I think it is more likely that the method used for dating these discoveries is horribly inaccurate. For decades we were using inaccurate methods, and we might still be.
I think Slashdot users are intelligent enough to hate people who were successful because they got lucky, while people who actually make a contribution to the world get ignored. I have more respect for someone in IT making $50,000 in Silicon Valley protecting our country, than some loudmouth who got lucky selling out during a dotcom bubble.
People didn't want what Cuban produced. It was a failure. He just got lucky selling it to stupid Yahoo for $5.7 billion which then shuttered it. He was in the right place at the right time in the middle of a bubble.
That does under the "duh" file too. You don't think tech board members actually do any work do you? They are just riding the wave of money that is in tech.
That isn't a Co-op. It is just trying to sell stock to individual investors. These people have no idea how public companies are run. Unless you own a significant portion of the shares you aren't changing anything.
Eh, that is fairly typical with software development. The truth is that no one really knows how to do it right. That is why the methodologies switch around every few years.
Like AI and autonomous cars, flying cars are right around the corner. And since I had a C64 in my youth, and now my computer today is 10000x faster, computers in the future will be even more powerful than today. After all: progress is inevitable.
If you can install software on a computer it makes that computer instantly insecure. It really has nothing to do with SMB being secure. You could do this with any protocol, but API support for this in SMB makes it easier.
Slashdot Mirror
I think it is more likely that the method used for dating these discoveries is horribly inaccurate. For decades we were using inaccurate methods, and we might still be.
Dianetics. I had money before I read it.
I think Slashdot users are intelligent enough to hate people who were successful because they got lucky, while people who actually make a contribution to the world get ignored. I have more respect for someone in IT making $50,000 in Silicon Valley protecting our country, than some loudmouth who got lucky selling out during a dotcom bubble.
People didn't want what Cuban produced. It was a failure. He just got lucky selling it to stupid Yahoo for $5.7 billion which then shuttered it. He was in the right place at the right time in the middle of a bubble.
Why would you donate any money to a tech company? They are rolling in money.
That does under the "duh" file too. You don't think tech board members actually do any work do you? They are just riding the wave of money that is in tech.
Duh. They aren't doing it for fun.
Red meat is a poison too, but I always see you stuffing a burger in your face.
Truly the "social sharing" generation!
What is wrong with "watching what you say"? Didn't your Mom teach you that when you were a kid???
That isn't a Co-op. It is just trying to sell stock to individual investors. These people have no idea how public companies are run. Unless you own a significant portion of the shares you aren't changing anything.
I used to do that. Now I just ignore them. It is much easier!
Eh, that is fairly typical with software development. The truth is that no one really knows how to do it right. That is why the methodologies switch around every few years.
You won't get funding for your next mission unless you dangle the "well there could have been life there" card.
Bugzilla. It sucks. But that is what it is there for.
I'll bet Pinboard makes upwards of $0 per year on subscriptions.
Like AI and autonomous cars, flying cars are right around the corner. And since I had a C64 in my youth, and now my computer today is 10000x faster, computers in the future will be even more powerful than today. After all: progress is inevitable.
That probably explains it, and also the 800MB file limit they mentioned.
If you can install software on a computer it makes that computer instantly insecure. It really has nothing to do with SMB being secure. You could do this with any protocol, but API support for this in SMB makes it easier.
It is Windows only for now, but we are working on a Linux version. Don't tell anyone though.
I'm still trying to figure out how it only supports 20 files max. I am suspecting variable names like "filename1", "filename2", etc.
Lots of people like chicken. Not just me, snowflake.
You are responsible for security at a 3 letter government agency and you earn $50,000 in Silicon Valley?
I probably will buy it too. What do you think about that?
I thought we were all going to Mars. It turns out the rich just want to deliver more satellites. What a waste of time. Use a regular rocket, Paul.