Laws are by and large still in effect, and we're not gassing women and children.
Or at least none who were of any consequence.
(Excerpt from The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Page 634784, Section 5a, Entry: Magrathea)
Many men of course became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural and nothing to be ashamed of because no one was really poor--at least no one worth speaking of.
They can demand access to or confiscate any potential data storage device. That can even include a custom knitted sweater if they think the pattern of stitches is a method of illicitly encoding data. Imagine what they'd think about flying with a replica of The Doctor's 40-foot scarf, especially if neither end of your flight involved cold weather!
They won't confiscate your skin for having tattoos applied overseas, but expect them to take pictures of your body for later analysis, Scofield.
At the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, in the Student Union on the main campus (not East Campus), there is still a bank of pay telephones under one of which is a large metal box with a single LED on it, still there even after the remodel since I was a student there. One day between classes I observed someone using that particular pay phone and seeing the LED on that box alternately flickering in concert with the person's lips, then again presumably in sync with the sound coming from the other end of that call. I've long thought that if I converted that brightness pattern back to sound, I could listen to both ends of the conversation at a distance.
And I also wondered what the purpose of that box truly was.
Given the nature of the movie and the tempo of the song, I imagine(!) the 15 seconds weren't necessarily contiguous and suspect the portions were, "Imagine there's no heaven... and no religion too." I'd argue that 15 seconds is not enough to include to base a fair criticism.
And yeah, I'm just asking for someone to say, "Remember, Ralphie, if you're being sued over Fair Use, it's because you sampled too much... or not enough!"
(I wonder how much one can sample of this movie in another movie criticizing this movie. Could the netiquette-conforming trimmed amount of verbatim quoting in a USENET or other discussion forum posting be a useful metric?)
Isaac Newton knew that any liquid, if put into a shallow container and set spinning, naturally assumes a parabolic shape, the same shape needed by a telescope mirror to bring starlight to a focus.
The only reason I can think that evolution then has not developed this as a vision enhancement is that evolution still hasn't developed the wheel. Otherwise it would be a selected-for survival trait as an aid for detecting predators and prey at greater distances.
"At this moment, the headset only detects the gamer's level of concentration and relaxation by means of a single electrode placed on the forehead"... ONE electrode... magic?
"Let's see now. You've come here from a great distance.... You want me to buy a subscription to the Saturday Evening Post!"
...unless someone saves that as a separate layer. PNG or JPG only!
I don't know about PNG, but I believe JPG can also contain more image pixels than are actually displayed. I know for certain GIF can. Simply put, the image can be bigger than the viewport in which it is displayed, or even simpler, the image is overscanned. Some image views can expand the viewport revealing the cropped data. (A certain small underscanned GIF can crash some browsers when they fail to allocate memory for it.)
There's even easier ways on television. First, in standard definition programming, often the censors don't bother pixellating content in the overscan area of the image (within 5% of the edges of the frame, usu. the bottom edge), and they also tend to miss instances where the even and odd fields are of different content (changes to another camera angle). The former revealed nudity on an episode of C|NET in its early years airing on USA Network. The latter revealed nudity of a guest (topless bartender) on Unscrewed with Martin Sargent on G4-TechTV who was otherwise pixelated.
Space Ghost: Wait a minute! Computer, zoom in. [Control monitor zooms in on painting of Golden Gate Bridge on Space Ghost's wall, forming two big blocks] Automated Voice: Enhancing. [Image becomes one big yellow block] Automated Voice: Enhancing complete. Space Ghost: That's the bridge I painted. It's like they filmed this tape recording in an exact replica of my apartment. Wait a minute! They must be in my apartment! But wait a minute... Automated Voice: Yellow. Space Ghost: How'm I gonna get in there? Automated Voice: Block. Space Ghost: Wait a minute. I have the keys. Perfect!
You can fit a Burger King [ad] into Iron Man and play it off as a quirky character moment, but you can't really shill for, well, anything in something like The Hobbit.
Indeed, that's one of the things that ruined my enjoyment of sequels to The Neverending Story: fantasy characters talking about microwave ovens.
How can a person stand against government electronic surveillance while at the same time say the behavior of this individual is acceptable?
How can a person (or government) stand for government electronic surveillance while at the same time say the behavior of this individual is unacceptable?
Slashdot Mirror
Let's see, poster's name is "casualsax3," so...
So he's only the third person on Slashdot to think up that pun for a username?
(Actually, there is no casualsax2, casualsax1, or casualsax without a number on Slashdot.)
if BHO gets in.
You just gave me an idea for a line of "BHO knows" political T-shirts.
Laws are by and large still in effect, and we're not gassing women and children.
Or at least none who were of any consequence.
(Excerpt from The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Page 634784, Section 5a, Entry: Magrathea)
Many men of course became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural and nothing to be ashamed of because no one was really poor--at least no one worth speaking of.
They can demand access to or confiscate any potential data storage device. That can even include a custom knitted sweater if they think the pattern of stitches is a method of illicitly encoding data. Imagine what they'd think about flying with a replica of The Doctor's 40-foot scarf, especially if neither end of your flight involved cold weather!
They won't confiscate your skin for having tattoos applied overseas, but expect them to take pictures of your body for later analysis, Scofield.
To see changes over time wouldn't they need two disparate inspections separated by time?
Are they imaging drives on departure from and arrival to the US and running a diff?
At the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, in the Student Union on the main campus (not East Campus), there is still a bank of pay telephones under one of which is a large metal box with a single LED on it, still there even after the remodel since I was a student there. One day between classes I observed someone using that particular pay phone and seeing the LED on that box alternately flickering in concert with the person's lips, then again presumably in sync with the sound coming from the other end of that call. I've long thought that if I converted that brightness pattern back to sound, I could listen to both ends of the conversation at a distance.
And I also wondered what the purpose of that box truly was.
Given the nature of the movie and the tempo of the song, I imagine(!) the 15 seconds weren't necessarily contiguous and suspect the portions were, "Imagine there's no heaven... and no religion too." I'd argue that 15 seconds is not enough to include to base a fair criticism.
And yeah, I'm just asking for someone to say, "Remember, Ralphie, if you're being sued over Fair Use, it's because you sampled too much... or not enough!"
(I wonder how much one can sample of this movie in another movie criticizing this movie. Could the netiquette-conforming trimmed amount of verbatim quoting in a USENET or other discussion forum posting be a useful metric?)
Isaac Newton knew that any liquid, if put into a shallow container and set spinning, naturally assumes a parabolic shape, the same shape needed by a telescope mirror to bring starlight to a focus.
The only reason I can think that evolution then has not developed this as a vision enhancement is that evolution still hasn't developed the wheel. Otherwise it would be a selected-for survival trait as an aid for detecting predators and prey at greater distances.
Plumbum?
"At this moment, the headset only detects the gamer's level of concentration and relaxation by means of a single electrode placed on the forehead"... ONE electrode... magic?
"Let's see now. You've come here from a great distance.... You want me to buy a subscription to the Saturday Evening Post!"
How about a pair of red stars with the words "Girls Gone Wild" written on them?
Make sure what you're obscuring isn't also reflected in the chrome grill of the semi cab behind her. (They actually missed that for months.)
...unless someone saves that as a separate layer. PNG or JPG only!
I don't know about PNG, but I believe JPG can also contain more image pixels than are actually displayed. I know for certain GIF can. Simply put, the image can be bigger than the viewport in which it is displayed, or even simpler, the image is overscanned. Some image views can expand the viewport revealing the cropped data. (A certain small underscanned GIF can crash some browsers when they fail to allocate memory for it.)
There's even easier ways on television. First, in standard definition programming, often the censors don't bother pixellating content in the overscan area of the image (within 5% of the edges of the frame, usu. the bottom edge), and they also tend to miss instances where the even and odd fields are of different content (changes to another camera angle). The former revealed nudity on an episode of C|NET in its early years airing on USA Network. The latter revealed nudity of a guest (topless bartender) on Unscrewed with Martin Sargent on G4-TechTV who was otherwise pixelated.
... Except when you leave the black rectangle as a separate layer.
Or draw the black rectangle using Word's image drawing tools, or in a vector image file, and leave the actual text underneath.
Or you forget to delete the embedded unaltered EXIF thumbnail data.
Space Ghost: Wait a minute! Computer, zoom in.
[Control monitor zooms in on painting of Golden Gate Bridge on Space Ghost's wall, forming two big blocks]
Automated Voice: Enhancing.
[Image becomes one big yellow block]
Automated Voice: Enhancing complete.
Space Ghost: That's the bridge I painted. It's like they filmed this tape recording in an exact replica of my apartment. Wait a minute! They must be in my apartment! But wait a minute...
Automated Voice: Yellow.
Space Ghost: How'm I gonna get in there?
Automated Voice: Block.
Space Ghost: Wait a minute. I have the keys. Perfect!
Traveling at a speed of 800 kelicams per rel.
Tried that, nix. So far I haven't found a brand of candy that glows under UV.
Darn. Would have been good, especially for Gummy Worms.
Have you checked SweetTarts Sours or other sour candies? That outer sour coating might twinkle.
I guess for glowing under UV you'll need something with a UV-reactive wrapper.
Is it libel when its printed in a database? Is there an establishing precedent?
GFP is a protein, gummy bears on the other hand are completely inorganic goo.
They're a gelatinous suspension of sugar. As you saying sugar is inorganic?
(Actually, in most US states they're probably high fructose corn syrup.)
You can fit a Burger King [ad] into Iron Man and play it off as a quirky character moment, but you can't really shill for, well, anything in something like The Hobbit.
Indeed, that's one of the things that ruined my enjoyment of sequels to The Neverending Story: fantasy characters talking about microwave ovens.
any green glowing food coming for halloween?
Gummy Bears under blacklights?
Well if you watched law & order last night...
Last night's Law & Order (SVU) was pre-empted by a live presidential debate, you insensitive west-coaster.
ol.loweralpha { list-style-type: lower-alpha; }
This is the dumbest crime ever.
la cocoracha!
The chocolate-roach?
How can a person stand against government electronic surveillance while at the same time say the behavior of this individual is acceptable?
How can a person (or government) stand for government electronic surveillance while at the same time say the behavior of this individual is unacceptable?
Pics or it did[n't] happen.
Fixed it for Schrödinger.