Slashdot Mirror


MythTV 0.17 Released

foobar01 writes "MythTV 0.17 has been released. Changes include Mac OS X frontend support, big improvements to DVB and HDTV support, "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly), firewire capture support for cable boxes with firewire output, and widescreen user interface support. See the changelog for the full list of changes."

337 comments

  1. Why Apple? by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously this relates because of the native Apple Frontend, but is there any other reason this is in the apple section of slashdot? This project is still primarily a linux toy, is it not? (real question).

    1. Re:Why Apple? by duguk · · Score: 1

      Exactly what i was thinking, although it does now have support for apple. I think someone made a mistake here :D Dug

    2. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple is hip. It is in the Linux section, too.

    3. Re:Why Apple? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm not really sure, but here's a guess...

      if (product.getDescription().contains("Apple")) {
      setCategory("Apple");
      logger.warn(this.class + " [TODO] -- needs to extend SteveJobsRealityDistortionField");
      }

      Obligatory disclaimer... I own a couple of Apples.

    4. Re:Why Apple? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      An honest mythtake...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    5. Re:Why Apple? by illtron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well it has always run on Linux. An updated version to run on Linux isn't really as big as an update that will run on Macs is. That said, I'm sure it is newsworthy to Linux people too. Maybe I'm biased, though.

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    6. Re:Why Apple? by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because some time ago, /. started putting stories in more than one category. For example, this story is in Linux, Apple and what appears to be Television. The only thing the OSX program can't do yet is record; it would be interesting to see a OSX backend that used iCal or something to record shows.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    7. Re:Why Apple? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      Apparently you haven't been reading slashdot lately, or you'd know about the Mac mini, which can function perfectly as a DVR -- the MM has very small form factor, in addition to its inexpense easy set up.

    8. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, Bungie is a sweet company. I know all you XBox fanboy retards get all excited over Halo, but let's give them a chance to really bring their true games to the masses

      waaah? Reply to the wrong post?

    9. Re:Why Apple? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Isn't DVRs based on some advanced MPEG2, while Apple is always in favor of Quicktime?!

    10. Re:Why Apple? by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But does the backend work on the mac as well? As I understand it the front end is just the interface that plays shows recorded by the backend.

      I don't know. Put it in the apple category, but I'm disagree that the primary category should be Apple.

      Just my opinion, I guess.

    11. Re:Why Apple? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Quicktime is not a codec.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Why Apple? by erlenic · · Score: 1
      You're looking at the category, not the section. There is a difference. I don't know why there's a difference, but there is.

      Sections: Some (not all) stories are placed in a special section. You can tell the section by the story title on the main page. This one says "Apple: MythTV 0.17 Released" Also, the URL is apple.slashdot.org/....

      Category: All (I think) stories are placed in at least one category, usually more. This is what you're looking at. It probably helps when searching old stories.

    13. Re:Why Apple? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      The two aren't mutually exclusive. There's no reason you can't do MPEG-2 stuff on a Mac. In fact, it's considerably easier on a Mac because FireWire is built right in.

    14. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory disclaimer... I own a couple of Apples.

      Heh, I own a few, too - only they don't tend to last long. Neither do Pears, for that matter. Luckily, the market is close enough so restocking is trivial.

    15. Re:Why Apple? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 4, Funny
      An honest mythtake...

      You mythpelled "honetht."

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    16. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why's apple at the start of the subject on the frontpage tho?

    17. Re:Why Apple? by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      If you have the right cable box, you can record on OSX. You can schedule recording using iCal, too. I know its not exactly MythTV based, but its still cool as hell.

      http://macteens.com/more.php?id=410_0_1_0_C

      As an unrelated aside, MythTV hackers/ contributors have been making strides, writing code to assist in changing channels and complelely controlling /s treaming from cablebox firewire things. Which is cool; one cable for audio, video and administration makes PVR'ing supereasy.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    18. Re:Why Apple? by foobar01 · · Score: 1

      Because someone at slashdot must have changed it from "Television" (the category I had picked) to "Apple." I don't think it really belongs there though.

    19. Re:Why Apple? by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      Here.
      Feel better?

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    20. Re:Why Apple? by hunterx11 · · Score: 5, Funny
      If you really owned a couple of Apples, you'd do it this way:
      if([[Product description] rangeOfString:@"Apple"] != NSNotFound) {
      [Article setCategory:@"Apple"];
      NSLog(@"%@%@", self, @"[TODO] -- needs to extend SteveJobsRealityDistortionField");
      }
      --
      English is easier said than done.
    21. Re:Why Apple? by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      Perhaps with the release of the Mac Mini, Apple put a lot of effort into the software?

      All of the additions seem to make it wonderful to use with a Mac Mini. Firewire capture support!

      Rock on!

      AT

    22. Re:Why Apple? by WCityMike · · Score: 1
      An honest mythtake...


      You mythpelled "honetht."

      Why do I suddenly feel like I'm in Ankh-Morpork? :)
    23. Re:Why Apple? by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

      Any links to the firewire/controller related info? Such a "one connection" system would make me strongly consider replacing my x86 media box, which is by nature a rats nest of wires.

    24. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They needed to turn this story into another Apple© Slashvertisement(TM).

    25. Re:Why Apple? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Like AVI, QuickTime can serve as a file format wrapper for whatever codec you want to use, be it MPEG 1, MPEG 2, MPEG 4, Divx, Xivd, DV, Motion JPEG, or whatever you can get a codec for.

      And a DVR doesn't have to use MPEG 2 either. When DirecTV makes its switch to MPEG 4 for HD, their new DVR will record MPEG 4 natively.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    26. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because A comes before both L and T.

    27. Re:Why Apple? by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      the firewire / controller related info exists mostly at avsforum.com

      Specifically, Motorola makes a cable box used pretty widely, its the DCT 6200. Comcast and Shaw use it. Also, some other boxes like samsung and Directv have firewire out.

      Basically, with my comcast 6200, you can hook a six pin to six pin into your x86 pc or Mac, and with the right drivers, view the view stream as a 'Transport Stream'. All analog and digital video appears minus certain HD channels which are 'blocked'. Basically, all analog channels are available because the analog stream is converted into MPEG-2 by the cable box. The digital channels require no conversion, but when passed to the firewire, are blocked by some flag in the transport stream.

      I think the .17 release probably has this integrated, AKA you don't need the drivers since the code talks to the device directly.

      Its actually really hard to implement in windows since talking to devices requires a lot of overhead, you need a specific device driver first. In linux, i'm pretty sure you can just open a raw firewire AV/C handle and write data to the device. I've been trying to re-work some of mythTV's code in windows, with little success.

      appropriate links:
      PC: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?s=&t hreadid=403695
      MAC:
      http://macteens.com/more.php ?id=410_0_1_0_C

      email me if you have any questions or pop on over to the AVS forums

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    28. Re:Why Apple? by n4t3 · · Score: 1

      Um, what am I missing here? I don't see any video inputs on the Mac mini. How do you do digital video recording (DVR) if you can't input the video? Are there firewire/USB devices that will allow this? Somebody enlighten me here, I am still trying to decide between the Mac mini and build-my-own Freevo/MythTV linux box for the living room!

    29. Re:Why Apple? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Are there firewire/USB devices that will allow this?

      Do you have a DV camcorder with pass thru, that will allow you to convert the signal to firewire? If not, it might be cheaper to build your own MythTV linux box.

      However, while the Mac mini solution might be more expensive, you are also getting a Mac mini, which to me would be preferable.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    30. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the Apple developer site download the firewire sdk.

    31. Re:Why Apple? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      You mythpelled "honetht."

      And you myththpelled "myththpelled"!

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  2. Why does this make the frontpage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But a big mailman password flaw doesn't?

    1. Re:Why does this make the frontpage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "A previously unknown vulnerability in Mailman, a popular open-source program for managing mailing lists, has led to the theft of the password file for a well-known security discussion group."

      That's why. Security flaws only make the front page if they're Microsoft related.

  3. timestretch? by Bs15 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So the video is speeded up but the audio remains normal? Wouldn't there be sync issues?

    1. Re:timestretch? by Bohnanza · · Score: 4, Informative

      The audio IS "speeded up", but the pitch remains the same. This is fairly easy to do with digital audio.

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    2. Re:timestretch? by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      I guess I can't believe someone who can't even put in an apostrophe where required is lame enough to call someone with a legitimate question dumb... Maybe it is becaue you are 12 and everyone who is 12 is automatically smart and everyone else is just dumb...

    3. Re:timestretch? by Phillup · · Score: 1
      oh wait i can

      I'm pretty sure that should have been:
      ow wait i am

      ;-)
      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    4. Re:timestretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is "fairly easy", I guess. It's also fairly easy to cram a twinkie into a pepsi bottle, but do you really want to eat it afterward?

    5. Re:timestretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "12 Year Olds Gone Wild: When Mom's Away, Little Billy Goes Postin'"

    6. Re:timestretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who spit out "twinpsi" when reading this?

      I gotta patent this ambrosia.

    7. Re:timestretch? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      They do it on TV all the time - have you never wondered how movies ft into exacting TV timeslots? This technology was first introduced to the broadcast market by Macrovision.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:timestretch? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Hm, i thought they were just making cuts.

    9. Re:timestretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I always assumed that they cut scenes, like the other poster said. There are so many opportunities there to shave or keep a few extra seconds, that I assumed you could get pretty close to exact. Still, I suppose I wouldn't be surprised if they massaged it to perhaps 105% of normal (about 5 minutes of fudge time), but above that I think would be too sucky even for TV. I'm curious. Any links? "macrovision pitch compression" and variants yield nothing.

      Now, I have occasionally seen bad daytime TV which looks like someone screwed the framerate up, or perhaps did a bad transfer. Maybe they are actually hack jobs with this macrovision tool to easily compensate for the fact that there are more commercials in that time slot.

    10. Re:timestretch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, I suppose I wouldn't be surprised if they massaged it to perhaps 105% of normal (about 5 minutes of fudge time), but above that I think would be too sucky even for TV.

      The 4% PAL speedup seems to go mostly unnoticed.

  4. Mac Mini Frontend by LinuxOnHal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who's ready for a Mac Mini frontend?

    --
    Trying is the First Step to Failing --Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Changes include Mac OS X frontend support"

      "Who's ready for a Mac Mini frontend?"

      Did I miss something? Since when did the Mac Mini not run OS X?

    2. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am, but make sure your TV has computer-compatible DVI input. Mine has set top box only DVI, whatever that mean.

      And the s-video adapter I got from Apple does not perform well, kind of bended at the edge and there is a 1/4 inch dark rim on all sides.

    3. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I miss something?

      Yes.

    4. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by interiot · · Score: 4, Informative
      From what I've heard, the horsepower requirements for decoding HDTV are:
      • 480p - XBox Media Center
      • 708p - Mac Mini
      • 1080i - x86 >2.8GHz, or equivalent
      So, the Mac Mini may not be enough in all cases, right?
    5. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by freemacmini · · Score: 0

      Neat but a bit expensive just to use as a front end.

    6. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      That's predicated on the assumption that the Mac is going to be encoding and decoding the video. It really shouldn't be. In a perfect world, your Mac will just write the pre-encoded MPEG-2 transport stream that comes down off the satellite or over the airwaves to disk, then stream that data back out over the FireWire port on playback.

      High-definition MPEG-2 ranges anywhere from about 14 Mbps to about 25 Mbps, depending on the source. That's really low. Even a laptop hard drive can handle 25 Mbps.

      Now, it's possible to decode the transport stream in your TV or set-top box and then bring it out via DVI or component analog into your Mac, re-encoding it for storage and then decoding it for playback. But that's kind of a waste, considering that every HDTV and HD set-top box has FireWire on it already.

    7. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by yabos · · Score: 1

      You could still use it for regular tv which >90% of people have and for which the Mini will work good enough.

    8. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by interiot · · Score: 1

      If you completely offload MPEG2 decode to the TV (because your CPU can't handle it), doesn't that prevent you from overlaying a live stream with PVR interface graphics? (eg. as seen in about half the MythTV screenshots)

    9. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by JWW · · Score: 1

      Apple sells an adapter that outputs S-Video if you do not have a DVI input on your set.

    10. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by dirty · · Score: 1

      No it's not possible to import DVI or HD Component video, at least not without hardware that costs many thousands of dollars. 1080i over DVI would come in at just over 177MB/s (1920*1080*29.97fps*3bpp). It's just way too much data to deal with.

      --

      -matt
    11. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      On cable systems, 720p is the standard that is broadcast. On Dish and DirectTV I'm not positive. We have Dishnetwork with HD package at the moment and it is set on 1080i, however from what I've heard that between signal degregation the most your really going to get is about 900 lines but more likely 700. I think (not positive) that most HD programming though is sent out in 720p. I know it is on most major sporting events, especially on FOX. Usually make and ad saying "Transmiting in best available 720p HD" or the alike. Discovery HD Theatre I'm not positive about.

      So as I understand it, a Mac Mini should be powerful enough for playing back most HD content going over Cable today.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    12. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by halfelven · · Score: 1

      It greatly depends on what kind of other hardware you're using.
      If you have a not-too-old GeForce board, the CPU requirements for HDTV (either 720p or 1080i) are reduced a lot.
      I think your little bullet list is so off, it's wrong.

    13. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by tji · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, Apple does not have an API for MPEG2 acceleration (equivalent to DxVA in Windows and XvMC in Linux). So, you cannot currently benefit from the hardware in your Mac. Hopefully Apple will remedy this situation in 'Tiger'.

      All ATI Radeon cards have hardware offload support.

      Nvidia GeForce4 MX, GeForce FX, and newer cards support MPEG2 accel. All the others did not.

    14. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by tji · · Score: 1

      That is true for the recording piece.. Digital TV broadcasts are already MPEG2 encoded, so you just write it to disk.

      For playback, you're making a big assumption to say you can just send it via firewire. Very few TVs have integrated HD tuners and firewire. Today, the best option is to decode/display on the PC.

    15. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Uh, dude, you either have 1080 or you don't. The magical electromagnetic spectrum fairy doesn't just randomly pull out a 100 lines here and there to fuck with people. You won't get 900 lines or 700 lines, you'll get 1080 or you'll get nothing (or 720 or 480 or 576 depending on the broadcaster's format). Lemme guess, the HDTV expert at Best Buy told you this?

    16. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      You're pretty much on target with respect to recording -- I record HD from my Moto 6200 cable box's FireWire output to a G3 Blue & White I picked up off eBay for $100. So a Mac Mini is more than equal to the challenge, except for the skimpy hard drive capacity; an external FireWire hard drive would probably take care of that.

      Can't play back from the Mac, since my HDTV doesn't have any 1394 capability (AFAIK, most don't), and the cable box doesn't accept 1394 input (or no one's figured out how to make it happen yet). Also, most HD OTA and satellite tuners in the US market don't have FireWire -- the cable tuners do because the FCC said they have to.

    17. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by ttrafford · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's what an overlay is for.

    18. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...from what I've heard that between signal degregation the most your really going to get is about 900 lines but more likely 700.

      You are an idiot and whoever told you that was an idiot too. It's either on or off dummy.

    19. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      And thoughtful constructive comments like this are why so many people adore Slashdot.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    20. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      The Mac mini provides big screen resolutions whether you use a DVI or VGA monitor. For digital connections, you can set your display up to a widescreen resolution of 1920 by 1200. For VGA, see up to 1920 by 1080.

      From the Apple site...

      --
      realkiwi
    21. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      He was rude, no question, but he was right. If you're missing 200 lines, you're not going to get a picture -- you're going to get severe artifacts or nothing at all. This isn't like old broadcast television where you could get away with some snow.

      For example, I have a DirecTV high-def Tivo box. It has an antenna for picking up over-the-air signals. If I don't get a signal, there's no picture, period. If I get part of a signal, still no picture. Only when I get "full-strength" do I see anything.

    22. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Hey, someone has to be an authoritative ass on some subjects. Otherwise we'd have millions of people running around thinking they know left from right when they are actually talking about red and blue. Oh wait, that's how it is today. Damn.

  5. Ooooh... timestretch! by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    That means I can watch 24 in 18.

    1. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by ollie_ob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can already watch 24 in 18 if you strip out all the adverts. With timestretch as well, you could be pushing for 24 in 12...

      --
      #define ROSE any_other_name
    2. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you take out the adverts...

      24 is 18 ...check out the BBC broadcasts if you don't believe me.

    3. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by paulmedina · · Score: 1

      You already can - check out the time stamps before and after the commercial breaks. Each episode is only about 45 minutes long.

    4. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The season one episodes were about 41 minutes, including credits. *very* short for a prime time show.

    5. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Given that it's on its third or fourth season, 24 is closer to 48 now.

  6. Why is this in the Apple section? by SECProto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree, frontend support for the mac was one of the bigger changes, but... it still will not record tv shows on a mac. it can only be used to watch already-recorded shows. Which is not much different than a video player, which is not the only function of MythTV

    1. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by Wessel+Starbuck · · Score: 1

      So then you're paying $500 for a frontend when you can buy an xbox for $150.
      Ok, add the price of a mod chip ($25) + setup time, but that's still a big price difference.

    2. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if you can do other stuff on a Mac mini as well...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      ... because the XBox is practically useless apart from being a front-end for MythTV. I mean, yeah it can play some games, but it has like 1/10th of the selection of good ones that are available for the Mac.

    4. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by standsolid · · Score: 1

      Everyone bsically gets a boner for Mac Minis in a home theatre setu pfor some reason.

      I think it's wayyyyy overpriced if that's all you're going to use it for.

      But then again, I'm one of the ones who would get a boner from seeing the mac mini in the HT setup.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    5. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      The X-Box looks like a heatsink that fell off the back of something cheap.

      And buying one involves giving money to MS, which I have never done and intend never to do.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      no actually ms make a loss on the xbox, so if you buy an xbox and no games, your actually taking money _from_ them

    7. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      It can only play all ready encoded video, which is much different than only being able to watch already-recorded shows. You can watch (and pause) live TV over 802.11* if you have a linux backend, which is a pretty cool. I actually just installed a Mythtv front end port on my wifes iBook last night. I'd provide a link, but they appear to have been /.ed already.

      --
      i forget
    8. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no actually ms make a loss on the xbox, so if you buy an xbox and no games, your actually taking money _from_ them"

      I hope your trying to be funny.

  7. Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Joshua53077 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cool program. This looks like a perfect compliment to the digital lifestyle. If this were part of the iLife suite, I bet a lot of people would jump at it. If Apple had put it in iLife 05, it definitely would have justified the $20 increase in price, and it probably would have sold better and could draw more people to the platform.

    1. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful
      mythTV is NOWHERE near ready for primetime. It is still a bitch to install and update.

      Hopefully this new version will fix some of these issues, but don't kid yourself. Call me when it comes with a graphical installer and I dont have to edit conf files.

    2. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Plus, using a general-purpose computer as a DVR just sucks compared to the user experience of something like a TiVo.

      I think the opportunity here is for something more like a TiVo with FireWire or DVB input and FireWire or DVI/component output. Hughes (I think it is) makes a TiVo for HD already, but it only works with the DirecTV system or with over-the-air HD. There are various HD DVRs for the various cable services, but the user experience generally sucks. And none of these devices can play DVDs or pre-encoded content. And they're incredibly expensive.

      There's definitely an opportunity here, but MythTV is no the solution.

    3. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine with us. You keep your Tivo.

    4. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This post is in agreement with the parent, however, you might notice the 0.17 version number. This kind of tells you that it isn't ready for John Q. Wallet to be using in his living room.

      However, it IS ready for prime time - records stuff from 8:00 - 11:00 perfectly =)

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Joshua53077 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up, I haven't run the program, I just checked out the website so I don't know much about the set up. While the project is no where near groundbreaking, it does look interesting. Perhaps the developer could provide the technology and Apple could provide the refinement (including the graphical installer)needed. Apple seems to do well when they acquire smaller companies and developers, like when they brought in the developer of Soundjam MP to create iTunes, although they have also screwed developers by copying programs and putting them standard in the OS (like the Sherlock/Watson or Dashboard/Konfabulator).

    6. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by duguk · · Score: 1

      Have you tried KnoppMyth? http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    7. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, go back to kindergarten and stop hanging out on slashdolt spreading your FUD, you newbie script kiddie.

    8. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      The one I built for my parents works great, they have no problem using it in their living room and showing it off to their friends.

      They use it to watch tv, watch divx that I upload to them, look at photos, etc.

      So.. setting up mythtv in the first place is NOT for john Q.. it's a bit complex. Once it it configured, however, it runs pretty much flawlessly.

    9. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've missed the boat here. I'll take my MythTV experience over a Tivo any day.

      A Tivo is easier to set up, and probably cheaper. MythTV isn't best at everything. Neither is Tivo.

      Where MythTV really shines is flexibility and control. Tivo has a good user experience, as long as you only want what they decided you could have. MythTV gives me what I want. I find that a rather important part of the user experience.

    10. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by TheDawgLives · · Score: 1

      sudo apt-get install mythtv;
      sudo apt-get upgrade; ...not THAT hard...

      --
      -TheDawgLives suckitdown
    11. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      lakeland@jaki:~$ sudo apt-get install mythtv
      Reading Package Lists... Done
      Building Dependency Tree... Done
      E: Couldn't find package mythtv
      lakeland@jaki:~$ apt-cache search mythtv
      lakeland@jaki:~$

      Funny, didn't seem to work for me. You sure that is all you did?

    12. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by smeenz · · Score: 1

      yep.. and it's still a pain if you don't live in the US and don't use NTSC and have national TV stations that don't put their schedules up on the web in an easy-to-parse-format

    13. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Download the TIVO SDK http://tivohme.sourceforge.net/ and then you can put in functionality that you want that they haven't provided.

    14. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Herbmaster · · Score: 1

      There are in fact debian packages for mythtv, and they really are excellent. See the packages here and modify your sources.list file accordingly. You will also need a few packages from unstable, if you are otherwise running stable or testing.

      --
      I'm not a smorgasbord.
    15. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. Fine, but just don't force me to have to use a GUI installer. I like it the way it is.

    16. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by TheDawgLives · · Score: 1
      Add this line to
      /etc/apt/sources.list
      deb http://dijkstra.csh.rit.edu/~mdz/debian unstable mythtv
      And then execute this command:
      # apt-get update && apt-get install mythtv
      After installation, read
      /usr/share/doc/mythtv/README.Debian
      for any further information or instructions.
      --
      -TheDawgLives suckitdown
    17. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
      mythTV is NOWHERE near ready for primetime. It is still a bitch to install and update.

      Indeed (and I say this with my own MythTV box sitting on the floor next to my television, having just gotten basic recording working last week). However, I think the poster was suggesting that Apple either take MythTV and polish it, or create something similar. Obviously Apple wouldn't just take it and ship it unchanged; at the very least it needs to be more "Mac-like." Indeed, Apple has shown themselves to be quite capable of taking existing open source world and putting a polish on it. Examples include Apple's rootless X-server (derived from XFree86), the distributed XCode compiles (derived from distcc, I believe). They ship gcc, vim, and a pile of other OS tools. I would certainly find an Apple refined MythTV (iTV, I guess), a compelling option.

    18. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Have you tried KnoppMyth?
      Yep. Couldn't get it to install properly (can't remember why, sorry). Also tried to use it as a frontend and it locked up on boot: some sort of driver issue - maybe the USB keyboard I was using. I now have a working Gentoo based setup, but it was a lot of work to get it going.

      There are too many separate components required to get MythTV to work for KnoppMyth to do everything automatically. I mean you need to setup kernel drivers for your capture card, video drivers (including configuring overscan), audio has to be correctly configured (volume settings and capture source etc), lirc has to be configured for whatever hardware you have, guide downloads (which are easy in the US, but not in many other countries), and there are a lot of software dependencies if you use many of the Myth modules (MythVideo, MythMusic, MythGame etc). I think KnoppMyth works ok if you've got a pretty standard setup (i.e. Hauppage card), and not so well for anything else.

    19. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      sudo apt-get install mythtv;
      sudo apt-get upgrade; ...not THAT hard...
      Great, you've got an uptodate MythTV install that doesn't work because nothing's configured. You haven't setup the drivers for your capture card. You haven't configured your graphics card to output overscan NTSC or PAL signals. You haven't configured your channels or guide data source. You haven't got any IR stuff working. You haven't made sure your audio capture source and volumes are correctly set. You haven't setup X to automatically log into a MythTV session. There's a massive difference between installing the MythTV software and having a usable PVR setup. For you to claim it's that easy only confirms that you've never done it.
    20. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by TheDawgLives · · Score: 1

      > For you to claim it's that easy only confirms that you've never done it.

      Actually, I've been using mythtv for almost a year with no major problems. Thanks to lab.zap2it.com, I was even able to move from Alabama to Arkansas and still record the shows I wanted. All I had to do was log into their website and update my zipcode. Pretty simple, if you ask me.

      --
      -TheDawgLives suckitdown
    21. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not impossible - I'm from the UK, and I did it!

      Have a look at the KnoppMythWiki at http://knoppmythwiki.homelinux.org/

      It's probably got what you need.

      Dug

    22. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      And if you don't live in the US, like 95% of the world's population? Zap2it isn't much use then.

      Are you claiming that you didn't need to do any driver or other configuration to get a nice MythTV setup going? No X configuration?

  8. Native or X11? by illtron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was looking at the site earlier and didn't immediately notice anything saying if it was running as a native OS X app or through X11? I'd be really tempted to check it out at work, but, well...I'll let you guess the rest.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:Native or X11? by Dalroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a native OSX app using the Mac OSX port of QT. I've run the previous version (0.16) on my iBook. It was a bit unstable and crashed often, but it ran. I suspect 0.17 will be considerably more stable but haven't tried it yet.

      Bryan

    2. Re:Native or X11? by jargoone · · Score: 1

      It was a bit unstable and crashed often, but it ran.

      How can something be a bit unstable and yet crash often?

    3. Re:Native or X11? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      It's a native OSX app using the Mac OSX port of QT.

      This is nitpicky, but that's a little bit of a contradiction in terms. QT applications are not native. They don't look, feel or work like native Mac OS X applications. They might be kinda close, but they're not the same.

      I've never understood the point of a Mac port of QT anyway. It's so easy to write a Cocoa application that it hardly seems worth short-changing your users on the application in order to maintain a single code base with lots of hairy ifdefs.

  9. or... by Ooter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    Or, if you're from the south, you can slow down the show for easier understanding.

    1. Re:or... by Phillup · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you're from the south, you can slow down the show

      But, does it add the extra syllables?

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    2. Re:or... by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Actually, it adds more syllables by having character shouting, forcing them to enunciate more.

    3. Re:or... by dook43 · · Score: 1

      Ah coo-dn't under staaaahhnd yah. Cooo-d yahh pleeeasse rreeepeeaaat yoooour-sssellff?

      --
      This comment was randomly generated by a school of piranhas chewing on the PCB of a Microsoft Natural Keyboard.
    4. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow, you must be a bigotted pseudo-intellectual liberal snob, subsidized by mommy and daddy in some university near san francisco. Southerners are far far better people than anybody you'll find in san francisco.

    5. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, does it add pompous self-righteous arrogance to the northern folk?

    6. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it really needs is the ability to change the pitch while keeping the speed the same. That could make an Alvin and the Chipmunks cartoon really creepy.

    7. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wow, you must be a bigotted pseudo-intellectual liberal snob, subsidized by mommy and daddy in some university near san francisco. Southerners are far far better people than anybody you'll find in san francisco

      aww, go fuck your siblings or something.

    8. Re:or... by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      On the (semi) serious tip... you could have a "Bullet Time" button that slows down for the framerate for a coupla seconds but ups the pitch to "normal sounding" levels.

      For what, you say? Well... it'd kinda be schweet to watch really spectacular hits in football or car crashes on indy 500 (or Cops, if you're into that sorta thing). Even better, it could add the "swoosh" sound as it goes back to regular speed.

    9. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you're from the left coast, you can delete FOXNews from the channel list.

    10. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everytime I read a comment like that I think to myself, "well George W is kind of dumbass, but at least he pisses off the tree huggers and the massholes, so he must be doing something right by accident when I'm not paying attention."

      Yall can secede whenever you feel like it. We promise not to invade and burn down any major cities.

    11. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, see thats amusing part. I think it would be awesome to secede, so that we don't have to support your ignorant asses anymore. You do realize that so called "Blue" give far more in federal taxes to the nation than "Red" states? To the point where "Red" states actually get more than what they put into the system, while "Blue" states get less than they put in? You couldn't get your farm subsidies without us, so stop telling us how to live, you worthless asshole.

  10. myth by rogabean · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah! I was going for a quiet weekend... Now I gotta decide whether or not my MythTV box needs an upgrade or not...

    ok what am I saying? Sounds like a fun weekend for me :)

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:myth by rogabean · · Score: 1

      Then again I also now have to wait on the changelog to get un /.'ed /sigh

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    2. Re:myth by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      That is what I was thinking - guess I'm not getting the garage cleaned anytime soon.

    3. Re:myth by rogabean · · Score: 1

      I'm lucky and the MythTV box has a very high approval rating from the other half... so I can *get away* with putting off other things for it sometimes...

      sometimes...

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  11. been thinking about mythtv for a while... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but the thought of going from component input to coax irks me a lot (I also like how my non-hd Sony tv is able to 'compress' the DVD output so I get more lines of resolution for example, which I don't think would happen off a wintv pvr-350), what do people here do?

    I'd like to have a mythtv box in the basement, drops in a few rooms and some sort of wireless system to remote control it all from wherever, but if the video quality will drop noticeably it wouldn't really be worth it.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm confused but I don't think capturing TV off of your PVR-350 will affect your DVD playback.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    2. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      ...but the thought of going from component input to coax...

      I know I'm just being pedantic, but don't you mean from component to RF? Your component cables probably are coaxial.

    3. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by imroy · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your first question, but the second part I know about. MythTV is setup as a frontend and backend. The backend has the tuner and storage (or you can use NFS). The frontend is the part that displays material. They can be on separate machines. You can have multiple frontends and backends. A backend can have multiple tuners. It's all very flexible. I think you can even have separate machines for the commercial detection and other CPU-hungry tasks.

      So, don't go running coax or anything around your house. Put a backend box near your source, probably in the ceiling cavity for terrestrial reception or the basement for cable. Then make up some little diskless, netbooting frontends with remote controls. They're each separate machines and can watch the same program (probably not synced to each other) or watch pre-recorded material. Cat5 cable is cheaper and easier to run than coax, or 802.11g should be enough for wireless operation.

      How does that sound?

    4. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Your component cables probably are coaxial.

      Well I don't know about you, but mine aren't coaxial. They are standard wire cable(heavy gauge) terminating in RCA-type male connectors. With the component cables I have (PS2, HD Cable, DVD) the insulation actually bundles all three wires into one flat (and thick) ribbon with 3 male RCA terminations at each end (except the PS2 - one end is the standard PS2 video input plug thingee). Coax is a completely different type of cable.

      Now the raw feed into my HD cable box and my cable modem is coax, but from my cable box to the TV is 3-cable component.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    5. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Just because there's an RCA connector on the end doesn't mean the construction of the cable isn't coxial. The component cables I have, PS2 cable included, each component wire is a round coaxially constructed cable. Even good composite video cables are coaxial these days. If you cut into yours I bet you'd find the same, since the coaxial construction makes each component less susceptable to noise from the others.

    6. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      The answer is multiple mythtv boxes. myth splits recording (mythbackend) from playback (mythfrontend) from storage and database.

      Without going into the details of that, you can setup mutiple boxes. Setup something small with a nice video card next to your tv and run dvi straight into your tv if it supports it, or get a vga to component convertor cable (the simpler ones need specific configuration of the X sync timings, the more expensive boxes with silicon can do the timing conversion for you). If only for occasional use, you could always go with a simpler composite or svideo out from your video card, but the quality is less.

      You can put the tuner and storage in this box if you want (but the better cpu, hdd whine and fans will add noise) or you can put tuner(s) and storage in a beefy box near another aerial drop, and just run cat5 between both boxes.

      Hell, you can even have tuners in the loft, storage in the closet, and a playback box by each tv, with cat5 wiring it together. You add mythmusic, mythvideo and mythdvd, and you can have all your media stored in one place and available to all frontends/stereo/tv's.

      Add an ir receiver with remote to the frontend boxes, and away you go. You can even add an ir-blaster to your tuner box so it can automatically change channel on your cable box if it only works with a remote.

      The one downside is configuring. Mythtv 0.16 is a right royal pain to setup - I don't know if 0.17 will be nicer. Guess I'll find out soon :)

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    7. Re:been thinking about mythtv for a while... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't know the definition of Coax. By the way, RG6 cable (used by most cable companies) can run component video quote a long ways with decent quality if you solder RCA connectors onto it.

  12. I can do ya one better! by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not watch 24 at all!

    I've got ya beat by 18 hours, plus I haven't suffered through a mindless, repetitive story about a guy who likes to yell at people.

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:I can do ya one better! by ewg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I loved that part where that guy had a gun and was pointing it at that other guy.

      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    2. Re:I can do ya one better! by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah. Or the bit where the stupid "protocol" didn't allow that one guy to do that thing he felt he needed to do, but he did it anyway, consequences be damned. That was awesome.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    3. Re:I can do ya one better! by jdray · · Score: 1

      Wait, doesn't that violate the Prime Directive? That's against the rules, but Kirk keeps...

      Oh, wait... Sorry. Wrong show.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:I can do ya one better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! But you forgot about the part where that one guy said he was a good guy but it turns out they weren't!!!!

  13. HDTV. by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So say I buy a HDTV tuner card to avoid future issues w/the broadcast flag. Will I only be able to watch the HDTV content on an HDTV capable monitor?

    Does that mean that I need to have both a regular TV-in card and a HDTV-in card to record both types?

    1. Re:HDTV. by lynnroth · · Score: 1

      I watch HD content on my standard Sony Wega TV (NTSC). Even works great with the 16:9 function of the TV that squeezes the image.

      You will need seperate cards for ATSC and NTSC.

      I have the Air2PC card. Works great.

    2. Re:HDTV. by garcia · · Score: 1

      So as long as you have a TV that supports the 16:9 you are good to go?

      Thanks for the info. While I 100% disagree with HDTV (as many of you well know) I also disagree with the broadcast flag and because TV is going HDTV and I know I should be allowed to do whatever I want with what comes over the lines (regardless of what companies have paid the FCC to say we can) I want to make sure I am covered.

      Thanks for the info.

    3. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Will I only be able to watch the HDTV content on an HDTV capable monitor?"

      Depends on TV, no problem on computer monitor. I have a athlon 2500XP system, but I can not watch HD content while recording it. I have read that you would at least need a P4 3GHz to watch and record. At least the easier way: http://www.eff.org/broadcastflag/cookbook/

      "Does that mean that I need to have both a regular TV-in card and a HDTV-in card to record both types?"

      The PCHDTV card will do both, but I don't think that Mythtv will switch between HD and NTSC. To tune from HD to NTSC, you have to switch the card to another mode. If you have spent the $189 on the PCHDTV what is another $40.

    4. Re:HDTV. by Casca · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that having an HDTV tuner card doesn't get you anything in terms of the broadcast flag, unless you happen to get one that ignores the broadcast flag, which either are or shortly will be illegal to purchase.

      Also, for cable, you still need to have a HDTV cable box or HDTV cablecard that is compatible with your cable provider's service.

      For satellite you would obviously need their equipment.

      For OTA broadcasts you can just use an antenna to pick up whatever the local channels are. Even those will eventually only carry flagged programming, barring a revelation in the industry.

      --
      Casca
    5. Re:HDTV. by booch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HDTV will work fine on your regular TV, as long as your PC can output to the TV. That is, the HDTV receiver hardware (I use pcHDTV on Linux, and eyeTV 500 on Mac) is decoupled from the output (I use an ATI video card with TV out on Linux, and the $20 S-Video adapter on my Mac Mini). For HDTV on my plain old TV, I get black bars at the top and bottom of the screen. I'll be getting an HDTV monitor (with DVI) soon, but even with my 3-year-old TV, the HDTV picture looks better than analog TV.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    6. Re:HDTV. by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Informative
      My understanding is that having an HDTV tuner card doesn't get you anything in terms of the broadcast flag, unless you happen to get one that ignores the broadcast flag, which either are or shortly will be illegal to purchase.

      The answer to this at EFF:

      "As EFF describes on our Digital Television Liberation page, recent regulations in the United States will ban the manufacture of DTV-receiving hardware described here after July 1, 2005. While we challenge these regulations in court, the clock is ticking, and it's safest to assume that it will be difficult to get unrestricted DTV receiving equipment in the future the way you can today.

      However, despite the manufacturing ban, existing equipment will continue to work (and to be lawful to possess and operate); it will be immune from the restrictions imposed on future equipment. That means that the equipment you can buy today is more functional and more useful than what you may be able to buy after July 1, 2005."

    7. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the PcHDTV 300 card most of the work is software and it does NTSC (regular TV) as well as ATSC. Not sure, but I believe that means it should handle non-digital cable too.

    8. Re:HDTV. by interiot · · Score: 1
      July 1 will make it illegal to MANUFACTURE, but they can still be sold (on Ebay for a sky-high price, for instance).

      Also, starting July 1, companies are accountable to the FCC to make their software+hardware difficult to be "defeated or circumvented merely by an ordinary user using generally-available tools or equipment ... [including] specialized electronic tools or software tools that are widely available at a reasonable price". Before July 1, companies have no incentive to do this, and while they may release upgrades that add Broadcast Flag functionality to pre-July-1 hardware, they're not required to do this, and aren't required to make it difficult to continue using older code.

    9. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aught to look out for a video card with a "VIVO" dongle--it's a cable that has HDTV component out, and S-Video in, and the connector itself resembles an S-Video.. Both ATI and Nvidia make them. Some of them are quite reasonable.

      These cards apparently work with Linux; you just set the modeline as you normally would, except use 720p, or whatever you desire... And it just works. This probably isn't so important to those with HDTV sets that have DVI or VGA inputs--being an early adopter can bite you in the ass I guess.

    10. Re:HDTV. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You will need seperate cards for ATSC and NTSC.

      The ATSC PCI board I had supported NTSC too. Only the half-assed designs don't have backward compatibility. I need to get one before all the designs sold enforce the broadcast flag.

      You are right that it will work on other sets. There only needs to be a means to scale the image. Most set-top tuners scale with at most a switch setting, and PC video cards scale automatically.

    11. Re:HDTV. by blighter · · Score: 1
      So given that if one is thinking of ever trying to build an hdtv pvr one should by the hdtv input cards before this July's onset of the crippling law...

      What is the best card to buy?

    12. Re:HDTV. by dpilot · · Score: 1

      But since I can't get a decent broadcast NTSC signal, what are the chances that I'll be able to receive a decent broadcast HDTV signal? Seems to me that in my situation, buying the pre-July broadcast-flag-free HDTV tuner card is just a way to give the company a donation, and store another unused PCI card.

      Is there any other option for someone stuck with cable/satellite to run myth-HDTV? I've heard about IR kludges and the like. Can that do it? What kind of signal comes out of the back side of the cable/satellite box, and is there a way to digitize it for MythTV. (At least last I checked, these questions weren't on the FAQ.)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:HDTV. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about capture cards. Capture cards with component or HDMI inputs don't exist for a PC as far as I have been able to find (outputs, yes - inputs, no). From what I remember, this is because of massive network/corporate influence - ie. corporate interests don't want a PC that could receive true HD video from an outside source ( like my HD tivo ). If you can find a true HD capture card (not just a tuner), please link me to it. I'd love to get one.

    14. Re:HDTV. by lynnroth · · Score: 1

      It works fine in 4:3 mode too, mythtv just letterboxes it. You can choose the mode it scales to. If I want the best quality, I switch the TV to 16:9 mode, or, I can just let MythTV letterbox it.

      Lynn

    15. Re:HDTV. by ltburch2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually I think this is less of a consipracy than you think. The bitrate on composite or DVI inputs for HDTV is REALLY high, I think about 20mbs and it is all uncompressed. Storing the data uncompressed is not really workable because it would fill even a huge harddrive in a few hours. Compressing in real time that much data on the fly exceeds the abilities of typical processors. Since HDTV is actually sent as a compressed stream any capture solution is designed to capture the stream and write it to disk before it gets uncompressed for display.

    16. Re:HDTV. by tgd · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with the $20,000 cost that an HD-capable MPEG encoder costs. You can't use a $20 dedicated MPEG chip to do it the way Tivo does.

      There are LOTS of HD OTA tuner cards. It records the digital signal directly. There are also HD tuner cards that can do digital cable, but none of them are CableCard so you only get unencrypted channels. (Although with Comcast where I live thats 5-6 HD channels, virtually all of the digital cable channels, and bizarrely the entire NBA pay-per-view lineup, all unencrypted).

      Its possible you may start seeing cable-card compatible capture cards at some point, but they will definitely honor the copy-once flags, and will probably be very restrictive about how you man modify the data path from them.

      I may give this version of Myth a try, though, if it can handle firewire HD streams, as the blurb suggests.

    17. Re:HDTV. by dowobeha · · Score: 1
      Here's another option:

      Air2PC

      --
      I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
    18. Re:HDTV. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered how people get such decent signals with those cards, though. I mean, do they take their computers on the roof ? Are they near the top of a 20-story apartment building ? I need to put a full antenna on the roof and run the coax down to get a good signal, and I'm only 10 miles from Center city, philadelphia.

    19. Re:HDTV. by davidescott · · Score: 1

      HDTV is just an mpeg stream. So you can watch it on anything capable of displaying an mpeg stream, that could be your HDTV set, your computer, an NTSC tv attached to a computer, a cellphone. You may have to downgrade the quality but nothing stops you from using it.

      The big problem(s) with these broadcast flag ignoring cards are

      a) price, the deadline for the broadcast flag may be supporting demand from people like you making the price go up.

      b) Air stations only. Think of the card like a modem. Currently these cards (at least within the USA) only decode unencrypted QAM modulated signals, ie airwave, but not the encrypted modulation used for your digital cable from Time Warner or whatever. Will you ever be able to actually get HDTV ESPN off one of these cards? Maybe if someone breaks the encryption but then whatever you will be doing will be illegal, and you will constantly be fighting to keep ahead of the cable companies changing encryption keys.

      c) The market will have to change when the NTSC and PAL analog signals and coax connectors disappear. How will consumers respond when their new TV no longer has a plug in the back for their VCR, and when they can no longer record analog cable from their cable line? Will consumers accept the requirement that every TV must have a cable box attached to it? My bet is that something will change during the next 5-10 years so I'm not buying a tuner card that i think will only show its value in 5-10 years.

    20. Re:HDTV. by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Bah! Two words - mod chip! They will create a lucrative market for all those people popping mod chips into game boxes by adding modchips and hack to pvr's, tv cards etc, etc Our interactive world is the best proof of the axiom that states"if the enemy is in range, so are you"

    21. Re:HDTV. by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Air2PC - does it ignore the broadcast flag?

    22. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm capturing over-the-air HDTV with a hd3000 card, and watching with a 15 year old 27" Sony driven by an nVidia 5200 svideo output. When HDTV displays come down more in price, then I'll switch.

      Some shows are in Standard Definition, 480i, and I just watch those as is. That's DVD quality. Analog NTSC in theory has similar resolution for the black and white part, but the color is at a lower resolution. Compare the svideo output of your DVD player to the RF output to see the difference.

      780p and 1080i High Definition broadcasts must be transcoded down before I can watch them. Even with the resolution reduced, they look great.

      I use a separate analog capture card, with hardware MPEG encoding. That lets me capture two shows at the same time. The analog part of the digital TV card doesn't do hardware encoding, and is not supported by MythTV. Or wasn't supported; I haven't checked 0.17 yet. I doubt that I would use it for anything other than DTV capture, anyway.

    23. Re:HDTV. by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Also, starting July 1, companies are accountable to the FCC to make their software+hardware difficult to be "defeated or circumvented

      And note that in what I'm *sure* is a purely unintentional side effect, this by definition criminalizes all open source HD recording software.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    24. Re:HDTV. by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      Bah! Two words - mod chip! They will create a lucrative market for all those people popping mod chips into game boxes by adding modchips and hack to pvr's, tv cards etc, etc

      A grey market at best - mod chips are a notorious target for litigation.

      Our interactive world is the best proof of the axiom that states"if the enemy is in range, so are you"

      Depends on who has the bigger guns.

    25. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 40 miles from the towers, and get by with an antenna in the attic of my single story townhouse.

      YMMV. It depends on what's in between the transmitter and your house. A directional antenna can make up for distance, until you get far enough away that the curvature of the Earth gets in the way. Or you could be 5 miles away, and not get a good signal because you are behind a tall building or a hill.

    26. Re:HDTV. by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are a target, have been for years. Hasn't stopped them

      It's not the size of the gun, but how good the aim

    27. Re:HDTV. by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      Will I only be able to watch the HDTV content on an HDTV capable monitor? Unless you can watch it on HDTV incapable monitor, in which case said monitor would be...HDTV capable! To seriously answer your question, if you have a monitor that can do 1280x1024, you have an HDTV ready monitor.

      --
      i forget
    28. Re:HDTV. by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      It's not the size of the gun, but how good the aim

      Aim doesn't determine range =p If your enemy has a bigger gun than you, you might be in his range but he won't be in yours.

    29. Re:HDTV. by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Size doesn't determine range either, rather velocity etc and all the other good parts of ballistics. None the less, this is dumb, the point is that every attempt to curtail such activities has failed and spawned new and better ways of doing the same thing.

      This a war of attrition. For every programmer et al they have working on solutions there are a thousand geeks sitting in basements hacking away. Even by accident someone in the multitudes will find a new way.

      Canada, frankly, did the smart thing by taxing blank media and distributing the proceeds to the artists. At least they get something.

    30. Re:HDTV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to first link "no party shall or sell or distribute [a sensible HDTV tuner] in interstate commerce"

      Hasn't "interstate commerce" (in legalese) started to make some progress back towards mean "interstate commerce" (in common-sense-English) ?

      Could I start a plant here in Texas that makes and sells them only to Texans?

  14. Not that I should respond to my own post but... by Joshua53077 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After I posted, I remembered that way back Steve Jobs said something to the effect of "People want their computers and TVs to be 2 distinct experiences." Although the mac mini certainly represents several shifts in apple's business model so you never know.

    1. Re:Not that I should respond to my own post but... by saha · · Score: 1
      Hopefully there will be change of mind regarding this. People should have the right to change their position on what they said a long time back, especially regarding technology.

      Gates on DOS memory allocation "640KB should be plenty"
      Jobs at NeXTStep on ethernet "Why does a computer need an umbilical cord".

    2. Re:Not that I should respond to my own post but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Steve also totally missed the digital music trend until it was almost too late. See the recent Forbes article. Jobs admits he totally missed the boat, and Apple had to scramble to design and release the iPod in a mere 9 months.

      I wonder if something similar will happen with video? Steve Jobs is not always some great visionary - sometimes it takes him a little too long to catch onto what's going to be hot. But once he does, his company does it better than anyone else. Pretty amazing when you think about it that Apple went from being absolutely nobody to the dominant leader in digital music over a fairly short period of time. A few months later and they might have stayed a nobody.

    3. Re:Not that I should respond to my own post but... by zonker · · Score: 0

      heh, however jobs did seem to understand sound in computers with the mac and next computers having great audio support. something that took the pc many, many years to feature.

      on top of that was the apple iigs, which though it was severely crippled in many other ways (due to fear of competition with the mac) like having mono out only (though it had a better sound chip than any other computer available up into the 90's including the atari st and amiga). sadly it went largely unused as it was a pain to implement stereo sound through various hacks and audio trickery like demuxing.

      interestingly it was the iigs, not the mac, that first got apple into trouble with the beatles apple records after their initial agreement to not enter the music industry (currently they are battling apple records again due to the ipod, itms and garageband).

  15. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by EatingPie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using firewire based HDTV playback/recording on a Mac for a year or so. Had it not been tagged as "Apple," I might have missed this.

    Mistake or not, it works for me!

    -Pie

  16. Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just got my MythTV system running 2 weeks ago. I'm still running 0.16 but it's still great.

    I'm using a Pundit-R that sits beside my TV, and it uses a 802.11b wireless card to get programming data.

    Since I've been using it for 2 weeks, it's totally changed the way the wife and I watch TV. We never miss an episode of our favourite shows, and never watch commercials.

    The commercial marking function is like magic, it looks for blank frames in the data stream and flags that as a commercial. I'd say it gets it right 80% of the time, 15% of the time it will include the station ID clip, and 5% it will grab an extra commercial, but I'll just hit forward on the remote to skip it.

    My favourite part is using it to watch a new show that's 'almost' live. I'll set it to record the show, but then start watching it 5-10 minutes after it's started. When I get to the commercials I skip over them, and by the end of the show I'll have hopefully synced up perfectly with the real time stream.

    1. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by RadioheadKid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Glad you finally awoke to the world of DVRs; people have been doing this stuff with Tivos and other DVRs for years.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about building a similar set up, also using a Pundit-R, and a PVR-250. Any hints on how to quickly get it up and running?

    3. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Kirschenbaum · · Score: 1

      I like that case. I was wondering if you could help with the hardware list and which linux you used? Did you use a 250 or a 350 TV card?

    4. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been paying monthly fees for years, too. He's getting the DVR benefit without the fees. That's newsworthy.

    5. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Commercial DVRs do not automatically remove commercials.

    6. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by wizbit · · Score: 1

      Try KnoppMyth. Self-booting ISO, installs Debian and tries to auto-configure much off-the-shelf PVR hardware. Their forums are full of helpful advice and list specific hardware that's known to work without issue (and workarounds for things that aren't).

    7. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      A couple questions, if you don't mind:

      I'm also using a PVR I built a month or two ago, but the I could never get TV-Out working properly, which seemed to be an issue with the drivers. Is your TV-Out working? I'm wondering if ATI has fixed this problem since I built mine.

      That being said, I love my mythtv. I'm glad I finally built one, both for the way it changed my tv watching and for the stuff I learned in the process.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    8. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

      Ya, I posted about this on the mythtv mailing list a few days back. Look for my email address harford@gmail.com in the archives.

    9. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used a PVR-350 but then discovered that it sucks for playing DVD's and other things that aren't MPEG-2 format (like if you transcode to divx). They're basically unwatchable, playing at about 5fps.

      I used:
      Pundit-R
      2.4ghz celeron (overkill, but was cheaper than the 2.0 and 2.2's at my local store!?)
      PVR-350 (but would recommend the PVR-250 and the onboard tv out instead)
      160gb hard drive, but should have gone with a bigger one.
      Dual layer DVD burner, but that's not necessary, a DVD-ROM would be fine. My two tips for this are to make sure you get one that the case is compatible with for the eject button, and can handle being vertical.
      512mb RAM but that's overkill too, but I'm running a webserver, frontend, backend, VNC session, etc.

    10. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Kirschenbaum · · Score: 1

      I was thinking one 250 and one 350 or 2 250s and a NEC 16x dual layer. Should I buy the case first, then figure out the drive?

      Also, which linux? Thanks again!

    11. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fedora Core 3 for sure. It's the most popular and there is an apt server for FC3 that is the most up to date.

      I'd get 2 250's and save yourself the $50.

    12. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tip: Make sure you update the Pundit-R to the latest BIOS version. Otherwise it's like having a jet engine as CPU fan behind your TV.

    13. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by Kirschenbaum · · Score: 1

      That is great advise!

  17. Is there a good mythtv live cd? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did a quick search on google and found one knoppix based live cd but it seemed to be only the front end and still required the backend to be installed some where.

    Is there a standalone CD that I can try out with Mythtv ready to go for my GeForce FX 5700 personal cinema?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by prowley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Knoppmyth is the whole shebang. I based my dedicated install on it. http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    2. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by masonjd · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you are referring to KnoppMyth then it also installs the backend. You can use the cd to just install the frontend but it will install the both pieces on one computer. That is the way I have done it.

      KnoppMyth definitely makes MythTV more accessible. The entire install and configuration takes about 20 minutes provided that you are using linux compatible hardware. Pretty much if you are using a Hauppauge card then you are set.

    3. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by jarich · · Score: 2, Informative
      I did a quick search on google and found one knoppix based live cd but it seemed to be only the front end and still required the backend to be installed some where.

      Is there a standalone CD that I can try out with Mythtv ready to go for my GeForce FX 5700 personal cinema?

      No. In order to use Myth, you must have an installed system somewhere. There's enough setup to a Myth system, you wouldn't want to use it on a Knoppix boot type cd anyway.

      After you get a Myth server running on your network, you can use the live CD to boot a box for a front-end though. Or you can you run the front-end on the server box.

    4. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

      KnoppMyth is probably the one you're talking about, but it's not trivial to setup. It's much easier than doing it from scratch and so long as you pick hardware that is receiving attention in the forums there, you should be fine, but there's a lot of options and configuration you need to do sometimes. A live CD backend wouldn't help too much, given that.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    5. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by xsecrets · · Score: 1

      No there is not one that I know of, and probably never will be as you have to write data to the database which would be rater difficult from a live cd. I suppose you could write it to a ram disk, but video is very large, and you would have to have to write that as well.

      Secondly the personal cinema cards do not work with mythtv. As a mater of fact there are no all in one cards that I know of that do.

    6. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by cpeikert · · Score: 1

      I was very happy with KnoppMyth, but Hauppauge changes their hardware around so often that KnoppMyth isn't entirely plug-n-play.

      The PVR-350 that I got was the newest version, so I had weird "color issues" and had to download new ivtv drivers (and feed them non-default arguments). Also, the new PVR-350s come with a cooler remote, but it has different IR codes. So I had to find a config file for those too.

      Still: MythTV is awesome, KnoppMyth is fantastic, and I love my time-shifting :).

  18. Time Savings by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Re:Ooooh... timestretch! -- That means I can watch 24 in 18.

    Isn't that what's left after skipping all the commercials?

    i watch 7 of 9 in 5

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Golias · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about the EyeTV 500?

    I've just started using that same device myself. Seeing as it already does a great job of giving you complete PVR functions in HDTV on the Mac, what exactly does MythTV bring to the table that we don't already have?

    Just curious, is all...

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  20. HDTV tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any tuners available that can receive OTA broadcasts as well as via comcast (or whoever) cable? MythTV can do HD i guess?

  21. YES! by mboverload · · Score: 1

    HDTV support has been an absolute bitch for the last year. Now I can finally pull my computer (3ghz P4 computer I built for HDTV, $700) out of the closet and record some HD CSI!

  22. Is this possible? by scottking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With Lokitorrents getting taken down today, and left with a rather tasteless warning, I wonder if the MPAA will start looking to litigate the source of illegal content, like MythTV?

    Do you (slashdot readers) think it's a possibility?

    --
    scott king
    1. Re:Is this possible? by SigTom · · Score: 1

      Well, I can tell ya I dont think MythTV is the source of the content.

    2. Re:Is this possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source for illegal content? Mythtv is no different than ReplayTV or Tivo. Using a PVR does not make you a criminal.

    3. Re:Is this possible? by scottking · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree, although it is high profile enough to end up on the shitlist if the MPAA was able to overturn the Betamax ruling... However unlikely.

      --
      scott king
  23. HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast flag? by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

    Of all the HDTV capture cards on the market, which will ignore the "broadcast flag"? Which ones work in Windows, and which ones work on Linux?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  24. Have they put in the nagravision decoding algos? by Trigun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That'll get me to move from VDR.

  25. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by hostyle · · Score: 1

    Its free.

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  26. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any that will get cable HD?

  27. First rule of MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The first rule of MythTV, don't talk about MythTV.

    MPAA, RIAA, etc, please move along. There is nothing more to see here. No one uses MythTV, and there is no copyright infringement going on, don't worry about it. And definitely no laws broken in MythGame and MythDVD and MythMusic either.

    1. Re:First rule of MythTV by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      and there is no copyright infringement going on, don't worry about it

      I don't like how your lines sound, like you seem to suggest MythTV has anything even remotely connected to illegal activities regarding (C) infringement, which it doesn't, as well as your dvd-recorder and vcr don't.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    2. Re:First rule of MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's get this right, fellas:

      1. You do not talk about MythTV.
      2. You do not talk about MythTV.
      3. When someone presses "Stop" or drops the remote, or powers off, the show is over.
      4. Only two PVR-2/350s to a box.
      5. One tuner at a time.
      6. No commercials, no local programming channels.
      7. Shows only take as long as they have to.
      8. If this is your first install of MythTV, you have to record.

    3. Re:First rule of MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was making a nervous joke about the MPAA et al. I'm just a humble user of MythTV, but as far as I know MythTV and all of it's plugins in themselves do not infringe on anything. IANAL, but one could make the argument that it facilitates users to violate copyright.

      MythTV itself allows redistribution of recording, which poses a legal question. Unlike your VCR analogy, you can't ftp a video taped episode of some TV show.

      MythDVD by just playing a DVD on Linux (in the US) probably constitutes some DMCA crime.

      MythMusic allows users to rip CDs and use questionably sourced MP3 files.

      MythGame allows the user to use ROMs of copyrighted games via MAME.

      Of course, MythTV doesn't violate copyright, people do. I'm just afraid the MPAA or some other group is going to sue and try to shut it down. I'm so used to it I don't want to give it up.

  28. oooo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the car chase scene in bourne supremacy can be really nauseating.

  29. My prediction for the DVR market by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    Apple will buy Tivo.

    Disclaimer: I own a DirecTivo. I don't really know why I needed to declare that. I think I just wanted to sound important.

    [1] Tivo is starting to look like it might become "beleaguered" much like Apple was declared during the years 1970 through 2005. Yes, Apple was called beleaguered by the tech media even before it existed.

    [2] Tivo is (I think) Linux based. Making it compilable on BSD Unix is, like, what? Two man hours? What? Different motherborads? Ok, four man hours.

    [3] Steve Jobs wants the Mac to be the center of our digital media warm fuzziness thing where we go for brief respites from the wacky demon haunted world in which we live.

    [4] The Grammys have become dominated by hip hop and gangsta rap. Only a vast array of Mac powered DVRs spread across the nation can protect us from whatever.

    It can't be any more obvious that that! You savvy?

    You heard it here first.

    1. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think so. TiVo is great for what it is, but it's really not up to Apple's standards. The user experience is good, but not NEARLY good enough. Plus there's no FireWire support, which would be necessary for an Apple product. Also, no QuickTime, which means no easy way to add support for H.264/AVC.

      But the bigger problem is that TiVo's software is, I believe, encumbered by the GPL. That's a show-stopper for Apple.

    2. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe it. I would not be surprised to see Apple come out with a DVR, probably when the CableCard 2.0 standard becomes final, but I don't see what it gains Apple to buy TiVo. What would TiVo bring to the table? User interface? Apple's perfectly capable of doing that on their own, and as good as the TiVo interface is, it is beginning to look dated. Apple would want something new. Profits? TiVo is losing money. Affiliation with DirecTV? DirecTV is switching to a non-TiVo DVR. Userbase? Most TiVo customers will probably be looking to upgrade to a HD DVR with at least two tuners some time in the next couple of years, and it won't necessarily be a TiVo. It seems like the only thing TiVo really has to offer Apple is the TiVo name, but Apple's name recognition is at least as good.

      And yes, I have a TiVo too (I even have one of the new HD models).

    3. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      TiVo software is encumbered by the GPL? This has me scratching my head.

      TiVo's main app that does all the recording, sceduling, playback, etc is called MyWorld and it is closed source. Even if it wasn't, I don't think that they would be encumbered by the GPL, they would just have to release the source. How is this encumbering?

      The TiVo already runs a *nix kernel on a PPC core and uses HFS formatted drives. I could easily see MyWorld running on a Mac. The show-stopper would be the encoder/decoder hardware.

    4. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      Tivo now supports moving your shows from the Tivo to a PC, but it's a poor implementation. Tivo encodes video in hardware.

      Would it really be that hard to revise the hardware to encode in a more Quicktime-friendly format? I doubt it. Likewise, adding Firewire probably wouldn't take much. I'll grant that the UI could use even more work, but it's pretty simple as it is. Turn on the TV, go to the Tivo menu, and pick your show. Even non-techies "get it" within a few minutes.

      As for the GPL argument, I think that mainly counts for the kernel. The Tivo "myworld" program, which is more or less the core logic that sets the Tivo apart from a PPC/ARM box with TV out, certainly isn't GPL'ed. Linux is just a convenient kernel and GNU tools a sufficient toolkit to support the program. There's no reason that they couldn't port it to another Unix-like OS, it would just take time to support the hardware.

      I think the biggest problem is that no one's making enough money off of this yet. Apple would have to find a good way to guarantee long-term income from a DVR division before committing to such a path.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  30. Timestretching: ObGhostbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, no, I feel great. I just ordered some more vitamins. I see you were exercising. So was I. I taped "20 Minute Workout" and played it back at high speed so it only took ten minutes and I got a really good workout.

    You wanna have a mineral water with me?

  31. The Second Rule Of MythTV by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    The second rule of MythTV, you *will* fight with Tivo users. :)

    1. Re:The Second Rule Of MythTV by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Third Rule of MythTV - Don't ever, ever listen to Windows Media Centre users, for they spout MSish

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  32. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Of all the HDTV capture cards on the market, which will ignore the "broadcast flag"? Which ones work in Windows, and which ones work on Linux?

    I'm talking without any knowledge of what's out there, but if I were designing an HDTV capture card I would make sure that the hardware didn't do anything with any flags in the data stream except pass them on to the driver/OS and let them decide how to handle them.

    There's no value to having separate hardware versions for each region the device is sold in, depending on whether the government there has tried to make it illegal for consumers to timeshift and format-shift broadcast content...

  33. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    MythTV allows you to create a network of multiple sources, multiple outputs.

    For example, you've got a big computer in your basement doing all of the capturing, encoding, crunching, etc. It's got gobs of RAM, a Terabyte RAID setup, and it sounds like a fuckin hoover sucking the entrails out of a cat... You don't want to have this in your TV room, or bedroom, but you would like to have a PVR that has access to all of this, and everything on the server (music, photos, whatever).

    MythTV allows you to do this. You can ask it to record on your bedroom box, and it will record on your uber-computer in the basement, but play it when asked to do so on your bedroom screen, and it can even spread the recording duties across multiple computers and TV cards... This is where the Apple thing comes in. Apples are reputed to be quiet--especially the Mini. So, put the Apple in the bedroom, or the TV room, and voila. The Apple itself is not doing the recording (indeed, MythTV relies on vid4linux), it's just looking pretty and playing video. Point is, it's probably easier to buy a quiet Mac than build a quiet PC.

    I suppose that if a compatible video interface is ever made for the Mac, it would work just as well for doing the recording and storing, but it's just not to that point yet.

  34. HD CSI? Have you heard/read yourself? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Come out of the basement. That big yellow ball overhead is the sun.

    Really.

    Real life is less interesting than the crime lab in Miami but its real. The crime lab in Miami is fictional.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:HD CSI? Have you heard/read yourself? by mboverload · · Score: 1
      I dont watch CSI, it's just a show that is really good in HD.

      I'd be using it to record 24 and shows like that. Sure, I can download it from bittorrent, but I like uncompressed goodieness =)

    2. Re:HD CSI? Have you heard/read yourself? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Sure, I can download it from bittorrent, but I like uncompressed goodieness =)

      DTV is already compressed with MPEG-2. What you want is high bitrate.

  35. Funny you say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the next scheduled story is about a Microsoft messenger exploit.

  36. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Golias · · Score: 1

    So was the software that came with the the HDTV tuner.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  37. oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like it has been slashdotted...anyone have a link to a mirror?

  38. Re:Apple is gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess if you're dumb enough to think that's true, you're also dumb enough to think it's an insult.

  39. I think that the bigger news here... by Yonder+Way · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that a lot of digital/HDTV cable customers will be able to use their digital cable box as a capture device, and plug into the MythTV back end host with firewire. This uses almost none of the host CPU as the cable box is spewing raw MPEG2 over firewire, and MythTV just needs to save it to disk.

    That right there just tripled the number of channels I could record, and gave me HDTV capabilities as well as premium channels.

    I'm one of the people scratching my head over why this was put in the Apple category where few people would see it. Most of the people running Myth are on PC/Linux platform.

    1. Re:I think that the bigger news here... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'm one of the people scratching my head over why this was put in the Apple category where few people would see it.

      "Changes include Mac OS X frontend support"

    2. Re:I think that the bigger news here... by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that is just one of many changes, and one of the ones that affects only a very small number of people. A lot of non-Apple people are going to completely miss this announcement.

  40. Too little too late by zapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I ran myth for over a year... it served its purpose for a while.

    I have since put XP and Beyond TV on my box. The single biggest contributing factor to dropping Myth was the lack of a standard format. I couldn't view .nuv files on any other platforms. Oh, and good luck trying to transcode something to divx, that took way way way too long.

    Myth: Record to mpeg or avi!

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Too little too late by SigTom · · Score: 1

      Use a pvrx50, theres your MPEG2 stream. You want HD, hey the pchdtv3k does the same. No need to transcode if you can live with large file sizes. So SD and HD, both in MPEG2, thats standard, right?

    2. Re:Too little too late by fodder69 · · Score: 1


      I agree that part is a little lame, but nuv does yield the highest quality. I just use scripts to set mencoder to record straight to divx, has worked for the last couple years now.

      However with an mpeg2 capture card (Hauppage PVR-250 or 350) it will record straight to mpeg2. And with the ivtv project getting the new $60 PVR-150 working great, there is now a great cheap alternative mpeg2 card.

      So pick up a PVR-150 and take another look at MythTV.

    3. Re:Too little too late by gremlins · · Score: 5, Informative

      First if you use IVTV it does record mpeg. But besides that nuv is just an encapsulation for various diffrent encoding formats. So even though it says nuv the underlying encoding format is usally either mpeg2 or mpeg4. Now if you want to view them on other platforms mplayer has a patch to play nuv files. Also you could use winmyth to play them on windows. And if you want to easily convert nuv files to divx you can use nuvexport. Or you could play them through mythweb with mythstreamtv.

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    4. Re:Too little too late by amigabill · · Score: 1

      For the non-standard file format, that concerned me for a while. Then by chance I was fiddling around with disk sharing via samba to my Windows box in another room. Wouldn't ya know it, I could view my MythTV files without converting them. I have the Hauppauge PVR-250 tuner card with on-board hardware mpeg encoder, and this is the data in my files. It doesn't get mutated into nupple-native when being saved to disk...

      So that could be one way around the format issue. But you still get the incomprehensible filenames. :)

      I started my PVR PC project with Windows98. Using an ATI AllInWonder Radeon card the videp and sound were ALWAYS out of sync after a few minutes. XP didn't fix this problem, nor did Win2000. Turns out ATI's software cannot be made happy on any of my PCs. No diea why, or why other people can use it at all, or why it's never been fixed that I know of. After a couple years of on and off meddling with it I trashed the ATI software and tried Showshifter. Audio and Video magically were in sync finally! But Windows kept crashing and hanging and freezing every few days.

      That's when I gave up and decided to try Linux and MythTV. Using Gentoo no less, and now I know way more about Linux than any "casual user" like I want to be should have to. But it's much more stable and usable than anything under Windows that I've seen, and I get more features than anything under Windows that I know of with all the game, music, etc. plugins.

    5. Re:Too little too late by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      But you still get the incomprehensible filenames :)


      The Windows Myth Filters can automatically query your mythbackend to give recordings the appropriate names, IIRC.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    6. Re:Too little too late by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      I use a DVB (UK freeview) which broadcasts mpeg2, think you can do the same with HDTV in the US. That's recorded straight to disk; all I need to do is rename from .nuv to .mpeg and it plays in anything.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    7. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myth: Record to mpeg or avi!

      no need to do it. mplayer (and xine) can decode nuv files perfectly (even those containing mpeg2). you can find good mplayer packages for windows (and for almost every platform out there), and you can use it to transcode to mpeg4 or whatever you want, for example to an mpeg container WITHOUT recompressing them.

  41. How's the 64-bit support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How's the X86-64 support in mythtv these days?
    Alot of video programs assume if you don't have X86 you don't have SSE/MMX, so they get really slow when they fall back to non-SIMD code.

  42. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by interiot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Visit the EFF broadcast flag page, scroll down about halfway, and look under the Linux/Windows/Mac sections on the left.

  43. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Golias · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sounds incredibly useful if you are using a cheap, noisy AMD box running linux to do your video capture. However, the Mac G5 Towers run just as quiet as the mini, if not more so, which means there's no real need to hide the server in the back of your wine cellar.

    Also, I could see why you would want this if you are using satellite or digital cable. The current offerings from El Gato (the company which makes EyeTV) really only support so many video formats.

    Thanks for spelling out the real-world advantages of the code, instead of just giving boilerplate Stallmanist dogma about "libre" software. I don't think MythTV is the right solution for my set-up, but I can now see where it would be the ideal way to go for a lot of other folk.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  44. There was already frontend support for mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ported under darwin ports. with a native GUI, not X11. works better than my backend box for viewing.

  45. "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed by imrec · · Score: 2, Funny

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    And there are already plans to support blipverts in the next version!

    --
    Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
  46. ...for some definitions of fairly easy by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If by "fairly easy" you mean "there are existing algorithms that do this badly," then you're right.

    If you mean "sounds exactly the same, only faster" then you're wrong. Considering the quality of these things now, I'm not sure I wouldn't rather just let the pitch raise.

    The problem is how to represent pitch. Most of the time, this is done by converting to a frequency domain and doing a shift, or by convolving the signal with a waveform that causes a signal shift (the classical example of this is using a sine wave, as is done for RF encoding). The problem is that this technique is only really good for a signal that doesn't change over time.

    In fact, even the best pitch shifters assume that the pitch can be modeled as function of time and are unable to deal with randomly changing pitches very well. Lots of artifacts are still introduced when dealing with an "instrument" as complex as the human voice (on the other hand, they work great for flutes). Of course, if you don't change the pitch very much, you can get away with less artifacts.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:...for some definitions of fairly easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Most of the time, this is done by converting to a frequency domain and doing a shift

      Actually for stuff that does it in real-time they use an even simpler algorithm... I forget the exact details but it basically involves doubling or removing samples (depending on whether your speeding up or slowing down)

      This is basically what any modern DJ CD player does. The better, newer ones (like a modern Pioneer) actually don't sound that bad... when speeding up. Slowing down more than 2-3% tends to introduce audible artifacts (bass drum hits start to stutter a little bit) but I've played songs with vocals at +12% and more and it sounds fine. So that's enough to shave a few minutes off
      a half-hour program

      Maybe you wouldn't want to watch the opera this way but for converstational speech it'd work fine

      Non-real time ones do the FFT-based stuff you describe and then apply some secret sauce on top. Serato Pitch&Time is probably the best known software pacakage for this (sadly its ProTools-only)

    2. Re:...for some definitions of fairly easy by drawfour · · Score: 1

      Simply adding samples lowers the pitch (and stretches the sound) and simply removing samples increases the pitch (and shrinks the sound). Maybe if you take the two surrounding samples plus the one you're removing and average them together in some meaningful way, you can alleviate the problem, but simply removing/doubling samples does absolutely nothing other than decreasing/increasing the length of time for playback.

      On the other hand, radio has been using the technology for years. They have a 7-second delay (usually), but ever notice what happens when they use the 7-second delay? They don't just put a BEEEEEEEEEP or just pause for 7 seconds. Instead, they cut out a couple seconds of time, and lose a part of their buffer. Now they have to build that buffer back up, otherwise only a few incidents would cause them to lose the entire buffer. So they slowly stretch playback over time, but you can't tell. Whether they do it with just a 1% stretch or much faster, I don't know, but I've never heard any audible distortion after them using the buffer.

    3. Re:...for some definitions of fairly easy by MentlFlos · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you forget that if you are speeding up your shows I highly doubt you are _that_ concerned with the quality of the audio.

      I'm not saying your points aren't valid, just that I doubt it really applies in this case.

    4. Re:...for some definitions of fairly easy by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is the convolution of a signal with a rect function (I invite you to go over to mathworld and look at the mathematical definition of convolution).

      This isn't a very good approach. Even the existing methods will produce less artifacts.

      It does give you a bit of insight, though: existing methods work well when you have sound that is predictable, just as yours does - that is the same pitch over the interval of an entire sample (where multiple samples make up a signal). They also tend to cause less distortion when they're doing less - so if you only change things a teeny bit, there won't be many artifacts.

      As far as building back the 7 seconds, I think they mostly just start before the commercials end and have it all back at once.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:...for some definitions of fairly easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet my PAL conversions of movies are perfectly fine to enjoy.

  47. Sony v. Universal by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder if the MPAA will start looking to litigate the source of illegal content, like MythTV?

    MythTV merely turns your computer into a VCR. The movie studios lost that battle back in 1984.

    1. Re:Sony v. Universal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With such a corporate-friendly government in power, no consumer rights battle is ever "lost".

  48. no, I mean... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    my TV is connected to my digital cable box via component inputs, which is a heck of a lot better than the RF I'd be getting out of a 350

    having mythtv would mean that I might be tempted to rip all my DVDs to avoid the constant disk shuffling, but I wouldn't be able to do that due to, again, the video quality issues.

    The PVR from my cable company (which would cost me not that much more than a mythtv setup) although abysmal from the functionality standpoint does output in component *and* even downconverts HDTV to 480i: I'd much prefer to use mythtv but I'm starting to feel the pull towards that one instead, that's why I was asking if anybody knew of ways to fix my concerns.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:no, I mean... by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      I have been playing around with Myth TV and the problem I have is not only getting a quality picture out, but also a quality picture in. Right now I have my digital cable box connected to my PVR-250 with an S-Video cable, I would imagine if you wanted to spend the money, there are capture cards that could take take the component video out of the cable box. What would be ideal, which the article mentions, is capturing from the firewire port on a cable box, however, after talking to the cable company and to motorola, it sounds like you have to depend on the cable company to turn on that feature, and the people at my cable company don't even know they can do such a thing. Now to get the picture out, my computer video card has an s-video output (as does the 350 I believe), which again is not as good as component video. But, again, if you want to spend the money, I think they sell video cards that have component video outputs or I believe they make converters that will take the VGA output and convert that to component video.

    2. Re:no, I mean... by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Well, nVidia is now shipping cards (I think 6600GT and/or 6800) with component outputs, so if you have a lot of cash laying around, you can get those cards and have component output from Myth to your TV through the Geforce. That has the added bonus of being able to use MythGame for like Doom 3 and UT2k4 and whatnot. Sounds like your TV is on the fancy side, so with a wireless keyboard and mouse that might be a cool setup.

      My current setup is a Geforce2 doing SVideo or RCA output depending on what TV I'm using. Works pretty well, but obviously not at component video quality levels.

      If you decide to go the Geforce 6 route, do some research first. nVidia has excellent drivers, but I've run into issues with TV output before (on Geforce4 cards), so make sure those component outputs work well in Linux and such.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  49. Cheapest Hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the cheapest hardware you can get right now to run mythtv with hdtv tuner card? I'm looking to purchase http://pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html also what is the easiest ditro to go with?

  50. Would it now be worth it.... by agraupe · · Score: 1

    to go out any buy myself a capture card and install MythTV on my linux box? I've been thinking about it for a while, waiting until the time is right. I already have a TV, so is the ~CDN$300-400 worth it?

    1. Re:Would it now be worth it.... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      This is a timely story submission, because I've been fighting with a new Myth box for over a week now (Myth's not the problem -- it's the marginally supported accelerated graphics on my Via board, which I require because the CPU is only 600MHz.)

      But I first got Myth running about a year ago on my "working" box. To answer your question, I'd say that since Myth is a "roll your own" solution anyway, I think it's definitely worth playing around with. A basic setup would give you the capability to schedule recordings and watch them when you want. With the proper processor/graphics card you could move from there to watching live tv (encoding and decoding simultaneously -- not at all difficult, but I went the hard way because I wanted a fanless system.) From there, there are a bunch of different modules to play with. In short, you can get some functionality right away, and can spend time later getting that seamless and polished entertainment center integration that we all dream about.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    2. Re:Would it now be worth it.... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I was going to say that you don't need that expensive a capture card but then realized you must also be factoring in the cost of another hard drive.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:Would it now be worth it.... by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      With the new PVR-150's ending up around US$60 (~CDN$100.00?) for hardware capturing, you might find the buy-in easier. For me, the cost of the PVR-250 was worth it.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    4. Re:Would it now be worth it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES.

      Simply put. The Hauppage cards have been the focus of mythtv for a good long time, and the IVTV driver -- for the hauppage cards-- has been stable enough (for me) for the last year.

      I have the 250, which has an mpeg2 encoder on it. As a result, I'm running on an AMD Duron 1600, underclocked to 1200MHz for stability. Even when encoding and displaying live tv, cpu never gets over 60%. And that's with 256MB ram.

      With a 350 -- encoder and decoder -- there's very little need for a fast processor. A 350 on a Celeron 600 will do.

    5. Re:Would it now be worth it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PVR-250's are 129$cad retail now

  51. DVB support improved. by shippo · · Score: 1

    I set up a box to run MythTV with a cheap DVB card late last year, but the configuration of the DVB channels left a lot to be desired.

    Particularly troublesome were time shared channels that only broadcast during part of the day, as the mechanism to insert channels would feed incorrect values into the various fields. Even when I correct this when the channels were on air didn't help with a coupld of channels. I hope this mechanism is better.

    I'll have to spend the next week or three re-loading this box, as I've had to recycle it as a temporary Windows machine.

    1. Re:DVB support improved. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Quick tip (though it's still a pain)

      Using the guide here
      , about scanning and tuning channels. Scan at the times when the channels are broadcasting, and manually add the correct values from mplayer's channels.conf (guide for this is in part 2, 'adding the remaining freeview channels') to the channels options using mythsetup.

      HTH!

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    2. Re:DVB support improved. by shippo · · Score: 1

      That's what I did, but I still ended up with some corruption in the database for a couple of channels, as the audio PID values were still zero.

      Worse was scanning for The Community Channel, which at the time only broadcast between 2:45am and 5:45am. As the tool to generate channels.conf wasn't that reliable, setting a cron job to scan didn't work, and I had to get up in the middle of the night just to get the channel settings.

  52. I want my MythTV... by mooreBS · · Score: 1

    but it's been Slashdotted.

  53. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    Can you have network playback? I can have one PC in a corner with a few TB of drive space and n TV tuners...and have n small, cheap, quiet PCs feeding signals out (or more if some happen to be watching archived shows).

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  54. FireWire cable box? by fsck! · · Score: 1

    What providers offer FireWire cable box? Have I been living in a cave?

    I have Comcast digital cable in Massachusetts, which is about 700 channels (including 100 or so of just music and a handful of HDTV feeds). The cable box is Motorola, black, but I've seen some silver ones at friends houses. Are these the FireWire ones?

    1. Re:FireWire cable box? by tgd · · Score: 1

      Yes, all the silver ones have it, both the single and dual tuner versions.

    2. Re:FireWire cable box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it has a firewire port in the back, yes. :P

    3. Re:FireWire cable box? by fsck! · · Score: 1

      I just called Comcast and it seems the silver chassis are HDTV or PVR, and I have neither. Is this counter to the FCC saying they have to give me a firewire box if I ask?

      http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/fcc-requires-firew ire-on-all-cable-boxes-015708.php

    4. Re:FireWire cable box? by fromtheblueline · · Score: 1

      The boxes are Motorola DCT6200 and Motorola DCT6208. The ports may be deactivated by your cable company.

    5. Re:FireWire cable box? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the FCC says that the FireWire ports should be enabled. Whether or not the MPEG stream you get over them is encrypted or not is a different story. If they are disabled, bitch to them, then file a complaint with the FCC if they refuse.

      --
      this is my sig
  55. What?!? I didn't post this to the Apple section! by foobar01 · · Score: 1

    I posted this to the Television section, since that seems to be where MythTV-related articles generally go. Someone at Slashdot must have changed it to Apple.

  56. MythTV Win32 Fronend by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    What's the status of a MythTV Win32 frontend?

    I've got a PowerBook and a PC...and I'm thinking of building a machine to become a permanent Linux box -- if I moved my TV tuner over, could I watch TV on my gaming PC and/or my PBG4?

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:MythTV Win32 Fronend by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      What's the status of a MythTV Win32 frontend?


      Last I saw on the mailing list, there was lots of hinderance from the lack of a workable and free QT. Hopefully Trolltech will get help things along by releasing with a GPL'd windows verison. There were some tries with some other versions (I think from KDesktop?) but there was more than a few problems. Someone posted a copy of the Trolltech announcement to the list, but I didn't see the rush of people looking to get it working that I was hoping for.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:MythTV Win32 Fronend by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 1

      Theres a plugin now, mthtvstreamer?? that will let you stream your recorded shows via media player. So you can do it right now, without installing anything different on your windows box.

  57. EFF and a Marketing Ploy by droopycom · · Score: 1

    HDTV tuner card vendors must be very happy with the EFF stance than can only boost their sales.

    This sounds just like those TV commercials: "Offers valid only if you call during this commercial"...

    My ass, theres always another Sales, its never the last chance...

    And in this case, how much would you bet that after July, there will be hacks to disable the broadcast flag, discretly provided by manufacturers through back-channels, just like there are hacks to disable region code or macrovision on DVD players....

    I'm sure some guys are buying several of those cards hoping to be able to resale them at premium on eBay after July....

    1. Re:EFF and a Marketing Ploy by Herbmaster · · Score: 1

      And in this case, how much would you bet that after July, there will be hacks to disable the broadcast flag, discretly provided by manufacturers through back-channels, just like there are hacks to disable region code or macrovision on DVD players....

      Interesting. I will bet you...one linux-compatible HDTV tuner PCI card that isn't crippled by the broadcast flag.

      Region encoding isn't really comparable. Regionless DVD players aren't illegal. Defeating the broadcast flag will be.

      I hope you're right. But I was also hoping that HDTV would have been way more widely adopted by 2005, and that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 wouldn't pass.

      --
      I'm not a smorgasbord.
  58. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by EatingPie · · Score: 1

    "Are you talking about the EyeTV 500?"

    I'm actually talking about HDTV Cable. The FCC mandated that last April *all* cablecos had to deploy a firewire-enabled cable box to allow recording of HDTV. Copy Protection occurs via 5C / DTCP, but some cablecos dont have it on... allowing recording to any firewire capable Mac/PC.

    MythTV's features suggest that it will work in this regard (ie "Firewire Enabled"), but I won't know till tonight when I test. The previous software for the Mac was something called VirtualDVHS, a sample program delivered with the Developer Tools... It's beta and leaks memory like crazy... but it works!

    So in my case, I actually do not have any tuner card, just a stock Powerbook. I do not watch the HDTV on my screen either. I simply record from the Cable Box and playback to my Firewire-enabled HDTV (or Firewire-enabled D-VHS deck).

    -Pie

  59. Nice software, but... by TeeJS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never did understand why it's database driven. I first got into MythTV because I wanted to record shows at work (better cable service) and watch them at home - an never have figured out how to do it because of the database integration. I've been told Freevo may meet my needs better, but Myth is so nice...

    1. Re:Nice software, but... by halfelven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Duhhh...
      My first attempt at "networked MythTV": I installed the full MythTV suite on a stationary PC, played with it, works fine. Then i installed mythfrontend only on a laptop, pointed it to the PC, boom! it works!
      No fiddling required. It just works. Just tell mythfrontend to use another backend than 127.0.0.1

    2. Re:Nice software, but... by aventius · · Score: 1

      Then use Knoppmyth if you can't figure it out. Knoppmyth installs and configures everything for you. The only problem I had was with my Hauppauge PVR250-MCE card. It was recognized as a version 1 card instead of a version 2. So I installed Knoppmyth, recompiled ivtv and BAM... MythTV!

      --
      [insert lame joke here]
    3. Re:Nice software, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to check out the web interface, MythWeb. You can download the file from home, provided you can get an http link to your work, and not worry about connecting to the database at all.

    4. Re:Nice software, but... by babyrat · · Score: 1


      1) record show at work
      2) export via nuvexport
      3) put resultant file on cd and take home.
      4) Profit!

  60. Re:What?!? I didn't post this to the Apple section by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

    look at the list.. its in television

    they just put it under apple and linux also

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  61. changelog /.ed by RocketRay · · Score: 1

    Can someone post the changelog?

    And why put a changelog (which should be pretty static) behind a CGI?

    1. Re:changelog /.ed by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      And why put a changelog (which should be pretty static) behind a CGI?
      Well, it seems to be on a moinmoin-Wiki. Maybe the devs were just used to using it, and did not expect a direct posting of the ChangeLog on /..

  62. 20mbps? No... by tgd · · Score: 1

    More like 5 gig per second max.

    Its raw, uncompressed digital frames. 165 megabytes per second just for the base video data in a 720P stream. Slightly more than that for 1080i.

    That 20mbps figure is low for even the compressed bitrate.

    1. Re:20mbps? No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the 20Mbps is about right for compressed video. The max bitrate for 1080i is 19.25Mbps and 720p is 15Mbps.

  63. Re:Have they put in the nagravision decoding algos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mythtv works perfectly decoding nagravision for dishnetwork and bellexpressVU. It even pulls down the EPG so it does not even need the internet connection. I am using it with a Twinhan DVB card. It was a bitch to install that card.
    Here is a hint to get it working.
    SASC
    and
    http://dvbn.happysat.org

  64. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by dowobeha · · Score: 3, Informative
    Linux HDTV capture cards:

    pcHDTV 3000
    This card is the successor to the original pcHDTV 2000. Its chipset allows you to record either standard over-the-air NTSC or digital over-the-air ATSC. I believe that drivers are in the works to allow you to record unencrypted QAM channels from digital cable.

    Air2PC
    This newer card allows you to record digital over-the-air ATSC. It allows you to record unencrypted QAM channels from digital cable.

    From what I've heard, there's no clear winner for which of these two cards is better. The pcHDTV 3000 can be purchased at the pcHDTV web site for $189. The Air2PC is on sale here for $169. If you plan to purchase, do so before July 2005. After that date, it's questionable at best whether they will still be sold.

    Search the MythTV user group mailing list archives for more information about these cards and support in MythTV.

    --
    I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
  65. Hardware requirements and cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During Christmas I bought a DirecTV TiVo PVR and returned it the same day because it was too loud (it's got a fan).

    What kind of computer should I buy for MythTV that we wouldn't have to listen to while we sleep? How much would it cost (more or less than 300 USD)? Would it fit on the shelf next to the DVD player?

    1. Re:Hardware requirements and cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my understanding, you get one of those PVR-[2|3]50 cards, it does hardware mpeg2 so you should be able to get away with a much lower power cpu.
      You might want to look into the mini-itx PCs as well. Get one of those setup without a fan and the mpeg2 capture card (with S-Video from your directTV box, no need to drop the quality any more then necessary).
      Of course you then have to deal with hard drive and that capactiy, but that shouldn't be too hard to take care of. Either a big drive in that case, or just use a network conection for file storage.
      As for cost?, I would guess 4-500. Based on about $130 or so for the mpeg card, about $300 for the MB (assuming on-board video with s-video or composite out, and on-board audio), and $70 or so for a hard drive.

      Of course this is a lot of guesses, but it might be the start in the right direction.

      Another posibility would be to get an Xbox running Linux for the frontend that sits next to the DVD player ($150-200) and just drop the mpeg2 capture($130) card in another box already running linux and network the 2.
      This is the solution I've opted for, although in a dorm room I use it mainly because the TV is bigger and my CPU time isn't tied up with decoding the video, although I do watch on the computer sometimes.

  66. Re:Sony v. Universal is in trouble (Save Betamax) by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

    Did you miss Save Betamax?

    Hollywood is Trying to Kill Betamax

    The Betamax ruling is the only thing that protects your right to own a VCR, tape recorder, CD-burner, DVD-burner, iPod, or TiVo. It's that important. But new legislation that's being pushed through the Senate by lobbyists for the music and movie industries would override the Betamax decision and create a huge liability for any business that makes products which can copy sound or video. This legislation (formerly known as the INDUCE Act) would essentially give Hollywood veto power over a huge range of new technologies. And if they get this power, they'll definitely use it. Even "compromise" drafts from the Copyright Office could make mp3-playing iPods ancient history; the music and movie industries want to force all content to go through their own restricted channels.

    Just checking.

    --
    For context, click Parent.
  67. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by halfelven · · Score: 1

    Yes you can. I run MythTV on a stationary PC, while running only mythfrontend on a laptop, so i can watch Star Trek while taking a dump. :-)

  68. internal channel changing by DHR · · Score: 1

    It's strange that the changelog in .17 says that it won't change the channels on a 6200 yet, but in .16 it says: "A small program (6200ch) has been added to the contrib directory for changing channels on a Motorola DCT-6200 cable box via a 1394 (aka. Firewire) connection. See the README for compile and usage info."

    Anyone tried that app with .17 successfully?

    1. Re:internal channel changing by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      I'm picking up a firewire card on the way home from work tonight so I can try it.

      The gist of it is, with .17 you can add the 6200 as a capture device, and in mythsetup you can point to the script to have myth trigger channel changes externally. It just means myth doesn't have the internal ability at this point to directly issue a channel change (and may never need it).

    2. Re:internal channel changing by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be too hard -- I've been doing that on my Mac for months now, using AppleScript and the Apple FireWire SDK.

  69. 720P yes, 1080i probably not by doormat · · Score: 1

    Well I've seen articles detailing that the mac mini's radeon 9200 can handle 12x10 res, but not 16x12 (and therefore not 1920x1080 aka 1080i). Yes, you can turn it up that high, but OSX has problems at that res. So I'd *guess* that the 1280x720p would work fine, but not 1920x1080.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  70. Apple would respect the broadcast flag by sulli · · Score: 1

    and generally accept copy protection. Best to make MythTV work well before Apple gets all the fanboys with iHDTV (Lets you keep the Sopranos a whole week!)

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  71. Broadcasters have done this for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time stretching and compresionl algorithms have been around since the early Eventide Harmonizers from the 80s. Originally designed for broadcasters to trim a 63 second commercial to 60 seconds, and later systems were developed to sync with video playback systems to allow TV stations to cram an extra commercial in to a 30 minute program segment.

    "Considering the quality of these things now" - I bet you've never noticed it when it's being done right!

    All you examples are *not* how it's done by real audio hardware and software these days. It's all about loading a bit of the audio into memory, and reading it out faster or slower than you put it in, and intelligent algotithms to determine what to splice out or what bits to loop to stretch it out.

    Are you aware that most CD DJ style turntables (including most of Pioneers) have independent tempo and pitch control? They sound pretty damn good for complex music even at 18% faster or slower playback.

  72. Re:Why Apple? (Bad Obj-C, no cookie!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you -programmed- on a couple of Apples, you'd do it this way :-)

    if([[article description] rangeOfString:@"Apple"].location != NSNotFound) {
    [article setCategory:@"Apple"];
    NSLog(@"[TODO] -- needs to extend SteveJobsRealityDistortionField");
    }

    Of course, you would have written a category for NSString by now:

    @implementation NSString (SlashdotAdditions)

    - (BOOL)containsString: (NSString*)string {
    return [self rangeOfString: string].location != NSNotFound;
    }

    @end

  73. Re:Why Apple? (Bad Obj-C, no cookie!) by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
    As a /. reader though, I need to make it more complicated than necessary. Why not make grep a category?
    @implementation NSString (grep)

    + (NSString *)grepWithOptions:(NSString *)options pattern:(NSString *)pattern string:(NSString *)string {
    NSTask * task = [[NSTask alloc] init];
    NSPipe * input = [NSPipe pipe];
    NSFileHandle * inputHandle = [input fileHandleForWriting];
    [inputHandle writeData:[string dataUsingEncoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding]];
    [inputHandle closeFile];
    NSPipe * output = [NSPipe pipe];
    NSArray * arguments;
    if(options != nil)
    arguments = [[options componentsSeparatedByString:@" "] arrayByAddingObject:pattern];
    else
    arguments = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:pattern,nil];
    [task setLaunchPath:@"/usr/bin/grep"];
    [task setArguments:arguments];
    [task setStandardOutput:output];
    [task setStandardInput:input];
    [task launch];
    NSData * resultData = [[output fileHandleForReading] availableData];
    NSString * resultString = [[NSString alloc] initWithData:resultData encoding:NSUTF8StringEncoding];
    return resultString;
    }

    - (NSString *)grepWithOptions:(NSString *)options pattern:(NSString *)pattern {
    return [NSString grepWithOptions:options pattern:pattern string:self];
    }

    @end
    Then I could use
    [[Article description] grepWithOptions:@"-i" pattern:@"Apple"]
    --
    English is easier said than done.
  74. HDTV standards by NM156 · · Score: 1

    Nope. Only Fox and ABC use the 720p format natively. NBC, CBS, PBS, WB, UPN all use 1080i. Dish Network and DirecTV also utilize 1080i, but that doesn't matter in context of MythTV anyway, since there aren't any (legitimate*) satellite cards for receiving sat programming on computers. Incidentally, our local ABC affiliate WFAA in Dallas/Fort Worth upconverts their 720p network programs and broadcasts 1080i, leaving the Fox station as the only one in our broadcast area that actually uses 720p.

    By the way, what you heard about signal degradation reducing DishNet 1080i quality to lower resolution doesn't make much sense. It's 1920x1080 interlaced MPEG digital video stream so it either will have full resolution or you won't have any picture at all. Now, Echostar may be applying some filters to the video before they uplink it, but there certainly won't be any quality lost beyond that as a consequence of signal degradation, and the bitstream will still be full 1080i resolution.

    Anyway, one thing I know for sure is that my HD package from DishNet looks very good. (especially Monday nights on HDNet. ;-) )

    * - It is possible to receive Dish Network with appropriately configured DVB-S card and smart card emulator, but that puts any US citizen in violation of the DMCA.

    1. Re:HDTV standards by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      Our picture is great too, but we weren't too happy with Dish. Here is why. We've had an HDTV with JVC 6000 receiver and Dish 500 since 2000. We got Showtime and HBO HD at the time along with the demo channel because that was all the HD content. Then one day *poof* HD was gone. Called up tech support, they didn't know why. About a year later we had the people out to realign the two dishes after we had a new roof and low a behold, there was a new module we had to get in order to recieve HD programming once again because Dish decided to change their system. Oh, and they wanted $100 for it too. This was on top of the some $600 we paid for the model 6000 in the first place. I was like, "excuse me, but your telling me that we have to buy a new part for something you did. sorry, but seems like you have to make that right." After about 10 minutes of complaining we got the module sent to us for free. Got our demo channel back immeadately and the first thing running was an ad about how the model 6000 reciever needed this model to get HD again. I was like, "yeah, thanks for telling this to us on a channel we couldn't get".

      Our picture is also extremely clear, but after that, I've stopped recommending DISH. Plus our local feeds are not in HD. Don't know if laws and such have been passed to change this: note Dish channel 136 a few months back.

      But on top of things, HDTV still has the problem of the fact there are stations in 1080i and others in 720p. My friends with digital cable and HD boxes are limited to 720p. The very fact that some are 720 other at 1080 is not a standard...and the FCC and geeks wonder why people aren't adopting the technology readily.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  75. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can also get the air2pc from http://www.cyberestore.com

  76. Firewire capture? by JakiChan · · Score: 1

    I don't need capture hardware - I have a firewire enabled Moto box. So in theory my Mac Mini can do all my MythTV needs, right?

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    1. Re:Firewire capture? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      I don't run HDTV, but from what I've seen on the lists, just playback of HDTV is very processor intensive. Plus, playback on OSX has only just recently been optimized enough to give smooth playback on lower end G4's. (Assuming I'm remembering correctly, I don't own any Apple hardware) There's been a lot of Mac Mini frontend talk on the mailing list recently though.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:Firewire capture? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Well, I record HD using a 300 MHz Blue & White G3 -- the Mac Mini should have no problem with that, using the Virtual DVHS app from the FireWire SDK. You may have some problems with playback -- AFAIK the Moto box won't pass FireWire input to the TV, and the CPU may not be up to the task of decoding the MPEG2 stream to the video out. If your TV has a FireWire/1394/iLink input, you could probably playback that way.

  77. What hardware are you using? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What hardware are you people using? I'd like to build one of these bad boys!

  78. HDTV capture card legal if bought before July 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not sure about all of the MythTV features such as watching DVDs or listening to music but, from what I understand, if someone purchases an HDTV video capture card before July 1, 2005 it will remain legal to keep using that card. After that date it will only be illegal to manufacture or import DTV tuners unless they include the new DRM technologies. Here is a link to what the Electronic Frontier Foundation has to say about the subject:

    http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/HDTV/

    I do not know if anything else that MythTV does is open to challenge or not. I personally do not believe in illegally sharing music or movies and have never done so. I hope that it is still legal to build my own Linux based multimedia PC for my home network (at least if I do it before July 1st). I have dozens of DVDs and also some music CDs which I legally purchases. I have never owned a CD player or DVD player and have always just played them on my Linux Computer (I do not use Windows). I would also like to use my Linux computer as a Tivo or VCR like personal video recorder. I live in the USA where where these kinds of things may or may not still be legal. Do I have anything to be concerned about?

    The HDTV video capture cards only work for the new over the air broadcast high definition TV signals or the older lower quality NTSC analog signals. The capture cards do not work for HDTV cable or satellite. I do not have cable where I live so despite the high computer processor requirements I am considering building my own Linux based personal video recorder before the July 1, 2005 deadine. I am considering purchasing either an pcHDTV HD-3000 or an Technisat Air2PC ATSC-PCI HDTV card. Here are several more links on the subject:

    http://www.eff.org/broadcastflag/cookbook/guide. ph p#step7
    http://www.pchdtv.com/
    http://www.cybere store.com/product_info.php?produc ts_id=103

  79. Re:Apple is gay by dickko · · Score: 2, Funny

    From what I've seen most mac users are very happy to use them, so yep, you're right...

    Hang on, that's not what you were implying...

  80. MPEG2 is non-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got one digital TV capture card, and one analog TV capture card in my MythTV box. Both record as MPEG2. I've been able to play the files everywhere that I've tried, including Windows. VLC works well.

    If you try hard enough, and ignore all of the advice offered in all Myth sites and forums, you can buy hardware that doesn't save as MPEG2. But that's a reflection on you, not on Myth.

  81. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Golias · · Score: 1

    Since when is "a few TB of drive space" cheap?

    If I want to archive shows, I'll burn a disk.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  82. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Golias · · Score: 1

    Cool.

    I don't subscribe to cable, so I'm using the EyeTV tuner to get terrestrial-based HDTV (and digital SDTV) broadcasts.

    It tunes in the signal and feeds the MPEG-2 signal to the mini, which can cache and/or record just like any other PVR set-up, and then outputs the same digital stream via DVI cable. It's pretty slick, but if I had cable it would not be much use, since it's only built for tuning in HD over the air.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  83. They do. by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    It's called Virtual DVHS, and is part of their FireWire SDK. It takes a MPEG2 transport stream from the FireWire & records it to the hard drive (and plays back, too, of course). It'll run on any OS X capable box -- I record HD content using a 300 MHz Blue & White G3 I got for $100 on eBay.

  84. Thanks for the slashdotting :) by Freqdog · · Score: 1

    looks like the direct link to my wiki made the linode server it's hosted on explode.. moin isnt exactly the most resource friendly either. Looks like i'll be finding some diffrent hosting soon

  85. TV = a huge time waster by rolling_or_jaded · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting thread. I looked into setting up MythTV a few months ago, but a few problems (me being a MS kiddie and knowing zilch about *nix, and being Australian, where the program guides were something of an issue at the time) foiled my attempts.

    My partner and I (yes, a girl! :D) have sinced moved to a new house, and the TV now sits in one of the spare bedrooms. Our antenna has several missing elements, so free-to-air TV is fairly unwatchable... so we download most of the TV we want to watch, and occasionally stream it via the xbox.

    End result? We watch a *lot* less TV. And... it's bloody great. We've gone from, say, 4 hours a night of TV - 28 hours a week, over 9 hours(!) of ads - to maybe 8 hours a week, no ads.

    Break your TV. Cut off the cord. Move it to another room. Give TV a break... it's phenomonal what you can acheive without it - PetRescue is my example.

    Finally, and a little more on-topic:

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    So can you slow it down, for the stoners? Damn cartoons are getting too quick for me.... ;)

  86. Windows alternatives? by rfunches · · Score: 1

    What are Windows alternatives to MythTV? I have a Linux box but nowhere to put it, so I'm stuck with my Windows machine. And Beyond TV doesn't qualify, since it's not free.