Okay, this far down the page and nobody mentions it. GPUs are designed to perform floating point operations on 4x4 arrays of floating point numbers. This allows them to do the math required to scale, rotate, and project 3d vectors onto a 2d surface. Follow so far? These circuits not only have fast memory ties and huge parallelism, the are also hard wired to perform some of the exact same operations required by FAH in only a few clock cycles instead of 44 (on the P4, 14 on the Opteron). Being massively parallel means that instead of two FLOPS per clock the GPUs can push out hundreds, and they return in a short period of time so that any steps waiting on the result of a previous operation will be able to execute faster. GPU's are very specific in their power, and it is no surprise to anyone who has played a game in software-only mode vs hardware accelerated mode that custom hardware is insanely fast. Memory bandwidth is a factor, but not nearly the factor that people make it. It has NOTHING to do with not running the OS, if and OS had that much overhead we would be screwed. Get a clue people, custom hardware is good at custom things. Plain. Simple.
Also, research instead of speculating, or wait for someone to research for you. Don't throw assumptions out there, its bad for the community.
I feel like the fight has just begun. We are only a few punches in. AMD was slow to start, had a few HUGE hits(64 bit, hyper-transport, Opteron, Dual cores that perform like dual cores and not two CPU's chained to the same FSB) and Now Intel actually has thrown a punch. This will be back and forth every 6 or 8 months for a long, long time.
I've looked at the Core 2 Duo's processor specs (a riveting read, I swear) and they are not introducing anything that special, it really is an evolutionary breeding of AMD athlon64 tech with the P3, and I think they got the mix wrong. They will be hitting memory walls and scalability walls sooner than one would hope, they new FAB process will help with that, but they are shooting for massively parallel systems (4 cores,, etc). AMD is sticking to better per core and co-ordinated performance.
AMD will bounce back, and Intel will face problems getting cross-core communication to even hint at what hyper-transport can do for in that arena.
I'm going to be watching this fight with great interest, but even though I'm rooting for AMD I will still follow my wallet when the time comes to buy.
Dlink could have cheerfully continued to distribute their product but simply made available the source code from the kernel. Include a little piece of paper in the bodx that says something to the effect of, "This product is power by the Linux Kernel. In accordance with the GPL the source code for GPL software running on this device can be downloaded from www.dlink.com/GPL under [model number]. Please note that this product also contains proprietary software not included in the GPL." They can use linux for pretty much free (bandwidth for the few who download and the cost of ink) and the GPL is upheld.
Pretty much the GPL is a 'give credit where credit is due' licence, with derivative works included. How dumb can their legal department be?
Unless, of course, they are lining up to turn their backs on Linux =(
I hope not, it is a great tool that they should be using! They just have to follow the rules.
PostgreSQL has had an escape function for years. Just pass and null terminated string to the function and it returns a string (or a pointer to a string, depending on the language) and that is safe to put in a SQL query. Honestly it is just that easy.
IMHO Stick with Debian. It may not be perfect, but there is a huge process behind things. Ubuntu has a different process that brings newer (read: less stable inherently) things in sooner. Debian starts with proven code, so it can get away with more, shall we say, pointless politics and squabbles.
I love Debian, I used to love fedora, but that was before I had to use Linux at work. In work environments Debian rocks. Ubuntu is... not for work, it is a windows replacement. What else can I say?
A CLI is a bit more the system I'm afraid. You are right, the CLI does not imply that (ever used window's CLI to dome something useful, like a complex script?), but most non-gui based OSes are more prone to exposing the user to the down and dirty. Not a rule, more of a trend really.
I just want to put a plug out for my good friend whirlpool
Slected as the replacement for SHA-1 years ago by the European NSA, 512 bits long, based on AES.
Who loves ya?
Here is a page with a few promising items: http://www.sbs.com/products/family/110/
I don't know too much about more than T1s (yet), but that looks about right to me.
Let me know if it is of any use to you.
I do believe that this is a DSP, or digital signal processor and hence the amount of information that can be had from a signal is dependent on the speed that the DSP runs at. It may seem overkill to sample a signal at 210x its frequency (assuming 2.4 GHz range), but that can allow for all manner of interesting signal encoding to help transmissions approach the Shannon limit and allow for more tunable transmission of data (meaning that you get the speed you need while investing as little energy as possible). Plus with a processor like that and a small antenna array one can setup a highly directional signal, saving more energy.
The why lies a few years away in implementation when the speed is brought down to production levels, but lets give credit to a bunch of scientists with to much funding, time, and liquid helium (?) on their hands. Bravo.
Okay, why do they say things like "100 megapixel *limit*" (emphasis mine). The sound barrier was a limit, it was a point on the spedometer that seemed impossible to go past. Things changed at that point and a whole different school of thought was nessary to overcome the limit. a 100 Megapixel sensor, while an unholy and awsome creature, is nothing more than the latest and greatest CCD sensor. they broke hte 100 Megapixel mark. Having said that, bravo for them.
Okay, I had to turn my speakers ALL the way up to get the full THX sound, it is *not that bad*. Look at the ociliscope or spectum analyzere that you video player of chice provides you with, it barely moves from zero. It is simply a side effect of the wide range of volue (nothing to something) over a decent amount of time and the complimentary combination of tones that makes it seem so loud. Yeesh.
I like your quote. I just want you to change it to "I want to hear how it ends."
I'm normally not picky, but that line is (for now) the last haunting echo of Futurama, and it should not be misquoted. I check to wiki to be sure.
Nice to see that someone else still remembers Futurama.
First they outlaw playing the game that portrays breaking the law, Then they oulaw books that portray breaking the law, Then they illegalize negative writing against the government, Then there is no freedom of speach and no recouse but revoloution.
Any government that cannot be criticised by the people it governs, or limits freedoms against their will, deserves to be overthrown, and the leaders heads hung on pikes for good measure.
They also were the first ot introduce dual core cpus in which each core can talk to the other via a direct link instead of the system bus and they were to first to include a memory controller onboard their processors. They also have more registers than any other x86 processor, even more in 64 bit mode (those few extras go a long way, belive me).
They are figting an 800lb gorilla, they must win with brains, and I believe they have that in spades. I am certain the race will get intreresting in the next few years, but I feel that Intel cannot change direction fast enough to get out of some of their mistakes. Look how long they have kept netburst, despite superior technology in their Centrino processors. They seem to focus on the wrong improvements. That may all change, but I have a feeling that with their new VIIV (say 'vive') chipsets they will only serve to bing more bloat and latency to their allready crowded and busy chips. I wish them luck, it will spur innovation, but they are in a hole right now. Then again one new chip is all it might take to turn the tides, both in Pr and in tech. I wait with bated breath for both camps to make a big move.
Anything less than windows server 2003 standard edition (not small business, I think?) will only support 2 cpus. Anyway, in server 2003 there is little driver support in the graphics card world for server 2003, and for many other pc parts for that matter. Plus a copy of server will run you upwards of $1000. T
PLUS, most games are gpu limited anyway, not cpu.
Dual core is on there I'm sure, but right now most games aren't even optimized for that, let alone 4!
On top of it all the P4 does not support a 2 cpu rig, that would be a Xenon. You priced a dual core/dualcpu capable chip lately. I'm not even sure they exist, but just a dual core Xenon is...ouch.
Thats why.
Re:I know the question we're all asking ourselves:
on
Darknets Coming Soon?
·
· Score: 1
Is it not obvious?
N Qnexarg vf n cevingr iveghny argjbex jurer hfref bayl pbaarpg gb crbcyr gurl gehfg. Glcvpnyyl fhpu argjbexf ner fznyy, bsgra jvgu srjre guna 10 hfref rnpu. Va vgf zbfg trareny zrnavat, n Qnexarg pna or nal glcr pybfrq, cevingr tebhc bs crbcyr pbzzhavpngvat, ohg gur anzr vf zbfg bsgra hfrq fcrpvsvpnyyl sbe svyr funevat argjbexf.
Gur grez bevtvangrq sebz Gur Qnexarg naq gur Shgher bs Pbagrag Qvfgevohgvba, na negvpyr ol Crgre Ovqqyr, Cnhy Ratynaq, Znephf Crvanqb, naq Oelna Jvyyzna, sbhe rzcyblrrf bs Zvpebfbsg. Gurl nethrq gung gur cerfrapr bs gur qnexarg jnf gur znwbe uvaqenapr gb gur qrirybczrag bs jbexnoyr QEZ grpuabybtvrf. Guvf grez unf fvapr frra hfntr va znwbe zrqvn fbheprf, vapyhqvat Ebyyvat Fgbar, Gur Rpbabzvfg, naq Jverq zntnmvar, naq vg vf nyfb gur gvgyr bs n obbx ol W.Q. Ynfvpn.
Jura hfrq gb qrfpevor n svyr funevat argjbex, gur grez vf flabalzbhf jvgu gur creuncf zber jvqryl hfrq Sevraq-gb-sevraq - obgu qrfpevovat argjbexf jurer hfref pbzchgref funer svyrf bayl jvgu gehfgrq sevraqf. Gur zbfg jvqrfcernq svyr funevat argjbexf yvxr Xnmnn, naq rira urnivyl rapelcgrq argjbexf yvxr Serrarg, ner abg qnexargf fvapr crref jvyy pbzzhavpngr jvgu nalobql ryfr ba gur argjbex. Gur creuncf zbfg jvqryl hfrq qnexarg fbsgjner vf Ahyyfbsg'f JNFGR. Gur qrirybcref bs Serrarg unir fgngrq gung gurl ner jbexvat ba n arj irefvba gung jvyy or n qnexarg, juvpu hayvxr glcvpny Qnexargf, jvyy or pncnoyr bs fhccbegvat cbgragvnyyl zvyyvbaf bs hfref hfvat na nccyvpngvba bs fznyy jbeyq gurbel.
Rneyl irefvbaf bs Nccyr'f vGharf nyybjrq hfref gb fcrpvsl gur VC bs n erzbgr fhoarg naq funer gurve zhfvp jvgu hfref va gung fhoarg va n Qnexarg yvxr snfuvba. Arjre irefvbaf qvfnoyr gung shapgvbanyvgl, ohg fgvyy nyybj hfref gb fgernz zhfvp jvguva gurve bja fhoarg; unpxf fhpu nf bheGharf nyybj hfref ba gur fnzr vGharf argjbex gb qbjaybnq rnpu bguref' zhfvp jvgu ab ybff bs dhnyvgl.
Gur pbzchgre tnzr Fcyvagre Pryy: Punbf Gurbel zragvbarq n vagrerfgvat pbaprcg sbe n jveryrff Qnexarg gung hfrq aba-fgnaqneq serdhrapvrf, cbffvoyl vyyrtny hayvprafrq barf, gb znxr vg irel qvssvphyg sbe nal fvtany gb or vagreprcgrq. Jvgu fbcuvfgvpngrq uneqjner naq hfr bs fcernq-fcrpgehz enaqbz serdhrapl ubccvat bire n ynetr serdhrapl onaq bs, fnl, 900ZUm gb 10 be rira 50TUm, guvf pbhyq or n irel rssrpgvir zrgubq bs frphevgl, naq vaqrrq vf fvzvyne gb gur enaqbz serdhrapl ubccvat gung vf hfrq ol zvyvgnel enqvbf gb znxr fvtany vagreprcgvba irel qvssvphyg.
End to end hardware encryption between your Voip box and the Voip provider is TRIVIAL. I wanted to play with encryption not to long ago and all I had to do is pull the code out of the kernel. It is small, fast, and easy to understand and use, and with twofish or aes running with public key encryption there is no way to identify the data.
I don't believe that encryption will add any noticeable latency to the call, routing takes orders of magnitude longer. Another concern that many have is port blocking and traffic identification. This one is simple, just use the standard SSL ports (I know VOIP is currently UDP for latency issues, but it would be trivial to masqerade UDP style communications as TCP). If the SSL ports are blocked more people than just VOIP customers will be, for lack of a more vivid description, bloody freaking insane with rage, especially online retailers themselves. Unless Ma Bell wants to start a Chinese Firewall Jr., they can't do a thing about VOIP.
Oh, and one last thing, start filtering content and Ma Bell will lose her common carrier status. Now, she may have the legal power in Washington to get around that in the long term, but in the short term that guarntees that we will have plenty of time to re engineer the protocols for encapsulation and encryption while legislation is going through.
For those of you not in the know, a common carrier simply moves something (material, data, etc) from point a to point b and are afforded legal immunity from being held responsible for what they are carrying (amoung other perks). In order to maintain this status they must adhere to a specific set of rules. One of them is, roughly, ignorance of everything moving across their network. If they breech that rule once, they are vulnerable to any number of lawsuits ranging from all the stolen music on their network, to kiddy porn, to terrorist meetings being held, ect.
Fear not Ma Bell. She is simply speaking out of fear, or deep ignorance.
Sharp still has some work to do, however, as viewers say that they cannot look directly at the display, their eyes ccannot focus and seem to slide off.
If you have a managed switch, sounds like you do, set it so that the computer can see up but not around, they can see the reast of the world, but do not see others on the switch. NAT all the boxen as well.
Ok, lets just get ONE THING F*ING CLEAR:
Radiation is not like other everyday occurances, either radiation ionizes your molecules/atoms, or it dosen't. It's not like pushing a car down the road, where you will get thre no matter what, its just a mater of time, no. It's more like pushing a car up a hill, either your strong enough, or not.
Thats is why lab rats get cancer, or other assorted forms of doom, when they are exposed to "Cell phone like radiation", they get a higher dose to 'accelerate' (change the outcome of, whatever) the experiment. If they were given the dose that you recieve from standing a few hundred feet from a tower, or holding a cell phone an inch or so from your brain the rats would have jack.
Do some research, folks. Better yet, how bout the media do a bit of reporting! Tell folks what I just did, DUMB IT DOWN, make peoiple understand that unless the tests are fair, they mean SQUAT.
Sorry for all the shouting. False science makes me angry. You should hear me in my programing class.
Netflix has it down, if I time it right I can get a new movie almost every day. Sunday is my day to catch up if I need to. That sort of reliable, continuious service is hard to come by. They better not go out of business, I have 255 movies in my queue, thats a lot of movies to move over to another system.
Yeah, I'm adicted, so?
Slashdot Mirror
Okay, this far down the page and nobody mentions it.
GPUs are designed to perform floating point operations on 4x4 arrays of floating point numbers. This allows them to do the math required to scale, rotate, and project 3d vectors onto a 2d surface. Follow so far? These circuits not only have fast memory ties and huge parallelism, the are also hard wired to perform some of the exact same operations required by FAH in only a few clock cycles instead of 44 (on the P4, 14 on the Opteron).
Being massively parallel means that instead of two FLOPS per clock the GPUs can push out hundreds, and they return in a short period of time so that any steps waiting on the result of a previous operation will be able to execute faster.
GPU's are very specific in their power, and it is no surprise to anyone who has played a game in software-only mode vs hardware accelerated mode that custom hardware is insanely fast.
Memory bandwidth is a factor, but not nearly the factor that people make it.
It has NOTHING to do with not running the OS, if and OS had that much overhead we would be screwed.
Get a clue people, custom hardware is good at custom things. Plain. Simple.
Also, research instead of speculating, or wait for someone to research for you. Don't throw assumptions out there, its bad for the community.
I feel like the fight has just begun. We are only a few punches in. AMD was slow to start, had a few HUGE hits(64 bit, hyper-transport, Opteron, Dual cores that perform like dual cores and not two CPU's chained to the same FSB) and Now Intel actually has thrown a punch. This will be back and forth every 6 or 8 months for a long, long time. I've looked at the Core 2 Duo's processor specs (a riveting read, I swear) and they are not introducing anything that special, it really is an evolutionary breeding of AMD athlon64 tech with the P3, and I think they got the mix wrong. They will be hitting memory walls and scalability walls sooner than one would hope, they new FAB process will help with that, but they are shooting for massively parallel systems (4 cores,, etc). AMD is sticking to better per core and co-ordinated performance. AMD will bounce back, and Intel will face problems getting cross-core communication to even hint at what hyper-transport can do for in that arena. I'm going to be watching this fight with great interest, but even though I'm rooting for AMD I will still follow my wallet when the time comes to buy.
Dlink could have cheerfully continued to distribute their product but simply made available the source code from the kernel. Include a little piece of paper in the bodx that says something to the effect of, "This product is power by the Linux Kernel. In accordance with the GPL the source code for GPL software running on this device can be downloaded from www.dlink.com/GPL under [model number]. Please note that this product also contains proprietary software not included in the GPL." They can use linux for pretty much free (bandwidth for the few who download and the cost of ink) and the GPL is upheld. Pretty much the GPL is a 'give credit where credit is due' licence, with derivative works included. How dumb can their legal department be? Unless, of course, they are lining up to turn their backs on Linux =( I hope not, it is a great tool that they should be using! They just have to follow the rules.
PostgreSQL has had an escape function for years. Just pass and null terminated string to the function and it returns a string (or a pointer to a string, depending on the language) and that is safe to put in a SQL query. Honestly it is just that easy.
IMHO
Stick with Debian. It may not be perfect, but there is a huge process behind things. Ubuntu has a different process that brings newer (read: less stable inherently) things in sooner. Debian starts with proven code, so it can get away with more, shall we say, pointless politics and squabbles.
I love Debian, I used to love fedora, but that was before I had to use Linux at work. In work environments Debian rocks. Ubuntu is... not for work, it is a windows replacement. What else can I say?
A CLI is a bit more the system I'm afraid. You are right, the CLI does not imply that (ever used window's CLI to dome something useful, like a complex script?), but most non-gui based OSes are more prone to exposing the user to the down and dirty.
Not a rule, more of a trend really.
I was implying that European analogue for the NSA, though I suppose I should have been more specific.
I just want to put a plug out for my good friend whirlpool
Slected as the replacement for SHA-1 years ago by the European NSA, 512 bits long, based on AES.
Who loves ya?
Here is a page with a few promising items: http://www.sbs.com/products/family/110/ I don't know too much about more than T1s (yet), but that looks about right to me. Let me know if it is of any use to you.
I do believe that this is a DSP, or digital signal processor and hence the amount of information that can be had from a signal is dependent on the speed that the DSP runs at. It may seem overkill to sample a signal at 210x its frequency (assuming 2.4 GHz range), but that can allow for all manner of interesting signal encoding to help transmissions approach the Shannon limit and allow for more tunable transmission of data (meaning that you get the speed you need while investing as little energy as possible). Plus with a processor like that and a small antenna array one can setup a highly directional signal, saving more energy.
The why lies a few years away in implementation when the speed is brought down to production levels, but lets give credit to a bunch of scientists with to much funding, time, and liquid helium (?) on their hands. Bravo.
Okay, why do they say things like "100 megapixel *limit*" (emphasis mine). The sound barrier was a limit, it was a point on the spedometer that seemed impossible to go past. Things changed at that point and a whole different school of thought was nessary to overcome the limit.
a 100 Megapixel sensor, while an unholy and awsome creature, is nothing more than the latest and greatest CCD sensor. they broke hte 100 Megapixel mark.
Having said that, bravo for them.
Okay, I had to turn my speakers ALL the way up to get the full THX sound, it is *not that bad*. Look at the ociliscope or spectum analyzere that you video player of chice provides you with, it barely moves from zero. It is simply a side effect of the wide range of volue (nothing to something) over a decent amount of time and the complimentary combination of tones that makes it seem so loud. Yeesh.
I like your quote. I just want you to change it to "I want to hear how it ends." I'm normally not picky, but that line is (for now) the last haunting echo of Futurama, and it should not be misquoted. I check to wiki to be sure. Nice to see that someone else still remembers Futurama.
First they outlaw playing the game that portrays breaking the law,
Then they oulaw books that portray breaking the law,
Then they illegalize negative writing against the government,
Then there is no freedom of speach and no recouse but revoloution.
Any government that cannot be criticised by the people it governs, or limits freedoms against their will, deserves to be overthrown, and the leaders heads hung on pikes for good measure.
They also were the first ot introduce dual core cpus in which each core can talk to the other via a direct link instead of the system bus and they were to first to include a memory controller onboard their processors. They also have more registers than any other x86 processor, even more in 64 bit mode (those few extras go a long way, belive me). They are figting an 800lb gorilla, they must win with brains, and I believe they have that in spades. I am certain the race will get intreresting in the next few years, but I feel that Intel cannot change direction fast enough to get out of some of their mistakes. Look how long they have kept netburst, despite superior technology in their Centrino processors. They seem to focus on the wrong improvements. That may all change, but I have a feeling that with their new VIIV (say 'vive') chipsets they will only serve to bing more bloat and latency to their allready crowded and busy chips. I wish them luck, it will spur innovation, but they are in a hole right now. Then again one new chip is all it might take to turn the tides, both in Pr and in tech. I wait with bated breath for both camps to make a big move.
Anything less than windows server 2003 standard edition (not small business, I think?) will only support 2 cpus.
Anyway, in server 2003 there is little driver support in the graphics card world for server 2003, and for many other pc parts for that matter. Plus a copy of server will run you upwards of $1000. T
PLUS, most games are gpu limited anyway, not cpu.
Dual core is on there I'm sure, but right now most games aren't even optimized for that, let alone 4!
On top of it all the P4 does not support a 2 cpu rig, that would be a Xenon. You priced a dual core/dualcpu capable chip lately. I'm not even sure they exist, but just a dual core Xenon is...ouch.
Thats why.
Is it not obvious?
N Qnexarg vf n cevingr iveghny argjbex jurer hfref bayl pbaarpg gb crbcyr gurl gehfg. Glcvpnyyl fhpu argjbexf ner fznyy, bsgra jvgu srjre guna 10 hfref rnpu. Va vgf zbfg trareny zrnavat, n Qnexarg pna or nal glcr pybfrq, cevingr tebhc bs crbcyr pbzzhavpngvat, ohg gur anzr vf zbfg bsgra hfrq fcrpvsvpnyyl sbe svyr funevat argjbexf.
Gur grez bevtvangrq sebz Gur Qnexarg naq gur Shgher bs Pbagrag Qvfgevohgvba, na negvpyr ol Crgre Ovqqyr, Cnhy Ratynaq, Znephf Crvanqb, naq Oelna Jvyyzna, sbhe rzcyblrrf bs Zvpebfbsg. Gurl nethrq gung gur cerfrapr bs gur qnexarg jnf gur znwbe uvaqenapr gb gur qrirybczrag bs jbexnoyr QEZ grpuabybtvrf. Guvf grez unf fvapr frra hfntr va znwbe zrqvn fbheprf, vapyhqvat Ebyyvat Fgbar, Gur Rpbabzvfg, naq Jverq zntnmvar, naq vg vf nyfb gur gvgyr bs n obbx ol W.Q. Ynfvpn.
Jura hfrq gb qrfpevor n svyr funevat argjbex, gur grez vf flabalzbhf jvgu gur creuncf zber jvqryl hfrq Sevraq-gb-sevraq - obgu qrfpevovat argjbexf jurer hfref pbzchgref funer svyrf bayl jvgu gehfgrq sevraqf. Gur zbfg jvqrfcernq svyr funevat argjbexf yvxr Xnmnn, naq rira urnivyl rapelcgrq argjbexf yvxr Serrarg, ner abg qnexargf fvapr crref jvyy pbzzhavpngr jvgu nalobql ryfr ba gur argjbex. Gur creuncf zbfg jvqryl hfrq qnexarg fbsgjner vf Ahyyfbsg'f JNFGR. Gur qrirybcref bs Serrarg unir fgngrq gung gurl ner jbexvat ba n arj irefvba gung jvyy or n qnexarg, juvpu hayvxr glcvpny Qnexargf, jvyy or pncnoyr bs fhccbegvat cbgragvnyyl zvyyvbaf bs hfref hfvat na nccyvpngvba bs fznyy jbeyq gurbel.
Rneyl irefvbaf bs Nccyr'f vGharf nyybjrq hfref gb fcrpvsl gur VC bs n erzbgr fhoarg naq funer gurve zhfvp jvgu hfref va gung fhoarg va n Qnexarg yvxr snfuvba. Arjre irefvbaf qvfnoyr gung shapgvbanyvgl, ohg fgvyy nyybj hfref gb fgernz zhfvp jvguva gurve bja fhoarg; unpxf fhpu nf bheGharf nyybj hfref ba gur fnzr vGharf argjbex gb qbjaybnq rnpu bguref' zhfvp jvgu ab ybff bs dhnyvgl.
Gur pbzchgre tnzr Fcyvagre Pryy: Punbf Gurbel zragvbarq n vagrerfgvat pbaprcg sbe n jveryrff Qnexarg gung hfrq aba-fgnaqneq serdhrapvrf, cbffvoyl vyyrtny hayvprafrq barf, gb znxr vg irel qvssvphyg sbe nal fvtany gb or vagreprcgrq. Jvgu fbcuvfgvpngrq uneqjner naq hfr bs fcernq-fcrpgehz enaqbz serdhrapl ubccvat bire n ynetr serdhrapl onaq bs, fnl, 900ZUm gb 10 be rira 50TUm, guvf pbhyq or n irel rssrpgvir zrgubq bs frphevgl, naq vaqrrq vf fvzvyne gb gur enaqbz serdhrapl ubccvat gung vf hfrq ol zvyvgnel enqvbf gb znxr fvtany vagreprcgvba irel qvssvphyg.
So simple...
End to end hardware encryption between your Voip box and the Voip provider is TRIVIAL. I wanted to play with encryption not to long ago and all I had to do is pull the code out of the kernel. It is small, fast, and easy to understand and use, and with twofish or aes running with public key encryption there is no way to identify the data.
I don't believe that encryption will add any noticeable latency to the call, routing takes orders of magnitude longer. Another concern that many have is port blocking and traffic identification. This one is simple, just use the standard SSL ports (I know VOIP is currently UDP for latency issues, but it would be trivial to masqerade UDP style communications as TCP). If the SSL ports are blocked more people than just VOIP customers will be, for lack of a more vivid description, bloody freaking insane with rage, especially online retailers themselves. Unless Ma Bell wants to start a Chinese Firewall Jr., they can't do a thing about VOIP.
Oh, and one last thing, start filtering content and Ma Bell will lose her common carrier status. Now, she may have the legal power in Washington to get around that in the long term, but in the short term that guarntees that we will have plenty of time to re engineer the protocols for encapsulation and encryption while legislation is going through.
For those of you not in the know, a common carrier simply moves something (material, data, etc) from point a to point b and are afforded legal immunity from being held responsible for what they are carrying (amoung other perks). In order to maintain this status they must adhere to a specific set of rules. One of them is, roughly, ignorance of everything moving across their network. If they breech that rule once, they are vulnerable to any number of lawsuits ranging from all the stolen music on their network, to kiddy porn, to terrorist meetings being held, ect.
Fear not Ma Bell. She is simply speaking out of fear, or deep ignorance.
You had heavy elements?
Wimp.
Sharp still has some work to do, however, as viewers say that they cannot look directly at the display, their eyes ccannot focus and seem to slide off.
You could base 64 encode it.
S BmcHV0YygoKGE+PiggKCgoeT4+KDMteikqOCkpJjMxICkgLSgg KCh5Pj4oMy16KSo4KzUpJjcpKSApICkgJiAoMHhGRj4+KDgtKC goeT4+KDMteikqOCs1KSY3KSkpKSkrcyxzdGRvdXQpOwojZGVm aW5lIGsoeCx5LHopIGZwdXRjKCgoYT4+KCAoKCh5Pj4oMy16KS o4KSkmMzEgKSAtKCAoKHk+PigzLXopKjgrNSkmNykpICkgKSAm ICgweEZGPj4oOC0oKCh5Pj4oMy16KSo4KzUpJjcpKSkpKSsoJ2 EnLTEpLHN0ZG91dCk7CiNkZWZpbmUgbChhLGIsYyxkLGUpIGZv cihlPWM7ZTw9ZDtlKyspayhhLGIsZSk7CmludCBtYWluKCkKew ogICB1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgYT0weDFhZjM0NDAsYj0weDY3OTRi ODQ3LGM9MHg5MjZkNDcyNyxkPTB4NGU5NmM3NGUsZT0weDk0OT k0ZTI3LGY9MHhiMWFkY2I5MyxnPTB4NmRhZDAwMDAsaTsKICAg bChhLGIsMCwzLGkpCiAgICAgbChhLGMsMCwzLGkpCiAgICAgIC BsKGEsZCwwLDEsaSkKICAgICAgIHYoYSxkLDIsMzIpCiAgIGwo YSxkLDMsMyxpKQogICAgIGwoYSxlLDAsMyxpKQogICAgICAgbC hhLGYsMCwxLGkpCgkgdihhLGYsMiwxMikKICAgbChhLGYsMywz LGkpCiAgICAgbChhLGcsMCwxLGkpCiAgICAgICBwcmludGYoIl xuIik7CiAgIHJldHVybiAwOwp9Cg==
WW91IGNvdWxkIGJhc2UgNjQgZW5jb2RlIGl0Lgo=
Even Large files get past the lameness filter like that fairly easily.
I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN0ZGlvLmg+CiNkZWZpbmUgdih4LHkseixzK
post your fstab please.
If you have a managed switch, sounds like you do, set it so that the computer can see up but not around, they can see the reast of the world, but do not see others on the switch. NAT all the boxen as well.
Ok, lets just get ONE THING F*ING CLEAR:
Radiation is not like other everyday occurances, either radiation ionizes your molecules/atoms, or it dosen't. It's not like pushing a car down the road, where you will get thre no matter what, its just a mater of time, no. It's more like pushing a car up a hill, either your strong enough, or not.
Thats is why lab rats get cancer, or other assorted forms of doom, when they are exposed to "Cell phone like radiation", they get a higher dose to 'accelerate' (change the outcome of, whatever) the experiment. If they were given the dose that you recieve from standing a few hundred feet from a tower, or holding a cell phone an inch or so from your brain the rats would have jack.
Do some research, folks. Better yet, how bout the media do a bit of reporting! Tell folks what I just did, DUMB IT DOWN, make peoiple understand that unless the tests are fair, they mean SQUAT.
Sorry for all the shouting. False science makes me angry. You should hear me in my programing class.
Netflix has it down, if I time it right I can get a new movie almost every day. Sunday is my day to catch up if I need to. That sort of reliable, continuious service is hard to come by. They better not go out of business, I have 255 movies in my queue, thats a lot of movies to move over to another system.
Yeah, I'm adicted, so?
No, you got it wrong, in stead of each read being 1 bit, each is one megabit. This makes for roughly 1GB (byte) or more per second.