Slashdot Mirror


Graffiti Game Banned in Australia

afaik_ianal writes "The Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that 'Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure' has been banned in Australia. The game involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials using only street fighting skills and graffiti. From the article, "The decision was endorsed last night by the Federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, who had asked the board to review of the game's MA15+ classification after local councils and state governments voiced concerns that the game would promote graffiti.""

313 comments

  1. More Stupid Censorship and Irony by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Again, another government stepping in where parents and society in general should be the authority.

    Isn't it ironic though that the point of the game is to fight government corruption and promote freedom of expression.

    1. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, so we should allow anything inappropriate like drugs and guns to be freely allowed - like that works! Perhaps we should allow porn of all types to be available in public libraries, because clearly most parents do the "right thing" and educate their kids... what a joke, what world do you live in? Certainly not this world - many parents are fools and are poor role models - good thing the government steps in and trys to regulates things.

      Whilst you might like to think this game is about "expression", clearly the real motive in the game is to break the law.

      I'm sorry but I can't be supportive of any game that encourages breaking the law.

      Now if the game was on a "magical" kingdom where you "colour" the walls, then I suppose I would be for that. If kids can't tell the difference between make-believe and "pretend" then their parents are not doing the right thing. But when we "try" to emulate the real world so that the breaking of the law is very close, as society, we need to step in a stop this. It sends the wrong message.

    2. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as I see it Australia is much like US #2.

    3. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      America's such a good example.

      Actually, America is a perfect example.

      The more they regulate and litigate the worse things get here.

      There is a correlation, wether the totalitarians want to admit it or not.

      Politicians have absolutely NO RIGHT nor should they have the power to tell the population what is right or moral for what sould be completely obvious reasons to anyone smarter than the average barnyard monkey.

    4. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      It's the below averyage barnyard monkeys we have to worry about.
      They might pro-create.
      Better they should be writing on walls and shooting each other.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Crizp · · Score: 4, Insightful
      [...] when we "try" to emulate the real world so that the breaking of the law is very close, as society, we need to step in a stop this. It sends the wrong message.

      Mr. Thompson? Jack? Is that you?

      You can have your cute games with their colored walls. I think what the "realistic" games do is allow an outlet for things that should not be let out in public. Like killing people, or walking around randomly pissing on folks. It's safer to do it in-game, and you also avoid running into petty quarrels with those law enforcement people.

      I support the idea that the parents are ultimately responsible for what input their kids recieve in the fragile little minds of theirs. There will always be people doing bad things because - well, they do bad things. The reasons are many and complicated, but games (as TV before them) are not the one and only cause of this. A catalyst, perhaps, not the reason.

    6. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't it ironic though that the point of the game is to fight government corruption and promote freedom of expression.

      No, it's standard practice in political censorship to attack some side issue and not the political message. For instance, Ulysses was written by an Irishman and criticised British rule over Ireland.

      Ulysses was banned for obscenity rather than for it's political content even though the so called obscene content was tame even for the time in which it was written. The same case can be made for the film of A Clockwork Orange, which I believe is still banned in the UK.

    7. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, so we should allow anything inappropriate like drugs and guns to be freely allowed - like that works! Perhaps we should allow porn of all types to be available in public libraries, because clearly most parents do the "right thing" and educate their kids... what a joke, what world do you live in?

          Guns and porn are freely allowed, just not to a kid. You need a licence for a gun - you can even carry them arround in the street if you have a permit. Porn is allowed to everyone who's legally old enough.
          I also had this discussion with a friend a while ago about if drugs should be legalized, like alcohol is - i think that marijuana should be legalized, but he made a pretty good case about how every single drug should be legalized, which is a longer story in itself. Even then, alcohol, tobbaco and some medicaments ARE drugs and you can get them, again, if you're old enough.

          Eventually it's up to the parents to decide what's sutiable for their children to see. See, kids are NOT the only one playing games. And we have a rating system already to determine which games can and which ones can't be sold to a kid. Banning it was completely unnecesary. The game doesn't encourage vandalism more than GTA encourages stealing cars, Hollywood action movies encourage shooting people and religious TV shows encourage catholicism.

    8. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The same case can be made for the film of A Clockwork Orange, which I believe is still banned in the UK.

      A Clockwork Orange is not and never has been banned in Britain. It was withdrawn by Stanley Kubrick on police advice after receiving threats against his family.

    9. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by hdparm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. I wonder what are they going to do with AWB and 300 milion handed over to Saddam, with Howard's approval. Fucking hypocrites. Everywhere.

    10. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by lxs · · Score: 1

      thanks for clearing that up.

    11. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Rinkhals · · Score: 1

      Well, as I see it Australia is much like US #2.

      Yes, and isn't that the point?

      Don't you feel that the Americans, in particular Multimillionaire US fashion designer Marc Ecko are seeking to export their culture to the rest of the world?

      Personally, I'm a bit fed up of teenage hoodies hanging around on street corners saying "Yaah, wa's up bro'" and shaking two fingers of their right hands at me, wrist first.

      Is that what US culture is all about?

      Still, it does smack of overkill.

      Maybe putting "THIS GAME IS PROMOTED BY A PROMINANT US FASHION GURU" on it would do the trick?

      --
      "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
    12. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by LordSnooty · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the UK, A Clockwork Orange wasn't banned by any Government agency but by Kubrick himself, "on police advice after threats were made against Kubrick and his family" (link). It didn't get a video release until after Kubrick's death. But it was never "banned" in the traditional sense. The director refused to permit its release. Now it's been on TV & all sorts, and yes it's tame.

    13. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Again, another government stepping in where parents and society in general should be the authority."

      yeah. key word being should, hmm.

    14. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by TeraCo · · Score: 0, Troll

      What's that got to do with Graffiti, or even Censorship? Grind your political wheel elsewhere monkeyboy.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    15. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by packeteer · · Score: 1

      You dont need a license to carry a gun in public, you only need alicense for certain kinds of guns.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    16. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I hate grafitti. I hate crime. So don't pick out parts of sentences, (As Anonymous Coward no less), that I write and attack me. Read the entire commentary in context.

      All I'm trying to say is that it's not the government's responsibility to control what you do in your own home. That should be left to parents, period!

      If a game is violent, promotes gun use, promotes crime, grafitti, prostitution, gangs, etc..., etc...

      SO F'ING WHAT!

      If you don't want your kids to be affected by those types of influences, then do your job as a parent and monitor them! Simple!

      Living in a free society, or relatively free, means that you have the right of choice. If you don't want your kids to learn violence, then sell your TV, don't buy newspapers or magazines, turn to home schooling, don't turn on the radio, and by no means allow them to go out in public. If you don't like something, don't buy it. If you don't want to display violence in your home, change the channel on the TV. If you don't like a song, change the station on the radio.

      Um, wait, or maybe you could just teach them responsibility and citizenship. Yeah, that's a thought. Why didn't anyone think of that before.

      But for fucks sake, don't count on government to do parenting!

    17. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Triskele · · Score: 1
      Guns and porn are freely allowed, just not to a kid. You need a licence for a gun - you can even carry them arround in the street if you have a permit. Porn is allowed to everyone who's legally old enough.


      Really?? It's been a little while since I was down in Oz, but as I understood it you are only allowed a limited range of firearms and handguns in particular (I thought) were prohibited so no question of carrying them in the street, permit or no... I mostly hung around in Sydney so maybe it's different in your state?

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    18. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Cabby · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Clockwork Orange was never banned in the UK - the BBFC proposed cuts to make it meet a 18 certificate release which Kubrick objected to and withdrew the film from distribution. It wasn't actually banned.

      In any case, it's certainly available now.

    19. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only form of reply you deserve is insult, since you are obviously too stupid to understand anything else.

      Fuckwit.

    20. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use to believe that our violent urges could be taken out on a game but that was before i realised that children today grow up in a world full of violence and they cannot appreciate the games like people a generation older than them can because we didn't grow up with it. Of course parents or lack of parents play a part. Today i don't think the younger gamer can or wants to make a difference between the reality of life and the reality of a computer game. Don't forget, TV in some countries doesn't allow certain types of drama to be screened before a certain time as well, not everybody makes the correct distinction. Violent need to be handled correctly by the suppliers and parents and if parents are not going to help then they need banning by the government. Even porno is supposed to be out of reach for children (hence top shelf) and its not violent, there is a time for everything in a child's life to experience things, the least we could do is make sure it doesn't corrupt them by over stimulating them with unrealistic outlets for their expression.

    21. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Haeleth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sorry but I can't be supportive of any game that encourages breaking the law.

      So, do you think this game should be banned? It encourages kids to take the roles of 19th century slaves illegally running away and depriving their masters of their lawfully-owned property!

      And what about this game, where players are encouraged to steal a continent from its indigenous people, and then to commit high treason against their monarch? Clearly it should be banned! Won't somebody think of the children?!

      Sorry, but breaking the law is not always wrong. I would far rather our children were being taught to think for themselves and to actually consider the moral implications of various acts, than that they were being brainwashed into a black-and-white "Obey the laws because the State Knows Best" worldview.

      If there is hope, it lies with the proles. Let's educate them.

    22. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by koltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now it's been on TV & all sorts, and yes it's tame.

      Come on! A Clockwork Orange is one of my favorite movies. I've read the book twice as well, but to say it's tame is an absolute lie, unless you consider rape, murder, graphic violence and gratuitous drug use to be kid stuff. Just because Hollywood etc. has desensitized you to the point that you consider these things tame, does not mean that they actually are.

      Even when viewed through a contemporary lens, the portrayal of the banality of extreme antisocial behavior is disturbing, and scenes such as the beating of the bum or the attempted rape of a young girl in a theater by Billyboy's gang are still very graphic. The movie got an X rating in 1971 and would still get an R today, and rightly so. This is not a movie for children or those lacking maturity. It is in no way "tame", not even by today's standards.

      I know you're trying to bolster this knee-jerk reaction to the concept that banning anything is an overreaction, but mischaracterizing an extremely violent movie as "tame" does not lend credence to your point of view...and if you truly do consider this film to be innocuous, then you have bigger problems with which to contend than the banning of a video game in Oz.

      Isn't it ironic how your attitude tends to mirror that of Alex? Maybe you need the Ludovico treatment. XD

    23. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Thwomp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Clockwork Orange was banned in the U.K. up until Kubrick's death in 2000. Also, I'm pretty sure this ban was of Kubrick's own choosing and not down to the government of the day.

    24. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by MarkChovain · · Score: 1

      If they made a game where the main character was an troll, do you reckon the quality of /. comments would all deteriorate? Is there ever a point where we have to buy a couple of off-the-shelf games and the only one piece?

      This is a serious question. If people believe that a graffiti game can make people more likely to graffiti stuff, then why wouldn't a game about a troll make people more likely to troll? Are trolling and graffiting really that different? I think it is an apt analogy. Try extraditing yourself from the fear that goes and logs on to Warcraft is "addicted". Is there ever a point where I realize that George Lucas had defecated on your vision? What if the sole niche of an underground geek culture?

    25. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Ben+Varrey · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I'm studying Ulysses right now for a graduate course, and I can't imagine how it was "tame" for the time. Although the anti-obscenity laws were, of course, stupid, they were clearly violated when Joyce wrote about masturbation, poop, and the way one's penis tends to float in the bath. What other licentious novels passed unchallenged during this period?

    26. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Twylite · · Score: 1
      kids are NOT the only one playing games

      Which brings up a very important point: we need some comprehensive and reliable market research that shows the demographics of game players. A lot of the push for game censorship seems to be in the name of the precious children ... and we need to be able to show that the "games are for children" adage is wrong.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    27. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, we should let a society regulate itself. America's such a good example. Not at all full of selfish idiots with a chip on their shoulders with regard to authority and definitely not full of people looking out for themselves rather than each other and actually forming a society!

      So you want to be more like China than America then..

    28. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should allow porn of all types to be available in public libraries, because clearly most parents do the "right thing" and educate their kids... what a joke, what world do you live in? Certainly not this world - many parents are fools and are poor role models - good thing the government steps in and trys to regulates things.

      How is it alright to limit the freedoms of everybody to make up for idiots who aren't willing to make the effort and take responsability?

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    29. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      The point is that Australia has a government trying its damnedest to be as stupid as the American government.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    30. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The reason you see a lot of parents who don't educate their kids is because they have come to rely on the government to do it for them. So many rules have been instituted to protect the children that the parents often feel that they don't have to worry about it, they let the authorities handle it. I played a lot of wolfenstein when I was younger, and my parents knew I did, but they didn't stop me because it didn't really have a negative effect on me. I'm sure had they noticed that I was getting really violent, that they would have done something to stop it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    31. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is pretty graphic, but I think it almost needs to be to get the point accross. Alex was a pretty screwed up kid, and they thought they could cure him by removing his free will to do as he wanted to. I think that a lot of people see the beatings and the rapes and the drug use and don't see the real social commentary that the movie is trying to make. However, I think the violence is necessary in order to get the point of the movie accross.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    32. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Have you read Ulysses? 'Cause it doesn't seem like it. It was banned all over the world for obscenity (in the US for instance), simply because it's very obscene in places. There's no grander scheme at work.

    33. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by westlake · · Score: 1
      I think what the "realistic" games do is allow an outlet for things that should not be let out in public. Like killing people, or walking around randomly pissing on folks.

      This doesn't say much for the maturity of the M rated game.

      It does reinforce the stereotype that the real market for these games is the adolescent male.

      I would welcome an M-rated RPG (a successor to Fallout or Planescape: Torment) that didn't leave me feeling like I had regressed to my sophomore year in high school.

    34. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barn-yard monkies? What the hell kind of barn-yard do you have? Back in my day, we only had cows, horses, pigs, sheep, and chickens in our barn-yard and liked it!

    35. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      And I'll chime in to say that yes it is tame compared to some of the more graphic movies I've been freely able to watch in theaters and on cable which don't even have as precise social commentary.

      TETSUO!!!

    36. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Isn't the point of the game getting up that the graffiti artist trolls progressively more powerful people to get more recognition for himself? bringing those figures down in the process?

    37. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Rinkhals · · Score: 1

      The point is that Australia has a government trying its damnedest to be as stupid as the American government.

      Yes?

      Last I heard the American Government wasn't trying to ban this game?

      Mind you, I could be wrong......

      --
      "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
    38. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I'm a bit fed up of teenage hoodies hanging around on street corners saying "Yaah, wa's up bro'" and shaking two fingers of their right hands at me, wrist first.
      Is that what US culture is all about?"

      Sounds more like UK chavs than anything I know about here in the US. With the exception of Icy Hot Stuntaz :)

    39. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Best quote from Mr Ecko in the article:

      "... to blame gaming for everything that is inherently wrong in our homes, in our schools and on our streets is much easier to do than to actually figure out ways to fix the systemic problems that exist within our culture."

    40. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I don't live in the US (Argentina here), but in almost every single country in the world you can own a firearm legally as long as it's not full-auto, and that's pretty much it. You can even buy high powered ammunition and guns to fire it (stuff like .50BMG rounds). In my country anything over .32 is considered "war round" and requires a special permit, which requieres you to take a gun safety course and a clean rap sheet. But still, it's completely doable.

          Yo can also carry a handgun concealed here, only if you have a permit for doing so. In some places in the US, you don't even need that.

    41. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Triskele · · Score: 1

      Here in Britain and in much of the rest of Europe, you can not own a firearm legally (for which I am profoundly grateful). I was curious about the OP's comments regarding Australia as I thought they had reasonably strict gun control as well.

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    42. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Normally I would leave these topics alone as I am very anti censorship but a few comments of the parent post hit me as very disturbing.

      I think what the "realistic" games do is allow an outlet for things...Like killing people...

      I have to ask, why does someone need an outlet for killing people. The idea that we need such an outlet is a sign of serious problems in our society, and I am starting the beleive that our media is a big part of the problem. I don't think the issue is that there is too much violence in media (though I personally find most violent games to be boring) but that there is a lack of other more civilized things. We have reduced our enterainment to the lowest form of violence and nothing but.

      you...avoid running into petty quarrels with...law enforcement

      I find it even more disturbing that someone would think being arrest for killing a person is a petty quarrel.

    43. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by aiken_d · · Score: 1
      Politicians have absolutely NO RIGHT nor should they have the power to tell the population what is right or moral for what sould be completely obvious reasons to anyone smarter than the average barnyard monkey.

      I am confused by your point.

      Who keeps monkeys in barns? Doesn't it seem like they'd always be escaping and causing mayhem? And is the average barnyard monkey more or less intelligent than the average monkey in general? And how do they get along with horses, anyway?

      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    44. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Hmmm are you sure? Maybe it's not as easy as going to a gun shop and walking away with a semiauto pistol, but i'm pretty sure a civilian can own guns legally almost everywhere. Requirements for being able to own one vary wildly, of course.

    45. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Triskele · · Score: 1

      I live in Britain. Trust me when I say you can't own a gun here with the very limited exception of a shot gun if you're a firearm and sporting pistols & rifles which must be kept under lock & key at a gun club. Really. We don't have guns. And neither do our police. (Apart from a very few, none of them trusted after a few recent 'accidents' such as the guy with a table leg and of course the Brazilian, Menezes).

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    46. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Triskele · · Score: 1

      Argh! Failure to use preview. /firearm/farmer/ !

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    47. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who keeps monkeys in barns?
      Chuck Norris
      Doesn't it seem like they'd always be escaping and causing mayhem?
      Whenever a monkey thinks about doing so, Mr. Norris just gives him this look. You better believe he behaves himself!
    48. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moral legislation = bad

      On the other hand, properly done economic legislation = megacorporations not owning the citizens

      Too bad the US doesn't have properly done economic legislation.

    49. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      I work for a media organisation in Australia. I am required to possess certification from the Office of Film and Literature Classification (the government body at the centre of this controversy) attesting to the fact that I have been trained in and understand the application of the OFLC's classification criteria. I have a nice little certificate here with a government seal on it attesting to the fact that I am qualified to make judgements on the most appropriate classification for a piece of content.

      There's no way this game should have been "Refused Classification" (ie, banned). No way. Hell, even Manhunt for PS2, featuring sadistic snuff-movie murders, did not get banned.

      Now, video games can be banned from Australia they:

      (a) depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified; or

      (b) describe or depict in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not); or

      (c) promote, incite or instruct in matters of crime or violence; or

      (d) are unsuitable for a minor to see or play


      The OFLC's own guidelines specify further that a game should be Refused Classification if it shows "Detailed instruction or promotion in matters of crime or violence".

      BUT.

      According to the OFLC "assessed titles" database, the game was examined and assessed back in November last year and given an MA-15 rating. Unless Ecko has released a patch in the past 60 days which makes the game more offensive, I think it's safe to assume some politician who wants his name in the papers for "THINKING ABOUT THE CHILDREN" has pulled strings to have the classification changed.

    50. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by compro01 · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure that there have been studies and that aproximately 63% of games are over the age of 20, and something like 14% are over the age of 60.

      there're plenty of statistics on this, just that the anti-gaming zealots just omit them from their rants, and almost no one is able to correct them, as they tend to have much more clout in the world of public opinion, due to the fact they seem to be routinely on TV and other such forms of media.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    51. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by compro01 · · Score: 1

      no, they seem to be going more broadly by trying to ban just about all mature games as "only kids play games", or so say certain zealots.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    52. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply "banning" the game has caused me to break the law than the game ever would. While before its banning I probably would have looked over the game, now in order to obtain it I have to resort to "pirating" it of the net.

      GJ legislators. Remember kids games like GTA werent banned so its OK to go shoot people. Just dont paint any walls.

    53. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by cobras2 · · Score: 1

      >Like killing people, or walking around randomly pissing on folks. It's safer to do it in-game, and you also avoid running into petty quarrels with those law enforcement people.

      That and you're not actually destroying people's property (or lives) by doing it in a game...

      which is the whole reason why it's against the law in the real world...

      --
      Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    54. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by njyoder · · Score: 1

      The more they regulate and litigate the worse things get here.

      Then why have violent crime rates dropped drastically since the 60s? I suggest you do actual research before making open-ended statements. A quick look at crime statistics shows this.

      It seems to me, that we've only gotten freer and safer over time. Care to prove otherwise?

    55. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Haven't got the stones to post logged in eh?

      Don't feel too bad. It's only moderation, we all get through it.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    56. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      The more they regulate and litigate the worse things get here.

      Then why have violent crime rates dropped drastically since the 60s?

      Concealed gun permits, older population, higher abortion rates, take your pick. The point is that every one of those is a result of less regulation of people's lives.

      If you want to see a re results of a highly regulated society, look at DC's crime rates.

      It seems to me, that we've only gotten freer and safer over time.

      Yes, we have. Less regulation is more freedom.

    57. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by njyoder · · Score: 1

      Concealed gun permits, older population, higher abortion rates, take your pick. The point is that every one of those is a result of less regulation of people's lives.

      Amazing, so America is regulating things less then? Interesting. I change my mind, you're right; America IS the perfect example of how more regulations make things worse given how it's constantly regulating things less. Perfect case study.

      I'm ignoring your little causation fallacy, of course.

      If you want to see a re results of a highly regulated society, look at DC's crime rates.

      Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. DC's crime rates are high because it's filled with people in poverty.

      Yes, we have. Less regulation is more freedom.

      Yes and this is why I changed my view to support yours that America is the perfect case for this, given how regulating things less shows exactly how bad regulating things more does. Because, you know, regulating more is actually the same as regulating less.

    58. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by name*censored* · · Score: 1
      If some parents are "fools and are poor role models", then the children have BIGGER problems than a violent streak that may or may not be caused by violent video games. (You "moral activists" are yet to PROVE that emulated violence encourages actual violence, and not that the children who play violent games do so because they already have naturally violent tendancies).

      Secondly, violent games are not things that encourages breaking the law any more than Goldilocks And The Three Bears encourages unlawful tresspass, theft and vandalism. In fact, the only difference between one and the other is that one actively portrays the fact that the character's actions are {immoral and illegal}, whilst the other views the damage as nothing but "harmless fun".

      Moreover, young (and easily influenced) children are not the only ones interested in playing these games; many responsible and adjusted adults are also interested in playing. Alcohol is illegal for children (under 18, in Australia at least), but that doesn't mean an outright ban, just because it is bad for children (worse than a violent video game, that's for sure). Same with many movies, TV shows and certain Nightclubs. That's why there are ratings systems . Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, just because you are too irresponsible or lazy to raise your children properly. Not all of us had children. It is at YOUR detriment to raise them properly, NOT OURS.

      PS. [Quote]" ..the difference between make-believe and "pretend".. " There isn't anything substantially different between "make-believe" and "pretend". Proof-read your comment, dumbass.

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    59. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by Crizp · · Score: 1

      I have to ask, why does someone need an outlet for killing people. The idea that we need such an outlet is a sign of serious problems in our society, and I am starting the beleive that our media is a big part of the problem.
      You see, violence (or rather the desire to apply it) is a natural human instinct which people have been able to suppress in our "civilised" society. It's not a thing created by the media, nor is it possible to get rid of it for ever.

      Although just anecdotal, I can tell you that I'm not a violent person in the least - but there have been a few times (two) where I've actually wanted to kill people, yes, and in gruesome ways at that. Luckily, I am able to not do that. Partly since our society has taught us killing is wrong and set up punishment for it, and partly because it really is a bad thing to do - considering the people left behind.

      Some people don't have the mental blocks to stop them, and go about killing people. Klebold/Harris comes to mind, and I've been thinking; had they not been able to separate reality from fiction they would not have killed themselves. I think people in situations like this kill themselves because they know they'll get caught (or shot) in the end, and choose to end it themselves to be sure to die without pain. Regret might also be in the mix somewhere. One thing is certain, though: They knew they had killed real people with real lives, not characters in a game.

      My point is that you can't get rid of violence. You can't have good without the bad. It's funny, since I'm really a "hippie" peace-and-love kinda guy, but with added realism. There can never be all love all the time. We sure as hell could make more good and less bad though. Bad seems to be stronger these days.

      find it even more disturbing that someone would think being arrest for killing a person is a petty quarrel.
      A bit too tongue-in-cheek for you? Lighten up, my friend!
    60. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by xero314 · · Score: 1

      ...violence (or rather the desire to apply it) is a natural human instinct...

      I both agree and disagree. I think anger is a natural human emotion, and threw years of social learning we have come to the conclusion that violence is often the easiet way of dealing with a situation that angers us. But I don't think that it is natural to think that hurting some is the right way to handle a situation. I have neither done nor read and studies on that so it is all just speculation.

      Some people don't have the mental blocks to stop...killing people. Klebold/Harris comes to mind...

      I do agree that some people do not have the mental blocks to stop from killing people, but I also feel that the cause of these is largely environmental. In the end I do beleive that people are responsible for how they are affected by their environment, but even I succum to those effects in a negative way some times.

      My point is that you can't get rid of violence. You can't have good without the bad.

      This is not exactly a realistic point of view, it's a fatalistic point of view. It is always easier to say that "this is the way things are" than to actually put some effort towards changing them. Violence can be removed from society by simply removing the causes of violence, but that is really another topic.

      But as I said before, I'm not an anti-violence in media type person, but I would like to see more elements in games and other media that did not include violence. Admitadly it is worse here in the US than in other countries so I maybe a little tainted in my view. I just don't understand were things went wrong and somehow taught children that violence is entertainment. I recall playing games growing up that were entertaining and non-violent. Sure Pac-man ate ghosts, and Donkey Kong was trying to kill Mario, but it's not like the violence of today. Even the early violent games had a goal other than to kill things, but today you don't need any princess saving to make a game, just kill everything in sight seems to be good enough.

    61. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      I'll ignore the fact that I was mirroring your fallacies in order to make a point, but mocking you for missing that would be too easy. I just wanted to point out that there are plenty of possible reasons for things getting better/worse other than changes in the legal system.

      Besides it's too much fun to laugh at your inability to make a consistant argument: first it's getting better because of increased regulation, then it's getting worse because of decreased regulation. This is a textbook example of rationlization - change the facts to fit a pet theory.

    62. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by njyoder · · Score: 1

      I'll ignore the fact that I was mirroring your fallacies in order to make a point, but mocking you for missing that would be too easy.

      People generally say this when they've lost an argument and can't couldn't argue their way out of it if their life depended on it. I'm still waiting for evidence of the OP's claim that "America is the perfect example"; none has been provided.

      I just wanted to point out that there are plenty of possible reasons for things getting better/worse other than changes in the legal system.

      Wow, really?! That's why you didn't do that at all, but instead implied a causal effect? You are only reinforcing my original point, which was that the OP had nothing in terms of valid evidence to substantiate his point.

      Besides it's too much fun to laugh at your inability to make a consistant argument: first it's getting better because of increased regulation, then it's getting worse because of decreased regulation.

      Find where I said either of those, then you get a cookie.

      This is a textbook example of rationlization - change the facts to fit a pet theory.

      Projection for the win!

    63. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      That's why you didn't do that at all, but instead implied a causal effect?

      Your original post suggested that more regulation caused a decrease in crime. My reply answered your question ("Then why...") with a group of alternatives that might be responsible, thus "take your pick". If I was implying a causal connection, you were doing the same to a greater degree.

      And this: "DC's crime rates are high because it's filled with people in poverty." is clearly suggesting causation. Pot, kettle.

      Find where I said either of those, then you get a cookie.

      You didn't argue against the part of the OP that suggested that regulation had been increasing, but you did point out one thing that is getting better. The only reasonable conclusion is that you think that you believe that increased regulation has made things better (or left them the same).

      As for this: "Yes and this is why I changed my view to support yours that America is the perfect case for this, given how regulating things less shows exactly how bad regulating things more does. Because, you know, regulating more is actually the same as regulating less." I had to assume sarcasm, so that you (probably) had changed your mind about regulation increasing, but that you hadn't changed you mind about the relationship between regulation and things getting better/worse. If you were actually agreeing with me, sorry for the mixup.

      Right now, I'm not quite sure what your original point was. Either you're messing with me or your writing style is so ambiguous that I can't divine your meaning. If you want to continue this, why don't you just restate your original point in full, rather than using vage implications.

    64. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by njyoder · · Score: 1

      Your original post suggested that more regulation caused a decrease in crime.

      Nope, quote me where I did that.

      If I was implying a causal connection, you were doing the same to a greater degree.

      Nice backpedal.

      And this: "DC's crime rates are high because it's filled with people in poverty." is clearly suggesting causation. Pot, kettle.

      Of course it's causation, but it's well established that poverty causes increased crime rates so I'm pretty damn safe there.

      You didn't argue against the part of the OP that suggested that regulation had been increasing, but you did point out one thing that is getting better.

      No, I argued that if America was an example of regulation (i.e. there is an increase in regulation now) causing an increase in crime, then the reduction of crime would contradict his point.

      The only reasonable conclusion is that you think that you believe that increased regulation has made things better (or left them the same).

      Oh false dichotommies, how do I love thee. I was operating on his assumption that there was an increase in regulation to show that if that were true, then evidence would suggest a reduction.

      I had to assume sarcasm, so that you (probably) had changed your mind about regulation increasing, but that you hadn't changed you mind about the relationship between regulation and things getting better/worse.

      I was being sarcastic. Since you don't actually know my stance on the issue, it's bad to assume what I think the relationship was.

      Either you're messing with me or your writing style is so ambiguous that I can't divine your meaning. If you want to continue this, why don't you just restate your original point in full, rather than using vage implications.

      My original point is that "America is a perfect example of this" is incorrect. This does not necessitate me presenting my stance on the issue of whether or not regulation increases crime. It necessitates me pointing out the evidence surrounding America not actually supporting his point.

    65. Re:More Stupid Censorship and Irony by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Since you don't actually know my stance on the issue, it's bad to assume what I think the relationship was.

      If you were trying to point out a lack of evidence, you should have just said so, rather than only pointing out something that was getting better. Arguing against something is different than arguing that it isn't well-supported. You either need to communicate more clearly or stop being an ass when people don't manage to guess what you really meant.

  2. Re:GREAT! by RumpledElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Australia doesn't like graffiti much ... a while back they started putting spray cans behind locked doors in hardware stores and art supply shops to stop them being stolen - because of course the only tool you can use to graffiti with is a spray can. Might even be an ID age check when you buy them. Not being a graffiti artist myself I don't know the full details.

    --
    An Australian MMORPG under development - http://restlessworld.hidden-waters.com
  3. Speaking of things "Getting Up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Game is now $4000 AUD on eBay!

  4. that sucks by [cx] · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess kids will have to stick to the real thing.

    1. Re:that sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aah, the real thing is infinately better than some crappy game could ever emulate. Truly, if you walk around the streets of melbourne, there're beautiful grafs everywhere - it's part of the scenery and its accepted. Just another initiative of the australian government to squash any sense of culture we may potentially have.

    2. Re:that sucks by kfg · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be ironic if the ban promotes graffiti opposing the ban?

      KFG

    3. Re:that sucks by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      I guess kids will have to stick to the real thing.

      I only wish graffiti writing and street fighting would work to remove the current crop of corrupt government officials. Alas, it's not that simple.

    4. Re:that sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the really ironic thing would be if someone started spraying about what a corrupt asshole Ruddock is.

  5. ...and so they should !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How is being a fool and wrecking property entertainment? Why would someone need to emulate the idiots in society inorder to "sell" a game title. Clearly the developer lacked the imagination to do anything original and so they decided to make a computer game of something that the majority of society would frown upon.

    What is next? Stealing money from old or disadvantaged people? Maybe a game where you are supposed to cheat on exams and steal stuff from stores?

    I think this is exactly what should happen - good on the Aussies for doing what is right and correct for the majority.

    1. Re:...and so they should !! by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

      Clearly the developer lacked the imagination to do anything original...

      I dunno, I thought it was pretty original. Name me one other game where graffiti is a major gameplay element.

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    2. Re:...and so they should !! by actor_au · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jet Set Radio Future.
      And it was done better than this dreck will be.

      --
      Read Errant Story.
    3. Re:...and so they should !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your thinking of GTA:SA

      GTA:VC was the one with Vercetti in it. SA was the one where you were a hood-rat.

      Just so you know.

    4. Re:...and so they should !! by Mancat · · Score: 1

      Have you ever played a game based around subject matter that was not appropriate or possible to recreate in real life without reprecussion? You know, as in most video games on the market now? I guess not. You must play only sports games.

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    5. Re:...and so they should !! by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

      I must remember to play more games before making blanket statements about gamedom... >_<

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    6. Re:...and so they should !! by micpp · · Score: 1

      Even sports games do not escape, as if you play professional sports in reality, you face the repercussion of not having a real job.

    7. Re:...and so they should !! by prionic6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And its predecessor Jet Set Radio on the Dreamcast. Damn. That was a good game, with maybe the greatest soundtrack ever in a video game.

      Lets say they should also forbid all the games where private or public property is damaged in any way. In addition to every game where lifelike things are damaged in any way. phew. Breakout... Are these public walls you are destroying brick for brick?

    8. Re:...and so they should !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jet Set Radio Future didn't feature characters using cans as flamethrowers and torching other people, nor did it feature "instructional videos" on tagging. It was cartoonish and fun. So, it wasn't banned.

    9. Re:...and so they should !! by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      If people find the game excessively offensive, then they should boycott it. Limiting free speech, however, is more offensive than making a game about raping children, because while the latter is a simulated evil, the former is an actual act of evil.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    10. Re:...and so they should !! by kajen · · Score: 1

      You better hope that those in power of whatever country you reside continue to agree with you, or they might decide to come and make you illegal.

    11. Re:...and so they should !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is exactly what should happen - good on the Aussies for doing what is right and correct for the majority.

      Banning a video game about street art is best for the majority?
       
      Most importantly, censorship is good for nobody. Secondly, in case you were not aware, "graffiti" has a rich history in hip-hop culture, and is not just about wrecking property. Marc Ecko has been involved in this culture for many years, and it is via no lack of imagination that he brings it to an electronic medium.
       
      There is a bit of fantasy involved, just like in GTA, or really, just about any video game at all.
       
      I'm sure you have the best intentions, but, you come off sounding like Jack Thompson.

    12. Re:...and so they should !! by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      a game about raping children

      The scary part is I'm pretty sure that would be legal in Japan, as long as it was rated appropriately and didn't have actual child pornstars modeling for it.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    13. Re:...and so they should !! by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      What? I think car racing is boring and very dangerous as well as bad for the environment, I think that hockey and American football are to dangerous to be called sports, and I think that dancing is moronic because these days it is basically clothed sex without the fun of the real thing. But I don't think we should ban them. Maybe we should ban all movies with crime in them (like Ocean's 11).

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    14. Re:...and so they should !! by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Lots of games now are going the route of criminal activity, not just this game or the GTA series. Look at Need for Speed Underground or Need For Speed Most Wanted, it's all about illegal street racing which can be just as bad

      Oh, and coincidentally, they found a copy of Need for Speed next to the driver in one of the 2 cars that was racing:

      Police investigating the accident found a copy of the video game Need for Speed in one of the cars. The game involves street racing, drag racing and pursuit racing, where players attempt to evade police.

    15. Re:...and so they should !! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try the original on the dreamcast... Maybe you should point out it was the first cell shading game and had one of the best sound tracks of any game ever made.

      To graffiti you had to do simple chains on the joystick and to finish a level you'd have to graffiti over another gangs or all the propaganda by the cops/secret organisations etc. It was fun and didn't encourage me to go spray paint walls, just gave me a lot of cool songs to hum to myself and a newart style to play with.

      It's a game that hasn't aged a day since it came out.. yet you credit the sequal on the Xbox because..?

      --
      I like muppets.
    16. Re:...and so they should !! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Because it still answers the question?

      Because it's a good game in it's own right?

      Because the sequel doesn't impose annoying timelimits?

      Because not everyone owns a Dreamcast?

      Because the music is great in the Xbox version as well? (float like a but, like a butterfly)

      Because maybe he has never heard of the original.

      Maybe he was just trying to see how many Im-better-than-you gamers would come out of the woodwork and say 'OMGZ JET GRIND RADIO IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN FUTURE LOLZ U SUXXORZ'


      (try not to take too much offence, I'm bored on a friday morning at work)

    17. Re:...and so they should !! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      For starters, it's SET. Jet, set, radio.

      First was better.

      In a game where it's nearly impossible to die time limits make sense..

      Not owning a console shouldn't make you ignorant to it.

      If he's never heard of the original he needs slapping.

      --
      I like muppets.
    18. Re:...and so they should !! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Not owning a console shouldn't make you ignorant to it.

      If he's never heard of the original he needs slapping.


      Wow, you've got that better-than-thou gamer thing going really well there, don't you? You're right, everyone should know everything about all games that have ever been released.

      For starters, it's SET. Jet, set, radio.

      Err ... you do know the NTSC/US version is called Jet Grind Radio, don't you?

      Okay, so everyone should know everything about all games that have ever been released, except you. Not owning the US version of the game shouldn't make you ignorant to it. If you haven't heard of the US name change then you need a slapping. Whatever. Head, Ass, Extraction.

    19. Re:...and so they should !! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Japan : Jet set
      PAL : Jet set
      Aussie : Jet set

      3 VS 1 says Jet set.

      --
      I like muppets.
    20. Re:...and so they should !! by PaganRitual · · Score: 2, Funny

      So computer game names are voted on sort of like UN resolutions? Most country votes wins? The US version is Jet Grind Radio. You corrected me like a smartass because you didn't know. Get over it. I hope the time you spent looking up each terriories variation for your response was educational. You made the fact that you did pretty obvious by splitting up PAL and 'Aussie'. I patiently await your thirty-second Google researched response on how I'm now incorrect about the passing of UN Resolutions.

    21. Re:...and so they should !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, idiot.

      First of all don't start with that good on the Ossies shit. Fuck you. And fuck your country, I don't give a shit about anyone who lives there and neither does the majority of my coumuninity young and old.

      Sencond the graff couminity dosen't really give a shit about the game, so what's a ban gonna do, make it seem more interesting?, hell I know guys who started 30 years ago becasue of uch less than that.

      And just as a final note, Australia hates you, and your country, Faggot. Don't go with the Aussies Shit.

    22. Re:...and so they should !! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find I did know since I followed the games release.

      Aussie and PAL releases may use the same format but they're completely different areas and hence deserve to be split.

      --
      I like muppets.
    23. Re:...and so they should !! by MrAndyPuppy · · Score: 1

      Marc Ecko actually grew up as a graffiti artist before becoming one of the leading fashion designers in hip hop culture. I believe he created the game partly as a testament to his own beginnings.

      Also, the game is about the young guy trying to beat through an oppressive, controlling, corrupt government.

      I don't see either of these things as foolish (particularly in light of the game itself being censored in this way!). I'm guessing you're not a fan of any game that contains illegal activity, like speeding, or breaking into soda dispensers for free drinks (let alone murder, kidnapping, carjacking and drug dealing). Or is it that this particular act of vandalism is somehow worse than these other acts? Graffiti in its pure sense is actually an artform and the media bastardise it to make it the illegal activity.

      Most Aussies actually don't agree with the decision based on the various polls I've seen over here, so you might want to rephrase your comment to "good on the Australian Classification Reviews Board" (even the initial OFLC rating was MA15+ - it was only after a petition for review was lodged that it became declassified).

  6. Re:GREAT! by Crash24 · · Score: 1

    a while back they started putting spray cans behind locked doors in hardware stores and art supply shops to stop them being stolen - because of course the only tool you can use to graffiti with is a spray can.

    Don't tell them that I used to doodle stuff on bathroom stalls with a pencil.
  7. They have now guaranteed it will be a hit! by dustpuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we have long gone past the point were censorship of this nature will have any effect. What with bittorrent and other P2P networks, people will still be able to obtain copies. And by making such a big deal of it, all the authorities have done is made it into the latest 'must have' computer game.

    And I would love to read their position paper (which will apparently get relaeased) soon that explains the majority and minority positions. I cannot understand how they feel that they should ban this game and yet allow violent movies to not be banned.

    1. Re:They have now guaranteed it will be a hit! by Mike+Connell · · Score: 1
      I cannot understand how they feel that they should ban this game and yet allow violent movies to not be banned.


      "Normal" adult voters watch violent movies. Only (non-voting) "kids" play computer games.

    2. Re:They have now guaranteed it will be a hit! by SqueakRu · · Score: 0

      Yeah banning a game ensures it will be a hit alright....
      Anyone want to go play Night Trap?
      Anybody even know what the hell I am talking about?

      Didn't think so.

    3. Re:They have now guaranteed it will be a hit! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      whatchutalkinabout SqueakRu? I don't think the actual chick from Different Strokes actually had any memorable lines. And it's not like we can ask her.

    4. Re:They have now guaranteed it will be a hit! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Firstly, violent movies can fall under the R18+ rating in Australia. Games, in a highly retarded setup, do not have an R18+ rating. Anything deemed unsuitable for people under 18 is therefore also denied access to by anyone they deem could actually handle it. Thanks, oh mighty OFLC for deciding that because my 17 year old sister (no pix requests) can't handle they game, her 28 year old brother (that'd be me. pix+divx on request) can't either.

      Secondly, my torrent should be finished by the time I get home from work.

      Seriously though, you're absolutely right. No doubt there are a lot of people that couldn't give two shits about the game (I'm still trying to hunt down a copy of JSRF from ebay) that will now seek out (and I don't mean pay for) copies to see what the fuss was about ... no wait, I mean to see how to STICK IT TO THE MAN and how to correctly draw graffiti on walls. Although they are gonna struggle when they can't work out where to plug the ps2 controller into the wall.

  8. Who else feels... by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that they were concerned the game would promote THE OTHER aspect of the gameplay?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Who else feels... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Which would be?

    2. Re:Who else feels... by MrAndyPuppy · · Score: 1

      Physical violence against government officials. And listening to some of them on the radio, it appears that is indeed what some of the city mayors/councillors feared.

  9. Grafitti vs beating people up... by supertsaar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So Spraying a tag on a wall is worse than the old knee-to-the-solar-plexus move? Chigago-Curb-Job? Columbian Necktie?
    That makes me very sad. We teach our kids that violence is cool, acceptable, exciting, fun.
    Then we complain about all the violence in the streets.
    If you want to ban a game, please ban it for excessive violence, not for some paint sprayed on walls.

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    1. Re:Grafitti vs beating people up... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 2

      I think the only justifiable time to ban a game is when it depicts a real life crime. Sexually explicit pictures of a minor, a murder being performed, and that type of stuff.

      What is being done in Australia is blatent censorship. The government needs to realize it's up to the parents to raise their children right. There is no substitute for a parent teaching a child right from wrong.

    2. Re:Grafitti vs beating people up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er...no.

      we do not teach our kids anything.

      and kids do find it easier to see the negative side of some aspects while not the other...kids have a (limited) sense of discretion too. so even though kids play a game that involves both violence and grafiti , they are most likely to lean towards grafiti because they know (to an extent) the downside of leaning towards the violence.

      I am not supporting the ban or anything... but to bemoan it because violence is promoted is not being real.

    3. Re:Grafitti vs beating people up... by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      It is my personal opinion that our society promotes violence as cool, fun, exciting and acceptable.
      Just take a look at movies, television shows (even childrens cartoons in some cases) : a majority of them add ' excitement' in the form of violence. Obviously, this is for a reason: we _love_ violence.
      So by letting our kids watch all this crap we actually _do_ teach them that violence is cool and Okay.

      My post wanted to state that I would have understood it better if the Australians had decided to ban the game for being too violent. Banning it because some people spray paint on a wall in a video game makes very little sense to me. Even though I think most grafitti is crap or just plain old vandalism (mind you, there are some talented people out there..) I do not consider it a bigger problem than the violence in our streets, on the bus, in the train, in the supermarket, in the football stadiums and at schools.

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    4. Re:Grafitti vs beating people up... by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      I saw this on a morning news program today and they had the Gold Coast Mayor discussing it. One reason was the grafitti, he mentioned that his city spends $2 - 3 Million a year cleaning up the shit and that he didn't want to encourage more kids to do it. He also mentioned how evil the violence was. Apparently its not just about tagging, it also involves beating up people with wooden planks and baseball bats. He said that this was different to a game involving AK-47s and such because the weapons it depicts are actually readily available to kids. I can see their point of view on this but I am also totally opposed to a total ban. I'm actually considering buying the game from gameplanet.co.nz now, if there was no ban I probably would have never heard of the game so they've really done the opposite of what they intended to do. I'm sure plenty of other people will do the same.

    5. Re:Grafitti vs beating people up... by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember the huge success that 'Carmageddon' had after some politicians wanted to ban it here (the Netherlands). Banning is a statement, but the effect may not be the desired one...

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  10. Strange laws by grimdawg · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm in a bind about this. What most people don't know is that Australia lacks an Adults only game rating, so any game unsuitable for people between 16 and 17 must be banned, as 15+ is the hardest rating. This was the reason for the banning of games such as GTA3 (before changes) and BMX XXX. I'm torn on this issue, because I don't believe these games are suitable for kids under 18, and so by Aussie law, they're banned. Sure, it's up to the parents, but a game can't be rated 18+, so any 16yo would be able to get his hands on any game without parental consent. In summary, the ban is correct under Australian law (we should by no means lower the rating of titles to get them oin shelves), but the OFLC needs an 18+ rating, pronto.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    1. Re:Strange laws by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      but a game can't be rated 18+, so any 16yo would be able to get his hands on any game without parental consent.

      I don't think there is that much of a difference between 16 and 18. Kids who are going to be influenced by a game to go out and spray paint stuff would have to be much younger than 16.

    2. Re:Strange laws by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      i dont think theres much difference between 17 and 18, but remember the woo-har that occured when the hot coffee section of gta:sa was found. retarded parents across america were all like "OMG!!!11 theres sex hidden amongst all that violence!!! theres no way our 17 year old son timmy can play it now, that game was no way M(17+) material, it should have been AO(18+) so im suing rockstar". having the R rating there would keep morons happy, rather than banning anything that cant get M15+

      --
      TIAEAE!
    3. Re:Strange laws by pla · · Score: 1

      I'm in a bind about this. What most people don't know is that Australia lacks an Adults only game rating

      Umm... Okay? So I fail to see the problem (or rather, I fail to see why your government doesn't just implement the trivially obvious solution to the problem)... Allow adult-only ratings to apply to games.

      AU already has higher ratings for movies, or so I've inferred from other comments on this topic. Just extend them to apply to games, and you have no problem. No more need to outright ban games.


      Of course, ratings and bannings all amount to nothing more than a farce to make puritans feel better about their lack of actual parenting skills. I read my first Playboy at 8, have never, at any time in my life, had difficulty obtaining alcohol, saw my first hardcore porno at (by?) 12, and I won't elaborate on the banned/illegal materials I've partaken in, but suffice it to say the WO(s)D has never meant much more to me than a vague threat to my freedom if I didn't use my head.

      Any yet, somehow, I turned out a (reasonably) normal, healthy adult, with a college education, decent job, and meaningful long-term relationship with my significant other (who happens to have the opposite gender from me, but I wouldn't consider that a qualification to "healthy" or "normal"). Why? Because my parents focused on actually raising me as a decent and thinking person, rather than a sheep adhering to an arbitrary set of meaningless rules.

      The problem with sheep - They don't do so well once they leave the nice safe pasture.

    4. Re:Strange laws by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Imagine, for a moment, that because of some minute error, the language of the law for murder was written incorrectly such that it was impossible to find someone guilty of the crime. Would you support indefinitely holding all murder suspects to avoid letting murderers go free?

      I hope you'd say no. I know I would say know. Why? Because the sort of logic that would allow them to hold a person indefinitely for one crime could easily be extended to all other crimes by intentionally fucking up other laws. Really, if they simply did not have the power to ban such games, there would almost certainly be either a) a rapid move by the government to make proper 18+ ratings or b) you'd be stuck with a system that allows a few 16 and 17 years to play a game when you'd rather they didn't. But in the end, it's simply the case that giving the government the power to infringe upon rights because of how badly the laws they've written are written gives the government absolute power. That's a sad state of affairs.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    5. Re:Strange laws by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Umm... Okay? So I fail to see the problem (or rather, I fail to see why your government doesn't just implement the trivially obvious solution to the problem)... Allow adult-only ratings to apply to games. AU already has higher ratings for movies, or so I've inferred from other comments on this topic. Just extend them to apply to games, and you have no problem. No more need to outright ban games.

      Well yes, that would be the obvious solution. But this is government we're talking about.
      There have in fact been many reviews of the ratings system for games, and some time last year even decided to bring game ratings in line with movie ratings. Yet they still managed to leave out an R rating.

  11. Philip Ruddock by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
    the game features a world where freedom of expression is suppressed by a tyrannical city government.

    I've got an idea for a character in the next version of the game.

    But seriously, most of the games out there promote violence, road rage, all kinds of stuff, and they can still be sold. What makes graffiti so important?

    1. Re:Philip Ruddock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The reason this is an important issue now is because the the city of Melbourne and Victoria police is cracking down hard on graffiti gangs becuase of the upcoming Commenwealth Games (or Empire games if you so wish) being hosted here in March. Also the goverment is blaming gangs for causing public transport services to be disrupted (trains being cancelled mostly by people tagging trains) which could also be a problem for the games. So I would suggest that if this game would have been released about 6 months earlier it might have got through not a problem.

  12. Re:GREAT! by strider44 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No you don't, at least not in Sydney. Anyway I don't see how something like this *really* actually fuels graffiti. I'm one of those people who thinks that GTA doesn't fuel people going around shooting everybody, and like the designer said, it's not that hard to draw on a wall, and if a kid wants to do it he doesn't need a game to show him how.

    Quoth the Simpsons:


    Meyers: I did a little research and I discovered a startling thing...
    There was violence in the past, long before cartoons were invented.
    Kent: I see. Fascinating.
    Meyers: Yeah, and know something, Kent? The Crusades, for instance.
    Tremendous violence, many people killed, the darned thing went
    on for thirty years.
    Kent: And this was before cartoons were invented?
    Meyers: That's right, Kent.

  13. It used to be Music by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It used to be music that everyone said was a bad influence, now it is Video games.

    I love the following Frank Zappa quotation.

    "There are more love songs than anything else. If songs could make you do
    something we'd all love one another."
    -- Frank Zappa

    Not exactly the same, but close enough if we replace love songs with first person shooters and....

    Nevermind

    1. Re:It used to be Music by Prune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call bullshit. Love songs are usually about lust and romantic love, not loving your fellow human beings in general.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:It used to be Music by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Zappa was especially good at pointing out the stupidity of our fine elected officials (and their wives more specifically), even without being actively involved himself. He once had an instrumental album get stickered by the PMRC for explicit lyrics.

      "I wrote a song about dental floss but did anyone's teeth get cleaner?" --Frank Zappa

      --
      How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
    3. Re:It used to be Music by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and? That in no way refutes Zappa's point. If he'd meant "hump" instead of "love" he'd have said so.

    4. Re:It used to be Music by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Sen. Danforth: "There is nothing on the face of the album which would notify you if the record has pornographics material or material glorifying violence?"

      Tipper Gore: "No, there is nothing that would suggest that to me."

      Frank Zappa: "I would say that a buzz saw blade between the guy's legs on the album cover is good indication that it's not for little Johnny."

      -- The Senate Commerce Committee hearing on rock lyrics, from The Village Voice, 6 Oct 1985

      Now there was a guy who could puncture ass-hats.
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:It used to be Music by jmhewitt · · Score: 1

      replace love songs with crate smashing.

  14. A bit of context, please. by iainl · · Score: 5, Informative

    The real issue, once again, is that Australia don't have the equivalent of the UK's "18" or US "M" for games, so the highest possible rating is the aforementioned MA15+. So games like the GTA series are already banned there.

    Since the game involves just as much violence against policemen as GTA does, and the only non-violent aspect to the game is the vandalism, my only surprise is that they considered it possible for an MA15+ in the first place.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:A bit of context, please. by grimdawg · · Score: 1
      The reason it was considered for MA15 here is that they were trying to get around the lack of an R18 for videogames.

      Few games are banned here, despite being totally unsuitable for minors.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    2. Re:A bit of context, please. by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      There are two issues. First, does this make sense within Austrailia's laws. Two, is this the right thing to do.

      Obviously it makes sense within them. As many have pointed out that thier laws ban games that fall into a rating above thier maximum - thus it makes sense. So, from that "context" it is OK. This is where many of the supporters stops and, IMO, is a very bad precedent.

      Next, we have is this the proper thing for the govt to do? So, lets take an extreme example. right now, in China, you can be jailed and executed for speaking certain things (see some of the cases where Yahoo has given over Bloggers). It makes perfect sense within thier lwas - it is even internally logical and is relativly effective from their point of view (that is, other than "rights violation" there isn't much you can throw against it). If we view it "in context" we must conlcude that not only is it OK to do, it is the proper path thier govt should take as it is simply following their rules. However, I bet most of us here (including you) disagree with that as "rights violations" is a pretty big thing and this os where most of the posts I have read so far are arguing.

      Thus, I rather suspect that what you, and many of the other apologist, are using as the be all and end all argument is not one - otherwise you would support this type of thing (and if you do support it, then I guess I don't really have an argument against you other than I think you ought to go live in one of the areas for a while). Instead of arguing that "It makes sense within thier laws" you should be arguing why it is a proper thing to do. If all it takes is that it makes sense within thier laws even genocide can be accepted as right and proper.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    3. Re:A bit of context, please. by grimdawg · · Score: 1
      I'm going to disagree. It makes sense within Australia's laws, but the law is not in keeping with Australia's attitude and other laws.

      Films are VERY rarely banned in Australia (I can only remember one in my lifetime), and EVERY OTHER MEDIUM has an R18+ reating down here. Having a different standard for games, films, books and television is the error here.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    4. Re:A bit of context, please. by iainl · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I probably explained myself poorly. By saying that the issue was their lack of an R18+ for videogames, I meant to imply that I saw this lack as the problem. So I suggest we all calm down and agree to agree.

      1) Within their laws, it's the right thing to do - I do think that the game's content is unsuitable for the M15+ rating, and given a choice between handing it to children and banning it, I'm inclined to the latter for now.

      2) The fact that you're banning the game, and have previously forced other games to get seriously edited to get the M15+ rating is a pretty clear indication that pretending that games shouldn't be considered for the R18+ rating is no longer tenable. So the law should be re-examined.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:A bit of context, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK's BBFC ratings only apply to games with film footage. (The whole content of the game is examined even if the film is short and non-viloent, sexual etc.) The BBFC do not classify games without film footage. Therefore a game with sex, vilonce, etc. but without film footage isn't rated by the BBFC and therefore gets no legal limit on the age of the consumer the game can be sold to. Most game developers have an ELSPA/PEGI rating but this is volentary and not a legal limit.

    6. Re:A bit of context, please. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What's interesting is that apart from pornography, i'm not aware of any rating system for books, nor any rules or guidelines to follow for who gets access to which books. A child could go into a library and check out just about any book. It's all electronic now, so nobody would even know they were checking out the book, unless they bothered to look through the records. There's probably a lot of books out there that discuss topics too mature for many children, but we don't see any ratings on these. Not only that, I can't even remember the last time I saw a book that was banned, as it's often frowned upon. What brings all this attention to movies, and games, yet lets books slip through without any rating system at all?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  15. Re:GREAT! by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    and once they are past banning pencils, they will quickly un-ban them. Otherwise, people will start to doodle stuff on the bathroom walls with the "writing tools" they produce there and which can't be banned in bathrooms. (ick-ick, just hold it through double layer of toilet paper while writing.)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  16. Jet Set Radio by nkh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was Jet Set Radio banned in Australia?

    1. Re:Jet Set Radio by flamearrows · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. But Jet Set Radio was far cuter... the action was deliberately cartoonish and hence rather unreal and irrelevant. Thus, there's no "promotion" of graffiti or violence, and the game was classified as M.

      --
      The indiscriminate use of vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker
    2. Re:Jet Set Radio by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      That's odd. I have both Jet Grinf Radio and Jet Set Radio Future, and both games are rated T, with the the reason cited being "inappropriate lyrics," I believe. Though the game DOES open with a disclaimer, saying it does not condone the act of vandalism in any way.

  17. Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Melbourne and recently there has been alot of media hysteria regarding grafitti and the impression it will make on our upcoming Commonwealth Games guests.

    They are currently working very hard to clean up the train lines and they would not be impressed if a game like this made it's way to our impressionable young at the moment. Welcome to the nanny state.

    1. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Gleng · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I lived in Melbourne for nearly five years, and I used to really enjoy looking at the graffiti whilst on boring train journeys. I'd MUCH rather look at the graffiti - some of which is absolutely amazing - than a plain, blank grey wall for an hour, but that's just me I suppose.

      It would be a much better use of time if they could stop the trains on the Frankston line smelling like stale piss.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    2. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will probably happen after they stop Frankston itself from smelling like stale piss.

    3. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I lived in Melbourne for nearly five years, and I used to really enjoy looking at the graffiti whilst on boring train journeys

      I wonder if anybody figured out what MAX+GJE was all about?

    4. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try catching the trains on a weekend - that stale smell becomes renewed thanks to some cooperative passengers ;)

    5. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by miro+f · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm on the Hurstbridge line and we get some great graffiti too (our trains also smell like piss). it's always such a shame when someone puts a giant tag over a nice piece of artwork. I see signs everywhere saying "Tagging is illegal" but I don't see anywhere "Graffiti is illegal". Interesting.

      I actually like the fact that they spend time cleaning the walls that are covered in graffiti. I take the train every day and it gives me some fresh graffiti to look at. And clears of the ugly black tags.

      Although Connex could certainly do with spending their money elsewhere.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    6. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm not the only one who enjoys the ever-changing art gallery that is our Melbourne train system? I must admit I'm a bit of a graffiti addict, mostly the colorful graphic design stuff, but also some of the stencil stuff (but NOT the tedius tagging crap). There are some buildings/walls around Melbourne that I visit regularly just to see the latest works. Cheaper than any art gallery, and not nearly as much pretentious wank to dig through to find the good stuff!

    7. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by FlopEJoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      "It would be a much better use of time if they could stop the trains on the Frankston line smelling like stale piss."

      The fresh piss has been on back-order for ages.

    8. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by Stokey · · Score: 0

      For the uneducated, might I recommend:
      http://www.banksy.co.uk/
      A legend in his own lunchtime. When I walk home at the end of a gruelling day in the City [London], I am greeted by one of Banksy's rats holding a sign that simply says "You lie!". Makes me chuckle everytime.

      --
      Natsu gusa-ya, Tsuwamono domo-ga, Yume no ato
    9. Re:Not surprising - the games are coming up! by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      If I had moderator points, and hadn't already replied to this article about 5 times ... I'd try and give them all to you. Maybe I'm just going crazy on a friday morning, but I was nearly in tears at this. Well played.

  18. Don't you think... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Don't you think that Federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, the board and other authorities should be banned in Australia because they promote software piracy?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Don't you think... by lordperditor · · Score: 1

      They are a bunch of dicks (oh we know what is best for you grown adults!!!) and should be the first against the wall when the revolution comes!

    2. Re:Don't you think... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Don't you believe the acronym for Federal Attorney General is an accident?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Don't you think... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Don't you believe the acronym for Federal Attorney General is an accident?

      What, you mean he's in the pay of Big Tobacco?

  19. Wow by squoozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it's ok to "promote" shooting people, running people down and using / abusing prostitutes (GTA and plenty of others) but it's not ok to "promote" tagging a wall. Hmmmm we have a very weird society.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Wow by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it's ok to "promote" shooting people, running people down and using / abusing prostitutes (GTA and plenty of others)but it's not ok to "promote" tagging a wall.

      GTA was banned in Australia too

      Hmmmm we have a very weird society.

      I'm not sure whether you're talking about the USA or Australia - you seem a little confused. (but yes, they're both quite weird)

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:Wow by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      "So it's ok to "promote" shooting people, running people down and using / abusing prostitutes (GTA and plenty of others) but it's not ok to "promote" tagging a wall. Hmmmm we have a very weird society."

      It's probably because kids are more likely to imitate a petty crime they see in a video game versus something more heinous like murdering a hooker. Kids are always looking for ways to push the limits of right and wrong, and grafitti is smack dab on the borderline. Frankly, I would be concerned if graffiti was a problem in my area.

    3. Re:Wow by squoozer · · Score: 1

      Either US or Oz or anywhere else for that matter (I'm from the UK) I meant society globally or certainly at least the westernized bits of it seem to have some strange values. It doesn't surprise me that GTA was banned in Australia but I'll bet there are a lot of similar games that aren't. I'm against censorship in general but I think it's about time we had some official sanctioned game ratings with more teeth. When the graphics were poor it was fair enough to have no ratings or industry imposed rates but modern games are getting to the point where some of the content is quite disturbing.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    4. Re:Wow by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      I'm from the UK...
      I think it's about time we had some official sanctioned game ratings with more teeth. When the graphics were poor it was fair enough to have no ratings or industry imposed rates but modern games are getting to the point where some of the content is quite disturbing.

      Um, did you not realise that we do have official sanctioned game ratings in the UK? Violent games are rated by the BBFC, the same statutory body who rate films, and their ratings are enforced by law - it is illegal for a shop assistant to sell an 18-rated game to an under-18.

      All Rockstar's games, for example, carry proper BBFC "18" ratings, exactly the same rating with exactly the same logo and exactly the same legal implications as the 18 rating on a violent or sexually-explicit movie.

      So where, exactly, is the problem?

    5. Re:Wow by squoozer · · Score: 1

      Ok, that passed me by. I thought it was still a volantry rating system in the UK.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    6. Re:Wow by Tarison · · Score: 1

      Whether it's officially banned or not, I can walk into EB Games here in Sydney, tomorrow, and buy GTA just like that. Not just GTA3, but the same goes for Vice City and San Andreas. Even when the whole Hot Coffee thing hit the news, it was still on sale for a few days before they released the decaf version. Manhunt's actually banned, but was on sale for a while before any of the retailers paid attention to said-ban.

      Generally speaking, these sorts of bans don't actually happen until a few weeks after the game comes out (though not in this case, obviously), by which stage the majority of people already have them anyway.

      I still remember when these idiots wanted to ban PGR2 because it has tracks set in Sydney.

    7. Re:Wow by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see with that is that the UK is the only place (that I know of) that does that.

      Personally, I do believe something as simple as a universal ratings system could work wonders in helping parents understand games better. For some reason, I've noticed they tend to be very lazy (at least where I live) in trying to understand more than one system. They know the movie system well (G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17) but can't figure out a second for games (EC, E, E10+, T, M, AO).

      While I think this points out some disturbing trends in parenting, and will do nothing to solve that problem, it would at least make parents snap back and realize, yes, a game that has an M is just as bad as an R rated movie.

    8. Re:Wow by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      GTA: SA was banned in Australia after the whole Hot Coffee debacle. There is now a modified version which is perfectly legal for sale in Australia. GTA3 is also a modified version. I'm not sure whether the others are modified or not, but they certainly aren't banned.

  20. You Fuckstick! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, the form heading said "Reply to: Philip Ruddock" and I got carried away by the moment....

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:You Fuckstick! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1, Funny
      I got carried away by the moment

      We need to be carefull. His media manager's assistants are going to have to print out 50 pages of /. on friday morning. Phil is not going to be a happy chap after spending friday reading at -1.

      Better carry my passport around for a while, just in case.

  21. shouldn't somebody resign ? by richlv · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The game [that] involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials..." "...has been banned by authorities"

    --
    Rich
    1. Re:shouldn't somebody resign ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Fark, that would warrant an [IRONY] tag. On Slashdot, it's just another comment.

    2. Re:shouldn't somebody resign ? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The Attorney-General mentioned in the article has been involved in deporting and detaining sick Australian citizens and he still has his job.

  22. Re:GREAT! by flamearrows · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yup, you can be carded (16+) before you can buy spray paint. I've been refused in the past when Dad sent me to buy black spraypaint for a building job.

    --
    The indiscriminate use of vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker
  23. Not the issue at all by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    The lack of an 18 rating was tangential to the issue at hand. (And GTA is not banned here, we have a modified version, though I got mine from New Zealand :)

    This game was not banned because it featured graffiti in a fashion similar to how GTA features violence. It was because it (apparantly) contains material that is instructional rather than a shallow representation like the violence in GTA (or graffiti in Jet Set Radio Future). It wasn't considered to "promote" illegal behaviour simply because it represented that behaviour, but because it gave realistic instruction. The issue of promoting illegal behaviour is independant of the age rating so to suggest the game wouldn't be banned if there were an 18 rating is not really true.

    All that according to the woman who cast the deciding vote who was on Hack today.

    Which isn't to say I agree with the decision. I think it stinks!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Not the issue at all by micpp · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much "realistic instruction" that the game contains isn't obvious to anyone with an IQ above 50? Aim can at walls, spray paint.

    2. Re:Not the issue at all by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it's not so much the "aim can at wall, spray paint" that they were concerned about as much as the "aim can at face, spray paint, ignite aerosol with lighter".

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  24. Riiight ..... by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What they have basically done, then, is turned this game into an instant automatic hit. Everybody in Australia will want a copy of this game now, because it's illegal. And they will get copies of it. Either paid-up ones, sent in an innocuous music CD box by friends or relatives abroad; or, much more likely, pirated copies. {Does anybody actually pay for games? I suppose there must be one or two.} Everybody outside Australia will want a copy because it's been banned in Australia.

    All things considered, this is a fantastic marketing stunt.

    My proposed solution, by the way, is to ban all sales of video games to {but not possession by} minors. That way, parents and guardians get to decide what is and isn't appropriate.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Riiight ..... by cliffski · · Score: 1

      This whole 'scandal' is a cooked up piece of pathetic marketing but the middle class white boy who wishes he was a gangsta who designed this crappy game. He actually believes that ALL video games should be about graffiti, hip-hop and terrorism because 'thats what the kids dig'. He even posed on the front cover of 'Develop' magazine with a baseball cap on backwards. I reckon hes mid thrities. what a dick.
      And yes people DO buy games. Thankfully, otherwise nobody would be making them anymore. Thats called economics. If you think its the 'done-thing' to pirate games these days, you are just contributing to wiping out the industry or forcing even more draconian DRM in the future. If you like a game, buy it, it's not like they are a months salary FFS.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    2. Re:Riiight ..... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Personally, while I buy all my games, and like to feel good about that, there's a point where the ethics don't matter. If there's a game that exists and I want to play it, but the stores won't carry it, then it's time to fire up BitTorrent and have no qualms about it at all. Problem solved. Not my fault if they won't accept my money for it.

    3. Re:Riiight ..... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I should just point out, lest anyone take me for a "pirate", that full source code and distribution rights are prerequisites for any software I condescend to run on my own computers. This excludes most games. While it is true that I have never paid for a piece of software in my life, for at least this millennium I have only downloaded, modified and shared software with the blessing of the copyright holders.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:Riiight ..... by acb · · Score: 1

      Australian law actually criminalises possession of unrated videos or games. AFAIK, if the cops/postal authorities/customs authorities find a copy of Baise-Moi or GTA3 in your possession, you can, in theory, go to jail for it.

    5. Re:Riiight ..... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      ..... "if" being the operative word.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Riiight ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can, in theory, go to jail for it. Thats when I'd move to a less shitty country.

    7. Re:Riiight ..... by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Currently, it's extremely unlikely a game coul be a hit if it isn't on store shelves. While online retailers do get their share of sales and online distribution mechanisms such as Steam have some promise, brick and mortar retailers are still responsible for the majority of a game's sales.

      The fact that a game is banned may increase its desirability among a certain segment of the population but most of them will still have difficulty obtaining it if stores aren't carrying it.

      Now if you said that banning the game would greatly increase the number of people pirating it, I'd have to agree with you.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  25. Re:GREAT! by ben_1432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wasn't that to stop "chroming"? Kids getting high on the fumes? I seem to recall Extra did a nice big story on it, and then a short while later they put the restrictions in place.

    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/10/23/10345 61498638.html
    http://www.abc.net.au/stateline/qld/content/2005/s 1504831.htm

  26. Just seems like senseless paranoia to me. by Jessrond · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've never understood the whole idea behind banning video games and trying to blame them for various social problems. That's giving games much more influential power than they, or any form of media, ever has had. Really, if someone decides to spray paint just because they've been playing this game, they have other problems unrelated to video games. Parents should be regulating the games that come into their home, because they are the only ones who know if THEIR child is mature enough to understand them. It's not up to the government... And plus, the people in power today see video games as "new" and "confusing." Maybe when people raised on Atari, Nintendo, etc gain political power, we won't see such a witch-hunt on games.

    1. Re:Just seems like senseless paranoia to me. by shorgs · · Score: 1

      Every generation has their scapegoat. Its been demonstrated again and again in our recent history, motion pictures, comic books, rock and roll.

      I think there are two factors at work. Politics and xenophobia. Every politician needs an enemy to wage war against even if that enemy is benign, so long as it can be called an "emerging threat" and tugs at the current generations insecurities. In this case I'd say it's our parents fear that they weren't / aren't good parents. They see their children raised by media to which they aren't accustomed and get a little frightened. It makes it worse when politicians capitalize on that insecurity.

      Its happened before. Those people who hold power now will slowly fade away and people who aren't frightened will assume power. Ask any person who has been raised with videogames if they are concerned about the problem. They'll give the same answer as our previous generation would when asked about rock and roll.

  27. Yup the regulators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are working to control the world... oh no, soon you won't be able to sledge off against less fortunate or force your children to slave labor.

    Hang on? You can't do those things !!

    Maybe 50 years ago we had it all wrong? Maybe those who think games about graffti or "breaking the law" are all ok also have it wrong?

    Mmmm I wonder what those 50 years from now will think of the acceptable rules we have to day?

  28. Re:GREAT! by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Spray cans are locked up in the US too... (just in case you dint know)

  29. Game banning in Australia by BlackMesaLabs · · Score: 5, Informative

    From someone who lives here, here's the deal with what gets banned (as in games), and the GTA oddities: GTA 3 was released here, uncut. Then they found out about the prostitutes, and revoked classification- forcing a recall
    After this, the game was edited to remove the prostitute functionality and re-released, conforming to Aus standards. The reason the prostitutes were removed was NOT because of the sexual content, rather, it was because of the very strict rules we have here about sex and violence. It was the fact you could kill hookers after sex that had the game censored.
    Vice city was pre-edited by the developers and had NO sex (the Candy Suxx FMV's were fucked up) Pardon the pun.
    GTA:SA came out WITH hookers, unedited. I have no idea how/why this happened.
    Generally games are censored here when sex and violence is mixed, IN ANY WAY. Duke Nukem 3D was censored because you could shoot the strippers.
    I dont understand the logic of this banning though

    1. Re:Game banning in Australia by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Generally games are censored here when sex and violence is mixed

      How do they know the content is there? They don't play them (obviously).

      Perhaps the games are built with a "censor" interface. Or perhaps the censors rely on the documentation.

    2. Re:Game banning in Australia by BlackMesaLabs · · Score: 0

      The Australian Office of Film & Literature Classification (OFLC) actually do hire people to demonstrate games based on outlines provided by the developers. Thing is, they dont often see everything, or they see the wrong thing, or the developers convieniently leave out things.

  30. ummmm...where are you from exactly? What's the R rating for? (I'm from Brisbane, Australia)

    http://www.oflc.gov.au/special.html?n=291&p=134#1

    1. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      R & X cannot be used to classify games - MA is the maximum. From your link (emphasis mine): "Films and computer games are now classified G, PG, M or MA 15+. Films can also be classified R 18+ or X 18+. R 18+ and X 18+ are not classifications for computer games."

  31. LoL by ynotds · · Score: 1

    You certainly got me with that heading.

    I've been having this night^H^H^H^H^Hday-mare for some time that I was driving down the road and Phil and Johnny were crossing in front of me but so far apart that I could only choose one.

    Now I just need to find somewhere to show the contrasting pics of graffiti and authorised murals I took at the weekend.

    Maybe a carrot for the kids in terms of something interesting to do might achieve a lot more than forever telling them what not to do.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  32. yes, we do by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    umm, yes we do. would you please stop commenting on something you know nothing about

    http://www.oflc.gov.au/special.html?n=291&p=134#1

    1. Re:yes, we do by Howzer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, we don't.

      From the FIRST PARAGRAPH of the link you so helpfully supplied:

      "R 18+ and X 18+ are not classifications for computer games."

      Forget RTFA -- this is more RYOFL.

  33. Re:Wow! Such an important country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you want to see articles on the latest series of Bush Administration threats and blunders, I suggest you stuff it and go sit in the corner.

  34. Whats Different!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone ever play the Rockstar Game based on the movie "The Warriors" Whats different? I would be interested to see if that game was banned..

    The Warriors is based on the movie which features a bunch of rival gangs the subject of which "The Warriors" are trying to make a name for themselves.. by committing crimes, avoiding/attacking police, and spray painting (tagging/bombing) their logo all over the city..

    Sounds like the same sort of game. I actually liked it.. and by no means ever had the desire to attack police or even pick up a spray can.

    -Riddler

  35. A cure for grafitti by DrXym · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Any tagger who is caught should have all of their property defaced with gloss paint - their shoes, clothes, music, everything. Just empty a tin of the stuff all over their property and see how they like it.

    1. Re:A cure for grafitti by Jessrond · · Score: 1

      Since most of them live at home, I assume their parents would find even more ways to punish their kids after their property got tagged!

    2. Re:A cure for grafitti by pubjames · · Score: 1

      A lot of taggers are just kids and teenagers that actually have a reasonable sense of right and wrong, they just don't "get" why graffiti is wrong because the idea of actually owning a property at that age is so far removed from their experience that they have no empathy with the property owners. Also, they don't realise how expensive graffiti is to clean up.

      I think a better punishment would be to have to spend a few days with the teams that have to go around the city to clean up the graffiti, and have to pay a proportion of the costs of cleaning the stuff up.

    3. Re:A cure for grafitti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! We can't have parents actually parenting their children! That would mean they'd have to make a decision or exercise discipline. That's too hard for mommy and daddy when they can just blame the companies rather than themselves. Stupid, ignorant, self-centered louts. Really Australia and the US should ban breeding without a permit and an IQ test.

  36. d'oh by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    d'oh, ok you're right, my bad. I thought cause i have a couple of ma15+ games...

  37. d'oh by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

    d'oh, ok you're right...I thought, cause i have a couple of ma15+ games..

  38. Re:GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Its a vicious circle by fatted · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...It looks like the only way to beat these corrupt officials is with street fighting skills and graffiti! Everybody was kung foo fighting WHAH! HOO HAH!

    (I don't know any lyrics for spray painting).

    1. Re:Its a vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *pop* shhhhhwwwwww... shheeeeeewwwwwwwwww... shh.. shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhwwwwwww....
      cri-pop

  40. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GTA is banned in Australia too. RTFC!

    So they're not being inconsistent, just dumb.

    Even if this wasn't true, you're the third commenter to make this point. Again, RTFC!

  41. Stupid logic by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Japan, no game really gets publically banned for being violent or degrading (other than the pubes-mosiac thing), but then there is little violence in society and next to no graffiti. There is no fear of violence ever influencing anybody.

    The logic goes that maybe if there was less graffiti and less violence in Australia, then we could have violent games and nobody would care about any influence.

    Seems to me that the outside world influences video games more than the other way around.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Stupid logic by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      next to no graffiti

      Where in Japan do you live? Go hang out in the big cities in Kinki, like Kobe or Kyoto, or Osaka. There's plenty of graffiti. It's not as wide spread as in say London or American cities, but its there (and some of it is quite good).

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:Stupid logic by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      Japan had enough of violence after World War II. I mean, they got 2 of their cities obliterated, and before they they committed all sorts of horrid atrocities, not to mention fought a war which is never very fun. After that their constitution banned a standing army (or something) for a while. Fast forward 40 years and they make all the high tech stuff.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    3. Re:Stupid logic by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      You forget the difference between the Wester world and Japan. Japan is far more "all for one and one for all" in nature, where as the Western world is more "Screw everyone but me". So people see that painting crap on a wall just ruins that wall for them and everyone else. Where as some spoilt little brat might think it's "cool" and ignore this.

      Plus you'll notice the Japanese games market is VERY different. Quirky puzzle games and RPGs do very well, things based on anime (and similar things) also do quite well. But super violent games with no point but to kill people are more cult than super popular. GTA in Japan is about on par with Occult books, they're about and not frowned upon, but mostly it's a younger male market who have an intrest rather than the mainstream market. Here on the other hand RPGs and puzzle games are cult, where as GTA and violent sports games are popular.. Quite intresting to look into it all really.

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:Stupid logic by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Japan got many many more cities obliterated. Only two of them gained all the fame, though. Guess a prototype test is more memorable than old tried and tested airdrop of combined fragmentation and incendiary cargo.

  42. Re:GREAT! by Xayma · · Score: 2, Informative

    Spray paint is 18+, some stores had other codes voluntairly before that however. Knives and knife blades are only 16+ however.

  43. In Singapore, however by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Chewing gum can land you in jail.

    More stupid laws, anyone?

  44. Don't Panic by craznar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only differences this decision will have on the game in Australia are:

    1. Increased popularity of the game
    2. Lower profits to the manufacturer
    3. Larger US/AU bandwidth usage for a few weeks.

    That's about it really.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  45. Re:GREAT! by wease21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really? Where? I was at Home Depot yesterday and walked down an entire aisle of spray paint and didn't see a lock anywhere in sight. The locks were 3 aisles over next to the doors.

  46. Re:GREAT! by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

    Yea, thats why everybody seems to be using canned air now, from office supply stores - some guys in my friends dorm literally had dozens of empty cans laying on their floor all the time.

  47. A reason for Aussies to use Psiphon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now I know what I can use Canada's new Psiphon for. I am off to commit an act of civil disabediance... Well I will in about two days, no dam ADSL out bush here.

  48. Re:So what? by BruceCage · · Score: 1

    Quite coincidentally the picture of the day at Wikimedia Commons has to do with graffiti.

    --
    Perfect is the enemy of done.
  49. Re:GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, being Melbourne (aus) resident, I must admit I actually *like* the graffiti in a lot of places (but not the taggers... definitely not the taggers). Especially the more colourful, stylistic stuff livening up the bland concrete walls next to train lines... it adds colour and humanity to otherwise drab, dreary surrounds, and mostly doesn't cause any harm to anyone. And besides, even at it worst, is it really any worse than the current plague of malformed concrete lumps... sorry, I meant to say modern architectural masterpieces (yes federation square, that means you)... currently blighting the landscape hereabouts?

  50. To what end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now like most of you, I had absolutely no interest in playing this game. It sounds pretty dull, to tell you the truth.
    Now I know it's been banned, I feel it's a patriotic duty of mine to download it (since now I can't buy it in a store), play it, and encourage my friends too.
    I've got to say, it's unlikely it's going to make me want to go out and cover a train carriage in spraypaint scrawls of my nickname... Well, you never know...

    Second thing: Since when did graffiti become something Phillip Ruddock (the AG, my local member, the head of my soccer club etc) needed to concern himself with? Hey Phil! How about you get back to advocating sensible nationwide tort law reform, dreaming up new anti-terrorism laws that further impinge my civil liberties and the other things you do with your day?

    That's all

  51. Re:GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude. I just ate.

  52. Gee... by Otis_INF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The decision was endorsed last night by the Federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, who had asked the board to review of the game's MA15+ classification after local councils and state governments voiced concerns that the game would promote graffiti."
    Gee, for a minute I thought they had concerns the game would promite violence, but *pfew*, violence is still normal, and accepted.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  53. The writing is not on the wall by slushbat · · Score: 3, Funny

    And from that day forward no graffiti was ever sprayed on the walls of Australia again. The clean grey concrete canyons were the envy of the rest of the world where no other nation had the foresight to ban this evil computer game.

    --

    Don't put off until tomorrow what you can leave until the day after.

  54. The Attorney-General loves us, by kocsonya · · Score: 1

    That's why he, when he is not banning games, states that it is necessary to wire-tap people who are not suspects of any crimes (why, they *might* one they become suspicious!) or promote the idea (so much so that it is the law) that promoting the idea of the forceful removal of the (sorry, "The") Government is worth quite a few years in behind bars. And he is right, because if you cant trust the Government...

    He loves us, he and our wise government do indeed, they are our true Big Brothers and we have to trust them without reservation.

    1. Re:The Attorney-General loves us, by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      In America, the Smith Act essentially said the same thing: promoting violent overthrow of the government through literature or speech was a criminal offense. The reason for this is very simple:

      A single person or small group promoting anti-government violence will never have the actual military might to begin a rebellion. So instead they choose to act in single acts of massive and wanton destruction (the Oklahoma City bombing, or the Chechens who took over that school, for example) which more often than not hurt large numbers of innocent citizens and civilians.

      Whether or not you agree with this argument is why we, of course, have a government in the first place. (The Smith Act was upheld a few times, but was later ruled unconstitutionally excessive.)

  55. Carrying a gun in public by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    You dont need a license to carry a gun in public, you only need alicense for certain kinds of guns.

    People, this is VERY country and state specific.

    For example, in my state of ND, the ultra-short list:
    1. Open carry of unloaded firearms is legal, except for prohibited areas. No permit needed. Once you're out of the city/large town or on a firing range it can be loaded.
    2. Possession of firearms: The only firearms that you need a 'license' for is fully automatic ones. They must be federally legal, which means you pay a $200 tax, submit a huge load of paperwork and wait months. Oh, and the machinegun has to have been in the registry system before 1986, which is when they closed the registry to new personal entries.
    3. Concealed Carry of firearms: Permit needed. If you can buy a gun and pass a fairly easy written & shooting test you got it. This allows you to carry a loaded firearm however you like. Still can't carry in prohibited areas.
    4. Prohibited areas: Government buildings, schools, school events, concerts, sporting events, political events.

    To make a point, open carry is illegal in Texas, California has banned a number of firearms, in New Jersey possession of Hollow Point bullets are illegal for non-cops.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Carrying a gun in public by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. Some notes on Colorado. (I'm not a lawyer, don't believe a word I say.)

      Open carry is prohibited in many municipalities, but AFAIK Denver is the only county that prohibits it. (That said, all of Denver county is incorporated, so it depends on how you look at it.) The municipality I grew up in did not have such a prohibition in the mid '80s. There was some old-timer that carried openly in the mall!

      A concealed carry permit does not confer any additional right to openly carry. You will probably be convicted of "brandishing" if you openly carry in a prohibited location, CCW or no.

      Concealed carry is expressly allowed at schools (with the standard CCW). I think this is a very good thing. If a couple of teachers were carrying at Columbine it could have mitigated the effects of the intractable navel-gazing on the part of law enforcement. I also like the idea of guys considering becoming campus rapists having to take the possibility of armed women on campus into account.

      On the other hand you may not carry in banks. (I think this is a federal law.) This is one of the most blazingly stupid things I've ever heard of. Criminals are drawn to banks like flies to honey. That's where the money is, after all. And the feds go way out of their way to make sure that every gun in the place is in the hands of a criminal (minus some 80 year old who's punching a clock).

      Anyway, interesting stuff to me. I'm off topic. Mods, do your worst!

      -Peter

    2. Re:Carrying a gun in public by jackbird · · Score: 1

      And why, exactly, is turning a bank robbery into a gun battle a good thing?

    3. Re:Carrying a gun in public by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Geez, have some excitement for once in your life, grandpa!

    4. Re:Carrying a gun in public by eht · · Score: 1

      Gunfight bad, deterrent good.

      If the criminals know no one but them will have a gun they're more likely to strike, they don't like getting shot either.

    5. Re:Carrying a gun in public by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that the possession of a firearm by a law-abiding citizen would turn a robbery into a gun battle?

      -Peter

    6. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reason that turning an attempted rape into a dead rapist and a spent 9mm casing is a good thing.

      But you're right; let's just give criminals whatever they want, offer no resistance, and give up. That will certainly teach them a lesson. Just not the lesson you want.

    7. Re:Carrying a gun in public by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why ban hollow point? afaik, they are usually smaller bullets, and soft by design: they expand inside the body to produce a larger wound from a smaller round. It would seem to me that these would be the easiest bullets to stop with body armor. and therefore the round the police should prefer the baddies are armed with...

      (or maybe they're trying to create a mystique by making them illegal... hmmm..)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's probably the same stupid mentality that banned "assault weapons" which had bayonet mounts. Before the Assault Weapon Ban expired recently, it was perfectly OK to own an AK-47 or AR-15 (semiauto, of course). But it wasn't legal to have a bayonet mount on it, because that made it an "assault weapon". I guess there were a lot of problems with crazy people taking assault weapons into schools and offices, and not shooting people, but stabbing them with the bayonet....

      You're correct: hollow-points are better for shooting people, because instead of going through them, they mushroom and do more damage (and also stay in the person hit, instead of going through them and hitting someone behind them). And they're also much easier to stop with a kevlar vest. If you want to penetrate a kevlar vest, you want an armor-piercing round, like a FMJ. So why didn't they ban the FMJs and other armor-piercing rounds instead?

    9. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You should come down here to Arizona. Concealed carry requires a permit, but without a permit, you're allowed to openly carry everywhere except prohibited locations (schools, Mill Ave., various stores, etc.) So occassionally you'll see people with holstered handguns walking around.

      As for campus rapists, women would be better off learning martial arts, and carrying small bladed weapons. Knives are more effective in extremely close combat (provided you know how to handle them); guns are better when there's a little distance between you and the attacker. The problem with rapists is that you might not know someone's going to attempt it until they've already grabbed you.

    10. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Just want to make a point: The military does not consider plain Full Metal Jacket as armor penetrating. However, because it does come to a point, it is marginally more effective at penetration than a Hollow Point.

      Still, I fell obliged to point out that in either case we're talking about only a 10% or so difference.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      "There's lies, damn lies, and statistics."

      Go back and read my post. I said "Knives are more effective in extremely close combat (provided you know how to handle them)". There's martial arts classes that specialize in the handling and usage of bladed weapons, and there's a reason special forces soldiers always carry knives in addition to their usual firearms. Knives are simply more effective for close-quarters combat, but of course that comes at a cost: they're not as easy to use, and require more skill in their use.

    12. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I wanted to dissude people from carrying a knife for self defense casually.

      Thing is, a knife is an extremely close ranged weapon. Statistically, it leads to the highest injury rate.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    13. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with that. Anyone that wants to carry one for self-defense, I think, should take some martial arts classes to learn how to handle it effectively and not injure themselves. It's actually pretty easy to get a knife away from someone who's wielding it in an incompetent way.

    14. Re:Carrying a gun in public by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      For that matter, I do carry a gun, and that also takes a certain amount of training. Not as much perhaps, though more is always better.

      If nothing else, routine practice will help ensure your gun is and stays reliable. Too many* people buy one and then never use it, resulting in problems when a self-defense scenario occurs.

      *Seriously, in this fashion 1 is too many.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  56. Expected this... by 3.14159265 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, I guess it was banned by those corrupt officials, eh?

    1. Re:Expected this... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      So, I guess it was banned by those corrupt officials, eh?
      Ruddock may well be remembered that way - I certainly think so after the big "donation" by someone who wanted residency who then by "sheer coincidence" got it. The reputation of the Australian government is set to go spiralling anticlockwise down the toilet soon after the details of bribes in Iraq by what was at the time a wholly government owned body get some international attention. It's not nice to know we ripped off a UN fund allocated to stop people starving to help arm Saddam.
  57. Re:GREAT! by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The difference is that most kids know that killing is wrong, and won't kill someone because of that (as opposed to not killing someone solely because they might get caught). But a lot of kids put graffiti in the same category as underage smoking/drinking, smoking marijuana, shoplifting, and other nonviolent offenses. Nobody gets injured by graffiti and vandalism, so it seems more like a victimless crime, and so a kid's sense of morality is more likely to be swayed by peer pressure and media influence.

    I'm not saying the game should be banned. Freedom of speech and all that. But I am saying that games like Getting Up and Tony Hawk's Underground 2 should be rated closer to the adult end of the scale by the ESRB and that retailers should take this rating into account when selling games directly to minors. I'm also saying that developers should think about the impact that their work has on society and make an informed decision about whether they're handling things responsibly, rather than just thinking, "Man, this is sweet!" and charging forward.

  58. Wish I could mod this up. by Naruki · · Score: 0

    Because what I was going to say to that terrorism enabler was a lot less nice and would have prevented any kind of rapport.

    1. Re:Wish I could mod this up. by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      Mr Bush, is that you?

      ("Terrorism enabler". Is that your word for flamebait, or just anything you don't agree with?)

  59. Re:Wow! Such an important country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm - out of the last 2 days of stories (> 60 stories), I count 3 stories about Australia. Given that USA is about 15 times the size of Australia, that doesn't seem all that unusual.

  60. bullshit by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    In a free country, ratings and censorship are not codified into laws. In fact, freedom of expression is arguably the most important aspect of a free society.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:bullshit by iainl · · Score: 1

      By which description, Australia (along with a great many other democracies) is not "free". Congratulations.

      What is your point, however?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  61. Australia is a Police State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently the Australian Government passed Anti-Sedition laws which makes it illegal to criticize the Government. Which would make doing this sort of thing now illegal:

    Read it and weep: http://geocities.com/mypaljohn/

  62. Re:GREAT! by tdemark · · Score: 1

    The game involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials using only street fighting skills and graffiti.

    No word yet on if Turk 182 has been banned.

  63. There goes our freedom of thought and expression by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

    When you can no longer buy or sell something, just because some "corrupt officials" don't like the message it contains.

    It'd be too easy to say, "oh it's only Australia", because American and European legislature goes in the same direction.

  64. Theory on why they banned because of graffiti by protocoldroid · · Score: 1

    Maybe they banned a game that has to do with graffiti, because...

    A. The people who have something worth putting graffiti on, are tax payers
    B. If the property is not owned directly by tax payers, it's owned by the government (e.g. bridges)

    I'm not saying it's right to ban the game, I'm just thinking that's possibly why they care more about a game with graffiti than one with violence.

    1. Re:Theory on why they banned because of graffiti by altodarknight · · Score: 1

      Don't people's health and lives belong to tax payer's. If our government believes that games effect people's behavior, surely that would value the censorship of violence over gaffiti.

  65. Rinky Dink Goverment = $$$ by Gray · · Score: 1

    All censorship debate aside. The total population of Australia is only 20.4m. I bet the value of getting your 'fight the evil system with graffiti' game banned in Australia far exceeds the couple thousand sales you where going to make there. I'm just surprised it was Australia of all places that took the bait, they generally seem like a pretty cool lot.

    1. Re:Rinky Dink Goverment = $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are a cool lot, just our government (like most such) are twits. And those of us who aren't in government (most of us) wouldn't dream of getting into politics.

  66. I think we need a game.... by gijoel · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... where you play a concerned citizen or parent and campaign to get video games banned.

  67. Australia, the new China? by Winterblink · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Feel free to express yourself, as long as you don't challenge the authorities or what the government tells you is appropriate! I mean come on.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  68. To spray on an Australian wall: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'The video game being banned, I'm passing time by spraying this instead.'

  69. Chicago curb job? by Nimey · · Score: 1

    I wasn't able to find what "chicago curb job" means, except that it's Nederlander slang.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Chicago curb job? by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Try here.
      Not sure where that "chicago" thing came from, but that is somehow what it is known as in the netherlands, must be that alliteration....

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  70. Intervening Politicians by altodarknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many outside of Australian would know of a major political issue surrounding an abortion drug. Our health minister overided our medication authority to ban the drug and a conscious vote (non party binding) was held over a minister's ability to override certain decisions. And now (although on an issue of lesser scale) another minister is overriding the decision of an authority, our ratings board. It seems utterly stupid that a single man or women's opinion can affect an entire nation's ability to choose. Games that involve murder have drug themes and other anti-social behaviour is allowed, yet a game involves an art, no matter how controversial, is disallowed. The very reason we live in a democracy is so we can choose, and a single person's opinion/belief/religion isn't forced onto us. By minister having the power to override authority's decisions, we lose our choice.

    1. Re:Intervening Politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a conscience vote... although ensuring they are concious during the vote is also important...

  71. Just one problem with the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No soccer hooligans!

  72. Meanwhile by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ... the government of Australia is silent on the issue of banning corrupt politicians. One politician was quoted as saying that there's not evidence that corrupt politicians lead to a rise in graffiti. "That's just preposterous," sayeth MP Swindell.

  73. Re:GREAT! --- Hmm... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I guess they dont then here anymore - I just remember when I was younger going to places like Ace Hardware and them having the cans in the little wire cages where you had to have an employee come get it for you... So I guess either I remmeberd wrong (hell, thats 10 or 13 years ago...), or they never were and I've been spending too much time /.ing...

  74. Good thing no ones spray painting trades women in by guysmilee · · Score: 1

    Good thing no ones spray painting trades women in GTA ... they might have to ban that as well.

  75. Heard about the game on NPR by hwestiii · · Score: 1

    NPR just ran an interview with the man behind this game a day or so ago. It certainly didn't sound like something worthy of such heavy handed treatment.

  76. I doubt this is really about graffiti by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    local councils and state governments voiced concerns that the game would promote graffiti

    The basic fact that all the would-be-do-gooders-for-everyones-own-good is that games do not encourage people to get up off their ass, let alone do something other than go to work and go to Mc D's and get home to play some games. Its a good public pacifier and should be included with the likes of retirement, minimum wages, and beer in any governments arsenal.
    I have to get some kidnappings accomplished in COV, I got no time for chit-chat.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  77. Re:Wow! Such an important country! by cods69 · · Score: 1

    No - We are not an important country.
    We just do lots of silly things which draws attention to ourselves.

  78. Before music ... by dustmite · · Score: 1

    ... it was comics "[1] [2].

    Seems like there will always be a "scary bogeyman" "corrupting our children".

  79. Graffitti threatens Austraila's idea of Good Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australian TV shows suicides, murders & acts of violence - not to mention
    verbal abuse) very loudly and in full & colorful detail...

    Plots to swindle, double-cross & take advantage of the inexperienced,
    infirmed or elderly are unraveled for anyone to "copy-cat" in real life.

    This is fine... no one seems to complain and no censors act to either
    ban or even cut-out the offensive bits.

    But... to give the tourist camera the view of graffiti, ie, something
    expressed by "non-professional" artists... THAT doesn't go here.

    The image of an orderly state / city should not be disrupted by any
    "unauthorised" creativity here.

    Keep your idea & images to yourself. To our authorities, graffitti is
    more offensive than any the most "offensive" images or language that
    regularly make it to our air waves!

    From the earliest days at school, children here must give up their links
    to home & culture, and trade them for "school uniform"... uniform clothes
    helps create a more uniform culture, if you call it that.

    Getting used to looking like your peers prepares one for either factory
    or hospitality industry jobs, not for individually creative expression.

    Uniforms that vary from school to school makes people think in terms of
    "us" and "them" - ie, rather than a blend of individuals, each expressing
    their own styles of dress; the latter would be "too multicultural"...

    Only in -tertiary- educational institutions can one choose one's own style
    of dress, in school (unless, of course, one would be a chef, or perhaps a
    nurse).

    I am writing from Australia, in a state which no longer "tolerates" an
    -affordable- State Folk Festival... whose warm, mellow music used to be
    played in the sea-side town of Victor Harbor, over a long-weekend,
    each year.

    Unlike Victoria's very large & succesful Port Fairy Folk Festival, South
    Australia's sea-side festival venue was home to a retired community who
    (reportedly) told their Local Gov't Council they no longer want "hippies"
    coming to "their" town, wlking around "their" streets to celebrate Life &
    their various cultures - East & West, White and Indigenous - with lots of
    opportunities to dance & sing... not just places to sit & watch perfor-
    mances, while sipping local wines...

    We've got tons of grapes rotting on the vines, a big glut of them even,
    so, we can't let people spend all that time in motion, ie without glasses
    of wine in their hands! :-/

    So, SA;s rural-town based State Folk Festival is no more... instead,
    much more costly events occur all over the State's capital (Adelaide),
    providing lots of business for the the City's hotels, restaurants &
    pubs, not to mention taxis - since venues are farther apart than those
    in Victor Harbor were.

    So, if one wants a nice, participatory & folksie festival, a South Aussie
    must leave home & State for places like Port Fairy, Vic or Queensland's
    Woodforde Festival (even larger & longer than Port Fariy, I understand),
    creating more business for airlines, leaving less money to buy CD's from
    the artists who create the culture in front of them.

    God help a Graffiti "artist" who would try to upset such well-orchestrated
    controls on culture here...

    Before SA permitted poker machines at all the pubs, there was singing in
    some pub around the City, even close to Adelaide... no more... its revenues
    can't compete with those of the poker machines that have replaced them.

    Adelaide's

  80. The less egoistic scratchings on walls the better. by dsmatthews · · Score: 1

    There are very few good Graffiti artists and they get paid to do their work anyway, even by local gov, to do themed work on walls in public places.

    There is no such thing as a bill of rights in Australia so you can't claim the right to be a dickhead or a vandal, under the guise of free speech.

  81. Re:GREAT! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    Simple solution: Make grafitti'ing public property okay, but not private property. Everyone's happy.

  82. The joke's on them by kleptonin · · Score: 1

    I hope they realise they just banned a game with voice acting by ADAM WEST(TM)!

  83. Oz is ruled by people "doing the Blokey-thing' by ivi · · Score: 1

    i might not agree with all you've said, but that last bit is dead right:

      the australian gov't is notorious for not giving people what they want,
      as the case of 'morning after pill" ru486 [usedto induce abortions.] shows:

      we've just seen passage of a bill that might - in a year or so, make ru486 available here; it hasn't been all these years!

      way behind the times ..me thinks.

  84. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Games are known for allowing people to act out things they could never do in real life -- jumping cars, playing world-class sports, killing monsters and bad guys, but not graffiti! Hell no! Simulating doing graffiti is not allowed!

    Too bad you guys don't have a Supreme Court that recognizes unlimited freedom of speech, including expression in game design (or mere game playing, in this case.)

    And Moderators, I home you enjoy living somewhere where you're permitted by the government to mod me flamebait.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

      Australian constitution As a matter of fact we do have a Supreme court, in fact we have A federal Supreme Court, each state and territory has a Supreme Court of their own, we just call it the High Court.
      Justice, Peace and the 'stralian way....

      --
      You never catch me alive
  85. so what about by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

    Kazaa, Limewire, etc.!?!?!? No, I mean if they are banning the SALE of the games then doesn't that mean that they just told everyone to go to filesharing services and get it that way. Seems like the Australian government is promoting piracy with this attitude.

    --
    0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
  86. Re:GREAT! by homerules · · Score: 1

    That was to stop theft, not save lives.

  87. Jet Grind Radio! by gorus · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that sweet Sega Dreamcast game? You'd skate around spraying graffiti and running away from cops... it was intense! Ah, nostalgia...

  88. Download it for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H*ll yeah where can I download this game? I'm going to pirate it, setup a mass duplication operation, and give it to every kid I know.

    Street level guerilla warefare. This thing is going on the P2P networks for sure.
    Keep banning it. That's just what we want.

    A great counterbalance to that bs America's Army game, programming kids to be mental tools of the government and cannonfodder in the name of empty patriotism for capitalist bosses.

    Training video for a future generation of anarchists and freedom fighters. Heck yeah.

    The only authority there is yourself. Who else should there be? Anybody else is just another person, who knows less about you than you do.

    We need to crank it up a notch. Somehow put in the game how to build roadside bombs. How to create and distribute anti government leaflets. How to rally the regular folk against their tax and military power hungry crazy oppressors. How to fight a slander war against the state power like they've been fighting against regular good folk criminalizing them for centuries.

  89. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "game involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials using only street fighting skills and graffiti."

    I think I liked this game the first time when it was called Jet Set Radio...not to mention being better. :p

  90. Re:Book banning is next by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Many books provide detailed descriptions of people engaging lawless and anti-social behavior. The only difference is that it doesn't share the same level of abstraction that a game does, where you can attach this behavior to an object on a computer screen.

  91. Gun battles... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    And why, exactly, is turning a bank robbery into a gun battle a good thing?

    It's not, depending. It wasn't so long ago in Norfolk, NE where four people walked into the bank, shot and killed everybody(5 people) and left without taking any money. I had passed through on my way to Lincoln the day before.

    I am a holder of a CCW license and carry regularly. If I happen to be in any sort of commercial business and a robbery occurs, I'm going to be in decision making mode at first. I'm NOT going to automatically draw my weapon and go 'Dirty Harry' or 'Rambo' on them. Protecting some business's money is not my job. That's the job of the business owner, who usually contracts it out to security guards, and the police.

    I will draw, if in my opinion at the moment, it will lead to better chances for the preservation of innocent life. I will not draw to protect something as lowly as money. Innocent life in this context means everybody but the criminals. Nothing in life is sure, I can only go for the best odds. Going by statistics, I will tend to have a more reliable gun*, firing a more effective round*, and be more accurate. But I have to assume that I'll be alone in my action, so if there are multiple crooks, I have to feel that I'll be able to take all or most of them down before they can get me.

    Note how I say most. If it's a spree killing type situtation, the odds, and my choice, change. It's not just about me. I can only hope that I have the courage and fortitude to take the action I've decided upon. Taking down the killer or killers by whatever means necessary, denying them the opportunity to cause further harm, even at the cost of my own life. At best, I render them all incapable of causing no further harm without them being able to harm anybody else. At worst, they kill me and continue their slaughter, and at least I can say to God 'I tried my best'. In the middle, there's scenarios where it will become a gun battle, and they waste time and bullets trying to get me. Innocents may be harmed, but then, they most likely would have been anyways. Combat is different than target shooting, hit ratios go down. Hopefully they'll run out of ammo and get mobbed when they try to reload. I hope that the rest of the people can use the opportunity to escape. For the police to arrive.

    On the other hand, statistics prove that most criminals run when a civilian presents a firearm. Most criminal 'gun battles' are three shots. Most self-defenses situations are resolved without a shot being fired.

    *I'm currently at no failures over thousands of rounds with my ammo choice. I'm amazed at how many crook's guns malfunction on the first or second shot.
    *Premium hollowpoints, since I'm not in New Jersey. The favored choice among police nationwide.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  92. Get one fact straight, please.... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    YOU DO NOT NEED A LICENSE FOR A 'GUN.' You only need a license for a 'handgun,' which is a concealable weapon. I have bought shotguns when I was 16 right from Wal-Mart, Rifles at the age of 18. YOU DO NOT NEED A LICENSE FOR HUNTING WEAPONRY, just a license to hunt (unless you're hunting on your own private property.) I haven't hunted in a while, so I don't know the age restrictions on buying ammunition. I assume 21 for handgun ammo, and 16-18 for rifle/shotgun ammo.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Get one fact straight, please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dick Cheney, is that you?

  93. Has actually been proved! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    In some states, owners of private property are allowed the choice of whether to forbid CCW holders from carrying in their buildings. This is done by posting signs on the entrance.

    Thing is, in such areas, businesses that post suffer a higher crime rate than those that don't. The reason can be very simple. How many criminals are going to view the signs as anything other than 'Come on in, We're Unarmed, so we can't shoot back!'?

    10 Stores that posted are robbed
    New York residents place 'No guns in this House' signs, suffered robbery/burglury spree. Oh, and during a police strike in Albuquerque, armed citizens patrolled during police strike and felonies dropped sharply.
    Criminals don't seem to mind No-Gun signs in Ohio
    Lengthy article Texas's CCW laws, includes posting

    A good reference for CCW and other gun laws in the USA
    A collection of interesting statistics

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Has actually been proved! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      One of the recend Darwin Awards was awarded to a man who tried to rob a gun store (!). He had to walk around a parked police cruiser at the entrance, and inside, he shot one round into the ceiling. He was then shot by the uniformed policeman inside, the store owner, and several customers. Not too bright...

  94. Also to be banned in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The game involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials using only street fighting skills and graffiti. From the article, "The decision was endorsed last night by the Federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, who had asked the board to review of the game's MA15+ classification after local councils and state governments voiced concerns that the game would promote graffiti."

    Apparently Harper plans to review the game in Canada after his cabinet voiced concerns that the game would promote overthrowing corrupt officials.

  95. Slippery slope by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

    First they outlaw playing the game that portrays breaking the law,
    Then they oulaw books that portray breaking the law,
    Then they illegalize negative writing against the government,
    Then there is no freedom of speach and no recouse but revoloution.

    Any government that cannot be criticised by the people it governs, or limits freedoms against their will, deserves to be overthrown, and the leaders heads hung on pikes for good measure.

    --
    md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
    d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  96. hahaha by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    City officials attempt to shut down game that trains people how to overthrow Corrupt City officials.

  97. There's more to it than just laws on paper. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Here in Delaware, open carry is clearly and explicitly permitted by law.

    Supposedly, though, if you actually try it (and supposedly, somebody periodically does) one of a very few things happens:

        1) Nobody notices, have a nice day.
        2) Citizen calls police and police immediately cart you away for creating a threat to public safety, inciting to riot, and disturbing the peace. If you are polite to the judge, all charges except DtP will be thrown out in court but the weapon will still be confiscated.
        3) Policeman notices you, follows you around until some portion of your firearm is obscured to vision by your hand, jacket, holster, newspaper, or anything else you own or control. Then you are asked to produce your CC permit, and if you don't have it you are arrested and gun confiscated. If you do have it you get charged with DtP since you are allowed to carry concealed therefore you were openly carrying in order to start trouble. Permit revoked, weapon confiscated.

    This is all anecdotal from local cops and gun nuts, I've never actually seen anyone attempt open carry in Delaware. Recently there was a debate about this between some private citizens and a former Attorney General in the local newspaper; the citizens pointed out that while open carry is technically legal, you need a CC permit to use a vehicle while carrying a firearm, so you can't get very far from the house anyway.

    When I was 12, lots of kids had black powder firearms, which were unregulated at that time. One of my buddies had a .45 Peacemaker, we used to go down to the iron trestle bridge and blaze away at soda bottles and such after school. I doubt that's legal any more, though.

  98. your "facts" are all wrong. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    I just checked with the Coalition Provisional Authorities, and they say you are clearly a Pakistani terrorist infiltrator, and they will be sending some soldiers over shortly to re-educate you.

  99. And in perception, how like a God! by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whilst you might like to think this game is about "expression", clearly the real motive in the game is to break the law.
    "Clearly?" Damme, I wish I had the extrasensory powers you must possess. I can't even figure out the motives of individuals most of the time, much less peer into the souls of people on the other side of the earth playing games I've never seen.
  100. Australia by Pavatius · · Score: 1

    If any of you read Jared Diamond's Collapse you would see the conclusions Diamond draws as to why societies like Australia have to be much more conservative.

    You can complain all you want about a silly video game not being allowed in the country, but you should bear in mind those conservative views stop more 'liberal' ideas of 'let's try this and see what happens'. Ideas like cane toads or cows. You know what hooved animals do to the soil? Look it up.

    The US and Australia are not the same place socio-politically so applying American values to Australia really doesn't make sense. If the Australian government as permissive as the US to business interests the country would have probably been a barren wasteland years ago (more so I mean).

    Argue all you want about it, but being conservative is not a bad thing; sure it's a silly decision, but it's indicative of the socio-political climate of the country not some old guy who doesn't like video games and thinks gamers are evil. More likely he is someone who has seen the fuckups government has made by allowing industries (industries like the video game companies) do whatever they please. So be glad you have tight-ass politicians who think more regulations are good not bad because had their been more tight-ass politicians back in the day there might have been more objection to the swell idea of introducing rabbits for some good ole' entertaining fun.

    1. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If any of you read Jared Diamond's Collapse you would see the conclusions Diamond draws as to why societies like Australia have to be much more conservative.

      I have read the book - I think you are confused about the difference between "conservative" and "dictatorial". Being conservative is a good thing when experience tells you the potential downside is huge, and almost certain.

      In any event, Jared was not talking about entertainment - he was talking about the environment.

  101. Number of Complaints about the game... by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

    Have a guess about the number of complaints about the game.
    Here's a clue: Australia has a population of just over 20 million...
    According to Australian Youth Radio Station Triple J, There were only two!
    That's right - only two. You can download a podcast here: http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hack/ (Thursday 16/2/06)

    --
    Unexpect the expected!
  102. Great! now can we ban it everywhere else please? by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    Sorry but this is a game that just gets on my nerves! when this was called "Jet Grind Radio" it was kind of cool (specially with the "never seen before back then" toon shading style) but now that is some GTA meets Prince of persia pseudo Artist ego-centric clone, I wouldnt touch with a ten foot pole! exactly HOW do you fight a government by vandalising a city with your OWN name? in jet set/grind radio, you spray painted "JET SET RADIO" ads which was a rebel group/ anti goverment radio station. Even if "TRANE" spray painted the entire damned city wall to wall with HIS OWN name wtf is that good for? "Oh no! EL BARTO owns this town now! he has tagged everything with his name! beware of his mighty spray can!! he may spray paint us all!!"?! (rolls eyes)

    Worst of all, these guys have the best reviews money can buy! have you seen the gamespot video review? Its the poor bastard reviewer saying in a deep monotone voice "the engine has great graphics... the gameplay reminds you of prince of persia... great voice acting... the fighting starts ok but gets better ... the concept is incredibly well planned... today is my birthday..." Yeah we can see how excited and thrilled you are.

    (Greets to those old enough to remember the Billy Crystal's "Birthday, Liquor books" joke.)

    Dont fall into the hype, make a difference... by letting this piece of crap rot in the shelf!

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  103. How do you know about the machine? by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    The game involves battling the authorities to overthrow corrupt officials using only street fighting skills and graffiti.

    Any game that gives ways of overthrowing corrupt officials by any other path than thru the parliment process itself (hahahaha), where they have complete power to crush you like a bug, was always going to be outlawed. Wait, you can spray paint on walls as well. Yeah okay, whatever.

  104. Its because of the Commonwealth Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This probably has something to do with the Commonwealth Games which are about to take place . Apparently someone in the government thinks that we have a 'graf problem' and they want to clean up our image so that when all the foreign news crews come to Australia, they'll see a nice shiny city.

    http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page /0,5478,18160819%255E2862,00.html

  105. Re:Great! now can we ban it everywhere else please by beetlefeet · · Score: 1

    Noone is saying that it's a great game, they're saying it SHOULDN'T BE BANNED.

    I think that harry potter and the philosopher's stone for GBA is the crapiest game on the planet, does that mean it should be banned?

    I'd like the right to actually judge for myself if the game is worth buying rather than someone I don't know playing it and deciding for me thankyou very much.

  106. Whats different!?!? by the_ridd1er · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever play the Rockstar Game based on the movie "The Warriors" Whats different? I would be interested to see if that game was banned..

    The Warriors is based on the movie which features a bunch of rival gangs the subject of which "The Warriors" are trying to make a name for themselves.. by committing crimes, avoiding/attacking police, and spray painting(tagging/bombing) their logo all over the city..

    Sounds like the same sort of game. I actually liked it.. and by no means ever had the desire to attack police or even pick up a spray can.

    -Riddler

  107. Re:GREAT! by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't sell me an airsoft target at Walmart.
    Now I have nothing to shoot but other people.

  108. Re:GREAT! --- Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The locked up spray paint in America is for theft prevension. Only toys pay for paint.

  109. Re:Good thing no ones spray painting trades women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing no ones spray painting trades women in GTA ... they might have to ban that as well.

    They did

  110. Hollow Point Rounds by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    It's been the law there for a while, nobody I know has been able to come up with a good answer.
    Supposably they're more dangerous to police officers. It was probably passed before wearing body armor became the standard.

    Hollowpoints are NOT usually smaller than their FMJ equivalent. You can get .50cal hollowpoints, you can get .22LR fmj. In common self defense calibers(.45,9mm,.38,.32), both are available. They trade off penetration for more expansion. They're more effective against unarmored opponents, less vs armored.

    It might seem odd, but hollowpoints make the most difference in the middle calibers. This is because large rounds like the .45 don't need to expand to cause enough damage, while a small, marginal round like the .32 often won't penetrate deep enough to effect a stop if it does expand. It also helps high velocity rounds like the 9mm and .357 more than slower rounds such as the .45.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  111. I think I see your problem. by Naruki · · Score: 0

    Apparently it hasn't occurred to you that the Bush Regime IS a terrorist organization. They gain and retain power by terrorizing their constituency. Unlike most terrorist organizations, however, they don't have the lofty goals of driving out some oppressor. They are merely in it for the money, of which there seems to be a neverending supply (what with all the social programs being gutted).

    Someone who kisses the ring of government and sees Big Brother as a blessing simply enables those terrorists. They also work actively to prevent sane, freedom loving people from disabling the terrorists.

    So, no, I don't think anyone in their right mind would confuse me with Der Bush. And that term was specifically chosen for this situation. I don't have a generic term for "anyone that I disagree with", because at one point or another that includes everyone. Even myself.