That frequency is extracted from the data lines a trick that works just fine at USB speeds, and then utterly fails at the type of speeds we expect RAM chips to use.
LPDDR4X: 4.266 Gbps per pin.
USB 3.0: 5 Gbps per pin.
Alternatively you could also include bluetooth support so if you needed better control and had time/space to setup you could just use a full blown mouse.
The Gemini has (er, will have, if they ever build it) two USB ports.
Current median US house price is roughly $200k, so if Bezos wants to deserve a comparison to Ford he needs to up wages to about $39 an hour.
In 1915, $5 would buy a quarter ounce of gold. To keep up with Ford, Bezos would have to pay... 1/32 oz/hour... $1200/oz... $37.50 an hour. I'd say your math checks out!
That's a dangerous game for the 1% to play. Once the culling starts, nobody is safe. For reference see every single violent revolution in human history.
Even an encrypted hard drive can be cracked, it just takes time. And if I have the drive I can take as long as I want, hours, days, months, years, it just depends on what I think is on it and how much time I'm willing to invest.
All the computers in the world can't crack AES-128 in your lifetime.
Every TV image you've seen has been displayed at non-native resolution. When you watch a 1920x1080 TV, you're actually only seeing about 1890x1060 pixels. For obscure historical reasons, TVs overscan the video image. So if a show is recorded at 1920x1080, the image that's displayed on your 19201080 TV is actually a crop of the center portion of the original image, enlarged to fit the 1920x1080 pixels of your TV screen.
While I don't necessarily doubt what you say here, I'm having trouble reconciling it with my experience.
My monitor displays a 1920x1080 frame buffer which exactly fills the screen. The MPEG file saved from the OTA broadcast (verbatim, no transcoding) is specified as 1920x1080. The frames decoded from the MPEG file are 1920x1080 and fill the screen exactly.
So where does the rescaling / interpolation / anti-aliasing happen?
I was hoping you had some sort of proof of your assertion that reality is equivalent to a formal language. That would be pretty cool.
"There is some rigorous formal (i.e. mathematical) system that would be a perfect description of reality. Whatever the rules of that system are, those are the rules of reality, because that system is defined as whichever one has the rules of reality as its rules."
That begs the question. Consider mathematics, which cannot be completely described by any formal language, to the extent that there are true statements that cannot be derived from axioms (Goedel). Reality might have properties that cannot be derived or even stated in any given formal language. No matter how much you tweak and extend your formal language, some of reality will always escape it. Maybe. I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case, but I certainly don't share your certainty that reality can be completely ("perfectly") described formally.
So I'll ask again, out of genuine curiosity: Do you have some reason to believe that reality is completely formally describable?
The Constitution of the US applies to the US government everywhere and for all purposes. The Fifth Amendment prohibits the US government from compelling anyone (US citizen or not) anywhere (on US soil or not) to testify against himself.
Well, nobody aside from literally every single charity in the world and millions of other not-for-profit entities. But you're right, other than them absolutely no one would ever do that. Unless it promotes some agenda other than making money. But obviously there's no such thing.
I had a friend years ago who was depressed. She was tall slim attractive, high salary, highly educated not a drug addict or gambler or anything. I suggested she go to live in India for 1 year and it would have solved her depression for life.
Slashdot Mirror
That frequency is extracted from the data lines a trick that works just fine at USB speeds, and then utterly fails at the type of speeds we expect RAM chips to use.
LPDDR4X: 4.266 Gbps per pin.
USB 3.0: 5 Gbps per pin.
With trade imbalanced so heavily, China needs us much more than we need them.
What? How does that work? China has all the manufacturing, a billion consumers, and a huge cash surplus. What do they need the USA for?
I'd rather have the Chinese listen to me [effortlessly] than the rest of the world.
A backdoor for anybody is a backdoor for everybody, eventually.
Alternatively you could also include bluetooth support so if you needed better control and had time/space to setup you could just use a full blown mouse.
The Gemini has (er, will have, if they ever build it) two USB ports.
They had so many CxO positions that they had to move to a CxyzO system.
Current median US house price is roughly $200k, so if Bezos wants to deserve a comparison to Ford he needs to up wages to about $39 an hour.
In 1915, $5 would buy a quarter ounce of gold. To keep up with Ford, Bezos would have to pay ... 1/32 oz/hour ... $1200/oz ... $37.50 an hour. I'd say your math checks out!
That's a dangerous game for the 1% to play. Once the culling starts, nobody is safe. For reference see every single violent revolution in human history.
If kernel code is like most code, and it probably is, there is about 1 bug per line of code. So 10,000 or so.
Even an encrypted hard drive can be cracked, it just takes time. And if I have the drive I can take as long as I want, hours, days, months, years, it just depends on what I think is on it and how much time I'm willing to invest.
All the computers in the world can't crack AES-128 in your lifetime.
So how many planets do you want?
The more the merrier!
How many moons should Jupiter have?
Every TV image you've seen has been displayed at non-native resolution. When you watch a 1920x1080 TV, you're actually only seeing about 1890x1060 pixels. For obscure historical reasons, TVs overscan the video image. So if a show is recorded at 1920x1080, the image that's displayed on your 19201080 TV is actually a crop of the center portion of the original image, enlarged to fit the 1920x1080 pixels of your TV screen.
While I don't necessarily doubt what you say here, I'm having trouble reconciling it with my experience.
My monitor displays a 1920x1080 frame buffer which exactly fills the screen. The MPEG file saved from the OTA broadcast (verbatim, no transcoding) is specified as 1920x1080. The frames decoded from the MPEG file are 1920x1080 and fill the screen exactly.
So where does the rescaling / interpolation / anti-aliasing happen?
MovieChat has discussion forums like IMDB used to have. It's a lot smaller but better than the nothing that IMDB has now.
DHS was founded 15 years ago to prevent another Sept. 11, 2001, ...
According to my calendar, there hasn't been a single Sept 11, 2001 since the DHS was founded. Heck of a job, guys!
"There is some rigorous formal (i.e. mathematical) system that would be a perfect description of reality. Whatever the rules of that system are, those are the rules of reality, because that system is defined as whichever one has the rules of reality as its rules."
That begs the question. Consider mathematics, which cannot be completely described by any formal language, to the extent that there are true statements that cannot be derived from axioms (Goedel). Reality might have properties that cannot be derived or even stated in any given formal language. No matter how much you tweak and extend your formal language, some of reality will always escape it. Maybe. I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case, but I certainly don't share your certainty that reality can be completely ("perfectly") described formally.
So I'll ask again, out of genuine curiosity: Do you have some reason to believe that reality is completely formally describable?
There is some rigorous formal (i.e. mathematical) system that would be a perfect description of reality.
How do you know this? Reality might not be describable by any formal language.
Galanty Miller is a long-time contributing writer for the Onion News Network.
So.... Satire, maybe? I can't figure it out. Poe's Law applies.
The Constitution of the US applies to the US government everywhere and for all purposes. The Fifth Amendment prohibits the US government from compelling anyone (US citizen or not) anywhere (on US soil or not) to testify against himself.
Nobody's going to run servers for charity.
Well, nobody aside from literally every single charity in the world and millions of other not-for-profit entities. But you're right, other than them absolutely no one would ever do that. Unless it promotes some agenda other than making money. But obviously there's no such thing.
I don't watch TV. In fact, I don't even own one.
They didn't make your favorite dinner? They didn't tuck you in at night?
All I wanted was a Pepsi, and they wouldn't give it to me!
They give you an official generation card when you become an American citizen.
Linus is a later boomer
Linus Torvalds was born in 1969. He's Gen X, not a Boomer.
I had a friend years ago who was depressed. She was tall slim attractive, high salary, highly educated not a drug addict or gambler or anything. I suggested she go to live in India for 1 year and it would have solved her depression for life.
Chronic depression does not work like that.
Bits is bits, man. It's just a bunch of ones and zeroes.