Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Uses "I'm a PC" Character In New Ads

arcticstoat writes to tell us that in the wake of their largely unsuccessful Jerry Seinfeld ad campaign Microsoft is setting their sights directly on recent Apple ads by featuring the "I'm a PC" character in their new advertising campaign. "He then follows this with another phrase, such as 'and I've been made into a stereotype' before the advert shifts to a range of people performing a diverse assortment of jobs, all of which also say they're a PC. Among those featured are astronaut Bernard Harris, as well as religious author Deepak Chopra and 'Desperate Housewives' actress Eva Longoria. The ad also features a wide range of anonymous people, including a shark diver, a teacher and a guy with a beard."

837 comments

  1. New ads by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw the new ad for the first time last night.

    Man, it's HORRIBLE. The ads try to play on the fact that Windows has the biggest desktop market share by showing a diverse group of people in diverse situations admitting to "being PCs". While the characters try to come off as being "cheeky and cute", they just end up looking like ditzy, ignorant, darwin-award candidates In short ad is somewhat condescending. It's typical Microsoft Strategy -- copy others(Mac ads) and turn out a second-rate imitation.

    Yes, ol' Bill is in the ad, albeit briefly, but they should have echewed Bill and kept Seinfeld in(just to say "I'm a PC", at least) as a cameo! I'm still mad at Bill for the last commercial, in which he said nothing except, "I have a lot of money and now I'm going to wiggle my ass in your face, nyah nyah". If Bill wants to be a celebrity then he can just "leak" a homemade sex tape like the others do.

    1. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the ad was pretty good... much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

    2. Re:New ads by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft just failed on an epic scale. They didn't take the time to understand the Apple ads, so now they're lashing back at thin air.

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life. Microsoft obviously didn't get that.

      Mark my words: These ads will preach to the choir (the people who already hate the Mac commercials) but will do nothing to asuage those commericals. If anything, Microsoft has just drawn MORE attention to Apple.

      Way to go, Microsoft.

    3. Re:New ads by anaesthetica · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Admit it, you would hate the Microsoft commercial no matter what its content was.

      I'm a Mac and I found it to be pretty decent, for a commercial about an operating system.

    4. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Bill wants to be a celebrity then he can just "leak" a homemade sex tape like the others do.

      Oh, the world is better served by not even having to contemplate the celebrity sex tape involving Bill Gates.

      And, really, if the richest man in the world isn't a celebrity by now, something has gone wrong. Most people know exactly who he is, he doesn't need any help in being made famous. Certainly not 'in flagrante', as it were.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      While the characters try to come off as being "cheeky and cute", they just end up looking like ditzy, ignorant, darwin-award candidates.

      So, they tried to copy a retarded ad, and came out with a retarded ad. Surely that isn't surprising to anyone.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    6. Re:New ads by Brigadier · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      To acknowledge an attack is to admit its success. Stupid move on Microsoft's part. This would have only worked if they could have snagged the original PC guy and gave him some flair not a stupid explanation as to why PC's don't suck.

    7. Re:New ads by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Funny

      do they have a guy running round a street with a shotgun shooting people shouting "It crashed and lost my f***** work, I'm a b****** PC you c**** !"

      No? Perhaps its modelled after Vista... a huge fat guy stuffing his face full of burgers, "I'm a PC, now give me more resources".

      No? Pity, they'd be more in-tune with reality :-)

    8. Re:New ads by Goody · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I thought it was great and immensely better than the Bill and Jerry ads. They one-upped Apple in one fell swoop, breaking the I'm a cool twenty-something versus the nerdy looking guy message that Apple has been pushing. The message was PCs are more than just a inflexible box and more than the cool, hip....they do it all. Whether or not you agree with the statement the commercial is making, I think the move by Microsoft was brilliant.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    9. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, they tried to copy a retarded ad, and came out with a retarded ad. Surely that isn't surprising to anyone.

      Are you kidding? I think the "I'm a PC/I'm a Mac" series of ads is utterly brilliant.

      Having been around long enough to witness about 15 years or so of pain and suffering from Microsoft stuff, I think that they really do a good job of highlighting the (perceived) differences between the two platforms.

      For some reason, the Mac ads just seem to resonate with people. Certainly, some of the early ones about "we can have fun making spreadsheets and charts" when the Mac was talking about video editing and the like showed the very basic differences in what the machines come equipped to do. I remember back in the day having a windows machine, and, out of the box, it wasn't capable of anything but notepad, solitaire, and a calculator. When I first set up a linux box I had dev tools, games, editors, and a whole fleet of stuff that was actually useful.

      You may not like the ads, but I see them as sheer genius.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:New ads by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      horrible? I thought it was really *really* good. Not only does it help kill the stereotype, but makes the Mac commercials much less effective as well.

      Exactly! I'm getting "only on Slashdot" feelings about some comments here. :-S

      I'm planning for my first MacBook in a near future, but despite this, I have to commend Microsoft for getting a commercial out that makes Apple's predecessor look plain silly/stupid/childish in comparison.

      OK, to be perectly clear here -- what message Microsoft is trying to get across, is that Microsoft doesn't cater to a "kind" of user, like Apple implies in their commercial, but try to cater for all kinds. And in the process of doing so, doesn't try to smear other software platforms, but just speaks for themselves.

      I think the commercial is great, especially compared to the offensive-defensive Apple commercial.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:New ads by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was kind of my take. They started doing the "I'm a PC" thing, but it got old. I think the commercial would work better in a 30s version than the 60s version I saw.

      But the more I thought about the ad as I watched it, the more it occured to me they were all sheep. I figure the vast majority of them (especially those who looked like they were in other, poorer countries) probably hadn't tried a Windows alternative for more than 5 minutes. They just don't know there are better options, or for many that there even are other options.

      It actually made the commercial less "blah" and more "a tiny bit sad".

      I enjoyed the Seinfeld ads much more. I wanted to see what the next one would be. This is a generic Microsoft marketing "let's make an ad" ad. The tag line ("I'm a PC too") is meaningless. It doesn't do anything to make me want a PC more. And it certainly is about "breaking boundaries with Windows" which is what this whole campaign is supposed to be about.

      I'm going to put this one up there with the DotBomb era commercials like "Everyone is looking for the new economy, but it's not through a door, it's through a Window".

      Congratulations. You've poked fun at a popular set of commercials, made yourself seem less relevant by just copying off that (since obviously you didn't think your last idea was working). You're more Microsoft that ever. Isn't that exactly what you were trying to avoid?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    12. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never go full retard

      Speaking from experience?

    13. Re:New ads by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guy with a beard? Fucking traitor!!!

    14. Re:New ads by phasm42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life. Microsoft obviously didn't get that.

      I believe you're the one not getting it. The purpose of this advertisement is not to carefully interpret the Apple ad, but to override it with their own interpretation. I think they did a fair job at this.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    15. Re:New ads by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Funny

      My wife saw the ad and made the best comment ever.
      "I need to go out and buy a Mac now! I can not dorky enough to use Windows anymore."

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    16. Re:New ads by Brigadier · · Score: 2

      I actually watch the ad objectively and thought it made a point. Apple's ads were always about being free form. MS is saying there is nothing wrong with having form and structure. Fact is consumers are a Mob they only remember what they heard last.If this add manages to diffuse the stereo type then so be it. There is a vast majority of people in this world (over 30 crowd) who don't think striving to be cool is what life is about. It's about responsibility and dependability, I think MS may strike a cord with this market.

    17. Re:New ads by plague3106 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh... the Apple ads are supposed to be funny? Huh.

      The ironic part is that the fun, easy to use Mac can only point out that it "runs Microsoft Office just as well as [PC]," but otherwise has to pretty much lie about PCs and that they're good for work only (which is odd considering how small the Mac game library is compared to PCs).

      Oh well.

    18. Re:New ads by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'm a PC ... and I run Ubuntu."

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    19. Re:New ads by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a linux fan myself and I liked the ads. Much better than the Seinfield ads.

      The bit at the end with the guy in the shark cage "I'm a PC, and I'm scared" was pretty good.

      (Disclaimer: I recently built a Vista gaming rigs and have been extremely pleased)

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    20. Re:New ads by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      The ad is bad, certainly, but the editing room floor has the most important parts on it. The parts where each of those people (aside from Bill) said "because I believed what the kid in the store told me... only smart people wear clip on ties, right?"

    21. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it was college, give me a break ;)

    22. Re:New ads by Poltras · · Score: 4, Insightful

      better != good. But I liked this one better too.

    23. Re:New ads by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The purpose of this advertisement is not to carefully interpret the Apple ad, but to override it with their own interpretation.

      Except that they just acknowledged their existence. If Apple ignores these ads (which they will because they have no "punch") Microsoft will end up looking petty. And again, Microsoft is drawing attention to Apple's ads. Don't draw attention to your opponent unless he has managed to grab sufficient mind-share to demand a response! Microsoft still has the lead in the market, so there is no way they can "win" back attention they haven't lost. All they can do is continue to lose ground.

    24. Re:New ads by morari · · Score: 1

      Much better:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHwNEyRipkE

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEYot8voTDM

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-vHrS4s14Q

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    25. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      billg is not the richest man in the world.

    26. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you kidding? I think the "I'm a PC/I'm a Mac" series of ads is utterly brilliant.

      No, I'm not kidding. Not only do they tend to be, at best, completely blown out of proportion (I swear I recall seeing one or two that were outright false)... they're insulting and demeaning to the very users they're trying to convert. I constantly wonder what idiot came up with an ad that insults your potential customers, and why he isn't fired yet.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    27. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up.

      I can't stand Windows. The operating system is a piece of crap.

      However, this commercial is not. It's the old "positive/negative" campaigning option. Like it or not, Mac's ads are more or less 'negative' campaigning in that they specifically single out the opponent and paint it in a negative light. Note that the "Mac guy" never seems to do a whole lot, just stand there and be way 'cooler' than the "PC guy" while the latter bitches about how awful he is.

      This Microsoft ad accepts that complaint, and without responding in kind, instead shows that being forced into a box - the activity Mac users in theory would rail against - is exactly the sort of thing those commercials are trying to do to PC users, who aren't so easily described.

      I'm not going to go out and buy Vista. But I do think this commercial is a major success for their ad department.

    28. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman.

      Right. John Hodgman does not represent a stereotypical PC user and Justin Long is not intended to represent a stereotypical Mac user. If you pay any attention to the ad, you'll realize that they represent personifications of a Mac and a PC. So that's why they say "I'm a Mac," and "I'm a PC."

      So no, Apple isn't stereotyping PC users by saying that they're boring generic business geeks. They're making fun of other PC manufacturers for making boring generic business computers. Microsoft's ad people are either retarded or they're banking on the commercial-watching public to have paid little attention to the Mac/PC ads.

      So I think you're right. Those people who paid any attention to those ads will probably see Microsoft's new ads and think, "Wow they're dumb. They missed the point." But for people who haven't paid a lot of attention to those Mac/PC ads, these ads will call more attention to the Mac/PC ads. If anything, by acknowledging those Mac/PC ads, Microsoft is raising Apple up (in terms of consumer psychology) to their equal and competitor, whereas part of what keeps people afraid of switching is the idea that Macs are a fad that shouldn't be taken seriously.

      All in all, I don't think this is a great idea for an ad campaign.

    29. Re:New ads by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that Windows is now what you use if you have no choice. It is the default.
      Very few people really want to use Windows. They use it because it runs the programs they need and is cheap. Why is Vista doing so bad? Because it doesn't add anything to that the average Windows user cares about. It doesn't run more software than XP and it isn't cheaper.

      That is the problem Microsoft has now. Apple is a choice so people look forward to change. Windows is the default. If Windows users wanted change they would buy a Mac or install Linux.
      What windows users want is XP fixed and secure but running just as fast on their current hardware.
      Biggest mistake that I think Microsoft made? Not back porting DX10 to XP. Nobody is going to write a DX10 only game as long as a large percentage of users can not play it. Heck just make it run just a little faster under Vista than XP and people would have a reason to move.
      Second biggest mistake. Not making Vista 64 bit only. Just my opinion but I would bet that vendors would come out with Vista versions of their software just so they could use the 64bit mode.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    30. Re:New ads by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      And again, Microsoft is drawing attention to Apple's ads. Don't draw attention to your opponent unless he has managed to grab sufficient mind-share to demand a response!

      While I agree with this, Apple has definitely grabbed mind-share with their ads. Microsoft may be leading in the market, but Apple has been gaining ground. Whether their gains are sufficient to illicit a direct response is debatable (and something I'm not knowledgeable enough to debate).

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    31. Re:New ads by dogdick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good!? Good?! They were GREAT! I ran out and bought a new Windows Majave laptop!!! Who is laughing now steve jobs?!

    32. Re:New ads by Soko · · Score: 1

      I'm still mad at Bill for the last commercial, in which he said nothing except, "I have a lot of money and now I'm going to wiggle my ass in your face, nyah nyah". If Bill wants to be a celebrity then he can just "leak" a homemade sex tape like the others do.

      And I'm really pissed at you there, Ethanol-fueled dude. Some of us are visual and were eating lunch.

      *Throws 3/4s of a bowl of beans and rice into ethanol-fueled's face*

      Asshole.

      (Dear $deity: These ads are sooo bad, and yet the ad agency and Microsoft Marketing considers them a success due to the "buzz" they created. Please, please PLEASE don't let anyone from that agency read about this se*choke*, er, se*YAK*, AHEM, ethanol-fueleds "idea", lest there be wailing and gouging out of eyes.)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    33. Re:New ads by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, the message is, if you can't use proper English, you should buy a Mac?

    34. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 0

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users.

      In that case, they failed hard, because that's exactly how he comes off in the commercials. What they supposedly were trying to make cheeky, light-hearted ads came off as insulting and mean-spirited towards the very people they want to advertise to. If that isn't bad marketing, I don't know what is.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    35. Re:New ads by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users.

      Are you kidding me? They have the slightly overweight balding guy in an old suit being a PC, and you don't think that's stereotyping? Sure, the Mac commercials went over other things too, but saying there wasn't any stereotyping going on is just silly. Maybe you should read my sig.

      It's called parody, they are trying to imitate the guy from the Apple commercials.

    36. Re:New ads by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I liked the Mac adverts they were funny (the British version was better still)

      This is simply stating we have a large market share, which everyone already knows, or doesn't care

      I'm not a PC or a Mac or a Linux I'm a person who sometimes uses a computer, and runs programs on the computer, It runs an operating system - If I am aware of the operating system at all it is because it has got in my way

      Car Analogy : I got in my car and drove to work - which make of car was it : I don't know, and don't care, it got me here anyway....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    37. Re:New ads by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This wasn't a troll. It was funny.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    38. Re:New ads by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      This is true. The commercial is about as corny as anything else out there. Its nothing special, but i dont see it as bad. I think the seinfeld commercial was way better though ...

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    39. Re:New ads by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the Apple ads, both characters personify the machines and not the users. Most people unfortunately are extrapolating that Hodgeman represents the average PC user. It is clear that he represents the average PC machine and Justin Long represents Mac. What Apple is doing is just classic advertising. "Our product is better than that other product. It has these strengths. . ." It's no different than the old commercials where Brand A floor cleaner was compared to be more effective than Brand X. But just like any other product some people identify with the product and miss the message. "Hey I'm Brand X! I'm effective not matter what that commercial says! I'm offended!"

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    40. Re:New ads by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What are you talking about? I thought it was *devastating* to Apple. Primarily because it's true. The vast majority of people -- and yes, creative people -- use PCs. The Mac ads have always been arrogant and condescending, and this is a major "up yours" to Apple.

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      These ads are as good as the other ones were bad, and they were REALLY bad.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    41. Re:New ads by eta526 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sums it up nicely:

      I'm a PC, and a human being. Not a human doing. Not a human thinking. A human being.

    42. Re:New ads by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      You're a Mac? I think you've been watching those commercials too much... ;)

    43. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 0

      Microsoft just failed on an epic scale. They didn't take the time to understand the Apple ads, so now they're lashing back at thin air.

      And in my opinion Apple has failed on an epic scale too, by not understanding their own ads.

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life. Microsoft obviously didn't get that.

      The trouble is Apple doesn't get it either. John Hodgman's "PC" over time has developed a sympathetic cachet; everyone I know loves the apple ads, but we are all rooting for the poor PC who just keeps taking the hits.

      Mark my words: These ads will preach to the choir (the people who already hate the Mac commercials) but will do nothing to asuage those commericals. If anything, Microsoft has just drawn MORE attention to Apple.

      To everyone that's already seen the Mac commercials but isn't a rabid fanboi. The new MS ad actually appeals to them, its a little vindication for 'poor PC'.

      Way to go, Microsoft.

      Indeed.

    44. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life. Microsoft obviously didn't get that.

      I like the ads, but they're highly stereotypical. What surprised me is that Apple acknowledged the Mac User stereotype of a smug douchey hipster with Justin Long's character.

    45. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point of what AKAImBatman. He's not a stereotype of PC *users*. He is a personification of the PC itself. His character is supposed to be the computer, not the person using the computer.

      So the commercial isn't saying PC users are boring and inept, but rather that most computers are boring and inept, and people using boring and inept users should switch to using computers that are cool, sleek, and competent.

      So yeah, I guess that's a stereotype, but a stereotype about Dell computers and HP computers, and not about the people who use them. That's why the end of Microsoft's commercial, "I'm a PC, and a human being" is retarded. No, you're not a PC at all, you just happen to use one.

    46. Re:New ads by roggg · · Score: 1

      I think it's a stretch to say they "one-upped" apple, but it was a good ad given the success of the Hodgman/Long ads. It's by far the best MS ad I've seen in a long time. It piggy-backs on the fame of the Mac ad campaign, but refutes the core sentiment of Apple's message.

      There was an article in a local paper a month or two ago that claimed the "I'm a Mac" ads could eventually backfire on Apple if MS could only come up with the right campaign. The theory was that even though PC is portrayed as being flawed and bumbling, he was becoming a beloved character. I don't know if this MS ad is going to be that "back-fire", but I do believe it's the best rebuttal they've come up with so far to Apple's brilliant campaign.

    47. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, the guy with a beard? He's using a PC, but it's running Linux. He was just forced to pay the Microsoft tax.

    48. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Windows users wanted change they would buy a Mac or install Linux.

      That's change we can believe in!

    49. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, I don't quite get it, but that don't mean much. :-P

      they're insulting and demeaning to the very users they're trying to convert. I constantly wonder what idiot came up with an ad that insults your potential customers, and why he isn't fired yet.

      Are they actually demeaning and insulting to the potential customers? I don't perceive it as that -- they're not saying "PC users are doody heads", they're highlighting some of the more frustrating elements that people running Windows have encountered over the years. To me, it seems more like commiseration "we feel your pain" not "you suck". Heck, one of the current ads highlights how a "Mac Guru" will be happy to help you migrate your files from Windows to the Mac. They don't seem (IMO) to actually attempt to say anything at all about the people who use the machines, other than they might have experienced frustration.

      I mean, in an industry where "reboot the computer" is referred to as the "Microsoft Patch", and people have just taken for granted that strange stuff happens sometimes, I must admit I haven't always found the Windows experience to be quite what you'd call rewarding. (However, I will also say that my home machine running XP has been the single most stable Windows-based PC I've ever used.)

      Anyway, advertising is one of those things that you either like a campaign, or you don't. The ones someone dislikes, they usually do so quite vehemently. Not a whole lot of point in debating who is more right on this one. :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    50. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is originally what I liked about the ad campaign. You had "Mac" and "PC", and the two were comparring features.

      Mac would describe a feature that it had, and then PC would be embarrased it couldn't do something similiar.

      Then over the course of a year or so, it turned into a smear campaign. Mac would say "I'm a Mac." and then the PC guy would ramble on for about 30 second about Vista not working properly.

      The campaign stopped being clever at this point.

    51. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      They did do a fair job. It's half just brand awareness and half sending the message that PCs are used by a vast array of different people - which they are. The Apple ad was insulting to PC users (for those that cared). The Windows ad actually takes a higher moral ground in that it doesn't say anything negative about Apples. It just says 'we're here and we're used by a lot of different people.' The posters here acting so hysterically outraged and crying what a terrible advert this is would be saying the same or worse about any advert Windows released. It's not going to re-write the world of advertising, but it's not the mind-scarring horror that people here are acting like it is.

      For me, it's possibly a better advert than the Apple ones, the basic message of which I took to be: Macs are designed for goofing around showing off your photos, and PCs are for actually getting anything done.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    52. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "billg is not the richest man in the world."

      Actually he is

      Actually, AC may have a point, and I may have mis-spoke on this matter. Seems at some point this year, he was dethroned.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    53. Re:New ads by sexconker · · Score: 1, Troll

      Majave?
      I didn't know they had internets in Mozambique, let alone an MS distributor.

    54. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Are they actually demeaning and insulting to the potential customers? I don't perceive it as that -- they're not saying "PC users are doody heads"

      Maybe that's not what they're trying to say, but that's how every single one of those ads came across to me. "These machines suck, and by extension, you suck for being stupid enough to not use our machine." Fortunately for them, I wasn't in the market anyway, so they didn't lose a customer... but seriously, I can't imagine they've gained customers with this approach (once you factor in the people they've alienated). Why not pick something that isn't so arrogant, and can be seen as very insulting? Then they would gain customers, and not alienate potential customers. Surely that would be far better.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    55. Re:New ads by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that the ads were horrible. They are just not that great especially for the money that MS is claiming that it is spending. Personally, I found the HP commercials with celebrities like Gwen Stefani much more effective. They advertised for HP and Windows.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    56. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Personally I don't think you can draw a hard line between whether the adverts stereotyped the computers or their users. For me, the latter seemed quite obvious and I have no doubt that many others took things the same way. After all - the Apple ads played extensively from the very start on what the computers were used for. If that's not an extension of their users then you'll be hard pushed to find something that is.

      And for anyone who ever used to watch the British TV show in which these characters appeared together (before they turned into computers), the message is even further removed from what Apple presumably intend, because the character that became the Apple was an absolute arsehole to people.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    57. Re:New ads by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Parody? Maybe. But not effective parody.

      One thing I've lawyers say about defamation suits is that they're usually not worth bringing. It isn't just the burden of proof, it's that the publicity reinforces the defamation in the public eye. Parody might work here, but you've got to shred the Apple message, not riff off of it. You can't be timid with parody; there's no half way. Half way parody only reinforces what you want to fight.

      So Microsoft can't just bring the "I'm a PC" character out to defend himself, because that just reinforces the negative message. "I am not a boring nerd!" ** yawn **. They have to bring out the "I am a Mac" guy out and make him look like a total ass. Make him a pretentious airhead who spends all his time talking about how cool he is while "I am a PC" is quietly getting the job done.

      Of course, they can't do that without insulting everybody who has ever bought a Mac -- possibly even insulting everyone who's bought any Apple product. Given the number of iPods out there, that's a lot of people.

      Real parody is not nice. That makes it hard to pull it off when people think you're a vicious asshole. Maybe that was the point of the Seinfeld/Gates thing; to give MS a more aw-shucks regular guy image before they pulled out their sharp knives. Looks like they pulled out their sharp knife just long enough for a self-inflicted wound.

      The ad would be better just showing all the cool things you can do with a Windows PC, which is the point. They still need a hook, but it couldn't be hard to come up with a better one than, "You probably think I'm boring, but I'm not as boring as you think."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    58. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious as to why in all the Microsoft ads I've seen (even the "Wow" commercials) I've witnessed almost no demonstration of WPF's 3-D capabilities. Where are all the "great" WPF applications? Why isn't that being demonstrated somehow? (I don't mean Flip-3D either.)

      Note: although I have a Vista laptop, a Linux box, and an XP box, I haven't actually done anything yet with WPF, so I don't know how it runs performance-wise. Maybe I'm not missing anything...?

    59. Re:New ads by CODiNE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users

      Answered with ...

      They have the slightly overweight balding guy in an old suit being a PC, and you don't think that's stereotyping?

      You realize you missed his point entirely? The Apple commercials were NEVER talking about identifying with the users. It's personifying the OS itself, as if it has a personality. You're making the same mistake Bill Gates made about this whole thing.

      Instead consider this... Bill Gates is supposed to have Aspergers, Steve Jobs is diagnosed with ADHD. Now imagine what sort of differences that could have on their OS philosophies. Notice the OS characters in the Apple commercials sort of correspond to those? Microsoft is intentionally distorting the message to make it look like Apple was stereotyping PC users, trying to make people take personal offense at a characterization of an Operating System.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    60. Re:New ads by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's called parody, they are trying to imitate the guy from the Apple commercials.

      So two years after Apple brought out those commercials, Microsoft makes "parodies" that are lamer than any parodies that could be found on YouTube 2 years ago? Hey, that tells a lot about Microsoft in relation to Apple.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    61. Re:New ads by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you kidding me? They have the slightly overweight balding guy in an old suit being a PC, and you don't think that's stereotyping? Sure, the Mac commercials went over other things too, but saying there wasn't any stereotyping going on is just silly. Maybe you should read my sig.

      As much as I hate to admit it, Microsoft does have a point. I've always hated the Mac/PC commercials, because they never make any real point-- they only throw about strawmen and half-truth non-sequesters. And the entire run of commercials is just one big, poorly-veiled attack ad on Windows. "A PC is gray, therefore ever PC in the world runs slow. Hahahah. Buy a Mac.".

      At the very least, the Microsoft ads are trying to define the PC market as more than a homogeneous lump of "gray box that can only do spreadsheets and smells like Grandpa". Unfortunately, at that point they just fall into the same trap as the PC/Mac commercials. A PC isn't a Windows box (as much as Apple or Microsoft would love to have people believe). They're still trying to tie usage of their operating system (which is really what they're selling-- they're trying to sell you on Vista) to a specific demographic of people (ie: "normal" people). They can't sell it on the OS's benefits, or value, or usability, or usefulness-- or anything, for that matter. So they're trying to use peer pressure.

    62. Re:New ads by captaindomon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're not an exact opposite of the Apple ads, but that's not the intent. They're not trying to say, "Apple has it wrong." They're trying to say "People need to open their minds and not have a right or wrong argument". I think it's great. And yes, I have owned and used Mac, Linux, and Windows machines. Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    63. Re:New ads by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For me, it's possibly a better advert than the Apple ones, the basic message of which I took to be: Macs are designed for goofing around showing off your photos, and PCs are for actually getting anything done.

      I always thought the basic message of the "I'm a Mac/PC" ads was that PCs inhibit your ability to get things done and Macs make it easier. Note: I'm using "PC" in the same way the ads do...to refer to a Windows machine. It's not correct, but unfortunately it's another case where perception becomes reality.

      I can't see how you got the reverse out of those ads. If the focus group for testing them had had the same opinion as you, I don't think we would have ever seen them in that form.

      Personally, I like the Mac/PC ads, although I only agree with about 10% of what they say, since I (and people around me) run XP systems that only reboot once a month for patch Tuesday, and run a lot of different types of software with no issues.

    64. Re:New ads by TobyRush · · Score: 5, Informative

      The trouble is Apple doesn't get it either. John Hodgman's "PC" over time has developed a sympathetic cachet; everyone I know loves the apple ads, but we are all rooting for the poor PC who just keeps taking the hits.

      Of course everyone is rooting for Hodgman -- he's the star of the commercials. But people are watching the commercials, laughing at them, calling their spouses in to the living room saying, "Hey, there's a new one on"... that's advertising success. The point is to have people remembering how cool those commercials for Apple were when they are thinking of buying a new computer.

      The new MS ad actually appeals to them, its a little vindication for 'poor PC'.

      I disagree. If Charlie Brown started repeatedly kicking Lucy in the head in a fit of long-suppressed rage, we might sympathize, but I'm guessing readership would probably drop off a bit.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    65. Re:New ads by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users.

      In that case, they failed hard, because that's exactly how he comes off in the commercials. What they supposedly were trying to make cheeky, light-hearted ads came off as insulting and mean-spirited towards the very people they want to advertise to. If that isn't bad marketing, I don't know what is.

      Gee, if the shoe fits - do you look like John Hodgman by chance?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    66. Re:New ads by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      One thing's for sure: We've come a long way from the days when the IBM PC was represented by Charlie Chaplin:

      - Chaplin was artistic.
      - Chaplin was energetic.
      - Chaplin was a rebel.

      The original IBM PC was a remarkable invention, but the modern version of IBM/microsoft PC is certainly no Charlie Chaplin. Of all the machines I've owned, this Pentium 4 clone is the dullest and least exciting. It has no personality; it's just another appliance. (Oh and before somebody steps-in and starts spouting about what a PC can do --- that's only because those features were invented by more-advanced machines like Commodore, Amiga, and Apple who were the first to create the multimedia computer. Had those companies not existed & pushed for innovation, we'd still be using boring monochrome monitors with sounds consisting of "beep" and "boop".)

      "Nobody will ever need more than 0.64 megabyte." - Bill Gates

      Troy (proud owner of Atari, Commodore 64, Amiga 500, and Macintosh Quadra computers; not-so-proud owner of a generic blackbox PC)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    67. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree it just made Apple come off as more smug and pompous than the stereotype claims. Anyway the ads are definitely untrue since I don't think games are boring and windows has a hell of a lot more games for them. Also including the fact that PCs can do pretty much anything a Mac can do except run Mac OSX which itself is an artificial EULA restriction rather than technical.

    68. Re:New ads by Futile+Rhetoric · · Score: 1

      Yes, but thanks to the credit crisis, Billy has moved up in the list again.

    69. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      but seriously, I can't imagine they've gained customers with this approach (once you factor in the people they've alienated).

      Bottom line, I believe Apple's market share and sales have gone up a fair amount lately. I can only think that in no small way, that campaign is a factor -- certainly, if they had tested poorly or had significant negative perception they'd have pulled them, Apple is pretty savvy about their marketing and not willing to gamble with their image.

      Why not pick something that isn't so arrogant, and can be seen as very insulting?

      But, again, I think you're the only person who I've ever heard say that the ads seemed arrogant in any way -- that doesn't diminish the validity of your experience, it just doesn't match mine and whatever anecdotal evidence I've gathered.

      If anything, I think the Mac character comes across as fairly laid-back and inoffensive -- I guess one could argue that he's presented in such a way as to be more informal and casual (both in mannerisms and dress). *shrug*

      Anyway, I'm sure we can spare the rest of Slashdot from degenerating this entire thread into a debate on the merits of that ad campaign. You obviously feel strong about it ... Maybe a Mac bit your sister once? That would have been very painful. ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    70. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the more I thought about the ad as I watched it, the more it occured to me they were all sheep.

      It's a fucking commercial. The only sheep are those of you posting comments on here like it's anything more than that. Ads are made to get people talking about them. The only sheep are those dumb enough to get sucked into thinking it's anything more than what it is: an ad.

    71. Re:New ads by azav · · Score: 1

      "I have a beard!"

      "I turn number 2 into energy!"

      Well, I see just how blase these are going to be.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    72. Re:New ads by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      Of course, a life without walls is a life without privacy, security, stability ... Wow! I guess is is like Windows!

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    73. Re:New ads by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      horrible? I thought it was really *really* good. Not only does it help kill the stereotype, but makes the Mac commercials much less effective as well.

      I'd label the Seinfeld commercials "horrible" and these ones "expected." They only become "good" in the harsh light cast by the Seinfeld part of the campaign.

      Do they kill stereotypes? Hmmm. Good question. They might. But then, that's only part of Apple's campaign.

      Is it enough to say "we're everywhere"? Is that message strong enough on it's own? And is it strong enough to warrant acknowledging the other guy's message(s)?

    74. Re:New ads by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Note that the "Mac guy" never seems to do a whole lot, just stand there and be way 'cooler' than the "PC guy" while the latter bitches about how awful he is.

      I dunno, he interfaced with that Asian printer girl in the one commercial. That was hot

    75. Re:New ads by TobyRush · · Score: 1

      I agree that the shark guy was good. The pause after the guy saying he has a beard was also funny, but I'm guessing that 90% of the commericial's audience wouldn't get the "guys with beards run unix" reference that I assume was implied.

      I think that it would be a much better commercial if it stood on it's own, rather than being a "nyah nyah nyah" to Apple's commercials.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    76. Re:New ads by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I've been working as a designer since 1992 and have never used anything but a Mac in any studio I have worked for. Maybe you should go play with GIMP and make more amatuer RGB graphics...

      What is about being a designer that causes you to think that your personal anecdote has any statistical relevance to anything? And I've got news for you... Photoshop has been available for Windows since 1992. And Adobe sells *far* more Windows copies than they do on the Mac. AND -- I know this is going to be a shock -- you can do anything on the PC that you can do on the Mac. And no, you can't "work faster" on the Mac than you can on Windows. They are effectively identical.

      Oh, and one last thing. The GIMP is typically used under Linux, and very rarely under Windows.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    77. Re:New ads by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I thought the "windows Mojave" ad would've made a great Ubuntu ad. Instead, it was a terrible PC ad: the only thing it really does is admit that Vista has a negative perception. "See, it's not that bad" isn't exactly a selling point when you're trying to convince people to upgrade to your next product.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    78. Re:New ads by paniq · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? They have the slightly overweight balding guy in an old suit being a PC, and you don't think that's stereotyping?

      now that i think of it, i feel really releaved that the overweight balding guy didn't have a beard.

      it means there is still hope for us.

      --
      Do not trust this signature.
    79. Re:New ads by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put down the joystick and realize there is a whole real world out there. Many people just want to use the internet period. There is a whole baby boomer generation that is connected. They use computers to stay in touch ,get news and order things online. We have people 70+ years using computers every single day. The common consensus is apple is easier. That they don't have nearly as many problems, and they are "high quality". I'm not going to debate this. Its a perception and with people perception is 90% truth. There is a huge market for a device that keeps them doing what they are and "just works". Microsoft rarely puts out anything the just works. In many cases a PC works great for about 6 months to a year then it gets slower, and slower and sloooooowwwwweeer. And when they ask their local "expert" there is one in every family, they get reinstall your OS, check for viruses/malware, buy a new PC in that order. Lately a lot have just said screw it and buy a MAC. My company president came to me and said "its time to get a new laptop, this time get me a Mac. My wife loves hers." You can also play any game on a Mac as you can a PC. The idea of running windows in a protected virtual machine is appealing to many. Apple is a hardware company, lest you forget.

    80. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um... what British TV show where the characters appeared together? There was a British sitcom where anthropomorphized computers were roommates or something? Sounds like a show I want to watch.

      Anyway, no, it's quite clear that Justin Long is a Macintosh computer and John Hodgeman is a PC. When the "Mac" character gets Time Machine, there are lots of copies of him. John Hodgeman crashes and needs to be repaired. They talk about Mac and PC getting sold and having features.

      Now, you can argue that lots of people misunderstand the ads and think that they're supposed to be a Mac user and a PC user. However, if you think they are users and not the machines themselves, then you either aren't paying attention or don't understand concepts like "metaphor".

    81. Re:New ads by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Actually he is. http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Forbes/TheForbes400.aspx?GT1=10423

      ... he said, linking to the Richest Americans. Sorry, just because Warren Buffet lost > $10 billions in the last couple of months doesn't mean so has Carlos Slim Helu (& family).

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    82. Re:New ads by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're overlooking a critical point: The "I'm a Mac" marketing campaign is implicitly playing on identification. In a consumer society, we are what we buy. "Clothes make the man", "What does your car say about you", etc.

      (See also SUVs in the context of psychological compensating behaviors.)

      Yeah, you bet, the actors in the Apple commercials are saying that they're walking-talking personifications of the respective systems. But, undeniably, they also typify the stereotypes of the respective user communities, and therefore they are an extension of the time-honored "all the cool people use Macs, all PC users are incompetent dullards" marketing spin.

      This is the angle Microsoft's campaign is playing against. Their ad is asking the viewer "Aren't you offended that Apple is calling you a colorless incompetent tool? You should be, because look at the variety of cool interesting people who use PCs! You're a member of the cool set, not that mock-turtleneck phoney!"

      This is simply stating we have a large market share, which everyone already knows, or doesn't care

      The Microsoft ad is saying that they have a diverse market share. Again, attempting to counter Apple's elitist spin. (Yeah, a large market share, too; that's an appeal to belonging. That is very powerful in herd animals like Consumers.)

      I'm not a PC or a Mac or a Linux I'm a person who sometimes uses a computer, and runs programs on the computer, It runs an operating system - If I am aware of the operating system at all it is because it has got in my way

      Car Analogy : I got in my car and drove to work - which make of car was it : I don't know, and don't care, it got me here anyway....

      Congratulations on your immunity to marketing psychology. You are in such a trivially-small minority compared to the Consumer Herd that you don't even register. Advertisers aren't talking to you. They will score big if their wiles work on a small percentage of the remaining 99.999% of money-spending mass of humanity.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    83. Re:New ads by MrMarket · · Score: 1

      The MS ad represented a heck of a lot more walks of life than the Apple ads.

      All of this is irrelevant anyway. Microsoft will have a lot easier time connecting with consumers when windows is easier to use. The user experience plays more of a role in defining the brand than the advertising.

    84. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a Mac bit your sister once? That would have been very painful.

      Mind you, Mac bites can be pretty nasti...

      We apologize for the fault in the discussion. Those responsible have been sacked.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    85. Re:New ads by Pheonix28 · · Score: 1

      I personally like the new commercials (here comes all the flaming) They're good. They're not bashing, and they're actually entertaining ("I have a beard" made me laugh)

    86. Re:New ads by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      He is a personification of the PC itself. His character is supposed to be the computer, not the person using the computer.

      So the commercial isn't saying PC users

      Who's saying the MS ad is any different? Take a look at all the different types of PC's out there from Dell, HP, to the subnotebooks etc... The "PC itself" is as diverse as its userbase.

    87. Re:New ads by mingot · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If Charlie Brown started repeatedly kicking Lucy in the head in a fit of long-suppressed rage, we might sympathize, but I'm guessing readership would probably drop off a bit.

      True, but that was really not the tone of the new commercials.

    88. Re:New ads by cephalien · · Score: 3, Funny

      College? Maybe you'd like to try some of that delicious pizza over there?

      --
      If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
    89. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac ads are a prolonged insult; A gob of spit in the face every time i see them. If this is the first you've seen anyone think they were potentially insulting get your head out of your mac loving ass and think for yourself.

    90. Re:New ads by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      They also have to walk a thin line not to piss off too many Mac Microsoft Office customers.

    91. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Of course everyone is rooting for Hodgman -- he's the star of the commercials. But people are watching the commercials, laughing at them, calling their spouses in to the living room saying, "Hey, there's a new one on"... that's advertising success.

      I consider them to be a good enough series of ads that when I'm watching TV on my PVR and fast-forwarding through the commercials, I will stop and rewind to watch a new one in the series.

      I don't even own a Mac, and I'm not in the market for a new machine any time soon, but having experienced frustration with Windows at some points in my life, I think the commercials do a pretty good job of tapping into a shared perception.

      (And, yes, I'll be the first to admit that my XP box has been quite stable, so I'm not slagging Microsoft for the sake of it.)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    92. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Damn, this post is full of mistakes. In case there's any confusion, a couple fixes:

      • I think you're missing the point of what AKAImBatman was saying.
      • ...and people using boring and inept computers should switch to using computers that are cool, sleek, and competent.

      Anyway, hope everyone understood what I was trying to say.

    93. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the world is better served by not even having to contemplate the celebrity sex tape involving Bill Gates.

      I don't know, Melinda is kinda hot (http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=melinda+gates&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2). I mean, someone would have to pixelate the heck out of Bill first (oblig. "the goggles - they do nothing!"), but let's not rule things out prematurely ...

    94. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If Charlie Brown started repeatedly kicking Lucy in the head in a fit of long-suppressed rage, we might sympathize, but I'm guessing readership would probably drop off a bit.

      Probably. But that's going psycho, not a 'bit of vindication'. I'm sure the readership would have appreciated a bit of irony... like if Charlie had put glue on the football so that Lucy couldn't let go of it, and then anticipating her jerking it out of the way, didn't commit to the kick.

    95. Re:New ads by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a Mac and I found it to be pretty decent, for a commercial about an operating system.

      You know, I was about to say how the worst thing about that ad was the way it failed to create the idea that the people shown are really computers, and instead shows a bunch of people rabidly obsessed with their particular kind of computer. "Who the hell calls themselves a computer?", I thought. I found it creepy.

    96. Re:New ads by oatworm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, they have 18 MS distributors.

      The more you know.

    97. Re:New ads by jep77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the ad was pretty good... much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

      Right... which is exactly how they want you to feel. They released crappy ads that you hated and followed them up with ads which are only marginally better and you're calling them pretty good. This ad campaign is no mistake. What I'm about to say is so obvious I can't believe I'm actually taking the time to do so: Microsoft releases Vista... it's crap and you hate it... Next comes Windows 7 which will be marginally better crap and you'll love it... all because you're taking to the TV based training so well... This all just reminded me of something totally unrelated. I fed Microsoft Mojave into the internet anagram server recently ... Jive moms fart coo...

    98. Re:New ads by arktemplar · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't look at coming to slashdot for anything that is ermm.. 'unbiased' wrt msft. But, if some guy from cult of mac can say that the commercial was not that bad -- ahh well that day can still come.

      http://cultofmac.com/microsoft-debuts-new-pc-ad/2896

      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
    99. Re:New ads by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      non-sequesters? What does that have to do with the price of halibut?

      I sure hope neither MS nor Apple come to seize and hold my computers.

    100. Re:New ads by mingot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you REALLY think this extrapolation is accidental?

      That the advert company that makes the adds has said "Wow, here is a shocker, people are thinking wwe're actually doing this to have them think you'll be a cooler person if you run a Mac. Crazy. We didn't expect this!

      Most likely, because advertisers would NEVER use sex appeal / cool facor to sell a product or use an unappealing actor to represent the consumer of another product. Never.

      Gimme a fucking break.

    101. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, I think, is their secret message. "I'm Microsoft, and I'm scared".

    102. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, because some PCs have beards, have rings, and are scared while shark-diving.

      The ads end with some guy saying, "I'm a PC, and a human being. Not a human doing; not a human thinking. A human being." And you're arguing that he's an anthropomorphized computer?

    103. Re:New ads by jslater25 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      THIS! Please mod captaindomon up. An OS isn't a one size fits all. Heck, even web-browsers aren't that way. I argue this exact issue constantly. There are benefits (as well as disadvantages) to any operating system.

    104. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a stereotype of PC *users*. He is a personification of the PC itself. His character is supposed to be the computer, not the person using the computer.

      Yeah, why would an advertisement ever try to make a connection between the image of a product and the people who buy that product?

    105. Re:New ads by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The Mac ads are a prolonged insult; A gob of spit in the face every time i see them. If this is the first you've seen anyone think they were potentially insulting get your head out of your mac loving ass and think for yourself.

      Sonny, I don't even own a Mac, and I never have. I've never even sat at the keyboard of a modern Mac.

      But, I've been around long enough to have used DOS machines, migrated away from Windows before version 3.11 was even out, and have been through the hell that was Windows '95, Windows '98, and Windows ME (and listened to the fanboys tell me it was the greatest thing since sliced bread). I have personally tried to resolve IRQ conflicts. I've been told by IT that the solution to my wonky PC is to reboot it and see if the problem goes away.

      Again, the ads aren't even trying to insult PC users -- but they are referencing a shared experience of really wobbly Microsoft products and the frustration which ensues. And, it's a perfectly valid criticism, because an awful lot of us have put up with some really annoying stuff for a very long time.

      Seriously, before you go around being a wanker and accusing everyone else of not thinking for themselves, get a clue. I've got FreeBSD install disks that are more insightful than you.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    106. Re:New ads by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Mac Ads, as well as portraying the different "characters" of the respective operating systems, each contained a different message about what Macs do.

      Eg, they run MS Office, you can share files with a PC, you don't have to worry about viruses, they come with a built in iSight camera, etc.

      These Windows ads don't tell you anything about the benefits of PCs. I guess it is trying to say that there as a much wider range of software available for all sorts of different tasks, but it doesn't really spell it out to the viewer.

    107. Re:New ads by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      The common consensus is apple is easier. That they don't have nearly as many problems, and they are "high quality". I'm not going to debate this.

      Ahh, a fanboy. If Apple is so easy to use and doesn't break, please explain my wifes iPod that regularly starts skipping, locks up, and doesn't seem to sync properly using iTunes. Put down the crack pipe; Apples may have a reputation for high quality and "just works," but the reality is far different.

      If all people are doing is surfing the web and checking email, a PC will work just as well, and for much less the cost.

      Lately a lot have just said screw it and buy a MAC. My company president came to me and said "its time to get a new laptop, this time get me a Mac. My wife loves hers." You can also play any game on a Mac as you can a PC. The idea of running windows in a protected virtual machine is appealing to many.

      Thanks for your anecdote! I'm sure that will work out well.

      You can play any game on a Mac provided you buy a Windows license and boot to Windows. Wow... must as well just have gotten a PC.

      Apple is a hardware company, lest you forget.

      They are? I thought they were selling Intel chips on Intel boards. What hardware do they make on their own anymore, that isn't some other product rebranded?

    108. Re:New ads by Macrat · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought as well.

      Also a "Personal Computer" could be a Mac. :-)

    109. Re:New ads by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. These commercials represent PANIC at MS. Panic leads to change. Not always good change, but any change out of MS right now would be great. I am still waiting for them to drop the price on Vista, a big sign of weakness.

      --
      Good-bye
    110. Re:New ads by pyrbrand · · Score: 1

      Which is why the MS ads are advertising ninjitsu. They're taking the Mac ads and turning them into an insult to anyone running Windows (90% of the population). It's not that big of a leap and if Apple keeps doing them, that will be the impression people get.

      Apple already comes off as stuck up. No one I know likes Justin Long's character. Pretty much everyone loves John Hodgman. The new ads work.

    111. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't be timid with parody; there's no half way. Half way parody only reinforces what you want to fight.

      A good example of this is the whole controversy with the New Yorker cover showing the Obamas and their "terrorist fist jab". It was meant to parody the right-wing characterization of Michelle and Barack Obama by showing an absurd representation of them. The problem was, the representation wasn't any more absurd that the right-wing characterization, and so people weren't sure how serious the cover was.

      If you're going to parody something, you have to be far more absurd than the original. Otherwise, it's just not parody.

    112. Re:New ads by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The average person wants to use a computer for web browsing, emails (in most cases using webmail), word processing, and for managing and editing their photo collection.

      Macs are better than PCs for their photo collection, better for web browsing and emails because there is less concern about viruses, and just as good as PCs for word processing.

      Linux is just as good as Windows for word processing, better for web and email for the same reason as Macs, and probably not as good for photos.

    113. Re:New ads by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah. You'll like it. There's built-in spelling and grammar-checking in every text box!

    114. Re:New ads by E-Rock · · Score: 1, Redundant

      You're kidding, right? Only a mac user, who is being stroked for spending too much money, could like those ads. We mute the commerical (if we're stuck watching live TV) and talk about how smug apple is about being in last place.

    115. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Right. John Hodgman does not represent a stereotypical PC user and Justin Long is not intended to represent a stereotypical Mac user. If you pay any attention to the ad, you'll realize that they represent personifications of a Mac and a PC. So that's why they say "I'm a Mac," and "I'm a PC."

      Correct. But really, its almost an irrelevant distinction.

      The message is one of association: "if you want to be cool and do cool things, use a cool computer like a Mac. If you want to be boring and inept and do boring and inept things use a PC."

      And you take away the same stereotypes: cool people use macs, boring people use pcs.

    116. Re:New ads by fsmunoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. The ads are well-done and a decent reply to the Apple ones. They play on the Apple pseudo-elitism that seems to be the reason so many people like the Mac ads and many others dislike them nicely, basically saying "glam or no glam the truth is that Windows PCs are used to do just about anything".

      I don't even use Windows myself BTW.

    117. Re:New ads by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 2, Funny

      better != good

      With one-liners like that, you should become a consultant.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    118. Re:New ads by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Who are the ad wizards who came up with this one?!?

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    119. Re:New ads by story645 · · Score: 1

      Mark my words: These ads will preach to the choir (the people who already hate the Mac commercials) but will do nothing to asuage those commericals. If anything, Microsoft has just drawn MORE attention to Apple.

      Way to go, Microsoft.

      Dunno about that. I thought that the apple commercials were brilliant and that this is a great riff on them that is obliviously inspired by the formula but not a carbon copy. The ad co-opts apples hipster cool message by being about diversity, but tones it down into a more generic "everybody" message, which is actually great when going for more market share.

      *shrugs* My brother loves the new commercials and he's pretty much Microsoft's target audience: into technology enough to boy new boxes every few years, but not into using linux. Granted, my brother also hated the Seinfeld ones, so yeah there's definitely a "this is better than the last" effect, but not a preaching to the choir one.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    120. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You mention Gates/Jobs, and I've always found it noteworthy that the PC character looks a bit like Gates and Mac looks a bit like Jobs. So yes, the commercial is literally displaying anthropomorphized computers talking about their respective qualities. If you want to talk about the subtext, the subtext isn't about the users, but rather about the two companies (Apple and Microsoft) and their respective leadership.

    121. Re:New ads by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

      So is stepping into a bathtub full of agitated electric eels, but I wouldn't recommend Microsoft use that as a marketting strategy either.

      --
      That was either the start of something bad or the end of something stupid.
    122. Re:New ads by genner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      Blasphemy....burn the witch!

    123. Re:New ads by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I said when they fired Seinfeld,this is just sad.I build and repair PCs for a living and when I offer Vista as an option on a new build I get a loud "EEEEEW!" from the customer,like I just cut a big fart in front of them. And folks wanting to "downgrade" have gotten so bad that if they have one of the Vistas that have downgrade rights I send them down the street because I don't want to deal with it,and what is their big answer? Maybe bringing back XP in a new package like XP SP3:Reloaded? Nope,that lame Mojave bit and now a very sad Mac ad ripoff.

      If anyone at MSFT is listening,your problem ISN'T mindshare,okay? Folks already know who you are. And lame ads ain't going to help either,no matter how much money you throw at them. The problem is enough folks have gotten a taste of Vista to know that they hate it,and one person with a bad experience will tell 10 friends. Which is why I have folks that have never even tried Vista looking at me like I took a crap when I even suggest it as an option. Whether you can fix it now or not is irrelevant,okay? You screwed the launch,and the DRM and buggy drivers have already made folks minds up for them,and that can't be fixed with ads.

      Accept the fact that the public hates Vista and considers it WinME-II,and be glad that unlike most companies you have a product to fall back on the folks will gladly buy. So accept your mistake,bring back XP with maybe a new theme like one of these and enjoy the truckloads of money you will make,as well as the goodwill from the OEMs and buying public that hate Vista. Then take the time you need to get Win7 right. Worry about your customer base instead of the big media companies,who won't go with you anyway because Apple owns media with the iPod. But all you are doing with these ads is making yourself look a day late,a dollar short,and unable to do anything but ripoff Apple. And it is just sad. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    124. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      If Bill wants to be a celebrity then he can just "leak" a homemade sex tape like the others do.

      Oh, the world is better served by not even having to contemplate the celebrity sex tape involving Bill Gates.

      Rule 34?

    125. Re:New ads by genner · · Score: 2, Funny

      much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

      So is stepping into a bathtub full of agitated electric eels, but I wouldn't recommend Microsoft use that as a marketting strategy either.

      Actually that might work.

    126. Re:New ads by phanboy_iv · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it's much better than the Apple ones as well, in that it doesn't have that obnoxious Apple smugness. Besides, the Apple commercials were always missing a third character - Richard Stallman in a toga riding a GNU.

    127. Re:New ads by Luke_22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're trying to say "People need to open their minds and not have a right or wrong argument". I think it's great.

      by "people need to open thir minds", you actually meant "other ways? what other ways? everyone's pc!", right?
      seriously, i find those ads are quite nice, since they involve people... but i can't see any openness in presenting a lot of people with the same idea, and not saying anything else...
      openness would be having pc/mac guys working together... maybe the pc guy could "win" somehow, but openness involves multiple ideas, not just one.

      --
      "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I said I didn't know." -- Mark Twain
    128. Re:New ads by story645 · · Score: 1

      Right. John Hodgman does not represent a stereotypical PC user and Justin Long is not intended to represent a stereotypical Mac user. If you pay any attention to the ad, you'll realize that they represent personifications of a Mac and a PC. So that's why they say "I'm a Mac," and "I'm a PC."

      The point of ads is to sell things right? So, one of the best ways is to make people really identify with the things they own, 'cause loyalty is good. Spinning that the chars just identify with the OS's may be technically accurate, but they're also very much supposed to represent the user: The "creative OS is used by the cool guy, the stale OS by the boring one", and to say that wasn't the whole point of the ad is well kind of naive.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    129. Re:New ads by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly... I'm not a mac user, but I have actually gone to their site to watch their commercials (I have Tivo, so I never see commercials normally). They're that funny!

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    130. Re:New ads by Khakionion · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny, plz thx.

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    131. Re:New ads by Yosho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you can do anything on the PC that you can do on the Mac.

      Huh, I can modify and compile my own Windows kernel? ... no? Can I boot up my PC into a target disk mode that lets other computers access it as an external hard drive via firewire? ... no? Mount a ZFS filesystem? ...no? Write programs that use a POSIX API? ... only if I use a fairly slow, buggy middle layer?

      There are lots of things you can do in OS X that you can't do in Windows. Should I list more?

      And no, you can't "work faster" on the Mac than you can on Windows

      I find it interesting that you are familiar with my work habits and needs and know exactly how fast I can work in different operating systems. Are you a stalker?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    132. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to bring out the "I am a Mac" guy out and make him look like a total ass. Make him a pretentious airhead who spends all his time talking about how cool he is

      Keanu Reeves: "Uh, hi, uh, I'm a Mac. And I know kung-fu."

    133. Re:New ads by Digital+End · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Spoken like a true mac fanboy. I'm sure steve would be proud... wait he doesn't care...

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    134. Re:New ads by mweather · · Score: 5, Funny

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      If you don't like your OS being like a religion, maybe you should get out of the Cathedral and visit the Bazaar.

    135. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      Yeah, sure, because there's no lock-in with Windows.</sarcasm>

      And what lock-in is there with Apple, really? If you want to use their OS, you have to use it on their computer.... and that's pretty much it. You're free to not use their OS, and mostly Apple uses open protocols and formats. They even use a lot of open source software, and release some of their own software under open source licenses.

      People who complain about Apple's lock-in with Macintoshes (in comparison to Windows, at least) generally have very little idea of what they're talking about. You can present some arguments about iTunes DRM, but Windows Media DRM locks you in just as badly to devices and operating systems that support that DRM. Apple, on the other hand, at least uses AAC and H264, which means they're using real standards when you drop the DRM out.</tangential rant>

    136. Re:New ads by russotto · · Score: 1

      If they are representing any people (rather than just computers), it's not computer users. It's Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. Google up some old pictures of Steve Jobs, compare to Justin Long. Now find some more current pictures of Bill Gates, add a bit of weight, and compare to John Hodgeman.

    137. Re:New ads by mweather · · Score: 1

      Electro shock might even get RMS to use Windows.

    138. Re:New ads by El+Cabri · · Score: 0, Troll

      In short ad is somewhat condescending

      Yeah, condescending. That's not something that an Apple ad or an Apple fanboy would ever be, is it ?

    139. Re:New ads by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Should have done the "Chinatown" scene: "I'm a PC. I'm a human being." slap-slap "I'm a PC and a human being."

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    140. Re:New ads by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      But people are watching the commercials, laughing at them, calling their spouses in to the living room saying, "Hey, there's a new one on"... that's advertising success.

      No, that's entertainment success. Marketing success is only measured by sales numbers because that is the only purpose of marketing. At first glance, it seems like an entertaining comercial is a commercial that will generate sales, but that isn't alwasy the case.

    141. Re:New ads by jweller · · Score: 4, Funny

      and none of those parodies are as good as this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7PhJp3ciRQ

    142. Re:New ads by AncientPC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I was living a life without walls, then why would I need Windows?

    143. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried really hard to stereotype PC users as incompetent boring accountants. i hated those ads as a both a pc and a mac user. especially that one with the PC attached camera. wow. a usb camera, that's really hard, its called square peg goes in square hole (yes I know, its not square). I thought those ads made Mac users look like blithering morons - can't find the square hole, buy a mac it has a preinstalled camera to save you 10 seconds of your life and all the brain power associated with plugging something in. i assumed those ads were just for kids and college students who just want to have a pc for email and porn. they make me want to sell my mac.

    144. Re:New ads by Intron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hmmm...
        - Is the subject of many books and articles.
        - Has high priests who speak in a way that the masses don't understand.
        - Doesn't have any effect on 99% of what you do.
      In what way are operating systems not like religions?

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    145. Re:New ads by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that you are familiar with my work habits and needs and know exactly how fast I can work in different operating systems. Are you a stalker?

      I don't need to see your driving habits to know you can't drive faster in a blue Civic than you can in a red Civic.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    146. Re:New ads by mweather · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only Mac Office customers who aren't pissed are the ones who haven't used the software yet.

    147. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah! Me too! I went out and donated my Mac to the Salvation Army and my Unix boxen got sent to Africa, and I got me THREE BRAND NEW COMPUTERS WITH VISTA INSTALLED!

      Oh, boy! Talk about eye candy!

      Couldn't get the wireless at the hotel lobby to work, though...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    148. Re:New ads by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems a bit odd that Microsoft have chosen to do this now. I mean, the Mac vs. PC ads were *ages* ago - MS seem to have left it a bit late to do a direct response like this.

    149. Re:New ads by notaprguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You realize you missed his point entirely? The Apple commercials were NEVER talking about identifying with the users. It's personifying the OS itself, as if it has a personality.

      I think that's one person's interpretation. There is no mention of the OS in Apple's ads. They mention PC's and use Hodgeman as a personification of PC's...and by extension the people that use them. If that wasn't your interpretation then that's fine but I have spoken to many many people who basically think that Apple is slamming them...and trying to entice them to becoming cool if they start using Macs. The smart thing about MSFT's ads is that they don't even mention the Mac. They just make a positive statement about PC's and the wide variety of people from all walks of life who use them to do cool things. It's very democratic.

    150. Re:New ads by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      Yeah, it's taking the focus away from the KDE vs. Gnome and vi vs. emacs arguments.

    151. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not about religion. More, like, about quality.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    152. Re:New ads by thelexx · · Score: 1

      After seeing 'smug, arrogant, condescending' repeated numerous times I'm thinking two things:

      1 - La verdad es amarga.

      2 - A bunch of folks here have really low self-esteem.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    153. Re:New ads by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    154. Re:New ads by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I think the ad was great. I think they referred to the Apple ads in passing at the beginning and grew it out to be a message that people can feel good about running Microsoft.

      They made a really, really good move firing the marketing team who made the Bill and Jerry ads.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    155. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I thought "Life Without Walls" was kinda strange given it's a Microsoft Windows ad. If you don't have walls, you don't need Windows.

    156. Re:New ads by Miseph · · Score: 5, Funny

      "the representation wasn't any more absurd that the right-wing characterization"

      Did you really expect the impossible?

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    157. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      I would have been a pissed off customer, had I not learned beforehand that the thing was crippled (like, there's no Solver in its Excel).

      So now I am pissed off that Microsoft is such a pisser that they would cripple their own product.

      Oh, well... Saved myself a few bucks in the end...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    158. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      I always thought the basic message of the "I'm a Mac/PC" ads was that PCs inhibit your ability to get things done and Macs make it easier. [...] I can't see how you got the reverse out of those ads.

      Quite easily in my case. The very first adverts began with "PC" saying things like I can do spreadsheets, I can create a pie chart and "Mac" responding with "yeah, but I can play your favourite music and let you create image collections to show your friends" etc. The message was strongly about usefulness vs. "fun." (I've inverted 'fun' because it's the Apple definition, not mine - I like spreadsheets). I think one of the latest ones had "Mac" saying how he could run MS Office just as well as a PC, but this didn't really counter the overall message and was factually innaccurate as well. My favourite ad of this kind was the Linux one: Link

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    159. Re:New ads by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, this is just a rehash of the 1980's IBM add with Charlie Chaplain.

      The great strength of WinDOS and Microsoft has always been the bandwagon.

      It's what got them started and it's what keeps them from dying quickly.

      As an ad, it is f*cking brilliant compared to that Seinfeld thing.

      It still fails as persuasion for anyone with more than half a brain cell.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    160. Re:New ads by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      I agree. Apple can choose to respond in some snarky way as others have suggested but I think this essentially kills the Mac vs. PC campaign. It makes it seem snide and narrowminded.

    161. Re:New ads by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 1

      "Cannot what?"
       
      "Cannot dorky enough!"

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
    162. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lay off the guy with the beard. He never said he was a PC.

      If you watch the director's cut version, what he actually says is...

      "I'm a penguin and I have a beard". true facts.

    163. Re:New ads by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Well, at least they tried to tell you something about the product.

      It might not have been something you wanted to hear, but it was
      at least an attempt to be informative beyond an obvious logical
      fallacy.

      That third character could be useful.

      It and the Mac could compare notes and snicker at the PC together.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    164. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      These Windows add are saying: *everybody* uses Microsoft Windows. Except that it mentions Macs. Because everybody knows the PC guy. So it's kind of stupid. Kinda like the analytic approach the Microsoft users take when they keep up with Microsoft year after year, release after release of just bad products.

      I'm sure, though, they don't perceive themselves in that light.

      Nevermind. Just follow the crowd...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    165. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a mac user, who is being stroked for spending too much money, could like those ads.

      Well, except for the two non-Mac users in this very thread who like the "I'm a Mac" ads. So obviously you're already wrong.

    166. Re:New ads by Panoramix · · Score: 1

      Hear hear. I've been using Linux since 97 or so, pretty much exclusively, and I liked the Gates+Seinfeld ads. Mind, I don't intend to switch to Microsoft any time soon (whoa shiver!), but they did surprise me pleasantly. They probably would have improved my overall negative view of the company, subconsciously, a bit, had they keep it going. As in hey, so Microsoft is not just boring, mindless, afraid-to-take-risks, middle-manager wares! They have a weird, creative, experimental streak too!

      And yeah, I am aware this is just a manufactured image, like Apple's and everyone else. But it works. The human mind falls for this every time. And you know what? I actually appreciate Microsoft showing some effort trying to get a slice of my mind.

      Anyway, now this "I'm a PC" junk? Back to the same old lame, unoriginal, safe stuff. They didn't even come up with a concept, they took a tried one from Apple!

      Speaking for myself, this is fail. If I was charitative, I'd say I'm so far away from their market it was bound to fail for me, and perhaps someone in their market segment would find this appealing. But that would make this preaching to the choir, pointless anyway.

    167. Re:New ads by Kratisto · · Score: 0

      Nay, lad, ye can tell t'is good 'caurse the first comment on slashdot be an insulted mac user. Wot bloke said it was about getting yer product recognized ought to be swabbin' the deck. Yarrh, wot it's really about is makin yer competitors look like a bunch o' land lubbin' elitists.

      --
      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
    168. Re:New ads by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > you can do anything on the PC that you can do on the Mac.

      Huh, I can modify and compile my own Windows kernel? ... no? Can I boot up my PC into a target disk mode that lets other computers access it as an external hard drive via firewire? ... no? Mount a ZFS filesystem? ...no? Write programs that use a POSIX API? ... only if I use a fairly slow, buggy middle layer?

      That's a surprising laundry list of features completely irrelevant to the needs of an average desktop computer user, and not a very accurate one.

      And still, there remains that one thing that PC users can do that Mac users can't: shut the fuck up.

    169. Re:New ads by stdarg · · Score: 1

      The Apple commercials were NEVER talking about identifying with the users. It's personifying the OS itself, as if it has a personality. You're making the same mistake Bill Gates made about this whole thing.

      OF COURSE Apple is stereotyping the users. If you use a PC, you're like this. If you use a Mac, you're like that. That's basic advertising. To deny that because it wasn't explicitly stated in the ad is to ignore the idea of suggestion in advertisement.

      If they weren't trying to get users to identify with the characters, then they wouldn't have used people as characters, it's as simple as that.

    170. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the vast majority of scientific people use Linux.

      But that might be considered an own-goal, considering the general opinion of the world of scientists.

    171. Re:New ads by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      If you don't like your OS being like a religion, maybe you should get out of the Cathedral and visit the Bazaar.

      The Cathedral is where the priests are, sure, but all the cultists and evangelists hang out in the Bazaar.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    172. Re:New ads by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I think people can take things the wrong way. It's an ad but people make more of things than they are.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    173. Re:New ads by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If Charlie Brown started repeatedly kicking Lucy in the head in a fit of long-suppressed rage, we might sympathize, but I'm guessing readership would probably drop off a bit.

      I don't know about you, but I'd love to see that. I miss the dark and edgy Charlie Brown of the 1960s.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    174. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that show is about anthropomorphized computers?

    175. Re:New ads by FourthLaw · · Score: 1

      And the Seinfeld vs. Gates arguments...

      --
      Skilled in differentiating ravens from a writing desks.
    176. Re:New ads by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      What part of:

      I'm not going to debate this. Its a perception and with people perception is 90% truth.

      Did you fail to understand? I am writing this on Fedora core 8 system. I could care less, but the perception is what I said it was. If you don't like it oh well! People say Linux is too difficult. I'm not in the business of selling an OS. But from years of frustration, I am not going to rush to quote the merits of windows. I'm not a gamer, but I am systems admin. And having worked on more PC's since the early 90's than I can count. And having only owned 2 macs, I can attest Microsoft is not anywhere near "user friendly". Macs aren't perfect there is no perfect OS. Choice is good.

    177. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lock-in?? are you serious? you're comparing apple and windows and talking about lock-in?!

    178. Re:New ads by surferx0 · · Score: 1

      Right. John Hodgman does not represent a stereotypical PC user and Justin Long is not intended to represent a stereotypical Mac user. If you pay any attention to the ad, you'll realize that they represent personifications of a Mac and a PC. So that's why they say "I'm a Mac," and "I'm a PC."

      So no, Apple isn't stereotyping PC users by saying that they're boring generic business geeks. They're making fun of other PC manufacturers for making boring generic business computers. Microsoft's ad people are either retarded or they're banking on the commercial-watching public to have paid little attention to the Mac/PC ads.

      Who pays attention to ads? The mass market TV watching public certainly do not analyze TV ads in such depth.

      Commercials are made to be watched and simply evoke some kind of psychological response. The response that the "I'm a Mac" ads give is that people who use PC's need to get with the times and use a Mac. It doesn't matter whether you analyze the commercial into saying that they are representing the OS and not the users, the mass market public will think what they think based on what they saw regardless of what the commercial actually means.

    179. Re:New ads by houghi · · Score: 1

      As if you were talking about Windows releases over the years.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    180. Re:New ads by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The real question is not whether or not you can
      cobble together something under Windows to do the
      same thing that comes built into a Mac but rather
      would you want to?

      We could change some of those ads to make them
      "more truthful" and include all of the gory
      details and the Mac would still come out looking
      better.

      Some other guy whined about the "burden" of installing
      a 3rd party aftermarket webcam. Well under Windows that
      can really turn out to be the case. This is the platform
      where they put little red warning labels on certain USB
      devices warning you to NOT PLUG IT IN before installing
      the driver.

      Is it little wonder then that overeducated Windows users
      end up having their local Linux user install their stuff
      for them?

      While you are whining about it's no big deal to install
      your own USB devices you can whine about how it's no
      big deal to install your own OS while you're at it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    181. Re:New ads by kat_skan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, when I saw that, lock-in wasn't even the sort of walls that came to mind. I've got a fair number of devices running some variant of Windows, and what strikes me about them is how the most recent offerings have gone from "Where do you want to go today?" to "You can't get there from here."

      Vista Business can't play DVDs. You need third-party software. Vista Premium can't use a scanner or a fax modem. You need third-party software. And it can't ever join a domain. Vista Basic won't let you use Aero, so you can't change the freaking color scheme. XP can't play DX10 games, including Halo 2, which is only a DX10 game so that it won't work on XP. OEM versions freak out if you upgrade too much, and you have to call for permission to keep using it. And the 64-bit versions of everything are an entire separate product, so upgrade enough and you're buying another copy regardless.

      Office is subdivided a dozen different ways, with no apparent rhyme or reason. If you want a word processor, a spreadsheet and a desktop publishing app, you either buy them separately or get the "Small Business" suite that costs $450 because it also has PowerPoint, Outlook and Accounting bundled in.

      The Windows on my phone arbitrarily doesn't have Pocket Office. It syncs with Outlook, but not with the PIM apps included with Vista. And even if you have Outlook, it doesn't have a notepad, so it doesn't sync Outlook notes.

      Then there's their products whose entire raison d'être is to keep you from using your software. There's PlaysForSure, which was unceremoniously dropped in favor of the Zune's new DRM. They turned the servers off, so the computer your PlaysForSure music is on now is the last one it'll ever be on. And there's Windows Genuine Advantage, literally designed to make your OS break if it suspects you shouldn't be running it, or even just at the whims of the authentication servers.

      And the worst of it is, that's just first-party stuff. All barriers Microsoft has erected between their own freaking products. Life without walls, indeed.

    182. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Errr... no. The creative OS isn't used by the the cool guy, the creative OS is the cool guy. And the stale OS is the boring one, not the person using it. Now if you want to claim that advertising that your product is cool works because people think owning cool products will make them cool, I won't disagree. But the straight-up literal meaning of the commercials is that PCs running Windows are metaphorically comparable to lame, neurotic geeks that are difficult to work with.

    183. Re:New ads by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Someone hasn't seen tropic thunder.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    184. Re:New ads by FourthLaw · · Score: 1

      I agree that the shark guy was good. The pause after the guy saying he has a beard was also funny, but I'm guessing that 90% of the commericial's audience wouldn't get the "guys with beards run unix" reference that I assume was implied.

      Didn't pick that up the first time through. The lack of suspenders was just too subtle for me, I guess.

      --
      Skilled in differentiating ravens from a writing desks.
    185. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Cathedral has the accepted religion and the Bazaar has the more offbeat religions, but they all have as much validity as the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

    186. Re:New ads by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Slightly off topic.

      I had a conversation with a highly intelligent individual in her early thirties.

      She had no idea that Apple still made computers. She has seen Apple stores and never went inside. She assumed that they were for selling iPod-related stuff.

      I pointed her to http://www.apple.com/imac/ . Needless to say, she was blown away. I told her that next time she went to the mall, stop by the Apple store.

      I have an awful suspicion that she is not unique in thinking that Apple got out of the PC market around when the iPod came out.

      That being said, I'm pretty sure her next computer is going to be a max. :-)

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    187. Re:New ads by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      non-sequesters? What does that have to do with the price of halibut?

      Must have been Firefox's spellchecker hinting that I should be using more open-source software

    188. Re:New ads by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

      And what do blasphemers, witches, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs all have in common? So, if that ad weighs the same as a duck. . . OW! OW! Stop hitting me! Run away!! Run away!!. . .

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
    189. Re:New ads by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      "Biggest mistake that I think Microsoft made? Not back porting DX10 to XP."

      Wow. Ow. Of all the idiotic things MS has done, this is the worst?

      "Second biggest mistake. Not making Vista 64 bit only."

      What?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    190. Re:New ads by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The Apple commercials were NEVER talking about identifying with the users. It's personifying the OS itself, as if it has a personality.

      Sure, that's the metaphor of the ad, but it would be pretty naive to ignore the effect of associating a "boring" character with PCs and a "cool" character with Macs. You don't have to beat the viewer over the head with "Macs make you cool and PCs make you boring", they'll make the connection themselves. Advertising has been doing this for a really long time.

    191. Re:New ads by kosanovich · · Score: 1

      In what way are operating systems not like religions?

      In that you can use many different ones to accomplish the tasks you want and not have them contradict each other and not be a hypocrite for doing so.

    192. Re:New ads by Goody · · Score: 1

      I apparently pissed off some Apple zealot who has mod points today. :-)

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    193. Re:New ads by mrsbrisby · · Score: 1

      Because the one thing I'm sure Microsoft is saying, is that they want more choices for the desktop.

      Meanwhile, if you're tired of people using arguments involving "right and wrong" with things you have no better argument for, go away. This is slashdot, where everything is either right, or wrong.

    194. Re:New ads by Goody · · Score: 1

      The Hodgeman/Long ads are amusing and entertaining, but just how successful have they been? Has Apple really increased their market share significantly? And while the Apple ads are funny, Apple has unknowingly pigeon-holed the PC and Mac into stereotypes. Microsoft capitalized on that. Apple may have ridden their initial brilliant idea too far.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    195. Re:New ads by phanboy_iv · · Score: 1

      I had rather envisioned it as both the Mac and PC looking at the third person and being alternately scared, confused, and uncomprehending.

    196. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You sound like you're very sensitive about your choice in computers.

      Yeah, I guess it's true that *every* product is trying to create some kind of a subconscious association. "If you drink Coke, you'll be happy and cool and have lots of friends." Or maybe, "If your kids use MS Windows, they'll grow up to be famous." So if you want to argue that Apple is trying to make their product have an association with being cool, then I won't argue against you.

      On the other hand, it's very clear to anyone with even half a brain that the characters represent the computers themselves, and not the people using those computers. In the only depiction of a user I can think of, they have a yoga instructor being a dissatisfied PC user.

      So no, the subtext isn't that PC users are uptight businessmen, but rather that Windows users are dissatisfied with their dysfunctional PCs.

    197. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Yes. Pirated Windows is definitely non-elite.

      However, the cost of Microsoft Home Licenses can be as high as % 7.8 of GNI (Gross National Income) per capita in some countries (in this case, Brazil, it being a middle-income country - it is much higher for, say, Bangladesh).

      So the you realize it's a joke - or another load of royal M$ BS - when they portray Indians and Africans in that commercial.

      Of course, the ad is targeted at US Americans. But they are basically treating the target audience as a stupid bunch of uninformed people, telling them: "See? We're all are one big happy family of consumers of M$ products." Which is a lie. A statistical, numerical, monetary lie.

      So any which way I look at this commercial, it keeps saying: "Gee. I buy Microsoft Windows. I am an uniformed consumer that makes stupid buying decisions regarding technology."

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    198. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, by cancelling the Seinfeld ad campaign, they just donated a ton of money to Jerry's Kids... and now the new one is just as brain dead... of course thats what you can expect from the head "I'm a PC" guy.

    199. Re:New ads by Dillon2112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apple may say in the ads that Windows is more annoying than OS X, but in reality, they provide bootcamp and support users who choose to run both OS X and Windows on their Mac computers. So from the religion perspective, Apple just wants you to buy their hardware...they don't mind if you run Windows on it. Arguing that MS is somehow taking the high ground by *not* saying "Apple has it wrong" is kind of strange.

      Further, in the Mac ads, the people are standing in for actual machines. In the MS ad, people are standing in for...people. So the whole "I'm a PC" thing has kind of an odd ring to it. If anything, it is pushing a notion of your identity being strongly linked to what operating system you use. Since there are no "users" in the Mac ads, that tone is absent. From this perspective, the MS ads are more religious than the Mac ads, since they are defining *who people are* in terms of what kind of computer they use.

    200. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Right, lots of people don't pay a lot of attention to ads. I could watch the Microsoft ad and think it's about people claiming to be "PC", i.e. politically correct. People not-watching ads can come up with all sorts of random conclusions.

      But on the other hand, I agree that Microsoft's ad people may be relying on lots of people having misunderstood Apple's ads in a similar way. It might work too, because you generally don't lose money betting on the general public to be stupid or poorly informed.

    201. Re:New ads by lilomar · · Score: 1

      But how do you know she^Whe is a witch? (no girls on teh internets)

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    202. Re:New ads by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      He turned me into a newt!

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    203. Re:New ads by SocioDude · · Score: 1

      My word, I agree! It seems people I've run into on Slashdot promote their operating system with more zealotry than I've ever seen of people promoting their religion.

      Then again, this is the internet. It's not like it's a place for rational debate anyways.

    204. Re:New ads by Dillon2112 · · Score: 1

      Dead on. In the Mac ad where the PC gets sick, it is *not* the implication that PC users are getting sick, it's that PCs get viruses. In the ad where there are two "agents" that the PC has to ask permission from to do anything, it isn't the user asking permission, it is the PC. In even the most recent ad, Hodgman refers to "my frustrated users don't need to hear about that." Yeah, I'm going with the clear implication that he *is* the computer, and is not representing his users.

    205. Re:New ads by CaptPungent · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't saying shit about the users. I'm even a PC user and I can at least see that much. -1 FAIL

      --
      C Pungent
    206. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's think. The Mac guy violently pushes the PC guy into a box. Nope, that isn't like him...

      Or maybe the Mac dude tries to make fun or stereotype the PC guy? No, no. He's a nice guy. He's just cool and doing his thing. It's the PC guy that gets in trouble all by his own doing.

      This argument that the PC guy was "singled out" has nothing to do with the Mac character. It's all in your head, sorry to say.

      The Apple ads are just comedy. The Microsoft-camp advertising "wizards"tried comedy but it was awkward (as awkward as Gates wiggling his butt).

      My bet is these series of Microsoft ads will degenerate into "we're all one big happy family" kinda advertising. Which is pretty much as standard as it gets. Not really original or inspiring. Much like the difference between a PC box and a Mac design. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: try as you may, you can't break into the "cool zone" with Windows.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    207. Re:New ads by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that the Seinfeld ads were purposefully bad so that these would look good? NOW those ads make sense!

    208. Re:New ads by CaptPungent · · Score: 1
      Have you even seen the Apple ads? The characters talk specifically from the viewpoint of being a damn computer. They are defining the computers themselves, not the users. The point of the ad is to make the Apple computers look cool so the users want that product instead of the PC. It has nothing to do with defining the users.

      The only way your statement would make sense is if nerdy guys would see the PC and go "that's me, I want to be PC". That's not what the ads are about.

      --
      C Pungent
    209. Re:New ads by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Ages ago? I just saw a new one like 3 weeks ago. But then again, it was SO last month....

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    210. Re:New ads by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Arguing which OS is "the best" is like arguing about which color is "the best". "Quality" is just yet another way of saying "the best".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    211. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      You're getting all fuddy-duddy and hissy.
      You're a beige box.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    212. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really doesnt matter what Apple did or didnt do. M$ is attempting to associate the PC with everyday people... the people who do/will buy and use their product.

      The Apple ads may be personifying OS's, but people still relate to the hip or geek person on the screen, and aspire to be like the one they're attracted to by buying

    213. Re:New ads by Cormophyte · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      I don't know about that. Both are pretty esoteric topics and I've spent a lot more time fiddling with my computer than I ever did contemplating my beliefs on the existence of a deity or deities.

      In fact, considering that a person's choice of religion doesn't necessarily change whether they're a good person or not (unless your religion involves bothering me about it at dinner time, they're bad people), but your choice of computer will cost you time out of your life if it's the wrong decision, I'd say that your choice of OS is vitally important and should be argued passionately if you believe you're right.

    214. Re:New ads by MagdJTK · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to Mitchell and Webb, who did the same adverts for the UK. Although they've done lots of things together, they are most famous for the cringe-inducing, yet totally amazing Peep Show (which America will be missing out on it seems, as your networks seem to refuse to air anything that isn't recasted and watered down).

    215. Re:New ads by Hazard+J.+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Microsoft just failed on an epic scale. They didn't take the time to understand the Apple ads, so now they're lashing back at thin air.

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life. Microsoft obviously didn't get that.

      Mark my words: These ads will preach to the choir (the people who already hate the Mac commercials) but will do nothing to asuage those commericals. If anything, Microsoft has just drawn MORE attention to Apple.

      Way to go, Microsoft.

      Mark your words? Are you going to tell MS they will 'rue the day' next? I hate to be the one to break it to all you Mac lovers -- you're just as geeky as everyone else.. the Mac Personal Style is not included in the box.

    216. Re:New ads by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me but I've found some especially those that refer to Microsoft's business practices and their methods of maintaining their monopoly to be devastatingly accurate.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    217. Re:New ads by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Several people here have posited that the Mac ads are effective at communicating the "benefits" of using a Mac, and the "detriments" to using a PC, and most recently, to using Vista. You're suggesting that they've done the opposite.

      If you're right, and the ads are NOT largely effective, then I have a couple of questions:

      1) Why did Microsoft feel a need to respond to these ads specifically?

      and

      2) Did the perception of "Vista sucks" come out of nowhere, out of reality, or some other conspiracy against Microsoft, since these ads weren't effective at convincing people that Vista (and not them) was the problem?

      Clearly, I'm missing something.

    218. Re:New ads by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      So two years after Apple brought out those commercials, Microsoft makes "parodies" that are lamer than any parodies that could be found on YouTube 2 years ago?

      I didn't say the COMMERCIAL is a parody, I was countering the argument that the guy was a stereotype. He's Apple's stereotype and Microsoft is parodying the character for the purpose of the commercial... jeez.

    219. Re:New ads by MagdJTK · · Score: 1

      I don't need to see your driving habits to know you can't drive faster in a blue Civic than you can in a red Civic.

      But the red one appears to be driving away much, much faster.

    220. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      "Life without walls" ?! You thought that was great. LOL

      To me, the image I get from that stupid little irritating motto is:

      a bunch of advertising a-holes sitting around big tables in high-rises looking out their windows, trying to come up with something clever.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    221. Re:New ads by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Everyone knows they would user sharks with lasers.

    222. Re:New ads by Artuir · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone who these ads are targeted at even remotely cares for any of the logic or points you just presented, at all.

      Really. There's a time when some geeks are just overanalyzing way too much. You're there.

    223. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Did the perception of "Vista sucks" come out of nowhere?

      Actually, I contend that yes, it did. It's a few legitimate bad experiences which got spun up a ton into a great big ball of FUD. I use Vista as my main OS, and if it were even a shred as bad as people say it is, it would be absolutely unusable... but it works quite well. I know others who have had the same experience. Hm. Sounds like a classic case of "people blowing things out of proportion" to me.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    224. Re:New ads by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      "While the characters try to come off as being "cheeky and cute", they just end up looking like ditzy, ignorant, darwin-award candidates In short ad is somewhat condescending."
       
      So they did a good job copying Mac?

    225. Re:New ads by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      I invited my roommate to watch this new commercial last night and coworkers were talking about it today. Everyone agrees that this was a "much better" commercial portraying PC (funny how PC is synonymous with Windows) people as less pretentious than the mac crowd. What's more, it has an implicit reassurance that Windows is a ubiquitous OS as there is no doubt every single person featured, uses a PC to some extent. Good commercial. //bought a mac last weekend

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    226. Re:New ads by ari_j · · Score: 1

      She turned me into a newt!

    227. Re:New ads by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      Good for laughs, but not in the slighest bit accurate. Wii would be more like a ten year-old girl - just plain creepy to see old folks having fun with it. PS3 would be like a $1000 a night call girl - elegant and fun, but WAY out of your league. :)

    228. Re:New ads by ari_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have only one hope in all this, and that is that Ellen Feiss gets to be in another ad. And I kind of want that ad to be her saying "I'm a PC! Ooh, that paper looks really good!" and then eating the paper.

      With love,
      ari_j
      President, Ellen Feiss Fan Club*

      * - Okay, maybe not. But our official team name for programming competitions back in college when the ad was playing on TV was the Ellen Feiss Fan Club. It was a simpler time. It was a happier time.

    229. Re:New ads by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      The two guys represent the COMPUTERS (or maybe the OS, whatever), not the users.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    230. Re:New ads by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      I think he know Bazaar quite well

    231. Re:New ads by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      What part of "/. is a DISCUSSION site" do you not understand? Please, stop going on an on like you have been in computers longer than I have, or that I'm a gamer (both are bad assumptions).

      The next time you don't want to debate a point, I suggest you not post it on a discussion board.

    232. Re:New ads by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      It's typical Microsoft Strategy -- copy others(Mac ads) and turn out a second-rate imitation.

      You mean like the (fake) Microsoft iPod?

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    233. Re:New ads by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Then maybe the average person is better off with a Blackberry than a PC or Mac.

      Macs are better than PCs for their photo collection

      In what way? Maybe that used to be true, but certainly not anymore.

      better for web browsing and emails because there is less concern about viruses, and just as good as PCs for word processing.

      Only because there are far fewer Macs / Linux users, but there's nothing inherent about Mac or Linux that makes them any more secure. It's the same reason Civics are the most stolen car; there are simply tons of them out there.

    234. Re:New ads by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      The Gates/Seinfeld ads were an attempt to be really creative and iconoclastic. People hate that. They want faux creative and faux iconoclastic. As Fry remarked once, "Clever things make people feel stupid, and unexpected things make them feel scared."

      So rather than being entertained by interesting commercials (I try to avoid commercials, but if I have to watch them I prefer them to be interesting), we'll get the new ads which are not interesting. Just like Apple's ads are not interesting, come to think of it.

      Honestly, the Apple ads are similar to the Chad ads from Alltel, or the Welcome to the Next Level ads from SEGA. Or the "plumber boy" ads from Sony which basically ripped off SEGA's ad campaign, but were entertainingly extra-obnoxious. I'll admit, that when I was a SEGA partisan, I had fun with the SEGA ads, I loved telling my brother all about Blast Processing knowing full well it was somewhat disingenuos marketing. Since I'm not an Apple fan, I find the Apple ads only slightly amusing, sometimes. Mostly something to fast forward through or a cue to get a drink.

      However, the new ads will likely be successful. See this article, "I'm a PC" ad: Finally, Microsoft gets it.

      Honestly, you are probably too intelligent for ads to work on you the way they are supposed to. Advertising targetted toward you will be more subtle and harder to pin down. That's why advertisers employ psychologists, after all.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    235. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You sound like you're very sensitive about your choice in computers.

      Not sure what that is supposed to mean.

      Yeah, I guess it's true that *every* product is trying to create some kind of a subconscious association.

      Many products don't try and link "be cool = use our products". Most Coke commercials for example, contrary to what you claimed, generally carry a different message. (The Polar Bear campaign, for example...) They are trying to build subconscious mental associations... but its not usualy "If you drink Coke, you'll be happy and cool and have lots of friends." (That would be true of Pepsi or most beer ads...)

      And even of the companies that do link "cool = use our products" most most of them that do only do the positive half: "be cool/have fun = use our product"

      Apple is one of the few that directly do the "be cool = use our product AND be lame = use other product" (Pepsi springs to mind, but that's about it)

      On the other hand, it's very clear to anyone with even half a brain that the characters represent the computers themselves, and not the people using those computers.

      I agree. The characters clearly represent the computers. However, I think its equally clear to anyone with half a brain that the stereotype extends to the users, and that you are supposed to think "I'm cool like Mac, I should use a Mac."

      In the only depiction of a user I can think of, they have a yoga instructor being a dissatisfied PC user.

      And? Clearly, according to the ad she was using the wrong type of computer. She was cool like a Mac, all flexible and colorful and free thinking -- she didn't belong in the world of cheap suits and cubicles and was unhappy there -- she should have been using a Mac. That was the entire message.

      So no, the subtext isn't that PC users are uptight businessmen, but rather that Windows users are dissatisfied with their dysfunctional PCs. ...in large part because these Windows users aren't uptight businessmen; because these Windows users don't belong in cheap suits crammed into cubicles. They are like a fish out of water, they belong with Mac's, where things are open and colorful and fun.

      I agree that the characters are clearly literally the computers not the users, but you'd have to be pretty close minded not to agree that the characters are also metaphor for the type of users suited to each OS too.

    236. Re:New ads by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      If they would just make Entourage work with Exchange 2000 I would be a happy guy. -works in a hybrid office -tired of installing VMs just so Mac folks can use outlook.

    237. Re:New ads by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      I was born as a Mac IIe, upgraded to a Mac IIcx pretty quickly, went through that awkward Performa stage as a teenager until I figured things out toward the end of high school and became a Power Mac. I really took off in college though, as a dual G4 tower. But I changed during my year abroad in Europe to a svelte TiBook. After a disorienting state in my early twenties as a Mac Mini, I'm happy to say I'm back as a MacBook Pro, feeling as groovy as ever. What a long strange trip it's been!

    238. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Ok, but just for clarification, there's no claim here that the characters "Mac" and "PC" came from that show, but just the actors who played those characters in one country also played other characters on a show from that country?

      Because what confused the hell out of me was "And for anyone who ever used to watch the British TV show in which these characters appeared together (before they turned into computers)".

      And yes, Americans miss out on some fine British television. For some reason, the only British show I can think of that we get on a major channel is Dr. Who.

    239. Re:New ads by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      They didn't take the time to understand the Apple ads, so now they're lashing back at thin air.

      I respectfully disagree. If anything, Apple didn't understand their own ads.

      Apple's ads were popular, memorable and successful because of a blundering but lovable fool called PC. PC, as The Economist said, is the one you'd invite over for dinner.

      Mac is cool and easy going but he's smug and comes off as a twat. He's not as likeable as PC which is funny considering the fact that he's the one who is representing the product that Apple is trying to sell.

      So the ad company that Microsoft chose saw an opportunity--they would build on the likeability of PC.

      That was the point of the Gates/Seinfeld commercials...Gates *is* PC, and they are showing the two of them tool around in ways that make PC seem even more likeable. The new ad furthers that by saying that everyone is a PC in their own way.

      Will it work? That remains to be seen.

    240. Re:New ads by harry666t · · Score: 1

      I'm neopagan, you insensitive clod!

    241. Re:New ads by roggg · · Score: 1

      Has Apple really increased their market share significantly?

      There's not much analysis for the second half of 2008, but there is a TON of articles on Apple's market share gains through 2007, and Q1 2008. How much is due to the Hodgman/Long ads? No way to say, but the answer to your question is an emphatic yes.

    242. Re:New ads by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      ipods don't have mindshare? People don't know they are made by apple? Seriously, the thought that the average user doesn't know there is another OS is crap. they may not know linux, but they know about apple/mac.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    243. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Most Coke commercials for example, contrary to what you claimed, generally carry a different message. (The Polar Bear campaign, for example...)

      Those polar bears looked pretty cool to me.

      They are trying to build subconscious mental associations... but its not usualy "If you drink Coke, you'll be happy and cool and have lots of friends." (That would be true of Pepsi or most beer ads...)

      OK, so I'm not even going to bother with Coke even though I'm sure I could dig up some ads that prove my point, since it you seem to agree with me that creating subconscious associations, including associations with "coolness", is extremely common.

      However, I think its equally clear to anyone with half a brain that the stereotype extends to the users

      Only if you're shocking bad at understanding how metaphors work, but I'll grant you that most people are shockingly bad at understanding metaphors.

      and that you are supposed to think "I'm cool like Mac, I should use a Mac."

      In about the same way that whenever ads use celebrity spokespeople you're supposed to think, "I'm cool like that spokesman, so I should use that product."

      And? Clearly, according to the ad she was using the wrong type of computer.

      Yes, so clearly there are PC users who are cool (according to these ads). So the commercials aren't supposed to be saying that PC users are dull and stupid and boring, but just that the computers are. Which was what I was saying, and you were disagreeing with.

      And *of course* the commercial is trying to argue that, if you aren't using a Mac you're using the wrong computer. It's a commercial for Macs. I mean, WTF? You think they should put out commercials saying, "You shouldn't use our computer!"?

      She was a businesswoman and a yoga instructor who was frustrated with her computer, and the "entire message" was that she would be less frustrated if she had chosen to use a Mac.

      I agree that the characters are clearly literally the computers not the users, but you'd have to be pretty close minded not to agree that the characters are also metaphor for the type of users suited to each OS too.

      On the contrary, I think the message of the ads are that no users are suited to Windows, because Windows isn't very good in general and the Vista is a pain to use. Now, you might want to argue that the ads' claim isn't true, that Windows is very good and Vista isn't a pain to use, but that's another discussion entirely.

    244. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      Because Microsoft would never lock you in..

    245. Re:New ads by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "People need to open their minds and not have a right or wrong argument".

      Yes, but the want people to open their minds so much their brains fall out.

      When people say you need to "open your mind" they usually mean "You need to accept what I am saying without question."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    246. Re:New ads by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows is bloated, dim witted, and isn't nimble.

      There is a difference between stereotyping and accuracy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    247. Re:New ads by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It was better in the same way that 0.0000011 is bigger than 0.000001099.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    248. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Of course, they can't do that without insulting everybody who has ever bought a Mac...

      That depends of course. It turns out that the regular Windows guy wasn't insulted for being called a nerd (As Apple DOES in their advertisement).

      So, I'm guessing the reason why you're claiming Apple users can be more susceptible to criticism than Windows users, is because they REALLY are airheads, and even worse, with a tremendous ego.

    249. Re:New ads by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In Asia it's common for people to practice more than one religion.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    250. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure Funny is the proper moderation... perhaps Insightful.

    251. Re:New ads by nschubach · · Score: 1

      (in honor of today)

      And the Pirates vs. Ninjas arguments.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    252. Re:New ads by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Ok, but just for clarification, there's no claim here that the characters "Mac" and "PC" came from that show, but just the actors who played those characters in one country also played other characters on a show from that country?

      No, they just ha(d|ve) a sketch show and the Mac/PC stuff was never part of it.

      Very British humour, and IIRC there wasn't a laugh track, so I can't see it airing in the US.

    253. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most liberals are depressed idiots with their heads stuck. So, you really can't parody them without them getting bent out of shape.

      As a person who is avidly against what Obama stands for (higher taxes, redistribution of wealth, full out socialism) I would not, at all, equate him to terrorism, but rather to something more dangerous, socialism. It will be a definitive way of ruining the US economy and driving businesses out of the country - jobs overseas, and reducing the ability of the wealthy person or business to hire the middle and lower class... they'll have less money to spend.

      Take note, I also think McCain is an idiot... he's as straight a talker as a snake in the grass. But at least he might have the sense to use Mitt Romney in an economic position or as an adviser. As I said, though, McCain is an idiot.

    254. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few people really want to use Windows.

      I don't want to use ANY operating system. That is the point being missed. It is missed with KDE4 which went from a clean and easily-made-out-of-the-way GUI to a cashjew thingy that won't disappear and insist I play with spaztoys. On the PC, I'm in firefox, accounting software, gimp, browsing files. If I actually want to USE the OS, then that is missing the point. The programs use the OS, I use the programs. ANYTHING in the way of that relation is a mistake.

    255. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme a fucking break.

      I assume you are a typical /. poster and would require such a break to be no longer than 42 seconds.

    256. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's absurd. I keep all my agitated electric eels in my hovercraft.

    257. Re:New ads by nschubach · · Score: 1

      "I'm a PC, and a human being. Not a human doing; not a human thinking. A human being."

      Yeah, that made me go: "huh!"

      If I understand it, they want people to understand that PCs aren't for doing anything, aren't for thinking about anything, just sitting there... being. I guess it's true to the other commercial in some regards. Don't think, don't do, just watch this fun video of Mojave we made!

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    258. Re:New ads by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      vi vs. emacs argument?!

      Come on... how is this an argument. Emacs is clearly superior.

    259. Re:New ads by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The Flying Spaghetti Monster is TRUTH, nothing can match its eternal validity.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    260. Re:New ads by Mr.+Beatdown · · Score: 1

      Zing!

      --
      My fellow Americans, let's restore the death penalty for child rapists. Let's do it . . . for the children.
    261. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yes, so clearly there are PC users who are cool (according to these ads).

      "cool PC users" are like "fish out of water".

      If I claim fish are water users and you point at a poor fish flopping around on land, about to expire, you can't legitimately say "clearly there are fish who are land users". That's absurd, the fish in question may in fact be on land, but it belongs in the water.

      (yes I'm aware there are some fish that cope just fine on land... but those ones aren't flopping around in desperation, and I'm talking about one that is.)

      That cool yoga instructor is our poor gasping fish; she's clearly not in her element. She may in fact be struggling to "use a PC", but she doesn't belong there, she belongs on a Mac. She's not any more a "PC user" than a gasping floundering fish is a "land creature".

      She was a businesswoman and a yoga instructor who was frustrated with her computer, and the "entire message" was that she would be less frustrated if she had chosen to use a Mac.

      Just as a gasping fish would be less frustrated if it was put into water, where it belonged.

      On the contrary, I think the message of the ads are that no users are suited to Windows,

      Sort of. The ads suggest that cheap-suit nerdy petty cubicle dwellers are suited to windows. But that effectively says to everyone individually that "YOU are not suited to windows" because no one is supposed to self-identify as a 'user suited to windows' by the above definition. So even if you you happen to be using windows, you aren't really a windows user, and that's why you are so miserable. You are a fish out of water, come in and swim free.

    262. Re:New ads by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      This is simply stating we have a large market share, which everyone already knows, or doesn't care

      The Microsoft ad is saying that they have a diverse market share. Again, attempting to counter Apple's elitist spin. (Yeah, a large market share, too; that's an appeal to belonging. That is very powerful in herd animals like Consumers.)

      I would also note that there's also a "we're cool too!" part of that message. I'm not sure if it'll catch on or not... but it's there.

      Microsoft is battling a negative perception. It becomes really apparent when you look over their latest marketing web site:

      This epic struggle explains why we make what we make and do what we do. The thing that gets us out of bed every day is the prospect of creating pathways above, below, around and through walls. To start a dialogue between hundreds of devices, billions of people and a world of ideas. To lift up the smallest of us. And catapult the most audacious of us. But, most importantly, to connect all of us to the four corners of our own digital lives and to each other. To go on doing the little stuff, the big stuff, the crazy stuff and that ridiculously necessary stuff. On our own or together. This is more than software we're talking about. It's an approach to life. An approach dedicated to engineering the absence of anything that might stand in the way...of life. Today, more than one billion people worldwide have Windows®. Which is just another way of saying we have each other.

      -- http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-vs-walls.aspx

      That this message is chock full of irony is another subject.

    263. Re:New ads by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      In Asia it's common for people to practice more than one religion.

      ...And as a result they never take the time to get any one quite right.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    264. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life without walls...except walls around source code, and listening to music/playing videos that you didn't buy more than one copy of, and adding features to your operating system without paying more money for an "Uprade" in which we turn those features back on...

    265. Re:New ads by Intron · · Score: 1

      So still a lot like operating systems.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    266. Re:New ads by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      Personally, I thought the ads were great.

      Way better than Windows Vista, too.

      --
      --Matthew
    267. Re:New ads by syousef · · Score: 1

      I think the ad was pretty good... much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

      That wasn't difficult. I think when the word polymorphism appears in a mainstream ad, it's hard to miss that someone fucked up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    268. Re:New ads by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Find some balls and try again AC.

    269. Re:New ads by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Only if you buy from dell, hp, acer, etc. If you build your own machine, you do not have to pay the microsoft tax.

    270. Re:New ads by Hucko · · Score: 1

      They must have seen the previews. I used to hate previews but it has saved me from some appallingly dumb movies that I'm starting to like them. Of course that they had Ben Stiller's name up was also a hint that it may be neanderthal.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    271. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      If I claim fish are water users and you point at a poor fish flopping around on land, about to expire, you can't legitimately say "clearly there are fish who are land users". That's absurd, the fish in question may in fact be on land, but it belongs in the water.

      Weird metaphor. Here's a weirder one. If I claim no one is a lava user and you point to a fish being destroyed by lava and say, "Nope, see, lave is only bad for fish," then.... well we have a whole lot of nonsense going on here.

      That cool yoga instructor is our poor gasping fish; she's clearly not in her element.

      Yeah, well it doesn't seem like anyone is in their element when dealing with PC. It's not like they show a bunch of geeky business users getting along famously with PC. There is one ad where they show a whole bunch of broken PCs, while in another ad Mac gets all dressed up in a suit to go to a business meeting.

      I'm sorry, what's your point again?

      The ads suggest that cheap-suit nerdy petty cubicle dwellers are suited to windows.

      Ok, when? When does it ever suggest that even nerdy petty cubicle dwellers would do well to buy a PC? In fact, I can't remember a single instance of anyone particularly liking PC in the commercials, except maybe for Mac.

    272. Re:New ads by BBF_BBF · · Score: 1

      Car Analogy : I got in my car and drove to work - which make of car was it : I don't know, and don't care, it got me here anyway....

      That's got to be one of the worst analogies you could ever choose... the Auto Industry DEPENDS on style to sell cars.

      That's why there are so many different car makers, models per car maker, colours per model, and the fact that the cars are tweaked every year.

    273. Re:New ads by poity · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is actually hurt by the condescension perceived in Apple's ads -- you can point out an identifiable characteristic of something and recognize it as unpalatable without needing to have had your ego bruised.

      It's like when some guy is behaving like an asshole near you -- you don't need to have been personally attacked in order to point out that the guy is being an asshole.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    274. Re:New ads by neokushan · · Score: 1

      (I know I'm going to get modded off-topic for this, but I can't help myself trying to be helpful).

      I have no idea where you live, but in the UK we have a few services that offer free screenings of films before they come out. The most popular is www.seefilmfirst.com , I've probably seen maybe 20 films for free because of them. It's entirely pot luck on what you get to see, but like the previews you speak of, they've saved me wasting good money on rubbish films. I managed to see Tropic Thunder through this site a couple of weeks before it was even out in the cinemas here (I'm not sure if it's even out yet) and you're not far wrong, it's a bit of a stupid film that could have been a whole lot better, but in saying that I enjoyed it all the same.
      Anyway, what I'm trying to say is look around for some free screening sites like this, they're well worth it.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    275. Re:New ads by mweather · · Score: 1

      I'm so glad my office banned Outlook.

    276. Re:New ads by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Ok, when? When does it ever suggest that even nerdy petty cubicle dwellers would do well to buy a PC?

      What? Are you serious? In most of the ads in the series.

      Or did you mean for me to provide you a particular quote where it was explicitly verbalized?

      "Suggest" from Merriam Webster:

      2 a: to call to mind by thought or association b: to serve as a motive or inspiration for

      But I'm sure you already knew that and are just deliberately being obtuse. Now that you've reduced this to a silly dispute on the interpretation of common words, there is nothing more to say.

    277. Re:New ads by freddie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The vast majority of people -- and yes, creative people -- use PCs.

      I hate it when that phrase is used "creative people". Its generally a term used by artist-types to make themselves feel elite, implying that other people are not creative.

      The truth being is that engineers have to be more creative because our work is measured by the exacting standards of nature and of mathematics. We're creative at a level that those people cannot begin to comprehend, and they know it.

    278. Re:New ads by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1
    279. Re:New ads by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

      vi vs. emacs arguments are pointless.....vim is the best.

    280. Re:New ads by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "ctors in the Apple commercials are saying that they're walking-talking personifications of the respective systems. But, undeniably, they also typify the stereotypes of the respective user communities, and therefore they are an extension of the time-honored "all the cool people use Macs, all PC users are incompetent dullards" marketing spin."

      That's very deniable, as it isn't true.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    281. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No, seriously. When does it ever suggest that *anyone* is better off buying a PC?

    282. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Because what confused the hell out of me was "And for anyone who ever used to watch the British TV show in which these characters appeared together (before they turned into computers)".

      The characters of "Mac" and "PC" in the adverts were essentially the same characters that the actors played in "Peep Show," a series which preceded the ads. The character played by the PC actor was a boring and rather sad loser. His friend (only through lack of options, really), was a tosser who thought he was God's Gift and was pretty mean to him. Thus for anyone who used to watch this series, they have indeed seen these characters before and thus the ad campaign is flawed for such people. Apple may be trying to present PC as boring, but they also present Mac as a waster and a tosser.

      And no, it's seriously unlikely to get a mainstream US showing due to lack of moral overtones, lack of tastefulness and aforementioned lack of laugh track. You should track it down and try it and then you'll see what I mean about the ads.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    283. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      The Mac ads were already an insult to people running Windows. It didn't take until this Microsoft ad to make me think that!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    284. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      So the you realize it's a joke - or another load of royal M$ BS - when they portray Indians and Africans in that commercial.

      India is about to land an explorer on the Moon and I don't know what computer systems you think are predominantly used by most African nations but I'm reasonably confident in stating that it's not Macs. So you tell me why it's "bullshit" that there should be Indian or African people in that ad shown as Windows users.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    285. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      What part of: "I'm not going to debate this. Its a perception and with people perception is 90% truth" Did you fail to understand?

      Well, perhaps he's writing for the benefit of the thousands of us out here reading the comments. If you state your case you have to expect people to point out any flaws in it and saying you don't care to debate it any further isn't going to stop people doing so just because you don't feel like defending your case against them.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    286. Re:New ads by RobertM1968 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I never saw it as stereotyping Windows users. I saw it as something more akin to describing Windows itself... rehashing old technology, pretending it is new, trying to dress it up in "everyone else did that years ago" clothing.

    287. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      There are comedy shows in the US that don't use a laugh track.

      Anyway, it sounds like you think the characters were somehow derived from the show you're talking about, but AFAIK the American ads were first. The characters were created, cast as Long and Hodgman, and had no connection to the show you're talking about. Later, the characters were recast, using British actors in the UK, Japanese actors in Japan, etc.

      Now, they may have cast British actors who'd already worked together on this show, and those actors may have brought a lot of associations with them. But that doesn't mean the characters "Mac" and "PC" came from that show.

      Incidentally, before the ads, Justin Long wasn't really known as a "tosser", but was more famous for playing an semi-awkward/geeky teenager (see:Galaxy Quest). So the original American ads may have ended up with a slightly different tone.

      But yes, I think I will check out "Peep Show" when I get a chance.

    288. Re:New ads by miro+f · · Score: 1

      the fact that you're having this argument and so are so many other people on slashdot clearly makes you wrong. Because it doesn't matter what the INTENTION of the ad is, the only important thing is the message that the ad gets across to the viewer. And that message to quite a large portion of viewers is "Macs are for cool people, PCs are for dull people", as can plainly be seen by the number of people here on slashdot that see it this way.

      So you can argue all you want about your interpretation of the ad, or Apple's interpretation of the ad, but the truth is that many people extend the PC and mac characters past the products themselves to the users. You can't argue with that.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    289. Re:New ads by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I remember back in the day having a windows machine, and, out of the box, it wasn't capable of anything but notepad, solitaire, and a calculator.

      Wait, this has changed?

      Oh, right. They now come with OEM "extras", too.

    290. Re:New ads by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion,

      Damn straight! That's what text-editor flame-wars are for.

      EMACS FOREVER!

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    291. Re:New ads by mmarshall · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      It's like a scary movie: shut your eyes and it'll all go away.

      That is, a scary, silent, movie.

    292. Re:New ads by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      No, seriously. When does it ever suggest that *anyone* is better off buying a PC?

      nine-times: (in agreement with you) From what I have seen, never. I've watched them all. vux984 would have to really stretch the imagination to believe any say such a thing.

      Now.. on to Coke, that one I can help you with as well (sorry vux984, you are wrong about Coke as well).

      Try the numerous "Coke is it!" commercials from back in the day... they were all about how cool one would be (or was) for drinking Coke. Today, the message may be more subtle, but (1) is still there, and (2) as they are by far the reigning soft drink champion and the market isnt in nearly the flux it was "back in the day" Coca-Cola no longer needs to be so blunt.

      And vux, sorry to say, but based off your metaphors above, I simply believe you have very little understanding of what a metaphor is - perhaps that is your difficulty in accurately understanding the metaphor in the Apple commercials (and you finding hidden messages that most of the rest of us dont see).

      vux984... you sure you arent Bill Gates by any chance? You seem to have as skewed a perception of what the Apple commercials were trying to achieve as he does. ;-)

    293. Re:New ads by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      You really don't think that the ad is saying "mac users are hip - they wear turtleneck shirts, can organize and print photo's and make home movies" and PC users are "dull, ignorant idiots who wear brown suits and use an operating system written by monkey's that does nothing but crash"?

      Neither is true of course - Mac's can be used to do business and PC's can be used to organize photo's and make home movies (while wearing a turtleneck shirt no less)

      To me the ad says - if you want to be cool - buy a Mac. Its no worse than a soda-pop ad, beer ad or a SUV ad. I don't need any of those things, but if I want to be cool I better start buying.

    294. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct!
      When I worked for IBM in the 80s, Amstrad ran an ad campaign against the "Nobody got fired for buying IBM" mindset.
      Our marketing people loved it. It mentioned IBM more often than Amstrad.
      The MS ads don't have much impact unless you've seen the Apple ads. They are a direct response thereby validating Apple.

    295. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      ...and you should also hope an army of strawmen don't show up.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    296. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      My point was about the percentage of Windows OS installed that are pirated copies and what percentage of an average Indian household income a Windows license represents. My point was also about how Micro$oft want to portray their user base as one (i.e. we-are-one) giant family of Windows users when in fact it's bullshit. I wasn't talking about the minority of Indians that work in high-tech or TI that have bought Windows a license (with, say, 25% of their monthly income?).
      So fuck you for distorting my comments.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    297. Re:New ads by synthespian · · Score: 1

      ^^^^ Right up there ^^^^^

      Best comment of all!

      Oh, the irony of it all! LOL.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    298. Re:New ads by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mac ads have always been arrogant and condescending, and this is a major "up yours" to Apple.

      The Mac ads may be considered arrogant and condescending to some Windows users who identify far too closely with their OS of choice. Step back a little, and look at them for the light-hearted ads they are.

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      The tagline is atrocious. The next thought I had was "If there are no walls, why would I want Windows?"

      The new ad from Microsoft is nice enough, but since Linux runs on PCs, it works every bit as well for Tux. Hell, it more or less works for OS X.

      What was said about Windows in the last three ads? Buzz is nice enough, but when you're already the monopoly player you hardly need to get the word out. What reasons do people now have to buy Vista that they didn't know about before the last three ads?

    299. Re:New ads by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      And no, you can't "work faster" on the Mac than you can on Windows. They are effectively identical.

      An example from a while back - colour proofing tools were built into the Mac OS, making some tasks much faster on a Mac than on a PC.

      AppleScript was often (and may still be?) used for workflow automation. For a long time, it was capable of things that Windows could not manage. I knew people using it for printing workflow and other people using it for website content automation, and it saved massive amounts of time while still allowing them to use their familiar applications.

      Things have probably changed since then, but you cannot assume that the OS is irrelevant to applications.

    300. Re:New ads by sir+fer · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates *never* made that quote. It is an urban(e) legend.

      If your "blackbox pc" is too boring I suggest running Linux with the latest version of compiz-fusion. It shits over anything MS or Apple have put out...ever.

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    301. Re:New ads by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You've got to love Deepak Chopra. That line was right out of the Simpsons (that one with the self-help guru) and maybe they were referencing Chopra, maybe not, but the end result is a meaningless bit of text.

    302. Re:New ads by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      So fuck you for distorting my comments.

      I didn't distort anything. You said it was a joke for Microsoft to include African or Indian people in their ad. But there are many African and Indian users of Windows so why exclude them? I haven't seen many Macs in Africa quite frankly.
      And I don't know why you raised a distinction over piracy. It doesn't even make a difference to the point of the ad if someone has a pirated copy or not - they're still Windows users not any other sort. If you really feel that the "percentage of Windows OS installed that are pirated copies" makes a difference, I'd actually say that per person, there are more pirated copies of Windows floating around the UK and the USA than there are in most African countries. After all, you need the hardware to run it on. And that's another area in which Microsoft can emphasise their inclusiveness with this ad. The collage of people showed a much wider range of income brackets than you would expect with a Mac. If you have a little cybercafe in a less populous part of North Africa, you're not going to be filling it with Macs, it's going to be Windows machines.

      So please don't falsely accuse me of distorting your meaning. I responded to exactly what you said.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    303. Re:New ads by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a PC or a Mac or a Linux I'm a person who sometimes uses a computer, and runs programs on the computer, It runs an operating system - If I am aware of the operating system at all it is because it has got in my way

      And today it's getting pretty close to that. And this can only be good for Microsoft because you can get a Windows box for cheaper than a Mac, more customizable, more software, etc. If people don't care what they run, as long as it works, then they'll get the cheaper.

      Linux doesn't hold up here because, well, it doesn't always work (driver support, application support, etc). It's getting there though.

    304. Re:New ads by amn108 · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      They may be called "operating" systems but they are certainly not inter-operating. Not to a degree the majority would call for in their common sense. We just got to the point where one can save a Microsoft Office document on Windows Vista to the default binary Office format (which pretty much everybody does, coz ignorance is bliss) and hope to open it in Linux, without it looking like something recovered from lost+found. And that draws from the benefit of diversity that we would otherwise enjoy, as we enjoy diversity everywhere else.

      It is seemingly in interest of any corporation to develop and promote proprietary formats, for reasons one may deduce as valid pretty quickly. Unfortunately people have always suffered from lack of true foresight, and even more so in areas of IT and economy. As much as some suits hidden in some corporate building love to think that proprietary formats is a god given gift to a great IT company, such is a prime example of short-term gain and long-term disaster. This is like a kid who loves candy so much he would munch on it in blissful ignorance until all of his teeth shatter and fall out. They say a good business is one that satisfies its clients? What if there are two groups of clients - one that finds the service to be severly limiting their choice, and another one that is led to believe the first group does not exist, is a vocal minority or pure fact fabrication?

    305. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      the fact that you're having this argument and so are so many other people on slashdot clearly makes you wrong.

      The fact that you, who would make such an awful argument, think I'm wrong clearly makes me right.

      Ok, honestly it doesn't, but I'm right anyway.

    306. Re:New ads by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Most likely, because advertisers would NEVER use sex appeal / cool facor to sell a product or use an unappealing actor to represent the consumer of another product. Never.

      Of course not. Just like they didn't do on http://www.break.com/index/ps3_vs_nintendos_wii.html (warning: flash video, and the fat bitch is ugly).

    307. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, lots of people use (P)ersonal (C)omputers.

      Some of them are made by Dell, some by Compaq, some by Apple, some are home-built from parts.

      Some of them run an operating system sold by Microsoft, some run one sold by Apple, and still others use ones given away by programmers.

      Hint: if you mean "Computer running Windows", say that, not "PC".

    308. Re:New ads by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      I used to be a Mac; now I'm a Penguin. I like the Seinfeld ads, and I like this one, too. It won't be effective against me because I know that I'll never go with Windows, and I don't know how effective it will be at taking back new "Macs," but if anything I think it will at least provide a confidence boost to those remaining Windows users who may have started feeling "unhip" or something since the Apple ads have been playing.

      Regardless, it is certainly effective in undermining the stereotype that Apple has built. In a way, it lets the cat out of the bag: I think many people will look at the first scene and realize, regardless of what computer they use, that they have built a stereotype of PC based on Apple's ads. There will probably be a backlash.

      I don't see how Apple's Mac and PC ads can ever been nearly as effective ever again. I think they will have to be retired really soon, and it will be interesting to see what else they'll come up with.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    309. Re:New ads by thermal_7 · · Score: 1

      These ads are as good as the other ones were bad, and they were REALLY bad.

      I don't think that the other ads were bad. Microsoft is seen as a heartless and monolithic corporation. They knew that if they just came straight out with an ad campaign trying to sell more computers or change their image, many people would just shrug it off, without really paying attention to it's message. The Seinfeld ads served to shake up this view and made people more inquisitive as to what MS has to say.

    310. Re:New ads by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      I think the ad was pretty good... much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

      I'm starting to wonder if that was the whole point of the Seinfeld ones... to make ANY ad that comes after it look better

      --
      TIAEAE!
    311. Re:New ads by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      it's interesting they provoke this response in some people. most "average joe" type people see the ad, and can relate the many of the problems that PC seems to encounter; while in others, like yourself, they seem to hit a nerve. it's almost like you've bought into your platform so bad that anything that's insulting/deamning to it appears to be a personal attack on you yourself

      --
      TIAEAE!
    312. Re:New ads by dafing · · Score: 1
      "slightly" overweight? Just a bit? You must be American :)

      I'm (in american) 6'4 feet and 170 pounds, its not hard to stay in shape. I ride a exercycle while using Wikipedia etc :)

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    313. Re:New ads by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The only way your statement would make sense is if nerdy guys would see the PC and go "that's me, I want to be PC".

      You don't think people ever watch the ads and think "that's me, I want to be like that laid-back dude"? Or "I don't want to be like that stuffed shirt"?

      Advertising is all about selling a lifestyle. Of course I've seen the ads and of course they're presenting the characters as the personification of the computers. I've also seen the iPod ads infused with hip indie music. No one had to explain why they chose that music or what aspects of the iPod the music represents. It's selling a lifestyle, whether or not the script addresses it.

    314. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, is common for religion to practice more than one people!

    315. Re:New ads by dafing · · Score: 1
      I think you have a good post, but would just like to say that the Im A Mac ads arnt really about putting windows down that much, you see in a lot that the Mac and the PC are friends, one of the ones Im thinking of is about the Mac being an iMac etc and needing one glossy white box for shipping compared to some cheap brand PC needing a bunch of brown boxes.

      Mac is like "are you coming"? and PC says something like "no, parts of me are over there, plus I need to spend some time deleting the trial software applications that come with me" etc, Mac then says "Oh, well Ill just wait for you over here, I'll shoot a movie and make a dvd for you while I wait" or something like that.

      Most of its genuine surprise from Mac that the PC cannot do what he takes for granted. "what, you have to restart now?" "whats a virus?" etc.

      I really hope Microsoft can think of some positive ads, about something unique that windows computers come with. How about advertising Paint? Macs dont come with any kind of drawing tool, which is good enough to resize images etc. I miss that since I switched :)

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    316. Re:New ads by scotch · · Score: 1
      "..."

      This add brought to you by Anonymous Cowards for John McCain. John McCain does not endorse this message.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    317. Re:New ads by dafing · · Score: 1
      Guess Mac users download their copies of Photoshop :)

      Dont take me as a arrogant Mac user, but have you looked in many design outfits? Its always been a Mac domain. If you think that Windows and OSX are equal in time it takes to get things done, then you havnt used the Mac much :) OSX has plenty more key shortcuts etc to move about, desktop view, switch programs, tabs etc.

      Not saying you are wrong, dont want to start a fight, just saying that I think you would find the Mac to be faster as it uses less steps etc.

      Have a great day.

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    318. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called parody, they are trying to imitate the guy from the Apple commercials.

      So two years after Apple brought out those commercials, Microsoft makes "parodies" that are lamer than any parodies that could be found on YouTube 2 years ago? Hey, that tells a lot about Microsoft in relation to Apple.

      And also in relation to community driven projects/content, No?

    319. Re:New ads by idontgno · · Score: 1

      "isn't true" as in "all cool people use macs, all pc users are losers" isn't true? Agreed. But not my point.

      Isn't true that the two characters in the Apple ads are, in subtext, playing the perceived roles of the stereotypical users of the two systems, as well as (in pretext) playing personifications of the computers themselves? You can deny it, but it's still true: up front the ad is saying that Macintosh is liberating, cool, and competent and that PCs are clunky, temperamental, and losing; and, by extension, their user communities are the same.

      I'm not saying that it's a fact, only that the advertisement is trying to say it. And many consumers will believe it.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    320. Re:New ads by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      Car Analogy : I got in my car and drove to work - which make of car was it : I don't know, and don't care, it got me here anyway....

      You can drive your foot powered bumper car to work if you must.

    321. Re:New ads by DarthJohn · · Score: 1

      She turned me into a Newton!

      Signed:
      Pilot 1000

    322. Re:New ads by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      it's almost like you've bought into your platform so bad that anything that's insulting/deamning to it appears to be a personal attack on you yourself.

      Niiiiiiiiiiice. I find the ads insulting, so I must be a raving fanboy. Do you actually think that a statement like that has any basis in fact, or do you just enjoy insulting me?

      I don't take insults towards the platform I use personally. People insult Windows all damn day long on /., and I don't bat an eyelash. It's not that I care if people insult the platform, it's that Apple is insulting the users, not the platform. I don't see how anyone else sees it otherwise, to be perfectly honest. Those ads drip contempt.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    323. Re:New ads by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2, Funny

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman.

      No, John Hodgman is supposed to be boring Bill Gates, while the other guy represents hip, creative Steve Jobs. That's why they piss off Bill so much.

      I know this because at an Apple developers conference, they showed a tape of John Hodgman (in the same suit and using the same whiny voice) announce that he had been talking to Steve Jobs recently, and that Steve had told him that "all Mac developers should immediately stop innovating and go help Bill with Vista."
      Then he added "we need a lot of help with that."

    324. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somebody missed the...

      Take note, I also think McCain is an idiot... he's as straight a talker as a snake in the grass. But at least he might have the sense to use Mitt Romney in an economic position or as an adviser. As I said, though, McCain is an idiot.

    325. Re:New ads by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Naaah the Wii isn't a 10 year old girl, the Wii is that cute/perky but very annoying soccer mom that somehow gets the band/DJ to play the electric slide so she can dance with all the other cute/perky but annoying soccer moms at every public event like the ACS Relay for Life, or wedding reception she attends.

      The PS3 is smart, capable, versatile, a bit quirky, and high maintenance (expensive), it is Lorelai Gilmore of the Gilmore Girls TV show.

      The Xbox is Tara Reid, the drunken party girl all the drunken frat boys love.

      They all have their pluses and minuses. If you're sitting around bored during some get together, you want the soccer mom who pulls out some kind of party game.

      If you're at home alone and want intelligent conversation, some quirky fun, catch up on your blogs, AND listen to the Bangles, Lorelai's your woman.

      If you're hanging with your frat boy (or overgrown frat boy) friends, you want Tara Reid.

    326. Re:New ads by cubex · · Score: 1

      Why is it "PC"? Microsoft doesn't sell computers. PC just means Personal Computer so it should be "I'm Windows" or "I'm a Windows user". The ad doesn't convey any useful information, but a lot of ads don't. It's hard to imagine it would effect anyone's purchasing decision.

    327. Re:New ads by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

      Operating systems need to stop being argued like a religion, I'm getting tired of it.

      Yeah, it's taking the focus away from the KDE vs. Gnome and vi vs. emacs arguments.

      Even worse, it's distracting from the Pirates vs. Ninjas debate.

      --
      The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
    328. Re:New ads by el+cisne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not a bad comeback, but should have been done a long time ago.

      I thought it was a good response, although unclever, clumsy, obvious, tactless, pointed, non-subtle, defensive, immature (what, are they gonna cry?? mean ol' Mac making fun of them??), ham-handed, it was a solid response. A stupid response but a solid response.

      They took the Apple ads too personal -- their response was like they were hurt, and saying directly, 'hey, i don't either suck'.

      They couldn't come up with something a little more clever and fun?

      It's like they're trying to capitalize and leverage all the people that feel personally wounded from the Mac/PC ads, trying to rally them all. Still no class. Although Longoria is 'teh new hotness'!

    329. Re:New ads by sew3521 · · Score: 1

      I actually just saw the ad tonight for the first time and I really liked it. Then again I thought the mugshot on the shoe card was funny as fuck, I guess I'm just easily amused...

    330. Re:New ads by Draek · · Score: 1

      Come on... how is this an argument. Emacs is clearly superior.

      ...ever since it got a Vi-compatible mode. Good OS + good editor > good editor alone ;)

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    331. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a position where I control millions in national advertising spend and can tell you that you are exactly correct.

      How often have you seen McDonalds compare itself to Burger King? How often have you seen Coke go after Pepsi? The market leader should focus on defining itself and it's almost always a mistake to play by competition's rules. Microsoft is clearly in a defense mode and seems to have nothing salient to say about itself.

    332. Re:New ads by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Whew! We were hoping you would get tired of it soon.

      Guys!?! Pack it up!
      He's finally tired of it so we can quit now. Come on, let's go.

    333. Re:New ads by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      I think that the best counter for Microsoft would be to have the dozens of personifications of PCs playing a bunch of games, several of them playing together, and then the single personification of the Mac alone in a corner with nothing to do.

    334. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's not what they're trying to say, but that's how every single one of those ads came across to me. "These machines suck, and by extension, you suck for being stupid enough to not use our machine."

      that's not the ad saying that; it's your conscience.

      Fortunately for them, I wasn't in the market anyway

      wow! talk about an inflated sense of self importance

      but seriously, I can't imagine they've gained customers with this approach (once you factor in the people they've alienated).

      no need to imagine, take a look at their growth in marketshare.

      Why not pick something that isn't so arrogant, and can be seen as very insulting? Then they would gain customers, and not alienate potential customers. Surely that would be far better.

      I'll say what you didnt, but really meant. "Why not pick something that I as a windows fanboy, wont find is threatening my manliness. Then they would appeal to the niche minority that I exist in, while ignoring the rest of the potential market who are fed up with windows. Surely that would make me feel better about my choice of operating system."

    335. Re:New ads by HJED · · Score: 1

      Would Someone Please Tell Microsoft And Apple that:
      PC != Windows
      PC==Personal Computer | x86 Computer

      --
      null
    336. Re:New ads by HJED · · Score: 1

      Well, at least they tried to tell you something about the product.

      It might not have been something you wanted to hear, but it was at least an attempt to be informative beyond an obvious logical fallacy.

      That third character could be useful.

      It and the Mac could compare notes and snicker at the Windows OS together.

      fixed that for you
      PC != Windows
      I run Linux on my PC thanks

      --
      null
    337. Re:New ads by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pissed the Mac Office 2004 (demo) is in on my leopard box, and I don't recall ever installing it.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    338. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ... not really much of a standard for measuring improvement. Compared to an add for shoes and family counseling, yes, the new ads are a VAST improvement.

      The new ads are okay. They were probably much cheaper to make too.

    339. Re:New ads by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 1

      The crowd is growing. To the bonfire!

    340. Re:New ads by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      That was the idea. Put out two horrible ads. The next one will, obviously, look like a masterpiece in comparison.

    341. Re:New ads by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Just a correction.

      You have to commend Crispin Porter for that. Microsoft only hired them.

      And, BTW, the piece was finished on a Mac. Running OSX.

    342. Re:New ads by dmn · · Score: 0

      horrible? I thought it was really *really* good. Not only does it help kill the stereotype, but makes the Mac commercials much less effective as well.

      I disagree.

      If they were trying to counter the message of the original Apple ads, they failed miserably, because they completely missed their point. The Apple ads are basically saying "Macs are for people who want to do things better, than everyone else (the PCs) - more interesting, more fun and less effort". These ads are targeted at people who want to stand out of the crowd, or at least go their own way. The Microsoft ads on the other hand are saying "be a sheep, join EVERYONE in doing the same thing", which - to the crowd the original ads were aimed at - is the exact thing they want to avoid.

      But one might argue, that these ads were actually addressed to a different group of people - the sheep. But the sheep don't need ads - they'll simply follow everyone else. Worse yet - the ads might actually make them aware of what they're doing by blindly following the others and make them stop.

      In conclusion - FAIL.

    343. Re:New ads by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You can deny it, but it's still true: up front the ad is saying that Macintosh is liberating, cool, and competent and that PCs are clunky, temperamental, and losing; and, by extension, their user communities are the same.

      No, that's not true at all. The ads are trying to appeal to Windows users, saying they should switch to Mac.

      It's saying to Windows users: "Hey, you're cool, you don't have time to bother with clunky, old fashioned computers. Why not use a Mac, which suits you better?"

      It is definitely not saying that people who use Windows aren't cool.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    344. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is good, but they chose the PC guy's personality poorly. PC guy is WAY more likable than the Mac guy. It being Hodgman has nothing to do with this as it is the personality they were going for.

      The Mac guy comes off as pretentious and the PC guy comes off as quirky. That is probably by design, but I will take quirky over pretentious any day.

    345. Re:New ads by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      If you think that Windows and OSX are equal in time it takes to get things done, then you havnt used the Mac much :) OSX has plenty more key shortcuts etc to move about, desktop view, switch programs, tabs etc.

      I'm guessing you haven't used Windows very much. Windows has keyboard shortcuts for all of those and more. In fact, traditionally the Mac has been terrible when it comes to keyboard shortcuts (the last time I used a Mac was probably 8 years ago and was appalled). Apparently OS/X is better on that score these days. I can use Windows without ever touching the mouse (and often do).

      If you think Windows doesn't have keyboard shortcuts, that's simply not true. The reason is actually historical -- DOS was obviously very keyboard based, and Microsoft wanted Windows to be usable to people who didn't have a mouse when they upgraded.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    346. Re:New ads by uassholes · · Score: 1

      all the cool things you can do with a Windows PC

      I'm still waiting to see one.

    347. Re:New ads by uassholes · · Score: 1

      Hey gamers: Since you want performance, have you ever thought about writing games that would boot from bios instead of sharing resources running on top of some bloated OS that you don't need?

    348. Re:New ads by j-beda · · Score: 1
      No, you young wippersnappers have it all wrong.

      PC is a "Pocket Computer", from back in the late 1970s - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandy_Pocket_Computer, before IBM ever got into the game.

    349. Re:New ads by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      Can I getta AMEN-A!!!

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
    350. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree - the Apple ads were far more "condescending", to use the OP's words.

      A crucial difference is that the MS ads focus on promoting the PC in a good light, rather than ripping the piss out of their competitor, as Apple did, and which I view as a poor tactic. Actually the Apple ads were worse than that - they were mocking PC users, i.e., their potential customers. I'm not sure why they expected this to work - does insulting people usually work to get them to buy your product?

      And the MS ads make an excellent point. The Apple ads were 15 years or more out of date - the "boring PC user" stereotype might have worked back in the 80s or early 90s, but given how mainstream PCs are now, the notion is ludicrous. The Microsoft advert shows this by demonstrating a range of people who would reasonably be PC users. It's obvious really, but it's refreshing to see a response to those obnoxious Apple ads.

      I thought the second ad was rather funny (in a good way), rebutting the point about PCs only being for business. Yeah, that was the argument we Amiga users used back in the 80s and early 90s, when that point was actually valid. Macs, as ever, are about 15 years behind the times.

    351. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, the Apple ads blatantly were stereotyping users, not just the machines themselves.

      But even if we say you're right - the same argument could be made for these new ads! I.e., you didn't take the time to understand the Microsoft ads. The purpose was not to stereotype users. The idea was that the more artistic nature of PCs should appeal to users of all walks of life. You obviously didn't get that. Note - they still say "I'm a PC", not "I'm a PC user", so surely, by your own logic, this means it's about the machines, not the users?

      These ads will preach to the choir

      That's even more true of the Apple ads, since in addition they mocked the competition.

      If anything, Microsoft has just drawn MORE attention to Apple.

      But they didn't mention Macs at all. The Apple ads, however, drew attention to PCs.

    352. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Oh and before somebody steps-in and starts spouting about what a PC can do --- that's only because those features were invented by more-advanced machines like Commodore, Amiga, and Apple who were the first to create the multimedia computer. Had those companies not existed & pushed for innovation, we'd still be using boring monochrome monitors with sounds consisting of "beep" and "boop".

      Yes, but you can't judge modern PCs by how they were 20 years ago. It's no longer IBM's machine - yes, Commodore innovated with the Amiga, but companies like NVIDIA are now taking that onwards. The PC of today now does feel like a modern descendant of the Amiga, far more so than a descendant of an old PC - multitasking GUIs, dedicated graphics chipsets, cheap low end machines that are still relatively powerful and good enough for most users. Those are all the things I liked about the Amiga, and all the things that PCs didn't do.

      As I say elsewhere, the "PC stereotype" that Apple push is dated by about 15-20 years. If we're going to judge PCs by their 1980s versions, perhaps we can judge OS X Macs by criticising the abysmal joke of an OS that was classic MacOS?

    353. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      So? Aren't Microsoft allowed to do something with their own adverts? Anyhow, it is a rebuttal to the stereotype that the Apple ads used, associating PCs with only being used for business, by business users. So showing what PC users actually look like, along with what sort of "business" they use them for, is relevant.

    354. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is intentionally distorting the message to make it look like Apple was stereotyping PC users

      Which is why it's such a brilliant ad.

      (Although I find it hard to believe that Apple never intended to direct any stereotyping towards users, given the way that each character appeared - i.e, older guy in business suit for the "PC", younger guy in casual clothes for the "Mac".)

    355. Re:New ads by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The problem was, the representation wasn't any more absurd that the right-wing characterization, and so people weren't sure how serious the cover was.

      That's not a "problem". That was the whole point. I think the fact that it was on the cover of the New Yorker was a pretty clear indication that it was meant to be absurd. All that hand-wringing about how "people might take it literally" because they were too stupid to realise it was a joke -- anyone who did get that message already believed Obama was Saddam's love-child. And if they did email it around taking it at face value they would be left with egg on their faces in short order.

    356. Re:New ads by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Says who? You?

      "PC" is short for IBM-compatible PC, which is what we called them back in the day (unless it was an IBM, then it was just an IBM PC). Since Macs don't have a Bios and can't boot DOS, you can't really call them IBM-compatible, thus they aren't really a PC in that sense of the term.

    357. Re:New ads by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Microsoft rarely puts out anything the just works. In many cases a PC works great for about 6 months to a year then it gets slower, and slower and sloooooowwwwweeer.

      Most people I know have very little trouble with their PCs. It's not the days of Windows 98 anymore, a Windows computer is stable and relatively problem-free as long as you take some basic precautions, which most people know by now if they didn't already. I know lots of not very technically inclined people, and their Windows PCs keep on chugging along relatively problem-free for them. That's why when most people go out to buy a computer they buy a computer with Windows - it works for them, they know how to use it, and is cheaper so why not?

    358. Re:New ads by eniacfoa · · Score: 1

      Im a windows user and I want a change, I would never touch a mac. I cant use linux because it does not meet my needs. Linux is useless for a professional musician. Theres a lot of PC users in this boat - wouldnt touch a mac if they were paid and not able to use linux for their work. linux needs some millions thrown at to turn it into a real product, till then, it cant replace windows. Just wanted to let you know about a significant portion of PC users that you seem to have missed.

    359. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      In the Mac ad where the PC gets sick, it is *not* the implication that PC users are getting sick, it's that PCs get viruses.

      You've got the logic backwards. People aren't claiming that they are never referring to the machines - obviously they are. However, the point is that they are also stereotyping the users. To show that, it's not enough to show that some references apply to machines, you have to chose that none of them could apply to users.

      Or do you think that PCs wear business suits, and Macs wear casual clothing?

    360. Re:New ads by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If Apple ignores these ads (which they will because they have no "punch") Microsoft will end up looking petty.

      Microsoft won't look petty, because they still stand on their own merits - it's an advert promoting PCs. And if Apple's response is to stop doing their ads, then that is a win for Microsoft in itself.

      Don't draw attention to your opponent unless he has managed to grab sufficient mind-share to demand a response! Microsoft still has the lead in the market, so there is no way they can "win" back attention they haven't lost.

      But that's exactly why they don't mention Macs at all. Apple are the ones who criticise PCs, and if they continue to do so, they will continue to look even more petty (especially now as Microsoft have created the impression in people's minds about how these ads are stereotyping users too).

    361. Re:New ads by sen4fun · · Score: 1

      I saw the new ad for the first time last night. Man, it's HORRIBLE. The ads try to play on the fact that Windows has the biggest desktop market share by showing a diverse group of people in diverse situations admitting to "being PCs". While the characters try to come off as being "cheeky and cute", they just end up looking like ditzy, ignorant, darwin-award candidates In short ad is somewhat condescending. It's typical Microsoft Strategy -- copy others(Mac ads) and turn out a second-rate imitation. Yes, ol' Bill is in the ad, albeit briefly, but they should have echewed Bill and kept Seinfeld in(just to say "I'm a PC", at least) as a cameo! I'm still mad at Bill for the last commercial, in which he said nothing except, "I have a lot of money and now I'm going to wiggle my ass in your face, nyah nyah". If Bill wants to be a celebrity then he can just "leak" a homemade sex tape like the others do.

      Well, Bill has done a lot more for the community than you buddy. I guess the homemade tapes are for folks like you.

    362. Re:New ads by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > It still fails as persuasion for anyone with more than half a brain cell.

      True, but Microsoft is satisfied with 99% of the market.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    363. Re:New ads by earlymon · · Score: 1

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

      It was nothing of the sort.

      It was Billy's ego finally getting to get his rage satisfied against a Linux bumper sticker that one of our GUI programmers had above his monitor since the dot-com days: "LINUX - In a world without walls or fences, who needs Gates?"

      Ads serve two purposes - to persuade you to buy, and to persuade you to remain happy after you buy. That you think that ad in any way was devastating to Apple is merely a statement that you've bought the second part of the message. 500-level marketing courses preach that those who buy this second part of the message did so because they needed to - and because they need to, that part of the message is included in the ad.

      You'd do well to not admit publicly, without anonymity, that you thought the ad devastated Apple - you might be not be realizing what message you're sending to those around you, about yourself.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    364. Re:New ads by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      You'd do well to not admit publicly, without anonymity, that you thought the ad devastated Apple - you might be not be realizing what message you're sending to those around you, about yourself.

      And I wouldn't admit to anyone around you that you actually think anyone cares about the message you send under these circumstances.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    365. Re:New ads by dafing · · Score: 1
      heavens, you say I havnt used Windows much when you have never touched OSX? OSX is like Windows compared to the DOS of prior Mac OS versions!

      I used Windows until about 2 years ago, when I had saved the money to buy my beautiful 12 inch Powerbook.

      So in XP whats the command for Expose? that displays all open programs/windows in a bunch of different ways, it takes you to the desktop view etc etc.

      If Vista added similar features, it took them bloody long enough.

      Theres not many things that Windows does better than OSX. Try OSX sometime, If you are American you probably have an Apple Store to visit, Id like to go to america just to visit one :P

      Thank you for your reply though.

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    366. Re:New ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a life without walls, who needs Windows?

    367. Re:New ads by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've seen both the Apple and Microsoft adverts. Apple tried to demonstrate that their OS was the 'next generation' by representing their OS as a couple of smart students while PC's were represented by an overweight middle-aged office worker in a 1970's brown suit.

      While you identify with, will depend upon your age, but the Apple advert did seem to be demeaning to more mature people. From that perspective, I can see why Microsoft made their adverts in the way that they did. Apple probably shouldn't have used real people to demonstrate this difference.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    368. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      All that hand-wringing about how "people might take it literally" because they were too stupid to realise it was a joke

      I don't disagree, but that was the problem. The purpose of parody is to illustrate absurdity by exaggerating it. If you were too stupid to understand that the characterization was absurd when the right wing of politics was pushing it, then you might be too stupid to understand that the same characterization on the cover of the New Yorker is a parody.

      If it were a good/successful political parody, it might give someone pause at some point and say, "Is the way I think really that silly?"

    369. Re:New ads by VanessaE · · Score: 1
      For those who haven't seen it yet: one of many copies on Youtube.

      Dear G*d in heaven. Nevermind that I'm a diehard Linux fan, that ad was the worst thing I've seen in a long time - I mean, what exactly are they trying to say? Was there some product in there they were trying to sell?

    370. Re:New ads by HJED · · Score: 1

      I wasn't implying that Mac is a type PC I was pointing out that PCs can run both Linux, Windows and lots of other OSs.
      And that PC is not a synonym for Windows, as Microsoft and Apple seem to believe.

      --
      null
    371. Re:New ads by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If you were too stupid to understand that the characterization was absurd when the right wing of politics was pushing it, then you might be too stupid to understand that the same characterization on the cover of the New Yorker is a parody.

      Yes, some people are that dumb. But they aren't the audience of the New Yorker. If they are that dumb, no cartoon is going to make them reflect on their ideas.

      If it were a good/successful political parody, it might give someone pause at some point and say, "Is the way I think really that silly?"

      I'd think the aim was more just to make fun of these people, not to try to educate them. I think it was successful in that.

    372. Re:New ads by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Horse. Water. Drink.

      Clear thinking on that - right up there with that mythical lock-in that includes MS Office, Windows if you want it, BSD sources, GNU sources.

      Yep, being locked in to a proven cost-effective hybrid platform - best of Apple, best of FOSS - and then to be outed as so elitist by those ads - it's really devastating.

      To your point - thanks. I'm disabused of the idea that information fazes your preconceptions in the slightest, as someone dedicated to viewing the world objectively; without emotionalism, wishful thinking, cynicism or silly prejudices.

      Best luck to you.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    373. Re:New ads by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Australia. The only equivalent we have shows only kids pictures... some of which I would enjoy. Had I children I may take them just see the movie myself :) Some times a stupid movie can hit the spot.. I've quite enjoyed the new Get Smart, Spaceballs etc...

      In spite of our commonalities... I will not take you up on your offer.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    374. Re:New ads by Obsi · · Score: 1

      Her Pinkness disagrees. May She drive Her horn through your mouse hand.

    375. Re:New ads by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yes, some people are that dumb. But they aren't the audience of the New Yorker.

      Sure, but by being on the cover, people are still going to see it at news stands and such.

      Anyway, I'm not saying that the New Yorker did something wrong. I thought all the controversy over it was a bit silly. But I think it failed as a parody. The whole point of parody is to exaggerate something to the point where it changes the way people perceive that thing. Before the parody, people take that thing seriously, and afterwards they think it's a bit silly/absurd.

      I don't think they succeeded in doing that with that particular cartoon, and the fact that some people got upset was a symptom of their failure.

    376. Re:New ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Why is Vista doing so bad?

      Because the grammar-checker still doesn't understand your sentence needs an adverb instead of an adjective?

    377. Re:New ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      And in my opinion Apple has failed on an epic scale too, by not understanding their own ads.

      If you don't at least admit that the ads are effective, regardless of your personal opinion about them, than you don't understand advertising. Unless, of course, you wish to opine that Apple sales are brisk IN SPITE of the long-running campaign?

    378. Re:New ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Your perception (smug douchey hipster) does not equal reality. If anything, it equals your self-proclaimed biases.

    379. Re:New ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Car Analogy : I got in my car and drove to work - which make of car was it : I don't know, and don't care, it got me here anyway....

      So you are a PC then?

    380. Re:New ads by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Don't you get it? When Hodgman fumbles around with yet another clumsy Windows "solution", the Apple guy isn't saying nanner-nanner-boo-boo. He tries to give advice and help, but Hodgman doesn't listen, because Hodgman is averse to change...the single most important reason people keep using Microsoft OSes (and the point of one of the newest ads in the cycle).

    381. Re:New ads by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      I have one answer to this : Vista

      Less driver support
      More unstable drivers
      It does not "Just Work"

      Linux is not catching up - it has overtaken, the fact that Microsoft is advertising windows says they are losing market share, and are worried ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    382. Re:New ads by ZerdZerd · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of people -- and yes, creative people, and dump people, ignorant people, unethical people.... and so on and so on -- use PCs.

      And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls".

      In a life without walls, why would I need windows?

      --
      I'm not insane! My mother had me tested.
  2. Guy with a beard? by Temtongkek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sold.

    1. Re:Guy with a beard? by illeism · · Score: 1
      Off topic so bad but speaking of men with beards...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7NXBJYRHxA

      it is so safe for work... but still a bit unsettling to watch...

      --
      Help test the /. effect at my min
    2. Re:Guy with a beard? by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't be. It's obviously false advertising. Guys with beards are old-school UNIX hackers, not Windows users. They could also be circa-1983 stock brokers.

    3. Re:Guy with a beard? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      No, he's a traitor. You NEVER trust guys in beards unless they're telling you OSS is GOOD!

    4. Re:Guy with a beard? by Temtongkek · · Score: 1

      No, he's a traitor. You NEVER trust guys in beards unless they're telling you OSS is GOOD!

      Are you declaring all English lit. majors to be untrustworthy? :)

    5. Re:Guy with a beard? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Guys with beards are old-school UNIX hackers, not Windows users.

      Oh, talk about stereotyping! I just happen to be an old-school Unix hacker and I just happen to have a beard, but I know lots of old-school Unix.....ha....hmph. RMS... DMR.... Ken... Alan Cox....

      Ok. Maybe not.

    6. Re:Guy with a beard? by Temtongkek · · Score: 1

      Don't be. It's obviously false advertising. Guys with beards are old-school UNIX hackers, not Windows users. They could also be circa-1983 stock brokers.

      ...or those guys who offered me candy once... Ok, ok... twice.

    7. Re:Guy with a beard? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Well, I wouldn't trust a person like me if I were you.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    8. Re:Guy with a beard? by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      I'm aspiring to be an old school UNIX hacker, so I'm growing a beard.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    9. Re:Guy with a beard? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, we all have seen the 1978 Microsoft photo.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    10. Re:Guy with a beard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We *were* going to use him in our emacs ads... those bastards!

    11. Re:Guy with a beard? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Do you think it would be safe to disagree with him?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:Guy with a beard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what programming language he invented?

    13. Re:Guy with a beard? by fermion · · Score: 1
      Any actor can grow a beard...

      It is possible, at least theoretically, that even BillG could grow a beard. I would not put money on it, but it is not totally out of the realm of possibility. At least not any less likely than a tennis ball tunneling though a wall.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:Guy with a beard? by Temtongkek · · Score: 1

      :: hides the tennis ball he just tunneled through a wall. :: Nothin' goin' on here... :: whistles... ::

    15. Re:Guy with a beard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing is that it represents Microsoft perfectly: first the Seinfeld "shoe" ad (wtf?); second the Seinfeld "stuffed giraffe" ad (wtf?); and then the "I'm a PC" ad (finally makes some sense).

      Count on MS do something functional around version 3.0. Kudos to those who have the time to wait around for them to get there...

  3. Why is this tagged entertainment? by Datamonstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ads can at times be entertaining, but they are definitely not intended as entertainment.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by poopdeville · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      They aren't news, either. Except to the advertising industry, which I suppose Slashdot joined long ago.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't news, either. Except to the advertising industry, which I suppose Slashdot joined long ago.

      Joined? Forked maybe?

      Slashvertising: Advertising and promotion as performed at Slashdot.org, frequently resulting in Slash, Flash and burn when it extends to website promotion. See Slashdot effect for further info.

    3. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah, but they can be. If you find an ad entertaining, you're paying more attention to it. (Oh, and by the way, buy Pete's Hot Dogs, they're the best!)

    4. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by kat_skan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno. As someone who's suffered Vista for a year now, I find watching Microsoft spastically flail around like this pretty amusing.

    5. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Maybe you are missing the point of the tag.

      The ads are a joke.

    6. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by rukcus · · Score: 1

      You used Vista for longer than a month? I pity your suffering. There is help available.

    7. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      You're kind to offer, but I think it's too late for me. At this point I can only hope to serve as a warning for others.

    8. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just 'cuz something's not intended as entertainment doesn't mean it's not entertainment. . .

    9. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Entertainment is a tool that increases emotional response and memory retention. The folks at Crispin Porter know it very well.

      BTW, they already knew that - see how much we wrote about how lame the spots with Gates and Seinfeld were? Se how well we remember those?

    10. Re:Why is this tagged entertainment? by ZerdZerd · · Score: 1

      It was to be tagged as "laughable", but that goes under entertainment.

      --
      I'm not insane! My mother had me tested.
  4. Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Macs are PCs.

    They're even the same damn processors now, you can run Windows on Macs and you can run OSX on, uh, not-Macs.

    The most disgusting thing is the chauvinism from BOTH sides, the other operating systems don't exist, and if you're running a PC it must be running Microsoft Something. If you're running a Mac it must be running OS X.

    False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    1. Re:Guh. by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      Macs are PCs.

      While technically correct, this is not common usage. Even Apple promotes the distinction in their commercials (Mac guy and PC guy).

      The most disgusting thing is the chauvinism from BOTH sides, the other operating systems don't exist, and if you're running a PC it must be running Microsoft Something. If you're running a Mac it must be running OS X.

      It's an advertisement. They're already giving publicity to one competitor, why would they want to include even more?

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:Guh. by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      While technically correct, this is not common usage. Even Apple promotes the distinction in their commercials (Mac guy and PC guy).

      It's not that Apple is promoting it, Apple started the false distinction between a Mac and a PC. A PC is a personal computer, whether it's x86, PowerPC, SPARC or what have you.

      Apple simply made itself look cooler by creating a false dichotomy. And you know how people fall for the "To be special, I MUST use a Mac" mentality.

    3. Re:Guh. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Macs are PCs.

      And have always been from the "personal computer" sense of the word -- it's personal, and it's a computer. But, way way back in the day when it was the "IBM Personal Computer" the widespread distinction was "Mac" and "PC".

      However seemingly arbitrary it is now, that has been the common distinction between the two platforms for around 25 years or so. But, it's been an industry-wide distinction. It has gotten slightly muddier now that the underlying hardware is essentially the same.

      False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

      It isn't misinformation. Not by a long shot. Historically it's a little quirky, but you can attribute much of the source of that to Microsoft and IBM back in the 80's. It was their own marketing which co-opted the term "PC" to mean the MS/Intel platform on 80x86 type hardware.

      When IBM opened up the specs for the PC, generic computers became known as "PC Compatible", specifically to identify that they worked with the components and software designed for the "IBM PC" platform. This was a huge deal.

      This bit of pedantry comes up in almost all Mac threads. It's largely pointless, and in a few cases, rather disingenuous.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Guh. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um. . . When Apple switched to Intel, Apple has always told people that they could run Windows as well as OS X on a Mac. They even made a "Get a Mac" commercial about it in 2006 called Touché. In their latest commercial, Apple announced that their Geniuses will help you migrate your Windows files if you switch. Rather I find Microsoft in denial about Apple.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

      Because then all advertising would be illegal.

    6. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chauvinism

      You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

    7. Re:Guh. by Otter · · Score: 1

      "PC" has been used to specifically refer to IBM PC-compatible for over 25 years, since before Macs. Pretending that the 1978 meaning of the term is still the usual one is like the people who pretend to be outraged whenever "hacker" is used in a non-ESR-approved way.

    8. Re:Guh. by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because "false advertising" depends on the definition of "false". In this case, true or false depends on the definition of "PC".

      The common definition may be (lifted from Wikipedia): "A personal computer (PC) is any computer whose original sales price, size, and capabilities make it useful for individuals, and which is intended to be operated directly by an end user, with no intervening computer operator."

      But here's another definition, from Business Dictionary: "A computer designed for use by a single user. Although other Microcomputers preceded it, the IBM PC was the first to use the name specifically. As a result, the term PC now applies to an IBM-compatible computer as contrasted to the Apple Macintosh, these being the two standards that emerged from an abundance of competitors in the early 1980s."

      This definition has certainly ignored the transition of Apple to Intel processors, but it's not a long stretch to consider the definition of "PC" in some circles to strictly mean a computer in the IBM legacy chain, meaning something running DOS or a DOS derivative or successor, including Windows.

      I do find it disingenuous, though, that neither Apple nor Microsoft distinguish between "PCs" running Windows and those running Linux, and I've never seen a definition of PC that contrasted or excluded Linux systems (since of course the have always run on IBM-legacy hardware).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:Guh. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      You can't be sued for false advertising if your advertisement doesn't actually say anything.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    10. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot what you said. I am a PC.

    11. Re:Guh. by j!mmy+v. · · Score: 1

      the other operating systems don't exist, and if you're running a PC it must be running Microsoft Something. If you're running a Mac it must be running OS X.

      Yet statistically, this is all more or less true. What's the problem?

      --
      -- often wrong; never in doubt
    12. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Informative

      1: excessive or blind patriotism
      2: undue partiality or attachment to a group or place to which one belongs or has belonged
      3: an attitude of superiority toward members of the opposite sex ; also : behavior expressive of such an attitude

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    13. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Eva Longoria is a PC, then Jessica Alba is a Mac?

    14. Re:Guh. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I do find it disingenuous, though, that neither Apple nor Microsoft distinguish between "PCs" running Windows and those running Linux, and I've never seen a definition of PC that contrasted or excluded Linux systems (since of course the have always run on IBM-legacy hardware).

      Apple doesn't mind lumping them all together because they're both competitors their eyes, and Microsoft doesn't wish to publicly acknowledge Linux in any way lest it start "spreading the word".

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Guh. by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Either way, I'll take one of each please!

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    16. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      It's not just these things that get me though, it's stuff like diet pills, things that use weasel words, there's relatively few laws governing advertising compared to the incredible impact it can have on people while other, less dangerous things are often heavily bogged down with laws, like selling a car, opening a bank account... maybe I'm just talking out my ass because I can't think of any other good examples.

      That's just me, though, I'll bitch but I won't ask anyone to agree with me.

      But whatever, Microsoft has such an incredible, unimaginable responsibility to the world considering all the critical things that rely on Windows. They really need to reconsider fucking around like this, trying to scoop up audiences, getting into fake quarrels with a competition that hardly effects them.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    17. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I just rabble on about nothing. It sounds important when I'm going on with it but after I really look at it there's not much point to it.

      I can always say it's not fair, but we all know about life being fair.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    18. Re:Guh. by jimmux · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for the ad having Gates in it and a Windows logo, I could have thought it was an ad for Linux, or BSD, or even a PC vendor. Especially the final tag line, which was something about not having walls (what holds up the Windows if there are no walls?).

    19. Re:Guh. by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Because then politicians couldn't exist.

    20. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      People can always find some way to start a lawsuit. Just look at... oh, yeah, they challenged the legality to Linux and got completely trashed... never mind.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    21. Re:Guh. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I believe that one of the Mac commercials brag about how you can run either OSX or Windows on their machines thanks to BootCamp (it was probably shortly after BootCamp went gold). They probably said something cliche like "the best of both worlds." I don't recall if they mention "or miscellaneous" in that one (to cover Linux and such).

      Personally I like OSX more than Windows so I went Mac. However I still have Windows XP Pro on there for some work-related apps and gaming.

      I'm not a zealot. Windows XP has been rock-solid stable for me for years and I occasionally think about upping my Windows partition to Vista.
      So I don't have any qualms about using OSs from both camps, I just prefer OSX over Windows.

    22. Re:Guh. by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      "PC" has been used to specifically refer to IBM PC-compatible for over 25 years, since before Macs.

      And, since Apple uses the term to mean something else entirely, that's what makes it "misleading".

      Current Macs are as "IBM PC-compatible" as current machines from Dell, HP/Compaq, etc. Neither is anything like the last IBM-built non-laptop PC, but both have evolved from that specification into the current versions with 64-bit computing, multiple processors/cores, and PCI Express 2.0.

      And, both "Macs" and "PCs" (used in the Apple way) can run Windows or OS-X.

    23. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I forgot what I said too, but then, everyone's a little PC.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    24. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I hope you're following form factor, proprietary USB connectors are a pain in the ass.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    25. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      "In a world without walls of fences, who would need Windows and Gates?"

      I think the point of the commercials was... were to... uhh...

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    26. Re:Guh. by clang_jangle · · Score: 1
      While geeks know it's a false dichotomy, Apple is simply working with the fact that the average user wouldn't be equipped to pay attention long enough to understand *why* a personal computer running OS X is different from and perhaps a better choice than a personal computer running Windows. And in fact, strictly from a marketing POV, they have succeeded brilliantly. But yes, I am old enough to remember when a 68k Mac was called a PC, as was an Amiga, Commodore, TRS80... The whole "x86==PC" meme is only about 20 years old.

      And you know how people fall for the "To be special, I MUST use a Mac" mentality.

      No doubt some do, but mostly I think a lot of people are burned out on doing everything Bill's way and just want a bit of relief. Who can blame them? They are afraid of Linux, because they think (right or wrong) they're not smart enough to handle it, and sick of Windows, so that just leaves them with the Mac. It's quite logical; I don't know why so many people here get so worked up about it. Build a better mousetrap, make everyone aware that you built a better mousetrap, and there you go. Most of us need our computers to make a living; it really isn't about "being cool". Viruses, spyware, BSODs, and ten minute boots just don't pay the bills.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    27. Re:Guh. by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I love OSX, I just hate seeing something so hard to customize out-of-the-box being promoted as "Thinking Differently".

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    28. Re:Guh. by sremick · · Score: 1

      "I'm a PC... and I don't run Windows."

    29. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are PCs.

      False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

      Because "false advertising" depends on the definition of "false". In this case, true or false depends on the definition of "PC".

      And "illegal" depends on your definition of "illegal".

      If Video Professor can get away with it, why can't Bill Gates? Or the guys with the supposedly-enhanced shlongs?

    30. Re:Guh. by Locklin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows users can have their "PC," I'll just call my Linux boxes a workstation, a set-top-box, a home server, etc. "PC" just sounds so bland anyway.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    31. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are PCs.

      They're even the same damn processors now, you can run Windows on Macs and you can run OSX on, uh, not-Macs.

      The most disgusting thing is the chauvinism from BOTH sides, the other operating systems don't exist, and if you're running a PC it must be running Microsoft Something. If you're running a Mac it must be running OS X.

      False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

      here here!

    32. Re:Guh. by edalytical · · Score: 1

      I agree a Mac is a PC. But Apple or anyone else using the term is not being misleading, it is simply a marketing term to simplify the concept of an Apple PC. Microsoft wishes it had a concise brand term to refer to a computer running their operating system, but they don't and the more Apple exploits this the more they'll have to continue using the generic PC term.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    33. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe apple started these ads stereotyping windows as PCs and macs as macs. If you want to sue someone, start there.

      Not interested? Oh, you're a disciple of apple... I see. /me goes back to *nix desktop that beats the shit out of either proprietary system.

      Mac: I'm a mac
      PC: I'm a PC
      *nix: and I'm the 800lb guerrilla in the corner. doing a better job than either of you two quacks.

    34. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs might be PCs but they're so cool and hip. They dont have corners you know? Just curves. Sweet. Also they have colors and arent just black or grey. Double Sweet! And they also cost way more! Trip -wait for it- le sweet!

    35. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do find it disingenuous, though, that neither Apple nor Microsoft distinguish between "PCs" running Windows and those running Linux, and I've never seen a definition of PC that contrasted or excluded Linux systems (since of course the have always run on IBM-legacy hardware).

      Meanwhile, the ads from the Linux crowd are saying "I'm a desktop." [crickets] "No, really I'm a desktop this year."

    36. Re:Guh. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day, you can't play semantic games with terminology. The only definitions of the words that matter in advertising are those of the customers you're trying to talk to.

      Most everyone knows a PC from a Mac. If I tell you I have a PC, you may pedantically try to correct me, but you still know what I'm talking about.

      Additionally, the fact that macs currently run Intel is only relevant to the PC culture as part of the platform's identity. It stems from the PC's set-of-parts culture, versus the mac's sum-of-parts culture. Mac users tend to see the PC user's side as incomplete. PC users tend to think of the latter's as bullshit.

      I side with the former, b/c I do see the benefits (first hand) of a product engineering process that takes both software and hardware considerations into account. But this post isn't about the difference in platforms, it's the difference in terminology.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    37. Re:Guh. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, BUT the PC was tied heavily to IBM. In days of your, anyone said 'PC' the meant IBM.
      Apple had to have their own brand.
      IBM wanted every computer name to lead back to them.

      IT is not a flase dichotomy at all, there really is a difference between an IBM Clone(AKA 'PC') and a 'Mac', there is nothing false about it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, I've run Linux and XP on My Mac. Its the PC with the limitations.

    39. Re:Guh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are PCs.

      They're even the same damn processors now, you can run Windows on Macs and you can run OSX on, uh, not-Macs.

      The most disgusting thing is the chauvinism from BOTH sides, the other operating systems don't exist, and if you're running a PC it must be running Microsoft Something. If you're running a Mac it must be running OS X.

      False advertising is illegal, why isn't massively disseminating misinformation?

      dopey dude

      Apple Macintosh is mearly an alternative label for Personal Computer.

      All Apple products have always been labelled as a Personal Computer, Mac is mearly a Brand Name much like HP Presario, or IBM ThinkCentre.

      iBook is a brand name for a notebook computer

      If A personal Computer does represent a certain type of processor. It represents a target audience and form factors.

      PC's did exist long before X86 was popular.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_computer

    40. Re:Guh. by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      No, they're not by old skool standards, although I have long agreed with your sentiment.  They are Personal Computers, but they are not IBM-PC clones.  That's where "PC" came from, was the short form of IBM-PC.

      I know, I'm an old guy, I was there :-)

    41. Re:Guh. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Nice revisionist history. IBM-compatible PCs and Macintosh PCs were prevalent in the mid 80s. Once other companies started making a lot of IBM-compatible PCs, it made sense to drop IBM, as IBM was no longer the main producer. Mac is just an abbreviation of Macintosh Personal Computer. Besides, since Mac OS was distinctly different than Windows OS, why WOULDN'T Apple want to differentiate themselves from the hoards of otherwise boring clones?

    42. Re:Guh. by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      hoards of otherwise boring clones?

      Well, "boring" is your opinion. BeOS fans would certainly love to have a chat with you ;)

      Anyways, the point here is that Apple leverages the average consumer's lack of knowledge about what constitutes a PC and what constitutes an operating system, and in some form prevent the general public from understanding how things work. Pure and simple.

    43. Re:Guh. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting history. APPLE isn't the one who made the term PC apply to non macs--the INDUSTRY did. I believe this stems from the fact that Apple not only made the hardware (the PC part), but they had a unique operating system (Macintosh OS) that separated them from the others. It has only recently become a nice side benefit for Apple to be "different" than all the others. Dell and Gateway are the same thing to most people, and Apple is something different. It used to be a "bad thing" that Apple was "different", and it has taken many years for advocates to really show people that Macs really aren't that much different (still, most of my older relatives have no idea that a Mac is an intel-based PC), and indeed can do all the stuff you want it to do, despite the FUD of Microsoft cronies everywhere that "there is no software for Macs".

    44. Re:Guh. by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Sun, HP, Amiga, and all of the major hardware vendors at the time didn't make PCs, either?

      Admit it, Apple is not some sort of godly do-everything-wll company. Quit sucking Steve Jobs' dick. They saw the opportunity to differentiate themselves based on the ignorance of the average consumer and they took advantage of it.

      Heck, they're still making profit on the ignorance of consumers, apparently enough.

    45. Re:Guh. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Sun, HP, Amiga, and all of the major hardware vendors at the time didn't make PCs, either?

      No, I'm not saying that (you forgot the more consumer-known computers like Commodore and Atari), but I am saying, to most people at that time there were two choices--an IBM compatible that ran Windows or an Apple that ran Macintosh OS.

      Admit it, Apple is not some sort of godly do-everything-wll company.

      I never said they were in the first place, so what's your point?

      Quit sucking Steve Jobs' dick.

      Now there's another quality slashdot contribution.

      They saw the opportunity to differentiate themselves based on the ignorance of the average consumer and they took advantage of it.

      Seems we have nothing to debate then? Keeping in mind that it was fortunate for Apple to fall into this side benefit of differentiation and not an overt tactic they made themselves (well, not until the mid/late 90s with the "Think Different" campaign).

      Heck, they're still making profit on the ignorance of consumers, apparently enough.

      Again, thanks for contributing nothing.

  5. Deepak Chopra? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Funny

    If that quack uses Windows then I'm going to hug my Linux box when I get home.

    1. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't you see how they appealed to the linux guys? That one dude had a beard!

    2. Re:Deepak Chopra? by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      energy work

      Is that "kilograms meter squared per second squared" energy? Or what units do you use for energy?

    3. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're doing so much better with Richard Stallman. A fat, dumpy hobo with asperger's syndrome. Cuddle up.

    4. Re:Deepak Chopra? by andreamer · · Score: 1

      In the words of the great Julia Sweeney, "Deepak Chopra is full of sh(t!"

    5. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      existance

      SOMEONE is not using Firefox!

    6. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, you don't hug your linux box every night before bed time?

      kiss that geek card good bye, fella!

    7. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some of Deepak's later stuff has been a bit fluffy, but his earlier publishings were very informative to students of both New Age philosophy and energy work. He explained the chakras and personal energy fields very well. I have spoken to Reiki masters who cite his work, Wiccans(and other occultists) who have improved their magics from learning energy control, and Martial artists who have improved their skills through better visualization of their chi/ki just to name a few . All thanks to Deepak.

      Fluffy? Man... here I thought a friend of mine who claimed to see auras in badly-compressed JPEGs was... fluffy.

    8. Re:Deepak Chopra? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some of Deepak's later stuff has been a bit fluffy, but his earlier publishings were very informative to students of both New Age philosophy and energy work. He explained the chakras and personal energy fields very well. I have spoken to Reiki masters who cite his work, Wiccans(and other occultists) who have improved their magics from learning energy control, and Martial artists who have improved their skills through better visualization of their chi/ki just to name a few . All thanks to Deepak.

      One's use of an OS does not bespeak their worth as a person or teacher, just as one's faith in a diety does not justify their continued existance.

      From this statement alone I'd have to conclude it does, however, say something about intelligence.

    9. Re:Deepak Chopra? by und0 · · Score: 1

      I'll take Guru Pitka over Deepak Chopra any time! Mariska hargitay... ^__^;

    10. Re:Deepak Chopra? by Zillatron · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy

      The association fallacy would apply if we were criticizing Windows because Deepak Chopra chose to say something good about the operating system of its own accord. In this case MicroSoft paid him to become a spokesman for their product. MicroSoft asking for his endorsement is an endorsement of the man. If a lemon-lime soda asked R. Kelley to endorse their product you would learn something about the values of the soda manufacturer.

    11. Re:Deepak Chopra? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Well. We already knew he would say anything for money. We just didn't knew how far he was willing to go.

    12. Re:Deepak Chopra? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Let's step back and realize that it was, first of all, a joke.

  6. I liked it. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw the ad yesterday - they played the ad in my area during My Name is Earl on NBC.

    Seems to say that while Apple is hyping their coolness, we're still getting a lot of things done for a lot of real people.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:I liked it. by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seems to say that while Apple is hyping their coolness, we're still getting a lot of things done for a lot of real people.

      Wait, don't you mean "they're still getting a lot of things done..."?

      It's a Freudian Astroturf!

    2. Re:I liked it. by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 1

      How many "every day people" dive with sharks or have been to outer space? I get the point, and everyone has something special about them, but I think they're trying to hype "cool without trying" instead.

    3. Re:I liked it. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The basic failing of the ad is that the Apple ads don't say "Macs are for cool people, PCs are for dorks". The Apple ads say "Macs are cool, PCs are dorks". That's a every different thing. Even complete dorks want cool toys, not clunky toys.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    4. Re:I liked it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, um, uh ... I'm not a PC user! Girl Scouts honor!

  7. I'm a PC.. by boredandatwork · · Score: 0

    ...and I'll never understand people in marketing.

    --
    Yeah, I feed the trolls. Can't help myself. Sorry.
  8. Unedited version: I'm a PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but I run Linux.

    1. Re:Unedited version: I'm a PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a PC, but I'm made by Apple.

    2. Re:Unedited version: I'm a PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is everyone caring: " " Right there...

    3. Re:Unedited version: I'm a PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he would have to speak in a different language so nobody can understand him. And since few people are willing to help teach his language (let's call it 1337Z0l2Z), it is simpler to just ignore him and talk to another personality.

      Yea, I can see that commercial.

  9. The hidden meaning by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The new ad is saying that PC users are a diverse cross-section of humanity, while Mac-users are stuck-up racist white people. Of course, they are.

    1. Re:The hidden meaning by M-RES · · Score: 1

      I'm not racist, stuck-up OR white. Oh wait, yeah I'm white - but my Mac aint ;)

    2. Re:The hidden meaning by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I'm white - but my Mac aint ;)

      Aren't we all just aqua-blue on the inside?

    3. Re:The hidden meaning by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but I'm green on the inside.

    4. Re:The hidden meaning by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      You mean like the Apple "Think Different" campaign several years ago where Apple showed a cross section of society, different people, usig Macs....

      Wow, way to be cutting edge when getting you message out...what's next they're going to steal 1980's car marketing campaigns...."Oh, What a Feeling...Windows!"

    5. Re:The hidden meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you might want to get that checked.

    6. Re:The hidden meaning by M-RES · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find I'm a shade of beige on the inside - a similar kind of creamy-beige you'd find on a Vic20! heh

    7. Re:The hidden meaning by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Aren't we all just aqua-blue on the inside?

      The bits I've seen were mostly pink and red.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:The hidden meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Henry, how racist of you.

  10. Lie! by rlauzon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a lie! The guy with the beard has to be running Linux.

    1. Re:Lie! by Vagnaard · · Score: 1

      Even so, he'd still be a pc.

      --
      He had a baseball bat, and I was tied to a chair. Pissing him off was the smart thing to do. - Max Payne
    2. Re:Lie! by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but he must be running it as root, too. http://www.garyshood.com/root

    3. Re:Lie! by psxman · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've got your correlation and causation backwards. Having a beard doesn't make you run Linux; running Linux makes you get a beard.

    4. Re:Lie! by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      I hope "get a beard" is only in the loosest sense(s) of the phrase, as I'm trying to get my girlfriend to run linux. I don't mind some scratchiness, but please not from her face.

    5. Re:Lie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, apparently someone hasn't read Cryptonomicon.

    6. Re:Lie! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Or an iPod. Or...

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:Lie! by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it's not a neckbeard...

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    8. Re:Lie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a beard, not a neck-beard.

  11. Awaiting Apple by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    To use the failed Seinfeld commercials in thiers.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Awaiting Apple by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Apple needs to offer Seinfeld $10 million just to stick it to Microsoft.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:Awaiting Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I actually found the latest Seinfeld ad funny (the picture on the shoe circus club card was great), but it made absolutely no sense. It was basically: Bill wears shoes and has a sense of humor...so buy Windows.

      It must have been the same ad agency that made those Hootie and the Blowfish Burger King commercials. I have honestly not eaten at Burger King since those commercials debuted. They (and "the King") disturb me that much.

  12. A beard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it a wise beard, guy?

  13. Apple counters by philspear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Prediction: Apple, in what is becoming a war of "Who can make the most annoying ad" hires carrottop to do their next series.

    Microsoft responds with bill gates simply walking on camera, then making "the most annoying sound in the world" for 2 minutes straight (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cVlTeIATBs)

  14. No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

    and a guy with a beard.

    Okay, you had me up until that point, but this campaign is as doomed as the previous. We all know which operating system guys with beards use.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      OS/2?

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      Emacs?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by AioKits · · Score: 3, Funny

      and a guy with a beard.

      Okay, you had me up until that point, but this campaign is as doomed as the previous. We all know which operating system guys with beards use.

      Beard OS?

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    4. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      We all know which operating system guys with beards use.

      OS X?

    5. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Okay, you had me up until that point, but this campaign is as doomed as the previous. We all know which operating system guys with beards use.

      Avast, me hearties! Dread pirate Philski here to set the record straight on bearded computer usage, from a pirate that has worn everything from a chinstrap to a friendly mutton chops to the present full beard. While not pillaging or grogging with my favorite wenches, I use this here Windows computer, along with a RHEL box. 'Tis what thar employar gives me. At home, I use a Vista box for planning future pillaging, grogging, wench-gatherings and the like. Savvy?

    6. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by hey! · · Score: 1

      Err... you do know that MacOS is Unix?

      My only complaint is that they boot you right into a GUI. What if I don't want a GUI?

      Of course, the warm fuzzies I get from having a CLI as close that the alt key is the confidence that if something goes wrong with the GUI I can still have a computer while I muck around with X86Config. So maybe it isn't an entirely rational position.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      We all know which operating system guys with beards use.

      He looked like a mainframe guy to me...

    8. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Custom

    9. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      My only complaint is that they boot you right into a GUI. What if I don't want a GUI?

      Make sure you set the login screen so users have to type a username and password. (I don't remember if you can use the Preferences pane to do this, but Onyx will definitely let you.) At the login screen type >console and there you go, no GUI.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    10. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Idbar · · Score: 1

      You tell me! I didn't see any TradeMark on the whole website

    11. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Oops! Yes, I found it... it's BOS

    12. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emacs?

      Now if only it had a decent text editor. . .

    13. Re:No, I'm sorry, can't accept that by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Too bad it has a lousy text editor.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. "Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "David Webster, Microsoft general manager of brand and marketing strategy, says Microsoft had "to take back the PC brand and tell the truth about it." referring to Microsoft's latest ad that hits back at the Apple commercials. Like -- they own the PC brand now? OK -- We can admire someone who stands up for himself succinctly when picked on. Apple will never be able to use the "I'm a PC" line again now. However, in this ad Microsoft tries to appropriate the commons with a sinister attempt to hijack the PC. They want to confuse general public into thinking -- if it doesn't have Windows, it's not a PC. Is there an appropriate way to inform the public that the PC is an open platform that can run many other operating systems?

    1. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd love to see a Mac vs PC ad where PC gets attacked by an angry stuffed penguin and after a flash he gets up with completely new clothes saying:

      PC: Hey... that was... refreshing... I feel.... different!
      Mac: PC, watch out, there's a virus!
      PC: The power of GNU compells you! *hits virus*. I feel Powerful... I feel invincible... I feel... FREE!!!
      Mac: Want a performance race?
      PC: You betcha!
      *Mac and PC begin sprinting*

      Female voice: "Linux. Just like a Mac, but Free".

    2. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

      Like -- they own the PC brand now? OK -- We can admire someone who stands up for himself succinctly when picked on. Apple will never be able to use the "I'm a PC" line again now. However, in this ad Microsoft tries to appropriate the commons with a sinister attempt to hijack the PC. They want to confuse general public into thinking -- if it doesn't have Windows, it's not a PC. Is there an appropriate way to inform the public that the PC is an open platform that can run many other operating systems?

      Mac already branded PCs as computers with Windows on them with their commercials. To now blame MS for that image is ridiculous.

    3. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Apple will never be able to use the "I'm a PC" line again now.

      Wanna bet?

    4. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you insane? It's not sinister. Most common people call Windows computers a PC. Is it technically wrong, of course. Does it matter? No. Apple didn't invent the common usage - they exploited it. Thats what MS has to respond to. You expect them to take an aside to snide that PC means "personal computer" and Macs and Windows machines are both PCs? Ummm...get a clue.

    5. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft tries to appropriate the commons with a sinister attempt to hijack the PC. They want to confuse general public into thinking -- if it doesn't have Windows, it's not a PC.

      You'll excuse me, but you know what these ads spoof: the I'm a PC / I'm a Mac ads by Apple. If someone is confused, then it must be Apple.

      And of course this follows an even older tradition that PC-s always come with Microsoft software since PC-s were first on the market (DOS). Like it or not, it's only been recently that the notion of non-Microsoft operating systems are somehow "normal" on a desktop PC has been challenged. By that point, PC is for all practical purposes, equal to WinTel (and if AMD dies, it'll be even more so).

    6. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by cabjf · · Score: 1

      Actually IBM branded their line of computers as "PC". (Yes, I know the term Personal Computer existed before hand, but IBM made it their own) Once IBM went with Microsoft to provide the OS, the term PC and Windows was established as interchangeable in the public's view. The Apple ads are just capitalizing on the public's own perception of a computer with Windows on as something generic but a Mac as something different. (hmm, Macs advertised as something different, where have we heard that before?)

    7. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Trying to make PC a "brand" is entirely counterproductive to the message of ubiquity they're trying to communicate. I can't easily imagine my grandparents, or parents, using a Mac after seeing one of the ads. It's like imagining them using an iPod or wearing Nike gear. However I can't really imagine them standing up and saying "I'm a PC" either, although they all use Wintel boxes.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    8. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Flyers2391 · · Score: 0

      Kinda reminds me of this from a little while back: http://blog.wired.com/cultofmac/2007/03/novell_launches.html/

    9. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAWWWW... PC generally means x86 + DOS / Windows and has ever since IBM released the 5150.

    10. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      They could **both** get attacked by angry penguins...

      PC: Hey now! I'm a PC with Red Hat Enterprise Linux!
      Mac: And I'm Mac with Ubuntu!
      PC: Looks like you might still have some bugs in you.
      (Mac pulls a visible obstruction off his shirt and throws it off-screen)
      Mac: Well, somebody's got to test the software before it gets into the packaged and included in your stable, reliable, and supported platform.
      PC: Yeah, I guess you're right. Thank you Mac! I mean, thank you Ubuntu.
      Mac: You're welcome, PC.
      PC: Ya know... you've got some nifty features like the latest version of Firefox and OpenOffice that I'd like to try something.
      Mac: Oh, really? Well, you can run me, too!
      PC: Sweet. That sure is nice to know. You're a real good pal Ubuntu.
      (they hug, screen fades)

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    11. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Female voice: "Linux. Just like a Mac, but Free".

      I'm thinking something more along the lines of PC = Natale Portman at the beginning of V for Vendetta, and Linux is her about 3/4 of the way through.

    12. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      You could have a counter-ad. While Microsoft may have its holds in the public and corporate sectors, Linux is, to my knowledge, much preferred when it comes to science, computers, and math.

      So do a parody ad, with lines like:
      "I'm a PC, and I'm curing cancer."
      "I'm a PC, and I'm trading stocks."
      "I'm a PC, and I'm advancing robotics."
      "I'm a PC, and I do special effects."
      "We're a PC, and we offer things for free."
      [insert Linux logo of choice here]

      If you could somehow get that out there to the general public (Youtube push?) it might make a brief headway, but I doubt you'll ever change the notion that computer==Windows.

      How many people do you know that call their computer a hard drive? Or think that the computer is the monitor? This stuff will come down gradually over time, but not until most of the last generation dies off.

    13. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by RocketRabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't say that Linux is "just like" the Mac. From 1994 until 2000 I used Linux to a greater or lesser degree. I also occasionally used BeOS and always had a Windows partition around for gaming. In 2000 I switched to using FreeBSD and that was an upgrade in my opinion. In 2002 I got a Powerbook G4 and never looked back. Until this year, when I got the Mac Pro (finally replacing the Powerbook after 6 years!) I didn't use anything else, except a bit of gaming on the Windows Media Center my wife won at the state fair. I recently installed Ubuntu in Parallels, and noticed that it's decent, but X.org still has some serious shortcomings.

      Color profiles still are not implemented in any meaningful way for starters, which for me is huge. Audio is nowhere near Apple's standards. I use Audio Units Lab quite frequently, and there is no real analog on Linux that I can get worked out straight. Quartz composer also has no rival on Linux. These are just fairly basic features that you get free with the OS. The argument that programming for the Mac is easier than anything else out there except maybe Smalltalk could be brought up. Additionally, I have plugged in a whole bunch of peripherals from heaven knows where, and they have all worked with no drivers or configuration needed.

      I really still miss the /proc filesystem, though there are some similar features with the Mac. Also Apple for some reason neglected to take the jail facility from FreeBSD which blows my mind. OS X is not perfect, but Linux still has a long way to go and will never be "just like" OS X.

    14. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And harder to use. And confusing. And not unified. With even less software.

    15. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by diesel66 · · Score: 1

      Female voice: "Linux. Just like a Mac, but Free".

      Just like a mac? Um, no. I am able to use Linux to my advantage since I have years of experience, but in the hands of my father (who, incidentally, went from windows to mac a year ago) it would be pointless. He'd never get the thing to boot, let alone configure a printer. Joe Average isn't going to run Linux for a loooooong time.

      I'm all for evangelizing a great OS, buy let's not mislead people in the process.

      --



      eleven plus two / twelve plus one
    16. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by synthespian · · Score: 1

      "I'm Linux and I can't load a time series of 20 years worth of inflation rates index in OpenOffice without you having to go out and make yourself a cup of coffee because, apparently, my algorithms suck."

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    17. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Ok, not a real Linux problem. Unfair.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    18. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, your rendition of "PC on Linux" reminds me of Purple Tentacle at the beginning of Day of the Tentacle.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    19. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm Skynet and I'm gonna enslave you all.

    20. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Funny that you mention Natalie Portman and V for Vendetta. Are you sure you didn't read the Slashdot Journal entry I wrote about my switch to GNU/Linux?

    21. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      I've gotten a lot of interest in Linux from non-techies with this angle.  I say, "I can't actually say that it's virus proof....but it's virus proof".  And they get very, very interested, because getting a virus makes people feel bad and stupid--they don't like it one bit, even as they can't seem to help themselves getting pwned every other day.

      A couple are even using Linux now.  Linux really is ready for the desktop...

    22. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by supertjx · · Score: 1

      This is a war to win public opinion. And for 99.99% of the public who are not slashdot readers, the only 2 choices are PC (i.e. WIndows) or Mac. It's not Microsoft's job to correct the public's misconception of what a PC is, nor will most people bother to understand even if Microsoft tried.

    23. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Just film yourself saying "I'm a PC and I run Linux", "I'm an engineer|doctor|writer|grandpa|whatever and my PC runs Linux|BSD|anythingbutwindows" and things like that. People will get the published movies, edit them and assemble them into movies that say the truths Microsoft is trying to hide - that PCs run things other than Windows and that lots of non-geeks run Linux.

      Other suggestions: a phone saying "I'm a phone and I run Linux", a supercomputer saying "I'm a supercomputer and I run Linux", a home router saying "I am a router and I run Linux" and so on.

    24. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is there an appropriate way to inform the public that the PC is an open platform that can run many other operating systems?"

      Are you serious?

      It's pretty safe to assume that the people who actually care that the box can run other OS's already know it. Those who don't know it never will, I'm afraid....unless there is some Linux branding seed money floating around in the neighborhood of $80-100M.

      PS: Apple can use the "I'm a PC" line for as long as they want. In fact, they could rightfully claim copyright infringement against Microsoft. They have 4 years prior use, in form and function. But every day that Microsoft runs that commercial, at least part of the value extends to Apple. Not a person on earth doesn't conjure up an image of those hilarious Mac / PC ads everytime they see the new Microsoft Windows ads.

      It's a bit like the tobacco companies running "don't smoke" ads. People who are drawn to smoking can't help but think of smoking when they see/hear them.

      Here's a test: Do NOT think of a beautiful blond woman in a tight bikini. See, it doesn't work.

      Sadly, the "general public" will be forever confused. How else could we end up with the options we do for November elections??

      PS: Did you read that the new Microsoft Windows ads were actually created on a Mac? Priceless.

    25. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
      The timing on that was quite close. I was thinking of her experience immediately after she was freed and just before she asked to be brought up to the roof, and how she transformed in the close-up shot on her.

      I interpreted it not that she had become a fighter, but that freedom of fear of death meant profound peace, and total freedom -- which I guess is a great asset in someone who fights oppression. A very powerful image, something I'll probably remember for a while. Well, that and 'Your skin is so smooth, not rough like the sand.'

    26. Re:"Hi, I'm a PC, and I run Linux" by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Linux went a looong way since 2002? Heck, it went a long way in the last 3 years even.

  17. Should they have said "I use a PC"? by mveloso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People are not Personal Computers. People use personal computers.

    Have these people subsumed into the MS-Borg, and they really are now PCs?

    1. Re:Should they have said "I use a PC"? by miscz · · Score: 1

      I think everybody is missing the point. IMHO this ad tried to show that PCs are a diverse bunch. They are mostly running Windows OS but come from different manufacturers, in many forms, are dynamic in getting everywhere. Not just unifided glossy white/black/aluminum of Apple PCs for trendy hipsters. Those people use and are PCs in this sense.

      On the other hand, since people do not notice this, the advertising has failed.

    2. Re:Should they have said "I use a PC"? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "We are a PC. Resistance is futile"

  18. Its a good comerical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think its a clever stab at the mac Commercials and i think its way better than the Seinfeld commercials they were going with. It Highlights that People who use PCs are a wide variety of types of users and are not all middle aged accountants.

  19. Late comer as always by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They always arrive late to the party, but when you can buy small countries and outlast everyone else, does it matter if you are late as long as you show?

    In theory it also lets you learn from others mistakes.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  20. Guy with a Beard by timoguin · · Score: 1

    I think they went a little overboard by including the guy with the beard. That shit is nuts.

  21. for the love of god by nimbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    just buy vista. it doesnt matter if you use it or not. i cant stand anymore of this "im a..." bullshit. Someone at least tag this with a "pleasestop"??

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:for the love of god by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      New Age Advertising: Buy our product and we'll stop harassing you to buy our product.

    2. Re:for the love of god by Garabito · · Score: 1

      Someone at least tag this with a "pleasestop"??

      Sorry, those tags are reserved for 'Slashdot's Disagree Mail' stories

  22. This banner ad was on IGN this morning by Rashkae · · Score: 1

    This wasn't a spoof, but an honest banner ad at ign.com this morning that linked back to MS campaign site.

    MS advert

  23. Re:We all know which operating systems... by M-RES · · Score: 1

    Yeah - Amigas! heh ;D

  24. PC.... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    does that include linux users? Does that also include the fact Macs are technically PCs, personal computers and on the x86 architecture?

  25. Mac vs. PC parody by dlsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given that Microsoft is parodying the Mac vs. PC ads, this is on topic, right?

    Best Mac vs. PC parody ever.

    Computers suck.

    1. Re:Mac vs. PC parody by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Too true, too true. :-)

  26. Ad Video by The+Moof · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Ad Video by iknowcss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This commercial is a MUCH better response to Apple's ads. It's professional and doesn't leave you sitting there thinking "what the FUCK is going on here?"

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    2. Re:Ad Video by sheldon · · Score: 1

      That's pretty good. It's like buh-bye Apple, there's a new sheriff in town. :-)

    3. Re:Ad Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a PC and I sell fish...

      LOOOOL!

      And the beard...

      That was the 3% Linux-on-PC guy?

    4. Re:Ad Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like an ad going like this....
      In a world without walls...who needs windows or gates.

  27. So let me get this straight... by rk · · Score: 1

    Now Microsoft is copying advertising concepts from Apple? At least there's consistency

    How long until we see Bill doing product announcements wearing a black turtleneck, jeans, and tennis shoes?

    And no, I'm not an Apple fanboy. I have a WinXP desktop, a Linux desktop, and a Mac OS X laptop on my desk at home. The two desktops get used regularly. I last booted the OS X box 2 months ago. The work Mac runs iTunes and Safari, which only goes to Gmail and is a synergy client to my work Linux box.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by nomadic · · Score: 0

      Now Microsoft is copying advertising concepts from Apple? At least there's consistency

      Keep in mind they have the same advertising firm as Apple...

  28. Am I a PC running XP/2003 or Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows has had a natural monopoly on desktop apps like forever.

    Of course PCs have been getting the job done(and gaming to boot) forever with the good-old 2003 and XP which are fine operating systems.

    It seems Apple has never really been more than a few points of a threat. The real threat is that MS has provided no compelling reason to upgrade to Vista, and these ads don't change that.

    Spend your money to make Vista (or son of Vista) what you promised in the beginning.

  29. This is consistent. by greenguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back in the day, before the rise of Linux, I remember reading analysts who said that the entire history of the retail computer industry consisted of everyone imitating Apple. Windows 95 was the biggest example, but there have been others. This is one.

    Oh, I should be clear -- the reason they don't catch more flak for this imitation is that they don't do all that good a job at it. I haven't seen the ad yet, but I suspect this is also consistent.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  30. Microsoft, Live without Walls by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering the years it took them to implement a rudimentary firewall into Windows, I'm surprised that they're going with the "Live without Walls" slogan.

    But, putting that aside, these ads are much, much better than the Seinfeld ones.

  31. Best Mac Ad parody ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/437054

    After seeing all of the mac ads, and mac ad parodies, ones with or without linux, ones that try to paint the PC-guy as being really cool, this is the only one I've ever really liked, and probably the truest one, too.

  32. Microsoft just don't get it by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find it amazing the extent that Microsoft is screwing up at the moment.

    Hey Apple marketing guys, Microsoft is doing your work for you!

    This one is for free:

    Justin Long: I'm a Mac.

    John Hodgman and large crowd, together: And I'm a PC.

    Justin Long [sincerely]: Hey guys, nice to meet you! There's so many of you! And you look like cool guys!

    [John Hodgman looks smug]

    Justin Long: I'd really like to hang out with you guys. [face lights up with idea]. Hey, would you like so see some of the new products we're working on?

    [Lots of enthusiastic noise and nots - everyone follows Justin as he exits stage right. John Hodgman desperately tries to stop people. Final sequence - John Hodgman on his own, looking sorry for himself and a bit confused.]

    1. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another one:

      Justin Long: I'm a Mac.

      John Hodgman and large crowd, together: And I'm a PC.

      Justin Long [Friendly and sincerely]: Hey guys, how's it going?

      Crowd: [Friendly hellos.]

      Justin Long [sincerely]: How are you getting on with Vista?

      Crowd: [Lots of mururing and head shaking].

      Justin Long [wanting to help]: Oh. Well maybe I can help.

      John Hodgman [frantic]: No!

      [John Hodgman tries to usher everyone out as Justin Long looks on with a bemused and apologetic look]

    2. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality:

      John: Justin, how many of them will work on Windows?

      Justin: Well, none of course!

      [Crowd walks back to being with John Hodgman]

    3. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Justin: Well, none of course!

      Safari? iTunes? iPods? iPhones?

    4. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      WANT!

      Seriously. Microsoft decided to play hardball. Having a nice advertising saga - an "ad battle" might be soooo coool!

    5. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I'd modify by having diverse people representing Linux/BSD variants come out, and have PC (Hodgman) refuse to work with them or talk to them because he was on a power trip. And then have Mac work well with them, talking about how they used the same formats/protocols. "Hey, we can talk with SSH without installing any additional software!"

      On the other hand, most people wouldn't understand what the hell all that meant, since loads of people still don't even know what Linux is.

    6. Re:Microsoft just don't get it by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another freebie:

      PC [Hodgman] sitting in his king chair, surrounded by windows that have no apparent walls holding them up. Mac [Long] walks up.

      Mac: What's up PC?

      PC: Enjoying life without walls. I'm still the king, and all my subjects are PCs.

      (Strangers come up behind PC, carry off some of his stuff)

      PC: Hey! These guys are stealing all my stuff! (disgustedly sitting back down) Maybe going without walls was a bad idea.

      Mac: Could be, but I have to ask. If you don't want walls, why do you have Windows?

      PC: (long pause) I banish you... again.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Oh, good Lord by David+Gerard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Vista's slow, it's fat, my software doesn't work, I can't get drivers, the User Access Control's a pain in the ass and my network grinds to a crawl when I play an mp3! What do you call that?"

    "... The Aristocrats!"

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  35. Re:New ads ..... Maybe "PC" could stand for by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Prevalent Clunker

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  36. Weakness by Ungulate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My father was in advertising, and he always spoke, as if it were a rule, that you NEVER respond to criticism in an advertisement, only assert your strengths. The fact that Microsoft feels cornered like this speaks volumes. While they're still the 800lb gorilla, they perceive Apple as a real threat now.

    1. Re:Weakness by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's worse is that, not only do they perceive Apple as a threat (because, you're right - simply the fact that they are focusing advertising efforts to counter the Apple ads shows they are concerned), but they can't even manage to do it in an original way. They are basically ripping off Apple's marketing campaign in an effort to weaken said campaign. But, hey, if you can't be original, it's always a good idea to copy those who are.

      Seriously speaking, Microsoft's marketing firm needs to be fired. Actually, as a Mac guy, scratch that suggestion. Keep up the great work guys!

    2. Re:Weakness by Sean0michael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Our current presidential candidates should take that page out of your father's book. I might consider voting for one of them.

      --
      Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    3. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to rant here.

      It's McCain who's been consistently lying. What do you think Obama should do, just sit back and take it? That's what Kerry did, and that's why he lost.

      Unfortunately stating your positions is not enough in today's politics. And in the case of McCain, when he states his positions it's often the opposite of what he said last week. (His take on bank regulation being the latest example of this.) Do you expect Obama not to capitalize on this? Don't you think it's dangerous to have the executive branch be led by someone who says one thing to the cameras and votes another way in the Senate, repeatedly? Does it not scare you that Palin says war with Russia is possible? Or that McCain this week confused Spain's head of state with Latin American leftists? That McCain says he wants to kick out lobbyists, when its the lobbyists themselves who are running the campaign? Obama, for any of his flaws, hasn't made mistakes nearly this severe. And I'm only scratching the surface.

      I certainly don't agree with Obama on everything. But I don't think this election is about him. It's about John McCain vs. Reality. Do we want someone who is willing to face reality from time to time, or do we want a complete nutball who wants to hand America to the business elite and go to war with everyone, who this week questioned whether NATO ally Spain is a "friend" or "enemy"?

      How about the fact that in 2005, McCain was pushing that we hand Social Security to those Wall Street types? You know, the ones that are causing this bank crisis? The ones John McCain is now railing against?

    4. Re:Weakness by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      Your dad must have a short memory. There are many examples of direct competition in advertising including some very famous campaigns including the Pepsi Challenge.

    5. Re:Weakness by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      My father was in advertising, and he always spoke, as if it were a rule, that you NEVER respond to criticism in an advertisement, only assert your strengths. The fact that Microsoft feels cornered like this speaks volumes. While they're still the 800lb gorilla, they perceive Apple as a real threat now.

      If I hadn't seen the Mac commercials, I would say these were excellent. Having seen the Mac commercials, I think Microsoft's new motto should be:

      Microsoft, we take our competitors' ideas and pass them off as our own. Even their commercials!

      By responding to Apple's commercial, they are only acknowledging Apple's success. They need to get the same message across but without the "I'm a PC" line.

      Personally, I have found that the best advertising strategy is a great product. If you have a great product, all you have to do is make the public aware of it.

      Hi, I'm Mark Shuttleworth, and I'm here to tell you that your computing options are not limited to Mac and Windows. My Ubuntu Linux is faster and more secure than either of them. Best of all, it's free. To find out more, go to Ubuntu.com.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well, if your father said that.

      Your father's advertising business was more succesful than Microsoft, right?

    7. Re:Weakness by tenton · · Score: 1

      My father was in advertising, and he always spoke, as if it were a rule, that you NEVER respond to criticism in an advertisement, only assert your strengths. The fact that Microsoft feels cornered like this speaks volumes. While they're still the 800lb gorilla, they perceive Apple as a real threat now.

      One of the big reasons on why this is the case is that now the 800lb gorilla has acknowledged the competitor, which in turn may make more people aware of the competitor and realize there's another option. It's a big no-no when you're the top dog by a wide margin.

    8. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      as a Mac guy

      Ha ha. People like you make me laugh. "Windows guys" too. You are loyal to a fucking MACHINE. A MACHINE. Why do you even give a shit what other people do? What possible effect would their choice of MACHINE have on you? Car analogy: "As a Mercedes guy, I hope BMW dies!!1!oneone!1!" Stupid.

    9. Re:Weakness by tenton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's generally okay for the smaller company to mention the bigger company in their ads; everyone knows the bigger company. The goal there is to say "we're better than ". People already have the point of reference.

      Now, when you're the 800lb gorilla, you do not generally want to mention the little guy; you've just given them credibility.

      Now when the companies are neck and neck (neither really dominating the other marketshare wise), that's also a different story (there's no real rule* there).

    10. Re:Weakness by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      The current hot trend in personal computing is notebooks, and Apple has made big gains there. They now have about 10% of the notebook market.

      Ballmer must be sweating bullets.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    11. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My father was in advertising, and he always spoke, as if it were a rule, that you NEVER respond to criticism in an advertisement

      My father used to say "never quote your father"

    12. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a weakness just as the Coke ads mentioning Pepsi were a weakness--the ads that formed the no mention rules.

    13. Re:Weakness by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      While they're still the 800lb gorilla, they perceive Apple as a real threat now.

      What's nice is Apple is only a threat to Microsoft's wallet, and not to consumers. This type of competition can only make life better for us.

      That being said, it reminded me of that "I'm an American" commercial from a few years ago where it showed all different race, creeds, languages saying it. I like.

    14. Re:Weakness by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      But, hey, if you can't be original, it's always a good idea to copy those who are.

      Okay, nothing's really original, but those Seinfeld ads were too surreal to be called completely unimaginative. The grandmother living in the house for 12 years...(Windows 95?)

    15. Re:Weakness by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "But, hey, if you can't be original, it's always a good idea to copy those who are."

      If you actually saw these ads, you might not feel comfortable about using the word "always" in that sentence.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    16. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah I really like the Apple commercial where they do the PC vs Mac thing and thing at the end, "we can even run Microsoft Office"

      Bwahaha, sorry that one just tops it off and way to stick your foot in your mouth.

      Seriously MS cut Apples access to MS Office and watch them squirm.

      ahhh I could give a shit less about all this, it is only right that they respond to the pompous ass ads that Apple puts out. MS should brag about all they have done for the world and what people have accomplished while they used Windows on a PC.

      I walk into a University and I see XP loaded on all the computers.
      I walk into a hospital and I see XP running on the computers.
      I walk into my companies office and the accountants are using XP.
      I walk into my orthopedic surgeons office and he has XP running.

      Last time I used Apple was at a class I took back in high school for video and art, we read a thick book on how to use Final Cut Pro 9. I loved the program and you could do so many professional things with it, but I couldn't get it for Windows. That pissed me off they didn't release it for Windows, yet they have the audacity to sit there with the commercials making fun of MS yet still suck on the tit of MS Office.

    17. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! And that's how MS really seems as a business strategist as well, reactionary.

    18. Re:Weakness by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ, parodying does not implicate lack of originality, just parody. Might not be the best kind of advertisement they can do (actually I think it is the best thing MS can do because geeks like delicious irony) but a parody cannot be considered unoriginal unless it is ripping another already existing parody.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    19. Re:Weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that. It demonstrates at least a couple fundamental gaps in understanding based around system versus users. Apple's ad focus is obviously based on anthropomorphizing the systems. Where as Microsoft's are focused on substituting the user. The system is not the user and the user is not the system. PCs and Macs don't have mothers and employees. PC and Mac users do and in the end, there's not a lot of difference in the groups of users. And lest we forget Mac is a PC too.

  37. I am just waiting for ... by slashdotlurker · · Score: 2, Funny

    The announcement that Mac ads involving "I am a Mac, I am a PC" infringe Microsoft's patent US PTO 123456789, but Apple would be welcome to sign an indemnification deal that allows Microsoft to sell coupons to TV watchers to watch Mac ads.

  38. I really liked the Seinfeld ads... by JMZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They were exactly what MS needed - some humanization. They were sly. Some people here didn't seem to get or like them (well, they hated them for the most part) - but they made sense. They were the kind of ads you put out when you're winning, which, make no mistake, MS is.

    This new ad is just sad, they seem like a desperate response. The kind of commercial you do when you're losing. That's not the vibe they need.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  39. Live Without Walls by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Windows, you don't have any practical walls, firewalls, that is.

    Just remember, with Microsoft, simply because there are no walls doesn't mean you aren't behind locked Gates.

    1. Re:Live Without Walls by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      In fact since Windows XP Service Pack 2, it's had a reasonably good firewall.

      Doesn't stop the Windows experience being a piece of shit though. (says part-time Vista user and CISSP.)

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
  40. CustomPC uses Vibrant pop-ups. by argent · · Score: 1

    Please don't support sites like the referenced CustomPC that use Vibrant's obtrusive hover pop-ups, until Vibrant returns the ability for end-users to opt-out of their obnoxious ads.

    1. Re:CustomPC uses Vibrant pop-ups. by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      I would think that with a 5-digit UID you would have heard of "Firefox", "Adblock", and "NoScript".

    2. Re:CustomPC uses Vibrant pop-ups. by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      The web is about community. There are many other people who may not have heard about firefox, adblock and noscript, maybe he is concerned for them?

  41. HA HA Microsoft by ITman75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love how you are doing the advertising for Apple now!!! Like Microsoft is really making people love them with those ads that really don't say anything about their OS.

  42. Diver eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oddly enough dive computer interface software used to ONLY be available on Windows. Just two years ago there was absolutely nothing available on the Mac, which is the ultimate reason I ultimately purchased VMWare Fusion. Today there are several companies making new dive computers with Mac-compatible interface software.

    So they found one diver using Windows, but from what I've seen the Mac bug is biting a lot of my diving friends to the point where there's finally a recognized market for dive software that runs on Macs.

  43. PC or MAC - they still fail by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After years working on Windows & OSX I have found they both fail, both have their quirks, both are imperfect.

    PCs are cheaper, Macs are prettier

    Take your pick

    People are people

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:PC or MAC - they still fail by Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen.

      Computers (and operating systems) still suck. They just suck in different ways.

      BTW: Where the fuck's my flying car?!? I WAS PROMISED A FLYING CAR!

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    2. Re:PC or MAC - they still fail by geekoid · · Score: 1

      While there are cheaper PCs, there just that, cheaper.
      Compare similar systems.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Congratulations, Microsoft by houbysoft · · Score: 1

    This is just lame. The apple's ads are sometimes funny, this is really horrible. Microsoft, try being more creative. You copied the OS, now you copy ads.

  45. Not seeing the forest for the trees by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the biggest comments about the "I'm a mac" ads is that they are snobby and condescending. People relate more to "PC" than to "Mac". Many people see "Mac" as an elitist. I am betting that someone at Microsoft's advertising company saw the articles about it and created this campaign. It is a positive campaign where "PC" is made in to the everyman, someone just like the viewer.

    Everyone who is thinking this is "also-ran" or "johnny come lately" is missing the forest for the trees. This campaign is a very good idea and uses the negative perception of the "I'm a mac" ads against Apple.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Not seeing the forest for the trees by igb · · Score: 1

      You say `elitism' as though it's a bad thing for a product. Whose balance sheet would you rather read: GM's or BMW's? How are Rolex's margins look at the moment?

    2. Re:Not seeing the forest for the trees by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      It is not me that has a problem with "elitism". It has been engrained into American society that elitism is bad.

      Just look at how charges of elitism being leveled at both candidates from each other and others as well.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Not seeing the forest for the trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People relate more to "PC" than to "Mac".

      you're right.

      hey look, pc needs an upgrade to run vista, and I need an upgrade to run vista! we're like, totally the same!!! oh and look, there's a bunch of broken pcs that need fixing, just like my pc needs fixing! wow, I totally relate with pcs! macs must be crap!

      ...or maybe it just hurts because it's true

  46. You = dork. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a Freudian Astroturf!

    2 days ago, I was posting how I thought Vista sucks (see here. Then I was accused of having a religious stance against Microsoft - which I thought was ironic considering I don't own a Mac, haven't owned a Linux system for about 12 years (Slackware 3.1 was the last distribution I used if I remember correctly) and work all day every day on Microsoft products.

    So now I say I like Microsoft's commercial and now I'm astro-turfing for Microsoft.

    Gotta love the Slashdot crowd.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:You = dork. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered the possibility you're just an asshole?

  47. man with a beard? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    osama bin laden?

    ted kaczynski?

    santa claus?

    steven spielberg?

    oh, oh, i know!

    steve wozniak!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:man with a beard? by stak · · Score: 1

      This is a guy with a beard:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey

    2. Re:man with a beard? by Zibri · · Score: 1

      Alan Cox
      Ken Thompson
      RMS ( :D )

  48. Lame. by neowolf · · Score: 1

    The new ad campaign isn't any better, and is considerably less entertaining.

    They are trying to make Mac (or possibly other OS) users out to be elitist, while promoting the PC as the everyman's computer, or "The Computer of the People".

    The problem is- most everyday-ordinary people, like those in depicted their ads, can't even get Vista to run on their computers. They face expensive upgrades or buying a new PC, which they probably can't afford. Many have spent YEARS just trying to get XP to work consistantly and have spent lots of time and money protecting themselves from malware.

    I'm an IT manager. While we have kept Vista off our corporate desktops, we have to support outside sales staff and their home computers. Several have "upgraded" or bought new computers with Vista pre-installed. It's been a disaster. My help desk staff spends almost all of their time trying to help Vista users. Meanwhile- we started rolling out Macs to some of our internal staff- NO ISSUES! We even gave one to our biggest (for 10+ years) "ID10T" staff members, who seems to attract computer problems like a magnet. He loves it, and hasn't had ANY problems in the three months he's been using it.

    I've been using Ubuntu or 2+ years, although I also have a couple of Macs and an (unused) XP machine. I almost got Ubuntu on some of our desktops, except they screwed the pooch with gvfs/nautilus and SMB authentication with Hardy. :( Even with this fault- it works a lot better (faster, more reliable) than Vista on the same hardware.

    I actually used to be a fan of Microsoft. NT certainly made configuring and managing a corporate network easier than Netware. But it, and pretty much everything Microsoft has turned out since Windows first came to being, had one big flaw. Microsoft seems more concerned with making things "pretty", than making them functional, reliable, and secure. That is what they need to do to REALLY win people back.

  49. Sounds about right for MS, but.. by necro2607 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow. Deepak Chopra and Eva Longoria? Sounds about right for a Microsoft ad. Just the right amount of famous-ness to seem cool to your average "lowest-common-denominator" audience, but mediocre enough for probably anyone here on /. to be like "Uh, wow, so they just grabbed whatever recognizable figure they could get?" ...

    Maybe I'm biased, but I mean, when Apple used the likeness of significant figures in the past for their "Think Different" campaign, they had photos of like, Gandhi, John Lennon & Yoko Ono, Picasso, etc.. Not that Apple could get those people as actors in their commercials (so it's not the most fair comparison), but my general feeling about these new ads is that they're just throwing together some ads with some famous people to get peoples' attention. Whereas, well, people today still remember the "Think Different" thing from Apple. Microsoft is wasting their time if they're going to try to play Apple's game, in my opinion..

    1. Re:Sounds about right for MS, but.. by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      mediocre enough for probably anyone here on /.

      Probably anybody here on /. has already made up their minds about Microsoft, one way or another. Seeing through their ad is completely irrelevant; you're not their target audience.

    2. Re:Sounds about right for MS, but.. by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Not their target audience? Everyone who uses computers is their target audience, really.

  50. You miss the point by Tau+Neutrino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the Apple ads, the actors portrayed the computers, not their users. It wasn't saying that PC users are overweight, balding old farts in suits, but that PC's themselves are that boring.

    I use a Mac (as well as a Windows box), but I would no sooner say, "I'm a Mac" than I would, "I'm a Pepper."

    --
    Lemmings are silly; dinosaurs are extinct.
    1. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Pepper,

    2. Re:You miss the point by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It wasn't saying that PC users are overweight, balding old farts in suits, but that PC's themselves are that boring

      Boring, and with Vista, very overweight indeed.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:You miss the point by ral315 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I use a Mac (as well as a Windows box), but I would no sooner say, "I'm a Mac" than I would, "I'm a Pepper."

      Wouldn't you like to be a Pepper too?

    4. Re:You miss the point by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Consider how people cried RACIST! when the PS3 ad with the white woman/PS3 attacking a black woman/PS3 (or was it PSP, I forget) came out. Correct people all you want, but when you use actual humans viewers aren't going to assume the actors are anthromorphic personifications of product x, at least not completly, theyre going to see them as actual people.

    5. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but so do a lot of (maybe most) people. I agree that the actors are the computers and not the users, but I never really thought about that until I read your post. I think most people will associate the personalities of the characters to the computers, but from that point it's very easy to turn right around and associate those personalities back to the users. Not everyone is going to get it the "right" way. I saw a very appropriate quote the other day that I think a lot of slashdotters would be wise to consider - "Remember, half of all people have below average intelligence."

    6. Re:You miss the point by notaprguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Give me a break. It's clearly a personification of the PC and the people that use them. There's nothing inherently evil about what Apple is doing - it plays into their brand which has a certain amount of exclusivity. What's different about Microsoft's ads is that they don't make any direct slam on Mac users. They're just showing that there are millions of PC users from all walks of life and certainly different than the Hodgeman character. It's a pretty good campaign in my mind. Very empowering and positive and true to what PC's are about.

    7. Re:You miss the point by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

      What MS really needs to do to kick Apple's ass is to show a side by side comparison of Vista and OSX to show people how different they are and why Vista is so much better.

    8. Re:You miss the point by BlueStraggler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Apple ads are not saying PCs are boring. That's insecure geek talk. PC is actually quite likeable. But he is hapless. He's going to fail. He's Wile E. Coyote, to Mac's Road Runner. Everybody likes Wile E. Coyote (who is anything but boring), even though you know he's gonna end up crushed or burned or worse.

      That's why the ads are pure genius. People like, identify with, and root for PC guy. But they know that he's gonna lose to Mac, and the comedy is in how bad it's gonna be, and how annoyed PC guy is going to be with smug Mac guy. He's a classic anti-hero, you empathize with him, but you know it's not going to end well for him. Everyone who thinks the ads got it wrong because they don't like Mac guy has missed the point. Or rather they got the point, but didn't understand Apple's real objective, which is appealing to PC users, not preaching to the choir.

    9. Re:You miss the point by fyoder · · Score: 1

      It wasn't saying that PC users are overweight, balding old farts in suits, but that PC's themselves are that boring.

      Not directly, perhaps, but the implication was there, if only in the characterization of the PC (always assumed to be running Windows, of course) as the computer of business people. What is the stereotype of business nerds? Suits. Versus how they characterized the Mac as the computer of people who are really hip and creative. Consciously or unconsciously, PC Guy and Mac Boy reflect users. And which would you rather be?

      As far as I'm concerned both PC Guy and Mac Boy are brain dead consumers of DRM infested crap, so I guess I'm Angry Linux Zealot Guy.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    10. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, if we do a commercial for the Linux guy, we'd need someone like Rorshach, "No compromise, not even in the face of Armageddon."

    11. Re:You miss the point by MallocFork · · Score: 1

      But I am a Pepper!!
      Can trace back to Sarah Pepper that came over couple years after the Native Americans saved the pilgrims butts at Plymouth.

      I use Windows, OSX and Linux and all three have their uses. Just wish that one would win for the desktop. Because we all know Unix/Linux rocks for the servers!

      So I am a LinOSXdows Pepper that thinks all the ads are a waste.

    12. Re:You miss the point by Tony · · Score: 1

      Very empowering and positive and true to what PC's are about.

      True to what PCs are about? So they're running Linux or BSD?

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    13. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Pepper, and about to reference the 80's. Wouldn't you like to be a Pepper, too?

    14. Re:You miss the point by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "What's different about Microsoft's ads is that they don't make any direct slam on Mac users."

      Cause they can't~

      The commercial are about computer operating Systems, not the users.
      To take it farther then that is just looking to hard. Apple would not win people over by making fun of them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:You miss the point by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      PCs are about diving with sharks and saving polar bears? Sorry, I thought the ads were pointless. MS is lucky they have lots of money to burn. I thought the Amiga had forever set the standard for inane tech advertising, but congratulations Microsoft, it took 20 years but you've raised the bar!

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    16. Re:You miss the point by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      They could easily create an obnoxious sterotype of the Mac users that we've all met. Turtleneck dude. Graphic artist dude. Web scripter dude who really uses a PC for work but Mac for status.

    17. Re:You miss the point by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      You miss the point, if you are only capable of observing the literal words stated, and miss the blatant stereotyping of people who might use such products too.

      If someone put on a big bushy fake beard with bits of food stuck in it, sandals, and danced around his mum's basement going "I'm Linux, information wants to be free", you'd tell me that's not at all intended as a stereotype of Linux users?

      Anyhow, your argument applies to the MS ads too - they say "I'm a PC" too, so surely they're just rebutting the stereotype about the machine, too?

    18. Re:You miss the point by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The Apple ads are not saying PCs are boring.

      Yeah, the fact that they had an older guy in a business suit for the PC, and a younger guy in "trendy" clothing for the Mac, was just an accident, wasn't it.

    19. Re:You miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a defensive posture. "Windows users are real people, not bespectacled stereotypes" is weak, and it says nothing substantive about Windows. Microsoft is losing share, not because of Vista or Apple attacks, it's losing share because it has over 90% share to begin with. This is an indefensible position in the long term. By putting Apple on the same level (using their language and their iconic "PC"/Hodgman), they're giving Apple the final piece of the puzzle they need to compete head-to-head: Microsoft's acknowledgment that indeed Apple is a competitor.

    20. Re:You miss the point by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

      The stereotypes are of the PC vs. Mac. Getting a Mac doesn't make you cooler - it makes you a user of a cooler system. Using a PC doesn't make you fat and bald - it makes you lame.

      And the exclusivity of Apple products doesn't come from conspicuous consumption - it comes from being intelligent enough to not drink the fucking Kool Aide - even if you do think it tastes great.

      The reason that the Apple ads were successful is because many people - unlike you - had the ability to think in more than 1 dimension at a time.

      Apple ads essentially said, here's a metaphor for your OS - which do you want? Microsoft ads said, see? See? See? Apple makes fun of you, but not us.

      Right. The guys that gave you ME and Vista are not inherently making fun of you. Of course not.

      Maybe this can help wake you up: The Apple PC wasn't fat, balding and uncool - he was a CONFORMIST. Just like every character that appeared in the Microsoft ad - all cliche, no substance.

      You're right about one thing - the Microsoft ad was very true to the Microsoft defender is all about - conformity. And you're right about what you're trying to describe as empowerment - conformity thrives on large numbers acting the same.

      Looking for an individual in the Microsoft ad - a non-conformist - is like looking at all of the differences you'll find in a fundamentalist tent meeting, id est, none.

      Kool Aide, Kool Aide, tastes great - wish I had some - can't wait!

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    21. Re:You miss the point by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

      Trendy people where I live usually wear something a bit hipper than blue jeans and a hoodie that could have come from Wal-mart.

      I think Apple is making a distinction between office wear and home wear, not between boring and cool.

    22. Re:You miss the point by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      And what do people associate with "working in an office" versus "being at home in casual clothes"? Of course Apple intended to give the idea that PCs are boring, but Macs are exciting and fashionable - that's what advertising is all about. It's the "insecure geek"s that probably explains why so many people here seem completely oblivious as to the purpose of advertising. Anywhere else people are well aware that adverts are about making products seem tempting, fashionable or cool - it's not an "insecure geek" thing, on the contrary, it's an insecure geek thing to miss that implication, and only assume the most literal interpretation of an advert.

      Anyhow, this is irrelevant as the same argument could be made for the Microsoft ads - they too are just making the point that PCs aren't just used in an office.

    23. Re:You miss the point by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true Mac-o-lite...your opinion is always the right one and everyone else is drinking kool-aide. Gee...who's the one drinking the the Kool-Aide? By the way, I've owned many Macs, starting with a MacSE that I UPGRADED to 8MB RAM a MacFX (remember that one?, a Quadra 650 (wohoo!) and most recently an iMac. I speak from experience: Mac Hardware is NOT over-rated. MacOS IS over-rated.

    24. Re:You miss the point by earlymon · · Score: 1

      My opinion is right only when it is. The only Macs I've owned have run OS X (with the exception of OS 9 as my fall-back to rebuild my OS X partition in the beta-10.0 transition). As I recall, MacOS is the name used to denote pre-OS X systems - I cannot tell if that's your intent or not, but the pre-iMacs you mention were pre-OS X. If your point was that those OSs were overrated, I'd agree, in the sense that I found them to be about on par with Windows - both were videogames, not OSs, to me.

      I found Windows to be an intolerable experience until Windows 2000 and that one I liked, shared with others (not in the pirate sense, thank you), used extensively, and - if you will - campaigned for it. Replace Windows 2000 in the above statement with OS X and that's also true. I looked forward to XP upgrades until the actuality of it hit. First, on a purposely-slow machine, you could see the windows painted Classic, then painted with the newer XP theme - no excuse for that performance hit. Later, with SP2, performance was back on par with a quality product, and I like XP SP2 - as much as I can for a non-*nix system.

      OS X in Apple's rush to add gee-whiz has lost some of its original BSD appeal for me - but with greater acceptance, enough new apps have hit that I rarely miss it - but then, csh and vi were things I've been happy with.

      As for stability, Windows finally got there with Win2k and improved from there with XP. Until then, there was no question that OS X was not overrated over Win for stability. When VirtualPC came out, I could run Windows under OS X. When Fink came out and gcc upgraded to fully support the architecture, building GNU apps under OS X became a walk in the park. When Microsoft Office X came out, OS X users had the full Office without having to resort to Win under VirtualPC (I contend that the previous Offices on a Mac were weak compared to Windows versions, and that post Office X, the Win versions have been weaker.) When OroborOSX came out, it became a walk in the park to run various desktops under Linux, just a hot switch away from the OS X desktop or the Windows desktop. Oh - and its underlying stuff via the terminal was just straightforward BSD (admittedly frustrating to those more familiar with Linux as their only reference), so it was easy to pull server tricks with OS X (and still is) without resorting to OS X Server.

      If admiring that and noting that no other OS gives me access to so many desktops (and their important features) and server features, all for free (post-OS X purchase or upgrade purchase) with the exception of a virtual tool and a Windows license, makes me a Mac-o-lite, so be it. That you believe that although you can do all of those things under OS X, but cannot under Windows or Linux, and that OS X is overrated (if OS X was indeed your reference), so be that, too.

      Windows is a brute-force OS by a brute force company, and has only risen to prominence for reasons so aptly stated in Neal Stephenson's "In the Beginning was the Command Line" - which I'd recommend you read or re-read, as it clearly explains the MS Kool-Aide far better than I would attempt.

      I think people should use and enjoy the OS that supports the apps they need and want in the way that they want those apps to work.

      And if that OS allows you to do what you need and want without being a computer expert and without calling me as a pal out of frustration needing free support, then it's a great OS (therefore, that statement applies equally to Linux, OS X and WinXP to the equal amount that all three examples suck (Vista notably excluded from the list)) based on this personal-for-me criteria.

      My tirade was against Windows mentality and the Microsoft ads. I think the Apple "I'm a Mac" ads are targeting people who might not know that they have a true commercial OS alternative if they've become frustrated with their Windows experiences of things just not working right, and who still think of Macs in pre-OS X terms or in terms of hearsay rather than knowledge. I think the M

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  51. Real people != Every Day People by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    How many "every day people" dive with sharks or have been to outer space?

    I would wager a lot of every day people have dived with sharks, but that's kind of beside the point. I actually said "real people" which has a significantly different meaning to me.

    You don't use people lounging around in their underwear eating a block of cheese on their couch as someone to look up to. But there are plenty of real people that do incredibly interesting things. And a lot of them use PCs.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Real people != Every Day People by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      But there are plenty of real people that do incredibly interesting things. And a lot of them use PCs.

      And a lot of them use Macs - and Apple has showed them several times. So nothing new from Microsoft - again.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  52. Maybe Gates shouldn't have bailed Apple out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates once saved Apple from bankruptcy.

    Makes you wonder how "cool" Apple really is to turn around and bite the hand that fed it.

    1. Re:Maybe Gates shouldn't have bailed Apple out by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

      ...and Gates stole/copied tons from Apple. What goes around...

      --
      Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    2. Re:Maybe Gates shouldn't have bailed Apple out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who stole it from xerox.

      Theft isn't the issue. Jobs had nothing to steal. Supposed inventions by Apple were created 10 years earlier at MIT.

      It's Steve Jobs sleeping with the enemy is what's disturbing. The truth hurts.

  53. Deepak Chopra: Corporate Shill by ismism · · Score: 1

    I KNEW it!!

    1. Re:Deepak Chopra: Corporate Shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dude was in The Love Guru. He sold his soul at that point. He might as well make a buck from Microsoft.

  54. I AM SUPERMAN? by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    These are as annoying as those stupid "I AM" ads that Lotus used to run. Remember them? They had guys holding up "I AM" signs like this to try and convince you that Lotus R5 was the bridge everyone else was jumping off.

    Who the hell actually liked Lotus R5? Anyone? Anyone?

    Who in the hell actually likes Windows? I mean, enough to identify themselves with it?

    "Hi I'm a PC, and I'm really defensive about it..."

    1. Re:I AM SUPERMAN? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      "I AM sendmail" ... huh. So the guy has to be configured using m4 macros, has to make more copies of himself to do more than one task, and is terribly insecure? I bet he wishes he was Postfix or qmail.

    2. Re:I AM SUPERMAN? by argent · · Score: 1

      I AM qmail now, but I took that photo many years ago.

  55. Dunno. I think the opposite. by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I'm a heavy Linux user. I tend to just viscerally hate MS' OSes.

    The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life.

    Well, that was their intent. But in the end, I find John's carrecter more likeable. All mis-adventure that happens to him are funny, but in the end he tends to generate empathy. He looks like a caracter who is generally unlucky. He's not peculiarly snug. He ends up being likeable, partly because he comes as the underdog.
    On the other side there's the "mac" character which too much radiate a "I'm so cool, I'm so hip !" style which makes him unnerving. After the few first couple of ads, I mostly only want to punch him in the face.

    I think by having a comedy actor impersonate the PC in a humorous way backfired at least with some viewers like me. They should have gone with a pompous condescending bastard kind of character.

    Microsoft obviously didn't get that. Mark my words: These ads will preach to the choir (the people who already hate the Mac commercials) but will do nothing to asuage those commericals.

    Well on the other hand :
    They aren't as awful as the previous ads. The Bill Gates series mentioned yesterday were the dumbest thing I've ever seen (what the hell are they trying to say ? seems just random snips taken out of some brainless trash-tv reality show)
    The "Wow series" wasn't any brilliant either. In fact, it almost backfired : trying to present Vista as latest "world wonder" just sounds arrogant, and with all these stupid people staying O-faced in front of their machine it just begs that someone edits the video and puts a system explosion (a _litteral_ explosion) as a metaphor for this crappy software. Oh so exploitable.

    Or maybe I'm just allergic to any ad that make outrageous claims that their product is the coolest.

    This latest ads, are kind of cute. They don't try to pretend microsoft's product are the panacea. Just metaphorically show that its simply something everybody ends up using.
    (For the ad. For the reality of computing platforms I find this is bullshit. Anyway the currently most pervasive platform are ARM chips running embed OS - among which Linux happens to gain market share - "I'm a ARM running Symbian or Linux and I'm even in your phone, your TV and your washing machine" even if unpractically too long would have been way much more realistic and the only really relevant platform for the following couple years. But's my technical opinion. The ads look nice per se).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Dunno. I think the opposite. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I'm a heavy Linux user. I tend to just viscerally hate MS' OSes.

      The purpose of John Hodgman was not to "stereotype" PC users. The purpose was to provide a boring image of PCs themselves through the comedy of John Hodgman. The idea was that the more artistic nature of Macs should appeal to users of all walks of life.

      Well, that was their intent. But in the end, I find John's carrecter more likeable. All mis-adventure that happens to him are funny, but in the end he tends to generate empathy.

      Yeah, because everyone who has ever used a Windows PC has endured the same.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Dunno. I think the opposite. by anup_at_mac · · Score: 0

      But in the end, I find John's carrecter more likeable

      Wow! I did not know the No-Child-Left-Behind act would make a difference so soon.

    3. Re:Dunno. I think the opposite. by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Well, that was their intent. But in the end, I find John's carrecter more likeable. All mis-adventure that happens to him are funny, but in the end he tends to generate empathy. He looks like a caracter who is generally unlucky. He's not peculiarly snug. He ends up being likeable, partly because he comes as the underdog. On the other side there's the "mac" character which too much radiate a "I'm so cool, I'm so hip !" style which makes him unnerving. After the few first couple of ads, I mostly only want to punch him in the face.

      I think by having a comedy actor impersonate the PC in a humorous way backfired at least with some viewers like me. They should have gone with a pompous condescending bastard kind of character.

      But I don't think it was Apple's intention to say that one is better than the other. They made out that Windows is more for work and Mac is more for fun.

      I think that was part of the reason the PC guy isn't a complete twat.

      Also by making it a more friendly ad where they're saying that each system does different things they make the mac guy more likeable because he's not trying to be uber cool and dissing his enemy.

      Without getting into a reason why the fact is a windows box is more insecure so those comments are justifiable. Mac, imo, do have better performance too but that's through Apple's Nazi like control. Their systems aren't are open which most people, sadly, don't care about.

    4. Re:Dunno. I think the opposite. by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Well, that was their intent. But in the end, I find John's carrecter more likeable. All mis-adventure that happens to him are funny, but in the end he tends to generate empathy.

      And what about the PC character on this Microsoft ad? He tends to generate revulsion. There's nothing in him, he's a sorry character. Why put him in the add at all? How dumb are these people in the advertising business?

      I bet in the next ads, it will be about all the common people that buy PCs. You know, the "I'm a PC and I have a beard" types.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    5. Re:Dunno. I think the opposite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey U.S.-centric dipshit, look at his homepage address. Even without that I could was pretty sure the guy was not a native English speaker. Why don't you demonstrate how great your ability to hold an adult conversation is in German or French?

  56. I rather like the new ads ... by puddles · · Score: 1

    Especially the parts about the different "suits" one wears, and the vast differences between "offices". I would really love it if my office could be the ocean like the activist's, but I'll settle for taking my laptop to the beach during lunch.

    I'm a PC.

  57. Poor, lovable, nerdy PC by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point's been made before, but the Mac vs. PC ads, especially the UK ones (Mitchell and Webb was not good casting) make PC look like some lovable nerd who's just trying to get by (Crashy Time Calmomile) in spite of his problems, something mildy-but-not-terminally frustrated PC users can relate to. Mac spends literally all of his ad time either highlighting PC's flaws or saying how great he is. The PC is the everyman, while Mac is this rather aloof thing which sounds great but won't shut up about how great it is. That PC gets to set up all the humour and Mac is the straight man just reinforces it. I'm not sure that MS really want to fight that pair of stereotypes too strongly. If they emphasise that PCs are these boxes used by all these amazingly varied special people, they may wind up telling people that Mac is for the everyman, which is exactly what Apple seems to have failed at on their desktop line.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Poor, lovable, nerdy PC by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft ads showing many different PCs that look different and act differently are supposed to show that you can use lots of different applications on the PC. This is supposed to be in contrast to the dearth of applications MS wants you to think are on the Mac.

      What they may actually end up being is a joke about how inflexible the Windows interface is and a jumping-off point for millions of YouTube users to show how many different ways there are to put a GUI together on Linux.

  58. Reading Between the Lines by kbolino · · Score: 1

    Apple's argument: Switch to Macs because they don't have the problems Windows PCs have.
    Microsoft's argument: Stay with Windows PCs because everybody uses them.

    Apple as teenager: But I'm smarter!
    Microsoft as teenager: Who cares! I'm more popular!

    It's advertising as high school drama.

  59. Remember the audience by tyrantking31 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a slashdot reader, I do not believe that I am the intended target of these ads. Therefore I'm not going to pass judgment so much as critque them. For starters I laughed at the first few "I'm a Mac" commercials and have yet to laugh at any of the PC commercials. I have to question the wisdom of using celebrities. The minute i see a spice girl in your commercial, I instantly wonder how much she's being paid and that starts me wondering how much all the other people in your commercial are being paid. This highlights an important distinction between the Apple and Microsoft commercials. Apple's commercials are about their products. The supposed superiority of Apple's products are emphasized in a humorous way. The Microsoft commercials are about who Microsoft can pay to say how good their products are. Microsoft never addresses the issues raised in Apple's commercials.

    --
    We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Remember the audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's commercials are about their competitors' products. The supposed superiority of Apple's products are emphasized in an untruthful and exaggerated way.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Remember the audience by prelelat · · Score: 1

      cool I didn't know that John Hodgman worked for free. I'll have to get him for my next birthday party.

      He might not be as famouse as some of the people in the other add but they are all paid. I thought that the MAC ads were always trolling making them seem pompous. I hated them. I don't like the Microsoft comericals but at least they don't go around saying that MACs are stupid... just racist...

    3. Re:Remember the audience by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I laughed at the "I'm a mac" ads too but I disagree. The Windows ads are also hilarious.

      • The WOW starts now: "Wow! We finally made a product that doesn't suck. Get it now!"
      • Mojave: "Hey, our product doesn't suck as much as everybody you know says it does."
      • Seinfeld: Let's talk about anything except how much our product sucks.
      • I'm a PC: Ok, let's talk about how our product doesn't suck as much as mac seems to think it does.

      That's comedy gold, there.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  60. hodgmania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what you're selling. If you have John Hodgman, you're doing something right.

  61. You = (person - humor) by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Title says it all.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  62. The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

    Valleywag and those who agreed with it missed the boat. The Seinfeld ads weren't pulled because they failed. They were pulled because they did their job - getting people to talk about Microsoft - and that phase of the campaign was over.

    No, this isn't just Microsoft's spin on things. As has been noted, I'm included in the campaign. My participation began a month ago, well before the first Seinfeld/Gates commercial aired.

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    1. Re:The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So they paid Seinfeld $10 million for two ads?

    2. Re:The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by codeDr · · Score: 1

      I agree. This 'new' ad is just the 2nd phase in
      a multiphase ad campaign.

      If you research how long it takes to put together
      an ad, and the high production values of the 'new'
      ad, plus all the different people, it adds up to
      a significant amount of time. This 'new' ad was
      planned to be here, now.

    3. Re:The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      So they paid Seinfeld $10 million for two ads?

      The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure.

      At least, not for Seinfeld.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    4. Re:The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      MS said they pulled them becasue they weren't well received.
      Having every think you are lams is NOT a good result from a commercial.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:The Seinfeld ads weren't a failure. by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Who says they're only going to do two ads with him? That $9 million (the number I heard) was for total exclusivity: he'll do no ads but Microsoft for the next year, as I understand the situation. We almost certainly haven't seen the full extent of the campaign yet. That $300 million is worth a lot more than we've seen so far.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  63. The one people missed by etschreiber · · Score: 1

    There actually was a very funny Gates/Seinfeld short.

  64. Apple Ads=Change Good; MS=Affirmation of Choice by Webcommando · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always took Apple adds as trying to give the view of the change is good. The "switcher" adds and the "I'm a Mac" seemed, to me at least, to drive the message there's something better. The grass is greener in Mac pastures.

    The new MS adds seem to be driving affirmation of your current choice or what you have. In other words, it is OK to like your PC and Windows because everyone is using it.

    Just my perspective on it all.

    --
    I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
  65. Innovation? by CyberLife · · Score: 1

    Where's this innovation Microsoft is always whining about?

  66. Full coverage by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's nice to see that this time around, Microsoft's advertising people remembered to have a bunch of people astroturf on Slashdot about how great the new ads are.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Full coverage by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

      Interesting how a comment accusing Microsoft of astroturfing Slashdot got modded down. Kind of proves the point, doesn't it?

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  67. That didn't happen. by argent · · Score: 1, Informative

    From TFA: "Mr. Gates and Mr. Jobs announced that Microsoft would inject more than $150 million into Apple and take other steps to guarantee Apple's near-term survival."

    From reality, this was a face-saving way for Bill Gates to close a legal settlement between Microsoft and Apple. More details:

    On August 6, 1997 Steve Jobs announced that Microsoft would be investing $150 million in Apple and was committing to producing Microsoft Office for the Macintosh for at least five more years.

    Q: The deal included a technology sharing agreement between the companies. What was that all about?
    A: The driving force in this deal was the resolution of a long-standing dispute over patents.

    Q: The investment was in non-voting stock, which Microsoft was committed to holding for a minimum of three years. If the investment was a "gift" on Microsoft's part, why the three year minimum term?
    A: Because it wasn't a gift -- this is how the companies worked out their legal differences. Additional cash was quietly exchanged behind the scenes. How much was not disclosed.

    Q: Microsoft committed to Office for the Mac for five years. If this commitment was completely voluntary, how can the five year term be explained?
    A: It can't be explained that way, because it wasn't voluntary. These were the agreed-upon terms.

    A few of most common myths about the Microsoft-Apple deal debunked:

    Myth 1: Without Microsoft's investment, Apple was doomed.
    Reality: Apple had lost over $1 billion in the 18 months before the investment, but in August 1997, they still had $1.2 million in cash on-hand and annual sales of around $7 billion. The $150 million investment did not "save" Apple, though arguably the positive publicity did.

    Myth 2: Microsoft was acting to preserve their market for Mac Office.
    Reality 2: A nonsensical argument. Was the Mac's 5% market-share worth $150 million to Microsoft? If Apple went out of business, would Apple's former customers revert to yellow legal tablets and pocket calculators before they'd buy a Windows computer and Office for Windows?

    Myth 3: Microsoft invested in Apple to give them "cover" in the on-going federal antitrust investigation.
    Reality 3: This assumes Microsoft's commitments were essential to Apple's survival. If this is so, does Microsoft's ability to issue a life or death sentence over their only competitor make them look MORE or LESS like a monopoly? In fact, within weeks of the announcement, the deal was investigated by the Department of Justice. If this move was intended to give Microsoft breathing room in the antitrust case, then it certainly didn't work. It didn't, because it wasn't.

    Myth 4: This deal was a "big win" for Bill Gates.
    Reality 4: Apple gained at least $150 million, Microsoft's public endorsement, and a lot of positive press. What did Microsoft gain? Bill Gates appeared on a big screen at MacWorld, where he was roundly booed by the audience. They also got Apple to call MSIE the Mac's "default" browser, even though Apple would still be distributing Netscape. This fabulous deal only cost Microsoft $150 million, and then some.

    Myth 5: Microsoft owns a big part of Apple.
    Reality 5: At the time it occurred in 1997, the $150 million investment amounted to roughly 5% of Apple's market capitalization, but was held in a special class of nonvoting shares. According to the terms of the deal, Microsoft was allowed to liquidate these shares in three years, which they've almost certainly done by now.

  68. They're using the exact same character??? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Once again, Microsoft takes someone else's idea and runs with it. I'll bet their advertising agency referred to this as "innovation".

    I'll bet the commercials aren't any good until the third release, either.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  69. Truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy in the shark cage is holding a sign that says "I'm a PC - I'm a little scared."

    Truer words...

  70. You = AstroBoy by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice cover story there, AstroBoy! Way to go, TurfSmurf!

  71. He is... by Etrias · · Score: 1

    He is on his main box, probably a custom built *NIX box.

    His other PC running Windows is there to catalog viruses and spyware.

  72. everyman by joetheguy · · Score: 1

    I think its a well made commercial that does a good job for Microsoft as a brand. I do have a few issues with its message though:

    1) No real mention of any products or features or why windows is better, except for maybe the "Life without walls" tag at the end.

    2) The "life without walls" tag sounds great, but its not quite true, since Windows and MS is all about making a walled garden the size of the whole planet. I guess if you are inside the garden, then there are no walls. I reminds me of MS's original "Making it easier" ads back in the early 90s that didn't mention that they were the ones who also made it so hard to start with.

    3) It establishes the PC as the "everyman". I'm all for egalitarianism, and I can understand how many may think of the Mac as elitist, so this is a perfect counter to that. But combine this with point 1, and its also implying that the masses shouldn't ask for better, and should have some pride in being part of the status quo.

  73. Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I'm no fan of Apple's products, I think that the "if computers were people" premise of their adds as original and somewhat amusing. OTOH, Microsoft's "people are their computers" premise is just plain scary.

  74. Err by Lucky75 · · Score: 1

    Could someone please tell me what the hell that had ANYTHING to do with Microsoft, Windows, or computers in general? Ooh, I know, let's videotape as many random, diverse people as possible and have them say "I'm a PC". That'll show users that we really understand why our products suck.

    --
    DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
  75. I didn't get it. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I take it the new microsoft ad is a stab at someone else's ad, but I haven't seen the other ad, so the Microsoft ad makes no sense to me.

    It's a bunch of people claiming they are a computer. I don't get it.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  76. New Ads - Not Accurate by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    ffs. Where's the bloke hammering his keyboard and spitting at the screen over the OS cock up which lost all his work? Last night I didn't so much as get a blue screen, It just went black. (oh yes, Arrr!!!)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  77. Apple and Microsoft are not competitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is a hardware company first, Microsoft is a software company first.

    Microsoft couldn't give a rats ass if you run Windows on a Mac based computer or hardware from HP, IBM or self built.

    If Apple really wanted to push Mac OSX they would open it up to any piece of hardware, they only have a good OS to drive sales of their hardware.

    Apple's advertising is kind of odd since it bashes 'PC' when in reality they are bashing Microsoft Windows and not PCs.

    I'm not sure why MS would respond to the PC side of things, why not show the inside of a Mac and be like 'wow', the Mac IS a pc - now let's put Windows on it so you can work at home...

  78. Look! A link to the ACTUAL AD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of a link to some story blathering on about the ad, how about the fucking ad?

    http://imapc.lifewithoutwalls.com/

    There, was that so hard? Honestly.

  79. mom's basement by bey0ndme · · Score: 1

    I'm a PC and I'm still in my mom's basement. But it seems I now fit in with the "cool, sexy, and professional" crowd. Alright! Please. But I guess it's better than the darth showclown commericals.

  80. Johnny 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I use a Mac (as well as a Windows box), but I would no sooner say, "I'm a Mac" than I would, "I'm a Pepper."

    But wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?

  81. I'm a sheep is more like it by DevConcepts · · Score: 1

    All sheep (PC Users) have a tendency to congregate close to other members of a flock, although this behavior varies with breed.

    Farmers (Stores) exploit this behavior to keep sheep together on unfenced pastures and to move them more easily. Shepherds (Sales people) may also use sheepdogs (Corporate types) in this effort, whose highly bred herding ability can assist in moving flocks.

    Sheep are also extremely food-oriented (Windows only software), and association of humans (Sales people) with regular feeding often results in sheep soliciting people for food.

    Those who are moving sheep may exploit this behavior by leading sheep with buckets of feed, rather than forcing their movements with herding.

    Modified from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep#Behavior_and_intelligence

  82. elitist and egalitarian by kisrael · · Score: 1

    It's pretty amazing how that ad manages to be elitist and egalitarian at the same time, thanks to the relative ubiquity of Windows PCs -- all these interesting people run windows and you do too!

    Vista is still a heap of "throw everything at a window and see what sticks", but it's a good ad.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  83. Pretty solid... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    ...advertisement. I liked the Seinfeld ads and I like these even more. Despite owning a Mac for it's hardware (I have Vista on it) I've never been a fan of Apple's image and how they market themselves. It just so happened that I couldn't get 8 cores cheaper anywhere else.

    This ad really sums up the PC world for me...it's not just a trendy looking peripheral that you can tote around to various Starbucks to appear young and hip. Like Linux, it's used by a wide variety of individuals and professionals for an equally wide range of tasks...one of which is NOT looking hip and cool! ;)

    My two cents

  84. Live without wall! by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

    I do.

    I run Linux.

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
  85. The PC guy uses what phone again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "PC guy" uses (ta-da) an Apple iPhone.
    (Picture in the link below. Article is in Norwegian tho)
    http://www.itavisen.no/sak/787188/PC-mannen_bruker_iPhone/

  86. The things that pass for IT news these days by maliqua · · Score: 1

    Why is Microsofts ad campaign considered news worthy? do we have nothing better to talk about.. well I'm posting so i guess not

  87. I'm a PC best Quote by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm a PC and I turn #2* into energy!"

    I dunno, it just seems so appropriate for the Microsoft Ad.

    *#2 = shit.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:I'm a PC best Quote by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      *#2 = shit.

      No #2, Sherlock!

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    2. Re:I'm a PC best Quote by dangitman · · Score: 1

      This is a good example of why their advertising is misplaced. If they mean "shit", then why don't they just say it? Euphemisms are for the weak.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  88. Eva Longoria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eva Longoria is ON my PC.

  89. Finally by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

    I was waiting for the counter-programming to those ludicrous and annoying commercials of Apples to come out. Some people may have liked them, but I found them offensive. Here's a clue Apple, you don't get ahead by making fun of people. You just appear like a bully. I don't buy from bullies.

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You so don't get the Apple ads if you think they're making fun of people. You don't get it at all, when it's obvious that lots of ordinary people do.

    2. Re:Finally by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

      Only an anonymous coward can be so dumb.

  90. I'm a Linux. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    This ad reminds me of the Linux ads http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwL0G9wK8j4 that had all these successful people teaching Linux the kid.

    I'm a Linux.

    1. Re:I'm a Linux. by sen4fun · · Score: 1

      Well, if you are a linux then you have my sympathies! To get the actual dope on Linux and all its so called "benefits" go read http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/. Man, get a life - go get a Mac/PC.

    2. Re:I'm a Linux. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      Our sympathies are mutual.
      I went to your site, and from what I can see, it's a blog for idiots.

      I use MS as well, I just prefer Linux.

  91. What Exactly is MSFT doing? Embrace and Extend by egotripper · · Score: 1

    Apple's ads are successful in large part because Vista is mediocre, but in lieu of fixing the software MS is attempting to shore up the brand by beefing up its image. In this ad, Microsoft decided to do what they've done in the past so well: They embraced the "I'm a PC" Meme, and they're extending it. They are reframing Apple's message. They are repurposing "I'm a PC" to tell their story. They are even using Apple's own ad wording to base a claim on the brand "PC". I think they overthought this "I'm a PC" countermeme, there may be something underneath what we see holding the idea together, but I don't think the presentation carries it off. The message is simple and...fuzzy.

  92. Lipstick on a Pig... by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

    To be perfectly clear... Windows is the pig.

  93. HP ads are the best response to Apple by amillard64 · · Score: 0

    HP has been running ads for a couple of years now that are the best counter to Apples ads yet. The ads show all the creative ways well known people are using their (HP/Windows) computers. They are eyecatching, inventive, stylish and cool. I've always found the Apple ads to be fairly lame, though I can't deny the fact that they seem to have worked fairly well for Apple. I always thought Apple should have been the one with ads like HP's. I guess this is why I don't work in advertising.

  94. The Ads are wrong though. by __aauygf7127 · · Score: 1

    John Hodgman's character in the Mac ads is a representation of an actual PC *not* a representation of a PC user as the Microsoft ad wrongly implies. Apparently the entire executive staff of the worlds largest software and the staff of one of the most highly paid ad agencies were unable to understand the basic premise of one of the most popular ad campaigns running today.

  95. Why not a Constanza ad? by ZiggyStardust1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    George Constanza should be the I'm a PC guy.

  96. Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    One thing's for sure: We've come a long way from the days when the IBM PC was represented by Charlie Chaplin [..] The original IBM PC was a remarkable invention

    WTF? The original IBM PC came out four or so years after the genuinely revolutionary Apple II (arguably the first mainstream, non-hobbyist personal computer), by which time it was clear that the microcomputer was important and here to stay.

    It was built almost entirely from off-the-shelf parts, and ran a fairly unremarkable CP/M workalike, if not ripoff- QDOS (soon to be PC-DOS/MS-DOS)- that Bill Gates acquired the rights to. It was an almost guaranteed success because IBM was the safe choice in corporate America and no-one ever got fired for buying their stuff- but that says nothing about the machine itself.

    What was revolutionary was that its very genericness allowed people to clone it, and MS's willingness to license the OS to those people created a competitive market that drove prices down, making it more favourable and driving it to become the standard it is today.

    But I doubt that was originally by design- certainly not IBM's- and the original PC certainly wasn't the remarkable machine you seem to think it is.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  97. new, better, I'm a Mac commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Justin Long: I'm a PC.
    John Hodgman: Wait, no I'm the PC.
    Justin Long: Well, we're the same now.
    John Hodgman: I'm a little bit country.
    Justin Long: ...

  98. Bad timing with the astronaut by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Given that it was all over the news, just a couple weeks ago, that an ISS computer was infected with a virus - was it a good idea to have an astronaut saying "I'm a PC" right now?

    I can see the Apple ad now... (cue music)

    ---------

    PC: (Walks on stage, smiling and humming)

    Mac: PC! You're in a good mood today, what's up?

    PC: Oh I just learned that an astronaut uses me! That's really cool.

    Mac: That's great! Where'd you hear about that?

    PC: Oh I was reading the paper this morning, and saw that a computer on the International Space Station got infected with a virus! That tells me there are good old PC users up there!

    Mac: (Quizzical look at the camera)

    (Fade to black)

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  99. We all know which os guys with beards use... by tunapez · · Score: 1

    Minix...FTW!

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  100. I'm a PC, and I'm scared poopless by DJ_Adequate · · Score: 1

    I agree, these seem defensive--and the big takeaway is that Apple is seen as a real threat. It certainly won't stop people from being tempted to try out Apple. Also, Hodgeman is really funny. So it makes them seem a little humorless. Rather than complaining about the PC stereotype, they should have probably played up the Mac as a useless hipster.

  101. Novell's Linux Girl. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

    This would be a good time to bring in Novell's Linux girl. Novell needs to produce new episodes of those ads

  102. A bad copy? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Is it me or does it seem like MS has copied two Apple campaigns and rolled them into one. Remember the "Switch" campaign where Apple showed you real Mac users. Now Apple has a "Get a Mac" ads with "I'm a PC" MS rolled them into one with this new campaign. Has MS just run out of ideas?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:A bad copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did they ever have ideas?

  103. PC = Windows is 94% true. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    The mac commercial was disseminating false information when they are clearly talking macOS vs windowsOS then all of a sudden claim their 16% market share of laptops for students makes them the number one laptop choice by college students. I am guessing their saying the Mac book air out sell the Dell Latitude (or whatever the top volume models are), but it is a flat out distortion when dell alone sells 50% more laptops than all of apple, to college students.
    Especially their are true (non-misleading) statements that would have sounded just as good. But using the term PC to refer to windows machines (then making it very clear later) when 94% of PC's (start out) as windows machines, seams to pass truth bar for me.

    1. Re:PC = Windows is 94% true. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The mac commercial was disseminating false information when they are clearly talking macOS vs windowsOS then all of a sudden claim their 16% market share of laptops for students makes them the number one laptop choice by college students.

      Although Apple only has 16% of the total market, they say they will lead a particular segment. How is that false information? There is an actual study that says that this year, Apple will beat out Dell, HP, etc when it comes to college notebook sales. Last year, it was not the case. Now Apple never said it would lead overall notebook sales, just college ones. That's no different than Toyota claiming it is #1 in terms of truck sales in one state. In another state, Chevy or Ford might have the lead and Ford probably has the lead overall.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:PC = Windows is 94% true. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      1) context: their running this in a commercial comparing "Vista to Mac OS" not Mac hardware to Dell.
      2) their simply stating in the commercial "the #1 in sales of laptop to college students" (not sure the exact wording though)
      3) what I see is their 6% of the total market, 16% of laptops in education, projected to become "the preferred choice" for 43% of those projected to purchase a laptop for education.

      Their was no mention of "projected", no mention of "manufacture" and no mention of comparing a "single model of laptop".
      So A Macintosh OS will not be number one in that market, they may sell more laptops than Dell in this market, but that is not a "fact." And they definitely won't ship more copies of OS X than Vista to this demographic.

  104. So you're a pissy... by synthespian · · Score: 1

    So you're a pissy person...
    and you have a beard...
    you don't like tweed...
    you wear a headband...
    you wear a suit...
    you wear three rings on your fingers...

    but you're just a pissy person.

    So what, PC?

    You're still a sucker. (*)

    (*) For spending way too much cash on a tech firm that creates problems and then sells you the solution. Vista is the ultimate proof Microsoft sucks. For real.

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  105. beard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way! That guy with the beard uses LINUX! LIES! LIES! LIES!

  106. Seinfeld ad by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    I think the ad was pretty good... much better than the Seinfeld ones, anyway.

    Talk about damning with faint praise....

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  107. The real genius in the MS ads by skaimauve · · Score: 0

    We know Bill is mad about the Get a Mac ads. For one thing, these ads keep remembering people precisely what MS (and every PC maker) is trying to make them forget, that Vista has tons of problems.

    The Get a Mac ads is a comedy about two computers chit-chatting and one is always getting itself into trouble. With each new commercial, we know that PC is going to get into trouble, and you keep watching because you are curious to know *how* he will get there.

    With the new MS ads, there is a subtle difference at the begining: "Hello, I am a PC and I have been made into a stereotype" and then it shows people resisting that stereotype. Suddently it is not just two computers doing a comedy, but real people defending their identity. The tone is very assertive and they are not laughing. It's like they say: "I am busy working, doing important stuff, just don't laugh at me".

    With these new ads, Microsoft is trying to change people's perception of the Mac + PC duo. Suddenly, this is not about two computers, this about real people. And if Apple is making fun at the PC, it is making fun at real people doing their work.

    And Apple keep laughing at the PC, they will comes out as insensitive and arrogant. Brilliant!

    1. Re:The real genius in the MS ads by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      Except that people won't remember the Microsoft ads because they're not memorable. The whole "collage of lots of different people doing different things" is like amateur hour. It's been done a billion times for every product under the sun. There's nothing unique that helps their brand in it, and it's not even particularly well-done.

      People will still be watching the Apple ads and laughing long after this junior high school abortion of an ad is forgotten.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  108. I want to know... by Xelios · · Score: 1

    who is selling the Eva Longoria PC and how much does it cost? Actually, nevermind the cost, just tell me where I can buy one.

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  109. It's probably past by him a couple times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially when he's standing above your mom as she lays in the pit waiting for him to shit on her breasts so It can put the lotion on its skin or it'll get the hose. I personally like to stick a micro-flashlite inside my penis hole so I can point from darkness at your mom as I shat on her that one day you were conceived.

  110. Good change by theblackystrat · · Score: 1

    Not to say that the Seinfeld one was bad but I like the new ad as well... Cool one!

  111. Obligatory Eva runs Windows joke by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    If Eva Longoria runs Windows rather than another OS, that means some geek has a much better chance of rooting her box!

    Yes, I am ashamed of myself for typing that, in case you were wondering.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  112. New Windows Slogan by Dracos · · Score: 1

    I saw this ad last night, and my first reaction was to wish that someone spliced in a clip saying "I'm a PC, and I run Linux!".

    Obviously Apple can't say "Windows" for legal reasons, but do both companies have to conflate hardware architecture with operating system, especially since Macs have had all PC components for a few years now?

    Then I noticed the new slogan for Windows: Life Without Walls. Did anyone in Redmond think about this? It's absurd:

    • Walls provide security and privacy. In meatspace, we have cubicle walls, castle walls, dressing room walls, etc. In computing, we have firewalls.
    • Without walls, there is no need for Windows. Or Gates.

    Either MS has finally admitted to Windows' continual flaws and are trying to sell them as advantages, or they have no idea what the possible negative meanings of that slogan are.

  113. Oh, alright, since I haven't seen,.... by Yewbert · · Score: 1

    .... anyone yet in this thread make the obligatory comment,.....

    "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Eva Longorias!!!!1!!!eleventy!!!"

    There. I feel a little stupider now, but it had to be done.

  114. Images for the ad are made on the Macs! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 0, Troll

    Way to go Microsoft!
    link

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  115. Burn Karma! Burn! by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    Attached to story "Windows Home Server Corrupts Files": http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/27/1457240

    My post: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=399904&cid=21831664

    Yes. I'm shameless.

  116. I'm a Mac, I'm a PC, I'm Linux. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Novell did it first and took on both Microsoft and Apple. Linux has free stuff and that Mac and PCs can run Linux and then others made Linux annoying.

    Linux evolves PCs and Macs cannot.

    But all of the cool people use AROS instead of Linux, Windows Vista, or Mac OSX. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  117. Custody of the CISC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5150?
    Is that kind of like the chip that recreates itself into modern computing like a hardware-based virtual machine, and then when you confront said hardware it just ignores you, and insults you for ever marrying it to the motherboard, then it goes after your small beard and testicles, and gets leniency on traffic tickets, and gets to walk in the bypass line at the DMV and chain stores as being "disabled" yet is the only fucking instruction-set you are allowed to use rather than the modern RISC design underneath it?

    The cores are coming with me, bitch! If I see you or that new FPU you're clocking with then I'm taking the beige tower with me as well!

  118. Har, dis' whats 'e don' handle of lads shaving the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cunt. Tis a stubble ruff as sandpaper on the deck. Shavin' is a losing task, and it grows thicker and stimulates the more shavin' done. Just let her grow a quarter-horse's inch of it so we dont get the clasp!

  119. That's more like it by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    A much *much* better idea than the Sienfeld commercials. Although I see an obvious subversion possibility. Run a commercial that looks just like it (fair's fair) and have people saying "I'm a PC" while trying to recover from various PC-related issues. Like "I'm a PC" CRASH "I'm a PC" in chinese with subtitles, bluescreen on the Olympic dome "I'm a PC" push the button BONK sound -- error push button BONK push button repeatedly BONK BONK BONK "I'm a PC" Fred and Ethel looking at the TV, it's a black screen, Fred asks Ethel "What the heck is HDCP?" Ethel says "I dunno, Fred." "I'm a PC" a geek for hire babbling incomprehensibly while he's swapping cards around. "I'm a PC" a bored kid repeatedly pressing "Yes" to security popups. "I'm a PC" an elderly woman plugs in a USB scanner, gets BoDeep BeDoop "hardware not recognized". Pulls cable out, plugs it in BoDeep BeDoop. Cable out, cable in BoDeep BeDoop. "I'm a PC" Mom opens IE and suddenly the screen is covered with porn popups.

    The possibilities are endless. You could make a whole series of commercials.

    Caveat: Mac geeks embarrass me, and I think Macs are way overpriced. I have an elderly G4 so my daughter can do her art school homework. But I have to admit, it's never crashed. Not once. Ever.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:That's more like it by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Oh my God, how could I forget: "I'm a PC" whilst panning across those big plasma displays at the airport, counting how many have "Something has caused an error and must now close" popups.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  120. Clueless about advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an advertising professional myself, for as much as the general public thinks or says they know about how advertising works, they're completely clueless.

    Of course the Mac and PC commercials were talking more about the specific boxes. It's ignorant to think otherwise. They were talking about users just as much as the OS.

    You want to be seen as this guy? Use a PC. This guy? Use a Mac. That is the inherent idea of the commercials.

    The MS commercial does a really good job taking control of the conversation again, which is to say, that it isn't just that guy that uses a PC, but a huge swath of incredibly interesting people as well.

    It isn't as clever, or as funny as the Mac commercials, but it does it's job, and does it well, without attacking back...which is important.

    Mac attacks PC

    PC says "that's not how I see it, and neither do these people"

    I think this campaign took a lot of balls and succeeds on all fronts.

  121. I can see it now by Miseph · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "So Microsoft can't just bring the "I'm a PC" character out to defend himself, because that just reinforces the negative message. "I am not a boring nerd!" ** yawn **. They have to bring out the "I am a Mac" guy out and make him look like a total ass. Make him a pretentious airhead who spends all his time talking about how cool he is while "I am a PC" is quietly getting the job done."

    "The ad would be better just showing all the cool things you can do with a Windows PC, which is the point. They still need a hook, but it couldn't be hard to come up with a better one than, "You probably think I'm boring, but I'm not as boring as you think.""

    Mac: hey PC, check out my shiny new iPod Nano... IT'S CURVED OMG!!!1
    PC: Uh, yeah, that's great... I'm actually kind of busy, you know, working. It's that thing that makes me able to buy stuff for myself, not just have my parents or anonymous internet strangers who only know me through my webcam show buy them for me.
    Mac: ...
    PC: Yeah, I just went there.

    Mac: Hey PC, what's up.
    PC: Oh, not much I'm just helping to set up a home file and print server.
    Mac: You know, a mac genius could do that for you, plus set up a wireless network, transfer your files, update your system, bathe your cat...
    PC: Yeah, probably, but so could any of the millions of people out there working as travelling PC techs... and they charge less.
    Mac: That sounds like an awful lot of work PC, wouldn't it just be easier to have us do it all for you?
    PC: yeah, let me just drive 6 hours to the nearest Apple store so I can pay triple for all the parts and set something up. You just hold your breath and wait for me.

    Mac: Hey PC, I've heard that vista blows goats.
    PC: Yeah, I guess. Whatever.
    Mac: what? No gripe? No Argument? what's wrong?
    PC: STFU, you're getting me fragged you twat. I don't give a shit if you don't play video games, just go away.

    Mac: How's it going PC?
    PC: Friggin' sweet!
    Mac: Hey... you're not PC...
    PC: Of course I am, I just decided to go for a new look, how do you like the makeover?
    Mac: Well the sweater and Birkenstocks are pretty cool, but I'm not sure how I like the beard...
    PC: Hey, different strokes you know... that's what this is all about anyway, I went Linux!
    Mac: Isn't that, like, hard?
    PC: Oh, so THAT'S why you have that stupid hair cut...
    Mac: Huh?
    PC: You must be stuck in 1996.

    Maybe MS won't do that last one, but they probably should do the others.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  122. isn't a Mac a PC these days? by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Does Microsoft really want to play that game? Apple probably likes people to consider the Mac a Mac and not a PC but one mention of it and where's Microsoft's ad?

    What is even more interesting is the little laptops and the full size desktops and laptops getting Linux installed. Are the "a PC" too?

    And really, don't people know from experience that "being a PC" means all that fun virus, crashing updates, and rebooting stuff? Who's proud of being forced to deal with that?

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  123. Ubuntu ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just screaming for an Ubuntu ad:

    Hello, I'm a PC, and I've been set free.
    [sheds clothes, or sheds skin, or sheds large chain that leads up to a barred window]

    People start handing him useful things for free.

    A network appears and spreads out to a community.
    The network is followed to another person who says.
    [... maybe a few jumps here]
    "I study genes"
        Someone else puts a gene modeling program into another network location and it comes to the gene person.
    "and I have been set free"
    [...[
    "I have a beard" - Jon "maddog" Hall
      "and I have been set free."

    I'm sure some of the Nelson Mandela Ubuntu explanation could be fit in here.
    http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/06/01/the-meaning-of-ubuntu-explained-by-nelson-mandela/

  124. Hey kid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a computer!

    Stop all the downloadin'!

  125. New microsoft ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This ad is showing the outdated Shuttle cockpit, with mechanical instruments, instead of the current glass cockpit.

    How ironic that they are touting yesterday's PC technology with yesterday's cockpit technology.

  126. I'm a pc with a virus by plopez · · Score: 1

    and I have herpes :0

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:I'm a pc with a virus by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Yah, my sis had AIDS. Ubuntu cleared it right up.

      --
  127. Everyone knows, by GDgonzo · · Score: 0

    the guy with the beard secretly uses Linux.

  128. I am a PC by Device666 · · Score: 1

    I am a PC and I am made of stolen ideas only mutated in a bad way. Apple may wished they thought of this cool I am a PC and I am a Mac commercial, too bad they don't have our patent on it...

  129. think a bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all are doing exactly what the commercial was intended to do. get you talking. I'm a pc, i think its great, and i know mac people who actually say "I'm a mac" so you cant tell me that just because there portraying the system it self not the people, does not mean that people are not seeing them as people, yes mac stereotyped windows. To all who are complaining that ms is saying that windows is the only os for pc the mac commercials did it first "I'm a mac and I'm a pc" hum, yah. OK and finally you use what ever system works for you, i am a software developer and i use windows, my room mate is an artist he uses mac, a friend of my is a musician he uses windows. its seriously up to personal choice. if you want to play games other then made by blizzard you will still need a pc.

  130. MSFT trapped Apple. Big time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think these commercials are brillant. Apple has done a great job of stereotyping PCs are boring, business people and made Macs are young, hip people (just look at the way the characters dress).

    So MSFT does the same thing..and traps Mac. By saying that all of these people (writers, hot chicks in France, teachers, shark divers etc) are PCs, they are also saying that Mac is ONLY what they say they are: young, smart-assed kids.

    The only thing that MSFT hasn't really done is drive me to look for the next commercial. The Mac commercials are essentially franchises, and people wait for the next episode. The PC one? Not so much - they aren't addictive.

  131. Too bad the ad's images were made on a Mac by unassimilatible · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The vast majority of people -- and yes, creative people -- use PCs.

    Apparently they couldn't find any of those creative PC people to do the ad:

    Microsoft's 'I'm a PC' ad images made on Macs.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Too bad the ad's images were made on a Mac by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apparently they couldn't find any of those creative PC people to do the ad:

      Er, proving... what? Is Microsoft supposed to be so petty that they insist Macs never be used by any of their third-party contractors?

      On the other hand, I can *totally* imagine Steve Jobs being so petty as having something in his contracts specify that Macs must be used.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Too bad the ad's images were made on a Mac by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      I can *totally* imagine Steve Jobs being so petty as having something in his contracts specify that Macs must be used.

      mumble, mumble, iPhone devkits, mumble argh.

  132. So where I can find this PC? by misterooga · · Score: 1

    I asked Dr. Google. He won't tell me. He talks about Linux, Windows, and some weird kinky stuff called BSD...but no where can I find this new operating system called PC...and yet so many people are using it! I want to be in, people. Let me in.

  133. Unoriginal by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    It stinks of M$ thats for sure, whenever something great a new comes out, copy it....this one they are trying to show they are copying Apple, a la M$ but they failed badly...sorry M$ you suck

  134. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    Calm down. I was just being tactful. In 1981, I probably would have bought an Atari 800 versus an IBM, but I can understand why corporations would have preferred the IBM since it ran faster with more memory (especially important for accounting). In 1981 IBM PC was a respectable machine, even though I would not have bought one for myself.

    The Apple II was also a decent computer, but Atari had the #1 console at that time, and I'm a gamer so that's why I would have bought Atari instead of Apple. The Atari had somewhere around 64 color variations, 4 sprites, and a primitive noise generator (all-important for a decent game of Missile Command). If I had waited until 1982, then I would have bought the Commodore 64 (more sprites and music-quality sound).

    Bringing this back to the present:

    Today's PCs are boring compared to the multitude of choices we had back in the 80s. Back then companies were willing to innovate and try new things. Nowadays only Apple still continues that tradition (example:iPod) where Microsoft does not.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  135. Re:For balance, I'll write one for MS. by kanweg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think that would be understood very well. When I started my company 4 years ago, I made it all Mac, having experienced the inefficiency of my previous employer's PC-based business first hand.

    I'm not married to Apple. I'll switch to Linux if need be, but it would take more than a $300 M ad campaign to make me consider a switch to Windows.

    Bert

  136. Microsoft on a roll by kencurry · · Score: 1

    ... Vista ads say "hey dumbass, you are too stupid to understand this is actually a good OS" ... Seinfeld ads say "get with us: old dude and irrelevant 80's comedian" ... New I'm a PC ads say "Apple knows how to make commercials, we'll just copy them"

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  137. Games? by Alari · · Score: 1

    I like how neither Microsoft nor Apple talk about games in their commercials. Well, we know why Apple doesn't mention it... ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiAgrrwL_mk . But seeing as how it's really the only thing Windows is good for, I don't know why Microsoft doesn't even mention it. ( http://www.xbox.com/en-US/ ) Nope, no idea whatsoever.

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
  138. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    What was revolutionary was that its very genericness allowed people to clone it

    It also helped that IBM decided to publish the specs, making it an open architecture, so that anybody who wanted could design expansion cards for it, like sound cards, internal modems, better graphics cards and so on. This Open Source approach meant that there was a large supply of third-party after-market hardware for people to upgrade their computers. Apple, OTOH, kept to the closed architecture approach, so that the only source for upgrades was Apple. This meant that there was a smaller variety and everything cost more. As most people are looking to get the most bang for their buck, the PC soon cornered the lion's share of the home computer market and has never let go.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  139. You must be joking by jamrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought it was *devastating* to Apple. Primarily because it's true. The vast majority of people -- and yes, creative people -- use PCs.

    You're kidding, right? I find it unbelievable that Microsoft were so stupid as to feel compelled to acknowledge the existence of a series of ads by a rival. The Apple ads have proven to be very popular, and Microsoft has only called attention to them again, and worst of all, in a "Me Too!" fashion, merely reinforcing the popular perception that Redmond doesn't have an original idea all their own. It says something about how insecure Microsoft feels about their own brand, that they're reduced to playing defense. And make no mistake, when a company their size starts playing defense, it's sending the message to the public that they believe that they're being hurt by their rival.

    The Mac ads have always been arrogant and condescending, and this is a major "up yours" to Apple.

    This is something that's always baffled me: in what way are the Apple ads "arrogant and condescending"? I've even heard Justin Long's "Mac" characterized as such, yet in all the commercials, he's nothing but friendly and considerate. This has always sounded like sour-grapes to me; everyone I've spoken with about the ads (almost all of them XP users) find them amusing, and have said that they like both characters. When asked specifically about the tone of the ads, no one has mentioned any negative message; when asked in particular if they found the ads or the Mac character arrogant or condescending in any way, or if there was any undertone of meanness, they all said no. In fact, many of them told me that the ads portrayed their experiences with Windows PC's fairly accurately.

    And the tagline is absolutely perfect: "Life Without Walls". That's a direct hit on the most obnoxious characteristic of the Apple world -- the lock-in.

    As opposed to the sweetness and light of Microsoft? Now you're sounded like an angry Windows fanboy.

    1. Re:You must be joking by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      It says something about how insecure Microsoft feels about their own brand, that they're reduced to playing defense.

      So, given that, what does it say about Apple that they feel the need to compare themselves to Windows?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  140. Re-enegrize Apple's campaign by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    Ya know this might be good news for Apple.. Everyone has seen their ad's before and they are old news but Microsoft trashing on them (and getting the concept wrong in the progress) just made the old ad's popular again.. now we have to wait for Apple's response.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  141. Oh please, apply to be in the ad by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I think that it would improve MS's ad if they had dogdick in there. Absolutely. I am quite certain that it would help Windows improve sales to their core group of customers who peruse the net at night.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  142. Charisma Carpenter by steeef · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice Charisma Carpenter (AKA Cordelia from Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel) in the commercial? If my PC looked like her, I might be more excited about using it.

  143. and a guy with a beard

    Oh. *That* guy.

  144. I'm a PC too... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    ...with Ubuntu on it...

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  145. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
    I didn't say it was particularly awful machine, I said that it wasn't particularly revolutionary. I'm sure that its 16-bit processor was pretty fast at the time- but since it was an expensive machine sold to corporations, I'd expect that! It was still an off-the-shelf CPU running a 16-bit equivalent of CP/M...

    Your points about the other machines were interesting, but somewhat tangential and irrelevant to what we were discussing. (As a former Atari 800XL owner though, I'd say that the 8-bit computers were in the same ballpark as the C64 at least, and in certain respects were more advanced- though the C64 undoubtedly had a better sound chip. Not that the 800's was bad).

    Today's PCs are boring compared to the multitude of choices we had back in the 80s. Back then companies were willing to innovate and try new things.

    Yes, but the innovative PCs (in the generic sense) back then were those like the Commodore Amiga- not IBM's!

    Nowadays only Apple still continues that tradition (example:iPod) where Microsoft does not.

    The iPod isn't a PC, although- anticipating your possible response- I accept that as, in effect, a specialised computer, it's worthy of consideration. Nevertheless, Apple didn't even invent the first consumer-oriented MP3 player, they simply improved the design and- importantly- released the iPod just when technology was making a worthwhile MP3 player affordable.

    By worthwhile I mean that, circa 1997/98, MP3 players were available, but only had something like 32MB of memory (one album's worth), and slow serial/parallel connections that apparently took the better part of an hour to fill. Their only real benefit over even a cheap cassette Walkman would be random access- but since they could hold so little, you weren't even likely to want to skip any of the few songs that you could take with you.

    In other words, Apple released the iPod just when the technology had improved enough to make possible an MP3 player that offered the real benefits that we take for granted today instead of being forced (by low capacity) into being just a poor substitute for a cheap cassette player. But I'm getting away from the point myself here :)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  146. Very true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that Apple also invented interracial anal gangbangs. So nothing new from your mom either.

    1. Re:Very true. by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "I believe that Apple also invented interracial anal gangbangs. "

      Both Lars and myself are from Europe, where interracial gang-bangs have been happening for thousands of years, so they're not an Apple invention, fanboi.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  147. Fire the fucking MS marketing dept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their "innovative" most ass-sucking ads in the universe flopped. So they don't try again. They quit trying. They just completely copy another company's creative idea. Microsoft has not done a single thing right since releasing Vista, and they continue to dig their graves with these incredibly stupid and insulting ad campaigns. I certainly have been alienated in the sense that I now know Microsoft as a company has no fucking clue how real people think, or how they use computers. They seriously should grab 5 random people off the street to replace their giant marketing department that has its giant head up its ass.

  148. What's with people and infix these days? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    better != good

    With one-liners like that, you should become a consultant.

    But apart from that, the expression doesn't express what it should. "better != good"... If that were false, then there would be no point in having different words for "better" and "good", because they'd be equal.

    It's like when people use comparison operators where they don't belong: "Naruto > Inu Yasha" - that's totally meaningless because the things being compared don't exist on some scale where there is a clear-cut relationship like that. It's some facet of those two things that's really being compared... Does the expression mean the show is better? That it's longer? That the character is more powerful? That his golf score is higher? Worst kind of linguistic laziness IMO, and a terrible misuse of formal notation.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:What's with people and infix these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...linguistic laziness IMO...

      look in the mirror.

  149. PC?! It's a PERSONAL COMPUTER! Simple as that. by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    Wow - something in Slashdot that has provoked me to post for the first time in weeks...

    I hate Windows. Can't stand it. Haven't used it in four years apart from when I have to at work, it's got to the stage where somebody asks my advice on "computers" and I just have to tell them that I can't do Windows anymore, I'm too out of the loop.

    That said, I hated the "I'm a Mac/I'm a PC" ads too, mostly because a Mac IS a PC. So is a Linux desktop, and a Solaris, and a BSD, and a Commadore 64, and my much maligned Atari ST with the single sided double density disk drive.

    So frankly, MS (I'm going to avoid the $ because for once I'm in agreement) have struck gold here. The public need to understand the difference between hardware and OS. The more the waters are muddied by advertising the better, because then papers will start printing "What is a PC...really?" articles.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  150. PC guy from Apple commercials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should hire the PC guy from the Apple commercials and show him doing fun things. I think the PC guy work for the Daily Show on Comedy Central now.

  151. dorky...aka "whale penis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his mom is lusting after the biggest boners in the world: things that dump enough cum they can fill a swimming pool and feed a nation of pirate hookers for 40 days and 40 nights, and still leave enough to coat the continent of Texas 1-inch.

  152. I'm a PC and I was made on a Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found this today. Apparently metadata from images which appear to be single frames from the commercial, that were posted by Microsoft showed that the commercial was made in Adobe CS3 on a Mac

    http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-im-a-pc-ads-created-on-macs/

    1. Re:I'm a PC and I was made on a Mac... by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      So? Adobe runs on Macs and PCs, and I have personally loaded .mov's into Premiere on a work PC, which were ripped from a Mac in Final Cut. Sometimes because of some nitwit manager's decision, the preferred equipment isn't in place so people have to get by with what's available.

      PCs are about being open, open & open, Macs are about being proprietary, proprietary & proprietary. If you want to pay for convenience, buy a Mac, but you will pay more for what you get and be less compatible with everything.

  153. Ads? by PlantPerson · · Score: 1

    What does Windows need an ad campaign for anyway? Is Microsoft afraid that their huge and practically unchallenged marketshare isn't big enough?

  154. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot: News for people who enjoy Microsoft advertisements. Stuff you could see on TV instead.

  155. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    >>>the PC soon cornered the lion's share of the home computer market

    I'm not sure "soon" is the appropriate moniker. Even though the IBM PC was introduced in 1981, it was still not the number one computer system. The Atari 400/800 was dominant during the early 80s, followed by the Commodore 64 in 1983, 84, 85, and 86. The C=64 went on to sell 30 million units (equal to the number of Atari 2600 and Nintendo ES game consoles sold during that same era), and became virtually a home appliance for most people.

    The PC and clones did not take-over the top slot until 1987.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  156. Why is MS advertising? by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    Seriously when was the last time they had to advertise? I don't remember if ever. Why is this going on? Is Vista not selling well and they think tossing some bills into the fire will make things better? Did it take them this long to figure out their business model is not working? Almost everyone in America who would want a computer has one, and they are not into buying new one every 18 months. Why would they want a new OS?

  157. correction by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It actually made the commercial less "blah" and more "baa".

    Fixed it for you~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  158. oh really... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "And still, there remains that one thing that PC users can do that Mac users can't: shut the fuck up "

    oh really?
    I need this fixed, the computer froze again, I ahve a virus, I need a driver..they go on and on.

    The GP said anything, and last time I checked that meant anything.
    That said, those features are important to the average user, just like being able to get at the engine is important to drivers, even if they never open the hood.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  159. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    >>>I didn't say it was particularly awful machine, I said that it wasn't particularly revolutionary.

    Well if you're going to take that debating tactic, I will use the same tactic: I never said the IBM PC was revolutionary. You've setup a strawman argument, rather than address what I actually said in my original post. (I used the word "remarkable" meaning worthy of notice in 1981, not revolutionary.) :-)

    >>>Yes, but the innovative PCs (in the generic sense) back then were those like the Commodore Amiga- not IBM's!

    No shit sherlock. ;-) I agree 100%. But once again, I direct you to my original post: I never called the 1981 PC a revolution. Please read more carefully. Thank you.

    I looked-up the history of MP3 players. You're right: iPod wasn't the first but it was pretty early. If wikipedia is accurate, iPod was only the second to use a hard drive, and the first to use a 1.8" nanodrive to achieve a pocket-sized form factor. Apple did have an advantage with its loyal Macintosh base.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  160. Good commercial to help you feel better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it as akin to the AT&T commercials of 30 years ago. The commercials weren't made to convince you to buy the AT&T service, since you had no choice. But to make you feel good about with your lack of choice.

  161. Much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like it.
    Maybe its the Microsoft fan in me, but I like these a lot more than the Seinfeld ads, which made no god damn sense.

    And at least Im not left screaming at my TV like the apple ones.

    "Oh you can use the newest version of Office? You mean the same god damn version as PC users except with the updates already installed? GOOD FOR YOU!"

  162. guy with a beard.. by Synonymous+Bosch · · Score: 1

    ...Is obviously "a linux" running WINE

  163. I'm a PC AND a Linux by JagsLive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm a PC and a Linux. The Ad is excellent and its refreshing to see that Microsoft doesn't need to rely on negativity to sell its product. Keep 'em coming Microsoft.

  164. If Shuttelworth is reading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the camera then needs to zoom back, revealing grips, stage hands, cameraman, assistants, props people etc. who all turn to the camera and say "and i'm linux."

  165. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Yep, 1987. Zelda on the low end, and games just to complex to run well on a C64 on the high end. Commodore couldn't compete with both Nintendo and the DOS machines. They needed to get the Amiga price down into the C64 range, but couldn't. So all those people who bought all those C64's as essentially 2600 replacement game machines, thanks to the crash of 83-84, but couldn't afford an Amiga or DOS machine, jumped right to the NES.

  166. Microsoft reeks of fear by jamrock · · Score: 1

    It says something about how insecure Microsoft feels about their own brand, that they're reduced to playing defense.

    So, given that, what does it say about Apple that they feel the need to compare themselves to Windows?

    That's because Apple were the ones playing defense for the better part of 20 years, against a much larger, far more powerful rival. Where were you for the drama? Only since the introduction of the iPod have Apple managed to impinge on the consciousness of the public at large, and their confidence has recovered to the point of cockiness. It's really strange that Microsoft has voluntarily assumed the role of the underdog, especially since they remain a much larger company than Apple, and have far greater revenue. By overtly reacting to Apple's ads, much less acknowledging that they even exist, Microsoft is publicly admitting that they sting; they are admitting that a much smaller competitor is hurting them. For a rapacious, all-conquering monolith of Microsoft's reputation, this is tantamount to an admission of fear. Microsoft desperately need to rehabilitate their image, but this ad campaign is precisely the wrong way to go about it. By reacting to the Apple ads they're allowing Jobs & Co. to dictate the shape of the conflict. They should be steadfastly ignoring them and forging their own message; instead they're signaling that they have nothing to offer but feeble attempts at spin.

    There was a time when Microsoft was one of the most feared corporations on the planet, but recently the aura of invincibility has worn thin. People used to talk about them in tones of hushed awe, but now they're like the doddering old grandparent who smells faintly of urine.

  167. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    If Commodore had replaced the Motorola 68000 with a MOS 65xxx CPU, they could have got the chips essentially for free, and reduced the Amiga's selling price to around $500. That's just slightly more than how much a C64 cost in 1987 ($200), and it's likely Amiga would have sold like gangbusters to people desiring an advanced machine.

    Unfortunately Commodore had lost Jack Tramel, who recognized the value of using a self-built computer chips.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  168. "I'm a PC" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well, shows lack of originality on MS's part. Will one of the "PC's" be a slow moving cripple in a wheelchair, unable to do to the simplest things?

  169. Hmhm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We are Ubuntu"

    It had to be said.

    -schim

  170. Such a shocker by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    The PC guy is a stereotype?!11 Wow, whoever would have thought?

    I don't like the new MS adds on that basis alone -- no shit the guy in the commercial is a stereotype. Did anyone ever believe any differently? He's supposed to be a stereotype, and so is the Mac guy. That's why there are just the two of them representing a large number of people. Pointing out that the PC guy is a stereotype is like pointing out that Homer Simpson is a stereotype -- it's besides the point.

    1. Re:Such a shocker by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think it is. Making fun of the Windows user base is simply obnoxious, and I think MS was right to call Apple out on it.

      Besides, if we really want to look at the Mac user base, based on my friends...
      4-5 PC guy
      3 Mac guy (I'm being generous.)
      A lot of women.

      Which is just an asinine thing to say, true or not (it's true as far as I can tell.) Also asinine: calling Windows users fat nerds.

    2. Re:Such a shocker by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think it is. Making fun of the Windows user base is simply obnoxious, and I think MS was right to call Apple out on it.

      But it's not supposed to be real! That's why it's such a stereotype, because it's obviously supposed to be a stereotype. Whoever did the Apple ads obviously knew that many different people use Windows as do OS X. It's called humor. It's what some advertises use as way to get you to listen to them. That's why these MS ads are so bad; they are taking the thing too seriously, as if they believe that the people who see Apple ads will actually be converted and believe the stereotype. So they start a campaign to say "No, we aren't stereotypes!!1" and come off looking like someone who didn't get the joke because they are so out of touch with their customers.

      Additionally, they don't give a good reason why someone should use Windows. I mean, if I was an unbiased consumer and the Apple and MS ads are the only thing I see, am I going to make my decision based on who I think has the most fair marketing or who I think sells the better product? It's as if all MS can say to potential customers is "look, a diverse range of normal people use our product, so it can't be too bad (and if it is, misery love company)" whereas Apple is saying "We think we're the best because not only because our products look really cool, but they actually work better (than you know who)".

  171. I'm a Personal Computer? by deanston · · Score: 1

    Mac heads are apt to say they are proud to own Macs. Now MSFT is "taking back the PC brand" and having people say they ARE "a PC?" So MSFT is saying they OWN you - and I guess that is true - 90% of you are owned by MSFT.

    If MSFT has any real guts or genius they'd have the ad that shows people say "I'm a Vista." Let's see Deepak volunteer on that one. I'm sure he fully approved of the Mojave deception experiment.

  172. Anyone notice Stallman? by Aramgutang · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice Stallman reprising his monkeyboy antics on the I'm a PC site?

    I couldn't find a way to link to the video directly, but he's on the leftmost column, second from the top.

  173. Cameron is not a PC by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Cameron is a Terminator.

    A HOT Terminator.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  174. Re:For balance, I'll write one for MS. by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

    You don't make your purchasing decisions based on buzzwords and slick ads. You aren't their target anyway.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  175. New ads were made on a Mac! by 200_success · · Score: 1

    According to the TIFF metadata, the new ads were made on a Mac! After this was revealed, Microsoft has attempted to scrub the metadata from the files.

    This just keeps getting better and better. Note to Microsoft: when you're in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.

  176. Coming out of the closet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a PC

  177. Re:B.G. naked?? My eyes!, it burns, it burns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh %deity please no, not that. I'll admit it; I like porn. I'll even go so far as to say I can enjoy a diverse range of porn, but celebrity porn, IMHO is the lowest of the low. The idea of B.G. naked, mumbling inane "dirty talk" while clumsily fumbling around in a low light and hence low-rez video would have to be the least erotic "sex tape" I'll ever see in my life.

  178. Re:Off-the-shelf, after Apple... NOT revolutionary by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Sheesh... stop throwing about stupid accusations about "debating tactics". I might have disagreed with you, but I was at least trying to discuss the topic at hand in good faith, not to win a bloody debate.

    "Strawman" implies that I was intentionally misrepresenting what you said- I wasn't. I apologise if you feel this was the case, but it ultimately doesn't change what I had to say- I don't feel that the PC was "remarkable" either for the reasons I already gave above.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  179. "In a world without walls and fences..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The slogan in the corner of the commercial, "Windows Vista -- Life Without Walls"... what use is Windows when there are no walls?

  180. It won't win a Cannes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's effective advertisement, it's lively and it's as good as it could have been expected from the marketing guys. It did feel like an ad though and that bugs me, the Seinfeld one was strange and weird, but they will be remembered a lot more than the PC guy ones.

    I'm writing this from my MacBookPro... :P

  181. They really do what I told them to... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this, they really do what I told them to...
    http://algorithman.de/storage/new_vista_ad.jpg
    poorly imitating Apples ads, just like they poorly imitated Apples operating systems...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  182. Is this really the state of ads in the US? by Gnulix · · Score: 1

    Something as awful as "I'm a PC" wouldn't make it here in Sweden. Well, it might have 20, 30 years ago. But as a contemporary ad, it is just ridiculous!

    At least the Seinfield ads were amusing. Clearly their purpose was to be ads about nothing, just as the Seinfield show was a show about nothing. It was the only thing I ever felt the least bit excited about from MS.

  183. Um by alisson · · Score: 1

    Doesn't everyone like pc guy better anyway? Plus who cares?

  184. PC ads created on a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-im-a-pc-ads-created-on-macs/

  185. That's why I have Apple stock by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Instead of MSFT. I like Steve Jobs trying to increase my wealth as a shareholder.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you