A well set-up and firewalled Windows system can be very stable nowadays.
I believe that -
But how much work is it to get there? I just installed Windows 2000 SP4 under qemu. In the time I had all the important cumulative Patches and Hotfixes applied (there were some 37 to check on windowsupdate) AND fixed all the stuff that got b0rked on the way (Explorer.exe for a basic desktop and msi.dll for the install control in the control center for example) I would happily be running a gentoo stage 1 install (and thus any other distro of choice).
I might have just been unlucky - but still there was some serious tweaking needed to get this one up and running.
Read the link you supplied and dont be silly. [...] The name derives from a German producer having set up shop in Vienna and using a recipe (beef and pork) which just didnt allow him to use the 'Frankfurter' name.
Thats right. But the link show the company trying to make damage control. Still the company cleary intended to make that connection (esp. if you hear the song in addition to the text itbis obvious). In a commercial it is much more important what you suggest - the facts are almost irrelevant.
Just take a look at the associations germans get from the word "Deutschländer":
" [...] Heim ins Reich? Noch immer - oder schon wieder?"
"That are the Nazi-Würstchen from the TV-commercial. [...]"
"[...] For a germany in the borders of 1483. Neapel stays ours!"
source: http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/info/Deutschl%E 4nder.html
Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies
on
Grokking Knoppix
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
Deutschländers;) - though I think that term denotes the "Germany-born" children of Turkish immigrants.
No. Deutschländer are a brand of sausage with a very cheesy commercial with WASPs singing patriotically "Deutschlander Würstchen... nach bester deutscher Art..." - you get the picture.
http://www.songtexte24.de/songtext-Meica---Deutsch laender-179068.html
Also producer Meica claimed in the commercial that the sausage has "the best of all kind of german sausage: blurb like Wieners, blurb like Bockwürste and blurb like Frankfurters". If you take a look at the map you will see that Wien is not part of germany. And the only time it was, was in the late 1930s till the early 1940s. Not a good time to make commercials with. http://www.fragenohneantwort.de/fragen/frage77.htm
In that case, how about putting two things in the encrypted archive:
1) A file for which you own the copyright (easy to autogenerate) 2) Another encrypted archive, with some simple password, of the files you really want to share
How about making the content of the copyrighted file the password for the other one?
And to make it funny, let the copyrighted file contain a Perl-Haiku (so it is real art).
Out of curiousity, could you be more specific about the "bloat" in Apache?
The reverse proxy for my zope is running on a old AMD K6/200 with 64 MB RAM- almost everything is bloat for that machine. Anyway in the next weeks the old machine will be gone and I plan to put the proxy on the machine where zope is running on. Still I dont want too much additional load on that machine. So much for the footprint.
Apart from that: apache is huge and administration and configuration is not trivial and a small and simple proxy might be easier to configure (and thus safer too, since often security issues are just bad configuration...)
I will give http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ a try as suggested by bavarian...
i have lots of experience doing exactly that.
Oh, great! [I didnt get it working] but im not gonna tell you cuz youre obviously a fucktard who doesnt know how to use google. try looking for yourself, asshole.
Im not looking for a proxy that doesnt work - Im looking for a working one - thanks for nothing.
P.S.:So you have lots of experience and cant tell me you got it working - only that you failed on two tries (probably because you didnt google?).
Does someone have expierence using a lightweight webserver like thttpd, tux, boa, lighttpd in front of zope/plone instead of apache? Is there some equvialent of VirtualHostingMonster for one of those? I mean, apache is a but of a bloat to be just a proxy...
Please comment!
As projects such as thttpd, tux, boa, lighttpd and many others clearly demonstrate.
Has anyone expierence using one of these as a proxy infront of zope?
I'll split up kdelibs and email you the 'modules' for only ninety-nine ninety nine apiece!
I wasnt talking about kde. I was talking about QT. It claims to be platform independant. But it isnt for GPL software (see windows license). Its current design is making it hard to use QT *only* for GUI stuff and using libs that are crossplatform under GPL without generating much duplicate code on the system. Think of the convenience!
Trust your package manager, Luke.
That's a fair complaint, if you think of Qt as a GUI library. It isn't. It's a cross platform API: it's designed to let people write software for Qt, and, in that way, for multiple platforms (last I looked, Windows, Mac OS X, and X11, which covers the vast majority of desktops out there.)
Not if I want my software to be free - QT for example is not available under GPL for windows.
So its a cross platform API only for commercial software.
Consider Firefox or OpenOffice NOT having Windows ports..
Firefox and OOo were cross-platform even from their pre-open-source roots, so they where not really ported.
FF and OO are means to keep/get critical infrastructure (the www and Office-documents) to a open standard.
Rosegarden is not comparable to this.
Thats not the point. The point is QT is a huge monolithic toolkit (it even contains GUI unrelated stuff like file operations). It would be better if it would be cleanly split in modules, so only those libs *needed* have to be installed. (I dont have to tell you about the advantages of modularisation, have I?)
But I guess someone wants to sell the package as a whole...
and in addition there is miranda (mirando-im.org). It is:
- Windows/wine only
but it is:
- GPLed software
- its also free as infree beer
and it is even more powerful than trillian...
Re:The smallest possible reason but big enough for
on
Mozilla 1.7.5 Released
·
· Score: 1
it works here:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041124 Firefox/1.0
so its not a bug in ff but in the built you (your distro) have/has...
Theoretically...If you have one single processor and one single hard drive and one single memory bus... parallel is SLOWER ... in theory. In a real enviroment this is different, because you are waiting for different resources: apache reading its conf from HD, NTP waiting for the server reply and sshd doing some numbercrunching to setup keys all need different resources (HDD,Server on net, CPU).
this guy heard: "Stop, we have you surrounded. This is the police." and then ran away although he did not know the position of the assumed policemen?
Not the brightest guy - he might have been easily shot if this had been real...
Slashdot Mirror
as has been discussed elsewhere:
libtorrent is BSD-licensed.
A well set-up and firewalled Windows system can be very stable nowadays.
I believe that -
But how much work is it to get there? I just installed Windows 2000 SP4 under qemu. In the time I had all the important cumulative Patches and Hotfixes applied (there were some 37 to check on windowsupdate) AND fixed all the stuff that got b0rked on the way (Explorer.exe for a basic desktop and msi.dll for the install control in the control center for example) I would happily be running a gentoo stage 1 install (and thus any other distro of choice).
I might have just been unlucky - but still there was some serious tweaking needed to get this one up and running.
all the better to enhance the shock effect of your next frontal assault./ msg02991.html
The next attack will be against BSD, not binary linux.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
that is so sad. ....
kudos to SpanKY, who found the right words for this poor soul
Read the link you supplied and dont be silly. [...] The name derives from a German producer having set up shop in Vienna and using a recipe (beef and pork) which just didnt allow him to use the 'Frankfurter' name.E 4nder.html
Thats right. But the link show the company trying to make damage control. Still the company cleary intended to make that connection (esp. if you hear the song in addition to the text itbis obvious). In a commercial it is much more important what you suggest - the facts are almost irrelevant.
Just take a look at the associations germans get from the word "Deutschländer":
" [...] Heim ins Reich? Noch immer - oder schon wieder?"
"That are the Nazi-Würstchen from the TV-commercial. [...]"
"[...] For a germany in the borders of 1483. Neapel stays ours!"
source: http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/info/Deutschl%
yhbt
Deutschländers ;) - though I think that term denotes the "Germany-born" children of Turkish immigrants. ... nach bester deutscher Art ..." - you get the picture.
http://www.songtexte24.de/songtext-Meica---Deutsch laender-179068.html m
No. Deutschländer are a brand of sausage with a very cheesy commercial with WASPs singing patriotically "Deutschlander Würstchen
Also producer Meica claimed in the commercial that the sausage has "the best of all kind of german sausage: blurb like Wieners, blurb like Bockwürste and blurb like Frankfurters". If you take a look at the map you will see that Wien is not part of germany. And the only time it was, was in the late 1930s till the early 1940s. Not a good time to make commercials with.
http://www.fragenohneantwort.de/fragen/frage77.ht
This tax was already applied to CD/DVD-burners and blank media. ...
http://www.golem.de/0301/23447.html(german)
(google tranlation)
The GEMA is/was also trying to get the tax on printers, IIRC
McWizard in the red corner with Megameknet/Megamek:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/megameknet/
and in the blue corner urgru with mekwars:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mekwars/
Is this what its all about?
How about making the content of the copyrighted file the password for the other one?
And to make it funny, let the copyrighted file contain a Perl-Haiku (so it is real art).
Out of curiousity, could you be more specific about the "bloat" in Apache? ...) ...
The reverse proxy for my zope is running on a old AMD K6/200 with 64 MB RAM- almost everything is bloat for that machine. Anyway in the next weeks the old machine will be gone and I plan to put the proxy on the machine where zope is running on. Still I dont want too much additional load on that machine. So much for the footprint.
Apart from that: apache is huge and administration and configuration is not trivial and a small and simple proxy might be easier to configure (and thus safer too, since often security issues are just bad configuration
I will give http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ a try as suggested by bavarian
i have lots of experience doing exactly that.
Oh, great!
[I didnt get it working] but im not gonna tell you cuz youre obviously a fucktard who doesnt know how to use google. try looking for yourself, asshole.
Im not looking for a proxy that doesnt work - Im looking for a working one - thanks for nothing.
P.S.:So you have lots of experience and cant tell me you got it working - only that you failed on two tries (probably because you didnt google?).
Does someone have expierence using a lightweight webserver like thttpd, tux, boa, lighttpd in front of zope/plone instead of apache? Is there some equvialent of VirtualHostingMonster for one of those? I mean, apache is a but of a bloat to be just a proxy ...
Please comment!
As projects such as thttpd, tux, boa, lighttpd and many others clearly demonstrate.
Has anyone expierence using one of these as a proxy infront of zope?
I'll split up kdelibs and email you the 'modules' for only ninety-nine ninety nine apiece!
I wasnt talking about kde. I was talking about QT. It claims to be platform independant. But it isnt for GPL software (see windows license). Its current design is making it hard to use QT *only* for GUI stuff and using libs that are crossplatform under GPL without generating much duplicate code on the system.
Think of the convenience!
Trust your package manager, Luke.
That's a fair complaint, if you think of Qt as a GUI library. It isn't. It's a cross platform API: it's designed to let people write software for Qt, and, in that way, for multiple platforms (last I looked, Windows, Mac OS X, and X11, which covers the vast majority of desktops out there.)
Not if I want my software to be free - QT for example is not available under GPL for windows.
So its a cross platform API only for commercial software.
his sstory?
Consider Firefox or OpenOffice NOT having Windows ports..
Firefox and OOo were cross-platform even from their pre-open-source roots, so they where not really ported.
FF and OO are means to keep/get critical infrastructure (the www and Office-documents) to a open standard.
Rosegarden is not comparable to this.
Thats not the point. The point is QT is a huge monolithic toolkit (it even contains GUI unrelated stuff like file operations). It would be better if it would be cleanly split in modules, so only those libs *needed* have to be installed. (I dont have to tell you about the advantages of modularisation, have I?) ...
But I guess someone wants to sell the package as a whole
and in addition there is miranda (mirando-im.org). It is: ...
- Windows/wine only
but it is:
- GPLed software
- its also free as infree beer
and it is even more powerful than trillian
it works here: ...
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041124 Firefox/1.0
so its not a bug in ff but in the built you (your distro) have/has
And last I checked nVu wasn't available for Linux/PPC.
Check again: http://gentoo-portage.com/net-www/nvu
http://www.nvu.com/
Theoretically...If you have one single processor and one single hard drive and one single memory bus... parallel is SLOWER
... in theory. In a real enviroment this is different, because you are waiting for different resources: apache reading its conf from HD, NTP waiting for the server reply and sshd doing some numbercrunching to setup keys all need different resources (HDD,Server on net, CPU).
this guy heard: "Stop, we have you surrounded. This is the police." and then ran away although he did not know the position of the assumed policemen? ...
Not the brightest guy - he might have been easily shot if this had been real