I haven't bothered reading the report, but reading your summary reminded me of Vietnam. when fixing the election results the U.S. advisors suggested a more realistic value but they went for something like 99% instead.
contrary to Hitler's "the bigger the lie, the easier they swallow it", putting out BS of this magnitude is retarded.
It's amazing how much less of a retard you can sound when you don't start your argument by bitching about something I didn't even say.
what's a demonitator?...yeah, crafted REALLY carefully.
Please explain how SCO is only IBM's problem when Darl has made it clear he believes Linux to be, among other things, a tool for terrorist states to develop WMDs and a threat to the entire US computer industry. And he has the backing of the world's richest man. And the US government isn't known for making a habit of putting people before profits when lobbied by rich companies. Or understanding technology enough to produce quality legislature (e.g. software patents, DMCA).
>And IIRC, building solar-panels eats more energy than those panels will produce in their projected lifetime.
hahahahahahahahahahaha what BS, who told you this? a representative from the coal industry or something?
the effectiveness of solar panels obviously varies, but there are many places that use them productively.
think about it - why would calculators use solar cells? according to your logic it would be far cheaper for the manufacturer to just give the customer a sack full of batteries.
with coal, you are putting in energy (into the process) when you mine it and transport it etc. but when the coal burns the heat comes from the potential energy that was already there.
in the case of solar power, once you've built the solar panel you don't have to put in any energy because it's provided by the Sun. the Sun didn't cost us anything to make, it's already there just like the potential energy is already in the coal.
you missed the part where he says Linux enables axis-of-evil countries to develop weapons of mass destruction by allowing them to run "virtual supercomputers"
of course energy is conserved, but this doesn't mean you can't get more energy out than you put in. exothermic reactions produce more heat than is required to make them go, the extra heat coming from chemical potential energy. in nuclear plants energy is released when nuclei rearrange themselves. in these cases the energy released was already there but was inaccessible before the reaction.
another example is solar power - in this case electricity is produced but no energy is put in, in the sense that the energy comes from the Sun so there's no cost associated with it. other renewable energy sources work on the same principle.
I'm not so enthusiastic about USB keyboards. the only one I tried was a while ago, and it was probably a crap keyboard and a crap motherboard, but it didn't work properly and now I'm scarred for life.
I assume they thought the same processes that created the "canals" would have also got rid of the olivine. although Mars is very different to Earth right now, these processes took place a long time ago when it wouldn't have been different.
Slashdot Mirror
the logo still looks like "SuSE", but that's cos the chameleon's sitting on it.
all the text is SUSE, so get with the program!
"" could also stand for "SCO lies" or "RIAA acts like a dick", so I think "IE" would be best.
no I think he means that the subdomain can EITHER be an actual group of people (e.g. a club) OR a "symbolic" group of people such as a profession.
ATI is spelled ATI. check it out at www.ati.com
just because the logo looks like ATi doesn't mean it's spelled like that, otherwise Disney would be spelled Disnep
I haven't bothered reading the report, but reading your summary reminded me of Vietnam. when fixing the election results the U.S. advisors suggested a more realistic value but they went for something like 99% instead.
contrary to Hitler's "the bigger the lie, the easier they swallow it", putting out BS of this magnitude is retarded.
"If they start suing Linux users, things change..."
"First they came for the Jews..."
It's amazing how much less of a retard you can sound when you don't start your argument by bitching about something I didn't even say.
...yeah, crafted REALLY carefully.
what's a demonitator?
Please explain how SCO is only IBM's problem when Darl has made it clear he believes Linux to be, among other things, a tool for terrorist states to develop WMDs and a threat to the entire US computer industry. And he has the backing of the world's richest man. And the US government isn't known for making a habit of putting people before profits when lobbied by rich companies. Or understanding technology enough to produce quality legislature (e.g. software patents, DMCA).
I said SCO deserved to be DDOS'd. that's what the story's about [hint: read the title]. where did I say anything about back doors?
I stopped reading after "back doors". I suspect having set up a nice straw man you just tear into it for all the "Insightful" mods you can get.
...for Sean Astin? :-(
oh well, the Oscars are full of sh*t anyway.
...attitude. They deserve this. It's not like anybody is being physically hurt or anything.
I tried that it said something like "you won't receive important newsletters so we won't let you"
ha I just got to meta-mod this Troll-mod as unfair! he WAS being a penis!
>And IIRC, building solar-panels eats more energy than those panels will produce in their projected lifetime.
hahahahahahahahahahaha what BS, who told you this? a representative from the coal industry or something?
the effectiveness of solar panels obviously varies, but there are many places that use them productively.
think about it - why would calculators use solar cells? according to your logic it would be far cheaper for the manufacturer to just give the customer a sack full of batteries.
with coal, you are putting in energy (into the process) when you mine it and transport it etc. but when the coal burns the heat comes from the potential energy that was already there.
in the case of solar power, once you've built the solar panel you don't have to put in any energy because it's provided by the Sun. the Sun didn't cost us anything to make, it's already there just like the potential energy is already in the coal.
BPI release statement on CDWOW!
and just in case you might start using your brain and realise the isn't a good thing:
Music Buyers Enjoy Lower Than Ever Prices
no, this is the *B*PI so it's g-l-o-b-a-l-i-s-a-t-i-o-n
I can say "no energy put in" (which is what I DID say), which is what's important with power plants.
get it?
you missed the part where he says Linux enables axis-of-evil countries to develop weapons of mass destruction by allowing them to run "virtual supercomputers"
of course energy is conserved, but this doesn't mean you can't get more energy out than you put in. exothermic reactions produce more heat than is required to make them go, the extra heat coming from chemical potential energy. in nuclear plants energy is released when nuclei rearrange themselves. in these cases the energy released was already there but was inaccessible before the reaction.
another example is solar power - in this case electricity is produced but no energy is put in, in the sense that the energy comes from the Sun so there's no cost associated with it. other renewable energy sources work on the same principle.
I'm not so enthusiastic about USB keyboards. the only one I tried was a while ago, and it was probably a crap keyboard and a crap motherboard, but it didn't work properly and now I'm scarred for life.
indeed, I lost my Dvorak keyboard to a bottle of Smirnoff Ice
who modded this Informative? - Obviously someone who didn't read topic the let alone RTFA.
I assume they thought the same processes that created the "canals" would have also got rid of the olivine. although Mars is very different to Earth right now, these processes took place a long time ago when it wouldn't have been different.
may cause severe headaches or convulsions. do not stare directly at the gif, only observe using a red filter and half-silvered mirror.
and now back to Hypnotoad...
punctuation isn't allowed in domain names, but is assumed to be there, especially if using capitals to emphasise word boundaries. get it?
he said he got it because it sounds similar, which in no way supports the original claim that they sound *identitcal*. get it?