You know very very well that repetitively killing a mob to get its horn to get xp to get more horn-needing quests will not get pass the Kara level of brain you need to do raid. Heck, put five of those people together and they won't even finish Steam Vault regular (I've been/rw "Kill the tanks! Kill the tanks!" way too much). Put some of them on Supremus and you'll have 20 players who want to quit ("stay out of fire!"). We're not yet talking about Archimonde and Gorefiend, damnit!
The fact that those guys didn't buy or bot their 70s doesn't guarantee they have the brain. It doesn't even guarantee they understand their own class (I've never played hunter and I know what clipping is...). So yeah, I'd bot an alt anytime if I could get some of the classes we need in the guild to 70, and I'd still be considered a good player. I don't want to force myself 5-10 days/played time to get there, I have other things to do (IRL or not, raiding takes time).
Gimme the possibility to start a char at half the level of my highest char and I wouldn't consider botting. I'm not doing it (don't want the ban hammer), but I can understand why some would.
Check out the Programming paradigm page on wikipedia which has a good load of information on what differentiate a language from another. Java is absolutely not the same as C++.
The fact that not much people actually writes C++ (as opposed to, say, C with class) has something to do with the common belief that Java is alike, but look further than mere structural construct and you'll see why they are worlds apart.
Yeah don't worry. I never said Carter made a bad decision (zippthorne did), I'm much more real than that. The blame would fall on every administration (Dems or Reps) who was too scared of opening that old scroll since we've made enough advance around the world to recycle the waste and build much more efficient fission power plant. And the blame will still stay on the whole country as long as the next administrations won't realize (and make voters realize) fission can be controlled much more efficiently.
Although you are right about Java and its platform, I've seen quite a large group of C++ project that didn't need an API framework to work (aside the standard library, which is part of the language anyway) - just look at sourceforge. I don't see why you quote Qt though...
And thanks for correcting me about the origin of Objective-C. I'll correct you in turn: Elogant isn't a word; Elegant is what you meant
NextSTEP created Objective-C for their OS and API (which became Cocoa later on). So, it's not uncommon per se, it's merely created for that purpose. Although you can code on Windows with Objective-C (since gcc supports it on all platforms), without Cocoa it wouldn't be a seamless adventure. TBH I'd be surprise if anyone does any serious works with it outside of anything apple-related.
I develop with iPhone and OSX everyday and I agree Objective-C is a beautiful and well-designed language, but most of the fantastic experience of using it comes from the API part, not the language by itself.
So you'd let him/her libel her director on and on without consequences? What would be the limit, then? You'd be okay if s/he starts the rumor that the last time s/he was alone with the director he raped her? I am sick of students that think they can do whatever they can without repercussion.
Pedantry coming: old nVidia cards and documents used Quads as a primitive, not triangle, so polygons can be anything, even in video cards.
As for the whoosh, there is nothing in the reply from nawcom/Cillian, where the joke about a screen taking only 1 polygon, that says that it is in fact, a triangle. And he says, as a joke, that his screen takes ONE polygon - maybe he meant a triangle-shaped screen? So, whoosh-ever, I'm out.
People shouldn't ignore(/try to correct) the subtleties of the English language just because they don't understand them.
See? You're doing it again. Instead of "do not understand", you should say "do derstand". Now I feel better cause I've corrected someone on the interwebs.:)/satire
So between more criminals (although that remains to be seen) or less-but-more-dangerous ones, which you choose? And we're talking burglars now, but what about other crimes?
And you prove yourself that this method of thinking is wrong and why: if it gives you an incentive to kill him before he kills you, then it'd give them an incentive to search and kill you before you have even an idea they are there in the first place... and where does it end? everybody dies younger...
I'd sleep much better in a city where there is a low (or none) rate of murder than in one where I can carry a gun. My experience (though I'd like to see some worldwide statistics about it) has shown that if everyone has a gun with them, there is a lot more murder - and it's not always the honest guy who lives.
Uh, no. You don't shoot. You don't get mad, you don't lose your calm. That's the worst that could happen. If you can disarm the guy, you do so. If not, you give the guy what he wants, then call the police with info.
Being civilized is exactly the opposite of what you just said. And we didn't build a civilization for 6000 years (since writing, not bible-related) to come to the point where a "sensible" reaction to violence is to create a blood bath.
Disclaimer: I come from a part of the world which is not USA.
I could kill the operator of the scanner with a thought. Simple countermeasures.
Just concentrate on an imagine of a combination of Goatse, Tubgirl, 2g1c, and Lemon Party. Instant aneurysm.
So that's what the title means with Indian Woman Convicted of Murder By Brain Scan. Murder by Brain Scan - the googles do nothing...
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry to disagree here (well, not that sorry).
You know very very well that repetitively killing a mob to get its horn to get xp to get more horn-needing quests will not get pass the Kara level of brain you need to do raid. Heck, put five of those people together and they won't even finish Steam Vault regular (I've been /rw "Kill the tanks! Kill the tanks!" way too much). Put some of them on Supremus and you'll have 20 players who want to quit ("stay out of fire!"). We're not yet talking about Archimonde and Gorefiend, damnit!
The fact that those guys didn't buy or bot their 70s doesn't guarantee they have the brain. It doesn't even guarantee they understand their own class (I've never played hunter and I know what clipping is...). So yeah, I'd bot an alt anytime if I could get some of the classes we need in the guild to 70, and I'd still be considered a good player. I don't want to force myself 5-10 days /played time to get there, I have other things to do (IRL or not, raiding takes time).
Gimme the possibility to start a char at half the level of my highest char and I wouldn't consider botting. I'm not doing it (don't want the ban hammer), but I can understand why some would.
And talked with Apple about its ideas first.
Check out the Programming paradigm page on wikipedia which has a good load of information on what differentiate a language from another. Java is absolutely not the same as C++.
The fact that not much people actually writes C++ (as opposed to, say, C with class) has something to do with the common belief that Java is alike, but look further than mere structural construct and you'll see why they are worlds apart.
Yeah don't worry. I never said Carter made a bad decision (zippthorne did), I'm much more real than that. The blame would fall on every administration (Dems or Reps) who was too scared of opening that old scroll since we've made enough advance around the world to recycle the waste and build much more efficient fission power plant. And the blame will still stay on the whole country as long as the next administrations won't realize (and make voters realize) fission can be controlled much more efficiently.
And you just wasted it :P it's not a rick roll anymore if you say it's a rick roll....
Guys guys. Let's not talk about Guitar Hero 5 DLC business plan right away, okay?
Seriously, this is the best I've seen in a while.
Dude. Dude! Dude, dude... I guess you have a point.
Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate that decision with the advance we've made since then. Been a couple of years now...
What city are we talking about anyway? Cause we have some roads here where two lefts are needed to make a right. Just sayin'...
Although you are right about Java and its platform, I've seen quite a large group of C++ project that didn't need an API framework to work (aside the standard library, which is part of the language anyway) - just look at sourceforge. I don't see why you quote Qt though...
And thanks for correcting me about the origin of Objective-C. I'll correct you in turn: Elogant isn't a word; Elegant is what you meant
Define "sudden", please, since the supreme court was on the case since february 2007...
NextSTEP created Objective-C for their OS and API (which became Cocoa later on). So, it's not uncommon per se, it's merely created for that purpose. Although you can code on Windows with Objective-C (since gcc supports it on all platforms), without Cocoa it wouldn't be a seamless adventure. TBH I'd be surprise if anyone does any serious works with it outside of anything apple-related.
I develop with iPhone and OSX everyday and I agree Objective-C is a beautiful and well-designed language, but most of the fantastic experience of using it comes from the API part, not the language by itself.
Try having the start button at the bottom and the list of tasks at the top. Now you should get an idea why this wasn't possible before :)
So you'd let him/her libel her director on and on without consequences? What would be the limit, then? You'd be okay if s/he starts the rumor that the last time s/he was alone with the director he raped her? I am sick of students that think they can do whatever they can without repercussion.
First the articles, next the summary... now we have to read the comments before replying? /satire
Pedantry coming: old nVidia cards and documents used Quads as a primitive, not triangle, so polygons can be anything, even in video cards.
As for the whoosh, there is nothing in the reply from nawcom/Cillian, where the joke about a screen taking only 1 polygon, that says that it is in fact, a triangle. And he says, as a joke, that his screen takes ONE polygon - maybe he meant a triangle-shaped screen? So, whoosh-ever, I'm out.
A polygon isn't necessarily a Rectangle. Or, rather simply, "Whoosh".
better != good. But I liked this one better too.
People shouldn't ignore(/try to correct) the subtleties of the English language just because they don't understand them.
See? You're doing it again. Instead of "do not understand", you should say "do derstand". Now I feel better cause I've corrected someone on the interwebs. :) /satire
It cannot be goinger, not that it was be the badest...
So between more criminals (although that remains to be seen) or less-but-more-dangerous ones, which you choose? And we're talking burglars now, but what about other crimes?
And you prove yourself that this method of thinking is wrong and why: if it gives you an incentive to kill him before he kills you, then it'd give them an incentive to search and kill you before you have even an idea they are there in the first place... and where does it end? everybody dies younger...
I'd sleep much better in a city where there is a low (or none) rate of murder than in one where I can carry a gun. My experience (though I'd like to see some worldwide statistics about it) has shown that if everyone has a gun with them, there is a lot more murder - and it's not always the honest guy who lives.
Uh, no. You don't shoot. You don't get mad, you don't lose your calm. That's the worst that could happen. If you can disarm the guy, you do so. If not, you give the guy what he wants, then call the police with info.
Being civilized is exactly the opposite of what you just said. And we didn't build a civilization for 6000 years (since writing, not bible-related) to come to the point where a "sensible" reaction to violence is to create a blood bath.
Disclaimer: I come from a part of the world which is not USA.
Ted Stevens for president!
* "It won't be as good as Eve/Warhammer/etc."
Uh, I've been playing etc online for like a week. That game was crap. Eve/WAR maybe, but etc, never.
I could kill the operator of the scanner with a thought. Simple countermeasures. Just concentrate on an imagine of a combination of Goatse, Tubgirl, 2g1c, and Lemon Party. Instant aneurysm.
So that's what the title means with Indian Woman Convicted of Murder By Brain Scan. Murder by Brain Scan - the googles do nothing...