Use a JBOD enclosure to present the physical devices to the OS where you can do your own logical volume creation and management (such as with ZFS). Just because he wants a JBOD enclosure doesn't mean he's going to use the physical volumes individually.
Re:I stopped reading the summary
on
Best eSATA JBOD?
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Until your controller goes berserk and craps all over your disk or your other disk fails in the middle of the rebuild. Or...
Indeed, running a Web store has allowed Coulton and other artists to experiment with intriguing innovations in flexible pricing. Remarkably, Coulton offers most of his music free on his site; when fans buy his songs, it is because they want to give him money.
I had never heard of him but I am definitely going to take a listen. What's remarkable to me is that people find the idea that people will pay for value... remarkable. The whole article is peppered with great examples of how Coulton embraces people using his work -- he even says it is a way to get him exposure. Most excellent.
1) 2.25 times that of our own gravitational pull would not be ideal for us to live but, it doesn't mean nothing could live there. I pull 2.25g's with my car on a dry skid pad, I have not died yet.
Is your daily driver a formula 1 prepped vehicle? If not I seriously doubt you pull more than 1G on a dry skid pad. (when you say "my car" I'm assuming you are speaking of the vehicle you regularly drive). One of the best production cars for skidpad grip is the Ferrari Enzo and it "only" pulls about 1.05G.
While doing research to write Congressman Kline (2nd District, Minnesota) I came across HR 1525 (I-SPY act, much coooler name) that appears to be a competing piece of legislation that is much more palatable.
But the cops test his soap for a date rape drug? Did they bother to stop for a second and consider the likeliness of application? "Oh, honey, why don't you take a drink of this soap, it's delicious."
My favorite part of the interview (second link):
There's a lot of buzz about that movie. Have you seen it?
Not yet. I got to watch the kid who plays me, and that was awful. He's nothing like me, and it was the worst thing ever, for a while.
For a while? So he got better?
No. But worse things have happened to me since then.
"When Scytl presented the system, everybody was impressed on the security features. It is covered by international patent and it has been declared secured by no less than Switzerland and everyone in the global community should respect that decision," Tuason told reporters in a conference Tuesday.
Switzerland is now the global arbiter of the well defined "secured" and the global community should accept that? Huh? This quote is either a really bad translation or high comedy.
Thought of this a while back on a similar subject: taking bittorrent as an example you track a file (or set of files) and the torrent has presized chunks that are hashed. A simple extension may be to change that relationship from one to many to many to many. Share a set of chunks and this particular torrent uses the following chunks (identified by their hash). Obviously this would cause overhead issues but would address the issue in TFA (which, being new here I did not read).
But cheating is not the focus of why this is very scary. I'll stipulate that a) cheating in MMORPGs or any multiplayer game is bad and b) Blizzard's EULA specifically restricts cheating and they have every right to ban you.
That said, they are attempting to completely redefine how copyright works and if they are successful it will have a serious effect across the industry. They've realized that there is pretty much no way they can effectively scan users systems (which if you agree to the EULA you've agreed to) so they are attempting this legal approach which is based on dubious legal theory. If they win your ability to do pretty much anything with the software you've installed on your system (like run it) can be tangled with "protection mechanisms" that further restrict your rights to use the software. The DMCA is being abused here and THIS is the thing the OP has a problem with.
FTR, I played WoW when it first came out but their EULA was so far reaching and invasive that I cancelled my accounts after two months. With this latest effort by Blizzard to redefine copyright law I will not be buying another of their products, even if they lose this case.
Integra is a regional operator that (I believe) is based here in Minnesota. I my area (southwest suburbs) they are the incumbent telco and they offer a DSL package. After having to deal with Comcast in the NE burbs and Qwest DSL in Flagstaff I am pleased as punch with Integra. The advertised bandwidth is met both directions, they don't filter traffic, they don't care that I run my own servers and best of all when I called tech support and asked for a PTR record they knew what the hell I was talking about and had it done in 5 minutes.
DSLreports.com is also a good place for information about this particular subject. I used be CIO for a regional broadband company and the sad thing is that less than 10% of the user base uses 90% of the bandwidth on the average network. Getting rid of those people is much cheaper than putting in WDM or other expensive technology to increase bandwidth. More troublesome to me are companies that have something like a Packeteer shaping the traffic and they don't let their consumers know (we did this).
Anyway, Integra gets a big thumbs up from me so far.
It really is sad to hear of the "zealots" that pull stunts such as calling a company and heckling them for a choice that doesn't impact the zealot one bit.
It's idiocy like this that gives any advocacy a bad name.
I read TFA, nowhere did I see that "private file sharing" would remain or become legal. What I did read is that the EU is attempting to harmonize the criminal code around commercial piracy. This harmonization could actually be _detrimental_ to private file sharing because it introduces an element of Napster to the member states (not that the article was hugely detailed but a site like Pirate Bay -- not in the EU, just an example -- could be considered profiting from copyright infringement and be prosecuted under something like this).
Anyhow, nowhere in the article does it say private file sharing for non-commercial purposes will be legalized, it only addresses it by saying that it isn't addressing that aspect.
What part of your research led you to this conclusion?
What might an attacker use this function to do?
An attacker could try to exploit the vulnerability by creating a specially crafted web page. An attacker could also create a specially-crafted email message and send it to an affected system. Upon viewing a web page, previewing or reading a specially crafted message, or opening a specially crafted email attachment the attacker could cause the affected system to execute code. While animated cursors typically are associated with the.ani file extension, a successful attack is not constrained by this file type.
Perhaps you could expand your research into the actual issue. (Above italics taken from the microsoft advisory, clearly indicating that arbitrary code can be executed and it's not a "relocated hot spot").
The corn based ethanol craze is founded in subsidies, not practicality. I grew up on a farm in southeastern Minnesota and came to loathe subsidies, PIC setaside acres, furloughs, etc. All kinds of ways to make money to do nothing that didn't benefit the family farm (which ours was) but ultimately lined the pockets of corporate farmers with lobby interests.
When I went to college (in Morris, Minnesota) there was an ethanol plant in town and I researched ethanol production just to provide some context to the awful smell (think rotting sileage) that hit my apartment complex when the wind was right. Even back in 1990 there was little justification to use ethanol because of the high energy use for production, the increased end-unit costs because of the need to blend at the POS (because ethanol absorbs water it needs to be mixed into the blend near the end delivery point) and the other implications for vehicles (reduced power/volume, injection issues, etc). The investment that the government has made has been misplaced. It purely subsidizes this waste instead of promoting the development of more efficient production/end product. The plant in Morris is still producing the exact same product in the exact same way, the only difference is now (16 years later) they are making money hand over fist.
Finally, corn requires a tremendous amount of water to grow. When we grew corn we didn't irrigate but big corporate farms cannot resist. The Oglalla aquifer is draining, which is a big deal. Irrigation for crops of all sorts are the primary culprit but the impact is larger -- most of the 'breadbasket' of the US is dependent in many ways on the viability of the Oglalla aquifer.
I am stunned and pleased that the DOE has stepped up and stated what should be the obvious. I hope that people following the stories realize that subsidies without measurable and definable goals have no place in our "free trade" economy (tongue in cheek there).
Some folks may not be impressed by this but after reading the whole thing I have to applaud M$ PR firm. They do their research extremely well and prepare the employee so thoroughly for what is going to transpire that I'm in awe. I've never worked for a huge company with a "good PR machine" and I've given interviews before -- what I wouldn't have done for this kind of prep!
Sugar has long been a highly subsidized crop. With all that's happened for corn since we decided to make ethanol a national strategy, perhaps we can justify keeping crazy sugar subsidies so we can power computers.
I was just reading the other day that Diebold (which is a very old company) is looking at possible exit strategies from the electronic voting arena because of the "bad name" it is giving them. (read more here)
Not only are their machines vulnerable (which is what gives them a bad name) they then exacerbate the situation with a ridiculous lawsuit like this? "We didn't win the contract and there is no evidence of wrongdoing but we either want the court to award us the contract or re-open the competition." It's even more absurd because the selection process in the public sector is very open and very documented. While 9 million is a lot of money, I don't think it's worth the rep hit they are going to take, yet again.
Slashdot Mirror
Use a JBOD enclosure to present the physical devices to the OS where you can do your own logical volume creation and management (such as with ZFS). Just because he wants a JBOD enclosure doesn't mean he's going to use the physical volumes individually.
Until your controller goes berserk and craps all over your disk or your other disk fails in the middle of the rebuild. Or...
He knows the law and he's correct and you're not. Here's a summary of Illinois: http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/illinois.html
Troll? It's an honest question and was answered quite well by people that responded. Well done abusive moderator.
Indeed, running a Web store has allowed Coulton and other artists to experiment with intriguing innovations in flexible pricing. Remarkably, Coulton offers most of his music free on his site; when fans buy his songs, it is because they want to give him money.
I had never heard of him but I am definitely going to take a listen. What's remarkable to me is that people find the idea that people will pay for value ... remarkable. The whole article is peppered with great examples of how Coulton embraces people using his work -- he even says it is a way to get him exposure. Most excellent.
Did they ever have the lead?
Is your daily driver a formula 1 prepped vehicle? If not I seriously doubt you pull more than 1G on a dry skid pad. (when you say "my car" I'm assuming you are speaking of the vehicle you regularly drive). One of the best production cars for skidpad grip is the Ferrari Enzo and it "only" pulls about 1.05G.
While doing research to write Congressman Kline (2nd District, Minnesota) I came across HR 1525 (I-SPY act, much coooler name) that appears to be a competing piece of legislation that is much more palatable.
My favorite part of the interview (second link):
There's a lot of buzz about that movie. Have you seen it? Not yet. I got to watch the kid who plays me, and that was awful. He's nothing like me, and it was the worst thing ever, for a while. For a while? So he got better? No. But worse things have happened to me since then.
"When Scytl presented the system, everybody was impressed on the security features. It is covered by international patent and it has been declared secured by no less than Switzerland and everyone in the global community should respect that decision," Tuason told reporters in a conference Tuesday.
Switzerland is now the global arbiter of the well defined "secured" and the global community should accept that? Huh? This quote is either a really bad translation or high comedy.
more insightful than funny, right in one.
Thought of this a while back on a similar subject: taking bittorrent as an example you track a file (or set of files) and the torrent has presized chunks that are hashed. A simple extension may be to change that relationship from one to many to many to many. Share a set of chunks and this particular torrent uses the following chunks (identified by their hash). Obviously this would cause overhead issues but would address the issue in TFA (which, being new here I did not read).
But cheating is not the focus of why this is very scary. I'll stipulate that a) cheating in MMORPGs or any multiplayer game is bad and b) Blizzard's EULA specifically restricts cheating and they have every right to ban you.
That said, they are attempting to completely redefine how copyright works and if they are successful it will have a serious effect across the industry. They've realized that there is pretty much no way they can effectively scan users systems (which if you agree to the EULA you've agreed to) so they are attempting this legal approach which is based on dubious legal theory. If they win your ability to do pretty much anything with the software you've installed on your system (like run it) can be tangled with "protection mechanisms" that further restrict your rights to use the software. The DMCA is being abused here and THIS is the thing the OP has a problem with.
FTR, I played WoW when it first came out but their EULA was so far reaching and invasive that I cancelled my accounts after two months. With this latest effort by Blizzard to redefine copyright law I will not be buying another of their products, even if they lose this case.
Only an astronaut would be able to say this. (IP in space ... messy without the proper container)
DSLreports.com is also a good place for information about this particular subject. I used be CIO for a regional broadband company and the sad thing is that less than 10% of the user base uses 90% of the bandwidth on the average network. Getting rid of those people is much cheaper than putting in WDM or other expensive technology to increase bandwidth. More troublesome to me are companies that have something like a Packeteer shaping the traffic and they don't let their consumers know (we did this).
Anyway, Integra gets a big thumbs up from me so far.
It's idiocy like this that gives any advocacy a bad name.
Anyhow, nowhere in the article does it say private file sharing for non-commercial purposes will be legalized, it only addresses it by saying that it isn't addressing that aspect.
What might an attacker use this function to do? .ani file extension, a successful attack is not constrained by this file type.
Perhaps you could expand your research into the actual issue. (Above italics taken from the microsoft advisory, clearly indicating that arbitrary code can be executed and it's not a "relocated hot spot").
An attacker could try to exploit the vulnerability by creating a specially crafted web page. An attacker could also create a specially-crafted email message and send it to an affected system. Upon viewing a web page, previewing or reading a specially crafted message, or opening a specially crafted email attachment the attacker could cause the affected system to execute code. While animated cursors typically are associated with the
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin /MS05-002.mspx
It's a new vector on an old problem as the parent said, it's been around a while.
You may have missed the point.
When I went to college (in Morris, Minnesota) there was an ethanol plant in town and I researched ethanol production just to provide some context to the awful smell (think rotting sileage) that hit my apartment complex when the wind was right. Even back in 1990 there was little justification to use ethanol because of the high energy use for production, the increased end-unit costs because of the need to blend at the POS (because ethanol absorbs water it needs to be mixed into the blend near the end delivery point) and the other implications for vehicles (reduced power/volume, injection issues, etc). The investment that the government has made has been misplaced. It purely subsidizes this waste instead of promoting the development of more efficient production/end product. The plant in Morris is still producing the exact same product in the exact same way, the only difference is now (16 years later) they are making money hand over fist.
Finally, corn requires a tremendous amount of water to grow. When we grew corn we didn't irrigate but big corporate farms cannot resist. The Oglalla aquifer is draining, which is a big deal. Irrigation for crops of all sorts are the primary culprit but the impact is larger -- most of the 'breadbasket' of the US is dependent in many ways on the viability of the Oglalla aquifer.
I am stunned and pleased that the DOE has stepped up and stated what should be the obvious. I hope that people following the stories realize that subsidies without measurable and definable goals have no place in our "free trade" economy (tongue in cheek there).
Have you heard of the National Socialist German Worker's Party?
Some folks may not be impressed by this but after reading the whole thing I have to applaud M$ PR firm. They do their research extremely well and prepare the employee so thoroughly for what is going to transpire that I'm in awe. I've never worked for a huge company with a "good PR machine" and I've given interviews before -- what I wouldn't have done for this kind of prep!
Sugar has long been a highly subsidized crop. With all that's happened for corn since we decided to make ethanol a national strategy, perhaps we can justify keeping crazy sugar subsidies so we can power computers.
Not only are their machines vulnerable (which is what gives them a bad name) they then exacerbate the situation with a ridiculous lawsuit like this? "We didn't win the contract and there is no evidence of wrongdoing but we either want the court to award us the contract or re-open the competition." It's even more absurd because the selection process in the public sector is very open and very documented. While 9 million is a lot of money, I don't think it's worth the rep hit they are going to take, yet again.