Can we all just agree that their can be more then one best language-- that different people in different situations will sometimes choose different tools-- and that that's a good thing?
Shh... don't give away the secret. Those of us who understand that will always be ahead of the rest. Let them figure it out on theiw own, or suffer follishly.
Did you ever try to convince a Mac user that their platform wasn't perfect for everyone? Because that's basically what you're doing here. There's no talking to zealots, you know.
Makes sense. If it makes you feel any better, I try to live my life by the same principles, although I must admit I'm a little too cynical to believe that it can work for everyone. Very few of us are good because it's right, you know.
Oh well. I'm sorry I originally gave you a hard time. You've opened my eyes a bit.
It's just possible, of course, that I was twisting your nips.
So since you feel so strongly about this, I have a sincere question for you - what do you think you could do about what you've pointed out as problems?
Oh, I thought you realized that private companies aren't bound to provide you with channels to use for speech, and that the first amendment refers to government. I guess then I don't wanna join you.
And of course, you know this because everyone knows this, right? It's obvious! Only a fool would doubt the common knowledge of the people. POWER TO THE PEOPLE, RIGHT ON!
Slashdot Mirror
Lab test? What test? This was a list of features from the product documentation. What a disingenuous title.
Apparently if you say something with authority, people think you're right.
In case you were wondering, you aren't right, authority be damned. You're close, though. Just not quite there.
Ah, bigotry. It's wonderful how prevalent it is in technology.
Your well composed essay has convinced me you don't need any intelligence at all to run Linux.
I must be drunk. Sorry for the spelling.
Can we all just agree that their can be more then one best language-- that different people in different situations will sometimes choose different tools-- and that that's a good thing?
Shh... don't give away the secret. Those of us who understand that will always be ahead of the rest. Let them figure it out on theiw own, or suffer follishly.
The only way we can all be truly equal is for all of us to be only as capable as the least capable among us. Let's get on this.
using such terminology would likely send the typical Ruby programmer into a fit.
Geez, how did you know that?
Did you ever try to convince a Mac user that their platform wasn't perfect for everyone? Because that's basically what you're doing here. There's no talking to zealots, you know.
If it helps, I got your point from the first.
I don't think there was any danger of you losing this particular contest.
Silly me, I figured we were all done jerking off over this already.
I gotta tell you, I'm having trouble getting it up. Serenity is a brutish looking bitch, and I'm just not that desperate.
I'm not going to comment on the message of your post, but...
Redumbyacan
are you even trying? That's just fucking terrible. Seriously. If you want to seem like anything more than retarded, you've gotta do better than that.
Makes sense. If it makes you feel any better, I try to live my life by the same principles, although I must admit I'm a little too cynical to believe that it can work for everyone. Very few of us are good because it's right, you know.
Oh well. I'm sorry I originally gave you a hard time. You've opened my eyes a bit.
It's just possible, of course, that I was twisting your nips.
So since you feel so strongly about this, I have a sincere question for you - what do you think you could do about what you've pointed out as problems?
Yeah, but that's a whole other set of issues. It has nothing to do with free speech - it's more along the lines of limitation of liability.
It seems we're in agreement about the underlying issues, but we arrived there from different places. What an interesting journey. Thank you.
Oh, I thought you realized that private companies aren't bound to provide you with channels to use for speech, and that the first amendment refers to government. I guess then I don't wanna join you.
YEAH! RIGHT ON!
And then we'll have a music jam, and show them we aren't going to take this lying down!
And online petitions!
They can't violate our constitutional right to have the internet service we want!
And of course, you know this because everyone knows this, right? It's obvious! Only a fool would doubt the common knowledge of the people. POWER TO THE PEOPLE, RIGHT ON!
Good pun.
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
You know, physics is what makes everything work, but for the most part, we don't need physicists to tell how to make things, or how to operate them.
Just sayin.
And if he talks you into trying it too, he's one charming bastard to boot.
Geniuses and visionaries are a dime a dozen
Yeah, fuck them! What makes them think they're so intelligent anyway?
I'm pretty sure you missed my point (not to mention the joke underlying it)
Read it again with this comment in mind and it may make sense. If not, I fear for your comprehension skills.
Exactly which verb is 'Firstly' modifying?
You can't just ignore somebody? Alternatively, why remain logged in at all?
Your problem is so far outside the bounds of the norm, I'm kinda glad it's not handled in the app proper. It doesn't belong there.