Slashdot Mirror


Bad Spelling Pays on eBay

peebeejay writes "People say that as long as they're understood, spelling is unimportant. These people are unwittingly making others a lot of money online, according to this article in the NY Times (DNA sample and clean boxers required). So, aside from clarity and respect for your reader, there's another good reason to either spell correctly or use a spellchecker: get bidders to find your eBay items and give you their money! Or you can go ahead and see how many people bid on your 'labtop computers,' 'camras,' and 'earings.'"

525 comments

  1. This article is ridiculous by seidleroniman · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'm in shock that the NYT carries this article because it states something so ridiculously obvious: that if you misspell your listing, people may not find it. Its the same reason why when you search for a "labtop computer" on e-bay, you dont find anything. Maybe its just a slow news day?

    1. Re:This article is ridiculous by fizz · · Score: 1

      thats what we like to call bad journalism :)
      i cant spell either :)

    2. Re:This article is ridiculous by ewwhite · · Score: 4, Informative
      Try again....

      Search for "labtop" on ebay :)

      --
      Edmund White
      http://flickr.com/ewwhite
    3. Re:This article is ridiculous by LiberalApplication · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, this is exactly the kind of thing I'd been hoping noone would bother to publish as "news", precisely because I (in my cheapass, impoverished, bargainhunting gadgetlusting ways) have always managed to find the things I've wanted on eBay for great prices simply by repeatedly performing searches on what I'd expect to be common misspellings/permutations of spellings of the names of the items (whew... long sentence... deep breath...).

      That having been said, I wound up with a MITS Altair for $100 because it was listed as "Vintage Altar Comp", and a "sonydcv1" for about $300.

      My point being that as geeks, we should encourage all non-geeks we know who have an interest in selling items on eBay to forgo spellchecks and not worry about spelling in general. We stand to profit from it! Any attempt to educate the general populace (as this NYT article attempts to do) will reduce the number of magic bargains to be found on eBay ;)

    4. Re:This article is ridiculous by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Well obvious is in the eye of the beholder. I know it snowed a lot and that the streets are bad, but they seem to like to put that on the front page a lot.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    5. Re:This article is ridiculous by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Informative
      I found 425 "language challenged" knive sellers.

      Obligatory nerd tie-in: That's why Mozilla kicks IE's little tin arse. Quicklink "dict knive" --> no entry for knive.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    6. Re:This article is ridiculous by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even more shocking is that the NYT reporter didn't immediately attempt to patent searching for common misspellings as a business method.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:This article is ridiculous by jazman · · Score: 5, Funny

      LOL! Priceless - look at the description for http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =3456315281&category=177

      Choice quotes

      "I am not lying when I say that this labtop is hands down one of the fastest computers I have ever seen in my entire life. On the other hand, I am also completely clueless when it comes to computers so please bare with me."

      Oo-er - are we getting our clothes off together? (It's "BEAR with me")

      "keyboard has more buttons than I know what to do with"

      "a floppy drive, a CD rom drive, and another drive that I have no clue what to do with"

      "And...a rechargable battery"

      "some disk that I suppose you'll probably need"

      and to top it off "Chances are that you'll probably want to run this computer by a shop and get it cleaned out"

      Then he says "if you have any questions email me." Yeah, like he's really going to have a clue amout MHz, GB, serial ports etc. I wouldn't recommend asking anything more difficult than: "What colour is it?"

      He also can't spell "I nicked it" - he says "this is not my computer (I'm selling it for a friend)"

    8. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except that the article is about people taking advantage of those mispellings and reselling the items for a profit. It is a good article except for the people who do it because now everybody will know. Just like Ebay used to be a great place for bargains until it became popular and now most things seem to end up higher than buying it at a reputable retailer.

    9. Re:This article is ridiculous by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 0

      going to have a clue amout M

      Haha! You spelled "about" wrong in your post about other people's spelling errors!

      Congratulations, Ralph Wiggum!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    10. Re:This article is ridiculous by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =3456315281&category=177

      Wouldn't come up. No, I didn't search around, instead trusting the above address implicitly. But still ..... have we managed to slashdot eBay?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    11. Re:This article is ridiculous by corbettw · · Score: 1

      For the hypertext challenged

      Definitely screams "hot goods", with the "I have no idea what's on it" comments.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    12. Re:This article is ridiculous by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no doubt. I was inches from an excellent deal on a "Cannon Elf APS Camera" 6 years ago, before I changed my mind and decided to wait for digital. Two mistakes for the price of one! Guess the secret's out now.

      Especially since slashdot will repeat this tomorrow for anybody who missed it. ;)

    13. Re:This article is ridiculous by andy+landy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've always said that the best (and worst) thing about eBay is that it's full of stupid people. It's not just bad spelling that can get you the bargains, often people under-price their "Buy it now" items, or advertise things incorrectly, i.e. "This laptop has a 500MHz processor", but the model number they've stated suggests it's a 1GHz.

      This 'feature' isn't going to go away because the NYT has mentioned it. The problem comes from clueless people, who will still be clueless now! I doubt people deliberately mis-spell items on eBay and now are thinking "perhaps I should spell things correctly from now on"

      P.S. Remember to take full advantage, if you find cluelessness on eBay, "View Seller's Other Items" might be your key to many more bargains!

      --
      perl -e 'print "Just another Perl newbie\n";'
    14. Re:This article is ridiculous by ganns.com · · Score: 1

      I also get a little frustrated when I see businesses, etc, helping "less than smart" people. For instance, I feel that I am a fairly decent resume writer, so it bugs me when challenged people get professional help with their resumes. I guess it doesn't matter *too* much since it all surfaces to the top in the interview.

    15. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A site is NOT SLASHDOTTED when it's still up. You just copied the URL directly and got it wrong. Slashdot inserts spaces in long texts to avoid abuse, so you'll have to remove those spaces in the URL.

    16. Re:This article is ridiculous by throughthewire · · Score: 1
      For future reference, Slashdot adds a space character to URLs posted as text, so you can't just cut and paste into your browser.

      In this case, remove the space character after &item.

      Or you could click on the hyperlink helpfully posted by corbettw above in message 8112289.

    17. Re:This article is ridiculous by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      remove the space character after &item.

      Well then, all I have to do is run down to Second Light to check the surf (cold and flat) and come back, and when I do a very useful bit of information falls out of the sky and into my lap.

      Kindest thanks!

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    18. Re:This article is ridiculous by hkmwbz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "This 'feature' isn't going to go away because the NYT has mentioned it. The problem comes from clueless people, who will still be clueless now!"
      The problem isn't that there will be fewer people misspelling words. The problem is that there will be more people looking for misspellings, so it will be harder to find those nice bargains.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    19. Re:This article is ridiculous by BlueWire · · Score: 1

      Did a search on "keyboard has more buttons than I know what to do with" - in 'in titles & descriptions' link. Returned womens suits, Palm Pilots, and laptop docking stations. Strange.

      --
      Yes, but whats that got to do with the price of tea in D'ni?
    20. Re:This article is ridiculous by danbeck · · Score: 1

      You said it... I am regularly astonished and amazed that I can buy the same item from a decent online store for less than it's going for on ebay. And often with better shipping.

      I've tried to rationalize why this might be the case but just can't fathom why someone would do this other than abject stupidity.

    21. Re:This article is ridiculous by voidware · · Score: 1
      Parent is correct!
      "Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost."
    22. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Any attempt to educate the general populace (as this NYT article attempts to do) will reduce the number of magic bargains to be found on eBay ;)
      I, for one, promise not to get too worried that someone who would otherwise list "chandaleer earrings" or a "camra" is likely to be a regular reader of the New York Times.
    23. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (whew... long sentence... deep breath...)

      Use the commas, Luke!

    24. Re:This article is ridiculous by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Especially in the Mac market - one camp will sell their Macs for laughably low prices on a ghetto page. You buy from these guys. Make a nice page and resell to the *other* camp, the ones who will pay with a buy it now more than retail because, after all, if it's on eBay, it MUST be cheaper! No sense shopping around...my roommate in college made a killing off iBooks that way. I'd have done it myself if I had enough cash to buy the first one :(

    25. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said "surfaces to the top". What a numbskull !!

    26. Re:This article is ridiculous by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

      After seeing that ad I searched for "hardrive" and found hundreds! Some are quite good deals.

    27. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, some friend he is...

      selling his laptop.....

      that's cold, man....

    28. Re:This article is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who say "m'kay" should be shot dead.

    29. Re:This article is ridiculous by jazman · · Score: 1

      heh, well spotted, I always think it's amoosing when people critisise others' spellin errors and carn't spel themselvz.

    30. Re:This article is ridiculous by jazman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never did figure out how to do URLs on /.. Let's see, how about litigious bastards

      Or the article I'm laughing about.

      (preview...) Yeah, that seems to work ok. Now I know.

  2. you mean.... by hatrisc · · Score: 4, Funny

    to tell me that they aren't called "labtop" computers? ... you could've fooled my dad.

    --
    I write code.
    1. Re:you mean.... by javatips · · Score: 2, Funny

      When your healty... they are called laptop...

      When you have a cold... they are called labtop.

    2. Re:you mean.... by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Funny
      to tell me that they aren't called "labtop" computers? ... you could've fooled my dad.

      Does his labtop have a sloppy disk drive, like my dad's desktop does?

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    3. Re:you mean.... by Windsurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not just spelling that causes inter-generational confusion...

      My father asked me to buy him a PC, so I ordered him a nice little Dell desktop. The look on his face when I took it over to his house was priceless - it turns out he wanted a laptop! He's always had a laptop from his company, and to him PC == laptop.

      I understand that the definition of PC includes both desktop and laptop, but I think most people would assume PC == desktop.

      Luckily I managed to sell the desktop on to a friend, and my father got his laptop a few weeks later...

    4. Re:you mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, thats your mom...

    5. Re:you mean.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Funny

      When your healty... they are called laptop...

      Heh heh... the bitter irony.

      When you're "healty" they must be called "lapop". :-)

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    6. Re:you mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When you have a cold... they are called labtop.

      You missbelled labtob, stubid.

    7. Re:you mean.... by Windsurfer · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the UK, Dell charge a 50 GBP delivery fee. I would assume that they would charge a similar amount to come and pick it up again, leaving me rather substantially out of pocket. I was just lucky I knew someone who needed it.

    8. Re:you mean.... by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Pre-Pentium 4 they were called laptops computers. After burning the thighs of some users they are now referred to as notebook computers.

    9. Re:you mean.... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Dell charges a fair bit for shipping by default. However, you can UPS (or other shipping company) it back at their standard rates. Dell usually has a free shipping deal going, but if not and you want to buy from them, get an account with UPS (it's free), Dell makes it reasonably easy to arrange your own shipping for a lot less.

      This is true in the U.S., at any rate; I can't tell if there's a similar situation for the UK.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:you mean.... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      After burning the thighs of some users they are now referred to as notebook computers.

      Not to forget the guy who burnt his genitalia...

    11. Re:you mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought "labtop" was used intentionally to refer to a laptop which had special analysis capabilities (hardware/software), i.e. like a "lab" computer that can be taken out into the field to do analysis. No, seriously, that's what I thought!

    12. Re:you mean.... by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention your use of "WA Post." WA means the state of Washington, whereas the Washington Post is a Washington DC/Virginia/Maryland area publication.

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    13. Re:you mean.... by xkenny13 · · Score: 1

      After burning the thighs of some users they are now referred to as notebook computers.

      Yeah, your thighs if you're lucky. This man actually burned his penis.

    14. Re:you mean.... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I know this is 20/20 hindsight, but it might also have been a good idea to ask him what he wanted to do with it. When my mom asked for a laptop, it meant she wanted a new digital camera and her own PC to process them and send them off to friends and family.

    15. Re:you mean.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      they aren't called "labtop" computers? ... you could've fooled my dad.
      Maybe they are. Is he a scientist?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Search engines by Andrea_from_Arg · · Score: 1

    I would never search "camras"... a bid like that would be hard to find... right?

    --
    :: Andrea ::
    Anime Wallpapers
    1. Re:Search engines by neko9 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Search engines by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Yes. You would subesquently be competing aginst far fewer eBay users, and would therefore stand a good chance at getting a bargain. Searching for mispeld words is a good strategy. Now don't use it - that's *my* darned secret. :)

    3. Re:Search engines by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I would never search "camras"...

      I wasn't aware that CAMRA was up for sale...:-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Search engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wasn't aware that CAMRA was up for sale...:-)
      Mmmmmmmm. Beer!
  4. Interesting by greechneb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I find it interesting that below this is a story about Weighing the Value of Privacy, telling how people value their privacy, and then there is a post with a link to a site that requires registration - Ironic

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it more interesting that the /. janitors titled this article Bad Spelling Pays on eBay, when the article clearly states
      "People say that as long as they're understood, spelling is unimportant. These people are unwittingly making others a lot of money online, ... there's another good reason to either spell correctly or use a spellchecker: get bidders to find your eBay items and give you their money!?


      Actually, that wasn't even the article - it was the submission. Ergo, not only did the janitors not RTFA, they didn't even RTFS!

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by modding down a +4 post?

  5. Shhh! by CGP314 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Or you can go ahead and see how many people bid on your 'labtop computers,' 'camras,' and 'earings.'"

    I have a friend who makes money doing this. He buys mispelled items at a low price and then resells them on ebay with the correct spelling.

    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

    1. Re:Shhh! by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      No need for the shhh!, methinks -- the NYT article describes exactly the same thing and tells how people make a profit by doing this. So it's no longer a secret -- sorry.

      By the way, note the following quote from the article:

      Indeed, experts say the Internet -- with its discussion boards, blogs and self-published articles -- is a treasure trove of bad spelling.

      Boy, do we know that here!

    2. Re:Shhh! by junklight · · Score: 1

      You have to wonder when you get modded up to +5 for a comment that says "I know someone who does this".

      Why is that interesting? I know lots of people who do lots of things. Does that mean that this post is worth +5?

      Perhaps people should read the article and *then* post. Radical I know.

    3. Re:Shhh! by Scarblac · · Score: 3, Funny

      No need for the shhh!, methinks -- the NYT article describes exactly the same thing

      Yeah, but no-one reads the article, it was still a secret...

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    4. Re:Shhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Great, now they'll just mod "me toos" as +5 informative.

      He probably read the article and was just saying he knew someone like the person in the article. If he kept going and told us something more about this guy, he could have had a +5 worthly post.

    5. Re:Shhh! by kevinT · · Score: 1

      Something like the Contax camera. It was listed as Contact in the title, in the film section of ebay. Sold for $1000. In the medium format camera section, they go for $2000 to $2500! I just didn't have a spare grand laying around!

  6. Umm... by SilentT · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thank you Dr. Obvious...

  7. Old, old trick. by DdJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using this trick since I started using eBay, something like six years ago. When you look for something, always look for misspellings first, because you're less likely to have competition. Even got a gemstone or two this way.

    It's been known for years, and it hasn't changed much. I don't think this article is going to cause much of a change, even if it's widely read.

    1. Re:Old, old trick. by Yewbert · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even got a gemstone or two this way.

      Yeah, and that great Rolleks watch, too! What a bargain.

    2. Re:Old, old trick. by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I do the same thing... I "won" a really nice speaker set retail over $1,000 for $100 because it was misspelled.... although when they saw that the winning bid was so low they canceled the auction and claimed that after review the speakers were damaged...

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
    3. Re:Old, old trick. by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Great tip. The stuff that I look for on Ebay tends to be rather focused (music synthesizers without keyboards - tone modules) so I doubt the sellers would misspell their titles.

      Still it is interesting.

    4. Re:Old, old trick. by bpiltz · · Score: 1

      Yep. I think clothing sellers/fashion queens/housewares are also good areas to find Ebay idiots. I've bought new cargo A&F pants with the tags still on for $0.99 + $3.00 S&H. The goofy part was the seller listed another pair the next week - still mis-spelled. She probably was wondering why her "Ebay business" wasn't living up to the Make-A-Fortune-on-Ebay promises of her new book.

      Try permutations of Abercrombie & Fitch and Eddie Bauer. There are a lot of 'amercrombie', 'abercromie', 'finch', 'eddy', and 'bower' and all manner of combinations. Other good brands for mis-spelling: Onkyo, Panasonic, & Banana Republic.

      The trick is to find listings that aren't cross-reference-able. (i.e. 'Abercromie & Finch' vs 'Abercromie & Finch cargo pants' - people can search for cargo pants and still find the latter listing)

      Be creative - the ignorant human mind has great capacity for creative spelling.

      Legoes, Leggos, or Laygos anyone?

      --
      Goals for 2011: 1. Stop plate tectonics. 2. Prevent animal predation. 3. End supernovae now. 4. Rid the world of evil.
    5. Re:Old, old trick. by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      I have an old E-Mu morpheus that died...and some stuff for sale...

      But that is true, for specialized stuff, I have hardly ever seen it misspelled. The expensive stuff is usually spelled correctly as well. Otari and Atari are NOT the same.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    6. Re:Old, old trick. by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      No wonder I never can find anything on Ebay. But how can you predict how people are going to misspell something? Might as well go back to old English.

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
  8. I check for this on purpose by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. whenever I use ebay, I always try "alternative" spellings of words. Of course, being from the UK, I'm used to spelling things like 'color' incorrectly [its a JOKE!] :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:I check for this on purpose by pgpckt · · Score: 1


      I am an American, I prefer the Brittish (which I guess that term isn't right if you are from Northern Ireland?) spelling of words and many Brittish words (like "loft") to their American counterparts. When I was in 10th grade, I tried the Brittish spelling for some words in a paper and got marked off :( .

      UK is cool. At least if I lived there, I could visit all the other cool places in Europe! (The Brittish are acknowledging this month that they are a part of Europe, right?)

      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    2. Re:I check for this on purpose by nuffle · · Score: 5, Funny

      And is Brittish your British word for British?

    3. Re:I check for this on purpose by beezly · · Score: 1

      I prefer being British! ;)

    4. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, of course not. The only French military victories EVER were against us (William the Bastard, Jeanne d'Arc). I mean, that's kind of embarrassing. Even having thrashed them many times since then doesn't really make up for the humiliation...

    5. Re:I check for this on purpose by dogbowl · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was one thing I learned while traveling through Europe. We would inevitable end up meeting/talking with British folks (mainly because they spoke the language) and they would always refer to the French or Dutch as "the Europeans"

      Like, "The Europeans have this odd tasting candy" or "The Europeans have some odd TV shows".

      At first it threw me for a loop .. I didn't know what they were talking about. I mean .. the British are Europeans with funny tasting candy and silly TV shows too. I didn't know they could detect abnormality among their own kind!

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    6. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your deviation from the lexicographic norm set forth by our Great Nation's forefathers has confirmed my suspicions that you are in fact an Al Qaeda operative.

    7. Re:I check for this on purpose by cloudmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      (paraphrasing) I'm an American, but I like to write papers in languages other than American English. I'm suprised when this gets me poor grades in English courses that I'm taking in America.

      Adding extrae letteres too wourds jusst tou mayik themm moure impressieve oarr coulourfull iss nout ay goud ideea, even if the brits disagree in *their* english. :) Also, note that, thanks to modern transportational advancements, you could visit Europe regardless of where you live - you don't have to already live there!

    8. Re:I check for this on purpose by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      .. whenever I use ebay, I always try "alternative" spellings of words

      Mildly humourous, however, I do a lot of searches on eBay and find I often miss items because the offering party couldn't break things up. The search on eBay is pretty primative, but you can do multiple wildcards, i.e. (color*,colour*) in a search query. I've usually got a number of variations on things.

      The downside is I often get a very large list of things, where people have loaded their listings with chatter which match these words, but have nothing to do with what I'm looking for. e.g. I'm searching for a 'Teleporter', so I can go to Mars and fix the Rover and find and fix Beagle, I search on "teleport*" and get a listing like this:

      Bizaxian Grompfelated Nurbskin Sandals

      I need to sell these so I can afford to teleport to the moon for the holidays, blah, blah, blah (for the next 500 words.) Current Bid: $23.71

      I really could care less about peoples' live stories, I just want to find a things. Still, it's not as annoying as all that amimated crap and javascript some people cram their listings with, so one downloaded page is 500k+

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:I check for this on purpose by samhalliday · · Score: 2, Informative
      we speak "British English" everywhere in Ireland, not just the north, of course we call it "English" and your strange ways we call "American English". i would only ever say "British English" when speaking to an American, for emphasis.

      most late-period colonial countries are the same (i know they all set their dictionaries to "British English" in South Africa at least)

    10. Re:I check for this on purpose by grarg · · Score: 1

      we speak "British English" everywhere in Ireland, not just the north...

      The hell we do! I may well write the Queen's English, but the spoken dialect is a whole different kettle of fish.

      --
      The conclusion of your syllogism, I said lightly, is fallacious, being based on licensed premises
    11. Re:I check for this on purpose by sydb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like, "The Europeans have this odd tasting candy" or "The Europeans have some odd TV shows".

      They would not say that. We never say "candy", we say "sweets" and we prefer to call "TV shows" "TV programmes".

      Also, we wouldn't say "The Europeans"; rather, "the frogs and the krauts".

      "The frogs and the krauts have some rather peculiar TV programmes; care for one of their similarly bizarre sweets?"

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    12. Re:I check for this on purpose by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Just be happy that he's not calling it Great Britian ;)

    13. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And is Brittish your British word for British?

      No, it's spelled Bryttizh.

    14. Re:I check for this on purpose by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

      I prefer the Brit[t]ish (which I guess that term isn't right if you are from Northern Ireland?)

      Well, there's:

      England
      England and Wales
      Great Britain
      The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

      which are reasonably easily identifiable differnt geographical and legal entities, most bits of most of which are in the EU quite a lot of the time, but it becomes more complicated if you want to try to define what

      Britain

      means, or to work out which of the above do or don't include

      The Isle of Man
      The Channel Islands.

      Yes, there are places you can travel to and from, starting from the English mainland, where you don't need a passport, find the same money (Sterling) at the other end, but do pass through customs.

      Once you get into the adjectives (like British) it starts getting complicated, though, given the various different descriptions of nationality you can find on UK passports.

    15. Re:I check for this on purpose by Merk · · Score: 1

      Your rite! Less letter's is better. Who needs 'light' when you can have 'lite'? And who wants 2 type HTTP_REFERRER when you can u's HTTP_REFERER? Heck, why do they even cal it HTTP? That's 2 many T's, it should be HTP_REFERER!

    16. Re:I check for this on purpose by pablo.cl · · Score: 1
      Your rite! Less letter's is better.

      Cut Spelng Society

    17. Re:I check for this on purpose by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Another "Irish" guys who's never actually been to Ireland.

    18. Re:I check for this on purpose by dublin · · Score: 1

      Well, there's:

      England
      England and Wales
      Great Britain
      The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland


      My understanding (I'm a fifth generation Texan myself) is that there is still some considerable disagreement on whether "Great Britian" really and truly includes Scotland, a.k.a. Caledonia. And the current "devolution" actions, including the relatively recent acceptance of a Scottish Parliament, would tend to indicate that there's something to that argument...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    19. Re:I check for this on purpose by Dj+Stingray · · Score: 1

      Would you use a torch to see what colour your tyre is?

      Maybe there are better examples of this... but I just thought of it....

    20. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, another "irish" guy who was born and bred in ireland; for 21 years i'll have you know. don't you know how to follow username links? trolls get marked foe...

    21. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) a valid point

    22. Re:I check for this on purpose by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Oh goody goody, I get to be on an Irish guys foe's list. What does that do exactely?

    23. Re:I check for this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, we wouldn't say "The Europeans"; rather, "the frogs and the krauts".
      And the dagoes, the wops, the cloggies, the polacks...
    24. Re:I check for this on purpose by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Would you use a torch to see what colour your tyre is?

      > Maybe there are better examples of this... but I just thought of it....

      Would you bum a fag if you needed a cigarette?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  9. Reg Free by swordboy · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Reg Free by swordboy · · Score: 1

      That's odd... The Star Tribune just pulled this story and are now requiring registration. So Google for it.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  10. Play Staion by caseydk · · Score: 1


    Before the categories were as developed as they are now, a college roommate picked up a "Play Staion" for cheap.

    With the categories and the "Going Going Gone" auctions these don't stay hidden as easily, but they're still there.

  11. Mother of Perl??? by Dr.+Charles+Forbin · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the article, Mother of Perl is spelled incorrectly. Shows what they know.

    1. Re:Mother of Perl??? by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sweet stupid hell! I can buy Larry Wall's wife on ebay?!

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:Mother of Perl??? by elemental23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I assumed it was his cat, actually. Everyone knows the first perl script was written when she walked across the keyboard one time.

      That said, I'd buy that cat on Ebay if the price was right. She might be able to teach my cats a few things, and I could get them to do all my work for me.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    3. Re:Mother of Perl??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. Now, on the other hand, if it were Heidi...

    4. Re:Mother of Perl??? by caseydk · · Score: 1


      If a cat can do your job, you better hope that your boss doesn't read /.

    5. Re:Mother of Perl??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet stupid hell! I can buy Larry Wall's wife on ebay?!

      I'm sorry, but that auction is over and I won't put her up for sale again.

    6. Re:Mother of Perl??? by gotem · · Score: 5, Funny

      I assumed it was his cat, actually. Everyone knows the first perl script was written when she walked across the keyboard one time.

      That makes her a script kitty?

    7. Re:Mother of Perl??? by ManoMarks · · Score: 1
      One cat is better than a thousand monkeys.

      At least when it comes to Perl.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  12. earings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not how you spell it??
    shit...

    1. Re:earings! by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

      No... 'Earings are what they 'ave in the 'Ouse of Commons, guv'nor.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:earings! by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      I would have never believed it either, but it's spelled with two Rs. eaRRing. Who would have thunk it?

    3. Re:earings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think they were rings you put in your ears or something.

  13. Isn't this? by andih8u · · Score: 1

    One of the favorite tricks of domain squatters? Register, say, slashfot.org and have it point to a pron site or something. Regardless of how technologically advanced the internet ever gets, it'll still be used by humans, who are great at screwing things up.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:Isn't this? by adochan · · Score: 1

      Only today I accidentally typed http://wwwslashdot.org/ (I know the www is redundant anyway, but I already had it in the address bar and continued typing but missed the period!) and yes, "wwwslashdot.org" is being squatted. Funny stuff.

    2. Re:Isn't this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      heh... I wonder if wwwslashdot.org is happy for all the hits or pissed becuase they got wwwslashdotted... :)

  14. Lower Standards for all! by Lord_Frederick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is the glass half empty? Is the glass half full? No! The glass is simply too big! What ever happened to rewarding those who did things well, as opposed to making sure nobody gets their feelings hurt because they don't do something as well as someone else. I heard that in some schools they're not running spelling bees anymore because it makes the kids that don't win feel too bad.

    1. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why should we reward those who already get satisfaction from being better than the others? They don't need any more ego-stroking. Even without such rewards, these overachievers tend to grow up as self-obsessed and vain individuals who exhibit intolerant behaviour towards those with lesser faculties.

      What we need to do is to help those who are less gifted to develop their talents and most importantly of all their self-esteem. You deserve to get a job, be loved and treated with respect even if you're less than perfect in hard subjects like maths or spelling.

    2. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Dogers · · Score: 0

      thats also the reason theyre apparently giving up sports day here in the UK..

      the whole world is turning all cushy and average.. :(

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    3. Re:Lower Standards for all! by gabec · · Score: 1

      You guys should read the short story 'Harrison Bergeron' by Kurt Vonnegut. (It's in the book 'Welcome to the Monkey House.')

    4. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Blob+Pet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're talking about this, I believe.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    5. Re:Lower Standards for all! by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      That's terrible.

      Spelling bees are where I redeemed myself for sucking at every sport imaginable.

      Of course, now they probably discourage competitions with 'winners' and 'losers' in sports as well.

    6. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Unkle · · Score: 1

      That was quite the interesting premise for a story, making everyone equal by forcing all to the lowest common denominator. However, the way I remember the ending ruined the story for me. I may be wrong (I read it in a High School English class, and didn't pay the most attention because the teacher was just not good), but I remember him flying around the room when he was finally caught, and I remember that I took this to be literal flying, as in the air. Just kinda ruined the story for me.

      --
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
    7. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Xaroth · · Score: 1

      Here it is, for those of you who are into all that internet-based copyright infringement that's all the rave these days.

      Er, I mean, those of you who want to read this story without digging up that book for just one story.

    8. Re:Lower Standards for all! by The+Patient · · Score: 0
      With your first point, I disagree. If this site and other similar sites are any indication, it's the ones who can't figure out the difference between "lose" and "loose" who are the MOST intolerant. The ones who don't need a spellchecker tend to have more (some) self esteem, and don't have to always be in blind attack mode in order to prop themselves up.

      My favorite (yeah, I know. Look it up) proof so far would be the rocket scientist who responded to one of my posts on here with:

      You've been to stupid to manage a linux install before?

      Now, THAT'S comedy.

      With your second point, I agree.

      By the way, if anyone has driving directions to Stupid, I'd appreciate it. I take it there's some Linux guru living there, and I'm still having some trouble with this Slackware stuff ...

    9. Re:Lower Standards for all! by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was "Silly whim." Rush, 2112, right?

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    10. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Golias · · Score: 1
      Buck Henry adapted it to be a low-budget TV movie, too. It's not a bad rental, although the jazz performance that Harrison hypes to wake people up is a total let-down. A pedestrian light-jazz saxophone solo as a means to show how special music can be when individual greatness is encouraged just doesn't quite work, but I suppose they couldn't afford an old clip of Parker or Coltrane.

      Still, the rest of it is a fun show. (Plus, there's that comfy ironic feeling you get from watching a TV show based on a book about the dumbing-down of America instead of reading the book itself.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Lower Standards for all! by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Ahh that article just warms my heart. Its good to see that the 99.9% of humanity that's good for little more than converting food into shit is holding back the 0.1% that drives us forward. Who knows, maybe we'll start regressing. That way we can all be equal in our misery, squalor, and ignorance.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    12. Re:Lower Standards for all! by caseydk · · Score: 1


      No, eventually that 0.1% is going to build their own city in the mountains and escape while everyone else wipes themselves out.

    13. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Yakko · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't try to extrapolate this to the workplace, but...

      That problem has had a solution for ages. I don't think I'm good at something? Fine; I just don't do it. DONE

      What I find infuriating is those people who would force me to compete even after I've told them to get lost, just so they can have someone to "win" against.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    14. Re:Lower Standards for all! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      You deserve to get a job, be loved and treated with respect even if you're less than perfect in hard subjects like maths or spelling.
      Indeed. Toilets don't clean themselves.

      Well, some do. But they were probably invented by someone who could spell and add up.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Speiling DOESN'T matter by Polkyb · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
    1. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

      So this gets back to the people who said that Google does it right. Ebay simply needs to index all words with the same first & last letters when someone searches for it. I ask for plain paper faxes and get porn pleaser fetishes....

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    2. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Tuer. The troehy setats taht nllamroy redaers olny sacn fsrit and lsat letters of erevy wrod. Hevewor a soitutitsbun as slpmie as rnisreveg erevy letter epecxt tsehe mekas vrey dluciffit rnidaeg for the mtirojay.

    3. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by troon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I found that really easy to read except for "theory" - I had to read on and get the context to decipher that one - and "substitition". I also read "expect" instead of "except".

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    4. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this make you smart?

      Or unimaginative? Rather than plodding through with "intelligence", one could have, after deciphering the first few words, deduced the encryption algorithm and `read' the rest.

    5. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by Pope · · Score: 1

      That only works if you know what the original words were to begin with. Quite frankly, the communication skills of many slashdot posters frightens me, when 25 year olds can't even pass simple grade school grammar rules.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    6. Re:Speiling DOESN'T matter by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      It's been well known for decades - if not centuries - that we read words based on first and last letters and ascenders and descenders. Most words have few ascenders and descenders, so it doesn't throw us off too much, but some words do become illegible if too mixed up. In fact, I'd wager iglbilel is one of them.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  17. Re:It works the other way, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you bother reading the article? This is exactly what the article is about. Clearly those that moderated you didn't bother, either.

  18. Worked for me by jjeffers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some years ago I purchased a 36 gigabyte 10,000 RPM Fiber Channel drive very inexpensively on e-bay. Drives like it were selling for two or three hundred dollars and I paid $40 for mine. Why? Because I intially spelled Fiber Channel as fibre channel.

    There were two or three fiber channel products with british spelling and I think I was the only one that even bid on them.

  19. not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides being a bad speller by your own admittance, you also seem to be a bad reader. The whole article is all about what you seem to regard as "the other way". ;)

  20. I just got a great deal by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    You too, can find great deals on Sorny, Magnetbox, JCV, Keenwood. All because the manufacturer didn't spell the name right. (read "knock-offs")
    But seriously, now are we going to have people naming their auctions:
    Brand New Laptop Labtop Latpod Palpot PC!
    ?

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  21. Works for personal websites too by daBass · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend of mine (whose website I host) is terrible. But at least his pictures of the "rockafella center" get him on the first page of Google! :)

  22. Google has ruined my spelling by SpaceRook · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to be a good speller, but I use Google A LOT. And it is so forgiving that my skills have declined. I expect all programs to know what I mean when I type "Jva prgfamminh boolks". I just kinda hit the keys that basically represent the words I want.

    1. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by Walterk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yuoor seerch - Jva prgfamminh boolks - deed nut metch uny ducooments. Um gesh dee bork, bork!
      Nu peges vere-a fuoond cunteeening "prgfamminh".

      Sooggesshuns:

      - Meke-a soore-a ell vurds ere-a spelled currectly. Bork bork bork!
      - Try deefffferent keyvurds. Um gesh dee bork, bork!
      - Try mure-a generel keyvurds. Um gesh dee bork, bork!
      - Try fooer keyvurds. Um gesh dee bork, bork!

    2. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I use Google as a spell checker sometimes. If you put in an unusual spelling, you'll get result;, but the first thing you'll see is "Did you mean:", with the most popular spelling. It's like using the audience poll lifeline in "Who Wants to be a Millionaire"? -- the consensus answer is almost always the correct one. Only moreso, in this case; because it's consensus among speakers that actually defines a language.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by neko9 · · Score: 1

      actually many times i have found needed information by misspelling. if i typed keywords right than nothing useful was found. and thats not only google but on p2p and actually everywhere.

    4. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by jbanana · · Score: 1

      Your search - "Java programming bollocks" - did not match any documents.

    5. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      the consensus answer is almost always the correct one

      Yeah but in some cases the consensus is wrong for example of Email... most people spell it E-Mail... I just tried e-mail in google and I am glad to see that they got that error fixed it gives the suggestion of email now... e-mail I also find it interesting how a lot of people on the web use the two interchangeably.

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
    6. Re:Google has ruined my spelling by johkir · · Score: 1

      When did the Swedish Chef start reading /.

      --
      These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
  23. Re:It works the other way, too by gowen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, the article is about people who leach off eBay, by buying misspelled items and selling them at a profit. I'm a genuine buyer, whose own genuine bad spelling has led me to bargains. Thats not the same.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  24. misspelt searches by dkode · · Score: 0

    On the flip side, It would be really interesting if there was a way that you could obtain how many searches on ebay were performed for misspelt words. I wouldn't be suprised if just as many people search for 'earings' as 'earrings'. therefore, you could possibly get more business on misspelt searches, depending on how close the spelling is to the actual word of course.

    --

    Those who trade in their freedom for security, deserve neither.
  25. no wonder they're losing by plams · · Score: 5, Funny

    unnix licsene for olny $699!!1!

    1. Re:no wonder they're losing by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      I congratulate you on your correct spelling of "losing". Those who can't are real loosers.

    2. Re:no wonder they're losing by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      Those who can't are real loosers.

      Are you saying that they get around the block?

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  26. Re:Shhh! Dear Mr Moron --- RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA!
    Idiot!

  27. hah! by AgentGray · · Score: 1

    My dads been doing this for a couple of years with baseball items. Made a good bundle too, until most of the companies starting mass producing everything that's current.

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
  28. An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by hwsquaredcubed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was looking for a BikeE recumbent bike. There weren't any on Ebay. I tried "Bike-E" with a hyphen. There was an almost brand new demo model listed for $500. (They retailed for about $1200 at the time, I think.) I bought it, didn't even take it out of the box, relisted it with the correct spelling, and sold it for $850 seven days later. (I did have to pay for the bike to be shipped to me, which was about $35, I think.) I have also found that you can buy items that are poorly described and relist them with more thorough descriptions, links to the manufacturer's website, better photos, etc., and they will typically sell for higher than you paid for them.

    1. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did buy an ATI card on eBay, installed it and decide it wouldn't work for what I wanted to do with it, sold it a month later for about $50 more. All I added was a couple better pictures and a spare $5 DVI to VGA dongle that I bought to use it.

      Apart from proper spelling, good photos and a reputation for accurate descriptions, another thing that seems to help is to be willing to ship overseas, especially for the retailer exclusive items that overseas bidders couldn't get. It is a bit of a hassle but I think it helps the prices, and usually I sell to domestic bidders anyway.

    2. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I once bought an ADSL modem for 6UKP (about $10), which is just silly.

      Reason? It had been listed in with non-ADSL modems and without a title of "ADSL". I figure that the people looking for ADSL modems missed it because of category, and people looking for non DSL modems would have clicked it and seen it was ASDL.

      It was just a lucky hit, and I don't deliberately go looking for these things.

    3. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that doing it again this week. An item I bought last week for 320 that had only 7 bids despite being on for 10 days is already at 32 bids and 255 (started at 1) despite only being up for 6 hours simply because I did a better description and stuck it in a Classic Ford section instead of the normal Ford section.

      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    4. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Very true. I bought a stack of HDS ViewStation X terminals at a local DRMO auction and sold a couple on eBay. I wasn't expecting much, because the last one I'd seen sell went for about $15 - but that had no pictures and a single vague paragraph about what it was. I wrote up a whole page about it, took a picture, and sold two of them for over $100 each.

    5. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, eBay seems to discard the hyphen.

      I searched for "i-mac" and all the returns were for an "I Mac". {--(period outside the quotes for textstring identification, exclusive of proper written grammar. Take that, grammar nazis!)

      This being an exception to the boolean trick of using a hyphen (minus sign) preceding a word, which will exclude it from the search.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    6. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [...]another thing that seems to help is to be willing to ship overseas, especially for the retailer exclusive items that overseas bidders couldn't get. It is a bit of a hassle but I think it helps the prices

      Totally! I unloaded a couple of centrifuges on some guy in Libya this way ...
    7. Re:An Extra Hyphen Made me $350 on Ebay by cfuse · · Score: 1
      I have also found that you can buy items that are poorly described and relist them with more thorough descriptions, links to the manufacturer's website, better photos, etc., and they will typically sell for higher than you paid for them.

      Bought HP 19" rack for $1.00

      Sold HP 19" rack for $280.00

      The lesson: buy low, sell high.

  29. Lingo isn't in the dictionary by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When it comes to tech jargon it is not usually in the dictionary.

    Athelon, Athlon, Athalon, or equally correct but alternative spellings P3, Pentium 3 Pentium III...etc.

    I think I will wait a few weeks and do some bargain shoping.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    1. Re:Lingo isn't in the dictionary by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Trade names are not "jargon".

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  30. Spelling by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0

    You've no doubt heard of sounding out words phonetically. Well my friends that is what this article is about, spelling out words phonetically. Although I have to say, that spelling is on the better side of IRC speak. BTW can I ax u sumthing? NE1?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  31. L@@K!!1!! NYT ARTICAL WITHOUT REJESTRATION!!!1! by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those who don't want to sell their organs to read this, visit the link searched for in Google and click on the link to the article. This works in general for NYT articles - Google search for the link, and when you get the "nothing found, would you like to try the link?" page, just click on the link. It's 'cos the NYT uses a Referer check or something.

    This valuable piece of advice given in the spirit of the article - ie with a crappy header that'll ensure only people looking really hard will find it.

    Bidding starts at $5.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:L@@K!!1!! NYT ARTICAL WITHOUT REJESTRATION!!!1! by xoran99 · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone could try to get NYTimes to similarly recognize Slashdot referrals?

      --

      Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

  32. I do it on purpose ... form of keyword spamming by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Since eBay says that adding terms to your auctions, that are unrelated is called; "keyword spamming" - I purposely don't spell some words right in the description so I can get others who may not spell words right. Some terms in the Apple category are often spelled incorrectly.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I do it on purpose ... form of keyword spamming by lobsterGun · · Score: 1
      You aren't alone...

      From the article:

      But some sellers clearly bear in mind the potential for linguistic disasters when preparing their ads. Warren Lieu of Houston, who was selling hunting and fishing knives on eBay recently, covered all the bases. His listing advertised every sort of alphabetic butchery for his knives, including knifes and knive.
    2. Re:I do it on purpose ... form of keyword spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you report a keyword spammer? Tihs one jerk is showing up in my daily mailed searches for some car stuff and he isn't even selling items for the make of car I am searching on, yet he insists in including invisible text with just about every make of car out there. I poked around the ebay complaint section but didn't see anything remotely like a place to complain about keyword spamming.

    3. Re:I do it on purpose ... form of keyword spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ALWAYS give alternate spellings for items as I can fit in the description. If the people posting don't know how to spell, neither can the people listing. I also look for alternate spellings and the number of each to see what spelling an item is most prevalently listed under to get maximum visibility.

      Many people simply assume everyone spells it the same as they do, losing out on bids from the incompetent. Or in the case of this article, the incompetent losing out on bids.

  33. This, my friends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is why Microsoft could make the claim that people would go to mikerowesoft.com and get confused.

    Because people are that fucking stupid.

    1. Re:This, my friends... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why George Bush got "reelected" - they thought they were getting his dad ;).

      --
    2. Re:This, my friends... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      No, they thought they were electing a dead shrub from in front of ther neighbor George's house... :)

    3. Re:This, my friends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem with mikerowesoft.com... all future versions of Windows will incorporate automatic redirect to microsoft.com if the URL sounds like their company name. Long live AI. :)

    4. Re:This, my friends... by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am sorry to say me and my friends are responsible. One of my friends said hey I want pussy. And I said all pussy is covered by bush. So someone came up with the bright idea: hey lets vote Bush.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    5. Re:This, my friends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all pussy is covered by bush. The best isn't.

      And no, I'm not talking pedophilia, you sick cunt.

    6. Re:This, my friends... by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Is it still pedophilia if the girl is dead?

      Thank you T-Shirt Hell

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    7. Re:This, my friends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That . . . shirt is fucking great.

  34. "Plam" pilots are very common, too by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Almost always a good deal in that category.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:"Plam" pilots are very common, too by Benwick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Representing college literature professors in the arts I can safely say I would simply never buy something advertised as a Plam Pilot. What if it really was a Plam Pilot, like maybe some weird knock-off Palm from Vanuatu or something?

      Bad spelling really turns me away from these things... Even though there's no real connection between spelling and intellect, it is very hard to read poorly crafted prose and respect it if it's badly written. Oh well, not lkie abyndoy's pinayg aotitentn...

    2. Re:"Plam" pilots are very common, too by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the Pilot was the original model Palm. Most Palm products today have names like VII.

      It's like calling Ford Taurus "Ford Model-T" because, well, Ford made that at one time, and they're both cars.

      --
      Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  35. Re:It works the other way, too by SkArcher · · Score: 1

    I have done the same (fortunately I searched by the manufacturers name, not the product name) and got some real deals. Worth making multiple searches on different criteria - basically don't be lazy!

    --

    An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
  36. DAMMIT!! by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    Well, so much for my bargain shopping on Ebay!!

    Next they'll have a story about putting items in the wrong category...uhh, never mind.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
    1. Re:DAMMIT!! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I know, why'd they have to go and ruin a good thing? I really should be more careful to insert a few spelling errors into my listings, but the search engine is usually the last way people see my unique stuff.

      There is also an odd phenomenon where a listing for something will sell for $6 one day, and the next it is up to $12 in no time. Then it drops again. Strange stuff.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  37. Stolen by CaptainAx · · Score: 1

    Peeps are too illiterate to spell or know exactly what they are selling. Stolen stuff usually goes a lot cheaper than a legitimately purchased items. Just another angle at why it's cheaper.

  38. Re:Better prices in less sean shops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dyslectic? Is that some kind of scientology thing?

  39. Ruin by SuchiRu · · Score: 1

    As other people have said this is completely obvious, and has been going on for a long time. The only thing that NYT has done is make it hard to do this because more people will be doing this. It's going to be a fad of sorts for a while. *LOOK A MONITeR!*(It's obvious and misspelled! I'll look on Ebay. Hmmm, I hate you NYT...)

  40. Too much pressure over performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't see this so negatively.

    Our hunter-gatherer ancestors would certainly think that our cushy modern societies have made us weak and average. What's wrong with being average anyway?

    Many psychological disorders these days stem from the constant peer pressure to achieve. You've got to be perfect, make no mistakes or show weakness. I don't want my kids to grow up in a world where everything is measured in how well you perform at work, how much money you make, how high your IQ is or how good your DNA is.

    Fuck that.

  41. Re:use a search engine spell checker by marauder404 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They do use a spell checker, but I don't think it's quite as effective or aggressive about matching as a Google's. For example, eBay figures out that you've mis-spelled "compaq" as "compac" but doesn't catch the mis-spelling of "labtop" and recommend the correctly-spelled version. Google finds both of these.

  42. Re:use a search engine spell checker by rylin · · Score: 2, Funny

    That'll be 'surprised' :P

    I know, I know, sorry :(

  43. Women wearing labtops by October_30th · · Score: 2, Funny

    On another note, I wouldn't mind seeing more attractive female lab workers around here wearing snug "labtops"...

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  44. Automatic NY Times log-in by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    Random NYTimes registration engine.

    Warning to /.ers: your going to hav too read the instructions on how too work it good, or it won't. LOL WTF!!!!!!111

    --
    Yeah, right.
  45. We all know... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    that spehling is a lossed art ;P

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  46. Re:It works the other way, too by djhertz · · Score: 0

    Agreeded. Glad I wasn't the only one that thought that.

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
  47. For Sale: by vasqzr · · Score: 1



    For Sale: Dell labtop computer. Very fast. Perfect condition. 3 weeks old. Extended warranty, carrying case, extra battery, Windows XP, Microsoft Office 2003, DVD, 50GB hard drive, 512MB RAM, network card, 15" screen. Spell checker doesn't work.

  48. Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A story on Slashdot about accurate spelling! And referring to eBay no less! Oh, the irony!

    This is the first article about eBay where the editors haven't spelt (yes, "spelt" not "spelled") the company name as "Ebay".

    Somehow, they alway (well, almost always) manage to correctly spell iMac, iPod and iTunes, but eBay, nVidia and ATi often become "Ebay", "Nvidia" and "ATI". It would be nice to think that this article was the start of a trend but I seriously doubt it.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Oh, the irony... by XaXXon · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think I speak for myself when I say..

      sHut uP. pLease.

    2. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for myself when I say..

      Of course you speak for yourself. Who else would you expect to do it if you wouldn't?

      I think the phrase you were probably looking for was "I think I speak for everyone when I say...".

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Oh, the irony... by DomCurtis187 · · Score: 1

      "ATi" is incorrect (PDF - Page 2, near the bottom: "WRITING ATI: At all times ATI should only be written in UPPERCASE letters.") I think I saw a press release from NVIDIA that said NVIDIA was supposed to be in all caps, too. Whatever...

    4. Re:Oh, the irony... by rokzy · · Score: 1

      ATI is spelled ATI. check it out at www.ati.com

      just because the logo looks like ATi doesn't mean it's spelled like that, otherwise Disney would be spelled Disnep

    5. Re:Oh, the irony... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      No, it'd be spelled "Gisnep". :p

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    6. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • This is the first article about eBay where
      • the editors haven't spelt (yes, "spelt" not "spelled") the company name as "Ebay".


      "Spelt"? Wheat you talkin bout, Willis?

      8P

      (Bah, Brits...)
    7. Re:Oh, the irony... by sc00p18 · · Score: 1, Funny

      What's up wIAkywBFATW?

    8. Re:Oh, the irony... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      the editors haven't spelt (yes, "spelt" not "spelled")

      Webster disagrees with you.

      spell
      spelt

      Dictionary.com at least lists it as a past tense of spell, but so is spelled.

      In fact, every dictionary I've checked lists either spelled or both spelled and spelt. It's pretty clear which way the language is moving though. And, unusually, for once it's towards consistency.

    9. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      "Spelt" is the English spelling, "spelled" is the US one. Most of the world uses "spelt" though, so your comment that "it's pretty clear which way the language is moving though" is a bit hopeful.

      (And, for anyone who wants to get into a pissing contest over which is more correct, then I think I'll just remind you that the language is called "English", not "American", so guess which spelling came first?)

      The reason why I added the text in brackets (sorry, that's what these rounded things are called outside the US) is because there's always one smart ass who replies that "spelt" isn't a word when it clearly is so.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    10. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ATI, NVIDIA and 'spelled' are all correct, as replies to your post are collectively trying to tell you. The irony here, in your smugness, is your inability to follow the most fundamental rules of grammar.

      Please offer some reference, however obscure, indicating 'spelt' as the preferred past tense conjugation of spell.

    11. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now lets learn the difference between spelling and grammar and then you can start talking again.

    12. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Please offer some reference, however obscure, indicating 'spelt' as the preferred past tense conjugation of spell.

      Why don't you trust Google or even Dictionary.com?

      And I quote: "spelt: A past tense and a past participle of spell". Satisfied? Want another English lesson?

      I suggest you reread my original post and replies. I never said that "spelled" wasn't correct, only that "spelt" was so: in your smugness, you've incorrectly assumed that the only one of the two is acceptable.

      As I've pointed out elsewhere, they are both correct and the usage in this context depends on where you were educated. I, as someone who's not American, use "spelt" in this context, and I added the text in brackets because I'm fed up of smart asses telling me that I've got it wrong when I most certainly haven't.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    13. Re:Oh, the irony... by pboulang · · Score: 3, Funny
      Obviously adding in your parenthetical expression (which is what the text inside these rounded things is called -- are they referred to as bracket expressions elsewhere? (and they can even be nested for no apparent reason (by the way, that question wasn't rhetorical, I really want to know)) solved the problem of smart-ass replies ;)

      To be perfectly serious, there is a language called American English. Thank Daniel Webster for pushing for a distinct variant in spellings (Two countries separated by a common language and all that). And since this is slashdot, it is very American leaning (see here for the editorial opinion). Thus, your pre-emptive strike regarding which came first is really a moot point. You write for your audience. Do you use polysyllabic words when addressing toddlers?

      While correct, the word spelt just comes across as pretentious. It isn't wrong, but it sounds funny to the ear and is distracting in conversation. Of course, that's just Dennis Miller's opinion, he could be wrong.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    14. Re:Oh, the irony... by gordguide · · Score: 1

      It's called consistency.

      You can use either British or US spelling, as you please. Just don't mix one with the other in the same text (like I'm about to do now; it's OK though, because I'm doing it to illustrate an example).

      So, if I said color is spelled without a U, fine.

      I can also say colour is spelt with a U. Fine again.

    15. Re:Oh, the irony... by evilad · · Score: 1

      Most linguists would suggest that "correct" usage is the most common one. It's a sad state of affairs, but that's why we're not speaking the indo-european root tongue right now. Or grunting like cavemen, for that matter.

    16. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I refuse to tailor my spelling and grammar for anyone who's not paying me for the privilege. When Slashdot starts paying me a wage then I'll start editing my posts to house style (whatever that may be).

      Slashdot is more international that you realise (see, there's another word to get worked up about). In fact, I think it's fair to say that the percentage of its readership that is non-American is growing steadily.

      Of course, I have no proof of this, it's just a casual observation I'm making from the number of people who comment on American/non-American differences (such as TV technical standards) now as opposed to the number who commented on them two, three or even four years ago. Certainly, it would be interesting to see up-to-date traffic logs to see whether or not I'm right.

      And as for "(" and ")", those are called brackets in the rest of the world. (And "[" and "]" are square brackets, whereas "{" and "}" are called parentheses.)

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    17. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This clarification certainly solidifies your stance on the matter, though I feel obligated to point out to you that your original message may have implied that you meant otherwise.

      Your parenthetical (or, if you must, your 'bracketed addendum'), placed and worded as it was, could imply to the casual observer, such as myself and, apparently, several others, that you believed 'spelt' to be the only correct spelling of the past tense of 'spell', and that 'spelled' was not. (In much the same way that a certain English professor of mine often pointed out that the past tense of 'drag' is not nor ever has been 'drug'.) If you intended to indicate the correctness of both words and your preference for the former, you might have made the statement more concise. There all, after all, a plethora of words to choose from, all of which aid in the expression of ideas. Brevity is key, but sacrificing clarity for brevity can lead to further headaches.

    18. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ask again for some reference, however obscure, however British, indicating 'spelt' as the preferred past tense of spell. You assert with some level of vehemence that 'spelt' (yes, 'spelt,' not 'spelled') is correct. You indicate, therefore, that 'spelled' is not correct. Show me this is true; educate me.

      I'll leave the ATI and NVIDIA issues alone and trust that you stand corrected.

    19. Re:Oh, the irony... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Of course you speak for yourself. Who else would you expect to do it if you wouldn't?

      Ah, so you're not married.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    20. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you some kind of idiot?? Capitalization of letters is NOT spelling. And for the record. NVIDIA & ATI are NVIDIA & ATI. Not some stupid hacker writing that you are trying.

    21. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want you to tailor your spelling. We simply don't want you to tell us that 'spelled' is incorrect, which you have clearly implied. I spell realize with a Z, but my spelling is not wrong. Your spelling is not wrong.

      Slashdot's audience does not change the fact that it is a U.S. publication. Posts in different languages are not exactly common, and most of the world speaks languages that are not English. You miss your own point there.

      We do want to correct your grammar, but that creates a challenge too great for this forum.

    22. Re:Oh, the irony... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Here's a good page covering many of the irregular verbs...

    23. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1
      Which bit of the following do you find ambiguous?
      I never said that "spelled" wasn't correct, only that "spelt" was so...
      You've assumed because I asserted that I meant (note "meant", not "meaned") to type "spelt" rather than "spelled" that I was somehow saying that the latter was incorrect.

      I'm clear as to what I wrote and what it meant. What you choose to assume is up to you.
      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    24. Re:Oh, the irony... by peebeejay · · Score: 1

      You and I are on the losing side. We're watching a slow slide from the height (not "heigth") of Western civilization to grunts and scratches on cave walls. That the keepers of the keys to technology should be the leading us on that path is the irony here. P.S.: Try to see it in your heart to accept officially recognized American English spellings. "Spelled" is proper as the participle form, and "color" is perfectly fine here in the colonies. (We think "licence" looks strange). As for all of the incorrectly spelled business names: these companies bring a lot of grief upon themselves with their creative use of capitalization.

    25. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never said that "spelled" wasn't correct

      Earlier...

      yes, "spelt" not "spelled"

      Hm... you must be the master of implying things that you don't really mean. I clearly see "not spelled" here. ...but just so long as you don't assert that "loose" is the opposite of "win," we're all good.

    26. Re:Oh, the irony... by gryphokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you mean Daniel Webster, legendary Whig party U.S. legislator and secretary of state, fictionally renowned in a reversal of the Faustian tale of selling your soul to the devil?

      Or would that be Noah Webster, noted etymologist and namesake of dictionary publisher Merriam Webster?

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    27. Re:Oh, the irony... by pboulang · · Score: 1

      See, I told you my comment wasn't guaranteed.. hell, it wasn't even researched. :)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    28. Re:Oh, the irony... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      A story on Slashdot about accurate spelling!

      You don't think you're really going to peak the interest of semi-literate /. readers with your snide, elitist rant, do you? How rediculous! How ludicrist! You'll definitely loose karma for this!

      (Hint to the ignoranti: it's pique, ridiculous, ludicrous, and lose. And contrary to the parent, the trailing comma comes inside the quotes in English and outside the quotes in C.)

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    29. Re:Oh, the irony... by grouse · · Score: 1
      Slashdot is more international that you realise (see, there's another word to get worked up about).
      Is the other word to get worked up about your use of the word "that?" In most of the world, that use is spelled "than" and "that" has an entirely different meaning. Where are you from anyway?
      "{" and "}" are called parentheses.
      Just so no one actually believes this (Blatant troll? Or just ignorance?), I should point out that the Oxford English Dictionary, that paragon of non-American usage, only refers to "(" and ")" as parentheses.

      -- grouse, in England

    30. Re:Oh, the irony... by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I have to agree with WIAKywbfatw, he never said that 'spelled' was incorrect. People simply made a logical error thinking that.

      It's like if I said:

      "WIAKywbfatw is a fuckhole (yes, fuckhole, not asshole)"

      I'm not saying the word 'asshole' is incorrect, nor am I even saying WIAKywbfatw is not an asshole, I'm simply clarifying that, in this case, I'm choosing the word 'fuckhole' to describe him, and not the word 'asshole'.

      HAND

    31. Re:Oh, the irony... by pboulang · · Score: 1
      But the text in between still called a parenthetical expression?

      No need for you to tailor your spelling and grammar. For gods sakes, you already have good editorial skills evident from your lack of typos. . . My position isn't that the site isn't international, just that it uses American English and American topics as policy, etc. If you started using French/Italian/Japanese on this site, it would be an issue... the whole paradigm of what is slashdot will break down. Plus, you'd get a lot of flak.

      If you say you walked up to someone late at night and put a torch in their face, expect there to be some confusion as to whether there were burnt eyebrows (holy crap, now I have to think about whether to use burnt or burned... DAMN YOU! -- and you see which I chose), especially when you have an international audience. If you use the word spelt just use it. By remarking that it is correct usage (and implying it is more correct by doing that) you are inviting comments. Know your audience :)

      I seriously have no idea what the hell this topic is about... this conversation is tons more interesting.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    32. Re:Oh, the irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Please, realise that the OED is not canon. Look up "parentheses definition" with Google, etc and you'll find that "{" and "}" are indeed parentheses to non-Americans. (Or curly brackets if you want to be less formal.)

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    33. Re:Oh, the irony... by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      "I have no respect for a man who can't think of at least six ways to spell a word."

      --A. Jackson

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    34. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no respect for a boy who can't think of at least six ways to be penetrated."

      --M.Jackson

    35. Re:Oh, the irony... by slandis · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Interesting, since I found very few references to non-American parentheses. In fact, here's a link that kind of states otherwise (granted, it's only one link, and it's in the UK).


      They're called parentheses, or round brackets. I think you'll find that it's possible "{" and "}" can be used in place of "(" and ")", but they don't appear to be referred to as the same thing.


      I could be wrong, but that's what my limited research tells me.

      --
      BAM!
    36. Re:Oh, the irony... by slandis · · Score: 1

      Just another link to qualify my statement about "{"and "}" being used as an alternative (with "[" and "]" as well) from Australia.


      Punctuation - Writing - Study Skills

      --
      BAM!
    37. Re:Oh, the irony... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you when you complain about the horrible spelling of the editors here, but not with the examples you cite. The iFamily follows a pattern and has some sort of justification for the weird capitalization scheme. i for interactive* + some other word. Annoying but understandable.

      Now eBay is what? An electronic bay? No it isn't. It's a nonsense word like Google or Verizon, and I spell it Ebay for that reason. Do you Yahoo!, or do you leave off the exclamation point like most people?

      * - or maybe i stands for something else. I don't recall.

    38. Re:Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks I'll stick with my Canadian English spelling, eh? It's my favourite after all.

      (There is more to language then AMERICANS and BRITISH you insensitive clod!)

      -=DR=-

    39. Re:Oh, the irony... by grouse · · Score: 1

      Please, realise that your unfounded statements about usage are not canon. ;-)

      Here in the UK, "(" and ")" are parentheses. I'm not going to discuss this further. If you want to call "{" an left-facing aardvark that's fine with me, but don't claim that it is common usage outside the U.S. without any evidence.

    40. Re:Oh, the irony... by gordguide · · Score: 1

      You are using British spelling, just like they do in Hong Kong, Australia, Jamaica and every other Commonwealth Country.

      In Canadian colleges, you can uses either for an essay. But mix one with the other, and your Prof will dock you marks for spelling/punctuation.

  49. what matters by Jonny · · Score: 1, Funny
    From the article:
    "On something like eBay though," she said, "it matters.'
    On something like The New York Times matching quotation marks don't matter.
  50. What a role model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    What a role model you must be.

    "It's ok to be a slob on the dole..."

    1. Re:What a role model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thinking in black/white, on/off, just like a true geek! Comforting in a way, but generally false. This may surprise you, but it is possible to not be an overachiever OR an underachiever! There isn't some magical place in life that causes you to switch from one to the other.

      Try to remember that in nearly every non-computer situation there are many, MANY shades of gray.

  51. (DNA sample and clean boxers required) by jdcook · · Score: 0, Funny

    So which is it?

    --
    Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    1. Re:(DNA sample and clean boxers required) by sdcharle · · Score: 0

      Your sig is comedy gold!

    2. Re:(DNA sample and clean boxers required) by jdcook · · Score: 1
      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
  52. Re:use a search engine spell checker by platypussrex · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know this is slashdot, but if you RTFA you will see the following quote:

    Jim Griffith, whose official title at eBay is dean of eBay education, teaches 40 to 50 seminars a year around the country. Although eBay points out common misspellings, he said that the most common question he gets is, "When will e-Bay get a spell checker?"

    His answer? "You go to a store called a bookstore, and you buy something called a dictionary."

  53. *blink* by Daniel · · Score: 5, Funny

    experts say the Internet -- with its discussion boards, blogs and self-published articles -- is a treasure trove of bad spelling.

    They had to ask experts?

    Daniel

    --
    Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    1. Re:*blink* by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      "daer potentioal csutomer,

      eye am written dis leter form on behalve of teh assoseeashone of pore speling consoletants.

      we wood liek two ofer yuo a profeshonal stduy fo teh intrawebs.

      I thnik owl reputashone preseeds us.

      yors seenserly..."

    2. Re:*blink* by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      The same group of experts are due to publish a report suggesting the Internet may also be a treasure trove of porn.

    3. Re:*blink* by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      How exactly does one become an expert on internet content?Ship an application pack this way please.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    4. Re:*blink* by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      How exactly does one become an expert on internet content?Ship an application pack this way please.

      You dont need an application, just surf more than 100 porn sites and youre a certified expert.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    5. Re:*blink* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      un-named experts are the bad journalism equivalent of "evidense" and "proff".

  54. Pot to Kettle: You are black by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Making money off of mispellings? Slashdot's been doing it for years!

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Pot to Kettle: You are black by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my kettle is silver, thank you very much.

  55. "Earings" by mdw162 · · Score: 1
    ...bid on your 'labtop computers,' 'camras,' and 'earings.'

    Not to be confused with earrings, ornaments for your ear, I can see how someone might be selling "earings" on Ebay:

    earing : n. Nautical. A short line attaching an upper corner of a sail to the yard.

  56. Could it affect this item? by AndroidCat · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    A Canadian teenager who surrendered his website to Microsoft in a row over copyright is selling a legal document they sent him, on eBay.
    Except he's probably got the papers from Microsoft under the spelling of "mikerowesoft". Go figure! (Follow the LOTD in my sig.)
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  57. Sounds like by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should start using a phonetically based search engine at e-bay.

  58. Is this some kind of troll?? by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    >which I guess that term isn't right if you are from Northern Ireland

    >Brittish are acknowledging this month that they are a part of Europe, right?

    I'm not even going to bother correcting these...

    .

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    1. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The term "British" isn't inclusive of Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland isn't part of Britain, but part of the UK. That's not some kind of crazy republican (as in Irish Republican) propaganda but the simple honest truth known to all who have ever stopped to read the words "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" in their passport.

      I didn't know that we were supposed to be acknowledging that we are part of Europe this month, though.

    2. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by jbert · · Score: 0

      Geography and politics here.

      There is a geographical entity known as the British Isles, consisting of a large island called Britain, a slightly smaller island called Ireland and a number of significantly smaller islands (Isle of Man, Isle of Wight, etc).

      Geographically, one might call an inhabitant of Britain a Briton (or British person) and an inhabitant of Ireland an Irish person (don't know of an equivalent noun).

      The reason this is sensitive is that the political arrangements do not follow geographical lines and I'm not going to touch the topic of whether they should or not.

      I suppose one might be able to call both of these inhabitants British (due to their living in the British Isles) but that seems overly antagonistic to those living in the country of Eire (a country which covers the majority of the geographical entity of Ireland) and certainly doesn't follow common usage.

      Politically, I think people use "British" as a nationality to identify with "being a citizen of the UK" and "Irish" to identify "being a citizen of Eire".

      I might imagine (but would not wish to presume) that an inhabitant of Northen Island (a region of the UK which lies in the island of Ireland) might describe themselves as both British (nationally) and Irish (geographically).

      I think there is a lot of confusion on these issues, and I welcome corrections and clarify on this terminology.

      As to being in Europe, I think it depends on the rotating European presidency. Whilst Berlusconi is EU president I think we're not :-)

    3. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      As it was explained to me once, the geographic region of Britain is made up of Great Britain, Britannia Minor (Ireland), the smaller islands and the region in north France called Brittany.
      If this is correct (and I make no claims to accuracy) then people from all of Ireland and even northern France could claim the term British for themselves.

    4. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoever "explained" that to you was obviously a beardy loon, and either:

      1. one of those people who want to declare Essex an Aryan enclave.
      2. a schitzophrenic who thought he was King Arthur.
      3. Trolling.

      Point two reminds me of a time about a year ago when this black guy got on the bus dressed in a blanket and announced to everybody that he was Braveheart, and was engaged in a centuries-long struggle against the English, which none of us would understand, because we were too young.

    5. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

      Geographically, one might call an inhabitant of Britain a Briton (or British person) and an inhabitant of Ireland an Irish person (don't know of an equivalent noun).

      An Irishman.

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    6. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish Ireland is part of the British Isles, and it would not be technically incorrect to refer to anyone coming from the British Isles as British. In fact till 80 years ago it would have been perfectly acceptable to call an Irish man British, just as it is acceptable to call a Welsh , Scottish or even English man British today.



      That Ireland is now politicaly seperate from the rest of the United Kingdom and that they prefer it if you don't describe them as British, and indeed it does help avoid confusion does not mean that to do so is factually wrong to do so.



      It should be born in mind that the term British Isles and British (aka Briton) was coined by the Romans and at that time specifically included the Irish.

    7. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      As someone form Northern Ireland I can confidently tell you that my nationality is British. Though I could claim an Irish passport if I so desired, because my grandfather was born before 1921. Although Northern Ireland is not part of Great Britain, it is part of the UK, which means its citizens are British by default.

      To avoid confusion though, I often call myself Northern Irish, as do quite a few people from back home.

    8. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by jbert · · Score: 1

      I think we are in agreement. Your nationality (a political concept) is British.

      But as an inhabitant of the geographical region of the island of Britain, I am a Briton/British person. This happens to be the same as my nationality, but it needn't be. I am also geographically an English person. Its a multiple-value thing. Ditto I am a European person (I guess both geographically and politically).

      My point of interest is whether *geographically* inhabitants of Northern Ireland might consider themselves as Irish people. I thought they might, but also (quiet reasonably) the question is so charged with political overtones that some might not want to do so.

      (Its quite similar to the way Canadians and inhabitants of the USA are both North Americans. A person born in Canada is Canadian by nationality, and is geographically also a Canadian, a North American and I guess a Western Hemi-spherian).

      I'm beating this horse to death because there is huge overlap (and hence misunderstanding) regarding these two terminologies, and I'm interested in people communicating effectively (especially when they are disagreeing/discussing things). I'm also interested to get a larger sample of N. Irish people to answer this particular question :-)

      Your way of avoiding confusion seems very pragmatic...

    9. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see what you're getting at. When you're talking about geographic identity, I think you have to define the scale you're looking at. On the question of Irish/British though, I would say that British would only apply on a scale that is rather unhelpful, being slightly larger than national, but smaller that anything else. I would therefore call myself Irish geographically, British by nationality and Northern Irish as an all-encompassing safe identity.

    10. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Yes, Ireland is part of the British Isles, but some of the people living in the British Isles are not British, just as some of the people living in the continent of North America are not American but Canadian.
      "The British Isles" is a geographic term referring to a group of islands that happen to be named after the largest nation on them. "British" is a political term used to describe that which is part of the country of Great Britain, which is comprised of England, Scotland, and Wales, and together with Northern Ireland makes up the United Kingdom.
      The Republic of Ireland is not part of Britain, nor is it part of the UK. Northern Ireland, as part of the island of Ireland, is part of the British Isles, but it is not part of Britain, although it is part of the UK.
      And yes, eighty years ago it would have been correct to refer to an Irishman as British, just as sixty years ago it would have been correct to refer to an Indian as an Imperial subject, but it's not true now.
      I don't know where places such as Gibraltar or the Falkland Islands fit in, though. Or places such as Canada and Australia, which are independent nations sharing the same monarch.

    11. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by samhalliday · · Score: 1
      well since the island called Ireland is not connected to the island called "Great Britain", does that clarify anything for you?

      if you are born in Northern Ireland, you are British and Irish dual nationality. most are too stupid to realise the benefits this can bring them (e.g. 2 visas in a lifetime, entry through countries at war with the UK) and reject one.

      however, as to your original point: no Northern Ireland is not part of "Britain" (the shortened form of "Great Britain" the island), but yes it is under British rule, and yes it is part of the United Kingdom. The Republic of Ireland (the country) still _claims_ sovereignty, and thats why you are entitled to an Irish passport.

      To me, its a perfect deal!

    12. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... I think the people of Brittany would strongly disagree with that. But then again they are called 'bretons' (at least in French) which is pretty close. Could they be called 'british' in English?

    13. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      It has been suggested that we call the whole lot IONA (Islands of the North Atlantic) as a non-offensive alternative. Although no-one has asked the Icelandic folk what they think about being lumped in with us.

      I have to disagree about Berlusconi though - anyone who can wind up the Germans is ok with me!

    14. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

      > just as some of the people living in the continent of North America are not American but Canadian.

      Hate to break it to ya, but Mexico is part of North America as well.

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
    15. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you don't call them an "Iron"?

    16. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by n3k5 · · Score: 1
      Hate to break it to ya, but Mexico is part of North America as well.
      The parent poster you replied to never said anything to the contrary. He did not claim that all people living on the North American continent that are not (US) 'American' were Canadian, Patrick13. 13 ... is this your age?
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    17. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      The Republic of Ireland (the country) still _claims_ sovereignty,

      No they don't. There was a constitutional amendment in 1998 that disclaimed sovereignty of the six counties of Northern Ireland. This was part of the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement.

      and thats why you are entitled to an Irish passport.

      I've never heard that before, though you may be right.

    18. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by samhalliday · · Score: 1
      its a kind of "unoffical claim"... thats why i used _marks_ around claim. officially you can get an irish passport if your grandparents were born before ~1921 in northern ireland (can't remember date, im not a historian), but you will pretty much get one if you are from northern ireland and apply.

      rumour has it that using the irish name of your place of birth helps, and don't go doing something stupid like getting a protestant minister to sign the back of your passport photo :-/, but thats probably all just folklore... i don't know anyone who has been rejected.

    19. Re:Is this some kind of troll?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... one might call an inhabitant of Britain a Briton (or British person) and an inhabitant of Ireland an Irish person (don't know of an equivalent noun).

      I do:

      • Mick.
      • Paddy.
      • Taig.
      • Bogtrotter.
  59. "labtop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This couldn't be more true. My friend consistently (even after me bitching at him for it) types "laptop" as "labtop". NOTHING is more annoying. How hard is it to spell? Come on, people!

  60. Yep by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    The classic example is whitehouse.gov, versus whitehouse.com (links intentionally left out, find yer own pr0n)

    The former is the official US govt. website, the latter is a porn site.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not technically a squatting since there is a magazine called whitehouse that(ASFAIK) pre-dates the web.

    2. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think whitehouse.com is a squatter as such...Whitehouse magazine has been going since at least some time in the 1970s. Here in the UK we had a woman named Mary Whitehouse who made a lot of noise about all the Filth and Smut in the media. Someone founded a porno magazine, and since it needed a name, they named it after her, just to piss her off. I didn't know they were still going. I bet they had a website before the White House did!

  61. Real Life Example! by barryfandango · · Score: 1

    Case in point: a copy of the Mohawks' "The Champ" - a famous funk record that has been heavily sampled by many greats (including the organ from "let your backbone slide.) A mint condition white (promo) label pressing, neighborhood $450-$500, was had by me for $47 because the auction title read "Mohewks." Sweet!

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  62. Obligatory Simpson's Quote by servognome · · Score: 5, Funny


    Homer: "Look at these low, low prices on famous brand name electronics!"
    Bart: "Don't be a sap, Dad. These are just crappy knock-offs."
    Homer: "I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see it. And look, there's Magnetbox, and Sorny!"

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      That's Simpsons, not Simpson's. Never use an apostrophe to make a plural.

      Heh. I can finally say something like that and (probably) not get modded OT!

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    2. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by dr_labrat · · Score: 1

      Never? That's not entirely true:

      http://www1.umn.edu/urelate/style/spelling.html

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    3. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but I shit you not, when I went to Moscow the radio in my room was a Penasonic.

    4. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      While I was in Europe I had a Tobishi radio... "Not quite a Toshiba, almost a Mitsubishi, TOBISHI!"

    5. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by Osty · · Score: 1

      Bob the Angry Flower disagrees.


      For what it's worth, your article only has one exception for the case of abbreviations with periods and lowercase letters where the non-apostrophed 's' would be confusing (I believe the use of apostrophes on upercase letters is incorrect and more confusing). That's a very small corner case, and just goes to show that there is an exception to every rule. That doesn't make the rule wrong, though.

  63. Clod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My lab was hit by a tornado. It needs a new top. Do you think that they would have on for cheap on ebay?

  64. hehe by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Here's a current auction for a Tandum Recumbant. BikeE, but it never says that. If it didn't have a starting bid of $1000, I'd go for it.

  65. Re:use a search engine spell checker by mirko · · Score: 3, Funny

    His answer? "You go to a store called a bookstore, and you buy something called a dictionary."

    Why ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  66. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can make ANY NYTIMES.COM link reg free.... but do editors bother with this.....?

    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1. What's the point when we have a reg-free link.
      2. I'm sure OSDN doesn't want to sponsor crap-flooding of other online businesses' registration data (who may or may not be partners). It looks unprofessional too.

  67. Yet more irony... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Making money off of mispellings? Slashdot's been doing it for years!

    Look before you leap. (Ie, use the preview function.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  68. To the writer of this story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aslong you understand what I want to say, even if I dont spell correctly, I dont see why you would throw my text away, and yell at me.. Saying that you didnt understand it, just cause it was so badly spelled. If this was the case, yes then you could yell about it.. but 99.5% of the cases, people that do, understands perfectly what the writer meant... And they are just showing off some "Im smarter then you".. I say, Im good at logic, Im not good at spelling. If that disturbs you so much, maybe I should stop trying to explain things I take for granted (thinking logically) and only include the stuff I think important, in my messages to you.. Only they I guess you come back and yell at me, cause you cant understand what Im talking about.

    If people cant sell there stuff cause they spelled it wrong on EBay thats there problem I would say.. how can you get pissedoff about this?

  69. Illiteracy on the internet by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember back in the early days of the web, when it was just becoming popular, that John Dvorak hailed it as the coming of true mass literacy. His belief was that with so many average every day citizens posting web pages, surely this would lead to increased literacy.

    It couldn't have been a year later that he retracted that prediction and instead said that the web has proven just how illiterate Americans (and I presume others) are.

    Anyway, just thought I'd toss in my little anecdote.

    1. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      I concur. It is absolutely horrific.

      Okay, English isn't my first language, and I've never quite learned all the punctuation rules, so I pretty much stick with Danish punctuation (hence, all, the, commas,.!) :-)

      However, I'm very good at Danish and I can't really discribe the pain and suffering I go through every time I read a Danish site. I think it's a general thing, no matter what language we're talking about.

      And it's horrific.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, you mean Dvorak was RIGHT about something? God help us all.

    3. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by CanSpice · · Score: 1

      Not being able to spell does not mean that you're not able to read.

    4. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being able to spell does not mean that you're not able to read.

      Maybe not, but not being able to spell means that you hardly ever read, and thus leads to illiterate writing.

      If you read often, you pick up little rules like context, and which words are appropriate in which situations. Properly written books and articles don't confuse "their" and "there", for example.

    5. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by jimbalya · · Score: 1

      Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe

    6. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up, it is so true! I had no trouble understanding him.

      Can you tell us where to find this research?

    7. Re:Illiteracy on the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dvorak was right, provided you don't assume that 'literacy' means perfect spelling and grammar. I think, largely due to the internet, that 'loose' will become an accepted alternative spelling of 'lose', for example. Who knows, perhaps one day the dictionary will list the 'lose' spelling as 'archaic'. So, yes, internet == greater literacy, but internet != preservation of prescribed grammar and spelling. In fact, the only thing guaranteed is change.

  70. Bad Spelling Does Pay... Me by SmileeTiger · · Score: 1

    I have always noticed the bad spelling of item names on ebay so whenever I am searching for a common item like say a Network Card I will often search for things like "NIK" and come up with hits.

    A couple of years ago I got 5 IBM "NIK Cards' for $2 on ebay. I wonder if the person selling the items was curious why no one else bid on the items.

  71. Re:It works the other way, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You gotta watch those typos, knowing how much fraud is on Ebay. I declined to bid on a low priced laptop because the S&H was $1500, not $15.00, and I didn't hear back from the seller until after the auction closed. No way I was going to take that chance. Too bad, because the final price was good (maybe others also declined to bid),

  72. Watch your Malk by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    But what if you really do get a PlamPilot in the mail?

    1. Re:Watch your Malk by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      Plam pilots just another rip off on Ebay...just what we need, right?

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
  73. feedback loop by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Before the Internet came along, poor spelling by the public was by and large not exposed,"

    Just as importantly, it wasn't reinforced. Kind of like the lady who felt reassured by seeing "chandaleer" on hundreds of web sites, people whose reading consists primarily of web pages, e-mail, and chat (rather than books vetted by proofreaders) are learning to spell incorrectly. It's like the blind leading the blind. I've got nothing against spelling changes in principle; language is going to evolve. But this seems more like a case of language forking, almost geometrically.

    Ironically, the internet seems to be taking us back a few centuries, to the days before English spellings were standardized by the likes of Webster and other lexicographers. Which was fine back when all parsing of text was done by humans, who could easily figure out that "Thomas Smith" and "Tomas Smythe" were the same person. But as this article points out, it can be a problem when more literal computers are concerned.

    1. Re:feedback loop by Uttles · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? If anything, the internet is making the general public spell better. Hell, all you have to do with a word you're unsure of is type in in google, and they'll find the correct spelling for you.

      --

      ~ now you know
    2. Re:feedback loop by haystor · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Slashdot crowd is guilty of this as well:

      definately
      rediculouse
      wierd
      there instead of their
      loose instead of lose

      All of these come up on Slashdot alot.

      --
      t
    3. Re:feedback loop by theNAM666 · · Score: 1
      Ironically, the internet seems to be taking us back a few centuries, to the days before English spellings were standardized by the likes of Webster and other lexicographers.

      Two centuries for English as taught to 10% of the population in prep schools. The irony and pretension of the article is its assumption of 'correct' spelling: if you read the diaries of Lewis and Clark, much less Luther's bible, you'll quickly see that the idea of 'correct' spelling is a quite new one; before the Websters here and the Brothers Grimm in Germany decided to make a "standardized" dictionary, and before a government commission in each country decided to enforce what was in that dictionary, spellings were quite variate and diverse. And no one had the academic snobbishness to say one was particularly better than the other: the written word followed the spoken, as best it could.

      Such variation existed openly until the mid-20th century in most of the world, and still does in many areas (such as Flanders) and regions (such as parts of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland), not to mention in non-codified languages (such as Swiss Romand). To hear people speak such a language is to return to the days when language matched experience and creativity, and to places where our very words were not shoved down our throats by the boot of government decree. The "King's English," after all, is only a matter of geography away from the Reichschancellor's Deutsch.

      I personally would prefer if our children filled their brains with mathematical formulae and natural relationships, than the minutae and minuta of proper spelling. Unless they are intent on becoming botanists, of course.

    4. Re:feedback loop by Burlynerd · · Score: 1

      Re: "If anything, the internet is making the general public spell better. ...all you have to do with a word you're unsure of is type in in google, and they'll find the correct spelling for you.

      The problem is that almost nobody does that. Even many people who have spell checkers do not use them. Prior to the Internet, I had never seen the pseudo-word "definately". Now I see it many times in a single day.

      The Internet is definitely teaching bad spelling.

    5. Re:feedback loop by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1

      Offering a free spelling-suggestion service on a search engine doesn't "make people spell better". At best it's a nice aid for those who want to use it, but it doesn't change the fact that people with poor spelling are flooding the net with misspelled web pages, e-mail messages, and chats. Type "dictionery" into Google and it'll suggest "dictionary", but it'll also get you thousands of hits.

    6. Re:feedback loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in the US, no government body dictates spelling or language issues.

    7. Re:feedback loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should be "a lot" not "alot"...

    8. Re:feedback loop by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1
      I guess you missed the key point of the article: that irregular spelling genuinely hinders the usefulness of services that rely on text searching. The idea of "correct" spellings wouldn't have been accepted by the public if they didn't find some value in it. The ability to search eBay for a "watch" and find all the watches is one such example.

      P.S. The bit about how people whose languages don't have standardised spellings, speak with creativity, blah, blah? Now that's pretentious.

    9. Re:feedback loop by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      The hobbyist/hobbiest thing drives me insane. Likewise with the word "lobbyist".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:feedback loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that anyone who posts a mis-spelling on /. should be flamed?

      Oh baby! throw another log on the fire!

    11. Re:feedback loop by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      all you have to do with a word you're unsure of is type in in google, and they'll find the correct spelling for you.

      I typed "French military victories" in google, and got this "French military defeats"

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    12. Re:feedback loop by key45 · · Score: 1

      ...Kind of like the lady who felt reassured by seeing "chandaleer" on hundreds of web sites,

      The thing that confuses me is:
      If she's gonna use the internet to check her spelling, why did she use Ask Jeeves instead of the Dictionary ?

      Oh, nevermind- Dictionary.com would have suggested she call it a "chandler"...

    13. Re:feedback loop by raile · · Score: 1

      I share the same pet peeves; my latest pet peeve is the use of apostrophe's on words that aren't posessive. I see these thing's all over the place.

    14. Re:feedback loop by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 0

      Sadly, over the last couple of years, my own language has also (officialy, as in , by the dictionary) changed.
      Whereas before people had to _learn_ certain words, and how to spell them : My country somehow made the some words resemble their phonetics. :/
      Btw, I am from the Netherlands, and one example which terrible example is 'Champagne' (as in, the alcoholic liquid) : It's not 'allowed' to spell it as 'Sjampanje' : our dutch phonetics gone to text.
      Could name a few more very ridicilous ones, but they wouldn't make much sense ;)

    15. Re:feedback loop by djneko · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say, thank you for knowning how to spell lose. That's annoyed me since back in the BBS days.

      On the other hand, when they mistakenly call the goatse guy a "looser," they may be on to something. :D

      --
      `/\/\
      (^.^)
      (")(")
      not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
    16. Re:feedback loop by theNAM666 · · Score: 1
      I guess you missed the key point of the article: that irregular spelling genuinely hinders the usefulness of services that rely on text searching.

      I would hardly call that a "point," except in the language of ignorance. Anyone who has gone through a top-100 comp sci program in the last 25 years knows how to implement one of 10 root-based algorythms that would catch such variations; rule-based systems can easily accomodate your Smith/Smythe example, if tree/root won't (in fact it will, as i=y and e drops). The fact that eBay is now run by a bunch of MBAs who can't get a decent search tool is not "useful."

      The idea of "correct" spellings wouldn't have been accepted by the public if they didn't find some value in it.

      Public? You think the public has anything to do with this, except to have them shoved down their throats, so to speak?

      I once had a friend who had the rather unique displeasure of interviewing for a junior position in the English Department of Harvard University. During this drawn-out process, one of the rituals is to sit at dinner, served by women of the lower classes of Boston, making fun of their accents and "errors of language."

      That is pretension. Unfortunately, it is also such menwho largely set so-called language standards. To respond to the anonymous poster, while the US does not have a ministry of language, it does have a Modern Language Association, largely publically funded, and a system of public institutions and "public" (it would be called "private" in England, for good reason) education that enforces such standards; some of us went to 'grammar school' in the days when 'mis-spelling' was "corrected" with a good twack of the ruler.

      The bit about how people whose languages don't have standardised spellings, speak with creativity, blah, blah? Now that's pretentious.

      Pretentious, root, pretend.

      I would refer you to George Orwell's excellent "Politics and the English Language," and suggest, perhaps, a short trip to a city such as Ghent or Bratislava.

    17. Re:feedback loop by Riktov · · Score: 1

      It's not so much an issue of 'correctness' as an absolute measure, as much as plain practicality and utility through standardization. As human culture grew in the past few centuries to depend more and more on the technology of printing, there arose more value in standardizing culture to become more efficiently expressed by technology. Spelling became more important because writing did.

      Is there any utility at all in bad spelling, other than laziness? With, for example, computer protocols, violating the standards is commonly done because it ostensibly provides a technical advantage, but does bad spelling give you any advantage? Why would you want to be understood less clearly?

      And no one had the academic snobbishness to say one was particularly better than the other: the written word followed the spoken, as best it could.

      That was then, this is now. The written word now stands on its own. How do you get more information on your average day, the spoken word or the printed one? The modern technological society is not transmitted by oral history any more, it relies on the written word.

    18. Re:feedback loop by Xconnect · · Score: 0

      Is this what one would call the /. effect on E-bay? :->

      --
      --- root@127.0.0.1
    19. Re:feedback loop by saskboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On eBay, a "feedback loop", is known as Bid shilling.

      "Bid on my items, and I'll bid on your's" kinda thing. The last Power Seller of the Month was caught doing this by people on eBay's discussion boards. eBay had to remove his distinction, but they've yet to suspend him last I checked. One of his IDs has 'Blackmarket' in the word.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  74. NVIDIA is written in all caps by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1





    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  75. Why the fasinatoin with pron sites? by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1, Funny

    Granted, prons are a delicoius, suculent seafod taht many enjoy. But really, they get way too much attentoin here on wwwslashdot.org, and I, for one, just don't understnd why we...

    (one moment, someone is trying to tell me...)
    (Really? You're sure about that?)

    Never mind.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  76. Re:use a search engine spell checker by erpbridge · · Score: 2, Funny

    You sure you don't mean this link?

  77. THANKS by oZZoZZ · · Score: 1

    thanks a lot!!! this is how I used to get free stuff, and now the world knows... there goes my ebay scam =(

  78. It works for domain names by BuilderBob · · Score: 1

    How is this different to domain name 'squatters ' (loost term) using a domain name similar to a more popular website. Or advertising free porn to get email addresses in spam...

    This is usually done by somebody in a related field, but not always. And is usually to the detriment of the more popular website

    On eBay, this is used in the same way as putting random phone models after your Nokia phone so that it comes up in a search. Or the stupid people who want to sell you an ebook on how to get an XBOX for 2 dollars P&P.

    It only serves to dilute the usefulness of any search engine when this happens. Trying to search on google for just about any item that Amazon might sell, you'll get leeches for the first few pages trying to earn referral fees. The same is becoming true for just about any commercial item ,try "Hotel in Paris" (or any city) and watch the middle men flood the results.

    BB

    1. Re:It works for domain names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...and watch the middle men flood the results.

      More like middle finger.

    2. Re:It works for domain names by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the article is about people who do not mean to do it and hence get screwed because they get very few bids. I'm sure that on average, labtops receive fewer bids than laptops.

      Yes, people really are that clueless.

  79. another great example by barryfandango · · Score: 1

    Here's a great item, a set of olympic dimonds from the 1953 olympics in... Hungery.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:another great example by fgb · · Score: 0

      That reminds me. I was in NY recently and saw the same misspelling of diamonds (dimonds) on the window of a jewelry store!

    2. Re:another great example by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 1

      That reminds me. I was in NY recently and saw the same misspelling of diamonds (dimonds) on the window of a jewelry store!


      ITYM "jewlery."

      Just kidding.

      -W

      --
      All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
  80. Bad spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never know... someone might be selling a PS/2 games console?
    People selling copies of "MS Windwos", or a "Sun Spark".

    People may even be making advantage from homonyms, or suttle things like a picture of a diamond-encrusted Rolex. USB or USA?

    Well....

  81. Do you trust people who cant spell correctly? by clusterix · · Score: 1
    I have seen people intentionally place bogus ads like this. The ones that sell 'information' on how to get something cool/popular cheap. They are placed to look like they are an accidental good deal.

    I am always suspicious when prices are to good to be true. Some chump will ALWAYS put a bid on something they are interested in 6 days before the end. If there isn't an initial bid, are you falling for something those idiots didn't?

    On a personal note, I bought a 16x4 Rose KVM for $50 because it was mislabelled(It was marked as the chasis model only and mispelled, but pictures showed it complete so I gambled). Not all the ports work(2 bad), but 16x4!!! That is a $4K piece of equipment that I could never afford but actually needed.

    Some of those liquidation lot purchasers are great when they screw up like this.

  82. Konqueror to the Rescue! by sultanoslack · · Score: 1

    Konqueror in the upcoming KDE 3.2 has spell checking and highlighting in text forms.

  83. Lary Bird by starphish · · Score: 1

    You can find good deals by looking up misspellings. I bought a Sport Magazine Larry Birds that Larry Bird was on the cover of from his rookie year. It cost me $10.00. I imagine it would have gone for more if the seller didn't spell Larry Bird's name "Lary Bird".

    --
    Yeah, yeah, yeah. The story is a dupe, the topic is boring, the facts weren't checked. WE GET IT!!
  84. Cool! It works for moderators, too! by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Re:you mean.... (Score:3, Funny)

    "When your healty... they are called laptop..."

    Ill be sure to mispell my post so its moderated up!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  85. But what about the searchers? by nizo · · Score: 0, Funny

    But the people searching can't spell either, so wouldn't that even things out?

    1. Re:But what about the searchers? by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just add a line at the bottom of your listings with all possible misspellings of the main keywords.

      --
      What?
  86. L@@K! by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

    who the hell searches for L@@K anyways? what a waste of characters.

  87. Bad spelling works for me by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    I love terrible spellers on eBay. I buy and sell Magic cards and have been able to pick up cards cheap. It seems that even with the card in front of them, not everyone can spell:

    Chains of Mephistopheles
    Tolarian Academy
    Nicol Bolas

    etc.

    1. Re:Bad spelling works for me by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 2, Funny

      I almost got a killer deal on a miror universe one time. Some jerk outbid me, though.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
  88. It depends by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    If it's an obvious typo or dropped letter or transposed letters on a message board, it's easy to ignore. If it's a repeated error, or one where in order to be a "typo" the writer would have to have been hit by a car while typing the message and dc029in ok1n;lk;jkhhgggg ggggggggggggggggggggggggg

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  89. erm, what are we discussing here? by manavendra · · Score: 1

    I read the news item (and some of the comments here), but am still trying to figure out what the news item was trying to convey.

    Not a single figure or fact had been established (quote "No one knows how much misspelling is out there in eBay land..", "unofficial survey turned up dozens of items). It further trolls on completely unresearched bits like "Some experts say there is no evidence that people are spelling worse than they ever did".

    I think the news item is another shining example of eager "news" reporting, or meeting a deadline (gee whiz! I have to submit 1000 words today again!).

    Wans't tehere an emial diong ruonds soemtmie ago, taht metnoined taht huamns colud undrestand a mis-spleled wrod so lnog as the frist and lsat letetrs reamined the smae?

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  90. Dictionary by Joel+Carr · · Score: 1, Funny

    "When will e-Bay get a spell checker?"

    His answer? "You go to a store called a bookstore, and you buy something called a dictionary."


    So that's where I've been going wrong!! I always thought it was spelt 'dickshonery'!

    ---

    --
    Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. -- AE
  91. Re:Just to correct you on the Europe issue: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poppycock. The electorate knew about Tony Blair's feelings about Europe before he was elected. They knew where the Labour party stands on the issue. Even after seeing them in action, the British public relected them! If they strongly enough about it, then they wouldn't vote for them.

  92. Re:use a search engine spell checker by mirko · · Score: 1

    Answer from eBay : Did you mean... dictionary ?

    So, well, I did mean it, yep, but "eBay m'a tuer" ;)

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  93. Good etiquette requires both parties.... by thbigr · · Score: 1

    Both parties have a responsibility to make sure communication is being understood. Hence, in the Navy, all commands are repeated back to the person making the issuing the command. When lives are at stake then you MUST be understood.

    I think this requires some one who is listening, to ask questions when they don't understand. I have seen to many times in the IT field people do things, by "guessing" when they are unsure.

    --
    Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    1. Re:Good etiquette requires both parties.... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      While I was never in the Navy, all I have to say is "gads yes!" to the concept of repeating back instructions.

      Whenever I'm helping out a co-worker over the phone with something, it drives me up the wall when they don't give feedback like that. I have to continually sprinkle in "what are you doing? what did you just do?" in order to make any headway (or find out that they're 10 steps down the wrong path). One of these days I'll get them all trained and then I imagine we'll hire a whole new lot.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Good etiquette requires both parties.... by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      ?You mean, something like:

      "Wait...How do I...Oh, I see...What did...I can just...Hold on.

      "Now why did that happen?"

      And they really expect an answer!

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
  94. Wearing? How about /not/ wearing... by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    If we had attractive female lab workers here (which we don't), I'd honestly prefer them to not be wearing said labtops. ^_^

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  95. Atrocious spelling equals great deals! by dekker · · Score: 1

    If you're looking for a better deal on eBay, search for the most common misspellings of the item that you're interested in. There's a very good chance that you'll find a few listings, especially on more common items. Those auctions will be getting less traffic which means a lower final price. I've done this several times and ended up with some really good deals.

    Nothing like capitalizing on the ignorance of your fellow man.

  96. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  97. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use any auction sites, but are users responsible if they have misspelled model or product name somehow and they don't have it. I'm thinking about case where your model is cheaper than the one you have said you have.

  98. Amusing advertiser links by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    The funniest aspect of the article, to me, is that (at least when I visited the page) the New York Times helpfully added a set of three "advertiser links"--for companies that sell chandeliers.

    Well, of course--anyone that reads that article is someone interested in chandeliers, right?

    (Yes, it would have been even funnier if the links had been for companies selling chandaleers, but I guess I'll take my amusement where I can find it...)

  99. I am uneasy by paiute · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At first I enjoyed the stories posted in this topic: "I saw a Rolex listed on eBay under Rollex. Bought it from the idiot for $10, turned around and sold it for $500. What a loser!"

    Then I started to think: what if instead of trying to make a few bucks off of someone's typo, why not email them and tell them about the error? Here on Slashdot there is endless (and justified) ranting about the greed of corporate officers and their PHB minions. But are picking up a dollar off the floor in 7-11 and pocketing it even though you saw who dropped it or pulling these eBay spelling error tricks or laying off 1000 programmers to boost your stock price before cashing in your options not all acts from the same human motivation?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:I am uneasy by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Yeah. Profit. In the case of eBay, you are employing yourself as a reseller for a poorly marketed one-shot product. I really can't find anything wrong with this - someone is selling something and you could do a better job of selling it. Poof - instant open market.

      If some sap is going to all the trouble to sell something on eBay and can't be bothered to spell it right, you've got to agree that the responsibility for a poor sale lies with him.

      Sure, you could email him with a list of fixes to improve his sale, but you could also donate free source code to Microsoft to make Notepad a more flexible lightweight text editor or free blueprints to General Motors for an improved fuel injection system. You're giving away work for free, in this case to people who can't even spell their own products correctly. It is not like picking up money after you watched someone drop it, it's like picking up money that somebody dropped but were too lazy to pick up themselves.

    2. Re:I am uneasy by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I did that once. a Magic The Gathering card listed as German, it was actually French.

      But fuck it I need money I think I might try this...

    3. Re:I am uneasy by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It is a moral dilemma, on the one hand you can toss it off with "seller beware", on the other hand you are likely taking advantage of them.

      Not unlike attempting to buy the land rights from underneath a little old lady for pennies when you know there's millions of dollars worth of gold/oil there.

      However, that analogy stretches credibility a lot, because on the net/ebay, everyone has the same resources to determine fair market value. If a seller fails to use the tools provided to check spelling (or check against how other people spell/list an item), then it's their own fault. A seller with a modicum of common sense will follow other auctions for a small amount of time prior to attempting to sell something.

      Of course, there's no accounting for what a fool will manage to do...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:I am uneasy by DuncMan · · Score: 1

      For some inexplicable reason, people dislike having their spelling corrected and will tend to react angrily. It seems to be a common flaw in many humans that they when they make a mistake, any attempt to correct that mistake or educate them is perceived as a personal attack.

      The problem is not merely that people get things wrong, but also that they resist getting them right and resent those who do. Unbelievable...

      And here's a couple of entries from the idiot-to-truth dictionary I want to put together;

      • It doesn't matter
        • I don't yet realise why it matters
      • No one cares
        • I'm too ignorant, lazy or selfish to care
    5. Re:I am uneasy by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In my experience, eBayers are not as stupid as you may be led to believe. Yes, there are some true mouthbreathers out there, but there are also some rather sophisticated sellers who *purposely* represent themselves as clueless, in order to move the product without haveing to answer specific questions about it.

      Guitars are a great example: Almost every older 'consumer' acoustic made in the US (by Harmony) that you see on eBay will require a neck reset or brige re-glue, both very expensive repairs.

      By including one picture (straight on to the top, where the soundhole is) and saying, "I bought this at an estate sale, and don't know anything about it - plays good and just tuned!", the seller effectively puts the onus on the buyer to determine its condition in a vacuum.

      Yes, there are many clueless sellers, but I have known owners of music stores who get rid of the 'crap' by doing just this.

      As always, buyer beware. You may be thinking, "This poor idiot doesn't know any better", but there is a good chance that the seller is thinking the same about you.

  100. Not only bad spelling... by Gogl · · Score: 1
    What about broken english and dubious capitalization?
    THis Unit has 2 Floppy Drives i dont know whether it has a Hard Drive . It comes with the Power Supply . it POwers on to This MS DOS Type Mode. No Windows install. THis is a Very Old System. THis is great for a Project. You can type Commands in the MS DOS ENtry . It does include the Power COrd.

    On the plus side, it is five bucks and no reserve, and the username of the seller is a reassuring "legit17" (who also has 17 positive feedback, oddly enough)...
    1. Re:Not only bad spelling... by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but how real are those feedback comments?
      Drill down on some feedbacks, and you might find that they're all automated, and from people shipping stuff electronically.
      For a few bucks, this is an easy way to pad your ratings, before pulling a scam.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  101. I wish... by ChiefScientist · · Score: 1

    iPod was a little harder to spell.

  102. Thats fibRE channel by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The proper spelling is fibre channel. The british spelling of fiber is intentionally not used. (It is french IIRC)

    I think that you just worded the above wrong, but I'm not sure.

  103. Well... by nlh · · Score: 1

    At least it's not a eunuchs license...

  104. It works for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've sold quite a number of things on ebay. After making a few of my auctions I found that there were a lot of people selling the same items for more. Of course, there are a number of variables when it comes to selling an item and spelling happens to be one of them. I've found that I get the most out of my sales by researching similar sales of the same product and basically copying the highest selling sale. This means misspellings, length of the auction, starting pice, reserve or no reserve, subject, etc. Almost everytime I sell the item for at or above teh price of teh sale that originally copied.

  105. Worked for me by Bruha · · Score: 1

    After losing 2 bids on a Aircard 555 in the 150 dollar range (Most were 200 dollar buy it now) I decided to search for just Aircard.. I found a gem of a deal for a Aircard 555 (They forgot to put the 555 in the description) I got the card for 130USD..

    I'm a happy customer.

    Now I can surf the web over the cell network in Linux =)

  106. Thank's alot you Linux Guru's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  107. It works the other way, too by eschasi · · Score: 1
    Sometimes it works the other way, too. You can spell chandelier right and have the wrong thing happen. At the bottom of the NYTimes article are advertising links. The Times sells these links for a premium price because they supposedly correlate the item being sold with the topic of the article. So what are the three premium ads selling?

    Chandeliers.

    On a slightly separate topic, another good EBay hack is to look for items in the wrong place. I found disk drives advertised in Camera Accessories and got quite a deal.

  108. Re:Just to correct you on the Europe issue: by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    Great Britain is part of Europe in the geographical sense and was connected to it by a land bridge at one time. No amount of voting against it is going to change that fact.

    The UK is a member of a political entity called the European Union which contains a subset of the countries in Europe. We joined this organisation in 1973 I believe and there was a referendum in 1976 (or thereabouts) to determine if we should stay in. So the voters were involved.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  109. keyword spamming investigations by adzoox · · Score: 1
    You do an ebay request for investigation

    I'm with you - I hate receiving in my daily searches USB hubs that match extrememac - when extrememac only makes one specific hub I am looking for. Turns out the main offenders use an old trick of making white text on the white background. Some sellers have almost every single Mac product ever made in their auctions. I fI ever see that I report em at the URL above.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:keyword spamming investigations by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      I should do this to the people selling "RedOctane Style" DDR pads on ebay. It's such a scam, their pads are horrible quality, but even I was duped by them once, and I've had friends almost suckered themselves...

  110. Not limited to spelling by glorf · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine whose first language was not English is constantly inadvertantly coming up with weird mutations of colloquialisms (like taking the "small roads" instead of the "back roads"). One day we were talking about someone getting overexcited about something and this guy says they raised a "human cry". We tried to tell him the phrase was "hue and cry", but because he was able to find at least one page through Google in which the words "human" and "cry" were next to each other it must be a common phrase.

  111. I've done this for quite some time now... by TheWhaleShark · · Score: 1

    I play Warhammer (god help me), so I always use eBay to help me find cheap minis. One of my favorite tactics is to look for misspellings, as the people who misspell the various names often don't know exactly what they're selling.

    It's interesting to see how many ways people can screw up Slaanesh and Tzeentch.

    --
    "It never got weird enough for me." - HST (RIP)
  112. soundex by seanmceligot · · Score: 1

    Ebay should use the soundex algorithm to find similar items. It's already in Oracle if that's what they use.

    select soundex('compaq'), soundex('compact') from dual

    If they had an index of soundex values of keywords and the number of matches, they could return a list of popular keywords that sound the same as the one you typed.

  113. I've cracked the code! Now your post makes sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>...I use Google A LOT...

    You misspelled "beer."

  114. "Loose" your writing inhibitions at your own peril by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Granted, eBay provides us with a somewhat wilder, woolier petri dish to observe this in, but shoddy writing affects one's credibility everywhere. Spelling matters, and grammar matters, and having some sense of your audience is handy too.

    In the case of an auction site, the difference can be described in easily quantifiable terms. Botch the spelling of "earrings" and the value of your goods falls through the floor.

    On one of our local talk shows a few weeks back, the politician who's been sponsoring death penalty legislation for five years now made his case. He said the word "heinous" maybe twenty times, mispronouncing it every last time. (It was "hee-nee-us" for him.) Coincidentally, he also seemed to have no rejoinder to any of the basic criticisms of the death penalty. When asked about crime rates, he didn't seem to know they were adjusted for population. When asked about racially biased sentencing, he said he thought we had a pretty good justice system, and had little more to offer. After five years, you'd think he'd have at least considered how to rebut the opposition. His sloppiness over the little things did mean something; it affected his credibility, and it indicated that he wasn't to be taken seriously, at least in my book.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  115. The real question is... by HedsSpaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...how many of us went to EBay immediately after reading this article and did a search for 'labtop'?

  116. Loosing spelling skillz can effect sales? by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    Theirs a suprise!

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  117. Lay off the NYT by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny


    The registration is free and you don't even need a valid e-mail address. What's with the complaints? The 20 seconds you have to spend *once* to input bogus information is certainly a fair price for the online content of the NYT.

    Sheesh. People here would complain if you hung them with a new rope.

    1. Re:Lay off the NYT by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      IIRC NYT thinks I live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. So does Scientology.

    2. Re:Lay off the NYT by hether · · Score: 1

      I agree, but also have a suggestion. The people who submit the articles, or the editors, can easily give us a registration free link. All they need to do is choose to mail the article to a friend (link on the right side of each page) and send it to themself and use that link instead. That's what I've done in the past for links I've posted. Alternatively grab the link off Google.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    3. Re:Lay off the NYT by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the quality of news you get from the NYTimes for free and how painless it is to register.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    4. Re:Lay off the NYT by sLaSh_N_bUrN_(.Y.) · · Score: 1

      I would complain if you hung me with any rope. I guess I am ungreatfull.

    5. Re:Lay off the NYT by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Wasting my time to collect info and not even caring if it is valid... that's yet another reason it annoys me. Some related thoughts, in case any newspaper reads this or cares: every subscriber-only paper that comes up under news.google is ignored by me. None of them yet have been realistic on one-time-use pricing, none of them take me to a page that DEFAULTS to showing me subscription cost for my request (so I'm forced to waste time to find out). Hell, I even stopped using my local city's online paper when they started wanting another $7/mo. for hobbled online access (in addtion to the fees for a dead-trees edition!) Oh, and I sure would bitch about a new rope. If I'm going to hang, an old, old ratty rope that might break... that's the ticket.

    6. Re:Lay off the NYT by Karadryel · · Score: 1
      Sheesh. People here would complain if you hung them with a new rope.

      Ironically, it's "hanged." The past participle of the verb meaning "to kill by hanging" is "hanged." "Hung" refers to the hanging of something other than a person by the neck.

    7. Re:Lay off the NYT by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Thank you. To quote dictionary.com

      Usage Note: Hanged, as a past tense and a past participle of hang, is used in the sense of "to put to death by hanging," as in Frontier courts hanged many a prisoner after a summary trial. A majority of the Usage Panel objects to hung used in this sense. In all other senses of the word, hung is the preferred form as past tense and past participle, as in I hung my child's picture above my desk.

      You may want to look up "ironically" though... :)

  118. Putty... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Well, people aren't always evil.
    You know, Putty, the free SSH client...
    www.putty.org
    See bottom-right corner :)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  119. That's because the masses are used to using... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Word with with auto-formatting.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  120. go to a store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His answer? "You go to a store called a bookstore, and you buy something called a dictionary." Poor business view, he should have answered bid for one on e-Bay

  121. Re:use a search engine spell checker by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

    There must be a witty comment that could be made about the irony of the contents of that linked page, but I'll be damned if I can think of one. :)

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  122. re:Oh, the irony...(offtopic) by skinny.net · · Score: 1

    Let me see if I understand this correctly. You are complaining (on a website published in U.S. English) that a publication from the U.S. did not use the British spelling of 'spelled?' (Notice here that the question mark, like all punctuation, falls inside the quotes.) Your claim that most of the world uses 'spelt' is dubious at the least.

    Searched the web for words spelled correctly. Results 1 - 100 of about 161,000. Search took 0.52 seconds.
    Searched the web for words spelt correctly. Results 1 - 100 of about 25,000. Search took 0.42 seconds.

    There is an interesting article from the BBC (which I understand to be British) called Pupils 'struggling' with spelling , where 'spelt' is used once and 'spelled' is used at least six times.

    I urge independent research into both ATI and NVIDIA.

  123. In other news.. by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

    Cmdrtaco strykes it rich on e-baY.

    S

  124. Ob Simpsons quote by Wiz · · Score: 1

    "Me fail English? Thats unpossible!"

    Well I still like it. :)

  125. Spellcheckers ruined my spelling by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    there's more truth to what you say than you may realise. We're so used to the spellchecker correcting everything automatically, that when it's not available the spelling goes down the drain.
    If you were actually to go to the effort of proof reading using a dictionary everytime the chances are that you'll remember the correct spelling next time round.

    1. Re:Spellcheckers ruined my spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coincidentally, I turned off auto-correct in MS Word only last Friday. I am also trying to resist the temptation of right clicking on the "red wavy underline" and choosing the correct spelling. Instead I try to correct the spelling myself and, if I can't figure out the correct spelling then.....search the word in Google :)
      Happy to report that my fingers have already learnt the different between summary and summery.

  126. Re:It works the other way, too by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's not leeching. If somebody cannot be bothered to get a dictionary and look up the correct spelling of a word when they want to put out an advertisement that could be seen by millions of people, then to my mind they deserve what they get. You play with fire, you get burned.

    You might not get far appearing on TV if you're ugly, and you might not get far on the wireless if you have an annoying voice. But anyone can learn to spell properly -- the only thing stopping them is laziness.

    Actually there probably is a market for someone to charge a fee for checking spelling and usage {that would require a human being; a machine can spot "tehre" but "their" is a correctly-spelt word even if you meant "there"} -- because at some point, the benefit due to proper spelling would be greater than the amount you spent on it.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  127. Use the asterisk by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hate to give this one away, but you're all my friends so what they hell. Search using an asterisk. Example - If you're looking for sony headphones, type in "sony head*" and it finds anything with the word head and sony in it. I get stuff cheap all the time, because this trick can get the spelling mistake listings.

  128. Re:Oh, the irony...(offtopic) by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1
    Which publication are you referring to? I typed the following sentence myself without reference to any other publication:

    This is the first article about eBay where the editors haven't spelt (yes, "spelt" not "spelled") the company name as "Ebay".


    I didn't complain about any publication doing anything, I only clarified that I meant to type "spelt" and rather than "spelled".

    As to your other points, well, are you in any doubt that the web is US-centric in content? Especially if you discount content in non-English languages such as French, German, Spanish and Japanese? And don't you think that the writer of that BBC article was a little bit inconsistent using "spelt" and "spelled" in the same context in the same article?

    As to the correct spellings of ATI and NVIDIA, I stand corrected. Put it down to writing for a publication where "ATi" and "nVidia" were house style. (I'm not certain, but I have a sneaky suspicion that it once was "ATi" but I'm not about to get into a pissing contest over that: it's ATI now and what it once was or once might have been is irrelevant. I got it wrong, and that's that.)
    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  129. Of course "spelt"is a word... by n6kuy · · Score: 0

    .. and it makes a yummy alternative to wheat for the gluten intolerant!

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  130. Bad Spelling Pays on Slashdot Too by ptjapkes · · Score: 1

    The article right before this one "Microsoft-Funded Linux Studies Benefit ... Microsoft" has a spelling error. compairing?

  131. #define pritnf printf by rs79 · · Score: 1

    You make that sound like it's a negative thing.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  132. earing meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A short line attaching an upper corner of a sail to the yard.

  133. iPad by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    I recently got an HP iPaq (fairly new one) for under $65 because it was listed as "HP iPad".

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  134. Re:Cool! It works for moderators, too! by rjelks · · Score: 1

    Actually, "you're" would be right in that context. "You're" could replace "you are", while "your" is the possessive of "you". You could say, "When 'You're' healthy you can call it 'your' labtop(sic)."

    -

  135. spell casting by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's incredible to me that this late in the GUI game, I still can't just select text anywhere in Windows, right-click and select "Check Spelling". Anyone hook this up for GNOME yet?

    At Apple, we developed a "styled text pane" GUI component for a hypermedia documentation browser (not HTML, in 1993) as part of the corporate switch to a C++ toolkit. We threw hooks for spellcheck and themes (a la CSS) into the class, and argued that the component ought to be part of the toolkit itself, for *every* text display in the OS, which would mean every app, entirely standard. I heard that the design was part of Apple's plans right through the demise of the Bento initiative, which drowned our approach like a rat on the Titanic. So now every app reinvents the wheel, and it takes forever to crawl back to steel-belted radials.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:spell casting by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Well, you left Apple too early.

      OS X has had global spell-check since nearly the beginning. I didn't use the pre-10.1 versions nearly enough to remember where it started, but the hooks are in the OS. Safari makes very good use of them indeed.

      p

    2. Re:spell casting by mstra · · Score: 1

      All Cocoa apps on OS X have spell-check built in. Which means when I'm cruising around on Safari, I can spell-check any forms. It's a handy feature. Hell, even iChat has built-in spell checking!

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    3. Re:spell casting by TheHornedOne · · Score: 1

      You need to get back on the Apple platform, man. One of the coolest things about Mac OS X is its concept of system-wide services, with spelling being one of those. My browser, Safari, is spell-checking this as I write, and the code to do that came for free from the Cocoa core foundation. There are all sorts of other little nuggets of goodness in this system, too. Check it out.

    4. Re:spell casting by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I almost got an iLamp, or whatever it's called. I'm tempted to get an iBook, and probably would, if I hadn't wisely gotten the Dell i8000/UXGA a couple of years ago, which looks like it will easily suit me for the next couple of years. If I could install OSX on that, though... Steve Jobs is a hero. I wish he would put some kind of micro OSX on a 3G phone, with Bluetooth to the iPod and my LAN. That would get me back.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  136. Re:use a search engine spell checker by Derkec · · Score: 1

    What's sad, is that as I read the story a woman who used the word "chandaleer" said she did an internet search on it, got some hints and assumed she was right. If she had simply googled it instead, she would have got, "Did you mean: chandelier " at the top.

    Google is my spell checker - it takes less time to load than Word.

  137. Ebay Mis-spellings by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Love-em. I get lots of good stuff cheap from pur spellars.

  138. Misspellings say anything about character? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that I'd want to do business with anyone who doesnt seem intelligent/caring/thorough enough to properly spell check an auction listing anymore than I'd want to go in a store that had its signs and adverts mispelled. Especially considering it's eBay, and if you're shafted, you're shafted.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  139. Categories by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

    This is why eBay uses categories.

  140. Re:Cool! It works for moderators, too! by unother · · Score: 1

    It just rolls on! That should be misspell.

  141. Got scamed! by Keitero-sama · · Score: 1

    Well i guess my labtop that I just got off ebay is a fake then. I got a "laptop" instead.

    --
    -Kids in the back seat causes accidents.- -Accidents in the back seat causes kids.-
  142. This was news in 1990. by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

    why the hell did this even make it on /.??? trying misspelled words has been basic eBay-ing since the early 90s.

    1. Re:This was news in 1990. by Colonel+Panijk · · Score: 1

      trying misspelled words has been basic eBay-ing since the early 90s

      And how long has eBay been around???

  143. This proves the long held theory that... by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

    ... there is no patch for human stupidity.

    --
    PERL:
    All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
  144. Survival of the mentally fittest? by skintigh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I woke up to the news that some people went canoeing yesterday, during a wind advisory, without life vests, and apparently not knowing how to swim, and one guy drowned. Not to be callous about such a tragedy, but the phrase "survival of the fittest" did cross my mind.

    I think this story beats mine, though.

    The phrase that starts "a fool an his money..." also seems to apply.

    (Oh, and I spell checked this because I'm smart enough to know I'm stupid.)

    1. Re:Survival of the mentally fittest? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      "a fool an his money..."

      I guess spell checkers don't catch real words then, huh?

    2. Re:Survival of the mentally fittest? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      It's ok, I'm from Texas. Y'all'd talk like that too if you up an' moved here.

  145. Why spelling and grammar is important... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Computerized language translators depend on correct spelling and grammar to correctly manage a phrase.

    It takes a lot more time and processor cycles to translate misspelled words.

    Language translation, that is quality language translation, will be one of the 'killer aps' of the 64-bit generation of processors.

  146. Re:It works the other way, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! Leach=percolate, permeate, trickle slowly Leech=bloodsucking vermin :-)

  147. Speaking of bad spelling... by Sprite+Remix · · Score: 1
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =338207301

  148. *tosses boxers to who ever is collecting them* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that those are outta the way I can give you a DNA sample.

  149. Re:Speaking of bad spelling... and use of by Sprite+Remix · · Score: 1
  150. Bought many things thanks to fat-fingering by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    I can't begin to count the number of things I've bought on eBay that no one else even found that's to the seller fat-fingering the auction title and description. For example I bought a Cabletron SSR-2-B-128 for $57 the summer before last (loaded to the gills too). The reason I managed to buy it that cheap was because the seller repeated mis-spelled Cabletron as Cabeltron. He also used the S/N as the model number. Fortunately his photos of the actual unit showed the real model numbers. I can't begin to count the number of times I've had this luck. The way I find these auctions is I either fat-finger my search string or I view the seller's other auctions and find it in that list. It's well worth the effort IMHO.

  151. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "American topics"

    ?

    Arrogant little snob.

    The topics are international in nature.

  152. Re:use a search engine spell checker by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    Ebay does have a spellchecker, but it is not perfect. You want to make sure you have something spelled right, then use a dictionary.

    He is giving seminars to people that wish to use ebay profesionally. If you are using ebay asa commercial source of revenue, then you should use a dictionary.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  153. To paraphrase your point... by NoData · · Score: 1

    Me misspell on eBay? That's unpossible!

  154. I still give them money... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Just not as much as I might have to otherwise. :-)

    Case in point: A few weeks ago, I needed a conference speakerphone for the office. Searching for "Conference Phone" returned several US Robotics CS1000 phones, which seemed to meet my needs well. At that point I searched for "CS1000" in item and description, and up popped one titled "USRobotics Conference Link CS1000". Not only would that title not tend to pop up in a more general search, but they had the item [mis]classified under the consumer electronics tree.

    Long story short, due to their misclassification, cryptic title, and low opening bid, I walked away with the phone for $10 when all the others were going for $50-100.

    So please, don't stop the misspellings and other assorted ways of hiding items deep in the recesses of eBay. I see it as a form of natural consequences for the sellers, and it's helpful to those of us who run on a shoestring.

  155. Re:MICHAEL IS A COMMIE QUEEN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's more interesting to me is that NONE of the media networks have said anything about the Al Franken incident yesterday. Apparently, he tackled a guy from behind in order to preserve free speech. Not even Fox News had anything to say on this. I only learned it from my local news channel (who is not corrupted left or right yet).

    http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/16692.ht m

    Of course, it being in the NY Post could mean that it was entirely fabricated.

  156. A friend made 20,000 bucks this way by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    A freind of mine who buys and sells pinup and fine art from the 20s-70s bought a painting on eBay for roughly 15,000. This painting was of a famous gal, known for her preference for presidents.

    The painting was one of two done before she reached iconic staus. This painting is now selling for 40,000, to the family of the painter, I believe.

    The eBay auction title was off by one letter (the artist's name was spelled incorrectly), sadly, I can't remember what the title of it was.

    That kind of put eBay deals in perspective for me, though.

  157. rock a fellar by danharan · · Score: 1

    Neat. I did a quick search on Overture's Term suggestion tool:
    63138 rockefeller center
    869 center rockafeller
    310 center rockafella
    128 center rockafellar
    56 center rockefella

    I suppose you could find more...

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  158. Re:use a search engine spell checker.. or... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    Or, ya know, you could.... learn to spell and proofread. Seriously. I don't use a spell checker, ever, and I proofread everything I do. It's not that hard to do, and it's better for your mind. I can't tell you the number of times in recent years (and it's only been recent years, since the rise of editing programs with spell checkers) that a publication or a book I'm reading has misspellings in it where the word is spelled correctly, but it's the wrong spelling for the context (John picks the red card, witch is good for....). Now both the writer and the editor screw the pooch far more often because they're both trusting the computer to tell them if they got it right or not.

    We as a society are letting computers, cell phones, PDAs, etc do all our memory tasks for us, and it's killing our minds. Most people can't multiply 25 x 22 in their heads, they just whip out a calculator and do it. I had a friend who lost a bag with his cell phone and keys in it off the side of a boat in Burrard Inlet. When he got back to shore he wanted to call his roommate to bring him the spare set of keys in the house, but couldn't call the roommate's cell, or anyone he knew. Why? He always used that damn speed dial feature on his phone and as a result COULDN'T REMEMBER anyone's number now that the cell phone was gone.

    Seriously. Use the grey matter before it evaporates.

  159. Pretty sure they didn't use the word candy, though by Denyer · · Score: 1

    The most noticeable difference I've noticed in the US is the number of chocolate bars which contain peanuts. With products containing nut oils being given to more and younger children, instances of anaphylactic shock have risen sharply over the last decade or so.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  160. Re:Cool! It works for moderators, too! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Ill be sure to mispell my post so its moderated up!

    You did -- omitted two apostrophes.

  161. You are a complete imbicile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mildly humourous[.] However, I do a lot of searches on eBay and find I often miss items because the offering party couldn't break things up. The search on eBay is pretty primitive, but you can do multiple wildcards, i.e. (color*,colour*) in a search query. I've usually gotten a number of variations on things. [This sentence makes no sense.]

    The downside is I often get a very long list of things [ ] in which people have loaded their listings with chatter matching these words, but which has nothing to do with what I'm looking for. E.g. I'm searching for a 'Teleporter', so I can go to Mars and fix the Rover and find and fix Beagle[.] I search on "teleport*" and get a listing like this:

    Bizaxian Grompfelated Nurbskin Sandals
    I need to sell these so I can afford to teleport to the moon for the holidays, blah, blah, blah (for the next 500 words.) Current Bid: $23.71

    I really could care less [if you "could care less," that means you do, in fact, care some; you mean you "couldn't care less"] about peoples' life stories, I just want to find [ ] things. Still, it's not as annoying as all that amimated crap and javascript some people cram their listings with, such that one downloaded page is 500k+


    Please cease and desist attempting to write in English and return to whatever gibberish you call your native tongue.

  162. Mee to! by Alsee · · Score: 1

    I found an amazing buy on a lagtop on eBay.
    Best of all I got mad 1337 sniper skillz now!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  163. Because we all know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Microsoft's auto-formatting can make grammatical geniuses, hell, WIZARDS out of all of us.

  164. DNA sample and clean boxers required by Dharma's+Dad · · Score: 0

    Aren't those mutually exclusive?

  165. bad spelling = good deals by humankind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it's a liability for the seller, but a windfall for the buyer. For example, I was searching for a rare item that was part of a series of collectables named after the "millennium". The seller had the product misspelled as "milennium" and had much fewer bids and I was able to pick it up for a fraction of its worth. I guess it depends upon whether you want the buyer or seller to be uneducated. The former works if you're trying to scam someone; the latter works if you're looking for a good deal.

  166. not worth the hassle by humankind · · Score: 1

    It's a matter of economics. If the information that NYT is holding hostage is worth me sacrificing anonyminity, then ok. However, I don't trust most of the major media to be responsible with the information they collect, be it partially-bogus or not, and nowhere can that be more evidenced than an examination of the information they actually publish.

    1. Re:not worth the hassle by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      *psssst*

      The information can be completely bogus. Pass it on.

      And the informatin is not being "held hostage". It doesn't want to go anywhere. Consider your bogus registration to be the price of the bandwidth, server maintenance, and the effort that went into writing the article...or should I say, "kidnapping the data"?

      And keep this between the two of us, but I've found that wearing my foil hat when visiting the NYT's website defeats their web-based brain scanner that is embedded on all their pages.

  167. Re:This article is ridiculous - search for this by ZackStone · · Score: 1

    Search for item #3456315281.

  168. All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like moron spelling/grammar nazis who use non-words such as "alot" in place of "a lot".

    Wierd, ins't it?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by haystor · · Score: 1

      First, I'm neither a spelling nor grammar nazi.

      I was merely contributing list of words that are wrongly reinforced on slashdot.

      Wow, you caught the non-word. What you didn't catch was the fact that I used a contrived sentence in order to place a non-word at the end of a post about wrongly used/spelled words.

      Come one, its just one mispelling.

      --
      t
    2. Re:All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think he was kinda trolling you.

      (yeah, now you're gunna tell me that 'kinda' is spellt alot wrong two) I just wanted to say that kinda and alot are pretty cool words.

    4. Re:All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It's spelt weird. :)

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    5. Re:All of these come up on Slashdot alot. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      In reference to my one line ironic joke:
      • Wierd, ins't it?
      You wrote:
      • It's spelt weird. :)
      Did you miss the sarcasm or did you think ins't was spelled correctly?
      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  169. Cleveland Needs Priorities by spamguy · · Score: 0
    I picked up Cleveland's Plain Dealer today and saw this article on the front page. Next to Kerry winning NH and six soldiers being killed in Iraq.

    Did Slashdot make an under-the-table acquisition recently?

  170. mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sons!

  171. I bought a labtop once by PoignardSanglant · · Score: 1

    It is highly resistant against chemical spills.

  172. Free Reg by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    Name: slashdot2004
    Password: slashdot2004

    I didn't do it, can't prove anything.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  173. you blew my hook, chump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been getting bargains on ebay for years
    by searching for mis-spelled items... like
    that tosjiba laptop, and the shigaragi water jar.

  174. whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whore

  175. Who cares? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    What if it really was a Plam Pilot, like maybe some weird knock-off Palm from Vanuatu or something?

    Not if it has a picture of the thing, as in this one: Listing for a "Plam." You can clearly read the "Palm" for this device.

    Bad spelling really turns me away from these things... Even though there's no real connection between spelling and intellect, it is very hard to read poorly crafted prose and respect it if it's badly written.

    Actually, research shows that in languages like English, transposed inner letters have very little effect upon readability. In fact, such errors present great difficulty in proofreading because the human brain tends to correct the errors "on the fly." So for such errors, there is little effect upon "readability."

    As for your inability to respect anyone who commits typographical errors, that's your prerogative. Personally, I'd rather take advantage of them on ebay by purchasing items at lower-than-normal prices.

  176. Go away troll by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    And, for anyone who wants to get into a pissing contest over which is more correct, then I think I'll just remind you that the language is called "English", not "American", so guess which spelling came first?

    Sounds like you're the only one engaging in said contest. For what it's worth, both spellings were valid in England during the time that America and England split. You may recall (or not) that the English language is not fixed, and enjoyed a great deal of flux in the 1600s, including a vast number of accepted spellings for words. So even your timeline analysis is flawed, as "American" English is NOT newer than modern British English. Rather, they both derive from the boundary between late Middle/early Modern English.

  177. Ob.Simpsons Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homer: "Pfft. I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see it. And look, there's Magnetbox
    and Sorny!"

  178. Re:use a search engine spell checker by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    weird. ou'd think he'd refer people to ebay's own dictionary section

  179. Man some people can't speel. by CowardNeal · · Score: 1

    It's a pain in the ass.

  180. Re:Who craes? by Benwick · · Score: 1

    Yes, I was srot of ginettg at taht in the prat of my psot you coshe not to qtuoe. Not an isuse of drisepsect of the preosn, as the psot mkaes caler, but cretnaily drespisect of tiehr cvaialer auttidte trawod lganguae. Orwell siad it bset in "Ploitics and the Eglinsh Lungague". Bad witring lades to bad tghouht. Tehn you get bad iades and bad pocitilians.

  181. Re:use a search engine spell checker by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Funny

    but if i can't spell dictioanarie how do i get one off ebay?

  182. Even the literate are illiterate. by runamok1 · · Score: 1

    Actually it's pretty amazing how many best sellers and other books have incorrect spellings.

    Usually it's not something that spell check on a computer would catch. I.e. "there" vs. "their".

    So, essentially illiteracy is on the rise even in the literate.

  183. Re:use a search engine spell checker by technicka · · Score: 1

    Ebay is a first generation html site and they are very very archaicly slow making any upgrades to thier site. The paypal merger is a good one, but watch how long it's taking them to slowly migrate the features.

    I'm waiting until another company like amazon creates dynamic api tools,.. or ebay.. hello.. .css atleast?@?!?!

    first generation html is what they are. They are slow to migrate because they already have the user base. I believe this is just a market willing to be filled. Fix the lacking problems of ebay, (security) advertise (only a nbc type affiliate could do something this large and trusted) and give complete open ness and consequences to bad sellers.

    Everyone I talk to says they are afraid to give thier credit card out to people... these people refuse to get out of the 50's to 80's mind set)

    Sometimes I believe the only answer to security is to wait until the young population are adults. The ones that have grown up with this type of standard technology.

    Now that I'm thinking about it... isn't that the beauty of Evolution?

  184. Re:use a search engine spell checker by Trent_Alkaline · · Score: 1

    Hell in my english 121 class in college, I've been using google for my spelling, grammar and research =P

  185. Re:poor /.'ers f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb by grolaw · · Score: 1

    Flame-bait and off topic? It's a joke, but the point remains valid:

    No coder could make a living if their code were as full of grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors as the average /. post.

    I find the dichotomy ironic.

  186. Re:Who craes? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Yes, I was srot of ginettg at taht in the prat of my psot you coshe not to qtuoe. Not an isuse of drisepsect of the preosn, as the psot mkaes caler, but cretnaily drespisect of tiehr cvaialer auttidte trawod lganguae. Orwell siad it bset in "Ploitics and the Eglinsh Lungague". Bad witring lades to bad tghouht.

    I chose not to quote it because it seemed pompous, overly self-important, and unrelated to my point. Second, I find quotations less than authoratative on any matter. If Orwell, or you, have proof in that regard, fell free to cite it. Third, I don't see the link between typographical errors and a "cavalier" attitude toward the language, much less any implications upon one's intellect, thought, or any other matter.

    Finally, one need not take one's profession so seriously. I expect I could find evidence of your "cavalier attitude" toward science (my chosen profession) were I to thoroughly examine your life, yet I feel no need for condescension, overly broad generalities, or speculative outcomes based on such attitudes. Similarly, I think you don't need to overinflate the effects of spelling errors. Here, the effect is that the ebay seller will lose up to hundreds of dollars as a result of miscommunication. I think that is sufficient penalty.

  187. don't you mean "Bad Spelling doesn't Pay on eBay"? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    If I'm the seller, and I misspell the item I'm selling and it doesn't sell as high as it could have, doesn't that mean that bad spelling doesn't pay since I lost money?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  188. Re:Who craes? by Benwick · · Score: 1

    Gimme a break. If you're taking this so seriously you really do have a problem.

    Although I guess I am guilty of same for even bothering to write back!! But, enough. Cheers.

  189. Actually by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I have registered like 25 times and every time I go to another NYT story my bogus registration info is no longer valid. I don't know if this is something they're checking for or if it has to do with the way it handles cookies but I just don't look at NYT stories via links like that anymore because its too much hassle. I either read NYT via google or I read it using my lexis/nexis account if I really need the article. You can bet an article about bad spelling on ebay isn't worth thinking of new bogus information to fill in.... Oh well, at least they don't ask "Where did you hear about New York Times?"

    1. Re:Actually by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Strange. I've had the same one for years. I have to fish around for the username...it's usually one of 4 or so I use but eventually I get it. Maybe you're just forgetful :)

  190. I know I did. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Obviously sarcasm doesn't translate well :p

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:I know I did. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Obviously sarcasm doesn't translate well :p

      On Slashdot where the editors can't spell, I'm afraid the assumption is that a mistake is a mistake, not a joke. Sorry...

  191. Were you even paying attention? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    The original post incorrectly had the possesive your in place of the contraction you're.

    I merely quoted this and made grammar mistakes in my reply to draw attention to the irony of a person saying that incorrect spelling works, while spelling incorrectly.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Were you even paying attention? by n3k5 · · Score: 1
      ... draw attention to the irony of a person saying that incorrect spelling works, while spelling incorrectly.
      I could see some irony there if a person was arguing that incorrent spelling doesn't work, while spelling incorrectly.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  192. COME ON ENGLISH DUDE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us examine: ... "Although[,] I guess[,] I am guilty of [the] same for even bothering to write back!!" ..

    You forget to add a "the" in that sentence. We should not take stock in what Benwick has to say.

  193. Re: The Compleat Imbicile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, about 1/3 of your "corrections" are bogus (e.g., why the fuck can't a
    list be large?) Also, if you're a troll then you aren't very clever.

  194. Re:Who craes? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Gimme a break. If you're taking this so seriously you really do have a problem.

    This coming from the person who claimed catastrophe as result of a spelling error on Ebay. Hypocrite.

  195. Re:use a search engine spell checker by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    Jim Griffith, whose official title at eBay is dean of eBay education, teaches 40 to 50 seminars a year around the country. Although eBay points out common misspellings, he said that the most common question he gets is, "When will e-Bay get a spell checker?"

    His answer? "You go to a store called a bookstore, and you buy something called a dictionary."

    By that logic, there's no need for a word processor to have one either. Just balance the book on your lap and look all the words up. Of course, as it passes through the carbon based optical to mechanical convertor, there'll be new errors introduced and it will take four times as long, but such is life.

    I guess Griffith is only "dean of eBay education" because there isn't a post called "VP of patronising fucktards".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."