Slashdot Mirror


Cardboard WiFi Antenna Upgrade

An anonymous reader writes "A British company called Tritium is marketing a piece of cardboard with metal foil on one side. You order it for under US$25, shipping included, and you get a flat envelope with the cardboard. Cut it out, shape it into a parabola and snap it into the little stand. Then slip it over your current antenna. It is advertised to extend the range of your current antenna by 2 to 3 times. See their website for more information on the cleverly named Tritium Flatenna."

200 comments

  1. Hah by dotslashconfig · · Score: 5, Funny

    And you thought tin-foil was just for hats!

    1. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, antennae size has to do with the frequency transmitted and/or received. doesn't it? Wouldn't it be possible to mathematically prove that this product is crap?

    2. Re:Hah by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently their server is also made out of cardboard and tinfoil...

    3. Re:Hah by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I've seen something very similiar to this, which was for the same purpose. But the guy simply said how to form it yourself. :) Anyone with 5 minutes, some cardboard, foil, scissors, and tape, can do it.

      There's plenty of math that can and should be done with it, but lots of people do it by the "wing it" method. I took a day calculating the dimensions for a 2.4Ghz pringles-can type antenna, and made a few from dryer vent tube (cheap at Home Depot). It worked out very well, but I still prefer a good parabolic antenna.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! In other news, I have this great "cellular phone" (made from two foam cups and a string) for the low price of $5. Get yours today, while supplies last.

    5. Re:Hah by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Funny


      Then there are the guys who advertise a fool-proof cockroach killer for sale, just send $25, will work every time.

      Of course, what you get is two wooden blocks and instructions that say, place cockroach on first block, smash with second block, repeat as needed.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    6. Re:Hah by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      I get a large tomato can (empty), drill a hole at the right distance from the back, slip it over my current antenna, and it doubles or triples the range. Soooo easy.

  2. Tritium by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's an awfully bad company name to associate with antennas, considering some people are nervous about them to begin with.

    1. Re:Tritium by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have some tritium keychains and some watches with tritium in them. The mesuarable dosage that you get from it is nominal compared to background radiation. IE the difference in background radiation exposure between someone living in the mountains and someone living at sea level is greater than the difference in exposure carrying a small amount of tritium with a phosphor coating. You just don't want to eat the stuff. With a half life of about 15 years, tritium will hang around in your body quite a while.

      The main difference here is that there have been many studies on radiation exposure over both short term and long term durations. There have been far fewer studies on the effects of high frequency, low energy RF. When you consider what high frequency, high energy RF and even low frequency high energy RF can do to the human body, it sure makes you wonder if this stuff is safe anyway.

      People this paranoid, however, are definately the target market for this kind of antenna.

      To me, the whole thing reeks a little on the surface of ads proclaiming something 'it's like attaching a four foot antenna to your cell phone!, though the obvious benefit here is that it's an antenna tuned to a specific frequency designed to make an omnidirectional antenna a little more directional. Still when you can make it for about $1 using a ruler, some foil, and some scissors you have to wonder why they are even bothering.

    2. Re:Tritium by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You just don't want to eat the stuff. With a half life of about 15 years, tritium will hang around in your body quite a while.

      True, tritium has a half life of about 15 years (closer to 12 though.) However, when it comes to ingesting radioactive material, you need to be more concerned with the biological half-life. That is how fast the material will be excreted from you body. For tritium, it is just over 9 days. For tritium to harm you, you have too ingest a pretty large quantity. I know all about the stuff, I injected it into rats for years.

    3. Re:Tritium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but their website had a halflife of only about 15 minutes. The irony...

    4. Re:Tritium by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      I know all about the stuff, I injected it into rats for years.

      I can't decide which kind of rat's eyes are creepier: original blood red reflective glow or new cool green self-illuminated glow.

    5. Re:Tritium by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, tritium is a very low power beta emitter. I occasionally work with the stuff, for detecting various biological macromolecules. It takes weeks for the stuff to make an image on photographic film, that's in direct contact with the gel, and soaked in fluorographic enhancer. Our required dosimeters can't even detect the stuff, nor can a geiger counter. We still do periodic wipes and scintillation count them though. It's emissions wont get through your skin. Really the only risk is if you quaff a flask of the stuff.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Tritium by lost_packet · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's an awfully bad company name to associate with antennas, considering some people are nervous about them to begin with

      are you sure you don't mean Iridium?

      --

      BLOCK STRUCTURE breathing apparatus required for special maneuvers!!

    7. Re:Tritium by fermion · · Score: 2, Funny

      but...but...Tritium is the most valuable material in on earth. There is only 25 pounds of it. I think every new company is going have tritium or some variation of it in thier name. It so exudes power and value.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Tritium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the new Timex Indiglow Rats.

    9. Re:Tritium by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the fact that Tritium is used extensively in night-sights for firearms. Good stuff! Still, it's amazing how heavily regulated the stuff is...

    10. Re:Tritium by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah man, I saw that Spiderman movie too. That tritium can become unstable and then you'll have to drown it in a river.

      --
      main(0)
    11. Re:Tritium by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Still when you can make it for about $1 using a ruler, some foil, and some scissors you have to wonder why they are even bothering."

      Anyone can grow their own tomatoes, or search for gold or gemstones, but how many choose instead to buy tomatoes, gold, or gems? Often tomatoes in the grocery taste like wet cardboard and sell for $3.99/pound, which is why I grow my own when I can. But I also search for gold and gemstone deposits. Some are DIY'ers; most are not.

      -cp-

      Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    12. Re:Tritium by beej_55 · · Score: 1

      Aren't beta rays stopped by your hand?
      Alpha: Stopped by paper
      Beta: Stopped by your hand
      Gamma: Stopped by brick walls and the like

    13. Re:Tritium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most beta rays, yes. Like those emitted by P-32. But not all beta particles are created equal. A beta particle is just an electron moving at a high speed. A slower electron (or more strictly one with less kinetic energy) will obviously have less penetrating power.

    14. Re:Tritium by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Good to know! I will keep this in mind if I ever break open my keychain and snort it.

    15. Re:Tritium by Abreu · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful...

      Very true, you can grow your own tomatoes, or build your own custom made x86 computer from parts... other people buy tomatoes at the supermarket, or buy compaqs or dells

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    16. Re:Tritium by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the strength of the beta.

      Tritium's beta has a mean of 6KeV... you need a beta with an energy of at least 70KeV to penetrate the dead layer of cells in your skin.

    17. Re:Tritium by beej_55 · · Score: 1

      Oh. Thanks for the info.

  3. Make your own by webscathe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or you could just go here and make your own with stuff in your house for under $1.

    1. Re:Make your own by lil_nohreaga · · Score: 1

      TechTV did a screensavers show on the template shown on freeantennas.org. You can find the info at g4techtv.com.

    2. Re:Make your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, like someone said, If you glue two pieces of crap together, some $EXPLETIVE_FOO will pay good money for it. (And if you do it in white or aluminium and emboss an apple on it: 500% instant markup! ;) )

      /Consumerus Sapien

    3. Re:Make your own by Saeger · · Score: 2, Funny
      MAKE YOUR OWN? Why you dirty pinko commie! How dare you deprive this glorious capitalistic company the RIGHT TO PROFIT! Won't somebody please think of the GDP?! Go break some windows today!

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Make your own by pornaholic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This really works.

    5. Re:Make your own by jdray · · Score: 1

      It's a British company. If you're concerned about the American GDP, spend a dollar on aluminum foil and paper. It will affect the American GDP dramatically more than spending $25 for a product from the U.K.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:Make your own by chezmarshall · · Score: 1

      I did that!

      Without any particular skill in making stuff, I cut out a few pieces of cardboard, taped them together, then taped some aluminum foil to the back. Signal received at my desktop increased about 16 dB.

      Router is a Linksys WRT54G, network adapter is some Microsoft 802.11g PCI card, distance about 30 feet through a couple of walls and close to washer/dryer.

    7. Re:Make your own by Pete+McCabe · · Score: 1

      I believe George Carlin said "If you nail together two things that have never been nailed together before, some shmuck will buy it from you."

  4. This looks strangely like advertisement by Cyb3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    doesn't it?

    1. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by gphinch · · Score: 3, Funny

      More like /.ing.

      --
      in bed.
    2. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "This looks strangely like advertisement doesn't it?"

      So?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      excellent point. i wasn't going to click on the link until now. /., lets do our best!
      click
      click
      click

    4. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      so? let's try to keep some dignity to journalism. I am not bred to be an advertisement absorber.

    5. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "so? let's try to keep some dignity to journalism. I am not bred to be an advertisement absorber."

      News != journalism. Slashdot doesn't even have any journalists.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny
      so? let's try to keep some dignity to journalism. I am not bred to be an advertisement absorber.

      Luckily I have a paper hat coated with tinfoil that I can sell to you for $19.99 to block out all these kinds of advertisements.

    7. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      news != advertising either.

      /. has advertising, i hope they keep them out of the stories.

    8. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "news != advertising either."

      News != preclusion of advertisement. If it's new and of interest to us, then it passes.

      Advertising != bad. Quitcherbitchen.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      Like this?

      slashola

      S

    10. Re:This looks strangely like advertisement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quitcherbitchen != ...

      oh.

  5. Microwave Pizzas by mcgroarty · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microwave pizzas, hot pockets, etc come with foil-backed cardboard underneath. That looks to be the same material -- I'd wager you could cobble something together with those as well. And you'd have something to eat while you're geeking out.

    1. Re: Microwave Pizzas by Marshall+Banana,+Esq · · Score: 0

      So that's why my boss has been collecting my Hot Pocket sleeves all month long!

    2. Re: Microwave Pizzas by Steffan · · Score: 1
      • "Microwave pizzas, hot pockets, etc come with foil-backed cardboard underneath."
      Would that have the same effect as aluminum foil? I thought it was microwave absorbing - That's the idea, right - it gets hot and cooks the pizza?
    3. Re: Microwave Pizzas by Lehk228 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think the stuff reflects the microwaves back through the food, to effectively double the cooking speed.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  6. 100mW EIRP limit in the UK by DHR · · Score: 2, Informative

    These would probably put you over the legal limit, if you get more than ~5dBi out of them, which you should. Most cheap consumer gear is 15dBm, so 15+5=20dBm=100mW

    1. Re:100mW EIRP limit in the UK by xchino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, this doesn't change your power rating at all, it increases gain by adding directionality to your omni or dipole antenna. Bounce the signal of the back and to thr front and you've got a higher gain and receive sensitivity w/o modifying power.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    2. Re:100mW EIRP limit in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. EIRP = Effective Isotropic Radiated Power, which is the power of the unit, plus the gain of the antenna.

    3. Re:100mW EIRP limit in the UK by kju · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is right and wrong. Ever wondered how an antenna works? Take a look at an yagi antenne: Just metal and some wires. Do you believe this includes some secret powered power amp?

      What this Cardboard does is the same as every antenne with gain does: It focus the beam into a specific direction, which will "amplify" the effective radiated power in this direction. And effective radiated power (EIRP) happens to be, whats regulated.

      So this cardboard is bound to the same regulations as any directional antenna.

  7. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with that? You try to accept credit cards and ship any product for less than $25 and see how long you stay in business. Mail order is tough.

  8. Second use by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Funny

    A British company called Tritium is marketing a piece of cardboard with metal foil on one side.
    If you don't have Wi-Fi, these also make excellent hats.
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Second use by snowblind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you're a garden gnome.

  9. Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    just turn it inside out, insert over antenna, viola 10 mpbs and encrypted ...

    1. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by SoTuA · · Score: 4, Funny
      viola 10 mpbs and encrypted ...

      I'd rather have an unencrypted cello at 22mbps, but that's just me...

      (so THAT's how burning karma smells!)

    2. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "voilá".

    3. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, that would leave my brain unprotected!

    4. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      I never get tired of those. People's misuse of stringed instruments is a pet peeve of mine I guess.

      I think for my attempt to get on Slashdot I'll straighten out a coat hanger and promote it as a Wi-Fi antenna booster.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    5. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 1

      It's spelled "voilá".

      Actually it's spelled "voilà".

    6. Re:Finally, a use for tinfoil hats ... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Hah, I'll see your 22mbps cello, and raise a 3Mbps electric guitar..

  10. feedback by cmoressi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this at all dangerous? Any modification like this is bound to cause signal feedback. Seems like it might work for receiving but I would hesitate to use it to xmit.

    1. Re:feedback by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      I doubt it would upset the standing wave ratio too much, but you'd have to ask a real RF engineer. At least, it wouldn't be nearly as bad as unplugging the antenna while the card is on. Has anyone out there actually fried a card doing that?

      -jim

    2. Re:feedback by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1


      Yes, you certainly have to be careful with "signal feedback". It can be very dangerous.

      It's also complete bull.

      I built one of these things out of foamcore and tinfoil, and it works very well. 50% improvement in received signal indication when it's in place.

  11. Let the price wars begin! by glowfish · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll offer the same thing for $22.50! Shipping included! and um, I'll throw in a free yahoo e-mail account to boot!

    Beat that!

    1. Re:Let the price wars begin! by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Funny

      $19.95 for a tinfoil antenna booster, with a free tinfoil hat for ordering now! The first 15 customers will get a bonus mint (I found some under my bed). Price includes shipping, and one of those tiny bags of potato chips.
      Everyone knows you can't beat something thats "all that and a bag of potato chips!"

    2. Re:Let the price wars begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For twenty five bills, I would expect the piece of cardboard and a blow job.

    3. Re:Let the price wars begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, $22.50! Shipping included! A free Yahoo e-mail account AND 1040 hours of AOL ... free!

  12. In other news... by dotslashconfig · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tried this once. People called it "fraud", though... they were so disappointed when they saw the Staples price sticker still on the cardboard and tin-foil.

    Just goes to show you, those British folk can get away with anything! :)

    Anyways... back to planning my quest for world dominaton using nothing more than a stick of gum and a paperclip.

    1. Re:In other news... by SpookyFish · · Score: 4, Funny

      This one is right up there with the little ads in the back of magazines (like Popular Science) several years ago:

      "Genuine Copper Bust of Abraham Lincoln -- only $9.99!"

      And the lucky purchaser received a nice envelope containing a small cardboard stand -- and a penny.

      They were *unsuccessfully* sued for fraud.
      Caveat emptor!

    2. Re:In other news... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      "Genuine Copper Bust of Abraham Lincoln -- only $9.99!"

      And the lucky purchaser received a nice envelope containing a small cardboard stand -- and a penny.


      But was it a shiny penny?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plan for world domination:

      Open stick of gum and chew it nonchalantly while walking up to Fort Knox. Chewing gum automatically increases your nonchalant appearance and also provides an outlet for your stress.

      Make up some reason to see high muckity-mucks. While waiting in lobby, note position of guard and bend paper clip into a U shape. Insert paper clip into nearby electrical outlet, blowing the circuit and throwing the room into a blackout.

      Knock guard out with chair. Use gum to stick wrapper into lens of security camera. Quickly change into guard's uniform and obtain pass card and weapon. Retrieve gum and wrapper.

      Run into higher security areas and locate lockdown control for riot doors. Lockdown all buildings except for path to vault loading area. Steal truck full of gold. Use foil wrapper to shield antenna of any GPS locator.

      Go to war-torn country and recruit band of mercenaries. Develop stockpile of weaponry and recruit enough troops until you are able to overthrow country's government. Turn economy around and recruit highly intelligent people from around the world. Develop next generation of super-weapons and orbital laser platforms. Plant agents in key governmental and economic postions.

      Then, announce your takeover of the world.

    4. Re:In other news... by drew · · Score: 1

      i assume it was at least a pre-1983 copper penny, and not a zinc penny, otherwise the suit might have been successful.....

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    5. Re:In other news... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      That's not a bust, it's a bas-relief.

      BTW, without a cite, I don't buy the story.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  13. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gone already!

  14. Oh Crap by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn that summary...

    Cut it out, shape it into a parabola and snap it into the little stand. Then slip it over your

    ARGGHHH, but I really have the urge to say 'HEAD'.

    Damn you tinfoil hat posters, damn you to hell and back damn blast and double damn.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Oh Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut it out, shape it into a parabola and snap it into the little stand. Then slip it over your

      Under no circumstances I slip this over my penis. What the hell kind of contraception is this anyway???

  15. Great, but.. by noname3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does it work? Yes, this advertises a boost, but so do a bunch of products for cell phones that are purely decorative.

    I had to sell these for a small retail store, and to this day I feel guilty. A local newstation did an expose where they found there was zero conductive material at all in these stickers.

    1. Re:Great, but.. by iomanip · · Score: 1

      I saw an episode of The Screen Savers where they reviewed antennas such as this and they were shown to work. I don't remember the specifics as to the actual dBi gain but I did gather from it that they worked.

      Pretty sure it just takes the signal going out the back side of an omni-directional antenna and reflects it back the other direction so you have more waves of the same amplitude going in the same direction, which would increase the signal strength. That increase in signal strength would create an increase in distance? Note: I could be wrong on all of this, I'm just basing my ideas off of a collection of stuff I've heard over the years.

    2. Re:Great, but.. by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it work? Yes, this advertises a boost, but so do a bunch of products for cell phones that are purely decorative. I had to sell these for a small retail store, and to this day I feel guilty. A local newstation did an expose where they found there was zero conductive material at all in these stickers.

      I think a big clue is located in the disclaimer at the bottom of the page:

      "No Warranty. ALL SALES ARE FINAL. ...NO CLAIM IS MADE THAT THIS ITEM WILL INCREASE YOUR SIGNAL."

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    3. Re:Great, but.. by catch23 · · Score: 1

      They seem to work according to this empirical study:

      http://home.pacbell.net/mtom168/internalantenna/

    4. Re:Great, but.. by Bishop · · Score: 1

      I have seen two tv shows that tested those cell phone boaster devices. Several devices were tested, all were found to not work. It was found that most of the devices were non conductive. One of the devices that was conductive actually interfered with the signal reduceing range. Beside just conductivity one of the shows went a step furthure and tested if the devices had any affect on radio waves in the cellular bands. All devices tested had no affect and were basically invisible at the frequencies tested.

      Both shows asked real professors, at real acredited universities to conduct the tests. One professor had a Ph.D in physics, the other had a Ph.D in Electrical Engineering.

      The fact that these cell phone boasters don't work is no surprise. Antenna design, and tunning, is hard. You can't randomly stick a bit of metal next to an antenna and expect the antenna to work better.

      These WiFi antennas should work though. As others have posted the antenna apears to be similar to this antenna. This parabolic antenna is simple to build, and it will work. That is because this antenna is a specific shape, and is placed at a specific distance from the typical omni WiFi antennas.

  16. Too Expensive by MagicDude · · Score: 1

    25 Dollars? I can get two for $3.50 at the corner store.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1860241.stm

  17. Ouch by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1, Funny

    The site itself already got "flatenned" :(

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
    1. Re:Ouch by happyfrogcow · · Score: 0, Redundant

      maybe they need to put more tinfoil wrapped cardboard into their servers.

    2. Re:Ouch by node+3 · · Score: 1

      From this I deduce that they, indeed, use their own product.

      The increased load from the slashdotting was expertly focused onto their server which subsequently vaporized.

  18. cardboard webserver by cenonce · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like their webserver is made of cardboard too...

    1. Re:cardboard webserver by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, that is funny!

      The only thing they are lacking is "Made of recycle cardboard" to get in with the PC (Politically Correct not Personal Computer) crowd.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:cardboard webserver by gordyf · · Score: 1
      to get in with the PC (Politically Correct not Personal Computer) crowd.
      You know, you could have saved yourself a lot of typing by just saying what you meant in the first place.
  19. /.ed to oblivion by nekdut · · Score: 4, Informative

    That was fast. Less than 5 posts and the machine is melted.

    Well here's a press release on the product. I like the part about it "vaguely resembling a Klingon space ship".

    Check it here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/6/prwebxml13509 7.php

    Oh and of course the Google cache of the melted tritium.co.uk box: http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:TSbW7tvLA14J:ww w.tritium.co.uk/

    1. Re:/.ed to oblivion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I correct that we are slashdotting the google cache as well?

    2. Re:/.ed to oblivion by gekman · · Score: 1

      Sure seems like it. Is this a first?

      --
      Look at all the happy creatures dancing on the lawn...
  20. Cheaper solutions exist by mcgroarty · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can get Wi Fi Speed Spray for a few bucks less, and there's no overseas shipping to worry about.

    1. Re:Cheaper solutions exist by MesiahTaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speed Spray? From the makers of Handsome Cream?

      --
      Are you an open source warrior?
    2. Re:Cheaper solutions exist by howlatthemoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They won't let me buy it online. I don't trust people who won't let me just type my credit card number into a web form.

    3. Re:Cheaper solutions exist by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      From the site:
      Compatible with Windows and most versions of Linux.

      I'll wait until the Linux support is better.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    4. Re:Cheaper solutions exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, from the fine makers of Marconi brand antenna wax.

  21. Slashdotted already, so here's a picture by RealAlaskan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Picture of flatenna on a review page. Scroll down to the bottom of the page.

    It looks to me as if 15 minutes with graph paper, scissors and glue (together with a bit of card stock and foil) would give you the same thing, without waiting on the snailmail, and without the $25 U.S.

    By the way, the site I link to says 9.99 pounds, which should be a bit less than $25.

    1. Re:Slashdotted already, so here's a picture by YankeeInExile · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You order it for under US$25, shipping included, and you get a flat envelope with the cardboard.
      I can forgive not reading the farking article, the site is slagged. But please try to at least read the summary. UKP 10 and post and packing for under USD 25. No error.
      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    2. Re:Slashdotted already, so here's a picture by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1

      Oops. Well, good thing I didn't explicitly say it was an error, then. I can claim that I was confirming their take on shipping and exchange rates. Yeah, that's the story.

    3. Re:Slashdotted already, so here's a picture by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Let's see, $25 vs 1/4 hour... Maybe *your*
      time is worth less than $100 per hour, but
      *some* of us have better things to do than
      build our own flatennae.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  22. crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had one of these, actually worked quite well. Until the glue dried up and the foil fell off. I made something better using regular aluminium foil and cardboard; it lasted longer and wasn't quite so dear.

  23. lets just hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it doesn't amount to this

  24. i laughed at this too by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i laughed at this too, like 90% of slashdotters here

    then again, if you told me in the 1980s that people would pay for bottled water

    or in the 1990s that people would pay $5.00 for a cup of coffee

    i would have laughed at you too

    the lesson is not to laugh, but to figure out your own amazing scheme

    for while we laugh at the people who sell this stuff, they are laughing all the way to the bank

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i laughed at this too by Scutter · · Score: 1

      they are laughing all the way to the bank

      That explains all the funny looks.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:i laughed at this too by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      or in the 1990s that people would pay $5.00 for a cup of coffee .... pah! I make my own espresso dammit.

    3. Re:i laughed at this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you are awesome. Tell us more.

  25. History of ideas, volume 27 by legLess · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good idea Getting an ad for your product posted to Slashdot. Bad idea Hosting the site on DSL in your mom's basement.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    1. Re:History of ideas, volume 27 by stienman · · Score: 1

      Remember this is in the UK.

      Good idea
      Getting an
      advert for your product posted to Slashdot.
      Bad idea
      Hosting the site on DSL in your
      mum's basement.

      -Adam

    2. Re:History of ideas, volume 27 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After doing a nslookup on tritium.co.uk and www.tritium.co.uk , the websites don't appear to be run from the UK at all. They seem to go to somewhere on Verio's network around the east coast of the US (Virginia I believe). Not sure why they have the co.uk name... maybe they feel that if it was a .com domain name, people would be less inclined to purchase cardboard from them.

      Not like it matters now anyways, as their website seems to be getting hammered by the effect.

    3. Re:History of ideas, volume 27 by bigbadunix · · Score: 1

      Worse idea
      Running Zeus/4.2 on the 486 on DSL in your m[o|u]m's basement.
      --

      The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
  26. Not an upgrade... by xchino · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is NOT an upgrade for your antenna. This doesn't increase gain, it just takes it from the back and adds to the front. The good thing about this method is it doesn't require you to modify your original antenna, so you don't have to worry about breaking FCC regulations on all equipment being certified. Apart from that, they are selling for $25 something which I created for free out of household items. Check here for more info on how to do it yourself (took me all of 30 minutes the first time).

    But again, I want to state this isn't an upgrade, your antenna isn't any more powerful, you're just taking power from the back and shooting it forward, so if you need omnidirectional signal this isn't for you. It can however, increase a dirctional link, but so can a pringles yagi directional, and that's still cheaper than this. Forget about this company and just make your own, it's simple, fun, and cheap, and gives you more of a choice in what material you want to use.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:Not an upgrade... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe the FCC limits are on EIRP - effective isotropic radiated power. An isotropic radiator is a theoretical antenna that radiates equally in all directions. EIRP measures the equivalent amount of power an isotropic radiator would need to put out to equal the effective power of your non-isotropic antenna.

      Say we take that energy from 180 degrees of the antenna's pattern and reflect it back along with the other 180 degrees. Now we've got twice the (effective) power, with half the coverage. This is EXACTLY what the EIRP rules are talking about.

      Sorry, there's no getting around the rules just because you don't physically touch the radiating element...

    2. Re:Not an upgrade... by nukeqler · · Score: 1
      This doesn't increase gain, it just takes it from the back and adds to the front.
      "Gain" is routinely used in the world of RF to refer to the effect of directional antennas (either as dBi (relative to an ideal isotropic radiator), or, more rarely, as dBd (relative to a plain dipole).

      One of the ways the FCC specs power allowed is by field strength at a given distance. I can't remember if this is how ISM band (all 802.11) allowed power is specced.
    3. Re:Not an upgrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Taking from the back and adding to the front is the freaking definition of increasing gain, you fool.

    4. Re:Not an upgrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say we take that energy from 180 degrees of the antenna's pattern and reflect it back along with the other 180 degrees. Now we've got twice the (effective) power, with half the coverage. This is EXACTLY what the EIRP rules are talking about

      Ok so I don't attach it to the antenna, I set it next to the antenna. Plus, I don't call it a modification, I call it decor. The fact that it happens to reflect microwave is incidental, the same as my (cliche)foil hat(/cliche)

    5. Re:Not an upgrade... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think you are correct on the EIRP.

      I thought FCC allows 1000mW with a 24dB antenna. At any rate, it is a power that most consumer devices don't try to transmit at. The EU allows 100mW, but not sure about the antenna.

    6. Re:Not an upgrade... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      This is NOT an upgrade for your antenna. This doesn't increase gain, it just takes it from the back and adds to the front. The good thing about this method is it doesn't require you to modify your original antenna, so you don't have to worry about breaking FCC regulations on all equipment being certified.

      Of course you're modifying the antenna.
      Just because it's not permenant, does not mean you're not modifying it. Especially in the eyes of the FCC.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    7. Re:Not an upgrade... by eflanery · · Score: 1

      For 2.4ghz ISM, the FCC allows this under part 15 (hams and military fall under different "parts", with different rules, which I can't seem to recall):

      Point to multi-point - 30dBm (1W) TX power, 36dBm (4W) EIRP

      Point to point - 30dBm TX power, 36dBm + 3dBm per 1dBm reduction in TX power.

      In 5.8ghz ISM (but not the overlapping UNII):

      PtMP - same as 2.4

      PtP - 30dBm TX power, unlimited EIRP.

      So, no a 1000mW (1W, 30dBm) transmiter, with a 24dB antenna, would not be legal in 2.4ghz ISM (the 802.11b/g band, and the most frequently used). It would, however, be legal in 5.8 ISM, one of the bands 802.11a can use (it also often uses the much more restrictive UNII bands, where this setup would be WAY over the limit)

  27. Gain vs signal by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately all this does is crank up the gain. It probably works fantastic with one story houses, but I imagine for two story apartments and houses it wouldn't be too ideal. Crank up the gain, your antenna becomes more and more dipole- it broadcasts very well onto one plane but not anywhere else with a strong signal.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Gain vs signal by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

      put the transmitter on a high on bookshelf on the second floor and redirect all the signal broadcast up back down.

      twice the signal going down into (and through) the house, no signal going through the roof.

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    2. Re:Gain vs signal by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2, Informative
      Crank up the gain, your antenna becomes more and more dipole- it broadcasts very well onto one plane but not anywhere else with a strong signal.
      Uh, I do believe you meant to say "directional" there, and not "dipole". Dipole is a fairly simple and commonly used type of antenna. Roughly: two resonant lengths working 'against' each other, hence the name, "two poles" The word 'dipole' is not normally used to describe a radiation pattern. Dipoles are genreally considered 'omni-directional' radiators.

      And you are correct, gain antennas can not 'create' or 'amplify' energy (for that, you'd need an amplifier, duh), they only take what energy is fed into them and direct it in a prefered direction at the expense of other directions. Consider the common yagi (or Yagi-Uda for the purists). Great gain forward, almost none to the sides, limited to the rear.

      This cardboard reflector is doing about the same idea - but by reflection rather than refraction. One possible caveat - depending on the distances from radiator to reflector, you can get phase problems. Get the spacing wrong and you can all but cancel out your own signal - or make it unusuable.
      --
      Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
    3. Re:Gain vs signal by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "Crank up the gain, your antenna becomes more and more dipole- it broadcasts very well onto one plane but not anywhere else with a strong signal"

      The propogation pattern of a dipole is a torus, not a plane. As you increase the gain, the pattern becomes elongated in the forward direction. As the gain increases, the antenna acts less like a dipole, not more.

      A.
      (who could have modded, but made you read this post instead)

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
  28. which Klingon ship? by L-Train8 · · Score: 1

    Which Klingon ship does it resemble? A battle cruiser or a bird of prey? I can't see any pictures because the site is slashdotted.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  29. There are other factors. by GoClick · · Score: 0

    Ever notice that giant radio telescopes are not simply long wires?

  30. This doesn't increase the power by Gregoyle · · Score: 1

    It just makes it directional. It's like the reflectors behind the bulb on a flashlight.

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

    1. Re:This doesn't increase the power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. It increases the Effective Radiation by focusing it, which and the Effective Radiation, not the transmitter power, is what's regulated.

  31. Other cardboard products for under $25 by James+Turpin · · Score: 5, Funny

    For $24 I'll sell you a cardboard box that you can sleep in. Just think how much money you'll save by not paying for housing! This is ideal for people living in Silicon Valley.

    --
    Mathematics is not a crime.
    1. Re:Other cardboard products for under $25 by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your idea has already been taken.

      "We've got some very interesting offerings in the cardboard division," Alberts said, gesturing toward a 200-foot-long aisle of appliance boxes. "Now, it used to be that, in order to get a refrigerator box, you had to search high and low, with no guarantee you'd ever strike gold. No longer. We sell our top-of-the-line, Kenmore 25.5 cubic foot double-door refrigerator boxes right here, only $4.79 each."

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    2. Re:Other cardboard products for under $25 by stienman · · Score: 1

      This is ideal for people living in Silicon Valley.

      You might think so, but heat grates are renting for $24/sqft/mo, and even sidewalk and alley are as much as $20/sqft/mo so it isn't quite as cost effective as you might think.

      The fridge box might be $25, but the sidewalk is $180/mo. Hope you've got a good job!

      -Adam

    3. Re:Other cardboard products for under $25 by James+Turpin · · Score: 1

      In that case, I'm sure you'll be interested in a manhole cover hook for a low, one-time payment of $99.95. Sure, our competition may sell them for less , but we'll deliver to a P.O. Box or a homeless shelter!

      --
      Mathematics is not a crime.
  32. You still may be breaking FCC regs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't have to worry about breaking FCC regulations on all equipment being certified.

    Just because it doesn't modify your antenna directly doesn't mean it's legal.

    If the directional gain it produces is above a certain amount, then you may still be above the power limitations on the signal. It doesn't matter if you don't directly alter the antenna itself, you're changing the characteristics of the signal, and technically the "antenna" includes any reflectors and such that you might attach to it.

    I doubt anybody will break down your door or anything, but it may still not be within the FCC limits.

  33. How Do You Eat Hydrogen? by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

    Or phosphor coat it for that matter? Tritium is a Hydrogen isotope.

    I suspect you are thinking of Radium.

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
    1. Re:How Do You Eat Hydrogen? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or phosphor coat it for that matter? Tritium is a Hydrogen isotope.

      You can disolve tritium in a phospor liquid. Tritium is usually used in compounds or molecules that have been 'tritiated'. Like tritiated water, tritiated thymidine, etc.

    2. Re:How Do You Eat Hydrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tritium sometimes is dissolved into phosphorscent liquid, which then glows. People used to paint this stuff onto watch arms, etc. Unsuprisingly, most of them died from cancer (they would lick the brush, to make the bristles stick together for a finer stroke), but I'd guess that the phosphors/paint/other chemicals had more to do with that than the tritium.

      The other method is to encapsulate tritium in a bead of thin glass, and phosphor coat the outside, then encapsulate that into another piece of glass. I think there is one company doing this (they have a patent on it). They use it in Navy SEAL dive watches, compasses, and gun sights. But I'd guess that the patent has expired. I have a military compass sitting right next to me dated 15 DEC 1981 (patents of that sort last 20 years, so it's done for), with the tritiium beads. Even has a warning on the back saying it contains 190 milicuries of radioactive hydrogen 3.

      One thing is for sure, it used to glow about twice as bright. (~14 year halflife IIRC).

    3. Re:How Do You Eat Hydrogen? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      People used to paint this stuff onto watch arms, etc. Unsuprisingly, most of them died from cancer (they would lick the brush, to make the bristles stick together for a finer stroke), but I'd guess that the phosphors/paint/other chemicals had more to do with that than the tritium.

      I think you are thinking of radium, which used to be used for this purpose long before Tritium could be isolated in usable quantities. And yes, the radium did cause cancer.

      Here is the problem....

      Tritium isn't that radio-active, but when it does decay, iirc, it beta-decays into 3He. The beta particle is stopped reasonably by metal, heavy clothing, etc. It isn't that dangerous except in large quantities.

      Usually during the process of beta decay, you also see some other radiation released as well, such as X or Gamma. Tritium actually releases anti-neutrinos which should be sufficiently non-reactive to pose no real danger (except to neutrinos? ;-))

      Theoretically you could drink heavy water, etc. which could expose you to an elevated cancer risk. But who wants to drink heavy water?

      Also unlike Strontium or Radon, the exposure to the released ionizing radiation would be spread throughout the body (H is a common element in nearly everything) and since a large component of sweat and urine is water and other hydrogen-based compounds, it probably would not stay around in sufficient quantity that long. Compare this to Strontium which gets stored in the bones, and radon which gets temporarily inhaled.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  34. Beware Mortal by trifakir · · Score: 2, Funny

    The distribution of magnetic waves is His business and thou who tampers with it art deeply sin. Instead of getting thee Ethernet frames in the coffee below, they (the frames) can end-up at the neighbour above.

  35. Other Cardboard/Tinfoil Geek Project (OT) by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once you've got a few dB's of gain, why not use the leftover cardboard from your pizza box and heat up some more pizza?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  36. /.ed by abuendia · · Score: 1

    Damn. I'll have to wait a couple of days just to check that piece. The site is currently /.ed.

    --
    Moment of terror is the beginning of life !!!
  37. I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flatenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might was well Slashdot them, too:

    http://www.fractenna.com/

    (I'd make it clickable, but I depend on the kindness of strangers to show me how)

  38. Low-Sodium salt... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ... is horrendously radioactive. Get a Geiger counter, measure what your tritium keychain is putting out, and measure what your salt shaker is putting out. Go on, I dare you.

    1. Re:Low-Sodium salt... by Nasarius · · Score: 3, Funny
      Low-Sodium salt

      Also known as chlorine?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Low-Sodium salt... by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      Potassium Chloride, actually.

      We used it as a radioactive tracer in a Hazardous Materials Incident Response Supervisor class I once took.

      Apparently, scatter some on a chemical spill and it becomes "mixed radioactive waste" and an extremely expensive remediation (clean up).

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    3. Re:Low-Sodium salt... by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 1

      Potassium 40 is a naturally occuring radioactive isotope of potassium. A small percentage of the potassium in your salt substitute (potassium chloride) is potassium 40, hence the low levels of radioactivity.

      If you spilled potassium chloride on anything, it would not be considered a radioactive waste, because the radioactivity levels are at natural levels.

      If you have potassium chloride where the levels of potassium 40 have been enriched, that would be considered radioactive waste.

  39. Soup can stopped waveguide. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the only way to fly. Pringles can antennas just plain don't work - the only reason you see an improvement is because *anything* even vaguely right is better than the piss-poor excuse for an antenna that wifi cards have.

  40. SWR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    just don't ask what the SWR (standing wave ratio) is, but i bet the output transistors of the phone do

    mmm toasty

  41. Re:I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flaten by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    You don't know how to make an HTML link? What the hell sort of geek are you?

  42. Re:I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flaten by WillWare · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'd make it clickable, but I depend on the kindness of strangers to show me how

    Set the kind of post to "HTML Formatted", using the little menu in the lower right. Then wrap HTML markup around it:

    <a href="http://www.foo.com/"> Text that you want highlighted </a>

    Fractenna is actually a pretty interesting-looking link. Thanks.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  43. Re:I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flaten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know how to make an HTML link? What the hell sort of geek are you?

    The anonymous kind :)

  44. Re:I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flaten by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 1

    Same kinda pseudo geek that'd think Fractena has any cred, let alone is cool. Google up Nathan Kohen, fractena and rec.radio.antenna (rec.radio.amateur.antenna?? I forget which one, been awhile) - this guy's snake oil has been lambasted so bad it's impressive he's still in busininess!

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  45. Microwave Pizza boxes make rotten antennas. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the stuff reflects the microwaves back through the food, to effectively double the cooking speed.

    No, the previous poster had it right.

    Your basic microwave heats the food where there's water or resistive material (like carbon). So it tends to make crispy materia soggy (by "steaming" it with the water evaporated from the wet places). And if you heat it long enough to dry it out, some spots heat enough to become burned - at which point they absorb more microwaves and become MORE burned - in a positive feedback that makes spotty burns rather than a crispy crust.

    The material is very thinly coated with metal and quite resistive. So it absorbs a portion of the microwaves and becomes very hot. The infrared is used to crisp the surface of the material, like a broiler would.

    Getting the packaging balanced - so the food is thawed, frozen, and crisped properly in the oven - takes some work. (Resistive cookware is available for do-it-yourselfers who want to broil in a microwave oven.)

    Such resistive packaging would make a rotten reflector. It's more like a "stealth" coating on an aircraft than a microwave mirror. (It might be useful, though, to make a microwave absorbing wall between your antenna and a nearby interference source.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Microwave Pizza boxes make rotten antennas. by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

      1)Collect hot pocket wrappers
      2)?????????^Wcover car
      3)Don't get speeding tickets

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Microwave Pizza boxes make rotten antennas. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried this, and my car overheated.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Microwave Pizza boxes make rotten antennas. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      1)Collect hot pocket wrappers
      2)?????????^Wcover car
      3)Don't get speeding tickets

      You'd have to stand the wrappers off the car by at least a quarter-wave or so.

      (I wonder if the guys working on the stealth projects have designed any car bodies? B-) )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  46. Cantenna by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or you could just buy a Cantenna. It's based on the pringles-can antenna, but it's bigger, better, weather-proofed, and takes a lot of the hassle out of making an antenna out of a pringles can. Not to mention the fact it's better.

    1. Re:Cantenna by crapnutassneck · · Score: 1

      You also have to buy a pigtail at about $20 and it only works with APs that have removable antennas, which the new Actiontec AP/Router/DSL Modem Qwe(r)st is giving out doesn't unfortunately. I nearly voided the warranty on mine to add a real antenna, until I found plans for one just like this one and it improved coverage in my back room by ~%26 with about 20 minutes work and at no cost! Otherwise the Cantenna is great if you wanna pay for the connectors. I built one for a 300 foot shot at my folks place out of a folgers can and it rocked.

      --
      .-=Wit is educated insolence=-. -Aristotle
    2. Re:Cantenna by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      or you could just buy a real commercial antenna for a little bit more from places like http://www.fab-corp.com or http://www.demarctech.com

      The thing that really bugs me about all these is the lack of real spec information.. cantenna looks like they finaly posted specs for their product.

      for $43 from fab-corp, you can get a 15db (2x the gain of the cantenna) parabolic dish.

  47. "Finally" a use for tinfoil hats... by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows tinfoil hats are the only way to keep Rumsfeld from reading your thoughts...

  48. o great by thegoogler · · Score: 1

    next its gonna be "the water antenna" and then what "the air antenna, just imagine it and it works" all they do is have a guy come to your house and adjust your current antenna....... o well. life just gets dumber dont it

  49. Or you could... by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're probably in the minority if you don't have a semi-parabolic pan or pot lid lying around your kitchen (though, this is Slashdot, maybe you're not in the minority here). That's what I used for to focus the signal at my last place. Just used a pack of CDs to prop it up behind the antenna. It was a fairly signficant boost. I was impressed. And it didn't cost me anything I hadn't already paid.

    1. Re:Or you could... by Necr0maN · · Score: 1

      now the RIAA is probably going to find a way to sue you because your are using CD's in a way they didn't think about.

  50. 4W EIRP or 1 Watt actual output in US by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    Your rules in the UK must be more strict than ours in the US, we get to use 4 watts EIRP in the ISM band (more info).

    -jim

    1. Re:4W EIRP or 1 Watt actual output in US by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 0

      Is that for Hams, or can anyone use that much power? (in the specified bands and adhering to all other legal requirements of course)

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
    2. Re:4W EIRP or 1 Watt actual output in US by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      That's FCC part 15 - anyone can use it. There's more rules, of course, but the legal limit is much higher than the 35mw that most wireless cards use. The 23 cm ham band overlaps the ISM band, so hams can use much more (their maximum allowable power is between 200 and 1500 watts on most frequencies, though there is another rule that says they have to use the minimum power necessary to communicate).

      -jim

  51. DIY by gtoomey · · Score: 2, Informative
    I made a similar antenna using this design

    Cost:
    Chicken wire $1 (from hardware store)
    styrofoam as a base $0 (free from greengrocer)
    Cable ties (to hold it together): $1

    Gain should be at least 6dB

  52. MODS ON CRACK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, if you visit the site, you'll see that the WiFi spray is a *joke*. "Interesting"?? Try "Funny" if you must mod it up :-p

  53. This is better! by rkuris · · Score: 1

    That doesn't work better than the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie

    --
    Get rid of everything Micro and Soft: Buy Viagra and/or Linux
    1. Re:This is better! by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      That'll go great with my CoffeeTron Dick Defender(tm)

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  54. Re:Make your own -> splayed beer can by anon+coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remove top and bottom, cut down side to get rectangle with nice built-in curl. Then fashion cardboard braces ala www.freeantennas.com and tape to antenna. Soft drink cans work too; plastic coating doesn't seem to degrade performance.

  55. Not correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Parent said "This doesn't increase gain, it just takes it from the back and adds to the front." But this is the definition of gain from an antenna: it alwas is about taking ot from the back and adding it to the front. An antenna, which is just some passive materials, can never add any power!

  56. Great! by jjholt1213 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This saves me from using tin foil and running out before my hat is complete

  57. Plywood by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing a plywood satellite dish...

    --
    meh
  58. 2 to 3 times by Biogenesis · · Score: 1

    From the website:

    2 to 3 times the range (one Flatenna)

    So can I get 10 of them and extend the range to 20-30 times?

  59. Hey! This actually works by hey! · · Score: 1

    It took me ten minutes to print out the template cut it out and assemble. I didn't bother with glue, I just taped everything together it actually works. I've got a huge increase in singal strength, enough so I have good coverage on the far end of my house where my wireless never worked before!

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  60. Been using it for a while by crapnutassneck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I built one based on this http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/ind ex.html and it increased coverage in the back of my house by %26 according to the Cisco Aironet Desktop Utility when connected to my Qwe(r)st issued all in one Actiontec DSL TA/802.11G AP/Router. Given, it is not "increasing gain" just making it directional, but for 20 minutes work and no cost it was worth it.

    --
    .-=Wit is educated insolence=-. -Aristotle
  61. tritium by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    I want to get tritium sights for my Glock.

  62. It is. And I pay for a subscription for this? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I mean, lets break it down.

    1) anonymous poster
    2) price of product mentioned in "article"
    3) website that looks it had a once through by an SEO consultant (just look at that page title)

    The only thing the SEO can't get you in 3 is slashdot linkage karma.

    So you submit it as "story" to slashdot. Ingenious.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:It is. And I pay for a subscription for this? by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      > So you submit it as "story" to slashdot. Ingenious.

      Why ? Slashdot would be the worst place to submit an advert for a product like this.

      It's obvious that posts will either talk about it being a sham, or will say how you can build yourself one for free.

      I wouldn't have thought this product would be aimed at the typical slashdotter (if there is such a thing!)

      --
      Sig out of date
  63. I am a garden gnome... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    ...you insensitive clod!

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  64. The reason it's called "Flatenna"... by hprotagonist0 · · Score: 1

    is because they tried a flantenna first, but the custard kept melting.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." --Voltaire
  65. This sounds familiar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Is it like the cardboard submarines you could buy from ads on the back of comic books ?

  66. Spiderman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Doc Ock didn't make you nervous about tritium, then nothing will...

  67. WRONG we are laughing at the buyers by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Well at least I am. Personally I don't have the guts to pull this kind of scam since I would be afraid that one of the dumbshits would be told by some smarter (like say the housecat) that he been had and come look for me. Dumb people can be awfully big.

    So I just stand by the sideline and laught at the dumbshits who buy this kind of stuff. Antenna extenders are so basic. Who hasn't used their body to clear the radio signal on a portable?

    I know that most radios used in workplaces (factories) wich have a lot of metal usually have a few meters of wire attached or have the antenna leaning against a handy pylon.

    For the more fragile /.er there is the old pringle can antenna.

    These guys selling pringle carton at a huge markup are pretty smart. Now it is just a question if they are smart enough to avoid the trading standards agencies. This is england and not the US. In england only very large companies are allowed to rip people off.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  68. Re:I think the Fractenna is cooler than the Flaten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, fractenna.com is a pretty neat site - I've looked at these antennas previously and would like to see something like this to make a WIFI access point that resembles the puzzle box from the Hellraiser movies.

    Even cooler if it unfolds, twists, and turns like the one in the movie. :)

  69. Another way to increase reception for tv or radio by I7D · · Score: 1
    Sorry this post is so late!

    The best length for an antenna is one quarter of the frequency's wavelength.

    -so, to figure this out....

    -Consider the equation... Wavelength = (Speed of light/Frequency in hz) -which is like saying Lamda = 3x10^8 m/s divided by (frequency number x 1000000). You'll get a nice number like 2.83 or something small. This unit is in meters. Your antenna should be 1/4 this length. -for example, a frequency of 106.1 in San Fran will work best with an antenna 27.8 inches long Have fun! Now the question is, are there antennas out there that auto adjust? I havn't seen any...

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  70. Re:Another way to increase reception for tv or rad by pbjones · · Score: 1

    there are auto-adjust ants for HF to VHF, I have no seen them for this sort of part of the spectrum.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  71. Re:Another way to increase reception for tv or rad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a guy spouting a lot of half-baked antenna math, you don't know much. (Maybe not stupid, just ignorant.) Do a little homework before trying to pontificate. (Keeps you from looking like a fool.)

    Ham radio frequencies have usually been integer multiples. This way, the same antenna can be used. (A 1/4 wavelength antenna for 80 meters is a 1/2 wavelength antenna for 40 meters.)

    There are antennas that auto adjust for length. They call them trap antennas.

    1/4 wavelength is typical. But many times, a 5/8 wavelength is preferred. (It reshapes the radiation balloon around the antenna. Use a directional reflector, and you get a long balloon instead of a spherical. If you see an antenna design that reshapes the balloon into a weiner dog, let me know.)

    BTW, pumping more power into the antenna is like pumping more air into the balloon - it gets bigger.

  72. Radio in your fillings by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Your point about RF is well taken. A recent item (on /.?) discussed discovery of a mechanism for RF in cellphones to affect biochemistry in the body - RF in quite low doses tends to orient water molecules in line with the electrical field, which _might_ affect the complex organochemistry in the cells.

    More interestingly, stories have been around since the 1940's at least of people receiving radio stations on the fillings in their teeth. I don't know if that was what happened to me, but ... I once spent a month in a cabin in the woods, on the north side of a steep canyon, with no electricity, i.e., out of the line of sight of nearly all possible radio transmissions, though I don't know if that was significant. When I was driving away from the place, I had a country and western song running through my head. I turned on the radio and the song was playing on the radio, exactly at the point where the song in my head was at!

    This is a true event. It was during my hippie-vegetarian-ascetic phase, so I suppose that I was highly "tunable" at the time. It was weird, whatever it was. Perhaps it was my fillings. It's never happened again, so far as I know.

    My friend says it was probably the Crab People.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    1. Re:Radio in your fillings by alienw · · Score: 1

      This could possibly happen, but only if it's an AM station. And even then, the transmitter would have to be rather close to where you were. I'd say it was a coincidence.

  73. Power Magnification Curse er Curve is Missing by newpath4com · · Score: 0

    You might could magnify it's available power by spraying it with supercold liquid nitrogen on one side and steaming the other side... hehe hehe www.newpath4.com Perhaps it needs more CAPACITORS TOO to control all that power!

  74. By the numbers by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    1: Collect empty Pringles cans (cost: free).
    2: Cut up one side and roll flat.
    3: Xerox one page of instructions (cost: 5 cents).
    4: Insert in envelope (cost: 20 cents).
    5: Postage (cost: 57 cents for over 1 ounce).
    6: Walk to mailbox (good exercise).
    7: Collect $25 checks for above.
    8: Walk to bank (better exercise).
    9: Profit!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  75. What about a target-shaped antenna? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Back in the days of coffee can HBO receivers, a friend of mine who made them told me he had read about an antenna design involving concentric rings of aluminum foil, properly spaced on a flat surface, which simulated a parabolic dish. I know nothing whatsoever about antenna design. Does this sound like something that would actually work, and could it work for WiFi?