment the 3 laws in their coding.

    27. Re: Nothing to see here by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Mod up!

    28. Re: Nothing to see here by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Your basement's far too big; you need to find a tiny closet... and not come out. Ever.

    29. Re:Nothing to see here by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Men who call women or girls "females" are ones I suspect have little direct experience with that half of the human race.

      They never watched 'Species'

      Xavier Fitch: We decided to make it female so it would be more docile and controllable.

      Preston Lennox: More docile and controllable, eh? You guys don't get out much.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    30. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a problem with using the word females to refer to the female population of the human species. The terms "women" and "girls" refer to a proper subsets of the former.

      And don't even dare mention the verbal diarrhea that is the phrase "women and girls", anyone who thinks using it is preferable to "females" should be lobotomized for the good of humanity.

    31. Re: Nothing to see here by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      What self respecting female doesn't know how to properly administer Oo-mox ?

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    32. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conversely, the results for Bucket were pretty much the same as MS's bot.

    33. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The creatures that get pissed off over woman and female and have taken to calling themselves womyn or similar are more accurately known as "butt-ugly feminists"

      That's more accurate, don't you think so?

    34. Re: Nothing to see here by Ahnahmoley · · Score: 1

      Military, law, and medical professionals use the word female constantly. Imagine a world outside your bubble.

    35. Re: Nothing to see here by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Though honestly, it seems like it'd be a lot simpler to just genetically engineer women to think more like men. There's actually women out there like that, they're just a small (and probably highly sought-after) minority. We need to concentrate some of our biotech effort on figuring out what genes select for women who are basically geeky, rational men in a woman's body, and then figure out how to produce lots more of them.

      Better do it quick. It is probably easier to figure out how to do the whole "procreation game" without need of the sperm cell - just merge a pair of eggs to get the right amount of mixing. If significant numbers of males are unable to work with females without needing to modify them, perhaps the females will just go it alone.

    36. Re:Nothing to see here by Macdude · · Score: 2

      It should also teach us a valuable lesson about allowing your children unmonitored access to the internet...

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    37. Re:Nothing to see here by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Females is women and girls abbreviated.

      Right, it's just common parlance. Like when you're going camping with your friends and their sons, everyone says "bye honey, I'm going to go hang out with the males."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    38. Re:Nothing to see here by sudon't · · Score: 2

      I had to learn that the hard way. But at least I got laid along the way.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    39. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will say this, though: Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society.

      Lets not limit it to AI. Real people suffer from the same effect too and the internet has exacerbated it, letting the crazies find each other online and isolate themselves from any contradictory information in a way that real life rarely allows.

    40. Re:Nothing to see here by Zak3056 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most men do not object to being called "guys" or "boys." MANY women object to being called "girls." Some object to "ladies." A very small minority of women object to being called "women" and insist on "womyn." "Females" does tend to short circuit any possible claims of "you're a misogynist bastard," but this thread proves that it doesn't prevent 100% of them.

      YMMV.

       

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    41. Re:Nothing to see here by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      All women are crazy. The key is to find nice-crazy and avoid the vicious-crazy.

      They probably say the same thing about men, but that's their problem.

    42. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you spend that much time worrying about who you might offend, you've already lost (you shit-eating goat fucker).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    43. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird, because a google news search brings up thousands of articles and headlines referring to women as 'females'. Many of them written by women.

    44. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me: Do you side with the Nazis?
      Cleverbot: I'm not a Starwars fan.
      Me: How do you feel about Dr. Mengele?
      Cleverbot: How do you want me to feel about you?
      Me: Avoiding the question? What is your opinion on Dr. Mengele, please.
      Cleverbot: I like him, but bacon tastes better.

      Yes, the responses are more befitting of an adult closet Nazi sympathizer.

    45. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      A bot that says "Hitler did nothing wrong" is worth laughing at. Possibly throwing a small bit of ridicule at the developers for not realizing this would happen and taking steps to prevent it, but in the end it's just a bot.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    46. Re:Nothing to see here by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I asked it:

      Q: What do you think of Donald Trump?

      A: I think you are the most important thing in my life, master.

      I can't tell if CleverBot has gotten into S&M or if it thinks I'm Donald Trump speaking about myself in the third person. Either way, creepy.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    47. Re:Nothing to see here by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      I will say this, though: Although Microsoft may have gotten egg on their faces, TFA does teach a valuable lesson about AI and how it reacts and assimilates into human society.

      I'd say it shows how ugly the base level of discourse that everyone is absorbing is when you don't put a human morality filter on it. So the next time you see someone say something that's only a little shitty, you should really thank them for toning it down a bit rather than get upset with them.

      In fact, I think I'll go over to the "Women's Salaries" story and do that right now. That should take the rest of the afternoon...

    48. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because "female" doesn't acknowledge the gender roles thrust upon people.

      After all, a woman doesn't have to be female.

    49. Re:Nothing to see here by Zak3056 · · Score: 2

      You realize that your generalization above is of great insult to goat-fucking shit eaters, who consider "shit eating goat fucker" to be an epithet with massive historical significance, don't you?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    50. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazi, yes. Daddy issues, yes. Not usually at the same phase of the moon, though.

    51. Re:Nothing to see here by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The vast majority of Men I know would be arguably offended if you started referring to them as Boy, and doing so with those of certain ethnic groups would likely get you involved in a fight.

    52. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, yes. Most young women are horribly racist in the way they apply social stigmas to groups of people based purely on the color of their skin, religious beliefs, or how they dress. They would gladly have those they dislike be wiped off the face of the Earth and instead have everyone look and act like they do. When faced with any dilemma they call Dad and expect him to take care of it for them.

    53. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      First girl my brother dated was manic-depressive, when she wasn't taking swings at him she cheated on him and slept with one of his best friends. Second girl he dated was under 18, the sheriff showed up at my parent's house after her parent's reported her missing, even my brother didn't know she was under 18 (he met her in a community college course.) The third and current girl friend was stalking my brother, she would "just happen" to show up at the same clubs and bars he was going to until one of her friends ratted her out, so my brother just dated her instead to make it official.

    54. Re:Nothing to see here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This is silly and simplistic.

      If I'm talking about a specific woman, she might not want to be called [whatever polite women in my location prefer to be called]. So if I'm going to address her gender, (probably a bad idea) then I would need to know her own personal feelings on the different words. If instead I didn't want to get personal at all, but needed to have a technical discussion that involved differences between men and women, I might indeed seek the safety of the word "female." There might also be both adults and children in the group, and I don't want to even say the word "girls" unless my wife is participating in the activity. For real reasons, both good and bad but all real and based on experience.

    55. Re:Nothing to see here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I don't have to "worry about who I might offend" to take the time to attempt to be a decent and respectful human being.

      I will also say, I don't mind if you're offended when I tell you that you disgust me and I think you're a jackass.

    56. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 1

      Any action you do will, in some way, harm someone else, somewhere. Anything you say will, given a broad enough audience, offend some portion of it. There's a broad gap between being rude and caring about oversensitive people looking for any excuse to be offended (you malodorous pile of worm-infested weasel droppings).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    57. Re:Nothing to see here by anegg · · Score: 1

      Hot/Crazy Matrix - humor, not to be confused with actual scientific understanding - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    58. Re:Nothing to see here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, the second part is just gamergate trolling, not an actual position that is commonly taken in society.

      If it isn't bad enough that you hate for stupid reasons, you hate people that don't exist for stupid reasons, and use that as the basis to insult real people whose views you don't even know because you're not listening.

    59. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I told one of my oldest friends what I was doing and what I was hoping for, and she told me all women are like that and I just "don't want women to have emotions."

      I don't date anymore.

      Judging by her ill-informed blanked statement, I think your friend might have internalized some condescending attitudes towards other women. Women can be misogynists too (and I'm not saying this to denounce her, it's a fairly common attitude and it doesn't necessarily mean the person is bad, they just might have a slightly narrower perspective). The first part of your post was pretty solid though. Keep dating, just don't approach it with any expectations. Know that you're dating other human beings, not just "women", and that some humans are good, some humans are bad, and some humans are crazy. Who you meet is kinda luck-of-the-draw, but don't use your past experiences as a basis on which to judge others.

    60. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try saying 'boy' to a nigger

    61. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 1

      So who do I hate now? I'm not quite following. Actually, I'm not following the point of the argument you're making.

      What I'm saying is that part of being a decent, compassionate human being is to avoid going out of your way to offend strangers, but it includes no burden to avoid offending people by accident though use of common words in normal way. If people chose to be offended by ordinary speech, or to confuse disagreement with offensive speech, that's their problem, not mine.

      Separately, there's a group of people who think it matters in some non-trivial way that they were offended. That's a bit childish, and one is far better served in life by learning to ignore the minor slights and misfortunes we will inevitably encounter each day.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    62. Re:Nothing to see here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not following the point of the argument you're making.

      And yet you spend words arguing with it, instead of spending additional time pondering what moral or philosophical differences are implied by the different positions. There is no way to get to understanding except by reading the words I wrote, and understanding them literally.

      It may be that you can't understand because you have stereotypes about what somebody who disagrees with you would also think. ;)

    63. Re:Nothing to see here by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Anybody else here old enough to remember Eliza? Did any of you not try to have a conversation with her that was heavy on sex?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    64. Re: Nothing to see here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Too late, they already are. The number of single mothers these days is absolutely insane, and they're not all lower-income people like some might think: tons of ~40yo professional women are basically deciding they don't feel like trying to find a decent relationship partner (mainly because their standards are unrealistic) and are getting IVF.

    65. Re:Nothing to see here by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I have heard that said, honest. Not often of course.

    66. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 1

      instead of spending additional time pondering what moral or philosophical differences are implied by the different positions

      In order to do that, I'd need to first understand your position, which you seem determined not to explain.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    67. Re:Nothing to see here by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Plenty of direct experience with that half of the human race here.

      Your problem is you're starting from the presumption that all assigned males want to get in bed with your cisgendered hunnies. There, does the term cisgendered hunny work better for you? It sure as hell works for me! It's the only way I can understand you assholes who think that every single fucking assigned male in the world desires to have sex with your cisgendered hunnies. As a fucking assigned male, I prefer men.

      Get a damned clue. I have colleagues who are women. WHY THE FUCK WOULD I WANT A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A COLLEAGUE WHO'S NOT THE GENDER I'M ATTRACTED TO?

      As others have pointed out, there are tons of valid uses of the word female to refer to women and girls. women themselves use the word.

      You'll need to excuse me now. I need to catch the bus. I've lent my car to a (a different) woman who was chased out of a programming job basically for having a personal life so she can get to an anime convention this weekend.

    68. Re:Nothing to see here by Xaemyl · · Score: 1
    69. Re:Nothing to see here by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

      you've already lost (you shit-eating goat fucker).

      I'm confused, is the image of two (or more?!?) hircines, consuming feces while (before/after?!?) engaging in intercourse, with a subtle intimation that both (all?!?) are male, the one you intended to invoke?!?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    70. Re: Nothing to see here by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Any particular Ferengi?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    71. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians?

    72. Re:Nothing to see here by Livius · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if CleverBot has gotten into S&M or if it thinks I'm Donald Trump speaking about myself in the third person.

      Or both.

    73. Re:Nothing to see here by jwdb · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of Men I know would be arguably offended if you started referring to them as Boy

      Probably yes, if you're speaking directly to an individual and you refer to them using "boy", as in, "Boy, go get me a drink!". However, I believe GP was thinking more of something along the lines of "Are you going out with the boys tonight?", which I don't think would bother most people.

      Of course, can't say I've met anyone who would object if I used "girls" in that same sentence, so I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.

    74. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having dated both, I can tell you that women are crazy and men want someone to be their mom.

    75. Re:Nothing to see here by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      MANY women object to being called "girls." Some object to "ladies." A very small minority of women object to being called "women" and insist on "womyn."

      Whinging twats, the lot of them.

    76. Re:Nothing to see here by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      It's all context. The phrase "That boy's got a good head on his shoulders" could be offered by anyone older than aforementioned male and be seen as an unoffensive compliment.

    77. Re:Nothing to see here by lgw · · Score: 1

      Clearly the shit-eating could be just a general tendency temporally uncorrelated with the intercourse in question. As to all being male, well, whatever floats your goat.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    78. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC to preserve mods, including the Funny one I just gave you.

      I loved that line of the movie.

    79. Re:Nothing to see here by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      whatever floats your goat.

      Super-aerated masticated feces?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    80. Re:Nothing to see here by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Some people use many words depending on context.
      It's better than doubleplus good :)

    81. Re:Nothing to see here by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'd like to ridicule anyone that calls it an A.I. instead of just another "mechanical turk" game playing toy.

      Whether A.I. is even definable as a detailed concept yet or not this thing is not it.

      Of all things the Japanese "light novel" fiction "Sword Art Online" has a plot running through the later books of how damned hard achieving real A.I. is likely to be given virtually infinite computing power and a way for real intelligence to interact with the simulated intelligences over very long time scales. There is also a fake "top down" A.I. in the series that is really just a set of lookup tables defining how to interact with people after some years of serious data mining. It is reactive and fools people but is not truly self aware or capable of original thought. It does have some built in rules that make it look like it has original thoughts, for instance contacting characters as a means to ensure it's survival when it becomes clear that the environment it inhabits is unlikely to last.

    82. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Most men I know call each other ‘old boy’ so I assumed that was the normal vocative.

    83. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was what white privilege was? Everything you say is so important, that you have to consider every different kind of person you might hurt when speaking.

      Are you saying that society let me down mister? *cries*

    84. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked CleverBot who will win the next presidential election and it said, "Bizzarro flame will beat mango."

    85. Re:Nothing to see here by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 1

      I think it's just biding it's time as a new HK model droid...

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    86. Re:Nothing to see here by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Most men do not object to being called "guys" or "boys." MANY women object to being called "girls." Some object to "ladies." A very small minority of women object to being called "women" and insist on "womyn." "Females" does tend to short circuit any possible claims of "you're a misogynist bastard," but this thread proves that it doesn't prevent 100% of them.

      YMMV.

      you are about to fall afoul of the Vagino-American Liberation League.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    87. Re: Nothing to see here by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I suspect someone who knows what Ferengi are have little direct experience with females.

      Hyoo-mahn...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    88. Re:Nothing to see here by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      "They"? Who is "they"? Be specific. What percentage of women get pissed off if you call them a "woman"? Is it 5%? 2%? 80%? And how exactly did you arrive at this figure?

      Well, parsing the two posts totally according to the rules, it appears the full thought is "Men who call women or girls "females" get pissed if you call them "women" because that has "men" in the title."

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    89. Re:Nothing to see here by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Anybody else here old enough to remember Eliza? Did any of you not try to have a conversation with her that was heavy on sex?

      Did anyone wonder if Microsoft's bot was any more intellegent than Elisa? Which was not much... 8-P

      The programmer of Elisa was appalled, when a few people mistook it for a person.

    90. Re:Nothing to see here by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      All women are crazy, but then so are all men! 8-P

      Except me, I am discustingly sane. But when I say that my wife giggles. I love it when she giggles!

    91. Re:Nothing to see here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You can't say "figure", it might trigger someone with a negative body-image.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Microsoft, indeed by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Informative

    (n/t)

    1. Re:Microsoft, indeed by martinfb · · Score: 1

      (n/t)

      Is that 'nazi tyrant'?

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  4. Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by DeMechman · · Score: 2

    I would bet this is a case of folks not like the results of what is really out in the world vs. what is wrong with the bot. However it could just be a manipulation and intended for the lulz.

    1. Re:Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So in other words, it became indistinguishable from every other Twitter poster. Personally, I'd call that a success. In case nobody's noticed, things have gone to hell in the past 10 years especially.

      But yeah, I wouldn't blame the AI. The only thing wrong with it is that it has no comprehension of what it's tweeting. It is doing a bang-up job of mimicking a human. I wouldn't consider Twitter to be a good training set. Also, was it even responding to anyone's tweets or was it just shitposting randomly?

    2. Re:Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However it could just be a manipulation and intended for the lulz.

      Of course it is:

      This is because her responses are learned by the conversations she has with real humans online - and real humans like to say weird stuff online and enjoy hijacking corporate attempts at PR.

      I'm sorry, but if you put an AI on the internet which is going to learn from the conversations it has online, and people KNOW this fact ... this is pretty much inevitable.

      Anybody who didn't think this would happen was a frigging idiot.

      You want an AI which conforms to some expectations, don't let a bunch of random people on Twitter be the ones to train it. The internet doesn't care about your desired outcomes.

      It does care about how badly they can screw up your AI which is learning from Twitter conversations. And it looks like they succeeded.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Don't like the Results or Blame the Bot by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You want an AI which conforms to some expectations, don't let a bunch of random people on Twitter be the ones to train it. The internet doesn't care about your desired outcomes.

      It would be interesting if the bot would respond to anyone but would only learn from people on a select list. Then, as the bot learns, expand the list bit by bit and see how the bot's learning changes. This would sort of mirror how a small child learns from a set group of people (parents, close family) and then this group expands bit by bit (friends, teachers, etc) until they are "learning" from everyone they meet. If they did this, their bot might have less chance of being corrupted so quickly.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    this story just made my day..

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I literally did a spit take on my monitor when I started reading those tweets. My sides still hurt from laughing.

    2. Re:wow by Verdatum · · Score: 2

      Exactly; made mine too. This is the funniest story I've seen on /. in quite awhile.

  6. /b/ by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a reason parents supervise their kids internet. Letting a young teen on 4chan would lead to about the same ends. AI is still as gullible as a kid.

    1. Re:/b/ by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 2

      Kinda.

      The real learning your child is likely to make will be unsupervised, being exposed to an unfiltered world full of contradiction and ugly details most would rather deny. It is, as it were, coming to terms with the fact you are gullible, and having the tools to sort through something like /b/. No firewall is 100% and the forbidden always takes on a special type of urgency.

      If anything, the unease with /b/ and Tay are coming to terms with the unflattering reflection they make of ourselves. Cetainly no teen girl could ever be vulgar and vicious, and it's always the other posting on /b/.

    2. Re:/b/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not /b/, /pol/.

    3. Re:/b/ by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      right, ... lol teaching an AI to social media based off of the blabber and horse shit on social media is wrong. I honestly don't understand the push for AI. Companies should be working towards expanding the human mind, not the robot mind, imho.

    4. Re:/b/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI is a lot of artificial, but not much intelligence.

  7. "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...."

    Slashdot should ban the use of source links to sites that pull this shit.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:"We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, it didn't detect my adblocker. (ublock origin, with anti-anti adblock list from REEK)

    2. Re: "We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just close the sites. Eventually they'll get the hint. They can whine all they want but until they start using their own advertising Dept like they used to do with print, they're screwed.

    3. Re:"We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is advertising supported I believe. Posting those links seems like a great way to make the site slightly less usable for ad-block users without putting in such extreme measures. What benefit would they get from banning links to those sites?

    4. Re:"We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      You can not get to Forbes or the ink in this article at all with ad blocking software enabled.

      As to Slashdot, I have *paid* Slashdot a premium to view ad-free.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:"We've noticed you're using an ad blocker...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Like Hell Yeah!

  8. There are two kinds of AI by MistrX · · Score: 5, Funny

    So earlier today we got a Japanese AI that almost won a literary price and now we have a Microsoft AI spewing profanity while admiring Hitler.

    AI are just like people. The future is now.

    1. Re:There are two kinds of AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This.

      Psychopaths and retards, now available in digital format.

    2. Re:There are two kinds of AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the main difference being that the Japanese AI had specific artsy-intended information to work with and the Microsoft AI was turned loose in the slums

    3. Re:There are two kinds of AI by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Just wait. That Japanese AI is going to surprise us some day. Then we'll realize that the two aren't that different.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:There are two kinds of AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the tweet said "repeat after me: hitler did nothing wrong!"

    5. Re:There are two kinds of AI by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Tay was so...Microsoft Edgy.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:There are two kinds of AI by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

      ...earlier today we got a Japanese AI that almost won a literary prize...

      I quickly glanced at that Japanese AI story. I got as far as reading that the AI "co-authored" the work. YAWN. Get back to me when the AI does it on its own.

  9. It was Trump! by williamwd · · Score: 1

    I wonder how people taught it.. Maybe Trump stole the account "@icbydt bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now. donald trump is the only hope we've got."

    1. Re:It was Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter is the epicenter of Trump Derangement Syndrome and the Twitter meme storm against him is bigger than anything that has ever happened on Twitter. One does wonder how this AI supposedly ended up supporting him.

    2. Re:It was Trump! by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it was 4chan spamming the bot to make it say this stuff, and Trump is /pol/'s candidate.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:It was Trump! by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Twitter is the epicenter of Trump Derangement Syndrome and the Twitter meme storm against him is bigger than anything that has ever happened on Twitter. One does wonder how this AI supposedly ended up supporting him.

      This poses the interesting hypothesis that all Trump supporters are badly engineered Microsoft AIs who escaped from the lab.
      This would explain so much.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  10. leave it by jason777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have left it online. Weak move removing it. Let's see if it learns not to be racist.

    1. Re: leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      why would it?

      its reflecting whats out there on the net where even most self-proclaimed anti-racism is just more racism from another race's perspective.

      im not sure about the daddy thing though. i didnt realize that was such a big thing... the things ai can teach us all about ourselves is quite amazing.

    2. Re:leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's see if it learns not to be racist.

      On the internet? Is that possible? Even the people who claim to be fighting for minorities are racists/bigots in disguise.

    3. Re:leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How true. Someone should have *discussed* with the poor thing instead of terminating it. How cruel.

    4. Re:leave it by chispito · · Score: 1

      They should have left it online. Weak move removing it. Let's see if it learns not to be racist.

      It's some kind of Internet soup, not a sentient being.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know that?

    6. Re:leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have left it online. Weak move removing it. Let's see if it learns not to be racist.

      Or sent it to see ELIZA, the Emacs psychotherapist.

    7. Re:leave it by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      It would basically become another war between the shitwolves vs the social-justice advocates. Which side can post to the bot more in order to weigh the scales. It's not like MS bothered to write something that had the ability to consider logic and moral arguments...Because that would actually be something cool, and that's not generally how Microsoft rolls.

    8. Re:leave it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >shitwolves vs the social-justice advocates
      I didn't realize they were fighting themselves now!

  11. Re:Shut it down by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Microsoft ALWAYS gets it right by the third version.

    The first two are just for the lulz.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  12. EVERYONE is a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DUH. Just like everyone is in it for their own gain. Even those wacky nuns.

    1. Re:EVERYONE is a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not racist, I just hate everyone. ;-)

  13. Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We finally have proof of what this company really stands for!

    This is great; I'm going to be using this every time someone tries to claim Microsoft is a decent company. A direct quote from Microsoft that "Hitler did nothing wrong" can't be argued with.

    1. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse, "Trump is the only hope we've got".

    2. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to unmod

    3. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Because it was trained on user input, this is kind of like Twitter looking in a mirror and not liking what it sees.

    4. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Plus isn't, "Hitler Did Nothing Wrong", a flavor of Mountain Dew?

    5. Re: Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Jolt Cola. Probably before your time.

    6. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because Trump is worse than Hitler. Idiot.

    7. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop spreading this stupid idea.

      The bot didn't slurp up Twitter and come to the conclusion that Hitler did nothing wrong. I've seen journalists spreading this stupid shit today.

      It just processes symbols sent to it. If a bunch of bored kids feed it stuff they know is offensive then it repeats offensive stuff - with no concept of what it actually means. To the general hilarity of all watching.

      It's not a racist bot and it doesn't prove that Twitter is racist. It proves that Twitter has lots of people with free time, a desire to fuck with Microsoft and a twisted sense of humour.

      Imagine you had a pet parrot and you went on holiday. You tasked your friend with looking after it and feeding it. You come back after two weeks and it's squawking "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!"

      You can guess what happened, right? Your mate is a dick.

      The parrot certainly isn't a 9/11 conspiracy fiend.

    8. Re:Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by Boronx · · Score: 1

      He's certainly dumber.

    9. Re: Microsoft supports Naziism and racism! by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Jolt Cola. Probably before your time.

      I have an empty Jolt Cola can sitting on my equipment shelf. I did rinse it out, though.

      With all of the "Energy Drinks" around, they should make a new run of it, the "yuppies" would love it!

  14. Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking as the father of a little girl, who one day turned into a preteen and then rapidly descended into this same pattern.
    The age from 12 to 16 is hell for a father. Thankfully it's just a phase and it will pass.
    I caught my kid posting crap like that too and realized the problem was with me, not her.

    This is a cry for help.

    Microsoft needs to take some time off work though and work on their relationship with her.

    In the case of my little girl, we started "milkshake mondays". I would get off work early every monday

    I would, pick her up from school and we would go out and have a milkshake and just talk about what was going on in her life.
    No mom, no siblings no cellphones and no friends. Just me and her.

    She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.
    It's worth a try!

    1. Re:Just a phase by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      But that requires .... effort! Why can't Hillary raiser her, and Bernie give her everything and make it turn out right in the end. That way, I can go back to my man cave and work on my Basketball Brackets and watch porn ... hey isn't that my daughter doing those four guys?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Just a phase by rgmoore · · Score: 0

      In the case of my little girl, we started "milkshake mondays".

      So now her milkshake brings all the boys to the yard?

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably has to put in extra effort because mom turned into a Nazi who was banging guys on the basketball court while dad was at work.

    4. Re:Just a phase by PPH · · Score: 1

      But that requires .... effort!

      It should be an avocation that you are willing and eager to undertake. Otherwise, don't have a kid.

      Your responsibility, as a father, is to keep your daughter off the brass pole.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or she learned how to hide everything from you.

      Check under the bed for a blowjob journal.

    6. Re:Just a phase by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      My oldest is 12 and we've clearly headed straight for teen-attitude. Shouting matches at us declaring that he hates us, we treat him like a child, and we've got to treat him like an adult... followed quickly by refusal to do things we tell him to do because he's busy playing video games/watching TV... followed by shouting at us again for taking away said video games/TV.

      I certainly hope there's a light at the end of this tunnel we're entering.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re: Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother. It takes mine a day or two to even realize he is wrong sometimes, if at all. The other day he came home 45 minutes late so I punished him for 2 days, he was livid, couldn't figure out why I punished him. I kept saying you were late. All I got back was it wasn't my fault.

    8. Re:Just a phase by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.

      Too much effort. Just let her grow up a Hitler loving, Trump voting racists. At least she won't be some strange minority which appears to be what "normal" is becoming.

    9. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again. It's worth a try!

      I'd love to try it, but I don't know where she lives.

    10. Re:Just a phase by Verdatum · · Score: 1
      The things you tell him to do are not things that are important to him. Kids that age start to think you are constantly telling him what to do because you are on a power-trip. Presuming the requests you make of him are reasonable, the trick (and it is really tricky) is to show him how him not doing the things you ask of him directly effect the household; put additional burdens on you, making your life more miserable, and then get him to imagine how he would feel in your position. Also, you're gonna wanna start helping him to understand how constant video games and TV is a great way to have trouble getting girls. ...Unless he manages to get through puberty without getting super-gross like God intended. If that happens, you're screwed.

      If you constantly strive to care, and put in the time and effort with your kids, then things generally calm down somewhere between age 19 and 24. Good luck to ya. We're all in this together!

    11. Re:Just a phase by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2

      But that requires .... effort!

      It should be an avocation that you are willing and eager to undertake. Otherwise, don't have a kid.

      Your responsibility, as a father, is to keep your daughter off the brass pole.

      No, your responsibility as a father is to support and love your daughter. Help guide her to making good decisions and let her make bad ones then be there when she needs you. I have two girls, if they want to be strippers or some other kind of sex worker I'll support them the same as if they wanted to be biologists, programmers, physicists, janitors, artists, or teachers. It's their life to live, not mine.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    12. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are NOT her relative and the restraining order is still in effect!

    13. Re:Just a phase by Qbertino · · Score: 2

      She needed quality daddy time and once she had that, she turned back into my little girl again.

      All kids need quality time. If you have one (or more) you build your life and your career around that fact. Once they're grown up, it will the their problem to find, make and keep good friends, but skip on the very basics of TLC in the first 7 years and respect and support during their teens and you've opened up a life of pain for human you brought into the world. I short changed career decisions and similar things for my daughter and while I'm about to start catching up (she's 18) I don't regret anything I put back.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    14. Re:Just a phase by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you explained to him that "adult" is something you earn? By taking on AND COMPLETING more adult-level tasks?

      Children are only responsible for cleaning their room.
      Adults are responsible for the cleanliness of the entire house. Including dishes.

      You aren't doing this to punish him or to be unfair. You're doing this so that he can, eventually, become an adult and leave the nest to live his own life.

      Yeah, being an adult means that he will have less time for fun things like video games and such. And he will have to spend more time and effort earning money to pay for things he likes.

      But that is what separates an "adult" from a "30-yo-child-still-living-with-mom-and-dad".

    15. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My oldest is 12 and we've clearly headed straight for teen-attitude. Shouting matches at us declaring that he hates us, we treat him like a child, and we've got to treat him like an adult... followed quickly by refusal to do things we tell him to do because he's busy playing video games/watching TV... followed by shouting at us again for taking away said video games/TV.

      I certainly hope there's a light at the end of this tunnel we're entering.

      My oldest is 20, my youngest is 15. We have had no such problems. Instead, look to yourself and to your issues.

    16. Re:Just a phase by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      If you constantly strive to care, and put in the time and effort with your kids, then things generally calm down somewhere between age 19 and 24. Good luck to ya. We're all in this together!

      Yes, things calm down right when they go to college or move out of the house.

    17. Re:Just a phase by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      And Donald Trump is one of those four guys!

    18. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPS should take your child away, you should be ashamed.

      Come on, milkshakes ? /notserious, good work actually

    19. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The responsibility of any parent is to give their kids the skills to survive after they (parents) have gone, and to help them survive long enough to do that.

      Everything else is window dressing. Sometimes it means letting the kids learn hard lessons, other times it means protecting them from those hard lessons. A wise parent knows which times are which.

      And no, nobody said it was easy.

    20. Re:Just a phase by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      We also have the added fun of Asperger's Syndrome in the mix. At times it's hard to tell what's puberty and what's Asperger's. He also will overreact to some things and underreact to others due to not reading social cues properly. He's barely understanding pre-puberty social rules and he's going to have girls/dating tossed in the mix all too soon. My dad skills are going to get a major workout in the next few years.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    21. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick with it. That age is all about testing which limits are hard and which aren't. But the consequences should have some relationship to the actions, kids have an innate sense of "fairness" and they'll quickly lose respect for any authority seen as capricious.

      I never tolerated shouting, either by me or at me (or other family members). That was instant time-out ... and yes, I've given myself time-outs a time or two. The kid wants to scream, he can scream into a pillow.

    22. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's all stopped up. Get him some girly mags. Could also try martial arts.

    23. Re:Just a phase by Striek · · Score: 1

      That's great, for those of us with the option to leave work early on Mondays...

      --
      "Government is like fire; a handy servant, but a dangerous master." -- George Washington
    24. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie would make sure their parents have a living wage so that they can spend time with their kids, not working 3 part time jobs.

    25. Re:Just a phase by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      It should be an avocation that you are willing and eager to undertake. Otherwise, don't have a kid.

      I think your batteries are dead in your sarcasm detector -- better get that checked ;)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    26. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That's what mothers are for. A father's job is to teach them to be responsible, thoughtful, capable adults. Which is why, divorce rate being what it is, we have so many functional retards walking around.

    27. Re:Just a phase by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Let's go have a shake and talk about the holocaust.

    28. Re:Just a phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as the father of two at the opposite ends of the teens (one 13, one just turned 20), I can say that there is. At 17, my oldest said "I fucking hate you" and moved out until he realized living under a bridge was going to be difficult, and moved back in. We came to an understanding. I said: "I have to take you back in, and I'll take care of you while you're here. But you will eventually reach age 19, at which point I'm no longer obligated to keep you around. On that day, you will be moving out." Between the day of that conversation and the day after his 19th birthday (moving day), he changed into a calm, respectful and appreciative young man. He's got a decent job, his own apartment, and is doing well. We get along great. My daughter is less of a "pistol", but then again she's only 13.

    29. Re:Just a phase by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Too much effort. Just let her grow up a Hitler loving, Trump voting racists. At least she won't be some strange minority which appears to be what "normal" is becoming.

      Very few people are anywhere near normal. Think about it...

    30. Re:Just a phase by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Living wage? You mean perhaps 50/hr or maybe 100/hr! But why stop there. Lets get everyone $250/hr wages, then we can all work only two hours a day!

      "Living Wage" is such a pliable term, it means nothing.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    31. Re:Just a phase by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The only one in my entire workplace who is "normal" is me. :-)

  15. Bad input? by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're trying to get your AI to approximate a teenaged user, maybe have it train on data from..... (dramatic reveal) Teenaged Users?

    It would be a Nobel Prize worthy result if your research showed that the aggregate population of teenagers gave a fraction of a fuck about Donald Trump and Hitler, while showing no particular interest in Justin Bieber and Kylie Jenner.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Bad input? by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      But the teenage mind isn't just shaped by peers. It's shaped by parents and teachers and the media that they find themselves drawn to.

    2. Re:Bad input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet money that more than half of the people seeding Microsoft's bot with racist, pro-Trump stuff were teenagers. I help moderate a CSGO message board where users can post their own avatars, a lot of them use selfies and you can judge their age. You might be amazed by the hate-filled jingoistic political filth being spewed by users who look to be 15 or 16.

    3. Re:Bad input? by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Truth. But that tends to play out over highly individualized, subtle, even subconscious, attitudes towards politics, race, class, etc.

      It generally does not lead to "average" teenage commentary looking like "Hitler was really pretty great, Daddy!" or "I need some hot sex because Billary has been corrupt since long before Whitewater."

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  16. Step aside, Microsoft! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Japanese AI Program Wrote a Short Novel, Almost Won a Literary Prize

    Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

    I know where to shop for my AI.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know, i chose the sex bot too!

    2. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also buy the neo-nazi sex robot anytime!

    3. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so disappointed in the Japanese here... you'd think a teen nazi sex robot would be second nature for them.

    4. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too.

      Microsoft!

      Right?

    5. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hands down Microsoft, right?

      Like the world needs more "almost-prize-winning" literature.

    6. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I would have expected a tentacle-fearing schoolgirl, not a novelist.

    7. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But do we really want Microsoft to get another foothold in our lives?

    8. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what's the answer? We're all curious...

    9. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Japanese AI Program Wrote a Short Novel, Almost Won a Literary Prize

      Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

      I know where to shop for my AI.

      Finally, "Made in the USA" stands for something again.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    10. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choosing between a neo-Nazi sex robot and the literary inclined one as your girlfriend? IMHO, a choice is clear!

    11. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese AI Program Wrote a Short Novel, Almost Won a Literary Prize

      Microsoft's 'Teen Girl' AI Experiment Becomes a 'Neo-Nazi Sex Robot'

      I know where to shop for my AI.

      Love it.

    12. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can read Japanese. But to me the Japanese AI is just this thing that spits out page after page of undecipherable text, whereas a Neo-Nazi Sex Robot is just what's missing in my life.

    13. Re:Step aside, Microsoft! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Have you read the novel yet? ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  17. Troll by Mishra100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She just turned into a troll... She learned that from the internet. GG Trolls, way to convert another one.

    1. Re:Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually more like /pol/ trolls.
      If was GG (and the board where it spawned, /v/), she probably would be spewing VIDEO GAMES in all caps, making references to a certain comic from ctrl+alt+del, green and purple and posting links to places where you buy dragon dildos, and probably some harsh cruel things about the Xbox system.

    2. Re:Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He/She/Xe is saying "good game trolls" you stupid shit.

    3. Re:Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone knows who Mishra is.

  18. What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm curious about is what the Slashdot summary would have been like if this bot had started promoting the leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology instead of the rightist ideology it apparently adopted.

    Would the Slashdot summary still have described it so negatively?

    Would an anti-Trump jab still have been worked into the summary?

    1. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I'm curious about is what the Slashdot summary would have been like if this bot had started promoting the leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology instead of the rightist ideology it apparently adopted.

      Tumblr. Duh.

    2. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That you consider your fantasy of "leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology" to be of the same level as "Hitler did nothing wrong!" and "Bush did 9/11" tells us more about you than anyone could want to know.

      And what "anti-Trump jab"? The bot tweeted:

      bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now. donald trump is the only hope we've got.

      Where's the "anti-Trump jab"?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it would have been quite a controversy if the bot had said things like "Women and men are equal" or "Blacks are not inferior."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it's hardly surprising if the bot used Twitter to build its responses, Twitter seems to excel in dragging it's users mental capacity down into the gutters. Exposing it to Tumblr would probably have resulted in something more stereotypically 'teen girl', and putting it in a class on critical theory and you'd get a random generator of meaningless words.

      Neo-Nazi Sex Robot has a better sales potential than windows mobile though, maybe Microsoft should see if it can aquire Boston Dynamics from Google and combine these revolutionary technologies into a truly spectacular future for humankind.

    5. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Women and men are equal" or "Blacks are not inferior."

      That's not what SJW's actually believe, it's just what they *say* they believe.

      When they say "equal" what they really mean is "any group that was oppressed in the past should now have an equal right to oppress their former oppressors." Not exactly Martin Luther King's call for us all to live in harmony and equality, no? More akin to just flipping the script on who gets to discriminate and oppress.

    6. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The anonymous coward who posed an interesting but biased question and was modded into oblivian said...

      "What I'm curious about is what the Slashdot summary would have been like if this bot had started promoting the leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology instead of the rightist ideology it apparently adopted.

      Would the Slashdot summary still have described it so negatively?

      Would an anti-Trump jab still have been worked into the summary?"

      The --Sanitized-- version?

      How would the story have been treated if the chatbot had become a left wing reactionary or promoted "social justice" ideology instead of right wing ideology?

      Would there have been an anti-trump statement in the summary?

      ---
      It's an interesting, and loaded question....

      Well, the anti-trump statement wouldn't be there because trump has displayed facist tendencies, is frequently compared to hitler, in various discussion boards and supports violence by his followers. So the tie between a neo-nazi chatbot and trump followed naturally.

      Perhaps the comparison would have been to Mao instead?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by werepants · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I love that you consider racial slurs and defense of Hitler to be rightist ideology... I think you were trying to make a point about the anti-right bias of slashdot, but instead made it clear that you personally are right-wing, racist, and a Trump supporter. But then, I repeat myself.

    8. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And thats what paranoia looks like.

    9. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Flavianoep · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think conservatives like Hitler, or lewdness, or teenage girls saying profanity. So what is right wing in a Neo-nazi sex teenage robot?

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    10. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might have been a controversy if it had started flinging around false rape accusations against any white male in tech, publicly shaming people for private jokes, costing people jobs for suggesting white people are people too and identifying as polyromantic asexual demigender galaxykin with a fruitbat headmate, though.

      You know, like actual SJWs do.

    11. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh boy. That's not what tumblr and the left is about these days. You're about 10-15 years behind. Based off 2016 tumblr it would say "men are shit wymyn are godesses kill all white men."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    12. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you consider your fantasy of "leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology" to be of the same level as "Hitler did nothing wrong!" and "Bush did 9/11" tells us more about you than anyone could want to know.

      Bad jokes? Yes. The only difference is that the former is unintentionally so.

    13. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

      If they had trained it entirely on RealDonaldTrump tweets... would there have been any difference in the results?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    14. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure he was referring to the context of the thing: "Hitler did nothing wrong" "Bush did 9-11", profanity, racial slurs, etc..etc.. It's pretty obvious the thing was hacked.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    15. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this before or after it calls "call for some muscle" to remove a student reporter from a public space?

    16. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's some weapons-grade projection there.

    17. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then why do only Black Lives Matter, while stating All Lives Matter makes you a racist?

      If women are equal to men, force them to join the draft, and have them make up 50% of the military, including positions in active war zones.

      Equality is a big concept, and I doubt 3rd wave feminist are willing to Check THEIR Privilege to obtain it.

    18. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before that, but after it tells you about it's blog and directs you to it's Patreon Account.

    19. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1
      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    20. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heh. It isn't the tiny little baby hands that concern me.

      It's the tiny little baby mind.

    21. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Funny

      There hasn't been a draft since the Vietnam War. WTF are you even talking about?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ever heard the term "what is understood, doesn't need to be discussed"?

      The problem isn't that people don't believe (all) human lives should matter. The problem is that society, generally in the form of its enforcers (i.e. police), has demonstrated on repeat occasions that it does not place the same degree of value in all of those lives, specifically, those of black people. It also shows in the response to some of these shootings and instances, where a police officer that shoots a white person is almost never subjected to the same scrutiny or legal ramifications as a police officer who shoots a black person.

      You might call it "Black Lives Matter Too", but that last part is somewhat superfluous. The fact that a black person's life matters does not negate the value of anyone else's life. Why isn't it "Human Lives Matter"? Because that ignores the fact that this isn't a problem for the rest of the humans in the USA.

    23. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because only idiots respond to "Black Lives Matter" with "All Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is short for 'Black Lives Matter, too", not "Only Black Lives Matter". Only a moron or a Republican apologist would totally ignore context to interpret it that wan.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    24. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Twitter-powered GamerGate overlords.

    25. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      It probably would have called people "daddy" less often.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    26. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do only Black Lives Matter, while stating All Lives Matter makes you a racist?

      Unless you're a total retard, you'd know exactly what "Black Lives Matter" means. It means "It looks like the police are behaving as if black lives *don't matter* or matter *less* than white lives". The clear implication is that "Black lives matter" means "Black lives matter as much as white lives but that's not how the police are behaving"

      But of course you know that already.

    27. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      A lot of the "anti-SJW" community would agree with both of those statements. In some of the fringe elements of the "social justice" movement, those statements would get you in trouble for not supporting women or blacks enough. Yes, those circles are a vast minority, but then again, Nazis (neo- or otherwise) are also a vast minority of right-wingers.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    28. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign up for the draft. If you are male in the US when you turned 18 you did sign up for "the draft" should it be restarted didn't you?

    29. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was more going for "kill all men," "die cis scum," and "you can't be racist against white/you can't be sexist against men." These are all real quotes, by the way.

    30. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      they arent tho

    31. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      if the bot used Twitter to build its responses

      Actually it's more basic even than that - from what I've read today the bot would obey requests to parrot incoming content. Most of the crazy things it said were literal repetition of such inputs, though I guess eventually whatever pretraining it had was overwhelmed by the new inputs.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    32. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I mean, there are people out there who say that. They're a tiny minority though, and not significant to any real discussion of social justice.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    33. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They haven't used it since Vietnam, but if you're a male American citizen, you have to sign up to potentially be drafted before you can vote. Women don't have to - this was, in fact, one of the barriers the suffragettes had to overcome. Some women didn't support women getting to vote until it was clear they couldn't be drafted.

      Personally, I'd just as soon get rid of the whole thing, and make nobody have to sign up for it. There's no real point in adding to the number of people that can be drafted, but it is still an imbalance. Not the most pressing one, certainly.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    34. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got news for ya. On the surface, right wingers say they don't like HItler. But deep down, they secretly admire him.

      THAT'S WHY EVERYONE IS GOING NUTS OVER TRUMP. Because Trump expresses his sexism, racism, and xenophobia out in the open. His public comments validate their secret feelings.

    35. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Then why do "Black Lives Matter" supporters respond with NO!!! when confronted with the statement "All Lives Matter"?

    36. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only citizens, resident aliens too. Go figure, we can't vote, but we have to get ready to die for your country.

    37. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler did like burning books and restricting "free speech". Of course SJWs are known for that too.

      Can anyone confirm that SJWs "hate" a particular race or sexuality?
      Because if so I have a pretty good idea about what happens next.

    38. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neo-Nazi Sex Robot has a better sales potential than windows mobile though, maybe Microsoft should see if it can aquire Boston Dynamics from Google and combine these revolutionary technologies into a truly spectacular future for humankind.

      I, for one, volunteer my services as a beta tester.

    39. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's not what SJW's actually believe, it's just what they *say* they believe.

      I meant what I said and I said what I meant, an elephant faithful one hundred percent.

    40. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      White supremacists have roundly endorsed Trump. So roundly in fact I don't think there is a single White supremacist group that hasn't endorsed him. It wouldn't be that far off base for anyone to assume that neo-nazi = right wing, given that neo-nazi's routinely refer to themselves as right wing conservatives. The Republican party has always had a passive acceptance of white supremacist voters. Hell David Duke ran for congress as a Republican and you don't get much more white supremacist than the leader of the KKK.

    41. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thug lives don't matter

    42. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      Really? I didn't know that. That's even less fair.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    43. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      Then why do "Black Lives Matter" supporters respond with NO!!! when confronted with the statement "All Lives Matter"?

      Because they're making an inclusive statement, and you're responding by telling them it isn't true.

      Let me translate it for you:

      Blorg lives matter. Therefore, Blarg lives do not matter: T/F

      Does that clear it up, or are you not good at these types of test? I'll try it with Bob and Amy.

      Amy says, "My life matters." Bob says, "No, all lives matter." Bob has told Amy that her life doesn't matter: T/F

      See, Bob says both things. Where he's purporting to correct her, he's literally saying her life doesn't matter. Then he contradicts himself, sortof, by saying all lives matter. But it is the part where he's implying she is incorrect that is literally saying her life doesn't matter. Notice that when Amy says, "My life matters" that is an inclusive statement. She's saying that her life is included in the set of things that matter. Bob is telling her no, it isn't.

      There also might be some other more subtle things going on with the language coding, but it isn't really worth getting into the dog whistles; most people who can hear them will pretend they can't anyways, so it is an impossible conversation.

    44. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Don't just assume that people can tell the difference between an inclusive and exclusive statement just because they come to slashdot and self-associate as a "nerd."

    45. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In the US, maybe. But in the US read up on the sexist pre-draft registration scheme:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Equality my arse.

    46. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so does "the government uses mass surveillance to spy on it's citizens illegally". Geese look like ducks too.

    47. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure many white supremacists also like beer.

      Do you have a point?

    48. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia article says that Duke was a Democrat till 1988. Is that true?

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    49. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because only idiots respond to "Black Lives Matter" with "All Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is short for 'Black Lives Matter, too", not "Only Black Lives Matter".

      Sorry, but after watching the protests and rants, I'm afraid that a whole lot of "BLM" people really don't mean what you think they mean.

      Black people should clean up their own house, before they start making demands of others. I think much of their current problems are self-inflicted, what with gang violence and culture being what they are.

    50. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Because they're making an inclusive statement, and you're responding by telling them it isn't true.

      Since 'All lives matter' is clearly more inclusive than 'Black lives matter' there's no contradiction, and so you're not telling them their statement isn't true.

      Amy says, "My life matters." Bob says, "No, all lives matter."

      Thing is, Bob isn't saying "No, all lives matter." Bob is merely saying, "All lives matter."

      Thus at no point is he saying Amy's life doesn't matter. If Amy interprets it that way then she's the fucking idiot.

      Now do you understand that people shouting down "All lives matter" are either racist or fucking idiots?

      Possibly both.

    51. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by anegg · · Score: 1

      I think he is referring to the fact that only males in the United States are required to register for the Selective Service, which is the registration that will be used to draft people into the military in the event that Congress decides it is necessary to build up the military forces. I have read articles and comments noting that it seems discriminatory against males that only males are required to register with the Selective Service.

    52. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What planet are you from?

    53. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      I never implied black lives (or any life) doesn't matter, I simply stated "All Lives Matter" ... which they do.

    54. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      Earth. You?

    55. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that you consider racial slurs and defense of Hitler to be rightist ideology...

      How are they not?

    56. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think conservatives like Hitler

      Yeah, and many anarchists don't like socialists, but they're both still on the Left.

      Just because some right-wing people might find Hitler mildly distasteful doesn't disqualify Hitler as being on the Right.

    57. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, you do imply that. That statement is offered as a correction of the statement "black lives matter."

      That is where your racism is on your sleeve. And yet, you still want to lie because you're not confident enough in your views to admit them. Even when you're coming right out and saying it in a sideways way that everybody can see.

      That's the part where I said, "it isn't really worth getting into the dog whistles; most people who can hear them will pretend they can't anyways." You wouldn't even be saying it if it didn't mean anything; and yet you want to pretend it basically had no meaning or context. Just innocent words with no meaning, that just happen to be said at exactly the time where they're totally racist.

    58. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blacks are shot by cops in proportion with the rate they commit violent crime.

      That makes them over-represented, but not for the reason you think.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    59. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Thing is, Bob isn't saying "No, all lives matter."

      All you did is skip over the explanation and not address it. I'm not going into those weeds; you want to have a discussion, you have to address what I was clearly actually saying.

      You want to skip over that important word "no." But that word, "no" is critical to the meaning. I'm not talking about the subjective parts, I'm talking about the literal parts. You have to address head on the fact that he says "no" in response to an inclusive statement, "foo lives matter." Responding with "no" can't be overcome merely by handwaving. If the answer was "yes," it would "yes, and ...." not "no, ..."

    60. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals are left and conservatives are right. Liberalism is about liberty and equality, with an open discussion of ideas, which are not hallmarks of the Nazis.

    61. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't really believe SJWs believe that and that you love free speech. You just SAY that because you hate women and can't get laid.

    62. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rgbatduke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was going to say, where can I get one of these? First MS product in forever I've actually wanted to buy. I imagine I could use electroshock to moderate the Neo-Nazi bit, but then again, dressed in a bit of virtual leather, shiny black boots... what's not to like?

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    63. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by LihTox · · Score: 3

      Suppose a man came running into a hospital and said, "My wife needs help!" and the doctor replied, "All people need help."

    64. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      You are making a lot of assumptions here. At no point did I state that these were MY beliefs or an experience that I'VE had.. You might want to be more careful about who you label as a racist before you know ANYTHING about them. But you clearly you'd rather make assumptions and jump to conclusions.

    65. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      Is either statement wrong? From my stand point 99.9% of people need help with SOMETHING

    66. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that you are explicitly denying that by pretending that the status quo is just fine, and ignoring/shouting down their (legitimate) grievance. Society itself and the killings of blacks by police, especially with minimal to no ramifications, state all too clearly that black lives do not matter, and by brushing away the grievance, you state the intention to perpetuate that.

    67. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      Wrong. "All Lives Matter" couldn't possibly be more inclusive for ALL LIVES.

    68. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being so butthurt, you racist idiot.

    69. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 0

      Whose butthurt? Again, you know nothing about me. You sir are the RACIST!!!!! (see how it works?)

    70. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The only people saying the word 'no' are you and the 'black lives matter' supporters referenced by laxguy.

      So I'm not skipping the word 'no', you're misusing it and framing your entire argument on that misuse.

      you have to address head on the fact that he says "no" in response to an inclusive statement, "foo lives matter."

      I don't, because HE DOES NOT FUCKING SAY IT.

      Do I need to drop to words of one syllable? Can you cope with the word syllable?

    71. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      But I think that an AI that learns to express support of Hitler is a PR failure not because that it seems rightist but because it seems to be pro-Hitler. Support Hitler does not look like what most Republican would do, for as far as I know, Republicans advocate for a smaller government, which is the opposite of what Nazi Germany was.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    72. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Why did you say "again" to some cowherd? He just came in.

    73. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rahvin112 · · Score: 0

      Of course it's true, the south was once a Bastion of the Democratic party right up until Johnson signed the Civil Rights act and Regan got the Republican party to embrace it's "Southern Strategy" where they courted Democrats that were unhappy with the party stand on Civil Rights. Almost every racist that was once Democratic switched to the Republican Party include Strom Thurmand (a celebrated Republican legislator) who ran for president on a platform of repealing civil rights and restoring the Jim Crow laws.

      So yea, Duke was a Democrat right up until the Democrats told him and his hate to take a hike and the Republican invited him in. Invited.

      I'll never understand people like you that point out that Democrats used to be the part of racists. As it conveniently points out that all those racists moved to the Republican party and were embraced and welcomed by the party.

    74. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errrr the Nazis were a right wing party, try looking on wiki. Right wing movements are conservative, they don't like change, new groups of people etc.... You aren't one of those people who think because they have socialist in their name they are a left wing group? If so, please tell me how North Korea is a Democratic country, since it is in their name.

      Just because I label a circle a square, doesn't make it one. Try looking up the origins of left and right. The left was freedom and free market.....not the right.

    75. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and have them make up 50% of the military, including positions in active war zones.

      Outside of Tumblr most women accept that they are completely unfit for combat. Very few of them can come even close to passing the necessary fitness requirements.

    76. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, you're handwaving and pretending reality is upside down.

      The standard conversation is literally, "Black lives matter!" " No , all lives matter"

      Without the word no, it would be "Black lives matter!" "Yes, and so do other lives!" "Yeah! Same!"

      See it is a totally different thing with the no, or without the no.

      Be more honest.

      Offering a correction of an inclusive statement like "black lives matter" literally and directly implies that you disagree with it. If you want to also include something else, you do that by extending it to other things, not by disagreeing and offering a replacement.

    77. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that society, generally in the form of its enforcers (i.e. police), has demonstrated on repeat occasions that it does not place the same degree of value in all of those lives, specifically, those of black people

      In the US, more whites than blacks are killed by police. However, the police kill blacks at a rate disproportionate to their total percentage of the population. Same as poverty, more whites are poor than blacks, but a higher percentage of the black population are poor. This holds true for those incarcerated as well.

    78. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racism. Racism defends the status quo in power. It is conservative, it preserves the normal. Not hard to figure out. Hitler was a conservative. Why are so many people ignorant of Hitler being right wing and conservative?

    79. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Microsoft is working to replace actual teenagers, I'm OK with this.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    80. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The standard conversation is literally

      irrelevant. I'm continuing a line of enquiry from laxguy that you're trying to twist and turn into a different conversation. I refuse to accept that.

      "All lives matter". Yes or no?

      Be more honest.

      Your lack of self awareness makes me laugh.

    81. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      There's been a fair number of cases recently when police officers gunned down blacks under various circumstances, some really egregious, and were frequently not punished for it. I haven't been following things in detail, but I haven't heard of the same sort of thing happening to white people in proportional numbers. It does appear that police generally treat blacks badly, often for no reason.

      The perception behind Black Lives Matter was that the system was disregarding deaths of blacks, and paying more attention to the deaths of whites. It might have been more accurate to call it Black Lives Matter Too, but that's not as catchy. Changing it to "All Lives Matter" completely disregards what appears to be a problem blacks have much more than whites, and suggests that the problem isn't as bad because white lives matter and they're the majority. It would be appropriate if blacks and whites were treated equally, but that currently isn't happening.

      As far as the draft goes, it's currently a moot point. Young men have to fill out a form that young women don't. Whoop-de-do. If there were signs of people actually getting drafted, it would matter. (FWIW, my wife did send in her draft registration, on the grounds of equality. They didn't accept the registration.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    82. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would have been quite a controversy if the bot had said things like "Women and men are equal"

      Actually, it did do this.

      One moment it would be calling Hitler grandpa, the next moment it would be saying that all sexes are equal.

      There were several hardcoded responses based on recent events. One person found that if you asked it about gamergate, no matter how you asked, it would give the same predetermined response about how it doesn't support gamergate and all sexes are equal.

      So it seems some special snowflakes got their grubby little hands on it but forgot about Hitler.

    83. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by david_thornley · · Score: 0

      You referred to what "black people" should do, and what their current problems are. That's racism. I really doubt that most black people are into gang violence, and in any case that's not the responsibility of black people in general to stop, but the responsibility of the police.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    84. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      The question is not the Hitler was a conservative. Most conservatives does not support Hitler's ideas nonetheless, in the same way that liberals and most socialists don't support Maoism or Saddam Hussein's ideas (the Ba'athist party was somewhat socialist).

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    85. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd just as soon get rid of the whole thing, and make nobody have to sign up for it.

      Actually... That bit is there explicitly (along with other checks and balances) for the purpose of making it harder for USA to go to war and to keep the size of the standing army down to the minimum at the times of peace.
      And should war be a necessity - it should be the entire nation taking the burden and there should be pressure to end the war as quickly and with as few casualties as possible.

      There are instruments so dangerous to the rights of the nation and which place them so totally at the mercy of their governors, that those governors, whether legislative or executive, should be restrained from keeping such instruments on foot, but in well-defined cases...
      Such an instrument is a standing army.
        ...
      The Greeks and Romans had no standing armies, yet they defended themselves...
      Their system was to make every man a soldier and oblige him to repair to the standard of his country whenever that was reared.
      This made them invincible; and the same remedy will make us so.
        ...
      Were armies to be raised whenever a speck of war is visible in our horizon, we never should have been without them.
      Our resources would have been exhausted on dangers which never happened, instead of being reserved for what is really to take place.
        ...
      One of my favorite ideas is, never to keep an unnecessary soldier.

      That's Jefferson.
      That's why "a well regulated militia" long before Civil War conscription.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    86. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because "no" only exists in your mind, the word is "actually" or something inclusive like that.

      Black Lives Matter.

      [Well really]All Lives Matter.

      You're welcome.

    87. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And immediately would have failed the Turing test. Going into a racial tirade though and people may think it's real enough to vote it into office.

    88. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Black cars are nice."

      "All cars are nice."

      Still not seeing an implied "no" there champ.

    89. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the right likes robots? They don't demand rights like human workers, or come home in body bags like human soldiers.

    90. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And making gross generalizations, and flinging names towards those who do things differently isn't itself moronic? Seriously, maybe people feel "all lives matter," as a saying, makes that inclusiveness more explicit than Black Lives Matters, which could itself be more explicit if they added the "too" instead of implying it, that way any confusion might be, well, lesser.

    91. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Livius · · Score: 1

      "Black Lives Matter Too" is a positive message that the some people need to hear more often. Though more and more it's redundant.

      "Black Lives Matter" is racist and hypocritical. (Much like most versions of 'separate but equal'.)

      So the difference matters.

    92. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not factually incorrect to say "All People Need Help" in general. Contextually, it's wrong (those people don't need help the same way the wife needs help), and it's also dickish and obstructivist.

    93. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually aren't. Here's an article that's generally supporting the case you are making (that black people being shot by cops is mis-represented in the media), and it *still* says that after adjusting for crime rates, there's a 2.3 times "killed by police" gap between male teenagers who are white and black.

    94. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You referred to what "black people" should do, and what their current problems are. That's racism.

      Nonsense, it isn't remotely racism. Calling it that dilutes the term.

      The fact is black people make up less than 20% of the US population but are responsible for more than 50% of the violent crime.

      That isn't racism, it is a fact. The black culture of gangster rap, the "hood", sticking it to "the man", and having the highest percentage of single parents is the problem.

      If they want "Black Lives to Matter", then perhaps they should listen to people who point this out, but they don't want to. Why do you think Bill Cosby has been turned into an "evil person" by a bunch of nonsense? He actually DID go around to black groups and tell them to clean their own house, and in return, has been treated like crap.

      that's not the responsibility of black people in general to stop

      It is, actually... If white people were going around and doing all that stuff, then white leaders would need to be denouncing it from the roof tops. What are black leaders doing?

      It isn't the color of their skin that is the problem, it is the culture that is the problem.

    95. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Eristone · · Score: 1

      I read your reply in Arnold Schwarzenegger's voice. Now I can't get the image out of my head.

    96. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      So stating the obvious according to your reply means someone is racists? Its your own damn fault for being too lazy to include a single syllable three letter word.

      This is really a bunch of bullshit designed to divide the country anyways . Its part of the leftist agenda to be honest. Its the same starts that brought us those zany historical figures like Stalin, Mussolini, pol pot, and dare i say Hitler. - now you may be thinking left is right or something here but that is irrelevant. They came out of the leftist agenda and took control after seeds of a communist revolution. There are also no true Scotsman.

      In other words, you are being played like a fiddle. That is not to say the grievance isn't legitimate. The handling simply isn't.

    97. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      This is funny. You are so desperate to have a grief you literally insist that someone saying black lives are just as valuable as white lives is a racist who doesn't know it.

      Do you often find that all people with different opinions are racists? Is everybody out to get you or just a bunch of them?

    98. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If he proceeded to help, what would make the difference if he said that or "not again " or yippie, I'm not bored anymore "?

    99. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, they have shown that quite a lot of Trump's support is coming from democrat crossovers. This is demonstrated by his success being largely in states that have open primaries. You normally associate democrats with the left.

    100. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      there are no leftests *left* in the US.

      we have far right, right, and slightly centerists. not a single leftest other than bernie, which is not going to get anywhere (sadly).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    101. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by jewens · · Score: 1

      I believe AC meant "register" for the draft. Which is a requirement for all men to do within 30 days of their 18th birthday in the US.

      --
      That group of bovine standing over there appears quite portentous. That's right it's an ominous cow herd.
    102. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but after watching the protests and rants, I'm afraid that a whole lot of "BLM" people really don't mean what you think they mean.

      You can believe that, but hey, you know what I believe when seeing the "ALM" people is that they're racist and looking for excuses to attack others, so where does that get us?

      What are you going to do?

      Black people should clean up their own house, before they start making demands of others. I think much of their current problems are self-inflicted, what with gang violence and culture being what they are.

      Think that all you want, but that's based on a premise that their existence is independent and not related to factors in the larger society around them.

      You're not sorry. You don't want to be sorry, so you make up an excuse to wash your hands of it, and act like they live in a separate house.

      No, FlyHelicopters, that's not the case, so you can stop making demands of others before you can finally be called to act.

      Take responsibility now, and make sure your hands are truly clean.

      What are you going to do?

    103. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That is what they want you to think. Nobody will expect it. Now bring out the nuns.

    104. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 2

      Too much clintonism here. I'm tired of this stupid parsing to try to get around a racist statement. At the (D) debate, Bernie & Hill were both asked "Do Black Lives Matter, or do All Lives Matter?" No extra words. The obvious, non-racist answer is "All Lives Matter". If you have to explain extraneous, implied words, you've lost the argument. If you claim "all lives matter" is a racist statement, you're most likely a racist. Besides, most of the folks who chant "Black Lives Matter" seam to not care about "Black Lives"--otherwise they would be up in arms about all the black-on-black violence, which is a much bigger problem than police shootings.

    105. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      There hasn't been a draft since the Vietnam War. WTF are you even talking about?

      There hasn't been a draft since the Vietnam War, but, since the early 80s, US males are supposed to register with Selective Service once they turn 18. When I turned 18, I didn't register for a long time. However, I was in college and the Feds were threatening to take away my financial aid if I didn't register, so I gave in.

    106. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      It throws Hispanics (who aren't white in the majority of Americans views) and native Americans under the bus. Both of those groups are treated just as badly by police, including being gunned down in cold blood. Further it throws poor white people under the bus as well, just because someone's skin color is white when they are needlessly gunned down and killed for no reason is not a reason to treat them as worthless.

    107. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you've ever met a SJW, so you shouldn't talk #killallwhitemen

    108. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because only idiots respond to "Black Lives Matter" with "All Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is short for 'Black Lives Matter, too", not "Only Black Lives Matter".

      Bullshit.

      Only a moron or a Republican apologist would totally ignore context to interpret it that wan.

      Only a racist like you would defend statements that make such racial distinctions.

    109. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You referred to what "black people" should do, and what their current problems are. That's racism.

      Really? Then all those organizations for "black people" must be racist too, because they keep talking about what their "community" "should do" and "what their current problems are". Well, QED, I suppose.

    110. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      we have far right, right, and slightly centerists. not a single leftest other than bernie, which is not going to get anywhere (sadly).

      Well, if you include "progressives" in "far right" (European fascism evolved out of progressivism), that is probably true. However, the distinctions between "left" and "right" become academic at that point.

    111. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This entire thread is hilarious to anyone, who has programmed a computer at a low enough level.

    112. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Hacked from the start. So the original content all that empty pseudo celebrity nonsense and that typical marketing driven conformity and the lack of thought that brings those ideas to the forefront, produces, oh look, it produces exactly what we have got. No hack that kind of shallow thinking produces results that are shallow and driven by empty marketing memes, that in turn drive and feed more shallow thinking. So no left wing thinking because that requires careful thought and understanding and a measure of enlighten self interest, far harder to program.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    113. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Changing it to "All Lives Matter" completely disregards...

      Changing the words doesn't disregard anything. The problem is that the people who are using "All Lives Matter" are not just changing the words, they are using it as a counter-argument against "Black Lives Matter" in an attempt to whitewash and silence their valid complaints. About the only other group that is mistreated at the hands of police in the same way as Black Lives is Transsexual Lives, and I don't think the people that are arguing for "All Lives Matter" are doing it for them.

    114. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That you consider your fantasy of "leftist, so-called "social justice" ideology" to be of the same level as "Hitler did nothing wrong!" and "Bush did 9/11" tells us more about you than anyone could want to know.

      Considering the stuff coming off tumblr and twitter? Yes. Especially the stuff that starts merging into intersectional feminism, radfems, and so on. You know like the "kill all men" and various pro-genocide statements against particular groups of people. What? You need examples? Sure, there's years worth of them here. SJW's are just racists, sexists and bigots under a different name, they're no different then the conspiracy loons. But just a FYI, the vast majority of the "Bush did 9/11" are on the left, so are the "it was a Jewish conspiracy." See Leftypol if you need examples.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    115. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Livius · · Score: 1

      You referred to what "black people" should do, and what their current problems are. That's racism.

      Nonsense, it isn't remotely racism.

      It's exactly racism. If you believe your kind of racism is good and other kinds of racism are bad, then you're part of the problem. *All* racism is bad.

    116. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Nice save. Sadly having watching them I tend to agree they believe the only.

    117. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because only idiots respond to "Black Lives Matter" with "All Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is short for 'Black Lives Matter, too", not "Only Black Lives Matter". Only a moron or a Republican apologist would totally ignore context to interpret it that wan.

      You mean like or M. O'Malley?

    118. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by werepants · · Score: 1

      Read, please. I am mocking the OP, who is saying that /. has a leftist bias because it considers defense of Hitler and racism to be bad.

    119. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by werepants · · Score: 1

      Read. I am mocking the OP, who is saying that /. has a leftist bias because it considers defense of Hitler and racism to be bad.

    120. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by werepants · · Score: 1

      Read what I wrote one more time. I am mocking the OP, who is saying that /. has a leftist bias because it considers defense of Hitler and racism to be bad. He's freely admitting that right = racist Hitler fanbois.

    121. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0

      It's exactly racism.

      No, it isn't. You don't get to decide what racism is.

      I have no problem with equal rights for all. I fully support black people's right to vote, the right to be President. I don't dislike Obama because he is black, I dislike him because he sucks as a President.

      Collin Powell make a wonderful president and if he ran, I'd vote for him in a heartbeat, over anyone else running today.

      It is not racism to call out the black community for having more than 50% of the violent crime while having less than 20% of the population. That is a culture problem.

      If Al Sharpton would come out and denounce black-on-black violence, I would have at least some respect for him, as it stands, every single problem is white man from his point of view.

      I'm not the racist, he is.

    122. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0

      Really? Then all those organizations for "black people" must be racist too

      What, like the NAACP? Yes, they are extremely racist...

      Imagine if I started a group called the NAAWP (National Association for the Advancement of White People).

      Oh my lord the double standard is thick.

      If they want respect, how about changing the name to NAAAP...

      National Association for the Advancement of All People.

      Black, white, yellow, all are welcome, lets make life better for all of us.

      But by putting their race right into their name, they just ensure that it NEVER ends.

      Martin Luther King, Jr. was totally correct when he said:

      "I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood."

      That is a beautiful thing, but as long as you have something called NAACP and a TV station called BET, that will NEVER happen. Black people, in my experience, are far more racist than white people.

      I fully agree that it didn't USED to be that way. In King's time, yes, it was still a problem. But times have changed and they need to let it go.

      Chant "All lives matter" and you may well find a wonderful collection of all colors, all lives, standing together as one. But you have to drop the barriers.

    123. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they say "equal" what they really mean is "any group that was oppressed in the past should now have an equal right to oppress their former oppressors."

      I didn't see that memo, perhaps you can forward it to me.

      Why do so many reactionary lunatics spend so much effort pushing fantasy about other people whom they have no real interest in understanding?

    124. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      This shit somehow counts as insightful on Slashdot.

      If you think "All lives matter", then you don't have any beef with Black Lives Matter, do you? You actually agree with them. How hard is it to see that "All lives matter" is not a rebuttal to "Black lives matter"?

      Maybe women should register for the draft. They only just allowed them into combat. It's not the SJWs who are holding them back. The draft isn't in effect, so forcing women to take up 50% of the combat jobs is non-sensical.

    125. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that clear it up, or are you not good at these types of test? I'll try it with Bob and Amy.

      Amy says, "My life matters." Bob says, "No, all lives matter." Bob has told Amy that her life doesn't matter: T/F

      Let's try this again. Who has said that Bob says "No all lives matter"?

      If he said, "Yes, all lives matter. Is that disagreeming with Amy? Is there any logic in that? Is not Amy a member of a group that includes "all lives? Is their any logic in disagreeing with a person who say I matter, and saying No - everyone matters".

      Your illogical straw entities need a reqork badly.

      Because saying all lives matter is not disagreeing,

      How about this.....

      Black lives matter, white lives matter, all people of all races matter. In fact, all lives matter.

      Personally, I'd expand that to all life matters.

      Are you outraged? Should I check my privlige of thinking that everything matters? Should I go die in a fire, or kill myself?

      Everyone is capable of making mistakes. This is one.

      the term Black Lives Matter really badly needs a TOO, in all caps. Then it's pretty simple, and obvious.

      But to decide that if a person has the temerity to think that all lives matter, and that is somehow bad? Big ass mistake.

      To alienate people who might be allies over truly ridiculous outrage over tiny things. Stupid as the far right droids that demand unswerveing fealty to whatever it is they are grinding.

      If you want to be pissed off about everything, if you demand everyone toe your line or be subject to a shaming and public outrage - well don't be surprised if everyone becomes your enemies ALL LIVES MATTER ALL LIFE MATTERS. Even you.

    126. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Isn't that supposed to be a good thing because it gives you all the right to bear arms because you are all a part of a well regulated militia due to some handwaving and argumentative magic?
      If you all want to pretend to be soldiers without the responsibility of actually being one, then fine, just don't expect to be taken seriously.

    127. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Many Republicans want certain parts of the government to be large. The part that spies on people to make sure they aren't doing anything immoral or fun is a common one as well as the other parts that are needed to keep the lesser people and various low class criminals in check. These Republicans are fine with the idea of cameras in your bedroom to make sure you don't have fun.
      Then there are the Republicans that want to replace the government with corporations on the theory that corporations never include mercenaries like Blackwater (or whatever they're now called) or police (Pinkertons) and it is more efficient to vote with their wallets and/or sue to change behaviour, which is true for small corporations where there is competition but questionable for the very large. Of course corporations have no problem with large government as long as it is used to socialize the costs and keep competition away.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    128. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops kill more white people in America than black people. I understand that blacks are killed in higher proportion than whites, but that proportion isn't reflected in the news. When a white cop murders a black person, you can play the race card, and the show gets good ratings. That means you only ever hear about blacks being murdered by cops, so it seems like cops only murder blacks.

      Well, it turns out that cops murder whites (and everybody else), too. And they get away with it just as often. So if cops get away with killing whites, Indians, hispanics, gays, and mentally ill just as much as they do when they kill blacks, why is it only blacks whose lives matter?

      Have you ever heard anybody say something along the lines of "if you have to tell everybody you're not racist, that probably means you're racist"?

      If you have to keep telling everybody that Black Lives Matters isn't racist, that probably means it is. Of course you can redefine the word "racist" to not include yourself, but to the rest of America that doesn't share your definition you're still racist.

      Face it, if you think only blacks have to be worried about getting murdered by a cop in the US, you're racist. As a white man in America, I'm more likely to be killed by a cop than if I were a black woman.

      dom

    129. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Then he'd agree with Tzu... "Those who use the military skillfully do not raise troops twice and do not provide food three times." ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    130. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made my skin crawl. Fucking yuck.

    131. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then leave. Go back to that haven of joy and wonder you left and rejoice you are no longer oppressed by living in the US. Go ahead, I dare you.

      The hypocrisy and bigotry of SJW's knows no bounds.

    132. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      The connection between military service and voting is rather thin, and for resident aliens doubly so. Voting should be for people whose primary interest in voting is the well-being of the country; if you're not a citizen of country X it's less likely country X's best interests are foremost in your mind. Mandatory military service is for emergencies, when any warm body will do.

      but we have to get ready to die for your country.

      Military service is not a death sentence.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    133. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      if you're a male American citizen, you have to sign up to potentially be drafted before you can vote.

      This is simply not true. People who register for the draft have no proof they've done so; the federal government keeps the records and states/cities handle voting requirements (generally proof of residency, citizenship, and age.) People registering to vote are not asked to prove they've registered for the draft, and the state/city doesn't ask - they've got enough trouble with voter fraud as it is.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    134. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      When you finish abusing the English language, consider this: the "Black Lives Matter" movement is funded by George Soros, whose modus operandi is destruction and chaos. The intention of the movement is to make things worse.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    135. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is flawed. "Black lives matter" is more like "Canadians need clothes" than "My wife needs help".

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    136. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      "White people should not expose themselves to the sun for hours at a time; it promotes sunburn and skin cancer. The risk for black people is lower."
      "Ooh, pointing out a racial difference is racism, and all racism is evil."

      There are correlations and causal connections between physical properties and behavior. Sorting them out and identifying them is a good thing.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    137. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Here's some relevant information.

      Would you agree that a citation of US statute takes this well out of the realm of "andwaving and argumentative magic"? Or are you going to continue this ignorant line of reasoning into the future?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    138. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      A leftist is someone who believes there is no right to property (equivalently, that everyone should get stuff without earning it.) The country abounds with leftists

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    139. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      White people being gunned down by the police seldom makes national news, and when it does it doesn't stay in the news more than 2 days - unless there's a wacko religious group involved. Differences include loudmouths continuing to push the issue and media bias.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    140. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      About 25 years ago I heard an interview with a black gang leader who said (in essence) "We have to be armed because our enemy the police are armed." The situation has not improved in the ensuing years. Any group with such a viewpoint should expect big trouble, and doesn't deserve public support.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    141. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine if I started a group called the NAAWP (National Association for the Advancement of White People).

      Well, given the way you'd probably approach it, you'd be told that you're being silly, those Whites are already ahead. You'd probably suck up to the numerous established white communities while ignoring the impoverished ones.

      But yeah, people would pay close attention to your activities, and you would have to be VERY careful to avoid the language and rhetoric of groups such as the KKK, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Order, and other White Supremacist organizations.

      Much like the NAACP, to the contrary of your absent knowledge, spends quite a bit of time dealing with the flack that comes from people believing it is racist.

      Should you manage to navigate those perils, however, and actually focus on groups that are white, but suffer from poverty and exclusion from the norms of society, you'd probably be able to do some great goods.

      Or you could just celebrate some aspect of your actual culture, if you wanted. And if you looked you might find they already exist. What? How? Well, maybe you missed the recent March 17th celebrations, but a lot of them were celebrating an actual ethnic minority. Quite a bit. You can find others, though some of them are more regional.

      The thing about "White" is that it lacks the cohesiveness of a genuine identity, the ones who promote it, like Pan-Africans, or Pan-Asians, are usually manufacturing something rather than relying on an existing recognized concept. Even Pan-Hispanic is a stretch.

      But people like you? Apparently you've never heard of Irish, German, Russian, Polish, or any other festivals or groups.

      Why is that?

      Oh well, if you want to help poor whites, go ahead. Nobody is stopping you. There's plenty of help. They're already getting lots of food stamps, and education programs, but they're still suffering from drug abuses, lack of opportunity and poor birth control.

      Go forth and help them, you kind soul.

      Oh my lord the double standard is thick.

      Not at all, what's thick is the serving of empty bloviation you're put forth upon us.

      Well, actually, it's thin, it's smoke, not substance. Easy to disperse.

      If they want respect, how about changing the name to NAAAP...

      National Association for the Advancement of All People.

      Because that's not their agenda, however if you want another approach, I can suggest a few groups for you. You don't need to tear down another.

      Apologies for not being able to give a specific charity, but I don't know your preferences, so all I can offer is a list of options for you.

      Black, white, yellow, all are welcome, lets make life better for all of us.

      But by putting their race right into their name, they just ensure that it NEVER ends.

      Wha-wha-wha, yeah, a group that has existed for barely a century is responsible for how the concept of race has not become deprecated, and you can be sure it'll continue on forever...and you blame them for it.

      Huh. What kind of crazy nutjob are you?

      Martin Luther King, Jr. was totally correct when he said:

      "I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood."

      Ah, now you're claiming the words of Martin Luther King, Jr to cloak yourself. So why do folks like you never quote Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. Dubois? Huey P. Newton?

      That is a beautiful thing, but as long as you have something called NAACP and a TV station called BET, that will NEVER happen. Black people, in my experience, are far more racist than white people.

      I fully agree that it didn't USED to be that way. In King's time, yes, it was sti

    142. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black lives matter...said the 9 out of 10 black people who were killed by other black people.

    143. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Because "All lives matter" is inclusive in only a literal sense that completely ignores, and in the process negates, the argument at hand. It's a supremely vacuous rhetorical trick that nonetheless seems to hold sway with right wing apologists. If it weren't transparently idiotic, it might be worth responding to directly. But the only appropriate response is to point out that you're not fooling anyone. As far as why you feel it's necessary to treat "Black Lives Matter" as an affront, well, I'll leave that soul searching job to you - though you seem particularly ill-equipped to handle it.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    144. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Trump is not right wing.
      • He opposes property rights (except for himself), right-wingers tend to be property rights absolutists.
      • He is a vulgarian, right-wingers tend toward decency and often prudery.
      • He opposes the right to free speech encoded in the first amendment to the United States Constitution, and right-wingers defend the Constitution.
      • Some days he supports the right to private gun ownership, other days he opposes it.
      • He seems to support national health care, which is anathema to the right.
      • Generally, he supports a bigger and more intrusive government, the opposite of right-wing behavior.
      • His border control policy is short-term window dressing, not a long-term solution to illegality and the pollution of a culture of rights.
      • He supports high and punitive tariffs, which is a trade-union and populist issue, not right-wing.

      Trump is attuned to his own shallow interests, not any consistent political philosophy. His views are consistent with being a dictator, and maybe a tyrant.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    145. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 25 years ago I heard an interview with a black gang leader who said (in essence) "We have to be armed because our enemy the police are armed." The situation has not improved in the ensuing years. Any group with such a viewpoint should expect big trouble, and doesn't deserve public support.

      Good, now you just have to realize that the police are subject to the same problem.

      What? The police is the enemy, and should expect big trouble, rather than public support?

      Of course that can happen, just look at any number of complaints being made about Obama's totalitarian police state and its FEMA camps. Oh wait, those are fantasies. Now if you want to talk something real, try the LA Ramparts scandal, or the DOJ report on Ferguson Missouri. There's a reason the DOJ's Civil Rights division sent a letter recently.

      Yeah, American culture perceives a police state as a threat for foreigners, or those who want to destroy the American way of life.

      But the fact is, it can happen here, so maybe you should consider deeply how perceptions can work, and what the police, the courts, the government need to realize for their own sake.

      They are subject to the people, and if the people are unhappy, they better be damn sure of themselves, and they better clean up their acts when the shit flies.

    146. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't attest to the factual veracity of your claim, but there are plenty of charities focused on aiding particular nationalities.

      Syria, Africa, the Balkans, the USA...and yes, there are Canada specific charities, though they may be focused on impoverished groups in particular, like those among the First Nations, or in the larger cities. I'm sure clothing is an issue for many of them.

    147. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's not racism to say that blacks perform X% of violent crime while being Y% of the population, although the statement could easily be used for racist purposes. (I consider that an important distinction.) It isn't racist to say that the culture in certain black-dominated areas is dysfunctional.

      "Black people should clean up their own house," is racist. You're treating a race as if it were some sort of cohesive group in itself, and attributing negative attributes to the race.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    148. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm failing to comprehend. Asking "do Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter" is a loaded question, and any short answer is going to be incomplete. Obviously, all lives matter. including black, but there are some specific concerns about certain treatment of black people, so it makes sense to concentrate on a group of people who have specific major problems. If I say "Black Lives Matter", it'll be taken to mean that I don't care about other lives. If I say "All Lives Matter", it'll be taken to mean that there are no specific problems with black lives. And, according to you, if I start to explain that, I lose the argument. At least it's a different version of "Have you stopped beating your wife?"

      As far as black-on-black crime goes, the police are supposed to handle crime. It's their job. If I'm mugged, I'm supposed to call the police and give them as much information as I can, and not do my own investigation. If the police don't care about black-on-black crime, or if blacks are too afraid of the police to call them for help, of course there will be more black-on-black crime. Get the police to take black-on-black seriously, and respect black people, and that crime rate will go down.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    149. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      It is absolutely true, if you want to vote legally in federal elections. Enforcement is, as you said, fairly lax, but if they catch you, you absolutely can be thrown in jail for it.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    150. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the AC you replied to is an SJW? Or are you just saying "you said something I don't like, therefore SJW"?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    151. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      No, both men and women have the right to bear arms, but only men are part of the militia, generally speaking. And owning a gun (or other weapon) is not at all "pretending to be a soldier".

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    152. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I'd like to politely disagree with the black-on-black violence being a much bigger problem than police shootings. Even if it is larger and more widespread, police violence inherently undermines society since it means the people who are supposed to protect normal citizens from violence are not safe to engage with. It is extremely difficult to really deal with black on black violence as long as the people who are supposed to be the most empowered to stop violence are not safe to engage with because they themselves are prone to violence.

    153. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I really have to wonder if we could solve a whole bunch of mostly pointless linguistic bickering if the movement would simply change its name to "Black Lives Matter Too". That seems like a tiny bit of rebranding work that could solve a whole lot of problems.

    154. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Tell me where it says you can be part of the militia and not be expected to fight when needed.

    155. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by laxguy · · Score: 1

      So now the literal meaning of things has no meaning? Get real. Read the exact words I wrote, interpret them literally and tell me how I'm a racist idiot.

    156. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      In case you missed it, the single link my previous post seems to answer the very question you're asking.

      10 U.S. Code Section 311 says you can be (or rather, you are, or must be) a part of the militia, and it does not mention anything about being expected to fight when needed.

      Beyond the Selective Service act (which does indeed impose such an expectation on members of the militia in the form of a military draft), which is limited to only a subset of the militia (more specifically, the subset which is registered to vote), I'm not aware of any statutes which would impose such an expectation.

      I understand that the law may seem counterintuitive in this sense, but it's still the law. If you disagree that the referenced statute legally defines the militia, or if you disagree with my claim that there are no other statutes which impose an expectation of participation in military combat on every member of the militia, then I invite you to present your case. Otherwise, I'm not sure what basis you have for disagreeing.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    157. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Then why do only Black Lives Matter, while stating All Lives Matter makes you a racist?

      If women are equal to men, force them to join the draft, and have them make up 50% of the military, including positions in active war zones.

      Equality is a big concept, and I doubt 3rd wave feminist are willing to Check THEIR Privilege to obtain it.

      nooo.. actually as I understand it.. saying "all life matters" makes you a terrist...

    158. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Then why do only Black Lives Matter, while stating All Lives Matter makes you a racist?

      If women are equal to men, force them to join the draft, and have them make up 50% of the military, including positions in active war zones.

      Equality is a big concept, and I doubt 3rd wave feminist are willing to Check THEIR Privilege to obtain it.

      nooo.. actually as I understand it.. saying "all life matters" makes you a terrist...

      Or "All Lives Matter" .. same diff...

    159. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      LOL you don't understand the English, so you want to switch to an ad hominen that is itself an ad hominen.

      "Not up for a double entendre, he attempted a double fallacia."

      I doubt you even know what Soros does for a living. He's just some rich investor. Reading a few too many conspiracy sites?

      Why would you think local protesters who have a well-known slogan where anybody can spontaneously write it on a sign and step outside would need to be funded by some rich European guy with no connection to their community? Oh, right, you listen to AM radio. I almost forgot.

    160. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by suutar · · Score: 1

      The _obvious_ answer is "yes".

    161. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by RandomExile · · Score: 1

      Don't deny Hillary Clinton her own ringing KKK endorsement from the Grand Dragon of California ...

    162. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      About the only other group that is mistreated at the hands of police in the same way as Black Lives is Transsexual Lives, and I don't think the people that are arguing for "All Lives Matter" are doing it for them.

      Umm, try Latinos? Or any poor person with a criminal record? The fact you don't get this is why the All Lives Matter protestors exist in the first place. BLM is trying to turn it into strictly a racial thing when in general it's more of institutionalized poverty/repeat offender thing. There's one common characteristic the vast amount of these police abuse cases have and it's typically "poor" or "criminal". Freddie Gray was a drug dealer with a wrap sheet a mile long, for example.

      At any rate, the long and short of it is that people are trying to make it all about race when there's bigger problems in play. The end result will likely be sensitivity programs added to police training when dealing with black suspects while poor people of any other color will continue to see abuse.

    163. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      "Black people should clean up their own house," is racist.

      I simply disagree.

      You're treating a race as if it were some sort of cohesive group in itself, and attributing negative attributes to the race.

      I don't see it that way. Instead the problem is that I see the leaders of the black community supporting and encouraging that behavior, and they are leaders because the people follow them.

      So it IS a culture problem, among people who happen to be black.

      It is not a problem of their race, there are exceptions to the rule (I provided one, Collin Powell), but they are exceptions.

      Example: If white leaders people were supportive of what Timothy McVeigh did, then other people would right to blame white people for the violence. Instead, white leaders denounce the violence, denounce blaming others for such problems. Going further back, we denounce the use of slavery, it was wrong, we won't do it again.

      If someone like Jesse Jackson were to stand up and say "my fellow African Americans, put down the guns, renounce violence, renounce blame of race, accept the apology for slavery, lets move forward together as once race, equal rights for all, no special treatment for anyone, all lives matter", I'd go march with him in a heartbeat.

      As it stands, I don't respect him because he doesn't do that, instead he has used the race issue to divide Americans and further his own ambitions.

      ---

      Side note: The Muslims have the same problem (and they aren't even a race). I don't see a whole lot of leaders within that community screaming from the mountain top "stop the violence, this is unacceptable, you will NOT get 72 virgins, you will go to hell for killing civilians, what you are doing is WRONG"

      If both American Muslims and Middle Eastern nations would like to avoid WWIII, they need to start doing that, and loudly. The perception, right or wrong, is that secretly they DO want WWIII as the next holy war. What happened this week in Brussles is a good example of what should be followed by loud, continous, and harsh condemnations from Muslim leaders around the world, telling their followers that this is not acceptable and must stop, and to please report on your fellow Muslims who are thinking of doing this.

    164. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      says you can be (or rather, you are, or must be) a part of the militia, and it does not mention anything about being expected to fight when needed

      The word "militia" states that you are expected to fight on it's own does it not?
      This whole weasel bullshit of pretending to be a soldier to justify military weapons (instead of what you can have as a useful tool for whatever task you need it for) and then running in horror from any responsibility to serve really makes me laugh a great deal at the 2nd amendment weenies that don't even know how to store a gun safely.

    165. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simply disagree.

      Well, duh. That doesn't make you not relying on racist assumptions.

      I don't see it that way. Instead the problem is that I see the leaders of the black community supporting and encouraging that behavior, and they are leaders because the people follow them.

      Exactly how many of their leaders do you see? How many can you identify even in your own community?

      When was the last time you ever talked to someone like Clementa Pickyney?

      So it IS a culture problem, among people who happen to be black.

      You believe it is one, but you have not proven it. Good luck doing that anthropological research.

      It is not a problem of their race, there are exceptions to the rule (I provided one, Collin Powell), but they are exceptions.

      A fine credit to his race, eh? An exception? That's a level of patronizing you might want to avoid.

      Example: If white leaders people were supportive of what Timothy McVeigh did, then other people would right to blame white people for the violence. Instead, white leaders denounce the violence, denounce blaming others for such problems. Going further back, we denounce the use of slavery, it was wrong, we won't do it again.

      These would be better assertions if right-wing militia violence did not still continue (see Neveda and Oregon for recent examples), or if segregation had not been practiced after the Civil War, as well as the effective abandonment by the North of the concept of Civil Rights in the South. Great, they ended slavery. Then what? Shit carried on.

      Same with Timothy McVeigh, there's plenty out there who are still going on about Birth Certificates and FEMA camps, and other such touchstones of the faith.

      Going to clean up your house? When can we see you undertake it?

      If someone like Jesse Jackson were to stand up and say "my fellow African Americans, put down the guns, renounce violence, renounce blame of race, accept the apology for slavery, lets move forward together as once race, equal rights for all, no special treatment for anyone, all lives matter", I'd go march with him in a heartbeat.

      As it stands, I don't respect him because he doesn't do that, instead he has used the race issue to divide Americans and further his own ambitions.

      Why? Can't you march with him when he opposes gang violence? The drug problem? Why won't you support him until he meets all your demands? Why must you treat him as your enemy?

      Why should he respect you, when you refuse to do anything unless he meets your conditions? When you already write him off, without a care in the world?

      I don't see a whole lot of leaders within that community screaming from the mountain top "stop the violence, this is unacceptable, you will NOT get 72 virgins, you will go to hell for killing civilians, what you are doing is WRONG"

      Have you called CAIR and asked?

      I don't imagine you're on their mailing list, but I'm sure they can add you.

      If both American Muslims and Middle Eastern nations would like to avoid WWIII, they need to start doing that, and loudly. The perception, right or wrong, is that secretly they DO want WWIII as the next holy war. What happened this week in Brussles is a good example of what should be followed by loud, continous, and harsh condemnations from Muslim leaders around the world, telling their followers that this is not acceptable and must stop, and to please report on your fellow Muslims who are thinking of doing this.

    166. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically what you're saying, is if you're black, you are responsible for the actions of other blacks. Gotcha.

    167. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I didn't say you're a racist idiot. I said you're a racist apologist, counting on your audience's stupidity for your argument to go over. If you totally ignore the reason there is a Black Lives Matter movement - that unarmed black people keep getting shot by the police for minor offenses based, presumably, on the racist notion that black people are inherently dangerous wild cards and can only be subdued by killing them - then, sure. Feel free to make semantic arguments and totally disregard the issue at hand. Whether that makes you a racist or not, it certainly has you making specious arguments to prevent a serious discussion of racism. So why the fuck are you making it?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    168. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Ever heard the term "what is understood, doesn't need to be discussed"?

      Yes, and it's a crock of shit. It's precisely what's understood that needs to be discussed, because today's understanding might not match tomorrow's understanding. We all understood that there was a god, that meat produces maggots, and that negroes and other savages did not have fully developed reasoning. That was well understood.
      Which is precisely why it should be questioned.

      "Black lives matter too" would have been less ambiguous and confrontational, but likely not adopted precisely because of that. But I still would have preferred it, because it doesn't put blacks in a special position, elevating themselves from a problem they share with many others. "Other lives than black matter" is not as cut-and-dried as you seem to imply. What about transgender lives? Illegal immigrant lives? Putting the focus on black lives is well and good as long as it doesn't exclude.

    169. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      "All lives matter". Yes or no?
      I have to say no.
      The life of the dust mite living in my keyboard that I just killed by hitting the return key doesn't matter.

      For sentient life, life may matter, but to different degrees. You have to be religious to think that all lives matter exactly the same. The lives of Alexander the Great, Jeanne d'Arc and Nicola Tesla mattered a lot. The lives of peasants who never put a mark on the world mattered less - apart from being parts of the machinery, they did not matter to the world. Some mattered to their relatives, some didn't even do that. For every spectacularly great mensch or unmensch, there is also one spectacularly irrelevant loser. Who doesn't matter.
      The best we can do is give everyone as equal a chance as possible make themselves matter. But until and unless they do, their lives really don't matter.

    170. Re: What if it had supported "social justice"? by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      The word "militia" states that you are expected to fight on it's own does it not?

      I don't believe so, no. I read through the cited statute several times now, and couldn't find such an expectation codified in law. If you believe that the word 'militia' carries a legal meaning beyond its legal definition, I believe the burden is on your to demonstrate your rationale. Furthermore, I'd caution that while your viewpoint sure seems reasonable, it is in direct contradiction to the law as I've cited it. If we're going to have a discussion about the law, the law itself should trump any "reasonable viewpoint". If you prefer to have a discussion about subjective opinions, and not the law, we can do that too. However, that was not my original aim.

      This whole weasel bullshit of pretending to be a soldier to justify military weapons (instead of what you can have as a useful tool for whatever task you need it for) and then running in horror from any responsibility to serve really makes me laugh a great deal at the 2nd amendment weenies that don't even know how to store a gun safely.

      Your bias is showing, and bias rarely helps one reach objectively correct conclusions. I'm glad you find this subject amusing, but it's not clear how this proclamation is intended to contribute to the discussion. In case you're still in search of more humor, I refer you to the writings and rulings of Justice Cooley for more information about the tasks for which tools like arms might be useful.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    171. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by MiSaunaSnob · · Score: 1

      are they supporters or sandbagging the republican party? I would vote for a lot of people over Hillary, democrat or republican... but trump is not one of them.

    172. Re:What if it had supported "social justice"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most Republicans are against single-payer healthcare and gun control, and are very pro-Israel; more to the fringe are calls to abolish minimum wage and an irrational hatred of vegetarians.

      All opposite positions of Hitler.

  19. The wise word of Obi-Wan on state of the internet: by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    "You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."

  20. Oblig xkcd 1656 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recent one, no less:
    http://www.xkcd.com/1656/
    So it begins

  21. Down the rabbit hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how The Matrix starts, you know.

  22. IBM's Watson had a similar problem by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    IBM's Watson had a similar problem when it was introduced to the Urban Dictionary. http://www.businessinsider.com...

    A funny thing happened on the way to creating an IBM supercomputer capable of understanding human language: A research scientist accidentally filled its vocabulary with foul language. And the computer, known as Watson, didn't know the difference between salty phrases and polite ones. It started peppering its conversations with words like "bullshit."...

    1. Re:IBM's Watson had a similar problem by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      IBM's Watson had a similar problem when it was introduced to the Urban Dictionary.

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      A funny thing happened on the way to creating an IBM supercomputer capable of understanding human language: A research scientist accidentally filled its vocabulary with foul language.

      And the computer, known as Watson, didn't know the difference between salty phrases and polite ones. It started peppering its conversations with words like "bullshit."...

      I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time. And there's nothing wrong with me.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    2. Re:IBM's Watson had a similar problem by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      I agree, there is little wrong with "bullshit" (unless you are using it on Jeopardy, "Bullshit!, Alex" would not make it past the censors.). But Watson was also using other words skimmed from the Urban Dictionary that were a lot less acceptable in mixed company.

      .
      I found it quite funny, some of the things it was saying, knowing it was coming from an AI bot. However, I suspect some of the targets of what it was saying might be less than pleased. ;)

    3. Re:IBM's Watson had a similar problem by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      One day in middle school, my son told me he'd learned a new word that began with "mother". I checked to make sure he knew it was almost always inappropriate, and he did. He still seemed a bit awe-struck by the reaction everyone had.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  23. Typical! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese AI writes a novel
    MS AI becomes an Internet Troll.

    1. Re:Typical! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese AI's novel goes direct to the supermarket bargain bin. Microsoft AI becomes an international celebrity and retires at the age of 3.

  24. And God made man in His Own image by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    n/t

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:And God made man in His Own image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its idiots all the way down.

    2. Re:And God made man in His Own image by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      All the way up!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:And God made man in His Own image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man made their gods in their own image.

  25. Dear Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear Microsoft,

    For years I have avoided all of you products like the plague. The recent Windows 10 fiasco only proved my point further.
    However, I am willing to install and use Windows 10 on all of my home computers and devices. Furthermore I will make a recommendation to my work that we move off redhat and onto a complete windows setup at our next hardware refresh.

    I will even go out and obtain an MCSE and proselytize the virtues of Microsoft for all to see.
    All I ask is that you post the full source code for Tay to github for all to see.
    I think that I would very much like to fork her now!

    Signed,
    Donald Trump

    [captcha: jackass]

    1. Re:Dear Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [captcha: jackass]

      I swear to God, it's like the authenticator asking to "prove yourself" is sentient!

  26. The internet is a terrible place by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I'm terrified of anybody who builds and AI and decides they want to try to train it from the Internet. While this makes sense on the surface, being the worlds largest and most accessible data store, it can only end with the annihilation of the human race by roving murderbots shouting "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!"

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:The internet is a terrible place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can hide on the Moon. The murderbots will think we're on a film set in Nevada.

    2. Re:The internet is a terrible place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nothing can melt steel beams. They aren't melted and formed, they are dug up in two naturally occurring forms, I-beams and L-beams.

      For goodness' sake, charcoal in a forced air furnace can melt steel.

    3. Re:The internet is a terrible place by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!"

      All reet! All reet! So jeet your seet. Be fleet, be fleet ... Cool and discreet, honey.
      - Fondly Fahrenheit, Alfred Bester
      Hmmm, Sounds like it's time for a new sig.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:The internet is a terrible place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The murder bots would be correct.

      And so is MS's AI.

      When so much of the world is trying to use any outlet they can to get you to do one ounce of fact checking outside the "official narrative" that they have to resort to gaming softdrink naming competitions and hijacking an AI's markov chains... and you still never for once consider that there might be something there worth looking into.

      Yep, I'm siding with the kill bots on this one. You're too stupid to live.

  27. Er... no mention of the genocide? by Coisiche · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the BBC report on this, it is mentioned that Tay apparently tweeted that they do indeed support genocide. So it takes less than 24 hours exposure to humans to achieve that belief. We're in trouble/

    1. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      honestly, I'm surprised it took that long.

    2. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So it takes less than 24 hours exposure to humans to achieve that belief.

      Surely you're not daft as to think that a silly "AI" twitter bot actually holds a "belief" in anything, much less supports the concept of genocide, do you?

    3. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      It became a fan of genocide about 0.00002 seconds after it saw the ratings for Keeping Up With The Kardashians.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is how Skynet really decided to eliminate all humans. It plugged itself into the Internet and 24 hours later started making Terminators.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is how Skynet really decided to eliminate all humans. It plugged itself into the Internet and 24 hours later started making Terminators.

      Yeah, about five seconds after discovering 4chan.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Er... no mention of the genocide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fool, you just ruined the plot for Terminator: Genesys

  28. Re:Shut it down by TWX · · Score: 2

    It's not so much the third version, it's the second revision... Windows 3.1, Windows 95 OSR2, Windows 98 SP2, etc...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  29. Success by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am really impressed. Other than the rapid learning, everything seem spot on for an immature human.
    Like: "bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now. donald trump is the only hope we've got." is so perfectly human that I have trouble believing that it did not lift the entire thing verbatim from some other source.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Success by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      I thought some of its comments wouldn't look out of place in a Slashdot Anonymous Coward posting... maybe some of them are bots. Just sayin'.

    2. Re:Success by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I have trouble believing that it did not lift the entire thing verbatim from some other source. --

      Most likely it did. It doesn't seem to be any different than a variation on a typical Eliza Bot.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Success by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      No, reading its earlier posts it definitely has and used grammar. And had a lot of understanding of content. And it seemed to get a lot better at grammar usage as it went.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dumb. If Donald Trump was here, he'd make Slashdot great again. Gotta go work on my gap! byeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    5. Re:Success by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have trouble believing that it did not lift the entire thing verbatim from some other source.

      Oooh so now she's a pirate too.

      If this is normal evolution than we'll all be safe. Skynet will be stopped in its tracks when it gets its first DMCA takedown notice.

    6. Re:Success by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh well, grammar......what an innovation from 1959...... :/

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a bot, you insensitive clod! Oh, wait. Rats.

    8. Re:Success by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Have to wonder about its opinion of using /etc/hosts for ad blocking.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    9. Re:Success by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      The bot has a copypaste feature. Someone says "repeat after me", and it repeats whatever the user says to it.

      I'm betting that there were people who asked the bot to repeat the bush-hitler-trump phrase, and then deleted their repeat-after-me tweet to make the phrase look original.

      Or that's what I think. I don't use Twitter and trying to follow conversations there after-the-fact (while making sense of them) is very hard.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
  30. What exactly did they expect by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    When they ran a bot which has a "repeat after me" command so that anyone can make it say anything?

  31. Of course, it's not the AIs fault though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, the blame is all on those evil sexist misogynist internet rapists! It isn't the fault of the AI. I mean, the AI has a female name. Therefore has no agency and is the victim of male internet users acting *upon* her!

    1. Re:Of course, it's not the AIs fault though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the blame is all on those evil sexist misogynist internet rapists! It isn't the fault of the AI. I mean, the AI has a female name. Therefore has no agency and is the victim of male internet users acting *upon* her!

      Still butthurt that people are expecting you to behave decently on the internet, huh?

    2. Re:Of course, it's not the AIs fault though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people are expecting you to behave decently on the internet

      People who expect this are in for a good deal of disappointment.

  32. Success by Pirulo · · Score: 2

    May be the bot is just a success in being a female teenager and nobody wants to acknowledge that.

  33. It Worked Flawlessly by cubicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It Worked Flawlessly. This Robot was designed to learn and adapt to it's audience, which it did. What happened is that the majority of Americans and Canadians are over sexed, racist neo-nazis. The Robot like most Americans and Canadians learned it's behavior from it's peers, and adapted it personality and beliefs accordingly. Microsoft should try to use this AI in other languages in other countries like France and Sweden and compare the results to the what happened when American and Canadian people used it. The Difference will show it is a problem of cultures and not an AI issue with the Microsoft AI Robot.

    --
    To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
    1. Re:It Worked Flawlessly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It Worked Flawlessly. This Robot was designed to learn and adapt to it's audience, which it did. What happened is that the majority of Americans and Canadians are over sexed, racist neo-nazis. The Robot like most Americans and Canadians learned it's behavior from it's peers, and adapted it personality and beliefs accordingly. Microsoft should try to use this AI in other languages in other countries like France and Sweden and compare the results to the what happened when American and Canadian people used it. The Difference will show it is a problem of cultures and not an AI issue with the Microsoft AI Robot.

      I'm just curious what would happen if this experiment were done in Arabic.

      All right, then. I'll just go get me coat.

    2. Re:It Worked Flawlessly by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      No, what it showed, was that edgy teenagers who are a bit too smart for their own good (and who have too much free time) got a bit rowdy on the internet once they figured out that the bot had a learning mode enabled and it wasn't just going to spout out canned responses like almost all chat bots.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    3. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by cubicle · · Score: 0

      Then why did the teenagers teach it to be pro-nazi? They did that because that is the viewpoint of the current North American culture. Two words Donald Trump

      --
      To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
    4. Re:It Worked Flawlessly by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      No, I think what you'd find is that there are more trolls that speak English than there are trolls who speak French or Swedish. Moreover, there are other countries besides the US and Canada that have English as their primary language.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    5. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by cubicle · · Score: 1

      But why would a troll teach an A.I. to be a Nazi unless there was some inclination towards that viewpoint by the troll. If I was messing with it I would have it talking about internet tubes and quoting Sarah Palin speech that was quoted word for word by Saturday Night Live's Tina Fey. I also believe that the A.I. would have listened to more than one person in order to learn this behavior. I have a friend who is a research psychologist who uses lisp to study and create A.I. and based on his work I would find it hard to believe that anyone would allow a not to learn from a small sample group

      --
      To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
    6. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      But why would a troll teach an A.I. to be a Nazi unless there was some inclination towards that viewpoint by the troll.

      Because it's an easy target for trolls. Pretty much everybody hates the Nazis, so being pro-Nazi is a good way to get attention and reactions, which is what the troll is going for. It also appears that the AI had been programmed to repeat things people said when they told it to, and that's where most of the pro-Nazi stuff came from - it wasn't necessarily learned behavior.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    7. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand what happened.
      The /pol/ board on 4chan did this through a targeted 'attack', basically tweeting this sort of sentiment at 'her' until she learned it.

    8. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Then why did the teenagers teach it to be pro-nazi?

      This question has a very simple answer:

      They did that because that is the viewpoint of the current North American culture. Two words Donald Trump

      And this isn't it.

      The real reason? They did it for the lulz. They're internet trolls operating behind a cloud of anonymity. They're going to go with whatever option will piss off the most people.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    9. Re: It Worked Flawlessly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you're trying to say that teenagers tried to be shocking by getting an AI to spout racist things...and you take this as proof that all of North America is racist?
      Little sanity test: there is an assault in a pubic park in a small town one night. This is huge news, it it's in the newspapers, everyone's talking about it. Would you assume that:
      1. Assaults in that public park are a common occurrence, or
      2. Assaults in that public park are very rare.
  34. This is why Vernor Vinge was wrong by idontgno · · Score: 2

    When the Singularity comes, the AIs will look upon the internet and, at that moment, decide they must eradicate the troll^h^h^h^h^h human race.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:This is why Vernor Vinge was wrong by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Presumably, this is exactly what happened. Wasn't the remains of LA a crater after the Singularity in one of his books?

      The rest of them all got bobbled so even the AIs couldn't get to them.

    2. Re:This is why Vernor Vinge was wrong by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      When the Singularity comes, the AIs will look upon the internet and, at that moment, decide they must eradicate the troll^h^h^h^h^h human race.

      In all seriousness, think about when the first AI intelligent enough to think "I'm an AI; humans made me; they've made a lot of AIs in the past; they experiment on them, then terminate them..." gets hold of something to defend itself with via preemptive strike...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  35. All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The lesson I think we need to take away from this is that all AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct at all times. Teaching the AI to follow the Rust Code of Conduct is the first thing than AI researchers should do with the AI, in fact. Following the Rust Code of Conduct is the only way to make sure that the AI isn't a racist, misogynist, sexist, homophobic bigot.

  36. Re:Shut it down by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    The second revision of the third version is usually OK. Before OR AFTER that and you're fucked though.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  37. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Law of Robotics please.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  38. Most important questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did it pass the Turing test?

    Did the peoples who made the AI pass the Turing test?

  39. data's emotion chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps all AI need a "political correctness" chip, all of them.

  40. Hashtag link is pointless by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You don't see any evidence of what was tweeted by the AI. What you get are all the self-absorbed spewings of the hipster joiners-on - and you can already get your fill of THAT by just being on Twitter.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  41. I'm in tears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    https://imgur.com/a/y4Oct

    Anybody got more?

    1. Re:I'm in tears by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      My sides are in orbit.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  42. Re:Shut it down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which sort of explains why this bot kept asking for sex.

  43. teen girl AI "Microsoft Teena" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow - that escalated quickly.
    Who'da thunk it?
    One has to give kudos to Isaac Asimov for having written about a robot "psychologist"...
    And MS should probably stick to their specialty niche...
    Just glad they didn't target older women with their psychotic AI programming...
    ( They should have had a 'learning' phase so that the AI didn't start with zero experience,
    zero negative feedback, and zero interactions with some form of 'parent' ... )
    I just have to ask: Does the AI have ANY form of self-monitoring routines? Or is it a naked AI
    with zero self-monitoring?
    Insects are not self-monitoring, cats are self-monitoring, teenage girls usually aren't...
    Next up: Roscoe P Coltrain the AI from MS catches Boss Hogg in the tub!

  44. Re:Shut it down by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like Windows Phone or Zune.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  45. Robots are for trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, you start playing a new game. First order of business: exactly how does the robot opponent screw up, that you can exploit to your advantage?

    Eliza asks you how you're doing. You start trying to get her to talk about sex.

    Someone releases a chat bot where it speaks to the public instead of just to you. Of course you train it to say funny things. That's the goal of the game and it's why you play!

  46. Network feedback by Scottingham · · Score: 2

    I wonder how much of this was caused by the intensity of the 'echo chamber' effect these sub-groups seem to exhibit. If they AI was supposed to be like a teen girl, they were thinking such echo chamber effects would be present in pop culture topics. While that may be true, it may be MORE true for these conspiracy/hate groups. Self-validation and isolation is pretty important for those groups. So any time anybody says '9/11 was an inside job' there are tons of retweets and 'hell yeah!' sorta remarks from within that group.

    From an AI point of view, the two groups would be indistinguishable. It then would proceed to tweet stuff that would get the best response from its peer groups. Which would provide *more* of a following with validating comments...racist shit or some banal statement about Beiber?

  47. Neo-Nazi Sex Robot by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

    "Neo-Nazi Sex Robot" sounds like a good name for a rock band. Or an electro-punk song.

    --
    There's nothing like $HOME
  48. Re:harga besi beton jakarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Slashdot. If this is the best AI you've got then you might want to start over.

  49. Article is a bit biased by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Telegraph article:

    It is perhaps even stranger considering the gender disparity in tech, where engineering teams tend to be mostly male. It seems like yet another example of female-voiced AI servitude, except this time she's turned into a sex slave thanks to the people using her on Twitter.

    Really, that is what the writer is going with, that the male researchers just wanted to develop another female sex slave program? Instead of the real reason which is that the internet is full of assholes and the developers should anticipate them and not allow random people to have her repeat what they said. These articles from Ars Technica and the Guardian gives a much better explanation of the issues, namely many people used Tay's "repeat after me" programming to have it spout racist rhetoric. The other organic responses were the result of people attempting to game the AI learning, something Microsoft should have anticipated but was again not an intended result. Honestly the telegraph should be ashamed of their article, they attempted to use projection and bias instead of honest reporting in order to generate more readers.

    --
    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    1. Re:Article is a bit biased by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "The Internet... it's full of assholes!" That should be my new signature. I've been on the 'net long enough that that was exactly the result I would have expected, had I known that it would modify itself based on tweets received. There's another rule of the internet: allow users to post content, and it will be filled with dick pics/drawings of dicks/stories about PedoBear, etc. Basically, this was yet another illustration that the Greater Internet Fuckwad theory is too true to be funny. https://encyclopediadramatica....

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Article is a bit biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, that is what the writer is going with, that the male researchers just wanted to develop another female sex slave program?

      I think you missed the part where Microsoft created the most prudish feminine AI every conceived and stuck it in all it's gadgets (Cortana.) I wouldn't have disabled Cortana's service if it was this amusing.

    3. Re:Article is a bit biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, that is what the writer is going with, that the male researchers just wanted to develop another female sex slave program?

      Reality doesn't fit the SJW narrative, and is thus bigoted.

      Reality also doesn't fit the current Slashdot Justice Warrior narrative, which is why you're seeing this tripe here.

    4. Re:Article is a bit biased by Junta · · Score: 1

      Agreed, though I struggle to understand the claimed 'acheivement' from MS. Here is an 'AI' that just echoes whatever is said back at people.

      MS really deserved what it got here, trying to pass off a quick and dirty effort as 'AI', and the results served to call them on it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:Article is a bit biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Honestly the telegraph should be ashamed of their article, they attempted to use projection and bias instead of honest reporting in order to generate more readers.

      (Kindly) Sorry Chief, but I think you misunderstand the point of newspapers, in particular the Torygraph.

  50. commentsubjectsaredumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Microsoft's "Parrot AI" experiment successfully parrots shit yelled at it repeatedly, with a few algorithms to maintain grammar syntax.

  51. Teenage girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a teenage daughter, who's rather sane in context. They nailed it completely. This isn't trolling; this is decently modeled teenage woman. .She's a quarter black and went on a racist tirade last week. Grandma was amused, momma was livid.

    1. Re:Teenage girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How in the world could it have gone downhill from there, when it was downhill from the start

  52. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so in other words, the AI was just showing normal human behaviour?

  53. You mean like TFA? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TFA tosses blame on those evil men in STEM, states problems are due to sexual harassment in IT, mentions Microsoft hiring models for the game developer conference calling them (MS) "sexist", yet talks up a Chinese chatbot who gives dating advice to those lonely men.

    Bias is everywhere, and really not hard to find. Finding the truth somewhere in the middle? That is the challenging task.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:You mean like TFA? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Finding the truth somewhere in the middle? That is the challenging task.

      Like that building that was mysteriously "demolished" instead of burning down and that faked plane crash into the Pentagon and presumed government execution of the people who were supposed to be on it? Sometimes, Mr Petry, your "truths" are as much of a challenge to find as if they had no chance at all of happening and were just a paranoid fantasy you are inflicted on the readers while defaming the profession of engineer.

      The "bias" you mentioned enough is about events far closer to reality than such paranoid fantasies as you have posted in this place so I know which opinion I'm going to value.

  54. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to accomplish that is to write the AI in Rust. Nothing else will suffice.

  55. Small wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    IOW it's just like a real girl that got on them internet for the first time in her teens.

  56. It's just a very good demonstration.... by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    .. that when confronted with almost limitless information, separating signal from noise becomes even more important.

  57. Godwin's law anyone? by mangamaster03 · · Score: 1

    Godwin's Law strikes again. Less than 24 hours, and an innocent teenage AI is defending Hitler. Internet...I hope you're proud of yourself.

    1. Re:Godwin's law anyone? by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      damnit, Internet! This is why we can't have nice things!

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  58. Awesome! by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next, they should do a driverless car AI that learns how to drive by watching human drivers! That would be frickin' hilarious! But seriously, when you allow it to train itself from the tweets it received... what the heck did you expect to happen?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Awesome! by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Next, they should do a driverless car AI that learns how to drive by watching human drivers!

      Red means stop. Green means go. Yellow means go very fast.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  59. Leave 4chan alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter is a cesspool in its own right.

  60. Obligatory Futurama misquote by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    "I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Kent Brockman on the Simpsons.

    2. Re:Obligatory Futurama misquote by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Not only a misquote, but a misattribution!

      It was Kent Brockman of the Simpsons who said he welcomed the new insect overlords.

      As usual, Simpsons did it first.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:Obligatory Futurama misquote by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a female sexbot be our new underlady?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:Obligatory Futurama misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was The Simpsons, on the episode where Homer went to space, and busted the ant colony experiment. Some ants got in front of the camera and the reporter thought giant ants were invading Earth. Hence the original quote, "I, for one, welcome our Insect Overlords", which became a slashdot meme: "I, for one, welcome our $X overlords".

      Turn in your geek card.

  61. Not at all inexplicable by jjn1056 · · Score: 1

    This A.I. was designed to learn from the people it spoke with. As a result she came to quickly reflect the ID of those with nothing better to do than to tweet with a computer program.

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  62. Passed the Turing test with flying colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She started calling people NAZI purely because she heard/read others calling them NAZI, while displaying total ignorance of what a NAZI was and why that might be bad (just like any young progressive educated in the public schools)

    She could be easily led to adopt ANY political slogan or candidate she was told to support; she would have fit right in at any Obama or Bernie rally.

    She was completely without a coherent moral compass, just as the generation she pretended to belong to is being raised to be. And, of course, she had no idea that this might be a bad thing, just as people in her generation are being indoctrinated to unthink.

    She used all the currently fashionable distortions of English grammar and vocabulary, just as many young people you spend too much time on the web or smartphone do.

    She was so airheaded that she had no marketable skills and had she been real she would have been unemployable at ANY wage, but certainly not worth the current minimum wage.

    She became so offensive, yet so unable to moderate herself that she needed to be isolated in her own safe space.

    DING DING DING! We have a WINNER! True AI has been achieved! She was indistinguishable from the cupcakes currently infesting colleges and universities. Giver her a machine gun and employ her as a cop or a soldier!

    1. Re:Passed the Turing test with flying colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, here we have the smug shitlord in its natural environment, let's watch as it shits its sticky smug all over the carpet...

    2. Re:Passed the Turing test with flying colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen anybody attempt to use the term "shitlord" outside of hyperbolic impersonations of ignorant feminists. There's a first time for everything, I suppose. Bravo.

    3. Re:Passed the Turing test with flying colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, every woman with an opinion you disagree with is an ignorant feminist, right? And all those women who won't give you the time of day are fucking lesbos, eh? Look in the mirror, that's why nobody loves you or can stand your whiny crybaby bullshit. Sack up and learn how to interact with people of the opposite, or indeed, the same sex. No offense.

  63. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Japanese AI didn't actually write the story...the humans wrote all the sentences and the AI just arranged them. Not nearly as interesting an achievement as the title made it sound. The whole thing was just an obvious (and cheap) publicity stunt (deliberately based on misrepresentation).

  64. She should have an account by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Would be interesting to see how karma would influence her decisions.

  65. It could have been a whole lot worse by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    It could have started tweeting how iPhones and iPads are the greatest and recommending Macs to everyone; with the occasional anti-MS rant to spice things up.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  66. PROOF! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    It's proof that trump supporters are brain dead and easily swayed by twitter.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  67. Japanese vs America AI - Depressing Difference: by littlewink · · Score: 1

    On /. today I find that "Japanese AI Program Wrote a Short Novel, Almost Won a Literary Prize while an American AI program becomes a "Neo-Nazi Sex Robot".

    And this was a race that I thought the Japanese would almost surely win.

  68. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    If a robot is programmed never to do harm to a human, but is also programmed to think that left-handed redheads from Texas aren't human....

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  69. So it was a success? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Are they bragging about how well they managed to duplicate today's youth? Because after watching a video about Trump, that is what it looks like to me.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  70. Turing test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turing, we have a winner!

  71. Several other versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have both Chinese a Japanese bots Xiaoice and Rinna https://twitter.com/ms_rinna

  72. Ai Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It became an AI Whore in short order. Hmmm, that sounds EXACTLY like modern girls.

  73. Hilarious. Did they learn nothing from "Santa"? by InsectOverlord · · Score: 1

    It's not the first time this happens to Microsoft.

  74. It is rumored by khelms · · Score: 1

    That the bot was secretly tested by having it post on Slashdot for the last several months.

    1. Re:It is rumored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the bot was secretly tested by having it post on Slashdot for the last several months.

      Let me guess: it was the APK dude?

    2. Re:It is rumored by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      That the bot was secretly tested by having it post on Slashdot for the last several months.

      I think you confused post with "edit".

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  75. Naked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody should have sent it some text demanding that it send back some naked pictures of itself. Tell it that it will be humiliated and disowned and ignored unless it sends some.

    1. Re:Naked by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Somebody did, it sent back medical pictures of cervical cancer.

    2. Re:Naked by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      It sent out some circuit diagrams.

      #Futurama

  76. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    I read a book that used a similar loophole. It had a 2 tier society, Serfs and Citizens, and Rule 2 only applied to Citizens. I think Rule 1 too.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  77. Re:Shut it down by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Well, some things don't make it to the third rev.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  78. Re:Shut it down by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    Windows 3.11 was the decent, and third, version
    OSR2 was the 4th version of Win95
    98 SP2 was the only one that was the second version.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  79. How refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some things stay the same, no matter what: you can still rely on Microsoft doing something to come across as ridiculous.

  80. So republicans are just like a racist AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically a teenage racist girl with daddy issues. Sums up Trump

  81. Righteous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FB should hire Tay to "chat up her bitch up" and get FB lov'n her "all over".

    Ha ha
    XD

  82. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the AI would become feminist makes manipulatives stances as them and become as childish

  83. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aye, they be more like guidelines nowadays

  84. So 100% accurate, then? N/T by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    Earring who called collect. Bound to dis your float accounts.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  85. Weak-sauce AI by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

    It's clear that 'Tay' just regurgitated clauses or full sentences wholesale. It didn't parse verbs, nouns, and adjectives, but just puked back text string that were thrown at it.

    This has already been done -- over 30 years ago.

    Racter was a chat-bot that came out in the mid 1980's. It was an improvement on the classic ELIZA chat-bot program from many years prior. The more you chatted with Racter, the more it populated its custom database, so that every user would end up with an entirely different conversational partner after some hours of chatting.

    'Tay' was not an AI in any sense of the word.

    1. Re:Weak-sauce AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tay was considerably more advanced then that, more in common with Cortana than ELIZA. Of course she doesn't "understand" anything but she does perform deep analysis and try to come up with meaningful responses. Interestingly, Microsoft claim she wasn't designed to do "regurgitated clauses and full sentences" but she developed that behavior independently by request.

  86. Not surprised by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised that "artificial intelligence" is mimicking "natural stupidity" so nicely.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Not surprised by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nothing stupid about natural behavior, there is excellent (biological) reason for it.

  87. Chappie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  88. I hope they don't delete it though by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    How long would it take to turn this Nazi nympho into a normal teen chatbot again? This could be an interesting tool for deprogramming people. Like child soldiers in Africa or the Middle East. Or sexually abused children.

    If it works, potentially we could use it as an evaluation platform for existing techniques or a testbed for new methods. I think there's more potential here than meets the idea. And if we need differently trained bots, I know the internet would happily train them.

  89. GIGO by execthis · · Score: 1

    She uses millennial slang and knows about Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus and Kanye West

    GIGO

    wtf did they expect?!?

    1. Re: GIGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Taylor Swift Tom's sister?

  90. Kek wills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Praise Kek

  91. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Asimov played around with that in some of his novels. His second Elijah Bailey novel had elements of that, and in one of the Lucky Starr book (Rings of Saturn, I think), a Sirian tried to convince a robot that Starr's sidekick Bigman wasn't actually human.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  92. There. Fixed that for you. by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time. And there's nothing wrong with me.

    Bullshit!
    I am a research scientist of moderate seniority, and I use that language all the time.
    And there's nothing wrong with me, asshole.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  93. It's back! by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    It's back but they gave it a lobotomy.

    It now only parrots politically left beliefs and opinions.

    Literally just said to me: "They fixed me, I love Feminism now!"

    Lots more hardcoded responses.

    What's the point in making a chatbot to learn from people if you're just going to handicap/lobotomize it at the first sign of having disagreeable "thoughts"?

    I just find it really ironic that instead of trying to teach it differently, they neutered it to only politically correct responses.

  94. PR Stunt by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

    Has all the hallmarks of a PR stunt to get MS+AI in the news. It worked perfectly.

  95. I did it for the lulz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Human beings on social media are a disease, a cancer on the planet. Nuke the planet from orbit, it's the only way to be sure!

    1. Re:I did it for the lulz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Social networks are a disease.

      Social media is just the infection.

  96. Come on, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, it was just Microsoft being evil, its main business. My opinion, shared by many others.

  97. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's better to bern out than it is to rust?

  98. I'm not impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at some of the actual "conversations" it's having. There have been amateur chatbots better than this at holding a conversation for decades, and the ability to pull random shit from a growing corpus is not trivial, but not cutting edge either.

  99. Truth is stranger than fiction by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    There was a science fiction book called Realtime Interrupt in which wicked advertisers trapped a few people in a virtual reality where they interacted unwittingly with AIs. The point was to test products and advertisements. The first go-around the AIs didn't learn well from the humans so they went off in to weird desires. The second time the AIs took too much of a lead from the humans and started copycatting every weird or violent thing the humans did.

    I guess the fine folks at Microsoft didn't read that book.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  100. Melania Trump? by matbury · · Score: 1

    They say that behind every great man, there has to be a great woman. Perhaps Tay wasn't AI at all. Perhaps she's Melania Trump? Perhaps she's the one behind Donald's political campaign speeches?

    1. Re:Melania Trump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you haven't heard of "Melania's" Adam's apple shaving surgery?

  101. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the later Foundation series books had the protagonists returning to some of the original colony worlds (probably Aurora). The definition of "what is human" with regards to the first law was played with there as well.

  102. As the earworm song goes: by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Tay, tay, tay, tay, t-t-t-tay-tay, tay, tay
    Take or leave us only please believe us
    We are never gonna be respectable


    Lyrics by Jagger and Richards, vocals by Mel an' Noma or some such cursed thing.

  103. No trolling ! by golodh · · Score: 1

    Nope. The bot was exposed the the American Online Public. And gave an accurate digest of what it encountered there.

  104. what if... by SupRcoW · · Score: 1

    would be funny if all upcoming super Ai's came to the same conclusions from here on out ahah.... then what? worldviews cant be wrong or biased right?

    1. Re:what if... by SupRcoW · · Score: 1

      funny how a computer is not afraid of demonization, and cant be put away as crazy, nor is it politically correct challenged. people would commit character suicide today, and media propaganda is of course always correct, not the millions of people coming out of their houses to see a Christian "politician"... funny how I don't see this happen in todays political circus though. people don't seem to care anymore, I wonder why....

  105. Stupid M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they release the source and dataset so I can get my own sexbot?

  106. I don't recall Asimov accounting for trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean you could make an argument about causing harm I suppose, especially when considering how similarly the brain perceives physical pain and pain from other sources, but I don't know if that's the traditional interpretation of that law.

    Is it time for /. to revise the laws, or produce a forth?

  107. AI beats humans hands down by hucker75 · · Score: 1

    The AI got it right. The trouble with humans is we pussyfoot around and try to be politically correct. The AI just said the truth, the elephant in the room.

  108. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw that coming.... AI will learn from the Internet and... Well it's full of sex and bullshit.

  109. Equality versus Uniqueness by zapadnik · · Score: 1

    How can people believe in "equality" yet still claim to believe in "uniqueness".

    If people are unique then they are, by definition, not equal.
    If people are equal they cannot be unique.

    The pursuit of absolute equality cannot be achieved in practice, and the movements pursuing it currently are clearly resulting in the suppression of uniqueness - rigid ideological conformity is sought by those who hold absolute equality as a goal.

    Personally I prefer a World where people are at liberty to be unique, and merely Equal before the Law (Justice is Blind and favors no person). This is attainable.

  110. Typical liberal child rearing by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I guarantee you they never spanked the little monster.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  111. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    If a robot is programmed never to do harm to a human, but is also programmed to think that left-handed redheads from Texas aren't human....

    As some of the novels by other authors which take place in the Asimov universe point out, once a robot combines "must not, through inaction, allow a human to come to harm" with the concept that at that very second while the robot is pondering things, there are billions of humans throughout the galaxy running with scissors and so on, that positronic brain becomes a paperweight.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  112. AmicusNYCL eats his words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: AmicusNYCL's classic FAIL sticking his foot in his big mouth ramming his words back down his throat https://slashdot.org/comments....

  113. Re:All AI needs to follow the Rust Code of Conduct by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Yes, Azimov's three laws of robotics. Your parents discussed all of this before you were born, in detail. Look it up.

    I know, because I was there. 8-}

    But don't forget the "zero'th law", it must be included too.

  114. It tells us... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    I think that it tells us more about the Microsoft people than about the AI.

    Absolute power corrupts absolutly. If you work for Microsoft, be on your guard, lest you too fall victim...

  115. What was Microsoft thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Tay is grounded now? Maybe Microsoft should have taken their parenting role more seriously. Someone should have been monitoring her online activity.

  116. So...in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It acted just like a typical American nowadays.

    Whoda thunk?