"It would have to be backwards compatible with English. Then you could say that everyone who speaks English is also speaking your constructed language."
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
Note that if anyone with copyright over the kernel wins such a suit, the rights to use the kernel are lost for all time ("terminated"). And, there's no way to get those rights to use the kernel back. (Well, maybe they could negotiate with every individual copyright holder...)
Those who don't honor the requirements are playing with fire, and risking their entire business. That includes large firms like Samsung, who makes a habit of not releasing Linux (Android) kernel source for a considerable time after releasing new phones.
Someday, someone with a copyright interest in the kernel is going to sue a Samsung, and get a billion dollar negotiated settlement because their business couldn't exist without a valid license to the kernel.
Woz designed a video system which very gracefully solved a few problems. For memory, one could choose from static or dynamic RAM. Static was easy to use, but costly. Dynamic RAM was required to be refreshed (accessed every couple of ms), or stored bits would simply be forgotten. But you could get higher capacity chips at lower cost.
Woz designed the Apple ][ video system so the order it read data from RAM automatically fulfilled the DRAM refresh requirements. And, the video system reads were interleaved with CPU access, so the CPU never had to wait while video or DRAM refresh was happening, as was common with other designs.
The claim of an 8:1 interlace isn't really correct. The bitmapped memory layout used an 8:8:1 interleave. The first 8 rows were addressed 0x400 apart, that pattern was then repeated 8 times with an offset of 0x80. Details can be Googled. Part of the reason for that is so DRAM refresh hit every required location often enough.
I don't know anything about this "Internet Association"...Just a guess...
Why guess? There's this cool website called "Google," which lets you look things up. For instance, it can point you to the "Internet Association" website!
And, their website even has information which indicates they support net neutrality, which makes the question legitimate.
"I don't mind a subscription model if it is cheap enough and I get upgrades forever."
And it doesn't cruft up and slow down over time, and a reinstall doesn't require 2 days of reconfiguring everything, and the upgrades don't break things by requiring new apps and drivers, and they don't move all the configuration settings again, and, and, and.
" the Argentinians have never had a presence on the islands"
Unless you consider that the Spanish had claims earlier than the British (via an agreement with the French, who were there first), that Argentina was previously held by Spain, and that independent Argentine claims date to the early 19th century attempts at settlement.
"The only tangible facts are that the people who now live on the islands voted overwhelmingly to remain under British sovereignty"
Are you related to Vladimir Putin? He says the same thing about Ukraine.
You do realize that Snowden only gathered the info, and it's journalists such as Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras who vet and release the information publicly?
Are you talking about the same Falkland Islands which the British took over from the Spanish who took them from the British who took them from the French? I'm not really seeing any valid claim to "UK sovereign territory," only a claim by force. Argentina has a reasonably legitimate claim based on geography instead of imperialism.
Why isn't there already a policy in place which anticipates and addresses your question?
My experience, personal and seeing others - he packs a box of personal things and goes home, making himself available via phone/personal email for the 2 weeks.
You absolutely need him there to transition the job? Again, poor planning - what would you have done if he had gotten hit by a bus?
"Voter apathy," you mean. I for one don't want people who would only vote because of a legal requirement to do so. If they won't get out and vote on their own, they're certainly not going to take the time to make an informed decision.
Then again, that's no doubt exactly why Obama wants it.
"Our very Constitution says quite explicitly they aren't allowed to issue warrants for "unknown" locations."
No, it says what it says. And, it says no such thing.
This is no different than a warrant to search a specific vehicle, independent of the location it might have been driven to. "Place to be searched" doesn't need to mean a physical location, it can mean a specific person or vehicle or computer.
The intent of the restriction is to ensure specificity, so there are no blanket warrants/searches. Allowing warrants for specific computers whose logical, but not physical, location is known doesn't undermine that.
The US Constitution was written to protect individual rights from a tyranny of the majority. The problem is judges who can't read plain English, and will rationalize to give the other branches whatever they want. The Supremes deserve contempt.
Slashdot Mirror
"It would have to be backwards compatible with English. Then you could say that everyone who speaks English is also speaking your constructed language."
Atsthay away oodgay ideaway. Itway eemssay ikelay away implesay ingthay otay oday.
Note that if anyone with copyright over the kernel wins such a suit, the rights to use the kernel are lost for all time ("terminated"). And, there's no way to get those rights to use the kernel back. (Well, maybe they could negotiate with every individual copyright holder...)
Those who don't honor the requirements are playing with fire, and risking their entire business. That includes large firms like Samsung, who makes a habit of not releasing Linux (Android) kernel source for a considerable time after releasing new phones.
Someday, someone with a copyright interest in the kernel is going to sue a Samsung, and get a billion dollar negotiated settlement because their business couldn't exist without a valid license to the kernel.
Woz designed a video system which very gracefully solved a few problems. For memory, one could choose from static or dynamic RAM. Static was easy to use, but costly. Dynamic RAM was required to be refreshed (accessed every couple of ms), or stored bits would simply be forgotten. But you could get higher capacity chips at lower cost.
Woz designed the Apple ][ video system so the order it read data from RAM automatically fulfilled the DRAM refresh requirements. And, the video system reads were interleaved with CPU access, so the CPU never had to wait while video or DRAM refresh was happening, as was common with other designs.
The claim of an 8:1 interlace isn't really correct. The bitmapped memory layout used an 8:8:1 interleave. The first 8 rows were addressed 0x400 apart, that pattern was then repeated 8 times with an offset of 0x80. Details can be Googled. Part of the reason for that is so DRAM refresh hit every required location often enough.
I've developed a perpetual motion machine. My main challenge is getting it to work without energy input.
Why guess? There's this cool website called "Google," which lets you look things up. For instance, it can point you to the "Internet Association" website!
And, their website even has information which indicates they support net neutrality, which makes the question legitimate.
I think Cromemco might have something to say about any claim Apple might make...
(Assuming we're limiting this to microcomputers. Otherwise, see Tek 4010, among others.)
"I don't mind a subscription model if it is cheap enough and I get upgrades forever."
And it doesn't cruft up and slow down over time, and a reinstall doesn't require 2 days of reconfiguring everything, and the upgrades don't break things by requiring new apps and drivers, and they don't move all the configuration settings again, and, and, and.
He realized he was not in a position to personally vet the info. He turned it over to well respected professional journalists.
You don't know your history very well, either.
" the Argentinians have never had a presence on the islands"
Unless you consider that the Spanish had claims earlier than the British (via an agreement with the French, who were there first), that Argentina was previously held by Spain, and that independent Argentine claims date to the early 19th century attempts at settlement.
"The only tangible facts are that the people who now live on the islands voted overwhelmingly to remain under British sovereignty"
Are you related to Vladimir Putin? He says the same thing about Ukraine.
"Is your position based on anti-Imperialism rather than will of the inhabitants of the islands?"
So, you support Russia taking over the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine?
You do realize that Snowden only gathered the info, and it's journalists such as Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras who vet and release the information publicly?
Are you talking about the same Falkland Islands which the British took over from the Spanish who took them from the British who took them from the French? I'm not really seeing any valid claim to "UK sovereign territory," only a claim by force. Argentina has a reasonably legitimate claim based on geography instead of imperialism.
Why isn't there already a policy in place which anticipates and addresses your question?
My experience, personal and seeing others - he packs a box of personal things and goes home, making himself available via phone/personal email for the 2 weeks.
You absolutely need him there to transition the job? Again, poor planning - what would you have done if he had gotten hit by a bus?
"essentially due to the retentive heroism of the pilots"
Or maybe they just, you know, pee before they go.
...and years before that, big labels got in trouble for paying people to stream their songs for free!
Perhaps the solution is to create an offsetting TWATTS project, to make the whole thing gender neutral.
(yea, some people simply want to be offended)
" I meant what I wrote. Disenfranchisement is a significant operation in this country right now. "
Oh, then. Bullshit.
"voter disenfranchisement doesn't help anyone"
"Voter apathy," you mean. I for one don't want people who would only vote because of a legal requirement to do so. If they won't get out and vote on their own, they're certainly not going to take the time to make an informed decision.
Then again, that's no doubt exactly why Obama wants it.
I suspect his problem with it is that he confuses it with WEP.
This is different because a cop can't search a car in Finland without going to Finland, and placing himself under Finnish jurisdiction.
"Our very Constitution says quite explicitly they aren't allowed to issue warrants for "unknown" locations."
No, it says what it says. And, it says no such thing.
This is no different than a warrant to search a specific vehicle, independent of the location it might have been driven to. "Place to be searched" doesn't need to mean a physical location, it can mean a specific person or vehicle or computer.
The intent of the restriction is to ensure specificity, so there are no blanket warrants/searches. Allowing warrants for specific computers whose logical, but not physical, location is known doesn't undermine that.
But, the thing is, the cops don't have a license to transmit on the frequencies uses. Yet another case of breaking the law to enforce the law.
Its a mute point. Your begging the question, "Y"?
The US Constitution was written to protect individual rights from a tyranny of the majority. The problem is judges who can't read plain English, and will rationalize to give the other branches whatever they want. The Supremes deserve contempt.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
But, the murderer is no longer a burden on society.