Slashdot Mirror


The DVD Rental Race Analyzed

Thomas Hawk writes "Netflix and Blockbuster have been locked in a price war with regards to the DVD rental space. Wedbush Morgan Equity Analyst Michael Pachter has a $3 dollar price target on Netflix and is in contrast bullish on Blockbuster. Davis Freeberg challenges Pachter's thinking that Netflix will be the loser in the DVD rental battle and Pachter himself responds back on his rationale on why he thinks Blockbuster has the advantage." From the article: "Irrespective of what Pachter thinks about the overall DVD rental business, Pachter's seemingly obvious prediction would appear pretty dire for Netflix. Pacther updated his price target for Netflix On 4/22/05 with the new $3 price. If Pachter is right, then we should expect to see Netflix's stock fall by approximately 75% over the next 12 months."

306 comments

  1. I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you know someone who is using Netflix right now ask them about the service? Do they like it?

    I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

    Now go into your local Blockbuster Video store and ask the clerk there how he feels about his employer.

    I have a feeling that they will have no comment... We all know what happens when you bite the hand that feeds you.

    Netflix's customers are huge evangelists for the service and they view the service as fun, innovative and exciting -- not bad for a growing company with very little debt.

    This guy is probably a customer for this young and new company w/o many subscribers (compared to Blockbuster). I really can't speak either way about it though as I have never used them myself.

    Blockbuster on the other hand is a bloated company, with tons of debt, who is laying off it's employees, cutting back their hours, fending off a shareholder proxy fight with Carl Icahn, who has had their CEO recently announce that if he was not re-elected he would resign from the company.

    Ok, yeah, it's bloated - along with plenty of other companies out there. I am not fan of Blockbuster and their tactics which include blatant lying to their customers and potential customers about their "no late fees" crap.

    Cutting back hours? I don't know about that. I know of a couple Blockbusters around here and they are open the same hours they have been for years. At least you know that the movie rental places are open on Thanksgiving and Christmas.

    In the long run, all three companies, Netflix, Movie Gallery and Blockbuster will face a tremendous battle to stay alive when Video on Demand becomes widely available, but in the short run, if you agree with Pachter, then you should short Netflix and use the proceeds to buy Blockbuster and Movie Gallery.

    I'm not holding my breath for VoD, really, I'm not. Even if/when it does become "viable" I have a feeling it will continue to be expensive and a little bit behind the DVD release dates. I really don't see any advantage to VoD but then again I have ~6 different movie rental places within 5 miles of me. YMMV.

    I realize that I am a bit different than most people when it comes to renting DVDs. I'd prefer to buy them. Target has great deals on movies (i.e. Pulp Fiction with extended crap for $10 and many random titles for $7.50). I spend a lot of time looking through the $5 bins at Walmart for movies. I also buy previously rented DVDs which are usually 3 or 4 for $20. I don't frequent Blockbuster as I always feel uncomfortable in their store. I prefer Hollywood Video because of their random titles that are $1 back if you return the movie within 24 hours.

    So I really don't care if Blockbuster or Netflix do well or not but I certainly don't believe for a second that the sudden downfall of the rental business will come from VoD. Then again I'm not a market "analyst" blogging away about stock prices... I'm just a movie watcher that doesn't like to pay a whole hell of a lot to watch a movie once.

    1. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by winkydink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

      They have 1.5 million customers. Clearly somebody is using it. In our little corp headquarters office or 25 people I can think of 4 people who use it (myself included) and the other 3 are definitely not in the Slashdot demographic.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I am not fan of Blockbuster and their tactics which include blatant lying to their customers and potential customers about their "no late fees" crap.

      I haven't entirely figured out why people got so worked up over this. As soon as they introduced the new policy, I went up to the counter and asked "So, what does this mean?" I got back the straight answer that it gives you up to two extra weeks to return your videos. I didn't even have to ask them to elaborate on what happens after that. It's just like the library: You pay for the item.

      Now talk to me about their previous policy of staff failing to note the return of a 2 day item before 12 PM, and I'll happily dig in to the money grubbing bastards. :-)

    3. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My aunt and uncle use Netflix, and enjoy it. I know a number of other people who like it.
      I worked at Blockbuster, and even while I was there, everyone hated working there. I suppose its better than fast food, but the pay sucks and so do the customers.

      In the words of Randal Graves, "This job would be perfect, if not for the customers."

    4. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by gelwood · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? Pretty much everyone I know, who rents dvds, gets them from netflix. Everyone else just gets movies on demand from cable.

    5. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Lando+Griffin · · Score: 1
      I worked at Blockbuster, and even while I was there, everyone hated working there...

      So they must have really hated working there when you were not around!

    6. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Mintee · · Score: 0

      I got a letter in the mail from blockbuster once. They were taking me to court... I ended up having to pay like $90 for 1 movie that I didn't even get to keep.

      --
      Help me get a PSP! Who can afford s
    7. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by aquarian · · Score: 1

      If you know someone who is using Netflix right now ask them about the service? Do they like it?

      Almost everyone I know uses it exclusively, and likes it very much. They epecially like the variety they'd never be able to get from B'buster or Walmart.

      I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

      Did someone pay you to write this, or have you been living under a rock? (Or both?)

    8. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by ic0wb0y · · Score: 2
      I never would have gotten NetFlix, but my wife did. For a couple of months I ignored it, didn't even give it a second thought, except for the $17 per month.

      Then it hooked me like a crackrock in Compton.

      I love it. I think it's right up there with Google (a few years back), Craigslist and eBaY--almost right up there with coffee and beer!

    9. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called working at blockbuster. they will tell you how shitty it is if you ask.. they wont rant but they will say it...

      its mostly kids that dont give a fuck about the job to begin with

    10. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise."

      Not sure about where you live, but here on the Central Coast of California, we're getting commercials for Netflix on TV. Also, BestBuy has given me fliers for it before.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really like the service from Netflix. They are also the first to do it and they do it well. I have the three at any given time plan and my cycle time is 5-6 days (assuming two day delivery to me, two day delivery to them, one day viewing, and one day delay on their part)

      Even when they were a couple of bucks higher then blockbuster - i stayed loyal because they were the innovaters and still offered me great service.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    12. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

      I realize that I am a bit different than most people when it comes to renting DVDs. I'd prefer to buy them. Target has great deals on movies (i.e. Pulp Fiction with extended crap for $10 and many random titles for $7.50). I spend a lot of time looking through the $5 bins at Walmart for movies. I also buy previously rented DVDs which are usually 3 or 4 for $20. I don't frequent Blockbuster as I always feel uncomfortable in their store. I prefer Hollywood Video because of their random titles that are $1 back if you return the movie within 24 hours.

      A big price advantage of Netflix vs. purchase is for TV-series boxed sets (typically a season at a time on 2-6 DVDs). These come out at $30-50 and , in my experience, never seem to go below $20-30 on eBay. Blockbuster typically splits the sets up into 1 or 2 disc subsets, so they are expensive and inconvenient to rent that way, too.

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    13. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by jp10558 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've used netflix quite a bit (in fact every time I have a full time job - currently in college though). Their prices aren't bad - especially given where I live there is no cable anyway.

      So, for the price of basic cable I can get DVDs right to my doorstep, usually with no more than a day lag time. I can hold on to those movies, with no penalties. They have a selection that puts the "local" (30 mile one way trip) blockbuster to shame.

      I think services like NetFilx will be able to find a niche if they want to - specifically with rural america (which is pretty big IIRC from the last election etc...).

      With gas costs rising, do you want to drive 20+ miles to get to blockbuster, and then drive back, and then be locked into driving them back within a week (or 2 now?) or else fees? Gas is somewhere around $2.20 a gallon most places in the US.

      I think the average gas mileage is 25MPG or so. So figure on average 3 gallons per trip out to blockbuster for many rural americans. That's 6 gallons once you return the movie. So, it cost you around $13 just for travel, not counting wear and tear on the vehicle or time. That one trip to blockbuster just about paid for a standard NetFlix monthly package, before you rent one video. And this assumes your time is worthless.

      Of course, we try to make our blockbuster trip coincide with other shopping and such, but that's not always feasible, though the new extended time (I think, I haven't really looked at whatever the "end of late fees" became) it's a lot easier compared to the 2 day turn around time on new releases previously.

      With more TV shows coming out on DVD a year later, and with our situation in the country, when the analog TV goes dark, we'll just up our NetFlix subscription. Better quality, better choice(4 analog tv stations on a good day), and no commercials.

      So, I think NetFlix can do very well if they don't mind catering to the rural market.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    14. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by jtaylor00 · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the reciept to see the details of the policy. Right after the return date for each one it said, "Or keep it after [date] and pay only $$". What is so hard to understand about that? People wonder why companies treat consumers like idiots with stupid explainations and warnings. Its because consumers act like idiots.

    15. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by badasscat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They have 1.5 million customers.

      They have 3 million subscribers, not 1.5 million (I hate to link to such a dire-sounding headline, but the article does have a lot of hard info). And their subscriber base is growing rapidly.

      Every day at my office you can see a bunch of those red envelopes in the office inbox. And a lot of us that subscribe get them at home, so clearly there are more where I work than I even know about.

      This is a popular service and one that people really like. One of the first things I learned when picking stocks is that the bottom line is the product has to be something people want. The quick test of any stock is to look around at what people are saying about the company, not from a business perspective but as customers. I have honestly heard the words "I love Netflix" more times in one week than I've probably heard the words "I love Blockbuster" in my entire life.

      That doesn't mean the company's on the road to success, but it does mean they have the basic building blocks right. Blockbuster's really got nowhere to go but down at this point.

    16. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by sbeitzel · · Score: 1

      They have 1.5 million customers.

      Um, over 3 million, actually. :)

      --
      Oh, go on, check out my job.
    17. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Surt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1.5 million customers + 4 in your office of 25 people => skewed sample.

      If one in 6 working age americans used netflix that would be a customer base more like 30 million.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    18. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

      I know exactly one person who uses netflix and he loves it. He was using it 5 years ago.

      Cutting back hours? I don't know about that. I know of a couple Blockbusters around here and they are open the same hours they have been for years. At least you know that the movie rental places are open on Thanksgiving and Christmas.

      I don't think that's what he meant. I think he means that individual employee hours are being cut back. Reduce the number of concurrent employee hours during the work week. I can't confirm that this is the case, because I haven't entered a blockbuster in about two years, but the intent of his statement is clear.

      I'm just a movie watcher that doesn't like to pay a whole hell of a lot to watch a movie once.

      This is the key. Circuit City misunderstood the collective mindset of movie consumers. People WILL pay to have a movie at their disposal. They will not pay to increase the bottom line of any company (except Apple, but that's another discussion).

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by alexhohio · · Score: 1

      I think the business model is bad for me- for the price of netflix I have all the starz channels including starz on demand. I Have a dvd burner (super low end, cost about 200$ at the time) and I burn dvds all the time. So for the $$ I have all the movies I could want, and occasionally, I will get a pay per view of something new, but usually I will just fork over the $20 for a brand new release on DVD if I am so inclined... Yes, I have to buy DVDs and yes I have to set the DVD burner, but DVDs in bulk aren't expensive... and some day, when TV's have hard drives, I can put all my dvds onto the hard drive....

      --
      Almost every Harvard student was High School Valedictorian- After a year of college, half are in the bottom of the class
    20. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have pointed out, the number is really more like 3 million subscribers. And the average US household size is about 2.5 people, so those 4 employees represent about 62 people if you include their households. Still a skewed sample, but not as bad as at first glance.

    21. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

      Have you been living in a CAVE for the last 3 years? Do you not have a Best Buy? Are you not aware that Best Buy was a major advertisement center for Netflix (or at least once was)?

    22. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      garcia is an old, old troll....

    23. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      VoD is dead in the water as implemented by the cable companies. It's a train wreck that has already happened.

      I have Time-Warner. Their advertising slogan is 'watch it when you want'. It should be 'watch it when our server isn't completely overbooked'. Pause the movie and you loose the connection. We lost 'AVP' 10 minutes from the end and couldn't finish watching it till the next day.

      I'd much rather have the DVD.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    24. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by kelzer · · Score: 1

      They have 1.5 million customers.

      They have 3 million subscribers, not 1.5 million

      Wow! What a testament to the power of the Slashdot effect. They doubled their subscribers since the grandparent post!

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    25. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cutting back hours? I don't know about that. I know of a couple Blockbusters around here and they are open the same hours they have been for years. At least you know that the movie rental places are open on Thanksgiving and Christmas.

      Speaking as a Blockbuster employee (and anonymous coward), I assume what he's talking about is the cutting back of hours for individual employees. The stores are staying open according to the same schedule, but customer-service manpower is being reduced so drastically that I went from 22 hours a week to 10.

    26. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's what he meant. I think he means that individual employee hours are being cut back. Reduce the number of concurrent employee hours during the work week. I can't confirm that this is the case, because I haven't entered a blockbuster in about two years, but the intent of his statement is clear. I can confirm this. I work at a blockbuster in Orland, FL. We have received NUMEROUS memos, phone calls, etc. to cut ALL extra hours (basically leaving that minimum 1 employee and 1 manager per store at a time). I expect layoffs or quitting soon as many employees are getting only 0-1 days of work per week.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    27. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I think it's a decent argument but your numbers are completely wrong.

      25 miles per gallon, ok.

      In our hypothetical scenario:
      The nearest Blockbuster will be 30 miles away
      Distance travelled: 60 miles
      Fuel Consumed: 2.4 gallons (rounding up for car warming up, leave running, whatever else)

      2.4 gallons consumed, not 6. So, really, it's less than $6... Lets say it's $5.

      Now, lets say that you do this trip once a week and rent 3 movies:
      $20 in fuel expenses, movies rented 12

      With Netflix, you spend $18 total and can easily get 12 movies in 4 weeks. For rural areas you save money using Netflix than you do over Blockbuster.

    28. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't get too carried away with assuming that Blockbusters are typically so far from people. If you're rural, sure. But, lots of people live in medium to large cities that have much shorter drives to Blockbuster. I'm in a city of about 110,000 (Fort Collins, Colorado) and have 2 Blockbusters within a mile of my house. One of those is on my route between home and work. Now, I'm not a big fan
      of Blockbuster; I'm tired of their misleading advertising (the "three moons" campaign, the so-called "end of late fees"). I've been a Netfixer for years and really like it.
      However, if Blockbuster matches that and allows cheap/included rentals from the brick-and-mortar stores, then that seems like an advantage over a mail-only service.

    29. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "They will not pay to increase the bottom line of any company (except Apple, but that's another discussion)."

      WTF?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Cutting back hours? I don't know about that. I know of a couple Blockbusters around here and they are open the same hours they have been for years.

      I don't think he is referring to the cutting back of operating hours, but of employee hours. Such cutbacks are an inevitable result due to the way employees are "provisioned" - it is based on the store's revenue, not on the number of rentals.

      Blockbuster has both an online netflix clone and a B&M version too. Based on my personal discussions with a couple of store managers, the B&M version has hit stores hard - their heavy renters, the people who might rent 20+ movies a month, have all converted to the new B&M program for around $20 per month. Thus, their most lucrative customers are now their most expensive customers because all the overhead remains the same - cashier, shelving, etc - but the revenue for them is about one fifth of it once was.

      So, revenue goes down and because employees are only allocated based on store revenue, a lot of them have to either be let go, or have their hours cut. Since the workload remains about the same, but there are less employee resources to do the work, the people who remain are now overworked and stressed, which leads to the good employees, the pro-active, customer-focused and just all around mentally engaged (yes such people do work at blockbuster!) being the first to quit because they have a better chance of finding other work.

      It is kind of a vicious circle and may end up being a death spiral for blockbuster unless they are able to greatly increase efficiency in their stores - god knows there is plenty of opportunity, their computer systems suck, their inventory control and pricing is terrible, their training of employees is notoriously bad, etc, etc. But, they've been coasting for so long with such little competition that their corporate culture may not be able to make the necessary changes because they would be just too drastic.

    31. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix's customers are huge evangelists for the service and they view the service as fun, innovative and exciting -- not bad for a growing company with very little debt.

      This guy is probably a customer for this young and new company w/o many subscribers (compared to Blockbuster). I really can't speak either way about it though as I have never used them myself.

      Umm.. Blockbuster Online is the "young company." Sure, Blockbuster is old, but their online rental business is very new (a reaction to Netflix) and lacks not only in Queue & Family managment features, but also in number of titles available and, from my experience, DVD turn around time.

      The only thing Blockbuster leads in is price, which happens to be what I care most about so I've stayed with Blockbuster. That said, I tell everyone who's interested in this sort of thing to try Netflix first, since it's a better experience.

      Cutting back hours?...[snip]
      He's talking about cutting back employee hours, not store hours. Where they'd often have two employees staffed, they now have 1, etc.

    32. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Stupid public terminals.... you hit the back button and slashdot logs you out! grrr..
      --
      Don't Fight Firefox, Let Firefox fight you! (Or something)

    33. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I live in a metro area with 3 million people, there's a Blockbuster just 2 miles from my house, but I use NetFlix. The reasons are simple: for the cost of 4 or 5 rentals, I get DVDs to my mailbox all month (certainly more than 5), I don't have to drive anywhere, I don't have to waste time at some local store looking through their crappy selection and dealing with their minimum-wage staff, and I don't have to try to remember what obscure movies I was interested in seeing. I just go to netflix.com, type in the movie I want, hit "add", and as soon as it comes up in my queue, they send it to me. Then I just drop it in the mail; no rushing back to the store to avoid late fees.

      The overall convenience of the service, from the enormous selection, to the easy-to-use website, to no late fees or having to drive anywhere, make NetFlix worthwhile even if the price were double what it is now.

      We tried Blockbuster Online because my girlfriend got involved in some promotion. It was ok, but it was just a copy of Netflix, and not as good. When she learned about their sleazy tactics with the "no more late fees" campaign (and how they just billed people for the cost of the movie if they were too late), she cancelled our subscription and signed us up to Netflix. She's no geek, but she's been ecstatic over Netflix, much more than me.

    34. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I'll stick with Netflix too. It's a 4 day turn around time for my house to Netflix for me. The maybe higher than Blockbuster but they have a better selection and better service. Try finding all 6 dvd's of some rare anime at cockbusters.

      That, and they just seem like a cool company to me.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    35. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a recently new netflix subscriber. Ditto everything you've said. I'll add that I'm into more obscure less popular specialty DVDs, at some point I may also start renting the IMAX and documentaries as well. I pay little attention to mainstream Hollywood releases. So selection and choice are huge bonuses in favor of Netflix vs Blockbuster.

      Many I know have been burned by Blockbuster one to many times with regards to late fees and I don't like their policies or attitudes. If they were the only rental company left I would stop renting. I'd rather go without then give them any of my money. As it is, sometimes I go to a local brick and mortor mom and pop rental shop for popular movies if I want to see one.

      But for many of the reasons people listed, Netflix rules. I'm very happy with the service. One other thing, I can search out DVDs and queue them up, I have over 100 titles in my queue. You can't do that at your local Blockbuster, you go in, try to decide which 3 you're going to rent, and you repeat, if you see something interesting on the shelf, or get a recommendation from a friend, you have to remember or write it down. I like that I can do a quick netflix search, yup they have it, click add, and forget about it, eventually it will arrive. I suppose it's not really a problem at blockbuster because you get a wall stocked with 50 copies of the same new release movie, so you can pick 3 among 50 total movies for what you want to see (okay it's an exaggeration, but blockbuster's selection sucks).

    36. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      "If you know someone who is using Netflix right now ask them about the service? Do they like it?"

      I am a netflix customer. Their service is very fast. Due to various distribution centers, they ship very quickly. I have found that I can, using their 3 DVD at a time service, can cycle 6 DVDs a week, every week.

      I get 3 DVDs on Saturday. I put them in the mail on Monday. I get 3 new DVDs on Wednesday, and put them in the mail the next day. I get the next shipment by Saturday. Keep repeating this and you can get at least 24 movies a month.

      Their rental system is easy to use. You just create a list of movies (your queue) and it picks them off, 3 at a time, or 2, or 5, depending on your subscription.

      You could even stagger the movies out so you receive a new one just about every day mail is delivered. You don't need to send them all at the same time - that's just what works for me.

      Cost wise, I pay less than $1 per movie. That is very reasonable to me.

      Due to the greedy pricepoint, I never rent pay per view movies, and likewise will not use video on demand. If they set the pricepoint at $1 per movie or had bulk pricing of 15 movies/month for ~ $14.99 a month, I might consider it. But for the deal I get with Netflix, the convenience, the gas I save, I don't see myseld leaving the service anytime soon.

      I find it strange that pay-per-view is so expensive. The same signal is being beamed onto my dish regardless if I pay or not. I would think the volume would more than triple if the cost per movie were 1/4, or they would get more total revenue by selling a bulk amount per month, even $5 for 5 movies - since it is better than what I currently average - ZERO.

    37. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Surt · · Score: 1

      You're still off by an order of magnitude. Also, I deliberately factored out the households when I calculated the fraction in the first place. That was why I specifically mentioned working age.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    38. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VoD maybe dead in your Time Warner market but its a beast in the east. I run VoD for a very large Comcast Market. It is the most popular service we have. It has all but killed PPV. Who woulda thought people would pay 11.99 for XX porn.

    39. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by whitis · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what you said. But I question your prediction that netflix will find a niche in rural america. I suspect that lackluster video will probably get most of that market share. But netflix should still do well. Netflix will appeal, instead, to the same people it does now - those who have non-mainstream tastes who will mostly be non-rural (though netflix will be popular with the more educated people in rural areas). And more unusual movies are a growth industry since DVD has made it feasible for movies to have a market even if they don't have enough mass appeal to get exposure on big screens. The gradual trend towards installing video projectors in theaters (where the UK is currently leading) and distribing movies digitally (much lower cost per screen) will also help that. Also, with digital projection, a theater can show a less publicized movie 2 nights a week for 7 weeks instead of 7 nights a week for two weeks and give time for word of mouth to spread. And the greater exposure in theaters will help boost DVD sales as well. The internet contributes to this trend by letting you interact with people you have more in common with than zip codes. When legal movie downloads become common the trend will get another boost. As independent and foreign films grow in popularity, Hollywood may try to cash in on name recognition with a steady stream of low budget sequels to popular movies.

      Part of the reason I chose netflix is that not only do they have lots of obscure movies but they help you find movies you will like but haven't heard about through their system of letting you rate movies and then recommending movies based on those you liked.

      Someone suggested that netflix would lose market share and have to reduce its selection to more popular movies. Not only do I not think they will need to do so, it would be a mistake. Popular titles (particularly new releases) are expensive for movie stores because they need to purchase large numbers of copies to meet peak demands and then the peak subsides and they are stuck with all those copies. Interest in the long-tail movies, however builds gradually. So, as long as you have a reasonable sized customer base, you may only need one or two copies of a more obscure movie but demand will be pretty steady. Also, the long-tail is their reason de etre. And, the long tail doesn't cost that much. One copy each of 30,000 movies at $25 average price is $750,000. 3 million subscribers at $18 (or more) a month is $54 million dollars a month. 3 million subscribers (on the 3 at a time plan will have 9 million disks checked out at any one time. Thus, a movie can be 300 times less popular than a popular movie and still be profitable.

      Netflix isn't going to lose customers to lackluster. Instead, netflix will continue to grow while Lackluster may grow at an even faster rate. But netflix is already profitable so we know they can stay in business with their current size customer base. Intelligent viewers will continue to use netflix but the ignorant masses will flock to Lackluster.

      What netflix might eventually do to boost market share is add porn, hentai, and other more explicit content. Lackluster is a conservative corporate "family" name and isn't likely to add porn. Netflix, however, could do so. But it will probably be an extra price option to offset the higher prices of porn movies. One of the things that keeps local video stores in business in many areas is that Lackluster is too timid to carry porn.

      The downside of Netflix is that they need to be more honest about their policies. Unlimited rentals aren't. In practice, if you are on the 3 movies at a time plan you are effectively limited to about 3 movies per week. Netflix throttles your deliveries based on how many movies you rented in the past month. While they may not explicitly set a quota on individual users, they give users who have rented fewer movies higher priority and limit the total number of rentals per day at each distri

    40. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Wow, moderators on crack alert, my post:


      1.5 million customers + 4 in your office of 25 people => skewed sample.

      If one in 6 working age americans used netflix that would be a customer base more like 30 million.


      got moderated troll. Not sure how much more untroll a post could be.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    41. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Surt · · Score: 1

      moderated troll on a factual ontopic post ... slashdot moderation quality is on the rise again.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    42. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Slightly OT but anyway,
      It always amuses me to see you guys bitching about gas being expensive in the US. You should come to the UK where we are paying minimum of £3.70 / gallon thats currently just over $7 a gallon.
      When you catch up with us (and you will) you won't be able to afford netflix/blockbuster or pretty much anything else.

    43. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Rib+Feast · · Score: 1

      The reason it is expensive is the studios - if they can sell a DVD at $15 they sure as hell aren't going to allow it out the door to cable companies for a 50 cent royalty.

    44. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were pissed off because they didn't start putting that on there until after the class action lawsuit was brought on...

    45. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

      My mom and dad are using it, and they have never heard of slashdot. Nor would they understand what it is when I tried to explain it.

      I probably know a half-dozen people using Netflix scattered across 3 towns. That's just among my friends; I don't make a point of asking people if they are on Netflix. None of these people were computer people.

      So I don't think this is some l33t service only used by the technophiles.

      I really can't speak either way about it though as I have never used them myself.

      I realize that I am a bit different than most people when it comes to renting DVDs. I'd prefer to buy them.


      So why are you commented on a service you know nothing about? Oh yeah, this is slashdot.

    46. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you stayed loyal because of the advertising revenue that they deliver to your site, no?

    47. Re:I'm no market analyst, just a movie watcher... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I'm in Cary, North Carolina.

      VoD/PPV. I can't see the difference. I go through an on-screen menu, watch the movie, and get a hit on my monthly bill. It all looks the same from here. In neither case can I view the movie if the cable craps out.

      Those people are happy to pay the 11.99 vs the $40 at the scummy video store that they have to walk into and risk someone seeing them there.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  2. I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVDs are so over.

    1. Re:I just use On Demand by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you have a widescreen HDTV, Video on demand sucks. All the video on demand I've seen in my area from Comcast, is crappy, standard 4:3 format, and has bad artifacts. It looks just like standard digital Cable or Satelite signal, which ain't great on a 55 inch widescreen.

      At least with a DVD, I can play anamorphic Widescreen with 480 progressive scan DVD player and get something that looks half-way like the movie in the theatre. DVD still has artifacts, but they aren't nearly as bad as Video on Demand.

    2. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On Demand?" Is that a new BT client? :)

      Actually, I've been doing the Comcast On Demand thing too. The bitch about it is that the free movie selection is a little stagnant, with movies staying on for months and hardly anything new. I haven't been doing PPV on demand, because I don't ever buy PPV anyway.

      The on-demand weekly reruns make things better (and are where you'll be able to watch the majority of the movies you might've missed last week), but the best thing is the music and the anime. The music "channels" have a much bigger selection than you'll see in any week's worth of programming on the MTV and Fuse live networks combined (although VH-1 has VH-1 Classic, meaning you can't really beat them in terms of selection). The exclusive concerts are good too. And if English-dubbed anime is your thing, it's almost foolish not to take advantage of On Demand, since it's included in your digital cable service anyway, and the selection is fairly large, though not necessarily good. Personal tastes, etc. (especially since I don't watch dubbed anime, and am not exactly into typical catgirl and shounen stuff).

    3. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is anything worth seeing on 55+ inches, I'd go to the theater.

    4. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never say that low-bitrate VOD is a good replacement for DVDs like the OP did, but ever since it's become part of my monthly service, I've been watching more and more movies this way, as opposed to DVD rentals. For stuff you don't already _know_ that you're going to like (as with most of the stuff I watch, since I try to limit the amount that hype affects my judgment of a movie), it's fair.

      Now if we were talking about PPV (not free) VOD vs. DVD rental, DVDs win hands down, especially since Comcast doesn't offer an HD VOD option. Better movie selection, better picture & sound quality (until/unless Comcast offers HD VOD), larger viewing time window, better controls, better options, and more & better features all point to DVDs as being the superior video delivery system for the money.

    5. Re:I just use On Demand by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      The few times we've tried our Comcast provider's On Demand, we've given it up as a futile effort within 10 minutes. Talk about getting your RDA of stuttering and artifacts! It was painful to even try to watch that crap.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:I just use On Demand by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then your limited to the 20-30 movies that are currently out. What if you want to see "Blade Runner"?

    7. Re:I just use On Demand by DesertBlade · · Score: 0

      I use the Comcast on demand. At $3.99 (versus $3.79 at the video store) it is a good deal. Hey I don't even have to get off my couch and no late fees. Most of America does not have a HD tv so they would never know what they are missing.

      You also have to remember VOD is a new technology and it is only going to get better. Imagine if Comcast gave you 4 free VOD (the new release movies) a month. The average consumer would stop going to the video store.

      VOD with a DVR, I always would have something to watch and from the conveince of my own home.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    8. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have three cable boxes in my home. We can stream on-demand perfectly fine to at least two of them at the same time, while also downloading at our rated speed over cable internet (haven't tried all three boxes with on-demand at the same time).

      All of them can do on-demand just fine, even though one of the boxes stutters for other things (like sound ocassionally stuttering during menu access).

    9. Re:I just use On Demand by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Was it macroblocking errors from the cable signal, or was it just poor encoding of the video in general?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, transmission errors are more common, since the original encoding looks fairly good (with the exception of small to medium text, such as in scrolling credits). You can test this by rewinding and watching a glitchy section over again; most often the problem is not duplicated during a second playback.

    11. Re:I just use On Demand by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Ya, I know. I work with cable which is why I asked him the question ;)

      If it's a macroblocking issue, he should have a tech look at it and request credit for the movie if it's a technical issue that needs to be resolved.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:I just use On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend turned on The Matrix: Revolutions on OnDemand (Don't know why... I have the DVD.) You should have seen the Neo Vs. Smith fight at the end. Couldn't even tell what was going on the artifacting was so bad.

  3. Winner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either way the consumer wins

  4. First Post by nearlygod · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As long as the subscription price falls %75 too, I'll be happy.

    --
    The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    1. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually you were the 6th post. garcia pwnt y3w.

      Maybe you should learn to be like him and actually try and post something worthwhile for "first post".

      Notice how his post doesn't say "first post" yet it is?

      Lamer.

    2. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you garcia's girlfriend or something?

    3. Re:First Post by anagama · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the price is fine right now. I suspect that if it became too low, the good service I get with Netflix would suffer. Realistically, the cost is about what I'd expect to pay to rent 4 or 5 movies per month. It's easy to get 3 movies a week if you watch and return quickly so the price can be roughtly 4x cheaper than renting at a store. That's a bargain.

      But the real value is in the selection. Netflix stocks a lot of things that aren't easily found locally. If the price becomes too low, they won't be able to afford buying anything but the most in demand titles. That would suck.

      Finally, I did a free trial w/ Blockbuster. They were missing an entire season of one of the Star Treks (a middle season like season three or four -- I can understand not having the last season, but why have 1,2,3,__,5 ... crazy!). The selection wasn't as diverse as netflix's. And finally, Blockbuster's website was annoying and ugly -- it looked like a WinAmp skin designer had made it up after huffing glue. In contrast, Netflix websitte is very useable, very simple. It isn't gaudy and flashy, but conveys information efficiently and accepts user input efficiently. I really like it.

      So, while I don't think of myself as Netflix zealot -- I will become one if it means keeping Blockbuster from dominating the DVD by mail rental market.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just like to add that i have subscribed to both services, and here is my two cents:

      i really havent seen much throttling with my service, i rent A LOT of movies, and i always gets more 2 days after i ship them back...i have every time.

      i canceled netflix, just to give blockbuster a shot. somebody told me you could get games and movies, and since i was curious to try it out over netflix anyway i gave it a shot.

      so i did, and it was much much slower than netflix, 3 to 5 days after i sent them back would i receive more movies, id rather pay more money for netflix.

      another thing to add, i cancelled blockbuster and tried gamefly, which ships them all the way to california, and i get games faster from them than blockbuster sent me movies (i live in southwest wisconsin) and blocbuster sent me movies from minneapolis.

  5. I'm going to wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until its on basic cable.

    It's too bad the music industry got music rentals outlawed, else I'd be renting tons of stuff.

    1. Re:I'm going to wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad the music industry got music rentals outlawed, else I'd be renting tons of stuff. Napster 2 go?

  6. Netflix needs to be acquired by winkydink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's pretty clear that Blockbuster has the size, relationahsips, channel, and most importantly, money to crush Netflix. Each day that passes is, in reality another day that the value of the company decreases. Rather than "talking with Amazon" or thinking they can get a bazillion dollar deal, Netflix should get off their collective butts and start shopping around.

    Who would buy them? Well Walmart is an obvious choice. The current offerring sucks. Barnes & Noble? Target? I'm sure there are others, these are the only ones that immediately jump to mind.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by aquarian · · Score: 1

      It's pretty clear that Blockbuster has the size, relationahsips, channel, and most importantly, money to crush Netflix. Each day that passes is, in reality another day that the value of the company decreases.

      They also have a lot of expensive real estate, payroll, and other costs associated with retail locations, which are becoming less and less relevent. Even if Blockbuster starts to dominate the mail order rental space, they're still saddled with the retail ball and chain -- which Netflix, etc., don't have. This was true from the beginning, and it's even more important now that mail order rental has "caught on."

    2. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      It's pretty clear that Blockbuster has the size, relationahsips, channel, and most importantly, money to crush Netflix.
      But not the catalog.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    3. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Real estate are typically leases in commercial retail space which can be sublet. Payroll I'll grant you, but the average wage has be close to minimums for retail store employees (the bulk of the company).

      Brick and mortar isn't going away any time soon. There's a lot more to the "shopping experience" than just driving to the store to buy something. Heck, my wife (and many others) can tell you that.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by shayne321 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Netflix should get off their collective butts and start shopping around.

      I keep reading people saying this, but my question is: Why? Every interview I read with the founder of Netflix says he's having a ball running the company as is, they're moderately successful, profitable (how many startups can you say THAT about?), and have a strong brand.

      What would the deep pockets of wal-mart, amazon, or blockbuster give them? It's not like there's a lot of room for innovation in the online rental market. I go to the site and request a disc, they mail it to me, I mail it back. What sort of value added service are they going to provide, offer to mail me popcorn with my disc? Thanks but no thanks.

      I think Netflix has a good thing going, and the founder has said repeatedly he is not going to get into a price war with blockbuster, he is going to compete on service.

      Granted I'd love to see netflix do away with throttling, but for my $18/month I'm happy.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    5. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Morinaga · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Blockbuster has the size, marketing and money to TRY and crush Netflix. However, they also have overhead, tons and tons of overhead. Retail consumer locations cost money but nothing in comparison to the empolyment costs of having people in those buildings. When you run a company that floats a margin above large amounts of overhead your company's profit margins look like the DOW with very high Highs and very low Lows. Overhead produces the types of losses you see from Airlines and car manufacturers. They have fixed costs in this massive retail chain that don't change without significant closings, firings etc...

      Netflix on the other hand has a much more flexible overhead structure. They have fewer customers? Well first, they KNOW how many fewer they have because they have subscribers and a predictable cash flow regardless of customer usage unlike Blockbuster. Second, if they get fewer customers they spend less on postage. Perhaps they reduce purchasing on new titles. At worst perhaps they lay off employees.

      Netflix is a remarkably proficient business model. The biggest issue is that since they went Public in '02 they have become part of the beast that is stakeholder appeasement. They are a 'growth' stock. Shareholders want growth so a company has to invest in infrastructure, marketing, promotions and everything under the sun to show revenue growth. It frankly doesn't matter if the growth is done smartly as long as it's not slowly. The board of directors gets pressue for stock growth, which bears pressure on the CEO for that same growth (who is beholden to their own income (ie options) to show growth). The days of developing a solid income stock company are dead. Profits be damned if revenues grow by 19.5%!! Who cares if you lost 100 million in a quarter. Anyway, that's all a tangent rant but suffice to say that because Amazon posted losses during their growth years doesn't mean the business model won't work. It also doesn't mean there's no place in the market for retail when a web service is available.

    6. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      In the past year or so, what with the "No More Late Fees!" half-lie and the $15/mo. unlimited rental plan, my "shopping experience" at Blockbuster has consisted of settling on renting my twenty-fifth highest choice, as everything else is out, seemingly forever.

      Online rental places have their flaws - good luck getting your top movies from Netflix after several months of membership - brick and mortar stores now have so few movies on hand that it's barely worth even going in. I'd say that about 2% of stock at the Blockbusters near me are movies from before 1990. There's still a whole shelf full of "The Passion of the Christ" however.

      That said, online rentals will never catch fire, only create a spark. Movies on demand over cable/satellite/DSL are the wave of the future.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    7. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Morinaga · · Score: 1

      These blockbuster buildings aren't just typical business lease space areas most of the time. They just opened a brand new one hear near my home in Colorado. It's in a seperate building with a wide open floorplan. It's characterised by 10 foot windows surrounding three sides of the building with One double door entry in the front. It's very "Blockbusteresque" and while it may not be quite as identifiable as the real estate office that's in what used to be a Taco Bell, it certainly has a significant amount of custom features that make remarketing troublesome and somewhat expensive to retrofit. Retail space is a significant financial consideration for many more reasons than just the lease. Insurance, utilities, janitorial services, security and all the fun stuff that comes with it.

    8. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's tons more to the shopping experience than just driving down and renting a video. But on the other hand, who would sign up for a shopping experience that involves driving down and discovering that the selection is total ass?

      Compare shopping for that really good movie at Blockbuster to shopping for that really good movie on Netflix.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    9. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Buy is already working on it.

    10. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why? Every interview I read with the founder of Netflix says he's having a ball running the company as is, they're moderately successful, profitable (how many startups can you say THAT about?), and have a strong brand.
      All beside the point. Netflix isn't a mom-and-pop business that can stay open and independent as long as they have money coming in. They're a publically held company whose management holds their jobs at the pleasure of investors. None of those investors have seen any serious returns on their investment, since profits get plowed back into the company, and the stock price is about what it was when the company went public. And some current investors have probably seen loses, assuming they bought in when the stock was about 3 times higher.

      Right now investors seem to be buying managements line that they're building long-term growth. But that can't last forever, not with Netflix locked in a price war with Blockbuster. Eventually, stockholder will revolt. That will probably lead either to a hostile takeover or a management change in preparation for a friendly takeover.

      Granted I'd love to see netflix do away with throttling...
      Don't get your hopes up. Do the math: if you assume mailing costs are 80 cents a disk, and a non-throttled account can rent 5 disks a week, then the account costs them $17.20 in an average month just for mailing. Add in other costs and they're losing a couple dollars a month on that account. Maybe my assumptions are too high, but it's still very clear that such an account would make them a small profit, at best. So they have to throttle -- though they really ought to be more honest about the fact.
    11. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      It's pretty clear that Blockbuster has the size, relationahsips, channel, and most importantly, money to crush Netflix.

      They are both media distribution companies, only Block Buster has nearly all of its business locked up in brick and mortar stores which are in complete opposition to the "no store" business model. Why did it take BB so long to get a service similar to Netflix? Why weren't RIAA companies able to lead the way in offering digital downloads? Why did the MPAA try to get VCRs banned? Historically, companies are exceptionally bad at embracing radical innovations that destabilize their primary business.

      What's going to be really interesting is who's going to come out on top when we all start downloading movies. It could be netflix, it could be blockbuster, but more likely it's going to be someone else entirely (Apple?).

    12. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks that netflix will be accquired by Google and ultra-cool search features will be included.

    13. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even realize that Blockbuster has entered the online rental market? Nothing in your spiel indicates so...

    14. Re:Netflix needs to be acquired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely irrelevant to his point, moron.

  7. The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Doug+Dante · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I get DVDs back from Netflix in about 48 hours. The US Postal Service gets my videos to Netflix in 24, they ship the same day, and I get them back the next day. It doesn't happen all of the time, but it's pretty impressive when I'm about 100 miles from my local Netflix processing center.

    I wonder how quickly Blockbuster returns videos for what percentage of the population as compared to Netflix?

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
    1. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Uranium194 · · Score: 1

      blockbuster is about 48 hours on getting them and then its like 4 days later to get the DVD, but it all depends on how close you are to the nearest Distribution center. I am in KC and there is a Netflix here, but the closest Blockbuster is St. Louis, so easier to get DVDs quicker from Netflix, but if you lived in STL youd be better off with BB

      --
      There are 3 kinds of people in the world: Those that can count and those that cannot!
    2. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by tscheez · · Score: 0

      My experience with blockbuster has been about the same. But then again, I am also only 100 miles or so from the distribution center. It's in CT I think.

      --
      Supplies!
    3. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by DarkFencer · · Score: 1

      Netflix has MANY more distribution centers around the country then either Netflix or Blockbuster. The only time I don't get a 48 turn around (from when I drop my last movies in the mailbox to when I get my new movies) is when I've dropped them in the mail on Monday (they seem to be overloaded on Monday and get a LOT more back then so its a day slower).

      Lackluster video has only a handful of distribution centers. The same is true of Walmart and others.

    4. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

      Netflix has it down, if I time it right I can get a new movie almost every day. Sunday is my day to catch up if I need to. That sort of reliable, continuious service is hard to come by. They better not go out of business, I have 255 movies in my queue, thats a lot of movies to move over to another system.
      Yeah, I'm adicted, so?

      --
      md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
      d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
    5. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course that has more to do with the post office than with Netflix or Blockbuster. I use Netflix, and they generally put a movie out in the afternoon mail if they get it in the morning mail. That's about as fast as one can ask.

      I assume that Blockbuster is the same way. If not, then they're in serious trouble. I'm not going to say it's easy to achieve on a large scale, but they'd better not be any slower and I bet they can't be any faster.

      I don't usually get 48 hour return time, even thoug my local distributor is only an hour's drive from here. But that's mostly the post office adding an extra travel day on one end or the other.

      One could choose to alter their model to allow even faster service; say, the ability to request that a movie be sent when you put it in the mail, rather than when they get it, and trust you to be honest (and drop you if you're not). But that would involve them letting out more movies at once, which would cost them more.

      Blockbuster could add service whereby you could exchange either by mail or at their place. That might work well for them, since it would mean that they could batch up returns. Mailing costs have got to be a huge chunk of Netflix's cost, since those recipient-pays envelopes have a significant surcharge. A big box of returns would cost only a few dollars. But that would mean making more copies available at the individual stores...

    6. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Chupa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blockbuster has a 2-day turnaround for me...although I live just outside the DC metro area and the distro center is only about 40 miles away.

      Last month I went through 15 movies, which could've cost me $45-60 to rent locally (assuming I could even find that many movies worth watching amidst the rows upon rows of garbage), but instead was only $15.

      I used to split Netflix with my roommates in school...but I have to say I went with BB on my own because of the price and the two free movie/game local rental coupons per month.

    7. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix has MANY more distribution centers around the country then either Netflix or Blockbuster.

      wtf???

    8. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've used both, and Blockbuster seems about the same to me. Of course, Houston probably has its own distribution center, so that may be part of it.

      I was talking to an employee at the Blockbuster store by our house (when we were using one of our 2 free monthly in-store rentals, which are handy when you want something on a whim) says they're in talks with the USPS to have them scan the returning DVD's when they receive them, so that they can send outgoing ones before the returning ones even arrive at the distribution center.

    9. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by mobiux · · Score: 1

      Mine is similar and I live about 250 miles from minneapolis.

      I get the 5 at a time deal and average about 5 movies per week

    10. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To contrast your point about good service, I also live about 100 miles from the nearest Netflix distribution center (Louisville --> Cincinnati), but my service lately has been slower and slower. Six months ago I could get between 15 and 18 dvds a months, now it is below 12. I'm guessing they have more dvds to ship since they lowered the price, and can't keep up with the volume. It can take several days for Netflix to acknowledge receipt of a dvd.

    11. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Jason+Ford · · Score: 1

      Netflix has MANY more distribution centers around the country then either Netflix or Blockbuster.

      I knew Netflix was good, but I didn't know they were THAT good! ;)

      From my experience, if I get the discs into the mail Monday morning, they'll be waiting for me when I get home Wednesday night.

      --
      I did not become a vegetarian for my health, I did it for the health of the chickens. --Isaac Bashevis Singer
    12. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Hi Anonomous Coward,
      I also live in Louisville, and my DVDs came addressed to a PO box in Louisville.

      Last summer the service was great. 48 hour turn-around.

      This fall it got krappy, somewhat less than 3.0 DVDs per week, they only seemed to ship on Tuesday or Thursday, so that set the ceil at 3/week, and one disc was always mislabeled or MIA or scratched or some other bull. We decided to cancel.

    13. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Netflix has MANY more distribution centers around the country then either Netflix or Blockbuster.

      WOW! That's impressive!?!?!?

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    14. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by slaker · · Score: 1

      I live in Northwest Indiana, about 25 miles from Chicago. Netflix has a one to two day turnaround to and from their distribution center in Chicago (I put something in the mail and usually get new movies two days later). Blockbuster also has a center in Chicago. Turnaround from Blockbuster is usually five business days. I also have a subscription to Wantedlist (porno-netflix), which has a distribution center in California. Turnaround from wantedlist is usually 5 - 7 business days. I've actually had Wantedlist turnaround - all the way to and from California - beat Blockbuster a few times.

      Blockbuster has fewer movies I'm interested in, takes about twice as long to get me a title in general has little to recommend it. The only reason I have both services is netflix queue is so stuffed with the obscure titles I want (on the 8 at a time plan) that I started Blockbuster to grab the occasional commercial title I want.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    15. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by eander315 · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster has a deal with the USPS. When the video is put in the mail to be returned, it is scanned at the post office. This alerts Blockbuster that the movie is on its way back, and they ship the next movie in the queue.

    16. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Well, my household has been a customer of netFlix for about a nine months, and we get about a week turnaround on DVDs. It's ridiculus, considering that their DC is just on the other side of the metro area (which just might be 100 miles thanks to urban sprawl ;)). This observation has been termed "throttling," although I know of no hard proof of this.

      Needless to say, I too, wonder how quickly Blockbuster returns videos.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    17. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      The problem that I had with BB wasn't that they were slow to process returns, (they seemed to be 24-48 hours, about the same as NF, and both companies have distribution centers within 30 miles of me, and BB also has its national headquarters here) but that sometimes 2-4 days would go by with empty slots while I had literally a couple hundred titles enqueued and all "available now." I'd email and ask why repeatedly, and 4-6 days later they'd email back saying things to the effect that they were having problems because of the volume of new members. So, basically, the discs weren't really available. I decided to drop them because they seemed to be deliberately misleading, and slow in customer service, besides.

    18. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course that has more to do with the post office than with Netflix or Blockbuster

      Not true. The companies decide how many distribution centers to build and where to locate them.

    19. Re:The Other Kind of DVD Rental Race by furchin · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster gets me my next movie the instant I return my old one. You see, I'm a blockbuster subscriber because I went with their in-store option. I have tried Netflix on two separate ocaisions in the past, and you know what I learned? That I rarely feel like watching the same DVD I wanted to watch 48 hours ago. If I feel like watching a movie RIGHT NOW, I go to the store, hand in the one I currently have, and get the one I want. I know that Netflix has a huge selection, much bigger than I find in the local Blockbuster, but I also know that just because I read an article online about an obscure movie and put it on my Netflix Queue, I don't feel like watching it when it finally arrives because I'd forgotten why I wanted it, and because now I'm in the mood for brainless action instead of an intelligent foreign film.

  8. Netflix by mrbaggs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speaking as a longtime user of Netflix I think they will be around for a while given their excellent service and selection.

    1. Re:Netflix by jeff67 · · Score: 1
      ...I think they will be around for a while given their excellent ... selection.
      I'm a new Netflix user. I've got a 24 hour Blockbuster a mile from home - they always have a copy of the latest Hollywood drek du jour. But that's not what I want to watch. IMHO, Netflix will always have a market as long as enough people want to watch quality film, not just star-packed rehashes and smarm, or gratuitous eardrum-bursting explosions.
    2. Re:Netflix by MyTwoCentsWorth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Speaking as a long time user on Netflix, I think they will go bankrupt in a few years.

      I have been one of their early customers and I must be responsible for at least 7 or 8 other Netflix accounts being open.

      I agree they have excellent selection. Service, on the other hand... what are you smoking ?

      I am a high-turnover user. I have been born and raised in a former communist country and only came here some years ago, so I have never had the opportunity to see almost any good movie until I moved to the US. As a consequence, I have a big backlog of movies on my must-see list and I try to watch them ASAP and then return them so I can quickly get my next one. My wife shares my account and situation too (we have the 3 out subscription).

      In the last year or so, and clearly worsening over the last 6 months, they are dragging their feet. It used to be that they would deliver my next movie the same day they received one back. Now the average is 2 days of waiting until they ship the next one. Add the fact that they only operate during the business days, the mail time and you'll realize that they have effectively decreased the number of movies I can see by 50%.

      I was always aware that they have this built-in conflict of interest where the flat rate caps the money they make monthly and their expenses raise with the number of movies you rent, but they did not behave like this at the beginning. Now, they do - and any rational person must admit that this is a calculated attempt to improve their profits.

      Nothing wrong with profits, after all - except that they advertise unlimited movie rentals and then they effectively impose a cap on the number of rentals by doing this. Also, it is short term thinking, because while I still have my account open I am pretty close to the end of my patience (how long can you hope it's only a temporary phase?) and I have already started to warn all my friends about their tactics.

      My only guess is that they want to show profitability NOW and to heck with the consequences, but they are harming themselves immensly in the long run.

      They only had to keep doing the right thing for a few more years until the DVD was obsolete, and they would have had a huge pool of happy users to transition into the next big thing (whatever the next movie rental model is). They chose to annoy their best promoters, people like me and I think the company will live to regret that decision. I'm sure that the executives will have cashed their stock options by them and will not care, but I miss the Netflix that I first met and which is no more.

      Enough sentimentalism - happy posting, y'all.

    3. Re:Netflix by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      they always have a copy of the latest Hollywood drek du jour.

      Have you been there lately? My friends tell me that it's become impossible to get new releases since they started the "no late fees" thing. People are simply holding on to movies for as long as they can.

      I Love my Netflix.

  9. hmmmmm by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    Well, reading TFA, it would seem that video on demand from cable is in this race, and looks to be the odds on winner...

    Comcast being better than a rental company sounds oxymoronic, but its possible. I somehow think there will be more wrinkles in the plot before this falls out to a two horse race.

    1. Re:hmmmmm by winkydink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, reading TFA, it would seem that video on demand from cable is in this race, and looks to be the odds on winner...

      Really? Do you think you'll be able to watch the movie as many times as you want in a given period for a fixed fee? Can you "lend" your copy to a friend? I'm also pretty sure that they will devise some way to "force" you to watch advertising (granted, DVDs do this too, but it appears that may be changing based on recent proposed legislation).

      I'm sorry, but I believe that saying Video on Demand will replace DVDs is a lot like saying eBooks will replace paper (and I'm a big eBook proponent).

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:hmmmmm by Mintee · · Score: 0

      On Demand only works like 3 outta 4 times. Cheap crap. Maybe I should get a new cable boxen. hum..

      --
      Help me get a PSP! Who can afford s
    3. Re:hmmmmm by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

      Video on demand has a long way to go. On Comcast, they didn't offer true Widescreen VOD last time I checked. And the quality is much worse on a Widescreen HDTV. And the selection is not even close to what you can get from Netflix.

      VOD is only for the average Joe that watches Hollywood blockbusters and mainstream movies on a 31 inch 4:3 format TV.

    4. Re:hmmmmm by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Tivo and Netflix have agreed to somehow produce movies on demand...I don't understand why you think that idea is rediculous, not only does it save Netflix expenses (they dont have to ship or store physical media), but the consumer gets an instant product. The only technical hurtles I see are the copyright issues and the bandwidth. Since Concast started offering OnDemand, I use it at least once a week, they are a decent selection of free stuff.

    5. Re:hmmmmm by EvlG · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the vast majority of the market??

    6. Re:hmmmmm by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but the videophiles like me spend a lot more on DVD's, video, electronics, and renting than the Average Joe, so it balances out. The customer electronic companies know this. Thats why HDTV and widescreen are showing up everywhere, even in laptops, and Dolby Digial 5.1 surround sound is on almost every DVD now.

  10. Analyst shmanalyst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember Henry Blodget? These guys are mostly idiots. Sometimes they're right, often they're not, and most likely, it's their recommendation that creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, dooming the stock to whatever they declare.

  11. Investment Rule by stecoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    7.5% of Netflix is currently owned by Netflix Co-Founder and CEO Reed Hastings. Given that Netflix stock has already fallen by 60% over the last 12 month and that their stock is currently one of the largest short postions on Wall Street, a $3 price target seems a little aggressive .

    Second rule in investment is never say a stock can go no lower. The trip to zero is a hard fall at any price.

    First rule, you probably are wondering, is: buy low and sell high.

    1. Re:Investment Rule by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The trip to zero is a hard fall at any price.

      Stock never actually hits zero. 1/128th of a cent, yes. But never zero. (And yes, I do remember a company trading for about that price at one point)

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Investment Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stock never actually hits zero. 1/128th of a cent, yes. But never zero. (And yes, I do remember a company trading for about that price at one point)

      Heh, I had a 1000 shares of stock at worth less than 10 cents (was worth $28,000 at one point.) What sucked was paying $60 to sell it so I could take the capital gains loss. What sucks even more, is that I sold all my Apple stock last year at $28/share.

    3. Re:Investment Rule by 2short · · Score: 1


      Sure it does. Stocks may never trade at 0, but companies can certainly go bankrupt in such a way that the shareholders get nothing.

  12. adult by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't believe neither service rents porn movies. I think it would boost service considerably. Just keep it on the down-low. Hide it under "romance".

    1. Re:adult by mmkkbb · · Score: 3, Informative

      greencine.com offers adult movies and a more eclectic selection than either. however their service is slower and their prices are higher.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:adult by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      dvdbarn / intelliflix has them too. there are also porn-only services with a presumably wider selection, but they charge a premium.

      --
      -mkb
    3. Re:adult by Lando+Griffin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Greencine http://www.greencine.com/! They have all the Hollywood releases and a ton of stuff the average Slashdotter would be interested in--anime, classic horror, non-animated Asian stuff, and even pr0n. I've been a member for almost two years and their service is great.

    4. Re:adult by jvagner · · Score: 1

      adultdvdempire.com is netflix for porn, and you don't even need a subscription.

    5. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe neither service rents porn movies. I think it would boost service considerably. Just keep it on the down-low. Hide it under "romance".

      I would have a division under another name but using the same infrastructure handling porn. Then NetFlix could collect two monthly payments from everyone... one for porn and a second for non-porn.

      Baba Booey. Howard Stern's Penis! Yeah!

    6. Re:adult by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Netflix use to have pr0n but they stopped carrying it for some reason.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    7. Re:adult by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      I can't believe neither service rents porn movies.

      Porn is the cash cow of the video rental industry. While it might take up 10% of the floor space it makes more than half the profit.

      Forget Blockbuster renting porn. IMO it won't happen unless they get bought out. Rumor has it the Mormon church owns a chunk of them but I have no idea if that's true or not.

      As for Netflix though I could see them moving into it if things get difficult. Think of it as their "nuclear option". While they'll catch crap from the Radical Right and Jesus Freaks it all comes down to staying in business. I suspect the porn industry would help them out. They'd be a very powerful friend with mighty deep pockets.

      If I was Netflix I'd move into porn before losing too much business to the newcomers.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    8. Re:adult by spanishflies · · Score: 1

      Netflix needs something to differentiate itself from Blockbuster.

      The "deal" from Blockbuster is already sweeter due to lower cost and the two free in-store rentals. Also, any shipping delays that Blockbuster currently will most likely be minimized as they expand their facilities.

      I think the perfect differentiator is porn. As you probably know, Blockbuster will never carry porn (or even NC-17) movies.

      Porn rentals lend themselves perfectly to the anonymity of the mail order system. Plus, it would be funny to see the titles that Netflix decides to recommend to you based on your "tastes".

    9. Re:adult by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      The thing that already differentiates itself in my opinion is this: Nearly every movie on my blockbuster queue shows either "short wait" or "very long wait." This is never the case for new releases, but if it has been out a year or more its like blockbuster gets rid of all their stock. My buddy has netflix and never has this problem, no matter how old the movie. Needless to say, I think netflix has better service and will be gaining a new subscriber shortly...

      --
      I got nothin'
    10. Re:adult by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      "are you seriously saying you would want to physically touch an porno dvd that's been "handled" by thousands of wankers before you???"

      Considering brick-and-mortar rental stores have made money over renting pr0n for a great while now, a lot of people would answer "yes" here.

    11. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      greencine.com offers adult movies

      ...minus the awkwardness of shopping at a brick-and-mortar porn store or checking out a porn DVD at a "mainstream" video store.

      however their service is slower...

      Apparently, their only distribution center is in San Francisco. So if you're far away from San Francisco, they might not be worth it unless you really value their selection. Their FAQ says a 1-3 day delivery time for the West Coast and 2-4 days for the East Coast. Personally, I wouldn't use them if I lived outside Northern California.

      ...and their prices are higher.

      ...and more flexible. From $15 for 2-out to $60 for 10-out. I think the price premium is worth it, but I'm a guy that likes porn and doesn't need more than two DVDs at a time.

    12. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why you were modded down - this is the exact reason why I don't rent porn.

    13. Re:adult by William-Ely · · Score: 1

      greencine.com has been slashdotted. Thanks a lot guys. Now I will have to actually go somewhere to get my porn vids.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    14. Re:adult by Castar · · Score: 1

      The other interesting thing about GreenCine is that they offer VOD titles. Some titles are _only_ VOD. Unfortunately, it's a DRM-encumbered timebomb-type VOD, but it's kind of cool. They release a lot of independent movies that way (that don't have DVD releases.) They're also doing an online-only film festival right now.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    15. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't slower if you live in the Bay Area :) Next day, every time.

    16. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, this should hide well under the romantic category.

    17. Re:adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe neither service rents porn movies. I think it would boost service considerably. Just keep it on the down-low. Hide it under "romance".

      I worked in a porn-only video store for six months in college, and I can tell you that the typical cash-cow customer is a disgusting fucking savage. True Porn Clerk Stories is fucking dead-on about some of the archetypes you see. Most people aren't so bad, but the ones that keep the business going can be truly sickening.

      Mind you, I think porn is great -- but the kind of crap a business would have to put up with to really operate such a service is so awful as to be relegated to specialty companies.

  13. One important thing Michael Pachter is missing by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is the fact that Blockbuster's previous practices of changing late fee's that were outlandish, has pissed a ton of people off. Also, Blockbuster used to not carry a lot of movies because they were too of the wall or "racy" or "sexually" oriented.

    Blockbuster pissed me off so bad in the 1990's I haven't rented from them in several years, nor would I even consider renting from them if they charged less than half what Netflix did.

    Check out the other people they pissed off:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=blockbuster+s ucks

  14. Embrace the technology by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I come from a country (in south Asia) where they have anti-piracy laws but nobody abides by them because of the slack law enforcement. Piracy is so prevalent that if anybody buys digital content by paying money they would be considered fools. So the few sites that sell digital content target fellow countrymen settled in Europe or America. Now a handful of websites sell subscription which allows me to access latest movies. I pay about $15 for access to the latest movies which are streamed to me. Please note that these websites are illegal and have uploaded pirated versions of the movies. Now if these guys can do it, why not Netflix or Blockbuster? Why cant I pay a monthly subscription fee for online streaming movies? Its high time that they embrace the available technology.

    It would be so convenient for me to just go click, click and watch a good movie. I don't have to drive all the way to blockbuster to get a copy at 1:00 AM.

    1. Re:Embrace the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAble companies do.Chink.

  15. War of attrition by C_Kode · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A war of attrition (price wars) are a top cause of business failures. Read any guide to the top reasons businesses fail. A war of attrition will be listed.

    Blockbuster is a fat cow. Netflix will die by the very sword they have drawn.

    Offer what the others don't, and offer it at a good price. It doesn't have to be the lowest. I buy from NewEgg not because they have the best price, but because I get what I ask for and they are quick to fix it if I don't.

    1. Re:War of attrition by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster is a fat cow. Netflix will die by the very sword they have drawn.

      With all due respect, I hope you're wrong. I wouldn't miss Blockbuster one bit if they went away forever.

    2. Re:War of attrition by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      did you see the size of Blockbuster's debts??? the moment they fail to service the debt the vultures will call them in... bye-bye... Blockbuster cannot cut their prices too low for too long just to eliminate Netflix... they run the very severe danger of slashing their own lifeblood... cashflow to service the debt...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:War of attrition by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      As someone who went to Dell to save $40 but now has spent the past three hours on the phone trying to return a damaged product, I completely agree with you. Service still counts, and even if Netflix (or GreenCine) is a bit more expensive, if the service is better, people will buy your product. That applies to almost any business. As much as things have become commodities, there is always going to be a niche for someone who does things well. That's not Blockbuster.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:War of attrition by kenthorvath · · Score: 1
      Offer what the others don't, and offer it at a good price. It doesn't have to be the lowest.

      Tell me about it. Whatever happened to the 8-out at a time for $40 plan? That is ideal for my summer vacations - I hate watching TV, but boy can I burn through a season of Deep Space 9 or Sex and the City in a couple of days. Now the best they can do is 3-out at a time, but it's not quite enough to meet my needs as well as the rest of my family who wants to rent actual movies.

      I can't wait until they have a legal torrent-like distribution service and I can buy episodes of my favorite show for a dollar or so a piece. That will seriously rock.

    5. Re:War of attrition by Mignon · · Score: 1
      the vultures will call them in... bye-bye...

      And not a moment too soon. At their stores I've been to their selection sucks and service is worse. There was once almost a riot when the line went to the back of the store and the manager didn't put more people on the registers.

      An example about their selection - a friend once tried to rent some movie and was told they didn't stock it because it had a black/white love scene. And it's not like we're in the Bible Belt, either - this was on the Upper West Side in New York City.

      Fortunately there are still a few alternatives near me, but at least two other stores in the neighborhood have shut down in the last few years - presumably the B'buster competition hurt quite a bit.

      My g/f and I have talked about NetFlix but haven't gotten around to it yet.

    6. Re:War of attrition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see anything in their ToS about having multiple accounts. You could try signing up for two accounts and that would give you 6 out at a time for about $35/mo.

    7. Re:War of attrition by ZedmanAuk · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, Netflix has the 8-at-a-time plan for $48. Login to your account, click on "Your Account" at the top, then click on "Change" on the line that says "Membership: 3-at-a-time Program". You can pick whatever plan you want (from 1 to 8 at a time).

      --
      -ZA
    8. Re:War of attrition by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      Wow, I looked on the web page after having cancelled my account, I guess that page was for free trials only. Neato - thanks.

  16. What about Online Downloads? by Shafe · · Score: 1

    The Tivo-Netflix agreement should give Netflix the advantage for a while (assuming Netflix ever gets around to launching this service, which is due in 2005). Tivo is already available in millions of homes in the US, whereas Blockbuster currently has no vehicle for delivery into the home market.

    The real competitor would be something like Comcast-Netflix (or even just Comcast). With millions of cable company-endorsed DVRs each storing 80+ GB of video, and assuming 4 Mbps connections to download movies, Blockbuster could easily take a serious hit by the cable companies themselves. This is already available to a smaller degree in the form of On Demand, but imagine searching EVERY DVD every produced through the convenience of your remote control and having access to all titles for $10-15 per month extra.

    Hurry up! I want to never have to buy a DVD again!

    1. Re:What about Online Downloads? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      The only problem is a lot of services like VOD aren't available in a lot of places. And I somehow doubt they'd let you just buy VOD and say screw cable.

      Or even VOD + Broadband, but they always want to force cable on you. And I really think many younger people would have a difficult time caring less about cable now adays - crap on it, and interrupted by commercials that you get to *pay* for? Sign me up lol.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    2. Re:What about Online Downloads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I don't care if I miss the latest season of ATHF when it airs. I can rent it from Netflix after it's out on DVD. In the mean time, did you know there is so much media out there on DVD, that there's not enough time to watch it all? I'm so occupied I don't miss television/satallite/cable at all. NetFlix rules! Screw Blockbuster! I hope they, along with Walmart, Bestbuy, etc go to hell. Fuck these massive corporations if they're going to try and bully and abuse people with their size.

  17. From a BB customer by o-hayo · · Score: 1

    One of the nice things about BB is the coupons you get via email or on the envelope they ship the DVD's in for in-store rentals (which then can include games) or purchases. I've been happy with their service since the day I signed up, even when having to request replacement discs that were scratched or otherwise non-functional.

  18. What about Gamefly by Valleye · · Score: 1

    Who owns them and how do they figure in this. That seems like a semi-lasting market with VGoD being further off than VoD.

  19. Blockbuster, rentals, and my rant by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Troll
    First, Blockbuster sucks. For a while, they were the only big rental store in my area. And they charged close to $4 to rent, plus tax. They sucked. I went back once with a rental, and handed it to the person telling them it was due that moment and I did not want to drop it in the box. He said "fine, no problem". The next time I went to rent there was a late fee waiting. He obviously just dropped the rental in the box.

    Then Family Video opened up. All their older movies are 2 for $1. On Tuesdays through Thursday, if you rent a new release, you get an older movie free (Older = more than a year old). And their new releases are as little as $2.50, for an additional $0.50 you can rent a title for a week. And they treat customers well, I went there once and, it was my fault I was late and the store closed, and I dropped off the rental in the overnight box. The next day the guy working recognized me and said "jee... we just missed you yesterday, lemme take care of this late fee". No questions asked.

    DVD rental stores are there for our service. Guess where I'll be spending my money?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Blockbuster, rentals, and my rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD rental stores are there for our service. Guess where I'll be spending my money?

      Erm... Baskin-Robbins?

  20. no no no.... by rayde · · Score: 4, Funny
    every smart investor knows to skip these guys and just invest in the DVD+/-R manufacturing sector.

    ;-)

  21. Blockbuster still sucks. by Mintee · · Score: 0

    I signed up for blockbuster for the freepsp.com website, and their website is horrible. I think since netflix has been in the online rental game for so long, that blockbuster doesn't have a chance. Unless they hire a miracle programmer or something.

    --
    Help me get a PSP! Who can afford s
  22. Thumbs up on Netflicks by ericdano · · Score: 1

    As a user for the last 6 months, it's been great. Great service.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Thumbs up on Netflicks by knight37 · · Score: 1

      I've been using them for years. The only downside to Netflix is that they don't get ALL the new releases, and even if they do, you sometimes have to wait in a queue to get them. But the smart user knows to put the new releases in the queue BEFORE it is released, and you'll get them very quickly. I tried converting my sisters and my mom and my mother in law to Netflix, but none stayed long. Why? Because they didn't figure out or bother to learn how to "play" the queue. They didn't know how to find the new releases. It's as if Netflix tries to HIDE the new releases for some reason. So all they ever got was old movies and they didn't like that.

      --
      Knight37 - Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer
  23. Financial analysts by Petronius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are the same people that predicted that Enron and Worldcom were the companies of the future, that Lucent was going to grow forever, that QQQ was the ticket to retiring at 30. Who gives a shit about their opinion? Listen to successful investors: W. Buffett, Peter Lynch, they'll tell you that the best thing to do about analysts is to ignore their predictions. So what does this guy know about Netflix? Has he actually even tried their service?

    --
    there's no place like ~
    1. Re:Financial analysts by planetoid · · Score: 0

      W. Buffett, Peter Lynch, they'll tell you that the best thing to do about analysts is to ignore their predictions.

      On the flipside, why should I take financial advice from a parrothead and an eccentric film director?

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  24. Streaming is not better than renting! by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    Comcast being better than a rental company sounds oxymoronic, but its possible. I somehow think there will be more wrinkles in the plot before this falls out to a two horse race

    I will always continue to rent. I will never pay to stream. There are a few reasons why. If I rent, I can watch anytime, pause, stop, come back the next day if I want. If the movie is really good, I can watch it a second time for free. I physically have the media in my hand.

    If it streams, how long can I pause it for? What if I fall asleep watching the movie, can I replay it tomorrow? What if the movie is really good, can I have it streamed at my buddies house the next day for free?

    And here is the last reason streaming sucks. For a rental store, they need to pay rent, lighting, buy the DVD's, pay employees money. And they can charge $2.50-$3.00 per rental at Family Video. So why does Comcast charge more to stream? There is no store, there is no employee. It is just a program streaming it to me. I know it costs Comcast less, but they are not passing the savings to me.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Streaming is not better than renting! by pulse2600 · · Score: 1
      If I rent, I can watch anytime, pause, stop, come back the next day if I want. If the movie is really good, I can watch it a second time for free. I physically have the media in my hand. If it streams, how long can I pause it for?


      With ondemand, you can get the movie when you want (as long as it's listed), pause, rewind, and fastforward. Pause lasts for 24 hours, so if you want to watch the movie again pause it at the end, then rewind and play when you want to watch it again (as long as it is in the 24 hour period).
    2. Re:Streaming is not better than renting! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Will the on demand streaming be a flat fee that I can watch as many movies a month as my heart desires? While the 24 hour pause is nice, it is not that great. I have had movies where i got them, and started to watch them and didn't finish until a week later (life happens). Also, what if i want to rent it to take to my friends - or go on a plane trip (yes i have a laptop, and i like to take my netflix movies with me). I cannot do that with stream - unless comcast is going to provide me with a way to copy the stream to dvd so i can keep a version for myself.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  25. Netflix Customers by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    In Denver, I know of six families that are loyal watchers. I family has a geek in it, but he did not buy into netflix (his wife did).

    In pheonix, my little sister does netflix (very much not a geek).

    I do not use it, but I also do not use any rental agency (buy the dvd, comcast, and movie in those order).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. In my experience by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Blockbuster is a joke. An extremely bad joke. Netflix gives me a three day turn around, e.g., I mail on Monday, they receive it and mail a new one on Tuesday, then I get it on Wednesday.

    Compare that to Blockbuster that gave me about a 18 day turn around. About 9 days to get my returned DVDs. About 9 days to get new ones back. It was ludicrous! Here's an even better example: Two months after quitting I get an email saying they finally received one of the DVDs I had sent out OVER two months prior!

    Blockbuster is SO bad I seriously think it's a ploy to make internet/DVD rental services look back to protect their brick and mortar stores.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:In my experience by calibanDNS · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd just like to chime in and say that I don't think that your experience with Blockbuster Online is universal. I've had really great turn around times with their service (3 - 4 days) and I also enjoy the 2 in-store rentals per month that are included with my online subscription. With those coupons, if there's a movie that I want to have immediately, I can drive to my local Blockbuster and pick it up. If I get to the end of the month and haven't used the coupons yet, I tend to go in and pick up a random video game that I otherwise wouldn't have played. I haven't tried Netflix's service, but I have several friends who use it and are happy customers.

    2. Re:In my experience by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in the midwest and the Blockbuster DVDs came and went back to Maryland, i.e., the east cost. That's several states away.

      But with Netflix, they come locally, about two counties away. In other words, it appears that Netflix has many many many more local facilities than Blockbuster.

      And I don't get the whole coupon thing. If I want a movie I'll just move it up to the top position of my list and get it in a couple of days. The whole point of such a service is avoiding driving to the store, hoping they have it in stock, getting, driving back home, then doing to whole thing over again to return it.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:In my experience by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      The coupon thing helps if you have a sudden urge to see a particular movie (VoD would be better for this) or if a movie is only available on VHS. And like I said, video games. Netflix doesn't offer game rentals at all, and I don't want to subscribe to GameFly seperately for the 1 or maybe 2 games a month that I might rent. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

    4. Re:In my experience by CCW · · Score: 1

      I've been a blockbuster subscriber for a few months, and this is not my experience. Turn around time to southern california is frequently two days (I mail a disc, wait a day, and get the replacement the next day) That's pretty darn good.

      However, my queue is about 150 movies long and about 2/3 of them are in a wait state. I basically never get the top movie and frequently get something 25 movies down the list. That isn't very good. I will probably drop the service due to their inability to get me my most wanted movie.

  27. I prefer Netflix by Monf · · Score: 1
    I've used Netflix and Blockbuster: when I first had netflix, I'd get my 3 dvd's rip them and send them out the next mail day, I got my dvd's in one day and they got the ones I sent back in one day. I cancelled them becuase one time it took like 5 business days to acknowledge receipt of my previous rentals.

    I tried blockbuster and it took an average of 3 business days to receive movies and about the same for them to acknowledge receipt of the ones I sent back.

    One advantage of blockbuster was that you could send in a complaint about a non-received dvd or no returned acknowldgement immediately. When I had netflix, they wouldn't even let you complain until a certain number of days passed- I don't know if its still like that.

    plus, blockbuster gives you a couple of coupons to get a couple of games or movies at the local store for free each month...

    --
    Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
    1. Re:I prefer Netflix by mrbass · · Score: 1

      I did a comparison of dvd online rental services just at the end of last year. Long story short Netflix beats blockbuster and walmart and many others. Gamefly is the best gaming rental place. DVD Rentals Comparison

  28. And the winner is... THE CUSTOMER! by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, indeed, vibrant competition, the miracle of the marketplace, and Adam Smith's "invisible hand" ensure that by golly, no matter what happens, the customer will always win.

    The only reason Blockbuster ever used to charge those late fees is because, gosh, it's what customers wanted. And now that customers want something different, Blockbuster is responding to demand.

    You can look forward to a ever-brighter future of more and more choice, lower prices, and, of course, better movies.

    Because... everything is for the best in this best of all possible worlds.

  29. VOD by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    As a Netflix customer I've noticed a steady decline in the quality of service. Lost disks, wrong disks, longer waits, etc. Maybe they're cutting costs or maybe my postman is a film nut.

    I too hate BlockBuster, got burned to the tune of $40 after retuning a video to the wrong blockbuster, so the main reason I'm sticking with Netflix is for fear of the dark side. I don't think Blockbuster can compete with Video On Demand in the future, the doubters sound like long distance phone companies about five years ago.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:VOD by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      As a Netflix customer I've noticed a steady decline in the quality of service. Lost disks, wrong disks, longer waits, etc. Maybe they're cutting costs or maybe my postman is a film nut.

      Anecdotes are useless to judge service. But I'll give one anyway ;). They've never lost a disc. They've never sent me a wrong disc. I've rented well over 300 DVDs and have only 1 scratched disc. They're service slowed a little last month, for about two weeks, but it sped right back up to the typical turnaround (return on Monday, get new movie on Wednesday).

    2. Re:VOD by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

      "Anecdotes are useless to judge service."
      Yeah, you're right, we should just rely on the obviously accurate marketing materials and press releases put out by the company. I mean, I don't know how I'd live without my copy of Duke Nuke'm Forever and New Coke.

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
    3. Re:VOD by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      What I meant was that a single person's experience with a product/service is meaningless. It's the aggregate of people's perceptions that matters. E.g., Honda used to be considered the most reliable car manufacturer in the world (I think they've dropped, but are still in the top 5 or so). A friend of mine bought a Civic and had nothing but problems with them. Who would you believe, the aggregate of people who say Honda makes very reliable cars or the single person who had problems with it?

  30. Price target, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wedbush Morgan Equity Analyst Michael Pachter has a $3 dollar price target... "

    Is he the same guy who had $90 price target on Enron? No? The same company but different analyst?

    If you are naive to still believe in "price targets" and objectivity of "market analysts" you perhaps deserve what's coming to you.

  31. Beating the Street, a good read by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Informative
    These are the same people that predicted that Enron and Worldcom were the companies of the future, that Lucent was going to grow forever, that QQQ was the ticket to retiring at 30. Who gives a shit about their opinion? Listen to successful investors: W. Buffett, Peter Lynch, they'll tell you that the best thing to do about analysts is to ignore their predictions. So what does this guy know about Netflix? Has he actually even tried their service?

    I took Peter Lynchs advice as the best. His whole opinion of stocks boils down to one question: "Do I like their product, their service, the way they treat me", "Will I be buying from them again, and like it", "Will other people like them". He says, if you anwser yes to these questions, chances are you have a good company. Lynch said the best companies he invested in, the big ten-bangers, were companies he really liked, or noticed other people liked.

    People can read all about P/E ratio, how fast a company is growing, and the rest. But this will not tell you who will suceed. These numbers should just tell you if there is a red flag, if a company could collapse on itself.

    It all boils down to a good product. Price is very important, but if someone sells you crap, or bad service, people will not buy from them, and their buisness is doomed.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Beating the Street, a good read by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Peter Lynch was not interested in what HE liked personally, he was interested in what people in general liked. That's why he invested in barbers who did a bad job of cutting his hair. (but only after a lot of thinking) That's why his favorite strategy was take his daughters to the mall. When his daughters bypassed GAP completely one day he knew in advance GAP was going to have a bad quarter.

      Both studied those financial reports in depth. They both made sure the management was good. However before all that they went looking for companies that the people liked. All the nice numbers on paper and great management means nothing if the people don't like them. (though great management would never get into this situation)

      Latter on Buffet had enough money that he make money doing strange things like invest in silver at the peak. (he then had it delivered and bankrupted the short traders he bought it from who had to scramble to get the physical stuff at any price)

    2. Re:Beating the Street, a good read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do I like their product, their service, the way they treat me" ... and the price of the stock doesn't matter? Nonsense. This is how the Netscape, Krispy Kreme, Yahoo bubbles inflated. Stock trading was available to the masses so they bought what they "knew" were good products. Trouble is they didn't understand how much they were paying.

    3. Re:Beating the Street, a good read by graffix_jones · · Score: 1

      Then how do you explain Microsoft's success?

    4. Re:Beating the Street, a good read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Then how do you explain Microsoft's success?

      Because most people aren't loony OSS zealots?

      (And lock-in, of course. But mostly the former.)

    5. Re:Beating the Street, a good read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the price of the stock doesn't matter? Nonsense.

      Did he say it was the only thing that mattered? No, dumbass.

  32. Free DVD rentals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I "rent" my DVDs from http://www.thepiratebay.org/
    They always seem to have the new DVDs the day they are released or sometimes days before, and its free. About 2 hours to download per movie, and the quality is perfect. Its even legal because the site is hosted in Sweeden which has relaxed copyright laws.

  33. Missing the boat by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster doesn't understand where their competitive advantage lies (or, maybe they do, but can't use it for some reason). I got their little flyer in the mail the other day. Two options: Netflix-like rentals, or one at a time, unlimited, from the store. But I can't have both. I'm forced to choose between selection and convenience, and right now, Netflix has a better selection and better customer service. If I could combine the two Blockbuster offerings, I'd probably switch, because even though I usually get my Netflix stuff within 48 hours, I walk past a Blockbuster on my way home from work. I could pop in and pick something up on the spur of the moment.

  34. DVD Evangelism by brontus3927 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have to agree with Freeberg. Short of changing their corporate direction like NetZero (not that it hasn't worked for NetZero, emphasising the low-cost pay service over the ad-based free service), NetFlix is always going to have high popular opinion. NetFlix customers are very similar to Apple customers in that regard. They see themselves in a good vs evil fight with a giant corporation (Blockbuster for NetFlix, Microsoft for Apple). Netflix customers are fighting the good fight. Despite this, everyone thinks in the Microsoft business model of "there can only be one company in a given market" Two (or more, and more is better) companies can peacefully co-exist in teh same market. I use Netflix. My sister uses Walmart's service. My neighbor stopes at Blockbuster on the way home from work to rent DVD's because their an impulse item for him. To each their own. I don't see any of the services as inherently better or worse than the other.

    1. Re:DVD Evangelism by elbarono · · Score: 1

      You are living in a dream world dude. Nobody gives a shit about some good-vs-evil battle of DVD's. All they care about is that they get their movies on time. If Netflix service gets worse again (as it did twice, for several months at a time, while I was using the service) then their customers will start leaving them again.

  35. Re:Montreal? by montreal!hahahaha · · Score: 1

    that's not funny...
    (muahahahahahahahahaha)

    --
    Words of a bright disciple: "If you have to ask, my young friend, then you will never know."
  36. Not even a contest... by flajann · · Score: 1
    Simply put, Netflix has a MUCH broader selection than Blockbuster can ever hope to have. Most of what I like watching -- foreign films, for instance -- Blockbuster can't hope to approach.

    Blockbuster may have plebian appeal, but my money is on Netflix.

    Besides, Blockbuster sent someone to jail once for failing to return a *single* rental (the woman simply lost the movie and forgot about it). After hearing that, I promptly canceled my Blockbuster account. No worries with Netflix on that! I can keep the rentals out as long as I want!!!!!!!

    So, rent from Blockbuster at your own risk. If the threat of being Busted for failure to return a rental doesn't bother you, if their limited Block of titles doesn't faze you, and if you don't mind their "no late fee" late fee deceptions, then rent from BlockBuster by all means!!!!

  37. illegal in some places by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Informative

    if a dvd mail rental place exists in SF for example, how will they know it is illegal to rent porn in a specific county in Georgia, that it violates community standards?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:illegal in some places by theskipper · · Score: 1

      With GreenCine, they use a list of ZIP codes that they won't ship to. My guess when I saw it was that there were around a thousand of them listed, not surprisingly about half are 3xxxx (in the south).

      Couldn't find the link it in their faq but it's on the site somewhere if you're curious.

    2. Re:illegal in some places by MacJedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks to visionaries such as Adam & Eve's Phil Harvey, the right for a company to sell pornography, sex-toys, contraception, and other "obsecne" material over the internet and via mail-order has been upheld.

      --
      2^5
  38. what about Canada? by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    I *wish* netflix was available here, the way things are going we might end up getting only Blockbuster which, for more 'niche' movies, is really not very good :(

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:what about Canada? by abucior · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's plenty of options already in Canada to get a similar service. How about zip.ca? or vhqonline.ca? I've been with Zip for half a year now and I love it. As much as I'd love to see Netflix start up in Canada, it's not like we're totally deprived without it. Zip.ca's selection is pretty massive. Turnaround times aren't as fast as some people claim they are for Netflix, but I expect that's more an issue with Canada Post than zip.ca. So, don't worry, you won't be stuck with "getting only Blockbuster".

    2. Re:what about Canada? by Senkrad · · Score: 1

      I have been using Zip.ca for a few months now and like it a lot. It is a little frustrating not getting things in the order I want/add them, sometimes not even close, but thinking a little about how the whole thing works it is understandable.

  39. You'd be bloated too by OutOfMemory · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFA "Blockbuster on the other hand is a bloated company" You'd be bloated too if you had over 9,000 stores and kept opening more (Thats more retail locations than WalMart in case you're counting). You just don't get that big without a certain amount of bloat , extra layers of management, etc.

  40. Using Netflix for 3 years by VirtuousPagan · · Score: 1

    I've been using Netflix for three years, and have absolutely no complaints about the service. I've only had one instance of a broken disc coming in the mail and have had two others lost in the mail, and the customer service response has been great. Got a new disc right away or credit for returning the viewed one, no questions asked. I experience a two day turn around time when I'm done viewing and return the DVD. The website is easy to use, and they have a great selection. This is the best way to rent DVD's and they have instilled in me a high degree of brand loyalty. I would rather see a pioneer like netflix succeed than give more money to Wal-mart or Blockbuster.

  41. Netflix kills BB on movie availability by Honorbound · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster seems to have major problems with not having enough copies of movies available. I recently had rougly 40 movies in my Blockbuster queue. Of those, only six were listed as "available." Several were listed as "short wait", but a distressing majority were "long wait" or "very long wait." I checked the same movies in a friend's Netflix account. The results? Only three of those ~40 movies were not immediately available.

    Disclaimer: Of course, this is just my experience. YMMV.

    --
    "I'm not, like, that smart. I, like, forget stuff all the time." -- Paris Hilton
  42. Re:One important thing Michael Pachter is missing by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    I completely agree. Blockbuster screwed me out of $20 for "them" loosing the movie I put in the return box about 5 years ago. Now if they had not been down right rude when I went to clear it up, I might have let that and the huge late fee costs slide. But paying for service and being treated like crap was enough for me to never go back (for me when I pay for high priced service it means you are never wrong, within reason, even when you are). If they were the only movie store in town and you could not get a movie any other way I would book trips to china. I feel that strongly.

    Netflix on the other hand has "always" been on the mark. Love their service and it makes a trip to the mail box a bit better than an hand full of bills and junk mail.

    Don't know if he figured that into his analysis and the fact that people talk and the internet is pervasive.

    Hope Netflix is around for a long time to come.

  43. A users comparison by Aflat · · Score: 1

    I used both Netflix and Blockbuster online at the same time for about 5 months, I ended up canceling the Blockbuster account, even though it was cheaper, and price is usually a very big thing for me. There are a couple of reasons I chose Netflix. Living in the Boston area, both Blockbuster and Netflix have a distribution center near me, in the same city. Supposedly Blockbuster has a deal with the US Post Office so that when they scan in your movie being returned, they will ship out the next in your list, even before your returned movie gets back to their distribution center. I had this work once in 5 months. Normally it took 2 days for them to receive my movie, so it wasn't a big deal. If I shipped it on Monday, they got it on Wed, and I would get it Thurs or Fri, usually Thurs. Netflix on the other hand is a day faster. If I sent a movie back on Monday, they receive it Tues, and I have a new movie by Wed. I always dropped them both off at a post office on the way to work, and both distribution centers are in the same city near me, so that makes me think its the processing centers at those distribution centers that cause the extra day, although it may be the post office. My second gripe was the web page. I wanted to rent Napoleon Dynamite but all I could remember was Dynamite. I tried typing just Dynamite into the Blockbuster search, and it found nothing. I went to Netflix, and it found quite a few movies with Dynamite in it, Napoleon Dynamite being one of them. The BLockbuster search is terrible. If you don't type in almost the entire movie name it can't find it. The movie selection is very similar, if you are looking for popular releases. For the more obscure titles Netflix has many more. I think Blockbuster pads their numbers a bit, although I can't prove it. I think they count Shrek(Widescreen) and Shrek(Pan and Scan) as 2 movies, that would make up for the lack of obscure movies. Blockbuster's queue system is funky too. Just about every movie in your queue says available now, but its not true. You don't always get the first movie in your list, even if it does say available now. You just get your second choice, and your first still says available now. So the status in the queue means nothing. The 2 coupons a month at any Blockbuster store is very nice, you can use it for anything, including games. I don't go too near a blockbuster store, since the closest one is in the opposite direction from work, but it was nice to use them when I had visitors and we could go rent a game or 2. Thats why I chose Netflix, Blockbuster just isn't ready yet. Netflix has had a couple years head start, so its understandable, but for now, I prefer Netflix.

  44. Depends on what Netflix hub you go through by spun · · Score: 1

    I used to live in San Francisco, near wher Netflix started, and the service was great, one day turnaround time. Now I live in Albuquerque and the service is not so great. Not only does it take a week to get our movies, they have lost three movies in the six months we have been here.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  45. Re:One important thing Michael Pachter is missing by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to note that in the switch over to their "No late fees" program, Blockbuster is now managing to annoy people who return on time in addition to those who return their rentals late.

    It's obvious that the late return customers will get upset at the idea of being charged the full replacement price of a movie after seven days after the due date, but the extended return grace period has a bigger effect in that people are keeping titles out longer.

    I'm currently on the "movie pass" program which allows unlimited rentals for $24.99 a month, but I'm getting to the point where I'm frustrated enough with movies not being in that I'm looking to cancel and go to Netflix. I'm not alone.

    Movie passes result in people keeping movies out longer, but it's also guarenteed income, so the stores know to increase stock as they become more popular. The extra seven day grace period for regular rentals, however, means that demand is increased even more as fewer people are returning on time. Unfortunately, most of the Blockbusters I've been to around her haven't increased stock to counteract this, which means even going in during the middle of the week I'll no longer see new releases back after their 3 day rental period is over.

    Blockbuster is trying to push people who visit their stores into switching to their mail rental program, but frankly if a customer is going to go that far, why wouldn't they consider Netflix first after the trouble they're having with Blockbuster?

  46. Pachter is an Idiot or a Charlatan by raam · · Score: 1

    FIRST OF ALL, AMAZON NEVER TALKED TO NETFLIX. Netflix freaked when they thought Amazon was starting a service here in the states. They weren't. They started that service in the UK. NO TALKS ON ADDING THE SERVICE TO AMAZON. Saying so is just stupid and betrays a complete lack of research.

    Let's assume for a second that every potential customer does not know that:

    1. Netflix' site is better at what these sites do.
    2. Blockbuster edits their movies.
    3. Blockbuster has a more limited selection (including no NC-17 movies, last I checked) ...etc.

    So assuming that, some famous analysts seem to think that Blockbuster can address their debt and benefit from the bricks and mortar infrastructure. I don't see how this is likely.

    Problem #1: Many stores are franchises!

    Problem #2: The whole point is to provide these DVD's in the mail. So, as I read it, Pachter thinks they will somehow benefit from these bricks and mortar locations fulfilling online orders from their limited invetories??? Yeah, right. Not the stores I've been to.

    And to add to this, Blockbuster has no soul.

    They do have name recognition, the ability to shoot new releases out quickly, and a lower price point. But no evangelical fans to tell their friends and parents to sign-up and no pretty red envelopes (I won't go into color psychology).

    So, there is at least, no clear f---ing winner. And why does there need to be? Are we really that friendly with the idea of monopolies? Jeez.

  47. Dvds by mail. by mhx · · Score: 0

    From what I hear is that someone stole a list of netflix or blockbuster online customers. And people are stealing there DVD's from there mailboxes before they get home.

    I see the whole online movie rental thing crashing. Besides who wants to wait 3 days for a movie that you want now. When you hit up your local video store and go rent it, NOW.

    I agree with a 75% loss of the next year.

    1. Re:Dvds by mail. by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Besides who wants to wait 3 days for a movie that you want now."

      The millions who have signed up for these services, who else moron! And let me ask you this, is the movie going to suck after a three day wait? A great movie is a great movie whether it's Monday or Wednesday.

      And you don't even understand the service, you're constantly getting movies. For example, I'm getting about 14 movies a week for less than 70 cents a movie. Does your local store offer that kind of deal?

      And lastly, does your local video store offer nearly EVERY DVD ever made?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Dvds by mail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm getting about 14 movies a week"

      You must have a very fat ass...

    3. Re:Dvds by mail. by mhx · · Score: 0

      You can get a movie pass from blockbuster for 25/mo.. keep 2 movies out at a time.. swap them as many times as you want..

      so thats 2 movies per day lets say
      (2 x 7) x 4weeks in a month thats 56 movies

      56/25 = 2.16 ... your way is cheaper but u will see alot less movies than I will. And I can get movies on the "now" factor instead of the "3day+" factor

    4. Re:Dvds by mail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This only works if you consider your time to be worth nothing. Driving to Blockbuster, picking up the movie (assuming they have it in stock, never a safe bet for anything but a, well, blockbuster movie), STANDING IN FUCKING LINE FOR 20 MINUTES WHILE ONE FUCKING CLERK CHECKS US OUT, and driving home.

      Unless you live 5 minutes away, you're talking at least 30 minutes out of your day. That's 28 hours out of your month, using your figures.

      Netflix, on the other hand, arrives with my mail which I have to pick up anyway. I watch it, then I walk it all the way to the curb to send it back. 1 minute of my time per movie.

  48. MOD DOWN SPAM SIG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should be shot!

  49. Why can't I rent Music CDs? by brighton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this really illegal? It seems like a great niche for amazon. Sure its quite obvious that 98% of people renting music will be burning copies, but the same argument can be made for Netflix and GameFly . (Or could be made in the not-so-distant future. ) Is someone offering this? (DRM'd music downloads don't count.)

  50. Some of us... by killermookie · · Score: 1

    Some of us don't normally bounce around from competitor to competitor just to get the lowest price. I've been using Netflix for over 2 years now with nothing but fantastic service. And that's the reason why I'm staying with them.

    I really don't give a crap if Blockbuster is cheaper, Netflix has been good to me so I'm staying loyal to them.

  51. I have both (currently) by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    I've had Netflix for a couple of years, and decided to try BB for a couple of months, and switch if it were 'better'. Netflix is better on turnaround time, selection, availability.

    Blockbuster is better on price, and 2 free instore rentals per month.

    I'm dropping Blockbuster.

    I went to cancel BB once already, and they acknowledged the poor selection and availability. They gave me a free month. Still going to cancel at the end of the free.

  52. Netflix vs. Blockbuster vs. VoD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Blockbuster, typical turnaround for DVDs was about 4-5 days, meaning I would usually get 3 DVDs per week for $18/mo. With Netflix, typical turnaround is 2-3 days, which translates to 6 DVDs per week for $20/mo. For VoD to compete, they would have to price each movie a bit below $1 to make it comparable in value to Netflix. If they adopt the old pay-per-view model of $7 per movie, I don't think they'll go very far.

  53. In the end they both lose--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently I have discovered plenty of interesting, free and legal content available on the internet to watch.
    Because I have been watching so much from the internet I have cut back on my Netflix subscription.
    There just are not that many hours in a day.

  54. it's a no-brainer for "real" movie fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blockbuster stores carry "soft" versions of what Blockbuster considers "hard" R-rated films. They actually carry edited versions of MPAA R-rated films. A film from Bbuster may be different from the version you saw in a theater. Also, they do not carry NC-17, unrated, etc.

    Feel like watching Romero's Dawn of the Dead? Good luck finding it at Bbuster.

    Netflix on the other hand caters to the film fan. You can get unrated director's cuts, unrated material (very often "x-rated" or worse for those interested), art films, etc. Most Netflix subscribers I know are urbanites with interests beyond the disneyfied and censored selection of Bbuster and Hollywood Video. Even a good independent store can't cover the diverse material out there.

    Video-on-demand is for suckers. I want commentary tracks, extras, and portability. 20,000 films on demand...I'm not holding my breath.

    Basically, there is a niche that Bbuster won't even touch. At this point it's like if McD's started offering scotch or fine wine. If you like shopping where you need a member card for sales, coffee from trendy chains, and food from cartoon characters, then by all means rent the latest Michael Bay movie from Bbuster.

    Netflix has excellent service. I will always pay more for diverse selection and opt out of supporting homogenizing and competition killing corporations like Blockbuster.

  55. Re:what about Canada? Try zip.ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try http://zip.ca/ Those I know who use it are fairly happy with it.

  56. Stock "analysts" Who needs 'em?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, whenever my company issues a generally positive quarterly earnings announcement for our shareholders, our stock drops $2. Actually, it's almost inevitable that when we release any scheduled type of press release like quarterly earnings news, our stock drops $2. Then it's up by $2 about 2 weeks later. Why? Because the all-knowing "industry analysts" like to bash our stock every time and the other anal-ysts and "stock dudes" actually pay attention to them and do as they say, and sell our stock. Then individual investors slowly gobble it back up and the big boys jump on again until the next scheduled earnings news release when they'll sell it again.

    Look, we all know that monkeys throwing poop on the wall are just as good, if not better, at randomly picking the right stocks as the "industry analysts" are. Personally, I hate Blockbuster and all their recently evil commercials and would love to see THEM crash and burn. I don't even use Netflix and would love to see them win this "war." But ultimately, who cares what a bunch of "industry analysts" have to say??

  57. Re:A users comparison AUTOCORRECTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING: Malformed post detected....
    .
    autocorrecting....

    I used both Netflix and Blockbuster online at the same time for about 5 months, I ended up canceling the Blockbuster account, even though it was cheaper, and price is usually a very big thing for me.

    There are a couple of reasons I chose Netflix. Living in the Boston area, both Blockbuster and Netflix have a distribution center near me, in the same city. Supposedly Blockbuster has a deal with the US Post Office so that when they scan in your movie being returned, they will ship out the next in your list, even before your returned movie gets back to their distribution center.
    I had this work once in 5 months. Normally it took 2 days for them to receive my movie, so it wasn't a big deal. If I shipped it on Monday, they got it on Wed, and I would get it Thurs or Fri, usually Thurs. Netflix on the other hand is a day faster. If I sent a movie back on Monday, they receive it Tues, and I have a new movie by Wed. I always dropped them both off at a post office on the way to work, and both distribution centers are in the same city near me, so that makes me think its the processing centers at those distribution centers that cause the extra day, although it may be the post office.

    My second gripe was the web page. I wanted to rent Napoleon Dynamite but all I could remember was Dynamite. I tried typing just Dynamite into the Blockbuster search, and it found nothing. I went to Netflix, and it found quite a few movies with Dynamite in it, Napoleon Dynamite being one of them. The BLockbuster search is terrible. If you don't type in almost the entire movie name it can't find it. The movie selection is very similar, if you are looking for popular releases.

    For the more obscure titles Netflix has many more. I think Blockbuster pads their numbers a bit, although I can't prove it. I think they count Shrek(Widescreen) and Shrek(Pan and Scan) as 2 movies, that would make up for the lack of obscure movies. Blockbuster's queue system is funky too. Just about every movie in your queue says available now, but its not true. You don't always get the first movie in your list, even if it does say available now. You just get your second choice, and your first still says available now. So the status in the queue means nothing. The 2 coupons a month at any Blockbuster store is very nice, you can use it for anything, including games. I don't go too near a blockbuster store, since the closest one is in the opposite direction from work, but it was nice to use them when I had visitors and we could go rent a game or 2.

    Thats why I chose Netflix, Blockbuster just isn't ready yet. Netflix has had a couple years head start, so its understandable, but for now, I prefer Netflix.

    .... parse completed
    waiting for (0) jobs...
    exiting

  58. Selection, selection, and selection. by darkrose · · Score: 1

    Pachter's analysis doesn't take into account one of the primary factors that keeps people at Netflix: selection. Blockbuster simply doesn't have the variety that Netflix does. If you want anything more than standard Hollywood fare, you're unlikely to find it at Blockbuster. Some people may switch because of the price wars, but for the most part, I think you're dealing with two different customer bases.

    1. Re:Selection, selection, and selection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have subscriptions to both Netflix and Blockbuster.

      Blockbuster online has a wider selection than Netflix. Yeah, I was shocked too because their store selection sucks.

      Try to rent the Cosmos series from Netflix. Try Blockbuster.

      Also, Netflix has really slowed down their turnaround. Blockbuster, right now, appears to be quicker.

  59. Never heard of - Best Buy????? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't know a single person that uses Netflix so that's rather difficult. I also haven't heard it *anywhere* other than on Slashdot. I wouldn't even know it existed otherwise.

    You just might if you ever shopped at BestBuy or bought a DVD player there.

    A mental excersize - do you think more than a few people just might be buying DVD players at Best Buy?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  60. It's HUGE in southern california by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    When I was living in southern california tons of people both my girlfriend and i knew were using netflix. Now that we've moved to miami there are alot less people here who use it. Of course I saw more netflix commercials in LA than i do here.

    1. Re:It's HUGE in southern california by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is just a leeeeeetle bit ahead of Florida on the tech curve, I'd say, even those SoCal types. That's where the media capital of the world is, for starters (and for better or worse).

  61. totally different labor force and advantage by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    I don't know how much of a difference this makes, but consider the vastly different kind of labor force that Netflix can hire versus BB.

    Netflix can hire anyone (and just temporarily too if they want) to push discs and envelopes under a barcode scanner, attach labels, etc. Anyone can do this, and it's a no obligation job. No personal skills needed, or asked. Replaceable in a second.

    On the other hand, to work at a video store, you have to be the type of person who likes movies, can interact tolerably with customers, and get crapped on by inept local managers. Must probably pay health benefits eventually, not easy to find replacement labor, and certainly can't just hire someone off the street.

    So compare these two schemes. I'd much rather be the first company.

    BTW, if you google for "inside netflix distribution center" you are supposed to find a link to a news story from Louisiana about the inner workings of Netflix. But the story was yanked a while back, maybe by Netflix. Does anyone have an archived copy of this??

    1. Re:totally different labor force and advantage by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      I suggest using Google Cache to find the article.

  62. Netflix Totally Gets It by Teddy_Roosevelt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been a Netflix customer for several years. They totally get it. It's like someone went through every aspect of the customer experience looking for anything that might slow down, confuse, or annoy a customer, and then they eliminated it. This is the way businesses should be run, now that the Internet allows the customer to be king.

    Netflix, Amazon, Google, Apple and others get this, while, for example, Enterprise Rent-A-Car definitely does not. See http://www.failingenterprise.com/.

    1. Re:Netflix Totally Gets It by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      For real. I thought that living in the country would be a problem. Waiting forever for movies. I get most movies sent back in one day, and if it's in the early part of the day a new movie sent out that same day. of course that's more the Post Office being effiecent, but Netflix has to be on their toes to send a movie out so quickly.

  63. Both have physical distribution - Netflix wins by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The assumption that Netflix does not have physical distribution methods (such as Blockbuster stores) is just plain wrong.

    The reality of physical distribution nodes is that Netflix has a lot - they are called distribution centers! In fact they are far better off than Blockbuster in that regard.

    Yes for perhaps 10-20 titles you might get stuff a little faster at Blockbuster. However a lot of stuff people rent is not going to be something carried at your average Blockbuster - and then the advantage of Netflix becomes apparent, in that you are going to get ANY movie no matter how obscure pretty quickly. Not just the 10-20 post popular at the moment.

    So basically Blockbuster has a lot of distribuition centers, but with poor stock. You can think of it like a really badly run cache management scheme, where Netflix fares much better.

    And both are just idling until online distribution takes place in large quantities - I'll bet that Netflix is more nimble in this regard.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Both have physical distribution - Netflix wins by notchcode · · Score: 1

      I second that....in fact, if you live in a bigger town (like Denver), chances are there's a distrubution center nearby. My movies get turned around in 1-2 days now that Netflix has added distribution centers...as opposed to nearly a week before they expanded.

    2. Re:Both have physical distribution - Netflix wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't understand how this will work. Blockbuster is a franchise, right? So is corporate ordering the franchise owners to fulfil orders? Or is it opt-in, which means maybe your order will be serviced by the local Blockbuster, or maybe not?

      Regardless of that issue, using local Blockbusters for distribution means that now the employees there have to handle an additional job. Considering what a generally poor job they do on the rest of their work, why would they do better when additional work is added? Is there going to be resentment about the work? Will online orders be filled before they stock the store? From the comments I have read about Blockbuster's turnaround time, I'm guessing not.

      Finally, Netflix has true distribution centers. They can be located way outside of town, on cheap land. Blockbuster has retail establishments, which must be in shopping centers, and thus far more expensive land. This is a huge advantage to Netflix.

  64. Yeah I worked there too by CiXeL · · Score: 4, Informative

    store #06516 hermosa beach,ca back in '97

    and yes it really REALLY sucked working there. The number one thing i couldnt figure out was why they would try to sell all that movie merchandising crap but it was a loss every damn month when they would put it at 99 cents clearance just to get rid of it piling up. also i hated how they would have us specifically mislead the customers for their rewards cards and return times.

    1. Re:Yeah I worked there too by Dr.Worm · · Score: 1

      Heh, i just new that you were going to post to this story.

  65. winner/loser by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    With BT and others P2P, everybody in the business' a loser.

  66. Netflix could easily match that though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...they're in talks with the USPS to have them scan the returning DVD's when they receive them, so that they can send outgoing ones before the returning ones even arrive at the distribution center.

    That's an interesting idea, but Netflix could pretty easily match it if they go forward with the plan - just let consumers indicate when they've dropped the disc in the mail and send off another right then.

    They already do something simialr if you report a disc damaged or incorrect, they mail off another right away.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Netflix could easily match that though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an interesting idea, but Netflix could pretty easily match it if they go forward with the plan - just let consumers indicate when they've dropped the disc in the mail and send off another right then.

      Quickflix, the netflix clone in Australia does that. I've found that if you check the return box by 2pm on the day before you post them back, you get a 24 hour turnaround.

  67. envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want to lick the envelope to send back the used dvd.

    1. Re:envelope by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want to lick the envelope to send back the used dvd.

      They come with the sticky stuff already applied.

    2. Re:envelope by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      ewwww. I bet they do.

    3. Re:envelope by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Nice double entendre. Good show.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  68. Anything but by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, reading TFA, it would seem that video on demand from cable is in this race, and looks to be the odds on winner...

    I would say that video on demand would be the winner if anyone but cable companies were feeding it up.

    The great thing about a DVD is that you can watch it in a lot of places. Cable Video On Demand is carefully protected so you can only watch it in a few. And DVD's are generally a little more random access with more features than any video on demand I've seen.

    I agree video on demand will be pretty popular at some point, but I'm not sure it can ever surpass DVD/HDDVD/BluRay rentals unless cable companies can change the way they think.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  69. What, you don't want Blockbuster monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, saying you don't want Blockbuster to run the video rental market is like saying you don't want all the radio stations owned by Clear Channel!

    It's like... saying that you want to watch more than the same top-1000 movies which every Blockbuster Video stocks.

    Like saying you'd prefer to watch TV shows via rented boxed sets, instead of on cable or by buying them.

    Hmm. Come to think of it, all the above are why I'm a Netflix customer. Incidentally, so far the throttling hasn't been too bad on me. I get a lot of DVDs, but so far at least 50% of it has been obscure stuff. I suspect that Netflix doesn't engage the dreaded throttling unless you start choosing the same titles everyone else wants. The contention for titles such as Evil Cult, Stacy, and Mimic 3 is probably pretty low.

  70. Damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to add to this, Blockbuster has no soul.

    Damn! I wanted to rent "Shaft" from them.

  71. Netflix + Tivo by MhzJnky · · Score: 1

    I'm a current net Flix subscriber, and I love. I do wonder though. It takes 3-5 days to turn around a movie in the mail. It would take a little more than a day to download a 5 gig DVD to a hard disk over my DSL line to a Tivo like box.

    Basically, the first company to figure that out will get my money.

    --


    "Failure is not an option, it's part of the standard package"
  72. Neither by Belgand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frankly I dislike both options.

    Blockbuster (at least their retail locations) are terrible. They have a horrible selection that concrentrates only on crap released in the last two months. The prices are insane and the employees utterly clueless.

    Netflix has a much better selection, but it's still lacking. I don't get to select exactly what I want due to the list system and quite frankly I'm pretty damn picky about what I'm in the mood for. The turnaround time is also pretty bad. I want to select the movie that I feel like watching now, not a movie that I kinda want to see so I'll leave it around the house for a week or two until I'm in the mood and want to watch a movie.

    My local video store, however, has a great selection (though anime fans may appreciate their huge selection I'm far less appreciative when they shove aside horror to make room for it), generally knowledgable employees, excellent prices (almost everything is $2 for 5 days, new releases are $3 for 3 days, a few are $1 for 5 days) and are cunningly located (the main location is next to the cheap pizza place, they're also smart enough to have a drop-off bin on campus). One of the few times they haven't had something that I asked about the employees said "Wow.. we don't have Foo? I can't believe that, we need to order it." Lo and behold it was on the shelf there not long after. It's also the little things. If a film is not a new release, but rather an older film just recently released onto DVD it does not go on the new release wall like so many other locations. The owner once dropped off my lates fees when I went to pay them off citing that they were only a few hours late. Employees regularly let me skirt the drop-off time (ingeniously 7pm so that the new movies are on the shelves when you come by to rent) if I'm a little bit late. They carry porn (though a really crappy selection and heavy on hentai).

    I could go on and on, but quite frankly a good local shop will always win out over either a giant, crappy chain or a mail-order service in terms of giving the goods. Now, if you want something really obscure (not everyone is blessed with a store that has their own Troma section or carries the Short Films of David Lynch box) Greencine or some other option might help you find what you're looking for, but I doubt it'll be a primary rental location.

    1. Re:Neither by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Something tells me you're talking about Scarecrow.

    2. Re:Neither by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Netflix has a much better selection, but it's still lacking. I don't get to select exactly what I want due to the list system and quite frankly I'm pretty damn picky about what I'm in the mood for.

      What you find lacking about Netflix is also lacking with Blockbusters online rentals, and that is the only thing comparable.

      This is NOT brick and mortar vs. mail, it's small companies' DVD-mail service, versus large companies' DVD-mail service.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Neither by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      No big surprise with a shop like that around you are happy! Lots of others would be too I'd imagine.

    4. Re:Neither by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Nope. Digital Shelf in Manhattan, KS. Amusingly the shop opened back in 1999 not terribly long after I moved to town to attend university. It has, since that time, grown increasingly larger, moved across the street to a much larger location and opened a branch location (not counting a largely ignored rack in the student union bookstore). It's very successful and just about bursting at the seams at present.

    5. Re:Neither by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Very cool. If I'm ever in Kansas, I'll have to check it out. I suspected you might have been talking about Scarecrow Video, in Seattle, WA.

    6. Re:Neither by Belgand · · Score: 1

      If you're ever in Kansas I highly suggest you leave, quickly. Anything outside of Kansas City (where most of the real action is really in Missouri) or Lawrence (home of the University of Kansas) is pretty much unbearable and even they're barely tolerable. If you happen to find yourself in Manhatan, KS look for the fastest route out.

  73. Netflix vs. Blockbuster by Jett · · Score: 1

    I've been a Netflix subscriber for about a year now, prior to that I got all my movies from Blockbuster. I still rent from Blockbuster on occasion, primarily when there is no other choice - i.e. if someone is over and we spur of the moment decide we want to watch a very specific movie that we don't have. With Netflix my wife and I just queue up movies whenever we think of them and then adjust their order when we feel like watching something specific. We have about 100 movies in our queue right now, we add more every few weeks. We have always gotten the movie we wanted when we wanted. We always get our movies quickly, about 3 months ago it went from an average of 3 days down to an average of 2 days between the time the mailman picks up a movie to the time he brings a new one.

    With Blockbuster we always forget to return movies, they've claimed we have not returned movies that we have (twice this has happened!). Half the time they don't have the movie we want, and their movies are NEVER IN ORDER. The staff is often rude, slow, unhelpful, or annoying. There are always lines and screaming kids, and idiots who insist on writing a check and then take 15 minutes to do it, etc. I dread going to Blockbuster.

    Netflix is 100x better than Blockbuster - whenever I feel like it I can search for what movies I want, read reviews on them, I can always find really obscure movies, and there lots of TV series you'll never find in Blockbuster (like seemeingly anything good ever made for the BBC). I really don't understand how Blockbuster stays in business, the only thing they have going for them is the immediacy of picking out a movie and having it. I'm not that impulsive though so Netflix is perfect. Compared to how much money we used to spend renting movies Netflix is a really good deal. I would be very suprised if they didn't survive as a business, they offer a great service at a fair price - I think it's just that it's still new to a lot of people so it hasn't caught in a lot of places.

  74. Re:vod vs dvd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    consider that satellite and cable companies are dramatically increasing their bandwidth at the same time as moving to mpeg4 compressed video. within a year they'll be able to offer a -huge- library of movies on demand, many of them in high definition, much more quality than a dvd and long before any hd-dvd stuff is widely available.

    the only factor then in determining what wins is how fast hdtv displays is adopted by the masses. the fcc gets to control that when bother to decide if the deadline for hd broadcast should be delayed again.

    most people in this country don't care about hdtv, their existing tv "works fine". thats the largest hurdle and thing that will keep dvds popular.

  75. My experience with Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I started (mid 2000) it was the good old days of the "I mailed it" buttons, so you where insured shipping a few hours after you pressed that button. My record is 28 movies in a single month, with a 4 disk program.

    When I cancelled in 2003 according to their own database, a movie was taking 4-5 days to get to me and as much to get to them, with another day or two to ship another one, longer if your "top 5 pick" was not available within 2-3 days.

    So a 2-3 day "turn-around", insuring me of a movie a day, and 2 on week-ends jumped to 10-12 days in 2003. I found myself not listening to movies received passed Tuesday just to be sure I had "something" for my Saturday evening; this made the turn-around delay even longer.

    Still, at the end I had rented on average a movie every 3 days for about 3 years and still believe it was way worth it.

    The real reason I cancelled is following a Slashdot link, an interview with the Netflix CTO explaining how "near abusive" customers like me (bringing almost no profit) where purposely put behind "rare rental" costumers (highly profitable), to be sure they would get a great service and insuring they would stay on board.

    I understood the reasonning, but did not think I had to put up with it anymore, since I started to rent at local store on some week-ends anyway. (and yes, I belived I was listenning to way too much movies).

  76. Re:Compete on Service? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    So you are at fault for losing the envelopes, are too cheap to pony up the $.37 (or slightly more) for the postage, but still blame Netflix?

    You can mail back multiple DVD's in a Netflix mailer as well BTW.

  77. Netflix Rules by blooba · · Score: 1

    Netflix rules! Blockbuster blows chunks. When you compare them based on solely economic factors, you miss the heart of the issue. Netflix will win because that's the way it should be.

  78. Re:Compete on Service? by justforaday · · Score: 1

    "Pony up for the shipping"???? Ummm, yeah, that 60 cents is really gonna fucking break you. As for your claim of "Netflix said I was on my own, and if I didnt hurry up, they would charge me for the DVDs" I call complete bullshit! If you didn't hurry up? Yeah, that's exactly what I hear from Netflix when I keep movies out for a few weeks...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  79. Tried both services by William-Ely · · Score: 1

    I signed up for Blockbuster's online service and NetFlix in November 04. I finally got fed up with Blockbusters crappy queue management and lack of movies in stock so I canceled this month despite it being a few bucks cheaper. NetFlix actually had movies I wanted to see in stock and in my mailbox the next day. It was easy to add multiple DVD sets to my queue and reorganize it. That kind of service made it worth the extra 3 bucks. There is a reason why people love NetFlix

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  80. Blockbuster censors movies, Neflix doesn't by tomRakewell · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am definitely rooting against Blockbuster. Don't forget, Blockbuster has been known for censoring movies -- editing them to make them more palatable for family viewing. Try renting a movie like 'Y Tu Mama Tambien' from Blockbuster or Walmart. You will end up seeing a version that has been edited for content.

    Maybe I'm 'misunderestimating' the maturity of the average American, but I think that as long as Blockbuster and Walmart have crappy policies like this, there will be a nice niche for the comparatively corageous Netflix.

    1. Re:Blockbuster censors movies, Neflix doesn't by elbarono · · Score: 0

      what the fuck are you talking about? I rent movies from Blockbuster and Hollywood video all the time including unrated directors cuts and NC-17 movies and I have never seen a movie that was edited for content.

      I don't even think that Blockbuster could possibly have the infrastructure to do massive reproduction of edited films, or why they would even want to. Maybe this goes on in buttfuck alabama but not in any civilized part of the country.

    2. Re:Blockbuster censors movies, Neflix doesn't by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1
      Don't forget, Blockbuster has been known for censoring movies -- editing them to make them more palatable for family viewing. Try renting a movie like 'Y Tu Mama Tambien' from Blockbuster or Walmart. You will end up seeing a version that has been edited for content.

      You are so completely off-base, even your example is wrong. There are two releases of Y Tu Mama Tambien - R-rated and unrated and the version that corporate Blockbuster stores carry? The UNRATED version. I know this specifically because I purchased one of about 20 previously-viewed copies they had at my local store. Another example is "The Dreamers" which has been released on DVD in both R-rated and NC-17-rated versions, Blockbuster carried both (although only some corporate stores got the NC-17 version), I bought my previously-viewed NC-17 version there too.

      For the REAL story, lets go straight the horse's mouth:
      We do not edit or otherwise alter movies ourselves. We leave the methodology as to how ratings are applied specifically and completely to the studios involved. We are retailers and not members of the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America), so we take no position on individual scenes or the overall artistic merits of a film. We are not in the content business. We are in the business of exceeding the expectations of our members and customers, and thus our goal is to offer the widest possible selection.

      BLOCKBUSTER has always tried to provide our customers with a variety of choices while maintaining our family orientation. As you know, we will not generally carry "X" rated or "NC-17" rated films. However, there are unrated film titles we feel may contain content unsuitable for children, and we designate these titles with a "YRV" designation, for "Youth Restricted Viewing". Although not pornographic, only members older than 17 are allowed to select these films.

      http://blockbuster.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/blockbuste r.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=239

  81. Re:Compete on Service? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I call Bullshit. You can keep Netflix movies indefinitly, and the only thing you pay is your monthly subcription fee. Also, Netflix tells you right in their faq that you can return two disks in a single envelope. So, again... Bullshit.

  82. Re:Compete on Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the problem is Netflix, I think the problem is that you're a complete jackass...

    It's not their fault that you're too stupid to keep track of 3 bright red pieces of paper. I guess they want their customers smart enough to not drool all over the DVDs.

    Pony up $0.37... Just think about the FREQUENT FLYER MILES!!!! YEAH BUDDY!!!

    Jackhole.

  83. Re:One important thing Michael Pachter is missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also have been pissed off one to many times by blockbuster, I will never give them another dollar of my money. I cant put into words how much I hate Blockbuster. If Blockbuster was a person I would urinate on them after making tiney incisions all about their body and shoving rock salt into the cuts... then I would anally rape them and invite alll my friends over to participate. On the other hand I have only good things to say about Netflix I love the service and if Netflix was a person I would give them unlimited foot massages and grill steaks for them in my back yard. I would buy them beer and even give them a ride home if they got too drunk to drive.

  84. Huge customer base = failure? by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

    I disagree with the opinion of Netflix dying anytime soon. Regardless of stock prices, Netflix has a steadily growing customer base, which is definitely the biggest asset a company can have. They are striving toward profitability, and with their target of 4 million customers by the end of the year, I'm pretty sure Netflix will be here for a while

    Nothing against Blockbuster, but they certainly don't have the online customer base that Netflix has, and until they start shipping movies from every store, I don't feel they have any major advantage on Netflix.

    And for all you Netflixers out there, give the newest version of my Netflix queue manager, FlixQueue, a spin. We're nearing the end of beta, and we have many new features!
    http://www.5hyphen.com/flixqueue/index.htm

    --
    Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
  85. Review of Comcast Video On Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Review of Comcast Video on Demand from the indiepop list:

    If you live in certain parts of the US and have Comcast Digital Cable, you can watch Jens Lekman's "You Are The Light" video on In Demand. Look under "Havoc". It's a scream.

    In Demand is Comcast's heavily-advertised stored content system you can call up when you want. It's supposed to compete with TiVo, and with all that horrible free stolen copyright shit on the internets. Alas, for Comcast, it sucks ass.

    I'm not talking about the lack of indiepopness. That's expected. I'm talking about how shit the system is.

    Most of the programming digitally skips every few seconds. When you navigate the menus, you ,may pass out from monotony before reaching your desired destination; watching two Residents videos in a row (don't ask why) requires 20 button-pushes. And the data is hopelessly falcoed. Like the Goo Goo Dolls? It's spelled three different ways on three videos. Wanna check out Badly Drawn Boy? Look under "D" for "Drawn Boy". They have two Scissors Sisters tracks, one filed under "S.Sisters" and the other under just "Sister". Many, many bands are alphabetized under "The".

    In short, it's a hopelessly incompetent system, user-hostile, programmatically limited, and technologically flaccid.

    Comcast is a huge corporation, the second-largest cable-tv company on earth if I'm not mistaken; and they have been promoting this service all over the place. But it sucks immeasurable ass in at least seven different ways compared to free stuff maintained by users, like illegal downloading. And they wonder why people don't want to go along with the "professional" stuff. Ugh, ugh, ugh.

    On the other hand, on a live channel I just saw a commercial for a new medicine that "may cause vaginal bleeding", so maybe there's worse. I'm supposed to ask my doctor about it. I do believe I will.

    --

    Steve

  86. Neither of these options excites me by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Neither Blockbuster nor NetFlix really interests me. Blockbuster is too expensive at $3 a rental when the local supermarket has 24-hour rentals on weeknights for $1. With Netflix, you have to wait for the stupid disks to physically ship back to the warehouse before you get others.
    I live on the border between the city and the suburb and can use the public libraries of both. The city library has lots of high quality DVDs that didn't blast the boxoffice. Stuff like David Mamet films and non-Hollywood gems like John Malcovitch's 'The Dancer Upstairs'. The suburban library has multiplex titles like Julia Roberts and Tom Cruise, but even the newest titles sitting on the shelf are about a year old (from opening weekend). It doesn't matter much: last year's Tom Cruise movie is pretty much the same as next year's Tom Cruise movie and 'Buddy Cops VI' isn't a giant leap from 'Buddy Cops IV'.
    None of it's really worth a $30/month subscription fee or $3 rental.
    Libraries are good places to get old Hollywood stuff that you might not want to rent or purchase when you live on a Technician's budget. Stuff like Humphrey Bogart's lesser known films or John Wayne, Hitchcock, silent era films, and so forth.
    Am I cheap? Yeah, sure. Do I give a fuck? Not really anymore. This is the new America, the old rules no longer make any sense.

  87. Re:Compete on Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you had to pony up $2 for postage? Poor fucking baby. There are people in Sudan who can't even get netflix!

  88. Re:Compete on Service? by Quikah · · Score: 1

    You can up to two DVDs in the Netflix return envelopes also. Not sure why the Netflix CSR told you otherwise (it is right on their website), probably due to the question you asked.

    --
    Q.
  89. What about obscure stuff? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The only reason I would switch from my lovable but neighborhood one-of-the-last remaining independent video rental stores is that Netflix has stuff that nobody else has. For example, neighborhood store's idea of japanese cinema is two copies of "Seven Samurai"; is I want to rent "Tokyo Story" I'm SOL. I know Netflix will have it, Blockbuster may not. The only question is, it would take only a minimal amount of cash and licensing clout for Bluckbuster to be able to essentially burn obscure stuff on demand and crush Netflix in this regard.

    Meanwhile, for film buffs, Netflix is the only choice unless you're lucky enough to live close to Le Video on 9th Ave in San Francisco (http://www.levideo.com/) which is the absolute best video rental place in the galaxy.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  90. I use Blockbuster by ac3boy · · Score: 1

    and I love it. I am doing the 8-out at a time plan for $38 a month. They have been very reliable and when I had problems they had everything I needed on the web to fix it. My only gripe would be they NEVER respond to emails.

    Cheers, John.

  91. Neither company provides what consumers want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both companies are bound to fail unless and until they start to supply what customers want, i.e., porn.

  92. Digital Delivery by wrast · · Score: 1

    The NetFlix/Tivo partnership will put NF back in the driver's seat IMO. Imagine being able to avoid the mail altogether. I have yet to hear anything from BB about such things. Hopefully NF is smart enough to not ONLY deliver to Tivo boxes. It ought to be able to deliver to any DVR. Better yet, just send it to an IP address.

  93. Mail Problem by Tante · · Score: 1

    I tired Netflix in 99 and had a horrible experience, but I think that was due to the fact they had one distribution center. After receiving my first 3 movies at once I watched them all and sent them all back at the same time. Netflix claimed they never received them, so I had to wait 2 weeks to see if they would ever receive them, which they never did. I hear they fixed that part of the service now, but I still haven't gone back.

  94. The future of Netflix. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    You know, I really think that Netflix is ultimately going to kick Blockbuster's assets. See, Netflix works like this: You can log on and make a list of all the movies you want to see. They arrive in the mail; you get to have three at a time with their most basic package; you watch them and keep them for as long as you like; each time you send one back, Netflix sends you the next one from your list.

    It seems like an inconvenience to wait for the movies to show up in the mail. Truth is, it's actually very convenient, especially if you commute to work and your wife has to drive the kids around to ten different extracurricular activities. Making yet another stop at a video store to pick out a movie, and then having to return to that store a few days later, is a lot more inconvenient, IMO, than waiting for something to show up in the mail.

    Furthermore, a Blockbuster store is only going to hold so many different titles. However, I routinely suffered from the fact that my local Blockbuster didn't carry a particular title that I wanted to watch. This happened on enough occasions that I stopped watching rental movies for a while. Netflix, on the other hand, has virtually every DVD ever made.

    The above two advantages that Netflix has over Blockbuster will ultimately tilt the scale in their favor. And finally, I believe that with broadband becoming more commonplace and with high compression video (such as H.264, which Steve Jobs has been touting), it's not inconceivable that Netflix will offer some, and maybe later all, of its titles with an immediate viewing option. Imagine digitally "checking out" a movie, watching it as much as you want, and then exchanging it for something else. Or, you could watch a movie digitally and then decide to check out the DVD physically to watch on your TV. There are a lot of options that Netflix could take advantage of to differentiate it from the more limited Blockbuster.

  95. I love WebVan by sabernar · · Score: 1

    ...well, 'loved' is the proper tense of the verb, methinks.

  96. Netflix + Amazon by sabernar · · Score: 1

    I heard that Netflix was talking to Amazon to provide their DVD service because Amazon didn't want to build one from scratch. (Maybe a bit gunshy from their attempt at auctions?)

  97. There's LOTS of them, even in Canada! by Nik13 · · Score: 1

    I already have like a couple dozen sites bookmarked, and I've tried 5 of them so far. Haven't had any problems with any of them. Selection (exclusive stuff), shipping time and prices changes from one to another, that's why I suscribe to one for a few months, then move on to another.

    As for blockbuster, it's an hour long trip for me, their rates are the worst of any video store I've *ever* seen, late fees, they've held one of the kids' DVDs "hostage" until I bring theirs back (put the wrong one in the case), poor selection, they only got like 1 copy of good classics so it's always rented out... I've given up on them well before I started renting online. It just doesn't get worse than this.

    Anyways, here's a few, I'm sure you could find lots more if you searched. Every time I do, I always find several new ones... (too lazy to make links, sorry)

    zip.ca
    dvdhype.com
    hollywebdvd.com
    davada.com
    moviesforme.ca
    jurassicdvd.com
    starflix.com
    v hqonline.ca
    cinemail.ca
    cinedvdmax.ca
    dvd-renta l.ca
    rentadvd.ca
    dvdflix.ca
    dvdstoyourdoor.com
    relayrentals.com / .ca
    dvdzap.ca (in french)

    I think futureshop has something too...

    A couple adult rental sites I just came across...
    avica.ca
    dirtyrental.ca

    --
    ///<sig />
  98. Netflix by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    For us, Netflix is the alternative to a "HBO" package or equivalent. I get "classic" TV OTA, and "cable" via satellite. For the price of the "hbo" package, netflix is the exact movie I want when I want to watch it. I just rented the full series of "ufo". Try that anywhere else. You may insert your fatally geeky movie or series here. Website, mailbox, website....no investment really in time or hassle. I hope these guys make millions. And, by renting, I'm doing as little as possible to subsidze the morons at MPAA.

  99. TCP over Netflix by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    So..

    I've been trying to figure out how to maximize netflix subscription by sharing it with other people. I'm not a big movie watcher and neither is my wife. We would rent about 2 movies a year from blockbuster.

    But the idea to share among multiple families who are like would be interesting.

    The question is:

    How many families needed in order to maximize the amount of movies among the families in order to watch 3 dvds every day so we end up sending the movies back the next day? There's got to be a good algorithm to do that. :-) If I were to somehow use the algorithm for tcp, I wonder if I could communicate with Netflix efficiently enough to get good throughput.

    Then I would maximize my 25 dollars a month for the maximum amount of pleasure with the minimalist of costs. Baby, I want MAX/MAX/MIN baby.

    What kind of network stack would that be?

    [Me]
    [TV] [Web page]
    [DVD] [Warehouse]
    [Mail/Link] -> [Mail/Link]

    No, something's not right..the request would come from me -> webpage..so maybe it's not exactly a network model yet.

  100. Won't someone think of the children? by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

    Everyone that I know that uses Netflix are childless. Everyone I know that have one or more children have rented movies at a physical store. You can't ask a five year old to pick a movie to watch, then wait 24 hours (or more) for the movie to arrive in the mail.

  101. What's 04/22/05? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it supposed to be a date? And in which year? 2004 perhaps?

    You know, you can write dates so that all people understand them by using ISO standard yyyy-mm-dd format (eg today is 2005-04-30). Then the majority population of the world won't think you are stupid.

  102. Shame on you slashdot. I expect this from spam. by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    Slashdot:

    I get enough spam in my mailbox telling me to buy or short such and such stocks, I don't need to hear it from you. In fact you are doing the community a disservice by mentioning "price targets." Look, the article is interesting enough by posing a head-to-head battle between Blockbuster and Netflix, and a synopsis could have been easily written up that avoided even a mention of stock prices. In fact, that last comment starting with "Irrespective of what Pachter thinks about the overall DVD rental business..." was unnecessary. The last thing slashdot wants to be is a bulletin board for daytraders.

  103. Why does every 1st post get modded Insightful? by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Why can't it be modded Ignorant? I mean, the guy even goes on in his post about how much he doesn't know. Why even bother posting, you yutz? You can't even do basic math. Why are you commenting about things you don't use? I, one among many, love Netflix. I mark my calender when I receive and send a movie, and while they seem to be slowing down the churn slightly I still get 12-15 movies a month for the $17 plus tax; about half what I'd pay per rental at most rental places, minus the hassle of going in, finding something I like by browsing shelves, and then having to take it back. Netflix also has the advantage of their review system, which I find invaluable.
    And you, Bill Firstpost, don't rent, don't like hanging out at Blockbuster, and do like lurking in Walmart in your polyester pants, too small t-shirt, and white sneakers, buying movies on the cheap to keep (oops to Own. Own it now on dvd!). Look at your "collection" right now: how many of them have you watched only once? How many of them do you expect to ever watch again? Of the ones you really like, how many have you watched in the last year?
    You're not only a nitwit with an empty first post, you're a perfect example of what is wrong with modern western society: a bottomless pit of selfishness and uninformed, unsolicited opinions, living simply to consume, working like a dog somewhere to enrich someone else and distract yourself from how miserable you truly are with shiny trinkets and empty entertainments.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  104. Resist Subscription Submission by eTanstaafl · · Score: 1

    This is nuts! I don't need no stinkin subscriptions. Ooooh Aaaah, now we can get digital radio, and pay a monthly subscription for it, what a bargain. Wait. Now we can subscribe to movie rentals, and wine, and beer, and cheese. What a concept. Get stupid people to but shiite they don't want or need. Get them to pay for stuff whether they use it or not. This is a recurring revenue model from the heavens. Its amazing to me that there are enough stupid people out there to support it. Wish I thought of it!

  105. People are simpletons, that's why by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    People saw the commercial that said "No late fees" and showed people rushing into the streets to celebrate. No matter how often people are told to read the fine print etc, people jump to the most ludicrous of conclusions based on very scant evidence, from a VERY suspect source (a tv commercial). Yet they have the nerve to get pissed for thinking they got to keep videos forever for the price of a rental! Stupahd!

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  106. Some corrections by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Netflix's customers are huge evangelists for the service and they view the service as fun, innovative and exciting -- not bad for a growing company with very little debt.

    This guy is probably a customer for this young and new company w/o many subscribers (compared to Blockbuster). I really can't speak either way about it though as I have never used them myself.

    Umm.. Blockbuster Online is the "young company." Sure, Blockbuster is old, but their online rental business is very new (a reaction to Netflix) and lacks not only in Queue & Family managment features, but also in number of titles available and, from my experience, DVD turn around time.

    The only thing Blockbuster leads in is price, which happens to be what I care most about so I've stayed with Blockbuster. That said, I tell everyone who's interested in this sort of thing to try Netflix first, since it's a better experience.

    Cutting back hours?...[snip]
    He's talking about cutting back employee hours, not store hours. Where they'd often have two employees staffed, they now have 1, etc.
    --
    Looking for a pyramid? Join the conga!

  107. blockbuster sucks by js205 · · Score: 1

    I had netflix for a good while and I enjoyed their service. Blockbuster had a better price so I figured i'd give them a shot and I was very disappointed. Their site navigation sucks, it takes forever to receive dvds, they have next to no reviews, and their TV series selection is laughable. When I get some extra money i'll be going back to netflix without even giving blockbuster a second look.

  108. I have Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live near Seattle. The turnaround time is 2 days! It's amazing. I can send a movie back on Monday and get the next one on Wed.

    Gamefly (which I also have) takes 3 days each way compared to Netflix's 1 day. Gamefly is still a good deal considering my local Blockbuster rents only crap games.

    You have 3 copies of Britney's Dance Beat but not a single copy of Katamari Damacy?! Blasphemy!

  109. I just became a Netflix customer 2 weeks ago... by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    Yea, I just became a Netflix customer 2 weeks ago. I used their 2 week free trial offer, and after 1 week I went into Blockbuster and canceled my Movie Pass subscription. I haven't looked back since. I love Netflix! I get a 2 day turnaround also. The movies are sent from the same city I'm in, Houston, and I mail them back to a local PO Box. I send a movie on Monday and then Wednesday I recieve a new one.

    I had been looking for a movie at Blockbuster for weeks, BR (Battle Royale), and of course Netflix had it. It was a great movie!! I even found some Morrissey DVDs that I was unaware of and they are in my queue.

    I LOVE NETFLIX !!!!!!!!

  110. subscriptions is a tough business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People forget that there is nothing magical about the subscription business. Subscribers cancel - and the more you have the more of them are cancelling. Might as well be selling toilet paper - x dollars to market it, y dollars collected over the average length of a subscription, there's your profit - or not. Very difficult to be a real growth company without a stream of new products and/or price increases/cost reductions - and if you don't have that, at least something defensible so that you can survive.

    But - Netflix does not have a stream of new products, does not have defensible pricing, does not have any other 'moat'. Video on demand, whether cable, internet, etc will eventually make them obsolete as they currently exist - contrary to someone's comment, video on demand vs dvd is *not* eBook vs real book - it's my TV vs my TV... Netflix is the Tivo of video rental, and should start to develop partnerships with Amazon, etc, to survive.

  111. Re:One important thing Michael Pachter is missing by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

    Yeah,
    You metioned several other reasons I can't stand them. One of my biggest beefs outside the late fees and censorship is I could almost "Never" find a movie I wanted to watch, unless I went there first thing in the morning. And their DVD selection was abyssmal, they still hadn't got rid of most of the vidoes the last time I visited a location 3 years ago.

    Netflix, with the exception of a few movies, has always shipped everything I asked for within a couple of days. And I watch a lot of off the wall stuff. Netflix also rules If you want to watch an Entire series, like the Sopranos. The disks keep coming in, as soon as you mail them back.

  112. 20/20 video and other mid sized chains by jbolden · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what actually happened to all the good mid sized chains (roughly 20 stores)? These used to carry a full selection of movies including NC17/X/NR had fewer copies of the new releases than the big chains but also often had:

    1) A much better selection of older stuff
    2) Usually a few areas where they really excelled
    3) Really cheap purchase options for inventory they were dumping.

    So what happened to them? Why couldn't they compete?

  113. Netflix Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I hope not. Blockbuster takes forever to ship the movies. .. Netflix gets here in one day.