i downloaded the rss feed to my ipod, read it at the beach.. found out about google's stock, wrote a note in the back of a corona's label (drank the corona) and rushed to the internet cafe to find this was a better place to post...
so i guess it was a corona label
yes, evolution is a process where the results are neither good or bad, but rather a step forward. DNA replication produces innacurate copies of itself, being this only one part of the whole concept of evolution...
One of the reasons is stated in the article, where it may be possible that the child's cells will be too tired to properly sustain his muscles when he reaches 30.
Moreover, i read once about this issue envolving the 'garbage' inside the DNA, called introns. They accumulate on the chormosomes arms and are spliced each time it duplicates. Up to here there is no real problem, but think about the times this kid's cells will multiplicate by the time he reaches 10. When the telomerase starts fading away, the part of the chromosome that is chopped are introns, and that can be a real issue if you start thinking about cancer being 12.
In the other hand, IMO evolution doesn't make mistakes, so this might just be one of it's first experiments to improve one of it's youngest species, and most (that is genetically) underdeveloped.
believe me, those 400 bucks spent are worth it all the way
anyhow.. a nice discount would atract even more customers and all those stuff...
yeah.. it is still worth each and every buck i spent on it...
63. synapsis is an unknown phenomenon to the driver ahead of you of course, in this case it is, the one behind you...
i downloaded the rss feed to my ipod, read it at the beach.. found out about google's stock, wrote a note in the back of a corona's label (drank the corona) and rushed to the internet cafe to find this was a better place to post... so i guess it was a corona label
the data consumes YOU!
we are, really :D
oh wait.. their using our taxes for that
damn...
yes, evolution is a process where the results are neither good or bad, but rather a step forward. DNA replication produces innacurate copies of itself, being this only one part of the whole concept of evolution...
One of the reasons is stated in the article, where it may be possible that the child's cells will be too tired to properly sustain his muscles when he reaches 30. Moreover, i read once about this issue envolving the 'garbage' inside the DNA, called introns. They accumulate on the chormosomes arms and are spliced each time it duplicates. Up to here there is no real problem, but think about the times this kid's cells will multiplicate by the time he reaches 10. When the telomerase starts fading away, the part of the chromosome that is chopped are introns, and that can be a real issue if you start thinking about cancer being 12. In the other hand, IMO evolution doesn't make mistakes, so this might just be one of it's first experiments to improve one of it's youngest species, and most (that is genetically) underdeveloped.
...i've just wet my pants.
unplug ethernet, tell them where the nearest internet-caffe is
the original article on /. bout the first gen ipod is funny... after alll these years
who uses msn search engine, to start with?
believe me, those 400 bucks spent are worth it all the way anyhow.. a nice discount would atract even more customers and all those stuff... yeah.. it is still worth each and every buck i spent on it...