Slashdot Mirror


Tips For Taking Your Laptop Into and Out of the US?

casualsax3 writes "I'm going to be taking a week long round trip from NYC to Puerto Vallarta Mexico sometime next month, and I was planning on taking my laptop with me. I'll probably want to rip a few movies and albums to the drive in order to keep busy on the flight. More important though, is that I'm also going to be taking pictures while I'm there, and storing them on the laptop. With everything in the news, I'm concerned that I'll have to show someone around the internals of my laptop coming back into the US. The pictures are potentially what upsets me the most, as I feel it's an incredible violation of my privacy. Do I actually need to worry about this? If so, should I go about hiding everything? I've heard good things about Truecrypt. Is it worth looking into or am I being overly paranoid?"

940 comments

  1. If you're that worried... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...encrypt it. Full disk encryption is relatively cheap, easy, and unobtrusive.

    You gave one such example in your post.

    But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

    1. Re:If you're that worried... by vwjeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Make sure you have a backup of the pictures before you enter the US. Secure online storage is cheap. You can refuse to give them the password but they can take your laptop for "analysis."

    2. Re:If you're that worried... by asdir · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to briefing my boss gave me recently, Truecrypt would not help: If they really wanted to see your content they could ask you to show it to them or alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves. The latter would mean you would probably not see your laptop again.
      Let me tell you: As a European scientist I am even more frigthened now to go or even move to the US.

    3. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what kind of pictures he is taking.

      Encrypt the entire hard drive.. Or.. email the pictures home...

      Do not give them the password.
      They can take the notebook, and they will never get the information on it and just send it back to you.

    4. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good advice. Get up on the Truecrypt. It's freeware. Set up an encrypted container file, and just keep it unmounted. Good to go.

    5. Re:If you're that worried... by do_kev · · Score: 1

      If your laptop gets seized and searched, and they discover it's encrypted, couldn't they just order you to give them access to the files?

      If you're really that worried, it seems like a safer bet just to make sure that you don't have anything that you need to hide.

    6. Re:If you're that worried... by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...encrypt it. Full disk encryption is relatively cheap, easy, and unobtrusive.

      And ineffective, unless your privacy is worth more than the cost to piss them off and have to replace your laptop.

    7. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      It shouldn't matter what kind of pictures he takes. It is none of their business.

    8. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      Ohh c'mon... the guy's going to mexico. There's only one answer: DONKEY SHOW! *ducks and hides*

    9. Re:If you're that worried... by QCompson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      A subtle "if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear" poke. Haha.

      It doesn't matter what kind of pictures he takes with him on vacation. He doesn't want a bunch of random law enforcement officials looking at his private pictures. Understandably.

    10. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, poster's name is "casualsax3," so...

    11. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think Tijuana without those pesky "laws"

    12. Re:If you're that worried... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      When it comes down to it, the best defense is to have nothing on the laptop that you don't want them to have access to. It's the same as not carrying anything in your briefcase you wouldn't want them to see. Full disk encryption will work, but then they could force you to type in the password, etc. If you want to fight the intrusiveness and fight for your privacy, then good for you, full disk encryption and refusing to type in the password will work for you. If you just want to get through fast without getting hassled, then bring a laptop with nothing on it but the essentials (assuming your business won't get you landed in jail), let them do their thing, and go through.

    13. Re:If you're that worried... by mozumder · · Score: 1

      They'll ask you for the decrypt password. If you don't give it, they can seize laptop.

      We need a distress-key decrypt password system that unlocks a false filesystem when ordered to decrypt.

    14. Re:If you're that worried... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Truecrypt would not help: If they really wanted to see your content they could ask you to show it to them or alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves.

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      As for the US government just decrypting the colume themselves, as far as I know they simply don't have that capability. If your boss knows otherwise or has knowledge of ways to defeat Truecrypt's plausible deniability then (s)he should provide some kind of evidence to back that up, otherwise this just sounds like uninformed guesswork or pure tinfoil-hattery.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    15. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which TrueCrypt actually implements. Other problems you want to bring up that we can solve technically or are we just left with political problems now?

    16. Re:If you're that worried... by Popeye04 · · Score: 1

      Actually, just create a file with truecrypt - that way the authorities can see a normal windows (or linux - let them figure that out) system with none of your private stuff unless you moutn the encrypted file - it looks less suspicious that way

      --
      *** Better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt ***
    17. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try not to use Full disk encryption. use a file volume instead. if you use FDE you will have to login at boot time.

      when you get to the border theagent will boot your box, and ask you for any passwords that pop up. if you have a discrete volume somwhere in your /home though, no one would notice it unless they we're going through your content file by file.

      good luck, and yse Truecrypt is a good choice.

    18. Re:If you're that worried... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Full disk encryption is good, but you need an unencrypted dummy OS to throw them off or you'll never see the laptop again.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Store your pictures on a flash drive or burn them to CD, put them in your check-in baggage, delete from laptop. Problem solved.

    20. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with full disk encryption in this situation is that all they have to do is tell you to log in and unlock things. You can certainly say no, and they can still take your laptop, toss your bags, etc. Better for this scenario is to use the virtual-volume method of Truecrypt. Put anything and everything you don't want seen on an encrypted volume, but don't automount it and don't leave a lot of obvious icons lying around. They want to see your machine, you boot up, log into Windows, and they have a vanilla machine to examine. They're happy you cooperated and you reveal nothing.

    21. Re:If you're that worried... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they cannot "sieze your laptop" if you don't give them the encryption password; a strict reading of the policy is that the laptop can be seized in any event, encryption or no. There is NO REQUIREMENT to provide anyone with an encryption password under any circumstances. The existing policy doesn't even speak to encryption. In fact, leading privacy advocates recommend encryption as the most deisrable solution.

      You guys do realize that customs agents at the border have ALWAYS had the right -- without a warrant -- to perform reasonable search and inspection of all physical objects and persons coming into the United States; this policy was designed to expand those longstanding inspection rights to electronic data.

      In its current state, it's a poorly written policy. The fact is, no one is going to look at the contents of your laptop, much less be seizing it. (Do you guys actually travel internationally?)

    22. Re:If you're that worried... by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      Well, there's that, and the fact that no file can be positively identified to be a Truecrypt volume. Until you you give a password it just appears to be random data. High entropy random data, but the guy at the border is looking for a 5 minutes spree tops - I seriously doubt he knows what entropy is let alone enough to check for it.

      If you're that worried create a volume with nearly same size as your system RAM, keep it in a directory with some source code (even write a stupid program that will crash if you want) and just name it "core" or "core.dumped". If asked about it tell them when you were testing your program (that does whatever you want to maekup) it crashed and dumped memory to file. It's probably just corrupted nonsense . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    23. Re:If you're that worried... by Jjeff1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not full disk. If it looks like you're got something to hide, eg anything your average AOL using person wouldn't have on their PC, they'll be all over you. You want to look as much like your typical PC user as possible.

      Use truecrypt with the encrypted volume option. When truecrypt is running you'll see an additional drive letter where you store your documents. When truecrypt isn't running, you just see a file. The file can be anywhere, named anything, say C:\windows\system64.dll.

      Before you hit customs, remove or hide truecrypt.

      It's very unlikely anyone would notice anything out of the ordinary.

      Of course if you're the type of person who's randomly selected for special screening, then you might still be better off uploading the files.

    24. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like TrueCrypt's hidden operating system?

    25. Re:If you're that worried... by martinw89 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I was going to recommend plausible deniability as well.

      Here's a little more info about how it works. Basically, you set up a container and a hidden volume. Each has its own passphrase. To open the hidden volume, you use its passphrase when opening the container. To open the container with dummy data, you type its passphrase. It's very simple and quite hidden if done correctly. To be safe, it's best to access the hidden volume from a live CD so the OS doesn't break your deniability by storing temporary files or "recently accessed documents" etc.

      However, there is one big note of caution. Do not back up the container. Ever. An attacker could look at the change over time and determine there is a hidden volume. That's probably too paranoid for your case but it's worth mentioning.

    26. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah right. Puerto Vallarta is a child molestors destination and your looking to encrypt your pics.

      Get real fool.

    27. Re:If you're that worried... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's only one solution that guarantees that nobody will rifle through your data: don't bring it with you through the border crossing. That's what servers are for... and SSL, or at least SSH/SCP/SFTP.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    28. Re:If you're that worried... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      need a distress-key decrypt password

      truecrypt to the rescue, whether you setup a actual partition, or a file to be mounted as a partition, truecrypt can have multiple passwords that each extract different files, one stats at the end of the partition, the other at the beginning. Since neither algorithm knows the others data exists, filling more than half of your file/partition is risky. since you can also due partitions inside of partitions, you can setup as many distress passwords (ie put text files with password reminders only you could get...)

    29. Re:If you're that worried... by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Informative

      confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves.

      They could confiscate the laptop, but as for decrypting it? Doubtful. A brute force attack on Rijndael (which is the default for TrueCrypt) is just not worth the effort assuming that it can even be done. As far as is publicly known Rijndael has not been broken via brute force attack and if the laptop is not in the "on" state when they confiscate it then they are looking at either brute force attack, rubber hose cryptanalysis, or forget it (i.e. you don't have your laptop anymore and they don't have your data). Probably the best solution that I have heard is to have a hidden partition (a feature of TrueCrypt) with the secure operating system and an main unencrypted partition for the public operating system whereby the secure operating system is only booted if a "key" (typically a USB memory module or other USB device) is inserted during the boot process AND then the corresponding password entered at the prompt. That way when the laptop is presented for inspection the public OS is booted automatically (as expected) while there is no indication that a hidden secure OS even exists. The border police on duty likely have no knowledge of TrueCrypt and its various technical modes (that information is above their pay grade) so they won't suspect that there is anything more than meets the eye with regard to your laptop and will simply waive you by.

    30. Re:If you're that worried... by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      Tell him it uses 2 factor authentication that requires the local office to enable the VPN to access the password file.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    31. Re:If you're that worried... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The smart thing to do is stay the hell out of the country. It's not safe. There are systems in place to make a person disappear into a concentration camp forever. Whatever justifications are made for their existence, all it takes is for some small minded official to decide to start the process, and you are totally fucked.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    32. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TSA isn't always understanding when you take naked pictures of Mexican hookers inside your new grow-house.

    33. Re:If you're that worried... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 5, Informative

      If your laptop gets seized and searched, and they discover it's encrypted, couldn't they just order you to give them access to the files?

      No, they cannot order you to provide the keys to decrypt or force you to decrypt the hard drive/files yourself. There was a recent case (I think it was United States v. Boucher) regarding this issue, but here in the U.S. (for the time being) you are not required to aid law enforcement officials in essentially self-incriminate yourself. In the U.K. you are required to hand over your encryption keys if law enforcement demands it, I think--someone correct me if I am wrong there.

    34. Re:If you're that worried... by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      It shouldn't matter what kind of pictures he takes. It is none of their business.

      I think he was more concerned about our amusement than their business.

    35. Re:If you're that worried... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      In the U.K. you are required to hand over your encryption keys if law enforcement demands it, I think--someone correct me if I am wrong there.

      What happens if you take the Bush Administration approach? "I don't recall my pass phrase."

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    36. Re:If you're that worried... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves

      Good luck with that. Even if the Federal Government has the resources to break AES-256 I highly doubt they are going to deploy them to break into casualsax3's laptop. More likely than not it would just be a royal PITA and you'd have to fight to your laptop back.

      I would just store them in an encrypted container and hide it somewhere. From what I've read the border patrol laptop "examination" consists of looking at your recently opened documents and browser bookmarks for kiddie porn. I highly doubt they are going to take the time to scan your hard drive and ask about that strange file of random data buried somewhere......

      If they are you have bigger problems than them looking at your vacation photos.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    37. Re:If you're that worried... by paulatz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it is much easier to bring 2 USB keys to Mexico, move the data on them and send them home via regular mail, separately.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    38. Re:If you're that worried... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no one is going to look at the contents of your laptop

      they're have been over 20 lawsuits filed against US customs for them doing that exact thing (how many didn't sue?). So it is very unlikely the someone from customs will look at your laptop data. But not a absolute by any means.

      Now the likely hood of those outside of US customs (ie a thief or friend, etc) looking at it is infinitely more likely. They may even blackmail you with that data. So it is a very good idea for him to encrypt the incriminating photos,etc and a few other things for kicks. I wouldn't worry about the video files ripped from DVD, at most rename them to something less obvious (for windows just change the extension, they won't even play then) Besides if you watching them on the plane the air Marshall seeing(and caring) you play them is slightly more likely anyway. Since entering the US is the only time you'd see customs just delete them as you watch And empty the recycle bin (restore from backup once home.)

    39. Re:If you're that worried... by Mascot · · Score: 1

      A few dozen others have already chimed in, but I can't help myself.

      Do _not_ fully encrypt the laptop. If you do catch the customs people's eye, you'll end up having to give them the passphrase or let them keep the laptop.

      I suspect hidden encrypted OS is overkill in your case. The simplest is to create a truecrypt container file and put your pictures into that. Name it something plausible and if they poke at it shrug and guess the file's been corrupted somehow.

      One step up the paranoia ladder from that is to create a container with a hidden portion. In the unlikely event they dig around enough to find the Truecrypt container file in the first place, you can just give them the passphrase to the outer layer where you've put some files for show and they'll never know there's a second passphrase unlocking the other part of it.

      Or just upload your pictures to your service of choice and delete them from your laptop before you travel.

      How depressing it is that it's the "land of the free" you need to take these precautions with nowadays.

    40. Re:If you're that worried... by Reece400 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Burn the data to mixed mode disc's & label only the music on the disc for extra obscurity.

    41. Re:If you're that worried... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      So I should put clothes on the hookers before I take pictures inside of my grow-house and post them on Myspace? Good to know.... ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    42. Re:If you're that worried... by rvw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, there is one big note of caution. Do not back up the container. Ever. An attacker could look at the change over time and determine there is a hidden volume. That's probably too paranoid for your case but it's worth mentioning.

      You say an attacker could determine whether there is a hidden volume by comparing two versions of the file. How would they be able to do that? And does this mean they will be able to decypher the password?

    43. Re:If you're that worried... by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2

      ... and SSL, or at least SSH/SCP/SFTP.

      SSH and its related services are SSL, with the addition of a convenient user interface and more direct control over which certificates you choose to trust. You're at least as well off with SSH/etc., security-wise, as you would be with HTTPS.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    44. Re:If you're that worried... by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      its called the 5th amendment rights. Since its not a physical key to like a safe, its something stored in your head. You use your right for a speedy trial on them using military grade encryption they will have to let you go since they won't break it that fast.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Self-incrimination

    45. Re:If you're that worried... by Mike1024 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      Most keen photographers - myself included - have a story or two about being hassled by security guards or police for photographing public buildings. Check out this article for examples. It's for security reasons, you see. I might be planning a terrorist attack.

      You wouldn't want the TSA goons to decide that your photographs seem odd and to give you a full-body cavity search "just in case".

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    46. Re:If you're that worried... by xant · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes he fucking minds. That's the whole point. :-)

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    47. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is not a good idea to lie to border security. Wipe your laptop and install a plain Linux system so that you can show that the computer works. Encrypt your data and transfer it over the internet or by mail.

    48. Re:If you're that worried... by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No they will not get the password, but they will see bits changing in 'Empty space' that will alert them to the presence of a hidden container.

    49. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Such a plan is an invitation for disaster and confiscation. Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag. And if they could decrypt (I believe for many reasons that there isn't such a thing as an unbreakable cypher) your data, why are you angry? Would they steal it? Put it up on a flickr site?

      Yes, the entire program is a total affront to both US Constitutional rights to reasonable search (this isn't), to privacy (yes, we need a real amendment) and just plain human dignity.

      If you have important data, drop it to a DVD. Put that in a separate place. Carry lots of them. Don't look like a terrorist or mad scientist as you go through customs and immigration. Then restore your data as needed. And feel free to make your computer bag as messy as you can.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    50. Re:If you're that worried... by number11 · · Score: 1

      What happens if you take the Bush Administration approach? "I don't recall my pass phrase."

      They (quite reasonably) won't believe that anyone could possibly be that stupid.

      The difference is, members of the regime are not subject to "enhanced" interrogation techniques. (I really do think that Congress dropped the ball on that one.)

    51. Re:If you're that worried... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      Places you went to. Pictures of you in those places. Pictures of things you ate, things you found interesting. Pictures of your kids. Pictures of you with your kids. People in entertainment venues. People in swimsuits. People at their most informal, goofing off, making faces, having fun. All people you know or met, including yourself. These and more.

      How many of these are you OK with customs sifting through? With a foreign or domestic government recording and preserving? How many images do care enough about to keep, but less enough to hand over to complete strangers?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    52. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are systems in place to make a person disappear into a concentration camp forever.

      Alright, back to the basement! Don't forget your shiny tinfoil hat.

    53. Re:If you're that worried... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      I agree that this is one way to go, but I wonder if there isn't a simpler way: store your "private" data in an obscure folder. Chances are, the border police aren't going to have oceans of time to pore over every bit and byte on your system searching for stuff (nor do most of them likely have the technical skills to look deeply into your system), so as long as your laptop appears like a "normal" laptop, I'd be willing to bet you get by.

      For example, if you're running Windows, stick a few pictures in your My Pictures folder, then store the rest of your stuff in C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Components or something like that and just don't act all jittery and odd while they're inspecting your laptop (if they even do).

    54. Re:If you're that worried... by autophile · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      And that helps when they confiscate your laptop and "lose" it... how?

      Pictures: Store them on a high-capacity USB drive, SD card, or other small device. Hide it. That way, if they get your computer, they still won't get your pictures.

      Movies: Why I iPod ya? I think they're less likely to grab task-specific devices over computers. And they cost less.

      Either way, by bringing along a laptop, there will always be the risk they simply take it and lose it. No amount of data trickery can get around that.

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    55. Re:If you're that worried... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves

      Unless the NSA actually does have TRANSLTR, they're not going to be able to decrypt any reasonably strong (128+ bit key) encryption anytime this century.

      DES may be well and truly broken, but a 128-bit key is not merely twice as hard as a 64-bit key. it's 2^64 times as hard. every additional bit doubles the size of the keyspace.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    56. Re:If you're that worried... by adlib24 · · Score: 1

      If you have so much trouble with customs that you wish you had encrypted your whole hard disk, you are already in a load of trouble. And by the time they get around to browsing your personal pics on your lap top, you will already have done so much wrong in customs, that encryption or no, you might want a good lawyer. Unless you are stupid enough to try to physically smuggle illegal pics (terrorist propaganda, kiddie porn), I think it not worth your time to worry about encryption just for the sake of customs.

    57. Re:If you're that worried... by srs232 · · Score: 1

      But there's no guarantees foreign governments won't search it either so its always safer to take anything confidential off your notebook before you leave the country.

    58. Re:If you're that worried... by Panaflex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, I'll bite. Name one US citizen this has happened too. I'm not saying there isn't injustice - but from what I can see the courts still operate in full public view. Laws are by and large still in effect, and we're not gassing women and children.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    59. Re:If you're that worried... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Why is that stupid? Seems to have worked pretty well for the Bush team. If I had to choose between going to prison and lying about remembering my pass phrase.... well, thankfully we have the 5th amendment and that's a moot point (for now).

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    60. Re:If you're that worried... by crunch_ca · · Score: 1

      High entropy random data, but the guy at the border is looking for a 5 minutes spree tops - I seriously doubt he knows what entropy is let alone enough to check for it.

      gzipped data also has high entropy, so it's hard to tell whether you simply have compressed data, or random junk. Except for the gzip header/magic number of course.

    61. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just came back from a 5 week-long trip to 5 different countries in Southern Africa and South America, in which I flew on 12 different flights. There were plenty of security checks, obviously! Not once did anyone ask to look at the contents of my laptop, even though several comments were made by security personnel as to its small size (Asus EeePC 701). Other people around me in the security lines who also had laptops of various types were not stopped to show what was on their laptop either. I don't think there is anything to worry about.

    62. Re:If you're that worried... by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. What if he took pictures of naked 10-year-old girls?

      This whole mess is around something called the "border exception" to the "probable cause" requirement for search and seizure. The idea behind the exception is that the government gets to say what comes into the country, so it gets to search everything that comes in.

      It's a bit silly, considering how easy it is for people to send stuff over the Internet. But, the fact that they can't do it for everything doesn't mean that they shouldn't do it for ANYTHING.

    63. Re:If you're that worried... by spagetti_code · · Score: 1
      Do NOT encrypt your drive. That is a sure fire way to get them very interested in you.

      They can't demand your password, but they can require you to enter it. Having said that, of course, the people manning these stations aren't concerned about your rights and may just demand your password anyway.

      The key is to make it look like you are open and friendly and giving them all they want, while keeping your privacy intact.

      So... use truecrypt. Make a single large encrypted storage file called (say) .zip, or better backups.tar.gz (they might search for .zips along with .jpgs).

      Put all your stuff in there. Then you can happily let them search and mess around on your laptop. You can log in for them etc.

      If they should happen to find your backup.tar.gz (unlikely) say that it is an backup but it got corrupted. You are hoping to find someone who can fix corrupted backups because you lost some work files in there. It sure will look corrupted.

      Oh, and make sure you clear your cache.

    64. Re:If you're that worried... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those are some great suggestions.

      I've thought about this myself and if you don't mind getting your hands dirty you could take an SD card and loaded it up with Linux, and wire it in parallel with the hard drive. install a small switch under the battery or something that switches power from the hard drive to the SD card. Then when traveling set the switch to select the card... it will look like a clean Linux install.

    65. Re:If you're that worried... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      TrueCrypt rocks!
      http://www.truecrypt.org/

      Avoid full disk encryption if you're trying to hide something.

      A drive that won't boot because it's encrypted raises a red flag.

      A completly invisible encrypted area on a machine that boots and works normally is another story.

    66. Re:If you're that worried... by Toonol · · Score: 3, Funny

      He can't name them! Don't you understand! They have systems in place to wipe all evidence!

    67. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What stops you from uploading all your sensitive data to your own FTP server or some public secure online storage, and securely deleting (random bit wipe) all the sensitive data from your laptop?

    68. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Extending off of this idea, My solution for travel to the US was to remove the hard drive, leave it at home, and run my laptop off of an ubuntu livecd. Any data I wanted to keep was stored on SD cards purchased in the US.

    69. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truecrypt is easy to defeat. you simply use the waterboarding attack. it surprisingly works very quickly.

      America uses that technique for everything nowdays.

    70. Re:If you're that worried... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      I have a similar, yet I guess smaller, problem. I read somewhere that they can also ask you for your pendrive/mp[3,4] player/CDs/DVDs. I always carry my mp3 player on flights for obvious reasons, but all my mp3 come from P2P sites. I will travel to the US in 3 weeks. Should I worry and bring my mp3 player empty or like the post, I'm being too paranoid?

    71. Re:If you're that worried... by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      What happens if you take the Bush Administration approach? "I don't recall my pass phrase."

      They (quite reasonably) won't believe that anyone could possibly be that stupid.

      Why is that stupid? Seems to have worked pretty well for the Bush team.

      Because you missed his joke. Let me know if you still don't see it.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    72. Re:If you're that worried... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      And that helps when they confiscate your laptop and "lose" it... how?

      Well using the plausible deniability option they shouldn't have any reason to seize your laptop at all. It's highly unlikely the guy checking your laptop at the airport has the level of technical competency to be aware of the concept. It's certainly a lot less likely than him not knowing that an iPod can contains something other than music or not knowing what a USB drive is.

      But then the question was never about "how do I prevent my data being lost by overzealous fascists?", if that's the question then the answer should be to get it into the country using at least one other method, ie. send it on a CD via post and post them online somewhere (both encrypted aswell of course).

       

      Pictures: Store them on a high-capacity USB drive, SD card, or other small device. Hide it. That way, if they get your computer, they still won't get your pictures.

      That's a novel idea. Wow, nobody ever thought to hide something from officials. It's a good job terrorists always attempt to get onto planes swinging their explosives over their head because I bet if they ever hid the bombs there's no way airport security would ever think to check for hidden devices. You sir, are a genius.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    73. Re:If you're that worried... by clodney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely understand not wanting a bunch of law enforcement officials looking at his private data. The thought that it is allowed infuriates me.

      But the practical side of me says that I have come into the US several times in the last year, and not once has anyone even asked me to open my bags, let alone turn on my laptop.

      Security through obscurity is probably the best bet here - and obscurity means looking just like all the thousands of other tourists coming in from Mexico every single day.

    74. Re:If you're that worried... by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Informative

      International mail is more likely to be opened going across the border than the probability you have of having the computer searched.

      The #1 thing is, remove the computer from its bag before they tell you to. They're getting increasingly angry at people for not doing that.

      A low tech way to discourage searches is to not bring the battery (buy a new one when you get there) and not clean the keyboard and/or screen.

      I travel outside the United States all the time and I've never had a problem (other than the single time I did not take the computer out of the bag), nor have I seen someone undergoing a computer search.

    75. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'll bite. Name one US citizen this has happened too.

      Yaser Esam Hamdi

    76. Re:If you're that worried... by philspear · · Score: 1

      Oh please, "insightful?" When did that start meaning the same thing as "so cynical as to be delusional."

    77. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      To see changes over time wouldn't they need two disparate inspections separated by time?

      Are they imaging drives on departure from and arrival to the US and running a diff?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    78. Re:If you're that worried... by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      The best and only answer is to buy a drive/usb stick (Depending how much stuff you wanna take photo's of) while your in the US if its a drive buy a IDE/SATA to USB setup and store all of your stuff on that and send it via mail to yourself..

      But as far as ripping anything onto your drive.. Good luck with that.. Thats what they will be looking for and as far as RIAA and the MPAA are concerned there is no legal way/reason for you to do this.. Its wrong it goes against fair use.. but what are you going to do.. Argue with the border guard that you have exercised your fair use rights and spend the night in jail and goto court over it? Its just not worth it. Buy a paperback book to read or sleep on the plane.

      I would even go as far as to buy a new drive format it and install your OS so that you have a perfectly clean drive for them to inspect if it goes to that point and there is 0 chance of them finding anything that could be mistaken as copy written material.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    79. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that there is a key code that can be used to unlock the encryption that you are never given right?

      all you have to do is miskey the code a few times until it gives you a key that you have to give the manufacturer, the manufacturer validates your access by verifying you are the customer or you have a legal reason to be there. they give you the code for this instance and magically the tinfoil-hattery is reality, and all the kiddy porn you're trying to smuggle into the country is found.

      The best way to make it through with out having to expose your soul, is make it as nondiscript as possible. They're not looking for a certain picture, they're not looking for a specific code, they are looking for a list of identifiers that mark suspicion, such as encrypted volumes inside encrypted containers.

      Most of all, all they are looking for is that the computer functions and is not a bomb that is made to look like a computer and computer parts. Most of these guys barely know how to turn a computer on or what a hard drive is.

    80. Re:If you're that worried... by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe for many reasons that there isn't such a thing as an unbreakable cypher.

      Theoretically that is true, but the computational complexity (i.e. the number of operations required to solve the math problem) of modern crypto systems is such that rarely will an informed and determined adversary attempt to brute force the crypto system. In fact the number of operations and computing power required render the entire attempt hopeless, since the data cannot be recovered in this way within a single human lifetime (i.e. 120 years) even when the resources available to first world governments are taken into account. It is more likely, assuming that they have no qualms and are determined to get your data, that black bag or rubber hose techniques will employed instead. Basically, if the computer leaves your sight and possession (i.e. it is taken into the back room before being returned to you) then that particular computer can never be trusted again, which is why you should have a backup of your data somewhere else, preferably on a secure off-site server, before you begin your travels and regularly update it during your trip. As far as I know, from my background in Computer Science, modern cryptography provides security that it at least as good as any alternative method and most probably substantially superior to those alternatives. The mathematical and theoretical foundation of modern crypto is well understood and proven (the government also uses these same or similar crypto systems for their own data, so draw your own conclusions about the effectiveness of modern crypto systems).

      Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag

      So what if it is? Do we surrender our rights under the Constitution because authoritarian elements within our government are treating us all as criminals and terrorists with something to hide? Shall we surrender to fear and give up our rights in response to terrorism or criminal activity and in exchange for what? The promise of those some government agents to protect us against the bad guys? No thanks, I will take my chances with my rights intact. A right not exercised is a right that does not exist except on paper. We should all encrypt all of our data in order to more effectively assert our collective rights against unwarranted search and seizure.

      And if they could decrypt...your data, why are you angry? Would they steal it? Put it up on a flickr site?

      It is the principle of the thing. The government in the US exists because of the consent of the people. Here in the United States, at least according to the Constitution, the individual citizen is sovereign and any powers not specifically granted to the government by the consent of the people are reserved to us the people. I would rather that everyone walk around armed to the teeth and encrypt all of their data then live in an authoritarian nanny state where big brother is watching.

      If you have important data, drop it to a DVD. Put that in a separate place. Carry lots of them.

      There are many ways around their schemes (some better than others) and that is one of them. The fact that determined and knowledgeable adversaries can slip through undetected makes this whole piece of security theater even worse. It only inconveniences and compromises those citizens and people who are not able to, by reason of ignorance or incompetence, protect their data (which almost certainly would not include anyone intent on doing real harm).

    81. Re:If you're that worried... by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      No.. that will start if Obama wins

      Yes.. this is a flamebait/troll. But mark my words. If Obama gets in, look for all your civil liberties to disappear faster than anything the stupid Bush Administration has done. Orwell was just off by 20 years, if BHO gets in.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    82. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the assumption is they can get it out of your head faster and easier than cracking the encryption.

    83. Re:If you're that worried... by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Actually, if he's that worried, he's being overly paranoid. I've taken my laptop in and out of the country four or five times this year, from Asia, Mexico and Europe. No problems, no searches, no nothing.

      I'm prudent, though - there's no business data on my laptop. I either download what I need when I get there, then delete it when I'm done, or I VPN back to the corporate network. But that's not because I'm worried that the gubmint is going to swipe my notebook. I'm far more worried about regular old thievery. And, to be honest, I'm not terribly worried about that!

    84. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just "umount" the partition, and drop it from "fstab". The cops didn't check if HD is 80GB or 160GB.

    85. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      They can demand access to or confiscate any potential data storage device. That can even include a custom knitted sweater if they think the pattern of stitches is a method of illicitly encoding data. Imagine what they'd think about flying with a replica of The Doctor's 40-foot scarf, especially if neither end of your flight involved cold weather!

      They won't confiscate your skin for having tattoos applied overseas, but expect them to take pictures of your body for later analysis, Scofield.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    86. Re:If you're that worried... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      all you have to do is miskey the code a few times until it gives you a key that you have to give the manufacturer, the manufacturer validates your access by verifying you are the customer

      What the hell are you talking about? Truecrypt doesn't give you any key to give to the manufacturer if you fail to provide the correct one. If you fail to provide the correct key it can't even validate that the target is a Truecrypt volume rather than random bits. The "manufacturer" (developer) wouldn't be able to verify anything anyway, nor do they have any knowledge of their "customers" (someone who downloads a binary installer or source code for free). I don't know if you're thinking of something completely different or if you've been fed some incredible FUD about Truecrypt but what you're describing isn't even remotely accurate.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    87. Re:If you're that worried... by Misch · · Score: 1

      yeah right. Puerto Vallarta is a child molestors destination and your looking to encrypt your pics.

      Get real fool.

      Oh, come on, even Rush Limbaugh knows the Dominican Republic is where it's at

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    88. Re:If you're that worried... by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      to be fair a micro sd card is easier to hide then let's say, heroin or explosives...

    89. Re:If you're that worried... by weetabeex · · Score: 1

      And where could I find such encryption, assuming I'm not in the military?

    90. Re:If you're that worried... by anom · · Score: 1

      Another solution is to use Truecrypt to protect the contents of the drive. Then, the day you leave, send your hard drive back to yourself via overnight mail. Then if they ask for the contents of your laptop, you're incapable of giving it to them, but you're no less secure. You are however out of your data for a day or two.

    91. Re:If you're that worried... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure it is. What if he took pictures of naked 10-year-old girls?

      What if he had pictures of his own children and didn't want them in circulation? Being a parent with daughters myself I'm fully aware of the sort of people who make up a percentage of border guards, and I don't want them stalked or targeted or "collected" by people I don't trust. And I certainly wouldn't trust strangers with photos of my children.

      You can't just simply go fishing for incriminating material without probable cause, it isn't right. And in the case of border guards, what amounts to "probable cause" needs to be set out in strict procedures, and every such trigger event needs to be backed up and independently verified. The difference between police and thugs are laws and procedures, not uniforms and badges.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    92. Re:If you're that worried... by jeti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's all fine and dandy as long as the burden of proof is not on you. But I suspect that you'll have to convince the border guard that they've seen everything if you want to enter the US and take your laptop with you.

    93. Re:If you're that worried... by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Rather than encrypt the whole drive (it looks like you have something to hide) I would create a truecrypt volume file (Make it big enough for all your stuff) and give it a .tmp extension, since temp files are common and no one would ever suspect them since various apps automatically create them. I would then erase truecrypt from the computer-- If you don't have any encryption software installed, why would authorities look for encrypted files? Also, remember to act like a stupid tourist who barely knows how to turn the computer on.

      Of course, this is assuming you don't need to use the files until you are able to install Truecrypt again and decrypt.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    94. Re:If you're that worried... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... I feel really bad for the guy over everything that happened... but shit happens. Especially when you're hanging around a bunch of Taliban fighters... Especially when you're carrying a kalishnakov around...

      Anyone else?

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    95. Re:If you're that worried... by ender8282 · · Score: 1

      How do you figure that they don't have the ability to decrypt? They might decide that a brute force attack isn't worth their time but they certainly could.

    96. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Laws are by and large still in effect, and we're not gassing women and children.

      Or at least none who were of any consequence.

      (Excerpt from The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Page 634784, Section 5a, Entry: Magrathea)

      Many men of course became extremely rich, but this was perfectly natural and nothing to be ashamed of because no one was really poor--at least no one worth speaking of.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    97. Re:If you're that worried... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And what happens when Customs opens your international mail?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    98. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only one solution that guarantees that nobody will rifle through your data: don't bring it with you through the border crossing. That's what servers are for... and SSL, or at least SSH/SCP/SFTP.

      Better yet: if it's a business trip, leave sensitive data on the server and access via VPN, and if it's a vacation, leave the damn computer at home and go sit on the damn beach.

    99. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      if BHO gets in.

      You just gave me an idea for a line of "BHO knows" political T-shirts.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    100. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be taken on holiday. Could be. Nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more!

    101. Re:If you're that worried... by KillerBob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So... you're saying you'd rather have an old fart who's liable to die in office, and a VP who doesn't know what magazines she reads and believes that the world was created 6000 years ago, and that humans and dinosaurs coexisted?

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    102. Re:If you're that worried... by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      A subtle "if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear" poke. Haha.

      Oddly, I thought the ;-) indicated it to be a not-so-subtle bit of humor.

      Or, just ignore that, post a generic "It's nobody's business!" comment, and ride the mod-wave all the way to shore. ;-)

    103. Re:If you're that worried... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      More importantly, are you sharing them with us when you get back?

    104. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      We agree that you don't surrender US Constitutional rights. But you may end up surrendering your laptop. It hasn't happened to me in my international travels, but it could.

      And the principle of the thing is very and deeply important. That's why pressure placed upon the Congress and executive branch is important. That doesn't mean they won't take your laptop, for mindboggling reasons unknown (mostly because they can, and lesser civil servants need to feel powerful). If you have the need for high security, there are many means available. But I truly believe that there are methods available to make short work of encryption if it's believed you're a terrorist, and not just a good looking blonde female to hassle (sorry to insult so many people by saying this, but ugly people like me seem to get hassled less).

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    105. Re:If you're that worried... by dos4who · · Score: 2, Interesting

      TrueCrypt plausible deniability was just recently broken. See this Slashdot article from July 17 http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/17/2043248&from=rss

      --
      "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
    106. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Let's see, poster's name is "casualsax3," so...

      So he's only the third person on Slashdot to think up that pun for a username?

      (Actually, there is no casualsax2, casualsax1, or casualsax without a number on Slashdot.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    107. Re:If you're that worried... by nahdude812 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it was recently demonstrated that you can positively identify a hidden volume exists within a TrueCrypt volume, defeating plausible deniability. In addition, it was also recently demonstrated that regardless of the encryption algorithm used, it's possible to get a silhouette of high contrast encrypted images.

      So if they really wanted, they could identify the hidden volume exists, then apply this second technique to identify that images exist on it. To border agents, this is probably tantamount to admitting on the spot that you're smuggling kiddy porn across the border, and you may find that it's more than your laptop which is detained.

      Your best protection is to transfer the images separately from your laptop. Store them on Amazon S3 with a tool such as JungleDisk, and download them when you get home (this is a good idea in case something damages your laptop while traveling too).

    108. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, re-partition your disk, make a TrueCrypt partition: no visible files, not visible in Windows Explorer (I don't think an unrecognized partition will get a drive letter?), only in Control Panel - System - Disk Administration.

      Your (e.g.) 160GB disk will look like an (e.g.) 80 GB disk to the mercenary monkey, just start TrueCrypt and mount the other 80 GB to get your data.

      Of course having TrueCrypt installed on your computer might be grounds for suspicion too, so better uninstall it before entering the fascist territory.

      And if they do see 80 GB unused, you can also say "Oh I was planning to install another OS, haven't gotten around to it yet!".

      And hello to the three letter agencies! Going anon because I'm a dirty foreigner :)

    109. Re:If you're that worried... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      SSH uses SSL libraries for crypto, but not in the same way that a traditional SSL-secured services do, so I don't consider it an SSL-based service. They do serve the same purpose, though, and with foresight (memorizing the SSH key fingerprints, for example) have equivalent levels of security. With SSH, the key process is very much ad hoc when compared with traditional SSL-secured services that use certs signed by a signing agency.

      Certainly you'd do just as well with SSH as with other SSL-derived services assuming you've ssh'ed to that machine at least once with your laptop while in a known, trusted DNS environment. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. Of course, if you forget to connect from a trusted network first, there's a world of difference between SSH and a signed-cert-based SSL protocol.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    110. Re:If you're that worried... by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      ...encrypt it. Full disk encryption is relatively cheap, easy, and unobtrusive.

      It would also be a gigantic red flag for someone expecting your password protection to involve clicking a flower icon at the windows login screen. Personally, I would just stick my data on a couple multi-GB encrypted volumes named gamedisk1.iso or hiberfil.sys. The last thing you want to do is give TSA a reason to get another free laptop.

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
    111. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent reminds me of those INSANE people who write emails to slashdot (and subsequently get posted). Seriously, are you insane? And not only that, but if what you're saying is true, then at least there will be a country to be taken away from. Because more deregulation from McCain will take this economy directly down the toilet.

    112. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely an AOL users disc is full of spyware/adware etc?

    113. Re:If you're that worried... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Would they steal it? Put it up on a flickr site?

      Is there something preventing them to do so ? If they do so, is there even a remote chance you could prosecute them for this ?

      Don't look like a terrorist or mad scientist as you go through customs and immigration.

      How do I do that while carrying a lot of DVDs and a messy computer bag ? When I cross the borders, I try very hard to not look like a drug user, and I do look like a mad scientist. How do one not look like a terrorist with an arabic name ? (fortunately not my case)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    114. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability

      So, the strength of Truecrypt at the security checkpoint is based on your acting ability.

      If you deny a hidden volume, and subsequently open a volume under pressure, they've got you for lying to them, and you have no way to prove that there is no other hidden data. Lets hope you're good under pressure.

    115. Re:If you're that worried... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      All this talk about truecrypt and plausible deniability is rubbish.

      Simply upload your photos from your hotel room (or an Internet cafe) and delete them from your laptop before leaving for home. Viola.

    116. Re:If you're that worried... by The+Faywood+Assassin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually its even easier than that.

      If you can, set the BIOS to set the CF or SD card slot as the first boot device, and the hard drive as the second.

      Thus, without a card in the slot during boot up, you get a normal Windows session, with the card in you get a Linux session.

      Also, if the Linux session does not auto mount the windows disk, then the simpleton inspecting your computer will never see your files on the hard drive.

      Puppy Linux and Damn Small Linux are perfect for this

      Beny

      --

      "I'm a humble person really,

      I'm actually much greater than I think I am"

    117. Re:If you're that worried... by kklein · · Score: 1

      ?I fly in and out of the US a couple times a year. Never once have they looked at my laptop, and never once have I seen them look at anyone's laptop. Hundreds of people streaming through customs, and not one, ever, being asked to show them their laptop.

      Of course, we know they DO, sometimes, look at laptops, but I think they have to have a reason to be suspicious. If you come through sweating bullets from Cambodia, yeah, they might decide they want a peek at your "My Pictures" folder.

      I'm not defending the policy; I think it's bullshit. But I'm also saying it almost never happens, so people might want to do a cost-benefit analysis before doing something like encrypting the whole hard drive with Truecrypt.

    118. Re:If you're that worried... by squizzar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe for many reasons that there isn't such a thing as an unbreakable cypher

      One time pad

      It is the only 'unbreakable' encryption since if done correctly the encrypted data shares no information with the plaintext.

      Unfortunately it's not the easiest encryption to use. My best guess in this case would be to take a copy of the pad with you. If the laptop is searched then you never use that pad because it is compromised. Once you have encrypted your data you destroy the copy of the pad. When you return home you decrypt the data using the original pad. Obviously you would need to secure the original pad at home (e.g. not actually in your house) so that it can't be found in a search. Not convenient of course, but technically unbreakable.

      Personally I agree with whoever suggested transferring your data back via secure shell. In fact, encrypt it with a nice big RSA key, email it to an anonymous gmail account, and carry the key back on a USB stick. What are they gonna do, find all the encrypted data in the world and test your key to see if it decrypts it?

      (The really paranoid part of me thinks that this makes it only a matter of time before possession of any data that could potentially be an encryption key will be a criminal offense)

      Finally if you wanted to be cocky, I'd suggest hiding your pictures as a watermark or whatever in some other, completely innocent pictures. You really think they'll look twice at pictures of a geek in swimshorts.

    119. Re:If you're that worried... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Er... perhaps my memory is faulty, but a brute-force attack on that cipher would take longer than our lifetimes (assuming the technology stays stagnant, for simplicity's sake). Pretty sure that's a safe enough bet.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    120. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I have a friend that looks like a terrorist. He moved to New Zealand. He's just a nice Jewish guy from the Bronx, who was born looking very serious and 'foreign' to WASP-ish eyes. After years of getting detentions while transversing US airports, I think he gave up and left. That's sad.

      If your data gets misused, call those attorneys for the RIAA. They seem to be able to get settlements. Bastards.

      A messy computer bag is normal. I would think that obfuscation is a good thing; and after all, who has time to look through tons of stuff?

      Somewhere there's a horribly misguided DHS nabob in DC that needs to be sent on a new mission, maybe to watch grass grow in the Arctic. We need a regime change to get back our civil rights and liberties. Vote in November. If in Chicago, frequently.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    121. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if you take the Bush Administration approach? "I don't recall my pass phrase."

      You do two years time.

    122. Re:If you're that worried... by 1karmik1 · · Score: 1

      [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassan_Mustafa_Osama_Nasr]Abu Omar[/url].

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
    123. Re:If you're that worried... by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I travel in and out of the US probably 20 times a year, and I have yet to be harassed by the customs people about my laptop.

      However, last year I forgot an apple (the fruit) that I grabbed at a hotel in Germany and promptly forgot in my backpack, and that damn beagle nailed me. Now I get extra screening, but they never look at my laptop or other electronics.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    124. Re:If you're that worried... by FakeSkeleton · · Score: 1

      the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      Here is a story from a guy who had a similar solution in mind. Apparently the airport people get suspicious if the laptop runs something that they are not used to, like anything non-Windows.

      On the other hand, he suggests that they are easily satisfied if you setup your laptop so it boots Windows by default and shows some normal-looking desktop; and that they are stupid enough not to suspect that there might be other operating systems installed if they don't show up in the boot menu.

      Maybe it would suffice to setup your boot loader so that it boots Windows unless you press Shift or something like that.

    125. Re:If you're that worried... by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      A brute force attack on any decent encryption algorithm with a reasonable key length is simply not feasible. Even if every atom in the Earth was converted to a machine capable of testing one million keys per second, brute forcing a 256 bit key would still take on the order of 14 trillion years (barring any errors in my calculations).

    126. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I've gone to the states many time. I've never had my laptop searched there. I've had a certain angry customs inspector in a certain angry middle-eastern country search my laptop for porn, but that's it. Didn't have any (they have shitty jails, literally) and went on with no problem. If you've got something to hide, truecrypt is not your answer; encrypted DVD's through DHL are the answer. The American customs guys are assholes, but they've got nothing on anywhere I've been in Africa.

    127. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I travel quite often out of the country and only once have they asked me to log on the PC as part of a random check. It took about 15 min and I was on my way.
      To me this is no different than when they hand search my tavel on or I get the little notice in my bad that they went through my suit case which we all have probably seen.
      There will always be one jerk in the TSA who will use it to abuse you but frankly for the most part its a non-issue.
      Given that there is an election on right now you serriously dont think CNN wouldnt love to point out how this "Bush" policy is damaging travelers if they could????

    128. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Places you went to. Pictures of you in those places. Pictures of things you ate, things you found interesting. Pictures of your kids. Pictures of you with your kids. People in entertainment venues. People in swimsuits. People at their most informal, goofing off, making faces, having fun. All people you know or met, including yourself. These and more.

      How weird is that? casualsax3 having pictures of the GPs kids?

    129. Re:If you're that worried... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      No, because they aren't going to protect our civil liberties either. If they were, however... absolutely yes. Our civil liberties are far more important than some petty disagreement over religion.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    130. Re:If you're that worried... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you read the discussion attached to that article when it was posted on Slashdot, you'll find many many solutions to this issue. Apparently the fix is trivial, and that was just a press release to get attention.

      --
      :x
    131. Re:If you're that worried... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Easy answer: uninstall Truecrypt before you reach the border, so it doesn't look like you used any encryption, then put it back again when you get home. While that's not going to stop a pro who has your laptop from figuring out what happened, you're way less likely to set off any "this guy has something to hide" alarms at the border if there's no obvious sign that you ever had encryption software installed.

    132. Re:If you're that worried... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      I see reading comprehension continues to decline on ./. The ggp said not to make a personal backup, but suggested this probably didn't apply to the border-security case anyway.

      --
      :x
    133. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Allow me to translate your statement:

      All this talk about truecrypt and plausible deniability is rubbish.

      Simply upload your photos from your hotel room (or an Internet cafe) and delete them from your laptop before leaving for home. A four-stringed musical instrument of the violin family, slightly larger than the violin; a tenor or alto violin.

      Voila

    134. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But uh, mind if I ask: exactly what kind of pictures are you planning on taking on your vacation? ;-)

      None of your damn business. That's the pointï¼Z

    135. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Even with ciphers, it seems that image fundamentals can be inferred without decrypting an image, just like the old ASCII art that we used to print on weird dot-matrix printers. I believe the same techniques are currently employed to check for child porn. But it shouldn't be done without a warrant based on probable cause.

      I don't doubt for a minute that RSA is in cahoots with the NSA. Think about it. I don't trust either, frankly. There are big fat keys, but using them, and starting encryption in the middle of a file somewhere, then moving back and forth in a file, seems to be the biggest hassle to surmount, because only the user knows how to unwind such a thing.

      With a big enough hammer, you can break anything, an old adage states. Instead, if I have confidential docs, I watermark them as described. There are all sorts of slick ways to do that. Many people have things that should be private and for good reasons. Vote in November.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    136. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are quite correct, in the US, you are free to refuse to divulge your key. And the US officials are free to "detain" you in Gitmo for a few days because you were "acting suspiciously".

      Have fun.

    137. Re:If you're that worried... by Geirzinho · · Score: 1

      You can see the afterimage of the previous bit direction on magnetic storage. Not all of the magnetic domain making up a bit is changed, sort of getting a fuzzy + when changing - to |. This is why repeated overwriting is recommended when you really want to delete files.

      The effect is probably better explained under hysteresis over at google :)

      No idea how this works on solid state disks though.

    138. Re:If you're that worried... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      He must be talking about some commercial product. How anyone with an Internet connection could be that misinformed about TrueCrypt is beyond me.

      There is some good news. A recent court decision has affirmed that Fifth Amendment protections apply to encrypted data ... if the password is in your head, you can't legally be forced to reveal it. Just make damn sure you choose a good one.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    139. Re:If you're that worried... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      We agree that you don't surrender US Constitutional rights. But you may end up surrendering your laptop. It hasn't happened to me in my international travels, but it could.

      Unreasonable seizure. If you are forced to surrender your laptop, then you've been forced to surrender your US Constitutional rights.

    140. Re:If you're that worried... by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

      Since we're talking thumbdrives, secret them somewhere about the person... I believe that the rectum is a handy choice.

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
    141. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which points out the futility and overall stupidity of the Customs people. There are only two reasons why they would even do this: 1) to try to prevent "contraband" from being carried over the border, and 2) to catch bad guys carrying in emails or other files that incriminate them in terrorism, organized crime, or opposition to the Republican party.

      So, if it's 1, then give me a break: any data can be safely and securely squirted over the internet from anywhere to anywhere else, regardless of international borders. In some cases it takes some creativity (for instance, bypassing the Great Firewall of China), but it can be done.

      If it's 2, then again, these days any terrorist or mafioso or Democrat with half a brain is going to encrypt their sensitive data, put it on a flash drive, and put it in a warm, wet, dark place while they go through customs (why do you think flash drives are shaped like that anyway?). Or, more comfortably, they can squirt the data electronically, as per the previous point.

      So the whole thing is just another example of our increasingly authoritarian government getting more ham-handed and stupid. You would think things would get better with time...sigh.

    142. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2

      That's more an argument for never modifying your data, not never backing it up. Which would require you to write once as encrypted and not write and then rewrite in place as encrypted.

      And if you are backing it up, I'd assume you wouldn't be traveling with both your originals and your backups.

      No idea how this works on solid state disks though.

      Wear leveling probably results in rewrites not going to the same physical areas of memory, so every multi-wipe must be to full SSD capacity, as well as never storing the data on the device in a clear form.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    143. Re:If you're that worried... by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      You want to think *VERY* seriously before using plausible deniability while crossing the border.

      Basically, at the moment an official asks you for your encryption password and you provide the incorrect one, you have probably committed a crime. You will probably get away with it, but be aware that the risk you are taking - should they decide to do a more thorough analysis and discover you were lying - could have severe consequences: never being able to travel easily again, restricted in getting foreign visas, being detained for a long and uncomfortable time with a large fine ... and that's assuming there is nothing actually illegal on your laptop.

      Personally - I think the best approach is to be completely transparent. Upload everything you care about to the cloud before trying to cross the border. If your laptop and photos look completely normal then they are very unlikely to spend any time on you and your privacy will be only very minimally violated.

    144. Re:If you're that worried... by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      How about, since we're talking about customs, a Canadian citizen?

      Maher Arar, who got rendered to Syria by your friendly neighbourhood CIA? Dude wasn't toting a kalashinkov around in Afghanistan, either.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    145. Re:If you're that worried... by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      Do you also apply that to physical goods? A lot of illegal drugs, counterfeit goods and other contraband is discovered through border searches where there was no probable cause.

      It may not be right, but it's long-standing law that the government doesn't need probably cause at the border. That's the law.

    146. Re:If you're that worried... by Atraxen · · Score: 1

      There's an option better than encryption - just don't take anything important with you at all. Why not swap in a different hard drive with a clean install and critical programs? Not only does this guarantee that you can say "nothing to see here, move along..." but that your important data stays safe - as well as avoiding lack-of-access upon your return if the border guards do keep your laptop. I've done this recently for my trip to Playa del Carmen, and it had the extra payoff of giving me a swap-and-go safety net while writing my dissertation - if the real hard drive (backed-up, of course) died, I could pop in the extra harddrive/OS and keep on working.

      TrueCrypt gives plausible deniability, sure - there's nothing to explain at all with a lack of data. You simply didn't want to take your important and personal data to a hotel while on vacation - I'm not a fan of doing so while still in this country.

      That said, sure - encrypt your 'clean' hard drive if you care to - that way, your data you've generated while outside the country is safe en route to home. In the end, data security is bolstered by having encryption and preventing physical access - what better way than this? (And the question is not purely rhetorical - if there's a better approach I'd like to know!)

      --
      Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
    147. Re:If you're that worried... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems like overkill if he is just wanting to transfer his pictures and not get hassled. I am assuming you have a Windows box at home,yes? One that has a nice 24/7 Internet connection like cable/DSL? If that is the case then the answer is very simple:

      1. Install the free UltraVNC on the machine at home,set your username and password,and if you want,install and use the optional encryption plugin that encrypts the entire stream.Install it on the laptop and test it,and if you don't want el border guards messing with it simply leave the installer in a folder somewhere on your laptop and uninstall after testing.2. When you get to where you are going,run the UltraVNC installer,give it the name/password of the machine you are connecting to and there you go! You now have a secure connection to your main machine at home. Simply transfer you pics and other data to the home machine before you leave and then uninstall UltraVNC and delete the pics. When you get home your pics will be sitting on your home box waiting on you to edit/print/whatever. Enjoy and have fun in Mexico!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    148. Re:If you're that worried... by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Not a good idea. You're talking about committing perjury to enter the US, which I think is punishable with hefty fines and jail time (maybe even being stripped of your citizenship if you're a naturalized citizen -- although I could be talking out of my ass on this one).

      "Yeah, but how will they know if you don't tell them?" I hear you ask. Things like this happen, you can incriminate yourself in a flash, especially if they ask you a question you don't expect. Yeah, everyone's careful, but it still happens. Why put yourself in that situation??

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    149. Re:If you're that worried... by sraviik · · Score: 0

      Flamebait...

      --
      4c:61:7a:79
    150. Re:If you're that worried... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      so people might want to do a cost-benefit analysis before doing something like encrypting the whole hard drive with Truecrypt.

      Cost-benef ... honestly, what are you talking about? TrueCrypt is not only open-source, but free. There is no cost involved, only increased security. Okay, so you lose an hour or so while it encrypts your partition. Big deal. TrueCrypt is not the only solution out there either.

      I routinely encrypt all forms of portable storage that I use, just as a matter of principle. Forget the TSA and airlines: anything you carry with you has the possibility of being lost or stolen, and ending up in the wrong hands. Am I a terrorist? No. Am I a paedophile? Hardly. But what's mine is mine, and if you don't have a court order (and maybe not even then) you have no right to it. Furthermore, the law can't protect your personal informatoin (and in many cases wants to do quite the opposite) so you have to protect it yourself.

      Look, unless you're just transporting public domain files from the Gutenberg Project or something equally innocuous, just encrypt it and be done with it. We live in an increasingly criminal society. Take the proper steps, keep your data safe from prying eyes. It's easy, costs nothing, and may save you a heap o' trouble.

      It's one less thing to worry about.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    151. Re:If you're that worried... by Geirzinho · · Score: 1

      That's more an argument for never modifying your data, not never backing it up. Which would require you to write once as encrypted and not write and then rewrite in place as encrypted.

      True, so I guess I join you in asking 'why is backing up an encrypted volume a bad thing?'

    152. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people such as myself have jobs that require international travel often. With my job I travel into and out of the US several times a month sometimes. Being that I am a US citizen I haven't had problems at the border, cant say the same for people with other nationalities.

    153. Re:If you're that worried... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      That is correct. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act demands that you hand over your encryption key, and also stipulates that the maximum penalty for refusal is five years imprisonment.

      So far, there have been 8 notices served under the act. 2 complied, 2 are being prosecuted, 2 may yet be prosecuted, and 2 of them are not being spoken about. So far none of the cases have come to court yet.

    154. Re:If you're that worried... by nasch · · Score: 1

      But I truly believe that there are methods available to make short work of encryption

      Are you going to provide evidence for that claim, or at least admit it's totally unfounded?

    155. Re:If you're that worried... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      That will just make them want to know what you are trying to hide.

      For the average non-technical border guard, saving them on an unmounted partition is probably better.

      Or go to an internet cafe / wifi place, and upload them back home before your trip.

    156. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in all my travels i have never had a security guard ask me to view the contents of the computer. doing so is a gross violation of privacy and i would sue the shit out of anyone who even asked to see it. it ranges from propriety information on business data and personal expectation of privacy. a polite fuck off is in order if it happened to me.

    157. Re:If you're that worried... by rimclean · · Score: 1

      perjury? I don't think so, you aren't under oath. Also, I don't think you can be stripped of your citizenship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk

    158. Re:If you're that worried... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      trying to smuggle something across the border? one of my buddies in Chigaco used to be a professional, um, "pharmaceutical courier." just do what he did and hide your laptop in a hollowed out space in the car's door panels.

      that seemed to to work for him pretty well--at least until he got busted and had to do time in Mexican federal prison. but police dogs can't smell laptops.

    159. Re:If you're that worried... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Law enforcement don't do brute force attacks. They do rubber hose attacks, and I very much doubt TrueCrypt is secure against them.

    160. Re:If you're that worried... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. What if he took pictures of naked 10-year-old girls?

      That's still none of your business. He might be from a family that isn't sexually repressed, where people habitually are naked without seeing anything pornographic in it.
      In quite a few countries "nudists" are protected by law from persecution.

      It's the sickos that equate nudity with sexuality and pornography that should go to jail, not those who accept nudity as natural.

    161. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have read an article on this site saying that NSA can decrypt things less then 2048 bits.

    162. Re:If you're that worried... by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A low tech way to discourage searches is to not bring the battery (buy a new one when you get there) and not clean the keyboard and/or screen.

      Do this only if you're worrying more about having your computer searched by some random 8 dollars an hour baggage handler than having it "kept for further analysis" by the DHS.

      Anything that would fall outside of the ordinary should a raise a major red flag for them, and that includes having a laptop with no battery and no power chord, having a cell phone/PDA with no batteries in it (or next to it), or having a non-work related laptop from a male traveler that has no pornography on it and no bodily fluid (that's UV light reacting) on its keys.

    163. Re:If you're that worried... by vanyel · · Score: 1

      the guy at the border is looking for a 5 minutes spree tops

      When I went into Canada, they had it for a half hour or so, twice (they decided since I was bringing in some commercial gear that triggered the whole thing in the first place, I had to use a different border crossing). Not enough to decrypt, but not just a quick skim either.

    164. Re:If you're that worried... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      How do one not look like a terrorist with an arabic name ?

      Wear a t-shirt with American concert dates, shave the beard, and don't act creepy? Might not work, if the guy's enough of a jerk, but it can't hurt.

    165. Re:If you're that worried... by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "minimally violated."

      Yeah, like being minimally raped.

    166. Re:If you're that worried... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Here in the United States,

      Therein lies the problem. You are not "in" the United States until you have been released by border security.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    167. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why this this guy modded as insightful, he couldn't be more wrong. A one-time pad with a key size of at least the length of the plaintext message is completely unbreakable. Even amateurs know this.

    168. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey at least he didn't write "walah" as I've seen others do in the past :).

    169. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I believe for many reasons that there isn't such a thing as an unbreakable cypher)

      Wait, so you think math is wrong?

      And you got modded to +5?

    170. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to Europe several times. I've never even been looked at cross eyed. I always bring my laptop.

    171. Re:If you're that worried... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It's the German spelling! Really! *cough*

    172. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag.

      This is exactly why encryption needs to become more common place.

    173. Re:If you're that worried... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      In the TrueCrypt documentation see the sections on "plausible deniability" and "hidden operating system". They have already assumed that you have been taken into the back room and coerced into giving up your "password" and made allowance for this situation. You can give them the password to the decoy and there is no way to prove that a hidden partition exists. If they still want to detain or beat you after that then I submit that you are probably not going to convince them otherwise no matter what you do or say.

    174. Re:If you're that worried... by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      And if you only access the hidden volume from a live disk, like I recommended, you won't have any of those problems ;)

    175. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      We agree. Whaddya going to do about it-- is their attitude. Better prepared, than not.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    176. Re:If you're that worried... by travbrad · · Score: 1

      So you're saying there's a chance.

    177. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I unfortunately can only point to the evidence. Consider that there is an essentially unlimited budget available, and all of the resources that can be mustered towards finding ways to crack encryption. No one in the government is going to admit it one way or another. Add in budgets that are seriously huge, and access to information 'in the name of government security' that we don't have.

      Consider also that the government hasn't made much noise about anyone using encryption. It's my educated guess, as I've watched all kinds of schemes through MD5 cracked like an egg far before it was predicted it could happen, that the combinations mean that it's not reasonable to believe that any given scheme can be cracked. Just think of all of the cacheing that Windows does, for an example, to get an idea where passwords and keys might be found. Hibernation files, browser cache and history, Java caches and other trails that were deemed secure-- right down to the ability to write out DRAM long after it's been powered down, all add up to my guess.

      Unfounded, no. More than I want to say, yes. Not on /.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    178. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Nothing of the kind.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    179. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be much more inclined to get some 16GB Micro SD cards, and store anything on there that I want to keep private from the guys at customs.

      Seriously, you can probably put your data onto 32GB of removable media, and carry them in your shirt pocket (or passport bag) without them even lighting off the metal detectors.

      a/c

    180. Re:If you're that worried... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Until you've crossed the border you're not in the US so don't have any rights not granted to you by the border patrol.

      So basically they can do anything to you, including sieze your laptop and detain you without charge. It's not wise to piss them off.

    181. Re:If you're that worried... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Easier than scp privatestuff.zip you@someserver:.? And it ain't gonna get lost in the mail...

    182. Re:If you're that worried... by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      I would not be that worried. Even so, if you are, do not turn on your computer near an airport. You may even want to leave the batteries out. I am not sure why but there are enough rumors around that there is likely something to it. Not at an airport.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    183. Re:If you're that worried... by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Sure, agents have always had the right to go through stuff - but that doesn't include reading medical records, family pictures, job prospects, building blueprints, scientific research, you favorite mp3 collection of Hezbollah chants, or your gory collection of people exploded by terrorist bombs, does it?

      I'm sort of joking, but a guy has a right to his collection of Hezbollah chants, if it pleases him, doesn't he? Suppose the guy's learning Arabic?

      That it would be so absolutely fucking stupid to enter the U.S. with this material sort of proves my point.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    184. Re:If you're that worried... by kesuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      close, they can beat you up and shoot you and of course, you did it to yourself. http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/higgs-e1.html

      i was actually looking for a story about an army private who was shot in the leg, and all record of his ever being shot were erased, it made the local news... but this story was better, so...

      btw i realize this has only happened (reportedly, anyways) to 'army' privates, and of course, Iraqis and Afghanistan people, but it's amazing how some people with pull in the military can abuse the system.

    185. Re:If you're that worried... by fugue · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you can find somewhere with reliable high-speed access. When I go on holiday I often come back with 2G of photos (that's with a 6MP camera and medium compression; many poor suckers will be shooting more pixels and less compression). I don't know about where you're going, but Mexico is not exactly known for network bandwidth or reliability.

      Which means, I guess, that you should move to a country where you're not subject to unreasonable search and seizure. Or fulfill your duty to overthrow corrupt "government"...

      --
      "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
    186. Re:If you're that worried... by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      He was talking about a one time pad. That is indeed mathematically impossible to decrypt given a random seed source. Like absolutely impossible. As to the RSA and NSA I have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you should read this

    187. Re:If you're that worried... by antic · · Score: 1

      Put your charger in checked-in baggage. Take two batteries. Put the full one in your partner's carry-on baggage. Keep a drained one in the laptop.

      When they ask, say the battery's flat and you don't have your charger. Unless they're really suspicious, they might just wave you through?

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    188. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they cannot "sieze your laptop" if you don't give them the encryption password; a strict reading of the policy is that the laptop can be seized in any event, encryption or no. There is NO REQUIREMENT to provide anyone with an encryption password under any circumstances. The existing policy doesn't even speak to encryption. In fact, leading privacy advocates recommend encryption as the most deisrable solution.

      You guys do realize that customs agents at the border have ALWAYS had the right -- without a warrant -- to perform reasonable search and inspection of all physical objects and persons coming into the United States; this policy was designed to expand those longstanding inspection rights to electronic data.

      In its current state, it's a poorly written policy. The fact is, no one is going to look at the contents of your laptop, much less be seizing it. (Do you guys actually travel internationally?)

      Thanks Dave from DoIT for this comment, i actually browsed comments to see if SOMEONE had mentioned those facts. Also, don't piss of the customs agents and they will leave you alone. Unless you hid raw meat in your laptop, or you are flagged as an international hacker they won't ask for it.
      UW CS alumn.

    189. Re:If you're that worried... by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

      Of course, the best way to avoid giving up data is to not have it in the first place. Anyone with any degree of paranoia already does this; SSHing in to a home server to conduct business should be standard practice. You never know when someone may get access to your laptop, and the most foolproof method of encryption is to not have any data at all (encrypted or not).

      If you're REALLY paranoid about the US government, you can always encrypt your data with a one-time pad before you send it back to your home box...

    190. Re:If you're that worried... by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everybody knows that only terrorists use Linux. You are supposed to help the guy. Seriously. If TSA stopped people with a Macbook Air because it had no optical drive, then they will probably freak out and think you replaced your hard drive with an explosive or something like that if it doesn't show up.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    191. Re:If you're that worried... by netdur · · Score: 1

      OP is pedobear

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
    192. Re:If you're that worried... by udoschuermann · · Score: 1

      Hidden volume within truecrypt's volume is the answer. You enter your password, they get to see some of the hidden stuff, like documents and such that you wouldn't want to actually fall into someone else's hands if the laptop were stolen, but the stuff you *really* want nobody else to even see is on another volume hidden there in such a way that you can claim that it does not exist and they could not prove you wrong.

      It's called plausible deniability. Use it.

      But above all, don't play the pissed-off jerk at the airport. Just open the laptop up and let them browse the files while you ask to be there, too. Be nice, be friendly, not too helpful, but demonstrate that you have nothing to hide and they're unlikely to feel it worth their time to waste their time with you.

      Not sure if that works, but keep the human equation in mind. They're people, too, even if they're paid to shove a stick up their ass before they show up for work.

      On another note, it is sad how quickly our government undermined, as a response to those attacks, the very values that made this nation what it used to be. Four damn airplanes is all it took and the perpetrator is still alive today. The mind boggles.

      --
      --Udo.
    193. Re:If you're that worried... by C_L_Lk · · Score: 1

      So really - even if you're bringing back 2GB or 4GB of data - almost all of today's laptops have SD memory card slots, and an SDHC 8gb chip costs less than lunch at most restaurants. Why not take all the pictures while you travel and when the trip is over put them all on the SDHC card and stick said card in your wallet. I've yet to see many wallets extensively searched at customs.

    194. Re:If you're that worried... by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      A few months ago, a colleague of mine had to go to a customers site in South America. It was decided that it was better to take a longer trip, to go around the U.S.
      And this despite the fact that it was a short trip, and obviously perfectly legal.

    195. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was teaching overseas. This shitface at the border, opened up all my letters from kids who wished me farewell, and when I asked him why is he looking at my personal letters (mind you, WRITTEN with crayons) he told me to go sit down, and to pull out my laptop. I told him, that he has not right to read those letters. He told me, that "This is not America, and you HAVE NO RIGHTS!" On top of that he said, "America is 60 feet behind me, and I am the one who will determine if you enter it or not." I said, "I am an American!" He said "Did you know that few of the terrorist who flew in into WTC were Americans." I said, "and if I refuse?" "You can sit here, until you are ready." With that he turned on my computer. Lucky for me, the battery was dead!

        A little bit of America in my heart died that day. That is not American spirit, or ideals! The interesting part, I had MORE right, and was TREATED with GREATER respect, when I was overseas; from third world countries, to communist/socialist places.

        That is just fucked up.
        So, it has nothing to do with "nothing to hide." It is about absolute control state dictates over you as an individual. It is big brother, we all like to talk about it. And yes, I know FBI reads this -and to you I ask -"Is this what the cost of freedom is? Depriving all, except the rich and the powerful who are in fact elevated to the royalty status with rules that do not apply to them? Is this the American way or Fascit way as from what we used to see in WWII movies with SS troops asking all for papers?

        This is not the ideals of America - but of some dictatorial state.

    196. Re:If you're that worried... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Actually, if she wasn't bright enough to sign anything else into law, yes!

      Sadly there is no real shrink the size of government candidate :(

    197. Re:If you're that worried... by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      That would still require you to HAVE the OTP on you, and get that through US customs...

      I can imagine that few customs workers have the knowledge (brains) to tell an OTP from encrypted data, or accept the explanation that he is looking at an OTP, and not encypted data.

    198. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so if it's just corrupted nonsense you won't mind if we delete it then...

    199. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full disk encryption is relatively cheap, easy, and unobtrusive.

      So are blank DVDs and a bubble-wrap envelope. That's the strategy I've been employing for the past year...bring blank recordable media, fill it, mail it to myself and keep it off my hard drive. Each time I've done it, the package has arrived unopened.

      The true benefit is that no over-zealous TSA agent can confiscate it or make me divulge the password to it. For the truly paranoid, you can even use GPG to encrypt the information before you send it. Keep the key either on your laptop or on a secure server you've got somewhere.

    200. Re:If you're that worried... by BerkeleyDude · · Score: 1

      In addition, it was also recently demonstrated [springerlink.com] that regardless of the encryption algorithm used, it's possible to get a silhouette of high contrast encrypted images.

      Provided your image is a plain bitmap. If you use any kind of compressed format - JPG, PNG, etc. - you don't need to worry about this.

    201. Re:If you're that worried... by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      While it is in the Bill of Rights, we are not permitted the right to a speedy trial. A speedy trial has been interpreted as "within a couple of years" while two opposing attorneys put together cases for the trial. Granted, most don't take that long, but they can. (The latest Simpson escapade lasted for a full year. That's not a speedy process.)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    202. Re:If you're that worried... by anoopdotk · · Score: 1

      For Windows, isn't it just enough to put all your data in a single drive and remove the "Drive Letter" in Windows Disk Management? The drive wont be visible to windows until you assign a drive letter again.

    203. Re:If you're that worried... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's an awkward mistype because in French, 'voila' is roughly 'there ya go' (lit. 'see there') whereas 'viola' is more along the lines of 'rape'. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    204. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, you should uninstall truecrypt before you go to the airport, it's a simple matter to download and reinstall it later and if you don't have an encryption program installed there's no basis for suspicion

    205. Re:If you're that worried... by nasch · · Score: 1

      I thought you said you were going to point to evidence. That is all speculation and guessing, topped off with a claim of information you have access to but aren't willing to share. Not convincing.

    206. Re:If you're that worried... by fractoid · · Score: 1
      You didn't read that link, did you?

      Focusing on the encryption of digital image and video, this paper reports an intrinsic weakness of all existing discrete-cosine-transform (DCT) based algorithms.

      Last I checked, 'plain bitmap' isn't DCT based. >.>

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    207. Re:If you're that worried... by fractoid · · Score: 1
      Because, as the GGGGGGGP said:

      However, there is one big note of caution. Do not back up the container. Ever. An attacker could look at the change over time and determine there is a hidden volume. That's probably too paranoid for your case but it's worth mentioning.

      If you have two copies of your "big file of random data" and one of them has a small amount of the file changed, then that indicates that there is data in there somewhere that's being changed.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    208. Re:If you're that worried... by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

      That would still require you to HAVE the OTP on you, and get that through US customs...

      Obviously anytime you ever encrypt anything with a OTP you must immediately destroy the pad data afterwards.

      So, by the time your laptop got to customs at the end of your trip the only copy of the pad would be on your home box, and (if you decided to leave encrypted data on the laptop) it would be irretrievable by the customs service. To transport the pad on the outgoing flight I would suggest a DVD in your carry-on, which you can melt with a simple lighter when the transmission/encryption is complete and you are ready to leave for home.

    209. Re:If you're that worried... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If you have two copies of your "big file of random data"

      ...don't keep them in the same frakking place! Not on the same drive, not in the same case, not in the same bag, not on the same person, not on the same flight... hell, keep them on opposite sides of the border or across a second border in a third country for all it matters: if they don't have access to both copies, they have nothing to frelling compare against!

      And besides, having one backup does not imply that the data changes. Two separated by significant time might. And still you can conceal the fact that any backups were ever fucking made!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    210. Re:If you're that worried... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      +1, Insightful. It sounds stupid and trivial but stereotypes are huge. Wearing a turban and muttering in Arabic as you walk through the gate is going to get you hauled off and strip searched. Wearing jeans and some American pop culture t-shirt, maybe something referring to a university if you're under 25 (and bonus points here for a matching accent) and they'll wave you through.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    211. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're saying "having my privacy raped and my rights trampled over like the door mat of grand central station doesn't matter, it's no big deal"...

    212. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Seems like overkill if he is just wanting to transfer his pictures and not get hassled. I am assuming you have a Windows box at home,yes? One that has a nice 24/7 Internet connection like cable/DSL? If that is the case then the answer is very simple:

      Actually it's not so simple. If there's a lot of storage used broadband will be needed to send it but it may not be available. A static IP address will also be needed and while cable/DSL is supposed to be "always on" not every cable or dsl provider provides a static address. Also he says he wants to rip movies and music he can enjoy on the flight, this may cause problems though that can be easy to fix. He can bring the original paid for media with him. A possible problem with that though is that airlines are limiting how much baggage and luggage a person can bring.

      Falcon

    213. Re:If you're that worried... by Xakh · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend SliTaz, it's only half the size of DSL.

    214. Re:If you're that worried... by raptorsforever · · Score: 1

      Well, there's that, and the fact that no file can be positively identified to be a Truecrypt volume. Until you you give a password it just appears to be random data. High entropy random data, but the guy at the border is looking for a 5 minutes spree tops - I seriously doubt he knows what entropy is let alone enough to check for it.

      If you're that worried create a volume with nearly same size as your system RAM, keep it in a directory with some source code (even write a stupid program that will crash if you want) and just name it "core" or "core.dumped". If asked about it tell them when you were testing your program (that does whatever you want to maekup) it crashed and dumped memory to file. It's probably just corrupted nonsense . . .

      That would be seriously funny unless you're like me and can't keep a straight face! Then the guy at the border would offer to delete the file for me, and I'd probably turn a dozen shades of white! :)

    215. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      However, there is one big note of caution. Do not back up the container. Ever. An attacker could look at the change over time and determine there is a hidden volume. That's probably too paranoid for your case but it's worth mentioning.

      If you have two copies of your "big file of random data" and one of them has a small amount of the file changed, then that indicates that there is data in there somewhere that's being changed.

      To compare though you need or more things to compare. I can backups all I want but if I don't bring a backup with me there's nothing to compare the state the storage I have with me is to.

      Falcon

    216. Re:If you're that worried... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the context of someone passing border security. Whether or not they stored their holiday photos on a DvD buried on a remote beach with a treasure map to lead them to it... that's way out of scope.

      Lots of backup systems do local backup to allow for versioning, data recovery after accidental deletion etc. I think it's pretty obvious that that's what the G^8P was referring to.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    217. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      to be fair a micro sd card is easier to hide then let's say, heroin or explosives...

      I think it's easier to swallow heroin and explosives than it is to swallow a micro sd card. Now I don't know if anyone's swallowed explosives but drug carriers do swallow drugs.

      Falcon

    218. Re:If you're that worried... by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're absolutely right, it'd be downright trivial to confound any "homeland security" flunky. Those wretches couldn't find their own genitals with both hands and a flashlight.

      What bothers me is that we're even talking about this like we're troubleshooting a minor tech issue. Why the hell should we have to even think about this? How did we get a place where this is an issue to deal with?

      What comes next... they require us to install and run a government supplied application to scan the disk? I mean... that would be in our best interest, right? It'd shorten the lines and protect our children from terrorists at the same time? It's lightweight and unobtrusive, while protecting our freedom?

      This country has a horrible sickness, and no politician is going to cure it. I'm about as normal a guy as you'd ever meet... but something has to happen to wake us the F* up, and I afraid it'd have to be something terrible.

    219. Re:If you're that worried... by LandruBek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I seriously doubt he knows what entropy is . . .

      lol. Von Neumann advised Shannon to call his measure of information 'entropy' because, as he put it, "no one knows what entropy really is."

      --
      $META_SIG_JOKE
    220. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Basically, at the moment an official asks you for your encryption password and you provide the incorrect one, you have probably committed a crime.

      You have only committed a crime, perjury, if you are sworn in. Otherwise the 5th amendment protect you from self incrimination.

      restricted in getting foreign visas

      US government doesn't give visas, the counties being visited do.

      being detained for a long and uncomfortable time with a large fine

      You can not be held more than 24 hours without being charged. And if you are charged you can sue for false arrest. This almost happened to me, I was at a shopping mall when some mall security personnel came up. They asked me to follow them to a room then called the police. Once the police arrived security asked me for my id and at first I refused to show it, so then they said if I didn't show it they would have me arrested. Not knowing they could do that I asked the officers if they could and they said yes. So I ended up giving security my id. Later I told my brother-in-law who's a laws school graduate about it and he confirmed it. I asked him what I should have done and he said I should have let them arrest me saying I'd have a good case to sue them for false arrest.

      However this happened before 911 so it might not apply now.

      Falcon

    221. Re:If you're that worried... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Just storing the pictures on the computer may be insufficient, I suggest that an external disk also shall be used, and then store that in the checked-in luggage. Using a bunch of flash drives can also be a good alternative.

      For triple safety, you may also set up a server at home (or similar location) and then access it over the internet from a WiFi hotspot.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    222. Re:If you're that worried... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about Truecrypt encryption is that if they don't have your password and your password is reasonably decent (not your girlfriend's name), then they shouldn't be able to hack it. Truecrypt is considered military-grade protection when used correctly.

      As LighterShadeOfBlack said, Truecrypt's "plausible deniability" feature is not to be discounted, either; a hidden, encrypted volume simply won't show up by any conventional method of data retrieval, and can only be accessed if you have the password.

      If somebody asks if you have any other data hidden on the system, you can request that they scan it themselves to verify that there is nothing else besides the random data you would expect to find in unallocated disk space. Since Truecrypt will continue to function even after deleting the program file used to set up Truecrypt volumes, you can choose to delete the software in order to further conceal the fact that you might have hidden data. Authorities can't simply ask you to give them every single password you have in order to verify that you aren't keeping something from them.

      Truecrypt also allows for hidden operating systems, which means that you can boot into a vanilla, dummy system for show, which should go a long way towards allaying suspicions about your trustworthiness. Without actually scanning the data structure of your hard drive, it's not worth their while to investigate further unless you give them a reason to be concerned.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    223. Re:If you're that worried... by LKM · · Score: 1

      Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag

      So we should all have encrypted files on our disks, and put encrypted stuff on our friend's computers, so that it will become commonplace and will no longer serve as a way of singling out people who value their privacy?

    224. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It runs linux, see." "Wassat? Some sorta terrist penguin? Please hand the laptop over sir."

    225. Re:If you're that worried... by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      Hard to sniff out sd cards, tho. Heroin/explosives have chemical signatures, SD cards presumably just smell like every other bit of silicon.

    226. Re:If you're that worried... by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      you can hide the micro sd card in your cell phone behind the battery, or inside the laptop, where even Mr. Xray wont notice it. There are a lot of un exciting places to hide that most tiny of cards without raising even the slightest suspicion

    227. Re:If you're that worried... by slash.duncan · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... And extending off of that...

      Those "netbook" mini-notebooks are practically semi-disposable price-wise, now, plus they're small and great for traveling. Buy one of those for trips where it might get lost (either at the border or forgotten, or swiped). Put most of your data on USB sticks, and do the Internet connectivity thing (some of them have 3g cell connectivity if you wish) and upload to some online storage site (even attach them to mail and google-mail them) periodically (depending on how long you're gone and how many pics you take) and before you return. You can encrypt before you upload if you're worried about someone snagging them as you upload or off whatever site.

      That way you aren't taking anything thru customs that worst case, you can't afford to lose. Similarly with losing your laptop at the airport or from your hotel room or whatever. The 300-ish you spend on the netbook isn't something you probably want to spend for every trip, but then the odds are you won't lose it on every trip... and if you lose it on one trip, oh, well. Meanwhile, your data too is backed up, since you uploaded it over the net, and can retrieve it once you get home if the physical copy gets snagged (either at customs, or as I said, from your hotel room or the airport or whatever).

      As for the encryption choice you can try gpg/pgp and possibly legitimately say you use it for mail, but they can ask for your key. (FWIW, unlike Britain, it's illegal/unconstitutional to demand it in the US including clearing customs, according to a recent court case, but illegal hasn't seemed to stop a lot of the Gov't thugs recently.) But the Truecrypt solution provides plausible deniability if you do it correctly (the recent /. headlines to the contrary not withstanding, see the discussion threads), and it's open source, so it should be reasonably secure from No Such Agency trojans or the like.

      But the little netbook solution, combined with (encrypted) net based storage, should pretty much solve the problem. And if the worst happens and you lose it... you've limited your loses.

      --
      Duncan
      "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master,
      and if you use the program, he is your master."
      R Stallman
    228. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do travel internationally. From the Netherlands to the US most of the time.

      Last time I was there I had to turn on my laptop and log in for them and then one customs officer went to a separate room for about 30 minutes (probably to look at the contents).

      They are and will look at the contents of any portable media device. There are a lot of cases of laptops being seized (and sometimes not returned) or just plain data being looked at. And there's nothing you can do to stop them, especially since I kind of want to enter the country instead of being turned back at the border.

      It's a huge invasion of privacy and I'm not even sure if they were allowed to take my laptop to a different room to look through it. But then, what am I going to do? Complain before I get a stamp in my passport?

      All I know is I'm not bringing my laptop anymore.

      I doubt you enter the US border often from abroad? Or read any stories about US customs?

    229. Re:If you're that worried... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I think it is much easier to bring 2 USB keys to Mexico, move the data on them and send them home via regular mail, separately.

      Last time I tried that, one of the USB keys came back with a NIN video.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    230. Re:If you're that worried... by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, they can simply chuck you in jail till you agree to hand over the encryption keys. Not a good plan.

      My company pulls off a disk image before you fly, wipes the drive and give you a live that just boots up, and downloads and replaces the disk image. Rinse and repeating before flying home. I imagine someone who implemented this commercially would be onto a nice little earner.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    231. Re:If you're that worried... by Eivind · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's not true. You can only get the silhuette under certain very spesific scenarios. Namely that the analyst has access to two *different* copies of the picture (say one with the contrast adjusted) both encrypted with the same key and the same initialization-vector. Oh yeah, and the picture must be stored a a bitmat, if it's stored in an compressed or compressed-and-lossy format like png or jpg (like basically all digital photos are) the attack don't work.

      It's an interesting theorethical result. Not terribly important in the real world. (easily defeated by changing the IV when rewriting a block, for example, and no issue at all in usage-scenarios where one can use CBC or similar)

    232. Re:If you're that worried... by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > Do not back up the container

      Really ? I didn't realise that. I'm just using a regular crypt, as I've no real need for a hidden volume, but out of curiosity:

        - can you mount both the regular and the hidden volume at the same time ?
        - would it also be detectable if you were to use the regular volume for 'reasonably sensitive data' which also gets changed on a regular basis ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    233. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Hard to sniff out sd cards, tho. Heroin/explosives have chemical signatures

      But can those chemical signatures be detected when the heroin or explosives are in your stomach?

      SD cards presumably just smell like every other bit of silicon.

      Which can be searched. Kamran Habib, a software engineer with Cisco Systems, has had his laptop and cellphone searched three times in the past year. Once, in San Francisco, an officer "went through every number and text message on my cellphone and took out my SIM card in the back," said Habib, a permanent U.S. resident. "So now, every time I travel, I basically clean out my phone. It's better for me to keep my colleagues and friends safe than to get them on the list as well. " Homeland Security can seize electronics indefinitely".

      Falcon

    234. Re:If you're that worried... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      In addition, it was also recently demonstrated that regardless of the encryption algorithm used, it's possible to get a silhouette of high contrast encrypted images.

      That was for four-color bitmaps, not 2^32-color compressed images (i.e. jpegs). And it depended on seeing the volume at two different points in time, with a white image exactly at the spot were the four-color bitmap would be placed later (or was located earlier).

      This scenario will not happen to the querent.

    235. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      uninstall Truecrypt before you reach the border, so it doesn't look like you used any encryption, then put it back again when you get home.

      Why uninstall it? Instead change it's name. I quickly looked at the apps installed on my laptop and there's more than 50, how long would it take to start everyone to see what it is? And that's supposing a border agent knows what TrueCrypt is.

      Falcon

    236. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better yet, send it to you using ups.

    237. Re:If you're that worried... by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Why go for "plausible" when you can have *real* without problems ?

      Leave the data at home on an internet-connected computer, or on some server on the internet.
      Cross the border with a laptop that REALLY (not just "plausibly") contains nothing even remotely interesting.
      Download the data once you're inside USA. Or just mount the remote drive if you've got the bandwith. No big deal.

      That way they can search all they want. They cannot find what GENUINELY isn't there.

    238. Re:If you're that worried... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      you can hide the micro sd card in your cell phone behind the battery

      They search cellphone as well as laptops: Kamran Habib, a software engineer with Cisco Systems, has had his laptop and cellphone searched three times in the past year.

      or inside the laptop, where even Mr. Xray wont notice it. There are a lot of un exciting places to hide that most tiny of cards without raising even the slightest suspicion

      They're willing to confiscate not just laptops but cellphones, mpg3 players, and other electronic gadgets as well. If they're willing to take one thing they can take other things also.

      Falcon

    239. Re:If you're that worried... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Damn, that's the last time I'll try to make a joke if no one can understand my punch lines.

    240. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit!

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    241. Re:If you're that worried... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      It's nothing new or US specific, most of the time, it's basic CYA crap.

      In 99, I was doing my year in the french army and one of the other victims had a bad accident during an exercice (he felt from a climbing wall a broke one leg in several points), and before the ambulance arrived, he had been expelled from the army and the hospital had to consider him a civilian patient with no insurance.

    242. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag.

      Probably true. I do wonder if customs could grasp the idea that if you've got confidential data from your company on your laptop, you want to encrypt it in case it gets stolen.

    243. Re:If you're that worried... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      The powers given to customs officials were designed to prevent smuggling. If I have data that can be transferred electronically and want to smuggle it into the US, I suspect I could find a way of doing so that does not entail carrying it manually through customs. Random searches of private data on people's notebook computers, iPods and phones may successfully find incriminating information. It does absolutely nothing to keep contraband out of the US.

    244. Re:If you're that worried... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      so you have a 20 in 10,000,0000 chance? I think you are more likely to die in a plane crash on the way than have your laptop siezed once you get there.

    245. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Privacy? In an airport?

      We're forced to nearly disrobe, pull things from our suitcases, have anything sharp or pointy confiscated, be subjected to machines that display us in the nude, and now our notebooks are fair game for some ham-fisted twit to peruse our files.

      The terrorists seemingly have won.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    246. Re:If you're that worried... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      If you have important data, drop it to a DVD. Put that in a separate place. Carry lots of them. Don't look like a terrorist or mad scientist as you go through customs and immigration.

      Don't worry, if you carry lots of DVDs, you'll look more like some kind of perv than anything else.

    247. Re:If you're that worried... by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      Label them: code v.0.9.3.a , then scribble something incomprehensible.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    248. Re:If you're that worried... by dword · · Score: 1

      Excellent point... If they want to see your pictures, just give them the notebook and never look back. Now worries, you'll probably get it back in five years. What a great deal!

    249. Re:If you're that worried... by mikejones_uk · · Score: 1

      Why not just burn any pictures or other data to DVD & mail it back to your home address?

    250. Re:If you're that worried... by dword · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that you can say you don't know the password and that the information stored there are just some documents from work or a movie you made. They can't prove you don't know something and they can't erase it because it is your data even if nobody can use it; you might even "remember" the password some day. Anyway, they're still your bits. You own those 1s and 0s and they can't understand what they mean nor force you to show them. It may very well be something completely meaningless, just random data but it's still yours.
      That's what good encryption software is for, turning your data into trash, helping you "forget" the password and later, when you're alone, recompose your data when you "remember" it.

    251. Re:If you're that worried... by Thunder+BoB · · Score: 1

      Why not just wade back across the Rio Grande like everybody else.

    252. Re:If you're that worried... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Sweet. I'd not realised they'd raised the baggage weight limits that much. I'll simply pack my stuff in the trunk of my car next time, and forget the suitcase for the plane.

    253. Re:If you're that worried... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      There's only one solution that guarantees that nobody will rifle through your data: don't bring it with you through the border crossing. That's what servers are for... and SSL, or at least SSH/SCP/SFTP.

      At which point No Such Agency will record your transmissions and decrypt them at their leisure. Nice try, though.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    254. Re:If you're that worried... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      "Hi, I notice you have TrueCrypt installed. Please decrypt your encrypted partition."
      "Certainly sir, here you go!" *Clicky clicky*
      "Thankyou, now the hidden volume."
      "I don't have a hidden volume."
      "I'd like to make sure. Yoink."

      Wipe laptop, install windows, office, camera drivers, put some photos of you / grass / birds (avian) on there. Take through customs. Email photos back to yourself from cyber cafes.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    255. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would disagree there. when you make a TrueCrypt volume of, lets say, 1 GB with a 512 MB hidden volume in it, the volume shows up as a little over 1GB, when mounted, it shows as 512. so there is no plausible deniability with a hidden volume.

      Interesting, deniability isn't in the FireFox dictionary...

    256. Re:If you're that worried... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Well, that reading comprehension thingy applies to the ggp who talked about something that is not applicable to this subject (i.e. crossing border with laptop).

      --
      I come here for the love
    257. Re:If you're that worried... by RobMac21 · · Score: 1

      Don't bring your laptop. You have a better chance of it getting stolen than getting searched. Don't leave it in a rental car i have had 2 friends get laptops and various other things stolen from their cars and hotel rooms. Just load up on memory cards they are way cheaper than possibly getting your laptop stolen.

    258. Re:If you're that worried... by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me, Areyoukiddingme? ;-)

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    259. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a European scientist I am even more frigthened now to go or even move to the US."

      I've long ago decided that the US would NOT be a good place to live because of increasing harassment to ordinary citizens doing ordinary stuff. I don't even like to go for a visit, and would not ever think about living there. Sorry for those who have no option but to live in the USA, but your country is increasingly scaring away the inventive, creative, highly specialized workforce - thank you government for that in the next election!

      Posted as anonymous because I work for an American company and I do have to travel to USA from time to time.

    260. Re:If you're that worried... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about most people, but I'd have a hard time straight-faced telling the customs officials one password while knowing that another password exists. They could also ask you "are there any more passwords?" if they know about this encryption scheme. Do you risk lying to them? That could be very bad, worse than if you'd just given them the password.

      As noted in a previous story, your best bet is to tape a starting pistol to your laptop. It'll get marked "special". ;)

    261. Re:If you're that worried... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      The difference is, members of the regime are not subject to "enhanced" interrogation techniques. (I really do think that Congress dropped the ball on that one.)

      If waterboarding is not torture, surely Bush and his people won't mind being subjected to that kind of interrogation, right?

    262. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try to mail from Mexico? I'd say use UPS/FedX
      if possible.

    263. Re:If you're that worried... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      In Puerto Vallarta its always easier (and cheaper!) to score with drunk gringas than with the local girls.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    264. Re:If you're that worried... by LunatikOwl · · Score: 0

      This country has a horrible sickness, and no politician is going to cure it. I'm about as normal a guy as you'd ever meet... but something has to happen to wake us the F* up, and I afraid it'd have to be something terrible.

      I'm afraid that this recent trend is not only exclusive to the US...

      I remember when in Israel the Knesset(Israeli parliament) voted for the Internet censorship at the ISP level, people where enraged and started to make comparisons with Soviet Russia.

      The truth was that ISP blocking P2P traffic and governments pressuring ISP to revel IP addresses and other identifying information has been a worldwide trend for some time.

      Recently Israel tried to move to biometric identification of the entire population... Again people were enraged and again the authorities claimed it is becoming the norm in the Western world.

      I think that since technology advances this trend will continue, since terrorist organizations and others will threaten democracies around the world. I just hope that proper legal chains will be put on those(e-surveillance) methods to prevent using those methods for political reasons.

      Also, I hope that we'll never cross the line from Defensive Democracy to democracy without it's basic principles

      I remember reading a comics once from the time of the first Intifada. The characters in the comics where living in bomb shelters checking everyone who knocks on their door for explosive belt and traveling through the streets with Uzis. Then the whole scene turned out to be a dream of some terrorist who dreamed that they accomplished their goal...

    265. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind that right now - my Dell battery has "exceeeded its useful life" and needs a $200 replacement..

    266. Re:If you're that worried... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      This country has a horrible sickness, and no politician is going to cure it. I'm about as normal a guy as you'd ever meet... but something has to happen to wake us the F* up, and I afraid it'd have to be something terrible.

      Unfortunately it's the "terrible" things that happen that lead to excuses for doing things like searching laptops... When people stop thinking things like "what if a terrorist..." and stop being scared pussies then maybe they'll grow some and stand up for freedoms.. I am not scared of Iran, Al Quada or any of these crazies.. that the government thinks they are making me feel safe by scrutinizing me as a potential threat shows how much of a clue they have..

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    267. Re:If you're that worried... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      That's creepy. I see it as far easier to implement concepts like that in Israel where threats are much more likely or frequent.

      I just hate the idea that we're talking about subversive behaviors to escape the eyes of our government as if we've just accepted it. I don't want to behave as if I were some sort of criminal just so I can maintain some modicum of personal privacy. It seems the real solution is to make it clear that this situation is unacceptable.

    268. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should have unusually low entropy for "random data", not high entropy.

    269. Re:If you're that worried... by akozakie · · Score: 1

      Something terrible? Wrong idea.

      Something terrible is like a miracle to politicians, a breath of fresh air. It's difficult to force some things while the nation watches, but something terrible will spark emotions and emotions are great waves to surf on. You can push the wierdest things if you justify them as reaction to something as long as sufficiently strong emotions are associated with that something. And even if you don't, you can use that wave to propel you to greater power - nothing better for the current ruler than a catastrophy just before election. Unless the ruler can't react quickly enough, that's his problem: his opponents will surely use that.

      That's why you got so many freedom-restricting laws just after 9/11. That's why you hear such a lot about pedophilia. That's why anything you see in the papers with sufficient emotional comments will cause governmental action, even if it actually makes things worse.

      So, what terrible thing did you mean? Innocent people suffering? Already happened and can be used to advantage - out troops still don't have enough information, causing false positives, more snooping is necessary to Protect Innocent Citizens!

      What else? Revolution? Even bigger emotions, even better situation. Sure, your current government would collapse, but the revolution tends to give power to people with results, not visions, and in effect often lands with ruthless dictators in power. USSR - product of a revolution. Robespierre's terror in France - product of a revolution.

      That's the problem with masses. Usually they sleep, but if you wake them up, they tend to demand action, but think even less. The trick is to create a slow push. React to small incidents. Mobilize people separately for every small battle. Make them write to their representatives. Make them answer the difficult questions: "Do you know what your representative's position was on (...)? And on (...)? So, would you vote for him again?" Make them feel that they are losing something and push for changes, then hope that a good group of leaders forms. Then they can take over and fix things.

      Remeber - the old America didn't become great because of a revolution. It had good leaders. Without them the results would be the same as with most revolutions. Have a vision and good people in charge before you even start, or you're risking everything.

      So - this situation can only be fixed by politicians, but you need new ones. Completely new ones. And the sad thing is: with such a strictly bipartisan system, with most citizens confident that any third party is a waste of a vote, you're not going to get any. Sorry.

    270. Re:If you're that worried... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Can it be set up so that if given a certain "wrong" weak password (I'm thinking birthdate or something simple) it provides access to a honeypot encrypted volume with nothing of interest?

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    271. Re:If you're that worried... by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and try it.

    272. Re:If you're that worried... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      First, he's not a US citizen.

      Second, the guy was walking around with Osama's friends!!

      Third, he got his day in court.

      Blame Canada... they're the one that sold this poor guy down the river in the first place. They alerted the US authorities, told them Arar was not a citizen of Canada and would not accept extradition, and actively solicited intelligence information leading to deep suspicion.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    273. Re:If you're that worried... by LunatikOwl · · Score: 0

      That's creepy. I see it as far easier to implement concepts like that in Israel where threats are much more likely or frequent.

      I'm afraid that since 9/11 every government feels obligated to frighten the public into giving up their basic freedoms

      It seems the real solution is to make it clear that this situation is unacceptable.

      That's apparently one of the shortcomings of democracy in the modern age. Every day you see some restrictive format getting iso approved or some law enacted that takes freedoms from citizens, and you hear people raving about it in sites like /.. But the average layman don't even grasp how these things restrict his/her freedoms, so it doesn't have any electoral power to oppose to...

    274. Re:If you're that worried... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      And a Slashdot user who works as a border guard would simply ask: "Then you don't mind if I temporarily fill up the remainder of your free space on this TrueCrypt volume with random data?" Because unless you explicitly acknowledge and protect the hidden volume (or mount the primary volume read-only) any data you write to the primary could easily overwrite all your hidden data.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    275. Re:If you're that worried... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      There are two weak spots when using unbreakably strong encryption:
      - Poor choice in passwords
      - Rubber-hose cryptography

      Both are probably going to be sufficiently useful that algorithm strength won't be a significant issue. The exception to that is if people start encrypting large volumes of innocuous data.

    276. Re:If you're that worried... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      That's not CYA, that's having no humanity left. I don't think the army needs not to have it, despite killing people.

    277. Re:If you're that worried... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Panaflex, the entire subject of this conversation is about foreigners who are worried about going to the US and then leaving again.

      So, enough with the "But they weren't US citizens" crap. It's irrelevant, and really, we don't give a flying fuck what you do to each other. Shoot each other up to your hearts content. The question is, how can I be safe bringing my laptop in and out of the US. The answer is, you can't.

      I don't know the millions of people in FEMA concentration camps by name. But they are there, and if there is any justice in the world, one day they are going to come pouring out of those camps and massacre your population for the injustices that have been done to them.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    278. Re:If you're that worried... by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      alright lol. What about inside a stapler. Surely they don't open your bag and proceed to dismantle all objects down to their constituent parts. Inside a usb mouse. There's tons of empty room, and all you need is a phillips screw driver. What about one of those rolls of quarters in paper. Slip it between two quarters. Inside a keyboard. Inside speakers. Inside a graphing calculator, or better yet, a 4 function calculator. They can't possible take a apart all of these things, and an x ray wouldn't notice a micro sd card inside a stapler or mouse, where plenty of other electronics are there too.

      If the zipper in my pants doesn't set off a metal detector, would a micro sd card?

      I'm just saying, there's got to be limitless amounts of places you could hide something that small.

    279. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, if he doesn't like your smell he can confiscate your laptop.

      Besides that, there are attacks to TrueCrypt.

      If you don't use XTS there are attacks.

      Pictures can be read, too.

      And, cold boot attack vector.

    280. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know the millions of people in FEMA concentration camps by name. But they are there

      Prove it or admit that you're lying. Those are your only choices.

    281. Re:If you're that worried... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      You can't bring a laptop "safely" ANYWHERE, period. Every country in the world has the right to search at the border - both citizens and non. I don't see how the USA is any different from France, England, or Japan.

      Secondly - there are not millions of people in FEMA concentration camps. That's utter and complete B.S. Be vigilant for freedom and liberty - don't make a mockery of it.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    282. Re:If you're that worried... by nobodymk2 · · Score: 1

      Supercomputer brute force attack? The strength of 128-bit keys or even 1024 bit keys aren't that powerful...

      And let's not forget that merely encrypting your data is (can be) incriminating.

    283. Re:If you're that worried... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      Supercomputer brute force attack? The strength of 128-bit keys or even 1024 bit keys aren't that powerful...

      Truecrypt uses 256-bit symmetric encryption algorithms. These are far beyond what anyone on Earth is capable of breaking within the lifespan of the Universe using current technology. Estimates put 96-bit encryption more-or-less within the reach of the greatest global powers with massive budgets to put into customised hardware - even then we're still talking about months or years to break a single message. As far as your comment about 1024 bit keys, I assume you're talking about asymmetric encryption which is a different kettle of fish and not relevant to Truecrypt.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    284. Re:If you're that worried... by reeeh2000 · · Score: 0

      Check out the stickers from eff.org. They have a roll of stickers with the fourth amendment on them. It probably wont stop customs but you can argue with them about it. It's extra fun to quote the fourth amendment to them.

    285. Re:If you're that worried... by mustafap · · Score: 1

      >The really paranoid part of me thinks that this makes it only a matter of time before possession of any data that could potentially be an encryption key will be a criminal offense

      No problem. You can hide the key in a jpeg image. Let them work *that* one out.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    286. Re:If you're that worried... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't say "walla!"

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    287. Re:If you're that worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in the UK you are required to hand over user ids/passwords/encryption keys if requested. Additionally, you are not ever allowed to tell anyone that you were asked for the user id/password/key. I believe that there is a mandatory prison sentence for the latter 'offence'. So basically in the UK (which is now a police state), who knows how often these kinds of searches are being performed (?), because they absolutely cannot be talked about.

    288. Re:If you're that worried... by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that something like mounting a Samba share on your home machine over a VPN link is the way to go. Most of the things that you create (besides video and perhaps some pictures) aren't going to be incredibly large.

      The bonus here is that you control the machine running the Samba share and VPN endpoint. Since you're uploading, your home machine is downloading which means you get the better part of the asymmetric deal on the receiving end. You can add other layers of encryption (disk encryption on both the laptop and on the Samba server, files encrypted with GPG or an entire TrueCrypt drive image) on top of it easily. The only downside I can see would be having to leave your machine and modem/router on at home ($$$).

      Of course, you could always just use SSH, but Samba share over VPN has a much higher non-geek acceptance rate as all you need is a file browser (and for the non-Unix using, Windows Explorer and Finder on the Mac would work just fine) and a "click-here-to-connect" button after it's all set up.

    289. Re:If you're that worried... by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't bother with encryption, I'd use a Netbook and WiFi all my images to Flickr, then when I'd used my monthly upload limit, Photobucket, then Facebook. Then at the end of the trip, erase everything from the Netbook before flying home and download all the photos when I got home. (You can make them private easily enough on these services.) It's a lot of work, yeh, but it would give some satisfaction to me to so easily bypass such a silly security measure using such simple tools. ;-)

      Another fun way to thumb your nose at authority would be to just get a large capacity memory card for your camera, but have the standard one in the camera while traveling. Place the working SD/XD camera card in your shoe, between the sole and inner-sole, under your toes. If you cycle and use SPD pedals, take your bike shoes in your luggage and tape the memory card under the inner-sole, just over the cleat mount bracket. Use metal foil tape, cut to the same shape as the cleat mount and they'll never see it in a million scans.

      If they do find it, they'll be putting the anal inspection gloves on, though. That's when the fun backfires :D

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    290. Re:If you're that worried... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Just put them on facebook like everyone else does. Its not like the NSA would ever think of looking on Facebook!

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  2. mail it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    problem solved.

    1. Re:mail it. by nwf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what I was thinking, but it would likely be expensive to get it through customs. Or put all your data and OS on a SSD and rent or borrow a laptop on whatever country you are going to. Swap the hard drives and you are good to go.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:mail it. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 1

      Halfway. According to the fine summary, submitter also wants "to rip a few movies and albums to the drive in order to keep busy on the flight."

      I'd mail the computer and bring along a personal media player.

    3. Re:mail it. by dword · · Score: 1

      Don't they still have the right to retain it and look at it? And it's suspicious to me, why mail yourself your own laptop if you're going home? That might give them just the reasons they need to do it.

  3. Flash mem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    keep an SD card in ur wallet

    1. Re:Flash mem by doas777 · · Score: 1

      that's a good plan as long as they don't find it. my first thought was the same. unfountunatly though, the statute allows them to confiscate media as well.

    2. Re:Flash mem by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Keep the SD card in your underwear. They are NOT going to look for it unless they absolutely must.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    3. Re:Flash mem by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      I usually carry multiple memory cards and I take thousands of pictures while traveling. I keep one with the camera because thats where they expect to find it and carry the rest in my pocket. I travel internationally a few times a year and have only had customs ask to see the pics on the cam once when I was returning to the US from Thailand. I just flipped on the cam and scrolled through the pics quick and was on my way.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    4. Re:Flash mem by nwf · · Score: 1

      Ah, and since cameras won't show data, it looks clean! Good idea!

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    5. Re:Flash mem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Them: Excuse me, sir. Why do your balls make my detector wand beep. Please come with me.

      You: Uh oh.

    6. Re:Flash mem by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      Most of the times, the real reason they ask you to turn your camera/laptop on, is not to see any content, but to make sure that that's indeed a fully functioning camera/laptop, and that you have not swapped the battery with a fake one filled with drugs.

    7. Re:Flash mem by eosp · · Score: 1

      They have Neuticles for humans now too?

    8. Re:Flash mem by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      So make sure you're packing a foil-wrapped cucumber in your pants, ala Derek Smalls in "This Is Spinal Tap".

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Flash mem by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      With a powerful microscope, you can read the data of an SD card.

      Assuming we've got people lurking here for more serious advice, an SD card is never the way to go.

      I'd say mix movie DVD with data DVD, and post it. Or SSH back home. Truecrypt volumes, not total encryption; I would seriously suspect you if you had total encryption, to be honest. But volume encryption? Good luck figuring it out.

    10. Re:Flash mem by Abreu · · Score: 1

      "I have balls of steel!"

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  4. Put the tinfoil hat away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one is going to search your computer other than to make sure it is a computer and not a bomb.

    1. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      No one is going to search your computer other than to make sure it is a computer and not a bomb.

      You'd think that, but there have been stories recently about that not being the case.

    2. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by doas777 · · Score: 1

      you haven't been paying attention have you.

    3. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by tindur · · Score: 1

      And what are you doing in a foreign country anyway?

    4. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "No one is going to search your computer other than to make sure it is a computer and not a bomb."

      Unless someone steals it.

      Worrying about ZOG poking through your machine and actually caring about what's on there is fashionable, but it is at least equally reasonable to worry about someone bagging the computer itself.
      If they do that, you might feel less violated if they cannot get to your data.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by Raleel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually fly international, and am currently overseas, and typing this on a laptop. Yes, they can probably search your laptop. I've yet to actually see anyone get their laptop searched in the airport... I've been in more than half a dozen airports in the last month and a half. I've been with teams of a half dozen, all with laptops, and none has gotten searched. I'm currently with a team of many more than that and none of them has been searched.

      So, yes, it's probably possible for them to search it, but I don't think it's particularly common.

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    6. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > No one is going to search your computer other than to make sure it is a computer and not a bomb.

      Oh, really?
      You give those trained monkeys way too much credit:
      http://www.pressrepublican.com/homepage/local_story_278220015.html

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd think that, but there have been stories recently about that not being the case.

      There are "stories" about kidnapping of children, but I still let my children play outside. There are "stories" of serial killers, but I still walk in the city. There are "stories" of school shootings, but I still let my kids go to public school.

      What's your point?

      I can find a "story" about anything. That doesn't mean that it's common or that special precautions need to be taken.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by computational+super · · Score: 1
      There are "stories" about kidnapping of children, but I still let my children play outside. There are "stories" of serial killers, but I still walk in the city. There are "stories" of school shootings, but I still let my kids go to public school. What's your point?

      Clearly that you're just asking for it...

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    9. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, if something is newsworthy enough to be a story every time it happens, it's probably rare enough to be safely ignored.

    10. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I don't see a need for the paranoia. The most I've been searched at the border is a look through my bags, and other times I was just waved through. Same for everybody I know and that they know...I haven't even heard a "friend of a friend" story. You're far more likely to have your laptop stolen in Mexico than having it searched at the border.

    11. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by francisstp · · Score: 1

      I still let my kids go to public school.

      Ok that's just silly.

    12. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I still let my kids go to public school.

      Ok that's just silly.

      Yeah, he lost me on that one too.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    13. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Unless someone steals it.

      That would be my biggest worry. There's a lot on my laptop of importance to the right people. SSH keys, SSL keys, etc, and the configuration to make it pretty obvious which key belongs to which server. It's a matter of ease of use for me.

      Keeping the disk encrypted is a good (not perfect) way to keep a casual thief from rifling through my stuff. It's a good way to keep a less casual thief from gaining access to the several gigabits of Internet bandwidth that my servers sit behind. It is also a good way to keep prying eyes out of things like (possibly) my Internet banking details and other 'sensitive' crap that people keep on their laptops.

      Unfortunately keeping the disk encrypted is a sure fire way to get red-flagged in the very unlikely event that your PC does get searched at the border crossing.

      It comes down to a game of numbers. Do you risk having your lappy stolen and your personal data (some of which may be of interest to even a casual observer) compromised or do you risk getting red-flagged in an unlikely search? The choice is yours to make!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    14. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by firmamentalfalcon · · Score: 1

      Wrong. There are "stories" about kidnapping of children, but you don't let your children play outside when the kidnapper is on your lawn. There are "stories" of serial killers, but you don't walk with one.

      The government is a single entity. And it, as one entity, is willing to search your laptop.

      When one person murders, not all people murder. But when the government search a laptop, the entire government is willing to search a laptop.

    15. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      The government is a single entity. And it, as one entity, is willing to search your laptop.

      Except your analogy makes no sense. The government is *not* a single entity, it's a collection of individuals. Not every laptop gets switched on, taken apart or whatever other nefarious activity. The point is that invasive searches of laptops is a very rare occurrence. Obviously -- like there are enough airport screeners to search every laptop? It's absurd.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    16. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      Searches of laptops at border crossings for information, not explosives, are no myth, according to this "story". Business travelers are taking precautions to avoid interference with the conduct of their business because of this situation.

      Perhaps that's the sort of thing the GP was referring to.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    17. Re:Put the tinfoil hat away by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Two weeks ago, I went to my brother's trial. Upon entering the courthouse, I passed my laptop through the scanner, then the laptop bag.

      While I was turning on the laptop, one deputy (US Marshalls) quietly said something to the other, and he quickly grabbed my laptop bag and started rifling through it.

      After a minute of turning up nothing but the normal stuff, he whispered to the deputy at the scanner again, who replied, and I overheard "three sticks of dynamite."

      At that point, I was seriously thinking "WTF???", and let them keep rifling through the bag. After another couple of minutes, I asked "Are you really looking for three sticks of dynamite?"

      "Well... that's what it looks like on the scanner."

      I pulled out my spare battery, which internally has three rows of lithium cells, and said "It's just a battery." The deputies realized how dumb their mistake was, laughed, and apologized.

      Nobody took me into a room and cavity-searched me, nobody tackled me, or confiscated my laptop. I just went along my way.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  5. don't take data across the border by Aurisor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Throw a clean install on your laptop, and put your critical data on a server so you can just log in and download it when you arrive.

    When you're about to fly back, re-upload your data and wipe the drive.

    You could also just mail encrypted DVDs with substantial insurance.

    1. Re:don't take data across the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better way to do this is with SSH/Rsync, and instead of "wiping the drive" simply redact the space you "emptied" when you deleted the files off the local drive. There are quite a few good utilities to do this on both Windows and Linux. This is all assuming you have an internet connection to upload the files from where you are. Otherwise, you could always just do something like tar all the files, gpg them into an encrypted file, then re-tar or even compress them and hide the file somewhere (or even split it up into pieces and hide it in mulitple places). Disguise them as system files or something.

    2. Re:don't take data across the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or if you do then use the best deterrent of the Ages:

      dirty underwear. Few tourists bother to do laundry before coming home and the luggage rifflers know this. So be sure to pack lots of filthy, stinking, absolutely disgusting pieces of apparel near the laptop. Save that neat donkey ride until the last day, go hiking when it is hot, have really wet sex just before leaving. Just smile a say that you had already packed your luggage and so had to carry it on.

      Kooties: the ultimate fear.

  6. Memory Stick would be Easier by MuChild · · Score: 1

    You could offload all your photos onto a memory stick. I doubt they would search that. Especially if it's not in your carry-on.Encrypting is pretty darn easy, too. Although if they give you a hard time, you'll just have/want to decrypt it for them to take a look. Otherwise it looks real suspicious.

    1. Re:Memory Stick would be Easier by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 2, Funny

      Memory sticks work fine, most security personnel don't even know what they are. Just remember, what ever you do, don't EVER bring a bottle of water with you!

    2. Re:Memory Stick would be Easier by tchuladdiass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go a step further. Take a 16GB flash drive, and create a 512 MB partition on it. Mount the rest of the drive using a 512 MB offset, and put your encrypted volume on that. Place a few scenery pictures on the 512 MB fat32 partition, and finally print up a label that says 512MB and stick it on there. They wouldn't even come close to seeing that there is an encrypted volume hidden on there then.

    3. Re:Memory Stick would be Easier by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Go a step further. Take a 16GB flash drive, and create a 512 MB partition on it. Mount the rest of the drive using a 512 MB offset, and put your encrypted volume on that. Place a few scenery pictures on the 512 MB fat32 partition, and finally print up a label that says 512MB and stick it on there. They wouldn't even come close to seeing that there is an encrypted volume hidden on there then.

      At some point DHS will catch on to this. Its not hard to train border guards on the usage of The computer management MMC to look at physical drives and mounted partitions on linux. I think its also reasonable to be able to train at least one per shift per airport to use fdisk on linux.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  7. Linux to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install linux, set grub to boot into windows straight away. Put what you want on your linux partitions. Fix grub when you're in the US and reboot into linux.

  8. rental by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    I'd use Truecrypt on a USB key of some sort, and use rental computers on the plane and at the destination rather than your own machine, which you leave safely at home.

    Use certain Linux distros, and you can literally have your own "computer on a stick" this way.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. Not in my experience by Buddy_DoQ · · Score: 1

    However, my international adventures are limited to Canada and Japan. Most recently was a trip to Tokyo last March, where I had 0 issues coming or going with the Macbook I took along for digital photo dumps. YMMV.

    --
    -Buddy of DoQ
  10. Short Answer by scipiodog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Short answer: Truecrypt (as you mentioned in the summary.) Is it worth looking into? Yes. Are you being overly paranoid? No. Seriously, have you noticed the big brother trends recently? Truecrypt is very simply and effective encryption, in several forms, from simple encrypted containers to hidden O/S partitions. To take such a simple precaution is not, IMHO, overly paranoid.

    --
    http://clightnirish.wordpress.com/
    1. Re:Short Answer by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Short answer: Truecrypt (as you mentioned in the summary.) Is it worth looking into? Yes. Are you being overly paranoid? No. Seriously, have you noticed the big brother trends recently? Truecrypt is very simply and effective encryption, in several forms, from simple encrypted containers to hidden O/S partitions. To take such a simple precaution is not, IMHO, overly paranoid.

      What you're recommending is an effective deterrent to data loss to government employees or criminals. So effective, in fact, that some countries have made it a crime to not divulge your passphrase to law enforcment. The idea being, I suppose, that if you are hiding something, you're presumed guilty of something and punished anyway. In the current legal climate in the United States encryption is a good idea ... but if you're traveling to England you might want to find another solution to protecting your data.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. You could. by FireStormZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Use a clean install and email the photos to yourself while you are there... or put them on an encrypted thumb drive / cd and snail mail it..

    --
    "Ahh! Arrogance and stupidity in the same package, how efficient of you!" --Londo Molari
    1. Re:You could. by doas777 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      great sig man!

    2. Re:You could. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had external drives of any sort searched, be it an X-HD in my check-on/laptop case or a Flash drive in my pocket. Odd, because their sole purpose* is to hold "data".

      *The cool factor when you empty 2 or 3 USBs from your pockets in front of the super-model w/ the geek fetish standing in security line behind you has been voided by the "pay-to-circumvent-security" option provided by the carriers... for our convenience... and our protection... for a price...

  12. Nobody's going to look at your pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had anyone inspect my laptop, let alone demand it be turned on and proceed to rifle through my personal files. You could probably zip up your photos and rename the extension and nobody would be the wiser.

    Get a grip, man.

    1. Re:Nobody's going to look at your pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't read the recent stories on slashdot, either.

  13. Maybe not so often? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know what the criteria for the search is, but FWIW, I've been in and out of the US at least six times in the past two years, and never had my laptop searched. Never seen it happen to anyone either.

  14. Tip #1: by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Use a cruise ship as much as possible. If you leave the US on the boat and come back on the boat then they won't rummage through your shit:

    On my last cruise we hid(and these were strictly for our own presonal/recreational use) 3 handles of booze, 24 Marijuana cookies, 1 small bag of marijuana buds, and my noncritical laptop in our main(heavy with clothing etc) luggage. Only the carry-on bags were searched. When coming back into the US just keep your laptop in your main luggage with your clothes and don't have any contraband on you when you get back(like I said, they won't search your laptop if its in the large luggage) as there may be a doggie sniffing.

    If you are flying out of the country and flying back in, I don't know what to say except sorry, bro!

    1. Re:Tip #1: by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, wait a minute. You were worried enough about being searched that you chose to bring your "noncritical laptop" (I'm assuming that's oposed to your critical one). And you packed this laptop right next to your drug stash?

      Also, last time I was on a cruise they had bomb/drug dogs checking the bags both while loading and unloading, so I'm not sure how safe it is to pack contraband on your way out of the country either. Though they weren't checking bags if you carried them onto the boat yourself so I guess that's just one more example of security theater.

    2. Re:Tip #1: by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      When I said "noncritical" I meant to emphasize that I didn't care whether or not they looked through it as it's my only laptop.

      If I was worried about being searched then I wouldn't have loaded up all the fun stuff because I knew that as long as I didn't take any fun stuff back off of the boat then I'd be fine.

      Obviously YMMV depending on the methods of travel and the agency or cruise line involved among other things, that's why he's asking slashdot and that's why I suggested an alternative to flying.

    3. Re:Tip #1: by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Informative

      If ever a comment needed to be AC'ed it was this one. You'll probably be getting a knock at the door any moment now.

      I went on a cruise last year and the day we were to disembark we had to stay in our rooms an hour while the police with drug sniffing dogs arrested several passengers for drug possession.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:Tip #1: by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which cruise line and port, if you don't mind me asking?

    5. Re:Tip #1: by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having worked on cruise ships for several years, I can offer some advice if you'll be there a while (not just your average passenger):
      * We were warned about Coast Guard inspections days in advance. The contraband was placed into film canisters, and those film canisters were washed thoroughly. They were then hidden in PUBLIC areas of the ship -- if found, it would be difficult to determine just who had put them there. As far as I know, none were ever found.
      * Make friends with security. Remember that when you are on shore having fun in port, they are standing in the doorway checking everyone. They don't get to go shopping, or out to shoot pool or hit nightclubs. Something as simple as doing their shopping for them once in a while could net you one very valuable ally.

      Other points should work for anyone:
      * If you are trying to take goodies back OFF the ship, separate these goodies from anything personally identifiable. The way the dogs mark the bags to be checked is to piss on them, so if you see your bag is wet or sitting in a puddle at the pickup point, just walk away.
      * If you are bringing goodies ONTO the ship, you should only bring enough to last you until your first port, not the whole trip -- this should make it easier to keep them on you personally and not in your luggage. Re-stock once outside the U.S. where the inspections will be much less intensive. If going to Mexico, the guys who will weave a wristband with your name in it for $5 will also happily set up a transaction for you for an appropriate fee.
      * Take one more bottle of booze than you are entitled to, and DECLARE IT. Nothing looks more like cooperation than voluntarily paying $3 in taxes. If you want to take more than that, feel free -- the one extra is just a minimum to make sure you have something to declare, and even with taxes you'll generally pay less for a liter bottle on-board than for a 750ml bottle of the same thing on land. Spread the most expensive bottles around, one to a person, to be their "freebie", and pay taxes on the cheaper ones.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    6. Re:Tip #1: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During my younger, more stupid years, I put a pipe with res all over it in my carry on. Went through X-Ray machines with NO issues whatsoever. But that was Canada ;)

    7. Re:Tip #1: by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If ever a comment needed to be AC'ed it was this one. You'll probably be getting a knock at the door any moment now.

      Why would posting as AC help him? If some law enforcement officer is reading this and is actually bored enough to track down Ethanol-fueled for pot they'd subpoena /. to get his IP address. I'm assuming that even AC posts have a log somewhere of the posting IP address so unless you are also using tor (or some poor bastards open AP) posting as AC isn't necessarily going to help you.

      I would also hope that any LEO reading this has better things to do than track down some random person on the internet down for pot possession. At worst that's typically a misdemeanor -- in my state it's not even that.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  15. i dont think they care about your personal pics by nolosses · · Score: 1

    what are you taking pictures of if you are worried about them looking at them. i can just about guarantee you that they dont really care what the pics are of as long as its your personal life and not something important.

    1. Re:i dont think they care about your personal pics by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Better not to keep that stuff on your laptop at all, if you're worried. FTP it to yourself, or burn it to some DVDs and stuff 'em in your checked luggage.

      If you have more than that, it's best to seek professional help...No one needs to travel with that much pron.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:i dont think they care about your personal pics by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      "what are you taking pictures of if you are worried about them looking at them"

      Well, they could be graphic pics of himself cavorting with his gay lover.
      If he is rich and married to a woman that could be a serious risk to him.

      Or maybe they are pics from a series of academic meeting he was having with his middle-eastern islamic peers.
      Maybe he has also participated in some peaceful anti-war protests and has already been added to a terrorist watchlist for that reason.
      Since he is a non-citizen at a border control point no laws apply and he could be detained and rendered to Syria or gitmo for 'interrogation'.

  16. Well, who are you... by nweaver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you a middle eastern looking young male? A white male returning from Thailand? If so, be paranoid.

    If not, no worries.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Well, who are you... by paazin · · Score: 1

      Parent is, sadly, pretty much right. I've had my laptop(s) with nearly a dozen times in the past year and the security folks never did more than a quick look-over.

    2. Re:Well, who are you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We recently had a laptop confiscated from a white, middle aged, morbidly obese man while entering the US via a flight from Canada. I don't think it matters what you look like, they just take what they want.

    3. Re:Well, who are you... by againjj · · Score: 1

      My father and I (white males, myself 20 and my father looking like a hippie) returned from Laos separately from the rest of my family, and got our luggage pretty thoroughly searched (+1 to parent for correctness). After I got married to a Lao woman and came back from Laos later, we were pretty much waved through.

      Don't want trouble? Mail it! That's how we have dealt with things.

    4. Re:Well, who are you... by Johan+Folin · · Score: 1

      I am white european male in my mid-twenties, I look like the average dude. On my vacation to the US in june this year, I hade to turn on my macbook in three of the six security checks we passed through (we covered a handful of states during the trip). They wasn't interested in any of the content though, they just wanted to see it running. But being a caucasian white man in tidy clothes isn't enough to be safe.

    5. Re:Well, who are you... by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a middle eastern looking young male ... well, not so young anymore, but still well under 50. And as I said in a previous post, I've never had any real problems with bringing a laptop past airport security on domestic or international flights. And I have had problems before -- big problems -- with airport security (and US Marshals) on a domestic flight. But none of those problems focused on a laptop, and I've never been asked to show what was on my laptop other than once I had to open it up and show that it actually did run. I suppose if someone looked like a child sex tourist flying from Bangkok they might be interested to see what photos are on their hard drive, but by and large their scrutiny is going to focus on whether you're a threat to the other passengers, but do you really think they are looking for vacation_photo_with_osama.jpg?

    6. Re:Well, who are you... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ah, don't forget white male with a common name who has a degree in electrical engineering. I get searched more than my middle Eastern colleagues.

    7. Re:Well, who are you... by mikee805 · · Score: 1

      Would you mind elaborating on this I am a white male and will be honeymooning in Thailand next month. Thanks, Mike

      --
      B5 71 ED FB 55 D6 4E 68 07 25 E2 FA CA 93 F0 2F, is mine! All mine!
    8. Re:Well, who are you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn it! I'm a white male and i will be returning from thailand in 2009!
      guess i will just have to buy a blank hdd in thailand!

    9. Re:Well, who are you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a white male returning from Thailand?

      No wonder I always get stopped at customs. I just thought it was me being "randomly selected".

      Now I know.

    10. Re:Well, who are you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.... not really.

      I have Tourette's Syndrome. No, I don't swear, but thanks anyway.

      The last time I was going through an airport, I noticed an agent stairing at me. Oh, great. He doesn't like the tics. Play it cool, play it cool...

      If you know anything about Tourette's, you know that trying *not* to tic just makes it worse. So, after not more than a minute, one slipped out. I think I gave a funny arm shrug and an odd face, or something like that.

      "YOU! Step aside! Put your bags down!"

      Ah, crap. They did stop short of a cavity search, but they rifled through *everything* that I had. Of course, I'm not dumb enough to try to bring anything illegal through an airport, so all was well.

      As an aside, it didn't really bother me. It was an inconvenience, but hey... if I saw someone acting that funny in an airport line, I might feel uncomfortable, too.

  17. encrypt working OS and partition by tonywong · · Score: 1

    Encrypt your working partition then install a 2nd OS that it defaults to without revealing your main working OS.

    That way they can scan for all the information they want off of your plain jane machine and not raise any suspicions about your private data.

  18. Let them try to decrypt it. by haeger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Put your files on a few small USB-sticks, or on your home server (for encrypted retrieval once you're in the country). Bring a Live-CD to boot from and then "cat /dev/random > /dev/sda".
    Make sure to grow a big beard, learn a few arabic phrases and quote Allah to the security guard in customs.

    Then let them have a crack at decrypting your "encrypted" drive.

    Just be sure to say "Just kidding" so they don't ship you off to Guantanamo.

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Let them try to decrypt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda bs=4096

      it is important to remember /dev/random only provides bytes when there is system generated entropy to dump . . . meaning it would takes days to fill a single GB of storage space

      urandom is pseudo-random

      less random but will dump its random data as fast as your drive can write

  19. Put the dunce cap away by megamerican · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you haven't noticed lately, the DHS can search your laptop, make copies of everything on your laptop and keep it. If you are a person who loves exercising arbitrary power over people, you probably work for the DHS or another government agency.

    Its really funny that a person who doesn't care about basic civil liberties is posting as AC. However, the joke is probably on me and you are just a troll. :)

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    1. Re:Put the dunce cap away by HBI · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK, i'm not AC and I can tell you that they don't have time to check out laptops at most international airports beyond the aforementioned bomb check.

      Yes, i've passed into and out of the country several times during the last year. No search.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Put the dunce cap away by megamerican · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one said it is happening to everyone. That misses the point entirely. Illegally searching even a small percentage of people is unnacceptable. Especially since people affected by this have almost no redress and the DHS doesn't even accurately report when they do this.

      I guess its only a problem when it happens to you. Maybe you should pick up a history book and find out how well that attitude worked in the 1930's and many other time periods.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    3. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      I posted as AC because my opinions are usually not inline with the group think of Slashdot. From the posts here, you'd think there is an entire army of computer techs just waiting to break into their laptops. It's simply not true and is out of touch with reality. Anyone who has flown internationally lately knows that. I bet not one Slashbot has ever had his personal files pawed through going through airport security.

    4. Re:Put the dunce cap away by HBI · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only children think in terms of the worst things that could happen to them. Every day, when I leave my house, I could get run over by a bus. I could get ass raped in a jail after being unfairly imprisoned by a cop for a crime I didn't commit. My house could be robbed. My person could be robbed. My car could have a molotov cocktail thrown at it. I could catch some nasty disease from a toilet seat.

      Note I spend about zero time thinking about these things because the chances of them happening to me are about nil. Ditto having my laptop searched. What are they going to find, my porn stash? WTF do I care, really. It's not worth a moment of my life to worry about.

      I retort: Maybe you should grow up and worry about things that are important, like where your next meal is coming from. I hear that it's growing fashionable now.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well apparently you can't understand this discussion so why don't you just fuck off you stupid motherfucker.

    6. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Exactly... Basically, all you can do is be organized and not be a dick and you should be fine. Make sure you can turn on all your electronics, watch whatâ(TM)s in your carry-on, and try not to sweat, or avoid eye contact, etc... They're so slammed with human traffic that as long as you don't trip one of their "triggers", you're just one more sheep in the herd.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    7. Re:Put the dunce cap away by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent. There are thousands of people traveling internationally every day, and only a very small percentage of their laptops are being searched (well below 0.1%). There are better things to worry about.

      I travel internationally fairly often, and I am far more concerned about having someone else pick up my laptop by mistake from the X-Ray machine (which almost happened about a year ago in Japan).

    8. Re:Put the dunce cap away by tirerim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, you don't believe in life insurance, then? How about property insurance? Do you even lock your door when you go out? I don't worry too much about getting killed or having my stuff stolen, but that doesn't mean I don't take reasonable precautions for it. Having those precautions in place saves me from worrying about it.

      Personally, I don't worry too much about where my next meal is coming from, because I have a job. If I lose it, then perhaps I'll worry, until I find another one.

    9. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't believe in life insurance, then?

      I'm sure he does think about life insurance, which is why he might buy it. Then he doesn't have to worry about every little problem that could arise. Same goes for property insurance. That is what insurance is used for a lot of the time - to assist you when unforeseen events happen.

    10. Re:Put the dunce cap away by madfancier · · Score: 1

      I know it's not something easy to imagine, but there are humans out there that happen to be familiar with the concept of a "girlfriend". And that "girlfriend" thingie might be photographed in ways that only the boyfriend alone prefers to see. You may argue that nobody cares about some random officials, but in my opinion this is extremely horrible, and I can't stand the thought of it.

    11. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been paying attention to any of the stuff going on in your country? Or should we just chalk you up as "yet another stereotypically ignorant American?"

      What is on my computer's hard drive is not the business of the people at the border. Let's say my wife and I take a couple "fun" photos on vacation - do I really want those to be passed around the office at US Customs for shits & giggles? No, I don't.

      What about my banking information? Or my saved passwords in my browser (if I actually did that, which I don't)? Do I trust Mr. Joe Customs enough to allow him free access to that information? What happens 4 months later when there are unexplained charges on my credit card?

      Y'know, I don't know you but I'm just going to prejudge you: "Just another stereotypically ignorant American". Enjoy your state-approved CNN news broadcast tonight. Everything is fine.

      (seriously, clue in and start watching/reading news sources external to your own country - America isn't what it used to be and you need to wake up to that)

    12. Re:Put the dunce cap away by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note I spend about zero time thinking about these things because the chances of them happening to me are about nil.

      Which just goes to show how bad people are at understanding small probabilities.

      It's foolish to completely ignore possible bad events just because they're unlikely, just as it's foolish to spend lots of time preparing for most unlikely events. The right way to handle unlikely but severely damaging events is to spend a small amount of time on them, and use that time to mitigate the risk to whatever extent is feasible.

      For example: you could get run over by a bus. Therefore, it's prudent to pause for a half-second before crossing the street and look both ways to see if perhaps a bus is coming.

      You could get unfairly imprisoned by a cop for a crime you didn't commit. Therefore, it's worth learning a little about what you do and don't have to say to police in order to minimize the probability that he'll be able to find probable cause for an arrest, and it's a good idea to have your attorney's phone number in your cell.

      Your house could be robbed. So, you should have insurance that covers theft, and should take 15 minutes once a year to video the contents of your home, and store the video in your small fireproof safe (where you keep important stuff to address the small probability that your house will burn down).

      You could catch a nasty disease from a public toilet seat. Well, you could use one of those seat protectors, I suppose. Personally, I think the risk is too small to bother. I do, however, make a habit of grabbing a piece of toilet paper to wipe off the seat before I sit down. This would provide some protection from nasty diseases, but also addresses the much more likely issue that someone may have peed on the seat.

      And so on. Don't ignore small risks, just take appropriately small actions to mitigate them to the degree that makes sense. If you need to figure out how much makes sense, just come up with a dollar figure that values what you'd lose if the event happened and multiply that by the probability of the event happening in a given year. That's the expected annual cost of that risk. Pick an hourly wage for yourself, divide the risk cost by the wage to get a maximum amount of time that it makes sense to spend addressing that risk.

      In the case at hand, it's probably worth a few minutes to type an Ask Slashdot question and read the answers, then a few more minutes to implement whatever seemed to be the best EASY suggestions.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people('s files) are more interesting than others. Travel itineraries are available to border agents well in advance of the arrival. Some people have interesting itineraries or belong to businesses or organizations which are of interest to the US, be it as a matter of national security or for plain economic reasons. It is not unreasonable to expect that these people face a non-negligible probability of having their belongings searched and/or seized. If you travel with your company's data on your laptop, it is advisable to protect it from prying eyes.

    14. Re:Put the dunce cap away by beefsprocket · · Score: 1

      The ancient Library of Alexandria had a policy that any visitor to the city would have their documents confiscated and copied. The library kept the original and gave the owner a copy. The historical precedent exists, and the similarities to today's border policies are spooky.

    15. Re:Put the dunce cap away by tygt · · Score: 1

      Note I spend about zero time thinking about these things

      Apparently not, as you bothered to write about it (and thus thought about it - at least once), but I'm fine assuming that you barely ever give it more than a niggling thought.

    16. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Kohath · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how important he thinks he is. The border agents care about his life and his pictures because he's one of the important people. The stuff on the news is relevant to him because he is important, just like the people that appear on TV.

      When you say "only children think in terms of the worst things that could happen to them" you forget how many people have a child-like mentality even though they're 18 or 30 or 67 years old. It's an increasingly large percentage of the population.

    17. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats not entirely true, just because you have the precautions in place doesn't save you from worrying over it, not worrying over it saves you from worrying over it. Having insurance just saves your FAMILY from worrying over what they will do if it happens, not even what to do if it happens.

      what he was saying is worry about what matters not what you cannot change. if you cannot change something there is really no point in getting worked up over it, mainly because it will happen no matter what you do.

      In the case of my laptop when traveling over seas, I'd be more concerned about while I AM out of the country, not at customs.

    18. Re:Put the dunce cap away by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      My father is in the entertainment business and he travels out of the country on a regular basis. He always brings his laptop with him. Not once has he ever mentioned having his laptop - much less his baggage - searched at the border coming into the US.

      That said, he HAS had quite a few searches going into Germany. They're always paranoid that he's hiding something in his artificial leg - but even they have not once turned on his laptop.

      I'm all for taking reasonable steps to ensure privacy, but I think some people have paranoia issues.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    19. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. Are you saying that you buy life and property insurance to protect yourself from Uncle Sam? Must be worse than I thought...

    20. Re:Put the dunce cap away by kklein · · Score: 1

      Okay, once more with feeling: "It is not illegal now, and never has been illegal, for customs agents of any country to search anything they Damn Well Please for any reason they Damn Well Please."

      And nice try with that "and many other time periods." You still just Godwinned it.* ;-)

      * Which is not to say it isn't appropriate in this context, because it totally is.

    21. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      No one said it is happening to everyone. That misses the point entirely. Illegally searching even a small percentage of people is unnacceptable. Especially since people affected by this have almost no redress and the DHS doesn't even accurately report when they do this.

      Speaking of missing the point entirely...

      1) It's not Homeland Security doing the searching, it's Customs
      2) It's not illegal

    22. Re:Put the dunce cap away by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      There's nothing illegal about searching people at the border. All nations reserve the right to search anyone coming in, and to deny that person entry if they choose to (detaining them for extended periods of time may cause the person's rights to kick in). This laptop search business is just an extension of search powers that all border guards have, in every country.

      Your civil rights start when you're in a nation, not when you're standing at the gate asking to be let in. This isn't really new at all. Is it disgusting? Sure, for us freedom-loving types it rankles that the border guards can basically do what they want to you, but it's been a fundamental feature of international law for a long time now, and no State is going to give that up without a fight.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    23. Re:Put the dunce cap away by WeirdJohn · · Score: 1

      As a bearded person, I have always been subjected to lengthy searches and interviews when entering the US, except for the one time I entered clean shaven. I suppose we Australians are probable terrorists if we wear a beard!

    24. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? You think because you didn't get searched, that means it doesn't happen to anyone? It does happen, they do force you to login to your laptop and rifle through your files, and as they're going through all the photos on your little digital camera, it sure doesn't feel like you're in the good ol US of A.

    25. Re:Put the dunce cap away by PylonHead · · Score: 1

      I recently grew a beard, and I've noticed a subtle difference in the way authority figures treat me.

      I think it has less to do with looking like a terrorist (I'm blond and blue eyed), and more to do with looking like a trouble maker.

      As a geek, I'm actually kind of flattered that I can manage to look vaguely dangerous, but it is occasionally a pain in the ass.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    26. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry fella... it is leagle and has always been so.

    27. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only question is, is it happening to everyone? If just a handful of people are being given pink stars to worry, then they're just troublemakers -- it's not like everyone is being forced to wear pink stars now is it?

    28. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illegally searching even a small percentage of people is unnacceptable.

      Who used the word "illegal"? The constitution has been worth about as much as a roll of toilet paper since the early zeros. Hell, there is a new law on the books that states that $700B belonging to taxpayers will be taken to "stabilize the economy by doing ???, thereby supporting ???" Oh right, that .7T for the government to buy iffy mortgages that, even if they were all complete duds wouldn't be worth a fraction of that. They're also going to sell me a cool bridge.

      I agree with everything in your post except for the word "illegally". The word "legal" now means "whatever the fuck they feel like" and the word "illegal" refers to everything you do, regardless of its nature.

      Oh, and as far as the laptop thing goes, the first thing that you do with a new laptop is install some lame garbage, pull the hard drive and put another one in. If you are ever forced to visit "the land of the free" then you replace the real hdd with the vanilla hdd, cross the border, pull it again, put in a drive from a local store and download all your stuff over the Internet. Before you leave you wipe the temp drive, mail it to yourself (if you are so inclined), and put the vanilla drive in again. With any luck you'll be back home in 8-12 hours and not in legal limbo for years without charge, with german shepards chomping at your nuts.

      Of course the real answer is that if you don't want to go to a gulag then don't go to Soviet Russia. If you don't want to get zykloned and turned into soap then don't go to Nazi Germany. If you don't want to be tortured to death in Gitmo then don't go to Neocon America.

      Pardon me if I sound bitter. It's because I am.

    29. Re:Put the dunce cap away by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I know it's not something easy to imagine, but there are humans out there that happen to be familiar with the concept of a "girlfriend". And that "girlfriend" thingie might be photographed in ways that only the boyfriend alone prefers to see. You may argue that nobody cares about some random officials, but in my opinion this is extremely horrible, and I can't stand the thought of it.

      And to add insult to injury, remember this:

      10 years ago, when they found naughty pictures of your girlfriend, they ogled for a minute, and then had to give them back.

      Today, they're allowed to make a complete copy of your hard drive - you sure you want those pictures circulating around the customs office?

      That's what folks are missing - I don't care if customs sees I took pictures in Vegas. I do care that they intend to make a copy for themselves. And I will be completely unsurprised when full-drive copying becomes SOP, for "security reasons"

    30. Re:Put the dunce cap away by truesaer · · Score: 1

      I don't much like it, but I have to point out that the searches are not illegal. They're just objectionable.

    31. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

      Only children think in terms of the worst things that could happen to them

      I think only children/childish people don't see beyond the first hurdle.

      As a european who has an ISV which directly competes with american software companies, I definitely won't go to the US with a laptop with material on it which could benefit these american companies. You might say that that is 'childish' but YOU won't compensate us when the border patrol (who knows in advance that I'm arriving at some US airport) confiscates my laptop with material on it (encrypted or not) and passes it on to a competitor.

      You apparently are that naive that you think that there's a clear distinction between 'good' and 'bad' and that the US is 'good' and won't do things which are forbidden in its own lawbook. Well, I can only say: better safe than sorry. The world runs on money, if it benefits the US to get hold of material which is in hte possesion of foreign companies, why not grab it?

      Sure, one will say: "Don't bring it to the US then!", which is a reasonable point, until you realize how stupid it actually is: why would I be worried what's on my laptop (encrypted) when I enter the US? I don't want to be worried about that. That's the whole point. Yes, I can mail it to myself, whatever, that's just a workaround to some stupid rule which affects my life.

      You as an american apparently hasn't been questioned 5 times in 10 minutes when entering your country what your business was to be there. I have. After the 4th time, I began to start worrying why I got all these questions by people with a machine gun.

      It's simple: when you enter the EU, you don't get the treatment a EU citizen gets when he arrives at the US. If you WOULD, you wouldn't been babbling about how childish all these people are. What's on my laptop is MY business, not the US'. Apparently that's a childish thought... ?

      --
      Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    32. Re:Put the dunce cap away by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      The odds of losing your job is much higher than your laptop being searched and confiscated...
      The consequences of losing your job are probably more severe than having your laptop's content exposed.

      Still worrying about the laptop thing?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    33. Re:Put the dunce cap away by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      You really need to ask slashdot to implement the solution of just uploading the stuff encrypted and downloading it back when you get home... yeah.

      I never thought of that!!

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    34. Re:Put the dunce cap away by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had his laptop confiscated when coming back from canada. It happens.

    35. Re:Put the dunce cap away by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I travel internationally fairly often, and I am far more concerned about having someone else pick up my laptop by mistake from the X-Ray machine (which almost happened about a year ago in Japan).

      Those places are so crowded and confusing that I'm always amazed people don't lose half their stuff there.

      You throw your wallet and other valuables in a plastic tray which is placed in plain sight in front of lots of strangers picking up similar trays while security people are busy looking at new arrivals and padding you down because you forgot to take off your belt. Despite the security it looks like a really easy place for theft.

      It's hard to run away if the victim finds out in time, however.

    36. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's absurd. See the parent where he references the 1930's. Same thing applies.

      It is a real concern. Not everything on our laptops are things we would like to share with the government. And vice versa, not everything on a business or government laptop is legally viewable by a non company employee or an official without access to classified data.

    37. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not worth a moment of my life to worry about.

      I retort: Maybe you should grow up and worry about things that are important, like where your next meal is coming from. I hear that it's growing fashionable now.

      Maybe you should take privacy seriously.

    38. Re:Put the dunce cap away by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      Can't say as I agree with you on that. The original poster was right - it would be a different story if it happened to you. And besides, your own argument is flawed - if these events have a nil chance of happening to you, there literally is nothing to worry about. But as far as being singled out for an exceptional search, there is a non-nil chance that this can occur to pretty much anyone.

      The degree of concern one should exercise vs. low-percentage risks is not zero. If you think that, you're the childish and ignorant one. Proper risk management involves considering these risks and planning according to both their likelihood of occurence and the severity of the event if it occurs.

      Now, if you value your sense (or illusion) of privacy to the point where having it compromised is significant disturbance, even a low odds risk to that might be unacceptable. If, for instance, you're someone from outside the US that may be travelling with work-related materials governed by either government rules or private NDAs back home, you can't be truly compliant with those security regimes if you cross a border where there is a non-zero chance of a confiscation or copying of your media since you can't garantee its security once Border Services snags it. You have a legal and moral obligation to insure its safety in accordance with the legal instruments which may pertain in your country of origin.

      For instance, I was supposed to be making a trip to the US from Canada this weekend. I was debating taking a DB backup with me so I could do some SQL related work on my travels. Nothing at all related to anything in the US, strictly me doing work for my customer's customer back in Canada. But that information is covered by an NDA. And there is a very low odds but non-zero chance that someone at customs may seize it (they have the legal right). If I proceed and bring the data en clair, I am setting myself up for a potential violation of my NDA. So I get stuck with the choice of letting the project languish or not taking my trip. Or taking substantial precautions to protect that data so that I can work while I'm in the USA.

      If you think it won't happen to you or the consequences are acceptable if it does, that's fine for you. But don't go accusing those who may have different levels of concern or obligation of being childish - that's ultimately an ignorant assertion.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    39. Re:Put the dunce cap away by HBI · · Score: 1

      I do not believe it to be an ignorant assertion to suggest that we have limited time and space in our life to worry about things, and therefore one must aggressively prioritize those issues based on relevance and probability. I also do not believe it to be ignorant to suggest that this is the fundamental difference between 'child' and 'man'.

      You have correctly identified that the chance of such events as noted above are nearly zero. The fact that they are nonzero is notable but irrelevant. It doesn't change the calculus.

      We are free to be unconcerned about real issues and to worry about things that do not have relevance to us when we are children. When we take on the onus of manhood, we must prioritize, and these are way below the radar for me. There are people who depend on me for livelihood (ironically, above someone made reference to not having a girlfriend, in fact I have an ex-wife, a girlfriend and 2 children aged 14 and 11), and I would be letting them down if I were paying too much attention to stupid stuff that has no relevance. I need to make money and make sure they are all living well.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    40. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? So your saying its childish to look both ways before you cross the street? To put razorwire in your ars? To clean the toilet seat in a public restroom before you sit down?

      Prevention is not childish, its freaking common sense.

    41. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      megamerican is talking about principles, HBI, whereas you're saying "it hasn't happened to me, and probably won't, so it isn't a problem." That's a pretty narrow and selfish viewpoint.

      See the famous poem "First they came..."

    42. Re:Put the dunce cap away by swillden · · Score: 1

      You really need to ask slashdot to implement the solution of just uploading the stuff encrypted and downloading it back when you get home... yeah.

      That's one solution. Throwing it out to slashdot will undoubtedly generate a bunch of them, and perhaps there's another that fits better.

      The fact that you see one obvious solution hardly means it's either the best or the only one. Also, there are some major problems with your suggestion -- what if the data in question is, say 50+ GB in size? Where are you going to upload that to? And how long will it take?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    43. Re:Put the dunce cap away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note I spend about zero time thinking about these things because the chances of them happening to me are about nil. Ditto having my laptop searched.

      But you spent non-zero time reading about these things and writing post about these things... Hm...

  20. If you can't afford to lose it... by Duradin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the old traveler's adage goes, if you can't afford to lose it, don't bring it.

    Find a cheap laptop used laptop you won't have problems with ditching. Use a live cd or usb key boot solution so nothing ends up on the hard drives.

    Keep your pictures on SD cards and mail them or a copy to yourself or some drop point. Encrypt them all.

  21. Best defense by C10H14N2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is a good offense.

    If you're offended by having your privacy invaded, just make it horribly offensive for the invader as well.

    With the right accessorizing and appropriate leather:latex:chainmail ratio, you can ensure even the most intrepid airport screener will breeze you through in record time.

    Oh...and, yes, Truecrypt is terrific, but not nearly as fun.

    1. Re:Best defense by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had the same experience. A few sex toys in the carry on will greatly expedite any terminal searches you wind up going through.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Best defense by fr4nk · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... or just use the goatse pic as a wallpaper.

    3. Re:Best defense by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

      Actually, quite the opposite depending on where you coming from. Generally customs officials tend to worry when you've made your bag embarrassing/unpleasant to search.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    4. Re:Best defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >leather:latex:chainmail

      I doubt the best way to get through security is to look like THOR GOD OF METAL AND WAR.

    5. Re:Best defense by RingDev · · Score: 1

      A good warning. I haven't flown internationally since the 90's, so I have no idea on customs. But in my flights since 9/11, the embarasing bag trick has reduced my average 'departure interview' (or what ever they are calling them now) times significantly.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    6. Re:Best defense by definate · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a genious. /me runs off to cover my laptop in Goatse, TubGirl, LemonParty and similar.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Best defense by CrazedSanity · · Score: 1

      Na. Use a picture or a small clip from "Two Girls and a Milkshake" video (just the first 30 seconds should do). Guaranteed you'll get your laptop back in 30 seconds or less... well, if they don't drop it first.

      --
      Sanity is like a condom: rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
  22. tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set your background wallpaper to goatse, tubgirl, or lemonparty. It will disgust the jack booted border control types and I've found at airports and such, it's a great way to meet feelow linux users and others for bathroom sex.

  23. My personal experience by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've taken my laptop across the border 4 times, my wife has done so many times more, neither of us have had our laptops searched. I've been pulled aside by customs and asked questions once, but even then they did not request to see my laptop. I think the bottom line is, if you act shady they'll look at your stuff, if you're just getting your business done then you're fine.

    1. Re:My personal experience by legirons · · Score: 1

      I've taken my laptop across the border 4 times, my wife has done so many times more, neither of us have had our laptops searched. I've been pulled aside by customs and asked questions once, but even then they did not request to see my laptop.

      I think the bottom line is, if you act shady they'll look at your stuff, if you're just getting your business done then you're fine.

      Just to calibrate this anecdote, what are you? i.e. nationality, race, age, class, political opinion, how smartly do you dress, etc.?

      As rationale for this question, I seem to recall some informal tests where the same person will effortlessly pass customs while clean-shaven and dressed in a suit, yet be reliably (over several tests) taken aside for extra questioning when they grew a beard or dressed in cheaper clothes

    2. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with the above. There are thousands upon thousands of travellers who fly internationally in and out of the U.S. with laptops every day. If this were really a widespread problem, it would have a terrible effect on travel, the economy, and everything else, and there would be a outcry to the high heavens from all the first-class business travelers, which would put pressure on the government from the airlines. All in all, if this even happens at all, it has to be extremely isolated, rare incidents. Besides, the customs and immigration people really don't care about a few ripped movies and your travel photos -- unless you're suspected for other reasons, they have much bigger fish to fry.

      I would estimate, based on my experiences/observations, that less than 1 in 100 travelers get sent to Secondary Processing (the only time where they'd really get you to go through the contents of your bags), and very few of these are U.S. Citizens. And even when I've been sent through secondary processing (I'm not a U.S. Citizen), they've never looked at my laptop (though they did go through my papers, notes, etc.). Having the right to do these sorts of invasive searches is one thing, but they just don't have the time, resources, or need to do this normally. Plus, as I said above, they really don't care about *you* -- they just want to make sure you're not a threat or arriving illegally.

      Anyway, all that to say, TrueCrypt is certainly never a bad idea, but I do think the original poster is being overly paranoid.

    3. Re:My personal experience by againjj · · Score: 1

      I think the bottom line is, if you act shady they'll look at your stuff, if you're just getting your business done then you're fine.

      Except for the fact that "act shady" can mean " be a white male returning alone from Laos. They searched my luggage every time. When returning with my (Lao) wife, we were passed through with out a luggage search. Though it is true, I have never seen a laptop search, ever, but I have been told to wake my laptop up from sleep before boarding in SFO.

    4. Re:My personal experience by Cookie3 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Since 2001, I've made a number of trips to Japan. I fit the "dirty hippy" profile, and I usually carried a laptop, so customs would regularly pull me aside and ask me about why I was traveling, or do drug tests, etc. When they asked about the laptop (which wasn't often), I told them that it had a power cable in the carrying case, but no battery installed (which was the truth). The battery was usually either in another carry-on or in stored luggage.

      To date, neither Japanese nor US customs has asked me to plug in or turn on the laptop, or even to discuss its contents.

      --
      present day... present time... hahahaha...
    5. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A family member has done the same between the US and Taiwan several times. One run was to actually return the laptop servicing. AFAIK he's never been hassled at all about it.

    6. Re:My personal experience by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm trying to figure out the reference... why exactly is that considered shady? I've never heard of that.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    7. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong bottom line. I've had customs tell me to login to my laptop, after which they searched through my files and pictures, took my cellphone to copy the contacts, and went through all the photos on my digital camera. And there was nothing "shady" about me. Except perhaps my skin color or my funny sounding name.

      I'm an American born US citizen, but I've never been so ashamed of my country as I was that day.

      So with all due respect to your "personal experience," don't generalize.

    8. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend who has his laptop searched crossing the border by car.

    9. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm trying to figure out the reference... why exactly is that considered shady? I've never heard of that.

      Drug smuggling and or being gay.

    10. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:My personal experience by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      so customs would regularly pull me aside and ask me about why I was traveling, or do drug tests

      Can you explain what you mean by 'do drug tests'? Are they swiping your belongings down for drug residue or something like that?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    12. Re:My personal experience by againjj · · Score: 1

      Drugs and prostitution. On one trip, my father and I were returning together (he looks like a hippie) and were specifically asked if we were offered (or used, etc.) drugs while there. Our answer was yes, we were offered (as an aside, I think it was meth), but we didn't accept. The officer gave us a funny look -- I don't think he expected us to tell the truth.

    13. Re:My personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've cleared customs at least 6 times since I started reading reports that customs was searching laptops, including returning from Puerto Vallarta twice.

      Customs haven't searched my laptop, yet. It pisses me off that they can, but I think you're being overly paranoid, I don't think the odds of you being searched are terribly high.

  24. Truecrypt. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    Trycrypt is a answer. It is free and they did everything correct. You can encrytpt your current data, and even add a second OS for deniablity.

    If they ask you to boot the laptop you type in the password for the 2md OS and they see nothing of your main data disk, only your 2nf OS.

    Ae you paranoid? Well, you better be paranoid than sorry.

  25. Boot to shell by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    Once at a shell prompt they quickly lose interest.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Boot to shell by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      Or they think "What the fuck, from my knowledge of movies I know he is a terrorist hacker about to kidnap the president, better send this back to the tech guys.".

    2. Re:Boot to shell by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use it. If you tell them you are a developer, system administrator, etc. They don't even want to HEAR you talking over their heads. You obviously know more about that machine than them and they send you on your way.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Boot to shell by sgbett · · Score: 1

      Easiest 'solution' I've read so far! Bravo.

      --
      Invaders must die
    4. Re:Boot to shell by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use it. If you tell them you are a developer, system administrator, etc. They don't even want to HEAR you talking over their heads. You obviously know more about that machine than them and they send you on your way.

      Amen. When coming back from the Phillipines I was asked by customs what I did for a living. I explained what my company did, in a nice combination of PHB and technical speak. After about two sentences his eyes glazed over. He dint even ask me about being near livestock (I declared so on a customs form as I rode a water buffalo.)

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    5. Re:Boot to shell by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use it. If you tell them you are a developer, system administrator, etc. They don't even want to HEAR you talking over their heads. You obviously know more about that machine than them and they send you on your way.

      An awful lot of people seem to be under the impression that computer professional work is no more difficult than playing "The Incredible Machine" except the machine you build actually does something.

      Assuming that "everyone has seen a shell prompt" is plain wrong.

    6. Re:Boot to shell by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Well in one sentence above, someone asserts that everyone has seen CSI and knows that 'hackers' use shell prompts and that using a shell prompt will get you arrested. But when asserting that everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use them, you assert they have not. So which is it? The CSI argument or that they have not? You can't have it both ways. Either everyone airport security guard watches TV or they don't.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Boot to shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use it. If you tell them you are a developer, system administrator, etc. They don't even want to HEAR you talking over their heads. You obviously know more about that machine than them and they send you on your way.

      Hehe wasnt going to post but this was just so spot on. I actually did that (im a programmer) and was sent to some room for interrogation. I was there to work for an american company (im swedish) and after telling the customs officer I was programmer on my way to detroit he actually asked me what languages i programmed in. I said C/C++/Assembler and he sent me of to the interrogation room for some reason. I do have dark hair and thick eyebrows though.. .so I guess its to be expected.

      p.s This was before 9/11

    8. Re:Boot to shell by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Well in one sentence above, someone asserts that everyone has seen CSI and knows that 'hackers' use shell prompts and that using a shell prompt will get you arrested. But when asserting that everyone has seen a shell prompt and knows that computer professionals use them, you assert they have not. So which is it? The CSI argument or that they have not? You can't have it both ways. Either everyone airport security guard watches TV or they don't.

      Like so many arguments on /., you're trying to paint it as black and white when the reality is likely to be many shades of grey.

      Some security guards may have enough of a side interest in computers to know that Windows isn't the only thing. Some may have paid enough attention to the TV in the first place to associate a shell prompt with "hackers".

      In any case, I seriously doubt that the person who actually spends time going through your files on your computer (rather than just asking you to turn it on and prove it's a computer rather than a bomb) will be the strategically shaved ape who's watching the luggage go through the X-ray machine.

    9. Re:Boot to shell by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Like so many, you like to assume that security guards don't watch alot of TV and somehow are all idiot savantes in their spare time. Wait, who am I kidding, you're just kidding yourself.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    10. Re:Boot to shell by jimicus · · Score: 1

      And now you're trying to paint me in black and white.

      Please stop it, it's rather offensive.

  26. Yes, you're being overly paranoid by novalis112 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The laws are a travesty. The system is fubar not just beyond all recognition, but beyond all belief. However, you've got a better chance of justifying the average DMCA takedown notice then you do of having something bad happen to your laptop because of your border crossing. I do it several times a year and have never had anyone even take notice of my laptop. In fact, in all my years of international travel, I've had one complete *ass* of a border agent (at London's Luton airport) and for the most part all the others have been cordial at worst, and down right heartwarming at best. The bureaucrats need to be executed for treason and absolute scumbaggery immediately, the border agents are just people like you and me doing their (admittedly lousy) jobs.

    1. Re:Yes, you're being overly paranoid by goaliemn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. I go in and out of the country 15-20 times a year, and have for the last 5 years. Never had any problems with customs. I bring my laptop with about 1/3 of the time and never been asked to show it, let alone whats on it.

      If you're a nice guy, it shouldn't be any problems. If you make an idiot of yourself, get ready for the check.

    2. Re:Yes, you're being overly paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same story here. I've taken my laptop all over the world - from security-conscious countries like Britain and France to sketchy second worlds like Turkey and Vietnam, and I've never had a problem.

      Everyone travels with laptops these days, so it's like asking if you should stash the film in your 1995 disposable camera.

    3. Re:Yes, you're being overly paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not enough to not act shady, or appear a certain way.

      You need to know if you're on "the list". Unfortunately, you'll never see "the list". So, take a trip with a laptop you don't mind losing. If they take it, don't bring laptops when you travel abroad. If they don't, you should be good to go

    4. Re:Yes, you're being overly paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree; to paranoid. I have flown to Puerto Vallarta roughly once a year for the past several years, and I've been out of the US numerous times.

      I've never personally seen customs ask someone to even open their laptop, much less confiscate the hard drive.

      As long as you aren't a known criminal and you don't antagonize the customs agents, they won't bother you.

      Just don't claim anything on the customs forms, and US customs is unlikely to even search your luggage.

      If I were you, I would be more worried about getting killed in a car crash in Mexico or breaking my neck in a freak para-sailing accident. The odds of something like that actually happening is much higher.

      Note, however, that the Mexican authorities manually search almost every piece of luggage on the way out of PV. I suggest that you avoid printing any clearly incriminating evidence... ;)

  27. Just passed through security with a laptop... by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just came back in from a two week stay in Europe, where my travels took me through several countries there. While I was there, all the photos that I took were stored on the laptop, along with several movies that I'd ripped to the drive.

    Upon my return to the states, the check-in process wasn't any different than it had been a couple of years ago. They asked no questions about my laptop, or if I even had one. The only time my laptop left my bag was when I put it through the X-ray machine.

    That being said, it never hurts to encrypt your data anyway.

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
    1. Re:Just passed through security with a laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me. In Europe I went to a special podium for those going to the US and Israel where I got asked all the standard questions you get asked in the US about liquids and the like. Other than that, nothing special.

      Back in the states I didn't even get rescanned or asked questions, they looked at my customs form and waved me right along.

      I was ready for a big scene and peopl

  28. Misdirection is key by anyGould · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Put them on your iPod. I've got a 80GB Classic, and there's more than enough room there to store whatever you need, and who's going to search your music player for stuff?

    Unless, of course, you're doing something naughty and arouse suspicion, in which case you're pretty boned - encrypting/obfuscating the file on the 'Pod would probably help, but if you're getting the full treatment...

    What the world really needs is secure storage with a self-destruct feature - when they ask you for the password, you give them X, which wipes the drive as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. (Preferably with a "decrypting, please wait" message)

    1. Re:Misdirection is key by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      What the world really needs is secure storage with a self-destruct feature - when they ask you for the password, you give them X, which wipes the drive as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. (Preferably with a "decrypting, please wait" message)

      Second.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:Misdirection is key by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      What the world really needs is secure storage with a self-destruct feature - when they ask you for the password, you give them X, which wipes the drive as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. (Preferably with a "decrypting, please wait" message)

      Any real law enforcement investigation is going to begin by making a copy of your media and retaining the original for evidence. So unless you can build that self-destruct feature into the hardware (and somehow ensure that they can't bypass the controller chips/hardware and get at the media directly) it doesn't do you much good. If it's built into the software it will just be bypassed when they make an image of the media before trying to crack your pass phrase.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Misdirection is key by RemyBR · · Score: 1

      What the world really needs is secure storage with a self-destruct feature - when they ask you for the password, you give them X, which wipes the drive as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. (Preferably with a "decrypting, please wait" message)

      www.ironkey.com

  29. Well... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    There is always the tried and true method of shoving it in a condom and swallowing it...Just tell them you have a bionic stomach.

    Otherwise, I think you're probably fucked. If you encrypt, you're just showing that you have something to hide, so that's a trip to GITMO.

    If you don't encrypt, then people will see your deviant porn, and that's a trip to PMITA prison.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  30. xor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring a few GBs of random data with you. Have a copy back home. Don't let them copy them, but allow them to look at them, using your computer w you around. When you arrive, xor your photos w the random data and put the result on the laptop. Erase the random data. Go back home. Xor with your backup back home of the random data. At any given time, they will only be able to get random data, and/or prevent you from bringing any photos, not getting to see the photos. Unless they breake in to your house. If that is really an issue, get someone to safekeep the random data back home and phone you if it gets stolen.

    1. Re:xor by GiMP · · Score: 1

      A one time pad... with oneself. This is an excellent idea, as long as they don't subsequently search your home ;-)

  31. Don't just encrypt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't just encrypt your drive. They can take your laptop indefinitely; and if the whole disk is encrypted, they probably will. My recommendation is to use truecrypt, encrypt the files you want to protect, and remove them from your hard drive. Put them on SD cards, with innocuous filenames, along with unencrypted photos, and store them with your digital camera. Or do something similar. The key is to encrypt the files, and hide the encrypted files where they won't look. Another option is to give the encrypted files garbage filenames and put them in your internet cache directory, or some other temp storage.

  32. don't worry about it, unless you are a criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you are already under investigation by the US government then there is very little chance that you will have to show anyone anything.

    I travel into and out of the US on a periodic basis and the only thing that I have had to do on rare occasions is power up that laptop, but I think it has been years since I've had to do that.

  33. no worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am just back from a month vacation in the US. At not one security checkpoint they asked me to poweron my laptop.And i passed several checkpoints at different US airports. But maybe I was just lucky :)

  34. Takes real vision balls to say something like that by Tiger+Smile · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No, message. The subject line was the joke. Move along.

    --
    -- Prepared at the direction of, or to be sent to Legal Counsel, in anticipation of litigation. Attorney Client Pri
  35. circumvention by Draque · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An ounce of circumvention is worth a pound of countermeasures. Don't store them on the laptop at all. Store the pictures you're taking online and you'll be able to access them from anywhere. Border patrol can't find something on your computer when it's not there. Even if that's not feasible 100% of the time, you could still make a temporary archive online while removing them from your computer. If even that has you feeling paranoid, you could always burn the files to DVD, wipe them from your computer, and stow the DVD.

    1. Re:circumvention by legirons · · Score: 1

      Great advice, but one suggestion to add:

      Once you've cleaned your laptop of everything you don't want seen, encrypt a goatse image renamed to something like documents.tar.gz.gpg and leave that in your home directory.

      Bonus 1: you get to punish the bastard who violated your privacy. "get this image out of my mind!"

      Bonus 2: you get to find out whether they're capable of detecting an encrypted file and capable of making you decode it, without risking any significant data.

    2. Re:circumvention by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Some places have very poor Internet connection, if not non-existent. And, if he needs to store them in the laptop, means that a 4Gb SD won't do it. I'd go for the DVD-burning solution then, better yet, a small external HD would do it.

  36. Chester Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your going to the gay boy toy capital of the world and plan to take photos eh. And your worried about customs being able to see what "photos" you have stored on your laptop. I dont buy it one bit.

    Your just another perv looking to hide your stuff and was hoping /. would help you out.

    I hope you get caught, strung up and beaten.

  37. It's all bs - both sides of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe, that coming into the country, the customs agency should have the right to search you and your belongings. I don't believe that they should have the right to sieze any of your belongins without probable cause.

    I spent the last five years traveling around the world, typically taking 2 trips a month out of the U.S. to other places. Outside of Saudi Arabia, I've never even had to open a bag for a quick look, although in Saudi Arabia I was more concerned with having my pony-tail chopped off. The current policy of potentially having a laptop siezed is asinine. However, I don't know anyone who has ever had this happen to them and I know a lot of people who travel in and out of the country on a regular basis.

    While it's possible for it to happen to you it is extremely unlikely. If you're that concerned about it then encrypt the contents and be done with it.

    I'd be more concerned about the 10,000 laptops lost or stolen every week (more bs about this can be found here: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147739/laptops_lost_like_hot_cakes_at_us_airports.html) than for a customs agent to have enough interest in me to 1) look at my laptop and 2) to want to keep it.

  38. Forget encryption. by grub · · Score: 1


    You can fit a lot of USB sticks in your anus. Probably 3 or 4 Libraries of Congress in your ass, isn't technology wonderful?!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  39. In other news.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offshore laptop rentals with temporary accounts linked to offshore data are booming! What a great business model. You set up an account with the company, stuff all your crap on a server, then when you get to your destination, you pick up a laptop (maybe your "rental fees" are part of your normal monthly service account)... logging in to the laptop mounts the remote volume and download away.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:In other news.. by thepotoo · · Score: 1
      Wait, $randomCompany expects me to trust them with my data?

      Do people really not know how to use TrueCrypt or run their own server that they're willing to trust anyone over the government?

      (Note: I did not say they should trust the gov, merely that they shouldn't trust $randomCompany either).

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    2. Re:In other news.. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      People are more likely to be trustworthy if you are paying them to be trustworthy. We pay the government to be assholes, so they're more likely to be assholes. Just sayin'.

  40. recommending truecrypt by wastedbrains · · Score: 1

    I love it, works great. I honestly don't think full disk is what you want because they can force you to type a password to let them look around. I have a hidden truecrypt file so even if I boot up and they look around they won't see my personal data. Mostly I keep my old journal, email backups, and other stuff in encrypted file. I highly recommend truecrypt

    --
    Dan Mayer: my blog, essays, art, etc
  41. There's this new invention by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Called email. Just email them to yourself...

    1. Re:There's this new invention by Pope · · Score: 1

      But then I checked my email accidentally, and it downloaded all the attachements, and now they're back obn my laptop! ARGH!!!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:There's this new invention by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      format c:

  42. Security guards are security guards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're going to copy all the data over, and search for it for kiddie porn and other junk. You can perform drive encryption and claim the 5th, but they're going to confiscate it from you since if the 4th doesn't apply, nor will the 5th. You're out a laptop and since it's DHS, and above the law; the only way to get it back is by the liberal execution of the 2nd; hiring a lawyer is probably not economically viable. However, if 30 or 40 DHS personell were to be killed in a raid to get some guys laptop back, I do not believe there would be a public outlash, although getting the mass media to report anything truthfully would be difficult.

    If you were to go that route, you'd need a couple of buds, a good .308 winchester rifle to pin them down in an open area, a couple of bernelli M3's with a good slug load, M1911; IIIA body armor should be sufficient to take the slug although you can find interceptor on E-bay. Spare the techs, as miserable as they are and as much as they deserve it, they hate their job.

    Best advice; leave your laptop at home, buy a stack of MicroSD cards on newegg and hide them in your wallet. A specops wallet

    http://www.uscav.com/ProductInfo.aspx?productid=16869&utm_medium=shoppingengine&utm_source=googlebase&cm_mmc=Google%20Base-_-Products-_-SF-_-V1

    is cheap, less expensive than paying for a broken laptop, has hidden compartments, and its pretty hard for even the dumbest security guard to destroy a MicroSD card.

  43. Memorize this text by mangu · · Score: 1

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    That's all you need. If it doesn't work, let them have it and sue the hell out of them. The ACLU and EFF may help you.

    1. Re:Memorize this text by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      Memorize this document.

      And you're completely wrong about the Fourth Amendment, by the way. It doesn't apply to customs searches at the border. Read up.

      Also, "travelers may be stopped [and searched] at . . . the border without individualized suspicion even if the stop [or search] is based largely on ethnicity[.]" United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985), United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563 (1976)

      Additionally, CBP may conduct searches of the traveler's body -- including strip, body cavity, involuntary x-ray, and in some jurisdictions, patdown searches -- if the Customs officer has reasonable suspicion to do so. United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004); United States v. Johnson, 991 F.2d 1287, 1291-92 (7th Cir. 1993).

    2. Re:Memorize this text by mangu · · Score: 1

      Read the link you posted: "Although border-searches are exempted from the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, they are still subject to the amendment's reasonableness requirement" (Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. at 537-38)

      "In the border search context, reasonable suspicion means that the facts known to the customs officer at the time of the search, combined with the officer's reasonable inferences from those facts, provides the officer with a particularized and objective basis for suspecting that the search will reveal contraband." (Idem)

      This is a typical case of the "slippery slope" problem. The government is using the "terrorism" and "child porn" catchwords to extend the meaning of "reasonable suspicion". It's up to the people to resist this.

    3. Re:Memorize this text by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Neither here nor there, but why are "strip, body cavity (!!) [and] involuntary x-ray" searches apparently OK across-the-board whereas "patdown searches" are only in some jurisdictions?!

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Memorize this text by Littleman_TAMU · · Score: 1

      Actually both cases were decided long before the GWOT. The government in those cases was conducting the searches for drug and illegal immigrant enforcement. Not everything relevant is the fault of the Bush Administration as much as you might wish it to be. You keep on "fighting the man" though, but realize that these types of searches have been upheld multiple times by the SCOTUS and, from my reading of the decisions, are supported by the Constitution. That doesn't mean abuse does not occur, but not everything is a nefarious plan by Bush to trample your rights.

    5. Re:Memorize this text by Littleman_TAMU · · Score: 1

      It's the difference between a border search and a search elsewhere. SCOTUS has historically distinguished between regular searches and border searches finding that the government has an overriding interest in controlling its border vice personal rights.

    6. Re:Memorize this text by Khyber · · Score: 1

      To help out with this opinion, drive the I-10 from CA to TX. You will be forced over into a border patrol station at some point, and the only thing they do is look at you and wave you through. They only stop you if you're a van without windows or whatnot. They can only give you a cursory glance, and unless you've got something moving under blankets or a burning roach in the ashtray, they're not going to do a thing to you because they legally can't.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Memorize this text by Khyber · · Score: 1

      WHY, why did I say opinion when the poster I replied to was referring to a fact..... ugh i need sleep. Someone mod my idiocy down, please.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  44. Backup hard drive, then FedEx it by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Make sure to get a laptop built with ease of HDD removal in mind. Most business oriented laptops are built this way. I usually have a backup HDD (2nd) with a fresh install of windows and some basic apps. If your laptop is subject to search and seizure, the less data on it the better. "Give me six lines written by the most honorable of men, and I will find an excuse in them to hang him" Cardinal Armand Jean du Plessis Richelieu (1585-1642)

    --
    Good-bye
  45. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can fit a lot of USB sticks in your anus. Probably 3 or 4 Libraries of Congress in your ass, isn't technology wonderful?!

    The one time goatse is on topic and you forget to link it? Seriously?

    Oh well, if anything should miss it's fifteen minutes in the limelight it's that image.

  46. Taking laptops into Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a tip about going in to Mexico: only bring a single laptop. A traveller is allowed to bring a single laptop into Mexico for free. I flew into Cabo San Lucas with my work laptop and an EEEPC and they charged me over $100 tax for the second laptop, ostensibly in case I sell it they get their tax.

  47. Sure, encrypt your drive.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

    ..if you want to ensure that they take your laptop away, since you "obviously" must be hiding something. I'd advise you to leave your computer at home. Simply bring some extra memory cards for your camera, and maybe a media player of some sort if you're really going to be that bored on the flight.

    Why does everyone feel the need to travel with their computer? Whenever I go on vacation, a computer screen is the last thing I want to see.

  48. USB keys by Improv · · Score: 1

    I would bet that if you move any sensitive data onto USB keys on your keychain, nobody will give them a second glance.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  49. Trucrypt is a great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trucrypt has a way of encrypting that makes it safe. It has "hidden" encryption. What this means is that you have two "parts". One on which you put sensitive-looking files that you don't actually care about, and the other where you put your naked pictures (or whatever). Then, if they force you to decrypt, you give them the password that decrypts ONLY the sensitive-looking parts that you don't mind much.

    There's no way to distinguish the other part from random data, and, seriously, there is no way to decrypt it without the password (contrary to what we see in movies) or spending a few years with a few thousand computers trying on passwords until they get it.

  50. Laptop != Vacation by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    Leave the computer at home. Drink beer and enjoy yourself on vacation. Problem solved.

    Even a moderately sized memory card for your camera can hold 200 pictures - can you really shoot more than that in a week?

    1. Re:Laptop != Vacation by Pope · · Score: 1

      I did almost 1,000 on a 2 week trip to China last year, split over 3 CF cards, so it's easily done. Depends on where you go, obviously! :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Laptop != Vacation by jweller · · Score: 1

      I just got back from England for 8 days and took close to 700. I am a bit of a nut though. Film is cheap, plane tickets are expensive. Digital "film" is even cheaper. It will take me a while to get through them all and a lot are duplicates.

      but yes, I left the laptop (and cellphone) at home and enjoyed lots of cask ale, thats the whole point.

    3. Re:Laptop != Vacation by Mascot · · Score: 1

      I've shot more than that in a weekend.

      There are a number of good reasons to bring a laptop on vacation, not just as extended storage. I bring a netbook with me so I can call home at local charges using the same IP phone service my home phone is connected to, for example.

      Also it is sometimes convenient to be able to process the RAWs while still on the same continent as the location, in case I missed so badly on exposure the image can't be rescued.

    4. Re:Laptop != Vacation by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? I've shot more than that in ten minutes. Okay, I was shooting a wedding. ;)

    5. Re:Laptop != Vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if something happens to the card?

  51. El Cheapo by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Just buy a cheap laptop, and/or an USB stick. Put your pix on the USB key and put it in your checked bag. Nuke the laptop b4 you come back, I've typically cross the US border 3-4 times a year. I've never had a problem with carrying a USB key along with my camera. I've only brought my laptop across once, and had no problems. The thing I get questioned on is my underwater camera housing, but they just ask what it is. Then they say cool, and ask if their camera will fit. ~:-) To which I say "No, each housing is made for a specific camera." Hope this helps.

  52. Ob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stick a thumb drive up your ass...

    1. Re:Ob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you go to Tijuana for that, not Puerta Vallarta.

  53. Don't have anything for them to find. by Yath · · Score: 1

    Make a spare hard drive that you can boot from, and contains totally innocuous data. Take both drives with you on vacation. Then mail the first hard drive back to yourself. Return to the U.S. with the spare hard drive in the laptop.

    The point of this is not to draw suspicion to yourself, and to reduce the DHS's incentives to confiscate your laptop. If they want to see what's on it, you can show them everything - because nothing will be there. If they take your drive and image it, they won't find anything.

    You don't want to use encryption, because that will draw attention to you and possibly get you put on a list. You certainly don't want to assert your fourth amendment rights - not only because it won't matter to the DHS while you're physically trying to cross the border, but also because the courts are unlikely to uphold them nowadays.

    If you don't want to use a spare drive, then treat the data itself as disposable. Keep track of everything you consider private, and then wipe it from the drive before returning.

    --
    I always mod up spelling trolls.
    1. Re:Don't have anything for them to find. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      So your idea is to mail back the drive? Not only do you risk damaging the drive in transport or worse losing it all together, but it becomes even easier to inspect upon entering the company as you aren't even there to object. You'd be far better off just copying it to a flash drive and crossing over the border with it that way.

    2. Re:Don't have anything for them to find. by Yath · · Score: 1

      It all depends on your objective, I suppose. If you don't want them to find the data, the best strategy is not to have the data. I agree with your objection that it would be easier to inspect. So you'd be better off wiping everything you don't want found, and forget about having a second hard drive, or flash drive, or other storage device.

      But above all, don't try to bring data back with you in the hope that it won't be found. Luckily for submitter, that doesn't appear to be a necessity.

      --
      I always mod up spelling trolls.
  54. Why not just leave the pictures on the camera? by Eezy+Bordone · · Score: 1

    I would think they'd be a lot less out of the norm there. Unless you're totally going for the coke & whores where the whores are 12 year old boys. Then you may want to just mail yourself the SD card.

    --

    -EB

    Do you ever walk alone like a drifter in the dark?

  55. Bandwidth by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    If it's the pictures that you're worried about, archive, encrypt, and email them to yourself or upload them somewhere safe.

    If you plan to take gigs and gigs of pictures, take an external hard drive with you and ship it back ahead of you. Make sure it's encrypted, too.

    If you really want to test the law, simply encrypt your hard drive or store the photos in a PGP-encrypted file on the unencrypted hard drive. Remember, though, that while the 5th Amendment will probably protect you as an American citizen, it will not save you (nor your family) from the hours and hours of delay and frustration.

    1. Re:Bandwidth by Malc · · Score: 1

      It's easy to take several hundred photos in a week or two, which is going to be more than half a gig. That's not practical to upload. It me took an hour to upload 15 pictures from an internet cafe in Santiago, Chile. Even in the US, upload speeds can be variable. For example at hotels the internet can be unbearably slow in mornings and evenings.

      Personally I think taking a laptop on vacation is dumb. It's extra weight, and a constant worry. It's a pain in the arse. Take a book or some magazines, or sleep on the plane (I found melatonin and two bottles of wine great for whiling away the nearly 14 hour flight back from Shanghai yesterday!)

  56. It's called probable cause by Crane+Style · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you've got an NTFS drive you could always go about it using Alternate Data Streams. What pictures? Not going to fool a forensic examiner (nothing you do will, given enough time to look) but you'd probably slide past border folks just fine without having to give up your laptop for not providing the password to an encrypted drive. Don't give them any reason to want to look any further ;)

  57. Plausible Deniability by belphegore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're worried about having to give up the password to your encrypted drive, try Rubberhose:

    http://iq.org/~proff/rubberhose.org/

    1. Re:Plausible Deniability by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      How would that be better than truecrypt?!

      and

      "...Rubberhose is currently available for Linux 2.2."

      hahaha

    2. Re:Plausible Deniability by belphegore · · Score: 1

      It should work without too much trouble (maybe any? Haven't tried it recently) on 2.6

      It's better than truecrypt because it overlays multiple encrypted partitions over each other on the same physcial media, with no partition knowing about the others. So if the authorities say "well what about this encrypted partition?", you hand over a key. This key decrypts one "view" of the partition. Let's say it's a 1GB partition. key1 can show you 400MB of data, and key2 shows you 200MB of other data. Given key1, you can't even tell there is a key2 -- it just looks like you have a 1GB partition which is 40% full. Looks like you did turn over your crypto key, and since they find nothing of interest in the 400MB partition, they let you keep your laptop.

    3. Re:Plausible Deniability by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that is any better than using a hidden volume.
      http://www.truecrypt.org/hiddenvolume.php

    4. Re:Plausible Deniability by belphegore · · Score: 1

      It's not any better. I didn't know that Truecrypt had that feature.

  58. No media. . . by crimguy · · Score: 1

    I'd not have any movies or music on my computer that I can't provide any kind of supporting information that I am a legal owner of it, particularly with regard to movies. For an interesting listen, download the latest episode of TWIT (Laporte) where he interviews Kevin Mitnik. Mitnik pointed out that what the powers that be were most inquisitive about were 1) pirated movies, 2) pirated music, and 3) kiddie porn.

    1. Re:No media. . . by crimguy · · Score: 1

      I should point out that this was regarding a recent detention of Mitnik at Atlanta Airport.

  59. Easy Solution by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Send it to your hotel DHL overnight before you leave, and do the same to get it home.

    Problem solved.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Easy Solution by orsty3001 · · Score: 1

      Ha! DHL won't get it there in one piece, at the same time, it will get searched coming though customs like all the hardware we get from overseas does.

    2. Re:Easy Solution by bogjobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, problem not solved. He specifically said that he wanted his laptop for the flight, so your solution is no help there. And it is much, *much* easier for them to search your stuff if you send it through a private carrier. There's no expectation of privacy so they can inspect it without a warrant, which is effectively the same as physically carrying it through customs. But this way there's no upset traveller yelling at them and wasting an officer's time, and more imporantly, there's no way you would ever know if your laptop was searched.

    3. Re:Easy Solution by thepotoo · · Score: 1
      Send it registered+insured USPS mail instead. It's a federal crime if it gets stolen that way.

      If you're worried about them opening it, don't be. It's a federal crime for USPS employees to tamper with mail, too.

      The minus side to this solution is that it may cost you $50+ to mail the damned thing, so you're probably better off with TrueCrypt.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    4. Re:Easy Solution by Zadaz · · Score: 1

      Well, not DHL, they're the K-Mart of package delivery. But yeah, it's essentially on track.

      However customs is allowed to go through international mail the same way they are allowed to go through your stuff at the airport.

      If it's the photos you're most worried about, either emails/ftp them to yourself, or take the SD card out of the camera, tape it to a piece of cardboard put it in a plain envelope and mail it to yourself.

      Or keep the files on your hard drive, just run a script to rename /photos/DSC####.jpg to /MSappdata/sys####.dat and the guys at the border will never know.

      Bust the best answer is don't give into fear. There is a better chance of getting brutally attacked on your vacation than someone at the border looking through your holiday snaps. I travel internationally quite often and I have never ever seen or heard of anyone checking a laptop other than to see if it turns on (ie:is a real laptop.) (+1 conformation bias)

      Enjoy your vacation!

    5. Re:Easy Solution by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      So I guess it's a bad idea to bring a broken laptop across the border?

    6. Re:Easy Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather trust it with feeble minds of UPS employees than the filth at DHL *spits on them* *cough*Fed-Ex*cough*

    7. Re:Easy Solution by krlynch · · Score: 1

      But if you are sending the package internationally, it is decidedly NOT a federal crime for the Customs agents to open that USPS package and search the contents. Without warrant, same as a border inspection when you are present.

    8. Re:Easy Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send it to your hotel DHL overnight before you leave, and do the same to get it home.

      Problem solved.

      Er, yeah, except you just blew ALL of your beer and coffee house money on fucking overnight shipping fees. Give me a break. One possible solution, but hardly problem solved.

    9. Re:Easy Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Customs never opens packages that are shipped internationally...

      Might as well mail some drugs along with it, since they won't catch that either.

    10. Re:Easy Solution by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      I see. I guess I'll use DHL from now on, then.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    11. Re:Easy Solution by Malc · · Score: 1

      Want to deal with reclaiming taxes and brokerage fees if they decide to ding you for that?

    12. Re:Easy Solution by krlynch · · Score: 1

      Customs can open the DHL package, too. They can open ANY package that crosses the border....

    13. Re:Easy Solution by Xamusk · · Score: 1

      Much better (and cooler) would be to have a professional smuggler take your laptop for your destination.

  60. Holy shit, it's an editor who uses Ask Slashdot! by Nimey · · Score: 1

    I thought the lot of you didn't bother posting to Ask and would instead post Ask questions to random sections instead, sections which might have nothing to do with the topic.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  61. Yeah, we know by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    The people who worry that about privacy, are the people have something to worry about.

    It's obvious, you should be jailed. ;)

  62. Give them something to look at by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    Write a script that will copy goatse, tub girl and screen shots from 2 girls 1 cup thousands of times into every directory of your hard drive.

    After they check a few images, they'll stop looking.

  63. Just wait a little longer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the rate the US financials are going (the number doesn't even fit the live counter anymore) it won't be long before the US simply can't afford it anymore to pester its visitors. At that time they would need all the visitors they can get to get some (real) moneyflow going.

    I for one refuse to bother with those 3rd world -like politics where the "Grand Nation" allows itself to treat everyone like criminals when they see fit.

  64. The Supreme Court agrees by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Darned border search exception.

    "travelers may be stopped [and searched] at . . . the border without individualized suspicion even if the stop [or search] is based largely on ethnicity[.]" United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985), United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563 (1976)

    and

    "may [...] conduct searches of the traveler's body -- including strip, body cavity, involuntary x-ray, and in some jurisdictions, patdown searches -- if the Customs officer has reasonable suspicion" to do so. United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004), United States v. Johnson, 991 F.2d 1287, 1291-92 (7th Cir. 1993)

    1. Re:The Supreme Court agrees by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What? They can strip search you, body cavity search you and x-ray you against your will, but only in certain jurisdictions can they dare pat you down?

    2. Re:The Supreme Court agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody remember when the fourth amendment used to mean something?

    3. Re:The Supreme Court agrees by isorox · · Score: 1

      "may [...] conduct searches of the traveler's body -- including strip, body cavity, involuntary x-ray, and in some jurisdictions, patdown searches

      So they can strip you naked, stick their head up your ass, and bombard you with radiation, but they can't check your pockets?

    4. Re:The Supreme Court agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it wrong that it's the second case here that truly scares me even though the first is much more outrageous?

  65. I've had no issues by SpineZ · · Score: 1

    I've been back and forth to China a few times over the last 6 months and have had no issues bringing 2 laptops with me (personal and work) and getting them back to the states unchecked.

    I've also heard the stories on the news and it is a bit disheartening but again, I've had zero problems myself.

  66. Better Solution Than Encryption by TheSimkin · · Score: 1

    Even if you encrypt, there is the thorny issue that you may need to provide your password etc... You can plead the 5th but it may not work. It's still a grey area. A better solution would be to upload your pictures to your home computer from an internet cafe or hotel etc.

  67. Are you too paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not now, you're not. We are watching you.

    And you think I'm gonna post with my real name?

  68. It's easy... by Chonnawonga · · Score: 1

    Don't look Muslim.

  69. A couple of 4GB SD cards should keep all the pics by Calinous · · Score: 1

    All the pictures you need. You could even use micro SD card/cards in your mobile phone (if your mobile phone can carry micro SD cards).

  70. Depends on what you look like by umStefa · · Score: 1

    I just came back from Egypt with slightly under 40 gigs of commercial photographs and had to pass through Seattle on my way home to Canada. Got asked two whole questions... where was I coming from and where was I going. Now I am your stereotypical white guy, the middle eastern looking people on the flight where without exception getting the third degree (and they where all holding American or Canadian passports).

    --
    Technology is most abused by the very people it was created to help
  71. Alternative to trying to hide everything by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

    Before you leave home image your hard drive to dvd with no data at all, just OS and apps. Use Ghost or something like that. Put some work files on on a flash drive. Skip the ripped movies. When you are ready to return, move all your images to flash and mail them home, then re-image your hard drive with the no data image. When you go through customs let them look to their hearts content. If they ask about the really clean hard drive, tell them it company policy that not data is to be left on hard drives while traveling because of fear of theft of the laptop. Show them the flash drive with your work data on it. Keep a memory card in the camera with a couple of pictures of the beach for them to look at.

  72. Rubber hose code cracking.... by refactored · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...the trouble with any encryption is it sends a strong signal to the spooks... This guy is hiding something, put him through the works and see if anything leaks out.

    But I dare say you may be safe... after all, TrueCrypt has probably received a visit from No Such Agency.

    Google for crypto nsa backdoor

    1. Re:Rubber hose code cracking.... by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well with Truecrypt at least it's open source so that should provide a good degree of protection against a backdoor in the software itself. There's still the possibility of a backdoor in the underlying encryption schemes of course which would be far beyond most people's ability to detect no matter how many people see it or how long they look. Truecrypt does however allow you to chain multiple encryption and hash algorithms which, given the diversity of their origins, should provide a reasonable degree of protection from backdoors.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    2. Re:Rubber hose code cracking.... by Delusionner · · Score: 1

      There's still the possibility of a backdoor in the underlying encryption schemes of course which would be far beyond most people's ability to detect no matter how many people see it or how long they look.

      not for Bruce Schneier! he finds backdoors to encryption algorithms while drinking his morning Tea! (c.f. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/ )

  73. Never been asked about laptops by afore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been between Taiwan and the US, Shanghai and the US numerous times in the last two years carrying 2 laptops. Never been asked. In fact, the last time two weeks ago, I had two laptops, 1 for work and 1 for my personal use, and a newly purchased in Taiwan EEEPC netbook which I declared.

    1. Re:Never been asked about laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm pretty sure that 99.999% (with a +-.001% error margin) of the Slashdot readership haven't been killed by a bus, yet it doesn't hurt to look both sides of the street when crossing it. I hate to put the my tinfoil hat and the faraday robe, but I bet that none of the nonpersons already disapeared by the goverment post here in Slashdot.

    2. Re:Never been asked about laptops by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      +1 "Faraday Robe" reference

  74. Just came back from Puerto Vallarta in May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And I was concerned about the same things. Turns out that concern was needless. Mexico doesn't care what's on your laptop or in your luggage -- my luggage wasn't even seriously searched there. A Mexican Federale rifled around in my main suitcase looking for bottles of liquor and foodstuffs on my way back to the states (he only found one, haha) but that was it. They didn't even bother to check my laptop bag at all. I flew out through Atlanta, and the only searching I had to go through stateside was routine x-rays. Laptop out of the case and in a tray by itself, run through the machine, and that's it. They didn't blink when it went through.

    If my experience is any indication, the only thing you'll have to worry about is getting a good wireless signal while you're there. Not that you'll want to be on your computer, it's one of the most beautiful places I've ever been. I don't think you have anything to worry about. Take your ATM and/or credit card with you too. You can use it in most places down there -- even in ATMs which dispense pesos at the current official exchange rate, meaning you won't have to haggle with anyone about how many pesos your $10 bill is worth.

    Oh yeah, and you want to take the zipline tour through the jungles. That and the Catalina excursion if you can. Well worth the cost.

  75. Encryption good, but bypassable if key demanded by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

    You can do what my company has been doing. They bought a few eeePCs at a decent price and literally keep NOTHING but a Citrix client on them. When employees cross the border, there is no liability if the netbook gets confiscated, stolen, or wiped. When they reach their destination, assuming the laptop is okay, they bring up the encrypted Citrix client and VPN into work. This way they have full access to their environment: Outlook, Internet Browsing, etc. all done through the corp network with encryption. The cost of this is minimal (a $300 netbook) as opposed to a full $1000-2000 laptop PLUS sensitive data.

    Now, for personal use you could simply run an ssh tunnel. Takes, literally, just a few mouse-clicks to setup and costs nothing extra (minus the netbook).

    Bottom line: The less you bring, the less risk you take.

  76. This has yet to be an issue for me.... by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    I travel a lot. I've yet to have an issue with this.

    --
    Derek Greene
  77. Why rip? by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    Why not just take the DVDs with you?

    1. Re:Why rip? by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      Spinning the DVD drive is more power intensive than spinning the hdd

  78. Happened to Kevin Mitnick recently by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1

    Kevin Mitnick was recently on TWIT 163 this past weekend discussing a recent incident he had at an airport in Atlanta, GA coming from Columbia where he was detained and ICE/Customs officials were attempting search through his property and a laptop of his. He offers some tips on what one should do before taking your laptop with you when leaving the United States.

    http://twit.tv/163/

    1. Re:Happened to Kevin Mitnick recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that the name Kevin Mitnick didn't have anything to do with all that, either.

    2. Re:Happened to Kevin Mitnick recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Mitnick being a world-class asshole-with-an-attitude didn't have a lot to do with him getting hassled?

      You can be sure that the second the customs agent read the name on that passport, he was thinking his boss would ream him a new one if he DIDN'T put Mitnick through hell.

    3. Re:Happened to Kevin Mitnick recently by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Kevin Mitnick [wikipedia.org] was recently on TWIT 163 this past weekend discussing a recent incident he had at an airport in Atlanta, GA coming from Columbia where he was detained and ICE/Customs officials were attempting search through his property and a laptop of his. He offers some tips on what one should do before taking your laptop with you when leaving the United States.

      Tip #1: Don't be Kevin Mitnick ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  79. rsync every *.jpg at icanhazcheezburger.com by physicsphairy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Insist on showing them every picture!

    Also, backup the gutenberg project.

    Fill up the rest of your drive with dd if="/dev/random" of="secretstuff.iso" so that if they copy your drive they at least have something they can work on decrypting.

    Don't forget to bring your extra harddrives, too! I'd pay you to take some of my crashed ones... I would love for somebody to get the data off of them.

    Other than that, all I can think of is for you to laugh maniacally.

    1. Re:rsync every *.jpg at icanhazcheezburger.com by aaandre · · Score: 1

      And remember, it's very easy for an NSA worker who feels that he's being f*cked with, to inflict, should we say, max payne in your life.

      Good luck!

    2. Re:rsync every *.jpg at icanhazcheezburger.com by advid.net · · Score: 1
      if="/dev/urandom"

      is enougth, otherwise you need entropy from keyboard or mouse to generate output

      Good idea: broken hard drives, thanks.

  80. Re:Boot to BSoD by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or have it "crash" on boot and you'll be sent along your way with a sympathetic shrug.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  81. Rename the files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just write a script to rename the files from IMG12345.jpg to 12345. I'm sure they won't know what the file is, because it has no extension.

  82. US to Barbados and back - no trouble by no1nose · · Score: 1

    I went from the US to Barbados and came back without having to show them anything on my laptop (and there are some good pics on there). I had to take it out of the case for the x-ray machine, but that's it. Have they developed technology that dupes the hd while going through the x-ray yet?

  83. Paranoia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ended up going to korea with a 1TB external stuffed with movies. Personally I wouldn't worry about it... I ended up going to japan and then back to korea in the same trip. 4 Security checks and no problem.

  84. pictures by alxkit · · Score: 0

    may i suggest a microSD card? unless you're gonna have a full body cavity search - you have nothing to fear.

  85. Micro-SD cards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy a few Micro-SD cards. Preferably without any "size" labels on them, and/or make new labels that indicate a smaller size. This won't fool any experts, but it will pass a cursory check.

    2. Create 2 partitions on each, the first one small (eg. 32MB) with a FAT32 partition. This is what will pop-up when someone puts the card into a system. If you create a custom label for the disk, put the size of this partition on the label.

    3. Create one encrypted image _smaller_ than the size of the second partition -- preferably a sparse filesystem if you can manage it, and a second encrypted image the size of the remaining space. Fill them up, the first with "junk" data, and the second with your real, hidden data.

    4. Concatenate your encrypted images and 'dd' them to the second partition.

    5. Wipe all the original data and encrypted archives from your harddrive.

    With a MicroSD card, it is a lot easier to hide it than the larger cards. Besides the physical size, the reduced components contain less metal. If someone tries to look at the card with a cursory glance, it will just show small filesystem. If someone notices that the card is, in fact bigger, or that it contains a couple filesystems, you can claim that it is a swap partition. If you are more honest, say that it has an encrypted filesystem, and offer to decrypt it for them. When they open it, they will see your "junk" data. Having a sparse filesystem is good here, because you can make it look like the filesystem is larger than it really is, concealing the second encrypted filesystem. If they do realize there is a third filesystem, then you're pretty screwed...

  86. Don't make it conspicuous by orzetto · · Score: 1

    Full-disk encryption is a tad too suspicious though. Yes, yes, it should not be this way, but someone is going to ask what he is hiding. So I would rather go for partition encryption, leaving the OS functional.

    Just partition the HD so that there is some space left, use it for encrypted storage and mount the partition when you need it. I think we can safely assume that no border-control enforcer knows what a partition table is, and much less how to mount it; if they did they would have better jobs. And, if they really find out, it will look just like an unformatted partition. Just say that you got the partitioning wrong, or something like that.

    And for the extra paranoid, remember to encrypt swap with a password scrambled at boot and to mount /tmp on tmpfs.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  87. secondary inspection by drfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if uve never been pulled into the us customs secondary inspection i wouldnt worry about it

    ive never had my laptop scrutinized and ive been pulled into secondary inspection a few times

    { canadian programmer telecommuting in the states == working in the states }

    think about who and what they are really looking for , its probably not you or your files

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
    1. Re:secondary inspection by advid.net · · Score: 1
      your mean:

      "its probably not u or ur files"

  88. I Can't Believe It by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

    No one has said the simplest way. Slap any data you dont want them looking at on an external and put it in your carry on. I travel with 10-15 external usb drives, and no one says ANYTHING about them. also, because there is no chance of them being a weapon (And they go thru the xray machine), they cant legally confiscate them. Well, i mean, they could i suppose, but that would bring along a few lawsuits from my employer.. either way, they never mess with your usb drives.

    --
    "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
  89. Buy a second disk, by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Install a plain old OS on it, and NOTHING else.

    So, it's a brand new laptop OS install.

    Ship your other one, after backing it up of course, to your destination next day.

    If you absolutely must work on the plane, just put those documents on the damn thing, work on them, get your disk and sync up after arrival.

    Reverse for the trip home.

  90. External storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep your laptop clean. Just OS and applications.

    Use external drive or USB stick for all your data.

  91. Laptop theft is a greater risk by MrAtoz · · Score: 1

    As far as TrueCrypt is concerned, I started using it when I realized what a problem I'd have if someone stole my laptop (either at home or on the road). I now keep all my sensitive financial and personal data on an encrypted volume; the innocuous stuff is in the clear. Frankly, the risk of theft is far greater than the risk of border seizure.

    If it's your photos that you're concerned about, why not just upload them to you favorite photo sharing site and delete them from the laptop?

  92. Create a Harmless looking truecrypt file... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truecrypt is a great option, make a truecrypt file to hold all your pictures. Then move it into your windows directory and rename it "Harmless.dll".
     
    If your worried that they will see truecrypt and demand you decrypt a something; create a second truecrypt file in the default location and put some scans of tax documents.

  93. From my experience (I'm NOT a US citizen) by juanca · · Score: 1

    I've been to the US a couple of times this year, the last one about 3 weeks ago to Las Vegas.

    I had to take my laptop with me for several reasons, but during the security check-in in Houston no one bothered me at all about the laptop, just had to take it out of my bag for the x-ray check.

    I think encryption is a great alternative, not because of Big Brother, but because your laptop might get stolen in Puerto Vallarta.

    --
    --Necesito una chela, bien fria...
    1. Re:From my experience (I'm NOT a US citizen) by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Nobody said they check and/or confiscate all laptops. The issue arises if and when they decide to pick on you. Because they _do_ pick on some, and they _do_ seize laptops. You just need to be unlucky enough for them to decide to do it to you.

      Apart from that, I totally agree the risk of theft is much greater (assuming you're an ethnic westerner, otherwise the risk of seizure skyrockets) and a cause for encryption in itself.

  94. Just don't take it by ilovesymbian · · Score: 0

    Just don't take it along buddy. :)

  95. No search by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    I entered the US 3 months ago, and left after a week. I too had read about stories where they could search and confiscate your laptop for no reason. Since I'm a Linux user, the act of using an operating system that they don't know (i.e. everything except Windows) might cause suspicion, so I removed Linux from the boot loader and put a few photos and documents on the Windows partition as a decoy. I really didn't want to go through the trouble of formatting my Linux partition since all my important stuff are not on Windows. My business partner, who traveled with me, didn't bring his Macbook at all out of fear that it would be confiscated.

    It turned out that we have been worried about nothing. There was no search. One time I forgot to remove the laptop from my backpack. They took the backpack and inspected it, and I was acting nervous because I was worried they'd confiscate the laptop. After a few minutes I got my laptop back. Nothing happened.

  96. Use goatse in Splashy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use goatse in Splashy for some nice mind gaming :)

  97. not a problem for most people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've taken my laptop out of the country on several occasions, and despite being searched on a number of occasions, they have never tried to get onto my laptop.

  98. Be white by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    I've gone overseas three times in the last three years, and the customs people never even give me a second glance. Just be white, be polite, look "normal" and as long as you aren't coming from somewhere that traffics in "interesting" things, they will spend all of fifteen seconds looking you over.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  99. Buy a second hard disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put the one you really care about in your suitcase. Odds are that if you get inspected, they won't look at anything beyond the drive that's in your laptop. Personally I would never encrypt anything, it won't enhance your privacy, it will ensure that you get even more deeply investigated.

    FWIW I've been back and forth between the US and the UK several times a year since 9/11 and I've never had even the slightest bit of interest taken in my laptop... touch wood.

  100. Use encryption... by melted · · Score: 1

    ...only if you don't mind an occasional cavity search. Use DHL otherwise.

  101. One other note by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    I should clarify to say that the policy does mention encryption; but whether your device is encrypted is unlikely to determine whether or not it is seized.

    Specifically:

    (2) Assistance by Other Federal Agencies or Entities.

    (a) Translation and Decryption. Officers may encounter information in documents or electronic devices that is in a foreign language and/or encrypted. To assist CBP in determining the meaning of such information, CBP may seek translation and/or decryption assistance from other Federal agencies or entities. Officers may seek such assistance absent individualized suspicion. Requests for translation and decryption assistance shall be documented.

    (b) Subject Matter Assistance. Officers may encounter information in documents or electronic devices that is not in a foreign language or encrypted, but that nevertheless requires referral to subject matter experts to determine whether the information is relevant to the laws enforced and administered by CBP. With supervisory approval, officers may create and transmit a copy of information to an agency or entity for the purpose of obtaining subject matter assistance when they have reasonable suspicion of activities in violation of the laws enforced by CBP. Requests for subject matter assistance shall be documented.

    Actually, reading the actual policy is probably not a bad idea for those so outraged with it (or frightened of it). Keep the longstanding border search exception in mind when reading the policy, and try to imagine how it might be in the realm of possibility that it might be reasonable to also apply the border search exception, repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court, to data inside electronic devices as well.

    1. Re:One other note by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      and try to imagine how it might be in the realm of possibility that it might be reasonable to also apply the border search exception

      That exception basically says searches can be unreasonable as long as they are routine: policy trumping Constitution.

      So as long as they regularly violate your rights (not necessarily personally), your rights aren't violated by virtue of their not existing.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  102. Careful!!! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the right accessorizing and appropriate leather:latex:chainmail ratio, you can ensure even the most intrepid airport screener will breeze you through in record time

    Have you seen the people they are hiring at the airport security recently? You might be subject to an entirely different form of harassment, from someone who feels you are their perfect soul mate...

    1. Re:Careful!!! by philspear · · Score: 1

      ...which will really help out the lawsuit that he's going to file.

  103. MicroSD is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get yourself an 8GB microSD card or two or three and a card reader if your laptop doesnt have one built in. They don't set off metal detectors and can be carried easily in your front pocket or shirt pocket or in your socks or wherever makes you happy. Although honestly I have passed through customs at least a dozen times since 9/11 with laptops, mp3 players, cell phones and all kind of electronic goodies and never once been asked to actually turn one on or let someone from security examine it. But I still keep all my work and personal documents on microSD just in case that ever changes.

  104. Go Gold. by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 1

    I'm actually waiting for this to happen to me. When it does, I plan on opening the laptop, turning it on, and letting it tumble from my hands to the floor. God bless the Dell gold full replacement warranty.

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
  105. Never mind the laptop by legirons · · Score: 1

    If you know enough about US authorities' attitudes to be worried about the border searches, then surely you also know enough about the US internal authorities to realise that it's not a safe place to visit?

    Just tell your employer that you won't visit an active war zone

  106. Dual boot? by dogganos · · Score: 1

    Many have a dual boot machine. My laptop has WinXP that I rarely use as first partition and then it's all garbage (if you don't have the passphrase).

    So, I do the following: Before a journey to USA, I remove the GRUB loader, and windows just loads without questions. Who is gonna find out that I have a second encrypted partition in the 5 minutes of the search?

    1. Re:Dual boot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before a journey to USA, I remove the GRUB loader,...

      You don't need to remove it. Just use the 'hiddenmenu' option, set the timeout to zero and the default boot option to WinXP in menu.lst/grub.conf.

  107. as a smuggler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once smuggling some books into a country that did not permit such books.

    Sure enough, I got searched and questioned.

    What I was doing was illegal and I got busted. I don't mind because those laws are stupid and as it is often said - information wants to be free.

    At worst they were going to confiscate "my" belongings and destroy them. I got 'lucky' as I was also carrying relief supplies (clothing for children to mask the books).

    I now run my life on encryption and assume everything I do on the net is tracked and logged.

    Depending on how much you believe in what you are doing you will take risks.

    For family photos? Mail a backup to yourself (encrypted) and take your encrypted laptop with you or mail it back. Insure it and at worst, you'll have a backup and only have lost the hardware.

  108. No quite... by MikeRT · · Score: 0

    Look, I hate that argument. In fact, I think it's one of the most disgusting, chickenshit and reflexively authority-loving mottos that only a mewling statist who pisses his pants every night in fear of a ripple in the public order would use. That said, the original poster specifically brought up his pictures as though he **knows** there is likely to be a problem. That does change things around and make even someone like me have to ask just WHAT IS he carrying?

    Either he's breaking the law, or he's incredibly paranoid, since most border agents really wouldn't care unless they found a ton of pictures of kids that obviously have no connection to him on his laptop, really sick pornography or pictures showing you high fiving a terrorist in front of a nuclear power plant. The way I read it was that he's pretty sure that he'd get in trouble, even with a pretty reasonable customs agent. Remember, Customs and the TSA are two separate agencies; Customs doesn't tend to waste its time on the minute bullshit that the TSA wastes its time with.

    1. Re:No quite... by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Look, I hate that argument. In fact, I think it's one of the most disgusting, chickenshit and reflexively authority-loving mottos that only a mewling statist who pisses his pants every night in fear of a ripple in the public order would use. That said, the original poster specifically brought up his pictures as though he **knows** there is likely to be a problem. That does change things around and make even someone like me have to ask just WHAT IS he carrying?

      Mike, I think you are discounting the paranoid angle here. After all this is Slashdot. There was recently an article about "compromising principles and making a facebook account thereby giving up privacy forever." I suspect this person has nothing worse than some extreme liberterian or socialistic rants, and some naked pictures of females obviously over 18. Maybe he has pictures of naked men or similar.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:No quite... by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      Either he's breaking the law, or he's incredibly paranoid

      That's a false dichotomy made by almost every moron with the "If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear."

      Here's another option, maybe he wants to choose who gets to see his pictures.

      The right to privacy is important. Not wanting some minimum wage power-tripping ape going through your vacation slideshow and making fun of you because he doesn't like your face doesn't make you a criminal, it makes you human.

      Wanting to choose who gets to see my pics isn't paranoid, it's human.

      Right NOW all the shit YOU do isn't illegal...but in 5 years, who knows?

      Smarten up. Protect your right to privacy or lose a lot more than your dignity.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
  109. screw encryption by dargon · · Score: 1

    just get one of those 64GB thumb drives from corsair and swallow it before you return :)

  110. i have *actual* experience in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have entered the us from mexico a few times by bus and car. Once, they asked me to turn on my laptop but the border agent just looked at the icons on the desktop and that was it. There was mo detailed examination of my files. Also, when entering by car, they will ask you to not take your cell phone with you to the waiting room so you might want to erase text messages etc.

    My pockets have never been searched so you could easily "smuggle" a thumb drive or laptop harddrive in your pocket. Just have another harddrive with a clean install of windows to put in your laptop so that they do not become suspicious.

    Sending your stuff by DHL/UPS/Whatever is just plain stupid. It will cost you $$$ because we are talking about an international shipment.

  111. the only safe answer is: by toby · · Score: 1

    Don't carry your laptop. Encryption won't help you.

    --
    you had me at #!
  112. Theft in foreign country is a bigger concern by krlynch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it's the hip thing to worry about Customs rifling through your laptop, but statistically, you have much better things to worry about when bringing your laptop on vacation ... among other things:

    0) Forgetting to bring the AC plug adapter,
    1) Customs services in the foreign country,
    2) Airport security on both ends,
    3) Simple theft of the laptop during the trip,
    4) Putting your laptop bag down on the bus and forgetting it,
    5) Spilling coffee on your keyboard at an internet cafe, and
    6) Dropping your laptop on your big toe and breaking both.

    Practically speaking, Customs agents can't be bothered to search individuals that aren't acting truly "hinky". I've been traveling internationally on a regular basis for business. My travel patterns certainly fit a certain "risk" profile (long stays outside the country, frequent travel, watch list name match, etc.) and I've never, in six years of this, ever had anything searched or questioned, much less seized. Practically, it's not worth worrying about.

    1. Re:Theft in foreign country is a bigger concern by karbyn-aceous · · Score: 0

      > 2) Airport security on both ends,

      I saw that in a 'movie' once ... I think it would be uncomfortable!

    2. Re:Theft in foreign country is a bigger concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Practically, it's not worth worrying about.

      This is slashdot, where nobody has ever traveled abroad (going outside the basement doesn't count), much less seen any customs officials, and everybody is out to get them because they are super geniuses.

      Why wouldn't the customs want to search the laptop of the most important person in the world?

  113. Laptops and Airport Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I traveled to Morocco and Spain last Summer. They didn't give a crap about my laptop. They honestly didn't even ask me anything about it. The only things they cared about was if I brought any weed back(Morocco grows a lot) or trained to become a terrorist in a Mosque.

  114. chill out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude don't be so paranoid. i look middle eastern/mediterranean (phenotypic blending of my mixed russian, mexican, native american ancestry) and get pulled aside for questioning every time i fly. they never go through the contents of my computer; they're interested in making sure it's actually just a computer.

  115. Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

    To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed, which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume. If you don't and they suspect of being a terrorist sympathizer you'll just get thrown in Gitmo until you give up your secrets.

    TrueCrypt plausible deniability is useful against those who cannot employ deadly force against you.

    If you're really concerned, wipe the drive, install linux on a small partition, use an encrypted network connection to upload the photos, then secure wipe the drive and install Windows XP on it for your border crossing. Better yet, get a $50 used laptop and leave it with a local school.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Known Your Adversary by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      TrueCrypt plausible deniability is useful against those who cannot employ deadly force against you.

      True; a Chinese blogger trying to make a push for democracy probably won't get much out of it.

      On the other hand, it sounds like this guy is your typical paranoid geek (no problem there, I'm one too :)) coming back from a vacation in Mexico. They're not exactly going to be cracking out the rubber hoses and doing an e-full-cavity search on his laptop. Encrypt it, name it something off the wall, and he'd probably never even be asked about it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Known Your Adversary by XanC · · Score: 1

      I think that's why the recommendation is for an encrypted volume within your encrypted drive. They can tell you have TrueCrypt installed, they see you unlock it for them, and then have no way of knowing there's another encrypted volume there at all.

    3. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, you're absolutely right. I suspect that he's either one of: not sufficiently paranoid, or way over paranoid. As usual it's what you need to defend and against whom.

      Heck, I can't even find stuff on my own drive I'm looking for inside 5 minutes sometimes - there's no way any kid of quick search can be of any use, unless we're underestimating our enemies again. I'd suggest that putting the photos inside a dot-directory would be largely sufficient.

      Still, I think it's better not to play along with surrendering your 'fourth amendment' inalienable rights at all.

      I bet photoshopping a picture of yourself shaking hands with Dick Cheney and setting that as a desktop picture would be the fastest way through the line.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Known Your Adversary by dslbrian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed, which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume.

      Plausible deniability can extend beyond just what truecrypt offers. Personally I would not encrypt the whole disk, just select container files. After all if they seize the computer they would expect it to boot and behave like a normal system, so give that to them.

      For truecrypt use the "hide a tree in a forest" approach. Create some bogus aptly named containers - "MySecretStuffFile", and such with nothing but useless junk in it. When someone asks for the truecypt password give them the password to that.

      Then create some actual containers masquerading as real files - "Big.zip" or "YourFavLinuxDistro.iso" or such. If they ask what that is, say its a zip or iso or whatever. If they ask why it doesn't work, say I guess its corrupted. If they can't prove its a truecrypt container there is not much they can do. Realistically unless your name pops up on some watch list I doubt that anyone would ever spend the time to sift through the files looking for that stuff.

    5. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      They can tell you have TrueCrypt installed, they see you unlock it for them, and then have no way of knowing there's another encrypted volume there at all.

      You're quite right, but to clarify, the danger isn't them knowing you have another encrypted volume it's them suspecting you have another encrypted volume. Here I'm measuring risk relative to your person, not your data. The only way out of this is Complete Deniability, which I don't think we have yet.

      Remember, it's encrypted volumes all the way down.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Known Your Adversary by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed

      Not necessarily. Have a bootable USB stick with Linux including TrueCrypt. On your way out, you probably won't be searched, but you could always stick it in your hold luggage so they don't find it if they search your hand luggage. Then don't bring it back. USB sticks are cheap enough nowadays.

    7. Re:Known Your Adversary by LKM · · Score: 1, Redundant

      That would actually be a neat trick. Photoshop a few pictures of you along with high-ranking government officials. Put the pictures among your personal pictures on your computer so the agent will stumble upon them should he want to look through your images (preferably sorted along the top so he'll actually see them). See if that helps you get better treatment :-)

    8. Re:Known Your Adversary by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed, which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume.

      Not correct. You are thinking of the Hidden Operating System feature.

      A standard Hidden Volume can be placed in any truecrypt container.

    9. Re:Known Your Adversary by gnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume within another encrypted volume, thereby allowing you to grant access to unimportant/dummy data when a password is asked for without the attacker knowing additional information even exists.

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed...

      No. You don't. -1 Wrong.

      You only need the boot-loader if you're doing full-disk encryption. But you can boot up unencrypted and create as many volumes as you'd like with or without hidden volumes inside with just the normal TrueCrypt software.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    10. Re:Known Your Adversary by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      My personal pictures with Dick, Karl and George?
      Those would actually be in my encrypted files thank you very much.

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    11. Re:Known Your Adversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed, which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume.

      Wrong feature. What you're talking about is if you encrypt the entire drive. You can hide an encrypted volume inside another without anything as obvious as a boot loader.

    12. Re:Known Your Adversary by McNally · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would actually be a neat trick. Photoshop a few pictures of you along with high-ranking government officials.

      For bonus irony points, put your head on top of Saddam Hussein's body in that famous picture of him shaking hands with Donald Rumsfeld. (Although, Rumsfeld is technically no longer a high-ranking government official.)

    13. Re:Known Your Adversary by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      That doesn't always work. Some visiting leaders of political parties from allied nations occasionally get the full treatment. For some strange reason this poor guy tends to trigger every terrorism watch list going, even when he's on his way to meet with the President.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    14. Re:Known Your Adversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False, the container can be a file and not the entire hard disk volume.

    15. Re:Known Your Adversary by XanC · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that's theoretically possible? How can a piece of software assign meaning to any random collection of bits?

    16. Re:Known Your Adversary by julesh · · Score: 1

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed

      Not really. You can create a truecrypt hidden volume in a secondary partition or in a file container if you wish. It isn't as secure (unless you disable paging and ensure your applications never write to temp while modifying data you store in the hidden partition), but it does work.

      which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume.

      Not really. I don't think *most* people using truecrypt are using the hidden volume function. At least not with their bootable partition. It's just too damned fiddly. Truecrypt is popular as a reasonably good, high performance, full drive encryption system. Hidden volumes, however, are more effort than they're worth, because in order to avoid overwriting the data, you have to (a) give the system two passwords rather than just one and (b) the driver can report write failures when you hit the sectors that the hidden volume is stored on, which screws all kinds of stuff up.

      Seriously, you don't want to be booting off a partition with a hidden volume on it unless you really have to.

      TrueCrypt plausible deniability is useful against those who cannot employ deadly force against you.

      And those who have no reason to be particularly suspicious of you. And, you know what, I believe TSA comes under both categories.

    17. Re:Known Your Adversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that's theoretically possible? How can a piece of software assign meaning to any random collection of bits?

      Access times.

    18. Re:Known Your Adversary by cmr164 · · Score: 1

      Truecrypt provides plausible deniability - the capability to create a hidden encrypted volume ...

      To do this you need the TrueCrypt bootloader installed, which is a dead give-away that you probably have a hidden volume. ...

      I think you are confusing the capability of having a hidden O/S with the capability of having a hidden container. The boot loader is not required. Also in answer to the objection elsewhere about data being recognisable as encrypted, this might well be true on a normal drive but a hidden container sitting inside a high entropy existing container really is undetectable. This is why Truecrypt and Bestcrypt initialise the entire container upon creation.

      --
      Implemented Integrated Systems Corporation 131 Bishop's Forest Drive , Waltham , Ma. USA 02452 Systems Developmen
    19. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing the capability of having a hidden O/S with the capability of having a hidden container. The boot loader is not required.

      Just going by the TrueCrypt docs on using a decoy OS; they suggest their bootloader is required.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    20. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You only need the boot-loader if you're doing full-disk encryption.

      Which you need to do for complete deniability, to address the suspicion risk.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It isn't as secure (unless you disable paging and ensure your applications never write to temp while modifying data you store in the hidden partition)

      Agreed - I was assuming the above scenario isn't readily achievable. At least that's what I've read about Windows.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that's theoretically possible? How can a piece of software assign meaning to any random collection of bits?

      You have to successfully decrypt every block on the device.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    23. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not correct. You are thinking of the Hidden Operating System [truecrypt.org] feature.

      A standard Hidden Volume [truecrypt.org] can be placed in any truecrypt container.

      Agreed. I've been lead to believe most OS's aren't actually secure when dealing with only hidden volumes, so I'm assuming hidden operating system.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:Known Your Adversary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Have a bootable USB stick with Linux including TrueCrypt. On your way out, you probably won't be searched, but you could always stick it in your hold luggage so they don't find it if they search your hand luggage. Then don't bring it back. USB sticks are cheap enough nowadays.

      good idea.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  116. Plausible deniability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you need is plausible deniability. You can achieve it easily with the hidden volumes option of Truecrypt. You encrypt your HD two times, the first with a dummy filesystem & password that you can show in case of inspection, the other, with another password, to do your stuff. The cool thing is that you can even use two different encryption algorithms. Bye

  117. Doesn't seem to be a problem by D+H+NG · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just returned to the US last week from a month-long trip overseas. I brought my laptop along to store photos from my digital camera. The only time I had to remove my laptop from its case was at the airport (LAX) when leaving the US, when I had to put it through an X-ray machine. I didn't have to do it again when I returned (it still went through the X-ray machine). At no point was I asked about the contents of my laptop nor asked to turn it on. This was a marked improvement from 2 years ago, when I had to remove the laptop from its case and remove my shoes at every point in my journey (my trip had a connecting flight).

  118. USB Keys & Email by sciop101 · · Score: 1
    USB keys for local storage and travel. Email anything sensitive/embarassing/questionable.

    Or just say in a clear calm voice "That is not mine! I have never seen that before now!"

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  119. you are correct, by toby · · Score: 1

    But the O.P. is presumably a US citizen.

    Citizens of other nationalities cannot safely travel to, or stop over, in the US.

    (Ask Maher Arar and the several other Canadians who were kidnapped at the border, and sent by US authorities to Syria to be tortured. And they are only the ones we know about.)

    --
    you had me at #!
  120. Don't, if you can avoid it by Tridus · · Score: 1

    I work for a provincial government in Canada. Pretty much every province (including mine) deals with US states on a regular basis, so we have employees going back and forth.

    The policy we have now is that if you don't have to bring electronics across the border, don't. If you do have to bring a laptop, don't bring any data. We just purge everything off of it except a VPN client. Once you're across the border, you can VPN in and work on a virtual machine using remote desktop.

    Its sad that its come down to this, but the US government is so rampantly paranoid that at this point its crossed the line into insanity.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Don't, if you can avoid it by krlynch · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that's the same set of recommendations that most major US Corporations follow when sending their employees outside the US ... to make sure the authorities in the both the US and the foreign country don't find anything when they walk through your laptop.

      Remember, the rules that we tend to rely on in our home countries don't typically apply in other countries, or even at the borders. If you think that Canadian Customs has any fewer powers than US Customs with regards to laptops, dream on:

      CBSA has yet to publish a report detailing its policy on border searches of electronic devices. That said, the CBSA has stated that its examination authority under the Customs Act extends to electronic storage devices. Other sources of information also suggest that they, like their American counterparts, do not accord electronic devices special status at the border. For example, the Canadian Customs Act broadly defines "goods" to include "any document in any form." suggesting no special treatment for electronic documents. Canadian case law also supports this interpretation. In a 2008 Ontario Court of Justice decision, the Court stated that it saw no intrinsic difference between a computer search and a detailed examination of the contents of one's suitcase.

      Even more goodness:

      From their press releases concerning the confiscation of child pornography, it is evident that CBSA Officers regularly perform spot-checks of laptops at the border. Moreover, in another recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice case, the Court justified a customs search of a computer disc by reasoning that searches at the border are routinely held to be reasonable simply because they are searches at the border[.]

      Think you're safe in Europe, specifically the UK? Think again:

      A spokesman for Customs and Excise said officials would routinely scan laptops for illegal material such as pornography. Encrypted files will be treated in the same way as a ordinary luggage. "So far as we are concerned, there is no difference between an encrypted file and a locked suitcase," said the spokesman. "All travellers entering the country should be prepared to have their equipment scanned."

      Perhaps you think it's just the crazy Brits? Not so fast. The German government says:

      Customs authorities perform customs controls along the external frontier of the EC and within Germany. As a rule, customs officers check travellers on a random basis without a specific initial suspicion. [...] Occasionally it happens that articles are found during a customs inspection and it cannot be clarified immediately whether they are subject to prohibitions and restrictions or not. [...] In such cases, the articles in question can be seized and submitted to a test by experts.

      And remember that most customs rules are harmonized in the EU ... things are pretty much the same everywhere. If you peruse the lists of "prohibitions and restrictions" for the EU, you will find many, many things that are perfectly legal to transport into or out of the United States.

      Borders everywhere have different legal status than the interior of those same countries ... many many fewer protections apply, even in the most "Western" of democracies. Forget that at your own peril.

  121. Extra tips on air travel to USA with laptops by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    For security reasons, certain items need to be placed into plastic bags and put in checked baggage when traveling to the United States:

    1. Batteries, including rechargeable ones
    2. Containers of liquids
    3. Osama Bin Laden

  122. Can you explain what frightens you? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're frightened because the Customs has always had the power to search persons and physical objects at the border without a warrant, or that someone actually thought it might be a good idea to extend the longstanding and repeatedly upheld border search exception to include data on electronic devices? If it has always been acceptable (and repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court[1]) to search for anything else illegal at the border without a warrant, can someone make a good argument why data on one's person or in one's possession at the time of border crossing should be excluded under those same provisions?

    Or are you frightened because you subscribe to the idea that the US has turned into a fascist regime, when the EU and individual European nations have their own laundry list of controversial laws and provisions attempting to grapple with how to handle electronic data in a legal sense in the continually emerging Information Age?

    [1]:
    United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985)
    United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563 (1976)
    United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004)
    United States v. Johnson, 991 F.2d 1287, 1291-92 (7th Cir. 1993)

    1. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or are you frightened because you subscribe to the idea that the US has turned into a fascist regime..."

      Yes, I'll take fascist regime for 100, Alex.

    2. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we just don't want them to find our jb pics

    3. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by rbnunes · · Score: 0

      I'm frighted because US authorities looks like they are living in fear and fear make people stupid and make they search and torture innocent people.

    4. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      [1]:
      United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985)
      United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 562-563 (1976)
      United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004)
      United States v. Johnson, 991 F.2d 1287, 1291-92 (7th Cir. 1993)

      One of these things is not like the others...

    5. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by samantha · · Score: 1

      Those provisions are sick and a perversion of law to start with. The electronic devices are increasingly extension of our most private and sensitive thoughts and knowledge. Perusing them is nothing less than mind rape. I don't give a damn what those old dudes in bad drag have approved. This is utterly unacceptable.

    6. Re:Can you explain what frightens you? by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      First, just because something is not Constitutionally forbidden, does not mean that it is good policy, or that it should not be outlawed.

      Second, such an invasion of American citizens' privacy by their government, if it were to be performed, should be justified by some overriding government interest. I have seen no good argument that searching ordinary people's laptops has contributed to the security of our border or nation at all, much less to a degree that it would take to justify the burden imposed.

      Third, the contents of your laptop are fundamentally different than the contents of your suitcase, making the invasion of privacy far worse than the loss of privacy from a suitcase search.

      The laptop is a huge vault of information about your life and thoughts, including lots of things completely unrelated to your travels. Those things are really none of the government's business - information on your political leanings, reading materials, intimate email letters to/from your wife, etc. These are all things over which inside the border, the government would have no authority to obtain (barring court-authorized surveillance).

      In contrast, what physical items you bring across the border are the government's business, as they could be truly dangerous to public safety - illegal weaponry, drugs, dangerous biological items, etc.

      Fourth, sanitizing your laptop before crossing the border is a much more difficult and error-prone process than leaving a physical item at home. This makes it a greater hardship for travelers.

      So to answer your question of "what frightens you", it's that our government seems so willing to invade its citizens' privacy for so little, if any, gain. What also frightens me is the argument that if current law allows something, it must be OK, because hey at least we're not a fascist state, or because Europe (from which our forefathers fled in search of freedom) is making similarly poor decisions. The lowest common denominator is not something we should aspire to.

  123. Easy by friedman101 · · Score: 1

    Store anything too private on a network drive or private ftp. Upload before you leave, download when you get back.

  124. Proud to be an American? by No2Gates · · Score: 0

    Not me. I have never been more embarrassed to be an American as I am now. I thought we had the Constitution to protect us. No, wait, W fixed all that when he created the DHS, they have no stinkin' rules.

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  125. This is a job for dual boot. by darkonc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Set your system to dual boot Windows/Linux. If you're really paranoid, have it boot off of USB first and the main hard drive second. Put the Linux/Grub boot on a USB key, and keep it separate. The system should default to a Windows boot.

    When they boot the system, all they'll see is Windows. Windows will ignore the Linux partition(s). For anything other than an anal-probe search, this'll be enough to keep them at bay.
    It's unlikely that they'll do an anal probe search unless they find something else on you that worries them.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    1. Re:This is a job for dual boot. by aaandre · · Score: 1

      Stop! We have reached the limits of what anal probing can teach us!

  126. Best defense:Photo Finished. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "With the right accessorizing and appropriate leather:latex:chainmail ratio, you can ensure even the most intrepid airport screener will breeze you through in record time."

    Hehe. Family photos huh?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  127. USB stick ftw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a 2 gig usb key, stick on some assorted word documents and MP3's, bang all your pictures in an archive, rename it to something inconspicuous like 2007 Oct rep.dat then stick the USB stick on your car keys.

    They would have to spot that you had the stick, decide to check it, find the random file suspicious, and then not buy your line that its a dump from the corporate database or something.

  128. I recently traveled to Pakistan... by leather_helmet · · Score: 1

    for a family visit and also brought my laptop with me. For what its worth, during re-entry check at JFK, I was not searched at all, nor any questions about my laptop. The agent was actually very polite and asked "Did you enjoy your trip?" I was not looking forward to the re-entry check, but it was smooth sailing - Last time I visited Pakistan (2 years ago), upon re-entry I had to go to the special Homeland Security check room and was questioned quite a bit, but they never checked my laptop. Anyhow, considering I traveled to what is perceived as a dangerous country, I was pleasantly surprised that I was not subjected to such a scrutinizing search of my belongings. I'm guessing that the searches are somewhat random..?

  129. The problem is overblown by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Millions and millions of people travel with their laptops to all countries in the world. Just about no one has problems. Keep things in perspective.

    Yes, you should be concerned about laptop searches and seizures as a general principle of public conduct. No, you shouldn't be at all concerned about your laptop on your trip.

  130. Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bring your laptop. In fact, don't come at all. America doesn't want you here.

  131. I know this is stupid, but... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    They don't check small devices, now do they? I mean your laptop is subject to search, but what about your MP3 player? What's to stop you from imaging your laptop, stuffing the image onto to your iPod (or Neuros II if you like your portable electronics big, black, ugly and not grotesquely overpriced like I do), and replacing it with a vanilla Windows installation. Let's face it, merely running Linux could be looked upon as suspicious by some people. It looks different. A loyal, patriotic American would run Windows.

    Anyhow, once you get past security, you spend a half-hour restoring your lappy and you're good to go. A 2.5" USB hard drive is about the same size as a (largish) MP3 player... are they likely to inspect, or even notice that? I doubt it.

    Frankly, I suspect they are really concerned about physical security, making sure your lappy isn't packed with plastique, than what data you have on there. Demonstrating that it works is probably sufficient, unless you've been pulled aside for "special" screening, meaning they are worried about you, or more likely want to hassle you so people don't get upset when they also want to hassle the people who, for instance look Arabic, dress funny, have one way tickets paid for with cash, no luggage and are muttering to themselves, "Allah Akbar!" and writing out their wills.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  132. Ummm... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Try not breaking the law. You have already posted in a public forum that you plan on doing copyright violation. How smart was that? You also said what you were doing and where you were going. Why do I get the feeling that you really aren't that concerned about privacy, or you're doing something illegal that is going to draw attention anyway?

    My suggestion to you at this point is to not bring your laptop at all. If you do, try bringing the actual DVDs with you and while you're at it burn your images to DVD too. They can't search those without a separate warrant.

    1. Re:Ummm... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Try not breaking the law. You have already posted in a public forum that you plan on doing copyright violation. How smart was that? You also said what you were doing and where you were going. Why do I get the feeling that you really aren't that concerned about privacy, or you're doing something illegal that is going to draw attention anyway?

      Try not being a douchenozzle. He never said anything about doing anything illegal, the summary said he intended to "rip a few movies and albums to the drive". This is not an illegal activity. Format shifting clearly falls into the fair use category. Yet you attack the OP and question his intelligence, in your words "how smart was that?".

      --

      Enigma

  133. Do not do anything, just go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go, take your laptop and use it as you would.
    Every extra step you do to hide your data in the laptop (if at all they check) will increase the suspision.

  134. Don't take the media on the laptop, use the tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the laptop contain nothing but a pretty blank install. Store all your data on a network share. If you want, you can encrypt the connection. Much better solution than using encryption on your drive, risking a bye-bye to your laptop and your data at the customs office. (By the way, in the current political climate, I wouldn't go into the US if I could at all avoid it, but I realise there may be people who don't have a choice in the matter.)

  135. No chance you'll even have to turn the laptop on.. by omkhar · · Score: 1

    You're being overly paranoid. As a Canadian who travels to the US a lot (and is scrutinized more than a US citizen) I can assure you, the extent of the laptop inspection is

    "Please remove the laptop from it's case and put it on the conveyor belt"

    Followed by an optional random swabbing.

    You stand a better chance of having your insides inspected by a TSA agent than your laptop (cavity search, get it?).

  136. mail the pictures? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Put them on a CD-ROM and mail it. Put a freakin britney spears cover on the CD if you don't want anybody looking inside; you can probably even bring it in your luggage that way without incident. I've brought laptops through US customs at least half a dozen times since 2001 without incident; I've had to take it out of the bag and once I had to open it and let it wake up so the federal douchebag could see that it wasn't running linux or some other commie operating system, but I've never been asked to open directories or files or had to surrender it for any closer inspection.

    1. Re:mail the pictures? by caluml · · Score: 1

      I've brought laptops through US customs at least half a dozen times since 2001 without incident; I've had to take it out of the bag and once I had to open it and let it wake up so the federal douchebag could see that it wasn't running linux or some other commie operating system, but I've never been asked to open directories or files or had to surrender it for any closer inspection.

      The mind just boggles. A: that it should be even slightly newsworthy that you can carry laptops through customs, and B: that they are expecting to find enough "interesting" stuff to make it all worthwhile. I'd love to go to the US. It's a large chunk of the world I've never visited. But until it all just chills out a bit, no way. The hardest time I've had at an international border is at Moscow Sheremetyevo airport - and there it was just a long, stern look from a rather cute lady in a uniform. And that's Russia! You know, paranoid, ex-Soviet, James Bond spyland Russia. Not our friends across the Atlantic.

    2. Re:mail the pictures? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Not our friends across the Atlantic.

      We the People are still your friends. It's the folks with tiny penises currently running our government who are not. Keep that in mind.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  137. Marvin would be proud.. by NekoXP · · Score: 1

    You're paranoid.

    I've never had or even seen anyone having their laptop searched. They only do it if they feel you are being incredibly suspicious in the first place.. what these criteria are, we don't know (and won't ever know..) but it's safe to assume that 99.999% of people take their laptops through without incident, unless you're going through Newark, in which case you don't need to be under any suspicion.

    After reading that news story I actually made sure all the stuff I had in my luggage when I came through Newark this August was ACTUALLY there (I just dumped it on a shelf and didn't bother to even untangle the cables) and it was so maybe I just missed him.

    All in all, I'd be more worried about theft, or even the aircraft not plummeting from the sky because you have wireless turned on in-flight, than privacy.

  138. Bottom line, they don't really care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just traveled back from Australia through LAX with my laptop. I and others around me, all whom had laptops, none were asked any questions and the security never even looked at the laptop other than putting it through the X-ray machine. I wouldn't worry about a thing; they sure weren't

  139. TWiT Episode #163 by gsmalleus · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the October 6th, 2008 "This Week in Tech", Kevin Mitnik talks about how he now deals with taking his laptops in and out of the country.

    TWiT 163: MitNicked

  140. One Week? by karbyn-aceous · · Score: 0

    > a week long round trip from NYC to Puerto Vallarta Mexico

    Are you sure you'll be spending anytime in Mexico? Seems to me you might get to mid-Texas before you have to turn around in order to make it back in time.

  141. Invading your privacy!! by old+dr+omr · · Score: 1

    Assuming you are just taking snapshots I would not encrypt anything as that would arouse suspicion and a suspicious customs officer may invade your privacy a lot worse ways than flicking through your holiday snaps. Rubber gloves etc....

  142. I won't say your paranoid... by wygit · · Score: 2, Informative

    there have been a LOT of scary stories about this lately... I was concerned about the same thing... BUT... like some others have said, I have yet to see a laptop being inspected/confiscated. Two trips out of the country this year, one to Cabo, the other to Paris and Prague. No problems.

  143. Just returned from Europe with no issues by HeWhoMustNotBeNamed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We flew into Munich, traveled by Train to Austria and returned to the US via Munich. We had no issues other than US Customs wanted to review the food items we were importing and declared. We knew that when we bought the Austrian chocolate and it took maybe an extra 5 minutes to go through the Agriculture lane for customs.

    I did burn a DVD of my pictures as a backup, more in case the laptop was stollen than if US Customs wanted to retain the laptop.

    Get over the paranoia and go see the world.

    1. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by bornwaysouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Deary, deary me. A sane voice. You really don't belong here. Your lack of problems came about because you acted on a normal fashion. Read the posts. These guys are off on another planet.

      An analogy.
      Imagine that you want to walk down a street at night, which just happens to have a lot of coke dealers on it. You have your own *private* reasons for being there. Cop patrols cruise by. The advice given by the other posts is wonderfully technical. The equivalent is. On seeing a cop car, scuttle into a doorway. Wear patterned clothing that allows you to blend into doorways. Wear rubber gloves and be prepared to drop any stash to allow plausible deniability. Have an artificial third leg. In short, wave a large neon sign saying "Look at me."

      There is an observation in the science press that terrorists seem to be more likely to be geeks than non-geeks. From the posts here, I'd say they are simply more likely to be caught.

    2. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Do you really think people are off on a tangent?

      Let's say someone works in a "sensible" area. Say, explosives. Say, a chemist. Should he go to the U.S. for a conference, even though he works, e.g., in a mining firm or in academia (I dunno - do people in academia research explosives?)

      Do you really think it's so far fetched, under the current climate in the U.S.?

      Maybe some specialties should really no go to the U.S. anymore. That's kind of sad for the human networking and the free exchange of ideas, don't you think?

      Cenario 2: you're a doctor. You go to a conference and you are randomly sampled to hand over your laptop. They probably do this. This sucks, doesn't it? It'll ruin your conference - and your reputation.

      IMHO, as long as the US continues with its post 9/11 über-crazyness, just go somewhere else. Besides, Paris is so much better than Buffalo, Texas. The U.S. is not a fun place anymore.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    3. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by overbaud · · Score: 1

      Nail on the head. Burn it to DVD send it home. Or if your really paranoid burn two DVDs in case one doesn't make it, and encrypt the contents on both and leave no return address and and get someone else to address it. But really that's just being paranoid... unless of course you have something to be paranoid about... then its both paranoid and rational at the same time.

      --
      Users... the only thing keeping 1st level support from being the bottom feeders.
    4. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by tknd · · Score: 1

      Get over the paranoia and go see the world.

      You do realize that most people have lived in their parent's basement for their entire lives.... right? Riiiight?

    5. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by firmamentalfalcon · · Score: 1

      But it's so fun to outsmart the system and be in control.

      Personally, the people who truly need these technologies are the people who I hope get caught. They sound suspicious.

      On the other hand, it is an invasion of privacy. :(

    6. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Get over the paranoia and go see the world.

      Someone who finally has a clue. I've traveled a lot since 9/11 and have never had a problem taking my laptop anywhere. Customs agents ask you a few questions and then generally move you along.

    7. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by servognome · · Score: 1

      Maybe some specialties should really no go to the U.S. anymore. That's kind of sad for the human networking and the free exchange of ideas, don't you think?

      Why is this limited to the US, the same can be applied to pretty much every country.
      Just because the US is in the spotlight, doesn't mean there aren't additional ZOMG Terristz screenings going on elsewhere. In my experiences the US isn't any better or worse than going to any other country.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    8. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by bornwaysouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you say is reasonable. I used to be a chemist. I even had the embarrassment once at an airport of having a little vial of a chemical out of my bag being waved at me and being asked what it was. I said "I don't know." This was utterly truthful. I was bringing it in to have X-ray crystallography done on it. At which stage, I played my voice back in my head and thought "What does that mean to the border guy?" Oh, oh. I said it was mine, I had made it, it had a weird formula, and if he could identify it for me, great. I just wanted to know what it was. And I was off to the local university to find out. He was happy with that (in a grumpy sort of way.) All this was pre-9/11

      I have not gone thru US customs post 9/11. I did know someone who did, with bits of electronics in his luggage. he was a production engineer taking stuff-ups from China back for detailed design analysis. He had a shit-load of trouble. About 4 hours before he could get onto a plane.

      All this is reasonable to expect when social paranoia is given power. I don't like it either. But the original post was, I thought, about someone coming back from overseas and wanting to keep private the info on his laptop. It seems to me that if you act suspicious (encrypting the whole drive) then you are attracting attention. If 300 people have been vomited out of a jumbo jet, the priority must be to clear the very likely innocent as fast as possible. As a passenger, your priority is to get shunted though in the of-no-interest group. This applies if you are a terrorist, porn collector, or simply a good looking woman with photos of yourself on a nudist beach. Making it obvious you have something to hide is a dumb approach. Fun to think of, but stupid as real-world advice

      As for being a specialist wanting to take stuff in. Yeah. You would have to evaluate packing it on the basis that you will be declaring it to a Russian customs inspector in 1961, he being well educated in Marxist-Leninist politics, the deviousness of smugglers, and how to keep the commissars happy. Openly declaring electronics and little vials of chemicals would simply speed up how fast you got taken to a specialist interview room. All three education streams probably apply today. (Marxist-Leninism uses different nouns, and the other two are unchanged).

    9. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to China twice this year, both times with a laptop, camera, DS, and iPod and no one cared to inspect anything at any point throughout the trip. The Chinese "TSA" seemed to care more about my voltage converter and power cables than the electronics themselves.

    10. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I travel in and out of the US 10-20 times a year, carrying a laptop every time. So far I have never had a problem. If you want to make a legal point, encrypting the data on the laptop is a good start. If you just don't want to be bothered, don't encrypt it, TSA isn't interested in your private pictures - unless they are illegal. If you have illegal data - well you can't complain if they stop you. Politically I have strong objections to TSA or customs snooping. As practical matter, so far it isn't very intrusive.

    11. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by Builder · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is not data.

      Just because you had a good experience doesn't mean that thousands of other people haven't had bad experiences, also by doing nothing wrong.

      Wait until you go visit the 'land of the free (some restrictions may apply)' and they separate you from your wife (on her birthday). They herd you into a room and leave you there for over an hour. During this time, no-one will speak to you. Your wife cannot get any information about where you are, what is happening or why.

      And the whole reason for this bullshit? I had got a new passport. The system showed that my old passport from a previous visit would still have been valid and the fascist cunt wanted to know why I had got a new passport.

      I explained that my old one would have had less than 4 months validity at the start of this visit. The terms of the VWP require that my passport have at least 6 months validity to be able to gain entry, so while my old passport was still valid, it wasn't valid enough for the visit. It took about 20 minutes to make him understand that I had got a new passport purely because one was required for this specific trip.

    12. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I regularly fly back and forth to Egypt from the United States and vice-versa. Initially, when I began traveling this route a lot I freaked out about having laptops seized, etc. But in 5 years of doing this, the worst security things that have happened to me is that I always get the "SSS" stamp on my boarding passes stateside and they ask me to take off my shoes and walk through the slow line while they poke around in my bag for a minute.

      This isn't to say that my laptop isn't disk-encrypted or that I don't have multiple backups, including an web-based backup of really important stuff, but this is because I have my research data on the laptop and I am more concerned about losing my writing than I am with anyone finding it. The encryption is just in case I have left anything in a file that gives away passwords, financial data, or anything like that.

      Just don't freak out and you'll be fine. Things are getting scary, 1984-style, but if you aren't doing anything wrong, then don't make it look like you are doing anything wrong by being afraid that they will think you are. Keep backups, though, it's always a good policy. I'm always astonished by how many people don't have some kind of backup.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    13. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Your statistically relevant sample size of 1 really fills me with confidence ...

    14. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      Coming from Germany, US customs might not be so surprised by a stollen laptop! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stollen Hehehee

    15. Re:Just returned from Europe with no issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky you.

      Last time I went through the USA, at each stop I was subject to at least one out-of-the-ordinary search or questioning, despite the fact that I was arriving from an entirely innocuous country and have visited the USA several times in the past without incident. Nobody would tell me why this was the case, but my guess is that it's because I share a name with some guy who was on the FBI most wanted list two decades ago.

      I'm visiting again later this year, and I assure you that I'm going to copy all data off my laptop and into the cloud before I set foot in a US airport.

  144. make 2 partitions by ajrs · · Score: 1

    and only auto mount one of them.

  145. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partition your hard drive, encrypt it, remove the hard drive from the laptop, send the laptop through by itself, send the hdd thats partitioned and encrypted somewhere else

    And tell them to eat dick. www.myspace.com/an_anti_hero

    more info on this at www.cryptogon.com

    How to beat those fascist pricks.

  146. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is easy.. you just take a really old laptop ald load Vista on it. It will take SOOO long for the laptop to boot and access anything they will just push you right through the checkpoint rather than waste time waiting to see what's on your Laptop.

    I mean who really wants to stand around and wait for a 10 minute boot time ? They are wasting your time, so turnabout is fair play waste some of theirs. It's not like they can cite you for having a slow machine,

  147. US Customs has NEVER asked to see my laptop by Madiba · · Score: 1

    I fly constantly, come back through US Customs at least once per month, have done so for over 4 years now. I have a Saudi visa on my passport and am back and forth to Qatar and Dubai as well as all over Europe. Not once has a Customs official ever done anything but say "Welcome home" upon my return to the US. Don't worry about it.

  148. embed encrypted contents in other formats by mrstrano · · Score: 1

    here is my idea about how to overcome the problem. When your hard drive is encrypted, with True Crypt for example, this is immediately visible to any observer. So they can take your laptop away or ask you to give out the password. Instead I would like to code a little utility, to pass the frontier :) The main thing to notice is that encrypted data is, high entropy data with no meaning (if you don't know the algorythm and the key :). So the idea would be to embed encrypted data in other formats that have high entropy as well, like compressed files or videos. If they try to open the video or the compressed file they will get meaningless and apparently corrupted data. So what? Haven't you ever had a corrupted video or compressed archive on your hard disk? Obfuscate encrypted data as corrupted compressed data of some sort should fool them. What do you think?

    1. Re:embed encrypted contents in other formats by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      If you want to go this route, then Steganography would be better. There are quite a few free utilities out there that will hide your information inside of .wav files, .mp3s, pictures of various formats, etc., and the files still operate correctly even after the extra data has been added.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    2. Re:embed encrypted contents in other formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and they all suck. The modifications they make are so readily detectable you might as well not be using them at all.

  149. Never had a problem by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

    I fly to Ukraine or Russia every year and have never had a problem. They do check to see what I have in the computer carry bag frequently but nobody has ever requested I show them the photos on my USB Memory Sticks or even turn on the PC. Unless there is a reason, they probably won't bother.

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
  150. Encryption isn't the point by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to briefing my boss gave me recently, Truecrypt would not help: If they really wanted to see your content they could ask you to show it to them or alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves. The latter would mean you would probably not see your laptop again.

    If you do your encryption properly, it simply can't cracked by anyone not willing to expend a lot of expensive computer time — if at all. Encryption gets broken by user sloppiness, social engineering, or (depending on your tin foil hat status) undocumented back doors. NSA magic only works in the movies.

    But you are right about one's laptop getting seized and disappearing forever. The possibility of that happening would keep me from ever taking my main laptop outside the U.S., period. The existence of an encrypted file system might raise their suspicions, but they manage to get suspicious even without that.

    If you have to take a laptop abroad, go out and buy a cheapie you won't mind losing. And if you decide to put your vacation photos on the laptop, you should make a point of not hiding them, so as to avoid drawing attention to yourself. Having an ICE agent see what you look like in speedos may be an embarrassing and pointless invasion of your privacy. But a little embarrassment is something you get over; becoming a "person of interest" is not.

    Unless your pictures are very sensitive indeed, and it would totally screw up your life if the wrong people saw them. In that case, the last thing in the world you should be doing with them is schlepping them around on a laptop.

    1. Re:Encryption isn't the point by Fex303 · · Score: 1

      But you are right about one's laptop getting seized and disappearing forever. The possibility of that happening would keep me from ever taking my main laptop outside the U.S., period. The existence of an encrypted file system might raise their suspicions, but they manage to get suspicious even without that.

      If you have to take a laptop abroad, go out and buy a cheapie you won't mind losing.

      What sort of percentage of laptops that go through US customs do you believe get seized? If it's a lower percentage than the cost of a 'cheapie laptop' divided by the cost of replacing your current laptop, then your advice doesn't make economic sense

      Besides which, I'm seeing a lot of advice here which seems to assume that laptop confiscation is par for the course when you enter/leave the US. Now, I hate to defend the US customs and immigration officers, but it's simply not the case. I and those I know have flown many, many times in and out of the US with laptops, and never had issues. But since the plural of anecdote is not data, consider this - wouldn't large multi-nationals which send people out with laptops have sued by now if they were losing laptops to the US government on an even remotely occasional basis?

      My suggestion would be to just go and take your laptop. If you're really worried, then put a password at boot and consider having a 'blank' user space account that you can load to show that it's a working laptop.

    2. Re:Encryption isn't the point by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If you do your encryption properly, it simply can't cracked by anyone not willing to expend a lot of expensive computer time â" if at all. Encryption gets broken by user sloppiness, social engineering, or (depending on your tin foil hat status) undocumented back doors. NSA magic only works in the movies.

      Our Government likes to install keyloggers to capture passwords during investigations. That might come under the category of 'user sloppiness' but how many of us have the resources to secure our systems against this kind of threat? Can you afford a team of armed guards to watch your system 24/7? Can you keep it within your sight 24/7/365?

      Of course if you have the Government looking into you hard enough to gain physical access to your PC then you probably have much bigger problems than people seeing your vacation photos.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Encryption isn't the point by fm6 · · Score: 1

      What sort of percentage of laptops that go through US customs do you believe get seized? If it's a lower percentage than the cost of a 'cheapie laptop' divided by the cost of replacing your current laptop, then your advice doesn't make economic sense

      There's more to economic calculations than replacement cost. Even assuming everything is backed up, changing the computer system that you store your personal life on is a major hassle. I recently had the tablet I use day-to-day die on me. I hurriedly ordered a replacement, which took a week, and doing without my digital memory for that long was a major pain. Then I discovered that even though the new tablet had a disk with the same form factor (it was the next version of the one I had before) it used a different disk connector, so I couldn't simply swap in the old disk. So more hassle and lost productivity while I migrated all my applications and backed-up data to the new system.

      Avoiding this would be well worth the cost of an old system from eBay, even if I never used it again.

      Besides which, I'm seeing a lot of advice here which seems to assume that laptop confiscation is par for the course when you enter/leave the US.

      I'm making no such assumption, and I don't think anybody else is either. Obviously they're not confiscating a significant percentage of laptops; if that many business travelers had that happen, the economy would grind to a halt. (Come to think of it... Nah.) But a small risk is still a risk.

      If you're really worried, then put a password at boot and consider having a 'blank' user space account that you can load to show that it's a working laptop.

      Now that is a really dumb strategy. Security people (properly trained ones, anyway) haven't applied the "it's a working system" test for years — you can conceal a bomb in a working device. These laptops searches are about child porn and "terrorist data" (whatever that is). Lame little tricks like a blank user only raise their suspicions. If you really want to avoid getting your laptop confiscated, you want to make it very clear indeed that you have nothing to hide.

      When it comes to dealing with authority figures, people's egos seem to require them to engage in a lot of silly tricks to "fool" them. None of which works — cops have seen them all before. If you really want to make a cop go away, put your ego aside and be so obnoxiously helpful that the cop will be happy to get rid of you.

    4. Re:Encryption isn't the point by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Your tinfoil hat is aimed in the wrong direction. Keyloggers are real enough, but most of them come from private individuals looking to steal your personal data. That's why God invented security software.

      Or do you mean hardware keyloggers? If you're actually worried about a government agent sneaking into your office and installing a snooping device, then you're probably part of a major criminal enterprise, and certainly can afford that team of armed guards.

    5. Re:Encryption isn't the point by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Or do you mean hardware keyloggers? If you're actually worried about a government agent sneaking into your office and installing a snooping device, then you're probably part of a major criminal enterprise, and certainly can afford that team of armed guards.

      That was my point.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Encryption isn't the point by Fex303 · · Score: 1

      There's more to economic calculations than replacement cost. Even assuming everything is backed up, changing the computer system that you store your personal life on is a major hassle.

      But that's what you were suggesting doing by getting a cheap laptop to travel with. At least with my suggestion, you don't have to set yourself up again if you don't have your laptop confiscated.

      Security people (properly trained ones, anyway)

      Now I know you haven't flown anywhere lately. All I see at US airports by way of security are TSA security drones. And they're not exactly rocket surgeons.

    7. Re:Encryption isn't the point by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Jeez dude, make some attempt to place the discussion in context. We're not talking about "TSA drones" and routine inspections on domestic flights. We're talking about Customs and Border Protection agents doing detailed searches of the contents of laptops being brought into the country. I'm not even going to try to answer your context-free reaction to my cheap laptop suggestion.

  151. Re: Removable Cards by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Why not just hide the living daylights out of the storage card? You can hide it inside a Reese's cup on the floor between the seat.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  152. Potential Encryption / Steganography System by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

    An idea that I had a while back (and previously mentioned on Slashdot), but which I have never had the time to implement, is to use multiple layers of steganography and encryption over Fuse to make a plausbly-deniable encrypted volume.

    The layers would be as follows:

    1. Base layer would be a directory of photos (music / whatever file types allow steganography).
    2. The bits of each file which are used to store data are concatenated (using some sort of RAID-style redundancy) to provide a 'contiguous' chunk of available bits. The level of redundancy could be adjusted to determine how many files could be deleted without actually losing data.
    3. This contiguous chunk is then encrypted, and presented via Fuse as a file system.

    This has advantages of being more deniable than a single large file of random data, unusable free space at the end of a volume, etc. Since the steganography layer would be storing essentially random bits, it would in theory be less succeptible to analysis which indicates that it *is* hiding information. (If you use high ISO photos, with a bunch of noise in the first place, this would probably be even better).

    Can anyone think of problems (either implementation or theoretical) which I may have missed with this?

    If anyone is interested in doing this with me, drop me a message... I am thinking of doing this in Python, as there seems to be a bit of encryption / steganography libraries already there... alternatively, if anyone knows of an OSS project which already does this, I would appreciate a link.

    Cheers

    1. Re:Potential Encryption / Steganography System by Littleman_TAMU · · Score: 1

      One thing that immediately comes to mind is that, to store any large amount of data using this method, you would have to have a very large base layer. This is based on my admittedly limited knowledge of stenography. I don't know the exact proportions, but from what I've read about stenography using images, you only have the last few bits of each color for each pixel in which to store data. That's, what, about 3-6 bits out of every 24 for a photo. Not too, bad, but, with a ratio of 4:1 to 8:1 dummy data to sensitive data, it's probably not something you would want to use to hide a whole other OS installation. As HDD prices fall and capacities grow though...and, right now, it seems very plausible to use this method to hide a fair number of sensitive documents or images, financial data, etc.

      I don't know anything about Fuse or how much I could help in such an effort, but I do hope you provide links on your website to such work should you decide to pursue this idea.

    2. Re:Potential Encryption / Steganography System by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      Well, the way I see it is that many people have massive music / photo libraries on their machines. Even assuming a very conservative 1:10 ratio, 10GB of raw data could provide 1GB of encrypted FS. You're right that this would not be feasible to encrypt everything, but I would argue that encrypting everything is not the point of this system; this is meant to hide and secure the most sensitive 1% of your data.

      If / when I start this, I will definitely be including it on my website.

      Cheers

    3. Re:Potential Encryption / Steganography System by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It looks complicated, doesn't show up on a search as "normal", and generally causes people to ask "what the hell is he doing? Why the hell does he want to store his data like that?".

    4. Re:Potential Encryption / Steganography System by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      But that's the beauty of it - the underlying files are normal .jpg, .mp3, etc. You can even use real family pictures, etc, which are completely normal to find on a system.

  153. I wouldn't worry that much by nacho_dh · · Score: 1

    I've travelled in and out of the US quite a lot of times in the last 12 months, and not being a US citizen you'd think they'd check better... well they don't , imagine that if they have to check everyone's hard disk, they'd take a lot of time for every board. At the most, they will ask you to turn on the laptop just to make sure it's a laptop and not a case that you use to put something else inside. Just be cool and don't start talking about privacy violations while you're waiting in line, that's the worst you can do.

    --
    The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who think.
  154. Done this recently for Linux by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 1

    I've done this recently, not just for travelling, but for using networked, 3D accelerated games with rich multimedia that cannot enjoyably run in linux or even played without proprietary kernel drivers outside of a VM sandbox, and which blow normal security practices to bits.

    What I did is create a normal linux partition, locked down but still highly usable for multimedia, gaming, and typical virtual machine usage.

    Then on one of the internal partitions I created a second, entirely encrypted root partition for a second OS using LUKS. This partition is booted by connecting a USB key and booting from it instead of the normal internal MBR, then entering passwords. The second OS is reasonably secure, locked down, much more limited in functionality, and contains tools to audit the integrity of the multimedia OS and virtual machines, as well as backup and restore them. The USB key is modestly obfuscated so that by default it will boot the multimedia OS unless a sequence of keys are pressed.

    At airports I boot the less-secured multimedia OS to show that it's a laptop. Casual inspection shows that it's been used recently and complete.

    If someone cares enough to really dig in, notice an encrypted partition, and confiscates my laptop for that reason alone the cost of the laptop is the lower down of my list of concerns. If it happened, I'd probably switch to booting the secure OS fully from removable media like easily hidden flash memory.

    If someone wants to threaten me for the secure partition's contents, including lie detectors, drugs, 'enhanced interrogation', etc.. Well that's honestly more than I am concerned with at the electronic level. But if I thought it was a real possibility and worth fighting against, I'd have some tripwire that would self-destruct the data on a particular password (perhaps obfuscated to look like a boot sequence that detects corruption and initiates a disk filesystem check), or not have any data of that importance on a typical laptop drive to begin with.

    1. Re:Done this recently for Linux by sjf · · Score: 1

      Wow James, when Q explained this to you didn't he tell you not to bring attention to it ? Now SPECTRE knows exactly where you are hiding the blueprints to the nuclear submarine base.

      Or is this just a ruse to hide your porn habit from your spouse ?

  155. take it from mitnick by Eil · · Score: 1

    On the October 1st edition of Off the Hook, Kevin Mitnick talks about how he was recently detained in an airport because because the FBI told customs that he was under suspicion for cocaine smuggling. (A charge which he was cleared of in a matter of hours). It's a fun story to listen to, but the lessons boil down to:

    1. You're still protected by the 5th Amendment if you're a U.S. citizen, even at the border. Although Mitnick consented to a search of his personal data and told the agents lots of stuff he wasn't required to, he did so with the intent of getting the whole thing cleared up so he could get out of there quicker. His lawyer later advised him that he only should have told them his basic personal information and travel plans and kept silent about everything else.

    2. Don't carry any privileged, sensitive, or classified information with you when you travel. Even encrypted. In today's wired world and near-ubiquitous Internet access, there's just no excuse. You carry a "blank" trusted laptop with you and access your data remotely via an encrypted link.

    3. The new boot-to-Linux-firmware feature on laptops is priceless at customs encounters. Maybe they'll pick up on it eventually (they'll probably consider it some devious deceptive thing), but for now it fools them into thinking that what they see in the flash-based Linux desktop is the whole computer.

  156. Only people who complain about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...illegal searches are those who have something to hide. If you are not guilty, then you shouldn't care.

    I also believe that everyone should have fingerprints and DNA on file. The right to privacy is NOT guaranteed in the the constitution.

  157. Re: LowTek!! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    IceT'd character would be proud.

    What about magician sleight of hand? "I take out my storage card, I hand you my storage card... oh look, it's not the same one!"

    What about a data cd with a Prof movie label on it? "Hmm... laptop, we'll take it. Brokeback Mountain movie, you can have that".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  158. I use by lawn.ninja · · Score: 1

    I'm no terrorist but this is how I do it. I personally don't trust anything. So I use a completely blank laptop and my Knoppix live CD. Then I mount my SD drive and push everything I need to save to that. Then I put my SD cards back with my camera, snap a few pictures and enjoy my flight. People only look at you weird when they ask you to turn on the laptop and it just does nothing. Either that or load DOS 6.22 on it.

  159. microSD by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Put any sensitive info (also encrypted, of course) on those little things. Extremelly easy to hide, especially if you're not targeted on any way and don't carry an adapter.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  160. Steghide by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    You could hide your pictures inside some porn downloaded off the internet...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  161. Best Suggestion by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that you've escaped, why bother tunneling your way back into the Stalag^H^H^H^H^H^H Soviet^H^H^H^H^H^H U.S.?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Best Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that you've escaped, why bother tunneling your way back into the Stalag^H^H^H^H^H^H Soviet^H^H^H^H^H^H U.S.?

      I went through Customs, and they asked me "Do you plan to overthrow the United States Government by force or violence?" I replied "What I gotta decide now? Can't I think about it for a while? Okay... violence." And then they took my laptop off me for 24 hours to search it, and let me into the country. YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!

  162. No problems that I know of by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    I just went to Japan and back (flying in and out of Detroit), coming back on Sept 5th. So it's a pretty recent trip

    I had a video camera, a still camera, and my laptop. I also took about (no joke) 1100 pictures.

    Aside from all the normal security rigmarole, no-one ever looked at my laptop or cameras. I also did not see anyone else get any special attention paid to their laptops.

    With going overseas, the only thing I saw as being important is that your passport is legit (and always out) and you aren't on any lists, and you go in the right line.

    And don't bring back anything "funny". The people at customs and international security (generally) do not like funny from what I saw...

    I did burn a DVD of the pics while there, and had most on a memory stick, as a backup. If you have internet you could do an online file storage service.

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  163. Don't worry about it by Nicros · · Score: 1

    I travel outside the US all the time, only once (several years ago) have I ever been asked to open the laptop and turn it on. Once they saw it booting up that was all they wanted to see.

    Im sure many others have horror stories about this, but for me they scan it in a separate bucket and that's pretty much it.

  164. Don't by houghi · · Score: 1

    I'll probably want to rip a few movies and albums to the drive in order to keep busy on the flight.

    Buy a book. That won't break and can bend and if lost is easily replaced. If you buy second hand, you can even trow it away (or donate it) without loosing too much money. And if stolen, it is not a huge loss.

    For the pictures you are going to take, buy some memory cards. Prices might be even cheaper in the USofA then where you are comming from. I have seen 2GB SD cards for 5USD and 8GBSD cards for 17USD. And if you are able to use SD, then you could even opt for microSD, which wil take no place at all. One adapter is all you need. I just put them in my wallet with my change.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  165. Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regular people, just doing ordinary legal business now need to worry about this?

    What the fuck is up?

    Doesn't this read more like an item that one would have expected to read - historically - by someone concerned about a visit to the Soviet Union, East Germany or Argentina? Looks like the Soviets didn't lose the cold war. There are just 1st and second runners-up, with both losers in a 15 year period, no? I mean, you fuckers used to have LAWS. You used to have a Constitutional validation of basic individual rights! But, I guess there are more important things to a nation, than the consent of the governed.

    In America, Soviet Union becomes YOU! You fucked up, America. And now you no longer exist in any meaningful context. The only single thing that defines you as a coherent entity within your borders is the way in which you are taxed - without representation.

    I don't know if I am angry or sad. But it is sad.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Seriously by Eternauta3k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't this read more like an item that one would have expected to read - historically - by someone concerned about a visit to the Soviet Union, East Germany or Argentina?

      Regardless of the truth in that statement, I never heard of Argentina being used as an example of an intrusive country. The checks they do at customs are laughable.

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    2. Re:Seriously by klausner · · Score: 5, Informative

      You aren't paranoid if you really have enemies.

      While having someone look at my vacation pictures wouldn't especially bother me, having some Homeland Security dweeb who can't find the power switch impound my PC because he thinks that maybe, possibly, there is a chance there is something questionable scares the hell out of me.

      Customs (and others?) can seize laptops, disks, media, etc, FOR NO REASON AT ALL, and there is little or no legal recourse to get the stuff back. If that's not worth being paranoid over....

    3. Re:Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Not in Peron's day... You could just pay 'em off easier.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Seriously by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      because you didn't visit argentina during late 70s or early 80s when our neighbors (well, we too, and ALL the rest of south america) were under a ruthless dictatorship that used to load anyone they didn't like into C-130s and drop them in the midle of the ocean.

      BTW, that regime ? sponsored by the US, with CIA's planning. as were all the dictatorships in the continent.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    5. Re:Seriously by habbi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wha?!?!
      Argentina???
      We are a democracy from 1983 you insensitive clod!

      besides, here we can fly all over with our porn, movies and warez in our laptops and no one is annoying us!

      Cheers!!!

    6. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how we become what we despise given a long enough time line.

      The US has become the USSR, Russia has become an imperialistic power, Israel has become state hell bent on war crimes, the list goes on.

      Just remember, the Goulags aren't designed to keep people out...

      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin

    7. Re:Seriously by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful
      One lesson from an incredibly expensive joke of a "terrorist" case in Australia is that a photograph of a landmark is proof you are going to blow it up. Be careful with those holiday snapshots!

      The outcome was that the case was thrown out due to a complete lack of evidence apart from a very distant family relationship with another suspect in the UK, so beware, if Kevin Bacon does something you're screwed. It really did look like a show trial set up for an election year so that Australia could finally show the anti-terror laws were working.

      To be practical and serious I would say leave a copy of everything you really want to keep with somebody before you fly just so you can get it back if the laptop is mishandled or held up in any way, or even if you just drop the thing yourself.

    8. Re:Seriously by nametaken · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, it's way more likely that someone will steal his laptop out of the hotel room while he's on vacation.

    9. Re:Seriously by Farhood · · Score: 1

      I'm Iranian (and have dual US Citizenship), and have never had any difficulties leaving or returning to the States.

      I travel outside the US at least 5 times a year, and typically take my laptop with me.

      Aside from the standard x-ray and "i'm gonna open the laptop and then close it back up" check, I've never had any issues.

      My most recent adventure took me through 9 European nations, which I honestly reported in my customs form (blue sheet) upon my re-entry. The customs guy asked me why so many nations; I said vacation. He said cool. I was on my way.

      I've traveled by air and sea.

    10. Re:Seriously by samantha · · Score: 1

      Yes indeedy. The "land of the free" ain't what it used to be, to say the least. What do they think they are going to find on these external minds they insist on raping? Plans to blow up the White House or something? Would any remotely competent "terrorist" be that stupid? No, there are only two purposes as I see it. The first is to acclimate the people to one atrocity against freedom after another. The second is to accustom us to the idea that the Bill of Rights does not include our mind extensions into computers. The second is far more dangerous imho.

    11. Re:Seriously by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      because you didn't visit argentina during late 70s or early 80s when our neighbors (well, we too, and ALL the rest of south america) were under a ruthless dictatorship that used to load anyone they didn't like into C-130s and drop them in the midle of the ocean.
      BTW, that regime ? sponsored by the US, with CIA's planning. as were all the dictatorships in the continent.

      Ah, that would explain the black helicopters full of US troops that were brought in to support the regime in it's brinksmanship foreign relations policies. Hmmm, no. But perhaps does it explain the US's attempts to make La Chienne de Fer Thatcher kow tow to Galtieri and fellow generals.

      Me ? I'm hoping to get some of the drilling work coming up in the South Falklands Basin, and the adjacent Malvinas Basin. I don't particularly care who I'm working for, as long as they don't kill me and they do pay me on time in a reasonably stable currency.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are significant concerns for persons who deal with corporate intellectual property, legal documents that are supposed to be confidential under client/confidentiality laws, personal or medical information that may be similarly protected. When the laptop is taken out of your possession for "analysis", it may be copied legitimately by the TSA. This data is now effectively out of your control and may be viewed, sold, lost, misplaced etc. by careless or corrupt TSA officials. Don't try to say that this doesn't or wouldn't happen - it does and has , and you can quickly and easily find such instances on the net (gov't agent/rep losing/misplacing data).

      So what if you're not one of those professions? So what if a border guard sees a picture of you and you're significant other consensually boffing one another? Ok, fair point...but now consider that same agent posting it to his "porn tube" account?

      The only real solution is to not physically transport the data over the border at all (even USB stick, memory cards, flash cards, etc. can be seized and searched under the same laptop laws). Take your pics, encrypt and post them to your online storage solution of choice and scrub the data securely.

    13. Re:Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Sorry. All my references for each of these governments date to the periods of the early 1970s.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    14. Re:Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Mobarak-e shoma! Khaasteh nabosheed, Agha.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:Seriously by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't that be "Agfa" instead?

    16. Re:Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Not unless you are into photo processing.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    17. Re:Seriously by ptudor · · Score: 1

      thanks for posting that comment. It surprised me.

      About a year ago someone in their early twenties asked me if it was legal to take photographs of federal buildings.

    18. Re:Seriously by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You mean the US government now steals laptops out of hotel rooms? That's insane!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    19. Re:Seriously by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't you be able to take photos of something you own, and paid for?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    20. Re:Seriously by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      there were no black helicopters, but there was the USS forrestal with a complement of destroyers and tankers on brasilian shore to support the coup in 1964.

      this was known as operation "brother sam". it's recorded on govt. files in brasilia.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  166. Camera? by speedingant · · Score: 1

    Why not encrypt all your sensitive files and chuck them on an SD card. Put .RAW as the extension and then put the SD card in a camera. Simply chuck them back on your laptop when you've passed customs.

  167. The key and the lock by westlake · · Score: 1
    Probably the best solution is to have a hidden partition with the secure operating system whereby the secure operating system is only booted if a "key" (typically a USB memory module or other USB device) is inserted during the boot process AND then the corresponding password entered at the prompt.
    .

    It would seem likely that USB key would be taken in for examination as well. If border security sees a key and a lock what happens when they ask you to open the door?

    The border police on duty likely have no knowledge of TrueCrypt and its various technical modes (that information is above their pay grade)

    That assumption strikes me as pure Geek - just a little too arrogant and careless.

    1. Re:The key and the lock by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Instead of a USB key, a micro SD card like the one in your phone. You can hide those just about anywhere, but you will need two. One for your secret stuff and one for your phone. You can explain the reader/adapter that you will need by showing them the card in your phone. Or else throw away the reader. They're pretty cheap.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    2. Re:The key and the lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not burn the pictures to a disk and let the snailmail get it to your home? They can't open al the mail that goes trough the 'paper' mailoffice.

    3. Re:The key and the lock by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Probably the best solution is to have a hidden partition with the secure operating system whereby the secure operating system is only booted if a "key" (typically a USB memory module or other USB device) is inserted during the boot process AND then the corresponding password entered at the prompt.
      .

      It would seem likely that USB key would be taken in for examination as well. If border security sees a key and a lock what happens when they ask you to open the door?

      Don't have the key with the laptop, and modify the key. The laptop can be in a backpack and the key, painted or with stickers or whatever, is in luggage, say in a toothbrush holder with the hygienic, toiletry, stuff.

      The border police on duty likely have no knowledge of TrueCrypt and its various technical modes (that information is above their pay grade)

      That assumption strikes me as pure Geek - just a little too arrogant and careless.

      How many people have heard of TrueCrypt? Of those how many know what it is? I only heard of TrueCrypt earlier this year and I think I know more about computers and software than most people so I'd bet most people have never heard of it. Sure, border guards could be taught stuff like how to find it but to learn everything to look for, remember they're also looking for drugs, explosives, and other contraband, they'd have to spend a lot of tyme in classes. It's not arrogance to expect border guards to know everything they need to know to find everything, heck only a small fraction of drugs are stopped.

      Falcon

    4. Re:The key and the lock by jimicus · · Score: 1

      How many people have heard of TrueCrypt? Of those how many know what it is? I only heard of TrueCrypt earlier this year and I think I know more about computers and software than most people so I'd bet most people have never heard of it. Sure, border guards could be taught stuff like how to find it but to learn everything to look for, remember they're also looking for drugs, explosives, and other contraband, they'd have to spend a lot of tyme in classes. It's not arrogance to expect border guards to know everything they need to know to find everything, heck only a small fraction of drugs are stopped.

      There are plenty of other, proprietary encryption products which do much the same thing in terms of full disk encryption.

      If you go for the "full disk encryption" option (and I strongly suggest you do otherwise you open such a huge can of worms you may as well not bother), they all share a common pattern. The laptop won't boot without a password and/or some sort of hardware key which is carried separately.

      Suddenly, you don't need to train your staff in TrueCrypt. All you need to say is "Any laptop which requires a password or plugging some other device in just to get it to start up is a red flag".

    5. Re:The key and the lock by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of other, proprietary encryption products which do much the same thing in terms of full disk encryption.

      I would pose the same question I did with TrueCrypt, how many people know about these products?

      If you go for the "full disk encryption" option (and I strongly suggest you do otherwise you open such a huge can of worms you may as well not bother)

      What's this can of worms? What does it contain?

      The laptop won't boot without a password and/or some sort of hardware key which is carried separately.

      And if you lose the key you're in trouble. Though the laptop I'm using now does bootup without a password or anything I have more than one user account on it, only one can install software. I setup and use an account without permissions and only log into the admin account to install stuff and to run updates. Now I could require a password to bootup but that requires creating a root account and if I lose that password I'm up shit creek.

      Falcon

    6. Re:The key and the lock by jimicus · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of other, proprietary encryption products which do much the same thing in terms of full disk encryption.

      I would pose the same question I did with TrueCrypt, how many people know about these products?

      You've missed the whole point of my post, which was "Suddenly, you don't need to train your staff in TrueCrypt. All you need to say is "Any laptop which requires a password or plugging some other device in just to get it to start up is a red flag"."

      If you go for the "full disk encryption" option (and I strongly suggest you do otherwise you open such a huge can of worms you may as well not bother)

      What's this can of worms? What does it contain?

      Swap files which, unless the whole disk is encrypted, won't be. Files used in hibernation (Linux uses swap, not sure about Windows). Temporary files used by applications in the normal course of operation (most MSOffice applications do quite a bit of this and it's not always easy to control where they go). Core dumps from application crashes (depending on OS, not all applications can easily be configured not to dump core in the event of a crash).

      This was the crux of a recent issue discussed with TrueCrypt - modern operating systems simply aren't designed with such encryption in mind, so you can't simply send a message to the operating system to say "This is now in secure mode, any user data or swapfiles must be stored in THIS location and any which are outstanding must be moved and the disk area they occupied securely wiped". Even if you could there's no easy way to guarantee it would be honoured without major OS redesign.

      The laptop won't boot without a password and/or some sort of hardware key which is carried separately.

      And if you lose the key you're in trouble.

      Yep. The commercial version of PGP does include a server-based mechanism to rescue you in the event that you don't want to be explaining to the managing director that his shiny laptop is now more-or-less completely useless until it gets rebuilt and any data on it is completely unrecoverable. I don't know how this works for certain but the only way I can make any sense of it is if it stores all keys - public and private - in escrow on the server.

      This is the kind of feature corporates will demand because you can never guarantee that nobody will ever lose a key or forget their password and "your data is now toast you silly fool" is seldom an acceptable outcome to such a scenario. It's also the kind of feature which is highly unlikely to be implemented in any F/OSS solution like TrueCrypt because it's a potential security risk and IME it's fairly common for F/OSS software to take the pure "this is the only guaranteed safe" path in development rather than the pragmatic "secure enough while still being useable" path.

      Though the laptop I'm using now does bootup without a password or anything I have more than one user account on it, only one can install software. I setup and use an account without permissions and only log into the admin account to install stuff and to run updates. Now I could require a password to bootup but that requires creating a root account and if I lose that password I'm up shit creek.

      Falcon

      Unless the disk is heavily encrypted then any boot password can be trivially worked around - worst case, with a screwdriver. Remove the disk, image it, mount the image, away you go. In the original context - keeping the data secure - having a functioning operating system on the disk is of no importance.

  168. Patents? by argiedot · · Score: 1

    Less of a problem in this particular case because I doubt any of those security agents will know what a software patent is. Still, if I use software that violates a patent in the US and if I bring a laptop with that installed into the US, am I committing a crime under US law? My country's constitution does say that I can only be tried under its laws, but I bet every country says that.

    1. Re:Patents? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      No. Patents are a commercial - hence civil - issue, not a criminal one. You don't go to jail for breaking patent, you get sued.

    2. Re:Patents? by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Ah, so I am liable to being sued if I did bring software that violates US patents inside the country? That is troubling news. I'm planning to apply for a course there next year.

    3. Re:Patents? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Well, if it does violate US patents, then theoretically you might be open to suit (I don't know, I'm not a lawyer), but I've never heard of someone being sued for possessing something that violates a patent - only for selling it. You shouldn't worry about it. US Customs is not in the patent-enforcement business.

      Big companies can't exactly get much in the way of damages out of noncommercial activity. Just out of curiosity, what software violates US patents in and of itself?

    4. Re:Patents? by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I did think it was unlikely that they'd do that for a single person.

      Besides the trivial codec hassles, I would say the ECDH algorithm in some company code.

  169. Re: Dummy OS by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Going for the Quadratic pun: How about a fake-broken copy of Windows?

    "Gee officer, I am such a dummy about computers."

    See this traumatizing example for case study material.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JMuJ6Wy1j0

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  170. Social engineering: Bring a baby by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This past year we took a laptop with us to Vietnam to pick up our daughter. (We blogged from our hotel a lot. We were awake most of the time anyway.)

    Our jet-lagged child's first hour in the USA was interesting. Nothing cuts through the red tape and lines more effectively than a cranky baby screaming at 160 dB.

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re:Social engineering: Bring a baby by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Nothing cuts through the red tape and lines more effectively than a cranky baby screaming at 160 dB.

      Very true...
      When i took my family to Singapore in 2005 my son was 1.5 yrs old.
      His ear drums were painful i guess, so he was making everyone deaf with his adorable screaming.
      The visa people called us out of turn (from behind 20 other guys) stamped our passports quickly (without even seeing it carefully) and was intent on sending us away.
      It was 6 AM in morning, guess she was upset her first duty in morning involved getting partially deaf.
      Unfortunately the same thing didn't work when we exited from Singapore.
      Our baby was very happy, smiling and clean: so much that the attendants were playing with him all the time,and delayed our boarding as a result...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  171. The real problem is ... by n0on3 · · Score: 1

    I will write here the same thing i said few months ago when a friend came with surprise for 'you have (if asked) to provide your encrypted volumes passphrase to enter US or you could be rejected!'... Is peolple who define these checks stupid ? Do they really think that who could have REALLY SENSITIVE / DANGEROUS data on his drive won't be able to encrypt them, store them online, and download them when inside the US ?

  172. Mail the drive. by JJman · · Score: 1

    A far simpler, though more hardware based solution: Mail the drive to yourself.

    That is to say, go out and buy another (small) hard drive for your laptop. Swap drives, and a couple of days before you leave, mail your real drive to yourself. *NOTE* Package it well!
    Go through customs with a completely fresh install of XP, and pick up your real drive when you arrive at your destination.
    Repeat the process in reverse coming home.

    Of course this has downsides: you have to buy another hard drive, be able to switch it yourself, and you lose a couple of days of hard-drive transit time.
    But on the other hand, the TSA will *never* see your data!

  173. Reasonable solution by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

    Ok, assuming you're not on the radar of the government, all you have to do is fool them into thinking you're a normal person.

    Why not do one of the following?

    1. Create a linux boot partition, but have grub not give you any time to choose (or to even see, on the screen, that grub is there) Your ext3 partitions wont show up on the windows side, and the airport guy will be none the wiser.

    2. insert a micro sd card into your watch (there's room), or into a cell phone, behind the battery, or any number of nonchalant places of no interest to the airport guys. 3. Create a spanned rar file and rename each file to not have an extension and to have an ordered but uninteresting name. Count them down from 100 or something. And then disperse them into at least 3 folders, like system32 and other random places. Just remember what you ordering system is and where you put them! =p Hell, a single obfuscated zip file isn't going to set off any alarms with the TSA guys.

    As long as your computer looks normal, they're not going to be as paranoid as you in figuring out where your stolen movies, music, games, enterprise software, and most importantly your porn, are at.

    No need for outlandish encryption schemes. Old fashioned "walk out of the store looking like you own it" mentality is all you need.

  174. You mean "Into and Out of Mexico", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be more worried about taking my laptop into Mexico. You might be left with no laptop to take out - encrypted or otherwise.

    As a matter of fact, I was in Cancun this spring for ICDE, and had to take my laptop for my presentation. I ended up checking it at the hotel front desk each and every time I left my room. It was an enormous pain in the neck. If you want to save your photos, upload them in Internet cafes, or bring extra memory cards. It's so much easier!

    And I just came back from Europe, traveling with a laptop. No one was interested in it, other than the usual "take it our of the bag and put it on the security belt." Do you really think customs officers have nothing better to do than look at your photos? Puhleaze. Worry about theft in Mexico - at least that one has a decent probability of happening.

  175. Laptop privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently travelled to Panama and took my laptop for the same reasons you are taking yours and never once was I asked to even turn in on at any point leaving the USA or coming back into the USA. Panama officials never had me so much as turn it on either.

  176. Re:Boot to BSoD - similar idea by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    make a movie in Flash or Director that simulates a BSoD, and set it as a full screen start up item. Computer starts, they get to see your desktop for 3 seconds and suddenly : BANG! BSoD.

    Next: cry or act completely bummed out.

    They will say "Let's restart it" and bingo: it happens again. They will let you pass. As you complain about Microsoft's craptastic OS.

    Perfect.

    And easy to undo.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  177. Maybe just not take your laptop? by PieterBr · · Score: 1

    Recently I've bought a new 8 megapixel camera and with it a 2GB SD card. I was pleasantly surprised that I'm now able to store over 1000 pictures. So, goto to the US without your laptop but with your camera and while there obtain some cheap SD cards. 10 of em shouldn't cost your more then 100,- and that's over 10.000 pictures. Unless you're shooting a lot of photos it should be enough. It would also save you the trouble of carrying that laptop everywhere.

  178. why data on one's person should be excluded... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why data on one's person should be excluded...

    I think if the person is, for example, a lawyer, the data in question could be protected by attorney/client privilege, and therefore they could face disbarrment for disclosure, even were it done under color of authority.

    I imagine, in fact, that this is a real issue for lawyers attempting to operate on behalf of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

    But I'll also answer the question in the subject, as to why it should not simply have an exclusion cause for lawyers, instead of being struck down for everyone: because it's in my head and they have no right to search my head. What's the difference between data in your head and data encrypted with a password stored in your head? To me, the data is in your head, and the data on the hard drive is just a useful memory aid.

    Oh, and if the original poster is more concerned about them getting his data than about losing the laptop, make a one time pad, make a copy of it, put the copy of it in a safe deposit box, travel outside the US, and then after encrypting the data with the OTP, destroy the OTP so it is impossible for you to comply.

    -- Terry

    1. Re:why data on one's person should be excluded... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if the original poster is more concerned about them getting his data than about losing the laptop, make a one time pad, make a copy of it, put the copy of it in a safe deposit box, travel outside the US, and then after encrypting the data with the OTP, destroy the OTP so it is impossible for you to comply.

      Of course if you are paranoid enough that you think you need to use a OTP then you probably wouldn't want to leave it unattended in a safety deposit box. Subpoena's and all that...

      If you have that level of paranoia you have bigger concerns than the customs agent at the border -- how much are you paying the team of armed guards that watch your computer 24/7 to make sure nobody installs a keylogger or trojan?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  179. Simple Answer: Don't Go to the USA by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    until they drop all this paranoid horsecrap. Works for me.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Simple Answer: Don't Go to the USA by dreemkill · · Score: 1

      yup. and also why im leaving.

      and its not coming soon enough.

      got the visa.

      --
      dreemkill.
  180. I travel through USA weekly, no issues to report. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    I live in a border town, and take my laptop 'over the river' at least once a week as I use it for Microsoft Streets and Trips w/USB GPS and I've never had any questions about the contents, aside from whether or not I just bought it or was importing it (I provided the receipt upon asking).

    I also had no issues taking my laptop to and from an islamic nation, travelling through 4 other countries at the same time. Nobody cared.

  181. No man's land by westlake · · Score: 1
    A subtle "if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear" poke. Haha.
    .

    The international border is inherently a "no man's land."

    Nothing is fixed or certain until you are safely across the line - one side or the other - and not always even then.

    It makes perfect sense to limit your exposure.

    In real life, spies hate gadgets. No matter how cleverly disguised, the gadget is always a danger. It's a lesson in survival the geek might usefully remember.

  182. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy the largest USB drive, 32GB with smallest footprint you can find. Go buy the largest car remote you can find. Open it and remove the guts. Place the USB drive inside the hollow cavity of the car remote and snap it back together. Attach it to the key ring with your keys. Make sure you copy all of your files on the drive before you return and remove them from your hard drive. Pass the keys and your pocket change through when you come back and offer your laptop to them for inspection. Works quite well.....

  183. Follow Kevin Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kevin Mitnick had this exact issue and spoke about it at length on "This Week in Tech" (TWiT). Essentially he said to send the data to yourself over the internet (email it or post it) and keep your laptop clean. If you must encrypt, use something strong like TrueCrypt. US law states that they cannot persuade you to provide any passwords. TrueCrypt best practice is to place an encrypted volume inside another. That way, even if you give them a password, they won't get your more valuable/private data.

  184. Do you need to dump them off the camera? by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Do you even need to dump the pictures off your camera while you're still on vacation? Just buy another memory card if you're worried about space.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Do you need to dump them off the camera? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      SDHC cards are readily available in 16GB format. You could easily dump a lot of data on them and conceal the card anywhere on you without raising suspicion. You could easily slide the card into a pack of chewing gum and toss it in the bowl when going through the metal detector. Or whatever.

  185. Buy a thumb drive by koan · · Score: 1

    Store everything on the thumb drive, don't use truecrypt because you don't have anything to hide correct?
    So why make it look like you do.

    Alternatively contact the hotel you will stay in, UPS the laptop there then UPS it back.

    My friend does this all the time to avoid border BS, and I can't express how stupid it is to check laptops...if I'm tryin gto get data in or out why would I leave it on my laptop?
    FTP it, bit torrent it, mail it in a hard drive or thumb drive...but leave incriminating evidence on my laptop?

    Only pedophiles are that stupid.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  186. I like the idea of packing lots of fried disks too by Orange_Flash · · Score: 1

    Call me paranoid, but I would encrypt my data, put it on a thumb drive that looks like Mickey Mouse, and then put in a bag with a lot of other small toys. (Or upload the pix to flickr.)

    --
    "Is dis a system?" -- R. Crumb
  187. End Of Forum by holywarrior21c · · Score: 1


    Pack it in your backpack.
    Security check? bite it, have a comfortable & pleasant conversation with the agents they want it.
    don't spend a dime on encrypting shit. don't fsck around w/ yo wallet before the trip. save up some and have a nice meal or sth.
    Pack up good dream and plan ahead your trip.
    Trust me, i don't think its luck or anything. agents like me all the time. just keep above things in mind.

  188. Think about your heart... by Bolzano-Weierstrass · · Score: 1

    ... and don't be overly paranoid :) This year, I entered the US 4 times, I've been pulled aside 2 times, I never had to show my laptop. My colleagues have similar experiences. I can only speak about traveling between the US and Europe though.

  189. The solution isn't encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're right to be outraged about unreasonable search and seizure.

    The people working on this are ACLU, EFF, I think Amnesty International, and some other similar groups. Maybe you want to forgo one of those umbrella drinks during your trip and send your favorite one a nice donation when you get home.

    1. Re:The solution isn't encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. The only government who would try something like this is a dog mad police state, and doesn't give a rip about "unreasonable search and seizure."

  190. Does happen but not as often as it's made out. by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

    I've flown back and forth to Central Mexico over the last 4 years (usually about once a month) with a laptop, and I've never had immigration or customs even look twice at it. While I know they are searching some laptops and probably confiscating some I think the rate at which it's happening is probably extremely small and much smaller than the paranoid folks here on slashdot make it out to be.

    In other words I think the risk of losing or even having your laptop are small enough that it really isn't worth the effort to worry about it, (unless you fit the "profile" of a terrorist that is.

  191. Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't speak for international travel as I haven't traveled out of the country yet but I have traveled around the US with my laptop. Most airports don't even bother with my laptop but I have had some airports pull me aside and ask me to power on the laptop to verify that it actually works and is not some sort of explosive I guess. I don't see why border customs would be any different. Why would they care what people have on their laptops (let alone have the time to rife through all the data)? I would think they'd only be concerned that it's not being used to transport other items of concern such as explosives or drugs.

  192. rich fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're rich enough to be taking a goddamned vacation right now, rich enough to be living in NEW YORK CITY and can afford the time and money to take a vacation, then you can afford to leave your laptop at home, buy one when you get there, and donate it when you're done. Why don't you just stay in Mexico, you filthy rich freak. People are hungry. People don't know if or how they are going to make their next house payment.

  193. External HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy external hard drive and mail it/put it with your luggage

  194. Easy! by rlp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Border agent: What is your reason for traveling today.
    Geek:  I'm talking to a company about fault-tolerant servers
           ...
           and in this Powerpoint you'll notice that the two processors are running in
           lock-step.  Whereas, this comparator here looks at these two pairs of CPU's
           ....
    Border agent: You may go.
    Geek:  Wait!  This is the interesting part ...
    Border agent: For the love of God, please go!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Easy! by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Hey!
      That is true.
      It did happen with me once, but not exactly as you say:
      The customs guy was more interested in the pics of the office women (stock pics) seen in our corp presentation.
      He wanted to know who the beautiful ladies were(!?!)
      For a second i was flummoxed (they were stock images you see on web sites), but i recognized he was serious.
      So i pointed to each one of those ladies and told him one was our CFO, the other hottie was our CTO, and the 3rd and 4th were our computer technicians repairing their PCs.
      He looked me up with envious eyes and sighed before sending me away...
      Damn, i wish what i said was true...
      But in London it didn't work: I had dropped my laptop when i took it from my bag, and they were clearly upset about it. But they were least interested in seeing what i was having in it and sent me on my way when i offered to show it to them...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Easy! by syousef · · Score: 1

      Let me correct that for you.

      Border agent: What is your reason for traveling today.
      Geek: I'm talking to a company about fault-tolerant servers ...
                    and in this Powerpoint you'll notice that the two processors are running in
                    lock-step.

      Border agent: (He makes more than we do and we can't flush his head down the toilet anymore, but watch this Larry). The use of unfamiliar and suspicous language leads us to believe you may be involved in terrorist activities. We're taking your laptop, and please step this way for a cavity search.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  195. worrying too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regularly cross the border to go shopping in the US and always take my laptop. Not once has anyone ever asked me or bothered me about it, I have even be using it as I show my passport and not be bothered.

  196. take care about other things by alini76 · · Score: 1

    I am in US just now. They just wanted to pass my 2 laptops through X-rays twice when I boarded in SFO to Orlando. When I arrived in SFO, not even X-ray. Take care about your passport. I just got it stolen, and I have to wait here until the authorities of my state will move to make me a temporary one.

  197. Just got back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just got back to the US. Had a laptop and an mp3 player. No problems. Do you think customs officers have nothing else to do other than check all laptops? You'll at least have to act weird to attract their attention.

  198. how big is your hard disk by mrsaggy · · Score: 1

    With a reasonably modern laptop, you have 100GB+ of storage space, TrueCrypt can pose as any file type. Even if they check ever file 1Gb or over thats still 100 files that would require checking. Somehow unless your pictures are in "My Documents/My Pictures/Porn" I doubt that an custom agent had the time.

    1. Re:how big is your hard disk by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      How did you find my secret porn folder!?

  199. What's the big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I travel into and out of the US with my laptop (including my normal photo collection and some porn videos). What's the big deal????? Quit yer whinging.

  200. Now go and help the others... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't you ever watch Hogan's Heroes? You tunnel back in to help the others and play tricks on the commandant.

    1. Re:Now go and help the others... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      And sleep with their secretary. Right.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  201. Decoy photos in "My Pictures". by TermV · · Score: 1

    First let me say that you're far less important than you think you are. Nobody is going to care about your photos. If they do, you must seem pretty sketchy.

    Take some crappy holiday snapshots and stick them into "My Pictures". If they ask to see your holiday snapshots, happily show that to them without going off on some ranting libertarian diatribe. That will satisfy 99.9% of the population. Put the rest into a vmware image or something. If you get the resident TSA IT genius, you're probably getting the rubber glove treatment.

  202. The thing that is so stupid about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that the best chance of sneaking peeks at real terrorists laptops is to feign disinterest. If customs just made cursory checks, the terrorists would get careless, and covert agents might get a peek. Just like the NSA wiretapping (of *foreign* calls to the US, not domestic calls, and citizenship not relevant) was most effective when the bad guys didn't know they were doing it. (Thanks a lot NYT.)

  203. New HD, Network Storage, & a RAM disk by farnsaw · · Score: 1

    Buy a new hard drive for your laptop and do a basic minimal install on it. (If they keep your laptop, nothing to find.) Store whatever data you need on the internet somewhere (even your home/business server), travel with nothing on your HD other than the OS. Then work exclusively with online data and / or create a RAM disk for local temporary storage. Then put the data back on the network and shutdown your laptop... poof data gone. Then come back into the US.

    This is becoming more and more common practice as it doesn't matter if your data is incriminating or not, it is company business and is therefore confidential.

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
    1. Re:New HD, Network Storage, & a RAM disk by trouser · · Score: 1

      actually you need 11 fingers for 1024, 10 fingers gives you a range of 0 - 1023.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    2. Re:New HD, Network Storage, & a RAM disk by farnsaw · · Score: 1

      Add one more and your bits roll over so when you get back to zero you are at 1024.

      --
      "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  204. Don't bring your data to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Law enforcement types are not that bright. Fighting with them is equally not bright. Hardware is cheap and encrypted online storage is too. If your concerned about your data it has no business on a portable device anyway!

    If I had to travel in and out of the US regularly I would buy a laptop for inside the US and a laptop for home and store the laptop in an airport locker or in a storage unit. This would just be a vehicle to my data however as the important stuff would reside on secure storage in a politically neutral country.

    The harder the government presses for "control" of something they don't understand or have rights to the more complex the encryption will become. Regardless if they want to admit it or not they don't have control over the digital world.

  205. Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good ideas:
    1. Put data on a partition that doesn't automount on boot (e.g on a linux partition that isn't in /etc/fstab).
    2. put the data on an ipod (usb drive). People don't usually think there is anything other than music on these.
    3. put data on usb key/cdrom and mail it home. (less likely to be checked). Encrypt it if you like.
    4. accept that these ppl are doing there job (which is ultimately to protect you and your fellow citizens). Go along with it. If you don't have anything to hide then you shouldn't worry. If you do have something to hide you need to get rid of it and become a better person.

    Bad ideas:
    1. put data on usb keys (uh people know how these work and can just put them in a laptop and check)
    2. Encryption - most people don't encrypt their data so this just says that you're hiding something.

  206. Nothing wrong with encryption by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    But there are enough stories of some border guard getting into a huff if he even thinks you're hiding something from him, and confiscating the machine for later analysis. Encrypting is a good measure that they won't find anything when they do that, but you're out a laptop. Better to not give them a reason to even care.

    Dual-booting is one option and, in my opinion, the best. Set up a small partition, put a clean install of XP on it, and set your BIOS to boot from that by default. Change the background and put a few totally innocent-looking, common icons on the desktop so it doesn't look so obviously fresh. Once you're through customs you put the BIOS back, lose the partition, and you're back to normal. They're not going to know about the partition where your real stuff is, and this method should work regardless of what OS you normally run.

    Hell, you could even deliberately break your new XP install so when they boot it up, all it does is hang / blue-screen / throw some error and reboot again. Then you grumble and say you dropped it while on vacation and it's been doing that ever since. They're not going to give you the third degree about it, cause everyone's gone through it.

    If you're really paranoid, pick up a little 10 gig 2.5" drive somewhere (they're practically giving 'em away these days) and put it in your laptop in place of your real drive. Throw XP on it, use it while you're out of the country. As for your data (e.g., pictures), either upload them or burn them to CD or DVD. Jam the DVD into your car CD player. It obviously won't play but they're not going to inspect your car stereo, especially if it's off. :P Either keep the drive in the machine for the trip back so they can see a relatively clean XP install, or ditch the drive somewhere and do the grumble-gee-it-broke routine when they try to boot and it complains about no system disk.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  207. My solution by h3llfish · · Score: 2, Funny

    My answer to this problem is simple. Fill up your hdd with legal but really gross images. Old people doing sexy times would be a good way to go. Then, the snoopes are forced to get an eyefull of some saggy luvin! I guess you are too, to some degree. But punishing fascists is never painless!

    1. Re:My solution by ocularb0b · · Score: 2, Funny

      AGENT: Sir we will need your password please.
      ME: Ok its "iamdoinganillegalsearch"

      --
      Support bacteria, the only culture most people have.
    2. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im changing mine to "DHSispants"

  208. NO data, NO encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry, but if you take your laptop and any part of it is encrypted (especially if you have full disk encryption where you need to enter the password just to decrypt the drive and boot) you are GUARANTEED to get it seized because you must have "something to hide".

    The only solution is to have a minimal install of windows xp (since that's what TSA drones will recognize) with NO DATA onboard. Keep all your data out on S3 (jungledisk) or some other service, and get access to it when you get to where you're going. That way if your laptop gets stolen (other than by the TSA who thinks he'd like your shiny new laptop) they don't have access to anything.

  209. Separate the media from laptop, change the laws by aaandre · · Score: 1

    Remove anything that you are concerned about from the laptop.

    Get a couple of flash thumbdrives - 16gb and 8gb versions are readily available. Carry them separate from your computer, use truecrypt.

    Consider burning movies/music on DVDs. If burning pictures, use truecrypt.

    Try to learn to deal with the emotions around someone snooping around your computer -- the ground troops are just doing their jobs, in long exhausting shifts, in exchange for low pay. If you want to address the problem of your privacy being abused, consider legal ways of changing the laws.

  210. This is a public venue. by eronysis · · Score: 1

    You realize of course this thread was initiated by the US Border Patrol Information Systems Agency...Keep letting them know what to look for.

  211. Spike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB thumb drive or a few 2 gig micro SD cards in your pocket and you wont have an issue; the MicroSD are so tinny they will never show on any scan/pat down/or metal detector. What's a s gig microSD worth these days anyway?

  212. How insightful by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Your sample size of 1 is clearly sufficient to establish a pattern.

    1. Re:How insightful by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Count me for that pattern. For the past 7 years I've traveled in and out of the US at least twice a year. Never had my laptop even turned on by border officials, or anyone else, for that matter. And I'm a single male traveling alone, dark messy hair, usually slightly bearded.

    2. Re:How insightful by John+Murdoch · · Score: 1

      I've traveled out of the U.S. and back in five or six times so far this year--I have traveled outside the U.S. dozens of times over the past fifteen years.

      Every single time I was carrying a notebook or portable PC. I have never, ever been stopped, searched, or seen anyone else get hassled.

      That said, though:
      One thing I have observed at border control in several countries (most notably Japan) is that if the authorities feel you are being disrepectful, they will become far more inquisitive. And if you get "uppity"--particularly if you start shooting off your mouth about your constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms (while entering another country) you are just begging to get hassled.

      My sense of the horror stories about notebook seizures, etc., is that somebody made an ass of himself, and the feds decided to make his life miserable. That's not to excuse what they're doing--but a suggestion that if you make even the slightest effort to act and dress presentably, you're not likely to have a problem.

    3. Re:How insightful by legojenn · · Score: 1

      I totally understand that. I travel into the US between 10 and 20 times per year, usually by car. They seem to want to look in the trunk more often than pre-911. In those trunk inspections, I've been asked why I brought a cooler (camping) and why I had two spare tires (a full-sized spare and the regular spare), a power supply (for jump starting the car and charging the laptop), but never why I had a laptop. (The laptop has GPS software on it, a wireless card, and recent episodes of my favourite UK soap.)

      I feel like I'm being one of these, 'you don't have anything to worry about people if you aren't doing anything wrong people', but the border guys are just doing their jobs. I notice a difference between the way I travel and the way an acquaintance travels. I have my passport and my dog's immunisation papers ready to hand to the border guy. I have printouts of hotel room/campground reservations or maps from Google to friends' places and work ID ready to show the guys. I answer their questions with one or two word answers. A buddy of mine seems to get the secondary inspection at least 3 times per year because he can look grubby, is fuzzy on where he is going and doesn't always answer.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    4. Re:How insightful by Diag · · Score: 1

      if the authorities feel you are being disrepectful, they will become far more inquisitive. And if you get "uppity"--particularly if you start shooting off your mouth about your constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms (while entering another country) you are just begging to get hassled.

      Absolutely.

      In the early nineties, so well before 9/11 induced terrorism hysteria, myself and 2 friends were returning home to Australia from our first overseas holiday in Hawaii. Upon arrival at Australian customs, the goons saw 3 scruffy 21 year old guys with a LOT of luggage and decided that we were worthy of a random check.

      None of us had anything to hide. Myself and friend#1 simply complied and opened up one suitcase each. The officials just had a quick glance, didn't even bother touching anything, and waved us through.

      However, friend#2 got very "uppity" and started claiming it was a violation of privacy and they had no right, etc, etc. So they took him into another room, and proceeded to completely empty each of his suitcases and examine every smelly sock and soiled pantiloon. He was in there for at least 45 minutes.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
  213. Here is what I did by Invisibleh8 · · Score: 1

    Emailing is only workable if you are using small files otherwise on foreign sometimes useless connections uploading the photos is a problem. Solution Get some no name Mp3 player that has a cord nobody would ever find in there life, upload the photos onto the mp3 player, and toss the cord (I put mine in my gfs bag). Another solution I looked into was bringing a small screwdriver, taking a USB key and removing the casing then inserting it into the innerds of my laptop so it appears as just more computer junk.

    1. Re:Here is what I did by Invisibleh8 · · Score: 1

      For those who think it won't happen to them. I went to Cuba and they insisted on searching my laptop (prob cuz it had a head shop sticker on it) the batt was dead and they hooked it up through the charger, and some voltage converter. It fried the mobo on my laptop and shocked the guy using it when he opened the dvd drive? They did a full search on me before finally letting me go. Lucky Best Buy has a wicked return policy :D

  214. Phone Sex Intercepts by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Just put all your data on a removable volume and label it "NSA Military Phone Sex Tapes - Top Secret." Customs agents will have already heard the most juicy .mp3s and your volume will be passed over as old stuff.

  215. New meaning to USB "Stick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your "pictures" and videos, put the on a USB stick and stick it... Somewhere they are not likely to look.

    Laptop clean, problem solved....

    1. Re:New meaning to USB "Stick" by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Laptop clean...

      ...but you can't quite say the same thing about your USB device.

  216. You are being paranoid by GayBliss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I travel in and out of the U.S., the U.K., and Spain every couple of months with my laptop, and sometimes with an additional computer, and I have never been asked to show it to anyone nor have I seen anyone else having their laptop checked. The security in Heathrow doesn't even want the laptop taken out of the carry-on anymore, and the U.S. customs rarely looks at anything from anybody that I have seen.

  217. Prove your innocence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While that provides wonderful protection from them actually getting your files, it does not protect YOU from invasive searches, detainment, and other things. So you really have to decide what's valuable to you.

    Frankly, your best bet is to be able to prove your innocence, rather than proving that you're some kind of cryptographic genius. In other words, you actually want good steganography, so that you appear to have absolutely nothing to hide and so that you can "prove" it to them without acting nervous.

    I'd recommend that:
    * You only travel with a cheap laptop you can afford to lose.
    * You can boot straight to something familiar like Windows and that your desktop & My Documents are nice, clean & relatively empty with only some innocent, planted files you don't care about. Similarly, clear the recent documents nonsense.
    * You have no (visible) encryption programs. If you want to encrypt something, encrypt it from another computer (the laptop you carry shouldn't have ANY encryption software), put it on a USB stick or hide it in the system32 directory or something with a name like memory_dump.dat or whatever.
    * Download the decryption program once you get to the other side, keep it on a USB key, and erase it when you're done.

    This isn't perfect, but the idea is that you should have nothing to hide. They don't search people who aren't suspicious-looking, after all.

  218. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just rename the .jpg or .gif or whatever picture file as a .mpg or .dll or any other filename. boom no picture files, then change it back when you are through?

  219. EFF Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are a few good articles from the EFF:

    EFF Answers Your Questions About Border Searches
    http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/border-search-answers

    Protecting Yourself From Suspicionless Searches While Traveling
    http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/protecting-yourself-suspicionless-searches-while-t

  220. You're being overly paraniod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all chances are that the TSA folks won't do anything more than ask you to turn your laptop on to show that it's not actually a bomb (or full of drugs, or whatever).

    Second, if they do want to actually look at whats on the machine which do you think is more likely result in you sitting in an interview room for six hours while your connecting flight departs without you, a bunch of picture of your girlfriend in a bikini or several MB of encrypted data that you refuse to show them?

    However you might feel about the current state of affairs vis-a-via laptops and TSA; unless there is something there that can land you in court you're way better off just looking as "normal" as possible and flying under their radar.

    If you want make a stand on principle regardless of the consequences then encrypt all files and put them in a folder on your desktop named "WMDs you can make at home", otherwise don't worry about it.

  221. Re:Boot to BSoD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say:
    Or have it "crash" on boot and you'll be sent along your way with a sympathetic shrug.

    I say:
    Ha! Have the grub menu show a Microsoft windows default boot. If the boot command line does not have a string (that you have to type in), Linux needs to silent boot and then display a Windows blue screen with some kind of good crash message ... then freeze.

  222. Spyware by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Here is another level of paranoia. What if they install a keylogger to snag your password after you refuse to give it?

  223. Suggestion by icazzi · · Score: 1

    Carry a copy of the 4th amendment.

  224. /. will keep you under the radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically you're safe unless you mention that you are concerned about the issue to someone who might make that public or in some type of public forum. Since you mentioned it on /. - don't worry about it. You're screwed.

  225. The answer should be obvious from your question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not understand why you are asking this question, since with the information you have, you already have the answer. You only actually need one piece of information from us, and that is whether Truecrypt is secure. The answer is yes, assuming you use it correctly. In fact, the cynic in me almost thinks that you know this very well and posed this solely to see if no one would figure out the correct answer...and the way you structured your question backs that up.

    You have given three key pieces of information, including the software you intend to use...all you need to do is put them together. But I think you already know this, and what you're actually asking is "Can you figure out what I'm going to do, is it obvious, and will I get away with it?", and the answer to all of those is yes. Although no one here seems to have figured out the obvious course of action, the police most certainly has...Truecrypt has been around for over 4 years. It depends a lot on the customs agent you are lucky or unlucky enough to end up dealing with. Assuming the worst case scenario, your laptop is seized and put through an intensive search (unlikely under normal circumstances); knowing how to act is important. The key thing to remember is that for every person who actually knows how to use Truecrypt, there are many more who do not. Leave everything on defaults, and deny knowledge of any of the program's more advanced features. Do not give up your passphrase unless you absolutely have to.

    And yeah...tinfoil hat....whatever. I've seen this sort of "naive" question many times before, and people who ask this kind of question nearly always have different motives to what they seem, usually aiming to discover the answers to the questions "can you figure out what I'm thinking?" or "what are the expected approaches to this?". Nice use of Socratic irony.

  226. Thanks Slashdot! Love, TSA by Monkier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So in a couple of months all the l33t slashdotters a going to be smuggly waking thru border checks, with their hidden linux partions, truecrypt archives.. And the friendly TSA worker is going to pull out a USB key that checks for all the helpful suggestions posted in these comments.

    TSA worker asks you 'are there any pirate movies / mp3s on your laptop?'.. are you going to lie? how many people on the flight saw you watching 'big momma's house 3'? can you afford to be without your laptop for a couple of months?

  227. Re:Thanks Slashdot! Love, TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, this comment list also indirectly tells you what methods do work. Which I think is what the guy who asked about all this was looking for...

  228. Truecrypt, you say... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    I say bullocks. Okay, so you encrypt your drive with truecrypt. I imagine the exchange at the border will go something like this:

    Border Agent: Okay, open your laptop and log in.
    You: Okay... (logs in...)
    Border Agent: Hmm, you've got TrueCrypt installed. I'm going to need you to give me the password to your hidden partition.
    You: But I don't have a hidden partition (And maybe you don't. But it's irrelevant; you can't prove that you don't)
    Border Agent: Why don't you just give me the password?
    You: But I don't have a password; I don't have a hidden partition!
    Border Agent: (taking away your laptop) You'll get this back after the NSA has cracked your hidden partition, or can prove that you don't have one. Have a nice day!
    You: What!?
    Border Agent: I said, have a good day.

    The best bet you've got is to have a relatively clean laptop with the usual files: pictures of the kids, cookies from gmail or Yahoo, etc...

    If you need to encrypt it, use steganography to hide it in your pictures of your kids, or that video you shot of dolphins at Sea World, etc... Because nothing attracts attention from law enforcement better than trying to hide something from them. The fact that you don't have a hidden partition is irrelevant; because of the fact that TrueCrypt makes no secret of this feature means that Law Enforcement is going to assume you are using it. It's their job to be suspicious...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  229. Do not lie to them by grahamsz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's the point in lying to a law enforcement official that's questioning you? Ultimately you could land yourself in a lot of trouble, and I suspect the better border officials will have a good sense for your body language if you are lying.

    Are you really required to hand over keys without a warrant? If its your employers data thats on there then you can surely hide behind a corporate policy that says you can't share your keys without a search warrant.

    Honestly, i've traveled in and out of the US numerous times with laptops and never had they even ask me to so much as turn it on. If you have any data so important that it can't possibly be compromised, you probably don't need to be carrying it.

    1. Re:Do not lie to them by Nursie · · Score: 1

      The point of lying is to stop dishonest or immoral behaviour by the official.

      More stuff becomes illegal every day and it's now damn easy to fall under suspicion for something.

      I have stuff to hide, sure. Maybe I have a picture of my girlfriend in the shower, that's private data and not something I want those people to see (or propagate!). Legal, but private.

      The US has a history of government sponsored industrial espionage. Company policy isn't going to do anything.

  230. Traveled overseas 5 times this year ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I traveled out of and back into the USA 5 times this year. Not a single time did they open my laptop, much less ask me to power it on.

    a) I was clearly on vacation each time - based on the guidebooks/language books / camera I took with me. Wine brought back from Argentina. Just photos and memories from everywhere else.

    b) I have an FBI file and finger prints

    c) I used to work for the government with a clearance - 10+ years ago.

    d) white male, graying hair.

    e) new passport model with RFID - had to renew about a year ago

    I use Truecrypt for all my passwords, personal data and financial data. A few programs are under truecrypt too, just because the data they need should to be encrypted too.

    Hong Kong didn't search anything (that I recall) - walked pass the inspectors onto the train to Kowloon.
    Argentina and Costa Rica ran everything through X-Ray machines, but seemed interested in fruits more than anything else. Leaving Costa Rica, they took my tiny bottle of hand cleaner away - too much alcohol in it they said.

    YMMV

  231. It's your call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can flat out guarantee that a number of UK based firms have instructed staff when flying to the US to delete any files that they would not want exposed - financial or competitive data, that sort of thing. I'm talking big firms. It *is* an issue, and non-US companies are very aware of it and actively avoiding it.

    That said, I subbed my hard drive out of my Macbook when flying into San Francisco last week. Took me 30 minutes. I got to customs, the guy waved me through without a glance. I felt rather silly until the women I spoke to at dinner tonight explained how her father died while on holiday and she had to fly back immediately on a one way ticket. Despite being 50, white, english, married with a kid, she had the air marshall on the seat next to her for the first 30 minutes "casually enquiring" about her flight and her plans.

    The moral is this. If you're white, booked a return ticket at least a week in advance with a credit card and didn't order a halal meal, you'll be fine. Otherwise, use TrueCrypt and prepare your story.

  232. USB Stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get a USB stick and shove it up your ass.

  233. Use the tarantino method by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way your dad looked at it, this Secure Digital Card was your birthright. He'd be damned if any slopes gonna put their greasy yellow hands on his boy's birthright, so he hid it, in the one place he knew he could hide something: his ass. Five long years, he wore this solid state media device up his ass. Then when he died of dysentery, he gave me the memory card. I hid this uncomfortable piece of plastic up my ass for two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give this Sandisk Extreme 8GB SDHC card to you.

  234. Stenography is your friend by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Create a bunch of hidden volumes, and fill them up with softcore porn. If they really do challenge you to give them access, you can go ahead and do it and explain that you needed to hide it from your girlfriend.

    Unless you area on a watch list then they really won't care to wade through your massive collection of jpegs to find the small amount of important data.

    1. Re:Stenography is your friend by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would bet that a directory full of porn would cause significant delays for a complete inspection of the files by one or more agents.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  235. Photos 250/day easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I routinely take 200+ photos a day when on vacation.

    Volcanoes, huge waterfalls, national monuments and the 7 natural wonders are worth more than 1 photo each.
    Blogging during the trip helps me step back and remember the trip years later. Family and friends enjoy reading a page with photos while I'm gone too. I tried doing an audio blog. I suck at speaking.

    About 50 photos a day are worth keeping ... filtering happens once I get home.
    A 4G SD card holds 2 weeks of photos at 3M resolution, no problem.

  236. Paranoia by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    I take 3 international trips every year (next one coming up in 3 days) and I've never been asked to turn on my laptop except on one occasion on a domestic flight in Italy 3 years ago when security (police there, actually) asked me to turn in on and log in just to make sure the laptop worked and wasn't just a fake laptop used to smuggle stuff.

  237. 24 hours by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    There is a bill being debated in the US Congress right now to limit impoundment of laptops to 24 hours.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:24 hours by jimicus · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is a bill being debated in the US Congress right now to limit impoundment of laptops to 24 hours.

      And I'm sure that in order to back that up, they'll take a forwarding address from you and FedEx you the laptop immediately those 24 hours are up, lovingly packaged and at no further cost to the passenger, regardless of where you are in the world. And when FedEx loses a package (because no courier company in the whole of history has ever achieved a 0% loss rate), they'll chase FedEx up on your behalf, replacing the laptop for you if FedEx can't find it in a reasonable timespan.

      Regarding the data on the lost laptop, they'll almost certainly image it before they let it go anyway, so I'm sure they'll be only too happy to copy the image to another disk and ship that to you.

      And all of this will be done so quickly and efficiently you won't even miss it.

    2. Re:24 hours by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      And if you believe that, I've got this really great bridge I'd like to sell you ...

  238. Done it quite a few times... by patches · · Score: 1

    And one of the places that I brought my laptop back from was Iraq. Have never had a problem, and never had to turn the laptop on. They swab it and check for chemicals on it, and x-ray it but that is all. Of course every time I was traveling for business, and had a tools of the trade letter for my laptop.

    The funny thing is I brought my laptop home from Iraq, and the only thing they gave me a hard time about was the hookah I bought in Iraq....

    Go figure....

    --
    The worst part of being athiest.... You don't have anyone to talk to during orgasm!
  239. very fucking simple by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

    Save yourself some trouble.

    Burn them to a friggin DVD / CD and mail them home.

    And yes, you are WAY too paranoid. Unless your making a snuff film, not much else would get you in some trouble in the states. (I can think of MANY things, but not many that a slashdot person would do).

    You think your personal privacy is that important, eh? Serious question, as I don't give a fuck what someone finds on my laptop.... Is it privacy, paranoia, or just being a nerd?

    --Toll_Free

  240. Not entirely true. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Most states have a fixed time that they consider "speedy". In may states, that time is 60 days. Generally speaking, they cannot change that period even if you were a serial killer.

    Instead, what they do is convince you to waive your right to a speedy trial so that they can "properly represent you", or some other such nonsense. Just recently, prosecutors in my county putt off a trial again and again on the basis that they "could not find" the complainant. When the defender finally stood up and mentioned "speedy trial" to the judge, the case was thrown out. But it took the defendant's lawyer to speak up... and the lawyer let them get away with two or three extensions before doing that.

    Make sure to demand your rights, even to your defense attorney. Otherwise, they might not be observed.

  241. Isn't there a better option? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    How about one of those Eee PCs. Put your operating system, or "personal data", on a card, stick it into the card slot. Remove when not in use.

  242. Do not encrypt! Don't pull the tail of the tiger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encrypt and you will be a suspect. It was not long ago that PGP was consider munitions by our government! I guarantee that if the Homeland dweebee finds that you have encrypted files, you will be detained and interrorgated.

    Do you really believe you have rights? Freedom is slavery, comrade!

  243. Overly paranoid, IMO. by Dputiger · · Score: 1
    Honestly, I think you're probably overestimating your chances of being stopped. As someone who's flown around (and out of) the US post-9/11, the truth is, the TSA folks aren't really any more interested in the contents of your stuff than they used to be. Yes, they do pull random people out of line, and yes, you will have to send the laptop through an X-ray scanner, take your shoes off, etc--but I've never had to do more than turn a laptop on to prove that yes, it was a laptop.

    I know there are people out there who have had terrible experiences with the TSA, but the chances of this happening to you, or to any particular passenger, are absolutely tiny. In order to "qualify" for such an invasion of privacy, you'd have to be pulled aside for individual screening (I'll call that level 1 inspection), have your carry-on + laptop hand-inspected, including turning the laptop on, and then have your laptop not just turned on, but painstakingly examined (lvl 3). Frankly, if you're at lvl 3, you're probably about to get strip-searched, which means the TSA is about to see most anything that might be in the photos you want to protect.

    More to the point, if you're at what I've defined as Lvl 3, refusing to work with the TSA (i.e., by refusing to decypt a TrueCrypt partition for inspection), is only going to get you in more serious trouble. At this point, you're in a room, in your skivvies, and the guy sitting across the desk does not feel overly inclined to give you a phone call or access to a lawyer. In such a situation, your absolute best bet is to smile, comply, and show the nice man whatever it is he's interested in seeing. Then get the heck out, and take what legal actions you feel are necessary *after* you're released.

    In short, the reason I think you're being overly paranoid is because the likelihood of you being inspected to such a degree is extremely low--and if you *are* inspected to such a degree, it's in your own absolute best interest to comply. If flying makes you nervous, if you have a habit of joking at improper times about improper topics when nervous, or if you simply feel there's something about your appearance, dress, or manner that makes you more likely to be selected for inspection, I respectfully suggest you spend time working on these behaviors, instead of encrypting your hard drive's contents.

  244. Much ado about nothing. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    1.- You don't need a laptop to travel. Honest. You don't, don't become an Apple posseur. The world is not going to end if one reads a good book, watches the on flight movie or sleeps instead of continuing plugged to a damn computer.

    2.- There are mobile devices that exist specifically for:

    a) Watching movies.
    b) Backing up memory cards (gosh, how many pictures can you take? In my last holiday I needed 2x4GB cards, which is enough for 8 hundred pictures at best quality, so the need of even this device is questionable)

    3.- The world is littered with internet cafes. Use them.

    4.- If your hotel does not provide internet access why are you staying there?

    Honestly, the best solutions are normally the easiest ones.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  245. Don't Leave Home With It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're going on vacation. Leave the laptop at home. I'm sure you can find something else to do to entertain yourself on the plane. If you want to store your pictures, just go to a local cyber cafe and burn them to a CD/DVD.

  246. USB Hidden Flash Drive Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this of course! USB Hidden Flash Drive Watch

  247. Markandsweep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Openssl tools can be used its good, but only encrypts files not the filesystem.

  248. The net is your friend by sjames · · Score: 1

    Remove all personal data from the laptop. SFTP or SCP your photos to a friend before you come home. During the flight home, wipe your drive.

    The most secure data is data that isn't there at all.

  249. Winrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The winrar is you.

  250. More disks. by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use two hard drives. One concealed in the luggage, or sent by Fedex/UPS/mail, fully encrypted. Backed up for case it'd be intercepted. Another one with a fresh install or known-good image in the laptop itself, so the laptop boots. That way, there's nothing to find during eventual search. You can either make the laptop some "history", so the OS looks used, or claim that it is a business machine and a fresh image is the company policy for overseas travels; many companies actually do so now, so it is a plausible legend. Also, look unimportant, a small grey corporate drone on a trip.

  251. photographing landmarks by falconwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    One lesson from an incredibly expensive joke of a "terrorist" case in Australia is that a photograph of a landmark is proof you are going to blow it up. Be careful with those holiday snapshots!

    I don't know if there's anything like it in Australia but in the US we have this handbook, "The Photographer's Right", photographers started to carry. In a photography class in college I was taking when 911 happened, we heard about how photographers started to go through questioning when they were taking photos. One student there was working on a class assignment when police or private security personnel tried to confiscate his camera. It was a bizarre tyme for photographers then.

    Falcon

    1. Re:photographing landmarks by laejoh · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was a bizarre tyme for photographers then.

      Italy during WWII was bizarre as well.

    2. Re:photographing landmarks by MullerMn · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was a bizarre tyme for photographers then.

      But atleast it smelt nice.

    3. Re:photographing landmarks by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      But atleast it smelt nice.

      The iron I got from it was exquisite.

  252. TrueCrypt by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    According to briefing my boss gave me recently, Truecrypt would not help: If they really wanted to see your content they could ask you to show it to them or alternatively confiscate your laptop and decrypt it themselves.

    TrueCrypt doesn't just encrypt data, it hides data. You can create a folder on a device, it works with USB Flash drives as well as harddisk drives, when someone opens the folder the folder is empty.

    The latter would mean you would probably not see your laptop again.

    That is scary.

    Let me tell you: As a European scientist I am even more frigthened now to go or even move to the US.

    I live in the US and in a few years I'd like to go to Brazil but all the stuff that's going on today makes me wary about trying to get back into the US.

    Falcon

    1. Re:TrueCrypt by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I know that swapfiles can be moved; this doesn't do any good when there's the potential for sensitive data to already be in swap because most operating systems do not securely delete data when it's no longer needed. Just because you hit "delete" and emptied the trashcan/recycling bin (oh look, there's another place where files might easily get moved to which isn't encrypted by default) does not mean that the file cannot be recovered, often quite easily.

      This also doesn't deal with applications which use temporary files as part of their normal operation.

      The key escrow feature is something which products like PGP make very easy. Integrate with a server and presto! Recovering from lost keys is just a few clicks and an administrative password away. Truecrypt doesn't provide the building blocks to do this - sure you can make a backup of the keys, you can store them with no encryption (or encrypted with a key held by someone else like your trusty IT department) but you can't enforce this and you can't automatically get the backup of the keys updated if the keys change.

  253. Why so worried? by moniker127 · · Score: 1

    I dont think boarder guards are so concerned about security. Heck, i'm driving down to mexico right n

  254. So, Slashdot is now Tips and Tricks for Pedos? by Tyrannicalposter · · Score: 1

    User name of Casualsax3, trip to mexico, afraid to show vacation photos?

    What, Date Line making Florida a bit too dangerous for you? Have to go down to mexico for your kicks? I guess Thailand would be a bit too suspicious.

  255. Suggestions by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

    Get a sub-notebook, like the Asus EEE PC. Small and cheap (starting $300 or less), built-in wifi, webcam, 3 USB ports, SD card slot, and runs on Debian or Windows. Get a slim external DVD drive for DVD movies. Get a 2GB+ SD card or USB flash drive, put your personal files there with your CHECK-IN LUGGAGES, NOT carry-on. Encrypt if you want. Use your sub-notebook (laptop) and flash storage during your trip. Before coming back to the U.S., put flash storage in CHECKED-luggage, wipe laptop to factory settings, if you need to (can be done in under 10 sec. with the EEE PC, and already has all drivers and apps loaded after factory reset), bring it with you on the plane. If customs take it, they won't know how to operate it most likely due to unfamiliarity with Debian, or they'll find nothing. If they seize it, heck, you lost barely $300. The plane ticket probably cost you more. Plus who cares, your data is safe, wrapped inside one of your pair of underwears in your checked luggage.

    --
    http://www.palmzone.net
  256. Use a bootloader by SmarkWoW · · Score: 1

    An option is to always make the computer unbootable.

    The idea has always stuck with me is to install a bootloader on a flash drive. When the computer boots it will look for the bootloader on the flash drive. If the drive isn't plugged in you won't be able to boot, if it is you're fine. Just keep the flash drive somewhere hidden and inconspicuous (wife's purse or something).

    Though it would be easy to get around you would need all of the following:
    1. Someone at airport who knows enough about computers to know whats wrong and how to deal with it.
    2. Be under enough suspicion to warrant the governments time to deal with your laptop.
    3. Take the hard drive out and put it in another machine to read the data (If you're using Linux then make the drive ext3 so they'll have to find a non-windows machine to put it in).

    Like many in this thread, I've heard good things about TrueCrypt, you may want to give that a shot.

    Also, first time posting on /. been lurking for years though.

  257. Be A Data Mule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are getting overly complex!

    Do what the real smugglers do and simply swallow your contraban.

    Here are the two simple steps:

    1) Write your data to a small microSD memory card, then wrap it in a latex wrapper, and swallow it. (A little olive oil might help)

    2) 24 hours later (after a memory 'dump') you'll be enjoying your 'warm' memories.

  258. me too.... by dreemkill · · Score: 1

    im actually facing the same situation right now..... im moving out of the country on november 3rd (western australia, and then off to Florence Italy) and i dont want people accessing my private data when i come back to visit family and stuff either. So I just got a 1TB drive, im currently encrypting it with TrueCrypt using the Hidden Volume encyption scheme thingy (technical term), and then dumping my data into it... im buying a new laptop (lets go apple.. dont let me down on the 14th!) and it'll just have a clean install of OS 10 on it.

    the point isn't whats on my drive, the point is my privacy.

    --
    dreemkill.
  259. Ship the hard drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going out is no problem, coming back is. So ship the hard drive back home via UPS. Get it packed up, insure it, and ship it home. Keep the laptop with you if you want - just boot it with a USB stick that's got knoppix on it, tell them the hard drive died a while back and you don't use it any more...

    Assholes can't inspect what isn't there...

  260. You'll be fine by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

    Having passed through both international and US customs, the questions you'll get asked will vary as will their expectations, but I've never had them make me show them my photos. The most important thing is to listen carefully and do nothing without them asking - or you'll spook them. For example one agent asked me to take out my laptop, and when I stood there idle they asked me to open it and boot it for them. Once it got a desktop they thanked me and sent me on my way. The next one asked me to take my laptop out so I went to boot it and they dove saying "NOOOOO!!"

    So don't act until they say ;)

    BUT - you ARE travelling with this laptop, you need to be prepared for the increased risk of loss and theft:

    * Bring the CD you reinstall your OS from with you! BRING IT!! A quaint town in Italy is not a good place to buy an English copy of OSX or beg someone to use their dialup and clunky machine to download Ubuntu!

    * If you want to encrypt your files in case of theft, go for it. The problem with Full Disk Encryption is it does nothing for a stolen, running machine. I've had a laptop stolen from right under my fingertips - it can happen! I like to keep several TrueCrypt "disks," separated by activity, and only unlock each disk as I need it with a timeout set on TrueCrypt. That way a stolen, running machine is likely to have few or no "disks" unlocked, and it will likely lock itself back up before they come across the files.

    * Backup your stuff. My favorite right now is DropBox. It works on Linux, Windows (XP and Vista), and OSX, it's dead-simple, and the first 2gb are free. Put the stuff you'd be saddest to lose most on there. Photos you take abroad, new code you write, that sort of thing. You can even put your TrueCrypt disks in DropBox.

    In summary:
    * Be nice to airline security
    * Plan for hard drive implosion
    * Plan for OS failure
    * Plan for theft (even a running machine)

  261. Confiscate the laptop... by chadenright · · Score: 1

    Keychain USB stick. With an operating system on it. It's all the rage. I have one. But don't go to the US unless you really have to. Not a good place to visit.

  262. Just relax by mimimi · · Score: 1

    I travel frequently inside Europe. The only thing that they sometimes (keep in mind, sometimes) check is they ask you politely to power it up and they take a look while you're holding the laptop if its actually a real laptop. That is that it boots to some kind of desktop or user login. Its just a method to make sure the laptop battery is not made out of C-4 wired to an electronic board or that somehow the entire device is not a bomb.

    My advice, I would just hibernate the device, no password, have it boot up to the desktop with a mexican themed wallpaper. Thats about as normal one would get upon returning from Mexico. Burn the data on a dvd, just to be on the safe side. And stop being so paranoid. Its this type of mentality that further enforces f**ked up policies.

  263. Nitrogen by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 1

    A swab of my laptop tested positive for nitrogen on my way back from the Dominican Republic. This delayed the flight for 20 minutes as they reportedly poked and prodded it inside a blast container. Incidentally, they never asked about the TrueCrypt partition.

  264. Make your self important or not.... by bjoeg · · Score: 1

    Go ahead encrypt your drive. While doing that, please bear in mind that an encrypted drive may seem more interesting to goverment agencies than just a plain "clear-text" drive with innocent pictures.

    And they have probably seen amateur porn recorded in a motel many times before (in case this was your concern)

  265. no worries by haasta · · Score: 1

    a 16GB high capacity SD card is going for around $40 bucks these days. encript 15GiB of it and leave the rest for random photos. save you data on the encrypted partition and put it back in you camera. photos pull up, data is encrypted, and hardware is clean.

    --
    --- haasta IT consultant | Web Programmer
  266. There is some good news. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    A recent court decision has affirmed that Fifth Amendment protections apply to encrypted data ... if the password is in your head, you can't legally be forced to reveal it.

    There's bad news too, judges have ruled US Customs can confiscate laptops. And if they do you don't know when, or if, you'll get it back.

    Falcon

    1. Re:There is some good news. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A recent court decision has affirmed that Fifth Amendment protections apply to encrypted data ... if the password is in your head, you can't legally be forced to reveal it.

      There's bad news too, judges have ruled US Customs can confiscate laptops. And if they do you don't know when, or if, you'll get it back.

      Falcon

      True, but if you encrypt anything important all you have to worry about is replacing the hardware.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  267. encryption by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Such a plan is an invitation for disaster and confiscation. Don't think for a second that encryption isn't a red flag.

    CodeBuster is talking about using TrueCrypt though, which hides volumes so they don't even show up on the storage media whether an hdd or a flash drive. The data encrypted is in these volumes.

    Falcon

  268. Separate data and laptop by langenaam · · Score: 1

    Being a foreigner from a so-called friendly nation, I'm used to the rediculous and non-privacy respecting entry into the so called land of the free. My laptop contains an OS (well, two: XP and Linux). All documents and other stuff are on the net or on SD-cards. Should I have anything to conceal, I would get data in and out of the US like I assume any criminal/terrorist would do: over the internet. Send it encrypted by mail, store it on online-backup, hell, you could even store it on gmail using GFS. In short, this is one of many US measures that only invade individual privacy/freedom of innocent civilians. The real culprits have zillions of ways around this. I can hear Osama laughing his head off in some cave in Afghanistan. I say: keep it up. Given the rate you annoy allies and the way you run your financials, it will be soon that the US is no longer of importance and there is no need to travel to the US and you can celibrate your constitution among yourselves.

  269. I have published a legal paper on this . . . by pacergh · · Score: 1

    And can tell you that you shouldn't really worry.

    On top of this, I just went out of the county with my laptop as well. No problems so far (although re-entry seems to be the big issue.)

    While I have not received my bar exam results, so I am not a lawyer (yet), and you should always consult a lawyer with legal questions, here is what I can tell you:

    QUICK SUMMARY:
    They can search your. Decryption will likely not matter much. They will likely NOT search your (sheer volumes). Searches are mainly used to find possessors of child pornography. Your risk of a search rises if there is something that leads them to believe you may possess child pornography. MOST IMPORTANT THING is to NEVER CHECK YOUR LAPTOP LUGGAGE. Airlines are worse than the government in this regard. Good luck, and IANAL. If you have more serious questions, consult an attorney.
    :END QUICK SUMMARY.

    The US has the right to search your laptop. All of it. They even have the right to copy your drive and search more later.

    This sucks. Is questionable against the Fourth Amendment. And people in Congress are working on it.

    For your trip, it is unlikley that you will have an issue. They do not invasively search each laptop that cross the border (even though, legally, they can).

    Even if they DO search your laptop, it is unlikely they will physically open your computer. (If, however, they feel you may be trafficking drugs hidden inside . . . that's another thing.)

    To give some perspective, the power to search laptops is often used to find child pornography possession. So, if you have some reason to believe the government may view you as a person who may have child pornography, then there is a greater chance you will be searched. (Yes, here, more types of profiling is legal, and the government DOES NOT need a reasonable suspicion for the search.)

    Also, decryption is not necessarily a good move. Why? Because the government can get through the encryption. How?

    Whole hard drive copy. Subpoena requiring you to give up your password. Things like this.

    Also, it may make things take longer.

    On a purely practical side, I would worry less about the government and more about your airline.

    DO NOT, EVER, CHECK YOUR LAPTOP LUGGAGE! The airline has a disturbing tendency to lose luggage containing laptops. In fact, my own experiences with a lost laptop should serve some warning.

    This is where encryption would be good -- encrypt private files (such as tax forms, passwords, financial files, and other important documents) that you keep on your computer so that if it is lost or stolen, no one will steal your identity.

    Good luck and have a good trip.

    - John

  270. In my experience by therealcrowchief · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I dont know if its because im military or not, but ive flown to and from the US 3 times each since this bill or whatever it is was proposed, all 3 times from Germany to the US, 2 times from the US to Germany and once from the US to France...and I have never been asked for my password for my laptop. While I have nothing to hide, anything I dont want to be seen isnt on my travel laptop, but I still never been asked. This is just my experiences.

  271. I do this every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cross the border between El Paso and Juarez every Sunday. I have never had them even ask to look at my laptop, much less been worried they'd take it from me. And I am on some DHS list as "armed and dangerous" -- I've been handcuffed and taken to "the room" several times. I have to tell them in advance that I will show up as armed and dangerous. Yet they STILL have never looked at my Macbook.

    That said, perhaps by air is different than overland. Just look halfway normal and answer their questions rapidly while looking into their eyes. They are looking for "shifty" or "uncomfortable." They're worried about catching drug smugglers mainly. Or maybe fining you for not declaring stuff. Make sure you tell them everything you're bringing in, even if you took it with you from the US, and they won't bother you.

  272. On the subject... TrueCrypt Guide. by BeanBagKing · · Score: 1

    I tried tooling around with TrueCrypt a while ago, creating a hidden operating system and all that. I don't know if the process confused everyone, or just me, but does anyone know of any good guides out there that show you exactly what to do? Idealy I'd like to install XP or even Ubuntu on one partition, the one I'd show off to customs inspectors because it's either light on resources, confusing for them to use (hehe) or both, and have Vista on the other (laugh all you want, I like it). I've yet to find a really good step by step guide though.

    I do like the idea of using a live CD and SD cards though, that'd throw um off!

  273. what if.... by Luke_22 · · Score: 1

    ...I backup everything, encrypt, put on a free web storage of some kind, take a knoppix,
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4k
    pass the border with knoppix, leave the knoppix to them if they want, buy an other knoppix in the us, download everyting and live happy?
    if they ask you why you did it, easy: i heard you were searching, i didn't want to lose my plane while you were searching, so i don't give you anything to search!
    ...
    do you think it sounds too suspicious?

    --
    "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I said I didn't know." -- Mark Twain
  274. This is so sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really loved my last visit to the US back in 2000, took bucket loads of photos of everything, people were so great. I am so desperate to go back, visit my brother in law and get to see NYC, New England and then over LA and out to the Grand Canyon, but as a European there is no way I am setting foot in the US now as they even treat their own citizen's as criminals, let alone someone from the other side of the pond.

    The very fact that their own citizens don't feel safe taking personal data in and out of the country, that they must search out industrial strength cryptography software to protect their memories and personal info.

    Everytime I read another story like this, it makes me feel so sorry for the US...

    Pain of Salvation : "It could have been Great America. I'm sick of a democracy, where every flaw and failure is called a right."

  275. Forgotten statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a lot of people there seem to have forgotten about that huge statue, near where the world trade center towers used to be.

    They've forgotten that its not a statue to democracy, but to liberty.

    1. Re:Forgotten statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the Bronze Bitch(R) a.k.a. Ishtar on the Hudson?

  276. How do we fight this? by samantha · · Score: 1

    How do we fight and win against this? How do we successfully demand that the government cease and desist from such depredations NOW?

  277. Upload, clean laptop, fly, download by evilandi · · Score: 1

    My solution is:

    1. Find broadband (eg. your house, hotel with wifi, cybercafe, wifi at airport).

    2. Put the data you want on a server somewhere. Protect it as required. I usually consider having it on a directory that can be only downloaded over SSH as sufficient.

    3. Clean your laptop of anything dodgy. Leave shred running overnight.

    4. Go through customs with clean laptop.

    5. Find broadband (eg. your house, hotel with wifi, cybercafe, wifi at airport).

    6. Download the files you wanted.

    There's simply no need to take data on physical media through customs, provided both ends of your journey have broadband.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  278. Don't bring a laptop by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Instead, if you really need to work for your company, put a VPN client on a bootable CD and bring that with you. I don't know if Windows can be used that way, but Linux can. If you go on holiday, find something better to do than hanging over your laptop - there is a world out there to be discovered.

    As for photos and videos - just keep them on memory cards till you come home, or if you are worried about customs officers looking at them, upload them to a place where can download them from later. And why bring videos and music with you at all? Read a book; or if you must, bring a media player instead of a laptop.

    It is up to the individual whether they want to fight this fight, of course, but most of us probably have worthier causes to spend our energy on, when it is so easy to just roll with the blows and ignore the idiots; against stupidity even the gods fight in vain.

  279. Maybe tag this "troll"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I was thinking the same thing. But on second thought, this guy is probably trolling.

  280. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to be taking a week long round trip

    As opposed to a week long one-way trip? What would happen at the end - execution?

  281. Use Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    encrypt your file(s). Mail them to your Google email addres en read/load them after re-entry.

  282. Help the child pornographers and terrorists? by harmlessdrudge · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that without exception, as far as I could see, the replies here were all "hell yes, keep the government out of your laptop." One person asked what the photos would be of and didn't receive an answer that I saw.

    A few days ago a friend of mine told me that on arriving on a flight from Asia at a European airport the police detained a number of single white men and checked their computers and cameras for child pornography.

    How would you feel about helping such people escape detection? Or providing tips to terrorists? Is your data really that confidential? Why? Explain.

    If you were to say "I am a European and I fear targeted espionage by the US government for commercial reasons" then your fears would be probably be legitimate if you worked for a large and important company competing with large and important American companies (it's happened before).

    If you were to say "I am not white and my middle name is Hussein and I have spent time a muslim country" you might find yourself receiving extra attention from insecure, paranoid, uneducated people.

    I have had my laptop contents checked at a European airport about 10 years ago. People were importing laptops and avoiding tax on them at the time, so I took the precaution of taking my purchase receipt with me. It was checked and the laptop was inspected. It was clear to me what happened: the guard checked the dates in the root directory on the C: drive against the invoice. He said nothing and gave it back to me. Had the dates been very different, suggesting a forged receipt I think he'd have taken a closer look and I'd have had to answer some questions.

    Yes, it was mildly annoying. On the other hand, the taxes I paid contributed to his salary and he and his fellow workers apprehend drug smugglers, illegal immigrants, fleeing criminals etc. on a daily basis. At that time child pornography was not in the news. Now we find that cheap airtravel, digital cameras and poverty in some countries adds up to a magnet for some people. Thailand and Cambodia are not the only countries they visit.

    I don't know about the US constitutional position re encryption but it seems to me that America's customs officials may now subject the poster to a very thorough proctological inspection on each and every occasion.

  283. Mail your photos/Upload to Flickr or Pix.ie by jaq1an · · Score: 1

    Copy all your photos to a usb flash drive or sd-card and just post them to yourself. Alternatively just upload them all to Flickr and make them private (or not). Better yet, use both methods. I woudn't bring a laptop to the states at all, use cyber-cafes to access your files and back them up on Flickr or other sites. http://pix.ie/ is another great photo site, is completely free with no upload limit. Rob

  284. What Pics? by etherwhisp · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should leave your kiddie porn at the beach instead of trying to save it to your hard-drive you freakin' loser. I don't think encryption software will help you out too much... This is based on my assumption that you obviously don't know how to hide things on a computer in the first place. I think you'd only arouse suspicion by installing an app and not having a clue about how to hide the encrypted data. Security Guards aren't rocket scientists... and apparently, neither are you.

    1. Re:What Pics? by Brian+Ribbon · · Score: 0

      "Maybe you should leave your kiddie porn at the beach instead of trying to save it to your hard-drive you freakin' loser."

      How do you know what the guy is going to do? He may want to take harmless pictures of kids on the beach without invoking the wrath of the thought police. He may want to take photographs of women (or men) on the beach without looking like a pervert.

      Would you be happy for an agent to search your laptop?

      --
      "To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free" ~ Nineteen Eighty-Four
  285. Live CD by HJED · · Score: 1

    if you put a Live Linux disk in your CD drive and put your hard drive in your checked luggage you should be fine
    Bob at customs desk 3 won't be avil to tell the difrence

    --
    null
  286. Traveling by Swingblade · · Score: 1

    I never travel with sensitive data on my laptop, just because I don't want to loose it to anybody. That be customs or some scum snatching it. All that data is on my server back home, so I can grab it from pretty much anywhere. Might cost me a few coins to go to a Internet Cafe, is I have to, but it's still OK. I also upload my stuff to the server. IF I have something I want to hide in a hurry, I just put it in a . Dir (running Ubuntu). Yeah, it's easy to find, but people don't know how to show these Dirs in a UI anyway. I don't bother to encrypt the disk, if I feel it's not safe to cary on me, I upload it first thing.

  287. Wow... having your laptop searched.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid traveling through Europe with my family, the searches in German airports was really laid-back and relaxed. Nothing big.

    Three soldiers would simply escort each family into a room. Two stood their watching with machine guns, while the third went through ALL of your baggage. They'd even reach into babies' diapers to look for stuff.

    Now, those wacky Americans that want to look at your laptop, now they're just wackos.

  288. Encypted USB by ehaggis · · Score: 1

    Put your real data and OS on a bootable USB drive. Keep it separate from your laptop. Encrypt. When asked about the laptop, boot and demonstrate the installed OS if necessary.

    If you are afraid they will investigate the USB drive, make a bootable SD card with your data. Keep that in the your digital camera or camera carrying case. Few would suspect your OS and data are stored there.

    You could even put your data on your USB watch.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  289. BSOD on startup by hotrodent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe a bit of social engineering?

    Someone should make a program that's easy to install and remove that makes Windows generate a BSOD (reliably) on startup. The BSOD might just be famous enough for the security guard to recognize it.

    Inspector: Can you please start up the laptop sir?
    Owner: Sure thing, but it's been crashing on me lately. I've got to get my IT guy to look at ... damn! It's done it again! Sh*t...
    I: Haha, my laptop was doin that when my kid messed wit it.
    O: That might explain it! As I recall, I let my son do his homework on it just last week and it's been acting weird since. Thanks for the tip!
    I: Hey, not a problem. Actually, I'm pertty good with the interweb too, cept once I went to one of them phishing site for some fishin tips, but even when I paid the stinkin $1 fee with my credit card, there weren't no tips or nothin! Just watch yourself sir, it's a crazy web out there. On your way!

  290. You can backup the container by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as you are re-encrypting the whole container to another hidden truecrypt volume or a regular volume if you can be assured your adversary won't become aware your backup exists (eg, burned on a DVD that's buried in your backyard)

    It would probably be smarter to mount the hidden volume and re-encrypt the plain-text contents to another hidden volume (with a live cd or hidden OS) if you need regular backups to avoid the disk overhead of hiding the dummy contents of the first container as the usable space available to a hidden volume is much less than the container it hides in.

  291. DON'T RIP CD's/DVD's to the drive.... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    unless you have the original disks on you. Having "contraband pirated media files" on your drive is pretty likely to give them probable cause for a seizure. Without the original disks, there's no way to back up your story while in the airport, and even with the disks you could get unlucky. Customs has forms and things you can do so that you don't have to pay import duty on the "Made in China" camcorder you bought before you left. They may have similar forms and procedures for media you've already bought and paid for.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  292. TSA and border security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have flown into DFW and MIA, neither place has ever given me problems with my laptop. They didn't even ask to see my laptop when I came through any of the times. I would be more concerned of a search when coming back from Europe and Asia.

  293. Partition by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

    How about create a new partition in whatever OS you're in, store whatever you want on it, and don't mount it? $10 says they don't know UNIX/Linux nor how to use the Computer Management tool in Windows. If they don't see it as a drive, they can't really look at it, can they?

    Now, if they confiscate it, I'm sure the person looking it over would be able to so encryption might still be useful. But it's a quick and easy solution. I do it to hide... things... from family/friends

    --
    -SaNo
  294. Security guide to customs-proofing your laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recentlly Declan McCullagh put together a guide here:
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9892897-38.html?tag=nefd.lede#fascism

  295. PS by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

    Don't forget your tinfoil hat either. You won't be able to wear it through the metal detector though...

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  296. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is wrong with you?

    "-can you open up your suitcase, sir? -NO. IT'S NOT YOUR BUSSINES, EVEN IF MEANS SECURITY"

    are you a military targets photographer?

    if you have some pr0n stuff there, zip it, then add it to some jpg file. works like a charm

  297. Leave pics in a SD card by mrops · · Score: 1

    In general you are being over paranoid, I look very middle eastern. I have been pulled aside a lot of times, once even 3 times on the same flight (talk about profiling). Anyhow, never have they looked at my laptop. They do often ask me to boot while passing through a X-ray scanner, however on the other end I just turn it off and slip it in my bag.

    Further, I carry a PDA phone, has a 8GB microSD card in it, never have they looked at that.

    If I was carrying nude pics of my girlfriend/wife (both), I would just encrypt them, put them on a SD card and slip it in my pocket or wallet. Of coarse, that is if I'm unable to upload them from my vacation to my online drive/server. In the later case, I just wouldn't carry them on me personally.

    Alternately, I would encrypt them and slip the card back in my camera.

    Having said all that, this comment may not even see the daylight.

  298. Re:Thanks Slashdot! Love, TSA by evalencia1 · · Score: 0

    Well, surely there can be only one way out of this potential dilemma:

    Never ever ever admit you saw Big Momma's House 3.

  299. Expect the gov't to expect Linux by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
    Despite the fact that many U.S. government agencies are ensla^H^H^H^H^H reliant on Windows for office automation software, they probably have people in their employ who understand a good deal about Linux, and I wouldn't be surprised if their tool kit included Linux-based tools. After all, if you want to be able to boot a system from CD or USB so you can copy its disk contents across the network to some storage and analysis system, wouldn't the obvious choice be to build something based on Damn Small Linux or some similar distribution?

    Somehow, I think that presenting the Border Patrol with a laptop that boots into Linux is going to add a few points toward qualifying for a VIP interview. Not that I would let that force me to use Windows....

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  300. Any international travelers here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As was said above, does anyone here actually travel internationally? I have been in and out of the States many times over the last couple of years, usually with two laptops in my hands. No one has been the least interested.

  301. Nix by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

    This plan requires a laptop, flash drive, and some blank cds.

    Have a laptop fully windows, nothing suspicious. Rip your movies to it like normal.

    While on vacation, rip pictures to your laptop. Reboot into nix live on your flash drive. Tar all your pics, encrypt, and write a straight encrypted image to a cd. No fs on the cd. Then write "country mix" on it.

    If anyone asks, it's a country mix you burned, but it must have gotten scratched or didn't burn right or something like that.

    If you really wanted to go all out, you could even make it a real 9660 image. Just leave some space at the end, and tack on the encrypted tar.

    Just wipe the pics from your laptop, and noone should be any the wiser. The downside is that you'll have to download some country/pop/some-sort-of-popular-bs for your mix.

    --
    Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
  302. No sign of DHS for trip to Taiwan by hardrealtimenerd · · Score: 1

    I'm not exactly a frequent world traveler, but I've been to Taiwan and back recently for business and saw no sign of DHS checks on anybody going through US customs on the way out or in.

    On the other hand, using encryption for private data is a good thing. I've been using TrueCrypt for all my personal and business data for over a year. It is easy to use, reliable and offers a spectrum of encryption feature from encryting and hiding volumes to simply having an encrypted file that is a virtual encrypted "drive".

  303. Just store it somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just upload your pictures to an online storage system. Then delete your photos in your HD.

  304. I'd just mess with the DHS and/or customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put a screen grab of 2girls1cup as your desktop background, or set your OS to rickroll the person who logs in with the "user name" and "password" you give them...

  305. Upload everything... by buanzo · · Score: 1

    .. before coming back to the US. Or record it to blu-ray/dvd, and ship it back home :P

    After all is secured somewhere else, delete from laptop and be happy.

    --
    Buanzo Consulting - 15 Years of GNU/Linux experience, for you.
  306. What about this... by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Since these kinds of inspections disgust me in principle I refuse to go to the US with any data at all, is not worth it, SSH serves me well and gives me peace of mind.

      Now the problem is that carrying a freshly formatted laptop could still become a liability. What is the probability of getting detained for not carrying personal data on a laptop? Would they even notice if there are no personally identifiable data, just generic stuff? If so how much decoy data would be enough? Do you have any recommendations for what kind of stuff to take with me? Do you think an empty windows installation safe after all?

      I'm not concerned about having my laptop searched, I just ASSUME they will. What I'd really like is to not be permanently tagged in a government database as Shipable-to-Guantanamo er... I mean dissident.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  307. Yank the hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just yank the hard drive? Tell customs that the laptop isn't working, you're just taking it home and getting it fixed later. Show that Linux/Windows/Leopard doesn't boot up properly and they will probably believe you. At home, stick the hard drive back in and go on with your life.

  308. don't carry what they're looking for! by the+big+v · · Score: 1

    They want to find porn and/or stuff to hand over to the RIAA.

    If you put movies on your laptop, delete them after you watch them or before you come home.

    If you have a reasonable amount of music you should be safe.

    They won't care what your pictures are unless they are pornographic.

    But for absolute safety, you must save your pictures to some other device you're not carrying with you in case they decide to take it from you for whatever reason they make up. A network backup is the best bet, and using an encrypted service like JungleDisk is very smart.

    Definitely image your laptop to a USB drive you leave at home before you head out, to make recovery faster.

    --
    The only ``intuitive'' interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
  309. security by obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual boot with linux & windows, store data on linux partition. Encrypt if you're paranoid.

    Before you cross the border, do that format /mbr thinghy (or whatever it's called these days, I didn't use Windows for ages). Now, when you open up your computer it will look like a normal Windows machine.

    They won't check more than that. Why would they?

    Make sure you don't have a very expensive laptop, they might want to impound and 'lose' it.

  310. USPS FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USPS it to yourself, as AFAIW in the US it still requires a search warrant to look through/open other people's mail, and is a (big time) federal felony if done w/o said warrant.

    That said you might run into problems with tariffs as the tax man is apparently, unhindered by trivial things like laws and may decide that your laptop has taxes owed on it for some reason...

  311. No problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I went to PV this past July, with camera and laptop and cellphones; we had no problems whatsoever neither leaving nor re-entering. Same inspection process as flying domestically. Not that that's really saying much, but no abnormal hassles...

  312. Ubuntu 8.10 and transparent encryption by halfelven · · Score: 1

    When dealing with the Almighty Government, encryption is not the solution. Stop believing in this myth, they can find their way into your crypt vault, one way or another, if they really want to. And no, cracking the encryption is not their only tool.

    With that being said, I am going to install Ubuntu 8.10 on my laptop and all my workstations as soon as it's released at the end of October. It has a very neat feature - it allows you to create a Private folder which is encrypted. You can then move things such as your Firefox files into that folder, and symlink them to the original location. Anything you move into Private gets encrypted. Very nice.

    Again, this is not to "protect" my data against Three Letter Agencies, but to prevent snooping from nosy sysadmins at work, to prevent data theft if my laptop gets stolen, etc. It's not perfect, there are ways around it, but it's better than nothing.

    As far as the Three Letter Agencies are concerned, I have nothing to hide. That's probably the best policy.

  313. Search your bags ?? by buckles · · Score: 1

    I have travelled to Europe for business about 40 times in the last decade. Always loaded with photographic equipment and computers. Only once was I briefly interviewed going into NL and once coming back into the US.

    The original post seems overly dramatic. It is routinely much worse for non US nationals . They have to under go the disgraceful biometric scan.

  314. hm by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    How exactly are these searches done? I keep personal stuff in a small encrypted disk image on my Macbook. It's just like any other file except when you double click it, it asks for a password. Is it really even likely the TSA would look through my files that closely? I'd think they'd just go into my movies and my pictures and do a cursory exam of the filenames to make sure there's nothing suspicious. I really doubt they'd take the time to randomly image my hard drive, and if they did that they wouldn't notice the encrypted volume until I was gone anyways.

  315. A dildo is not useful in the terroristic market! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I can see it now .. Everyone listen or we'll .. *censored* ..
    while holding a dildo at the flight-attendance head.

    There is just no terroristic market in sex toys...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  316. Burn a CD by dbc001 · · Score: 1

    Burn a CD and mail it to yourself from Mexico. Burn another CD and put it in your bag. Even if your laptop gets searched, it's unlikely that anyone will notice either burned CD.

  317. TrueCrypt by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    You've missed the whole point of my post

    And you missed the whole point of my post.

    Swap files which, unless the whole disk is encrypted, won't be. Files used in hibernation (Linux uses swap, not sure about Windows).

    I have 2GB in my MacBook Pro, which it came with as standard more than a year ago. If I wanted to I could add another 2GB. For now at least I seriously doubt I come near maxing that. I can see doing it when I start working on multi-media. However if I wanted to I could move my swap. Windows users can also move their swap, as can Linux users.

    you can't simply send a message to the operating system to say "This is now in secure mode, any user data or swapfiles must be stored in THIS location and any which are outstanding must be moved and the disk area they occupied securely wiped".

    When I installed Linux, years ago, it asked me where I want the swap partition to be. I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure I also told Windows where to put swap.

    This is the kind of feature corporates will demand because you can never guarantee that nobody will ever lose a key or forget their password and "your data is now toast you silly fool" is seldom an acceptable outcome to such a scenario.

    Yea, I'd imagine a corporation would have a backup key.

    It's also the kind of feature which is highly unlikely to be implemented in any F/OSS solution like TrueCrypt because it's a potential security risk

    How is TrueCrypt riskier or potentially riskier than a closed source proprietary program? Whereas anyone can examine the source for TrueCrypt and spot possible security holes, nobody can legally see source code that's closed. And that source code can be riddled with holes. Sure some cracker may find a hole in code that's open but with thousands of others having the code the likelihood of someone else seeing is better than if the code is closed, and closing the code only stops some.

    Unless the disk is heavily encrypted then any boot password can be trivially worked around

    Not too long ago, last month I think, there was an article on /. about how researchers were able to recover passwords after a few minuted with the computer shutdown. A recommendation when boarding a plane was to not use a laptop at the airport.

    Falcon

  318. Dead link in sig. - Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  319. No laptop by Puremajik · · Score: 1

    Don't bring a laptop?