Or just uninstall systemd + reinstall sysvinit. It's not miserably complicated, though there are some additional steps (and things with hard systemd requirements won't work, but I feel like that's less of an issue):
That being said, I'm all for Devuan as a source of attrition for Debian, until they pull their heads back out of their butts. Shame there aren't enough takers to really raise enough concern from them.
My ancient (Pentium M era) Fujitsu Lifebook's built-in SD reader reads a 32GB SDHC card without issue. SDHC wasn't a standard for ~2 years after the laptop was built, and 32GB cards seem to have spawned ~2 years after that. Not sure if the reader received a firmware update or anything to that effect.
Point is, it's a bit hit-and-miss, but the answer to your first question it "maybe"; it's a bit difficult to test with hardware that does not yet exist.
Regarding your second question: you want cloud. You're getting cloud. Because the makers of the phone know you need it. You can't be trusted with your own data, so they'll take it off your hands.
Don't take this as a slight against rail or other mass transit services; they're more than competitive with air (especially when taking costs into account), with respect to safety, and seem to have the potential to achieve parity. Distracted/imprudent driving/operating behaviors apply to all forms of vehicular travel, and this seems like the most approachable area for improvements.
You're mistaken; you've volunteered for it by using these services, which are not likely to be critical to your mere survival. If you're not using the services anyways, what's the point of saying all that?
... to them is next to nothing; even when great swaths of the tech community manage to boycott/complain, they know it's just a drop in the bucket. All they have to do is take minimal pains to marginalize our concerns in the eyes of Joe Blow and they've all but won.
Enough of the 'critiques' on browsers here are negative and destructive that I'd say we have a better chance at coming up with the ultimate anti-browser.
If it knows what touches to simulate, then it can use any of a number of ways of doing so when the user isn't actively handling their phone (e.g. after it has been set down, but not yet auto-locked).
This matched some of the flights that the pilot made with his home flight simulator.
I had long been under the impression that this was a totally dead lead, but I guess they confirmed some time last year that someone had indeed plotted similar flights on his simulator. Interesting.
Two the plane was taken over by terrorists and eventually dove it nose first into the water. Most likely preventing a breech of main body and preventing a lot of debris from rising to surface.
Entering the water in any way but a very controlled ditching tends to cause an effect reminiscent of a Pringles can being stomped on by an elephant.
Indeed, my proposed question was somewhat rhetorical; if airlines want to shed the image of putting cost/profit at least a little bit above safety, they'll eventually figure it out. I hope. That's also pretty slick, I don't think I had ever heard of this arrangement specifically.
Why are aircraft not fitted with multiple impact-resistant EPIRB-like devices designed to separate from the aircraft and float to the surface? That and/or some sort of massive dye pack. Of course, a high speed impact with the water might destroy them (blackboxes can and have been destroyed by impact too), but having multiple locators on board seems like a reasonable idea. These things obviously do nothing for those who perish in an incident, but doing everything we can to obtain data on failures allows us to be better prepared in the future.
We all know why; they know that most people won't be arsed to replace it when it starts to go bad, letting them sell another incrementally 'improved' generation of crap.
A balance must be struck between the masses that want the entertainment as cheaply as possible vs. the content providers who would love to be able to charge you extra for letting house guests watch your TV with you.
Seems like they might be coming back from trying to be a Chrome-alike, and that's a good thing. Is that a return of the on-toolbar refresh button, grouped with the previously-and-once-again static navigation buttons? Did they really listen to complaints/suggestions from the sorts of people that drove their adoption via word-of-mouth in the first place?
I feel like putting lights/electronics on/in these things defeats their entire purpose. I was under the impression that they were intended to be a minor vent for fidgetiness, not a distractotron.
Slashdot Mirror
They do hold the majority of the search advertising market, so they're not entirely insane. "Dominant market position" might be a better label.
Or just uninstall systemd + reinstall sysvinit. It's not miserably complicated, though there are some additional steps (and things with hard systemd requirements won't work, but I feel like that's less of an issue):
http://without-systemd.org/wik...
That being said, I'm all for Devuan as a source of attrition for Debian, until they pull their heads back out of their butts. Shame there aren't enough takers to really raise enough concern from them.
Only if you're a humorless pedant. This statement applies to each sentence in you post.
Might actually come very close to reality when the conventional desktop is outmoded and no longer produced..
My ancient (Pentium M era) Fujitsu Lifebook's built-in SD reader reads a 32GB SDHC card without issue. SDHC wasn't a standard for ~2 years after the laptop was built, and 32GB cards seem to have spawned ~2 years after that. Not sure if the reader received a firmware update or anything to that effect.
Point is, it's a bit hit-and-miss, but the answer to your first question it "maybe"; it's a bit difficult to test with hardware that does not yet exist.
Regarding your second question: you want cloud. You're getting cloud. Because the makers of the phone know you need it. You can't be trusted with your own data, so they'll take it off your hands.
Statistics seem to favor air travel (fatalities per passenger-mile), with buses and trains trailing a bit.
Having trouble finding other sources that actually have a decent presentation of stats that I had seen in the past, but here is one:
https://journalistsresource.or...
Don't take this as a slight against rail or other mass transit services; they're more than competitive with air (especially when taking costs into account), with respect to safety, and seem to have the potential to achieve parity. Distracted/imprudent driving/operating behaviors apply to all forms of vehicular travel, and this seems like the most approachable area for improvements.
Renting usually entails some sort of provision of rights to the renter...
You're mistaken; you've volunteered for it by using these services, which are not likely to be critical to your mere survival. If you're not using the services anyways, what's the point of saying all that?
... to them is next to nothing; even when great swaths of the tech community manage to boycott/complain, they know it's just a drop in the bucket. All they have to do is take minimal pains to marginalize our concerns in the eyes of Joe Blow and they've all but won.
That's funny, I don't see any of those installed on anything I own. /hipsterapphater
Enough of the 'critiques' on browsers here are negative and destructive that I'd say we have a better chance at coming up with the ultimate anti-browser.
https://www.backblaze.com/b2/c...
https://help.backblaze.com/hc/...
Disclaimer: No warranty expressed or implied by me, and I have never used it.
... with all these Fuxing puns.
Those tags though...
If it knows what touches to simulate, then it can use any of a number of ways of doing so when the user isn't actively handling their phone (e.g. after it has been set down, but not yet auto-locked).
This matched some of the flights that the pilot made with his home flight simulator.
I had long been under the impression that this was a totally dead lead, but I guess they confirmed some time last year that someone had indeed plotted similar flights on his simulator. Interesting.
Two the plane was taken over by terrorists and eventually dove it nose first into the water. Most likely preventing a breech of main body and preventing a lot of debris from rising to surface.
Entering the water in any way but a very controlled ditching tends to cause an effect reminiscent of a Pringles can being stomped on by an elephant.
Indeed, my proposed question was somewhat rhetorical; if airlines want to shed the image of putting cost/profit at least a little bit above safety, they'll eventually figure it out. I hope. That's also pretty slick, I don't think I had ever heard of this arrangement specifically.
Why are aircraft not fitted with multiple impact-resistant EPIRB-like devices designed to separate from the aircraft and float to the surface? That and/or some sort of massive dye pack. Of course, a high speed impact with the water might destroy them (blackboxes can and have been destroyed by impact too), but having multiple locators on board seems like a reasonable idea. These things obviously do nothing for those who perish in an incident, but doing everything we can to obtain data on failures allows us to be better prepared in the future.
The also save a few pennies on the BOM, so there's that too.
We all know why; they know that most people won't be arsed to replace it when it starts to go bad, letting them sell another incrementally 'improved' generation of crap.
A balance must be struck between the masses that want the entertainment as cheaply as possible vs. the content providers who would love to be able to charge you extra for letting house guests watch your TV with you.
Seems like they might be coming back from trying to be a Chrome-alike, and that's a good thing. Is that a return of the on-toolbar refresh button, grouped with the previously-and-once-again static navigation buttons? Did they really listen to complaints/suggestions from the sorts of people that drove their adoption via word-of-mouth in the first place?
I feel like putting lights/electronics on/in these things defeats their entire purpose. I was under the impression that they were intended to be a minor vent for fidgetiness, not a distractotron.
Forgot AppleGoogle