Oddly enough it is good as it points out the nature of such stories. The magazines that publish them, the nothing companies http://aimgroup.com/ that produce them and who in the background is actually paying for them.
/. is often really good and digging to the root of a story and laying bear all the bullshit within.
I often get the feeling that this is the goal of a lot of those kinds of postings and it is put out by the editors as a fun puzzle to be solved, that often gives rise to a new story about what was uncovered.
In this case an add for a oh my god only $399.00 report http://aimgroup.com/buy/2010/04/26/craigslist-2010-122-million-estimated-revenue-purchase/, ooh, now with a $4 discount only $395 according to the front page of a rather lame website (I hate to be cruel, but if your gonna sell reports for that kind of money your web site should look like it cost more than that to create, it's a marketing thing).
Does google docs audit and track all changes by users in documents or is it food for corporate political wars as users attempt to bugger up parts of a document that are other people's responsibilities and how readily accessible is it.
Also does google warrant the security of documents in the cloud with realistic values implicit with regard to, say tender documents were leaked information could be readily worth millions of dollars. None of this beta crap and your tender documents are readily search able by all of your competitors.
Yeah, I know, computer software the inventors of the utterly meaningless warranty, it is really high time that software companies were forced by law to align their marketing with their warranties.
Zoom in on a JPEG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jpg and find what ever the hell you want to find. Compression routines can generate all kinds of random artefacts and defects. What to see how really badly jpeg can futz things up, get any highly detailed black and white vector drawing and then run it through JPEG compression and see what you end up with.
The real problem here is cross international boundary signal jamming by Libya, that is bordering upon an act of war, really, really dangerous stuff. Definitely stop or the jamming sources will be targeted stuff.
If you have problems within your borders, you are responsible for keeping it within your borders, failure to do so, means they neighbouring countries are eligible to seek resolution to those now external problems.
You obviously are blind to how low a horizontally opposed engine can be. Nor optimal seating position, legs to butt. In open design there is no feature creep, there is no commitment, you can stop at any stage or explore alternates. Feature creep is post contract, where the big profit margins are, anything between 100% and 1000% and it doesn't happen by accident in military purchases it is largely corruption driven.
So smart design is to do exactly what the automotive manufacturers do, a modularise everything and have many alternate competing sources of supply but hey, we all know that is not the true function of the US military industrial complex (of course the contractor still does it to maximise their profits).
Sure there is, it's called hard wired and air gap with no portable media drives or connectors. Absolutely never ever anything on wireless in the hands of politicians. The whole thing must be some way early April fools joke. No who the hell is the politicians responsible for looking for stupid ways to throw away lots of money, on grossly overpriced under performing technology.
However the safest place for Assange to resist extradition is the country where he is a citizen, especially as there is a political divide in government about whether wikileaks is a good or bad thing. The underdog, the battler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aussie_battler is very big in Australian culture and Julian versus the whole US government would be extremely popular, especially after http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hew_Raymond_Griffiths and that took more than three years without much public sympathy (and not after being lied into a war in Iraq), something which those diplomatic would have likely exposed.
Well they broke that principle right out of the gate by locking up the location of the engine, drive, passenger and nature of the vehicle frame. So closed design, with openness seemingly only allowed for pretty body panels and the location of the cup holders.
Reality is for a flexible vehicle the driver and passengers should be as far forward as possible. The motor should be as low as possible, preferably horizontally opposed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_engine, under the driver and passengers butt. with a flat tray extending out from there to the rear of the vehicle. This leaves lots of space for below tray storage beyond the motor.
That flat tray with maximum length, means you can slide on any module your require and then lock it in place. As for driver and passenger survivability, they need to make up the mind, light or heavy, armoured or un-armoured. Armoured tub, you don't need no frame, the armoured tub has everything bolted to it. Tubular frame, then light weight and lots of kevlar and wishful thinking.
Want to open up the design, them 'OPEN UP' the design. Oh yeah and, having driven an ambulance cross country in the military, if it don't have tracks, then you are just fooling yourself and torturing you patients.
Australian polling stations are manned by, electoral officials and members from leading political parties who all monitor the election process http://www.aec.gov.au/ (Federal, there are also state electoral commissions). Add to that elections do not take place on a weekday but on a Saturday ensuring the majority people have much easier access to polling stations not only to vote but also to remain their all day to promote their political party (hand out how to vote pamphlets) or to actively monitor the polling process.
Whilst online voting sounds neat and high tech, it rather defeats the whole process. Voting is all about people, who is seeking to be elected, those that support them and those willing to vote for them. It is the most important social act in a democracy, in fact it is the very seed from which the whole democratic forest grows.
In Australia voting is compulsory and you will be fined for failing to vote and failing to register to vote, logically, as it is the most basic elemental responsibility of every citizen of democracy. Being compulsory also places the onus upon government to ensure voting is fully accessible, whilst electronic voting facilitates this, it would however detract from the important social nature of the democratic contract.
This of course doesn't even touch the inherent risk of mass corruption of election by digital means is far easier, than a multi layered people and paper trail. Taking people from any part of the democratic process seems, well, pointless.
Keep in mind political parties in the UK, Canada and Australia, actually mean something, they are there all the time and do function as the point for members to seek election.
In the US the political parties a hollow marketing memes and have no real existence apart from getting involved in all sorts of shenanigans to block new parties forming and of course to defeat the opposition marketing team.
In the US with candidates being 'elected' in the primaries and with those primaries being pretty much open to all comers. The smart person will ignore the election and focus on those primaries and quite simple get their candidate or more accurately both candidates up for the election.
Really smart as only a very small percentage vote in the primaries making it easier to get your say, Labour Democrat and Green Republican up. It would also make for a very amicable policy based election, with both politically content for the other to win, ego would still play a role.
In the US they have well and truly stacked the deck against any new party attempting to form or to gain any significance. So the only real chance is to flip the primaries on their head and drive out the corporate selections before the election even starts.
The basic principle still stands, to hack a network you basically must exploit a weakness. The ultimate goal of all security experts is to close all weaknesses. You can not exploit what you close, you can not secure what you leave weak. Any security organisation that knowingly leaves citizens exposed to security holes, in order to pursue personal promotions via committing crimes in other countries is in fact acting in a treasonous manner.
The white hate chooses honour and integrity and secures networks, the black hat chooses personal success and leaves discovered security weakness in place so that they can exploit them, for what ever reason and in which ever location the choose.
Your countries espionage White hats would be other countries Black Hats as there are always many more other countries and you would also consider other countries White Hat espionage agents as Black Hats, the numbers are definitely for Black Hats as the appropriate nomenclature.
Time of course to point out the stupid. You also would be giving away dangerous technology that once discovered could and would be used against you. Now to make that even worse, you can not defend against the attack without alerting others to it thus defeating it's value, what can you say but, "the stupid, oh my God, it burns". So not only Black hats but really bloody stupid Black Hats.
Only really acceptable to save money in this manner if the drones are large enough to drop a rescue raft or to act as a rescue raft themselves after making a splash down as near as practicable to the stranded person or persons.
In the case of Facebook there seems to be quite a few negatives in having an account. I don't think a hula hoop denied them a job, got the fired or even got them charged with a crime.
My ex-facebook account got me in trouble with family. I just logged on originally to view one political party web site and ignored it from then on. This managed to offend several family members who were aggrieved at my lack of response.
That whole rigmarole of wiping out an unused Facebook account is a real hassle, in fact it is the worst one I have ever come across, thanks to that privacy invasive ass hat Zuckerberg.
However that is the real problem, The alleged copyright infringement occurred in China not in the US. For the civil suit to proceed that US must now claim their laws take precedence over the China's laws within China.
For the judge to accept the case is stupid, as any attempt to claim money will result in a major legal dispute, which will inevitably be lost.
Any claims can only be made in the US for copyright infringement that occurs within the US. So the response by the government of China was the appropriate response.
It can not be considered child pornography, as only the lyrics were different. The only thing they can really go for is invading the privacy of children, in publishing the video without the consent of the parents, especially in an altered format. Overall a pretty stupid thing to do. Of course if he had permission of the parents to publish the video, then of course no problem.
Mobile phones can never be as powerful as desktops. Power and capability are dependent upon the full experience. So screen real estate 24 inch screen versus, well, what ever and input devices, full size keyboard, joystick, mouse and of course mass storage.
Mobile phones can not even match net books, for the same reason.
Mobile is stuck until you have a virtual overlay, via glasses over reality and input devices to match and, those glasses are treated in much the same manner as shoes today, protection and comfort as well as interaction.
Trusting that to modern corporations is of course another matter, their greed far outweighs their concerns about our safety, in fact our safety is considered a cost burden forced upon the by big government, psychopathic insanity.
You are subscribing to that publisher. If you got actual hard copy you would supply name, address, postal address, telephone number, postcode, state and credit card details. All apple is doing is hiding your details for it's own benefit to on sell adding a little bonus on top of that thirty percent.
For the publisher it is terrible there just left with a whole bunch of apple subscriptions with no idea if they are doing well in any particular region, if they need to change content to more accurate target their desired audience or if they need to include more content from certain regions, unless of course if they pay more money to apple for that data (rent only, not buy).
So reality is publishers best option, loudly and often shout, Apple sucks, don't buy apple, Apple is overpriced, and the publisher is far better off financially.
It still all fails, as it only cover people releasing data in the US. Once the data is released over seas by a non-US citizens the scope of US law is extinguished, unless the US is going to categorical state that it's Laws take precedence over all other countries laws within their own boundaries, a literal pre-warning of declaring war against the rest of the world should they fail to obey.
Now for example if countries overseas catch, US spies and informers, and declare and try them, is the US stating those countries have committed a crime against the US for doing so. One step further from current laws where US spies and informers are legally free to break others countries up to and including mass murder, including supposedly allied countries.
So if Julian Assange were to release the name of a US intelligence operative stealing data or corrupting Australia politics in Australia, would the US, demand Julian Assange's extradition for being a loyal Australian citizen.
Er, excuse it is due process only so long as they adhere to the warrant. They failed to adhere to the warrant and failed in due diligence to follow due process. So they are guilty of committing the crime of interfering with a computer network, as they had no legal jurisdiction to do so and should be liable for criminal charges as well as civil suit. Tee hee, whoops, we goofed, tee hee, does not serve justice.
It like all those no knock warrants where they go raid and shoot the people next door by mistake and say justified shooting because they heard gunshots, their own guns shots and somehow this being accepted as due process and justified shooting (they were scared by all the noises they were making, ergo, licence to kill). In this case the also end up paying millions in civil court but in a wholly uncivilised manner justice is completely abandoned for convenience.
I did not mention Arabs, as a citizen of the commonwealth, my interest was the way Jewish insurgents that went on to form the apartheid State of Israel, treated British soldiers, especially after those British soldiers has fought a war, paying a huge price, that resulted in liberating those people who were now murdering them.
Now what if the British empire had reacted to those terrorist insurgents as the apartheid state of Israel reacts to non-Jewish Palestinians in their own land.
Your referral to Muslim Palestinians as Arabs obviously reflects a guilty conscience. It seems that you are stating that the British should have treated Jewish Palestinians and Jewish insurgents from Europe, in the same manner as the Apartheid State of Israel treats Muslim Palestinians and that it would have been justified to do so.
Which is first the chicken or the egg. I think if all the tech and gadget magazines are looking a losing 30 percent of the subscription revenue permanently, the might decide apple sucks big time and endeavour to convince their subscribers of that. One useful tactic is straight up add 30 percent to the subscription price if they subscribe via apple and blame apple for it.
If a marketing company is described as shite by all it's advertising points, as far as marketing driven customers are concerned it is shite.
The concept is stupid straight off the bat. Why would a computer need to be trusted if it is not connected to the internet.
The reality is the only thing that needs to be secured is the connection point to the internet. A secured router firewall that blocks bad traffic incoming and outgoing. It can even be configured to scan computers connecting to it for viruses et al.
Form the M$ point of view it is all about trying to become the only trusted OS. For years M$ has being trying to export the idea of locked down computing xbox style to PC upon a compulsory basis using embedded hardware to force payment.
It would seem a terrorist territory, born of violence has simply continued down that path. Yes I know, it's all their fault for complaining and seeking assistance from neighbouring territories when they were being herded into reservation and camps, those Muslim Palestinians should have just gone quietly off to the camps like, hmm, it would seem that the abused became the abusers.
Slashdot Mirror
Oddly enough it is good as it points out the nature of such stories. The magazines that publish them, the nothing companies http://aimgroup.com/ that produce them and who in the background is actually paying for them.
I often get the feeling that this is the goal of a lot of those kinds of postings and it is put out by the editors as a fun puzzle to be solved, that often gives rise to a new story about what was uncovered.
In this case an add for a oh my god only $399.00 report http://aimgroup.com/buy/2010/04/26/craigslist-2010-122-million-estimated-revenue-purchase/, ooh, now with a $4 discount only $395 according to the front page of a rather lame website (I hate to be cruel, but if your gonna sell reports for that kind of money your web site should look like it cost more than that to create, it's a marketing thing).
Does google docs audit and track all changes by users in documents or is it food for corporate political wars as users attempt to bugger up parts of a document that are other people's responsibilities and how readily accessible is it.
Also does google warrant the security of documents in the cloud with realistic values implicit with regard to, say tender documents were leaked information could be readily worth millions of dollars. None of this beta crap and your tender documents are readily search able by all of your competitors.
Yeah, I know, computer software the inventors of the utterly meaningless warranty, it is really high time that software companies were forced by law to align their marketing with their warranties.
Zoom in on a JPEG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jpg and find what ever the hell you want to find. Compression routines can generate all kinds of random artefacts and defects. What to see how really badly jpeg can futz things up, get any highly detailed black and white vector drawing and then run it through JPEG compression and see what you end up with.
The real problem here is cross international boundary signal jamming by Libya, that is bordering upon an act of war, really, really dangerous stuff. Definitely stop or the jamming sources will be targeted stuff.
If you have problems within your borders, you are responsible for keeping it within your borders, failure to do so, means they neighbouring countries are eligible to seek resolution to those now external problems.
You obviously are blind to how low a horizontally opposed engine can be. Nor optimal seating position, legs to butt. In open design there is no feature creep, there is no commitment, you can stop at any stage or explore alternates. Feature creep is post contract, where the big profit margins are, anything between 100% and 1000% and it doesn't happen by accident in military purchases it is largely corruption driven.
So smart design is to do exactly what the automotive manufacturers do, a modularise everything and have many alternate competing sources of supply but hey, we all know that is not the true function of the US military industrial complex (of course the contractor still does it to maximise their profits).
Sure there is, it's called hard wired and air gap with no portable media drives or connectors. Absolutely never ever anything on wireless in the hands of politicians. The whole thing must be some way early April fools joke. No who the hell is the politicians responsible for looking for stupid ways to throw away lots of money, on grossly overpriced under performing technology.
However the safest place for Assange to resist extradition is the country where he is a citizen, especially as there is a political divide in government about whether wikileaks is a good or bad thing. The underdog, the battler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aussie_battler is very big in Australian culture and Julian versus the whole US government would be extremely popular, especially after http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hew_Raymond_Griffiths and that took more than three years without much public sympathy (and not after being lied into a war in Iraq), something which those diplomatic would have likely exposed.
Well they broke that principle right out of the gate by locking up the location of the engine, drive, passenger and nature of the vehicle frame. So closed design, with openness seemingly only allowed for pretty body panels and the location of the cup holders.
Reality is for a flexible vehicle the driver and passengers should be as far forward as possible. The motor should be as low as possible, preferably horizontally opposed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_engine, under the driver and passengers butt. with a flat tray extending out from there to the rear of the vehicle. This leaves lots of space for below tray storage beyond the motor.
That flat tray with maximum length, means you can slide on any module your require and then lock it in place. As for driver and passenger survivability, they need to make up the mind, light or heavy, armoured or un-armoured. Armoured tub, you don't need no frame, the armoured tub has everything bolted to it. Tubular frame, then light weight and lots of kevlar and wishful thinking.
Want to open up the design, them 'OPEN UP' the design. Oh yeah and, having driven an ambulance cross country in the military, if it don't have tracks, then you are just fooling yourself and torturing you patients.
Australian polling stations are manned by, electoral officials and members from leading political parties who all monitor the election process http://www.aec.gov.au/ (Federal, there are also state electoral commissions). Add to that elections do not take place on a weekday but on a Saturday ensuring the majority people have much easier access to polling stations not only to vote but also to remain their all day to promote their political party (hand out how to vote pamphlets) or to actively monitor the polling process.
Whilst online voting sounds neat and high tech, it rather defeats the whole process. Voting is all about people, who is seeking to be elected, those that support them and those willing to vote for them. It is the most important social act in a democracy, in fact it is the very seed from which the whole democratic forest grows.
In Australia voting is compulsory and you will be fined for failing to vote and failing to register to vote, logically, as it is the most basic elemental responsibility of every citizen of democracy. Being compulsory also places the onus upon government to ensure voting is fully accessible, whilst electronic voting facilitates this, it would however detract from the important social nature of the democratic contract.
This of course doesn't even touch the inherent risk of mass corruption of election by digital means is far easier, than a multi layered people and paper trail. Taking people from any part of the democratic process seems, well, pointless.
Keep in mind political parties in the UK, Canada and Australia, actually mean something, they are there all the time and do function as the point for members to seek election.
In the US the political parties a hollow marketing memes and have no real existence apart from getting involved in all sorts of shenanigans to block new parties forming and of course to defeat the opposition marketing team.
In the US with candidates being 'elected' in the primaries and with those primaries being pretty much open to all comers. The smart person will ignore the election and focus on those primaries and quite simple get their candidate or more accurately both candidates up for the election.
Really smart as only a very small percentage vote in the primaries making it easier to get your say, Labour Democrat and Green Republican up. It would also make for a very amicable policy based election, with both politically content for the other to win, ego would still play a role.
In the US they have well and truly stacked the deck against any new party attempting to form or to gain any significance. So the only real chance is to flip the primaries on their head and drive out the corporate selections before the election even starts.
The basic principle still stands, to hack a network you basically must exploit a weakness. The ultimate goal of all security experts is to close all weaknesses. You can not exploit what you close, you can not secure what you leave weak. Any security organisation that knowingly leaves citizens exposed to security holes, in order to pursue personal promotions via committing crimes in other countries is in fact acting in a treasonous manner.
The white hate chooses honour and integrity and secures networks, the black hat chooses personal success and leaves discovered security weakness in place so that they can exploit them, for what ever reason and in which ever location the choose.
Your countries espionage White hats would be other countries Black Hats as there are always many more other countries and you would also consider other countries White Hat espionage agents as Black Hats, the numbers are definitely for Black Hats as the appropriate nomenclature.
Time of course to point out the stupid. You also would be giving away dangerous technology that once discovered could and would be used against you. Now to make that even worse, you can not defend against the attack without alerting others to it thus defeating it's value, what can you say but, "the stupid, oh my God, it burns". So not only Black hats but really bloody stupid Black Hats.
Only really acceptable to save money in this manner if the drones are large enough to drop a rescue raft or to act as a rescue raft themselves after making a splash down as near as practicable to the stranded person or persons.
In the case of Facebook there seems to be quite a few negatives in having an account. I don't think a hula hoop denied them a job, got the fired or even got them charged with a crime.
My ex-facebook account got me in trouble with family. I just logged on originally to view one political party web site and ignored it from then on. This managed to offend several family members who were aggrieved at my lack of response.
That whole rigmarole of wiping out an unused Facebook account is a real hassle, in fact it is the worst one I have ever come across, thanks to that privacy invasive ass hat Zuckerberg.
However that is the real problem, The alleged copyright infringement occurred in China not in the US. For the civil suit to proceed that US must now claim their laws take precedence over the China's laws within China.
For the judge to accept the case is stupid, as any attempt to claim money will result in a major legal dispute, which will inevitably be lost.
Any claims can only be made in the US for copyright infringement that occurs within the US. So the response by the government of China was the appropriate response.
It can not be considered child pornography, as only the lyrics were different. The only thing they can really go for is invading the privacy of children, in publishing the video without the consent of the parents, especially in an altered format. Overall a pretty stupid thing to do. Of course if he had permission of the parents to publish the video, then of course no problem.
Mobile phones can never be as powerful as desktops. Power and capability are dependent upon the full experience. So screen real estate 24 inch screen versus, well, what ever and input devices, full size keyboard, joystick, mouse and of course mass storage.
Mobile phones can not even match net books, for the same reason.
Mobile is stuck until you have a virtual overlay, via glasses over reality and input devices to match and, those glasses are treated in much the same manner as shoes today, protection and comfort as well as interaction.
Trusting that to modern corporations is of course another matter, their greed far outweighs their concerns about our safety, in fact our safety is considered a cost burden forced upon the by big government, psychopathic insanity.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. If you seek to generate income by invading the privacy of others then expect yours to be invaded for free.
Privacy is a two way street and when it comes to minors, of course it should be compulsory.
Only those with out net neutrality laws. You buy the bandwidth and what you do with it is your business, unless you are breaking the law.
You are subscribing to that publisher. If you got actual hard copy you would supply name, address, postal address, telephone number, postcode, state and credit card details. All apple is doing is hiding your details for it's own benefit to on sell adding a little bonus on top of that thirty percent.
For the publisher it is terrible there just left with a whole bunch of apple subscriptions with no idea if they are doing well in any particular region, if they need to change content to more accurate target their desired audience or if they need to include more content from certain regions, unless of course if they pay more money to apple for that data (rent only, not buy).
So reality is publishers best option, loudly and often shout, Apple sucks, don't buy apple, Apple is overpriced, and the publisher is far better off financially.
It still all fails, as it only cover people releasing data in the US. Once the data is released over seas by a non-US citizens the scope of US law is extinguished, unless the US is going to categorical state that it's Laws take precedence over all other countries laws within their own boundaries, a literal pre-warning of declaring war against the rest of the world should they fail to obey.
Now for example if countries overseas catch, US spies and informers, and declare and try them, is the US stating those countries have committed a crime against the US for doing so. One step further from current laws where US spies and informers are legally free to break others countries up to and including mass murder, including supposedly allied countries.
So if Julian Assange were to release the name of a US intelligence operative stealing data or corrupting Australia politics in Australia, would the US, demand Julian Assange's extradition for being a loyal Australian citizen.
Er, excuse it is due process only so long as they adhere to the warrant. They failed to adhere to the warrant and failed in due diligence to follow due process. So they are guilty of committing the crime of interfering with a computer network, as they had no legal jurisdiction to do so and should be liable for criminal charges as well as civil suit. Tee hee, whoops, we goofed, tee hee, does not serve justice.
It like all those no knock warrants where they go raid and shoot the people next door by mistake and say justified shooting because they heard gunshots, their own guns shots and somehow this being accepted as due process and justified shooting (they were scared by all the noises they were making, ergo, licence to kill). In this case the also end up paying millions in civil court but in a wholly uncivilised manner justice is completely abandoned for convenience.
I did not mention Arabs, as a citizen of the commonwealth, my interest was the way Jewish insurgents that went on to form the apartheid State of Israel, treated British soldiers, especially after those British soldiers has fought a war, paying a huge price, that resulted in liberating those people who were now murdering them.
Now what if the British empire had reacted to those terrorist insurgents as the apartheid state of Israel reacts to non-Jewish Palestinians in their own land.
Your referral to Muslim Palestinians as Arabs obviously reflects a guilty conscience. It seems that you are stating that the British should have treated Jewish Palestinians and Jewish insurgents from Europe, in the same manner as the Apartheid State of Israel treats Muslim Palestinians and that it would have been justified to do so.
Which is first the chicken or the egg. I think if all the tech and gadget magazines are looking a losing 30 percent of the subscription revenue permanently, the might decide apple sucks big time and endeavour to convince their subscribers of that. One useful tactic is straight up add 30 percent to the subscription price if they subscribe via apple and blame apple for it.
If a marketing company is described as shite by all it's advertising points, as far as marketing driven customers are concerned it is shite.
The concept is stupid straight off the bat. Why would a computer need to be trusted if it is not connected to the internet.
The reality is the only thing that needs to be secured is the connection point to the internet. A secured router firewall that blocks bad traffic incoming and outgoing. It can even be configured to scan computers connecting to it for viruses et al.
Form the M$ point of view it is all about trying to become the only trusted OS. For years M$ has being trying to export the idea of locked down computing xbox style to PC upon a compulsory basis using embedded hardware to force payment.
You couldn't possibly be referring to this terrorist group http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irgun. You know those huys that were murdering and blowing up British soldiers in Palestine, hmm, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks, bloody long list of terrorist attacks.
It would seem a terrorist territory, born of violence has simply continued down that path. Yes I know, it's all their fault for complaining and seeking assistance from neighbouring territories when they were being herded into reservation and camps, those Muslim Palestinians should have just gone quietly off to the camps like, hmm, it would seem that the abused became the abusers.